All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 20, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:55
"The Politics of Polio" - The Highwire with Del Bigtree
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Very specific to this conversation today, which every single headline, if you're watching your news, the panic is over polio.
The politics of polio is afoot.
And we always hear about, well, you know, Del Bigtree and Robert Kennedy Jr. or Aaron Serrier want to go back to the iron lung.
They want to put you back in an iron lung.
I want you to hold on to that thought and ask yourself in this next interview that happened on the VAX tour, did we get rid of the iron lung?
Or did we just improve it and shrink it down, hang it around your neck and poke a hole into your throat?
Yes, that is what the iron lung looks like now.
And you know who's wearing it?
Oftentimes, vaccine-injured children and people.
This is a video of Colton.
Take a look at this.
Colton was a 13-year-old healthy strong boy.
He loved anything that has to do with an adrenaline rush.
Motocross was his passion.
We went to the doctor's office and the doctor says, hey, he's the age that you should get the HPV vaccine.
I said, okay.
So he was administered the vaccine.
And on the third round, two weeks after, he started having a really bad neck ache.
And then this is the last day he got to ride that big boy bike.
And that day he came home, he was Pale.
Starting to feel nauseous.
Really sore neck.
It didn't feel good.
He went to bed, and the next day I checked on him.
He still didn't want to get out of bed.
I just thought, man, you're just really weak and exhausted.
And that evening, when he sat up to take a drink of water, he said, Mom, can you give that to me in my left hand?
I can't use my right arm very good.
It's weak.
And he tried to lift up and all of a sudden he just flopped back and his head just hit the pillow and I went, Colton, are you going paralyzed?
They immediately took him down to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake.
When the doctor came out and asked me questions, they said, well, has he been sick?
Has he had any changes or anything?
I said, no, he hasn't been sick.
He had the HPV vaccine on February 1st, and they went, oh, well, we'll be reporting that to VARS, and they did.
I did do a lot of sports.
He was my favorite.
Now I have to sit on the sideline to watch everybody.
I'm angry that they're still getting out the vaccine.
They don't care that people are getting hurt.
It's a joke.
You gotta do your research.
You can't just trust a doctor anymore.
Fortunately, we lost Colton in 2018 when he took his own life.
Um...
I think he felt like it was a burden on his family.
It was unfortunate.
But his story has forever stayed in my heart.
And I know this is difficult, especially for all of you reporters right now.
I know what's going on inside of you.
I worked at CBS. I get it.
You're saying to yourself, well, I mean, it's rare.
It's rare when that happens.
I mean, okay, I suppose that does happen.
I mean, his own doctors wrote it down.
They knew it was the HPV vaccine.
But you see, I toured the country and did thousands of interviews like that.
Thousands.
I drove around in a bus with a team of people that said vax on the side of it, and thousands signed their names of injury, autistic children, you name it.
Sure, you can sit here, and I know you're trying to say to yourself, but I've been told that vaccines don't do that.
That injuries are really rare.
Well, I just want to ask you really quickly, just because it's rare, does that mean they deserve it?
I mean, do we not study rare cancers in children?
Do we not study rare diseases all around the world?
Well, only a few kids are suffering from it, so just let them die.
And then think about this.
This isn't a disease.
These are perfectly healthy children that were forced to take a product in order to go to school and somehow you're making it okay that on a rare occasion they are paralyzed or they are killed or they have a brain swelling incident.
But let me make this clear about Colton because this was the shocking moment.
It really was.
I was standing there.
My partner, Polly Tommy, was doing the interview and as I heard the machine going...
Fill his lungs so that he could talk, say a few words again.
I realized, oh my God, we didn't get rid of the iron lung.
It is hung around this kid's neck in a little backpack that's keeping him alive.
And when we say, oh, we got rid of paralysis and polio, did we?
Did we really?
Did we?
Did you know that right after the polio vaccine was introduced, at that moment, everything that had been categorized in one giant group as polio, many different causes of paralysis, they were all called polio before the vaccine.
Right after it, they broke it up and they only went with poliomyelitis.
Here's the other ones.
Acute flaccid paralysis, Bell's palsy, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, intraviral encephalitis, traumatic neuritis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
Look at that for a second.
Every one of those paralytic conditions are written as side effects of the vaccines we are giving our children.
And if this happens to you, and you end up being paralyzed, you get a walkable iron lung.
So don't tell me that, oh, Del Bigtree's going to bring back the iron lung.
No, the vaccines do a plenty good job doing that themselves.
In his case, it was Gardasil, the human papillona vaccine.
And in it, where does it list?
One of the side effects, nervous disorders, acute disseminated.
Look at this.
This is in the marketing information.
This is why the doctor said, oh my God, we know why he's paralyzed.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, dizziness, potentially Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis.
Paralysis.
And in his case, transverse myelitis.
If that's the first time you're seeing that, then you know why the Informed Consent Action Network exists.
It shouldn't be.
It should be showed to you before you get involved with this product.
You have the right to know that there is a potential to have this side effect.
How rare is it?
Is it rare enough?
Is it zero?
It's definitely not zero.
In fact, take every one of those side effects and each one of them is rare and there's like 20 of them on every single vaccine.
Are they still rare when you put them all together?
Well, the CDC once asked Harvard Medical School to look into how rare are the injuries happening from vaccines.
In fact, when we look at VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, which is what the mother of Colton said, the doctors reported it to VAERS, this is what that page looks like.
Alright?
This is just this year.
There's been 38,190 deaths reported.
219,170 hospitalizations.
155,989 urgent care visits.
246,208 doctor office visits.
10,924 cases of anaphylaxis.
And 17,864 cases of Bell's Palsy Paralysis.
Now, when Harvard Medical School was paid a million dollars to look at this, they said, you know what we're going to do?
We're going to look into our own Harvard Pilgrim Health System.
Our HMO, we're going to do a study on it and see and track doctors and see how many of the injuries they're actually going out of the way, very complicated system, in a very busy day, how many of them are reporting the actual injuries that you just read there.
What percentage do you think that is?
Do you think it's...
