All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 20, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
58:26
Trump Is Israel First Always, Venezuela In The Crosshairs, Fat Barbie, Covid Facts, White Hate
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 149 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truth, where Gary presents videos and stories I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
He's told me as something special for me to kick off the show today.
Gary, I can't wait.
All right, here we go.
All right, we're going to start off with asking one of the biggest search engines in the world if Inconvenient Truth is a good show or not.
All right.
Here it comes.
Searching the internet.
Okay, so you want to read it?
Sure.
Go ahead.
I looked into the show Inconvenient Truth featuring Jim Fetzer and Gary King.
Here's a breakdown of what I found and whether it might be a good fit for you.
What's good about it?
Those clearly have a strong and established niche.
Fetzer and King are longtime voices in the alternative truther media.
For example, investigation of historical conspiracies, false lie government cover-ups.
If you had an interest in deep dives into fringe theories, cover-ups, or very skeptical takes on mainstream narratives, then this show offers a lot of material in that direction.
The style appears to be quite informal, spontaneous.
For example, the transcript shows, they start off with this one.
We're doing a Rand Heavy today, etc., which might appeal if you like conversational, raw-tone shows.
What issues, caveats you should know.
Those in show are well known for extreme skepticism, sometimes toward mainstream sources and often promote highly controversial claims.
For example, Fetzers argue that crisis actors for crisis actors in places like Sandy Hook.
Because of that, much of the content may be speculative, poorly supported, or outside an academic consensus.
Few of you prefer shows with tight sourcing, peer-reviewed research, or moderate claims.
It might not match your style.
There appears to be a strong ideological leaning toward viewing major events as orchestrated or manipulated that can be insightful as an alternative viewpoint, but also means you want to approach with caution and critical thinking.
If you're looking for balance, multiple sides of the story, mainstream and alternatives, there might be less of that.
My verdict is it good.
It depends a lot on your preferences.
If you enjoy alternative media, enjoy exploring controversial ideas, are comfortable with speculative theories and willing to do your own research, yes.
This could be a good show for you.
If you prefer mainstream credibility, heavily sourced and peer-reviewed content, or you dislike shows that lean strongly into fringe or unverified claim, probably not the best match.
If you like, what do you think?
I don't have a problem with that, except I dare say what we do is better sourced than most mainstream stories, which are, on the whole, provable exaggerations or falsehoods.
So I would simply add that caveat.
The alternative media is becoming more and more relied upon by those seeking authentic news than the mainstream.
And I believe we have been very much a tip of the spear in that regard, Gary.
You had a great idea to do this show.
And I think that chat GDP review actually supports, endorses what we've been doing now for nearly a 150 weeks.
Yeah.
So there you go.
I mean, I wasn't too, you know, I was okay with it.
Yeah.
All right, now we've got a rap song about JFK.
And tell me what you think about this.
Here we go.
But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse.
And there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse.
The Jews and their lies always make things worse.
The international click of the sick and wicked.
The Dallas Citizens Council are the ones who did this.
What's done?
The Jews made the moves and bore false witness and created the cover story with their warring commission.
They blamed it only Harvey, who was not the mastermind.
He was shot and killed by the Jew Jack Rubenstein.
Some Jews even tried to blame the Cubans for this crime.
But the truth lies behind what made Ben-Gurion resign.
A Jew named Oliver Stone put out the movie JFK, produced by the Jew Arnon Milshan to blame the CIA.
The Jew who filmed Kennedy getting his head blown off that day was Abraham Zaputo who sold it for $150K.
The magic bullet theory was physically impossible.
It's why LBJ had Kennedy's body stolen from the hospital.
It was created by Jewal Inspector and spread like gospel to cover up the fact that there were multiple hostiles.
When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse.
But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse.
And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse.
The Jews and their lies always make things worse.
When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse.
But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse.
And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse.
The Jews and their lies always make things worse.
They found a sniper nest in Zapruder's Daltch HQ.
There's no chance all this just randomly leads back to Jews.
This was a mossad job to kill a U.S. president that refused to let Israel have nuclear powers that they would abuse.
Kennedy also sided with the Palestinians and their plight.
He was supportive of Nasser, who also put up a fight.
The point is, all Kennedy wanted to do was make things right.
But the Jews couldn't risk it and exercise their might.
These are the real reasons JFK was killed.
It had nothing to do with ending the fair silver dollar bill.
