All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 2, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:31:43
Need to Know News (1 February 2025) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news.
We're in February the 1st, 2025. Let's take a look at those topics and have opening statements.
All right.
Key Trump and team test to expose and end the ongoing U.S. Orwellian illegal lie started wars of aggression.
They're not even close to legal.
And the whole history is illegal wars.
We won't have the truth.
We won't be free until these wars are exposed and ended.
Training exercise?
Helicopter flies into an airplane directly in the pilot's line of sight?
What's that guy drone?
The woke reversals leading to truth?
Or are we back to the rogue state empire as usual?
And a key Trump team test exposed and end the license revocation of the ongoing criminally complicit lying corporate media.
And again, it's not even close.
They should not be on the air.
It's propaganda.
Trump team openings.
Will they deliver empire-destroying truth or more cover fire bullshit?
And then from COVID and health, lies, and crimes to recognized ongoing crimes against humanity and to the demand of Maha.
And then who were the old world Tartaria peoples?
What happened to them?
Trump team must reveal all the truths of the Earth's previous great resets.
Or we are not free.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, first of all, I want to apologize for the audience that I was unavailable last week.
I couldn't have anticipated that the job that I was working would turn into such a large mess and really eat up my whole weekend.
Fortunately, I made enough money in a week to pay for a whole month.
So running three teams of surveillance agents all around Houston.
Keeping everything going.
I mean, it's just a trade I have to make.
So, that's it.
Other than that, really excited about the news stories today.
There's a lot of really great things to cover.
I came back out to the lake house after working the streets of Houston all day, all week last week, and it felt good.
I chopped a lot of lumber today.
Therapeutic, to say the least.
Plus, I'm pretty sore.
I'm working at an eight-pound splitting mall on...
Huge rounds.
Each one takes about 35 minutes to bust up because you're so big.
But it sure makes for a heck of a bunch of nice red oak firewood.
That said, let's get started.
Let's go into it.
Alright, let's do it.
Okay, so three of these and conflicts of interest.
Tulsi tells senators our government supported al-Qaeda in Syria.
And they did.
And if we get to the truth of this, then it is not even going to be a question.
The published research via the Claremont Colleges...
Wait a second, wait a second.
I want to approach that story because I had to take a very close look at everything that was being said here.
You know, Kyle Angelo, he's a great writer, and he comes at a lot of different angles, and so the headlines really don't do justice as to what happened to Tulsi in there, but fundamentally, the Dems tried to attack her on Snowden, and that's one of the major parts of this.
Obviously, Syria was another sort of attack point, but basically...
They tacked her on Snowden, saying that Snowden recklessly disclosed too much information about how the federal government's programs were working, and then fled to Russia like some sort of wimpy little freak.
So that said, let's just give the audience a bit of a primer on what exactly Snowden did.
Snowden was a bit...
Or is a bit of an idealist when it comes to constitutional laws and the way America should work, and that's exactly how the deep state would define Snowden.
Snowden's document cache, remember he was a contractor, and basically his document cache fundamentally validated What had been said by six other whistleblowers in the previous 20 years.
So there had been six other whistleblowers that had tried to come forward about the different programs that were in place.
And Snowden dropped the document dump that embarrassed all of the detractors.
And so the guys were Russell Tice, Edward Loomis, Jay Kirk Wiebe, Thomas Drake, Bill Binney.
And James Banford.
And so I checked all these guys out and went back to their stories about how they were whistleblowing.
And it all started around just prior to September 1st, 2001, when a guy by the name of Russell Tice, actually Russell Tice was 2005, but these guys had long careers and long histories.
And there was different operations.
One of them was called Thin Thread.
Which was the core operation that they were dealing with.
Now, Thin Thread was basically originally designed in 1996 by Bill Binney.
And then he wanted to take it and leave the agency and go off on his own.
And in the process of getting his own company set up, he discovered that his technology that had been putting together for Thin Thread was used basically not just to capture foreign...
Internet communications that were coming through American servers, but that they had modified ThinThread to capture all of the information that was going through these different servers and sending it off to the NSA. So in 2001, there was a guy by the name of Edward Loomis, who was an NSA cryptologist.
He was the one who created ThinThread.
And again, it was to capture international traffic only.
But obviously these guys all came forward and said, hey, look, the government has taken over this technology that was supposed to be to capture international traffic.
It was supposed to be used for theoretically a legit purpose, but instead it had been modified to capture all the conversations.
There was Weeby, Drake.
Thomas Drake was into computer.
And with linguistics, and he had exposed a couple of operations that were also involved in this.
And then there was Bill Benny, who was a codebreaker, and he revealed that FISA, the FISA surveillance warrants, were capturing it all.
And, of course, there's a ragged, nasty history about Bill Binney and the targeted justice that's been applied to him in terms of the different types of operations that Catherine Horton and Bill Binney come out and talk about.
And then there was James Branford.
So basically, they're saying, hey, Tulsi, you defended Edward Snowden.
This is bad.
Edward Snowden was a little punk who released all this information and fled off to Russia.
And Tulsi, of course, did a good job defending herself on that.
But all these guys...
If you really look up their stories and go through it, there isn't an ounce of treason in these guys.
They're just simply trying to expose what the government was doing illegally.
And of course, there's going to be arguments that come from the other side of it.
But what Snowden did was he justified all of them by showing that all of these previous whistleblowers who had been attacked by deep state operatives were correct and were right.
So that's what his document, Doug, did.
To attack Tulsi on this ridiculous platform that, you know, oh, well, she's an Edward Snowden sympathizer.
I would say that she was more of a sympathizer for the Patriots.
So if that gives you a feel for what they're really afraid of here, that their programs are going to get discovered, then, you know, I think that does tell the story pretty well as to why they're so scared of her.
Thank you, brother.
Yeah, I do want the polarization of the whistleblowers versus the traitors, and that's really what it is.
Whistleblower law is designed to protect anybody who has a reasonable argument.
And if you can demonstrate, look, this is what I got.
This is the chain of command I went through.
And therefore, based upon my oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
I am coming forward publicly with this information because my chain of command, by all appearances, are prima facie criminal.
Now, for that woman to challenge Tulsi, I say bring it.
All of them, bring it.
And the truth will take them all on.
Bill Binney?
Wife Catherine Horton, they've been kind enough to participate with Jim Fetzer's False Flag and Conspiracies Conference and to be with us on Jim's programs.
And let's see, what else?
Oh, yeah.
And with the NSA having it all.
Now, if they do have it all, and if White Hats were in charge, then they would have everything in order to go to the criminal leaders and to show them, all right, pal.
You have a choice.
We can release this, or you're working for us.
And that is part of the basis for my conclusion, my working assumption, that we're looking at the show and the White Hats are running this because they have it all.
And that we have a war literally over our heads, under our feet, in the dumbs, with advanced aeronautic technology.
I think that we literally live in a space opera.
And that the war has been waging, and I hope, I can't imagine it's going to go on much longer than this.
All right.
Anything else?
Let me just throw this little edge in on that, okay?
For some reason, I've lately been watching chess on YouTube.
Not that I play, more that I'm more fascinated by the advanced thinking that takes place.
What I've been seeing so far here, we're on February 1st, so it's been, what, 11, 12 days.
What I've been seeing so far is sort of a lot of pawns getting knocked over.