Now, then they'll say, well, I mean, look, not every one of those cases is proven.
That's true.
I will concede that.
But here is what Harvard Medical School found when they looked into it.
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are even reported.
That's a mic drop moment.
Wait a minute, what?
Fewer than 1% when they did that study, I believe it was back in 2014. Now, maybe it's more now, maybe we're more aware, but every doctor I meet keeps telling me vaccine injury doesn't exist.
Every reporter that's watching right now has made a habit of saying to the public, vaccine injury is one in a million.
Really, one in a million?
How do you know that?
From the 1% of total reporting that we now know is going on based on Harvard Medical School?
And what happened when Harvard Medical School, after being paid a million dollars, said, here's what we found, CDC. And guess what?
You know what they said?
We found a way to automate the VAERS system.
So that we get rid of this error.
So that they automatically, the injuries or potential injuries, automatically go into the system.
What do you think, CDC? You know what the CDC thought?
This is what they wrote in the end of this study.
Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available.
And the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.
They gave us a million dollars but when we told them the truth they never picked up their phones again.
And so now mainstream media will tell you vaccines have been tested extensively.
Says it even in the New York Times article.
So tested.
One of the most tested products we have on the market.
They are so safe.
We know it.
Mountains of evidence.
Which, if you've been watching the high wire since the beginning of 2017, you know is total baloney.
That's what all of our FOIA requests and all of our lawsuits have proved.
They don't have barely any evidence at all.
But don't just take my word for it.
Take Bernardine Healy's word for it.
Former head of the NIH, the most important and best-funded research science facility in the world, making Bernardine Healy during her tenure one of the greatest scientists the world knew.
When she was interviewed by CBS what did she say about the mountains of evidence showing how rare vaccine injury is?
This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural, or to one particular vaccine, or to a component of vaccine like mercury.
The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group Is a real disappointment to me.
If you know that susceptible group, you can save those children.
The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they're afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away.
In every single crime, you need a motive.
You need a motive that makes sense.
Why would they do it?
Why would the scientists, the CDC and the FDA and the NIH not do proper studies, Del?
Why would they tell us there's mountains of studies if they're not there?
She just said it.
Because they're so concerned if they even did a study of those that had been injured like Colton.
Like, let's track Colton and everyone like him that's walking around in a walking iron lung right now.
Why don't we study them?
What did they eat that day?
Is there any genetic something going on?
Is there a study we could do?
Maybe we could find, if we did a blood test, we could find out, wait, they have a susceptibility, and maybe this vaccine is a better form of it than this one.
Or maybe this child should have them spread apart.
All things that would be totally sensible in a modern world that have never happened in the United States of America.
Why?
Because as Bernadine Healy said, they're so terrified that even looking into it...
Some of you would start to wake up and say, wait, what?
You mean vaccines aren't perfectly safe?
They're not as safe as water that I drink?
So then everyone in media has been lying to me?
You see, media thinks you're too stupid to know.
It doesn't matter that you still will see all of those side effects on every drug that you take.
For some reason, we can't do that with vaccines.
And so let me be perfectly clear about this New York Times article before I bring Aaron on here in just a few minutes.
Their headline is not actually what our petition was about.
Our petition was about the fact that this particular polio vaccine, just one of many, several...
Was only tested for three days.
A three-day safety test.
That's all it got.
That, obviously, New York Times thinks that is perfectly acceptable.
Why would we do that with everything?
This cancer drug had a three-day safety test.
This lupus drug, three-day safety test, go out and get it back.
The government's going to mandate on you, and New York Times is behind that 100%.
Let's be honest.
For every reporter watching right now, if you've never reported on a Colton or told a story about the vaccine injuries that are listed right on the insert I just showed you, then what you're actually saying is you don't care about all kids.
That it's okay to kill some innocent children in the United States of America every year.
It's okay to injure some innocent children every year.
See, that's what makes us different.
That's what makes Robert Kennedy Jr. different than all of you.
Because what he's done is spent his entire career as an environmental attorney fighting for the little man.
Those rare instances where your career is being hurt by an industry.
One of those few people that actually try to make a living off of catching fish, but the mercury in the fish and it's killing the Hudson River doesn't affect all of us.
The rest of us are just fine.
So what's Bobby Kennedy's problem?
Why has he got to deal with the fishermen and all their little problems?
Why does he care about some Indian tribe that's getting their forests knocked down and killed?
What difference does it make to me?
Well, it doesn't, does it?
Because you're a reporter.
And for most of us, that river doesn't affect us.
And that forest doesn't affect us.
And that toxic waste spill in the middle of an African-American community doesn't really affect us, so why report on it?
But Robert Kennedy Jr. is not wired that way, and neither am I. Ever since my days at CBS on the doctors, it was important for me to tell everybody's story.
I don't believe it's okay to destroy some children's lives so that others can be made whole.
I think that's murder.
I think that's abuse.
And I think we're capable, with the technologies we have today, with AI, home of Apple, home of IBM and PCs and computers and computer learning, We could actually get to the bottom of this.
We could actually study these children for the first time ever and find out why is it happening to them.
And let's bring up that VAERS report.
If you want to keep saying it's rare, is this 1%?
Are we going to add two zeros onto the 38,000 and say that there's potentially 3 million deaths?
By the way, I just want to double check.
I'm not sure this is one year of reporting.
Those numbers see high.
I don't want to get called out on this.
I feel like this is a couple years with COVID included.
But you get the point.
Is it possible, leave it up, is it possible that there's been 3 million deaths?
I don't know.
What if it's 10%?
What if it's just 380,000 that we end up finding?
But the 219,000 hospitalizations, are we going to add two zeros onto that because it's only 1%?
What if it's 10% and it's just 2 million?
Is that okay?
I mean, here's the point.
No one in our regulatory agency cares.
They're not studying what percent this is.
Yet they'll tell you, one child dying from COVID, one child dying from measles is too many.
Boy, we're a way, long ways past having that issue with the vaccine program.
It's thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, and if you include the world, millions, millions.
And we keep giving more and more and more and more vaccines, and the New York Times keeps telling us three-day safety trial is all that is necessary.
