All Episodes
Previous Next
March 10, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
58:42
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (09 March 2025) with Don Grahn, Joachim Hagopian, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, I should do the countdown.
3, 2, 1. And welcome, folks.
This is Truth vs.
the News.
And on the 9th of March, 2025, oh boy, and the truth is standing tall and the news is all over the place and it's getting harker and our show is going to bring you a lot of things that are in the news now and are pretty serious.
I'd say this is probably the most serious show we've ever done because things are getting to be...
In a word, apocalyptic, it looks like.
And I have the best experts who know exactly what's happening here.
We have Dr. Fetcher James Fetcher, the one and only author of books like Nobody Died on Sandy Hook, and 9-11, American Nuke, and J.F.K., and other outstanding historical books that set the record straight, and they're truth, not news.
So it's pretty great that we have...
Such a leader here and followed closely by Brian Davidson and Super Private Eye.
Yes, I'll show this.
A private eye out of Houston, who's really got the answers to a lot of the insider questions and facts and figures.
And from all the way from Bali, in the morning here, there is Joaquin Hagopian, a superior, less-point graduate author.
Historian and critic like no other who says it like it is and really makes you stop and think and maybe even cry.
So, Jim, let's get on.
What does Zelensky have to say?
What's going on there?
Is it pretty cool now?
Well, it's fascinating, Don, that a fellow has changed his mind again.
No mineral deal with USA. No negotiate with Russia.
Turns out he'd actually already made a mineral deal with the UK. For the fourth or fifth time Ukraine, President Zelensky appears to have changed his mind.
No longer wants a mineral deal.
Won't negotiate with Putin either.
There are lots to say about it.
Here we have the French president who's ringing the alarm.
NATO within NATO of France and the UK and Germany.
Macron says Russia is rearming to conquer Europe.
About as absurd a statement as you could get.
Finally, I can report Russian missiles are flying into Ukraine in droves, striking very many targets in the country.
There's no longer any U.S. intel being provided to Ukraine to stop them.
Turns out it's impossible to detect missile launches in time without U.S. intel.
The main problem is the detection of Sklander-M missiles in North Korea in K-23 and K-24.
Macron has given a speech to the nation sounding like a declaration of war on Russia indeed.
Here I summarize reports.
This is Zanei Spiegel from Russia Media about the speech.
Since I don't understand French, I can wait for a summary, but his statement was so harsh and aggressive, I'm making an exception and breaking the story.
Here's a translation.
Macron declared, only with a pacified Russia, pacified, that means militarily defeated, would peace return to the continent, speaking out against a ceasefire in Ukraine.
Peace cannot be created at any price.
And under Russian dictation, nor can it be capitulation of Ukraine, even though Russia has won the war.
We must recognize the Russian threat.
We must defend ourselves better.
The future of Europe cannot be decided in Moscow or Washington.
Further statements?
How many of these are true?
Russia has become a threat to France and Europe.
False.
Tomorrow's decision cannot be made on yesterday's habit.
We believe in defending democracy and defending freedom of speech.
But that's not what they're doing.
So that ain't true either.
Peace cannot be achieved on Russia's term must not mean the capitulation of Ukraine.
But when Ukraine is already lost, that's silly.
The Russian threat is real.
It affects European countries.
It affects us too.
False.
The conflict in Ukraine has become a global.
We see North Korean fighters, Iranian equipment used to help Russia.
Well, yes, but it's not truly global.
Indeed, NATO has been dumping all kinds of minute material in there.
President Putin is violating our borders to kill opponents and re-election blatantly false.
Russia is constantly arming itself.
It's expanding its military of necessity.
Given the threat now confronting from Europe, from France, And the UK under this new initiative?
We must take action to ensure first and foremost the security of France, Europe, and Ukraine.
Ridiculous.
We must continue to help Ukraine resist until it can negotiate with Russia on its own terms.
For all of us, well, you're going to be waiting quite a while.
We made the Minsk agreement in 2014 and Russia broke them.
We cannot trust the agreements with Russia.
It's Russia!
Who cannot trust any agreements with the West?
Even Angela Merkel admitted Minsk was just a cover to beef up Ukraine.
Macron says he decided to start a discussion on the use of France's nuclear weapons to defend the entire EU. He said start out with allies on the possibility of placing European countries under protection of France's nuclear deterrent force.
Point, a call from German Chancellor candidate Redrich Merz.
In response to a historic call of the future German Chancellor, I have decided to start a strategic discussion on the defense of our allies in Europe with a French deterrent power.
France will organize a meeting.
Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Countries.
This is one of those coalitions of the willing.
He said Ukraine must be given security guarantees for the future because Russia cannot be trusted at its word.
On the contrary, Russia is the only word you can trust.