And if you think about that in terms of a chess match, what we're doing, and we're going to see a lot of this stuff in the news stories that we cover today, but...
You know, we tend to like to believe that it's going to be as easy as just, you know, throwing a checkmate on him and taking down the kings and queens.
It's not that easy.
And I think a lot of the things that we've seen and that we're going to cover in the show today will show that what he's doing is he's knocking the pawns off the board and doing so quite decisively and quite vigorously.
Setting himself up for hopefully a larger type of war.
But I don't know if I'll be a believer until I see some super high-profile perp walks.
And I just...
I don't have my...
My instincts are telling me there's something to it.
My instincts are telling me that Guantanamo's getting prepped for these guys.
My instincts are telling me that...
The structure could break, but I'm going to show you during the show today as we deal with a few other stories why I have concerns that it's going to be just simply a swinging of the pendulum to the other side instead of a full-on demolition of the deep state.
I don't know how long the operation is going to go.
I don't know what it's going to look like, but for right now, my assessment is we've just got a swinging of the pendulum to the other side.
Rather than a total destruction.
But we'll get into that as we get deeper into the show.
Yeah, and that would be the alternative.
If the Black Hats are in charge, they're playing with their food, and they're just going to virtue signal that is just the switch to the right arm of the two-armed empire.
So we shall see.
By their fruit, you shall know them.
All right.
So again...
The wars aren't even close to legal.
And this is a huge point.
There isn't anybody I have ever talked to who is able to say, Carl, you're just wrong.
You see, here are the applicable treaties and law.
And the reason that the wars are lawful is because of ABC. And look here at the law to...
No, no, never.
Not once.
Not ever.
And I have...
It's not just me.
I read the books of, I believe, four international attorneys and teaching this information to our children in high school.
You know, I feel a certain responsibility or felt a certain responsibility to dive in and get my eyes on and hands on the appropriate documents and be able to say something.
And Claremont College has agreed, published that work.
And it's not just the recent wars.
It goes back.
And I took a top ten list of the most easily...
So it just goes on and on and on for this.
And in terms of being free for human beings, the number of human beings that the US government has killed in over 200. Armed invasion since World War II is more than the Nazis killed in World War II. It is just a horrendous ongoing toll.
John Perkins, economic hitman, sums it up the best that it is just an empire.
And the United States is dominating resources, both natural.
And human, we won't be free until we get the truth about these wars, that they have always been illegal, we have been played for hundreds of years, and it has been an empire.
Brian, your thoughts?
Ready to get into the Blackhawk story.
I think that one's fascinating.
And it is.
Let's go.
Alrighty.
So we're told it's a training exercise and the helicopter flies into the airplane directly in the line of sight of the helicopter.
And we got...
In the first video, the Black Hawk can be seen flying at speed over the Potomac from the left side of the screen.
The American Airlines plane can be seen flying towards the airport before the two collide causing a midair explosion and fall into the river.
Sorry about that.
Let me start that again.
From the left side of the screen, the American Airlines plane can be seen flying towards the airport before the two collide, causing a mid-air explosion and fall into the river.
In a second video, you can see the Army helicopter and American Airlines plane travel toward each other.
After the collision and subsequent explosion, the airliner can be seen spinning into the water, and the Black Hawk is also seen falling into the water.
All righty, and George Webb, American air collision like a bad JFK/9/11 remake by Brennan & Company part one.
And he's taken a look at the evidence that this was an exercise and that they were practicing to do what actually happened and that you would use a Black Hawk helicopter as a drone.
Now, I don't know...
Anything about what is going on.
I know what we're told.
I know that they say stuff like that.
Oh, and I do not have the clip.
I saw it on another news show.
They took a flagged, draped, either it was a body or a small coffin, from a hearse to an ambulance after this thing.
I don't have that clip with me, but that would be Blackhawk Takedown Part 2. George Webb, again, is taking a look at this, and he was one of the main analysts in taking a look at the assassination attempt on Trump.
So, whatever it is that happened, and I don't know what happened, but it's very interesting.
As Trump blames DEI for the plane crash, report shows understaffed air traffic control.
And that is some of the testimony that I have heard and that will continue with Monday's report and that they have been so understaffed.
And then to the extent that the DEI had a place, had a role to play with that too, I'm sure that that is a factor.
I haven't read a lot on that angle of it.
Brian, your thoughts.
Thanks.
Well, there's a lot to unpack here.
While the lazy man's mind may simply accept the mainstream media and politically expedient story that it's DEI and it's understaffing and Donald Trump is scaring all the employees in the world, that's the mainstream media.
But I think what George Webb was pointing to was that the training exercise that was taking place...
Was tied to a continuity of government operation.
And this is what raised red flags with George Webb, because he pointed out a book by a guy by the name of Garrett Graff, who had written a book called Raven Rock.
And what Raven Rock did, theoretically, was expose...
Wait, I actually broke this out.
Okay, Raven Rock.
The story of the U.S. government's secret plan to save itself while the rest of us die.
An in-depth exploration of the United States' secret continuity of government programs developed during the Cold War.
The book reveals the extensive measures taken by the U.S. government to ensure the survival of key officials in the event of nuclear war or other catastrophic events.
Are we dealing with nuclear war right now?
Probably not.
But are we dealing with a potentially catastrophic event?
Is Donald Trump a potentially catastrophic event, which sheds light on the largely hidden aspect of American history?
Graff details how the Eisenhower administration was instrumental in shaping the survival plans, laying the foundation for a vast system of emergency bunkers, secret relocation sites, and protocols for transferring power.
The most intriguing theme in the book is the moral and ethical dilemmas that the plans present and highlights how continuity of government policies prioritize the survival of government elites at the expense of the general population.
And so the book Raven Rock is supposedly a fascinating look into something that's caught a lot of Attention on the Pizzagate side lately, which are the deep underground military bumpers, which are the sort of, how will our government's elites escape the coming wrath of the people or escape the coming wrath of other nations who have had it?
And what will the government do to ensure, and I would say not just continuity, but...
They would use an opportunity of a catastrophic event to implement and go with the globalist agenda of setting up the new world order.
And how does the Pizzagate and the kids all play into that?
And what is Donald Trump doing right now that's sort of hitting it or exposing it?
There's been buzz on a number of different channels about people being freed from these systems and these structures.
It's not something that I put as much time into as I should in terms of verifying it, but I have a feeling that the tech is being used to sort of isolate and downplay the stories while we get sort of a mainstream media, hosed-down, whitewashed version that's just sort of the frosting on the cake.
But what really the author of the article that goes into is more along the lines of Is this a step or is this a comm that's supposed to notify the people that something is changing in terms of a threat?
And while that might seem like a stretch because we just have a Black Hawk hitting a commercial airplane, I think it's not.
And I'll tell you, just upon simple observation, There's no way in hell protocols would have driven that Black Hawk right in front of that airplane.
No way.
That wouldn't have happened.
There is safety measure after safety measure after safety measure.
And those two birds were on a collision course.
And to have a DEI pilot in place stinks to high heaven.
The fact that it landed in the Potomac where the wreckage will be buried for a long, long time.
The fact that...
But it was such a clear...
It almost seemed engineered.
And so the author, Greg Webb, goes into sort of, is this the deep state trying to fight back, trying to show Trump that they have the power to control these vessels that are part of our military apparatus?