It had everything to do with him refusing to break his will.
And this caused the Jews to kill our president with their shields.
And just to be safe, they had to kill RFK because they knew he didn't believe what happened on that day.
And if he became president, he would have found out their play.
So they hired Eugene Day Caesar to make him go away.
When all three Kennedys die, they called it a curse.
But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse.
And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse.
The Jews and their lies always make things worse.
When all three Kennedys die, they called it a curse.
But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse.
And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse.
the Jews and their lives always make things worse.
Well, that's very interesting.
I mean, they knew a lot about JFK.
There's a lot of truths there, but of course, it wasn't just a Mossad head.
Israel was one of eight different sponsors, including the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the Mafia, the Texas Oilmen, the anti-Castro Cubans, the Fed, and Lyndon himself, each of whom put up their own shooter.
So it's an exaggeration regarding JFK.
I think the role of Israel with RFK is stronger.
And of course, one of the signs is blaming it on a Palestinian sirhan who is merely a Patsy, where he was shot behind the right ear from about an inch and a half by Thane Eugene Caesar, the security guard.
There may have, may not have been yet an additional assassin behind, but as he fell, Bobby reached out, grabbed his tie.
You can find his clasp on the floor of the pantry as he's lying there dying.
The third, he mentions three Kennedys.
I infer they mean John John JFK Jr.
Maybe Kennedy was killed when his plane flew into Martha's Vineyard.
And from what I've heard, and this is not public knowledge, there was a Jewish conspiracy angle that bombs were actually put in his plane at Buttonville Airport in Toronto when he was lured up to visit the head of a big corporation there who claimed he wanted to help support JFK Jr. with his magazine
George.
And a number of us believe that the name George was deliberate to identify George Herbert Walker Bush as involved in the assassination, which was most certainly the case.
He was on the ground.
He was actually in the Daltech supervising the anti-Castro Cuban who had a man at Kercarcano and fired three shots, the only unsilent shots, fired during the assassination and was arrested coming out of the Daltech, where he identified himself as an independent Texas oilman, which was a CIA cover.
He'd been long associated with the agency.
He actually had orchestrated the Bay of Pigs invasion, which was codenamed Operation Zapata.
Same as the Bush family oil drilling company.
And I believe had it been a success, Zapata would have had the concession to drill all over the Caribbean basin.
We have photographs of GHWB in front of the book depository, others of Edward Lansdale, who appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots, walking past the three tramps on the one hand and waiting to speak to George H.W. to debrief him on the other.
So I think a lot of truth here, but it exaggerates the role of Israel regarding Dallas.
But I find it intriguing.
I think it'll get people to think and really more likely lead them in the right direction than the wrong.
All right.
Yes, indeed.
That was not written by DC Dave, but he sent it to me.
And whenever he sends it, I'll play it.
All right.
Next up.
Here we go.
Since Israel first launched strikes on Gaza after Hamas'surprise attack on October 7th, it has targeted residential buildings.
The UN says nearly 200,000 structures have been destroyed or damaged.
With so many fleeing attacks, Palestinians packed into makeshift shelters, many of them UN-run schools, but they were not safe.
More than 1,000 schools have been bombed.
And Israel has destroyed most of Gaza's hospitals, including Al-Shifa, where more than 400 Palestinians were killed in a raid in March 2024.
We make the best weapons in the world, and we've got a lot of them.
And we've given a lot to Israel, frankly.
And I mean, Bibi would call me so many times.
Can you get me this weapon, that weapon, that weapon?
Some of them I never heard of, Bibi, and I made them.
But we'd get them here, wouldn't we?
And they are the best.
They are the best.
But you used them well.
It also takes people that know how to use them.
And you obviously used them very well.
But so many that Israel became strong and powerful, which ultimately led to peace.
That's what led to peace.
So as we celebrate today, let us remember how this nightmare of depravity and death all began.
In 1948, when the land of Palestine was officially stolen and given to a group of rabid Zionists who murdered over 10,000 Palestinians, this crime against humanity was decided as early as 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, the British Crown, and Lord Rothschild of the Rothschild banking dynasty, otherwise known as the Bank of England, who, when it's all said and done, will have control over hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Palestinian oil and gas reserves.
As Michael Rivero famously said, all wars are bankers' wars.
According to Benjamin Franklin, the primary catalyst for the American Revolution was the Bank of England's Currency Act.
