All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
57:49
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (22 Sept 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Folks, the truth versus all that news out there.
Truth versus news incorporated is the name of our show.
It's been going on for 20 years or more.
And it seems like now it's more than ever here.
And we've got a bigger show than ever to expose this.
That will be the biggest hoax ever.
And we have the best people to do it.
Of course, we have Jim Fetzler, who's froze.
Okay.
The picture froze.
Anyway.
We have Jim Fetzer here, the leading on the show, who's our main man here.
He's written great books, American Nuka and 9-11 and about Sandy Hook.
These are classic books that are very hot that you need to have plus 40 more books.
And Jim is just a dynamo.
Plus, we have Brian Davison, private eye out of Texas, who's really been out exposing things and getting son exposure by himself and doing great plus Bali.
In Bali, we have team Hagopian, a foremost writer and author and authoritative expert on child abuse and other crazy things that we really need to know about that we don't want to know.
So Jim, I guess what's going on here with a Charlie Kirk big ceremony and the shooting and things.
Is that the way it's supposed to be?
That what we see on the news is really real?
Well, Don, let's begin with analysis by Max Blumenthal, who's really, in my opinion, just unbelievably good about Charlie Kirk.
This tiny muscle is the reason behind our feet.
Fix it by doing this for five minutes.
Let's start with what has happened in the United States, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and the way that the Israeli government, specifically, particularly Benjamin Netanyahu, was reacting to what has happened in the United States.
What is his obsession with the case of Charlie Kirk?
Yeah, I've lost count of the amount of videos, the number of videos that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has released and the interviews that he has conducted specifically about Charlie Kirk since the conservative operative was killed on September 10th.
But Netanyahu immediately weighed in with prayers about Charlie Kirk just minutes after he was killed.
It was eerie.
His body was still warm and Netanyahu was beginning to claim Charlie Kirk's legacy.
I've been writing about Charlie Kirk for 10 years now.
He was not just one of the most important conservative youth activists, he was also one of the most critical Gentile assets that the self-proclaimed Jewish state controlled inside the United States.
And he had started to move away from the Israeli line and specifically Netanyahu's line and even entertain the possibility of publicly calling for Netanyahu to resign because he privately despised Netanyahu in the months before his death.
He was under enormous pressure from Zionist activists who are close to Netanyahu, basically Netanyahu's cutouts and the millionaires and billionaires that Netanyahu presides over inside the United States.
He was under enormous pressure to kind of fall back to stop providing a platform to Israel critics at his TPUSA events like Tucker Carlson or Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And Charlie Kirk was resisting.
So Netanyahu sought to paper over all this history and this reality, which was mostly taking place in private, but which people who paid close attention to Charlie Kirk, like me, knew was taking place because of the public statements he was making, complaining about all of this Israel lobbying he was being subjected to.
And why can't he care most about his own country and not this foreign country?
So Netanyahu seeks to bury that history and to make Charlie Kirk out to be the hero of Israel after his killing.
And he starts conducting interviews on Fox about how much Charlie loved Israel.
Then he introduces a video on Twitter X, Netanyahu personally speaking to a camera about a letter Charlie had written him based on an invitation Netanyahu extended to Charlie Kirk two weeks before his death to visit Israel on a propaganda trip, which would have ostensibly been paid for by Israel.
And Netanyahu didn't say whether Charlie Kirk accepted his invitation.
The reason Netanyahu was doing this, just to answer your original question, was because Israel requires American Christian, mostly conservative men to fight the war of Armageddon that Netanyahu wants against Iran, just as it required them to fight Israel, the war Israel wanted against Iraq.
And so they need to keep the MAGA base on their side, and Charlie Kirk would have been the perfect symbol for that.
And then the gray zone comes in and screws everything up because I had been talking to friends I knew of Charlie Kirk about this transformation he was experiencing in private.
And my article about that and how he personally detested Netanyahu was one of the most viral pieces we have ever published at the gray zone.
And I followed it up by exposing.
OK, we broke the story at the gray zone by exposing the secret summit that one of Netanyahu's top billionaire cutouts in the United States, Bill Ackman, had convened in the Hamptons.
where basically Charlie Kirk was supposed to oversee a influencer summit where influencers were going to be paid to generate millions of clicks and impressions for Israel.
And everyone got invited on a propaganda tour to Israel.
This was not supposed to be known.
And the summit devolved into what was described to me by one attendee as a disaster when Bill Ackman, the billionaire donor close to Netanyahu, started challenging and pressuring Charlie Kirk about his views on Israel.
And then another Zionist influencer, this young British lawyer who is one of the biggest Zionist thugs in London, trying to get every protester arrested.
Her name is Natasha Hausdorff, started screaming at Charlie Kirk.
