All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 18, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:56:44
The Raw Deal (17 February 2025) with special featured guest Nick Kollerstrom of the UK
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I need somebody.
Help!
Not just anybody.
Help!
You know I need someone.
Help!
When I was younger, so much younger than today, I never needed anybody's help in any way.
But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured.
Now I find the genuine I know I'm gonna love the doors Help me if you can I'm feeling down And I do appreciate you being round Help me get my feet back on the ground Won't you please please help me This is Jim Fetzer,
your host on The Raw Deal right here on Revolution Radio Studio B live.
It's the 17th day of February, 2025.
Delighted to have my featured guest, Nick Kohlerstrom from the UK, who's been reporting about the false flag event in Manchester, UK, and how a brilliant investigator, Richard D. Hall, is being pilloried for exposing Richard D. Hall, is being pilloried for exposing truths.
Some of you may recall Richard D. Hall for his Flight 175 3D radar study where he proved that planes were not actually used in the UK, but rather the image of planes were projected from an airborne holographic projector flying 1200 feet to the right, which is why they were traveling at an impossible speed.
Why there was an impossible entry to the building and why we had a nose-out phenomenon due to a hand-eye coordination problem.
Keith Rogers may be joining us.
Meanwhile, I begin, as usual, reviewing some of the top stories of the day.
Putin bends knee to Trump after he pulls ultimate power move.
Peace talks begin immediately.
President Donald Trump.
Is wasting no time fulfilling his biggest campaign promise, ending the war in Ukraine.
Wednesday, he announced that he had a lengthy and productive call with Russian President Putin, in which they agreed to start immediate peace negotiations on the body conflict ratings in February of 2022. We agreed to work together very closely, including visiting each other's nations.
Trump posted on True Social.
We also agreed to have our respective teams start negotiations immediately, and we will begin by calling President Zelensky of Ukraine to inform him of the conversation, something I will be doing right now.
This marks an historic moment when Biden, NATO, and the entire globalist society has been able to achieve in two years.
He's moving quickly.
His task, Secretary of State Margot Rubio, CI Director John Ratcliffe, National Security Advisor Michael Wall, Special Envoy Steve Whitkeff, with leading the B-stocks.
The first meeting is always set for Friday in Munich, led by Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Rubio.
Another Trump-planned Putin meeting in Saudi Arabia to resolve Ukraine crisis.
In a move that could be straight out of a geopolitical soap opera, former President Trump announced plans to meet with Russian President Putin in Saudi Arabia.
The meeting comes as part of an ambitious agenda aimed to put an end to the ongoing Ukraine conflict, which many agree has turned into a bloody, drawn-out disaster for all involved.
Trump, who seemed to relish the role of diplomat-in-chief, indicated this could be the moment to shake things up.
He added that the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman might play the gracious host in the high-stakes showdown.
After all, if there's one place they could use a little diplomatic tension reduction, it's a desert kingdom with its oil reserves and penchant for extravagant gatherings.
A two leaders meeting in Saudi Arabia raises eyebrows, not to mention the question why they didn't think of this sooner, like perhaps Before Russia decided to roll tanks into Ukraine.
Here we have a report from M. Iraq.
Wonderful!
What a difference it is having Trump as president.
In Trump we trust.
Trump says he and Putin have started talking to end war in Ukraine.
Timing remains as elusive as Biden's long-term strategic vision.
With Trump only promising a meeting will happen in the not-too-distant future.
The phrase could mean anything from next week to never, but it certainly sounds nice.
He suggests the initial rendezvous would kick off a series of talks.
We'll plan for him to gallivant over to Moscow with Putin south by Washington, like he's visiting a friend's housewarming party.
Dramatic as ever.
Trump's efforts could signal a thawing relationship between the U.S. and Russia, something that had been as frosty as a Siberian winter since Biden last met with Putin in June of 2021. Since then, tensions escalate faster than a political ad in election year, especially after Biden's infamous declaration that the Russian leader, quote, cannot remain in power.
Since that bold proclamation, of course, it's Biden who's out of power, not Putin.
Opportunities for dialogue have been few and far between.
Under Biden, the strategy seemed to favor heavy sanctions in an isolationist stance, while Trump appears ready to open the door for meaningful conversations, if only to see what's behind it.
Trump seems optimistic about prospects for peace, staying both...
Putin and Zelensky are eager to put an end to the conflict, a refreshing change from a previous admin approach, prioritizing confrontation over dialogue.
And while some may question whether progress could be made with convoluted territorial disputes, Trump gave a nod to pragmatism, suggesting Zelensky just might have to do what is necessary.
Perhaps he should keep this advice handy when it comes to dealing with the self-proclaimed adversary that Russian relations have become.
Meanwhile, it's not all talk of peace and diplomatic dreams.
Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Rubio are set to engage with Zelensky in Munich, ensuring the U.S. maintains its standing as a significant player in the ongoing dialogue surrounding Ukraine.
We also have a report here, rather fascinating.
In the past 24 hours, the Russian army has achieved another significant success on the battlefield, this time to the west of the recently liberated city of Valyeka, Novoselka, and Kurokova, direction of the front.
Furthermore, on February 16th, the commander of the Spetsnaz Akhmat, General Opti, Along with Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov made quite harsh statements that chockbuster leaders and the head of the Kiev regime, Volodymyr Zelensky, to wit that Russia demands accepting all of its terms without exception.
Those terms, may I reiterate, including Russia continuing with possession of the Donetsk and the other who blasted his liberated plesak Crimea, no admission to NATO for Ukraine ever, demilitarization of Ukraine and no admission to NATO for Ukraine ever, demilitarization of Ukraine and denots of This report observes that Donald Trump is a real businessman, not an adventurer.
He will not invest money unless he's sure that the investment is going to have a return.
If it does not gain acceptance of its terms, it will not stop, but will take control of the entire territory of Ukraine, including its western part, which frankly, in my belief, would probably be a necessity for Russia in any case.
Nick, keep not being with us.
Would you have any comments on these late reports?
Are you asking me, Jim?
I am indeed, my friend, yes.
Oh, right.
I wasn't quite expecting that.
Well, I think it's very hopeful.
I think NATO is living in a kind of, he's always created this fantasy story about what the war is about, never acknowledging Russia's reason for being there, of essentially defending the Donbass, which is ancient Russian territory.
A thousand years ago, Russia began in East Ukraine, and it's impossible for it to just leave the Russian little mini-states, you know, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizh, they cannot possibly be left and abandoned, as NATO seems to ask. they cannot possibly be left and abandoned, as NATO seems
They've been bombarded mercilessly, as far as I know, it's still going on for about 10 years, by the Kiev government, and Russia has stopped the genocide programme, and it has allowed them, in elections, by overwhelming majority, which is virtually unreported in the West, in September 22, which is virtually unreported in the West, in September 22, to vote to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia.
That was the overwhelming wish of this huge majority of the people in East Ukraine.
And the Russian parliament accepted that request and so they have rejoined Russia.
It's now what's called Novorus.
The new Russia.
And that is basically irreversible.
No politician has the ability to negotiate that or adjust it or reverse it.
So Europe has got the problem that at the moment nobody can agree on a map of Europe.
From Russia's point of view, Russia includes the East Ukraine little states.
Now Russia didn't want that.
It didn't invade Russia did not invade Ukraine in order to take over territory.
That didn't happen at all.
On the contrary, Russia was trying right to the last to have a unified, neutral, prosperous Ukraine in between East and West.
That's what the Minsk agreements were all about.
But the West didn't want that.
It created this war scenario by having NATO right up against the boundary of Russia and continual sharing of these East.
Eastern parts of Ukraine by the main government.
So, in a way, Russia can't yield that.
It's not negotiable.
And the West is continually pretending that Russia is wanting to threaten Europe or invade Europe.
And that's the fantasy which NATO needs to keep going.
But that didn't happen in the slightest.
It was not the case that Russia anyway wants to...
Take over Europe or invade Europe.
They're basically protecting the East Ukraine mini-states, but also there's further, unfortunately, further complicated reasons for Russia being that.
For example, it discovers several dozen totally forbidden biological warfare centres of development right on the border of Russia, obviously intended by the Pentagon for...
Forbidden biological warfare, and it managed to dismantle those.
So thank goodness it did.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful commentary, Nick.
Here's some more.
Zelensky, under pressure, has proposed a land swap deal with Russia and end the war.
And he's unsure what part of Russian-occupied Ukraine he would demand return for a Koresk obelisk.
Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky is proposing a land swap with Russia in a potential negotiation for a deal to bring an end to the three-year-long war.