After the Revolution, a value-based economy with no interest being paid to any central bank was created.
But it didn't last long.
The first Bank of the United States was chartered in 1791 and favored foreign stockholders over Americans.
The charter ended in January of 1811, followed by the War of 1812 and the establishment of the Second Bank of the United States in 1816, which gave more power to the Bank of England.
Andrew Jackson successfully killed the bank's renewal and shortly after became the first U.S. president targeted for assassination when Richard Lawrence drew pistols on him outside the U.S. Capitol, but misfired.
Laws were passed in the early 1860s for the U.S. government to issue its own currency in a value-based economy as opposed to the debt-based system imposed by central banks.
According to an 1864 edition of the London Times, this would have made America the wealthiest nation of the world.
The article warned that if a government creates its own money, it will be without debt.
It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world and therefore must be destroyed.
In 1865, President Lincoln was assassinated and the economy was quickly phased back to the central bank's debt enslavement model.
In 1913, the tyrannical Federal Reserve Bank and federal income tax was born.
The two world wars brought Germany under the heel of the central banking cartel.
Western banking institutions financed the Bolshevik Revolution.
In 2000, Iraq stopped selling its oil and Federal Reserve notes.
In 2003, Iraq was illegally invaded by the United States, and dollar-based oil sales were reinstated.
In Libya, Muammar Gaddafi's gold dinar currency was making the nation rich.
In 2011, the U.S. invaded and reverted Libya's oil sales to dollars.
The Bank for International Settlements recently proposed efforts under the guise of anti-money laundering that would provide scores to tokens and digital wallets, including stablecoins.
Digital ID, social credit scores, and a carbon tax is what the bankers are up to now.
And everything else is a distraction.
Today's war is mostly psychological, and it's being waged upon you.
Greg Reese, reporting.
Hey, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, I think for a short piece, that's about as good as it gets.
I'm a huge fan of Greg Reese.
99 times out of 100, he just knocks it out of the ballpark as he does here.
So I would encourage everyone to watch this even more than once, because what he's explained here has been fundamental to the debt enslavement of the United States, and it's a problem from which we have yet to extricate ourselves.
Understanding the source of a problem is crucial to sorting out its solution.
And I think Greg Rees here has made a major contribution toward that end in relatively brief combust.
I endorse this.
I support it.
I encourage everyone to watch it multiple times.
I got you.
It just came to my mind.
I just scared the crap out of James Carville about an hour ago.
I was going to Claiborne supermarket and I pulled up behind, it was like a badoon buggy, and his car paint matched my shirt.
So I just went up to him.
I said, you know, you're carved.
And he looked at me and went, oh, oh, he just didn't see me coming from behind him.
So he said, oh, okay, thanks.
And he drove off.
So that was a little weird seeing him.
I didn't know it was him when I pulled up to the car, though.
Pretty strange.
All right.
On to the next thing.
Okay.
This may be the next oil thing going on.
It has happened again.
U.S. forces last night struck another boat off of the coast of Venezuela, suspected of carrying drugs.
President Trump said today Venezuela's dictator is trying to reduce tensions with the United States, but it doesn't appear that that will happen as long as Nicolas Maduro is in power.
Here's Scott McFarlane.
As the Trump administration continues to target alleged Venezuelan drug boats, the president today dropped a verbal bomb about the country's leader, Nicolas Maduro.
He has offered everything.
He's offered everything.
You're right.
You know why?
Because he doesn't want to around with the United States.
The president says Maduro has offered natural resources, including oil, to the U.S., to improve the relationship between the two countries.
But Trump, who's authorized CIA action inside the country, has made it clear he wants Maduro removed from power, in part because of his alleged ties to drug trafficking.
New images show the B-52 bombers that flew near Venezuela Wednesday, and CBS News has learned that for a sixth time since September, the U.S. military struck a vessel in the Caribbean Thursday night.
This time, what Trump called a submarine.
Just so you understand, this was not an innocent group of people.
I don't know too many people that have submarines.
And that was an attack on a drug-carrying loaded-up submarine.
Unlike previous strikes, which killed everyone on board, two individuals survived the Thursday attack and are now being held on one of eight Navy warships in the region, part of a large military footprint that includes 10,000 troops.
Holding the two men presents legal challenges for the administration, according to former State Department lawyer Brian Thanoukin, who served under Presidents Trump and Biden.
The Trump administration is engaged in a make-believe armed conflict and has used that make-believe armed conflict as a basis to kill people.
