All Episodes
Previous Next
March 3, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:35:44
Need to Know News (2 March 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo.
We've got Bryan Davidson in Houston, Texas.
This is the 2nd of March, 2025. Need to know news.
Let's take a look at those topics and opening statements.
What in the world is going on?
End times, end game.
Who's ending?
The Epstein-less drama the whole world is watching?
The Ukraine war, or whatever it is that we're shown?
Plus the actor Zelensky, dramatic endgame.
Corporate media self-destruction from ongoing prima facie, criminally complicit lies of omission and commission.
And then, back to the old world.
These buildings with impossible construction timelines, given the technology, the population, the infrastructure, they all refute the official his stories.
Therefore, when the official story isn't correct...
And we're left with the open question like, so what really happened?
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, it's been a nice weekend.
I spent all day yesterday fishing.
I didn't catch a thing.
But big bust.
But I had a lot of fun.
It was part of the area that doesn't get too many boats into it.
Beautiful.
I was all alone in the middle of nowhere.
Quiet as can be.
Great lily pads.
Boat did fine.
Didn't nearly sink it in some rapids.
That happens.
I didn't expect that they were going to open up the dam.
And they did.
And so while I was in some heavy waters, I decided to drop anchor and fish in what's called a fork, which is where two different rivers come together.
One's clear and one's muddy.
And so I wanted to fish right on the edge and just see how it was.
So I dropped anchor in my little 12-foot John boat.
You can't take a big boat up there because it's not deep enough in most of the areas.
Anyway, when that anchor caught, I had it tied onto the back edge of the boat and pulled it down and started filling up with water.
I had to cut it loose.
It happens.
It happens.
If I had been another 30 seconds in the boat without cutting that anchor off, because there's too much current to pull the anchor up, pull myself back out.
Every time I pulled it, I just swapped the boat even more.
Anyway, live and learn, live and learn.
Yep, yep.
Had a good time, though.
Must have, I mean, I probably got 400 casts in and a few little bites, you know, taking some of the plastics.
Wasn't able to put anything on the hook.
Happens.
Well, very good.
I do encourage our audience members to get out in nature, whatever it is that you enjoy most, to kind of reset yourself.
We are in the middle of a war.
It is stressful.
All right, what in the world is going on?
Is this the end times?
The end game?
And who's in control here?
There's a planet parade.
Photo capture seven planets in a line over Earth, possibly for the first time ever.
Now, I don't know anything about what this means.
I do understand the principle of frequencies and that we're lining up and the idea that we live on a planet of the official size and shape.
We've refuted that probably a dozen times already from objects being visible on the horizon.
So these wandering stars, I don't know what it means, but it's interesting.
We are at a unique occurrence in history, possibly And endgame, endtime, and those so-called planets are there.
All right, so this is primitive cutting technology into hard granite.
This is not physically possible without advanced machinery, and arguably machinery that is better than what we have today.
And yet we're told that these were carved out.
The official story in Egypt is that they just had stones and they just pounded one on top of the other.
I mean, oh shit, that's the official story.
Then I haven't seen this one before.
This is the Gorbara monolith in France, 300-ton granite column, measuring 55 feet.
And they're just sitting there, estimated to be carved over 1,000 years ago.
So that was some advanced culture that is no longer here.
So let me give you some theories on this.
Older theories on this.
First of all, I guess we'll deal with the stars issue.
You know, the heavens declare the glory of God, the firmament they're in.
Psalm 119, the stars are, I doubt they are what modern quote-unquote science tells us they really are.
If you get a lot of amateur telescope footage, you'll see they sort of flash and change colors and there's lots there that's happening that's not just your Typical observable little bright white light and even the stuff that comes out of the big observatories, which I don't generally trust completely, especially today with artificial intelligence.
But there's no doubt that there are certain things in the heavens that are fixed in position and we kind of know how they move and we can track it.
It's been around for a long, long time.
Remember our ancestors didn't spend much time in front of the TV, so they So they watch the stars all the time.
And, of course, even that ties back to a lot of the old pagan worship stuff.
If you look up the word astronomy and astrology, you'll see that there was all sorts of things out there.
There was a theologian by the name of Chuck Misler that came up with some pretty good theories on the stars, that the constellations were really sort of a pre-Christian sort of story.
Of God's relationship with humanity.
And so that's, you know, he'll explain things like Virgo and others Virgo.
You know, what's the image of Virgo as a virgin with child?
I don't put too much credibility into it, especially the stuff that comes from modern culture on the stars.
I am fascinated by what we see in the heavens, but I really don't look at it too much more than skin deep.
That's for the stones.
Okay, so I was doing a little bit of research earlier and I came up with some ancient civilizations that had legends, myths, theories about how they softened or melted stone.
Now, a lot of the old examples of the writings are probably poetic or symbolic.
Some people suggest they're lost.
I can tell you that there's a lot of botany that has disappeared.
There are plants that have sort of died off, just like animals extinct and others.
But the Incan in pre-Columbia and South America, basically they had something called a long-standing legends among the Incan and the Andean cultures that they had a secret method.
For softening stone, particularly a type of stone called andesite.
It's a rock that's extremely difficult to shape without modern tools.
And what was developed in that by some people who study it is that they were able to extract certain acids from plants.
And so some of the old accounts and the old writings are the...
Translations of the Old Romanians claim that there was a special plant extract that could dissolve or soften stone, making it moldable before hardening again.
That might explain some of the seamless fitting of stones that you'll see at Machu Picchu and some of the others.
There was a 20th century priest by the name of Father Jorge Lira who reportedly experimented with a plant extract.
That could weaken stone, might lend some credibility to the accounts.
Egyptian and Mesopotamian texts, there are some theories there.
Egyptian builders might have used a type of geopolymer technology, which is essentially a form of ancient concrete rather than farm carving.
Massive stone blocks.
And there's an old Sumerian text called The Tale of Enki and the World Order that describes how Enki, quote-unquote, the god of wisdom, had the power to shape stone like clay, which might be, you know, some type of allusion to softening or reforming rocks.
And then on the Hindu side, you had some old texts.
One of them was Agni and the fire weapons.
That was an ancient Hindu text that describes the fire deity and celestial weapons capable of melting mountains.
And I've looked at some of these old ancient Hindu and Vedic texts as well.
I even used some in the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference for a couple of slides, but they referred to some sort of high-energy weapons that could, or even lost metallurgical knowledge that...
Could melt cities and destroy entire areas.
There is a Sanskrit term called Shima, which some interpretations suggest the word refers to artificially fused or softened zone.
And then you get to the first century BC, which is, you know, you're looking at the Greek and Roman account from very early, from around Christ's time.
And so you have a historian by the name of Strabo, who's noted where he...
He's noted places where stones appeared melted by heat, though modern geologists attribute it to volcanic activity.
And then Vitruvius' writing on concrete in the first century BC, the Roman architect Vitruvius described how Roman concrete was made to mimic natural storm foundation.
There's not much in the Bible.
I did find something on it, but the deeper I looked at it, it didn't make any sense, but I'll just read it to you.
But it's not really much.
It's in Job 25. And the more I looked at it, the more it seemed like it was more just a process for extracting iron from iron ore.
But it says, Surely there is a mine for silver and a place where gold is refined.
Iron is taken from the ground and rock is poured out as copper.
So there are two very clear Hebrew words.
Rock is poured out as copper.
Here you've got rock poured out as copper.
It's the book of Job.
It's supposed to predate even Abraham.
Job wasn't a Jew.
We don't really know much about him in terms of who he was, but this story is in the Bible.
Therefore, I would say it belongs.
And that was Job speaking, not one of the three people he was debating with during the book.
So there might be something to it.
I don't know that it really matters in terms of how we live, how we adjust our lives, but I think it's interesting to take a look at it.
Yeah, it is interesting.
And when we get the real story, it is going to be mind-blowing.