And, you know, when this got out there, Candace Owens, a former TPUSA, associate of Kirk, longtime friend of Charlie Kirk, subsequent to the publication of my article about that influencer summit, Candace Owens goes live and provides more details about the summit.
And from there, the entire Zionist world of bigwigs and donors and operatives who are close to Netanyahu in the United States launches, goes into full meltdown mode and launches this all-out campaign to destroy Candace Owens' reputation.
You know, they're falsely claiming that the gray zone's funded by Iran.
They're trying everything they can to discredit this reporting.
And then, finally, Netanyahu does another video where he comes out and announces on his own on the prime minister's own channel on Twitter X and other social media networks that he did not kill Charlie Kirk.
I never accused him of killing Charlie Kirk.
I said there was no evidence that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, but he felt the need to proclaim that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, and he begins denouncing everyone who has reported that Charlie Kirk actually didn't like him.
So this got all the way to Netanyahu, and he is in full panic mode.
And again, the reason why Netanyahu is panicking, the reason why this Zionist network in the U.S. is panicking is because they are losing their last base of support, which is actually their most critical base of support, what Israel lobbyists referred to as Israel's safety belt in the Bible Belt.
And it's that base that they require of Christian, young white, mostly, yeah, white men who will go and fight Israel's wars on their behalf against Iran and its allies.
Max, I think what's happening in that I think I want to add some context here and get your preliminary reaction because here's a situation.
Charlie had wandered off the Zionist reservation.
He'd gone to Israel.
He was at the wall.
He reported 10 feet away, one with an AK-15, AK-47, another the machine gun, that there's no possible way the official story could be correct, that it was not un-American or anti-Semitic to ask questions about October 7th.
He had told Trump to his face he didn't think bombing Iran was a good idea.
He was very unhappy about the genocide.
He was under pressure to support the expanded definition of anti-Semitism, impose more censorship, and he didn't like it.
Netanyahu really basically offered him a choice between silver or lead.
He offered $150 million to add to Turning Points campaign chest, already 40 million strong.
Charlie turned him down.
He confided in his closest friends, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Clayton Morris, that he was worried that Mossad was going to take him out.
So confronted that situation, he designed an alternative, which was to stage his death so he could have his own life emancipated.
Now, that background, let me turn to what one of my brilliant colleagues, Vivian Lee, has discerned actually happened how it was done.
And get your assessment.
She is so good.
So how did they do it?
The hand sign triggered remote activation of a squib.
That squib activated on signal.
And then break and produce a fake wound with some blood.
I'm not even sure about that part.
They were people talking, taking cell phone footage in the immediate proximity, and no one outside the operation was allowed to get that close.
Then they sent their cell phone footage to the AI guys who added more blood and accidentally moved his ring to his little finger.
They didn't notice the ring problem and sent the doctored footage to the news networks who made sure the whole world saw it.
That way, anyone in the crowd would have seen the phrase phase one squib event so as to think it was real.
And the phase two AI doctored footage was broadcast far and wide.
Definitely a Hollywood Mossadegh style operation.
The commotion around the arrest of George Flynn was part of the op.
It was done to direct our attention away from the shooting toward the fake suspect to give the AI guys time to doctor the footage so it could be sent out to the media for wide distribution.
Once the doctor footage was ready to go, the news no longer focused on the false suspect, all attention on the fake shooting footage, the hand signs.
First, Charlie touched his nose to indicate that he was ready to start.
Then the guy in white, Frank Turek, touched the bill of his hat and then his top lip.
And the guy in black put out his right arm and then touched it above the elbow with his left hand.
That was a sign to the guy in the brown shirt in the front row to activate the squib.
Right after the guy in black made the armband sign, the guy in brown put out his left arm and touched it above the elbow with his right hand.
The remote was in the left sleeve of the guy in brown.
And when he touched his arm, he activated the squib.
Then he ducked down a little and focused his attention on Charlie.
When he saw the mission had been accomplished, he gave a smile, a smirk of satisfaction, and took off.
Now, here's some footage that shows what we're talking about, which Vivian had analyzed really quite brilliantly.
And there's, you know, you're going to see several takes here.
Not counting gang violence.
Let me tell you, the blood does not soak into the clothing, into the fabric, and it appears layer.
He holds a microphone too long.
Looks like there's a lot of blood, but when it's all said and done, there isn't any blood anywhere.
A lot of blood.
but it ain't real.
Oh.
This was a CGI fact.
So they had the original footage, which so far as I can see was actually bereft of any blood.
It did show the blowout of the shirt, and then he falls back, and it creates the impression he's been shot.
And then they have the distraction with Zen.
They send it out.
have it cdi'd and then they send it everywhere now let me give you some confirmation which is pretty damn interesting because there's nothing gory about this footage from the back
The thing that really stood out to me, and I just kept asking him to replay it over and over and over again, is that there's no blood.
There's no blood from the back.
There is no blood.
