All Episodes
Previous Next
May 1, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
35:26
Geezy Truth News with Jim Fetzer (1 May 2025)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We've got a great guest back on.
We've got a lot of interesting stuff to say.
It's been a while, so please let them have it, Jim.
Oh, delighted to be here with you once again.
Yes, yes, yes.
We've got to start at an odd part of the world, Pakistan and India.
It looks to me as though there was a false flag attack in Kashmir that was blamed on terrorists who were supposed to be operating at the behest of Pakistan.
I think this is totally false.
But Modi, who's the Indian PM...
In retaliation.
And this is one of those cases where they create a phony pretext so they can do what they wanted to do anyway, just as October 7th in Israel was phony, so they could slaughter the Palestinians, which continues unabated, has cut off water to Pakistan.
There's a major river, the Indus River, that's supposed to be divided between India and Pakistan, and India has a series of dams that enable to control the flow.
And of course, having water cut off is an existential threat.
Now, what's stunning is, of course, both India and Pakistan are nuclear nations.
I've heard estimates as high as 170, 180 for each side.
India, maybe a few more, but if it all happens, it's not going to make any difference.
The U.S. has, in my opinion, wrongly exacerbated the situation by sending a loaded B-52.
Now, I'm not at all sure with what it's loaded.
Conventional or nukes.
But the U.S. sent a B-52 to India to show its support for India.
Now, how they could do this when India's cut off the water to Pakistan is beyond me.
But you've got to bear in mind, even if the U.S. is supporting India, China will support Pakistan.
So, you know, we thought it was going to be Ukraine-Russia or it's going to be Israel-Iran.
I think it...
Could just as well be India-Pakistan.
So pay attention, everyone.
That's something to keep your eye on.
It's a loaded situation, and I'd say right now has the highest priority for a nuclear war.
We even have a report that from RT, you know, formerly Russia Today, And India's playing a military strike within 24 to 36 hours.
So, I mean, if it happens, it could be a big, big, big deal.
Meanwhile, Putin solidified his demand for control of the Oblosk.
You know, the whole thing was precipitated by Ukraine's attack on the Donbass.
Since the coup of 2014, financed by Victoria Nuland with $5 billion American taxpayer dollars to depose a Russian-friendly president of Ukraine and install a Western puppet, of whom Zelensky is the successor,
the Donbass had been under artillery barrage, and from 2014 to the intervention by Russia, They killed like 2,000 in the Donbass.
It's a Russian-friendly, Russian-speaking, ethnically Russian region.
So Putin's special military operation, notice it wasn't called a war.
I think this was very appropriate.
Special military operation.
It wasn't really an invasion.
It was a defense of the population of the Donbass.
And in the process, of course, Wanted to take out this vast number of bio labs where the United States have been conducting germ warfare experiments and developments, some of which was intended to be directed at genetically Russian population.
I mean, how disgusting is this?
In fact, in practically every category of murder and mayhem, it turns out the United States is way out there in the lead.
So Putin had excellent reasons for intervening.
He's been very cautious in the way he proceeded.
Actually, there was an armored column that could have taken Kiev within around 48 hours of the whole thing breaking out, and Putin called him back.
I think in retrospect, he may realize he made a mistake because he could have resolved the whole thing very quickly and effortlessly.
Meanwhile, however, as the war has progressed, the Russians have taken more and more territory, mostly in the oblasts of Donetsk and Luhansk, but also now Zaporizhia and Kherson,
and Putin's not going to give them up.
Zelensky...
You know, acting as though he hasn't lost a war where the Ukrainian side has over a million dead.
A million dead.
Incidentally, most of whom are Christians.
You know, it's been so long since I've factored in religious consideration, but in terms of what's going on in the world today, you have to factor it in.
Because in India and Pakistan, you've got Hindu versus Muslim.
Well, what's going on here in Ukraine is a mass killing machine of a whole lot of Christians.
Some may think that was partly designed or by purpose to make room for a whole bunch of Israelis to migrate to Ukraine because that's the region from which they originated.
Only a minuscule percent of the population in Israel today.
Has any Hebrew blood, as it's often put.
They're not Semites.
That's a linguistic distinction.
It doesn't apply to the Ashkenazi Jews.
They are not Semites.
And since they are the predominant population of Israel, who are attacking the Palestinians in every possible way, where the Palestinians are Semites, we have, as many, many have observed in the past, and I...
