Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 13, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:34:22

Yahwism vs. Monotheism: Are Jews Programmed for Genocide? (FFWN with Jim Fetzer)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Truth Jihad Podcast.
	No, actually, it's False Flag Weekly News Podcast.
	I'm Kevin Barrett, and you're having a flashback because guess who my co-host is?
	Who is it?
	It's Jim Fetzer.
	Hey, Jim.
	Yeah, Kevin, I think we started this thing together way back when.
	So you've been doing a terrific job with it.
	I'm very impressed, and I love your success operating for Morocco.
	Parodies and satires are just brilliant.
	Absolutely sensational stuff.
	I love what you're doing.
	Well, thank you so much, Jim.
	Yeah, I like your stuff too.
	And just to remind the viewers who've been with us all these years and the ones who haven't, the main reason that you left wasn't really that I had a problem with you.
	Although, I mean, we argued about Trump early on.
	And I think I won that argument, but we'll talk about Trump later.
	But Alan Rees, who was then our producer, the late, great Alan Rees of No Lives Radio, was terrified that you were
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Famous last words.
	So Alan might have gotten that one right.
	Allah your Hamu.
	So anyway, here we are.
	So let's do our show.
	We've got a crazy show lined up, all kinds of interesting, wild, and no, that's not the right one.
	Here's the beginning.
	The slide of the week is Yahweh.
	Telling Israel that it's going to have to commit genocide.
	And in our Bible quiz of the week, our Bible quiz question is, why does Yahweh command Ezekiel to bake his bread using human feces?
	Do you know that answer, Jim?
	Oh, I do not!
	Go for it!
	Okay, the correct answer is that he is making Ezekiel atone for the sins of his tribe.
	And Bibi Netanyahu also needs to atone for the sins of himself and his tribe.
	So there he is, getting ready to atone.
	That's an unreached...
	No, I'm sorry.
	Anyway, let's...
	Okay, we'll move on to some breaking news here.
	Quick breaking news before we get into the PSAs.
	This story just came out.
	Late yesterday or something, the White House moves Obama portrait.
	We don't mind that.
	It replaces it with a painting depicting the so-called Trump assassination attempt.
	There's the Trump assassination attempt with that amazing picture.
	It's almost like it was scripted.
	So here's the painting.
	There's the Obama painting that's being replaced with the Trump painting.
	And we have some other...
	This was my comment on Yahoo News pointing out that the fake Trump shooting was obviously a publicity stunt.
	And I've mentioned this before.
	People probably know why.
	You can hit pause and read what I wrote on the comment on Yahoo News.
	And so that's another great presidential portrait to go with this presidential portrait, which Jeffrey Epstein owned of George W. Bush.
	With his paper airplane knocking down the Twin Towers as blocks.
	He's an evil child knocking down two towers with a paper airplane with blocks.
	Jeffrey Epstein owned that.
	And then here's another Jeffrey Epstein owned from his art collection of Bill Clinton in a blue dress, presumably with a semen stain on it.
	And so, yeah, Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of, he had good taste in art.
	And that takes us back to Epstein was working for Israel.
	Jonathan Pollard has apparently was part of this huge Israeli spy ring controlling top Americans and Netanyahu was said to have offered the Lewinsky tapes in return for Jonathan Pollard back in the day when Clinton was being blackmailed by Israel.
	There's Bill and Jeffrey and there's Trump and Jeffrey and Trump apparently is awfully nice to Netanyahu.
	And complicit in genocide.
	Can you believe, Jim, that Trump actually took his kids with Jeffrey Epstein like that?
	That's just kind of amazing.
	So, yeah, the Israeli blackmail angle, and I think that this was also Israeli blackmail, this fake assassination stunt, because obviously he rehearsed it with the blood capsules, and they've got film of Trump repeatedly rehearsing,
	hitting the deck, popping the blood capsule on his ear, doing the war paint, jumping up, and shaking his fist in front of the flight, which, of course, could never, none of this could possibly have happened had it just been a random assassination.
	Oh, I think this is sensational, Kevin.
	You put together wonderful photographs.
	I've... Over a period of time become convinced, including by Joaquin Agopian, who's a leading expert on pedophilia and politics with a five-volume book available on Amazon,
	that Trump actually was involved in some of these pedophilia exploits with young girls.
	There's one story Henry MacHowe has republished about a girl who was raped when she was 13 and she was Panic-stricken over the prospect of becoming pregnant, asked him to use a condom, he was very brutish, and where he would just throw down money on the bed when he laughed.
	I resisted all this stuff for many years, Kevin, but I'm sorry to say that now appears to me to be true.
	And that would explain some of Trump's shortcomings as a president, wouldn't it?
	It would indeed, yeah.
	And there's even suspicion that Ivanka may be blackmailing him with her husband, Jared Kushner.
	Ivanka and Trump have had many inappropriate interactions.
	She's sitting on his lap.
	He's saying if he were a young man and she weren't his daughter, he'd be dating her.
	There's some suspicion they may have had sexual relations when she was a child.
	I think that's pretty weighty in terms of blackmail, Kevin.
	Okay, well...
	So we're on the same page with that.
	As far as the fake assassination stunt, would you agree with me that the top four reasons why this is obviously fake are, one, the Secret Service would never allow Trump to jump up and shake his fist and expose himself to more bullets.
	Two, the photographer just happened to get a perfect picture of the bullet supposedly going near Trump, which is exactly what they need to convince us that a bullet did go somewhere near Trump when actually they didn't.
	Number three, we believe a bullet hit his ear.
	When there's zero medical evidence whatsoever for any wound on his ear.
	And two weeks later, he takes off the bandage when he's meeting Netanyahu, and his ear is perfect.
	Not even a scratch.
	And then, finally, the odds.
	What are the odds that the first time somebody takes a loaded gun, anywhere near a Trump rally, that this is going to be the result?
	A picture-perfect photo op!
	And a nick on the ear that didn't even nick the ear!
	I mean, what are the odds, Jim?
	Kevin, I may have been calling this out even before you, but I love your argument.
	Those are four great points.
	Now, it appears to me there was a real plot to assassinate by virtue of Friday.
	There were shorts placed on 29 million shares of Donald J. Trump stock.
	Well, of course, they would pay off big if the stock were to drop.
	And if Trump were dead, obviously that would occur.
	But it appears that...
	He intercepted and flipped the script so that it was a staged event, just as you show.
	PK from Down Under has done a very thorough examination about members and the bleachers behind him.
	And notice, they're not just scattering pell-mell as they would if this had been authentic, but they're on their iPhones, iPads, you know, figuring out, being told what to do.
	It's much too small a crowd.
	One of the most awesome photographs I've ever seen politically was Trump coming down at night in a helicopter over the hills of Butler, which were just covered by tens of thousands.
	If this had been real, there would have been a huge turnout.
	It appears to have been a much smaller controlled group of crisis actors.
	And I agree with all the stuff about faking the blood.
	I've seen plenty of photos showing no damage to the ear.
	And of course, the positioning of the photographer, yes.
	This was a stunt analogous to Barack Obama staging a raid on a compound in Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden 10 days after his death on 15 December 2001.
	Afghanistan. It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves.
	He was, in fact, an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, an official from the agency who visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his demise from his medical maladies.
	And by the 26th, both Fox and CNN had caught up and were reporting that Osama bin Laden was dead.
	Well, I was running Scholars for 9-11 Truth.
	We had many reports about the fake Bin Ladens that were being used, the phony statements attributed to him, including analysis by the leading expert on Osama, Professor Lawrence from Duke.
	And Nick Kohlstrom has done a beautiful piece about it on my blog, Osama Bin Laden, I think 1957 to 2001.
	You're spot on.
	And it was the position himself for a triumphal reelection as the man who got the most wanted man in the world here, Trump, as a variation, the guy who survived it.
	attempted assassination.
	Now let me add, there have
	at least a dozen attempts to assassinate Trump.
	One involved a drone firing through a bedroom window, and if they hadn't changed the glass to bulletproof the week before, he would have been dead then.
	So this is fascinating.
	I think you're barking up the right tree, Jim.
	Totally. And I wouldn't be surprised if this fake assassination stunt might have in part been motivated by an effort to sort of preempt possible real assassination stunts.
	And that also could have been how they sold it to him, perhaps in exaggerated fashion.
	But that's all speculative.
	What we know for sure is there's no way that this happened the way we're told that it happened.
	And the most likely suspects would be blackmailers from the usual...
	Okay, well, I guess, you know, we had a big fight once about, like, you really liked Trump at that point, and I really hated him, and now neither one of us are big fans of him.
	How about PSAs?
	Let's do those first.
	I've got a new look at truthjihad.com website.
	So if you want to support this show and my other work, go to truthjihad.com.
	And here's the new look at the website.
	Follow that red arrow and click on false flag weekly news.