We will swap one territory for another, Zelensky said in an interview with The Guardian, published Tuesday.
Ukraine has been occupying parts of Russia's Kurskoblast after capturing it in its surprise incursion in August.
Zelensky said he's unsure.
What Russian-occupied region he would demand in return?
Russia currently occupies about 20% of Ukraine, while Ukraine occupies 500 square kilometers of Russia.
I don't know.
We will see, he said, but our territories are important.
There is no priority.
Heading the war in Ukraine is one of Donald Trump's top priorities.
Trump has spoken with Russian press and Putin in claims to have made progress.
In achieving a deal in the week since he took office.
J.D. Vance, Vice President in Europe this week with other administrative officials to meet with allies and Ukrainian officials to thus plan to end the war.
Vance is scheduled to meet with Zelensky this weekend at the Munich Security Conference.
Marco Rubio's Secretary of State would also be present over the weekend.
Trump said he may soon meet with Zelensky, potentially after the Munich Security Conference.
Putin has made several demands for ending the war.
Going to Ukraine, a demanding aspiration to join NATO in allowing Russia to have control over four Ukrainian territories, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zabrzayan.
During the Guardian interview, Zelensky expressed concern over losing American support.
There are voices that say Europe could offer security guarantees without the Americans, and I always say no.
Security guarantees without America are not real.
To keep U.S. support, Zelensky reportedly offered to give American companies lucrative reconstruction projects and investment concessions.
Meanwhile, Zelensky has called for the creation of a European armed force.
This is pretty nervy.
Zelensky said establishing a European military is necessary to ensure the future peace of the region as the United States focus.
A European armed force will necessarily have to have an enemy, and it will mean that Russia has to be the enemy.
That is the reason for not having that kind of armed force.
Unless a European defence policy can be...
That doesn't threaten another country.
It's defensive.
I mean, the best way to ensure peace in Europe is to have neutral countries down the middle in East Europe, which is what the old Warsaw Pact used to be.
It used to be a buffer between NATO and Russia.
And that is really, I'd say, pretty well essential.
And that's why you don't want NATO in Ukraine.
You want a neutral, independent Ukraine, same as Poland and Czech Republic and so on.
We need neutral, independent states in the middle of Europe.
And Europe needs to trust itself and not seek some security guarantee from America, which, I mean, how can it give that?
It's up to Europe to develop its own sort of stability and, you know, equilibrium.
I mean, it can't go on.
NATO has developed after World War II to basically stop.
European countries from fighting each other again.
That was the main reason for NATO. If NATO is desired, it can be in Western Europe, you know, but it doesn't help.
It's just totally provocative having it right up against the border of Russia, and especially if missiles are going to be installed.
That's the worst thing.
Missiles installed, pointing, five or six minutes from St. Petersburg, you know.
That is totally provocative.
And peace in Europe can't possibly remain if we have NATO right on the border of Russia, especially with American missiles.
So I think it's as if Europe can't seem to focus on what is designed for peace.
I think the Hungarian Prime Minister, Orban, is very sane and sensible.
The others don't seem to be.
Excellent.
Excellent.
On Saturday, he asserted, I really believe the time has come.
The armed forces of Europe must be created.
Nick's explained why not.
The old days are over when America supported Europe just because it always had.
Zelensky said Ukraine's three years' fight against a Russian invasion, which actually was a defensive operation to protect the people of the Donbass, demonstrates.
A foundation exists for the creation of a pan-European military.
It's long been discussed by segments of the continent's leadership.
However, it's unclear how deep the support goes, whether ongoing diplomatic struggles between the EU and the US might push Europe to create a regional military or a European native alternative.
Very unlikely, Nick.
I think you are...
I think you're making very key points about why this is a bad idea.
Europe doesn't want to spend the money.
The thing about the brilliant speech by Vance to Europeans, you know, is he the foreign secretary?
Oh, vice president, vice president.
Okay, he gave a brilliant speech, and he talked about the need to believe in democracy, and that is very much a problem in negotiations, because Zelensky has abolished all elections.
He's abolished the opposition party.
He's abolished any dissenting media.
He's abolished the traditional main church.
He's got secret police who hunt down anyone who speaks Russian.
So he's a total dictator.
And from Russia's point of view, he's not legitimate.
It's not legitimate to scrap elections.
And therefore, they don't really want to negotiate with him.
And then there's some problem with Europeans.
Europeans signed the Minsk treaties.
In good faith.
In good faith.
Well, Russia set it up in good faith.
The German and French people signed it, and then they never implemented it.
They were acting in bad faith to bring the opportunity for Ukraine to be beefed up militarily.
Outrageous.
Exactly, yeah.
And that's all that happened, all the years, eight years.
While Russia was hoping that the ministries would be enacted to get a neutral, independent, prosperous Ukraine in between East and West, all that NATO was doing is beefing up, as you say, the Ukrainian army, getting ready for the fight which they were intending to have.
And what that betrayal means is that the signed promise of prime ministers of Russian Germany and Ukraine isn't worth a damn thing.
That's right.
So Russia, the reason...
The reason Russia's negotiating with Trump now, and not with Europe, could be that.
He probably thinks he can trust Trump more than anyone else.
Now, if there are positive signs regarding the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine, the situation is very different in the Middle East.
Get this.
Visiting Netanyahu Rubio, Secretary of State, says Hamas must be eradicated.
The others said the U.S. and Israel share a common strategy on Gaza, including when the gates of hell will be opened.
Speaking to reporters alongside Israeli PM Netanyahu in Jerusalem Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Hamas must be eradicated, a goal that would require Israel to restart its genocidal war on Gaza.
That's kind of the ultimate nightmare, because the American White House has got so many Jews and Jewel citizens there that it's hard to resist them, or can't really resist them.
And so you get this ghastly genocide going on, an expanding greater Israel nightmare, which is a nightmare for all the world.
all the world experiences it as a nightmare slaughter are three different countries going now Syria Lebanon and Gaza and Palestine the slaughter and bombing it's American bombs and get this American jet fuel all the sources Israeli planes are making hundreds of sources to bomb and bomb and bomb it's American fuel that is being used for those so I mean it is a nightmare
but it's one that I don't see any resolution to you know and perhaps we should Go one at a time.
He's trying to solve the Gaza conflict, and that's the most that can be resolved right now.
Sorry, sorry.
He's trying to resolve the Ukraine conflict, and that's the most that can be achieved right now.
Here's more from Rubio.
I want to assure everyone now listening to us, President Trump and I are working in full cooperation and coordination.
We have a common strategy.
We can't always share the details of this strategy with the public, including when the gates of hell would be open, and they surely will if our hostages are not released until the last one of them.
This was actually Benjamin Netanyahu.
He mentioned, too, Trump's bold vision for Gaza, referring to his calls for the U.S. to take over the Strip, which involves an ethnic cleansing campaign.
Netanyahu said he and Rubio discussed how we can work together.
To ensure that that future becomes a reality when it's insane.
Meanwhile, while Rubio was visiting, the Israeli defense minister announced they received a shipment of MK-84, 2,000-pound bombs from the U.S., a shipment paused by the Biden admin but released by Trump.
Nick, this is just so outrageous, what's going on here, and the very idea of turning Gaza into the Riviera, the Mediterranean, is lunatic.
Well, it is.
It's a horror, hard to comprehend.
Let's just remind ourselves what Gaza is.
Since World War II, Israelis moved into Palestine, and they started their campaign of eradicating towns and villages.
And announce to a village.
Tell people they were mapping the village.
Locals would help them map it.
Then they'd turn them at midnight, blow up the houses, kill the men, and the women and children would be rounded up and then taken to an open-air prison, which was Gaza.
And then they'd bulldoze down the olive groves, ancient olive groves, and then ensure the name of the village was not even remembered.
So town villages are being erased so that Israel could move into them, the new concept of Israel.
And Gaza was created as an open-air prison, basically women and children.
And that's what it is now.
People don't seem to remember.
It's created by this horrific process.
I mean, the nightmare for us outside America is that American Christians seem to believe in Israel.
That is the most frightful thing.
Apparently you have got 50 million Christians in America, fundamentalists, who support Israel.
Some think that God's on the side of Israel and...
You know, Nick, it's so bizarre because, for example, Rabbi Schneerson, who many regard as the Meshiach, the new And Messiah returned to Israel, said, no, no, he couldn't be the Meshach because there are still Christians alive on the face of Earth.
In other words, part of the Talmudic agenda to kill all the Christians.
