All Episodes
Previous Next
March 29, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:45
Greater Israel, Gaza, Boston Strong, JFK, AIPAC, Mckinney & The Pledge, Titanic
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 120 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips, news stories I don't know are coming.
For my spontaneous and unrehearsed response, it's proven surprisingly popular.
I mean, here we are on episode 120.
What do you got for me today, Gary?
I've got a lot of things, of course.
I just wanted to talk a little bit about last week, we put up our rebuttal about the Titanic being switched by the Olympic.
And man, I've never seen so many furious people against it.
They just have to believe it's the Rothschilds, it's the New World Order, you know, and all that.
But I do want to say this, put a big feather in my hat, maybe to Bob Ballard, who discovered the Titanic, contacted me.
And said he doesn't know where all this came from.
He wished it would die out, but it doesn't.
So, you know, so it was like one of my big heroes reaching out to me.
It just blew me away completely.
Well, Gary, Gary, just to emphasize, he was saying you were right.
He was telling you you were right.
Right. See, I don't see what the problem is.
We have the Olympic.
The top deck goes all the way across with no windows.
All right, then you go down and you take a picture of the Titanic that Bob Ballard took himself, and there are windows across the promenade deck.
That's only one thing.
So I just want everyone to know that I have dedicated myself, with a little help from Bob, to make a really high-quality professional video debunking this foolishness, you know?
And, you know, I'm a little disappointed in the...
You know, conspiracy community or the truth of community, because if it's not all out, you know, JFK's still alive and, you know, he faked his death, then they don't want to hear it.
It's like, if it's not over the top, they're not interested, you know, so.
It is a strange phenomenon, Gary.
I've been confronted with those who want to claim he...
He faked his death.
Well, then what are his brains doing all over the trunk of the car?
What's Jackie climbing out for that chunk of his skull and brains, you know?
What are the physicians doing in Parkland?
Are they making it all up when they say he had this gaping fist-side hole in the back of his head that cerebellar as well as cerebral tissue was extruding from?
What about the shot to the throat that Dr. Malcolm Perry described three times as a wound of entry?
I mean...
Chuck Crenshaw, Dr. Charles Crenshaw, contributed to my first collection of expert studies on JFK, Assassination Science 1998.
He actually was the last physician to observe the body as it was wrapped in sheets and placed in the bronze ceremonial casket.
He closed JFK's eyes, which is one way we know that one of the...
Alleged autopsy photographs later show his eyes wide open, which isn't possible because Crenshaw had closed them.
And, of course, we had other proof that it was a fake body.
It was the Major, that Dennis David, who was the NCO in charge of logging, who went in and out of the morgue, was ordered not to report.
Clearly, they had something up their sleeve.
Now, I think those...
Who want to believe the whole thing was fake will leap on evidence that was used to mislead the true causes of death and suppose that's all there is to it.
But the problem is that's not all there is to it.
There's a whole lot more.
For example, I have spoken personally with Dennis David, with Paul O'Connor, with Jim Jenkins, with Gerald Custer, who is actually the...
The radiation technologists who took the x-rays.
They all worked on the body at Bethesda.
So we not only have the witnesses at Parkland, we have the witnesses at Bethesda, and then of course we have the witnesses who saw his brains blown out at Dealey Plaza.
I'm not quite sure where we can ask.
We've also gone through and explained how they falsified the evidence.
And what appears to me to be the case is that those who...
I want to believe JFK is alive, and I've never heard an explanation for why in God's name he'd want to fake his death.
I mean, that takes him out of the loop politically.
He's no longer a significant figure.
If it's discovered he's alive, he's held in contempt as a scurrilous fraud and a cat for having faked his death and caused grief by so many Americans.
I'll bet some even committed suicide.
The whole idea is loopy, Gary.
They're looking at evidence that was manufactured by the CIA to mislead the public about what really happened, as though that were all there were to.
As though that weren't the objective of all my efforts, beginning with that first book in 1998, then Murder in Dealing Plaza in 2000, then The Greats of Rudolf Ilmo in 2003.
We are sorting out the authentic evidence from the fake.
That's what the hell it's been all about.
That's what I've been doing from the beginning for over 30 years now, Gary.
So I find it just a tad offensive that these people who are pretending to know what they're talking about obviously haven't done any research.
They don't grasp that's what we've been about from the beginning, sorting out the fabricated evidence.
From the real evidence to figure out what actually happened.
And once you do that, the whole case just falls apart.
It's very obvious who is responsible and why.
Because, for example, the KGB could not have extended its reach into Bethesda Naval Hospital to alter x-rays under the control of medical officers of the U.S. Navy and the Secret Service.
Anti-Castro Cubans.
Could have substituted someone else's brain for the brain of JFK.
The mafia could have got its hands on the Zapruder film, subjected to very sophisticated alteration.