And the importance of having the proper history, it puts the present into context.
Human beings don't know anything except through history.
And if we have the right history, we will be empowered to move forward in the present and the future.
And because what we're dealing with...
Is how to destroy a society.
Make art ugly.
Make porn free.
Make God a joke.
Make food poison.
Make dads optional.
Make politicians rich.
Make money worthless.
Make buildings oppressive.
Make men and women compete.
Make children hate their ancestors.
What a mess.
So these scripts seem to be from some power that hates human beings and wants to cull and capture and enslave us.
Let me point something out about that.
I learned this back in college.
I haven't done much on it in like 30 years, so I don't remember much.
The ancient Chinese emperors used to send out a delegation who would evaluate the health of a society within their kingdom, empire.
And they would send them out and they would evaluate the artwork.
They would evaluate the music.
They would evaluate the architecture.
And they would evaluate the language.
And if it had high art form to it, they would preserve the culture.
And if it had sort of a low degraded art form to it, they would destroy the culture.
That way they felt they were strengthening the empire by getting rid of the societies that had boiled down to their, you know, basest instincts.
They were primal.
Fertility gods and goddesses and cults and then heavy rhythmic beats instead of high detailed music and architecture that was flat, boring versus architecture that was worshipped and built in a vertical fashion.
And apparently these ancient emperors, anyway, they'd send out a delegation and they'd evaluate it.
And then once they left, you wouldn't know until they made their evaluation whether that society was going to be destroyed or whether it was going to be brought in.
One other thing I heard recently on this that I think is interesting is, you know, there's a lot of chatter about Tartaria.
Well, Tartaria bordered the Chinese Empire.
And so we have this Great Wall of China.
And we are sort of given a history about it, but it's clear that it wasn't there to...
Well, what's interesting about it is that we tend to think of the Great Wall of China as being sort of a defensive mechanism so that opposing armies couldn't come in.
But when you look at where the turrets are for the bows and the arrows, they're on the inside.
So more of maybe a...
Prison wall to keep people in?
Anyway, it was the border of Tartaria, so maybe it was the Tartarians that built the wall to keep the Chinese out.
It's just something there, and I'm sure there's a lot of history that could be studied on all of that.
I haven't bothered with it a tremendous amount, but I have been to the Great Wall of China, and I must say it's something to behold.
It's not like the old pagan temples.
It's not like...
The Roman Colosseum, it's more of, what's impressive about it is that the vertical stairs everywhere, just vertical, and the steps are sometimes 18 to 24 inches tall, and, you know, they'll be 24 inches tall and then 4 inches on the stone.
So you're climbing, you know, you have to climb the wall more than, you know, it's a nice, comfortable, you know, 6-inch rise and 12-inch run.
It's not like that.
Crazy in terms of the structure of it, because in theory, you'd have to bring all those rocks all the way up those hills into the mountains.
Well, all the rocks were too large for a single human being our size to carry, I mean, unless they were super human.
So there's something to it in terms of how the ancient world operated that I don't completely understand.
Of course, the book of Job is in the Bible, your best bet at understanding.
What was around?
I mean, you certainly see Job 38, 39, and 40 having some descriptions that are beyond anything that's available in the world today.
There's no doubt about it.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
My working conclusion on the Great Wall of China is that it was Tartarian built at a defensive wall, and that because Tartaria is erased from history, you just have to attribute it instead to the Chinese.
Well, Tartaria would have been an umpire that was around for a certain period, and then it disappeared.
So, you know, I'd have to...
I mean, it's one of those things that I just haven't had the interest in deeply researching, but maybe somebody in the comments can give us a good site that has some actual good research on that stuff.
Very good.
All right.
India's first transgender clinic shuts down after losing its USAID funding with no hope of resuming.
So that was what the evil, the Satanism that is pushed upon us.
And I want to play this for you.
I want to play this for you.
I want to play this for you.
Oh, yeah, makes you think.
What kind of a coincidence is that?
Or is it a design, a cultural imposition option?
Can you imagine if you had someone who knows what you know now, helping you back when you were first waking up?
They will never understand what it was like living in a world that was so deceived, watching our loved ones support evil while hating good.
I personally think one year awake feels like seven because of how much excruciating It is to behold such profound ignorance slash brainwashing.
It was not the depths of the ungodly evil nor the staggering amount partaking in it that shocked me the most.
It was the length of time that is taking family and friends to finally see the truth.
When the veil falls, Anons are going to find themselves in front of a very large crowd.
Let me talk about that one for a minute, okay?
I remember waking up.
Many have heard the story.
It was after the Pulse nightclub.
And I said, that's impossible.
That's impossible.
But I remember coming out of the experience thinking, if they've lied to me on this level, how deep does the rabbit hole go?
And the problem was, at that point in time, every channel I tuned into to try to find somebody that knew the truth, Or was talking about it.
It only took me a matter of time before I could debunk it.
Or dismiss it as, that's not exactly reliable information.
So finding people that told me the truth was very difficult.
And I remember cycling through a number of guys' YouTube channels or videos.
I remember sort of going through a Ford's News stage and the aliens.
I went through a lot of different stages in my attempt to re-evaluate how I would begin to categorize and index the new knowledge that I was acquiring.
And it's very difficult to find somebody who...
There's people that think they're telling you the truth.
There's people that are telling you the truth, but maybe not the whole truth all the time.
And at the end of it, I pretty much had to throw out almost everybody.
Now, I stuck with Fetzer because Fetzer was right.
Where everybody else was wrong.
And that was on the false flags.
I couldn't find anything else out there.
Now I knew Fetzer had blind spots.
It was okay with that.
There was a lot of guys that had blind spots compared to what I thought I knew.
And I was okay with that.
Because it's not like these guys came out and said, well, I know everything about this and I know everything about that.
They knew something about this and something about that.
And what they told you was the best they could possibly do.
You're going to find, as more and more people wake up, that the enemy is deceit.
The enemy is sort of taking you into a different component of the grand delusion.
And a lot of the grand delusion has to do with the cosmos, which Which one is it?
Is it the one that the world gives you?
Or is it the one that comes from the Bible?
Or is it the one that comes from the history books?
Or is it the one that comes from the pagan religion?
Because we all live in our own personal Truman Show, in a sense, in that we can only see as far as our eyes can see, and we can only go as far as we can go, and we can only observe what we can for ourselves.
So we have to rely on other sources.
That window where you could really evaluate the world, I think, is closing up, and it's closing up very, very fast.
I find knowledge to be increasing at such a tremendous rate right now as the Internet continues to advance, but I also find that deception is increasing at a tremendous rate as well.
For instance, now you can easily go and create an artificial...
I did a...
I had a client the other day that was caught up in a romance scam.
She just couldn't believe it.
You know, paid me some money to figure out what was going on.
She just couldn't believe it.
Well, part of the romance scam was that she had been given pictures of a guy who I found out, who I figured out was sort of a C-list actor from Hong Kong.
Those were the photos that she was given by the scammer.
And then the scammer had used artificial intelligence to recreate that image on his face, and they were doing video chat.
But it wasn't with the P-list actor from Hong Kong that was represented in the photos, but she said it looked just like him.
So I had to show her the technology where it was so easy to duplicate somebody else and put them into the studio, sort of.
And I got to tell you that...
The more I take a look at artificial intelligence and the more I see what's available to the general public today, the more I wonder how long it's really been around and available to groups that had the purpose of rewriting history, deceiving.
I think a lot of the historical revisionism is grounded in Rome, frankly.
I think the Vatican is so tremendously rich that they've been messing around with history as much as they can for a long, long time.
I think it's part of a sort of a Jesuit op.
The deeper I look into it, the more I'm convinced that the city on Seven Hills that's spoken about in the Bible as Mystery Babylon is...
I mean, Rome is known as the city of Seven Hills.
The Vatican, I believe, as an institution is...
Is deeply corrupted over centuries and centuries and centuries.