He wants to station European forces in Ukraine, not to fight on the front line, but to monitor compliance.
Next week in Paris, we'll gather the chiefs of staff of those countries that want to take responsibilities at France and the most effective army in Europe.
Dubious.
European leaders want conscription, that is, drafts, will be necessary as EU launches a $840 billion program to prepare for war with Russia, a war they couldn't possibly win.
If you were drafted, would you willing to go to the killing fields of eastern Ukraine?
How about your children?
The war in Ukraine has been an endless meat grinder.
Hundreds of thousands of Russian lives and more than a million Ukrainians.
Those who are sane want to see if there's a peaceful way out of this mess so that killing can stop.
Alas, as numbers of leftists in the U.S. and Western Europe are rabid pro-war lunatics who are obsessed with defeating Russia.
So enormous Numbers of dollars and euros have been poured into Ukraine, but it hasn't worked.
The Russians are winning.
Now, European leaders want to take things to the next level.
Ursula von der Leyen has unveiled a brand-new $840 billion program to rearm Europe.
The European Union will free up $840 billion to finally defense.
European Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen announced.
If I were a young person in Germany right now, I'd be extremely concerned.
A spokesperson for the group that'll be heading up the new government has stated the first new conscripts.
We'll have to walk through the barracks gate in 2025. Defense Boise spoke when for a center-right alliance.
Florian Hahn told Bill Daly, Germany's suspension of conscription no longer fits the current threat situation.
The first conscripts will have to walk through the gates in 2025. That is this year.
Why are they in such a rush?
Do they know something the rest of us do not know?
Let me add, it turns out that Macron's statements are simply absurd because as he's been informed...
French nuclear policy doesn't permit French nuclear weapons to be used in any other purpose than for the defense of France.
So a guy has his head where the sun doesn't shine.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, once an errand boy for the Rothschild, always an errand boy for the Rothschild.
He actually was an employee before he went into politics.
You know, they sponsored him all the way.
And so, obviously, he's speaking for the Rothschild et al controllers.
So, the controllers want, you know, we've heard about the, it's not a theory, but.
They call it replacement, where they want to replace the white population on the earth.
And, you know, Europe and North America, along with Australia, are the white populations on earth.
And all of them are very much in the warring nation's stance.
And so Europe is like, he's rallying the troops of Europe to march off.
And fight Russia, which is so ridiculous because everybody that knows anything is aware that Russia has a far more powerful military.
They're seasoned veterans at war now.
The Europeans don't even have a military.
They don't have...
The equipment, they don't have the arms, they don't have the war-making capacity.
In every way, they're going to lose.
So, I mean, this whole thing is so ridiculous.
But, hey, they've got to do what they're told.
And the Rothschilds want war.
They want to eliminate Europe.
And so that's the way it's going to go, apparently.
Well, it seems to me, on the eve of this complete Russian victory, the Rothschilds are worried about...
The loss of the New World Order, where Klaus Schwab, their spokesman, said, without Ukraine, the New World Order cannot move forward.
I think this is a desperate last stand.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I think the New World Order is a technocratic world order, and I think that they're just simply making adjustments from the old...
Failed Marxism platform where it was sort of the type of platform that was based on a socialist perspective of everybody's going to work together.
But no matter how you cut it, whether you call them fascists, no matter what you cut right now...
The reason that it's so difficult to follow the news cycle is that you see every oligarch, especially related to Ukraine, every oligarch in Russia is vying for position.
Every oligarch in Europe is vying for position.
every American structure is vying for position.
What I was saying in the transition period is, it used to be sort of a left side, open society foundation, George Soros type platform of moral relativism and cultural change in the name of equality, diversity, George Soros type platform of moral relativism and cultural change in the name Well, look where that has swung.
It swung over to the right, where the new platform is sort of a technocratic Elon Musk style.
Think of Soros on the left hand and think of Musk on the right hand.
And think of Trump in the middle, sort of making sure that the machine swings one way or another.
What does the New World Order represent?
What does it look like?
Well, we always believed that the New World Order would consist of unions, European unions, North American unions, African unions, that the New World Order would sort of result in a consolidation of states, a consolidation of cultures, and A single centralized world government leader system that the world would sort of be forced to do.
Well, that's, of course, what the oligarchs want.
Now, I can't really tell from an American perspective as sort of a low-grade, middle-class guy which oligarchs are winning at this right now because I see Zelensky as an important puppet piece making deals over in Europe.
While America sort of stuns the old girlfriend that tied with the Newland neocons to the left and the Blinken-type neocons.
Now, if you want to have and show power, the last thing you want is for your spouse to be talking with every guy at the local bar.
Well, Zelensky...
Is out there talking with everybody at the local bar, and there's nothing loyal about him.
What did we get in return for our investment?