They have the power to do it remotely and that they're going to go ahead and start using that power to hit citizens.
And that's what Webb was arguing, was like, this is the calm.
This is the communication.
This is what you're supposed to be hearing.
We have the power to use the United States military against the people of the United States if you keep up with your crazy, you know, exploits in terms of cutting all of us out of the government.
We'll show you what we can do.
So that's the isolation.
And then to have the lifelight, that was also covered at the end of the article, to have the lifelight crash, I think it was this morning or yesterday.
A whole lot more to it that sort of indicates calms, I guess.
Yes, yes, yes.
So one point in the fog of war, you can't believe anything that you're seeing.
And imagine you're the pilot of a helicopter.
All right?
Now, in that particular area, there is a statutory ceiling for your altitude of 200 feet.
And that bird was way over that.
275 or 375, something like that, I don't remember.
But you're going to be able to see, as the pilot, you're going to see that approaching jet.
And the only way that you're going to hit it is if you want to hit it.
And even then, that would be, you'd have to be placed exactly right.
Or, as you're talking about, Brian, that was taken over.
And that was droned.
So, we shall see.
It is a war.
And in terms of issuing a warning, I go back to, I guess it was about two years ago, maybe, that the actor playing Biden had rented some cars for the Secret Service.
And then those cars got returned back to the lot.
And the following day, a do hit those five cars.
And melted out their engines.
Now, of course, they said it was a fire on the lot of the car company.
I remember that.
Yeah, but it hit only those five cars.
So if you're talking about a comm, that's a comm.
Now, as to what it means, I don't know.
We shall see.
I mean, it would be epic to have some sort of struggle for the nuclear football taking place.
In terms of who can control the tech, it would be an epic movie.
There's no doubt about it, especially if the good guys win.
Yeah.
And as to what may have really happened in terms of what was on that aircraft and who was in charge of what, so white hats, black hats, you just don't know.
And for me, I don't hold anything as reliable, but it is a fascinating, Alright, so we got Trump fires every January 6th prosecutor in an FBI bloodbath.
Agents escorted out of FBI by security.
Okay.
Alright.
All six FBI executive assistant directors and 25 special agents in charge are out at the FBI. Okay, that would be good.
And remember, the FBI has been criminally complicit in the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK. Hold on right there, right there.
We got two things going on.
I don't want to mix them because I do want to cover them both, okay?
So remember that on the airplane crash story, one of the themes was DEI. You know, we're hiring substandard people that aren't qualified because of their color or because of their gender or whatever.
Now we get into Benny Johnson covering the psychological conditioning that has been taking place at the FBI in terms of, and one of the stories he shows is, you know, they're painting over one of the walls inside the FBI training center where a bunch of diversity, equity, inclusion, you know, words are pasted all over the place in a big collage.
That's supposed to, you know, sort of brainwash all these FBI agents into being, you know, complicit, compliant children of the state.
You see that?
So now it's all getting painted over at the training center.
But basically, what they're saying, or one of the themes that comes up in Manny Johnson's report, is the question of psychological conditioning versus critical thinking.
And that's an important thing to begin to take a look at, because as we begin to take a look at DEI, we have to realize that it's not about diversity, equity, and inclusion.
It's about eliminating one's ability to think critically about the situation.
DEI is the smoke.
The fire is critical thinking, civil disobedience.
How to kick against the goads in terms of how much do we comply and how much do we fight back.
That's really what they're after.
They want to make sure that the people that staff the government are yes men and not necessarily people who are going to sit back and start thinking critically using logic and other forms of reasoning.
To decide what to do.
They just want to make sure that they've got a bunch of yes men who take the blue pill all day long.
We have to avoid those red pills among those agents.
Benny Johnson covers that and deals with that issue.
But to follow, you've got...
He covers...
The agents that are driven from the FBI, okay?
And this is where I was talking about with pawns, all right?
They're pawns.
They're like a police force, like a protection force.
But sometimes in order to win a chess game, the pawns have to come off the board first in order to get the proper positions because the pawns are there to protect other more important pieces that are in place.
All of this tied to DEI. Well, what's under the hood with DEI? What's really under the hood?
And so you have to think through what this war for our government is really about.
The FBI was there to protect the pawns, but the pawns are there to protect the kings and the queens and the rooks and the others.
Now, in my mind, according to the analysis that I've been trying to determine, there's one position that I'm looking at.
As the most critical position in all of the government right now.
And let me remind you of something Jimmy Carter put into place called the Senior Executive Service, which has been covered a lot by the American intelligence media.
And of course, I'm still reading and watching.
And they're telling me, the alternative news channels, that I must be a...
I must be a...
The plot agent, because I'm not talking about it enough.
I'm not informing my audience.
Okay, I'm not placed here to not talk about it.
I think it's a critical issue.
The Senior Executive Service has over 8,000 people placed into positions, and what that service does is allows them to bypass the traditional recruiting training ladders to get into positions.
By going through their sort of senior executive service qualifications, and then once they get in, they're basically tenured, and then they can move from agency to agency to agency.
So Clinton, it was Carter that initiated the program, and then it grew a tremendous amount under Bill Clinton, and it grew a tremendous amount under Reagan and others, but really where it really became a monster was under Barack Obama.
Who basically used the senior executive service to perform a total and complete takeover of the government, having appointed, I believe it was over 8,000 people to these tenured senior executive service positions across all 56 agencies.
And there's 56, but there's thousands of sub-agencies, thousands of sub-departments where these people come in.
And so it's my understanding at this point in time that there's about 8,000 people.
That the Office of Personnel Management have placed into these tenured positions to control our government.
And they all come through the school of, you know, the Rhodes Scholarship and the Ivy League institutions and the handpicked yes men among the Ivy League.
And, you know, they're brought through this school of obedience and placed into these positions.
But the most important position right now is The head of the Office of Personnel Management.
And this is a guy by the name of Scott Cooper.
And it's spelled K-U-P-O-R. And let me tell you what he really is, which is this is why I'm watching this so carefully right now.
Scott Cooper, currently managing partner at, or he was managing partner at venture capital firm Anderson Horowitz, is the planned pick.
He is the OPM director.
In Trump's second terms, his responsibility would include reforming the senior executive service.
Now, he's a swamp rat who's made tens of billions of dollars slopping at the SES trough.
And there's links to that.
He's a Silicon Valley venture capital swamp creature.
Closely interlocked with Mark Anderson and Anderson Horowitz, part of the initial funding group with Mark Anderson that stole Leader Technologies' social networking invention, and then they placed Zuckerberg as the front man.
He was vice president of HP when they helped found the IBM Eclipse Foundation that facilitated the theft of social networking from Leader Technologies.
He led mergers and acquisitions at Credit Suisse, Lehman Brothers.
As part of his grooming.
Now think about that.
Mergers and acquisitions at Credit Suisse Lehman Brothers as part of his grooming.
A Stanford graduated lawyer, heavily committed to biotech investments.
Chairman of the National Venture Capital Association from 2014 to 2018. So he's locked in with Breyer, James Breyer, Accel Partners, Accel China, which is British Pilgrim Society and American Academy of Achievement.