And remember what I've said before, which is institutions are easy to corrupt, whereas a cellular structure like a church is very difficult to corrupt.
Churches are supposed to be incredibly cellular and institutions are incredibly centralized and therefore you have sort of the pyramid of power at the top of the institutions.
And so one of the things I was thinking through the other day was the Chinese church because they have no buildings.
They're invisible.
They have no central heating and air conditioning.
They have no quote-unquote bishops with funny outfits and pointy hats.
They have no leadership because the leadership would be immediately taken out by...
The communist machine.
And of course, the communist machine wants to replace it with their church.
And there's limits to what you can talk about and what you can't.
But the real church, from what I've heard, what I've read, and what I've studied, and what I've personally experienced, is underground in China.
And it's an incredibly cellular structure.
And I'm not saying that that's not open to disease.
But I'm saying that, you know, these people have to hide their Bibles.
They have to hide it in their heart.
They have to hide the word.
And they have to literally walk one day at a time using the word as sort of a lamp unto their feet.
And that's completely different than what's happened in Western civilization.
In Western civilization, what we've done is we've indexed our Bibles and dropped everything into a certain bucket that we call doctrine and then built a version of that off.
I would say that the institutional corruption is much, much easier to accomplish than something that's very cellular.
So that said, that's a lot to think about for the future, because if the surveillance society that's structured in the New World Order...
And structured by the globalists does mimic the Chinese style of control.
And once you implement central bank digital currencies and once you implement sort of the new rules of the new social order, you're going to find tremendous amounts of restriction in terms of who you can criticize and who you can't.
And so what you've got to be prepared for...
If and when that day comes, you've got to have your mind prepared.
And we tend to think that we're going to be able to rely on our computers or our bookshelves or whatever, but there's a reason that we memorize this stuff as much as we can, and that's because the day may be coming, and it may be coming soon, when what's on our bookshelves and what's in our computers is controlled and outlawed, and even possibly that public speech about...
Certain things, religious nature, will be outlawed.
And it's just a lot there in terms of history, but a lot to think about.
Thank you, brother.
Yeah, we are in some sort of an endgame, and the question is, you know, who's ending?
You talked about the idea of being a truther, and that when...
Somebody can break into the truth.
I just represent that we're just talking about facts.
They're objective, independently, verifiable.
And Professor Jim Fetzer is a model scholar to be able to point to what scholarship should be about.
And ethical scholarship always is.
We're pointing to data.
And then people can have any opinion that they want.
We're going to have an allegorical table of facts in front of us.
Circle around it.
Take a look at it from different positions.
Hear the analyses of the meaning of those facts from many different people.
And then it comes down to a policy question.
Policy just is, so what are we going to do about this?
And one of the options always is, we don't have to do anything about this.
But we are talking about objective data.
And that's another way of talking about critical thinking as well.
Is that what is objectively real here?
And in the freedom of speech, of course, you can have any interpretation, any policy position that you want, but we're going to exclude those analyses or those explanations of the data that are refuted by the data.
And that's where we are as truthers, is that so much of what we are officially told as his stories is refuted by the very data that they say supports their conclusion.
It's Orwellian.
And the Vatican, you know, one of the difficult challenges for people to rise up to is that it is the most important, the most authoritative agencies that are captured, the Vatican being one of them, the governments, the central banks, corporate media.
It's all controlled.
It's all captured.
It's all by these demon-type people.
And then you got the so-called Pope in the Serpent Hall with the screaming, Demon statues coming out behind the Pope's throne.
And then you just have to see for yourself.
Jesus only gave one commandment.
Love.
And then I think an objective person would have to conclude that what the Popes do is just virtue signal that they care.
But Jesus physically threw out the money changers.
When we have about a million human beings dying from preventable poverty every month, and as a lobbyist, we lobbied the Vatican and the churches, and we just found out at the top, you'd think that they would be fully on board, but few of them were.
Well, the Vatican's pushing a whole global climate agenda.
I don't know.
You know, there's a lot.
There's so much to think through.
I'm not sure that you could deal with it unless it was almost a dedicated show.
But there's no doubt that this particular pope has had lots of news releases and press releases that don't align themselves with what you find in the Bible.
And then there's the question of the rug of authority over time.
You know, they would argue that the pope was...
Originally, Peter, quote-unquote, chief of the apostles, that idea didn't come around until the 4th or the 5th century.
There's a lot of old history there, and you really do need to study it.
And I think there was a lot of things that went wrong even as early as 320 in terms of the corruption of the original meaning of Christianity.
But I do think it's preserved.
But it's preserved in the hearts of the believers a lot more than it's preserved necessarily in the traditions of men.
The traditions can be corrupted pretty easily.
The rug of authority, certainly.
I mean, look.
The rug of authority, this is a big thing.
Of course, we had what's called the Protestant Reformation.
And we had the councils where there was decisions being made about the structure of the...
And you had all the theologians, which were the high minds of the day.
And again, I would say that most of the intellectual side of Christendom over the years has been people arguing about how all the puzzle pieces are supposed to fit together.
That that's how it developed.
It's pretty easy to kind of clearly see the difference between the two different approaches.
On one approach, you have the people of faith who are going to do the best they can and hope that the promises of God are going to apply as they humbly read the scriptures and pull out of them sort of, it's a lamp unto their feet.
They're going to walk the narrow path.
Using the word as sort of the daily lamp for how we're supposed to walk through the valley of the shadow of death.
And then on the other hand, you have the intellectual side that goes so deep into parsing out Greek Septuagint words and Hebrew texts and developing doctrines on this and doctrines on that and theories on this and theories on that.
And let me tell you something.
The whole thing's gotten screwed up more on the right-hand side of that equation than it has on the left-hand side, which is the people.
And I can tell you, I ran into a Chinese missionary in Seattle.
Yeah, China sent missionaries to the United States.
And I remember having an interesting discussion with this guy.
He had come from nothing.
I knew how these people lived.
I'd seen it.
Having an interesting discussion with him, and I'm like, well, so what type of theology do you come from?
And I'm trying to sort of pinpoint where this guy's at.
Is he dispensationalist?
And he wouldn't answer the question.
Just like you're supposed to.
Don't follow, man.
Don't follow, man.
Back to the Word.
Back to the Word.
Go back.
Go back.
And I thought it was an interesting discussion.
Don't follow men.
Don't follow men.
Read your Bible.
And that's where I think the two worlds begin to break, is when you have an intellectual class that begins to break out of the original meaning and sort of consolidate into a new religion.
And it ain't going to take long for that religion to deviate from the path, and no longer is the word a lamp unto their feet.
Each day, it becomes a doctrinal puzzle, which is very two-dimensional.
And of course, a two-dimensional image cannot represent God.
Just like we tend to think, oh, we've got all these words here.
We've got 66 books of the Bible.
We've got all these words.
We've got it all.
Therefore, we understand God.
Are you kidding?
Are you kidding?
You think God that created this world can be?
Boiled down to Greek and Hebrew words.
He lets us know what he wants us to know through his word.
But even then, we see through a mirror darkly.
But he calls us to do our best under the circumstances and rely on him and have faith.
Okay.
Pretty simple.
Yeah, in my experience, those people who do follow that path of just doing the best they can, being the best person, being humble, looking, actually having a relationship and trying to express it to the Creator.
And we've gotten enough assistance and enough hints to bolster our self-expression, or at least that has been true for me and in my observations of the strongest people I know.
Epstein-less drama.
The whole world is watching.
All right, so I'm going to – Tucker Carlson, tens of millions of people are paying attention to this.
I want to play a little bit of this.
But a little bit of like – they charged Epstein, but a little bit of like legal trivia.
I went there for the press conference.
I read the indictment, and the indictment was what you would charge someone if you wanted to create a media narrative that you were prosecuting them, but that under the law would be chicken shit stuff.
The lowest thing that you could possibly charge him for.