They wouldn't even have the ability to do it.
So once you understand the extent of the fabricated evidence, where it happened, who was responsible, you realize it had to be someone who was in with the Secret Service, with the medical officers, the U.S. Navy.
And that leads us to CIA, Lyndon Johnson, and a host of others.
I mean, Gary, the case just falls apart.
So I wish they would pay more attention to the very serious, dedicated evidence.
I mean, I brought together the best experts in the world.
Bob Livingston, MD, World Authority on the Human Brain, also an expert on wound ballistics.
It was he who discovered and certified.
The brain shown in diagrams and photographs at the National Archives can't be the brain of JFK because it's got a completely intact cerebellum, this compact part of the brain at the base, and yet cerebellar tissue was extruding to Parkland.
So either you got, oh, I've got like at least 10 physicians from Parkland reporting cerebellar as well as cerebral tissue extruding.
You got a world authority on the human brain who is an expert on wound ballistics explaining, give me a break.
Then, of course, we got David Bandic, MD, PhD, PhD in physics, MD, University of Michigan, board certified in radiation oncology, which is a treatment of cancer using x-ray therapy.
David went into the National Archives already in 1992 and performed.
Optical densitometry studies, where by measuring the amount of light that passes through an x-ray, you can determine the relative density of the objects whose exposure to x-rays created the image and discovered there was this roughly cashew-shaped area in the x-ray that was far too dense to be human bone.
So unless JFK was a bonehead, this had to be an artificial contrivent to conceal.
That blowout in the eye in going through the Zapruder frames reasoned that they spent so much time covering up the blood at the back of the head in early frames where they very crudely just blacked it out.
Maybe they'd overlooked that in later frames you can actually see the wound and discovered in 374 you can see the wound.
This is Jackie getting up, about to climb out, going after that chunk of Jack's skull and brains.
You can see the wound.
So I compare it.
I explain all this.
I'm telling you, I don't want to say these people are numbskulls.
I want to say that they have acted in an irresponsible fashion because they've not even reviewed the existing research.
So I find this offensive in the extreme.
There you got Jack with a blowout at the back of the head.
You can see it right in the Zapruder frame 374.
I explain all this.
Dozens and dozens of places, Gary.
So let me suggest, anyone who still has doubts, you got to understand, what we've been doing for over 30 years is sorting out the real from the fabricated evidence, and you can find versions of it all over the place.
I have dozens.
Of interviews about JFK.
One we did together, Gary, has been among the most popular.
Another JFK special, 18 November 2021, which I dedicated to Oliver Stone, is very good.
So go to my BetChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and do a search on JFK special, 18 November 2021, and watch it.
And absorb what I'm explaining.
Because I'm giving you a distillation of 30 years of research.
Another member of my research group was Charles Crenshaw.
That physician was the last to close his eyes.
And his attorney, Brad Kesai, brilliant guy.
I mean, I'm telling you, that book, Gary, of all I have published, 40 altogether.
It was by far the most successful, went through 14 printings, and is still available on Kindle on Amazon.com.
People ought to get their act together and do a serious review of the literature before they go off on these harebrained chases, wild goose chases after the imaginary.
Fantasy that JFK survived his assassination.
It's just really, really deplorable, Gary.
I mean, a lot of these people are sincere, but they're just not very good at research, I'm sorry to say.
They believe what they find, but they've only found a part.
Of the CIA fabricated, and they conclude because those parts were fabricated, the whole thing was fake.
Not understanding, they were fabricated to mislead.
So it's amazing, Gary, amazing.
I'm with you.
And congratulations on hearing back from the man who discovered Titanic.
You got it right, Gary.
And I like that fact about the windows on the promenade deck, that they're covered.
On Olympic, but they're open on Titanic, and we got photos from the ship at the bottom of the sea, and they're open, meaning it is Titanic.
Absolutely. Talk about being starstruck.
I got goosebumps when I heard from them.
But anyway, I was thinking maybe we can make some videos to rebut all this JFK stuff, but wait a minute.
We've got 350 of them.
If you want to take a long time...
Look, it's the new JFK show.
It's still on YouTube.
It's been demonetized.
But look, Larry Rivera, Jim, and I have been at this a very long time.
And don't get me going about Jackie shot him, the driver turned around and shot him.
You know, it's just getting out of control.
And it's disrespectful to the people that perished.
Because there was more than just JFK.
So, all right, here we go.
Okay. Wait, speaking of JFK...
We're actually in the process of tracking down two specific documents.
And also, too, Jesse, I would like to actually tell the American people, it was made aware to me this evening that NBC actually has a video that's never been seen before.
We're actually going to be sending a letter requesting that from NBC because it allegedly shows Oswald near the vehicle when the assassination took place, which means that he couldn't have been the shooter.