And the question is now whether we'll use that make-believe armed conflict as a basis to also detain people.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators today said they're going to try to force a vote on a resolution that would require congressional authorization of future strikes here in Venezuela.
Okay.
This is all very bad.
This is the kind of brutality the United States has exercised all too often in the past toward other nations.
It's clearly intended to extort natural resources, oil from Venezuela, which may have the world's largest supply, though it turns out that oil is produced naturally by Earth in unlimited quantity.
The oil companies don't want you to know that because it ought to be, you know, bring about a dramatic reduction in the cost of oil.
All you got to do is get it out of the ground.
It's not a fossil fuel.
It doesn't exist only in limited quantities, but basically is infinite in supply.
Now, the fact that two survived here is very troubling for the public relations aspect.
I'm rather confident none of those boats that were taken out were transporting drugs.
I mean, this is contrived.
I agree with the former State Department officials saying this is made up.
This is made up.
I agree 100% it's made up.
We're not going to hear from the two who survived because they'll explain they were just innocent fishermen or whatever.
It's going to be completely different, that they're not part of a drug cartel.
Now, the situation, as I understand it, has become dramatically worse.
While it's not reached the mainstream yet, that there actually has been a landing of American forces and Mossad snipers in Venezuela, and the objective is to bring about regime change so the United States can more effortlessly appropriate the natural resources of Venezuela.
Now, these are reports I have been given by sources I regard as reliable, but look for confirmation one way or the other because I'm no infallible source.
I can give you my best assessment of what's taking place.
But with the access, acquisition of new additional information or alternative hypotheses, I, like any other rational agent, will reject hypotheses I previously accepted, accept hypotheses I previously rejected, leave others in suspense.
Because Venezuela has the equivalent of a 4 million man militia.
However, Gary, I'm very troubled by what we're getting ourselves into.
Trump has a great deal of arrogance combined with massive ignorance about matters military.
He's displayed this in relation to Russia, Ukraine.
He's displayed it in relation to U.S. and Iran and how god-awful it was to see him as an Israeli stooge addressing the Knesset about how much the United States had provided weapons to Israel to slaughter innocent Palestinians.
I mean, it's grotesque.
And there he is taking credit for it, getting ovations from these rabid Zionists who account no lives other than Jewish as worth bothering with.
It's outrageous.
And when I dare say the Christian Zionists can understand that their position is incoherent because the Zionists want all the Christians dead.
That's part of their theology, that the Jewish Messiah, the Mesiac, can return to Earth only when every Christian is gone from the planet.
And I worry, worry that individuals in positions of significance like Mike Hark, who believe these absurdities are having an effect in influencing American policy toward the further destruction of the noble people of Palestine,
whose land is being stolen from them in an outrageous operation, justified by a contrived false flag event on October 7th, where more deaths were brought about by the IDF than by the alleged Hamas terrorist group.
We're living in very strange times, Gary, where false reports abound and many of them are widely believed and they make a difference.
They provide political cover for outrageous operations, where we're seeing yet one more instance here in Venezuela, yet again, sad to say.
All right.
Now, I think my grandkids are growing up pretty well here.
They actually wanted you to respond to something.
They're only eight years old, so I'm going to go ahead and show you what they wanted your response for.
All right.
What do you think about a Fat Barbie?
So there's going to be.
What are you telling me?
In other words, there's a new Barbie that's closer to reality these days.
As you can see in the picture, she's wanted to know what you thought about having a new dog called Fat Barbie.
Called Fat.
It's called Fat Barbie.
Fat Barbie.
I'm not sure if that's the name, but that's what they say.
Well, that's very intriguing.
I appreciate the kids asking the question.
Barbies have always been idealizations, you know, promoting a very slender, atypical body type that most girls and young women do not possess, will never possess, that genetics would never permit them to acquire.
So I think that if you have a more nearly normal variation on Barbie, that's probably going to come as a great relief to many.
And I frankly would endorse it because too many young girls, especially, feel as though if they don't satisfy this hypothetical, actually, fantasy ideal, that they're unworthy or lack self-worth.
So I believe this is a move in the right direction.
And I support it, Gary.
And just tell the kids, I also appreciate their raising the question.
I think that's terrific.
And I give them my heartfelt appreciation.
Love you guys.
Great, terrific.
Thanks.
They like to hang out with Papa.