I don't understand how these Christian Zionists can tolerate the incoherence of their position.
They must not understand what it's all about.
Yeah, it is so, so bizarre.
I mean, why do Christians want to give Israel, the Holy Land, to the one country on earth that hates Jesus Christ and is desecrating the holy spots and everything?
I'm absolutely baffled that Christians put up with it.
And as you say, they have an intolerance.
Their sacred text, it's in the Old Testament as well, not just the Talmud.
Preach this intolerance of exterminating, exterminate our neighbor, you know, rape his daughters, take his gold and silver.
That keeps as a refrain through the Old Testament as well as in the Talmud.
Nick, stand by.
We'll be right back.
Nick, right after this break.
We'll be right back.
FreedomSloops.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
This has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech.
in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
We'll see you next time.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern. 8 p.m. Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSleep.com, the people station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
I want to share some background about my guest today, whom I admire beyond words.
Nick Kohlstrom was a founding member of Britain's 9-11 Truth Group, 2002-10, which drew him into the area of conspiracy theory.
Following the 7-7 London subway bombing in 2005, he discovered a glitch in the official story of the trains.
The terrorists had supposedly caught that day that invalidated the official account because the train had been canceled.
A year later, the Home Secretary had to make an announcement in the Commons adjusting train times for that day to preserve the coherence of the fake narrative.
This may have led him to compose the main, if not only, book about the London bombing in terms of what happened that day, Terror on the Tube, third edition 2012. I believe now it may be in the fifth or the sixth, the most popular book by far about what happened that day.
For the last eight years, he's co-managed a monthly 9-11 Keep Talking group, a non-political current affairs discussion group.
His inquiries into cyanide absorption on the walls of the German labor camps 70 years ago had him thrown out of University College London in 2008 on the ground he was denying the Holocaust.
Subsequently, his book Breaking the Spell, 2014, for which I was honored to write the introduction, brought mathematical, chemical, and historical arguments to bear on the subject, and has become a bestseller.
As revisionist books go.
He has two degrees in the history of science, the first from Cambridge, followed by a PhD in London, where he became a member of the staff in the Science and Technology Studies Department.
His research there is focused on Sir Isaac Newton, where he has nine academically published articles that are accessible.
He was accepted as a member of the New York Academy of Sciences in 1991. Contributed Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomy, published in 2007 on Sir Isaac Newton, which I would add is the single most important entry in the encyclopedia, authored by Nicholas Kohler-Strahm.
He's been a fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society for decades, has published extensively on the discovery of Neptune, including studies on a plant's co-discoverer, Le'Veire and Adams, long ago.
In the previous century, in his youth, he was interested in her medical alchemical matters.
Some of the titles reflects in 1980. He's produced a biodynamic farming lunar gardening calendar.
Here are some of his books.
Terror on the Tube, available at Amazon, False Flags Over Europe, a modern history of state-fabricated terrorism in Chronicles of False Flag Terror, where he documents some 13. False flag events in Europe.
Nick, it's such a joy to have you back, my friend.
Such a joy.
Well, that's an amazing list of stuff, Jim.
I never realized I'd done all that, you know.
You've done all that and more.
Now, here we're talking about Nick zooming in on one of those 13 fabricated events, which is the Manchester phony shooting massacre where Richard D. Hall, as I mentioned previously, brilliant investigator of 9-11, has been, you know, punished.
Here we have Manchester, 2017, state-fabricated terror, and how British investigator Richard D. Hall has been fined for his dissident narrative several hundred thousand pounds.
Nick?
Yeah, right, yeah.
Well, it's not a crime to hold an opinion in this country.
And that's what he's done.
He's put forward his view, according to which nobody actually died.
Now, for American listeners unfamiliar with that, there's been a tremendous sequence of state-fabricated terror events blamed on Muslims in Europe, starting in 2004, Madrid bombing, and culminating in 2017 with the Manchester Arena bomb sort of hoax.
And in the early ones, there were lots of real...
Real terrible deaths, real blood and gore.
And then later, around the time of Sandy Hook, it transitioned into crisis actors with fake blood.
And that's what we see at this Manchester event.
And Richard did a very thorough investigation.
There's supposed to be 22 families.
22 people died.
He went very, very great detail through each of the families of the 22. And showed how either there wasn't a real child there in the first place, or the person allegedly died had gone off somewhere and been taken away.
And the whole thing was set up and photographed and filmed.
And there was a British intelligence patsy called Albeidi, Salman Albeidi, who was groomed.
And he brought in a little fireworks thing that did actually go bang.
And there's many thousands of people in this huge arena listening to this Ariana Grande singer, right?
Yeah.
And when she finished at half past ten, there was this little side room which is used for coming and going out, and that's where the bang went off, okay?
So I was all prepared, and there were various crisis actors lying on the floor and filmed, and there was a bang, but...
Nothing was really damaged.
The official report said thousands of pieces of shrapnel were supposed to have been blasted about here and there.
And there's a lot of big glass windows and glass doors in that side room.
And they weren't damaged.
They weren't broken.
And it was all just a story.
Nick, I do have your PowerPoint set up.
And this, of course, was the very first slide.
Do you want to go through them, or do you want to add further elaboration about the staged event?
Well, hang on.
Are you saying that PowerPoint is available?
Oh, yeah.
I'm showing.
It's showing right now.
It's in the video recording, Nick.
Oh, right.
Oh, okay.
Great.
Oh, okay.
Right.
Well, let's go through it, Jim.
All right.
We just hit number one.
Here's slide number two.
December 2024. Slide number two.
This is just to show that Richard Hall's...
The show is very well done and well known.
Rich Planet TV. And it's got millions of supporters.
And he investigates all sorts of paranormal events and also funny activities of the state, the deep state.
And I think he's much loved by a large community in the British people for his shows and his talks.
Very courageous.
And I don't think anyone would doubt that what he reveals and discloses is basically going to be true.
So the BBC started getting at him, and here is the culmination of the event, December 2024. He's fined £235,000, that's the cost of the court, plus £50,000 for the cost of these two hibberts who took out the legal case against him.
He has to pay them £50,000.
And in this slide, Nick, reporting the High Court of Justice tells him to remove all 20 or so of his Manchester Arena videos.
How bad is that?
Yeah, it's amazing.
It's a terrific detail.
He looked into the whole event far more carefully than anyone else.
And he knew what was going on far better than anyone else.
And the BBC didn't want to discuss this with him.
Oh, no, they just wanted to fine him, shut him up, and take down all his videos.
And that's what they've done.
Yeah.
So here we now have the third slide.
What happened at Manchester Arena on 22...
Well, this just shows the little side room, the so-called city room, which links together.
and it goes to the local station, and it's on the edge of the big arena, you can see.
So that's where it went off, right.
Next. - Yeah, it's there.
Abedish Fahd, Ramadan Abadi, M16, go ahead. - Yeah, the iron rule about terrorism, at least in this country, is that the alleged terrorist is known to the authorities, known to British intelligence before and always, right?
Always.
The father of this Abadi was used in the British Intel dastardly plot to kill Gaddafi in 1996. His father, Ramadan Abadi, was used for that.
It was foiled.
My friend David Shaler helped to expose it, even though later on they did get him.
So let's just show you that the father of Abadi in Libya was used by British Intel, right?
Okay.
Yes.
Okay, now here you see a picture of Abadi just before the event.
It happened at half past ten.
So this is 9.13, and he's walking, he's coming into the arena, and he's got a rucksack on his back, and they're trying to pretend that that rucksack is 30 kilograms heavy, which is very heavy indeed, and then it's got 3,000 pieces of shrapnel in it with the dreaded TATP explosive, which is very unstable.
I mean, that's completely mad and impossible, but that was the official story, okay?
Right, next?
Yeah.
Okay, this is what hit the headlines, the front pages.
This girl has allegedly got loads of wounds of shrapnel all over her, and you can see that she hasn't got any.
I mean, there clearly was no shrapnel, but that was a good...
Ever scantily clad to draw attention of every male in the UK. Well, of course, yeah, right, okay.
Right, next.
Okay, all the emergency services, the fire and ambulance and so on, were stopped.
They were told not to come.
So immediately after the bang went off, the fireman was told, oh no, no, don't come.
And some of the firemen were really furious, you know.
They were stopped for two hours.
And so they got there two hours later, even though the fire station is only seven minutes away.
Okay.
Right, next.
The Parker photo.
Okay.
The Parker photo, Nick.
Yeah.
This is the city room.
You can see here various actors lying on the floor.
They're all old.
There's not nearly enough of them.