So, again, we're tracking down all this information.
Look, there's even a CIA document that came out that Mr. Morley pointed out that actually said that the CIA never bought the lone gunman theory.
And so I think the American people had an inclination as to what we were saying, but we never had the hard evidence until now.
And so it's important to note that in a free and fair society, how could you operate or have an agency operating in the shadows?
And so kudos to President Trump, also Director Radcliffe and Tulsi Gabbard for pushing for this transparency.
It is going to be generational changing that they've done this, and we hope to bring forward legislation.
And two to ensure that this never happens again for future generations to come.
You're saying NBC has been keeping this tape of Oswald under wraps?
Correct. In fact, Director Stone actually told us that he was showed this tape, that it was a secondary copy, and that he said that this could blow open the entire GFK.
What I will also tell you, though, Jesse, is he said that NBC has been very, very much so guarding this tape.
And so I believe that that tape belongs to the American people.
We are going to be sending a letter asking for that tape.
And I would encourage everyone to ask NBC to release that tape to the public.
It's important, not just for our investigations, but so the American people know the truth as to what happened with John F. Kennedy.
All right.
What'd you make of that?
Well, what exact...
What video are they talking about, Gary?
I understand about him being in the doorway, which we know about, but I've never seen or heard of a video about him, you know, being near the limousine.
That's complete news to me.
Yeah, that's fantastic.
He wasn't ever near the limousine.
So what the hell's going on?
And by the way, just in addition, for those who don't understand how the...
Home movies, including The Zapruder, have been massively edited.
I have six witnesses who have seen what they call the other film, which is a less edited version.
Whether it's complete, they're not willing to assert because they can't with certainty.
Six! Some of them have seen it at least three times.
Some of them have seen it three different times.
And they confirmed the limo stop, which we learned about through Larry's work.
On the Fred Newcomb interviews with the four motorcycle escort officers and their supervisor, Stavacellas, that the limousine was brought to a complete halt.
And we've reconstructed all the activities that took place where Bobby Hargis left rear, parked his bike, ran between the limousines, which he could not have done were they in motion, up to the grassy knoll.
Five agents got out and surrounded the limousine.
One took a chunk of skull from a little boy and threw it in the backseat while, and this is most astonishing, another climbed into the limousine.
We're not talking about Clint Hill who rushed up onto the back.
He was Jackie's personal bodyguard.
We're talking about Glenn Bannett, who climbed in, and Gary, you and I were just as astonished as could be when Larry revealed this research, suggesting an agent, well, such an obvious indication of Secret Service complicity, they had to take it out.
So anyone who thinks this hasn't been a massive CIA op, I'll tell you, they need to get their head screwed on right, because the evidence is simply overwhelming.
I agree.
I think we should call this the new JFK show number or whatever number it is.
...
of concern to publishers as well as editors.
I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger.
The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some, but the dimensions of its threat...
Have loomed large on the horizon for many years.
Whatever our hopes may be for the future, for reducing this threat or living with it, there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security.
A challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.
This deadly challenge He imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the president.
Two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril.
I refer first to the need for far greater public information and second to the need for far greater official secrecy.
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings.
We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
Even today There is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions Even today There is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it and There is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security Will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits
of official censorship and concealment that I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control and no official of my administration whether his rank is high or low civilian or military should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news to stifle dissent to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know but
I do ask But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to re-examine his own standards.
There is no moral equivalency.
Israel does not name public squares after terrorists.
Israel does not pay its children to stab random Palestinians.
Okay, Dr. Pester, that one's a long one, so I had to cut it short.
Well, Gary, it's just terribly disturbing because the contrast between JFK and DJT is simply stunning.
Trump is imposing so many forms of censorship and suppression of freedom of speech.
Jack was a great champion of...
Accountability, transparency, accessibility.
Listening to him make that speech is just very moving to me because it prompts me to reflect on the profundity of the loss to the American people.
Not just to our society, but even to the world at large by having this man taken out in Dallas in such a brutal fashion, because he actually had an agenda for peace, he had an agenda for truth, he had an agenda for justice, and sad to say, as strong a supporter as I have been of Donald J. Trump.
I do not see that in the man today, the guy I voted for, because he campaigned on bringing an end to these stupid wars, which he's now expanding on being a champion of freedom of speech, which he's now compromising, all for the benefit of Israel, Jerry.
Gary, I'm sorry to say, those who talk about us as a...
The United States of America, or as the United States of Israel, I'm sorry to say, are very close to the mark.
We seem to have lost our way, and it's not at all clear to me how it's going to be restored.
I agree 100%.
Okay, this might help a little bit.
Our borders will extend from Lebanon, the Great Desert, which is Saudi Arabia, and then from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates.
And who's on the other side of the Euphrates?
The Kurds.
And the Kurds are our friends.