	That takes you to the false flag weekly news page.
	You can click on the first entry there to get to the
	latest false flag weekly news show.
	And when you do, you'll get to something like this.
	This is for this week.
	The very first lineup story, lineup story there, the first story in the lineup of stories, I should say, is our fundraiser.
	And this week, we raised a measly only $10 ahead of the show.
	So we're going to have to make that up if you guys want to
	So, please hit the subscribe button there at the fundraiser page and contribute.
	And then if you do that, then you'll get notified first as soon as we're setting up our story list for each week's show, which usually happens on Thursday.
	So click that subscribe and help support the show.
	And you can also support me by hitting pause and scanning this barcode.
	You can go to my PayPal, which is truthjihad at gmail.com.
	Okay, enough of that.
	Trump wars.
	Trade war on the world is the big Trump war this week.
	Ron Nunn's had another characteristically good article on Trump arguing that the colossal economic mistake of throwing all these tariffs at China and the world could be along the lines of Mao's colossal mistake that brought on these horrific famines around 1960.
	I hope that's an exaggeration.
	What do you think, Jim?
	Well, the tariffs have become so controversial, the White House has bragged that 50 or more countries are negotiating to reduce their tariffs, which could be counted a great success.
	But it appears, and actually one of our stories addresses it, that it was all contrived to target China specifically.
	And now he's jacking up his tariffs on China.
	Yes, 125% when they were already at 105.
	And I just...
	I find this a bit outrageous.
	Now, in the art of the deal, he does talk about taking extreme positions in order to provoke, you know, reactions, and then he wants to move toward an accommodating middle ground that was always his intention.
	And I think we've seen him do this on any number of occasions, including, it appears, this instance.
	Do you think it'll work, Jim?
	Do you think that, I mean, he'll have to retreat so far from these tariffs.
	So, I mean, I don't really see how that works.
	He's already backed off on 90% or more of them.
	The one he's really emphasizing is this article reflects by Mike Whitney, is that it was always intended to target China, which actually, although described as a second Largest economy in the world probably has the highest because the way it's measured gives a false impression in terms of GDP.
	I think U.S. is actually only the second largest economy, that China is the largest.
	And of course, as I believe other of our stories may include, it's Bolstering Brexit and the case against the United States.
	You know, I'm not happy about this.
	And no, ultimately, I think it's going to be deleterious.
	I think it's going to have negative consequences for America economically.
	Yeah, I would agree.
	And, you know, send people to that UNS piece if you're hearing from anti-communists who are huge fans of Trump.
	With the cultural revolution element is another possible comparison with Mao.
	So is Trump the American Mao?
	Well, maybe not quite.
	And here's the manufacturing output chart.
	They say that with purchasing power parity adjustment, the Chinese economy is in fact now bigger than the American economy.
	And certainly the manufacturing sector is bigger.
	I mean, look at that.
	That's not even close.
	Yeah, you go back to Bill Trump with NAFTA.
	Remember Ross Perot warning us that giant sucking sound was all those jobs moving south.
	Bill Clinton initiated the evisceration of manufacturing industry in the United States.
	It's been a calamity for us as Americans, Kevin.
	Trump is trying to reverse it.
	There are some...
	Companies moving back in the U.S. to circumvent the tariffs.
	I think that's got to be acknowledged as a plus, but it's got to happen on a much larger scale.
	He's undertaking a major change in the way the world stands today.
	I mean, I wish him luck, because I think in this instance his motives are pure and are devoted to making America great again, unlike most of his foreign policy, which is devoted to promoting the interests of Israel rather than Those of the United States.
	Right. Well, I think if he wants to fix that trade imbalance problem and save American manufacturing, he needs to invent a time machine and go back to 1980 or 85 to do it.
	I wrote about that in an article last week.
	So, yeah, the manufacturing share of U.S. employment has collapsed.
	And here's another war on China story.
	The Mike Whitney piece we mentioned pointed out That the real purpose of this is more decoupling.
	Well, COVID was the initial shot across the bow that changed the Titanic's path and started the process of decoupling from China, which is absolutely necessary if the U.S. is going to wage a hot war on China.
	You can't wage a war on somebody who's manufacturing most of your goods.
	So the COVID crisis, which shut down the Chinese economy as intended, led to...
	The U.S. forcing its manufacturing to start getting out of China, going to Vietnam, Bangladesh, and so on and so forth.
	And I think that was the purpose of the U.S. bioattack on China during the first Trump administration.
	I don't know if Trump approved it.
	Pompeo is the leading suspect.
	But it happened on Trump's watch.
	What do you think, Jim?
	Ah, Pompeo is a nasty piece of work.
	My impression is DOD played a major role in developing the COVID and that the DOD sprayed the wet markets in Wuhan in order to promote this impression that had been done by China.
	I think China actually has clean hands here, but that the DOD does not.
	And of course, Anthony Fauci and his gang of psychopaths were profoundly involved at the behest of the
	Have you read Ron Unz's e-book on making the case that COVID emerged from a U.S. bioattack on China and Iran?
	No, but it sounds absolutely plausible to me.
	Okay, yeah, I'll send you a link for that if you're interested.
	It's actually pretty well supported as our conspiracy theories go.
	How about the drunken psycho Hegseth?
	See, Andrew Anglin, who writes these hot take headlines, has kind of disappeared, so I thought maybe I should replace him and write these kinds of headlines.
	Drunken psycho Hegseth threatens Panama.
	This was my appearance on Press TV.
	But I think I made a valid point, which is that this whole...
	This claim that China is a military threat to the U.S., and specifically through Panama, is completely ludicrous.
	Would you agree?
	Yes. Yes, I would agree.
	And I also think Hegseth is a lunatic.
	And the very idea he should be as an extreme Christian Zionist in charge of the Department of Defense is irresponsible to the max.
	This is a guy in the direct chain of command to launch our nukes.
	I don't trust him at all.
	In fact, I'm very disillusioned with so many in the Trump admin, where we had 60% Jews and 100% Zionists, Kevin.
	It's dumbfounding.
	Well, Heg says Yahwism.
	That's what I call it.
	You know, Yahwism is the problem here, maybe, and the Christian Zionists are, in some ways, almost crazier Yahwists than the Jewish ones, which is saying something.
	We'll get to the Yahweh stuff in a bit, but first, let's mention the Yemen.
	Yemen is pushing back against genocide and top American commanders are terrified that they're going to get completely wiped out if they have to go to war with China after they moved all their chips over to the Middle East to deal with the Houthis in Yemen.
	I thought that was interesting.
	The New York Times got this leak from top US commanders who are really unhappy.
	about trump moving all of our chips to the middle east to threaten iran and to bomb yemen every day which he's doing Well, I'm a huge fan of Yemen.
	The Houthis have declared war on Israel.
	They are the only Muslim nation to have done so.
	They're acting in accordance with the laws of war, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter.
	Even the UN has acknowledged that by targeting ships headed for Israel with supplies but ignoring the others, the Houthis are acting responsibly.
	Trump, in my opinion, not.
	These attacks on the Houthis are violations of international law, the Geneva Conventions, and the UN Charter.
	It's the United States that is at fault here.
	And I have been furious with Donald Trump for initiating these wars.
	I mean, that's one that's clearly Trump's war.
	And he can't evade responsibility, just as Gaza slaughter is becoming Trump's war.
	Because he's providing the supplies, the weapons necessary to slaughter the Palestinians.
	It is a disgrace to the United States and an abdication of his responsibility as President of the United States.
	Kevin, I am disillusioned with this guy, whom I have, as you have observed in the past, supported with a lot of enthusiasm, voted for him three times, had to do, of course, with the quality of the opposition.
	We couldn't have...
	Kamala and Walz in the White House for crying out loud.
	But Trump, while he's doing a lot of good domestically except in relation to freedom of speech, where I'm appalled by this expanded definition of anti-Semitism that's used as a club, potentially Against even myself for speaking out in condemnation of U.S. support for genocide.
	I mean, what could be more noble and appropriate than a student to be opposing genocide, and yet Trump's cracking down on the campus, is taking vast sums away, even Harvard's having to borrow $750 million.
	Kevin, it's absurd!
	You know, the Houthis?
	Are the most robust, resilient fighting force in the world today.
	They withstood like 10 years of a war with Saudi Arabia, which was using the same kind of weaponry that Trump's using today.
	Why he thinks he's going to have more success than beyond me.
	But I'm all for the Houthis.
	I admire them beyond words.
	And if the U.S. can't even defeat the Houthis, how could they think they'd have a chance against Iran?
	Well, God bless the Houthis.
	Is it legal to say that?
	I don't know.
	I'm an agnostic, and I say God bless the Houthis.
	All right.
	Even agnostics say God bless the Houthis.
	All right, so let's hopefully the drone isn't coming at me out the window there.