There's supposed to be over 100 people in this room.
Parents waiting for their kids to come out.
A lot of young people were listening to this concert.
And on the right-hand side, you can see an enlargement.
One of the crisis actors is looking at his mobile phone.
And I noticed that blood is all on towels that were, you know, conveniently, they're not even going to get blood on the floor.
I mean, how ridiculous.
And you see the track of blood in the middle?
It doesn't lead anywhere.
It just tails off in the middle.
In the middle, that's supposed to be where the explosion was.
You're supposed to be looking at where the bang went off.
Ridiculous.
No signs.
No signs of any explosion whatsoever, Nick, nor any on the room, no damage to the room at all from this massive blast.
Absolutely not, no.
And it's very likely this was taken in the morning or beforehand.
Yeah, it's taken in advance.
Yeah, as Olly Damagard explains to us, with Fabregate Terror, they take photographs as much as they can before the event, so they're ready for it, you know?
Yeah.
So I would say they're prepared for this.
Okay, so this is some guy who got a photo, and we've got one more very important critical one.
We go to the next one.
Composite of Barfoot.
He's looking toward Emma's center of blast by Ian Davis.
Yeah.
Now, this is about a minute's worth of film, a film thing, and Chapman Davis has put together various bits of the photograph.
Again, you're looking towards the center where the bang is supposed to have gone off.
And you see various characters here, but they're not nearly enough.
They're supposed to be a much larger number.
And you can see the lighting and everything is totally undamaged in the hall.
Absolutely no damage.
Yeah.
We got 17 bodies where there should be 58. Yeah.
And in the middle, slightly to the left, you can see a stool, a merchandise stool, which is undamaged.
That's quite a fragile stool.
And that should have been blown to bits, obviously.
Yes!
Ridiculous!
Right.
Okay, now go on to the next one.
This is also from that bar footage.
This was very crucial.
A crisis actor called Paul Ruth Morell.
And she's supposed to have had a piece of shrapnel blown right through her leg in one side and out the other.
And you can see her casually walking along in high heels and, you know, holding her mobile phone.
And she's got a bit of blood put onto her jeans, that's all.
Yeah, ridiculous.
So there you go.
And she, in hospital, the Queen came to visit her in hospital, you know.
Of course.
Of course, yeah, right.
So I think that's one of the best things to show people about the way the crisis actors caught when they didn't think they were being filmed, you know.
Yes, yes, yes.
Okay.
Right, next one.
This shows the stool.
I mentioned it before.
It's totally undamaged.
A strong wind would have blown it up, much less a powerful blast.
Yeah, a wind would have blown it up.
Yeah, right.
Yeah, ridiculous.
Now, it's important to appreciate that the year before, 2016, in Manchester, there was another mock terror event.
Which was done with crisis actors and it's in the shopping centre, right?
In the shopping centre and it had people screaming and faint blood and a bang going off and all this stuff.
So in other words, it was exactly the same as the Manchester Arena event except that you were told, oh no, it's just a drill.
So this could be, in a sense, it's preparation for the...
Manchester, the big Manchester Arena event.
Yes.
So, acts of screaming out in pain and so on.
Okay.
Now, here's an important new voice for this event.
Ian Davis, he does interviews on stuff like the off-guard and so on, and he's done a very good book about Manchester.
This is an early work of his saying why no one believes the state anymore.
Nick, I think we skipped over one.
May 2016, mock terror in Manchester, The Crisis Actors Get Ready.
Maybe you were talking about it and I hadn't shown it yet.
Oh, right.
Yeah, that's right.
Yeah, right.
Yeah, rehearsal.
Very good.
Now we have his book, Does the Public Believe It?
A Dangerous Ideology.
Go ahead.
Over a third of the British population does not believe the mainstream media and government about major terror attacks.
And is that the reason why the British state went after Hall?
So they may have decided to make an example of Richard D. Hall because of this massive proportion of people who are taking his point of view.
What Richard D. Hall has done...
By taking this event and provoking the BBC, so they had to respond, he explains to me he was deliberately bringing it right into the mainstream, because before he did this, there was no mainstream media that would discuss state-fabricated terror, OK? Yes.
And you wouldn't get people like Ian Davis touching it, actually.
It was too extreme, OK? Whereas now Richard D. Hall has done this, He's put it in a situation where all intelligent people have to look at it and see what happened.
OK, now, there's a very good series of articles by Hughes, David Hughes, on this subject.
We'll come to, and I'll just quote from him.
This is about the trial that Hall has been put through.
If this entire travesty of justice has indeed been about trying to put a lid on mounting public scepticism, however, it's almost certain to backfire.
And he says, this is more of a show trial in which the defendant's guilt would determine in advance.
So it's to intimidate dissidents.
And I've been there, done that myself in case of a suit brought against me over Sandy Hook, Nick.
Exactly.
Yeah, so you know what it's like, right?
Yes.
Okay, next.
Targeting at Pardee Hall.
Yeah, let's just put some dates in this.
The chap who's going to prosecute him is called Hibbert, Martin Hibbert, and he allegedly discovers Hall's point of view in 2021. The official cover-up of Whitewash was called the Saunders Inquiry.
And then the next year, Richard says, I suffered a litany of harassment and smear campaigns by the BBC. They sent me a barrage of 11 emails.
And then the next year, legal action has begun.
And so it's disgraceful that the British Broadcasting Company, which we pay, everybody wants to watch television, is supposed to pay a fee to them, right?
Richard says, the BBC were and still are trying to shut my work down, which is exactly what the claim is trying to do.
So the BBC seem to have been behind this legal action.
That's very important to ascertain that, because, I mean, obviously they're not supposed to do this at all.
Well, as a function of the government.
I mean, they're clearly acting on behalf of the British government.
Well, they are, yeah.
Yeah, right.
Okay.
Now, Richard Hall's book, 400 pages, Night of the Bang, gives a very detailed investigation.
Once this court case started against him, it vanished from view, and you can't find it anywhere.
This is like banning...
Nobody died at Sandy Hook, my book, and just within a month of it's going on sale, even though it's sold already nearly 500 copies, Nick.
This is just outrageous.
Well, it's amazing what they can do.
This book had loads of five-star reviews on Amazon, and it just vanished from the book.
He might have put up a PDF. There might be a PDF about it, I think.
Okay, next.
Yep.
Bill King and Ian Davis discuss Ian's latest book, The Manchester Attack and Independent Investigation.
Yeah, I thought this looked, this shows you Ian's getting some very good, reasonable, sensible interviews, reasonable, sensible people are looking at this story now.
His book is called The Manchester Attack, and it's a very good book, I've got to say.
I mean, if and when...
State-fabricated terror, even when political science courses in universities get a module on state-fabricated terror, right?
That's what we want to campaign for.
Students today and tomorrow studying politics will want a module about state-fabricated terror because they know that it happened.
This is the world we live in.
And when this happens, I think Ian's book will be required reading for Manchester.
Yes.
Very good.
Very good.
Okay, so this is, as it were, what Richard's achieved, you see, by bringing this thing into the limelight publicity.
You've got a very wise, erudite fellow, Ian Davis, composing a book, Defending Richard, and that came out at the time of his trial.
He's talking about a gripping horror story, which wasn't the Manchester attack, which was fabricated, but what's gone on in treating Richard D. Holland, covering it up.
Well, it is, yeah.
Right, so we're on the next slide here.
I just thought this is a good expression Ian's got for getting people's interest.
A gripping horror story for our times.
Yes.
It exposes the covert state, then turns it apart.
Wonderful.
So, and it says it's a critical must-read that sheds light on the dark machinations of the covert state.
Yes.
So I think everybody knows this is the world we live in.
This does happen.
It is real.
And I don't see how they can stop interest in this subject developing.
Yes.
It reminds me a bit of the Sandy Hook story with Alex Jones.
There was a point when the authorities were frightened.
it was just a fabricated event you know and he was gathering massive support and I think the state managed to undermine him and demolish that view as well as they could but I think the authorities are now frightened because Richard is obviously sensible and the state is obviously covering things up that I
I mean, as I think your listeners are aware, all the media, all the British media with one accord, the printed media, will damn and ridicule Richard D. Hall, okay?
Yes.
Unanimously.
But when that is put onto websites, if the Daily Mail or whatever puts its article on the website, or if you've got an online Daily Mail which allows comments, then the comments will be more or less entirely supportive of Richard Hall.
Yes.
So I think that shows the view of the British people that a very large proportion totally support Richard and are furious at the way he's been treated.
Yes.
Yes.
Okay, let's move on now to Hibbert.
