All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 3, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:42
Need to Know News (3 August 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, need to know news, August 3, 2025.
Topics and opening statement, here we go.
Need to know news or more and more.
I'm seeing what's scribbled now.
What kind of war is AmRev 2 and World War 3?
And then the wars of rumors of wars of what was shown with Israel's ongoing self-destruction as a political entity with genocide on Gaza, along with their official censorship.
Domestic and international facts and optics.
Are we seeing an emperor's new clothes, great awakening, great choosing breakthrough?
Or the gangster, gangster pet of war business, net official?, his story Mind Control as usual.
And then from COVID lies and crimes to recognized crimes against humanity and a demand for Maha.
Brian, opening statement.
Well, you know, when it comes to analyzing current events, you find yourself slightly entertained, deeply, deeply disgusted.
I mean, you can run the gambit of emotions about all of it.
And I don't really know what else to say about this week's developments except, boy, it's convenient how they want to change that narrative from Epstein.
They're so desperate to change the narrative from Epstein that they're making indications that they want to give us Comey and Brennan and, and, you know, all these other deep, even Hillary Clinton and others.
We know we'll never see a perp walk.
I mean, what is it going to take to see someone actually led away in handcuffs by the FBI or by whatever police agency might have local jurisdiction?
Obviously, it's not going to happen.
And so that's why you watch the news with sort of a sense of abandonment and a sense of amusement because you know.
that there's never going to be or it's highly unlikely that we're going to find a real criminal abuse.
Now the good news is it looks like there might be some people inside the FBI and some of the other federal government agencies that were willing to preserve burn bags and there might be some whistleblowers out there that that didn't really want to go down with the ship.
Yeah, let me jump in while you were talking about that because So that burn bag thing, huh?
Well, let's think about this one for a moment.
If the state wanted to destroy documents, they would have destroyed them.
The idea that the official story is, is that you put it into some bag that is meant to be burned, and you think if it was a burned bag, then that would be a high priority item to get rid of.
But no, it's been staying around.
And the official story is a secret room of the FBI that Cash somehow found the secret room with the burned bag.
That, you know, if someone wanted to get rid of documents, I'm sure that the first thing they would say to themselves is, ah, let's put it in a bag and then put it in the secret room where it's going all you're right, it is all humorous, it's all ridiculous, and we haven't seen anything.
All these items just get put in front of our attention span for a few moments, and then they put something else new.
Go ahead, brother, go ahead and continue.
Yeah, it's it's a big distraction.
I think at this point in time, our audience all recognizes that the big elephant in the room still remains this global network of pedophiles that Trump may or may not be involved in.
It's the power structure.
The power structures always had appetites that can't be controlled.
That's why they're considered the power structure.
And by the way, what is power except the power to break the law, frankly?
I mean, what else is power?
The power to spend money, the power to harass legally, the power to do bad things.
I mean, it's it's a power, it's a power structure and it's a global power structure and I don't see any indication that that power structure is being threatened in the least bit.
I don't see anybody that's scared.
There are a lot of Twitter accounts that are being erased, like Peter Strzok and Comey and, you know, many of the others that might think that the heat's on.
But I assure you, it's just a temporary issue waiting for the wind to blow a different direction and, you know, for the whatever the new face of the Democrat Party might be to reverse itself and look a little bit different, you know.
Anyway, it's probably going to be as useless as the old one, but it might go back to some of the older, more conservative Democrats that came out of the 60s and 70s in terms of they still love their country and they still want to do right.
But I don't know.
That's a pretty tall order.
Anyway, that said, let's take a look at the the stories and just kind of work our way through it one at a time and see what we can come up with.
Yeah, I was making a list of all the things that have cycled through for the so called news with scripts.
We had the aliens not too long ago and then that all disappeared.
We had Audit Fort Knox and Audit the Fed and that's disappeared.
You had the idea of crimes, COVID crimes against humanity with RFK 2 and that's kind of disappeared.
You had Trump, the no war president, and then that's completely reversed with Israel and Ukraine.
And Lizzie, what else do we have here the Russian gate thing.
So is anything going to come of it?
I think you're right.
I don't think so.
I think that we're just going to get this circling of news that are more and more impactful.
But I think what the scriptwriters are waiting for is something to break, and that might be a natural break or something where the paper collapse of the economy is going to happen.
It might be something else.
It might be this three-eye atlas, this third interstellar object.
I don't know.
I don't know.
But the humored part of it, definitely I do recogommend that people have a sense of humor.
And once you get the recognition that this is all just scripts, then it is just a show.
It is just a shy up.
You're not going to feel good about it.
But don't take it personally.
I don't see that there's anything that you can do except keep on chatting to people about the nature and the falsity of the scripts.
All right, yeah, let's go into these stories.
What kind of war is Amarev 2 and World War 3?
Stu Peters.
I like this statement.
I'm not going to play the four minutes, but you thought it was bad when this country was run by some fat pedophiles and DC who run video raping kids.
And all of the indications, I don't think I have a story on this, but all of the indications and all of the circumstantial evidence is that Trump is certainly in the target for crimes against children.
What kind of a person would be engaged in teenager beauty pageants except some sort of a pervert?
That just isn't an area where people are going to be interested unless they have a deviant interest.
interest in fifteen years hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein.
All right, the NGOs are the key to the change.
Let's inspect that statement, okay?
How do you get into the club?
How do you become a part of the power structure?