So I think a lot of people were wondering whether or not that bullet pierced and went out to the back.
I think I vaguely even remember, and Skylar, you can maybe live look this up.
But like, I thought the feds were saying they were looking for a bullet at some point, which is now very alarming to me.
I don't understand that.
How could they have been looking for a bullet?
Because if I'm not seeing, and there isn't, I'm telling you, what happens in the front is not what happens in the back at all.
If I'm not seeing any blood, what are we to take from that?
The only thing that could make sense, if what they're saying is true and that person took the shot from the place that they are saying that individual took the shot from, it would suggest that it was inside of Charlie, right?
And they would know that.
The feds would have known that.
So they would have communicated that they were never looking for a bullet because remember, one shot.
So I'm very confused.
I'm very confused, not by what I saw, but what I didn't see.
That's just wonderful.
Candace is totally honest.
And the fact is, there's no blood anywhere.
There's no blood in the tent.
There's no blood on the floor.
They're carrying him out to the SUV.
There's no blood dripping from the body.
His sneakers are pure white.
There's no blood on the sneakers.
There's no blood anywhere because he wasn't actually shot.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Well, and then they've interviewed some of the people that were in the audience close by.
And they said, yeah, we didn't think it was an assassination.
We didn't see blood.
I mean, there is so much conflicting evidence from the narrative.
I mean, it's overwhelming.
This whole thing is another Hollywood production minus the lights, camera, action, and cut sequence by the director.
Everything.
They used the hand signals for that, you know?
So it was all set up.
I mean, it was all basically a stage production.
That's what it is.
And unfortunately, life in this world now has come down to a fakery series of stage productions called news.
I mean, it's just unbelievable how they try and foist this falsehood so that the whole masses of people get totally hooked in emotionally.
You know, that's, you know, they're very good at what they're doing, but they're also very sloppy because as you're pointing out, so many anomalies are inherent in this production that's really amateurish to a great extent.
So we're seeing it, and we got to put the truth out there so that people don't get fooled again.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Absolutely.
What's wonderful about this event is it's blown up Israel.
Everyone thinks Israel did it.
That's why BB was out there saying we didn't kill him.
We didn't kill him.
What?
Six times, eight times, 26 times.
Everyone believes it.
And nobody even, you know, I show them evidence of fakery.
They don't believe it.
And it's having a tremendous traumatic effect about Israel and its domination of American. politics and its use of assassinations, remember?
It went after the Houthis.
Oh, they're ruling.
It went after Iran.
Oh, they're ruling.
It went after the Hezbollah.
Oh, they're ruling.
It went even a Qatar.
All the Hamas ruling.
They know Israel uses assassination.
They believe they did it here and they are outraged, outrage, outrage.
And even if they learn that it was actually staged, that outrage remains.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, without going into, I mean, I didn't have to go very far into this thing to figure out it was fake.
As far as I went was, oh, the shooter was 200 yards away.
That's 15 frames at 30 frames per second before the sound arrives.
Yet the sound arrives concurrently with frame one, which is the moment of quote unquote impact.
And of course, on that video from 153 News, we see very clearly that the blood didn't come down and stain the arm in any way, that the blood didn't spurt out in any sort of heartbeat rhythm.
Blood is under pressure, especially if it's a carotid artery.
So we knew that there was fakery afoot.
The question was, what's behind the fakery?
And that's what I'd like to analyze at this point in time.
I believe that whoever the actor was that was playing Charlie Kirk on that day is in witness protection, probably because there were credible threats on his life.
Now, I made the same theory after the Butler quote-unquote assassination attempt with Donald Trump, was that there had probably been a real threat that he was going to be assassinated.
So he took the same team from Homeland Security that does the false flags, set it back up in Butler, and executed the false flag to allow him to beef up his security status protection and basically double or triple the backing behind it while making him a martyr and a hero.
Well, what do we have here?
We have Charlie Kirk as a new martyr and a hero.
And in theory, you've got the religious community aghast that this has taken place.
If they really knew and understood what was happening, they would roll their eyes and go back to reading their Bibles because they obviously don't understand the full gravity of the situation here.
I believe Charlie Kirk was extracted from the stage, flown out of town on a private plane.
He was definitely taken in a private vehicle.
The crime scene was never roped off like an official crime scene ought to be.
They were instantly cleaning it up and changing everything out.
And there were what I believe to be crisis actors clearly staged out of the area to talk to the journalists who came up.
And we have so much duping delight, which we've seen so consistently across other false flags.
Now, the big fundamental issue is, okay, so why are the Jews scared if this was an extraction program?
Why is this bothering the Jews?
Well, you've got to ask yourself the same questions and go back through history a little bit.
What are the Jesuits?
And how are they different?
And how are they the same?
What did the Jesuits do after Martin Luther had his 15 or 95 theses posted at the church door in Wittenberg?