Here is a statement that he's had some acting experience.
He tried to deny this.
He has some acting experience.
Something's gone wrong with his back.
He's always had a bad back, and he's now in a wheelchair.
So that's the key thing.
He's claiming that he's in a wheelchair because of this event.
Really?
Really?
Okay.
And here they are at dinner.
Yeah, here is him and his daughter, Eve.
They're in a restaurant in Manchester, and this was uploaded on the evening.
Of the Manchester attack, right?
So, he's claiming this shows he was at Manchester.
Richard says there's no evidence that he was present at the concert at all.
He and his daughter do not appear in any photographs, and moreover, they have not got any photographs on their phones, or don't seem to have, of the event that they were claiming.
Grande performing or even being in the arena.
Yes.
Yeah, there's nothing to show that they were in the arena at all.
But they had a nice dinner in Manchester, Nick.
A nice dinner in Manchester.
Yeah, a nice dinner, yeah.
Richard suspects this is some months earlier.
It might have been her birthday or whatever.
She's a 14-year-old girl there.
And he's sitting down.
There are no pictures of him standing up, okay?
And the question is, when did he have his accident?
He's had some sort of accident that's put him in a wheelchair.
Yeah.
So he's a key witness, but he wasn't even there.
Sorry?
He was a key witness, but he wasn't, in fact, actually there.
So here we get the accusation of mendacity.
It's a question of was he there.
The Sauners inquiry tried to make out.
There was CCTV showing him there, but there's a whole load that they won't release, you see?
Right.
So this is what Richard's saying.
Nick, we got a break.
We're going to return here with the accusation to Mendese by Richard D. Hall against this actor who posed as though he were a witness.
We'll be right back a Yeah.
Okay, I'll just get a couple of days.
Yeah.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bull hordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do.
And we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us.
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
That time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior, We're a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Revolution Radio.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10pm Eastern and learn why.
The story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997.
That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, my dear friend, Nicole Erstrom and I are discussing the Manchester attack, a clear false flag.
Richard D. Hall's effort to expose it and the way in which a state has come after him legally to punish him for exposing truths, the state finds inconvenient and does not want the public to know.
So here we have Hall talking about Martin Hibbert and all of the lies he said, Nick.
You want to go through them?
Well, we don't need all the details.
The point is that his story flips about like a flag on a pole, and the media will kind of believe whatever he says.
He's promoted by the BBC, and sitting in a wheelchair, he gets pity.
So there's an emotional blast in what he says when he's being interviewed.
He's in a wheelchair.
He was right next to the terrorists.
He looked into the eyes of the terrorists, you know.
His poor daughter was lying on the floor in front of him with her brains on the floor, you know.
And he had 22 pieces of shrapnel in his back.
And it's a pure blast of emotion in the story that's so absurd, you know.
Let me go through the observations of Richard D. Hall.
Martin Hibbert says a terrorist went into the auditorium.
This is untrue.
He says he brushed shoulders with a terrorist.
This is untrue.
He says he bumped into the terrorist.
This is untrue.
He said the bomb went off in the auditorium.
This is untrue.
He said he saw his daughter being taken away first.
This is untrue.
He said that his daughter had been covered with a towel.
This is untrue.
It has been claimed he was two feet from the blast, six meters from the blast, 30 feet from the blast, and 10 meters from the blast at first.
He said he was in a coma for four to five weeks.
This then changed to a couple of weeks.
He also claimed that he woke up after a couple of days, although claims not to remember.
The Hibbert do not appear in any of the public inquiry-released CCTV images, nor in the John Barr video, nor in the Chris Parker photograph.
Nick, what a liar!
Yeah, yeah, right.
I mean, we would say that him and his daughter were in a hospital being treated, but it was somewhat earlier.
Whatever happened to them, they probably picked because some sort of accident happened to them, did his backing, but the hospital's not allowed to give out any public information about when they were treated or whatever.
So that is the problem in ascertaining What happened?
Okay, now let's move on to this extremely absurd and probably most ridiculous legal charge you've ever heard of alleged harassment.
Yes.
If the charge had been defamation, it might have made a bit of sense.
You can imagine him saying, Richard not believing any of his story, calling him a complete liar, that that is defamation.
You can understand that.
But it wasn't.
That they took a charge of harassment out for subtle legal reasons and told it something to do with a harassment charge would not allow Richard to give his argument in court about what happened on the night.
Because he went to visit one of the purported victims whose name is Eve to ask her about it.
I mean, you've got a charge.
Well, what happened?
Let's come on now to the next slide.
All he did...
He went to where Eve's mother lived.
He was doing a tour around the country, looking at anyone involved in this event.
He knocked on the door where Eve's mother lived, and she didn't answer.
So we went away.
She didn't answer.
She didn't answer, no.
She didn't even answer the door.
Didn't even answer the door, no.
So that's all that happened.
They didn't know that he'd been there for a couple of years.
Yes, here it is.
It's hard to see a Hall's visit to Eve's home could be construed as impressive given that Eve and her mother did not know it had happened for 22 months.
How could they have felt oppressed by an event they did not know it occurred?
What happened two years later?
Is that the police came round, knocking on the doors of their road, you see?
So it was the police coming round that got everyone talking about it, and that is when Eve's mother discovered or heard that Richard had visited them, right?
Yeah.
Anyway, here is a very good summary for the next slide, the claim of harassment.
Yes.
Oh, I've been found guilty of harassing two people whom he had never met, had never tried to meet, with whom he had never exchanged a word, and with him having no idea that he was engaging in harassment, Dr. David.
So, this is what he's been fined, you know, several hundred thousand pounds for.
You're knocking on a door with no answer!
Yeah, basically.
Basically, yeah.
So here is the judge, Judge Dane, who came out with this verdict.
And what this verdict does, it totally clobbers British journalism.
Because journalists are supposed to investigate, you know, what the state does and check up on things.
That's what they're supposed to do.
And if it's harassment, they can't really do it anymore, can they?
If it's harassment, they just knock on a door.
Ridiculous.
Just insulting.
Well, it is rightly, yeah.
Okay, so there was one outlet of David Icke's son, the son of David Icke, who gave quite a good interview with Richard.
And what he says, the travesty of justice has potential, not just for Richard E. Hall, but for all journalists who dare to question power.
This is what the verdict does.
Anyone trying to investigate a state narrative can potentially be accused of harassment.
We all know what harassment means.
It's a very simple concept.
It involves repeatedly trying to follow someone or pursue them.
It's very simple.
Clearly, that didn't happen.
So this is a very extraordinary situation where what appears as very absurd is all the media, all the British state media accept it.
Okay, let's now move on to the strangest feature of this whole story, which is kind of comical.
The 22s, right?
Yes.
Are you there?
22s?
Yep, we got them all up, Nick.
The mystery of the 22s.
So, I'll just try and talk through them.
Go ahead.
I mean, what's special about this number, on the 22nd of May 2017, 22 people were killed at 22.31 hours.
That's the end of the concert, right?
Yeah.
10.30pm.
A 22-year-old terrorist, he detonated it at the end of Ariana Grande's 22nd and last song.
So she's sung 22 songs, right?
Martin Hibbert claims he was struck by 22 pieces of shrapnel and he then had the number 22 tattooed on his back.
So then there was a nurse at Manchester Hospital, 22 years old, said to commit suicide because it was all too upsetting.
And then Hibbert then comes out of hospital.
And returns to his hometown, Bolton, on the 22nd of August.
Then, on the 22nd of October, two years later, the Home Secretary announces that the inquest will become an independent inquiry.
Now, I could just explain that.
That's a sort of fiddle in British law.
With these state-fabricated intervents, you're supposed to have an inquest into the cause of death, right?
Now, if you've got no dead bodies, Clearly you can't do that.
So you have to do a fiddle, and the fiddle is that the inquest morphs into an inquiry.
Okay.
That's a kind of way of getting around the fact that you haven't got any inquest post-mortems.
Okay?
Yeah.
Right.
Okay, now, they wanted to charge somebody for this crime, but as the terrorist was dead, they got his brother instead, who was then 22 years old.
Hashem Abedi.
He had actually been in Libya at the time when the bomb went off, but that didn't seem to matter.
He was brought over to England and tried.
And he was charged on 22 counts.
A month after the event, the Manchester police reported that, quote, all 22 suspects have now been released without charge.
Right?
So they're 22 suspects.
Then, um...
The fake Saunders inquiry had Hibbert giving testimony on the 22nd of July 2021, and then a year later, 22nd of December, Hibbert sends off a Lester Richard Hall about the court case, announcing that he's going to face legal action, right?