And some rubbing off on them for sure.
Okay, here we go to, whoops, I missed my button.
Mm-hmm.
Here's a very smart girl.
Ultimately, the goal is to herd people into manufacturing consent for some sort of digital ID system with the goal of having that system being connected to all of your internet access through your internet service provider or ISP and also to your social media account with the goal of really having you have a formal government ID linked profile of everything you read and consume online.
All of these global policy agendas that are somehow being implemented in lockstep globally obviously have a transnational group behind them.
I think that's quite clear.
And there's no shortage of cheerleaders for that agenda in the United States, whether it's team left or team right.
And the same is true elsewhere.
It's just really the sales pitches to get people to adopt them are different.
So, you know, on the right, it's being framed as a way to stop illegal immigration.
On the left, it's being framed as a way to stop hate speech and stop cyberbullying online and protect children and all sorts of things like that.
Really, just looking for whatever metric sticks with whatever demographic they want to placate ultimately.
So, there's several groups that are behind it.
A lot of it ultimately goes back.
If you look at some of these entities that sort of first kickstart the digital ID push under the auspices of the United Nations, like the ID 2020 Alliance, which has now been folded into another alliance with essentially all of the same funders.
But ultimately, ID 2020 was started by groups like Microsoft, the Rockefeller Foundation, a censure, some of these big multinational corporations, or in the case of the Rockefeller Foundation, the philanthropic arms of oligarchic clans that have tried to create a global system of financial control in private hands for the better part of the last hundred years.
And so, ultimately, Digital ID is meant to sort of facilitate that kind of system globally.
They want it to obviously be connected to your online activities.
So, if you want to use the internet for economic activity, for social activity, or education or anything else, you will have to have a digital ID and connect it to your ability to get online.
Well, of course, she's spot on and does many extremely good reports.
And right now, there's a massive protest going on in London.
I just saw the story about it today over digital ID because it is going to be the key to using technology to control every aspect of our lives.
So, you know, I welcome more exposure to what's going on here.
I don't doubt that the powers that be are going to move forward aggressively here, but it may well also turn out to be the case that it has profound effects on our freedom, our ability to do what we want to do outside of the range of government control because the digital IDs feed into controlling our bank accounts,
our access to money, our ability to buy what we want to buy, do what we want to do.
So, the threat to freedom presented thereby is immense.
Yeah, Jason Boss.
Jason Boss, who had 153 News, is now defunct.
PayPal took away all of his rights to use PayPal, and that contributed to a lot of people that weren't that savvy about payments to make payments to a 153 News.
That happened.
Yes, yes, yes.
Great loss.
Yep, absolutely.
Okay.
Next one.
This is Brother Nathaniel.
I wonder what this is about.
The Jews love to ban anyone who attacks their brand, but this has hit the fan.
I got a six-point plan to turn around the band onto Jewland.
One, end the Jewish bed.
Printing money out of thin air has got to end.
Ron Paul hit a wall, but Thomas Massey, not Rand, has picked up the ball.
Two, end the Jewish monopoly of the media.
Jews own it all.
It's time for their information lies to fall.
Three, end Jewish censorship.
The ADL, led by Jonathan Greenblach, scours the internet with a gag in their hand.
No algorithm can stop a million of us saying what we see.
Four, end Jewish money out of politics.
Simply register APAC, ADL, and the Legion of Demon Jewish lobbies as agents of a foreign entity, Israel.
JFK tried to do it, and they killed him.
They ain't going to kill me.
Five, end Jewish presence and education.
The AFT is run by Jewish lesbian Randy Weingarten.
She created CRT.
White Christian Americans will make her fall to her knees.
Six, end mass immigration.
Revoke all H-1B visas.
Send the Hindus home like a bad disease.
Revoke the open immigration law of 1965.
All who arrived and born here thereafter must be deprived of influence and their anti-Christian issuance.
It's my six-point plan.
oh this is going to hit right between the lips hips brow and brain of every single hit hey dr betcha let me uh stop that one Okay.
Well, there's really no arguing with Brother Nathaniel about the first five for sure.
They're all 100% correct.
In the Fed, in the Jewish censorship, yet make AIPAC registers for an Asian, get Jewish money out of politics.
Those are all very clear and devoutly to be wished.
When it comes to immigration, if the United States only had rational immigration laws, such as we find in Mexico, where in order to immigrate to Mexico, you must first be able to show you have something to contribute to the good of Mexico.