I've got Aaron Seery coming up in a little bit to talk about this issue.
But from now on, if you're a reporter and you want to say that Del Bigtree is spreading misinformation, we're going to go ahead and prove you wrong today.
And I'd really like you to report, and why don't you just put the headline, New York Times doesn't care about rare instances of child death.
New York Times doesn't care about all children.
Washington Post doesn't care about all children.
CNN does not care about all children, just some children, the ones that took the vaccine.
Or as Jimmy Kimmel put it, Screw you, Wheezy!
You don't get to go into the hospital here because you didn't put yourself at risk, at rare risk, to save my child.
Is that the world we live in?
It's not the world that ICANN is fighting for.
So let's get to the Jackson Report.
All right, Jeffrey.
First of all, just thank you, by the way.
Thank you for just your incredible research all these years.
This is an incredible moment that we finally have the eyes of the world trying to attack us.
I've never felt better about the work that we do than this week right now.
I'm glad everybody's watching.
You're welcome and thank you.
It's incredible to stand in the truth that we know is truth and have these attacks come because there's a comfort in that knowing that we are on the right side of truth here.
And we are a media organization as well and the idea of regular programming is no longer in these new news cycles a thing.
It's a wild ride every week.
This week is no different and We take a break from sometimes what we normally cover to take something and look at it that's been happening that is just captivating the United States and the world.
If you know what I'm talking about, something fishy is going on in New Jersey.
It's been going on for about a month now and it looks like this.
All right.
Growing mystery in the skies, near nightly sightings of mysterious drones.
People across New Jersey and nearby states have reported seeing drone-like objects flying low in the night sky.
For almost a month, swarms of drones the size of small cars have been spotted over parts of New Jersey, alarming local residents.
The flying objects have been spotted over residential neighborhoods, restricted sites, even near President-elect Donald Trump's home and critical infrastructure.
An FBI official says they've received thousands of reports over the past few weeks, with less than 100 of those warranting further investigation.
We had something coming at us, and as it's coming at us, it stops, you know, it does like a 180 in the air and then drives away.
It then comes back and does like a giant U around us.
I look to my left and I see two big drones.
They were propeller driven, going very slowly.
The White House finally has broken its silence on the topic, saying that the drones seen over the Northeast are a mix, they say, of law enforcement, commercial and hobbyist drones.
Something dangerous, apparently.
We're checking it all out.
The vast majority of these drones are going to probably be recreational or hobbyist.
They're going to be commercial drones.
Let me calm those nerves.
We have not seen anything unusual.
We have not seen any unusual activity.
If there is nothing to be concerned about in any capacity, why does it require a classified briefing of such to tell us they're hobby drones, they're airplanes?
I call nonsense.
The bottom line is that the federal government is not being honest with the American people, chalking all these drones up as legally operated vehicles and aircraft and law enforcement.
If that's the case, they would not be shutting down military installations because of drone incursions.
It just simply does not make sense.
It struck me as Mallorca was like, there's nothing unusual going on here.
I don't know.
Just the fact that as of 30 days ago, a drone convention broke out in New Jersey that's never been there before.
Every drone enthusiast from around the world is suddenly flying drones perpetually over New Jersey.
I mean, that should be unusual enough.
This is such a crazy story.
And obviously something's going on.
And if someone says they know 100% what's going on, they're probably not being truthful with you.
Because look at this map here.
This is in New Jersey of all the reported sightings, over 5,000 of them and counting.
And so it's not just a couple hobbyists that are doing this.
And there's been briefings, classified briefings, but you can see people at all levels of society from just the general public to police, FBI, and even senators and congressmen.
They're seeing things too.
So here's the New Jersey mayor he took to the media just a couple days ago to kind of give his view on things.
Take a look.
Do you have any idea what it could be?
Or which side it could be?
Where it's coming from?
Yeah, I can tell you what it's not.
We know for a fact it's not little green men.
And more than likely it's not a foreign adversary because they would be able to figure out how to turn off the blinking lights.
These drones are huge.
We had a mayor yesterday on the call with the White House telling them that he had six-foot drones hovering over his house.
Yet they continue to tell us, we don't know what we're talking about.
It's misidentification.
Certainly there's some misidentification probably going on.
But I could assure you that we are seeing drones in New Jersey all over the place.
All right.
So we're going to go for a wild ride here because...
We're already on a wild ride.
Okay.
All right.
So the problem with what he's saying there is we know they're not whatever he was saying, but we have a news report, a local New Jersey news report that was showing something a little different than what he was saying.
Take a look.
All right.
You know, when things like this are happening, it seems everyone starts to look up like my crew and I have been here in Mendham recording this video that you're looking at right now.
We have no idea what it is, if it's a natural phenomenon, because it could be, but this is why so many municipalities are now asking people to reach out and send their videos To them or to experts who might be able to sort out what they're seeing in the skies, but I guarantee there are so many people looking up and making those recordings because this mystery is one that needs to be solved.
For now, we're live here in Mendonboro.
Tony Yates, Channel 7 Eyewitness News.
Lee's saying he's wondering whether or not that might be the moon, Tony, but you pointed out it's exactly the question people are asking.
What is it?
Yeah.
We're looking at the moon right now and that's nowhere near the moon.
Okay.
Nowhere near the moon at all.
So it was interesting looking at that.
You see this flashing aura and that brought back a thought in my memory in 2017. We had an article in the New York Times that kind of kicked off this whole idea of, you know, we're being visited and glowing auras, they said, the Pentagon's mysterious UFO program.
So you're connecting these, like I'm seeing a little bit of programming here of like, wait a minute, maybe they're onto something.
Well, unfortunately for that news station, no, it wasn't the moon.
We have a professional photographer on X, he's Andrew McCarthy, and he takes pictures of the moon and rocket launches and all types of other things with very high definition photographic technology.
And he says this, Because Russell Brand shared the same thing, saying, what is this?
So Andrew McCarthy says, this is how mass hysteria spreads.
A media outlet betraying the trust of their viewers by sharing an out-of-focus light in the sky and presenting it as a UAP, which then gets amplified by people who trust them.