So if you're really trying to run an analysis of what's taking place here, either this Scott Cooper guy has been placed into position through negotiations to protect the swamp, or he's been turned and he's going to start working his way through the senior executive service position.
So I just think it's something that we all ought to be aware of and ought to be watching long term, because I think in my mind it's the most important position related to How the government gets turned around while still continuing to maintain its shape and format.
Anyway, two cents worth there.
Those are excellent comments.
Thank you, brother.
And one of the ways that you could do that is you put out a little teaser of how much that the Trump administration knows, and then you offer to all those senior executives.
You say, tell you what?
We're giving you a window of truth and reconciliation.
And here's the deal.
You come forward and you tell us what you've been involved in that a reasonable person would conclude would be criminal activity.
Anything you come to us with, we don't prosecute.
But after that window closes, anything we have on you connected to criminal activity, we prosecute.
Now...
That would be sufficient in order to draw enough light.
And we have James O'Keefe.
I think we covered this a week ago, two weeks ago, something like that.
One of those senior executives connected to COVID. They got him drinking on a date with one of James O'Keefe's female accomplices.
And he was saying, oh yeah, RFK Jr. We could crush him.
And went over some of the ways that they could do it, just stalling.
Saying, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, we'll get a report on that.
Yeah, yeah, and we'll share it with you as soon as it's ready.
And of course they're not going to do anything.
So we shall see.
This could be the breakthrough that we've been waiting for.
But we're still chatting about it, and I don't know yet.
Alright.
Breaking news, Trump signs historic executive order ends radical indoctrination in U.S. schools to protect our children.
So, there's going to be no more as to withdraw federal funding from any school that teaches that the United States is inherently racist, sexist, or discriminatory, according to the New York Times.
That would be nice.
And that there's only two genders now?
That would be nice.
And the death of DEI.
Defense sec Pete Hegseth reportedly cancels identity months.
We're not joking around.
DEI is gone.
And that would be nice.
Oops, let's see.
Ooh, we have...
We're going to have to try something.
Here we go.
No more pregnant people as gender ideology is defunded and purged.
That's nice.
No pregnant people?
Two sexes?
Okay.
And we've already covered the defunding of the federal monies to sexually, to chemically castrate and then surgically mutilate our children to this trans cult and then to have them weaponized.
Trump administration orders the federal workers to remove pronouns from email signatures by 5 p.m.
tonight.
That's nice!
Okay, let's take a look at this.
I think this is a great time to talk a little bit about philosophical things because a lot of people don't understand what's really under the hood with the DEI. And what is, in my opinion, really under the hood is that we want to eliminate merit-based competition inside society.
And we want to replace it with more of a you-deserve-it, communistic, socialistic type of structure.
Where only the rich and powerful thrive, and the rest of the people end up becoming sort of slaves.
This is old Bolshevik Marxism-type chatter.
And what was Bolshevik Marxism-type chatter really born in?
Where was it born?
Where does it come from?
I mean, there's a whole library of history related to that.
Fundamentally, I just want to remind you, you know, a lot of people gave me a hard time about the Victor Vaca BS, okay?
It's the Jews, okay?
They're a part of the problem, but there's bigger problems.
And while I didn't come out and say it, what I want, because I wasn't really in the position to talk philosophy on Fetzer's channel, what I didn't come out and say was that I really want everybody to understand that there are more fundamental philosophical challenges that are under the hood that have been brewing in America for a long, long time that are causing us to rot away.
And maybe they were planted there by evil men who are of a certain nature, but maybe they were planted there by other men who control those men.
There's all sorts of things there, but let's...
Let's just identify one of the great darknesses that we all can see but we don't really say, and that's something called moral relativism.
What moral relativism does is it gives us sort of a cultural understanding and a tolerance by promoting an appreciation of different cultural practices and beliefs by recognizing that morality is shaped by societal norms rather than objective Truth.
Okay?
Societal norms.
So it all sort of fluctuates with what is society?
What do people feel?
Oh, it's all relative.
There's nothing really there.
It challenges the ethical dogmatism, meaning it discourages the idea that one moral system is superior to all others.
Fostering open-minded discussions about ethics.
Oh, it's a good thing, right?
We can have open-minded discussions.
There's no such thing as a moral compass that tells everybody what's right and what's wrong.
There's no such thing as sin and judgment.
There's no such thing as right and wrong or good and bad.
It's just a relativistic concept that floats with the times and truth is so malleable that...
You know, the next generation can think truth is that boys can be girls and guys can have babies.
I mean, look at the insanity.
Look at how far it's gone.
Wikipedia says moral relativism results in adaptability and ethics.
Oh, it allows ethical principles to evolve with changing societal values, helping address modern dilemmas in ways that the old rigid moral systems Don't.
You know, the old religious guys, the old conservatives like our founding fathers.
Moral relativism, this is Wikipedia, encourages critical thinking.
Instead of accepting moral codes blindly, do we accept man and woman, marriage, birth and death?
Do we accept these things?
Instead of accepting moral codes blindly, moral relativism pushes individuals to analyze and understand ethical reasoning with specific contexts.
And then it influences legal and political systems.
I don't know if you've ever heard that the Constitution is now a living document changing with the times, that the old words that we use were so harsh and they had so much edge and they laid out rights and wrongs and freedoms and, you know, good and bad and sins and this, but it's all relative now.
Okay, so if you really...
If you follow what I'm saying, DEI is just the output.
And as a critic to moral relativism, I'm going to argue that it leads to basically an ethical paralysis.
Think about it.
Men can have babies.
At what point does it become so absurd and that ethical paralysis results in being unable to determine what's right and wrong?
And basically it becomes a moral suicide.
It's moral nihilism, is what they're arguing, where moral judgments lose their significance.
Now, what has been being taught and what has changed since the 50s and the 40s and the 30s and the 20s?
Remember, it used to be America, it used to be a church society.
I was just reading a story this morning about Washington coming into contact.
George Washington coming into contact with the British troops.
That little revolutionary army was about to be annihilated.
And so they got together and they prayed.
This was August 17, 1776. And they had to cross the New York Harbor at night.
An entire army had to cross or they would have been destroyed as soon as the sun came up in the morning because Britain had brought in all their ships and all their troops and had that whole tiny little army cornered.
In New York City.
And so what happened?
Well, the men come together.
They pray.
And a mysterious fog kicks in at night.
A fog so thick and so mysterious that it was written about by a number of sailors or a number of the people as being supernatural fog.
And the British were so close that they should have been able to hear the wagons and hear the people.
They should have been able to hear the activity.
But as a result of their faith, or whatever you're going to call it, somehow that night the entire army was able to cross one mile of river and get to the other side.
And the British, in the morning when that fog, because the sun came up, that fog remained and they couldn't see.
The British were blinded.
And what happened was that the entire revolutionary armies of Washington were able to escape the pure death grip of the Brits that had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of ships and troops right there in New York.
And they did it seamlessly, and it was a miracle.
Even the British talked about it.
Like, God's fighting for them.
And so you've got...
This is my point, okay?
We shouldn't abandon the old ways just because some shiny new object comes along.
And what we've done is we've taught all of our kids that this mindset of moral relativism is, in my opinion, a very evil concept.
And now, you know, we think of these liberals' heads exploding about DEI and email signatures and pronouns.
Well, what is it?
It's a direct challenge to the worldview that they've been programmed with inside the educational institutions.