A talent, a craft, plumber, carpenter, lawyer, doctor.
Second, that you must have the financial resources to support yourself and your family, that you not become a burden on the state.
What the Democrats did was open their border with all kinds of inducements, free money, free support, all kinds of fringe benefits that's just drawn millions upon millions into the country and created a massive burden for ordinary taxpaying citizens.
It must end.
I think Brother Nathaniel is on the right track.
And if only we could find the political will to embrace those points, the nation would be far better off.
But remember, the Jewish influence on our Congress, which is Israeli-occupied territory, makes it all but impossible to implement.
I thought Donald Trump offered us a real prospect of putting America first and that he would be strong enough to minimize Israeli influence.
But in fact, it's turned out to be the opposite.
Trump is one of them.
He's not an American first guy.
He's an Israel first guy.
He may actually do some good trying to salvage his political standing, but he's at the lowest point of approval in his history as a prominent figure in American politics.
And I do not expect is going to move up anytime soon.
Yes, I agree with that.
All right.
This one was sent to us by Michael Ivey, our friend.
Publishing something like that.
I might as well retire.
I'd be finished.
I mean, I'm just curious.
What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think?
What was he so afraid of?
The study was a bombshell.
18,468 subjects.
1,957 of them were fully unvaccinated.
When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions.
The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.
4.29 times in the adjusted.
And that seems, I've looked at a lot of studies.
There's 3.26 to 5.65.
They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases.
Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases.
They found almost six times risk for autoimmune disease.
The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillambere syndrome.
They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times the increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated.
Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime.
Neurodevelopmental disorders.
What kind of numbers we're talking about, do you remember?
Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning.
And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms, presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain.
2.92 times the amount of motor disabilities.
4.47 times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
Three times the rate of developmental delay.
They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity.
Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group.
The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk.
For example, there were 262 children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group.
Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD.
Zero.
These ones are just mind-boggling.
These conditions were not found at all in almost 2,000 unvaccinated kids.
Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
I'm going to read the conclusion here.
Despite this, in contrast to our expectations, again, the author's expectations was they'd conduct the study and probably find vaccinated people a whole lot healthier than the unvaccinated, right?
This is what we found.
We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.
Okay.
Okay.
Well, Ron Johnson, just super.
He's been at the forefront of so many controversial issues, including exposing the theft of the 2020 election.
And by the way, a memorandum buried in the CI balls has now been released confirming that the CIA stole the election in 2020 to put the guy they referred to as the vegetable Joe Biden into office.
It was actually an imposter, not the real guy.
You go back and you see the real Joe, and he's very articulate.
He's expressive.
He uses his hands and gestures, just as do I, versus the zombie imposter who has a different shape and size of skull, has different handwriting, interacts differently with Jill.
All things outrageous.
What we have here now is a monster study.
I believe this was conducted in South Korea of vax versus unvax.
And the evidence is just as we have suspected, just as we have been reporting piecemeal.
What you have here simply is a larger sample size, more thorough and systematic, but it all confirms what we have long since concluded, to wit, the mRNA vacc is a bioweapon that is designed to maim and kill induce sterility and reduce the world population.
And my fear is it's going to prove to have been all too successful, and it may herald the extinction of the human species, Gary.
This is something you see that can grow and spread and eventually take a monster toll.
And I'm just filled with trepidation about what the future holds.
This is a very worthy report.
I'm glad you played as much as you did.
And again, I congratulate the scientists who are behind the study.
It's not new news.
It's really confirmation of old news, but the old news was so troubling.
We want to make sure we got him right.
And it appears we have.
Sad to say, because the future of the species hangs in the balance.
Yeah, we don't really like being right, but we are most of the time.
We are not the government.
During my administration, I, we altogether destroyed the caliphate.
Our political system is corrupt.
We want to build an America that works for the people, not one that just works for rich folks.
We killed ISIS leader al-Baghdadi.
Millions of people believe we are the government, a phrase coined by heavy-handed president Theodore Roosevelt that remains implicit to the notion of government today.
By virtue of the Constitution and elections, we are the government.
Those who control and work for the government represent us so much they are an extension of us.
In any given political or historical conversation, you'll inevitably hear people say, we won World War II.
We fought and overthrew the British in 1776.
We adopted the Constitution.
We killed Osama bin Laden, and we should pass laws to stop everything from transgender bathrooms and immigration to guns and plastic straws.