But you could say we're going after him.
There's a reason they did it this way.
They charged him for paying for massages in his New York apartment through, I think, the period of 2014 to 2016, somewhere in the timeline.
Massages in his apartment.
That's all they charged him for, the four corners of the indictment.
So why did they only charge him for that?
There's a reason.
He had a place in New Mexico.
He had his island.
He had his place in Paris.
He had another place, I think, in West Palm Beach.
And if they had charged him for trafficking, the FBI would have had to simultaneously raid every property.
Under a Man Act.
The Man Act makes it a crime to transport a woman.
State lines.
Yep.
And international, too.
So he was flying back from Paris, and he was flying women models all over the world.
Models, you know, not to diminish what he's doing, but that's what's his story.
He was flying underage girls, and some of age all around the world.
Well, what you would do with the SDNY, which, as we know, the SDNY, they go after you.
You've got problems.
Because they charge the most aggressive.
They're too aggressive, in fact, in highly charged cases.
That's the Southern District of New York?
What you would have charged it, if you were...
Concerned with being a prosecutor, you would have charged him under the Mann Act.
And under the international version of the Mann Act, you would have simultaneously searched and seized every property, taken all the evidence.
Instead, they arrested him, had a little press conference.
It was over massages on New York property.
They searched the New York property.
What was happening to the island?
We don't know.
What happened to the island?
We don't know.
Because the FBI said we can't search it because nothing that he was charged with concerned.
Because, of course, the FBI is very concerned now with due process.
Yeah.
You know, yeah, they're really, you know, we don't want to go over...
All right, there you go.
So the FBI is complicit in it, and that's the point that we're getting to.
And we're...
Hold on, let me deal with this one real quick, okay?
I just want to kind of point this out, okay?
We all know.
I mean, I think even the dumbest American at this point in time knows that there's something wrong with everything that happened with Epstein.
His indictment was superficial.
They did, just like they said in that video, just like you said, they did fail to search key properties.
They did fail to take the evidence or produce the evidence.
Of course, Epstein had huge connections with the international trafficking.
There's been no unreleased surveillance footage.
Of course, you've got the mystery client list that everybody believes has all the billionaires.
You've got...
The political implications on Epstein and this sort of massive fear among the elites that this whole structure is going to go up.
I doubt it.
We do know that Epstein's properties were wired for blackmail and that video evidence does exist someplace.
We have these very highly suspicious autopsy findings His suicide narrative, the unbelievable lack of prison oversight related to his quote-unquote death.
You, of course, have the earliest and most reliable 4chan post that went out at like 4.12 in the morning that said that a van full of unmarked guys came in and extracted Epstein, and that was the earliest.
I mean, it was just literally like...
Within a couple hours after the event actually took place.
And the security camera failures, Brian.
Both outside and inside.
What a coincidence.
What a shame.
And then you had the very, very weird Ghislaine Maxwell trial where it was totally censored.
Look at the difference between Johnny Depp and Ghislaine Maxwell.
And who's Ghislaine Maxwell?
Her father is Jeffrey Maxwell.
He's like this huge, huge billionaire, money manager, fun guy.
And a lot of people believe that Maxwell was Epstein's handler, which is pretty interesting.
And of course, then you've got Bill Barr, Donald Trump's guy.
Bill Barr has been involved in just about everything rotten since, I mean, I think it goes back to the Mena-Arkansas-Clinton era in terms of Bill Barr.
Being installed and he's always there when things get weird.
And then you've got the other inmates and all the questions about all the other inmates.
So we all know it stinks to high heaven.
We all know something's wrong.
And I think that I saw a good explanation the other day that I hadn't thought through yet.
And I can't even remember what channel it was.
I think it might have been Julian Dorsey.
Or something.
But I have been watching a lot of him because he's been doing a lot of interviews with John Karaku.
But this guy came out and he said, he said Epstein was handled by Maxwell, that this was all a billionaire machine, and that the real problem with bringing down Epstein is that Wall Street's going to come down at the same time.
That really, the ties to Wall Street...
And K Street are so incredibly deep and so incredibly powerful in terms of the big money managers and the big fund structures that it could collapse entire economies if it comes down.
And so you got to ask yourself the question at this point in time, you know, we all want justice.
We all want the whole Pizzagate thing to be opened wide up, Podesta, Hillary Clinton.
We all want justice for Julian Assange.
We all want justice for the children that have been abused and destroyed.
But this other guy says, look, the consequences of having that level of justice are seriously going to be a total destruction of society or a total destruction of the dollar.
And are we ready for that?
I don't know if I would go that far in terms of my own analysis.
I think we're definitely ready for it.
But the question is, how deep and how big does it go, and how much could it destroy in terms of our hegemony globally?
How much could it destroy in terms of the entire idea of Western hegemony?
Global collapse could come with a network this large and this powerful, and are we willing to suffer that for justice?
Under these circumstances.
And I just think it's a lot to reflect on.
I know I do think it needs to be opened up.
I don't think we're ever going to have a transparent government or transparent society until that can of worms is opened.
I like truth, justice.
I like prosecutions, perp walks.
But let's face it.
Pam Bondi and even Donald Trump.
Kash Patel, do they really carry that kind of stick?
I would argue that the globalists probably have a bigger stick, especially with other things that we're going to talk about here today.
But, of course, we're going to talk a lot about Trump.
That's coming up later on in the stories, and that's going to play a lot into this.
Let's keep going.
Anyway, that's my take on it.
Yeah, we'll see.
We'll see.
Nothing is broken yet.
And the longer that the Great Awakening, the Great Choosing goes on, I like it.
And this is what we were shown with this Part 1 of this disclosure.
You literally watched the corrupt FBI's New York field office verber publicly get caught defying a direct order from the USAG by hiding Epstein evidence.
And you cannot contain your anger at Pam Bondi?
Are you, like, retarded as something?
Mentally challenged?
A little slow in the uptake?
So, this is, uh, the silent war continues, is the point.
You, and this, as you were watching, Patriots attempting to assert full control over agencies' local offices that have literal traitors and embedded CIA, MICICS, bad actors in key positions.
Well, I think that, uh, it's all a show.
And that the only hope that we have for some elegant ending in court, and, of course, including...
Our dead system, the Orwellian opposite of a monetary system, is if we have adults in the background.
Otherwise, it's going to get ugly and there would be a paper collapse, but without anything in the background ready to roll in.
Oh yeah, ugly.
FBI Director Kash Patel and Pam Bondi released a statement requesting full Jeffrey Epstein documents.
Okay?
All right.
Well, we'll see what the next moves are.
And anybody who is on the side of truth is going to demand that we get the full truth.
And the data of who these people are, who are captured by the blackmail, that of course would be central.
Because these people are puppets.
And we've covered this for a couple years.
Wired Media Investigations has uncovered explosive data tracking nearly 200 mobile phones linked to visitors to Jeffrey Epstein's infamous island.
Leading straight to their homes and workplaces.
The investigation, based on detailed coordinates allegedly collected by data broker Near Intelligence, identifies these individuals with precision.
Yet despite having the names, Wired refuses to expose them.
And Pam Bondi and Cash Patel, they know this.
They're not stupid.
They have the option.
And then this is funny.
It's truth in...
Satire here.
My fellow Americans, today you may be waiting for the highly anticipated Epstein client list to be released.
So while I know you may see what appears to be my name on the list, I'd like to argue that I did not have sexual relations with those children on that island.
Would it even count though?
It wasn't in the United States.
Also, if you add up their ages, I'm sure it was above 18. Jeff told me since it was outside of the joystick.
Bill, what the hell are you doing?
Uh, no, Hillary, I'm not confessing.
You idiot.
Do I always have to clean up your mess?
What are you doing?
What?
No, wait.
Please don't hurt the cameraman.
He had nothing to do with this.
No, Hillary, that was my friend.
He wasn't a witness.
My fellow Americans.