Their response to the Protestant Reformation, fundamentally, the Protestants waking up to what was really taking place.
And at that time, the Protestants were starting to read their Bible and they began to realize that Mystery Babylon was most likely the Vatican and the Catholic Church, the city on Seven Hills.
All the pieces fit in terms of the Bible.
For those that believe the Bible, they would have seen that right away.
So what happened?
The Jesuits were formed as a military order to combat Protestantism.
There were draconian platforms laid down instantly to penalize and try to stamp out the movement.
And that ended up in basically overplaying their hand for years and years and years.
They were never able to get over it.
So in this case, we've got almost the same religious concepts playing out with Zionism as we did at that time with Mystery Babylon.
It's an old issue.
It comes down to how are you going to interpret the Bible?
And I know that this audience isn't normally one, but I'll give you the big broad strokes.
There are three main hermeneutics on interpreting eschatology.
That is what's going to happen in the end times.
There is the idea of preterism, which is all these important prophetic events happened in the past.
And now there's a big gap called the church age.
And then there's the idea of futurism, which is none of those events were fulfilled in the past, and they're all going to be fulfilled in the future.
But then there's the correct angle, which is historicism, which is of all the events correspond to different portions of time, which would put us in the seventh church, the church at Leoducia, which would be very interesting, which would show.
So people who really, that's very important.
Go read Revelation 3:15 through 20, and you'll get a feel for the church and ask yourself, does this match the church of today?
Well, it does.
And that's the last church.
So we've got end times prophetic events coming up.
And the great deception is that the Israelis somehow belong in there as some as a nation that's been reestablished.
And that's just simply not true.
Go read Deuteronomy 28, and you'll find out that they don't belong, that these privileges have been removed.
They've been replaced with the church.
And I'm not saying big words like replacement theology.
I don't need to go into that because all you have to do is read your Bible and go into it without labeling it one way or another.
I'm just simply saying that the new Israel is not the old Israel, one that was born of flesh and blood, but the new Israel is a spiritual Israel that's born of people who of faith who believe and it includes both the Jews and the Gentiles.
So there is no extra salvation plan for people with a bloodline that happens to tie back to Abraham, which may or may not tie back to Abraham, but that's what the Jews want you to believe so that they can establish their new temple in Gaza or in Israel and begin to deceive the rest of the world by seeding the Antichrist in that particular place.
Wow, that was terrific.
That was terrific, Brian.
I love that.
I'd like to add one thing to that on the Jesuits.
Oh, right ahead.
Oh, John Wilkes Booth.
He was a Jesuit, you know, and of course, he was the assassin.
They're known as the Catholic assassins, by the way, the Jesuits.
And the killer of probably our greatest president, Lincoln, was a Jesuit.
And they've been involved in so many operations, but yeah, it's kind of like tangential, but at the same time, important.
I love you guys.
This is so exciting.
Absolutely wonderful.
Meanwhile, here, as I was saying, not one drop of blood is rushing him off.
It ain't there.
We'll just take a little tiny peek here.
I mean, there he is.
Look at his sneakers.
See his sneakers perfectly white.
No blood.
No blood shows up on the way.
I mean, they're pristine.
They might have come right out of the box.
Meanwhile, we had Candace on threats to Charlie that they're lying about Charlie.
Candace is so wonderful.
Charlie from a month ago speaking about the kind of pressure that he was under, because I think that will also help to further contextualize this.
Take a listen.
I'm an American citizen.
Yes, I want Israel to win.
Yes, I'm a Christian.
But like the sum of the message, and you saw me, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some.
No, it's very irritating.
It's been so unfair.
They were coming after you after a turning point for, among other things.
And you had Dave Smith there.
Dave Smith is allowed to criticize Israel.
What both sides do.
The Israeli side was not allowed to criticize.
No, you're not allowed to.
It's even worse than that.
Again, I just want to repeat for the fifth time.
I love Israel.
I want Israel to win.
But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan.
Not my decisions.
Not like, hey, are you doing this?
Is it smart or is it dumb?
But no, I am a bad person if I do this.
And I could go.
I mean, you saw it, Megan.
It was trending on Twitter.
Thousands of tweets and text messages.
And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyper-paranoid state because they're at war and war tends to make things black and white.
And you're a hammer looking for a nail.
So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan.
Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can, right?
Like, okay, what would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in 1930s Germany online?
How would I behave?
So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit.
At the same time, I'm like, but you're, it's, it's not defensible to be dumb, right?
No, it's not defensible to be dumb.
And he was under an increasing amount of pressure.
Not just people telling him, oh, well, you know, I'm upset with who you're inviting, but flat out telling him that he was not allowed to invite certain people to his events.
They were threatening to pull out money.
Charlie was getting a lot of really nasty text messages and many of them pertaining to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.