First of all, they have to know that they can trust you, that you're not going to squeal on what it is that they're doing.
Second of all, you need to offer something and probably the frosting on the cake would be young impressionable girls.
And I've seen that many, many times in business over the years, that that's just in nature, that's sort of inside the nature of this top executive tier of board members, C-suite type guys and power structures.
Look, they might work hard during the week, but they want to party hard on the weekend.
Jets and girls is the nature of the business.
And I I hate to say it so flatly, but that's that's what's there.
And back in the 80s and the 90s, that was even bigger a part of it.
I mean, look at we all watched Miami Vice and we all saw.
the girls in bikinis and we all saw sort of And we were young and we had this appetite for this kind of stuff.
And obviously we've gotten older and we've grown out of those types of appetites, hopefully.
But the question is, did Trump grow out of these types of appetites?
And if so, is he still, can he, can he still play a role as a patriot?
Or should he, should we be reinspecting those, that old lifestyle much more carefully?
I can tell you this, it's shocking how silent the Democrats are on the issue, because I think that they're probably in it deeper than the Republicans, although I have a feeling that 80 percent of the Republican power structure is part of the same game.
If you watch like that movie with Tom Hanks where he starts the or he manages the war in Afghanistan, you watch something like that and you see the power structure in action with the young dancing girls and the hot tubs and the tables full of cocaine.
And that's it it it it it presents that lifestyle as a critical component of politics as usual.
And I think that you might be introduced to something like that.
occasionally, but to live that as a lifestyle and become addicted to it shows a terrible character defect.
And I think you can escape the madness.
And but I mean, we've seen we've seen younger politicians get caught in this sort of stuff before, but the difference is they they protect their own.
Now just a reminder to put everything back into balance.
If a crime takes place, it's very easy.
Put together the evidence, assemble a charging instrument, present it to the prosecutor.
I mean, this is what pol any street grade cop can do related to any crime in America.
But yet we can't pull it off with Brennan and Comey and Peter Strock and Lisa Page.
We can't pull it off with any of these despicable characters in DC.
Obviously, that's because the power structure, the institutional power structure that's in place values people who cannot control their appetites as someone that we can rely on.
That's not going to be all self righteous and blow the lid on our little party here.
So, you know, what, how do you fix that?
Well, you've, it's just like we solved the sexual harassment issues of the 80s and the 90s.
You start enforcing policy and you start showing that it's serious business and then you can, you know, then you can then you can at least address it.
But it's a cultural problem that happens in the halls of our power structures and institutions nationwide.
Sure, you can go out to the bar on Friday night or the clubs or whatever and have whatever party you want, but just don't bring it to work.
Well, I that that's that hasn't caught up in uh in DC yet.
I mean, even Matt Gates got caught up in a honey pot related to this stuff.
Um, so the only guy I think that's probably free and clear of it that I respect tremendously is Massey.
I mean, I don't I don't think Massey's been involved in any of that stuff.
There might be some other good ones out there, but it's really hard to, uh, hard to identify him at this point in time.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And John Perkins, best selling author, Economic Hitman, he described it that he was approached out of college by CIA and told, you're going to work.
for the agency, but you're going to be technically employed as an economist.
But what you're really going to do is you're going to be working with the heads of state in Central and South America, and you're going to be coordinating their internal policies to favor CIA and US goals.
And Perkins said that all that was required for them to own him as an economic hitman was to bribe him off.
And it was money, sex, and drugs.
And he was good.
And he was owned.
And then he did his job., he worked his career.
And then When he said that when 911 happened and he understood that the target was including Americans on our own soil, that's when he decided to go public.
He never thought that he would live.
He thought that he would die suddenly one way or another, and he was fine with that.
But he's still alive and kicking.
And then you take a look at how Trump was loved by corporate media up to 2015.
And he was just a little darling.
And you're right.
How you get into the club is you play dirty.
And I was talking to Joe and Chris that I know a couple of people who are pretty familiar with the New York real estate business.
And they said, oh, of course he's going to be dirty.
Of course he is.
You can't do anything in New York City unless you're dirty, unless you're working with the gangsters.
You can't produce anything in the building industry.
So we shall see what's going on.
And then there's the whole idea that we have, and I was talking to Joe and Chris about this this week, and we've talked about it from time to time, all the masked actors and who isn't controlled, who isn't a puppetist.
We know that at least one of the Trump's, the Trump brand, is a shorter dude.
One of them looks a little bit fatter too.
The golfer.
It's hard to tell what's going on.
And then the idea of what's going to be the correction for this?
Good people will go ahead and take a stand with our integrity and we'll see what we can do.
But the history argues that we haven't been able to do anything historically.
That the wanna be masters have owned us each and every time.
So it would take some sort of an intervention from friends in high places or some sort of a technical breakthrough.
And that is going to be, again, something that is going to be unpredictable and inimaginable.
because all the things that we've thought to try, you know, this hasn't happened yet.
All right.
All right.
Back to what kind of war is it?
The NGOs are the key to the child trafficking network, and Mark Atwood lays it off here well.
And that is going to be the NGOs are going to be funded from our tax dollars, and they are going to be doing something very different from their stated purpose.
And this is just the evidence that we have so far to consider is that we really do have petivores involved in this war.
And the idea that you're going to have the sex, the drugs, and the money that John Perkins is talking about, I think that is a go to script.