	No, I don't see any drones hovering around.
	And here's an article by Craig Mojibur that makes the same argument and points out that Yemen is acting responsibly to stop genocide and the U.S. is bombing them for it.
	I thought that was a pretty good, accurate headline.
	Yes, it is.
	100% Kevin.
	I couldn't agree more.
	And while we're pointing out Trump's failings, how about the trillion-dollar defense budget as were with Iran looms?
	I mean, is this what you voted for, Jim?
	Well, I'm shocked because the Pentagon is obviously the biggest, fattest target out there for dollars.
	So if Elon Musk wants to get back on Spandane, he could probably chop the Pentagon budget in half and there'd be no loss except the profits of the major military industrial manufacturers like Raytheon, General Dynamics,
	Boeing, I mean, they make money out of producing equipment that has serious design flaws.
	So they get maintenance contracts that extend for decades and double or triple their profits.
	It's outrageous.
	So I am very disillusioned.
	The latest report I had were that it must cut to the Pentagon where like a minuscule 4%.
	Well, he's at least firing a couple of park rangers.
	That'll save us some tax money.
	And here's our video of the week.
	I don't think we really need the soundtrack here.
	So let's see if we can watch this.
	Here's Trump helping.
	He's like his butler or whatever.
	He's like the waiter in the restaurant or the butler seating Netanyahu.
	I mean, you have to see now.
	Look at that.
	It's a photo op.
	Of course, but still.
	And speaking of Netanyahu and his genocidal Yahwists, now, is Trump treating Netanyahu that way because he's totally owned by him?
	You know, there's Jeffrey Epstein-style blackmail material out there, as we suggested earlier.
	Or is actually Trump pulling out his chair and acting like a butler and a waiter and kissing Netanyahu's kosher rear end when, in fact, he didn't really give Netanyahu very much on this trip?
	What do you think, Jim?
	Well, at least superficially, it appears he's not bending over for Netanyahu, but in the long run, it appears he is.
	So there's a bit of hypocrisy, theater.
	We know Trump's an actor.
	Netanyahu is a smug, satisfied look when Trump...
	Holds a chair for him.
	As you look to him sign, just look at his face.
	It's a cat canary expression.
	I really find this revolting that the United States should be so deferential.
	And of course, none of it is deserved.
	I mean, Israel attacked the USS Liberty in 67, attacked the U.S. on 9-11.
	These were Israeli operations.
	Lyndon Johnson was complicit and the former Dick Cheney in particular appears to have been the executive director of 9-11 on the occasion from a bunker beneath the White House.
	This is just outrageous that we should be deferring to what is actually our greatest enemy, Israel.
	I agree completely.
	And so even if this particular trip looks like more optics than outcomes...
	I think you're right.
	Israel and its fifth column has basically taken over the United States, never more so than under Trump.
	And here's a piece by Patrick McShay about the media dismissing the Gaza genocide.
	If this were happening anywhere else, if it was anybody but the quote-unquote enemies of the Jews that were being genocided, I think we would be hearing about it a little bit more, especially if the United States were paying for it.
	But the coverage is skewed and not particularly sort of, you know, screaming headline every day.
	The way it is here in Morocco and in most of the global south, we are just being tortured every day with these images of horrific genocidal Israeli crimes.
	But I don't think the West is quite getting it.
	Well, the media, of course, is being controlled by the Rothschilds who own both the AP and Reuters.
	You've got virtual complete dominance of all news other than local.
	So, we're getting everything with a sinus spin.
	We know ABAC has handlers.
	Thomas Massey has explained he's a sole member of Congress who does not have an ABAC handler to make sure he doesn't wander off the reservation.
	I don't know how we could be more troubled than to recognize that our Congress is Israeli-occupied territory.
	Not for no point is it said.
	We are the United States of America or the United States of Israel.
	I'm sorry, Kevin, but that's the way it is.
	We don't face up to it.
	We're not going to have a ghost of a chance of fixing things.
	I agree.
	Well, you mentioned the Congress critters have Israeli handlers, and so does the president.
	In fact, this picture may be a picture of Trump surrounded by his Israeli cabinet.
	I don't think that's his cabinet.
	That's his handlers that Jared brought.
	It might as well be his cabinet.
	Maybe that was Biden's cabinet.
	Enough to make a minion, as they said.
	So this was the big Israeli war crime story this week, was that the video surfaced.
	...of the attack on the ambulances where the Israelis slaughtered all these ambulance drivers and first responders and then pushed them into a mass grave and covered them up to try to cover up their crime.
	But the video then showed up and the New York Times, to its credit, did actually cover that.
	By now, it's kind of old news, at least in the West.
	And this shooting happened one day into the renewed Israeli offensive, right after Israel broke the ceasefire that broke the Trump truce.
	I mean, this is kind of embarrassing for Trump, isn't it?
	He gets into the White House, he forces a truce on Netanyahu, and then he lets Israel just break it.
	It's ridiculous.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	It turns out there was a video of the shooting at the pockets of one of the decedents they dug out of the ground.
	They even buried the ambulances, Kevin.
	Yeah, yeah.
	How is that?
	I mean, and they said they had no idea what had become of these people when they knew they'd executed each and every one.
	It's just a disgrace.
	Mass execution.
	They bury the ambulances and they say, oh, we don't know what happened to them.
	Yeah. Talk about guilty demeanor.
	Oh, man.
	Every week they come up with some new way to make us hate them.
	Of course, we're not allowed to hate them.
	That's the thing, is there are hate speech laws.
	So I guess we should just say that we strongly dislike them, we despise them, we find them revolting, we feel a deep revulsion for them.
	Pull out your thesaurus and say anything except hate, because hate is illegal.
	Well, the whole concept of hate speech is a constitutional absurdity.
	Freedom of speech in the First Amendment is to protect unpopular speech.
	Popular speech doesn't need any protection.
	It's saying things you don't want to hear, saying things you might hate.
	What they do is...
	They hate the truth, and we have to get the truth out there, Gavin.
	That's why shows like yours are so terribly important in this day and age, because the suppression of free speech by a president who has a constitutional oath to uphold it is clearly an impeachable fact.
	So he's talking out both sides of his mouth at the same time, claiming he's the greatest proponent of The First Amendment we've had in our history, on the other hand, censoring all the Americans, Palestinians, anyone who is anti-genocide or pro-Palestinian,
	I find this disgusting.
	In fact, there's been a pivot point.
	That has changed my attitude toward Donald Trump.
	It is his crackdown on freedom of speech.
	And we're going to talk to that in a second.
	That's our next section, I think, or maybe two sections down from that.
	We're still in the genocide section, though, so just quickly mention, this is just one of the daily massacres by the Zionists where they bomb houses and apartment buildings, or what's left of them anyway, bomb residential areas and kill random people.
	And to some extent, this is being driven by A downside of the Jewish religion.
	Now, I know there are people who follow Jewish religion who are able to interpret it in a way that is not this bad, but I think it lends itself to a lot of bad interpretations, and Lauren Guilleneau's book From Yahweh to Zion makes a very strong case there.
	So I got into a big polemical dispute about this.
	I published a response to Jonas Alexis, who is a senior editor like myself at Veterans Today.
	He published two extremely lengthy So-called reviews of Guyano's masterpiece, and they were negative reviews, but they never really dealt with the book.
	They just blathered about everything to the sudden, but the book and its key arguments.
	So finally, after Jonas had been trying my patience long enough, and then he started throwing totally gratuitous insults, obscene insults at the Prophet Muhammad for no particular reason, I finally lost patience and went ahead and went off on him and wrote this piece.
	And then he just responded to me with this.
	He said, Reflections on Kevin Barrett and the loss of intellectual integrity.
	If we apply the same standard that Barrett often imposes on much of the West, then the debate by that measure is already, what the heck is he saying?
	Well, read his article, and you'll say, what the heck is he, what the heck is Jonas ever saying in any of these articles?
	It's like, what's he smoking?
	And these are the articles, his so-called reviews of, you know, there's the first one in Culture Wars magazine, and there's the second one republished at Veterans Today.
	And again, I would say rather than reading those 30,000 words worth of just blowing smoke and never talking about the book he's supposedly reviewing, you could just read my short version about why you don't really need to read Jonas' stuff.
	Kevin, I read your response to him, this, just before coming on the show, and I thought it was impeccable.
	All too often, even I myself have suggested it's a Talmud, not the Torah.
	That's a problem.
	It's the Zionists and not the Jews.
	But when you read the Torah, the first five books, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, there's a God who's a vengeful God.
	He's having all kinds of vicious, malicious actions, including genocide being performed on his behalf.
	I think you nailed it.
	I thought that was a wonderful response.
	And while I've liked some of Alexis Jonas' articles in the past, in this case, it seemed to me he fell not just woefully short, but it was as though it were a deliberate distortion.
