DR. KATHERINE HORTON - Assassination Attempts on President Trump - Who Dunnit & How
|
Time
Text
Thanks everybody for sticking around.
We have Catherine Horton here, Dr. Catherine Horton here tonight.
And she is our second to final guest this evening at False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2024. We're so happy to have her here.
As you saw previously, she is married to William Binney.
And they had quite a day-to-day going on earlier today, but Catherine's got much more interesting information to give you, and she's going to tell you a sordid story.
So get ready for that, and I'll be back at the end.
So, hello and welcome everybody.
Can everybody see me?
I only see Laureen at the moment.
But anyway, I hope you guys can hear me okay.
And I would like to tell you the story of what exactly happened.
So, I am late for this presentation tonight.
I was scheduled to appear at 8 p.m.
Central Time, which is 9 p.m.
Eastern, And we had a power cut at exactly 8pm or very, very shortly after 8pm, which is the time you would think my talk was on if you missed the little note at the top of the website that said all times are in central time.
Now, the reason why I bring this up is because my whole presentation is about evidence to prove that the FBI tried to kill Trump.
And Bill and I always have this discussion.
He always says, don't forget to say CIA, NSA, they're also involved.
And yes, we have evidence of that too.
But I will just shorthand it.
Anything that's domestic, I will call it FBI. And in your mind, you have to just understand that behind the scenes, the FBI, CIA, and NSA are completely fused.
It's like having different branch offices of the same organization.
In fact, if you really investigate Secret Service criminality, you will find out That British intelligence, the entire five so-called Five Eyes are fused behind the scenes.
So the Five Eyes are US, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand.
All their intelligence agencies are really one corporation.
They pass the ball to each other.
If they want to surveil somebody digitally and it's not allowed by one country's rules, they ask the other cooperation partner to do it for them.
So Australia would spy on Americans if it has to be covered up and vice versa.
This is all very well known.
So basically, going forward, all domestic intelligence shitfuckery within the boundaries of the United States, I will refer to as the FBI, is involved, even though there's evidence that CIA was involved and NSA as well.
So this is just a shorthand so that I don't keep saying three acronyms every single time.
But my presentation today is about the evidence that U.S. intelligence was involved.
And the signatures, they always have coded signatures in their little false flag operations and so on.
And the coded signatures are Masonic symbolism, but also related to the owners of the Freemasons, which is a structure called the Crown, or otherwise known as the Crown Corporation.
I'll get into that.
But anyway, so my whole presentation today is about Evidence that the FBI, CI and NSA, were involved in the assassination attempts against Trump.
And the evidence is kind of, in my view, in Bill's view, I've run it past two police officers we know who are the two highest ranking police officers here in this town.
The evidence is kind of so important that it really should be looked at by investigators.
I am actually not really comfortable presenting it because I really think it should be part of an investigation.
But I have tried getting it to Trump several times.
I've tried to get it to the Secret Service several times.
And I even went to Mar-a-Lago personally and I appeared there Monday at just before 10.00.
Trying to hand evidence into the Secret Service and I was actually blocked and I'll talk about that.
So I was attacked on the road and I'll get into all that but it's really my conclusion is that the intelligence agencies are so in a mode of all out we don't give a shit if people know anymore type of sabotage That they have gone properly bonkers.
So I have the receipts for the sabotage.
I have video recordings of this power cut, our streetlights being out and everything.
But the power cut started pretty much at the time my talk was announced to start, if you missed the time zone, and it just ended very recently.
So they really tried to wipe out my entire presentation today.
Given the topic, it's almost not even surprising, right?
I guess if they hadn't tried, their superiors would be annoyed with them.
But anyway, so let's get started.
I want to back up a bit because what I would like to present today is the following.
I would like to present evidence that at the Butler assassination attempt, there were five people who all had foreknowledge.
That's what I'm trying to prove to you.
Five people who had foreknowledge of a shooting happening and a shooting of Trump.