Trump ends radical indoctrination program, Peg Seth's DEI, Meryl Nass, pregnant people, pronouns removed from email.
What they're doing now is they're having a cognitive dissonance because the world that they've been taught is being torn out from underneath them.
And it's causing a type of insanity and lash back on society that is so obvious right now.
but how dangerous is it going to be?
Are we literally going to be in the streets fighting with our insane, enraged, cognitive dissonance children?
I don't know.
But that's the way I see the battle.
It's much more of a home battle than it is that it's the Jews.
It's more of something that we have to deal with as a nation, as a society, as ourselves.
We have to fight this.
Rather than trying to go fight against flesh and blood, what are we going to do?
Make a list?
Oh, here's the good guys.
Here's the bad guys.
Let's go ahead.
Put the bad guys down.
Okay, get your pitchforks.
Get your torches.
Come on, we're going to go and string up a bad guy.
No, we're not going to do that.
So how do we fight?
How do we fight?
That's my point.
Great points.
Thank you, brother.
And to add on to what you're talking about with the DEI, taking it out of the meritocracy, then you can go ahead and hire your puppets who are going to be unqualified.
But you can say, oh, no, well, under the old racist standards, that person would be unqualified.
And then you just pick a quality or make a quality up or tell them, you just make something up and you can put in your puppets to do the job.
And anything that we're talking about in terms of the official morality, we have an official empire.
So any of the things that they're pimping, these are from criminals, criminal liars.
So nothing is to be trusted from them.
And finally, in terms of, Brian, you remarked of how far we've gotten.
To just being dictated to.
Yeah, yeah, Hayward Unified School District.
Health orders.
A hundred teacher colleagues.
I wrote an essay, and it's later on in the show here.
I'll point to it again.
Out of a hundred teacher colleagues, none would stand with me to accept the invitation.
To demand a written explanation of the ordering authority, given the law that I clearly documented and pointed out, made those orders unlawful.
None would stand with me.
And one day, in the course of about 12 hours, when the principal attacked, when I pointed out, it says, hey, so the principal sent an email.
Saying, hey, remember, you've got to tell the kids that they've got to wear their masks outside.
And I responded to all.
I said, that doesn't appear on any health orders.
It must be a mistake.
And you should correct that.
And the principal just responded, shouldn't you be teaching right now?
And then for the next 12 hours, about 20 of the staff just jumped on me.
Nobody to my defense.
I thought it was fun to...
To fend them off, but it makes the point that they would turn me in as a threat to public health.
That, their cognitive dissonance was so great.
Okay, now, key Trump team test.
Oh, so one of the things that we have to deal with, and just three reminders, is the criminal, complicit corporate media, and this is the status with that far-left hack, Chuck Todd.
He's out at NBC News.
Still sinking.
MSNBC's primetime lineup just had the worst January ever for ratings in key demographic.
And we've been pointing out of how far corporate media has gone down.
And again, the published research that I have via the Claremont Colleges, that criminal corporate media, in terms of pimping the reasons for the war formerly known as on terror, all of the reasons to sell that war, We're known to be false, as they were told, demonstrated by our most authoritative government agencies and their most authoritative documents within those agencies.
Now, for me, as a government and a history teacher, to be able to find that out and to document it and to point it out and corporate media can't, corporate media either knows or should have known.
And they are necessary criminal accomplishments or accomplices in order to engage and to run an empire.
Brian, your thoughts.
The kids that came out of the indoctrination institutions can smell a rat.
COVID was perhaps one of the greatest wake-up calls that ever hit America.
And America's youth in terms of waking people up to the total decline of our freedoms and the exchange of freedoms for safety.
This is what's being reflected in what's happening in the mainstream media right now is that nobody's listening.
Nobody believes it anymore.
And the question is...
If you don't believe them, where will you turn?
Oh, well, we're going to go to the alternative media.
Well, the alternative media might be giving you a lot of very interesting information.
I mean, I hear interesting things from Tupper Carlson and Matt Taibbi and interesting things from Stu Peters and Benny Johnson and interesting things from...
Redacted.
And, you know, you can name the channels and go down the line, Alex Jones.
Interesting.
It's like information that sort of tickles my ears in terms of it fills me up with something that sort of satisfies.
But to me, it's like food in the dream.
It doesn't really satisfy.
It's interesting and it's knowledge.
And a lot of people go along the lines of...
Well, we shall know the truth, and the truth shall set us free.
Well, having more knowledge doesn't make us more free.
What makes us more free is knowing that we've applied the knowledge in a proper way and lived, I hate to say it, but a moral life.
I mean, there's no man that's freer in this world.
Then the man who doesn't have to worry about whether somebody's coming after him because he's broken a law or made somebody mad.
There's nobody freer than a man who sleeps like a baby because he hasn't done anything wrong.
So look at the freedom that comes from morals.
And that's knowledge applied.
Living a moral life is really the knowledge that sets you free.
We think it's knowledge like information intake.
Information intake will...
Puff a person up and make them think they're the smartest person in the entire world.
You can have all the information intake in the world and all it does is make a man hard.
But what really makes a man wise is taking that information, chewing it up, and spitting it out in terms of his lifestyle and the way he shows his lifestyle to his family and his friends and his neighbors and his kids and the people that he influences.
That's a man who's free.
Very good.
Thank you, brother.
Yeah, the distinction between wisdom and knowledge is essential, and I would define it for my students, is that knowledge, you know stuff, and you may even know the right things.
But knowing it and living it are two different things.
Wisdom is being able to live what you know, to be able to produce it.
And that is an art and a science, and distinct from...
Just what you know.
All right, Trump team openings.
Will they deliver?
Or is this just virtue signaling?
FBI is still stalling and refuses to turn over the Seth Rich records.
The information could take down the Democratic Party for a generation.
Oh, yeah, it could.
Yeah.
And the information is that this was a flash drive that was given that documented.
to Julian Assange that documented that it was the Clintons that were behind and responsible for the attacks on Trump for the 2016 election.
Exclusive Democrat Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs under fire after 300 Wait a second, wait a second.
Before you jump into that one, let's talk about the Seth Rich thing, okay?
And Gateway Pundit is exactly the right Jim Hoft is exactly the right group to use to research Seth Rich, because nobody has reported more on Seth Rich than Jim Hoft and Gateway Pundit.
They've cut their teeth on the Seth Rich.
And by the way, we've seen a lot of sort of Democrat anti-heroes that have begun to develop, but Seth Rich was the original.
He was the original.
It wasn't Bill Clinton.
It was Seth Rich.
He was the one who said, hey, they're rigging this thing.
It's all wrong.
Let's just take a look at some of the hundreds of articles.
In 2019, Seth Rich murder update.
FBI claims they didn't investigate, but NSA claims they can't disclose the files due to national security.
Bill Binney says the DNC emails weren't hacked.
Attorney requests FBI to perform thorough search.
Remember that?
Where did the emails come from?
Bill Binney exposes.
I mean, FBI lied to a federal court hearing.
Strzok and Page emails regarding Seth Rich.
Now the FBI is doubling down on their cover-up.
Seth Rich family and defendants request testimony from Julian Assange.
All of these angles are tied.
This is such an important story in terms of American history.
Judge refuses attorney request for evidentiary hearing for Seth Rich.