	You are 100% in the right, and I find no merit in his replies.
	Okay, and I mean, we're, you know, Lauren Guino and I are not trying to defend the Talmud.
	The Talmud, though, is just commentary on the Torah.
	And if you want to address Lauren Guino's argument, which, you know, Catholic dogmatic thinkers like Jonas do.
	They really need to address those arguments about the Torah.
	You can't just say, oh, I don't like the Talmud.
	And then he spends like 10,000 words attacking the Talmud.
	Well, that's fine.
	That has nothing to do with Guyenot's argument.
	And I think there's something really revealing about this, that when Jonas Alexis tries to refute this great book by Laurent Guyenot, He can't.
	And I think he knows he can't.
	And so that's why he spends 30,000 words talking about everything but any critique of the book.
	Because apparently he can't make a real critique of the book.
	But anyway, moving on to more Yahwist horrors, it does seem that...
	Israel Shahak wrote in his critique of the Jewish religion, and Israel Shahak was an Israeli Jew and scholar who studied his religion and found all kinds of horrible things, including that Jews historically have routinely worshipped Satan alongside God,
	and that the ones who worship God have no problem with the ones who worship Satan.
	and that might explain partly why there's this massive jewish over-representation in satanic cults um anton lavey who was actually a fan of my first book which was called dr weird's weird tours a guide to mysterious san francisco well
	lavey was the founder of the church of satan and towards the end of his life apparently he loved my book which included you know how you could go and look at the sites where these
	Anyway, LaVey was Jewish.
	So were a lot of his followers.
	And it does seem that there's a bit of an overlap there between Satanism and Judaism.
	Zionism is 100% Satanist.
	It comes out of Sabbataianism, which is a satanic school of Jewish thought.
	Sabbataian Frankism.
	So we find that it's very common in Israel for rabbis to be dressing up in robes and presiding over these horrific rapes and tortures of children.
	As a religious ritual, that doesn't really surprise me.
	It doesn't please me, but unfortunately, I've learned enough to not be surprised.
	Kevin, I regard you as one of the world's leading experts in this area.
	You're doing such a sensational job, and yes, once again, if you dig deep enough, you encounter horrors of this character and quality.
	And of course, The ongoing slaughter of Palestinians also involves not only a lot of infanticide, murdering children, raping girls and women.
	I mean, it's routine among the IDF.
	They take pride in it, which means that Israel has really become a rogue nation far beyond the boundaries of civilized society, and there are many who believe it deserves extinction.
	Most certainly the behavior they're displaying is beyond indecency.
	It's utterly reprehensible, and I think it is splendid that you're inviting
	Well, thanks, Jim.
	There is this Jewish eschatology that...
	yearns for a messiah who would be a jewish military conqueror who will conquer the world and rule the world from a rebuilt temple in jerusalem and he will conquer uh exterminate and or enslave all of the non-jews of the entire world and at that perfect time in history this one thousand year paradise that the jews will have every jew will have thousands of You're
	spot on here.
	You're absolutely spot on here.
	Rabbi Schneerson, who many thought was a Mashiach, said, oh no, he can't be the Mashiach because there are still Christians alive on planet Earth.
	They want to kill all the Christians, which represents the incoherence of the Christian Zionist movement.
	They're advocating for their own devastation and destruction.
	It's just stunning, Kevin, that they are blatant about it.
	And of course, treating all the other races as mere cattle.
	They exist only to serve the Jews and even the depopulation agenda from roughly 8 billion to 500 million is supposed to include the Jewish supremacists and their slaves.
	I think 2,800 slaves are entitled to sex slaves, workers' slaves, the whole bit.
	It is grotesque.
	Absolutely. And there are three billion Christians on Earth, so killing that many people to bring on your Messiah, that's going to be quite a task.
	Hopefully they're not up to it.
	So how about the don't say genocide section?
	This is the part about they won't let us talk about this stuff.
	I mean, how long will we be able to say things like we're saying on this show before they find ways of scrubbing us off the internet?
	I mean, I've already been deplatformed for like five or six leading platforms, starting with YouTube and Patreon and on from there.
	So here's Mahmoud Khalil, who's a perfectly legal resident of the United States with a green card, married to an American citizen, and for the crime of participating in protests against genocide, he was disappeared, banana republic fashion,
	And whisked off to a horrific gulag prison in Louisiana where he's being held.
	And I think the latest on that is, I didn't include the story, that the local Louisiana federal judge just approved his deportation, but his lawyers are appealing.
	Your thoughts, Jim?
	Oh, it's outrageous.
	I did a year of graduate work at Columbia in 68, 69. He's an honorable man.
	These student protests are completely appropriate.
	Would you believe, Trump has just today announced the appointment of a Jewish rabbi, a child Lubavitcher, to be a czar for anti-Semitism enforcement in the United States.
	And of course they're using his expanded definition rather than the classic.
	Which was, of course, to discount or disvalue an individual or his opinions because of his religious heritage, being a Jew.
	Today, now, it's been expanded to any criticism of Israel whatsoever is regarded as anti-Semitism.
	So I trade on all the emotional luggage attached to the classic definition to carry over against freedom of speech, which has become utterly meaningless.
	I have long said, if you don't have freedom of speech in America, it means nothing to be an American.
	And Donald Trump is blazing the trail here.
	I am disgusted.
	Yeah, and traditionally the law has said that green card holders are fully protected by the First Amendment.
	So if they can do this to him, theoretically they could do it to citizens like us.
	And I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they might not try.
	So here's more freedom of speech news.
	So Meta, or Facebook, has complied with 94% of takedown requests issued by Israel.
	Well, I guess they're not complete slaves of Israel yet, because that's 6% of the time they don't obey.
	But still, that basically means that Israel can pretty much get anything taken down that it wants.
	That's pretty insane.
	Yeah, I was blocked from Facebook long, long ago.
	It's outrageous.
	I mean, it should be the case.
	Let every voice be expressed.
	Let every opinion be advanced and argued.
	That's the way we search for truth, as Sir Karl Popper observed.
	Open debate.
	Rational discussion is our most effective method of discovering the truth.
	When it is compromised, when it's restrained or not permitted, that is because the objective is not the discovery of truth, but the promotion of propaganda.
	And that's what we have here in the USA today.
	Sad to say.
	Well, the truth about this genocide is so powerful and it's going to have such powerful effects against the Israelis and the Zionists that you can see why they're panicking like this and trying to shut everybody up and terrorize everybody.
	And another way they're shutting people up is by murdering journalists.
	They've now killed more journalists than both of the world wars put together and throw in the Korean War and the Vietnam War.
	including the wars in Cambodia and Laos, as well as the Yugoslav wars, the war in Afghanistan, and the ongoing Ukraine war.
	And this is all Israel deliberately targeting journalists so that they can't report the genocide.
	Hey, this is completely over the top.
	Oh, yeah.
	100%.
	100%. You're all over this, Kevin, and you're in that very category that's most at risk.
	I perhaps, to a lesser extent, your proximity in Morocco, I'm sorry to say, no doubt makes you more vulnerable than mine here in this little village of Oregon, just south of Madison, Wisconsin, but...
	We're both in that category of reporting news that the Israelis don't want the world to know, and therefore we are vulnerable.
	Yeah, I don't know if Morocco's any worse than Wisconsin at this point.
	I'm surrounded by people here in Morocco who agree with me.
	Pretty much, you have to work really hard to find somebody who doesn't in this entire country.
	That sort of adds a little veneer of, if not protection at least, it's kind of comfortable to live among sane people.
	And here in Morocco, speaking of Morocco, Imtihal Abousad, who's a woman who's a Moroccan engineer, works at Microsoft, protested Microsoft's involvement in the genocide.
	She probably doesn't really like...
	Being a direct participant who was responsible for genocide.
	So she protested and they fired her.
	And so this was the story about how she protested.
	There was an event where she stood up and said that the company has blood on its hands.
	And so there's a big protest movement now to get her reinstated.
	And of course, everybody here in Morocco supports that.
	This is Morocco World News, which is sort of the leading, very mainstream Moroccan English language outfit.
	Yeah, very good, absolutely.
	She liked a fellow at Columbia, but, you know, others across the many campuses are heroic.
	They're putting themselves at risk.
	Trump responded by massive funding, withholding grants in the billions.
	It's just staggering what's going on on behalf of Israel.
	The deference of the President of the United States to putting Israel first.
	Indeed. Well, you're not the only one who feels that way.
	I mean, I might be surrounded by people who agree with me here in Morocco, and by agreeing with me, I mean supporting Hamas.
	I mean, yeah, I wrote a whole article saying why I support Hamas, and you should too.
	And here in the Global South, Hamas has almost universal support.
	If I didn't like Hamas, and I went out and told people here in Morocco, I would get a lot of pushback.