This has been shared, that video has been shared by millions and millions, it's seen by millions of people.
And so what they're talking about here is if you are a photographer and you have a very powerful lens, when you start focusing in on celestial bodies like The Moon or Venus or some stars.
You get to see something like this.
These are out of focus planets.
Here's four examples and you can see looking pretty close to what that that station was showing there.
So that's one example here.
And Del, you know, as we're going down this conversation, the view that there's something out there beyond us, I mean, that view goes back to indigenous cultures, their inception stories, and that's for the public to come to their own conclusions with their own experience and their own discernment.
The problem I have here, or we have, is when media outlets, the government, or people are making things appear as if they're something they're not.
And this is what we're going to talk about.
So let's go into another video.
This is another one, one of the biggest shared videos.
And you can see this object flying around.
This is supposedly over New Jersey.
And this thing is, this black object is flying over It looks like a drone, or it looks like something, some type of craft.
I want you to throw to it.
Let me take a look at it.
Let's take a look at it.
This is crazy.
We've got to look at it.
That's not a plane.
Yeah.
It's wild.
Kind of looks like the Millennium Falcon at sunset, you know?
Yeah, I mean, Star Wars part five.
So, you know, these images, again, they're shared by millions of people, and these have the tendency to stick in people's minds.
And really, when people think about the New Jersey story, that pops up.
Unfortunately, just a quick hop over to TikTok, where that video was created by the creator.
And you can see here, literally in the description section, it says this video was created digitally.
So, obviously, there's no saying like, I was hovering above and I decided to take this video of this thing and talk at 10,000 feet.
So, there's a lot of, obviously, what they call misinformation, disinformation going on, and it's very hard to weed this stuff out.
And even there's even some people that are just flying their own drones.
I mean, it's not just in New Jersey.
It's spreading throughout other states as well.
Here's Boston.
Two men arrested for hazardous drone operation near Boston Airport.
And then it says a third suspect fled the scene in a boat and has not been caught yet.
So, I mean, this is, people are perhaps seeing just hobbyists that are flying drones and reporting those as well, and maybe the people are actually harassing people that are hobbyists.
But we have the National Security Council spokesman, John Kirby, he took to the airwaves just a couple days ago, and he gave kind of a joint statement, and it was the concurrence of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense.
They say, they're circling the wagons here, and they're saying, we all agree on this narrative.
This is what you should believe.
Take a listen.
Okay.
You hear all of these officials.
You've heard a lot of concern, a lot of coverage.
Where are you tonight on this?
As we look at the information we've got, Brett, and we've now examined some 5,000 different sightings, we've added detection capabilities, additional observers.
As you and I stand here today, to date, our assessment is that this is lawful, legal, commercial, hobbyist, and even law enforcement aircraft activity.
Some of it's manned.
Some of it's unmanned.
We absolutely acknowledge that a lot of these are probably drones, but they're flying legally.
And it is legal to fly drones in non-restricted airspace as long as you're registered with the FAA. And there's thousands and thousands of these kinds of flights every single day.
I think there's more than a million drones that are registered with the FAA just in the United States alone.
Oh, Mr. Kirby.
So, okay.
Not much really coming from that.
It's just legal.
Right.
There's more mumbo jumbo nothingness, right?
Yeah.
Which does just smack of not making any sense.
Yeah.
And so, I mean, this has been going on.
And it's not just one government official coming out and doing these press conferences.
There's governors, mayors, senators, congressmen.
They're all saying, we need answers to this.
And it's being allowed to kind of breathe this chaos, this fear.
Yeah.
And for me, first thing, I'm looking through COVID goggles because we just went through that.
I see this.
This is the headline I see.
Government use grossly unethical tactics to scare public into COVID compliance.
So what are we being scared into?
And so Kirby is saying these are lawful.
Well, This is also the stance of this headline.
Just from last year, U.S. shoots down unidentified flying object above Alaska.
Oh, my God.
Well, it turned out to be a Chinese spy balloon.
And so we know over the past couple of years, there's been over hundreds, hundreds of what they're called drone incursions over U.S. military bases.
And I mean, here's just a couple of headlines here.
Key U.S. Air Force Base closes airspace amid drone sightings.
That's the most recent one.
And then a headline from two years ago, which is kind of interesting, adversary drones are spying on the US and the Pentagon acts like they're UFOs.
And one of the final things I'll say here just to complete this story is in November, late November, really right, I mean, we're talking about a week before these New Jersey drones really hit the mainstream news, you had the military, the Pentagon doing drills Drone drills.
And this is the headline here.
You can look it up for yourself.
Nets, jamming, and cyber scalpels.
Pentagon weighs homeland counter drone tech in mountain tests.
So they're doing testing drills.
And what did they find?
They found this.
And there's a quote here by the NORTHCOM commander.
This is one of the highest positions in the military here.
By all indications, he says, USAS, these are these drones, We'll present a safety and security risk to military installations and other critical infrastructure for the foreseeable future, says NORTHCOM Chief General Gregory Giette.
So not that we got it handled.
These are a risk for United States and our military, and they're flying all over.
So what's interesting about this story is there are two bills that are going through Congress right now.
One of them is set to be It has to be voted on by tomorrow because it's going to expire.
And in this kind of frenzy, these bills are now being forced to the forefront.
Here's one of the headlines.
Drone activity has gone too far.
Biden must step in.
This is Kathy Hochul in New York.
She's saying Biden must sign these bills.
And these bills basically give Homeland Security, Department of Defense, like kind of a The power position over dealing with these drones.
And as we're reporting right now, as it's breaking, the FAA has temporarily banned drone flights over critical sites in New Jersey communities until January 17th.
So the FAA is actually using some of its authority here, not waiting for local or federal government because they do have authority to do this.
I have my own theory, actually.
I think it's Papa John's.
I think Papa John's is working on a new pizza delivery system, and I think we should think about this.
We should really think about this.
And I'm partly joking here.
This is one of those places where, yes, it very well could be to create some sort of hyper-scenario to regulate and take drones out of the sky, because I'm sure they don't want private citizens tracking every police arrest going on.