But have the people who express these sentiments actually done these things?
Were they there?
Did they physically fight in World War II?
Did they sign the Constitution 250 years ago?
Were they consulted about it?
Did they kill Osama?
Do hundreds of millions of Americans write laws and enforce them?
For the vast majority of people, the answer is no.
But you might be thinking, silly, Carrie, we're a republic or a democracy.
Of course we did these things.
We did them as a nation.
In that case, are you also willing to accept responsibility for codifying slavery, throwing innocent individuals in camps simply because of their heritage, dosing people with mind-altering drugs for the purposes of mind control, toppling democratically elected leaders and installing authoritarians, infiltrating activist movements to undermine them, empowering corporate welfare whores, running up trillions of dollars of debt, poisoning generations of civilians with toxic weapons of war, torturing people in violation of basic human rights and decency, faking terror plots, and nuking civilians, to name a few?
If you aren't willing to take responsibility for these things, good, because you didn't do them, but you also didn't do any of the seemingly good things either.
Some people working for the government under the guise of authority did.
Or they went right on to establish their own government without the consent of the people at the time, let alone yours.
Yet hundreds of millions of Americans alive today believe we all must live under this government simply because we were born here.
If you do take responsibility for any of these atrocious acts, even though you didn't actually commit them, it shows just how much the conflation of individual action or any given nation with the government has dominated your thought process.
But if we really are the government, we all elected Donald Trump because that's how the system we accept works.
Even if you didn't vote for him, if you voted in the election, you participated in the system that put him in power.
Even if you hated Obama and voted for someone else, you participated in the system that made him president.
Linking the actions of a select few in government to the millions of people they tax to maintain their power and fund their policies and crimes is a potent propaganda tool that makes us dehumanize other people.
Whatever foreign government threat our government tells us we face is not a small group of rulers.
It's the entire nation.
A nation is not the same thing as a state, yet this is so ingrained in our belief system, we can't even recognize a distinction.
This conflation can be seen historically with war propaganda and the deliberate tactics to demonize certain groups as evil without distinguishing people from their government.
It can be seen today from assuming all Palestinians support the Hamas government or all Iranians endorse the Iranian government or all Americans back the American government.
Just as harmful, we consider ourselves complicit with or a party to the actions of the government that rules over the territory where we happen to be born.
We identify with the institution and believe it really is us, making it easier to rationalize the systemic violence and violations of rights the government commits and has committed in our name.
Sure, people may condemn certain rulers or policies and pledge allegiance to power seekers they hope will change them, but most of us wouldn't dare question the nature of the power that makes these policies possible.
We'd rather seize that power through the polls, content to impose our views on others who don't consent to the rules we think are good for us.
Rules crafted by politicians who claim to have the wisdom and authority to make decisions for everyone.
Elections give us a false sense of power, believing we are represented, when in fact it's impossible to achieve this for ourselves without denying representation to others who disagree with us.
We get angry when we lose that representation and our enemy gains it, yet we refuse to empathize with those enemies when they inevitably end up in the same position.
Yet regardless of who is in power, politicians rely on the violence of law enforcers to maintain their control and enforce their rules.
Would you commit this violence yourself?
Do you have a right to?
Would you show up armed at your neighbor's house to take guns you don't want them to have?
What about to enforce drug laws you support?
Even when these people supposedly breaking the law aren't hurting anyone?
If not, why do you endorse someone else doing it for you or even allegedly having the authority to?
In truth, we are only complicit with these government actions so long as we continue to believe the government has the authority to do that.
As we as individuals continue to believe violent authority is the best way to organize society, and we continue to believe the lie that if we just got the right people in power, things would be different.
But when has anyone intentionally voted to knowingly put the wrong people in power?
We're also complicit as long as we as individuals continue to fund the ruling class's escapades and exploitations and the enforcement class that shields them.
The real we is what we do as individuals working together voluntarily to truly make a difference, whether that's building and supporting new technology to clean up the oceans, reduce carbon dioxide levels, or 3D print organs and homes, volunteering in organizations or charities that help those in need, crowdfunding innovative solutions like planting billions and trillions of trees to help the environment or breaking the law to do what is right and serve our fellow humans.
We are doing these things and we are not the government.
So stop denigrating yourself by identifying with the most oppressive and violent institution in the history of the world.
Okay.