And moreover, is that our leaders, they look for people to bring into the system who are subject to this type of ownership.
But we shall see.
Another very interesting part of the ongoing war that we're in is that, as we've said, we may be going only as fast as Tucker Carlson scripts.
Candace Owens talked to Tucker and this is tens of millions of people.
And then you have the move of Big Brie and her little man Macron suing Candace Owens over the claim that Candace is saying that Big Bree, like Big Mike, like Big Jack Ardern, the former PM of New Zealand, and God knows who else was in there, Barbara Bush, perhaps, who else, who knows, that we are getting a good look at the nature of the war.
And it certainly is a different war from what people would anticipate on the surface of just being about money and power.
Brian, your thoughts, brother.
Bold move by the French president.
and she's going to sue Candace Owens in America over this stuff.
Apparently the attorneys and the law firms that have been involved with it are well known hatchet men that will say or do anything for money.
Apparently, this level of sleeze exists all over DC, it's part of the swamp, it's part of the creature structure that thinks that at the end of their life they'll be happy if they have millions and millions of dollars.
I think that in this case she's got very much an affirmative defense in that she told the truth about it.
The problem is it's an inconvenient truth because not only is it Macron and Brigitte, it's a potential pedophilia case, it's a parent, a student, a teacher-student relationship, it's an inappropriate on so many different levels.
But then again, you know, when have you known the French to have class?
I mean, this goes way back to the Revolutionary War and even before that, or the French-British War.
It's a different culture.
They're more permissive.
They're more depraved in that sense that they've tolerated that type of behavior for a very long time in France.
And I would say that the homosexuality is also a part of it, rampant probably on the same level as the Seattle, Portland thing, and even San Francisco for a large part in Paris.
It's sort of an anything goes culture and an anything goes society that doesn't seem to indicate much self control.
So we could expect that they take one of their swamp monsters and install them as president because it's very.
Very easy to control them.
Now, what's the outcome going to be?
They just stuck a big fat magnifying glass on the issue with Candice and they took what could have been a small story with, oh, she's crazy and, and, and, you know, basically blew it into what appears to be developing into some sort of international affair.
I hope it comes out.
It would be a nice domino to see fall, but I'm not sure it's going to change anything because I don't think the French give a damn, frankly.
Well, we shall see.
We shall see.
I'm seeing this.
I keep on talking about the NATO heads of state are as popular as FJB and they keep on thinking.
and the political strategists who are advising them are either not being heard or the political strategy is their self destruction.
And you're right, they could have just let this go.
They could have just not said anything, but they didn't.
They went ahead and exactly as you said, they put the magnifying glass on it, which I think is consistent with White Hats being in charge of the show, but we shall see.
Now, if I was the scriptwriter, what I would actually love to see is for them to go to trial., I have flashbacks to Jim being sued by the alleged dad of an alleged victim of the alleged shooting at Sandy Hook.
And I was excited.
I said, get it in there.
Let's go.
Let's have the facts tell the story.
But maybe in this trial too, it would be a nice move if the judge said, Okay, we're not going to let you.
Miss Owens, we're not going to let you present any of the evidence.
I'm going to declare you guilty.
And we're going to give to the jury.
The only instruction is how much you have to pay.
That.
That would be beautiful to shine a light on that, but we'll see.
Well, they might they might steamroller like that.
I mean, look, the way they did Jim in summary, well, it was called a summary judgment, frankly.
And basically, the judge Remington said, Oh, it's a foregone conclusion that this event happened exactly the way the mainstream media said it happened.
There's nothing else to argue.
You're because it's a foregone conclusion, you're not allowed to put any evidence in.
And we're just going to go ahead and make it a foregone conclusion.
And I'm going to rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
Violating basically every possible rule of the court structure.
And then what they do is they get you caught up in a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo that you can't get out of very easily and you have to pay to fight yourself out.
And that's unfortunately sometimes the legal system is punishment, you know, vastly more than it doesn't fit the legal system in itself has become punishment.
The punishment the IRS being put on people, tax structures, the legal system has become a punishment in itself because anyone can sue anyone for anything and it still costs you between $5,000 and $25,000 just to defend yourself because you're not allowed to go and speak the special language before the courts.
It's foolishness.
I wish more people would be out there doing pro se.
I'd like to see more artificial intelligence platforms that are designed to help the regular individual see through the legal screens.
But it's just not out there.
It's there to protect.
It's there to protect a particular industry.
And it's a very powerful lobby by the association.
Yeah, and the the attorneys have an idea that they're where the restrictions are.
Jim petitioned seventy attorneys to represent his case in Wisconsin.
No takers.
So he had to go pro se and for the retired AP US government teacher, these are the articles that I have.
The Sandy Hook Orwellian show trial continues.
Non crime, non judge, non trial, no evidence, no jury.
And if you want the documentation to be able to demonstrate that this is a show trial and the idea.
that it was anything other than a show trial is simply, it's stupid and wrong.
This isn't even close to lawful.
And the idea that in one of Jim's open petitions, he's got three petitions that are still open on that court case is that there was intrinsic fraud upon the court to say that Sandy Hook happened.
And of course, we have the overwhelming evidence that that is exactly the case.
All right.
And finally, we have here of what kind of war that we're in.
Well, it's not, apparently, it's not on a globe Earth of the stated size and shape.
And we've gone over this again and again and again.
And I'll find another video and put it up here of objects being visible on the horizon and the idea that the sun is going away.