So we have the Mediterranean behind us, the Kurds in front of us, Lebanon, which really needs the umbrella of protection of Israel.
And then we're going to take, I believe we're going to take Mecca, Medina and Mount Sinai and purify those places.
When we think of the land of Israel, Many of us tend to think of the small sliver of land along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
While this is currently the established land of the State of Israel, the boundaries of Israel according to the Elohim, God of the Hebrews, is much larger.
Based on the verses from Ezekiel chapter 47 verse 13 to 21, it is evident that the passage outlines specific borders for the division of the land.
The description goes beyond the current geographical borders of the modern state of Israel and include regions that extend into present-day Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.
In Genesis chapter 15 verse 18, it says, To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates.
This is the Promised Land.
That is why the founding father of Israel explained his vision that the state of Israel will be from the Nile River in Egypt until the Euphrates River in Iraq.
This ideology is depicted in Israeli flag.
Two blue stripes mean from Nile River to Euphrates River.
This is the Promised Land.
The idea of Greater Israel has found support among certain groups and individuals, particularly within Israel.
Some political and religious factions advocate for the realization of Greater Israel, which generally refers to the annexation or controls of territories beyond the borders established after the Six Days War in 1967.
Bezalel Yoel Smotrich as an Israeli far-right politician and the current Minister of Finance in 2022 is known for his advocacy of the realization of the Greater Israel.
Actually, the Greater Israel is not a new idea.
It is an old ideology that has been planned very well.
The Greater Israel Organization was formed In July 1967, a month after Israel captured the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights in the Six Days War, It called on the Israeli government to keep the capture areas and to settle them with Jewish populations.
The Arabs that stay were round up and wall in, take over land and force the inhabitants out.
The Land of Israel movement was a political organization in Israel during the 1960s and 1970s which subscribe to an ideology of Greater Israel.
The 1967 war Change thing for Israel.
Israel triples in land mass.
They started on a path of expansion land and population growth.
America backed Israel from the start and still does until today.
If you look at the current situation, Israel is still expanding their territory.
They take full control of Gaza and control the West Bank.
They even built many houses on the Palestinian land.
They are so ambitious in making their dream come true.
They want the greater Israel become reality.
Many Muslims are terrified by this ideology.
The Muslims today are weak and helpless.
If you look at the Middle East map, Israel is just a small country in the Middle East, but soon it will expand its borders to neighboring countries.
What do you think?
Leave in the comment.
That was a simply superb explanation of the Greater Israel Project from beginning to end.
I'm very, very impressed, Gary.
And bear in mind, the Israelis will brook no opposition.
They declare this to be God's will, just as they take it to be God's will that the goyim shall vanish from the earth, especially Christians.
Rabbi! Schneerson, who many believe was the Mashiach, the return of the Jewish God to Earth, said, no, no, he couldn't be the Mashiach because there are still Christians alive on the face of Earth.
Think about it.
The Jews, the Zionists, the extremists, and by that I mean to exclude Jews against genocide.
Jews who are decent human beings who believe in mutual respect, Jews who are non-genocidal.
The whole project is to exterminate Christians from the face of earth because they are despised by the Jews, by this group that is so powerful and influential, unlike Islam.
Islam! It regards Abraham and Moses and Jesus as prophets, just as Muhammad was a prophet.
Islam and Christianity are at least not antithetical.
Islam does not want Christians to die.
Unfortunately, that cannot be said for the Zionists who are out to exterminate.
All of those who are non-Jews so they can rule the world, Gary, that is their agenda.
It's taken me forever.
I'm 84 years old.
Let it be the case that you don't have to live to be 84 to figure out what's going on here.
It took me virtually that long to put a piece of it together, but I'm here to tell you that's the way it is, and you better understand.
That Christian Zionism is virtually a contradiction in terms because Zionists want to exterminate their Christians.
Think about it.
That's where we're at today in the USA.
The next thing, which is still part of what we're talking about.
Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu is facing the heat.
After the state of Israel resumed large-scale bombings over the Gaza Strip, the Israeli media says that over 40,000 protesters packed the streets of Tel Aviv in protest against Netanyahu's government.
The Israelis are accusing the government of abandoning the nation for narrow political interests.
Netanyahu and the government, no matter what they do, they're trying to prolong their grasp of the reins over Israel now, destroy all of its democratic foundation, and move away from the hostages, which is the main thing that's supposed to be on the table.
Everything else has to be second.
Second stage to that.
Now, hundreds of demonstrators marched on a main highway towards Jerusalem.
Protesters joined the motorway connecting central Israel and Jerusalem that was blocked for traffic by the police.
The many also marched to protest Netanyahu's move to oust the head of the Shinbeth, the country's domestic intelligence agency.
They say that sacking Ron Abar, regarded as the gatekeeper, puts Israel's democracy into a peril.