And the truth is going to be as wild as that if we can ever get to the truth.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, that's a good parody on Clinton.
I mean, it's what makes it funny.
Yeah.
American presidents caught up in this.
Folks, this ain't nothing new.
Go and look up the Franklin Affair.
It's been around for a long time, this stuff.
It has.
Alright, next.
Okay, the Ukraine war, or at least what we're shown, and Zelensky, the actor dramatic endgame.
So Zelensky managed to lie three times within a minute in the Oval Office.
Lie one, Russian troops didn't cross the border until 2022. It was Kiev that began the war by assaulting their own people in 2014. In addition, only two civilians died in the Russian operations to secure Crimea.
The vast majority of Crimeans welcomed the Russians, which they had been part of until 1954, and had voted to join previously.
From 2014 to 2022, Kiev...
Militarily attacked the Donbas, firing artillery shells and killing about 14,000 people.
And the special military operation of the Russians to protect their people is similar to the justification to begin World War II, where it was the previous German territory given to Poland, where it was former Germans being attacked by Poles.
And the Germans intervened.
And that was the justification for the war.
Lie two.
It was the Ukrainian army that began shelling and bombing Donbass's people militia in 2014. The Russian army didn't intervene.
There were zero Russian troops on the ground in Ukraine until 2022. Lie three.
Zelensky says he signed a deal with Macron and Merkel in 2019. Francois Haaland later agreed, as did Merkel, the deal signed was to allow Ukraine to rebuild its army to face Russia in a larger war.
Russia didn't break the deal.
Ukraine did.
Repeatedly.
According to the OSCE data, their bombardment of eastern Ukraine increased hugely just prior to Russia's intervention in 2022. And that's a big deal for context.
Trump is a dictator.
Zelensky is in year six of his five-year term.
He's banned 11 political parties, passed law in 2022 to censor journalists, and combined all news into one government station.
You guys would defend Satan himself if Trump called him evil.
Full 50-minute conversation between President Zelensky and President Trump reveals 40 minutes of dialogue before the fireworks.
And my understanding of what Zelensky was asking.
He declined.
He said no to a ceasefire.
He said, I want peace, but I don't want a ceasefire.
I want U.S. boots on the ground and I want more money.
And Trump said, okay, if you want peace, accept the ceasefire.
If you don't accept the ceasefire, then you're on your own and no more support from us.
Woo!
And that's interesting.
I did hear the tape of that, and that is apparently what was said, Zelensky's White House catastrophe.
And Klandeson is saying that this is a golden ticket, and that public perception, this is going to be the end of the public support.
And again, with what I see...
The effect of the orchestration of the messages is for the benefit in the Great Awakening and the Great Choosing for the truth.
and I'll give Trump a minute to talk on this on his own.
Let's try this again. - They should have an immediate ceasefire.
That was the other thing.
He didn't want to do a bad ceasefire.
A ceasefire could take place immediately.
A contract, if you want to end the war, you sign up an agreement.
That's going to take a period of time.
It takes time.
I want it to end immediately.
And I think if you had a ceasefire, it would be a ceasefire, a real one, that would end it.
But he doesn't want to do that?
That's fine.
You would better do it.
I want it to end immediately.
I want a ceasefire now.
He said, oh, I don't want a ceasefire.
Well, all of a sudden, he's a big shot because he has the U.S. on his side.
Either we're going to end it or let him fight it out.
And if he fights it out, it's not going to be pretty.
Because without it, without us, he doesn't win.
It doesn't matter what I'm considering.
I'm just telling you.
You saw what I saw today.
That was not a man that wanted to make peace.
And I'm only interested if he wants to end the bloodshed.
Thank you very much.
Okay.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I'm not sure.
Well, Zelensky's caught between a rock and a hard place.
First of all, I want you to take a second and compare Russian...
Compare Lavrov.
I forget his title, but it's high.
It's like Secretary of State.
It's like the Foreign Minister.
It's like our Secretary of State.
Lavrov is like a pro, right?
I think Lavrov could...
I'd argue Trump.
Like, Lavrov is a pro.
And Putin's a pro.
And I think this is something that scares the globalists, which is one of the reasons that they've wanted to tackle the Russian issue for so long.
I mean, Russia's been sort of their big thing for a long, long time.
And you'll get a lot of transparency from Putin.
You'll get a lot of transparency for Lavrov.
Now, Zelensky's in a tough spot because he's no Lavrov.
He's a puppet actor that's been installed into a position.
I mean, this is almost as bad as watching Biden from a global geopolitical perspective.
A puppet?
Or Kamala Harris?
A puppet?
You put a Kamala Harris in the room with Lavrov, or even with Trump, or even with Putin, I think I'm going to wipe the floor with him.
Lavrov said Rubio basically was a low-grade paper pusher compared to...
He said when he showed up in Saudi Arabia and he met with Rubio, he found Rubio to be completely unprepared.
For that particular level of engagement in terms of Russia already had their list.
They already knew their talking points.
They had already worked out the negotiation points.
What are we going to give?
What's a must-have?
Lavrov had done his homework, and he was a pro from the beginning.
Think of Jeffrey Sachs.
Sachs.
Sachs.
I can't remember which one it is.
Sachs.
He's a pro.
He's a pro.
Then you put Zelensky on the spot like that and you can see Zelensky was a lot like a deer in the headlights in terms of he's trying to decide whether Trump was the boss or whether his old handlers are the boss.
I mean, that's how bad it was.
He didn't know.
He didn't understand what he had to do.
And I think he's been shaking hands and glad-handing with so many globalists for so long that he might really think that he's sort of a rock star.
I mean, that would be an explanation for him showing up in his little war t-shirt, you know, his little war sweatshirt instead of a suit.
And I think Trump pointed that out and Vance pointed that out and the guy in the background pointed that out.
Anyway, my overall take on it is that...
Is that Zelensky can do as good as Zelensky can do, but he's only there to take as much money as he possibly can to be a puppet.
And you put him live on a spot like that, and he's going to get chewed up and spit out.
I mean, that's the level of frustration that was in his voice.
He didn't know how to handle pros.
This is a guy that's allowed a million people to be killed.
A million men to be killed under his leadership.
A million men.
Or at least that's what we've been showing.
Yeah, that's just what we've been showing.
Yeah.
And part of the impossible position of Zelensky, he can only operate within the scripts if the scripts are within the boundaries of what he can respond to.
The Russian peace terms from the beginning...
Are easy to do.
If people understood these terms, then there would be zero support for this war.
One is independence for the Donbass.
That's the eastern part of Ukraine.
And this is all about the people who say that they're for democracy.
Okay, bitches, then give it.
The people in the Donbass who were killed, 14,000 of them shelled by NATO-supplied artillery for eight years.
Nobody believes in the puppets.
This is a U.S. and NATO-imposed color revolution and all the background, and we've talked about this for a long time, but I don't want to go over it again with Newland's orchestration to create the new government before there was a new government.
And so independence for the Donbass and no NATO for Ukraine, which had been promised from the beginning.
And you can't talk your way out of that.
There's no justification for a war given those terms of peace or no reasonable one.
And then, you know, with what we're seeing, again, these scripts, this is death to the empire by a thousand cuts.
These scripts are jump the shark.
There is going to be new American left on board with the official positions or of the empire.
So, I am...
I bet in the background that members of the Empire, in a war, you want to win.
And one of the ways that you win is you continually tell your enemy, hey, you can join our side.
Here's how you do it.
We'll accept your surrender.
And in exchange, you'll get a better outcome than if you don't join our side.
I think in the background there is a lot going on, and we may see an explosion of a last-ditch effort of whatever power, whatever force our opponents have, or it may continue to softly crush down, but something is going to break.
I'm going to make a little argument against democracy under these circumstances.
We've got a problem.
Putin allowed them to have their democracy.
I say allowed, but America came in and corrupted it and put in our puppet regime.
Okay?