Now, Two people ducked before everybody else.
They ducked too early.
That one woman was found actually by the CEO of Twitter.
What's his name?
Matt Wallace.
I'm going to show you his Twitter link.
He found that, not me.
She filmed the whole thing.
She was wearing a black hat, so black hat reference, right?
There were other people who had acted in a way that made them kind of necessary co-conspirators to the whole thing, to pull it off.
If you run the whole analysis under the assumption the intelligence agencies did it, certain things are necessary conditions to pull off an operation of that size and You expect those actors.
And yes, indeed, they were there.
So it's really about those assassination attempts.
I would like to present stuff about the subsequent assassination attempts, one or two, depending on if you count the one in wherever it was out in California.
The third one is an actual full attempt.
But every single one of those has details that prove that the intelligence agencies are involved.
And when you know how to read this evidence and you have looked at Secret Service criminality for a long time, it is clear as day.
It is clear as day that this is happening.
But anyway, I would like to go through that.
And then at the end, if I have time, I would like to explain to you what really happened when I was trying to get into this.
Because Bill and I were trying to send this evidence to President Trump.
And I have the receipts here as well.
On the 18th of September, we overnighted documents to him, and we didn't know where he was going to be, so we sent one badge to Mar-a-Lago and one to New York.
He was traveling all over the country.
We didn't know where he's going to stay overnight or whatever.
So we sent it, and both of them arrived on the 19th.
But what's interesting is that a few hours after we sent these letters, And they were addressed to Trump and the leader of his protective detail, Secret Service protective detail.
So that's a guy called Sean Curran, according to articles by Susan Crabtree, who reports about the Secret Service.
And we picked that guy in the Secret Service very specifically because We are trying to tell Trump, I mean, it's not, nobody's going to be surprised to hear this, but the Secret Service is in deep capture, okay?
The management actually wanted Trump dead.
Secret Service senior management were 100% involved.
You know the statements about the slopey roof by former Secret Service director Kim Cheetle, which are so ludicrously moronic.
It was painful to watch, really.
But when they start lying, I call it pathological lying.
When you try to claim the Sky is bright pink and everybody can see it's not.
Then it's a level of mental degeneracy and a level of we don't give a capital F anymore.
That just betrays deep, deep institutional capture and the level of psychopathy and degeneracy whereby the leadership of the organization is really far, far gone.
I mean, really, they are ready for the loony bin, right?
But anyway, so at that level, you cannot trust anybody in the top management.
And the question is, how deep does the capture go down?
So in a situation of deep capture, if you just look at the system and run some systems analysis, The best way to proceed is to start where the problem is and try to create almost like an investigative sanctuary.
Start with people of proven integrity, people who you are absolutely certain were not involved in it.
And as far as the Secret Service is concerned, because of all the, you know, strategic, well-timed cock-ups that happened on the day, really the only people you can be absolutely sure were not involved were those four or five people who ran into the line of fire and piled on top of Trump.
Those are the only people you can be absolutely sure to trust.
Now, I have analyzed psychopaths and secret service criminality.
There's a level of psychopaths because they don't have any fear and their brains, they're basically genetically incapable of understanding danger or fear.
They run around thinking they are, you know, gods and they are just indestructible.
Those psychopaths exist, but they are on the crazy end, if you know what I mean.
So they really can run into a line of fire.
Actually, in situations of war, these soldiers like that excel because they will just go in, keep on shooting, bullets are flying by, but they just think, hey, I'm immortal, you know, and continue, right?
So they do exist and there's always a chance of somebody could be that level of psychopath even among those four or five people, but given how absolutely incompetent And moronic, the rest of the Secret Service is.
Even a psychopath of that degree would never trust their colleagues not to fuck up and not to shoot them.
All right?
But it's a serious consideration.
If you want to start off with some people, where do you start?
And this is a serious consideration that, hey, there's some psychopaths who would actually run into flying bullets.