	And fortunately, we all agree, we all support Hamas.
	Here in Morocco and throughout the Global South, 5, 6, 7 billion people support Hamas.
	And now, people in America may not have quite reached that level of awareness that it's okay to push back against genocide, including through military activity, which is what the Islamic resistance does in that part of the world, but that, at least in Israel,
	is... Well, shall we say, unfavorable.
	The majority of Americans now have an unfavorable view of Israel, despite the decades of propaganda funded by billions and billions of dollars coming from the 40% of American billionaires who are Jewish.
	Virtually all of those billionaires are radically pro-Israel, pro-Zionist, essentially traitors to the United States of America who have been propagandizing the American people on this issue, again, for decades, and that propaganda looks like it's failing.
	This is great news, Jim.
	It is 55% of the Americans bold to have an unfavorable view of Israel.
	It ought to be 95%.
	In fact, every nod to you ought to have an unfavorable opinion of Israel if you base it on objective evidence and rational standards of reasoning.
	So I interpret this as a positive sign, and I expect that number to climb.
	Okay, once it gets up to like 90-95%, maybe those billionaires will be in trouble.
	There was an interesting ideology article this week about sort of rigidly ideological people.
	And this scientist, Leora Zmigrod, says that there are two kinds of people in the world.
	There's the ideological people and then the not-so-ideological people.
	What's the difference?
	Well, she claims that the ideological people are basically wired to perceive some sort of tribal threat.
	And therefore, they buy into the propaganda coming from the tribal leader.
	They're going to have fear of others, fear of people outside their tribe, and then they're going to basically think very rigidly and interpret everything according to that grid.
	That strikes me as quite possible, and indeed even likely, but I think that it's not so much necessarily the sort of right-wing, the new right people.
	That the New York Times is trying to implicate with this.
	Who are the problem?
	I think the New York Times itself is the problem, because I think that the establishment in the United States is the one putting out most of the worst tribal propaganda.
	And then a lot of that establishment is Yahwist, you know, brainwashed by Jewish fanatical extremist supremacist tribalism.
	And, of course, the New York Times is never going to mention that.
	This is a variation of the attack on conspiracy theorists introduced by the CIA in the wake of criticism debunking the Warren Report.
	So instead of talking still about conspiracy theorists when conspiracies are so ubiquitous, as I observed in one of my early articles, conspiracies are as American as apple pie.
	They're now talking about ideology.
	Now this would require a predisposition toward and what ideology is it supposed to be?
	I think really what she's talking about, people who are capable of thinking things through and have the ability to sort out real, the truth from the illusion.
	The New York Times, of course, has been a major promoter of fantasies about all kinds of major issues in the past.
	I do not believe this is capable of being sustained.
	This article appears to me to be propaganda masquerading as scholarship.
	Yeah, well, I think there's some validity in the outlook that this author is putting out, but I think that it's being spun.
	By the establishment that she writes for and publishes in, in this case, the New York Times.
	But I thought it was an interesting read anyway.
	And I think that a lot of the so-called conspiracy theorists, people like us, are actually the non-ideologues, right?
	I mean, you, Jim, you were a big fan of Donald Trump, but you now have noticed all of these bad things that he's doing.
	And so the ideologues, the people who are fans of Trump, they can't see the bad things he's doing because they're such fans.
	Our good friend Rolf might be in that category, although maybe he's moved out of it by now.
	I don't know.
	Rationale requires adjusting your beliefs in response to new evidence or alternative hypotheses.
	You may have to...
	Reject hypotheses you previously accepted, accept hypotheses you previously rejected, and leave others in suspense.
	My evolution with Trump is a perfect illustration, just as you're observing, Kevin.
	But others, too, ought to be in relation to JFK, 9-11, even the moon landings.
	I mean, it's just stunning how much we know now about those events, each of which was grossly misrepresented to the American people.
	Okay. Well, speaking of JFK, that's our next category.
	So, this JFK task force hearing was reported.
	Where was this story at?
	Well, anyway, tell us about this, Jim.
	You were going to critique this story.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Well, before Congress, Representative Luna featured Oliver Stone and a fellow named Jim DiEugenio.
	Now, Oliver, of course, produced, directed his magisterial film JFK, released in 1991, which was the most accurate, comprehensive, and complete presentation of what actually happened in Dealey Plaza on 22 November 1963,
	ever presented to the American people through the mass media.
	But it was flawed in three major respects.
	He did not know or understand that Lee Oswald was actually in the doorway of the book depository at the time the JFK motorcade passed by, and therefore cannot have been not only the lone demented gunman, but one of the multiple shooters.
	On second, he posited three hit teams.
	That was a step in the right direction, but believe it or not, there turned out to have been eight.
	I have documented this in spades.
	And third, he didn't know that the Zapruder film had been massively edited and revised, including the removal of the limo stop after Jack had been hit twice in the back by a shot fired from the top of the county records building and in the throat by a shot fired from inside the triple underpass which passed through the windshield.
	Which, by the way, were widely broadcast on radio and television that afternoon.
	It was brought to a halt during which he was hit in the back of the head by a shot fired from the Dow Taxi.
	He slumped forward, Jackie used him back up, was looking him right in the face when he was hit in the right temple by a shot fired from the triple underpass of the picket fence.
	And then, near simultaneous, in the side of the head as well.
	So three shots to the head took place during the limo stop, which they excluded.
	They edited it out altogether from the film.
	There's an article on oons.
	We both admire what Ron has done with his website.
	A new book, Nails How JFK Was Taken Out in Dallas, that I published about...
	David W. Manick, MD, PhD's latest book, co-authored with Jerry Corsi, to publicize his discovery of the third shot to the head, which garnered nearly a thousand, I think 997 comments, more or less,
	and I encourage everyone to check it out, as well as an earlier piece of mine, What's Wrong with Conspiracy Theories, where I explain that.
	Because conspiracy theories are theories.
	They can be evaluated by the same criteria as applied to theories in science with great success, which I've been doing through collaborative research by bringing together the best experts to explain, you know, sort out what really happened.
	Now, in this case, Oliver and Eugenia were talking about events that were known at the time, 60 years later, about a...
	Bullet hole to the back of the head.
	Well, Manning discovered the autopsy x-rays had been altered to patch the blowout to the back of the head.
	They were talking about Lee not being, you know, where he may have been claimed to be because there were women on a stairway who should have seen him if he were coming down from the sixth floor or going up and did not see him.
	And that's, of course, because he wasn't there.
	But it's ridiculous that these were the claims they were making because they're ancient history.
	They appear to know nothing about the last 30 years of research, including even that Lee was in the doorway, which not only Jim Garrison knew, but before him Harold Weisberg published a whole series about the Warren Report called Whitewash.
	In his second volume, Photographic Whitewash, the last four pages, which was published in 1967, recount how The Warren Commission staff was having trouble concealing that we've been in the doorway.
	You know, so they're talking about ancient history and nothing new.
	All the research I have done, including now four collections of edited books about JFK, the first assassination signed in 1998, which has gone through 14 printings, Kevin, has been since JFK.
	But it appears Oliver Stone is utterly oblivious.
	Of any of that research, and I gotta say, I would describe their presentation before Luna as pathetic.
	Some may even regard it as a betrayal of JFK community because we've done so much research that's gone far beyond Oliver's magnificent work in JFK.
	So this promise of the Trump administration and some in Congress to start revealing all these secrets, you know, your AFK secrets, they're going to reveal all the records, et cetera, supposedly the UFO secrets and on and on and on.
	It looks like that's really not happening at any appreciable rate of speed, is it?
	Some material is slipping through the cracks, but a whole lot has been held back.
	Mike Pompeo apparently had the role of discouraging Trump from releasing early on when he wanted to get it all out there.
	A whole lot is being held back.
	But let me tell you something that did come through in an earlier batch.
	Larry Rivera went through.
	Now, none of this is...
	Put out online in a searchable form.
	So you have to go through it by hand.
	Larry is from Puerto Rico.
	He's multilingual.
	And he got a lot of documents about the Mexico City event where it was used by the Warren Commission as proof we had committed the crime because he was a pro-communist.
	Castro sympathized that he'd gone to Mexico City to obtain a visa to travel to Cuba and then make his escape back to the Soviet Union.
	Well, there he went through it.
	And of course, it turned out, I mean, this part has been known before, that there was an imposter Oswald there.
	We have photographic and audio.
	It was not Lee.
	Edgar even put out a memorandum to the station chiefs that someone in Mexico City was there impersonating Lee Oswald.
	And I say, if that's all you knew, you'd already understand this was a frame and a setup.
	But what Larry discovered in this latest batch, they put out a very cloudy, illegible version of Lee's passport in the past.
	But the Dallas police, when they took all of his property from his rooming house in Beckley, actually scanned The passport, and I think they didn't realize how revealing, because it states right in the passport, not valid for travel to Cuba.