Putin doesn't want to see that happen again.
America knows how to cheat elections, as we've all experienced over the last five years.
America knows how to work in our CIA, our U.S. aid programs, all about Calling it democracy to justify the puppets that get put into place all over the place.
Folks, if we were, if we really believed in democracy, and let's say that we hold a vote, you know, three months after COVID breaks loose, the mass media has everybody brainwashed, and democracy comes along, and so 51% of the people say we all need to wear masks the rest of our lives, that's going to be the law.
Well, balance that out.
Okay?
That's a temporary thing, but still, 51%.
So do you pass a law?
So we live in a representational republic.
I don't know why we're always calling it a democracy.
I guess we call it a democracy because we sort of count up the votes, but it's a representational republic.
And in a representational republic, the idea that one man can be correct and 99 men be wrong still exists.
Hire a representative fundamentally to represent what's in the best interest of the constituency.
And sometimes the tiny minority is correct in terms of how it ought to go, but the larger majority and the processes that stay in place and the different interests sort of corrupt the entire atmosphere.
Let me...
Point out that Caesar was assassinated by Brutus in the Senate.
I mean, he crossed the river and went against the Senate.
And then when he came back, he was assassinated by the Senate.
Well, sometimes the larger body has more power, but in that particular situation, Caesar was right.
And the question is, once we understand how all that goes, because right now, What Putin doesn't want is another Western puppet going into place to start to cut deals.
And I don't think Russia's really after the mineral rights.
Trump wants the mineral rights so that we can repay the debt that we loaned them.
Zelensky thinks he can go and sell all those mineral rights off to France and whatever power's out there that's going to make a commitment to him.
The European Union wants to give Ukraine a hundred-year deal, very similar to what England gave to Hong Kong after the Opium Wars.
That was 1897 to 1997, and that's how Hong Kong was sort of westernized and kept separate.
But in July 1st, 1997, that hundred-year deal ran out.
Zelensky already inked the deal.
Oh, what?
He's just going to cut out America and he's going to cut a deal with Europe?
And now you're going to have Europe fighting with America and you're going to have Russia wanting to make sure that it's not another Western-led leader that's installed.
You're going to have still a controlled media empire in Ukraine.
I mean, how do you solve it?
I think the only way to solve it is to eliminate Ukraine altogether.
Kind of allow Russia to take it over.
I hate to say it, but Russia's done a pretty good job operating their own society, operating their own borders and doing their own thing.
And I think that's probably what the people would lean towards rather than Western-led.
Now, will Russia allow them to have their own quote-unquote democracy?
Will they fall into the same traps Westernized governments have?
I don't know.
But they've got a problem in that they need to...
There needs to be some very smart people sitting down to decide what the new constitution of the new area is going to look like in terms of what the rules are.
Interesting times.
Yeah, it is interesting, and that will be a trip.
We tend to think that the nations are what the nations are, but if you go back a little bit in time, you can see that there are just lines drawn on a map and the idea of where should national boundaries be and who would want to go where.
Those are important questions, and it will be interesting.
But we've got to have the truth first.
Corporate media isn't going to give it, and their self-destruction from ongoing prima facie criminally complicit lies of omission and commission continues.
Poll.
Americans trust in mass media, lowest point in over 50 years.
And that's Gallup Poll.
And it's crazy.
Let me get to the graphs here.
Well, maybe this one doesn't have the graphs.
No, it doesn't.
I have to read it from the data.
All right, so 68% trusted the mass media, either a great deal or a fair amount in 1972. And then in 2000, it was 51%.
2004, 44%.
2016, 32%.
Now we're at 31% is trust in the media.
And that's awesome.
So 31% of the population can't be brainwashed no matter what evidence is presented to them.
That's interesting.
Yeah, and who knows how...
So we've hit critical mass.
There's no more minds that are going to change.
That's a sad statement, but that's probably true.
Academia has been working towards protecting their 32%.
On the lefty side for a long, long time.
And, you know, it's been effective.
I mean, when you start to brainwash people from a very young age and work them through an entire structure of life, given a particular geopolitical worldview, and then, you know, you can't crash it because the problem is the person's going to run into literally mental illness.
If one of these people that's been brainwashed on this level begins to break loose from The brain control matrix.
They literally go a little insane for a while because it's like they've always had their feet on the ground and now they're drowning in an ocean of information and they just can't find it.
And what they do is they just default to safety, safety, safety, safety, safety.
Get my feet back on the ground someplace while I need to sit back on my couch and watch MSNBC and have it remind me of how the world ought to be.
Rather than breaking loose into the alternative media.
Now the problem is that I believe that the window is going to begin closing here very soon as artificial intelligence is Google-ized and Wikipedia-ized.
And right now, I mean, I already see indicators of it.
I'm experimenting with my own to try to see how far it goes in terms of how it pulls and builds and structures itself.
But I would say ChatGPT is 60% controlled.
I would guess that Grok is...
I don't know.
I haven't played with it enough to really know.
But you've got different competing software and hardware structures that are in place.
And you really are going to have a hard time if you want to try to do these sort of matrix-like downloads.
Mass information, you're going to find that it changes.
And of course, if you've noticed all your Google search results now are all generated by artificial intelligence, right?
Like every time you'd put in a Google search, artificial intelligence is searching.
And so you've got a brave new world that's developing.
And this is why I would say this is a really good time to go get your eyes checked, get your glasses updated, make sure you've got...
Nice light.
This is just one of the powerful books.
I spend time in books.
I have books and journals everywhere surrounding me.
And I prefer it.
But sometimes I can't go through the whole thing, so I have to default to artificial intelligence because it's quicker and faster and easier.
But I can tell you that the results are pretty bad, pretty controlled.
So far, that 31% who still trust and are controlled by corporate media, we have patriots.
I mean, they have received an alternative point of view from us, and we're in perfect position when we get a breakthrough.
If corporate media, if the shattering of the official story...
is so severe that corporate media won't survive.
And then most of the people, I think if we had an AI unleashed where we could get the accurate information instead of a controlled story, a lie, an empire protecting lie is what is being generated from those machines right now, then I think we're going to be in good shape.
So nothing is broken yet.
But as I keep saying, I'm cautiously optimistic that the Great Awakening continues and the trust in the officials continues to be self-destroyed.
Nobody bothered to tell you Israel has started a war against Syria's liberators.
HTS's liberation of Syria is going extremely well.
And so corporate media doesn't tell you this stuff.
And that Israel is now attempting, apparently, with the story that we're told, to take over Syria.
And they're attacking the people who were rebranded as woke terrorists, Al-Qaeda affiliates that were rebranded as the savior because Syria was a target for the empire.
The facts about measles in one minute read written by me and published in the BMJ, Patriot Leader and Jew Meryl Nass.
And she's just saying, just responding to corporate media, trying to fear monger about Measles is that measles has not been a significant health issue.
And the individual that is at the heart of this apparently had comorbidities and may have even been injected with the vaccine before diagnosed with having measles.
Argentine researchers, and that's just testing positive for measles.
And I wouldn't trust any of the tests from the agencies that are trying to kill us.
Pathological liars.
Argentine researchers identify 55 undeclared chemicals, including arsenic, in COVID vaccines.
And this is published research, and corporate media isn't gonna tell you this.
And again, I like the trend that the public is withdrawing their consent.
Test results show Girl Scout cookies are extremely toxic.
All of them, Joe Rogan.
They're fucking toxic as fuck.
And if you want something truthful in the media, you might have to go to Joe Rogan because corporate media aren't going to give you that information.
And, of course, the Girl Scouts and the Boy Scouts probably just controlled agencies as everyone else.
Health insurance scams, her with a $5,100 MRI, while self-pays just $700.
And the idea that Americans are hearing about Doge and the corruption and the theft of the money, the looting, and the trend of that, if that continues, that is going to be death by a thousand cuts.
The official story...