They already have enough problems with cell phones, and God knows what else we might find out if we're able to get in the skies and look over things.
I've been to some weddings and things where you hear the drone overhead.
It's so disruptive.
Can you imagine what our skies are going to be like as Amazon and pizza delivery places start really looking at delivering through drama?
It's going to be just this mess in the sky.
It's going to be loud as hell.
And, you know, sitting and quietly listening to birds chirping, those days will be over, and it's right around the corner.
So if that's all this is, then I, you know, I'm on the fence.
Maybe the government does need to step in here.
But here's what bothers me about it.
And I know that there's also people saying that they're trying to find, you know, nuclear radiation, and everyone's got theories out there.
But...
I want to remind people that are like, well, I mean, the government is saying there's nothing here.
But remember, that's exactly what they did with COVID, too.
Remember how many times Fauci said, oh, no, no, no, it's a nothing virus.
It's not going to affect the United States of America.
That's how that started, too.
And when you look at, when you read Matthias Desmond's book, you know, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, it's creating a level of confusion where you just don't know what to believe.
And then somewhere in that, there's a level of anxiety that kicks up.
And then the government or, you know...
Hands you what it is that's making you anxious, gives you something to focus on, creates an enemy that you can attack, and then suddenly you're essentially hypnotized.
I think we have to look at all these things.
I don't trust any of it.
I even get more suspicious when it starts hitting mainstream news to tell me nothing to see here.
Why are you even reporting on it?
Why is this suddenly a story happening?
Especially a story with absolutely no story to it yet.
The whole thing is very suspicious and I think the timing is very suspicious.
It's wild that all of this is suddenly happening.
We're looking for radiation.
There's a bomb missing.
There may be UFOs all like just a few weeks out.
From the inauguration of a president that really is going after all the corruption in our government, is going to shut down the global takeover of our sanity here in the United States of America, just seems really interesting that, you know, we've got crazy vehicles flying all through the sky and people running around like, you know, an Orson Welles radio show.
So anyway, we'll keep our eye on it.
I'm glad we got out of the way because, I mean, every day this changes so much and I don't feel like reporting on drones every week that we're here.
Likewise.
And I know people in the New York Times, Washington Post that are watching, they're going, thank God they took a moment away from their medical reporting.
Our reporting and health reporting has devastated mainstream media.
I mean, we have took that narrative away from them that they tried to push on people.
But we're going to go back to it now for all you viewers out there in the mainstream media and the corporate media.
And there's a new study about the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine in children.
Remember, that was pushed on children in 2022. It was approved by the FDA. Here it is, protection from COVID-19 vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged six months to four years.
So that was authorized in 2022, but there wasn't a lot of real-world data.
In fact, it's still on the effectiveness of these vaccines in the age groups.
It still remains kind of scarce because they basically brought it over from the original clinical trials and said, well, working the adults, let's just move it to the children of the EUA. Well, now we have 614 children this study looked at.
From six months to four years, the same age group, and what did they find?
They found this.
There was no difference in risk of infection or symptomatic COVID-19 by vaccination status alone, regardless of timing of vaccination or manufacturer type.
However, naive participants, that means someone who's never had COVID before, Any participants vaccinated with Pfizer BioNTech were more likely to be infected and experience symptomatic COVID-19 compared to naive and unvaccinated participants.
Now there's a thing that says HR 2.59.
That's a hazard ratio.
So what that means is these kids, basically children, were 2.59 times more likely to have an infection or to experience symptomatic COVID-19 than unvaccinated participants.
That's just what everyone knows.
It's 250% more likely to develop a COVID symptom scenario than if you had nothing at all.
That's right.
I'm glad I got this straight.
Yeah.
This builds on three other studies.
So now we have four studies showing that not only are the vaccines not effective, they actually have a higher, you have a higher chance of developing infections or symptoms.
And here's an article that really brilliantly puts it together.
Four studies established that vaccinated individuals ultimately face a higher risk of infection compared to those who are not.
And at the same time, you have the CDC still going out on social media.
Mandy Cohen, head of the CDC, goes out on social media and advertises the vaccine.
She writes this, the single best way to risk less severe illness and do more of the things you enjoy is to get vaccinated against COVID and flu.
Have you made your plan to get vaccinated?
That's what's going on at CDC. Trust the experts.
Trust the experts.
That's it for Jim Brewer.
All right, so we have...
Now, let's stay on the vaccine conversation because a lot of these manufacturers, like Pfizer, like Moderna, they had such a great success with the COVID vaccine that they're moving on to other vaccines.
Moderna is moving on to the RSV vaccine.
This is a respiratory virus.
It can have complications if you're older, immune-suppressed, or in very, very young children.
And that's where they're testing it in.
They're testing it in kids in Panama, five months to seven months old.
So extremely small infants here for this RSV vaccine test.
And there's a problem.
There's what they call a safety signal, a little bit of a roadblock.
But don't worry, they'll get around that roadblock.
That's what the headlines say.
And you can look at this.
Moderna's RSV vaccine run into safety roadblock.
What kind of roadblock?
Well, in the study, there's five cases of severe to very severe lower RSV respiratory tract infections.
Those were reported among 40 of the babies who received the dose compared to just one in the placebo group.
What happened to those babies, those infants?
Five of them, all of them, required hospitalization.
One needed mechanical ventilation.
That was in the study.
You mean an iron lung?
An iron-lock shirt.
Right.
That don't exist anymore?
Caused by a vaccine?
Wow.
Fascinating.
Sounds familiar.
I think I've heard that before.
And Del, you know what's interesting about this?
As a journalist, I'm reading this, and I look, and they had to correct this article, the Safety Roadblock article.
And what did they say?
Well, apparently the FDA was really looking out for us because they found this.
Well, the author says, correction, December 11th, this story has been updated.
To make it clear that Moderna informed the FDA of the safety findings that triggered the study pause, not the other way around, biospace regards to error.
So yet another journalist is finding out the FDA is not monitoring these things.
They're relying on the company to go, oops, our problem.