I mean, you can go through hundreds and hundreds.
FBI's Peter Strzok and Lisa Page texted each other on report.
WikiLeaks was provided.
DNC emails from a Democrat insider.
I mean, this is the colossal, groundbreaking value.
Of, I would say, the martyr, Seth Rich, who under mysterious circumstances was murdered and robbed.
But in reality, he was talking to Julian Assange at WikiLeaks and he was about to expose one of the ugliest aspects of the Democratic National Party that has ever been exposed.
And they killed him for it.
So yeah.
They're murderers.
They're a bunch of murdering sons of bitches.
Who did they send in?
Who was the hatchet?
Man, it doesn't really matter.
It doesn't really matter.
But what matters was the fix was in even then.
And they've been gaslighting up until now.
Look at this.
They're still gaslighting.
Kamala Harris?
Tell me that's not gaslighting.
Joe Biden?
Tell me that's not gaslighting.
That's a power structure that is rotten to the very, very core.
Now, I can deal with a Democrat who just came out of school who just is a Democrat because they've been programmed to be a Democrat.
These guys I can deal with.
But the guys at the top level that can't think, that only respond, guys like Hakeem Jeffries, people like Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee, just puppets.
Those people are the ones that are the real enemies of the state.
And Kamala Harris, too.
Just going back to what we were talking about, DEI, is that she's one of the original ones, just a darker-skinned female, taken under the, I was going to say under the wing, but probably under some other body part would be more appropriate for that, just so that she could be groomed to be a puppet.
And that's all that they really want, is puppets.
The dirt on the Biden machine, there's no doubt they had the dirt on the Biden machine, because my understanding is Biden wanted the other DEI puppet, Karen Bass.
And so whoever was Kamala Harris's handler had something on the Bidens.
Otherwise, there's no way that dumb broad could have gotten installed into that position.
No way.
Or it's the White Hats in charge, and they took the dumbest, stupidest one to expose later.
Jared Bass would have been even worse, and Beetlejuice from Chicago would have been even worse.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Beetlejuice would have been a better object.
That was special.
Now I got Brandon Johnson.
Yeah.
All right, exclusive.
Democrat Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs under fire after $339 million disappeared from the state budget as Hobbs' budget director mysteriously resigns.
And that would be an ender for her.
But we shall see.
Okay, hold on.
Hold on to that one here real quick.
Let me just...
Let me just...
Okay.
So, Arizona State Rep Alex Kolodin raised concerns about $339 million that had disappeared from the state budget.
Yep.
The allegations centered around Katie Hobbs' unilateral expansion of the Arizona healthcare cost containment system.
And the allegations that he brought, specifically that Alex Culloden, Arizona State Rep, brought, was that she expanded the health structure without informing the legislator during the budget negotiations.
She misled the lawmakers about all the intended spending and failed to account for $60 million in state liabilities for the schools.
Now, the budget director that worked for Katie Hobbs has resigned amid the controversy, and Kolodin is suggesting that the situation is not arising necessarily out of incompetence, but more of a full-on intentional mismanagement.
So the Arizona Attorney General, Chris Mays, is prepping to launch a criminal investigation.
Maricopa County attorney is also investigating potential improprieties.
So you've got the state attorney general.
Now you've got Maricopa County looking into it.
And he's trying to get a state legislative committee to conduct a formal investigation.
And the broader pattern is that this is not the first time Hobbs has faced a bunch of scrutiny.
And it's a developing situation.
But really, I think what's under the hood here.
And what's even more important than $339 of missing money is what happened to Carrie Lake?
How did she lose that election?
And if that rock ever gets turned over, I say Arizona turns red forever after that.
Red forever after that.
Yeah, they probably already are.
And in terms of the pay to play and the kickbacks for that is that you get selected contractors and then they give some of the money back to the political principle.
And you got in California, we've covered Governor Newsom lost $24 billion.
And this guy ran on ending homelessness for like the last 15 years.
As mayor of San Francisco, we campaigned to end homelessness, made it worse.
Understudy to the governor, he said, yeah, yeah, let's end homelessness, made it worse.
And then his governor made it worse.
And anecdotally, we lived in Arizona, in Phoenix, in Maricopa County in 2005 and 2006. And I was a teacher at Central High School.
And I got to be friends with one of the assistant principals.
And she said, okay, so this other assistant principal that she works with, she said, He just got busted for stealing money from the school.
I said, oh, so is he going to be arrested?
She said, no, he's being transferred, and there's not going to be an investigation.
And the reason that she was telling me this is because she was my supervisor to evaluate my teaching, and she was interested in the topics that I engaged with.
So she knew a lot.
She knew I was interested in this.
And I said, so he's just being transferred.
Why is that?
And she smiled and said, because he knows that the superintendent does the same thing and probably brought out some of that evidence that if he goes down, the superintendent goes down.
So pay to play, baby.
See you.
I hope the audience is listening because the same thing happened with the Catholic Church when they started exposing all these priests that were being pedophiles.
They just moved them around.
Yep.
Why?
Why did they do that?
Well, because everybody's doing it.
This is the Catholic Church.
I mean, aren't they the bastion of society in terms of morals and ethics?
This is the Catholic Church, aren't they?
The holy representative of the vicar of Christ on earth, but yet they have this problem that's so deep.
And again, I want to point out to you that there is something under the hood that's more insidious than the Pilgrim Society or the Jews or the Zionists or anything else out there.
And it's internal rot.
It took the Romans down without a fight.
It's internal rot that allows this level of And that's why the Department of Justice and Pam Bondi is such an important role.
Now, right now, the buzz is Bondi's sort of pay-to-play in terms of how she's chosen to prosecute her cases in the past, and I hope that's not the case.
I would have taken Matt Gaetz because at least he was an idealist, but Bondi's tough.
And what's great about Bondi is she's a great communicator, and so that works really well in her favor.
But my point is, we have to stop allowing this decay of our moral platform.
We have to go back and recognize where it's born, where does it come from.
Folks, we have to have a great awakening if we want to save this country.
We have to duplicate that Great Awakening that happened.
Do you know that America has not had a revival in over 30 years?
Yeah, the last one was Promise Keepers.
Prior to that, revivals happened every decade.
They happened all the time.
I mean, you can go back through history and just read the list of all the revivals that took place.
You can start at the Great Awakening and then the Second Great Awakening and then you have...
This and Azusa Street.
You just go through, there's like a whole history.
Folks, I'm telling you, the spirit of revival hasn't moved in this nation in 30 years.
Now, there are lessons from the Bible on that.
A lot of you, oh, poo-poo Bible.
Poo-poo Bible, this idiot Bible.
Let me tell you something.
Every time Israel neglected to have a revival and clean it up and go back, The consequences were an outside nation came in and destroyed them.
And then that outside nation was fundamentally destroyed because they had been used as the hammer.
They had been used as the hammer.
I'm telling you something.
This nation was born in the fires of revival.
That's our history.
That's what it is.
And we haven't seen that in 30 years.
It is dry.
This is the value of the dry bones right now.
And if you're a religious person like I am, you start asking the question, well, if the revival doesn't hit, what's going to happen?
Crash.
And whose fault is it?
Is it the Jews?
You know, come on.
There's more important things here to look at than it's the Jews.
That's my point.