Well, I think there is something therapeutic about recognizing you are not the government and that the government does not invariably reflect the sentiments, desires, aspirations of the American people.
We have seen this in so many different cases.
I mean, right now in Venezuela, right now in Gaza, right now in Ukraine, and even if they're planning to attack Iran once again.
I repudiate all of the above.
I personally am supportive of Hamas, of Hezbollah, of the Houthis, of Iran, as having their rights to their own existence as groups that seek mutual respect, which is being violated by the forces that oppose them, that are frequently slaughtering them, raping them, killing them, kidnapping them.
Grotesque.
Gary, so much of this involves our ability to transcend our evolution as animals to a higher plane.
I submit what makes us distinctive as human beings within the animal kingdom is our capacity to exercise respect for other persons in a way that is independent of benefits to ourselves.
What you have with the Israelis, sad to say, is the most pernicious form of morality known as limited utilitarianism, which judges as good any action that maximizes benefits for the members of your own group, regardless of the consequences for others.
Where they want to seize the land and they don't care how many Palestinian men, women, or children they kill in the process.
They want what they want for them regardless.
And that, I'm sorry to say, has been endorsed and supported by the United States, its president in particular.
It's just outrageous to me that we're in a quandary where we were conned.
We were played for suckers and saps by a guy who claimed he was going to put America first.
He was going to end these stupid wars, one of which Ukraine, he thought he could do in 24 hours, none of which has proven to be the case.
And especially, he's turned out to be a puppet for Israel.
The President of the United States is not representing the American people.
He's not following his oath of office.
He's rather acting at the behest of Benjamin Netney, the prime minister of Israel.
You heard him say as much to the cadassant.
And this is in the last week.
I mean, for crying out loud, look at what we're up against here.
So this is a very soothing, sympathetic, appropriate observation that we as individuals should not feel responsible for the actions of our government, but on the contrary,
should do everything we can to make it more responsible and in accordance with American values, which include respect for the rights and the property of other people without limitation, provided they're not acting to harm us, which is the most fundamental principle of morality.
Always treat other people as ends, as intrinsically valuable and never merely as means.
And for those who want more understanding, try, for example, my piece entitle evaluating moral theories.
You can find it at jameshvatzer.org.
This actually is very deep in terms of understanding history, which has been predominated by the attitude that might makes right, which is the fundamental problem we confront as a species.
And it's consistent with evolution.
But humanity must transcend our evolutionary origins to fully realize what it means to be a human being.
Cross my mind, only humans write songs.
Okay, this is our last clip of the day.
We are constantly hearing from you in this room how on Black Lives Matter, how Jewish lives matter, how Palestinian lives matter, and I completely agree with you.
I don't have any problem when you are saying that.
But I will say something what many of you will have a problem with.
And I will say it loudly and openly.
White lives matter.
Because right now, white people are just a tiny minority in this world, and white people are the most hated group in the whole world.
Everything is allowed against white people.
You can openly spread hatred and racism against white people.
You can openly call for a violence against white people and nobody will ban you from social networks.
Nobody will prosecute you or put you in jail for that.
Nobody will prosecute you and trying to destroy your life because doing something like that.
And that's why I consider it very important to repeat that for you as a white man, as a Christian father of the family.
White lives matter.
All right, I agree with that one.
Yeah, yeah.
It was astonishing when in the wake of the George Floyd Vyasco and whatever may have happened to George Floyd, he wasn't killed by a police officer kneeling on his shoulder rather than his neck.
He was saying he couldn't breathe because that's an effect of fentanyl poisoning.
You lose your ability to breathe.
I believe the whole thing was orchestrated, but perhaps politically, what was most fascinating is that Antifa and Black Lives Matter protested those who said all lives matter, all lives matter.
Well, what could be more obvious than that all lives matter?
And that includes white lives, black lives, Jewish lives, Catholic lives, Hindu lives, Swahili lives, purple lives.
I mean, Gary, I'm telling you, it's totally revealing that any group or organization is ill-founded.
It has improper motives that it would repudiate or reject the simple slogan that all lives matter.
And it has reached a point where white populations in Europe and the United States are being pilloried and attacked.
It's a form of racism that is just as objectionable as racism in the past directed toward blacks, for example.
And in the memorable words of Martin Luther King Jr., we must overcome.
Thank you for all your clips today, Gary.
Wonderful assortment.
Very good.
I appreciate it.
And so does ChatGPT.
▲
Export Selection