It's not being obscured by the curvature of the earth.
And here is a one minute video to demonstrate that the sun is just going away further and further.
And finally, the atmospheric distortion between the sun at that distance and the observer is going to make the sun no longer visible.
It's not sinking.
It's not sinking.
this one day.
Turn.
type here and again oh this is popping up for me i'll put it into the show that that's google results you know that's the google results are always and the youtube results are always loaded to try to make you look stupid for looking into it.
You really need to go to a dedicated site that's, you know, part of the good guy structure in terms of guys that are actually doing observation and documentation.
Because there's a lot of disinformation.
You've got to remember that NASA makes billions and billions of dollars.
And what have they done?
What have they done for us?
What do we have to show for it?
It's been this way since NASA was formed.
What has space brought to us, besides for some gimmicky new products and some ridiculous new math?
It has done nothing but convince us that we're alone in the universe.
Third Rock from the Sun, meaninglessly drifting through the emptiness of a vast outer space as a cosmic accident that there is no real purpose to life and that we're not important, we're not loved by God, we're not creation, we're just simply a product of the primal ooze and millions and millions of years of time, and therefore there's no purpose to life.
I can tell you that if I were Satan, the biggest argument, I mean, the heliocentric model to me is, is one of the greatest arguments that Satan can possibly use.
We know that all the old societies that worshiped the old gods had some form of sun worship involved in it.
The Bible was different.
It always looked at the sun in terms of it was created for a purpose that it cannot be modified or controlled by anybody or changed by anybody but God.
And frankly, as a Christian, I don't like to use the word flat earth.
And I've said this before on the show.
Flat earth puts me in a group of people that may or may not understand exactly what it is meant by those statements.
I prefer a biblical cosmology.
Recognizing one very critical fact.
Water is level.
Sea level is level.
There is no bend at any distance.
And I don't care if you're talking 50 miles, 100 miles, 1000 miles or 10,000 miles.
It's flat.
And the Bible states that the earth was stamped out like it out like a coin, I think that's Job chapter 42.
He stamped it out like a coin.
And he set the shores and he set everything where it was.
Now, has he modified it?
Yeah, absolutely.
He modified it during the flood, which all ancient cultures recognize that there was at some point a massive flood, whether it be global or local or whatever it is you're going to come up with.
The Bible states that it was a global flood.
So again, I prefer Biblical cosmology and I like the psychic flat earth, sun and moon zodiac.
I think it's a YouTube channel.
I think they they have really the best library of videos, whether short or long in terms of balance and in terms of relatively good.
I think it's called Flat Earth, Sun, Moon, Zodiac app on YouTube.
I think it's a good one.
But you can find all you can learn a lot from taboo conspiracy and there's a number of different websites.
Just don't find yourself going to Flat Earth Dave and whatever it is that Google puts out in the first ten, ten things.
You can get good information, but you gotta learn to think if you really want to get to the bottom of what's this what it is.
this thing?
Yeah, I found that the good video has been scrubbed from YouTube.
And this is the one that I wanted, an attorney's guide to the number one proof of the flat earth and the top five long distance observations is that it is absolutely flat, observably slow.
So, and the objects that are visible on the horizon show refute the official story.
So whatever it is that Earth is, it's not what we're being told.
And that's kind of the fact.
It is not eight inches per mile squared.
It is absolutely not eight inches per mile squared.
Absolutely.
And it is provably provably that sea level is sea level.
Eight inches per mile squared is garbage.
Garbage, garbage, garbage.
No matter what model you put it into, sea level is sea level.
What does that mean?
Does that mean outer space is fake?
I tend to believe it is.
I think Anthony Cayde has got it right.
Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in the Hollywood basement.
I don't think anything can survive in a complete vacuum like they tell us outer space is.
I don't think that you can have an empty vacuum next to an atmosphere without a divider or a barrier.
I don't think it works because the divider would be ineffective.
I think gravity is a bunch of bullshit.
Density and buoyancy explain everything you need in terms of rising and falling.
It explains atmospheric pressure.
It explains the weight of water on top of you.
Density and buoyancy is all you need.
So whether you got to go back to the drawing board, these days you don't.
It's 2025.
There's a lot of great information out there for those that are truly seeking to figure out where we really live and what it is.
I tend to see it more as the Truman show.
I tend to see this as the cosmic Truman show.
And I believe that there is a firmament up there, but I think it separates the waters, like the Bible says.
Yeah, yeah.
The laws of physics won't allow an atmosphere to be next to a non-atmosphere.
You're absolutely right.
It would.
Without a barrier, yeah, without some sort of hard barrier.
Yeah.
All right, let's go to the war with Israel.
Israeli forces killed 111 Palestinians in Gaza over 24 hours.
All right, that's every day.
That's what we're being shown.
This ridiculous genocide.
Caitlin Johnstone, Israel apologists think, no, no, no, we're just starving the s sick kids is a winning argument.
And the Israelis were attempting to argue that, oh, you know, it's just the sick ones that are, the ones with pre existing illnesses, those are the ones who are really suffering.
Okay.
Yeah.
You know, I saw an interesting article this week talking about Israel since we're, you know, we're on the subject and we're not going through the articles deeply, but fundamentally, you have to all the articles, I think today point to one thing.
And it comes down to the question of all the articles on Israel.
And this guy wrote a good article here in Responsible Statecraft.