Now the threat of sacking the head of the Shin Bet and the sacking of the government general solicitor.
And that for me is like they are very important people that have been there protecting our rights.
So I'm out here to protest the potential dismissing them.
The demonstration was one of the largest against the Netanyahu government in recent months.
Now, Israel's relentless bombardment over Gaza has also paved the way for the cabinet of the far-right politician Itamar Ben-Gaver, who has now returned to the office of Israel's national security minister.
The move has sparked accusations that Netanyahu's administration ended the ceasefire agreement in the hostage negotiations to bolster Netanyahu's support with the far-right allies ahead of a key budget vote later in the month.
The Israeli government, however, is denying these claims.
For all the latest news, download the Vyron app and subscribe to our YouTube channel.
everyone's far the gut.
That was a war.
Go ahead.
Now, there's a perfect example.
These are actually...
Israeli Jews who are protesting against the genocide and, of course, against the firing of the head of the Shin Bet, the Israeli equivalent of the FBI, for wanting to have an investigation of what happened on October 7th.
You can't tolerate that because the whole thing was a fraud.
It was made up.
It was a false flag to justify the slaughter of the Palestinians in Gaza.
And even if you assumed it were real, the disproportionate response is all out of whack.
Because you had a relatively modest number who were supposed to have died, and where over half of them appeared to have been killed by the idea of itself to run up to numbers.
What do we got?
1,200, something like that?
Suppose it's 1,500.
They're going about the slaughter of the Palestinians wholesale.
Hammer and tong.
This is completely inappropriate under international law.
It also constitutes a form of collective punishment, punishing a whole group for the actions of a few.
It's also, of course, ethnic cleansing.
All of this being violations of international law of the Geneva Conventions and of the UN Charter.
Where does the United States stand?
We're all in on genocide.
We're all in on ethnic cleansing.
We're all in on violating the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter, and international law.
We have disgraced ourselves, Gary, and the world is not going to be forgiving.
I'm losing my faith in RFK Jr., I must say.
Here's his take on Gaza.
Hamas has made a stand.
They're putting civilians in the way.
What is Israel supposed to do?
It can't leave Hamas in there.
But Bobby, I don't think we should accept that.
They've rendered Gaza City uninhabitable.
You have collective punishment of 2.2 million people who are having their access to water, food, fuel, medicine blocked right now by Israel.
Do you think it is acceptable to impose a siege on the entire civilian population in Gaza?
First of all, I don't think that's happening.
Anybody who's deliberately targeting civilians.
It means they should be prosecuted and they should be jailed and the keys should be thrown away.
But, you know, I don't see any proof of that.
But the government announced they were doing a complete seizure.
We did collective punishment of Iraq.
We actually killed...
I'm not trying to justify that either here.
Why are we just going after the Jews?
Why is it only what the Israel does?
Let me just say it just right now.
Because all our tax dollars are going to fund what's going on.
Why are we blaming Israel?
Why are we blaming the people?
Because the ones dropping the bombs.
With our dollars.
They have to get at Hamas.
How would you get rid of Hamas?
Well, I'm not running for president of the United States, number one.
But number two, I think we have a model for this, in a sense, from the way we went in and approached bin Laden.
So it was a targeted raid.
You create a wedge between Hamas and the civilian population.
You can filibuster.
I'm not filibustering.
You asked me a question.
I'm trying to answer it.
I think you're filibustering.
You're not answering the question.
You're saying drive a wedge.
Well, of course Israel is trying to drive a wedge.
Ouch. That was repulsive.
He doesn't know how do we know this is happening?
By God, it's on television every single day, RFK Jr.
You are disgracing yourself.
You are no credit to your father or your uncle.
I'm embarrassed to hear this.
I actually advocated for you to become Secretary of Health and Human Services and here you're acting like a...
Propagandize. You're acting like a shill for Israel.
RFK Jr., I frankly find this action of yours contemptible.
You're ignorant.
You're apologetic.
You should be informed.
You're not informed.
And you're taking a stance that is reprehensible on any ground whatsoever.
Crystal Bald nailed you to the wall.
She's right.
You're wrong.
I'm... Disillusioned.
Disappointed to the max.
Okay, I've heard this clip referenced so many times, but I never actually saw it.
So this is Cynthia McKinney and the Oath to Israel Pledge.
We really have to teach the American people how this relationship came to be so close.
Such that our national interest is defined as the Israeli national interest.
How does that happen?
It is not by happenstance.
It happens because people of right mind, shared values get together and understand, they study the American body politic.
They understand the strengths and the weaknesses of our system, which is quite open.
And then, of course, they work.
To ensure that their values become policy.
And so if that means that every candidate has to pass through a sieve of how one feels on the Israeli issue, then so be it.
That's what happens.