And sometimes the company doesn't say, oops, our problem.
You know, let's look at the study, the actual study trial, because this is interesting.
They had two interventions.
They had two different types of RSV vaccine.
They're both mRNA.
This is where these vaccine industries are going, this new technology.
But you see, against a placebo.
So this is a very big story that they use a placebo, an inert placebo.
Amazing.
So just to be clear here, for everyone watching, yes, again, all of you reporters, one of the things that you've said is misinformation is that we say no placebo-based trials were used in the pre-licensure phase of the 16 vaccines on the CDC childhood schedule.
And here we're being proven wrong by a brand new trial.
But I mean, what's interesting, Jeffrey, is this proves our point, right?
They've never done, and we have a document that you can look up and you can see whether or not, there it is, that's on our website.
You can click right there to see it.
It shows all of the safety trials right there on the right, how long they looked at it.
Did they have a placebo?
None of them.
I think there was one tiny placebo group in an HPV vaccine trial, but they hid the data on that.
That's a long story.
But essentially, they've never done it.
When they finally do it, when they finally do it on an RSV vaccine program, suddenly they go, whoa, stop!
Kids are getting sick.
People are being injured.
Now, normally, if you don't have a placebo group, right, because they did show that they had one severe illness in that placebo group, so what they would all obviously say without a placebo group is kids get sick.
RSV, you know, it happens.
Like, you know, that would be the natural, you know, severe illness, needing a respirator.
Respirator, needing an iron lung, that would happen whether they got the vaccine or not.
That's what they argue when there's no comparator.
But when you actually can compare that group and say, nope, sorry, clearly a different result of the vaccinated compared to the placebo group, now you know why it's so important, New York Times.
This is why it's important.
By the way, was that trial three days long, Jeffrey?
Was it three days?
Four days?
Five days?
They found the problems from what I could see around day 85 to 141 in the trial.
So You know, several months into it that they find these problems.
So look what happens when you go beyond three days, New York Times, four days.
I want to do a little thing here, Jeffrey, because I am really tired.
I even sat down with a CNN reporter when I was in West Palm a week or so ago.
I said, I'm really tired of you guys just saying, the experts say is your response.
I'm so tired of it.
New York Times, all of you, I'm so tired of you calling that journalism.
That's not journalism.
The experts say, well, Richard Nixon, did you tap the phones over at the Watergate Hotel?
No, I did not.
Well, there you have it.
The experts say they didn't do it.
That is what our media has turned into now.
Every single news agency out there has gotten it wrong.
But let me show you how hard this investigation is.
Can I, Jeffrey?
Because I'm really tired of people saying that, no, they've been studied.
They had placebo tests.
Okay, really?
All right, can we get my computer?
Can you make my computer live here?
For everyone reporting out there, I'm just going to show you, you know, what I'd really love to see, okay?
Now, just go to Google.
Yes, I use Google.
I know some of my people are really upset about that.
FDA licensed vaccines.
Just, there it is.
The FDA licensed vaccines.
It's the first thing that comes up.
All right, let's click on that.
Vaccines licensed for use in the United States.
They're all there.
Oh my God, that was so easy.
They're all there.
Now, let me grab my glasses here.
They're all there.
Let's go down to hepatitis B vaccine.
This is one of my favorite stories.
There's two of them, obviously.
And right there you can see the package insert.
So this is what you should have been shown if you had informed consent.
This is what the doctor never hands you.
And frankly, I hear if you do ask for it, then they kick you out of their practice for wanting information.
But now on all of these, just go down to 6.1, the clinical trial experience.
This is what they used to approve this for safety.
Can you all read with me?
In three clinical studies of this hepatitis B vaccine...
434 doses of Recombevax HB were administered to 147 healthy infants and children up to 10 years of age.
I wonder how many of them were infants.
Remember, this is given to day one old babies in America, and they call it CPS if you don't give it, up to 10 years of age.
So 147 kids who were monitored for five days.
And there's no placebo group.
So anything that happened in that five days...
Who knows?
I mean, you just say, well, that was a natural occurrence.
And there's a whole list of side effects I'm not going to get into that they did see.
I'm just asking you.
New York Times, Washington Post, all of you, CNN, is a five-day safety review of 147 children between 0 and 10 years old adequate to mandate a vaccine on every child born in America on their first day of life.
I mean, if it is, then we don't come from the same plant.
Then let's just do it for all of it.
Cancer drug, every cancer drug, all I need is a five-day safety trial.
Any lupus drug, a five-day safety trial.
Any eczema or any of the things that we see this long, just why even bother showing the side effects?
You won't have any side effects as long as you only do the study for five days.
And by the way, you can go to that page and read every single vaccine.
And if you can find a placebo trial, call me.
I'll stop making this statement.
You won't.
They don't exist.
So this is what we're asking for.
Aaron's series right around the corner.
We'll get into it.
But let's finish up with you, Jeffrey.
I just had to make that point because journalism really just should not be that hard.
Absolutely.
And here's one of the biggest stories came and went last week.
And I didn't see, I saw a handful of people report on this thing.
And this was the re-upping of the PREP Act.
This is the Emergency Declaration for COVID. We're still under a COVID emergency, says the Secretary of HHS, Javier Becerra.
And this is the 12th time it's been renewed.
Here's the headline here.
And how long did they renew it for?
Till 2029. And we go to the actual press release, and you can see here it's the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.
And you go into here, it says, I, this is Javier Becerra, Secretary of HHS, I have determined there's a credible risk that COVID-19 may in the future constitute such an emergency and thus amending the declaration to prepare for and mitigate that risk.
So what's interesting here is, I don't know.
Can we just be seen for a second?
Why is preparing for a risk indemnifying the product maker?
I mean, especially this far down.
We're not rushing it anymore.
We're not rushing it out in two weeks and saying, well, we know that the manufacturer would have taken more time.
We're like years into this.
Why is it this product needs to be protected from liability?
They made $100 billion!
If vaccine injury is really one in a million, which we're proving beyond a shadow of a doubt right now today that that's crazy, that that's obviously not true, but here's the point.