Well said, brother.
All righty.
Next.
The, uh, let's see, how many more do we have here for the Trump team?
I got three more.
All right, so Jimmy Dore goes over the Democrats all sounded exactly like Trump and supported mass deportation.
He goes over the history that the leading Democrats, and I'll play one example here with Barack Obama.
So here we go.
Here's what Barack Obama, here's what Barack Obama had to say.
When he was president.
If you're a criminal, you'll be deported.
If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up.
The actions I'm taking are not only lawful, they're the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican president and every single Democratic president for the past half century.
What?
That's right.
So if the Democrat standards were their own chins, they'd be Mitch McConnell.
So of course, there weren't...
Do you remember the outrage?
Nobody just memory-holed that.
Everybody memory hold that.
Here's Hillary Clinton.
First of all, look at this psychotic Nazi with her in...
Oh, wait a minute.
That's Hillary Clinton.
That is Hillary Clinton.
I'm sorry.
We must be taking her out of context.
She must just be rehearsing for a Silent Light live sketch.
So here's what she has to say.
Remember when she used to say this about illegal immigration?
So, I think we gotta have tough conditions.
Tell people to come out of the shadows if they've committed a crime.
Deport them.
No questions asked.
They're gone.
If they've been working and are law-abiding, we should say, here are the conditions for you staying.
You have to pay a stiff fine because you came here illegally.
You have to pay back taxes.
And you have to try to learn English.
And you have to wait in line.
And it goes on and on and on with the leading Democrats, including Schumer, Bill Clinton.
All the same rhetoric.
And the hypocrisy, we shall see if the Americans can register that.
Musk calls out Mayor Bass's land grab scheme, warns she must be recalled.
Yeah, yeah, it's going to be hard to do on those Dominion voting machines.
But yes, it is a land grab.
And I'm glad that Musk is, or the actor playing Musk, is pointing it out.
And it's not just here.
We keep on pointing it out that it is an orchestration and all of the so-called developed nations, all the so-called former colonial powers, German firewall breached, mainstream conservative CDU votes along the right-wing AFD for emergency immigration legislation.
Outgoing Chancellor Scholz and the failing Greens are outraged.
And that's awesome.
And hopefully that this is an orchestration and that all of these crazy Orwellian inverted satanic governments are all being exposed.
Brian, your thoughts.
Like I said, I think this next generation of kids that went through this COVID thing are going to be a huge handful of kids.
They felt the government's overreach, and I think that they're going to definitely change the world.
In terms of their ability to enforce their appetite for rights.
I don't think you're going to find that this generation comes out as a bunch of little wusses.
I think they're going to be a bunch of righteous fighters, frankly, that fight for freedoms and try to figure out and understand what America was all about.
And right now they're getting a great lesson in somebody that they'll remember for the rest of their life, which is Donald Trump.
Whether or not Donald Trump is the hero or the savior or whatever you want to call him or not, doesn't matter.
He's showing them something.
He's fighting for them.
And I think it's going to be very important for the future of our nation that these kids were able to see this.
Yeah, agreed.
Agreed.
Okay, speaking of COVID, we got four of those updates.
Mainstream media admits.
A massive surge in deaths among young adults introduces a post-COVID generational despair and lists everything except mRNA as contributing factors.
So they have to admit that, oh yeah, deaths are going up.
The excess deaths are going up.
And gee, we sure hope we find out what is causing it.
And this was an article that was in Yahoo.
Pull this up fast.
Make it a little bit bigger for you to be able to see it.
Here's the data that they represented from JAMA Network Open, young adult deaths in the U.S. And we have a reminder, Dr. Jane Ruby, this Congress exempted themselves from the COVID shots along with 3,000 staffers.
On what basis did they do this, given it was such a dangerous virus?
And the shots were 95% effective, we were told.
They're all guilty of treason and premeditated mass murder.
Yes, they are.
They are.
And then we got war for the RFK confirmation.
And I just want to read this from the Solari report with Catherine Austin Fitz.
If you want to understand what is deeply, tragically wrong with America, you have only to watch senators who object to Kennedy but have absolutely no plan to address, let alone end the explosion of chronic disease.
Instead, they actively work to protect the extermination of American children by poisoning.
The reality of this psychopathy is something we must all face.
Americans have become a people who eat our children.
This cannot be permitted to continue.
And to the extent that it really is eating, as I think that that is central to it, and in terms of demonstrating the crimes against humanity, my documentation in my letter to my 100 colleagues is sufficient to be able to have any reasonable person apprised of the facts withdraw consent and demand leader arrests.
Brian, your thoughts?
You know, a lot of people throw out the word evil and they throw it around.
They'll throw out words like totalitarianism.
They'll throw out words all around, like eating children.
You know, we all sort of know what evil is, but I would ask one fundamental question that I think that all of America needs to revisit is, why is evil evil?
Is it because we universally accept some moral code?
Where did that code come from?
Why does that code exist?
How come it's built into all of us and it's built in practically the same?
How come people just generally start out knowing right and wrong?
Even kids know telling a lie is wrong.
They do it.
They get away with it.
They do it.
They get punished.
But we all have this code that tells us that these things that are evil are built into us.
And what is evil, really, if it's a relative term?
I mean, I remember Augustine, St. Augustine, 4th century AD. I mean, he realized how bad he was when he stole some pears off the neighbor's tree and went out with the boys and threw them at the other kids.
And he began to reflect on that.
It changed his entire life.
He said, why did I do it?
What was under the hood?
Why did I want to do that?
It was just destruction.
And why do we have these relative concepts?
I mean, is one thing really worse than another?
Where is the line drawn?
And so Augustine, who wrote Confessions, was a person who realized how deep and how dark the hearts of man really are.
And while you might think that this is no big deal, The man shaped Christianity in a huge way, just by simply pondering the question, what is evil and where does it come from?
And how do we know that murder is more evil than stealing a pair off the neighbor's tree?
Just interesting questions.
And, you know, this community, the truth of community, we throw these words out.
But I really wonder philosophically if...
If we're willing to do the work to get down to the bottom of understanding where the guidance is born, where the guidance about what's right and wrong is born.
And I want to do that.
I want to begin to explore that.
And I'm going to go deeper into philosophy.
I'm thinking of actually starting a show to deal with it, to try to get to the bottom of these issues.
You know, brethren, I think that you should because after we come out of this with We the People's Victory, one of the lessons is going to be is, okay, how did we all get fooled so badly?
And one of the answers is going to be is because you surrendered your own judgment.
You gave it to those fuckers.
And they told you what to think and what to say.
What to believe.
And there's going to be an art and a science, an art and a science to tuning in and finding out who you say you are and what you resonate with.
And in terms of this fundamental recognition that you're talking about, of where that comes from, is that human beings are created with the capacity to tune into.
I just call it virtue.
Leadership, love, intelligence, harmony, concrete knowledge, faith, efficiency.
And you can resonate with that.
You feel it first.
And in terms of the...
You generate a field of energy.
And the organization is called HeartMath, I believe.
And they can measure that.
And part of the...
My analysis for why during COVID you wanted to keep people six feet apart, it wasn't based on any science.
But that's kind of the distance of the energy field.
Because when you get within somebody's presence, if you're attuned to it, you can feel them out.
Now, as a lobbyist, I found that out.