	So the whole thing was manufactured, and guess what?
	Among the CIA assets were three presidents of Mexico.
	Interesting. And of course, these JFK documents that have been released seem there have been some tidbits that add to the case that Yes,
	that's not surprising.
	There's also a Schlesinger memorandum to JFK that he ought to disband or rein in the CIA.
	Of course, that was among the motives for the assassination where Lyndon initiated in Los Angeles in 1960.
	The plot was born there.
	When Jack beat him for the nomination, he invited Stuart Syming in Missouri to be his running mate.
	Bobby, but gave him overnight to think about it.
	Bobby went to the Johnson Suite to extend a pro-form invitation run with the president.
	That's a standard gesture made historically.
	Was astonished when Lyndon jumped on it.
	Threat to expose to Jack and Addison's disease, wasn't expected to live a long, healthy life, that among his dalliances was one with a beautiful woman who turned out to be a spy for East Germany, and that if he were not on the ticket, then any legislative proposal sent down from the White House would be dead on arrival,
	because in his position as a powerful majority leader, he'd bottle them up.
	Jack and Bobby tried to figure a way out what Lyndon had them boxed in and they had to accede to his demand.
	One of Johnson's wealthy backers hearing all this burst into the Johnson's sweet cursing and swearing because now Lyndon would help Jack become president.
	Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and told him what they had in mind.
	He came out all smiles saying he thought that was an excellent plan.
	Meanwhile then, thereafter, Bobby Baker would declare in public that Jack wouldn't live out his first term and that he would die a violent death, and Lyndon, in the course of events, would send his chief administrative aide, Cliff Carter, down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
	Okay, and that's...
	I think part of the story, there's also some, this was accomplished through professionals, including people in intelligence agencies, and there's a case that the Israeli Mossad and its organized crime assets had a big part of it, too, to save the Israeli nuclear program,
	as Michael Collins Piper wrote.
	Complex historical issue, and appreciate the work you've done to elucidate it, Jim.
	You were on The Real Deal talking about this on BitChute back in 2021.
	Well, I have hundreds of videos on JFK.
	If you go to my iTunes and put in Jim Fetzer comma JFK, you'll have access.
	This one is because I sent it to Oliver Stone prior to the release of JFK Revisited, which was done by this DiEugenio guy on the 18th.
	And there I lay out the whole plot, how it was put together.
	I identify many of the shooters.
	The revision I've made since is recognizing that, yes, just as you're implying, Alan Dulles was recruited by Linden to put the pieces together.
	So you had eight different sponsors, each of whom had their own shooter.
	It was a very complex, you know, mutual blood oath.
	Very much on the order of Murder on the Orient Express, Kevin, where you can distinguish between the sponsors, the facilitators, and the mechanics and their supervisors on the ground, the actual shooters, supervised by George Herbert Walker Bush and by Edward Lansdale,
	Air Force General responsible for assassinations around the world who appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
	Okay, and you made that case here at the, gave this presentation on who was responsible and why.
	That was just last month.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	I've continued pursuing this and laying out it different ways.
	Here I'm going through the conclusions of the people who knew Lyndon best up close and personal.
	Madeleine Duncan Brown, a mistress by whom he had a child, Stephen, born in 1950 after their affair began in 1948.
	She went to the home of Clint Murchison Sr. the night before where they had a ratification meeting, where Edgar Hoover was there, Richard Nixon was there.
	She thought it might have been in honor of Hoover who had stopped at the Murchison Ranch on the way to California to the Del Mar racetrack where Anytime he put down a bet, his horse won.
	Turns out the racetrack was owned by Clint Ferguson Sr., where Linden showed up late in the night and these heavy hitters disappeared into a boardroom.
	And when it came out, Linden strode toward her and she thought he'd whisper sweet nothings in his ear.
	Instead, he said in a hateful tone of voice, I won't have to put up with embarrassment from those Kennedy boys any longer after tomorrow.
	That's not a threat.
	That's a promise.
	The following day, actually, before the motorcade, he repeated the message.
	Six weeks later, they had a rendezvous in the Driscoll Hotel on New Year's Eve.
	Where she confronted him with rumors rampant in Dallas that he had been involved since no one stood to gain more personally.
	And he blew up at her and told her the CIA and the oil boys had decided he had to be taken out.
	We also have confirmation from Billy Solestis, a crony of Lyndon, who said that he'd had...
	...conversation with Cliff Carter and with Malcolm Mack Wallace, who was Lyndon's personal hitman, murdered a dozen people for Lyndon, including one of his own sisters, that they had been involved, from Barb McClellan, who worked at the office of Ed Clark,
	who was a powerful Texas attorney where much of the planning for the assassination was taking place.
	Roger Stone, as you know, of course, has a book, Who Killed JFK?
	The Case for Lyndon Johnson.
	We have E. Howard Hunt's final confession to his son, St. John, with whom I discussed this, when he thought he was about to die.
	He survived, but he told St. John the chain of command had gone from Lyndon Johnson to Cord Meyer of Cobert Ops at CIA to David Attlee Phillips, Western Hemisphere CIA, William Harvey, Assassinations CIA, to David Sanchez Morales for the Dallas operation.
	We also have Phil Nelson's magisterial book, LBJ, Mastermind of JFK's Assassination.
	So what I'm doing is reviewing all the pieces here, especially From those who knew him best, up close and personal.
	Okay, and here's yet another one, the JFK PSYOP.
	Yeah, Stu Peters.
	Stu Peters yesterday, yeah.
	Yeah, actually, the day before, he had me on Thursday night to talk about, in relation to the release of the documents, what we have learned, and I was able to give, he gave me, 21 minutes,
	Kevin, to review all this, and I want to encourage everyone, if you want an update, current, what we know about the assassination, this is a great place to begin, and then you can follow up by going to Jim Fetzer, JFK,
	and get all, you know, these hundreds of other videos I've done on virtually every aspect of the assassination.
	Especially with Gary King and Larry Rivera, where we have a new JFK show.
	We've done 300 of these shows updating research, and Oliver Stone and Neo Genio are oblivious of all of it.
	They don't have any idea.
	They have no clue of where things stand in terms of JFK research.
	So if Representative Luna wants to get current...
	I recommend there are five witnesses she should call.
	David W. Manick, MD, PhD, the leading expert on the medical evidence and the shots to the head.
	Douglas Horn, who is a senior analyst for military records for the Assassination Records Review Board.
	He's published a five-volume inside the ARRB and especially documents how the original film, an eight-millimeter already Split and developed in Dallas film was sent to the National Photographic Interpretation Center on Saturday,
	but where a revised version, a 16-millimeter unsplit film, was brought in to substitute on Sunday from Rochester, where the CIA has a secret photo and film lab called Hawkeye Works.
	John P. Costello, Ph.D., This time in electromagnetism, who's done a brilliant tutorial on internal features of the Zapruder film that prove it is a fabrication.
	Then Larry Rivera, who's not only the expert with the cutting-edge research on Mexico City, but who transcribed interviews with a motorcycle patrolman and their supervisor, Stavis Ellis.
	About the limo stop in Dallas, which I review here, by the way, it's fascinating, because during the limo stop, the officer to the back left, Bobby Harvest, got off his bike, ran between the cars,
	impossible if they'd been in motion, up to the grassy knoll.
	Officer Douglas Jackson motored up the grassy knoll until his bike fell over, then proceeded on foot.
	Five agents surrounded the limo.
	One took a chunk of skull, this triangular chunk of harbor fragment, threw it in the backseat while another, brace yourself for this, Kevin, Glenn Bennett climbed into the limousine to make sure JFK would be killed.
	I mean, it's just stunning stuff.
	And then on who is responsible and why myself.
	If she were to have those five witnesses testify, then the Congress would know where things stand with regard to JFK research and how it's gone before.
	Even including the appearance of DiEugenio and Oliver Stone was basically
	Okay, well...
	It doesn't surprise me that Oliver Stone isn't perfect, given that his movie was produced by Milchan, the Israeli smuggler of nuclear weapons from the United States.
	And, you know, the first time I heard of you, Jim, actually, was in the mid-90s, I think, was after Assassination Science came out.
	I found your book.
	I just happened to see it at the university bookstore in Madison, Wisconsin.
	You were teaching at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, at that time.
	And I went ahead and bought it out of curiosity and was favorably impressed.
	So that was my first introduction to somebody named Jim Fetzer, who I would then meet in person 10 years later as the 9-11 Truth Movement was getting underway.
	In Chicago, that book cabinet has been through 14 printings.
	Yeah, I still own it.
	So here's the Sandy Hook section.
	Here's your Sandy Hook, latest Sandy Hook bitches.
	This was from last year, an update of your Sandy Hook research.