But in this case, man, anybody who had two brain cells to rub together and saw the leadership that has been part of this criminal conspiracy, And after we've seen how bad the shooter was, right, thankfully, I think anybody who is involved in the conspiracy and actually has some brain cells realizes that they are working with absolute idiots and there's a high level of dying.
Also there's, if you're involved, They might just take you out to just, you know, tidy up the loose ends.
But anyway, so we decided the only people he can trust are those four guys piled on and then one woman, the short woman in the front, she was also right in there with them.
So these people are fairly trustworthy.
Out of that, his detail leader, Sean Curran, was the guy in the iconic photograph on the right hand side.
The guy who's itchy, frankly, into the camera.
So we sent it to him.
And the whole idea is that this material should go to the investigative division of Secret Service, which to this day still exists.
I have heard from Dan Bongino that they're wasting their time with doing financial investigations for banks, out of all things.
But hey, it still exists as a unit.
Some congresspeople want to Completely take that out and say, look, it doesn't belong.
I believe there should always be an investigative division, and it should always run their own independent investigation on the FBI. Now, I believe it should remain, it should just become more professional, but anyway, at this moment there still is an investigative division and in the situation of deep capture like the one we're in,
the people who you trust are the ones who have to recommend, if they know anybody, in the investigative division To run the investigation.
And you have to go along chains of trusted contacts.
That's the only way to operate in a situation of deep capture.
In a sense, that's what Trump is doing.
He is appointing loyalists, people who are tried and tested, And he wants to put them into his administration.
Those are the people he nominated.
That is the best and the only thing you can do in a situation of deep capture.
Now, this is what has to be done with this investigation about the assassination attempts.
And another thing that I've learned from Dan Bongino is that there's a memorandum of understanding between the Secret Service and the FBI, which is that the Secret Service does not investigate Assassination attempts or any fuck-ups regarding their protectee.
The question is, why do we have an investigative division at all?
If you don't investigate the times you fuck up, right?
It doesn't make any sense.
It seems so contrived.
Yeah, it's a reason, but if you think about it for longer than two seconds, it's a bullshit reason.
But what I'm saying is, right now, In this particular situation of the assassination attempts against Trump, it is the Secret Service who has to do it because the assassination attempts, as I would like to prove, were committed by the FBI. So you cannot leave it to the FBI to investigate their own assassination attempts.
If you do, which is what they've done, you will get exactly what you got from the FBI, which is more on great lying.
So, lying about who the shooter was, lying about the dead body on the roof, lying about the social media messages of the supposed shooters, lying about the freaking bomb, lying about absolutely everything.
But it's not even sophisticated lying where people of intelligence sat down and thought, okay, how can we get away with it?
It's like the biggest bunch of absolute R star star star, I'm not allowed to say the word in the US, morons, coming up with the first thing that came into their dumb little heads.
So that's the level of investigations that we got from the FBI. And it's frankly Insulting.
I'm particularly incensed.
I'm not an American citizen.
I'm here as a lawful immigrant, one of the few who actually was stupid enough to do the lawful process and pay a lot of money for it.
But I'm not a citizen, but I'm still very, very much invested in Trump succeeding because This deep state and the power of the United States is pretty much destroying Europe.
The tentacles are pretty global, but the US and Europe, they are tied together.
The deep state, here you call it the deep state, it also operates over there and it's using the US's taxpayers' money and most importantly, the US military and the contractors to kill us in Europe.
I have some evidence that several of my family members were murdered by the intelligence agencies using fairly sophisticated means and technology.
That's all part of my court case over there in Europe.
But it's all being fueled by this ginormous colony here in the United States.
This is a colony of the deep state.
So really, in Europe, for us to survive, Trump has to succeed and Trump has to drain the deep state.
In Europe, our little countries cannot possibly compete with the manpower, the finances, the connections, and just the sheer amount of people that this cabal can unleash using the United States, right?