Well, now we just have to exercise an iron fist on Ukraine, and we're working directly with Russia to try to achieve that.
While Russia is teaming up with China and making deeper roads in terms of...
Creating its own identity, but they're doing it with the communists of China.
It's strange what's going on because I kind of see the American hegemony being threatened by the neocon lefties of olden days.
I see the open society influences and the cultural influences that went to a sort of a lefty, like I said, DEI type of...
I see that downgrading, but what I see upgrading culturally is this sort of technocracy.
And at the same time, we're going to be talking about conscription services.
We're going to be talking about all sorts of different things that make this very complicated and provide all different types of political layers.
And to come out with a broad stroke and just sort of paint it up as...
Simple is ridiculous at this point in time, because if time is moving along like we think it's moving towards something, then we're going to find a more fragmented world when this thing's all said and done.
You're going to find a more isolated United States that sort of the rest of the world and the world leaders feel threatened about.
You're going to see Mexico keeping its distance, Canada keeping its distance.
You're going to see all sorts of adjustments.
And I would venture to say that American hegemony may be threatened by the end of this, which to me is a good thing.
I'd like to see us get out of all of these entanglements worldwide.
But the problem that comes with that is progressive decline of the value and power of the United States dollar.
And so I see Trump's moves.
Really there to protect the financial interests of the nation more than I see him doing anything along the lines of adjusting the culture.
He just is him, and that's doing a good job of adjusting the culture.
But I just find the times to be incredibly foggy right now, and it's hard to see how this is all going to shake out.
But I can guarantee you this.
From Trump's perspective, it looks like Ukraine is on the chopping block, and it just comes down to a matter.
Of negotiations.
Now, whether Ukraine is going to get it together and decide it's going to, you know, emergency elect new leadership or not, whether Russia decides America is too deep into the garden and it's just too late and they'll just never trust us again, there's all sorts of things that are taking place that really worry.
Watch Turkey, watch Syria, watch what's happening in the Middle East.
These are all, Poland, these are all very important places right now.
On the global stage, because I think the shift is going to go away from Ukraine.
That's just a matter of time before that's divided up and sold off to the highest bidder, if it hasn't been already.
Well, meanwhile, Europe marches to war.
The UK and France lead coalition of the willing.
A war in Ukraine has entered a new dangerous phase on March 2nd.
British PM Keir Starmer made a stunning announcement.
The UK and Brent are spearheading a Western coalition of the willing to deploy ground forces in Ukraine.
The unprecedented move marks the most aggressive military intervention by the West since the conflict began, significantly escalating tension with Russia.
With NATO deeply divided, the Western coalition Decision raises a critical question.
Are we on the brink of an all-out European conflict?
Could this trigger direct clashes between NATO forces and Russian troops, further destabilizing?
I have no doubt.
The coalition plan involved deploying up to 100,000 peacekeepers.
Russia, of course, has already rejected the very idea.
A massive financial commitment is also in play.
Britain alone pledging an additional £1.6 billion for defense missiles.
It comes that time of growing friction between the US and Ukraine, including the heated exchange between Zelensky and President Trump and Vice President Vance at the White House.
Meanwhile, Hal Turner reports something is going wrong.
Putin gives chilling speech.
The world may end earlier, but Russia will never.
I think this meant Putin, who has such excellent intel, knew what was brewing with the French and the UK to come to the aid of Ukraine, and he's anticipating what they're about to do and warning it's ill-advised.
President of Russian Federation gave his speech.
Contents indicate Russia knows something very wrong is going on.
Something indicating Russia is going to be attacked in a way that causes the end.
You officially warn the West what a war with Russia would look like.
Here's a machine translation.
European Union and NATO members, there are calls for a war against Russia.
We can't say again history repeats itself.
The views of colleagues from Europe and NATO and Russia never change.
They want to destroy Russia.
It's remained in the veins of colleagues in countries ruling the EU and NATO. Here again, Russia is an aggressor.
The truth, Russia has never been the aggressor, has always defended itself through history.
That's a fact.
Dear colleagues, Russia never starts wars.
Russia stops them.
Russia has never threatened countries, never threatened the security of the world, but we like to say, the snake bites the most when it dies.
You created fascism always everywhere and in Ukraine.
Wars are your work.
Russia will always defend its country and its people.
No matter what it costs, no matter how many losses we suffer, we have always defended our country and our people.
We have proven ourselves many times, and today you are shouting again victory over Russia.
I assure you, Russia will not fall.
It may be torn apart, but never destroyed.
If a NATO-EU country declares war on Russia, everyone must know our reaction will be lightning fast, and if we feel a threat to us, destructive.
Today Russia has all kinds of weapons in the current history of the world.