A hundred times before, Israel turns out to be the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world today.
Now that's all very ironic, considering how Trump has gone absolutely bananas over our best universities claiming they're anti-Semitic when they have a Jewish population that is grossly greater than the Jewish population in the United States,
which is less than 2%.
But these colleges, like Harvard, have 25% Jewish population.
Jewish students aren't being harmed or harassed.
What Trump is doing there is all for the benefit of Israel, trying to suppress any criticism of Israel.
I'm very happy to report that the anti-Semitism bill that they have been pushing appears to be in trouble.
In Congress.
This is wonderful.
Bernie Sanders is opposing.
Rand Paul is opposing.
And they're making a lot of progress.
They have offered a series of amendments that are intended to apply to Apply to the bill that would allow specifically protesting against genocide in Gaza,
which is the one thing they're trying to stop out.
So I'm mildly cautious, mildly optimistic at this absurd vishiation of the First Amendment, which I regard as...
An impeachable offense, by the way.
I mean, this guy took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic.
Might get nipped in the bud.
Because he's doing so many stupid things.
He's calling Harvard a threat to democracy.
Which is about as ludicrous as it gets.
Harvard being our most distinguished university.
Historically, profoundly important.
Admired worldwide.
Trump's overt support for Israel is becoming so blatant that no one can miss it.
And frankly, that's good.
He's overplayed his hand, but it was important for the public to learn what's really going on.
And by virtue of overplaying his hand, he's made it impossible to miss.
The guy's an Israeli stooge.
I mean, he's...
I have said before, if you want to understand Trump, think of his domestic policy.
Well, his foreign policy run by Bibi Netanyahu.
Now, domestically, it's mostly pretty good.
But for this thing about compromising on the First Amendment, It pisses me off, frankly, because I spent 35 years, that was my career as a professor of philosophy, many colleges,
University of Kentucky, Virginia twice, Cincinnati, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, new college in Florida, you know, eventually winding up on the Duluth campus, University of Minnesota.
There is no classic anti-Semitism.
In the United States.
Jewish students aren't being harassed.
And the idea that the President of the United States should dredge up a phony story, it's reminiscent of how the ADL will hire somebody to take a spray can, a can of spray paint, and put a swastika on a synagogue.
You know, they do this.
Or go into a cemetery and knock over a few Jewish tombstones and then give it big publicity play.
I mean, they've orchestrated it.
This is the Israeli way.
Create a phony incident and then react in the way you wanted to in the first place.
And sometimes it's just for a victim card to remind everyone that the Jews are supposed to be the world's greatest victims.
Even if it's now slaughtering Palestinians in a way Germans never did to the Jews.
I did a fair amount of research on the Holocaust way back when.
In fact, the most important book of revisionist history regarding the Holocaust is by my dear friend and colleague Nick Kohlestrom of the UK, who was actually booted out of his position at University College London for writing about delousing technology.
In the labor camps in Germany in World War II, because we've all been sold the story, told the story.
If we've been lucky, we've realized it was propaganda.
About six million Jews being put together in gas chambers using Zyklon B, which is a mild form of cyanide.
Now, it turns out...
According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, now confirmed by the British death books, because the Brits had cracked the German code and the Germans were very thorough and meticulous with the reports extremely detailed.
So Nick had the opportunity to compare the German death books with the International Committee of the Red Cross and found they virtually converged.
Where the International Committee of the Red Cross was keeping copious records on the age, the sex, the ethnicity, the religion, and the cause of death for everyone who died in all the camps.
And in 1993, they recalibrated, and they found the total 296,081 from all causes combined.
None, not one of whom, died from being put to death in a gas chamber.
In fact, Fred Lochter was the leading expert on gas chambers in the United States at the time for the Ernst Sundell trial in Canada for a Holocaust denial.
He distributed a pamphlet about questioning the six million, and he was put on trial for it, where there was a first trial in 1984, was notable for the prosecution being unable to produce a single witness.
Who could testify in the oath to have seen anyone put to death in a gas chamber.
And then in 1988, for the Lochter Report, Fred went to the various camps, came back with sample studies, and explained there was nothing at any of those camps that could have remotely served the purpose of a gas chamber,
which I thought was going to put the end to the whole whole hoax.
But no, the myth goes on.
They sometimes played with the numbers.
How many are supposed to have died at various camps like Auschwitz?