If it really was one in a million, don't you think they could afford that once in a rare lawsuit?
Why is it they need indemnity?
Why is it they don't do it for drugs?
They don't do it for anything else in this world.
Explain to me why this product should not be allowed to be sued and especially should hold on to not being able to be sued all the way through Robert Kennedy Jr.'s tenure at HHS. Absolutely.
And that's where the bigger story is.
Five years, 2029, not the usual four years.
So it leapfrogs Trump, possibly Kennedy if he's appointed.
It leapfrogs all of them.
Scoundrels, liars, thieves, murderers.
God, you guys are awful.
It does covered countermeasures in covered persons.
So this is what's in here.
So covered countermeasures.
So it's indemnifying and protecting remdesivir, Paxlovid, ventilators.
And of course, it has the countermeasures injury compensation program.
This is this administrative program where people have to kind of beg and plead It's extremely stingy.
It has nothing to do with the vaccine injury compensation program, which is somewhat of a legal process still compared to this.
But what it also does is under covered persons, you can go in there and read that yourself.
It adds pharmacists and pharmacy interns on there for administration of vaccines.
Over the last couple of years, about 17 bills at the state level have been trying to add pharmacists and pharmacy interns to be able to inject CDC's entire schedule and children to adults at pharmacies.
And, you know, there have been debates at state levels back and forth, as there should be.
This bill has come in.
Javier Becerra basically with a swipe of a pen said, you know what, pharmacists, pharmacy interns Can inject the COVID vaccine because there's an emergency and just go ahead and inject all the other vaccines ACIP recommends too.
We'll give you liability protection for that too.
So it's created an industry for pharmacists now, a brand new money-making industry.
Why would they possibly do that?
Well, it could be because of headlines that look like this.
Why Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid are closing thousands of drug stores across America.
The current pharmacy model is not sustainable.
It's quoted in there.
Almost 2,000 of these stores are declaring bankruptcy or are closing.
Rite Aid has declared bankruptcy.
So it basically buoyed an entire industry that was about to go under.
Let me be clear.
I'm going to state it right now, which is something I'm about to do in a minute, just to talk about how often we get things right before everyone else did.
Let me say that we will be reading a headline, probably a year or two out, based on the back of this, saying that pediatricians are shutting down, they have no business, they cannot survive, because you basically just took away the only thing that they do.
I mean, if the drugstore is going to handle it, then our poor pediatricians have nothing left to do.
So, pack up your bags, you guys.
You're not needed anymore.
We're just going to let the drugstore handle it.
You're 100% right.
And a lot of the heat comes down to here, the vaccine liability.
So this COVID vaccine is protected.
And why was this PrEP Act created?
It was created in 2005, signed into law by George W. Bush.
And if we can go into this PrEP Act, and you can actually see if we get in there, why was it created?
where we look at subsection two to encourage individuals to consent to basically covered countermeasures in a time of an emergency.
But part three, it says to provide individuals seeking compensation for damages related to the administration of a countermeasure with a non-adversarial administrative process for obtaining adequate and just compensation.
Well, that's kind of a joke and And in fact, they knew it was a joke at that time.
And the late Senator Edward Kennedy Put forth his own version a year after this, after it passed, and it was S2291. And he tried to get a real compensation program for these emergency countermeasures like vaccines that was modeled after the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund.
In his bill, it provided the government a right to sue vaccine manufacturers to get the recover payments made by this program because he was scared that this was going to turn into a black hole Where people will never be seen again.
They'll never get compensation.
They'll have to deal with these injuries.
Well, here we are today.
Here's Reuters, a black hole for COVID vaccine injury claims.
And that's where we're at with this countermeasures injury compensation program.
You get the COVID shot.
You get a problem with that.
You have some type of injury or illness, or you have to go through this program.
You have one year to file after injection.
Most people don't even know there was an issue.
Their doctors don't even know.
And we look at how many people have been paid out here.
Over almost 14,000 claims have been filed.
Only 20 people have been compensated.
We look at this chart here.
We can go down and it's basically just medical bills, not pain and suffering.
You're just being reimbursed for medical bills.
But you see something there.
There's a really big number.
370,376.
What is that?
Well, if you go into the framework...
$370 million, right?
Yeah, okay.
Got it.
Yep.
Yeah, yeah.
You go into the framework...
Oh, $370,000.
I'm bad.
Okay, my $370,000.
Okay, yep.
Yeah.
For the COVID compensation, they created a framework for this, and they gave out the payouts, the capping of awards, they call it.
And so you get $50,000 per year for lost employment.
But look at this, $370,376.
For the maximum death benefit.
Well, the only place I saw this reported was one substack.
This was Wayne Rohde.
CICP did pay out its first death benefit from a COVID vaccine.
Did you see that in the mainstream news?
New York Times?
No, did not.
Did not.
Keep hearing no signal.
Nobody dies.
Perfectly safe.
This is misinformation.
Safe and effective.
Well, the effectiveness is questioned.
The safety, they can't say that the vaccine has never caused mortality at this point because it looks like the program has just paid out a death benefit and no one has reported on that.
And this is exactly why that ICANN has put two lawsuits now together trying to get this countermeasures injury compensation program basically ended and get these petitions, these people looking for help, seeking damages, seeking a compensation into a better program where it's actually seeking a compensation into a better program where it's actually constitutional, where they have the right to sue and they have a legal process.
And so this is what, if Kennedy gets appointed, this is what he'll be able to, he can change any part of this prep act.
He can cancel the whole PREP Act.
He can pick and choose what he wants to do.
And this is what the headlines are showing.
RFK Jr. Pick Raises Hope for Vaccine Injury Program Overhaul.
It says in here, Representative Lloyd Doggett has introduced legislation, HR 5142, to hire more special masters and move pending COVID-19 vaccine claims into the VICP. He said he received mostly no help from the Biden administration and lawmakers, afraid to stir up vaccine skeptics stood in the way.
So no help is being had by your elected representative.
So there is another avenue here.
Whoever leads HHS moving forward, they can change this.
They have the ability to change this.