You have not seen anything from Russia and its possibilities in Ukraine because Ukraine is our historical country and there are Russians in Ukraine and we are saving them.
And this is not a war but a military operation.
On the other hand, it will not be like in Ukraine.
That is what you need to know.
As for whether we're ready to negotiate, we're always ready to negotiate.
But no one wanted to negotiate with us.
Russia has no friends among NATO and European leaders because Russia's a strong, huge country.
Exactly what your NATO and European colleagues do not want but accept it.
No matter how much you repeat that one day Russia will be defeated, I believe in God.
God is with us.
The world may end earlier, but Russia will not fall.
We do not need a world without Russia.
Unlike you, I know very well what a country and people are, and therefore I will always fight for my country and people.
Are you ready to accept this as you wish?
Are you ready to start a war against Russia again?
But we are also ready.
And today's war against Russia would be an absolute apocalypse.
I advise colleagues from Europe and NATO, work for the good of the world, not the destruction of the world.
Hal Turner, prescient.
I mean, this guy's very smart.
I don't know what's going on behind the scene in Europe.
That would have prompted a speech like this from Russia's president.
Well, now we know.
Clearly, whatever's taking place must be happening in Europe, because in the U.S., we see our country backing away from the Ukrainian Dabakal.
For weeks.
Trump has been openly saying that war must end.
Last Friday, last Friday, after Ukrainian President Zelensky's disastrous argument with President Trump and Vice President Vance in the Oval Office, within hours, the U.S. State Department halted funding for any rebuild of Ukraine's electric grid.
Yesterday, there was a full pause in U.S. military aid to Ukraine.
So whether it is that prompted Russian President to make this speech, it seems to me to have developed behind the scenes, likely in Europe, within the past 24 hours.
He is exactly right.
Russian intel gathering is amazingly efficient.
So it seems to me they have found something very serious which gave rise to Putin's public speech.
I may not be the brightest bulb of the chain, but seem to me when the leader of a country armed with the most nuclear warrants on Earth starts publicly talking about a NATO-EU country declaring war upon Russia and an absolute apocalypse, that's a really bad thing.
I can't believe how smart he was to sort that out in advance.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, like what was said.
Russian intelligence is on top of the situation.
So he reacts to that, what he already knows.
So, yeah, it's pretty obvious that the West is heading straight to war against Russia, at least the faction of the West in Europe.
How many times is Europe going to learn that when you go to war against Russia, you lose?
You know, going back a couple of centuries to Napoleonic era and the World Wars, you know, every single time.
Yet, we know who's been in charge since those times, and it's the...
Money changers, the Rothschild, you know, the big power in Europe, especially around the Napoleonic era, financing both sides to every war ever since.
So here we go again, you know.
The humans do not learn history, or I should more accurately say, the ones that are in control.
Just keep using the same divisive, violent methods to thin the herd.
And they are determined to make sure depopulation is the agenda.
So, I mean, there's nothing really new in any of this other than the human race could be decimated.
And I don't think we...
I mean, even the World War II, which is the largest war as far as death toll, this one's going to even be bigger, it looks like.
So, I mean, we're headed to madness, depopulation.
And we know who the culprits are that are pulling all the strings.
It's certainly not Macron and Starmer or Trump.
None of those guys.
So we know the money changers, money rules, you pay out, you know, sexual blackmail with the children and then the bribery and Israel, money changers, they're the ones that are in control.
Again, same old, same old.
Brian?
I see a lot of disorder out there.
I see Russia as having played a very defensive game against a Western-led hegemony on its borders.
And until Russia can literally threaten America somehow, I see them as relatively weak in terms of how they're going to...
Do their political power play on the world stage.
They need to get offensive, but we've been saying that for years, if they want to achieve their goals of having their borders be defensive borders.
There's so many missiles right now.
There's so many new types of ways to kill people, new technology, new everything, that Russia is just going to become unstable, and they're going to have to.
Team up with everybody else that's feeling threatened at this point in time by the Western machine.
I mean the Western machine like European cartel, banksters, oligarchs, and others are so dead set on continuing to threaten them that they're going to find themselves forced into a position.
What is the one thing that we're seeing consistently develop at this point in time is that We're seeing a consistent destabilization because of a deviation from the traditional New World Order platform.
But we've got sort of a New World Order platform developing, I think, in large part with Musk.
I think people underestimate what this guy's rotten...
Things that this guy believes and he's done.
Sure, he's likable and sure he can put on a good sentence, but think about where it's going.
He originally had said that artificial intelligence was going to sort of destroy the world, and yet he invests more and more in it.
He wears his bail outfit.
He names his children after robots.
He talks about missions to Mars.
He's worth $250 billion, and he seems to have...
A huge level of control, and he's becoming more popular every day, especially with the younger techie crowd.