Hall has to appear, he appears at the Royal Courts of Justice on the 22nd of July.
2024, I was there at the trial, and then on the 22nd of October that year, a judgment was released.
Hibbert was awarded £22,000 of damages for us.
Now, what do you make of all that?
Here's another one more.
In a way, this one's the most interesting in a way.
If you go to the next slide, right?
Yep, we got it.
So first of all, when he knocks on the door, that is somewhere in the first or second week of September 2019. He's visiting 19 witnesses in the north of England.
And he knocks on his mother's door.
And then...
22 months later, the police visit that road, and that's when she gets to hear about it.
So the interval between those two is 22 months.
Wow!
How damn strange!
Well, it is, yeah.
It makes you wonder who's doing all this.
Yeah, it is kind of weird.
But what it shows, what it shows, Jim, is that the whole thing is coordinated and arranged.
Yes, yes.
Start and finish.
Yes.
That's what it shows, isn't it?
Yes.
And then you have all these other 22s and chronicles.
Yeah, well, we come on to those.
But this event itself has a unitary planning.
The unitary planning is shown by the number 22. And Hubert is integrally involved in all that by the fact that he has 22 tattoos on his back.
Yes.
So, weirdly, the whole thing ties up together.
Yes.
Okay, next slide.
Next slide.
Got it.
Now we look at, a lot of people notice, these static fabricated terrain events occur on the 22nd.
Norway, Anders Breivik, Woolwich, Lee Rigby Death, Brussels Airport, Munich, Manchester Arena, and Westminster Bridge.
And so these are numerical.
So in other words, we may not believe in numerology, The perps do believe in it.
Whoever's doing this does believe in numerology.
Or as a way of signing off, identifying themselves as the perps.
Yeah, I don't find themselves as the perps, yeah.
22 pathways in the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and 22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet.
Well, yeah, I can't imagine what relevance this has, but I just thought I'd put it up, you know.
Yeah, no, I love it.
There you go, the mystic number 22. Yeah.
Then we get 10 post-trial articles by David Hughes, please.
Yeah, well, I recommend that, and as Richard said to me, these articles are all spot-on.
They're absolutely accurate at what he says.
So David Hughes must have downloaded all of Richard's videos while they were still available.
To get all this information.
Excellent.
This is a massive critique of the state.
Yes.
And I recommend everyone reads the first one, just to give an overall framework to it.
Part one, the law versus the truth getting to the bottom of the Richard D. Hall case, part two.
Part three, the summary judgment.
Been there, done that.
Part four, harassment, however, even has a video.
Part five, an abuse of media freedom.
Part six, truth versus authority.
Part seven, witness reliability, anxiety, and distress.
Part eight, implications for the independent media.
Part nine, the emergency response.
And ten, national security and counterterrorism.
Yeah, it shows in detail the corruption of the deep state, of the police, you know, and so forth, the BBC. For example, Part 7 shows Hibbert lying his eyes out, changing his story whenever he wants to.
Yeah.
And I think this should concern every English person about the corruption of the state and how a large fabricated derivative of this does corrupt all excellence of the state and the media.
I mean, what makes them do it is the fact that the survival of the state depends on it.
When an event like this is put forward, the very survival of the state is at stake.
If its credibility were to fall apart, the state would disintegrate.
It couldn't survive, this fact of creating fictional mass death just to terrorize the public.
One of the reasons they've come after me so hard...
Because I'm exposing and threatening the authority of the state.
You are, yeah.
You are, yeah.
Exactly.
Right.
Okay.
Now, there's quite a pleasant middle-of-the-road program called UK Column, which I'm not really knocking it, but just as an example, that it's sympathetic to Richard.
It tries to be sympathetic.
But it won't touch state-fabricated terror.
And, you know, this is a more middle-of-the-road thing.
So it looked at the way BBC told him to remove his material and said it was a political trial.
BBC had aided it, suggests how you can help him financially.
But it won't go into any details about what the case is actually about.
Yes, yes.
Yes, just as all the reports that I was found guilty of, you know, felt guilty of libel, never explains what was going on there.
They never go into the details or how I was treated by the court and how a summary judgment was held when there were massive disputed facts and a summary judgment could not properly be held.
But for the judge excluding all of my facts, To greet a fabricated absence of disputed facts.
Nick, it's just outrageous.
Well, it is, yeah.
This is the world we live in, that the need for war is so great, the military-industrial complex is so powerful that it creates this theater, this straight-from-hell theater, which destroys our trust between people and creates this illusory terror that...
To ratify the military position of war.
There is this enemy.
And in the case of Sandy Hook, it wasn't that.
It was gun control, wasn't it?
Yes.
So Sandy Hook was special.
It didn't have an Islamic enemy.
But mostly, all of this 21st century fabricants do have an Islamic menace.
Those that are occurring in Europe that you've so copiously documented in your Chronicles book and elsewhere.
Yeah, just to say, by the way, Jim, we're going to put an extra chapter in that Chronicles book about this, aren't we?
Excellent.
Excellent.
Yeah, so look forward to, perhaps later this year, a second edition of Chronicles with a chapter on all this.
We'll return and we'll review the book.
Yeah.
Okay.
Now here's a...
Ian Davis, if you go to the next slide...
The John Barr video?
Yeah.
Ian Davis goes around, he's posting up the John Barr video all over the place, and he notices that it keeps being taken down very quickly, right?
Yeah.
Now, who would want to take down that video?
It gives, just to remind you, it gives a few minutes, no, sorry, it gives a minute or so panorama of the room after the bang has gone off.
And it shows there wasn't any explosion, right?
Yes.
So, who would want to remove it?
And it tells us here.
It says, Conduct unavailable, blocked by order of UK counter-terrorism incident.
Yes.
Yes.
Well, isn't that interesting, you know?
Of course.
Now, counter-terror, the counter-terror command was an inherently absurd thing set out by Blair within the police force.
There used to be a world-renowned special branch that were respected all around the world, the British police, and that was changing to counter-terror command as if a war was being fought, you know?
Now, I would say that the terror there does not actually exist.
The counter-terror command has got a mock-up fake enemy, okay?
So, I mean, obviously there are anti-Muslims and angry Muslims, and obviously occasionally you get...
While I'm doing stuff in the street.
But the big spectaculars are not by any Islamic terror.
They're by somebody, high intelligence, high competence, high capability, high influence, who's doing it all.
And they're fabricated.
They're not real.
They're fake.
Fake, yeah.
Yeah, right.
So what this shows, counterterrorism, they are concerned to block the bar video, and we can see why.
That because this terror image doesn't actually exist, this counter-terror unit has to go right through the looking glass and become that terror itself that it's supposedly fighting against.
It has to mock up and create that terror.
And I think, in fact, that the day after this 22 Manchester event, there was a big NATO meeting in Europe, so I can't remember the details.
I think there was a big NATO meeting in Germany, and it then refers to this event to validate its position.
Yes, yes.
That we've got this threat of terror in Europe, and we've got to be extra vigilant.
Right, right, right.
Here we go, the Phantom Eve.
All right, well, these are one or two blog comments I put up, which I think say what's going on.
Eve never turns up.
She's never seen anywhere.
Nobody ever sees her.
And she seems to be in a wheelchair.
Something bad has happened to her.
And it's outrageous that she was allowed to take out this case against Richard.
Without any evidence about turning up or signing anything.
Wow!
Wow!
Looked at all her Facebook stats, and if she exists, she might exist, but she's a virtual construct.
Yes.
This is fascinating, because parallel to my lawsuit, it was brought by a fictional character named Lenny Bosner over a...
Yeah, right.
...child.
Name Noah Bosner and where he has an imposter come in as a fictional version of the fictional Leonard Bosner to testify.
Right, yeah, yeah.
Right.
So, I mean, Hibbert admitted in the trial, I heard him admitting that he was terrorizing this daughter.
She's kind of retarded and in a wheelchair somehow.
And him and his...
And her mother referred to Richard as the stalker.
And they scare Eve with stories about the stalker as if Richard were trying to stalk her, right?
Yeah.
And Richard's lawyer pointed out he's not in any way trying to meet her at all, let alone stalk her.
So in other words, he's lying to his own daughter.
Yeah.
Ridiculous, Nick.
Ridiculous.
Here's another.
Yeah, this is your second fictional fabrication.
The amount of miracles in Hibbert's life are overwhelming.
Yeah.
Yeah, well, I mean, what he said, he claimed to be in this city room with the bum going off.