Let me address this one, because when it comes to health insurance, that's a world that I was very high up into in my first career.
Okay?
She's right.
If UnitedHealthcare's reimbursement structure for this series of codes that are submitted for this patient that was indicating these particular illnesses, and again, artificial intelligence, computer structures, billing software and structures, that game has been a game of hospital structures, doctor structures.
Pharmaceutical structures trying to game insurance structures for a long, long time.
This is the battle that's been back and forth, back and forth, back and forth for goodwill.
There are consultants that come in and teach the hospitals how to basically commit fraud.
It's legal fraud, but it's basically unbundling, upcoding, how to adjust a record to make sure that you're getting the highest reimbursement without getting caught.
How to submit the bills faster so that you can get at the insurance.
Then you had Obamacare come along and that said, okay, well, it's all going to be sort of one size fits all so that the government can take over and decide what the new reimbursement schedule is.
Remember, there's the government that screwed all of this up at the beginning.
Okay, back in the day, there was, I mean, we're talking about passage of ERISA 74, 75. Back in the day, there was competition.
The competition was It was pretty simple.
Hey, guys, look, if you represent this particular employer group that works across different state lines, you can design whatever you want.
We'll allow you to make a promise to your employees.
That's your health insurance plan.
And we'll allow you to finance it however you want and pay out the reimbursements however you want.
You have a fiduciary.
You, as the employer plan sponsor, have a fiduciary obligation to the entire group.
Because everybody's putting money into it to control the expenses because you're going to sort of act as big daddy and act in the best interest of the entire population.
And if you do that under federal law, ERISA, then you don't have to worry about state insurance regulations.
Well, most of all the big plans are ERISA platforms, okay?
So then government came along and...
They said, okay, well, we got all these people that are not inside insurance plans.
And so there's going to be Medicare and there's going to be Medicaid and our government's going to set up reimbursements for all these people on all these government programs.
And so the government came in and they literally, I hate to say it, but all their big time consultants with all their big brains and garbage.
They decided to start paying reimbursements as a percentage of the amount billed.
Now, if you could run your company like that, how stupid is that?
Because all you're doing is telling the people that you're providing services to to raise their pricing.
And so then it was a battle.
The insurance company sort of said, okay, well, we have these big, huge legacy computer systems, and we can't really program them to be all agile.
So we'll just sort of merge off of...
Government-styled, quote-unquote, network discounts.
It all gets really complex, but it's simple when you break it down, okay?
It's a disease that has hit health insurance plans everywhere, and the government comes along and says, we are the cure for the disease.
The cure is a single-payer system, like Canada.
That way you have one big flex machine.
To tell all the doctors in the hospitals what the value of their services is and what the reimbursement's willing to be.
What does that sound like?
I mean, that's like a government-controlled healthcare where the guy that's got a million dollars is seen through the same lens as the guy that's got $2.52 in his bank account.
Because it's all a one-size-fits-all structure.
Well, that can't work here in America.
We've got to have rich people have to have their stuff.
They've got to be able to get the best at the biggest cancer centers and all this.
The structures got so screwed up that this is why you get a gap between a street-grade value of $700 for an MRI, street-grade cash value, and $5,100 that's reimbursed from the insurance company because the insurance company is still using an old legacy healthcare system.
They've got all those old...
Remember those big, huge legacy mainframe computers?
Well, they're fundamentally the same because their claims adjudication structures, while a little bit more sophisticated than they've adopted the new billing codes and new processes, it's still the same thing.
It's all built around a one-size-fits-all program.
So there's a reason that I bring this up.
I would like to go into full-time current event analysis.
Along with some other teaching endeavors that I'd like to start to go that direction.
I can't quite financially go there.
The private investigation company still needs to be ran.
I'm not going to go there.
But if there is somebody out there that's connected, and I just said I'm going to do this, I'm going to do this a couple of times, and maybe the phone rings, maybe it doesn't.
But if there's somebody out there who really wants to re-engineer a health plan.
To meet today's standards.
We have figured out a way, my team of people, and we're doing it right now.
We figured out a way to pre-negotiate the cost of the service at the cash value, $700.
And we figured out how to run that money through the plan and put it onto a sort of debit card that can only work on one particular tax ID number.
And so we'll pre-negotiate the service.
We'll see a trigger come in.
A trigger is somebody that's a trigger diagnosis.
They've got something that's going to get expensive.
Then we send out our teams of people.
They get on the phones.
They negotiate.
They find the guy that'll take the cash.
We steer the patient to that guy that'll take the cash by making sure they have no deductible, no copay, and no coinsurance.
And then we issue the prepaid card to pay for the service.
Prior to at the agreed rate.
Now, the problem with human bodies is there's complications and things can come up afterwards.
And the other problem is when you do an aggressive finance or a very flexible financing structure like that, you got reinsurance guys.
These are the guys that make sure that the bank accounts that hold everybody's money don't run out.
And they're like, hey, we need to make sure that everything's cool, that we're not just, you know, that this isn't a money laundering scheme because...
We're the guys that pay when the bank account runs out of it.
We got all this stuff figured out.
We had to build our own basic claims adjudication structure to do it.
We've been doing that for years.
We're on, like, version 9. But right now, it's incredibly efficient because what we're doing in these new plans is totally different than anybody else that's out there.
We're literally fronting the money for all the large...
Cost diagnosis structures along with different strings that are attached.
And then we can build the health plan to pay, instead of that street grade rate of $5,100, we can build the health plan to pay what Medicare would pay plus 50% or plus 35%.
So we're doing things that nobody else can do, has done.
And I just need to get one nice, big, juicy client.
So hopefully that comes out of the...
Out of the audience, that's the only time I've ever made a personal pitch for anything, but if there's somebody out there that's listening that wants to take a look at the corporate structure next year, I can talk with you about it.
That would be an excellent pilot project, and that's what you do in the real world.
It's not a pilot.
We got real clients that are doing it right now.
One big, large name that everybody would recognize.
All right.
Well, rock and roll with it, brother.
Everybody wants a better system.
And whatever it is that we get is going to be unrecognizable compared to the official system of so-called health, so-called care today, and so much of the official poisoning, torture, and mind control.
All right, final topic, the old world buildings with the impossible construction timelines.
Given the technology, population, infrastructure, the official, his stories are refuted.
Now, this is a nice one.
This is the Flatiron Building.
In Manhattan.
And the official story is that it was constructed in 17 months, which just isn't possible.
And this is from the testimony of construction experts.
We have here, this is a terminus in Mumbai, in India.
And this was built in one year, according to the official story.
Of course that is not possible.
I can't remember if I have...
Oh, there's a bunch of here.
There's a two-year building.
And then it was demolished in 1926. Yeah, this was built in...
This is in Galveston.
That's part of the old world that was taken down in the...
Might have been a due weather attack.
Palace of Education.
Built in 1900. So just one year, apparently.
And here, this is going to be from the Chicago Exposition.
This is the Machinery Hall.
I'll show you a couple of images.
It's in the official story, and look at the scale of the little people down here.
The official story is that, yeah, within two years, all of this was architectured, excavated, plumbed, wired.
And in 1893, before the power tool, before trucks.
That's all one building.
And going back to what Brian was talking about, for how to evaluate a culture based on its architecture.
And here's some more of the data.
And again, the official story is that, yeah, yeah, this was completely capable to hold people, and the tops were copper roof, probably for this type of free energy.
Just extraordinary buildings.
And again, I don't know much of anything about this other than the people who have backgrounds and anybody else.
And if you can go into chat GPT, here's part of the machinery that was in that hall.
And you put in the data about how long would it take to build this in modern times?
And one of the answers for one of these larger buildings, or just one building, not a large building like this, it would be 10 years.
If you had unlimited resources.
Confederation Life Building, built in two years.
Toronto.
And I'm going to play this one for you.
Colored pictures of San Francisco.
It's a very different picture.