He owns Twitter.
He says he's controlling free speech, but we're not exactly seeing all that develop, and I don't think they care about our speech anyway, because what they really care about is the machine and who can take larger and larger chunks of the control.
I see a lot that's developing in terms of I see a weird new stage in how all of this is playing out at this particular point in time.
I see mankind As sort of caught in the middle of a very difficult battle that we can't really win except to say we do what's right, we think what's right, and right makes might.
Just a really weird time for me to evaluate the nature of everything.
So for Putin to say, hey, you know, the world's going to go up in flames, it doesn't surprise me one bit right now with how fragmented it's getting with all these power plays.
The old order wants their power structure back.
Crump is threatening.
He's saying either you consolidate it over here with us or you go out there on your own.
And they're going out on their own.
So it wouldn't surprise me if we saw sort of a new beast structure in technocracy with Musk at the helm.
And I see this developing four or five years, but it's still very murky.
Anyway, just...
Free thinking here.
That's it.
More to come.
Furious Russia condemns European threat comparing Macron to Hitler and Napoleon after EU agrees massive war chest to rearm in France offers to protect the continent with a nuclear shield.
Russia's top diplomat has compared Macron to Napoleon and Hitler.
After he offered to extend his nation's nuclear protection to European allies and to discuss putting boots on the ground in Ukraine, the Kremlin fury came hours after Macron and Zelensky and other EU leaders met in Brussels for a summit, heralded as the start of a new era for European security.
Discussion in the Belgian capital demonstrated Europe's recognition Its security is no longer guaranteed by the United States, as leaders agreed to measure to free up hundreds of billions of euros and loosen the bloc's budget restriction.
Following the summit, Macron said he had been approached by several of his counterparts interested in exploring the possibility of France sharing its nuclear deterrent.
He also confirmed Paris, We'd host exploratory talks with EU defense chiefs, starting on Tuesday, about the possible deployment of European forces in Ukraine once a peace deal is signed.
A revelation, which came as French Mirage jets were deployed by Ukraine's Air Force for the first time to down Russian missiles and drones, led the Kremlin to deliver a venom-towing retort to the French president.
Unlike his predecessors who sought a fight with Russia, Napoleon, Hitler, Mr. Macron does not act very diplomatically, Sergei Lavrov said.
It was very strange to hear that Mr. Macron, in an aggressive manner, continuing the work of Napoleon, who wanted to conquer Russia.
Lavrov earlier chastised Macron by quoting the idea of sharing France's nuclear weapons with other European nations.
Of course it's a threat against Russia.
If he sees us as a threat and says it's necessary to use nuclear weapons, he's preparing to use nuclear weapons against Russia, of course it is a threat.
His own defense minister, Sebastian Le Cunot, however, reminded him and everyone else, declaring that Paris's nuclear capability is French, and it will remain French.
It cannot be shared with other nations.
Emmanuel Macron, no, Emmanuel Matre, an analyst at the French Foundation for Strategic Research, added, though there's compatibility between French national interests and those of the rest of Western Europe, France's president has given no assurance, no guarantee of nuclear production to his allies.
Britain's nuclear forces are assigned for the collective defense of NATO. According to the government's most recent Integrated Defense Review, which means, of course, it wouldn't be available for this new mini-NATO, but as already established, the UK's nuclear capabilities are heavily relying on ongoing support from Washington.
The challenges of a nuclear sharing arrangement on the continent are also compounded by regulations set out in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Under this agreement, To which UK, France, Germany, and all members of the European Union are signatories, states without nuclear weapons cannot acquire them, and states with nuclear weapons must pursue disarmament.
This means Germany, for example, cannot legally develop nukes of its own.
Even if France were to move to station some of its nukes in Germany, both parties would need to consult with their nuclear-enabled allies in the UN's nuclear watchdog.
The International Atomic Energy Agency, before any nuclear-sharing program, could be realized.
Russia outnumbers the U.S., of course, by hundreds of warheads.
The two nations control roughly 88% of the stockpile.
Russia reporting holding 5,580, the U.S., 5,044.
China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, and the UK control the rest.
The remaining 1500 global tensions appear to be boiling over.
With Trump warning Zolansky, he's gambling with World War III by not agreeing to America's peace terms.
Meanwhile, and this I think was a signal to Putin that the US isn't going to go along with this nonsense.
U.S. to cease all future military exercises in Europe.
NATO countries could be forced to plan maneuvers without U.S. if Trump continues pivot away from the bloc.
The U.S. had told its allies it does not plan to participate in military exercise in Europe in the future.
The move, the latest in Trump's pivot away from NATO, would See America pull out of exercise beyond those already scheduled this year.
The withdrawal concerns exercise that are on the drawing board.