And indeed, that is what exactly happens.
So that when I first ran in 1992, Now, mind you, I studied international relations as an undergraduate and as a graduate student, and so I had some clear ideas about the U.S. role in the world,
fact versus myth, and I wanted to place my imprint on U.S. international conduct.
So I asked to serve on the House International Relations Committee.
But that was after I got elected.
Before I got elected, I received the fax.
And the fax was from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
And it said that I needed to sign the pledge which was going to be my pledge to the State of Israel.
Now that's what every member of Congress Is asked to do.
Now that's what every member of Congress is asked to do.
Are you sure it isn't time for a colorful metaphor?
You sign a pledge or you write a paragraph and you state these are the things that I will support once I am elected to Congress.
Now, what were those things that were on that pledge?
Jerusalem is the capital city.
Continued economic and military assistance to the state of Israel at whatever those current rates were.
The military superiority of Israel.
Those are the three that I remember.
There were five to seven items on the pledge.
What I learned Is that the politics of Washington, D.C., they're all quite interrelated.
And if you don't sign the pledge, you don't get a darn thing.
And so I did what all candidates in Congress do.
I went to Washington, I made my ceremonial trek to Washington, and I placed myself before The various political action committees that are there.
And I asked for their support and their help.
And they were all quite polite.
But when I walked out of there, I walked out empty-handed.
Okay. Well, it's very interesting because I have frequently cited your appearance on press TV.
That's Iranian television.
I made in the past many appearances there.
They never censored.
They never gave me any direction.
They just wanted alternative points of view.
Where Cynthia explained the pledge in 2011.
Now here, I've not seen this clip before, Gary, but she actually was explaining to the public in Minneapolis in 2009.
But that's the deal.
The pledge says you're going to put the interests of Israel even ahead of those of the United States.
And if you don't, your finances dry up.
You find yourself confronted with an alternative candidate who has loads of money next time around or even that your district has been redrawn and you no longer had a seat.
Now, Cynthia was able to transcend those obstacles and serve like six terms in the House.
I admire her beyond words.
Dennis Kucinich.
Whom I regarded as the smartest member of Congress at the time, however, was not so fortunate.
His district was redrawn and he lost his seat today.
According to Thomas Massey, who's a mountain of integrity, he is the only member of Congress who does not have an APAC handler who accompanies him to ensure that all of his actions are...
Beneficial to Israel, that none of them are remotely damaging, whether it's in terms of public image, financial support, military funding, it's grotesque.
Once again, as I say, those that talk about the United States of Israel or the United States really are getting at the heart of the matter.
Our Congress is dominated by Zionists, by the AIPAC, and it's just outrageous what's going on.
I say Cynthia McKinney is a great American hero for outing what's going on.
But the public still has yet to absorb the message, Gary.
And I'm afraid by the time they put two and two together, it will be too late.
We're trying our best, Dr. Fetz.
We bring that up all the time, and this is about George Foreman.
Hey, I'm George Foreman and I took the shot.
Who is here to get?
is sharp and try to rally everybody to do the same so we can Take a big swing at this virus.
This has been a wonderful day for me, and as I would tell my friends and family, the UT people have put their whole name on the line.
I put my name on the line.
The one thing I'm walking away with today is trust that mankind has delivered something good for mankind.
This vaccine for coronavirus...
It's real.
You don't have to bring any superstition into it.
Believe it.
The doctors, the nurses, all of them are on the front line.
We've got what we prayed for.
Now, all we have to do is step up and take the vaccine.
Don't be afraid.
I'm not afraid.
And I'm happy to show you with proof that I've taken it.
It's your time now.
Still there.
And there's no reaction.
No. No.
No. No.
No. you you you you Thank you.
Okay. This is very sad.
The COVID thing, the VAC wasn't even tested for transmissibility.
It had no effect on whether someone got COVID or not.
The vaccine had nothing to do with it.
It was falsely promoted on the ground that you were being socially irresponsible by putting other Americans at risk if you didn't take the shot when it had no capacity to inhibit transmission.
The whole thing was an enormous fraud.
And it now appears, when you put all the pieces together, this was part of a Zionist depopulation program.
Where it's the Zionists who want to reduce the population of 500 million, which it appears is a calculation derived from how many of the Jewish supremacists survive, each of whom is entitled to 2,800 slaves. So, you know, you're going to be dead or you're going to be a slave.
George Foreman, a good, decent guy, he wasn't.
Sharpest pencil in the box.
But I never doubted his sincerity.
I like the guy a lot.
He's now gone on to greener pastures.
Whether the vax was involved or not, I cannot say.
But I will tell you, there's a new study out that I featured on my Rod Deal show yesterday, Gary.
Everyone needs to watch that.
It's a devastating report about the contents of the vax.
You won't believe.