How much is shoddy pro-Israel journalism worth?
asked Barry Weiss, as her free press is poised to seal a $200 million deal with the mainstream media news giant CBS.
Let us reflect on why.
And this is written by Bronco Marsitik in Responsible Statecraft.
And basically what it's arguing is that just about anyone who wants to play the pro-Israel game can get paid a great deal.
And I'll just summarize this article real fast.
But basically, it comes down to putting a price tag on the value of propaganda that's going to be pro-Israel.
Because if you look at it on its face for what it really is, there's no way you can come out with a pro-Israel stance for people that know how to analyze this stuff.
And my little systems are not working on this article.
Surprise, surprise, surprise.
But either way, Barry Weiss, the Jew, who we all think is some sort of hero, is about ready to enter a $200 million pro-Israel press deal.
So interesting.
You know, interesting.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They buy what they want with their monopoly money.
And we do have a related story with that for today.
All right.
The Israeli apologists support genocide.
Of course, they're fine with lying about it.
And they have to.
And all of this, the noise of the current events really goes down to the fundamental question is that the wars are illegal.
All of them.
So this is an illegal war of aggression, Orwellian illegal.
And then there are war crimes within the war.
And none of it is legal.
And people do get confused.
over the details.
Our genocide Israeli rights groups abandoned their restraint on Gaza.
Okay, after months of hesitation, we have a couple of groups are saying that, yeah, yeah, I guess it is a genocide.
Okay, good, good.
And that is the idea that for any group, and particularly for Jews, take a side, choose a side.
And again, as Brian and I were talking about, the facts are all on the side of the people.
This is a genocide.
US consular officials from US Embassy Israel have not visited Gaza the US citizen from the Gaza flotilla who have been in Israeli prison kidnapped for four days.
And this is in international waters.
And therefore, the correct description of what happened to those people is that they were kidnapped by IDF.
And the US is silent about it.
And then this is the guy.
And he's going to talk about what Brian was saying is that if you support Israel, you can get a paycheck.
Were you working with the Daily Wire?
No, I almost was.
Were you working with the Daily Wire?
No, I almost was.
I was at Boston University.
That's where they groom all the conservative influencers.
They then start their career towards being a Fox News host.
They basically realized that I was not going with the program on that one issue, on Israel.
It wasn't even anything else.
Trump in the inaugural said it's America first.
And I said, well, there's one country that seems to be the exception there.
And I would never let that go.
I was being actively canceled and blacklisted by the conservatives.
The Daily Wire crowd was coming after me, badmouthing me on Twitter, behind the scenes.
I got banned from CPAC, which is the big conservative convention.
At the same time, I couldn't make my own career because I got banned on PayPal, YouTube, ultimately then Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and they just kind of cascaded one after the other.
Were you working with the Daily Wire?
No, I almost was.
I was at Boston.
And next flash traffic urgent.
US makes direct nuclear threat to Russia.
And the idea that people wanted Trump based upon the idea that we could have peace and is just the opposite.
And that is crazy, but that is what we're being shown.
Threat.
Yeah, so that's a transition.
That's a transition.
We went from, you know, closing out on Israel.
And I think with all the different articles, we don't really need to talk about Israel anymore and the despicable things that they do.
But one thing we do want to point out is that global outrage is increasing exponentially.
And it's going to have ramifications, which is why right now whatever's left of the structures that support Israel is pouring in sort of the last gasp into trying to control the propaganda related to Israel because the appetite for this destruction has waned globally.
A number of different nations have come together and put together programs where they're seeking to end this as quickly and effectively as possible.
Israel does not seem to be backing off.
The propaganda is not having an effect any longer.
And a lot of people are seeing this as the decline of Israel.
Plus, in America, it's becoming more and more clear and more and more obvious that Israel is in control of the mainstream media through Operation Mockingbird.
And it's in control of a number of our politicians.
And it's directly tied to the Epstein blackmail conspiracy, which is huge.
And so I think this is why you're seeing the uptick in stories related to Russia, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia.
Remember all that.
They're trying to take the focus off of Israel as an instigator and as a player in that narrative as much as possible, as quickly as possible.
And I don't think it's going to be effective.
And I'm not sure how much of the population still believes that it's Russia, Russia, Russia.
I mean, if you really are to sit back and think about it independently, exclusive of the programming that you've received for the last fifteen years, no, ever since the Cold War ended, frankly, since Reagan.
But the propaganda was always America good, America big, Team America, World Police, Russia bad, KGB bad, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia.
But ask yourself one fundamental question if you're in that camp, what have they done to us?
What have they done to us?
What events have made them our enemy?
There is none.
There's there's none.
You can point at skeptic conjecture and speculation, but it's all related to a power structure.
The Russia, Russia, Russia as a safety and security complex argument died with the Cold War.
But what didn't die with the Cold War like it should have is an appetite for US hegemony.
And the only threat globally to United States hegemony has consistently been the nation with the vast resources of Russia.
And so if you think about it, the only reason that we look at this through this lens of Russia bad is because they're a threat to US hegemony.
And so with the rise of BRICS and with what has happened since 2014 with Maidan region, the coup, placing Zelenskyy in place, Victoria Nuland, you got to ask yourself if we're the bad guys in this, because what has Russia done, yet what have we done?
Colour revolution, CIA, murder, death, war, everywhere.
Are we really the heroes?
Are we really the heroes?
That's a tough question.
It is a tough question.