We are literally dying.
We're desperate.
So anyway, what happened when the assassination attempt actually occurred in Butler?
Bill and I got to know about it about, what, 20 minutes later?
We just sat down to have dinner and I said, hey, let's just see if there's any news about Trump.
I love to follow his rallies and so on.
And then we saw the news.
Now, I was so pissed off that I said, you know, you look at it and you do a bit of research, five minutes, and it's pretty clear that the whole thing was just bullshit from start to end.
So I was massively annoyed and I said to Bill, I will not go to bed before I have proof that the intelligence agencies did it.
And thankfully, 12 hours later, at some point at 6am in the morning or just before 8, I finally found the proof and I was tired as shit.
But anyway, the thing is, me with a little refurbished secondhand laptop in 12 hours could come up with this evidence and an entire investigation by the FBI couldn't.
They have access to all the cell phones and everything.
So when you realize just how appallingly piss poor their investigation is compared to what you can do as a private person with just a bit of brain effort and, you know, Some targeted analysis, you realize just how far gone the FBI is.
But anyway, so the bottom line is that I am kind of uncomfortable to present this evidence.
I present it under good faith and because we live in extraordinary times and because I couldn't get the capital F through to the Secret Service to even hand in this evidence.
So, yes, we sent, as I said, an overnight letter on September 18th.
Oh, what I also wanted to say is a few hours later, Trump rally goers reported burning in their eyes and temporary blindness, which is kind of a telltale sign of directed energy weapon attacks.
And because this letter also contains stuff that we wanted to talk to the Secret Service about, to Trump about, it's directed energy weapon attacks, it is neurotechnology weapons, it is covert implants that might also be in the Secret Service agents without their knowledge, yada yada.
It very much felt like a direct targeted attack.
But anyway, let me just share my screen and show you some evidence to really get into this.
Now, I have so many references up here.
Let me find the one.
God, this power cut has really thrown me a curveball.
Anyway, where should I start?
Okay, so first of all, let's go back to the very beginning.
Let me show you the...
Give me one second here.
Here we go.
All right.
So, this is what happened after Bill and I overnighted this contact request, okay?
So just so that I show you proof of everything, I would like to show you all the receipts.
I hope you can see this.
Actually, let me share the sound.
Let me do it one more time.
So this is the proof that rallygoers had these problems.
And if you listen carefully, they had the problems after leaving the rally.
I just would like to play you a few seconds here.
So this is eye pain after, the Trump rally attendees report eye pain after Arizona event, right?
So this was on, YouTube should show the date, yes, September 19th is the report, but the event was on the 18th at night.
So literally just a few hours after we sent this.
Now this is important because the symptoms that are being described are a telltale sign of microwave weapons being beamed in the eyes.
What's also relevant is when I play this, you will hear that the rally attendees all report having these symptoms after leaving, which means they could have been attacked from A microwave weapon hidden in a car or hidden somewhere in the environment, most likely in a car.
They would go back to the parking lot, climb into their car, drive home, not realizing that an FBI gang-stalking car is right in front of them and is beaming them in the eye or beaming the passenger or the driver, whoever.
Now, this is actually a very, very common type of attack in the targeted individual community.
In fact, I mean, I think this doesn't really show the camera, but I've got an entire Disc that was burned into my forehead with a weapon like that in retaliation.
So the first thing that Trump needs to understand is that as he goes about his business, there's an entire swarm of weaponized cars being operated by the FBI who can attack anybody at the moment's notice.
They can, in fact, pull out some cars and track a couple of rally attendees in Arizona without any problem.
I know of targeted individuals in Arizona.
There's a lot of them.
And yes, it is absolutely no problem at all for the FBI to do this.
And the FBI, in our dealings with them, they are obsessed with this tit for tat.
If you do anything, they have to retaliate.
And so it kind of makes sense.
But I would like to play this for you.
So this is now on the Inside Edition.