So that's San Francisco, 1901. 48,000 different lights in San Francisco, all using natural gas.
And this is what San Francisco used to look like before the great fires.
And the earthquake that took place.
Now, this building is still standing, but all of the other parts are all gone.
But this is just absolutely mind-blowing.
And this is why I wanted to get pictures in color.
Because does that look temporary at all?
That is an electric fountain.
That's how that water runs.
That's an electric fountain.
And then those are the old world buildings that used to be in San Francisco.
1901. And it's interesting because they say that they just threw this up overnight and they just decided to throw up a couple buildings, a little hammer and chisel, and your horses, and a couple maybe trolleys and wagons, and building buildings like this.
And it's interesting when you add color because even that green up there, that's copper.
It's a patina of the copper, so it makes you wonder how old these buildings are.
There's the people, as well, roaming around at the Old World Fair, they say, which is interesting.
Paint a very different picture.
And we have here, I am Kairos.
This is a construction professional and this is two hours of walking through the evidence of San Francisco with all of the impossible stories, the official stories that are impossible.
One of the points that he goes over the world's fairgrounds.
Spectacular.
And the Sutro Baths.
And right down here, you can see with my pointer here, is that there is a wall of melted brick.
The official stories of these bricks is that they came from Ireland, they came from China.
San Francisco itself in 1848, I forget what it was, it had just a thousand or five thousand people.
And then within 20 years, the panoramic pictures that we've shown here of San Francisco show a completely Built-out city.
He takes a look at the foundations and the fort around the San Francisco side of the Golden Gate Bridge.
And one of the points that he made, and all of these brick structures that go in, are the tunnels.
He goes over the LIDAR, and this is on the other side of the Golden Gate, on the Marin County side.
This is an old structure that is buried in the dirt that is 1,000 feet long.
And in the roughly 7-mile by 7-mile area of San Francisco, there are over 1,000 miles of tunnel.
So just here where I have here.
And apparently this was done without...
Well, the whole story is impossible.
So if you want a two-hour briefing of just the Bay Area, the San Francisco Bay Area, and this is in India.
And we're told that this temple is like a thousand years old.
And again, just the idea that you could just chip this out, carve it out.
I don't buy it.
And I do want to give you this little bit here, the Grand Palace of Bangkok Old World Technology, filmed in 1922. So guys, we're looking at some crazy old world technology right here.
Don't be fooled by thinking this is just extravagant architecture.
The structures you see here once created free energy and etheric technology and electric through sound waves and frequencies that came from the atmosphere itself.
So apparently this palace was built in 1782. I find that really hard to believe.
This architecture looks like it's been here for a very long time.
Just like the rest of the architecture you see around the world, the demonic entities came in and took over the buildings and made it their own.
Does this really look like it was built in the late 1700s to you?
Come on, guys.
This is old world technology.
And also, all of the metal used on the structure is a copper.
Copper is the essential element to create free ether energy from the atmosphere.
So why do you think that really is?
Why do you think every architecture from the old world has pointed tops or have like these cone-shaped buildings?
It's because it's cone technology, guys.
Stay blessed my guys So it appears that there was some sort of a civilization prior to and that refutes the official story of of earth and the development of earth and
I don't know anything other than the buildings, and the official story is ridiculous compared to the work that it would take to construct those buildings, even if we could do it today.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I'm not going to say anything definitive about it.
I've heard a lot of different theories, even from quote-unquote theologians.
There's a lot of discussion about a guy that died a few years ago by the name of Michael Heiser.
And there's a lot of discussion about something named the Book of Enoch, which is mentioned in the Bible that this book exists, so we know that some of the biblical authors used it as a source, but we don't know whether or not...
That source was reliable.
Obviously, it was never recognized as a book that belonged in the scripture.
So the theory was that some of the generations after Noah had begun Interacting with some of these quote-unquote gods.
Elohim, as Heiser puts them, part of Deuteronomy 32, and there's some other stuff on this, but it's basically an assembly of the gods.
Psalm 82 is another one that talks about the sort of assembly of the gods.
Well, some of them apparently began sharing information.
The quote-unquote gods with men, and the information now is claimed to have become part of sort of the secret keys, the secret geometry, the sacred geometry, the secret teachings, and maybe theoretically trace their roots back to Solomon in terms of the ancient mystery religions and the others.
Solomon being the wisest, theoretically, I would say he wasn't very wise at all.
He had a thousand wives.
He made a mess of things.
He ended up sacrificing his children to Baal in his deathbed.
It was bad.
It was ugly.
But all those mystery religions and the secrets of the Knights Templar, all that stuff goes back.
I'm not going to say that it's impossible.
I'm not going to say I can rely on it.
Because I think that what's more reliable is the life of Christ in terms of what we can prove and what we can't prove.
And he didn't really address these issues, and he didn't really bring them up.
He did talk about the temple as he saw it.
That was the one that was rebuilt by Ezra and Nehemiah, and it was destroyed in AD 70. He knew very well of the old temple under Solomon, which was supposedly the big, glorious one.
There's a lot there to parse out.
Whether or not it aligns itself with the Bible or whether or not it disaligns itself with the Bible is more of a question of analysis about the particular issue.
So there's a lot there, but I find it to be not a primary motivator in terms of where I want to put all my energy.
I mean, as a Christian, I'm going to put more of my energy into trying to live a Christ-like life than I am to try to solve all the mysteries of the world, because I found that the guys that try to solve all the mysteries of the world end up being very legalistic, can fall off of a lot of different cliffs in terms of the knowledge leading them to places that are wrong, and then they rely too heavily on that information and can't escape.
So, what do I have to say about it?
There are some ancient...
Ancient Indian cultures that have spoken of groups of white men that came in and built those structures.
I don't know.
I don't know who they were.
I don't know.
But I do know that mankind does and has at times done forbidden things and interacted with entities that they're not supposed to interact with and probably emerged with some form of technology that allowed all this to happen.
Very good.
Thank you, Brian.
Final thoughts.
All right, Patriots, hang in.
Their events are going ever faster, in ever greater significance.
And as I keep saying, the erosion of the trust in the officials continues.
And we're just a breakthrough event away, I believe, that we've already hit critical mass and that you Patriots listening to this now are in perfect position to be able to assist.
With family, friends, neighbors, and colleagues.
And just to tell them that, yeah, yeah, they did lie.
And because you've already worked through being completely upset by having the official story undermined, that you're in good position to let them know that you're going to be okay.
You're going to be okay.
Brian, final thoughts.
Now's the time to rebuild your mind.
Look, your life's not getting any shorter.
Every day you're one step closer to the end in terms of the next stage.
The mind can be developed.
And I think that one of the fundamental obstacles that most people have is that it's so easy to access different teachers, different YouTube videos, different entertainment, or even semi-educational entertainment.
You have to learn to think.
I mean, recently I've been sort of re-engineering my theology, and I have to think in order to do that.
I have to really, really sharpen up the edges.
And I think probably a lot of you have noticed some sharper edges on these particular areas.
But that requires a lot of study.
That requires a lot of really putting your mind into it.
And it's very easy to go out and sit down and listen to a YouTube channel and try to do this.
But what's harder is learning enough to be able to either include it or exclude it in terms of its reliability.
And that's a matter of critical thinking.
And you're not critically thinking if you're just watching videos all the time.
You're not.
You've got to read.
You've got to think.
You've got to write.
I have a notebook every day.
Notes, notes, notes, notes, notes.
Books, books, books, books, books, cross-referencing this, cross-referencing that, trying to prepare.
Do I have it right?
Probably not.
Probably not.
Will I ever get it right?
Probably not.
But I try to take it one day at a time, and like I said, keep this word right up in front and let it light my path.
It's the best I can do.
And the best we can do is the best that we can do.
And in good faith effort, people will find a way forward as best we can tell that direction.
All right.
Thank you very much, Brian.
Thank you, Patriot audience members.
▲
Export Selection