There's a Mahdi Python sketch where two of the cast members are dressed in World War 2 German uniforms and they're talking to each other and one of the guys says, Hey, let me ask you a question.
Have you ever wondered if we're the bad guys?
And the other guy says, What?
How?
The guy takes off his helmet and says, Heh, look at the skulls and the cross the bones and the skulls on our helmets.
And they go on and they're literally left at the end wondering if they were the bad guys.
Of course, the irony of that history is that I don't know if there were any good actors.
But I know that Germany was not the soul bad guy.
Speaking of Germany, I think the bigger question today, a better one to focus on is, are we the controlled opposition?
Are we being, are we a part of a controlled opposition party?
I think it's an interesting question when you start to study Trump and you start to study the rise of the MAGA movement, and then you take a look at where we are today.
You, you, you have to kind of ask yourself the question, if this is a controlled demolition, are we the controlled opposition are we the ones that are are we the are we the puppets that are going to be used to bring down the structure what kind of yeah i don't know i hope i can see clearer than that but i i'm not certain that i can i i wouldn't one of the ways that i could
see this playing out is that Trump indeed was dirty and Jim is featuring on his shows the evidence that this has been a mask wearer based upon the height of the actor playing Trump and the idea of the background of Trump if in fact it was dirty, well, it would depend on who's controlling, who's puppeting Trump, because you could use anyone at power to puppet anything.
So we shall see what happens and the idea that the whole world is watching, the whole world is watching and staying.
I think he's a part of many different structures.
Again, I don't, I don't, you know, I think it's too simplistic to look at the world through the lens of there's one big bad guy.
I mean, unless you want to take it to the religious level and call it Satan or whatever.
I think it's too simplistic.
You've got secret societies and factions, you've got different interests all over the world.
And what, someone's really going to herd together all these billionaire rats and put them on the same ship and they're all going to get along?
Are you kidding?
They're a bunch of psychopaths.
So is there some sort of centralized structure that pulls the strings?
I kind of doubt it.
I kind of doubt it.
I think it's more of an influence that comes as a result of the genetic makeup of people that are corrupted by this psychopathic appetite.
for power and it's their similarities that make them friends, that make them work together towards these destructions rather than their differences.
I think that they've got differences and I think they've got similarities, but the similarities are I'm afraid of a sniper bullet.
I'm still human.
And so we need to create structures out there that protect us and protect our kind.
And we need to live forever.
And we need to be a part of the new technocracy.
And we need to drive this new technocracy so that we can become superhuman in a sense.
All right, for Germany.
The Russians are all into Satanism.
Yes, they all are.
And I think that the gangsters do compete for roles.
And I think for the U.S. presidential elections, they have been lie contest winning attempts to be the head gangster in control.
Germany takes on aggressive new role in NATO, asks Washington for Tomahawk missiles capable of striking Moscow within 10 minutes.
Now, that, of course, is going to be deadly to the German public in terms of optics and the idea that this is just pressing on and on and on is just crazy.
And then you have Mike King of the Anti New York Times.
He's pointing out that the New York Times on Friday, July 25, put this picture and the idea that the young, the old, and the sick starve to death in Gaza.
There is nothing.
As so again, they're trying to limit it to the young, the old, and the sick.
Those are the first ones to go if there is a press on for resources.
And I can't see it any other way other than the political self-destruction of Israel and that this is intentional to take Israel down.
Okay.
Anything?
I see you brought up a Q post.
Oh, yeah.
I think it's fascinating.
I do.
I do.
It's fascinating.
It's fascinating to see how it's developed, you know, but the question still remains for me.
It's a very simple question.
Are there still patriots in the government?
And I just don't know.
Yeah.
I don't know.
Yeah.
The patriots.
are going to be weeded out for sure.
And that is the question is who's on which side.
All right, anything else?
Or on to the domestic and international.
Yeah, let's move on.
Okay.
Then we have here for the Seth Rich murder is the heart of the Russia collusion hoax and directly tied to Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
And the idea is that Seth Rich definitely was upset that Hillary Clinton stole the primary from Bernie in 2016, had the evidence, gave it to Wikileaks, and then Sethridge was murdered.
And the evidence is that through Wikileaks emails is that he was killed by the Clinton machine and that the left arm of the empire Obama plan dates to October 2016.
Okay, so we're getting more and more of the documentary evidence that this was the plan was to invent evidence of a link from Trump to Russia and then pimp it.
Smoking gun.
Declassified Durham appendix confirms Hillary Clinton plan to smear Trump, use the FBI to put more oil on the fire.
And again, the documentary evidence is clear.
And the best type of charge to put onto this for this ongoing scheme is, I think, it's treason for the destruction and attack upon the United States.
And the United States is going to be our constitution.
It's going to be the political structure managing it.
Declassified Durham annex.
Clinton can't push the Russian hoax.
The FBI knew, covered it, used it.
It is crazy, but That's what we're looking at, and we're just seeing the beginning of this.
Never forget, Comey, Mueller, Brennan, Obama lied about Russia hacking the 2016 election, and their alleged source, CrowdStrike, never had evidence that the DNC was hacked or that Russia was involved, and CrowdStrike did not allow any sort of an outside scrutiny for the claim that, oh, the Russians, they got into the servers of the DNC, but we're not going to let you see any of that evidence.
It's just going to be their testimony.
And then what we have here.
For she had Fort Hillary, she had a secret server hidden in her basement where she sent and received classified information.