He claimed that shrapnel went in through his neck, right, neck, and severed two of his arteries, and then stopped.
Yet he's not dead?
You can have severed arteries and not be dead?
Yeah, well, he said he swallowed.
Fortunately, he swallowed just in time, right?
He swallowed.
And that stopped the bullet, stopped the shrapnel, and he swallowed it and it went into his stomach instead.
Come on, Jack.
Give me a break.
Well, right.
But that is what interviews...
If you look at interviews on him, talking with interviewers, he gets away with saying this.
And then he says, oh, yeah, well, this is divine intervention.
Oh, yeah.
And so then he says he's on the floor for 15 minutes while the blood is coming out from his neck.
Yeah, he's dead.
I mean, why do people...
There's no pictures of him with blood everywhere at all.
And he just...
I imagine there aren't even any scars in his neck.
Nick?
I'm not sure.
There certainly aren't on his back.
Someone told me a scar on his neck.
But if he lifted his shirt up, you'd see there were no scars on his back from the event.
There is a long vertical scar down his back, down his spine, showing that he had an operation to do with his back some years earlier, a bit before the event.
Okay?
Yes.
So...
Stand by, Nick.
We got a break, then we'll finish with Nick, and we'll open the lines for your calls.
I'll give the next one.
When we return, with Nick, all right.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
One of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStip.com.
The People Station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it.
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Hello.
What's happening?
Hello.
Hello.
We have the war data from the Libyan war that I think it was in part motivation to cover up the fabricated events.
Yeah, this is some graphic.
American graphics just shows 2017 a peak of deaths from US strikes.
That is a possible reason for why they wanted a Libyan.
It was a Libyan terrorist who was prosecuted, okay?
Yes.
That could account for what's going on.
We have the UK, a war-making culture, and the vast sums of money involved.
Yeah.
Now, this is especially interest for British people.
I mean, we are a dreadful warlike nation that always bombs other countries.
That is the horror of living in this country.
The government will just suddenly announce they have to start bombing another country.
It's more or less always...
A darker-skinned Middle East country that has to be bombed, that can't defend itself.
And I've compared now.
This is the total military spending.
I put it all in dollars, right?
So the year 2023, the UK spent $75 billion on military.
And that's much more than Germany or France, you can see.
Yes.
And Spain is way down.
And three times Spain.
Yeah, three times, right.
Now, if you take the number of taxpayers, divide one by the other, you get the expenditure per British taxpayer.
Wow.
That's over $2,000 per taxpayer.
Wow.
And in English pounds, that's around £1,700 a year.
Yes.
I mean, British people are now in a desperate state just trying to pay the bills, electricity and gas bill.
As in the US, yes.
And, you know, vegetables are getting more and more expensive.
And what I find truly amazing is the way British people never, ever complain about the amount they're spending on military.
We're spending far more than any other country in Europe, both in total amount of expenditure and...
Per capita taxpayer expenditure.
Yes.
You can see, if you compare the per taxpayer expenses, British taxpayers spend 35% more on war than the Germans and French, which is staggering.
And, I mean, now on the radio, they're saying, oh, we've got to put up military expenditure now.
Oh, you know, our army's no good.
So they want to spend even more.
They're going to spend even more on the military now.
I mean, Britain's doing everything it can to start a new war now or to go to war with Russia.
It's horrible.
But this is the mentality behind state flag very terror.
You get so much spent on the military that the military has to, military intelligence has to create this theatre of illusory Yes, terrorist threats.
That's what they're protecting us from, these fabricated, phony, fake terrorist threats.
You've got it, Jim.
That's it, yeah.
So it's a theatre of illusion.
It's a straight-from-hell theatre of illusion whereby those who create the fictional terror get the increase in power.
Right, right.
Just like 9-11.
He announces on Monday that Pentagon is missing $2.3 trillion, and then as though he anticipated something, it's going to wipe that from consciousness.
The next day, 9-11, he walks back into the halls of Congress to ask hundreds of billions more in defense spending.
Just outrageous.
Yeah, well, I believe if we want a culture of peace to emerge, we need to...
We need to deconstruct these fabricated terror events, which you may say is as old as the hills, but it's very much a 21st century phenomenon.
Maybe because the digital illusion, the capacity of illusion is much greater.
It's very much a keynote of this 21st century that we get this illusory terror.
I hope it's very significant for this country that Richard has put himself on the line for this to show people as clearly as possible what happened.
He's also your top paranormal investigator.
Oh yeah, right.
Initially, he was doing stuff with UFOs and that, and he'd be trying to film them and stuff.
And that's partly why people enjoy his presentation so much.
It's of things that are normal.
I want to open the lines for callers while you continue to speak about Richard.
608-957-8727.
608-957-8727.
Let me just say what a unique opportunity this is.
You want to take advantage to speak with Nick Kohlerstrom.
Fabulous.
Nick, tell us more about Richard, whom I've long admired.
Oh, right.
Well, he's in danger of losing his home now.
Obviously, they want to take his home away from him.
And so he has received quite a large outpouring of support of people financially supporting him.
And it's very much open what will happen now.
And how can he continue?
Will they succeed in taking his home away from him?
And can they get away with this absolutely absurd travesty of justice?
Yes, yes.
Pretending that he has harassed people.
Pretending, you know...
It's so disturbing!
That the UK, the home of the Magna Carta, should reach this pathetic level of judicial abuse in fabricating evidence against truth-tellers who want to expose corruption by the government.
Of course, that's the motive.
They're protecting themselves.
Yeah, right, right.
Okay, well, I mean, I wish the people of Manchester would get together.
This thing can only really be exposed by people within the city itself, who know all the details, you know?
And I keep calling and telling people to manage to form a group, form some sort of group that can investigate the matter, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
Yes.
I'm pleased to see all the three books I featured, Terror on the Two False Flags Over Europe and The Chronicle of False Flag Terrors.
All have four and a half star ratings out of five.
I mean, Nick, that's as good as you get because there's always someone who's going to throw a curveball.
So four and a half is really the top of the mark.
I love it, Nick.
I love it.
Right, yeah, yeah.
Anyone who wants to call in, remember now the number 608-957-8727.
We're here.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Vic, do continue.
I mean, this has just been wonderful.
Turn around the tube.
What is it in its fifth, sixth printing now?
Tell me about.
Well, I think that's not so many people now interested in that.
That's a bit.
But the important thing is to see it as part of a whole progression of fabricated events whereby the state will deceive its own population.
Yes.
Yes.
Again and again and again.
Yeah.
I mean, after 9-11, you had the Bali bomb, which was the immediate next big event, blamed on some Muslim in Bali.
And we've had a terrific sequence each year after that.
To impregnate the world with the idea of Islamic terror.
And, I mean, the fact that Israel can do what it's doing now through Islamic countries so easily is, I would say, very much due to this fake theatre which creates the idea of Islamic terror.
If you say Islam or Islamic to someone, that almost suggests Islamic terror or terrorist.
And that was the aim of these theatrical events, wasn't it?
Yes.
And that in turn helps you to understand who's been doing them.
Yes.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
As in the case of JFK, exposing the cover-up.
It had the alteration of the x-rays.
You had a substitution of another brain.
You had the editing.
Extensive revision of the home movies.
The x-rays and autopsy photographs were only in the possession of the Secret Service and medical officers of the U.S. Navy.
So how could the mafia or anti-Castro Cubans or the KGB have extended their reach?
The films or home movies were only in the home of the...
Held by the Secret Service.
Again, how could any other source have been involved?
Josiah Thompson tried to defend my arguments for the alteration of the film by saying, but they were in the hands of the Secret Service, so it's impossible for them to have been altered, ignoring that the Secret Service was in on it.
I mean, Nick, that's outrageous, some of the arguments we have.
I always urge people to form a group, partly because if you're just by yourself, You know, there's always a risk of being taken out if you're too dangerous.
Whereas if you're part of a group, I think you're a lot more safe.
And if you're supported by the group and you share everything you've got with the group, I feel that's a lot more constructive and you're more likely to find the right answer if you've got a group to discuss things with.
I think that's a very nice point.
Very nice point, Nick.
I like that.
Yeah, whatever your location is, Help to preserve your own sanity by forming a group and every month or so get together and talk about things and you're more likely to find the answer then, yeah.
And how often I've been told by listeners how hearing me discuss these matters on the air reassured them about their own sanity, that they weren't just simply getting the big picture wrong.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, that's an important function of shows like this we do together, my friend.
Yeah, right, right.
I mean, the media, print media, the sales are going down and down.