Amazing, Jeffrey.
I mean, all of it is so shocking.
You finally have a placebo group.
You finally have the first vaccine really being pulled because of it.
God knows where we'd be had we been doing proper science like that all along.
You have a COVID vaccine being pushed by the CDC and the head of the current CDC head.
When we now know that increases your risk of catching the infection, which means it increases your risk of myocarditis, which we saw of those being paid out, the heart swelling, anyone that tries to challenge that, let's remember that what swells your heart in the virus is the spike protein.
That's what you're injecting into your body with the vaccine.
Only a version that doesn't die, doesn't die in a couple of days like the original version.
It lasts for more than four months, as many of the studies have shown.
So it just keeps circulating your body, your cells keep making it and how that's OK and how you can imagine death is a shock.
Death's got to be rare, really, in a product that's known to cause heart swelling.
All of this.
We could go on all day, Jeffrey.
I've got to try and tighten this show up.
So I want to move on to the fact that we were working on a series with you, Jeffrey Jackson Investigates.
It's a documentary series.
We were going to launch it brand new in January on High Wire Plus, which is our gift back to the people that donate and make our work possible.
But your first episode was on polio.
And since it's all in the news and it's about what I'm about to talk to Aaron about, let's just take a look at the preview trailer for your first episode, which we are going to release tonight.
Take a look at this.
Polio is a highly, highly effective vaccine.
An historic victory over a dread disease.
You meet people today in their 80s who were limping from childhood polio.
It's good that we don't have that, and vaccines played a major role in that.
I'm grateful that we have the opportunity to have a polio vaccine, but I also want the truth.
We're doing a deeper dive into the historic story of polio.
Polio is a virus.
It's something that's always been in human intestines.
No matter how remote you go out into the countryside or to remote Indian villages, it's been there not causing any disease at all.
What was this childhood disease?
Where did it come from?
And how can it be treated?
Rockefeller Labs was studying polio.
There's documented gain of function that was going on at Rockefeller Labs.
At this point, we have the rise of the chemist class.
They figured out a new pesticide called lead arsenic.
They're spraying everything with DDT. There was zero concern at the time for toxicity.
What we thought was polio sounds like it was actually an environmental toxin.
Parents lived in fear of polio's sudden attack.
Thousands upon thousands of children and adults fell prey to the crippler.
Would you say this disease had the best PR campaign to date of any disease known a man?
Mass media never existed before this disease reached its peak.
And there would be the March of Dimes.
Give every dime and dollar that you can spare to the 1954 March of Dimes.
The entire nation was mobilized against polio.
The medical system has this great invention and it's an iron lung.
There's that picture that you see with all the iron lungs in the gymnasium.
That was actually a movie set.
They now start looking for a vaccine.
It was so daunting creating a vaccine for a virus they couldn't even see.
There was something called the Cutter Incident.
They weren't careful about their manufacturing standards.
They weren't careful about the testing.
The fact that they were making vaccines with monkey kidney cells, they discovered the presence of SV40, which is a mutation that can cause cancers in animals and humans.
Polio was caused by both the injected and the oral polio vaccine.
And if you think that they stopped polio, you should realize that the total cases from the year 2000 to 2017 of acute flaccid paralysis in India is 653,000.
Polio will exist, whether we like it or not, forever.
Failed regulatory oversight, contaminated vaccines, causing massive harm and even death.
Imagine if the American people were told the truth.
Would we have had better regulatory guardrails going into the COVID response?
Everybody will say, well, what about polio?
And even parents that don't want to vaccinate their kids.
The one vaccine they gave, polio.
So, let's talk about polio.
You know, Jeffrey, I called you just the other day after watching this down and giving you final, final notes and I just said, this is a tour de force.
It is, you know, this is information that, you know, you get pieces of it, and you heard pieces, and we've all read different books that have been investigating this.
But to see it all put together the way you and the team have is absolutely mind-blowing.
This is going to be, I believe, the most mind-blowing documentary anyone is going to see, certainly this year and really of all times because this story is so pervasive in the media and it so lacks all the same evidence of all the rest of the reporting.
You know, it's not that, and I don't feel like the story is saying don't vaccinate.
What it's saying is just know what it is you're being told you should be afraid of and what this real story is.
How has it been working on this series?
Well, this is, as you know, a couple of years in the making, this entire series.
Obviously, polio is the founding myth of modern medicine, as it's put in that documentary.
And all eyes have been on the public spotlight on vaccination after COVID, after the COVID response.
And watching this, so many people, including myself, went, This is a very similar thing that happened during the polio response.
Although we didn't have social media at the time, we didn't have an activated public ready to report on these things.
It kind of just got folded into the pages of history.
So, I mean, I've been burning the candle at both ends trying to create this and get it done.
And this is my investigative lifeblood that went into this, along with our team and our amazing guests.
It's time for these stories to be told, and I wanted to create the best one-stop shop for the polio story.
There's a lot of great books out there, and I tried to incorporate some of the authors, some of the, you guys, Suzanne Humphries, Forrest Moretti, but we also go into the future series.
We have a series on Mental health.
We go into the deep dive of the mental health crisis.
We do everything from SSRIs and the homicide and suicide that's associated with those to ancestral plant medicines.
We do the whole spectrum.
We talk about the vaccine injury compensation.
We talked about a little of that today.
And even the food industry, the entire genesis of when people say now, why are there red dyes in food?
Why is there high fructose corn syrup?
We go into the entire history and reasoning why that was created, who did it, and how it can be changed.
I'm hoping these start national conversations.
That was my aim, not just for some entertainment, but to actually change a paradigm.
Well, it's incredible, Jeffrey.
I'm so excited for you.
I hope this doesn't make you so big that you decide to leave this spot right here.
I need you, Jeffrey.
Everyone, make sure you don't miss it.
Tonight, the premiere, everyone's going to be talking about it.
You just have to become a recurring donor for a minimum of $5 a month, which is less than any of the other subscriptions you have on your television.
Only this one is to be told the truth.
Jeffrey, Keep up the great work.
Really incredible reporting, as always.
▲
Export Selection