When those emails were subpoenaed, she deleted 33,000 of them.
33, that number there, it's a com.
Then she smashed her BlackBerry phones with hammers and used Bleachbit to wipe the server clean.
She paid for the fake steel dossier used to frame Donald Trump and kick off the entire Russia hoax.
And let's be real, she probably knew all about her husband flying to Epstein Island, what was it, 28 times to have sex with minors if she didn't help cover it it up.
So tell me again, why the hell isn't Hillary Clinton in jail?
So the optics have more and more pressure, but we haven't seen anything yet.
And I would bet with you, Brian, is that we're going to see this disappear for a while and something else come up, but this two step forward, one step back dance is going to cause a breakthrough and the credibility is going to be destroyed.
That's what I'm seeing.
Yeah, they're going to keep whitewashing and picking away at stones that are part of a facade.
Look, Russia, Russia, Russia didn't make sense to anyone.
anybody that had a brain back then.
It was obviously fabricated from the very beginning.
I don't think anybody believed that Donald Trump worked with Russia to manipulate the election through social media channels.
But again, you get to see the massive effect of a mainstream media mockingbird machine and you can start to see how big that is now.
NPR has announced that it's beginning to close its doors.
We know that CNN's viewership is through the tanks.
We know that MSNBC is tanking.
We know that a lot of these political talk shows that were considered lefty are beginning to slide off the boat as a result of the breaking up of a lot of the funding structures related to the NGOs.
And those are all really good steps and they show a lot of cracks in the pavement.
But let's face the facts here.
There's still over eight thousand senior executive service bureaucrats that were appointed by Barack Obama that are part of the largest sort of deep state structure you can possibly imagine.
Each one of those top leading candidates were basically hand picked because they were an excellent product of the academic institutions that they emerged from.
And they came through the systems because of their appetites for power and their ability to control the image and control the structure, but they're every one of them answers to someone somewhere related to and it's not a member of Congress.
So you've got a bureaucratic structure that has not just the top layer of eight to ten thousand agencies, but you've got at least three or four layers behind them because they get to appoint their right hand man and that upper crust structure that's part of our federal institution is so rotten.
So it's neat to hear stories about Russia, Russia, Russia, Durham Report and people are going to get caught and, you know, all this is out there.
But you've got to remember, if the structure begins to break up, there could be vast consequences.
And Trump doesn't seem to have the political appetite to be able to make serious moves against the structure.
Now, a lot of SES people have been driven out by, I think his name is Peter Koch.
He's the new Office of Personnel Management.
Is it Peter Koch?
It's Something Koch Chaos.
I think there's a lot of the structure that's beginning to break down, but if you want to continue to see a functioning government, you can't go in with a wrecking ball and just knock out the top structures.
You have to have a plan as to who you're going to install back at the top.
So you're going to have to be patient if you think America is going to heal itself from within.
I happen to be one that does not believe that America is going to heal itself from within.
I think the institution is so corrupt that it cannot be recovered.
I think that we will have to fall to some sort of major event, whether engineered or not engineered.
And I think it's going to result in a martial law, which is going to begin to illustrate its new ugly head of a technocracy of some sort with a social credit system.
Maybe some sort of mark that allows us to buy, sell and trade as long as we pay our taxes.
And the output is going to be an obedient slavish society that conforms to the 1984-ish George Orwellian concept of what this new society is going to look like.
I think it's going to look a lot like a Black Mirror episode, a lot more than it's going to look like what it is today.
Shows like us, guys like us, we will be gone, we would be purged.
The time is coming, so you better learn to think for yourselves.
They'll call us anti Semites.
They already do.
Yeah.
Even Victor Hugo calls us anti-Semites.
Yeah.
All right, so let's go to the last topic with COVID and the recognition that this is prima facie crimes against humanity.
Steve Kirsch, the single most convincing COVID vaccine harm signal to date, mortality increased each time they gave a new dose.
This kind of dose response temporal pattern is considered one of the strongest forms of circumstantial evidence and observational epidemiology.
And there you go.
And the data does argue that the more that you take these things, the more that you're going to die.
And the best international data was about 17 million deaths caused by the vaccine breaking COVID-19 vaccination not infection increases risk of multiple hair loss disorders.
Massive study of 5.7 million Koreans finds COVID-19 vaccination significantly increases the risk of complete hair loss, patchy autoimmune hair loss and excessive shedding.
And all of the data that we cover show after show week after week, month after month, year after year, again demonstrate that the reasonable response is to withdraw consent and demand leader arrests.
Are vaccines big money makers for pediatricians?
RFK Jr. comments.
junior comment during an interview with Tucker Carlson sparks a new debate.
And again, Tucker Carlson is covering this stuff.
RFK 2 also supports the genocide, by the way.
And the incentives here.
Let me see.
Champlin said doctors get their extra payments when a certain percentage of their patients, typically 80% or more, take all of the vaccines on schedule.
And let's see where do we get this data here?
Here we go.
The results published in a 2021 peer-reviewed paper in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research co-authored with Lyons Veiler showed that when patients deviate from the schedule of vaccinations, losses exceed one million dollars for a practice that bills approximately three million per year.
It becomes clear that the financial incentives to vaccinate are now a matter of survival for pediatric practices.
We have here paraquat is 28 times more toxic than glyphosate, the legal poison sprayed all across America's food, and the US EPA refuses to join the global ban.