Well, if you look at the floor plan of Auschwitz, there are a lot of oddities there.
They've got a woodworking shop.
They've got a symphony hall.
They've got a hospital with OBGYN facilities.
They've even got a brothel.
How can you account for that?
And if everyone's being put to death when they arrive from the railroad car stripped naked...
You know, having their gold filling plucked or whatever, then put into these massive showers and gassed.
There isn't time to procreate.
I mean, it still takes nine months to have a baby.
So why would they need to be with GYN facilities?
In fact, it turns out that Hitler was convinced by one of his generals that the men would work harder if they knew they'd be rewarded with sex, hence the brothel.
And in fact...
The general, of course, was right.
These were labor camps.
They were constructed at facilities, you know, munition plants, manufacturing tanks, all that sort of thing.
It was slave labor to support the war effort.
So a lot of us are really tired of the Israelis, the Zionists, playing the victim card because, as they've demonstrated in Gaza, And the whole world has been watching.
They're all up for extermination of Palestinians.
You know, a lot of Jews died in World War II, of course.
So did millions of others.
But there was no campaign to exterminate the Jews, unlike the campaign in Gaza to exterminate the Palestinians, which is modified.
And to my astonishment, it's supported by the President of the United States.
Genocide.
Supported by the President of the United States.
This is just disgusting.
Beyond words.
Not only that, but the one Muslim nation that declared war on Israel in an attempt in solidarity with the Palestinians and tried to...
Get Israel to be more humane in their treatment.
The Houthis of Yemen have now been targeted by Trump.
They declared war.
They've been interdicting ships, bringing materials to Israel, which is perfectly proper for nations at war.
Even the United Nations has confirmed that the Houthis are acting in accordance with international law.
They're entitled to do what they've been doing.
And now Trump has been attacking them.
We have the latest report, over a thousand air assaults on the Houthis since, what, like May 15th.
I mean, it's just insane what Trump is doing.
Now, part of the problem is that because they're attacking...
The US is attacking the Houthis.
The Houthis have broadened the scope of their attacks on ships, and they're now attacking American ships.
And there have been two carriers there, the Carl Vinson and the Harry S. Truman, within range of the Houthi missiles.
We had a report that was, in my opinion, rapidly suppressed, that the Harry S. Truman had been disabled.
I believe...
Trump is now initiating a ground assault.
I mean, this is absolutely reckless.
He's not getting congressional authorization.
He's evading it by calling the Houthis pirates, which they manifestly are not.
The Houthis are valiant.
They're most robust, most admirable soldiers in the world today, in my estimation.
Sending ground forces into Yemen is going to get a whole lot of them killed, I think.
I would predict.
Every one of the American soldiers sent to Yemen is going to be killed.
It's like those entering Gaza the initial round, my understanding.
They used a thousand American soldiers to enter Gaza initially.
It wasn't Israelis, it was Americans.
And Hamas killed every single one of them.
Well, the Houthis are going to do the same thing for American troops invading Yemen.
Mark my words.
Now, why is he doing this?
I think they've actually sunk the Harry S. Truman.
Trump doesn't want the word out.
But what he's doing is consistent with his being enraged because the Houthis were successful, not just in disabling, but actually in sinking the ship.
Now, obviously...
If we get proof to the contrary, I'll take it back.
I'm telling you, my surmise of the situation is that that is what has happened.
And that's why Trump is doing this.
He, of course, campaigned on ending wars, not starting new ones.
So I think an awful lot of us are disillusioned with Donald Trump.
He campaigned on one platform.
He's acting completely differently.
Not only is the free speech issue an impeachable offense, sending troops to Yemen without congressional authority is an impeachable offense.
I regard the support of genocide in Gaza as an impeachable offense.
There you already got three impeachable offenses.
Now, that isn't to suggest that we ought to support Kamala Harris or Tim Walz, a couple of lunkheads and losers if ever there were, but I'm saying that.
I, who have voted for Trump three times, who have been very strongly supportive of him in the past, am calling him out when he does wrong things.
When he does good things, I praise him.
When he does bad things, I condemn him.
He's doing very bad things right now.
In terms of Iran, it looks to me as though...
Trump backed off with Iran.
He's trying to resurrect a nuclear deal.
Well, there was one, the old Iran deal.
He pulled out of it, apparently, at the request of Israel.
But there was no good reason to have pulled out of it.