But Tucker Carlson was really the focus when it came to America Fest.
How could Charlie allow these debates about Israel to take place?
How could he allow Dave Smith, who by the way is Jewish, how could they allow, how could Charlie allow this other position to meet the stage?
Because obviously when people start to hear the debates, what Dave Smith is saying sounds so rational, but it was up to Charlie to not allow those things to happen.
And those, that amount of pressure towards the end, as you see, that conversation he had with Megan was just a month before he lost his life, really, I would say, reached a pinnacle of sorts on the matter of what Tucker Carlson actually said on that stage.
Tucker Carlson, while he was on that stage, a turning point, brought up Bill Ackman.
Bill Ackman is a billionaire, obviously.
He is also an extremely litigious billionaire.
And Bill Ackman was on Charlie about comments that Tucker Carlson had made on that stage.
Tucker Carlson specifically asked the question, where does Bill Ackman's money come from?
You know, who is this guy?
Actually, who is this guy that has this much influence?
And like I said, Bill Ackman was not happy about this.
And so I would like to contextualize BB.
Again, these are things BB brought up publicly, which he didn't have to.
He didn't have to bring up the letter.
He didn't have to bring up the phone call, but he chose to do this less than 24 hours after Charlie Kirk was shot.
Personally, Bibi, I would have appreciated if you guys used all of your spyware.
You'd spy on us for years to maybe track down the killer.
But I guess this is where you thought it was best, do a little propaganda for Israel would be better than us helping us track down the killer.
But anyway, so BB Netanyahu in that phone call, what took place was a couple of weeks ago before Charlie lost his life.
Charlie was in the Hamptons and he had more than one event, but he had essentially what was staged, an intervention, was staged by Bill Ackman.
Because Charlie's thoughts, Charlie's rational thoughts about Israel, were a no-no.
This is not the route that you should be going on.
And Charlie was surrounded by his friends, his quote-unquote friends.
Bill Ackman was very upset.
And did you know that simply choosing products from Israel can have a big impact on people's lives?
Candace is marvelous.
Love her.
Meanwhile, the decoy, the fake.
Agents asked to look at his phone.
He let them.
He then told the agents that he uses his phone to view and abuse CSAM material.
What?
And there may be some images on the phone.
Like, also, I've got CP on there.
Take a look.
Those agents haven't figured out he was a part of it yet.
And then it turns out that the Utah University board members are tied to NGOs funded from the State Department directly funding armed radicalized groups.
RICO charges are inevitable as the truth unfolds.
This is so much bigger as international ties involves members of our own government.
This is a full-blown color revolution, communist takeover operation of the U.S. federal government.
I like all of this because it's all reflecting on Israel very, very badly.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Several things.
You know, Netanyahu came out even before Trump about this Kirk shooting.
So that tells you a lot right there about Israel's role in all this.
You know, and look at that, the bigger picture.
Israel's involved in all of these major operations in America.
I mean, we go back to what?
They're stealing the uranium from America and the know-how to make an atomic bomb from America.
And then because JFK has an objection to that, they get rid of him.
They get rid of his brother because he's trying to put forth, you know, the foreign agent act where you have to report if you're getting money from an outside foreign entity, you know, and they got rid of him, RFK, you know, and then there's 911.
They had a central role in that, you know, on and on and on.
And every major historical event of the last century, they have been involved in.
And so here we go again, you know, it just doesn't end, you know.
So, yeah, that's my point.
And then, and then we have switching over to Kash Patel.
Oh, my God.
What a disappointment.
But anyway, within weeks, it was three or four weeks ahead of this event that he switched the Salt Lake City FBI director.
He took her out and brought in his guy, you know.
And so it's all part of the cover-up.
And we'll get into more detail about their cover-up of the FBI and Trump and the rest, because they definitely play a major part with Israel.
Brian.
Well, if you go away with, if you roll with my theory, I would say Kirk was being protected from Israel assassins.
Now, does that mean that Israel conducted the false flag?
No, that would be the opposite.
Israel would not have had knowledge of the false flag being conducted, but using their skills, they would have been able to analyze it very quickly and figure out what it was really all about and come to the same conclusions as we do.
What you guys have to realize is what's at stake.
The entire future of Israel rests on fundamentally one solid prophetic point, which is they don't believe that the Messiah has arrived.
They have rejected Christ as the Messiah.
And the reason that they rejected Christ as the Messiah is because there were two lines of prophecy about him.
The first line of prophecy was that he would be a suffering servant, which he obviously fulfilled.
And the second line of prophecy was that he'd be a reigning king.
Well, everybody thinks that the reigning king is still waiting to be fulfilled on this particular issue, but I'm telling you it hasn't.
He was crowned on the cross and he took his place at the right hand of God.
He is currently, in my opinion, the reigning king that there is.