And listen to this carefully.
It's an alarming medical mystery for Trump rally spectators.
These MAGA faithful were right behind Trump at last week's rally in Tucson.
And now they say their eyes began burning right after the event was over.
It hurt a lot.
Myra Rodriguez was in the high profile front row of the VIP section right behind Trump.
Sorry, I managed to cut it off.
I wanted to pause it.
So the point is, they said right after leaving the rally.
So you didn't have any symptoms in the rally hall and then right after leaving the rally you started having this.
So it's very important when exactly do these victims report about the symptoms because that gives you an indication of where these microwave weapons are hidden.
Now, in principle, they can deploy drones.
There's even visually camouflaged drones.
You can't really see them.
You can't really hear them that much.
Some dogs can hear them, can hear the low frequency of the propellers, but humans, not really.
You have to use a spectrum analyzer to pick up the drone.
The Secret Service might have spectrum analyzers and a drone monitoring thing.
You can stick it in principle on the roof of a car and try to make sure that the drone is not going to gun the motorcade.
Not sure if that's done.
It could be done.
You would need specific experts to continually read this out.
But one thing that the Secret Service needs to be aware of is that I don't know of a single technology that could tell you that there's a microwave weapon or maybe a much more sophisticated directed energy weapon hidden in the car in front of you.
And there are certain types of pulsed energy projectiles that I believe can go through even the bulletproof glass that the beast would have, right?
So really we wanted to get through to Trump and tell him You need to help us find these weaponized cards for your protection, for your family's protection, for your nominee's protection and their families, and also your supporters.
Because the truth is, people are being attacked with these weaponized cards, not just in the thousands or ten thousands, but in the hundreds of thousands.
So these attacks have been reported to the police for decades and 100% of them have been ignored.
So as Trump goes around and he takes these photo shoots with those smiling police officers and all these different police departments around the country, well, when you're a victim and you're trying to report crime, Some of them are real corrupt bastards.
They will hide evidence.
They will deep-six your case.
They will smear you as mentally ill.
Well, the upshot now is that after several decades of this, the FBI is running wild and is beaming anybody for any reason or just for fun.
That's the truth.
So we're trying to get through to Trump and explain this to him because this is something that puts everybody in danger, including his family members.
But also, especially him.
And I don't believe that there's a single technology that could prevent or protect Trump from, for example, pulsed energy projectiles.
There's certain electromagnetic bundles that can shoot through walls, can shoot people dead.
I survived an assassination attempt with one just like that on the 9th of November.
And really, putting these nominees like Tulsi Gabbard and, you know, I like them all.
I like Pete Hexess.
I like Kash Patel.
I like Tulsi Gabbard.
But they are just the very top.
On a cancerous organization that has sprawling front organizations, covert armies.
I also believe that they are using the illegal immigrants, the 15 million plus, to hire them into covert gang-stalking armies that are then operating these weaponized cars.
All right?
And that's from some people who stalked me around and they don't really speak English very well.
Other victims have reported the same.
So what we're dealing with is a covert army that was built up by the deep state and the intelligence agencies that can attack and kill anybody for any reason, burn them, shoot them dead, give them fake heart attacks with directed energy weapons.
Hey, You would think the President should know that, or the Secret Service should know that, yet I couldn't get the F through.
So, that's one.
Now, what happened shortly after these attacks on the rally goers was that next day Trump was going to meet The owner of Gottlieb's Deli in New York City.
And it's a Jewish deli, very popular, very well known.
And the owner surprisingly and mysteriously died that night.
So next day, Trump had to cancel it.
I tried to find out what was wrong with the owner.
There were some reports he might have been in hospital, but every single report of people who were from the community, all the comments that I could find, kind of implied it was really surprising.
So even if you're in hospital, it could be pneumonia, you know, you're in there, you're a bit sick, but The death was so perfectly timed that I am very suspicious of it and I personally believe it might also have been a targeted directed energy weapon killing in retaliation for Bill and me trying to actually hand in this information.