They keep going down because people realize that they're not worth reading.
Once a journalist purges themselves, once a journalist just prints what he's given without checking it up, you can't go back on that.
You can't say, I'm so sorry, I was dead wrong.
Yes.
You know, and come out a week later with a different view.
Yeah.
All that can happen in this country, say the Daily Mail, it will give the official story and then it will sometimes say, oh, whereas there are some conspiracy theorists who think dot dot dot, and then it will sometimes give a view of what alleged conspiracy theorists believe.
That's the nearest you'll get to the media.
And very often, the views of the conspiracy theorists are misdescribed to cast them in doubt.
I think you have excellent photographs here, Nick.
I'm looking at the photograph, 17 bodies where there should be 58, and this flimsy little magazine rack is still standing.
I mean, ridiculous!
It goes on and on, Nick.
How could anyone be persuaded by any of this?
They just take the word of the government and the press for granted, or skeptical, but they have no idea what to do about it.
Yeah, well, somehow the government found a lot of people who are prepared to act and look like they're wounded.
Or take a lot of money and be dead.
That means you go off and you get a new identity, which I think happens quite a lot these days.
You know, it's probably quite exciting to start a new life.
And so the whole thing is designed on a large scale.
It's done by what you might call the axis of evil.
That's the British, American and Israeli intelligence services working together.
You never quite know.
Who has done what, you know, that those are all kind of joined at the hip, so you can't quite tell.
Yes.
And then the whole thing goes bang, and next day it's in the papers, and nobody can doubt it.
Yes.
I think with some of the reporting, I noticed the British police were quite annoyed at the CIA releasing stuff before they had.
You know, the next day they were...
So allegedly trying to discover what happened, and the American intel was sort of knowing about it too soon.
And that reminded me of the 7-7 event, where they had something very similar.
The American intel would be releasing details of what allegedly happened, you know, before the British police had released it.
Fletcher Prouty reported how...
In Christchurch, New Zealand, they had a newspaper with a portrait-quality photograph of Lee Oswald before he was even arrested, Nick!
Before he was even arrested!
Let's see, we do have a caller here from the 442 area code.
Please join the conversation, caller.
Join.
I'm not 442, if you're talking to me.
Oh, Brian, I guess it is you.
No, you're 208. Yeah, I see.
The 4-4 was a prefix.
Go ahead.
Yeah.
No, I just had a question.
I was listening to Daniel Davis' deep dive the other day, and he had a journalist, investigative journalist from England, who, of course, you're not going to find on the mainstream media, and he was telling this story about how this group of...
Refugees from the Middle East somewhere had this 12-year-old girl that they somehow got a hold of, and they had her in some apartment, and they had all these guys lined up pulling a train, one after the other, and collected money, and the poor girl was screaming bloody murder, you know, please someone help me.
And the neighbors heard this, and they called the police.
So when the police showed up, They arrested her, okay?
I just found that just unbelievable.
And she got charged with public indecency or something like this.
Had to go to court.
A 12-year-old girl, and of course all these rapists were let go.
And I just find that so inconceivable that you have that in England.
And I just wanted your comments on that.
We got a story, by the way.
It'll be in my RBN show today or tomorrow of a 16-year-old girl down in Texas who was being pimped out by her teacher and making her take on five to ten guys a night.
The teacher was pimping her out.
How bad is that?
Oh, yeah.
Nick?
Well, I haven't really got any comment, Jim.
Yeah, I couldn't say.
Yeah.
Brian, I couldn't agree more.
It's just horrific.
Shows you we're in a satanic world now and I also found the story in Norway where an American girl moved there with her child and got into a dispute with her Norwegian husband and he called Child Protective Services in Norway and then her poor kid Brian,
we have.
We have.
You're right about the number.
I was reading Nick's number, not yours.
Yeah, I got you.
I'm glad to have you, Brian.
More thoughts?
More thoughts?
What did you think about the 22, Nick?
Uncovered all these references where the date involves the number 22. Yeah, it's part of the dark magic, okay?
See, you have a different take on time than I have, okay?
And so it involves that.
It's kind of like the Mandela effect.
When they're setting these things up, they'll get that number in different timelines, and then they'll have it all correspond to that number because it's easier for them.
So that's what I think is going on.
I think it's actually, as I said before, I think it's a way of signing off, of letting it be known that this is their work.
So anyone looks at a man and sees a 22, they know what's going on and who's behind it.
Yeah.
Well, it's extremely mysterious.
Heiglian dialectic.
Yeah.
Heiglian dialectic.
That's black magic because they have to use that to make it happen without using, what do they call it, the hermetic principles.
There's like seven of them.
Heiglian dialectic is in that.
It's part of black magic.
Okay, so anyway.
Yeah, right.
I know this stuff.
Yeah.
Right, thanks.
That's interesting.
Yeah, right.
Brian, other thoughts about this Manchester thing and Ariel Grande?
She just performed at the Super Bowl, I dare say.
If you go along with these fraudulent events, there's no end to how far you can go, Nick, or how richly you'll be.
Just come back to what our caller was saying.
In the first decade of the century, the numbers were mainly 7 and 11, it seemed to be, sometimes 3 and 11. That kept turning up.
And now, more recently, this 22 is kind of pulsating through events.
Ubiquitous.
Yes, yes, yes.
Brian, further thoughts?
Well, the biggie is June 6th of 1666. You know, that's the biggest one for the last 26,000 years because that's when Rabbi Shabbat and Zivi came back.
And that's why you had the London Fire, you had some plague, you got something called SESCU-QV, which was the basis for bureaucracy and government.
And so that one's a biggie, okay?
But yeah, they utilize all that kind of stuff.
Yeah, that was the Great Fire of London then, wasn't it?
Yeah, that was to herald the coming of the Antichrist, Rabbi Shabbat and Zevi, and you can go to Russ Winter on Winter Watch, and he's got a whole thing on Shabbat and Zevi.
And then Jacob Frank claimed to be the reincarnation of Rabbi Shabbat and Zevi, and so that's where we get Shabbat and Frankus.
That's part of where our problems come from, was his coming.
And you can't deny bureaucracy is a problem.
I mean, you're seeing that now with this USAID thing, just what a problem it is.
And that's part of Antichrist consciousness.
That's right.
Well, thanks for sharing that.
Well, I'm so very pleased to have you.
I'm here, Nick, today to talk about this.
You've done so much terrific work.
I think you're, you know, breaking the spell is decisive in refuting the whole hoax.
Many are realizing now, I mean, Israel has put it in a predicament where it's acting more brutally toward the Palestinians than they ever claimed the Nazis had acted toward the Jews.
I think it's causing a lot of people to go back and take a second look and to discover how massively they've been betrayed and deceived by the liars of the Holocaust.
I mean, it's just insulting beyond words.
Well, I think we become human by discerning the difference between what is real and what is not.
And that is a challenge put before us.
You know, if we want a culture to succeed, it's got to be able to see through these dark illusions.
And I always say to people, if you're going to believe the government narrative of a state fabricated terror, every time you believe it, your life will become worse.
Yeah.
You know, it's like an intelligence test.
And if you're stupid enough to believe it, You know, things will get worse.
Yes.
Brian, I know you want to add something.
Go ahead.
Well, when you talk about the hollow hoax, I was on one of your sister's, you know, shows on, I think, RBN, and this guy's talking about all this stuff, and I called him.
I said, look, what I don't understand about this whole hollow hoax thing is the fact that Emil Maurice was Jewish, and he was Hitler's chauffeur and private...
And I said, how is it he would do this?
I mean, Emil could come in and say, golly, my relatives went up in the chimneys last night.
I think I'll take this gun that I used to guard you and just shoot you.
I said, it doesn't make sense.
And this guy couldn't, he didn't know what to say, so he said, Emil Maurice was not Jewish.
So I got on Wikipedia and looked him up and there it was right on Wikipedia.
Evil Maurice was Jewish, you know?
So, uh, yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
Sorry.
Glad you called Brian.
I'm glad you called, Nick.
Your books, of course, are available on Amazon.com and also several at moonrockbooks.com.
You're just doing such sensational work, my friend.
My hat is off to you, and of course, you've made multiple presentations.
One of these years, you'll have a symposium.
We can get together, you know, and I think meeting the real people.
Like we did in 2012. In 2012, you had a conference, and it was wonderful.
I was there to be okay with you.
Yes, yes, yes.
Wonderful, Jack.
Brian, thank you for the call, everyone.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about.
We don't know how much time we have left, but I dare say Donald Trump is giving us a little more.
▲
Export Selection