It means NATO will be forced to plan exercise without U.S. Trump has repeatedly criticized NATO countries not meeting their goal of spending 2% of GDP. He warned the U.S. may not defend NATO allies that do not meet the spending target.
He told reporters, when I came to NATO, when I first had my first meeting, I knew people weren't paying their bills at all.
I said I should wait till my second, and I did.
And I brought that up and I said, if you don't pay your bills, we're not going to participate.
We're not going to protect you.
And when I said that, as soon as they said that, it was amazing how the money came in.
And now they have money, but even now it's not enough.
They should be paying more.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I think all this nuclear war talk, it's all bluff.
I think it's to condition people into accepting that there will probably be World War III, but I think it's just to scare people.
Condition and scare, because fearful populations do what they're told.
And so I see it as a ploy for that.
And, you know, the division between the United States and NATO now, I think that's a good thing.
I mean, NATO should not even be around.
Russia is not a threat to Europe.
We all know this, but they still...
Do that same old song that, you know, they'll not stop at the border with Ukraine.
They're going to keep coming, you know.
Again, the lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, over and over again.
We're done with it.
It's like, you know, they do what they're told.
They want to stir up war, and there probably, most probably will be war in Europe.
In addition to the Middle East, that's where we're headed on both fronts and potentially, of course, in Asia as well.
So this is not a good situation.
And the way I see it...
The globalists who are the money changers want to depopulate the world, and what better way than through World War III, amongst their many other weapons of mass destruction.
So that's kind of how I see it, over and over being played out.
A revision of a defensive alliance into an offensive operation.
How outrageous is that?
I'm very concerned about the Middle East, but I do think this thing with Ukraine is going to...
Simmer down when it becomes obvious that there's no serious prospect of this mini NATO version accomplishing anything, at least anything good.
Brian, your thoughts?
Wars are always cover for a powerful military industrial complex to continue to launder money.
Through a very foggy system of distribution.
They keep a population in compliance in terms of, oh, we better let the government continue to do what they're going to do to keep us all safe.
They've always wanted to keep us scared.
I remember, well, the history, I don't remember it, but I've read the history.
The Bay of Pigs is a good example, also known as the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Where Russia smuggled nukes into Cuba with Castro to threaten the United States.
And then, of course, that caused a large 13-day standoff that resulted in a negotiation.
Well, why did Russia do that?
Why did they put nukes on Cuban soil to threaten the American heartland?
Well, it's because we had put four missiles in Turkey.
So what most Americans don't know is that the negotiations went down and we agreed to remove our Thor nuclear-armed mid-range missiles from Turkey if Russia took their nukes out of Cuba.
So sometimes the only way to disarm what you're up against...
Is to threaten them with an equal and opposite reaction, if not a greater reaction.
And that's how you flex your muscles and that's how you show what you are.
Now, I do agree with Joaquin that the elite would like to see this break out.
They'd like to see sort of a darkness come over this world and they'd like to see the fear and the anxiety and the threats.
That always come as part of war because that's always an opportunity for the money changers to capitalize as much as possible.
But the kind of war that they're talking about is so short-sighted because what good is your money going to be if you're caught up in a bunker for the next 30 years after total destruction and annihilation takes place?
So the question is, can the powers control it?
Can they control themselves?
And who is going to sort of rein in all these other appetites for destruction if U.S. hegemony is threatened?
Will the world go to hell if we're threatened?
Does Trump need to get in there and protect the sort of Team America world police platform?
If he lets that go, what will happen to all of the...
Grazed, starved, and nutcase world leaders and dictators that have the power of the military missile in their structure if we let them off the chain.
In other words, you've got to ask yourself the question, yeah, we hate what the CIA does when they fix elections, but at least they've kept the world under control this long.
And that's always been sort of US policy.
If we abandon that policy...
What will happen?
Well, I tell you, the Arabs, what do they say?
They say, you know, kill the Jew, kill the American, kill everybody.
I mean, they chant this.
They have mantras.
Our enemies are so dead set on retribution that who knows what could go on.
And I don't know exactly how I'm arguing here because really I'm thinking out loud, but I can tell you this.
There's a lot of crazy installed political players that have reached positions of virtual insanity.
And at least the New World Order and American hegemony had always sort of kept them going towards a single purpose.
I don't know what to say, except it's going to be a big.
A really weird new frontier if all of this begins to break down and all of a sudden we have new power players like Turkey and Poland and Europe and Switzerland and Germany and China, India.
I mean, this world could go up in flames fast.
I think we've been messing with the world far too long.
I would take exception.
I don't think the CIA has played a positive role whatsoever.
America is held in contempt or reviled by the rest of the world.
We earned it.
And I think Trump wants to adopt a more modest version and doesn't believe in maintaining American hegemony at all.