Iran was complying.
They had inspectors there.
It was all hunky-dory.
But you see, Trump is too much subservient to Bibi the Butcher, and I find that...
Utterly appalling, completely wrong.
He's supposed to be the President of the United States.
He's supposed to make America great again, not Israel.
But without any doubt, he's putting all the resources of the United States at the disposal of Israel, which I find despicable.
Now, because Russia's got all the cards in relation to the engagement with Ukraine, they have...
Four clear-cut demands.
They want to hold the territory they've got, including Crimea and the four oblasts.
That will happen.
Ukraine must not become a part of NATO.
That will happen.
They want demilitarization of Ukraine, and they want denazification.
Those are the two most difficult.
Zelensky is being a holdout.
He's made so much money.
They have recycled so many weapons.
Among those, sent the Ukraine to fight Russia.
They turned around and sold them even to cartels in Mexico.
So the cartels have some very sophisticated equipment that should have been beyond their reach.
Compliments of Vladimir Zolensky.
I think Putin understands they're starting to kind of beef up, they're being more aggressive.
Putin has been kind and gentle, I think, because Ukraine was a part of Russia.
An awful lot of Russians in Ukraine.
So he didn't want to kill a lot of Russians.
He tried to be kind and gentle.
He has now begun to launch some rocket attacks in the area of Kiev.
Call it Kiev, but that's just silly.
The historic name is Kiev.
It was the original capital of Russia.
So Putin's been very kind and gentle, but firm.
And in my opinion, successful.
And were it not for Russia having such a wise, experienced leader, I think we'd all be in grave trouble.
I think Ukraine is going to be resolved.
They may have to replace Zelensky.
Of course, he's orchestrating these assassinations in Russia.
That's obviously not going down well.
But I think in the end, the Ukraine conflict will be resolved on Russian terms.
There's just no way around it.
They've won the war.
What's important is that Ukraine has to admit, acknowledge the reality on the ground.
But every serious...
Commentator on military affairs, Colonel McGregor, Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson, Colonel Wilkerson, all agree Ukraine lost.
And there's just no point in trying to drag it out further.
But because Zelensky isn't even the legitimate president of Ukraine since his term expired months ago, they may need a new leader.
And if he continues to threaten the assassination, he may find out he himself is taken out.
The U.S., of course, has this policy of not assassinating leaders of foreign nations.
So when we invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein was actually taken out by a B-1 bomber strike just four weeks into the event.
I know this because the mother of the pilot of the plane reached out to me to say how they were suppressing the story.
He was running a mission.
He was told he got a change in coordinates.
He was told it was the big one.
It was a restaurant on the outskirts of Baghdad.
He hit it with two 500.
Pound JDAM bombs that destroyed the restaurant, killed Saddam, his two sons, and 50 or 60 members of his general staff obliterated.
Shortly thereafter, we even had Vice President Cheney saying, yeah, I think we got Saddam.
His lifeless body was dragged out of the brawl.
Now, they're going to celebrate.
With his mission accomplished, a man on the USS Lincoln off the coast of San Diego, when someone, and we believe it was Donald Rumsfeld, realized that three presidents, Carter, Reagan, and Ford had all signed executive orders against the assassination of foreign leaders.
So if Bush were to come out, W, and declare we got Saddam, which was his intent, He would have been admitting it was violating the law.
So they had to cover it up.
They had to find one of Saddam's body doubles, claim they found him in a spider hole, put him on trial, and hung him.
I think they had a deal with him that if he played along, there'd be a platform there so that when they dropped him to the trapdoor, he actually would die.
But they could have him wandering around where someone might spot him.
Joe Viles, who was a photojournalist from Australia, was the first to notice.
Saddam Hussein had excellent teeth and an overbite.
Most of us do, meaning our upper teeth come out over our lower teeth.
The double had bad teeth and an underbite, meaning his lower teeth came out beyond his upper.
Not the same guy.
So it was an elaborate fraud.
It's the kind of thing we find the U.S. does a lot.
We just suffered four years of an imposter president.
The real Joe Biden from Delaware appears to have died in 2017, and he was replaced by a body double.
I think he was, or may have been wearing even a mask, a latex mask, but I'll tell you, for a certainty.
He had different shape and size of cranium, different handwriting, different social interaction with Jill.
I was documenting all this on my blog for years.
And I think everyone in Washington had to know this wasn't the real Joe.