But Israel cannot allow even the idea that Messiah has come and gone because they need to look forward to the reestablishment of their Messiah so that they can obtain dominance over the new one world government that they've been working so hard to try to obtain dominance over.
And if it becomes exposed that Messiah has already come and gone through guys like Carly Kirk or any of the sort of Christian religious movements that come along with Christianity, then Israel is going to find themselves in a bad spot when it comes to setting up their role in the new world order.
So they cannot have the Messiah.
Guys like Charlie Kirk, not saying Charlie Kirk was the world's greatest theologian.
He didn't have to be.
He was fulfilling his role in the game, which was he was working on the minds of young people who had already been, who were being indoctrinated into the new system and the new structure.
Charlie Kirk did a good job at his role, which was exactly what he was supposed to do.
But you've got to realize this battle is not about the minds of men that are 50 years old plus.
It's not about us or even our audience.
The battle is for the kids.
They need to get a hold of the kids and indoctrinate them because they see this as a marathon much more than they see this as a daily thing.
Now, we have our useful idiots in Congress, our Christian Zionists like Tom Cruise and Mike Huckabee and all the rest of them.
They're people that obviously don't study their Bibles as much as they ought to be, and they've been deceived by it too.
Think about it.
Israel just took 250 congressmen over to Israel for a tour to show them all the wonderful new things.
Israel is looking to reestablish a new temple to reestablish their sacrifices.
They want to do the sacrificing of the red heifer to create their super duper little formula to help cover up their sins.
But it's already been taken care of for believers, but it hasn't been taken care of for unbelievers.
So you've got yourself a very critical issue, which could lead to World War IX or whatever we're on right now.
Well, it turns out that members of Turning Point had already wandered off the reservation.
Paul showed Gen Zix as 65% supporting the Moss, only 24% supporting the IDF.
I think Charlie was learning from his followers as much as they were gaining from him.
But I got to tell you, I really knew nothing about Charlie Kirk before all this, but I wind up liking the guy a lot.
I like the way he handled himself.
I like the way he presented himself.
I think he was very charismatic and he was doing his part very well.
Unfortunately, he ran afoul of the Zionist controllers and I have no doubt they would have taken him out.
Meanwhile, we have a breaking article for occurrence here.
All I can tell you this can improve your hearing loss almost overnight.
No doctor, no prescription, and no need to speak.
Is this I know who benefits, who benefits is the military-industrial complex, who now is openly stating they're going to use him and various slogans that relate to Charlie Kirk's passing for the purpose of recruitment across the many chapters in the United States.
Isn't it coincidental that they now are not only going to be using that event for the purpose of military recruitment because the numbers are way down?
Hegsith isn't drawing the kind of recruits that they thought he initially would with all his attempts at badassery.
And in addition to that, you're also having anti-FA or anti-anything.
And isn't it convenient that the thing that has been designated a terrorist organization, this nebulous, ambiguous, decentralized organization, isn't it also coincidental that it has anti-in the name?
So if you're anti-war, oh, you must be anti-FA.
If you're anti-low pay, because the wealth gap is reaching record levels, oh, you must be anti-FA.
So it doesn't matter what you're going to protest in the future, you will be anti-FA adjacent.
And for the purpose of civil defense, this is what they're going to do.
You got the recruitment, you got the antifa, you got ICE rolling out hundreds, did I read that right, hundreds of new offices around the country.
These guys strutting around in paramilitary gear with automatic rifles with CBRN gear, training themselves to deal with a disgruntled, disenfranchised civilian population.
That is called preparation for civil war as a result, which will run concurrently with the major World War III on every possible front.
Venezuela, they're gearing up for war.
Taiwan, they're gearing up for war.
Iran today, with the snapback sanctions reimposed and the aircraft carrier exiting the Persian Gulf, all signs that war is about to flare up there once again as well.
Shit is hitting the fan all over the West Bank and the Gaza, the Gaza Strip and all throughout the Levant.
It's all going to heat up.
You got shit hitting the fan right now in Saratov.
Hit once again inside Russia.
One of their biggest oil refineries was struck once again, as well as Engels.
And I believe, if I'm not mistaken, at the time of making this video, Russia is lighting up Ukraine as well.
So we have.
I think the guy's quite good, and he's certainly right about all the chaos going on.
Meanwhile, a Polish missile caused a mishap that was being blamed on Russia.
The only confirmed damage from what Poland claimed was a Russian drone incursion into its airspace was actually caused by a Polish missile fired from a NATO F-16, which struck a residential building.
Polish officials last week had reported at least 19 violations of the country's airspace by drones, saying that before UAVs had been down.
Warsaw accused Moscow of being behind the incident, which Russia rejected.
And now, of course, we find out it was actually a Polish, not a Russian missile.
Meanwhile, Colonel McGregor suggests...
Do these gummies actually work?