We are being poisoned.
We are being tortured.
We are being mind controlled.
It is intentional and it is constant.
This is AmRev 2 World War 3 and it is the monsters against we the people.
The EPA is not our friend.
Nearly 100 pesticides banned in other countries are being used in the US.
Now EPA wants to re-register Bears Dicamba despite two courts having determined otherwise.
It is ongoing.
One of the ways that you can help yourself is to grow your own food or to and or to buy organic.
And then here is what Brian is talking about for the end game of our opponents or one of the end games if you sign up for digital ID, it'll be the last truly free decision you ever make.
Dr. Michael Yeden, a toxicologist and former Pfizer executive, issues a dire warning.
Digital ID isn't convenient.
It's control.
Once adopted, governments and institutions will recognize you only through this system.
You cease to exist.
You become a QR code at address to resources that can be edited, restricted, or revoked at will.
And this was the testimony of, I forget the guy's name.
He was all the way going back to the Pentagon Papers, making copies as a young man.
He became a documentary maker, became friends with one of the Rothschilds.
And this was 30 years ago.
And that was the testimony that he gave that he was told by this Rothschild is that, yeah, yeah, they're going to get an official ID.
And then with that, it's a chip.
Everyone's going to be chipped.
And if you do something that they don't like, they just turn the chip off.
And you won't be able to function in society.
And that that would be the final stage for...
uh for dissent yeah in Texas i'm not allowed to um i'm not allowed to opt out of digital ID.
It's become law in Texas.
And this is my driver's license.
And because I recently changed my address, I had to adopt into it.
See that barcode right there?
That's me.
That's how the government sees me now.
And yes, the back of my card says, Directives to Physician have been filed at telephone number.
Emergency contact number is now included in this, and all my allergic reactions to drugs have been included with this, and that new barcode on the back of the ID is my new digital ID that allows me to fly state to state on a commercial airline without without with their permission and I'm horrified of digital IDs but
I can't stop and I worry about the things I can change and I don't worry about the things I can't Texas I think is it's a crime to make me consent to this federal control but when a state's trying to get all the money they can from the federal government and that's all that matters to them.
They'll do just about anything and any tyranny on their citizens, including pull off false flags like Uvalde and Sutherland Springs, the Dallas shooting, Santa Fe shooting, and others.
It's a tyranny.
A tyranny.
Yep, yep, yep.
And it goes on and on.
And that was one of the favorite words of the founding fathers.
And the tyrant is just going to engage in dictatorial.
The definition of tyranny, going back into context for them, is these dictatorial policies that are destructive to the people and in favor of a chosen few an oligarchy and we'll go on to final thoughts and i like what brian is saying is just to worry about what's in your control and pretty much what you think what you say and what you do follow your intuition in areas where it doesn't look like there is productive work then
um i would say don't don't go in there just follow what your intuition tells you where you can see that you can make progress and the rest of it is going to be out of your hands and i keep saying that for me personally engaging in projects probably a dozen major projects in my lifetime going all the way up to two UN summits for heads of state.
I don't see anything personally for me to do otherwise than to just chat it up with the people around me.
And I am very encouraged with what I do see from what is being chatted up.
And as I keep on emphasizing with Brian on the show, is that for those of us who are men and women of faith, if you conclude that there is a God that is good, a creator, what else do you have to worry about?
The creator is in charge.
And everything that we're seeing, I just see it as a form of spiritual test and the only name of the game.
is to tell the truth.
Final thoughts, Brian.
Final thoughts, I want to remind everybody that there is a condition of the Constitution called the Tenth Amendment.
The Tenth Amendment clarifies that the federal government powers are limited to those specifically listed in the Constitution.
This means that any power not explicitly given to the federal government is reserved for the states or the people.
It's a cornerstone of the American way of life.
The federal government ought to have no power other than that power which is given to them in the Constitution.
Obviously, there doesn't seem to be the Supreme Court paying much attention to the Tenth Amendment.
It really has to do with the difference between federalism and states'rights.
Basically, your Brady Act and all your federal laws, Women, Rights, and Cancer Act and Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act.
you name the act even you know the patient protection and affordable care act all federal laws that were not allocated to the federal government in the federal constitution and there seems to be zero resistance whatsoever.
I think it's fundamental that we as patriots begin to understand our Tenth Amendments.
And I like the YouTube channel.
I think it's called the Tenth Amendment Center.
They do a great job of explaining what the founding fathers were thinking when they built out the Tenth Amendment and how it is that the federal government should have no power here other than the power specifically granted to them in the constitution, the power to protect our borders and militarily protect us for security.
So other than that, they should stay out of it.
and the states ought to have their rights.
It's been interpreted and reinterpreted and it's an ongoing debate, but it shouldn't even be a debate.
Yeah, yeah, it's it is Orwellian.
And as the retired AP US government teacher is that, yeah, you definitely, if you want to describe the United States of America in terms of the type of government that it operates, you just like with what we're talking about, that you can't say that we're living on a earth that's a sphere of the given size and shape.
You can't say that we're living under a government that is limited to the US Constitution in defense of the ideals of the Declaration of Independence, upholding inalienable rights.
It's not that, and the best phrase that description that I can give to the US government is a rogue state empire.
To elaborate just a little bit on that, a lying, looting, Orwellian, illegal rogue state empire with its crimes centered in war and money.
Well, all right.
Thank you very much, Brian.
▲
Export Selection