And I wanted to get as close as possible to the target.
So I could get feedback just from being next to the person.
So, Brian, I do recommend that you follow that because after we win, that's going to be a big topic.
And it didn't come up often, but when it did, I would inform my students as a teacher.
I was saying, you know, if it was me designing your curriculum, about half of it would be who you are being.
Who do you say you are?
How do you relate?
How do you communicate?
What is love?
How can you tap into the experience and expression of others?
Can you work effectively and produce results and synergy in a relationship, in a team, in an organization, and then as a community?
So it's a rich area, brother, and I think that you are being Encouraged to follow that.
Anything else, brother?
Nope.
I think that's pretty good.
All right.
All right.
Let's go on to this old world topic.
And in terms of for human beings being free, is that we have to get briefed on the how many times human beings have been reset.
And these World's Fairs, you know, the documentation, I've been looking at this, I don't know, probably eight years now.
And this was the Tower of Jewels in the 1915 San Francisco World's Fair.
This is not a temporary building made with straw.
This is what America looked like.
This is what we had.
And we had free energy.
And we had these palaces.
And this is just Wikipedia, but I want to point this out.
And water was a big part of it.
This was the old world.
It's like that Star Wars group that was whatever, let's see, was it Anakin's girlfriend?
Not Anakin's girlfriend, but the wife.
The one who ends up dying.
That whole society that lived in splendor like this.
This is what we had.
And in terms of demonstrating that the official story is false, again, that's easy to do.
And in my presentation at the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference, mid-December of, whoops, that should be 2024 right there.
Yeah, yeah, I'll have to change that off.
The documentation that we've looked at in Need to Know News is here, and all you need to do is go through those briefings, and you'll see for yourself the robust construction and the impossible official timelines of having like a thousand acres at the St. Louis World's Fairs and a thousand buildings, saying that, oh yeah.
We came up with the idea and all the plans, and then we excavated, plumbed, wired, and built them within two years.
All of them, all thousand buildings, thousand acres.
Yeah, we did that in under two years.
So once you demonstrate the official story is false, then all you got to do is start thinking, huh, well, what would be an explanation that matches the facts?
And one of the explanations is, oh, They founded those buildings.
They found them.
They were there.
And some civilization got wiped out.
And making the leap from where we are today of knowing they want to wipe us out, then if they want to wipe us out now, they would have wanted to wipe people out in the past.
And then we have the physical evidence that they did.
Or at least wiped out their history.
Brian, your thoughts?
You know, I was presented with this question related to Tartarian societies recently.
I think it was somebody in the comments.
I don't know if they were just asking a question or they were sort of poking at me.
They said, oh, you know, Brian's this Bible guy, right?
Bible guy.
How can you possibly believe in the Bible if we don't know something as big as what happened with all these buildings?
And I would say this.
You know, you were taught the heliocentric model from when you were a kid.
The first time you saw a cartoon with a big rolling circular ball in front of you, you believed it.
And you probably believed it until the last five or ten years when that issue has become to...
Make it more front and center.
There's a great awakening happening here at the end of these times as knowledge increases tremendously.
We're starting to be able to see things that we couldn't see before.
And I'll just answer the question this way.
There was 2,000 years between Christ and today.
I mean, we're coming up on 2,000 years.
I think it was 32, between 30 and 32 AD when they have the crucifixion.
There's some confusion about that.
But regardless, we know it actually happened.
But we're coming up on 2,000 years.
And I can guarantee you that a whole lot of things have happened historically in 2,000 years that haven't been documented.
I can guarantee you that there has been a strong presence of delusion that's been born in the secret societies.
All around this world, related to Mystery Babylon and related to the occult, especially what happened back in the 1800s.
You know that most of the heretical denominations and heresies related to Christianity had this massive expansion in the mid to late 1800s when occult activity was sort of at its highest level ever.
And, you know, there's a lot that we don't know and a lot that we don't understand.
And I'm okay with that.
But I do believe that the things that we take as a base, again, I use Christ as the litmus test.
I think he was exactly who he claims he was.
He quoted from the Old Testament, therefore said it was basically reliable, or said it was reliable in essence.
Plus, there's hundreds of internal verses, and he quoted from those as well.
And I do believe the way that the New Testament was assembled was appropriate and divinely ordained.
A lot of people have arguments and disagreements, but I don't.
I think Council of Nicaea basically were divinely guided when Constantine came along and said, I need 50 copies of the Bible.
Y'all decide.
What it's going to be.
And then what happened is all those 300 people at Nicaea, the bishops, got together and said, well, these are the books that we can all agree on.
They used the lowest common denominator set, and that's how they determined what would be in the final version.
And then they tossed out the ones that other people didn't agree with, and they agreed on the lowest common denominator because they worked together as a unit without deviation.
Book of Enoch didn't make it in because it had areas that conflicted with all the rest of them.
And so over that period, after Constantine asked for 50 copies of the Bible, that was basically when the canon was closed off.
A lot of people are trying to add to the book.
A lot of people are trying to delete from the book.
A lot of people are trying to second-guess those early Christians.
I won't have it.
I liked the book the way it is.
I know it's living and active, sharper than any double-edged sword you can imagine.
And I read it.
As much as I possibly can.
Because I think in its pages are life.
Life indeed.
And by the way, just a reminder.
Christ didn't just win a war.
He beat death.
Like the big boss.
The big boss.
And he's the one that taught us how to fight.
So yeah.
I'm following him.
I'm going to do exactly what it tells me.
Very good.
And as I've mentioned, is that when I read the Old Testament and the New Testament, the Old Testament, it was like, wow, these are psychopathic warlords who are on a rampage here.
But then the stories with Jesus, it was like, whoever this guy is, I'm on that team.
He is my brother.
End of story.
All right, we're going to final thoughts.
Patriots, hang in there.
If we're going to have the truth, then...
I would imagine it's going to continue in the drip, drip until we get to a flood.
If we really are in a war, if Trump really was recruited by white hats and NSA has it all, then there is a war in the background, literally under our ground and over our heads.
And what we're seeing...
Played out on the public stage is the Great Awakening and the Great Choosing, a psychological operation to transform the sheeple into critical thinkers.
That's what I think is happening.
And if that is indeed the case, then the facts are going to match it.
The first two weeks of the Trump administration.
All right, good start.
And we shall see what continues.
Brian, final thoughts, brother.
I just want to go back to the way I redefined, sort of, you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
I don't believe having more knowledge does anything except for make a man puffy and smarter than everybody else.
You know, we've all met these guys that sort of stink of being smarter.
They don't love at all.
They have no love in them at all.
They just...
Talk.
They just want to illustrate how smart they are.
It's almost born in narcissism or born in vanity.
But I'll tell you something.
You don't have to have a whole lot of knowledge to be able to love.
And that's more than just acting in the best interest of the person that you love.
And it's not an erotic thing.
But it means more like being capable of looking out rather than in.
Love is the cure for introspection, which is, introspection is a problem, and people just look in, look in, look in.
You know, they can't see out.
People that can begin to look out because they are comfortable with what they are and who they are on the inside, and they can now look out, those are the ones that love.
You take love and combine it with knowledge and wisdom, and you get yourself a real leader there, a real leader.
Thank you, Brian.
Thank you, audience members.
▲
Export Selection