	And quick disclaimer, I am not fully convinced by your take on Sandy Hook.
	However, I'm a sympathetic observer to your trials and tribulations with Lenny Posner.
	You wrote what I regard as a single best piece on the legal lynching of a truth seeker, Jim Fetzer, Stalinist style show trial.
	That captured a flavor of what I endured.
	Perfectly, Kevin.
	No one could have written a better piece for which I congratulate you.
	If you go back to the College of Complex lecture, this is one of a number I've given.
	For the last three years, I've been in contact and communication with two of the participants in the event.
	It was, of course, a FEMA drill.
	While the book observed where I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, And we concluded this school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and there had been a FEMA drill for which we even had the FEMA manual.
	I have learned from them over the last three years where they were reaching out because they didn't like the way I was being brutalized in the courts in Wisconsin.
	They informed me everyone in the community who participated loves the book.
	Because it's honest.
	They don't like how I'm being abused.
	They explained the school wasn't even an elementary school.
	It was a special needs school.
	And it actually was closed in 2006.
	And Eric Holder, who had become Attorney General, came to Newtown and offered the community $114 million.
	To participate in an event that was supposed to illustrate what could happen if we don't take guns away from the American people.
	They had auditions for the roles.
	They signed non-disclosure agreements.
	They continue to have fringe benefits to this day, including paying no taxes and free college.
	Now, the two with whom I've been in communication were cast in the roles of...of Emily Parker, little blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl, who is supposed to have been a victim, and Victoria Soto, who is supposed to be a teacher, who heroically gave her own life.
	And in this, I have photographs that have been...
	Given to me by a mutual friend of theirs, Steve Lucia, and they have approved.
	You're going to see everything's approval.
	It even shows Victoria Soto getting a degree from the NYU in like 2017 using her own name, Victoria Soto.
	They've also sent me the Sandy Hook headquarters in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
	Showing the drill exercise L366 right on the schedule and a map of how to get from Bridgeport down to the school to make your way where the exercise would be held.
	So there's a wonderful overview here.
	I want everyone to have a background to understand how thoroughly I've been investigating and continue to this day.
	Well, the judge who wouldn't even let you speak Your truth in court obviously didn't succeed in shutting you up about this issue.
	Not for lack of trying.
	That's for sure.
	Some people confuse me and Alex, but we are actually handling this in very different ways.
	I offered to be a witness, an expert witness in his trials, both in Connecticut and in Texas.
	But both sides opposed my entering the case.
	Here, if you go to an article on my blog at jameshvetzer.org, you can watch fake news at Truth versus Alex Jones, where I go through this phony video about him, implying that he threw his case.
	But there are slips, there are little gaps there, where proof that it was a drill, just as I maintained, are actually in the documentary.
	A fellow named Bill Bonatati from Connecticut and I went through the film together.
	You can only find that.
	You can also download the book now in a redacted edition.
	When it was banned, just less than a month after it had gone on sale, even though it had sold nearly 500 copies, I recognized it was political and released it for free as a PDF.
	Our friends have told me it's been downloaded millions of times.
	Well, they sued me over three sentences in the book.
	It's 440 pages.
	They found three sentences to sue me where I was declaring that a death certificate for the plaintiff, who calls himself Leonard Posner, Declaring the death certificate, which was incomplete, it had no file number,
	it had no town or state certification where the town certifies the content is accurate, the state certified it's a true copy, was fake.
	I was sued for that and they attached to the complaint a complete death certificate that had a file number, state and town certification claiming they weren't materially different.
	When obviously they were.
	I mean, material differences are ones that make a difference in the eyes of the law.
	So what happened there was they actually, the judge precluded my bringing in this vast amount of evidence, which even includes the FBI consolidated crime report for 2012, which remains in place to this day a dozen years later,
	declaring there were no murders in Newtown in 2012, directly contact.
	Predicting the official scenario.
	The judge during the scheduling conference excluded all my evidence.
	He said, I know you have an opinion about what didn't happen at Sandy Hook, but this was a judge's words now.
	That has nothing to do with the accuracy or the truthfulness of the death certificate.
	And he excluded it, even though the death certificate says that the decedent Noah Bosner died at Sandy Hook.
	On 14 November 2012, a multiple gunshot was.
	I mean, this was both legally and logically absurd, Kevin.
	But Jim, wasn't it partly, you know, you're doing in a sense, because I think, didn't you, you were representing yourself during the first phase of the trial, and there was, you went ahead and agreed with a stipulation that the issue would be narrowed down to that birth certificate,
	right? I didn't agree to the stipulation.
	The judge imposed it.
	Not only that, but by the time of the oral hearings, and yes, there were originally three defendants.
	It was myself, co-editor, co-author, Mike Palachuk, co-editor, co-author.
	And Dave Gehary, who is a publisher for Moonrock Books.
	Now, under the law, a company cannot represent itself but has to have attorneys.
	Well, he actually had two.
	I thought it was ridiculous that one of those attorneys should represent me and Mike.
	But no, that didn't happen.
	So he had two attorneys.
	Mike and I had none.
	He reached an agreement out of court settlement with Posner and withdrew from the case.
	Mike eventually would also withdraw, though he hung in there as long as he could.
	Dave says that after talking with Lenny Posner, he accepted that Lenny Posner at least sincerely believed that he lost his sons.
	It wasn't even Lenny Posner, Kevin.
	The whole thing's a fabrication.
	Listen to this.
	I mean, this was already in my opening answer, my reply to the complaint.
	It began by saying, assuming the plaintiff, Leonard Posner, to be a real person.
	In the end, I explained, I don't think it is.
	I believe it's actually a fellow named Reuben Vabner.
	And get this, Noah Posner was actually a fiction made up out of photographs of Reuben Vabner's younger son, Michael Vabner, when he was a child.
	He was very photogenic.
	So there's not even a real Noah Posner to be the victim.
	And this is part of my attempt to reopen the case.
	I also got from my friends in Newtown photographs of a party that was playing the role of Leonard Posner in courts being prepared for a 60 Minutes interview where they brought in this world-famous makeup artist to reconstruct his face to make it look more like the...
	Sandy Hook, Leonard Posner, who's actually his older son, Benjamin Favner.
	So the party that Harry was talking to wasn't even so far removed from Leonard Posner.
	It wasn't even Reuben Vabner who's playing the role.
	It was actually Benjamin Vabner.
	I've got all this documented now in a case, a reopened case, pursuant to extrinsic fraud and fraud upon the court.
	It's also in my motion to recuse the judge.
	They perpetrated all this fraud.
	And of course, they were supporting perjury.
	The Posner attorneys, they knew full well this was not the alleged...
	Playing to Fletcher Posner, who himself is a fiction.
	So you wouldn't believe the strength of the evidence I have, Kevin.
	They're trying to evade it as much as they can.
	I right now have four appeals, four, before the Court of Appeals.
	The last one lacking, only the last stage.
	They tried to defer from submitting a response to the fourth of these by a motion to dismiss.
	Which I defeated.
	I defeated the motion to dismiss.
	The Court of Appeals rejected it.
	So now they've got to submit their response.
	They had 30 days from the rejection of the motion to respond, which occurred about 10 days ago, maybe two weeks ago.
	And then I will have my reply brief.
	And then there'll be four decisions to be made by the Court of Appeals.
	But I'm telling you, Kevin, the evidence is overwhelming.
	Overwhelming. So we're finding out.
	This is a litmus test of the courts in Wisconsin.
	Of course, I have other options.
	If this fails, I could take it to the federal court.
	I could try and appeal to the Supreme Court.
	But you've got to exhaust the legal remedies within a state before you can carry it elsewhere.
	So that would mean I'd need to appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
	But the fact is that the courts here in Wisconsin...
	Are utterly incapable of dealing fairly.
	I mean, I was entitled to a trial by a jury.
	Anytime there are disputed facts, the juries decide the facts, the judges only apply the law.
	But the judge went so far as to rule out all my evidence so there'd be no disputed facts that he even excluded the reports of two.
	Forensic document experts who confirm not only was the death certificate I said was fake in the book fake, but so was the attachment to the complaint fake.
	So were two others, one David obtained from the town and one I'd obtained from the state.
	All four were fake.
	And the way these things are determined in courts is by document experts.
	Well, I had not one, I had two.
	They were unopposed.
	The judge has excluded them on the ground that in his...
	This is purely subjective, and it involves weighing evidence, which he's not entitled to do.
	They weren't helpful.
	He said they weren't helpful.
	And, of course, they aren't helpful if you're trying to gerrymander a predetermined verdict by having a summary judgment, which is only applicable if there are no disputed facts, when there are massive disputed facts.
	And the only way he got there was by excluding them all.
	I mean, it was just outrageous.
	There's even a book about it.