I don't think that's part of his game plan as I see it.
Meanwhile, he does interfere in Israel, however, in a way that I find highly objectionable.
Trump says the people of Gaza will be dead if the hostages are released.
And he meant, I think, by this past Friday.
President has again threatened it would be held if Hamas does not immediately release hostages.
Wednesday, people of Gaza would be dead.
If the Israeli hostages were released immediately to the people of Gaza, a beautiful future awaits, but not a few old hostages.
If you do, you are dead.
Make a smart decision.
Release the hostages now, or they'll be held to pay later.
This is just brutal.
This is thuggish.
This is very much on the order of an American mafia.
Think of the Godfather.
Addressing Hamas, Trump said, Shalom Hamas!
Means hello and goodbye.
You can choose.
Release all the hostages now, not later.
Immediately return all the dead bodies of the people you murdered.
Or it's over for you.
Well, how about the overwhelmingly greater number that Israel has murdered?
Trump's threat came after he met with Israelis previously held captive in Gaza, where those who have spoken out about it have said how appreciative they were of Hamas, how well they were maintained, fed, and not abused unlike.
Those Palestinians Israel has captured who've been tortured, sodomized, raped, and murdered.
It's outrageous.
I'm sending Israel it needs to finish the job.
Not a single Amos member will be safe if you don't do as I say.
I've just met with your former hostages whose lives you have destroyed.
False.
This is your last warning.
For the leadership, now's the time to leave Gaza while you still have a chance.
I find this utterly outrageous and despicable.
Trump admin recently expedited billions of new weapons to Israel right before Israel cut off aid in all other goods to Gaza in violation of the ceasefire deal with Hamas.
With U.S. backing, Israel is trying to get Hamas to agree to new terms to free Israeli hostages without Israel having to withdraw or agree to a permanent truce.
As soon as they get all the hostages, they'll just level the place.
If a mosque doesn't agree, Israel has a hell plan that would cut off electricity and water, all gross crimes under international law, crimes against humanity, violation of Geneva Convention, violation of UN Charter, and they're already doing it to prepare for full-scale resumption of the genocidal war.
Trump has repeatedly stated, He's willing to back Israel if it chooses to restart a bombing campaign.
Meanwhile, Witkoff said Trump's threat came after U.S. didn't like what it heard from Hamas.
The special envoy to the Middle East said Trump's ultimatum, including a threat against the people of Gaza, came after the U.S. didn't like what it heard in direct talks.
They confirmed the U.S. had engaged directly.
Unfortunately, what we learned is, they told us, we're going to...
We're going to be thinking about it a certain way.
That's important for us to have.
And so came the tweet from the president.
That doesn't spell out what it is, you know, at all that was supposed to be upsetting.
The Times of Israel reported Netanyahu was unhappy with direct-to-Moz talks.
Negotiation had hit a snag.
The talks were first reported by an Axios reporter, a former IDF intel officer.
Israel wasn't briefed about the talks ahead of time.
Israel learned details through other channels.
The focus of U.S. Hamas talks has been on the release of the bodies of four Israeli hostages who have U.S. citizenship, and U.S. citizenship believed to be a live 21-year-old Edan Alexander, who up in New Jersey moved to Israel after high school to join the IDF. In his ultimatum, Trump said the group Would be over.
The people of Gaza would be dead if the hostages weren't released immediately.
Just outrageous.
Whitcoff said the U.S. is still open to dialogue with Hamas, but said if it didn't work, the alternatives are not such a good, so good for Hamas.
He ended up potential military action.
What are we going to do?
B-52 carbon bomb Gaza?
Make it explicit that we're just as monstrous as the Israelis?
They're not going to be a part of the government there.
Everyone understands.
If they understand that, they have a path to leave.
Well, why not?
Hamas responded to the latest threat, saying it complicates the ceasefire process.
The threats complicate the agreement and encourage Israel to evade its commitments.
Indeed, Hamas has fulfilled its obligations under phase one, but Israel is refusing to move to phase two.
U.S. admin must pressure the occupation to engage in negotiation for the next phase, at least if they were objective, fair-minded, and just, which it's very clear in relation to Israel, Trump is not.
Hamas said, best path to free the remaining hostages is through negotiations in the second phase.
Israel violated the initial deal by refusing to enter talks on phase two and imposed a total blockade on goods entering Gaza to pressure Hamas to accept its new terms, which involve more hostages being freed.
See?
They're duplicitous.
They're not trustworthy.
They make an agreement, and then if they don't like it, they change it.
This is just disgusting.
Joaquin, your thoughts?
Again, history just keeps repeating itself.
This is an old pattern by Netanyahu to sabotage every time there's a deal made.
He does not follow through.
And then he goes for more aggression.