We have our suspicions.
Such a situation here.
Israel owns the United States.
It's a stake for us, but he's also never had any reluctance or any hesitation about supporting whatever the Israelis want to do.
It's that simple.
So Marco Rubio was sent to Israel, and one wondered, was he sent there to censure Israel, or was he there to do something different?
Well, in this interview, he was specifically asked about America's response to the Qatari attack.
President Trump says he's unhappy with the Israelis' surprise strike on Doha.
You yourself said that it could derail future negotiations.
It was an Israeli decision, and the consequences are owned by Israel.
So Qatar is convening today at this emergency session with its Gulf allies to come up with a response to those strikes.
I don't think it's a mystery that they're not happy about what happened.
I think our message is irrespective of that.
And that's one thing we need to separate that from the fact that no matter what, we still have Hamas, we still have hostages, and we still have a war.
So the Secretary of State, the chief diplomat for the United States of America, the one who was allegedly involved in running the negotiations we were having with Hamas specifically, says that, oh, well, whatever Israel did, that's their issue here.
But as far as Qatar goes, then he says there's still a war going on.
Well, yeah, that's why your guy was there to try to bring an end to it with negotiations.
And so he totally whitewashes the whole thing.
I mean, obviously, you can't be surprised by that, but what's your reaction?
Well, first of all, he says Israel owns the consequences.
Then he turns around and makes it clear that no, we and Israel both own the consequences because our position vis-a-vis Israel is unchanged.
Just because the Israelis chose to ignore whatever we consider to be international norms or international law, which, let's be frank, have not meant a great deal to the Israelis.
And admittedly, we flaunted it whenever we saw fit to do so, that we're in the same position we were beforehand.
And we've said, well, we don't care.
It's just irrelevant to us.
And I think you're going to hear an awful lot of crying and whining out of the Arab countries, but I don't see a whole heck of a lot of action from them at this point.
And action is much more important than words.
I would go one step further.
I've checked with people I know who are in the defense industries who are involved in Lockheed Martin and Raytheon.
And they both said to me categorically, if the Qataris had wanted to stop the Israelis, they could have done so.
And I said, well, explain that.
They said, because we've invested enormous quantities of materiel, radars, missiles, missile launchers, and so forth, lots and lots of training in Qatar.
They have probably some of the finest air and missile defenses that exist anywhere in the world.
It is simply impossible that Qatar could not have known the Israelis were coming.
They would have identified that.
And if they had identified it in advance, they would have said, you're violating our airspace.
You can't do that.
If you continue, we reserve the right to respond.
Well, none of that happened.
None of it happened, I think, because Qatar was well aware the Israelis were coming.
And of course, we were as well.
Nothing flies over that region of the world and the Arabian Peninsula, whether it's in the Euphrates river valley and in Iraq or further south over the Persian Gulf.
We know exactly what's in the air at any given point in time.
So we knew.
Qatar knew.
So all this whining about what the Israelis have done, I think, is more theater than reality.
The truth is.
Yes, more theater than reality.
Meanwhile, very significant.
More than half of Americans believe Israel has gone too far in Gaza.
A new poll shows half of Americans say Israel's onslaught in Gaza has gone too far.
Israel has killed at least 65,000 Palestinians.
Hundreds of thousands have been pushed into a state of famine.
The B. NORAC survey asked Americans if Israel's military op had gone too far.
49% said Israel had gone too far.
Only 12% suggested Israel had not gone far enough.
Joaquim, your thoughts.
Well, I think the running theme in every single of these news items are divide and rule.
Every single one of them pits one group against the other in conflict.
And that's what the controllers do.
That's how they make and exercise greater control by pitting groups against each other.
I mean, we can go with the Russian situation and the Polish hoax.
You know, they're stirring up trouble, you know, between NATO, which Poland, of course, is a NATO member, and Russia, blaming it on Russia.
Same old, same old.
That's what they do.
The divide and rule, always the West and against the East.
You know, and then we can go with the whole bigger picture also in the United States, the divide and rule, the left versus right, Democrats versus Republicans.
Over and over, they get this point across to divide the American people like they haven't been divided since the Civil War.
And yeah, I'd say they're working on another civil war here at the same time that Third World War is about to start.
So, yeah, the controllers have a singular theme in all of these fake news stories they're bringing about.
And that theme is conflict, dissension, and basically violence on a massive scale.
Every single one of these stories has that as their underlying theme.
And that's how they interpret everything.
Who gains, who benefits?
And it's always divide and rule is the modus operandi theme.
Brian.
Well, if 50% of Americans believe Israel has gone too far in its treatment of the Palestinians, then that tells us a lot of things.
Number one, 50% of the Americans are starting to listen to alternative media because you're not getting any regular mainstream media that's talking about this at all the way it ought to be talked about in a truthful manner, which means that Rumble, BitChute, and other alternative influencers and content makers are beginning to have a much bigger footprint than we can ever possibly imagine.