You no longer have to be in physical contact with someone who's vaccinated to have the effects of the vax.
It's in the air we breathe.
We are all contaminated.
Our food sources are all contaminated.
So, what this brilliant...
Physician, medical researcher has done is to expose it all.
Turns out that the fax is not just even a passive alteration to our DNA, but it's actually alive.
It has microscopic bots involved here.
She describes it as a machine because it can perform work, and get this.
Even in the blood of persons who have been dead for weeks, these little machines are still at work in their blood, believe it or not.
It's staggering.
Now, on the hopeful side, she suggests ways you can counteract it.
I believe ivermectin is among them, but everyone wants to watch this and pay attention as though it were a matter of life and death because It is.
I agree.
Okay, here's a minute 23 second clip.
Whoops, I missed the button.
*outro music*
Welcome to the New World Order.
This New World Order will be a new society and features lots of changes.
This new society is great for some and not so great for others.
In the New World Order, you will learn to love to live more modestly.
You do not need to own things when you can simply lease them from your loving government-approved companies.
We will transform our current pollution-ridden cities to something much more beautiful, and you will love it.
Life in the New World Order will be...
In this new perfect world, cash will be illegal.
Everyone will be issued a certain amount of global credits, which will be the only way you can buy and sell in the new society.
These digital financial credits will also be tied to your social credit scores.
Your credit scores will become your digital footprint.
And will be used to control your travel.
What you can buy.
Where you can live.
Your energy usage.
Medical excess.
Everything you do will be in a government database.
This is great.
This is great.
Well, the key there is it's all tied to your social credit score, but of course the idea of digitizing currency makes us all slaves.
Economic slay because they control anything we do.
They don't like it.
They can cancel it.
You want to buy a gun?
Sorry, you don't have any credit to do it.
You want to buy ammo?
No, once again, you're precluded.
You want to take a trip?
This is a relative.
They may not allow it.
They're talking about these 15-minute cities.
Everything is in roughly a mile.
It's just stunning, Gary, what they have in mind with the future where you'll owe nothing and you'll be happier than you've ever been.
Why? Because they're controlling your thoughts.
Turns out this injection also sets up the possibility of introducing thoughts that are not your own, controlling your state of mind.
I've even been speculating that Trump...
Displaying all this zeal for genocide, for bombing Yemen forever, it would seem, and now stockpiling massive armaments on Diego Garcia to attack Iran that he may have his thoughts being controlled.
This doesn't seem to me to be the same guy who was on the campaign trail, so either...
He's the greatest hypocrite we ever had as a candidate for president because his actual policies are so contradictory with those he promised when he was running for office.
Or we're not dealing with the same guy because he'd been mind-controlled.
And frankly, I find the latter at least as plausible as the former.
Wow, Dr. Besser.
All right, this is our last clip.
We're going to go with the Golden Oldie.
This is Dr. Fetzer and I in 2017, and this is about the Boston Marathon.
This is our last clip.
This is Jim Fetzer with Gary King.
We're discussing the new Hollywood production, Stronger, which might be described as a fiction about a fiction, because as we are going to demonstrate here now...
Three different crisis actors have played Jeff Bauman since the Boston bombing.
Here we have the latest being featured on television programs.
In this instance, he's with Jimmy Fallon, with Jake Gyllenhaal, who's going to play him, here on the Today Show.
Boston Marathon bombing survivor Jeff Bauman on new Biodrama Stronger.
Jeff Bauman lost his legs in the Boston Marathon bombing, then endured a grueling struggle to recover, as told in the new film Stronger, starring Jake Gyllenhaal.
Well, as we're going to find, Gary, it doesn't look like he had much of a grueling struggle to recover because he was already in a Boston Bruin game within 17 days after, which turns out to be a medical miracle.
If we go back to the Boston bombing, for those unfamiliar, the police on Bullhorns were calling out, this is a drill!
This is a drill!
Participants who have been interviewed reported they had bomb-sniffing dogs.
More importantly, the Boston Globe was tweeting that police will have a controlled explosion on the 600 block of Boylston Street.
Opposite the library, within one minute, as part of bomb squad activities, and lo and behold, Gary, one minute later, there would be an explosion.
But look at this.
It's all taking place after the races are complete, as you have assertly observed.
Look at the blue boxes.
Men's race complete.
Women's race complete.
Wheelchair race complete.
Does it make any sense if you're going to perform a terrorist act that you would wait until the race is done?
Nevertheless, here's that explosion.
As a former Marine Corps artillery officer, I can tell you these were puff pieces, lots of smoke, but not much punch.
I don't believe they could have killed anyone unless they might have been sitting right on top.
And when you peer through the smoke, Gary, here is what we see.
Yes, there are about a dozen or more individuals who are missing arms and legs, but Gary, there is no blood.