If there's a ceasefire, it ends.
And then there's more people dead.
And then he's got his bully, Trump.
You know, doing all these threats.
This is not good.
I mean, we're headed in the wrong direction there.
But, of course, we know it's all by design.
That's how it's being set up.
Hamas is not going to give in.
They're not going to die.
Yeah, some will, but they're always going to be more, quote, freedom fighters fighting for their cause.
It's called resistance to the oppressor.
And the oppressor, the annihilator, has always been U.S. and Israel.
But, you know, I mean, you know, might makes right with them.
And that's not the way it works morally.
And the world is caught on to it.
I mean, nobody hardly is in favor of the U.S.-Israel aggression in the Middle East.
Nobody.
So it's all going to backfire.
It's not going to go down as Trump or Netanyahu wants.
But it could get very nasty and much bigger.
And of course, that's what the game is that Netanyahu's playing.
And Trump's falling right along because he's owned and controlled by Israel and the founders, the money changers.
It's not a good situation.
I mean, it's almost like, in a different way, it's a parallel process with the impending war, erupting World War III in Europe.
Well, it's going to get bigger and more nasty also in the Middle East, it looks like.
Yeah, I think that it's going to simmer down in Europe, but it's going to flare up in the Middle East.
Brian, your thoughts?
The atrocities are getting larger and more obvious to the whole wide world right now.
Israel did cut off electricity to the last remaining desalination plant that remained in Gaza, so they no longer have the ability to produce any of their fresh water.
As for Hamas...
I believe that they'll remain as long as it's politically expedient for them to remain.
I think that they are the fabricated boogeyman a lot more than they're the real threat.
And it's the media that magnifies the stories that are planted a lot more than Israel is really being threatened in terms of their security.
They've been there for years.
It's Israel that's the threat.
They just had to have the boogeyman so that they had the political power to say that Hamas existed.
Trump come along and he's obviously took $100 million from Adelson and he said, OK, well, I got to live up to some end of the deal.
The question is, how far is Trump willing to go and what is it that he's willing to achieve out of it?
Is it a new Trump casino in Gaza right next to the new?
Third millennial temple.
What's the plan here?
Is it a bunch of new resorts on the water's edge that can be sold for millions of dollars apiece so we can bring the rest of the oligarchs into place?
The whole place could be devastated overnight by Saudi or Iraqi or Iranian missiles if that's what they really wanted to do.
Israel's plan is to expand way beyond.
All the way to the east side of the south, the east side of the Nile, into Egypt.
So now you see Egypt in there sort of negotiating as to what will Gaza look like.
You see Trump trying to negotiate with Egypt to get the rest of the people out of the land that are still alive.
You see Trump trying to negotiate with Lebanon, India, all others.
He can't get them out because I don't think Israel would ever want them to leave because it's politically expedient.
The place is a war zone.
It's totally devastated.
It's going to take a lot of bulldozers and a lot of time to rebuild, but I'm sure that the plans are already in place for what the new resort city is going to look like and how the surrounding structures are going to go into place.
Again, take a look at the arm patches on the IDFs.
They believe that they are going to achieve the promised land borders, the original Abrahamic covenant promised land borders, which are much bigger than where they're at right now, which they've never achieved, but they did have peace in the land twice before.
I'm not...
I don't believe that the Zionists have any claim to this thing whatsoever.
I see them as no more or less evil than anybody else that's out there.
Certainly America has its share of evilness.
Certainly you'll see the institutional religions that have their share of evil.
Certainly you'll see the oligarchs and the dictators with their share of evil.
It's all the same.
It's just a matter of...
How is it being applied?
What type of visibility is out there for it?
And what's it leading toward?
And that, to me, is the thing that's dominated more of my time and energy in terms of trying to analyze current events and figure out where things are really headed.
So I see it as...
I'm trying to step way back and look at a bigger view as to how is everything going to come together.
Over the next seven to 10 years to try to act the analysis, and it's not easy.
And of course, those patches represented the greater Israel and Zionist dreams from the river Euphrates to the river Nile, which also includes a chunk of Egypt, virtually all of Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, and even a chunk of Iraq.
That's what they want.
And with a fall of Syria, They're moving forward aggressively.
Meanwhile, however, Egypt has a proposal for the reconstruction of Gaza, with which all nations tend to agree with the exception of Israel and the United States, to which we shall return when we come back for our part two.
Don, take us out.
When I was talking about coming together, it looks like everything's going to be blowing apart.
And I don't like the word apocalypse being in our show and being so close to what could really be happening.
So you're going to want to share this, folks, because it's really vital to your existence.
And you want to come back for the second hour here on the 9th of March, 2025. I'm John, your host.
This is Truth vs.
the Natives.
Man, it's getting heavy.
▲
Export Selection