Now this needs to be looked at, one needs to look at the exact way, hospital records if he was in hospital or at home, but what Donald Trump needs to know is that in the targeted individuals community, I have stacks of cases of these deaths that are so highly perfectly timed that You know,
if you put them side by side, you can see a pattern whereby, you know, the fact that they might have been killed with a directed energy weapon is more likely than the alternative hypothesis of all these things having been coincidence.
So, again, directed energy weapons, he needs to know about them.
It's impossible to forensically trace them back to the gun, to the directed energy weapon, gun, whatever you want to call it, so they make the perfect weapon to commit the perfect crime.
Victims have reported this for absolutely decades and nobody did anything and now that's a huge problem.
So that was topic number two.
But anyway, so this is what happened when we're trying to reach out to Donald Trump and according to the tracking code, these letters have been received at Trump Tower and at Mar-a-Lago.
I think at Mar-a-Lago the guy who signed for it was called Andrew.
I have to look at the thing.
But then when we didn't get a reply at all, And Bill is the retired technical director.
He built the stuff that NSA is using.
Edward Snowden's whistleblowing is about the technology he built.
He knows it off by art.
He's a mass genius.
And we're writing to Trump and there's no reply.
So it could be he's busy.
He doesn't care.
He doesn't know who the hell we are.
All fair enough, right?
But after a while, it was a bit strange.
So we tried to contact him again.
And this time I said to Bill, Let's set up a mechanism whereby we can check if they actually got it.
And I suggested we send the letter again overnight, but in that letter we will announce with enough reasonable time, you know, ahead of time, that I will go and hand in this evidence in person at a later point.
Now, if I go and they have absolutely no record of these letters, the FBI got them.
So that's exactly what we did.
It was on the 2nd of December.
I overnighted, this time only to Mar-a-Lago because Trump seems to be hanging out there most of the time.
And I addressed it because Trump seems to be extremely busy.
This time I only addressed it to the Secret Service and Sean Curran by name.
It was received and signed for, according to the UPS tracking code, by Secret Service on the 3rd of December.
So Secret Service officially got it.
It was addressed to Sean Curran, Protective Detail Leader of Donald Trump in Mar-a-Lago.
Now, if you're Sean Curran, you think I'm a complete freaking kook because you haven't met me.
Fair enough, right?
I'm better known in Europe than here.
And the letter says, I'm going to turn up at the South Gate of Mar-a-Lago next week Monday at 10am.
The least you would do is warn your colleagues that next Monday at 10am some Freak, some cook is gonna turn up and would they please fob her off, right?
That would be the bare minimum.
If you actually thought I'm a loon and I might be a threat and all this, you would just like, if you get a freaking heads up from a loon, you would just warn your colleagues, right?
Well, the thing is, when I turned up Monday morning, I was there just, I think, at 9.30.
I even saw the Trump motorcade leave.
I think at 9.36 or 9.38.
And then when I, you know, I proceeded to go to the police checkpoint and I said hi, I said I will be here for meeting to hand in some evidence.
They called Secret Service and Secret Service had absolutely no information about any letters.
Any!
Not the first, not the second.
Right?
So I had a long chat.
So every time I guess it's an incident report because he tried to, you know, hand something into Mar-a-Lago.
I showed them my satchel.
It just had my laptop with evidence and, you know, stuff that I wanted to hand in and give to them.
And I filled out this whole thing, you know, but they had absolutely no knowledge.
Meanwhile, the FBI had stalked me all the way there, sabotaged my car once, then two more times after I went to this checkpoint at Mar-a-Lago, they hired six sports cars to try to run me off the motorway.
People who know me know that I have been covertly implanted by my university.
And I can be tortured by remote control.
Now that technology is in this book, Global Brainship and Mesogens, for those who don't know, by Dr. Hildegard Stanninger.