And, as we see here, in the background on the left is our Jeff Baumann, where a fellow in a hoodie has been attaching a false bone prosthesis.
And as you have astutely observed on the left, for example, there's his leg above this black lady, but there is no blood.
Now, Lorraine Day, Who is the head of trauma surgery for San Francisco General Hospital for 25 years, has remarked this is a physiological impossibility.
You cannot have arms and legs blown up by explosives and there to be no blood.
The blood only shows up later, Gary, and it came out of tubes.
We have it on video.
And here you see Jeff Bauman there in the background.
Lifting his leg with a false bone extension and keeping his head off the ground because that's where people spit.
Yeah, let's not forget that he got a wheelchair, but the lady, his leg was on top of her head.
She got a stretcher.
And Gary, if you actually had lost your legs...
You'd be tossed out.
Yes, you'd be unconscious in one minute, dead in two.
So here he is.
Minutes later, before, what do they do?
They put him in a wheelchair and rush him away.
And there's an all-too-familiar face in the middle with a cowboy hat.
His name is Carlos Arredondo.
Nathan Folks, who's a Hollywood producer and director, identified him as an actor.
He'd cast in one of his own films.
And Gary, believe it or not, is rushing him off in the wheelchair.
The vibrations cause the false prosthesis to detach, come loose, and they have to stop and reattach it.
So his leg fell off in the street.
I know!
Near the paint of the Boston Marathon finish line, that iconic image.
Absolutely unbelievable.
Now, we've been able to identify the crisis actor.
I mean, yes, many people don't realize these are amputee actors.
Who played Jeff Bauman number one, who was put in the wheelchair.
His name is Nick Voight.
He was a former army lieutenant who lost his legs in Kandar, Afghanistan.
You see him here.
And in the top right, it appears he lost his legs completely, even on the left.
It looked as though he had them blown.
Yeah, fascinating.
And here, Gary, as you have astutely observed, He also lost a little finger on his left hand.
That turns out to be extremely important because guess what?
Just 17 days later, we have Jeff Bowman, number two, in a Boston Bruin game, looking very chipper, waving a flag.
He has all 10 digits, and now his legs are not completely missing, but the thighs are there.
Here we have him again.
You can clearly see he has that little finger on his left hand where Stan Monti, Dr. Stan as he was known, Gary, who was an orthopedic surgeon, was very puzzled by this.
He explained to me that he performed surgeries like this and that it requires three months to recover from your amputation and then another three to learn how to get around without your legs.
17 days later, we got this guy here, a medical miracle Gary.
And then, as you very discerningly discovered, there's yet a third Jeff Bauman, where Carlos Arredondo, no less, is wheeling him out at a Red Sox baseball game.
And he, indeed, is missing the legs completely, doesn't have the thighs.
And it will turn out it has all ten digits.
So we know these are three different crisis actors playing the role of Jeff Bauman, where the guy they cast appears to be the third of the three.
You see him here with Jake Gyllenhaal.
This is a so-called exclusive interview with a fellow, Joe Blow, who does reviews or previews of forthcoming films.
Here you see, again, from the Today Show, Boston Marathon bombing survivor, but they don't realize this is not even the same guy.
So if you know what's going on, you realize that the Today Show has actually contradicted itself by showing two different Jeff Baumanns, Gary.
This is just stunning stuff.
Outrageous. Just outrageous.
And Gary, for people who want to find more, we did a previous Boston Strong, The Three Jeff Baumans.
You can find it on YouTube, which you have described as the most ridiculous hoax ever perpetrated on the American public.
A Millennium Report has republished two one-hour videos, one on Sandy Hook, the other on the Boston bombing for the background.
And for those, Gary, who want to go whole hog, there's a book.
And nobody died in Boston either, which not only goes through all the evidence, but identifies the actual perks.
Or from Kraft International, you can see on the back cover on the right, point out that as Nathan Folks observed, they actually use a studio-quality smoke machine.
So what we have here, Gary, was state-sponsored terrorism with Hollywood special effects.
That continues to this very day.
In fact, we have a new movie and everything, so that's what's bringing all this about.
And Hollywood is promoting it, Gary.
Absolutely, they're in on it.
Thank you so much for your great research on the three Jeff Baumans, Gary.
Real pleasure to have you here.
All right, I'm going to say it one more time.
The Boston Marathon is the most ridiculous, laughable hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.
We'll see you later, Jim.
Thanks, Gary.
That was just wonderful, Gary.
That was as clear and concise as it could be explained.
I'm just very impressed that we did a super bang-up job, and I hope the American people will pay attention because they've been played again and again and again, and I have been devoting myself since my retirement.
To exposing these frauds by bringing together groups of experts to sort out what really happened.
And once you understand, you won't like it.
I agree.
All right, everyone.
This is Inconvenient Truth number 120.
▲
Export Selection