	A first book about it by Ron Avery, who has a whole blog of documents in my case, of which are over 600 now, Kevin, entitled Judicial Blundering of Dr. James Fetzer, 2024.
	Very nice.
	He understands the issues very well.
	When I went to the Supreme Court, I was arguing on both 7th and 14th Amendment grounds, because in Texas, they have a different summary judgment procedure.
	In my case, it would have been tossed outright in Texas.
	So I was arguing, and this is peculiar.
	During my arguments in Wisconsin, the plaintiffs were contending that the right to trial by jury had never been...
	...in court to apply to the states.
	And when I did research, I found the nine other of the first ten articles of Bill Rice have been affirmed, but the seventh had not.
	But it's, get this, Kevin, it's built into the Constitution of Wisconsin.
	It says you're entitled to a trial by jury in a case of disputed facts.
	So, of course, the judge was just manufacturing the outcome of there being no disputed facts.
	I mean, I'm...
	So Ron Avery's book, you can check it out, Judicial Plundering of Dr. James Fetzer.
	It's a little book, but it's...
	I think I've read some of his stuff.
	He may have published some of it on the internet.
	Yes, yes, he's published a lot of my case before.
	And so the Supreme Court, I was arguing that the Seventh Amendment required, not only should they be affirming, you know, the Seventh, straightening out summary judgment here in Wisconsin, which has a bizarre procedure.
	But make it uniform for all the states.
	And I was actually acutely disappointed when the Supreme Court failed to act on my petition for a writ of certiorari.
	Yeah, I agree that it was a bizarre...
	courtroom ordeal that you went through and it was backwards because again as you say the juries are supposed to decide the facts and then the judge normally decides the penalty but here they had it backwards the judge had there was no jury there was only a judge in in the initial phase of the trial which is where what should have determined the facts but then the judge Issue the stipulation saying that,
	oh no, there's no dispute of the facts because I just accept what one side believes and I don't accept what the other side believes.
	So that struck me as a little strange.
	You picked up on the trial for damages, which was ludicrous, but you captured the spirit of the entire event, Kevin, perfectly.
	That's just such a wonderful article.
	Okay, well, here we are back at the article.
	And again, I'm not fully convinced by your arguments around Sandy Hook and including some of the trial stuff, but if people want to see my take on it, which is still sympathetic to you, seeing that you didn't get a fair trial, people can read this article at the Unz Review.
	You can just search for it.
	You'll find it.
	And then Alex Jones, of course, he kind of caved, unlike you.
	That's a long story, which we won't get into.
	But then...
	I had Victor Hugo Vaca on my show recently after he was recommended by one of my audience members.
	And in the middle of the show, I was kind of shocked by his claim that you threw your case, which I had witnessed.
	And so I explained to him that no, whatever you want to accuse Jim Fetzer of, throwing that case is not part of it.
	But apparently he's bought into this.
	I think he had some there's some guy who's been hounding you that came up with that claim and Victor Hugo believed it.
	So anyway, one of the reasons that you're here with me on False Flag Weekly News is to get your chance to tell your side of the story here.
	But I think you just pretty much did.
	Yeah, it's bizarre, Kevin.
	He doesn't know anything about the case.
	He's citing an attorney by the name of R. Wynn, W-Y-N, Young, who claims...
	He can tell that the case was thrown by both Alex Jones and me because this is his claim.
	No plaintiff would bring a suit in Sandy Hook, which is, in his opinion, such an obvious fraud, unless they knew that the defendant would throw it.
	Well, that's ridiculous.
	They had a judge who was on their side.
	They had a judge who was going to exclude all my evidence.
	So they had a different rationale.
	But he admits, this guy R. Wynn Young, He's never read any of my briefs.
	He's never read the book.
	He's never looked at any of my videos.
	In other words, he knows nothing about my case.
	He does claim now that another attorney by the name of Todd Callender, where Todd appears to be a reputable attorney, he's got offices in Boulder and in Golden, Colorado, and also in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, agrees with him.
	I think it's ambiguous.
	But his claiming that he agrees with him allows Victor to make the claim that he's got attorneys who substantiate his claim that I threw the case.
	How can I have thrown a case when I'm still in court fighting the case?
	How can I have thrown the case when I took it all the way to the Supreme Court?
	How can I have thrown the case?
	There's even a book about it that they obviously have never read.
	So I've been forced to conclude that Victor Hugo has an agenda of his own.
	There have been conflicts with me and Joaquin Agopian and Russ Winter in the past because he was attacking a colleague, Brian Davidson, for taking exception to Victor's mantra.
	It's the Jews!
	He says over and over again.
	And back on 17 December 2024, Brian...
	During a two-hour show called Truth vs.
	News at the end of the first hour, Brian explained how he felt that was an oversimplification, and that there were many parties involved here, including the Pilgrim Society, the Vatican, we've got Jews Against Genocide, and he objected to Vickers' oversimplification for dramatic effect,
	and he withdrew.
	...from continuing with Victor at the end of the first hour.
	Now, I respected Brian's stance.
	Victor, however, would subsequently begin attacking Brian as being a coward for having the intellectual integrity to stand up for his views.
	And while I had been including Victor as a part of the fearsome foursome that was a show on Wednesday with Joaquin, Russ, Victor, and myself, I dropped him.
	I propose if he'd stop attacking Brian, we could have a reconciliation, and he could come back on the show, but he refused.
	No, he said it was his obligation, you know, to defend himself.
	And would you believe, Kevin, at this point in time, I mean, it's staggering.
	He's published 250 attacks on me and Joaquin and Ross.
	I mean, all by name.
	He puts them in his titles.
	Over 200, 250, maybe even 300 by now.
	In other words, he's gone completely off the cliff, over the top.
	I mean, in my opinion, he's lost it.
	Something is terribly wrong.
	Well, it seems like an unproductive way to spend your time.
	Joaquin is, in fact, a licensed counselor, psychological family counselor, and it's his opinion.
	That Victor Hugo suffers from narcissistic personality disorder, and we've been doing some research on Victor, and he did many weird things in the past.
	In Miami, for example, in 2008, there was an article in a publication called New Times about Victor having hung a four-foot-long penis, a diagram of a penis, you know, to attract attention,
	and they're saying this is one of Miami's I mean, strange as there's other stuff like this there, Kevin, and it's very weird.
	He's one of these weird modern artists, apparently.
	Okay, so people can learn more about that by listening to your fearsome threesome plus one.
	That's right.
	This is the radio show where he again, he did say, it's the Jews, and he talked about people writing that on money and stuff.
	If he could copyright the phrase, it's the Jews, he actually might make some money.
	But in any case, moving on from Victor Hugo Vaca to The Gods Must Be Crazy, we're at the end of the show, and the final story is the YouTuber arrested after leaving a Diet Coke on an isolated tribe's island.
	This 24-year-old Mikhail Viktorovich Poliketov, or whatever, was arrested after going to the North Sentinel Island in the Indian Ocean.
	Where the local tribespeople attack, kill, and perhaps eat those who come to visit them.
	So he thought he would bring a Diet Coke to, I guess, wash himself down.
	And it didn't work.
	So anyway, there's the international crazy hit situation, comedy, whatever.
	The gods must indeed be crazy, given the stuff that the world is going through.
	And that's the end of our show.
	So thank you so much, Jim Fetzer.
	Always good to get back in touch.
	And keep up the great work.
	God bless.
	And keep on searching for the truth.
	Kevin, I think you're doing a fabulous job.
	And this story was really strange because it's illegal to visit this island.
	This is an isolated, primitive tribe.
	They've actually killed other people who've come aboard the island with bows and arrows.
	He's lucky he's not dead.
	But leaving behind a Diet Coke, you know, a lot of articles out there saying there are lots of ingredients in Diet Coke that do harm and even promote type 2 diabetes.
	So many of those, I think, who are drinking Diet Cokes in the belief that they're improving their health.
	are actually damaging it.
	And let me thank you.
	You are very gracious to have me come on here.
	And I very much appreciate it when Victor Hugo was there attacking me for throwing my case at you, said him right.
	No one is familiar with the case would ever adopt that view, but he's out there aggressively promoting it.
	He's on some kind of campaign of propaganda.
	And I do think, Kevin, it's to try to create divisions within the Truth community, because given my work on JFK 9-11, Sandy Hook, and more, given Joaquin's work on pedophilian politics, where he's the leading expert,
	he's got a five-volume set of books about it, given Russ Winter's role in, you know, keeping the public abreast of all kinds of bizarre things, I think he feels he's got a big target here, and he's working very hard to accomplish his mission.
	Okay, well, I'll...
	Maybe I can get you and Victor Hugo together on a podcast live from North Sentinel Island.
	The three of us will take a boat there with three Diet Cokes and have it out.
	All right, take care, Kevin.
	See you next time.
	Wonderful. Keep up the great work, Kevin.
	Real pleasure.

▲