So not only that, but now, of course, we discover he was so incompetent cognitively.
That the business of government was being run by an auto pad.
And it was just in the hands of, I think, Jill was managing the auto pad.
Who knows?
Could it have been Jill and Hunter who were actually running the government, making decisions, I don't doubt.
Many were going wild, looting the government, doing whatever they wanted as long as they could get access to the auto pad.
We've gone through a horrific...
Period here.
And I've yet to see a major newspaper relate the facts I'm relating to you here and now.
So the situation is really quite insulting, quite disturbing, profound deception, virtually at all levels, by our own government.
I love the fact this Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.
Is in jeopardy.
Let me share a bit about it because I think this is such a critical issue.
The future of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act was thrown into jeopardy Wednesday.
That would be yesterday.
After Bernie Sanders and Ed Markey together with Rand Paul's backing.
Introduce a series of amendments to undermine the bill's aim of outlawing criticism of Jews and Israel.
Have no doubt.
That's what it's all about.
From Jewish Insider.
Anti-Semitism Awareness Act Future in question after committee postpones vote.
Senators on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pension Committee.
Postponed a final vote on advancing the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act after approving four amendments that could jeopardize GOP's support for the bill and leave its future passage once again in question.
Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, the committee chair and the major proponent, told Jewish leaders after the meeting, He needed to postpone the vote because Republicans could not return to the committee room quickly enough to vote for it.
Just minutes remaining before a two-hour cutoff to the meeting where Democrats refused requests to waive the two-hour limit.
I couldn't get my people back.
And Democrats limited debate until noon is an obvious tactic to defeat the bill.
This is a terrible bill, one of the worst bills ever in American history.
It must be defeated.
The very idea Donald Trump would support such a bill is insulting beyond words.
The approved amendment included one by Bernie Sanders saying that it is not anti-Semitic to use free speech rights to oppose the devastation of Gaza.
And laid out a series of Sanders-specific objections to the war and criticism of Prime Minister Netanyahu.
All Democrats and Rand Paul voted in favor.
So it passed.
An amendment led by Senator Ed Markey would oppose the revocation of visas, detentions, and deportation of student and faculty based on protected conduct under the First Amendment.
All Democrats involved voted in favor.
It passed.
A third, also led by Sanders, states that the legislation protects rights to distribute material on canvas or online to carry out protests in adherence to schools, time,
place, and manner restrictions, and to engage in any speech that does not include true threats or incitement of violence.
Including such speech as communicated through guest speakers, materials used in a classroom or online or classroom discussion or debate.
All Democrats, Paul and Senator Susan Collins, voted in favor.
It passed.
A fourth by Sanders say that no entry of the federal government, no entity of the federal government can enforce a policy that will compel Educational institution to violate the rights of a student,
faculty, or staff member under the First Amendment.
All Democrats, as well as Paul and Collins, voted in favor.
This is just wonderful.
I can't begin to tell you how happy I am about this development, because this bill represents one of the greatest atrocities, abrogations of the Constitution.
I've ever seen come before the Congress of the United States.
So, in spite of Donald Trump's excessive zeal to be the president of Israel, really, of the United States, it's sometimes sad, or the United States of Israel.
This particular bill has been an enormous threat.
It's like a torpedo to the hull of democracy and freedom of speech in the United States, and it looks as though it's going to fail.
And I say that is just sensational.
Always a pleasure to join you.
So much going on in the world today.
Yeah, that's for sure, Jim.
Wow.
Thank you, as always, to unpack all that info.
And what can I tell you?
You know, all we can do is keep our chins up.
And like General Patton said, if a man does his best, what else is there?
So that's what we're all doing.
And we hope for the best.
They keep, you know, the Cabal, the Federal Reserve, all these assholes.
They keep on printing trillions of dollars and keep playing the games and keep playing all this stuff.
Yes.
I don't know when the charade's going to be over, but...
Well, this has been a major threat on academic freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press.
Let us hope it is put to death in this Senate process here.
It looks good.
Yeah, definitely.
So that's good.
And hopefully, you know, as sad as it is, the jokes write themselves.
And so you can't make any of this shit up.
And we'll just keep striving forward, brother.
So thank you very much.
Thank you, everybody, for tuning in.
Very pleasure to see you.
We'll see you soon.
Thank you.
Thank you, my friend.
▲
Export Selection