The second thing I have to say about it is, where are the other 50%?
I guess that other 50% are the ones watching Fox News and Ben Shapiro and all the traditional mainstream sources that are compromised by Jewish interests on that particular issue.
The second thing on the other with the wars and the rumors of wars, let me remind you that almost every major conflict that has taken place in this world has taken place as a result of a false flag type of psychological operation.
They always run the false flag.
You know why they do?
It's really rather simple.
If you want to defeat your enemy, you need to be the first one to move before your enemy has had a chance to prepare themselves for your movement.
So you have to run a false flag to give you the upper hand in the sense that now your opponent is not prepared and you've decided how to set the terms for the next engagement.
So that's why false flags are such an important part of what we do and analyze on current events.
Now, how do you know that something's going to be a false flag?
Does it smell wrong?
Is the mainstream media overpushing the narrative?
Is it something that's going out on all the morning news wires that all the talking heads need to talk about all the time?
If they make a bigger deal of it than it actually is in terms of its global potential impact, then it's probably a false flag.
And we need to be aware of that because what we've seen in America is that our FBI, our intelligence services are not interested in any way in exposing false flags.
Ask yourself, has Kash Patel or Dan Bongino or Pam Bondi had anything to say about a false flag?
The only people we've got talking about are Massey and Green and maybe Bobert and a couple other people.
And then all the rest have been relegated to irrelevancy off in the internet jails as a result of talking about it.
So look for the false flag.
When that comes, you will know that a major offensive event is beginning to take place with whoever the quote-unquote victim is in the false flag event.
Just like October 7th, just like all the other false flags that we've had, we could talk about Golf of Tonkin.
We could talk about World War II.
We could talk about World War I.
We could talk about the Bolsheviks.
All of them, false flags, because, again, it gives you an upper hand in the attack when you've decided that you want to start a war.
Very nice.
I'd like to add one thing to that.
False flags are also perpetuated because in the past, they always have worked.
Well, guess what?
The people are finally on the false flags and it ain't going to work anymore.
I got to tell you, I take such pleasure in this.
I have a friend who actually follows the media and published a book about it.
He thinks all the efforts I've expended on false flags have had a contribution to this and become kind of like a popular sport, a hobby at home.
You know, people want to spend their time cracking the latest.
And I'm just ecstatic about that very thought.
True or false, God knows you and Brian and I and others have invested a huge amount of effort seeking to expose these things.
And it's nice to think it might just be paying off.
And it is paying off because Israel has had its run over America and that's ending now, too.
I think this Charlotte Kirk thing is nuclear.
It's nuking Israel.
It's the equivalent.
It's a political, even a hydrogen bomb.
It is massive.
Brian, your final thoughts before we conclude the first hour.
Oh, They'll find another something to cycle it out of the news cycle and take the focus off on it because too many people are beginning to smell how bad it stinks and too many people are having trouble dealing with it.
Now, the good news is turning point is growing much stronger.
And that could, again, I cannot stress this enough.
This is not about 50-year-old plus guys.
This is not about old aging out boomers.
This is not about people that have aged up and have aged out of the cycle.
This is all about the kids.
This is all about indoctrination of the kids.
All the ancient societies, whenever they would go in and capture another culture, they would take the brightest, best, and youngest of the youth, and they would absorb them into the new culture, give them new names, give them new identities, and try to get them to come in as the next generation of leadership that will bridge the gap between the aggressors and the victims.
It's all a brainwashing game, and brainwashing is best accomplished when they're young, old minds are resistant, and especially the minds that have gone through COVID, because everybody that went through COVID can smell it stinks like to high heaven about that.
And still, we still have no government excuse for that absolute disaster of a false flag.
I believe that was the single greatest disaster to befall the United States to have the country shut down for a phony attack on our health.
Actually, it destroyed so many small businesses.
I think it led to, and David Icke was all over this from the beginning, the greatest transfer of wealth in history.
Joaquin, your final thoughts.
Yeah, that's a big part of what that's about.
They also wanted to kill a very big, sizable portion of our world population.
They fell way short of that.
However, you know, died suddenly.
We know it's taken its toll on many people and still is, still is.
The death rate amongst the younger population, it's all related to the kill shot.
So yeah, they overshot their WAD and the people are on to the bullshit now.
Love it.
Don, take us out.
Yeah, we're on to it all.
We've been here for a long time in truth versus the news, all that garbage news and being piled on so heavily as you see in this first hour, which I think is our most important hour to date here on truth versus news on September the 22nd.
First day of fall.
And fall is falling on us right now.
I'll tell you, it's all fall.
So come on back for our second hour because, oh, I've seen the schedule here, and there's lots of hot news here.
▲
Export Selection