And in her book, she has scientific measurements of these implants, if you buy the book for 10 bucks.
But you also have actual pictures of these implants removed from American victims.
So this is not conspiracy theory, it's fact.
And I have measurements from a Belgian university about these implants.
So that all happened.
But I mean, just to go through what happened on my way there is just crazy.
I was driving to Mar-a-Lago as I had announced, and I'm pretty sure the FBI intercepted it.
I climb into the car Sunday morning.
I leave Bill here.
We were too scared to fly, to be honest, because a plane went down over Brazil and the word on the street is that it was, you know, full with doctors traveling to a conference to prove that long COVID is due to the shots, right?
So I said to Bill, I think the stuff we want to talk about to Trump and the Secret Service is a bit more damaging than just the COVID shots.
So I said, I'm going to drive.
It's a fairly long journey.
And as soon as I, just before I had to go up on the highway, there's a little country road, so you drive off this fast road and then onto this country lane, then onto a As soon as I turned off this fast road and entered the country road, there was a car that looked like it was waiting for me.
It kind of accelerated when I came.
It overtook me and suddenly it felt like a punch to the teeth.
It really goes like BAM! And I even thought, what the hell was that?
And then I realized, oh, I've been shot in the teeth by a pulsed energy projectile.
So the impact can feel like, you know, somebody just flicking you all the way to somebody punching you all the way to, you know, if it shoots you in the head, you can die from a stroke.
If it shoots you in the heart, you can die from what looks like a heart attack.
So, you know, I got literally punched in the teeth.
Just after leaving my little town before driving onto the motorway.
Then I traveled on.
As soon as I pulled into the first rest area, as I'm rolling into the first rest area, the car starts to make a horrific sound.
The underside sounded like it's, you know, falling apart.
And then when I pulled over and I looked, somebody had detached the underside of the car.
So I think I even have a picture here somewhere.
Let me find that for you.
Yes, here it is.
So this is what my car looked like.
I hope you can see it.
So you even have the date.
This was 14 minutes past 1pm on the 8th of December.
So this entire underside had flopped down and folded in on itself.
Now, I already know this sabotage because once we wanted to go and see a lawyer, that's exactly what was done to our car at that time.
We couldn't repair it that time, so we had to call off the meeting with the lawyer, but it was very targeted sabotage.
So this is what happened.
In the end, I guess what the FBI didn't really expect is that if you're a particle physicist, the field is so underfunded that you always have to be a bit like MacGyver.
So it's like, hey, the particle detector is broken.
We have to fix it.
And the only thing we have is basically Tessa film and the spring from a biro we found on the floor.
That's pretty much how particle physics is.
So in the end, what I did is I found a data transfer cable in my car.
I cut the ends off.
These are the two ends that I cut off.
And then I fixed the car with just a cable.
So that in the end, it looked like this.
Actually, the setup was much better than the manufacturers fixing.
It held up for almost 2,000 miles that I drove all the way there and back.
But the point is that this is the level of sabotage that I just got on the day of trying to get there.
Later on, on the highway, as I think, I'm not sure where exactly in which US state I was, I think I crossed into Florida by that time, but certainly it was already after dark.
I was crowded by concept cars.
I call them concept cars.
They were sports cars, but so fancy, I don't know, make and model.
Never seen cars like that before.
And there were six different ones.
Suddenly they, you know, they catch up with me on the highway.
I was in the fast lane at the time.
And as I'm looking, these cars start crowding around me.
So they're literally, you know, locking me in.
And I looked through the rear view mirror and there was a crappier older Jeep behind me getting closer and closer.
So I have actually experienced that constellation before.
It's not nice.
It's actually preparing to be an assassination attempt and What they do is that they try to crowd you in, to hold you in position, to come close enough from the back to do that maneuver where they touch the back of your car and then yank their steering wheel to the side and, you know, the idea is that you are flying off the highway at that point and hopefully do some flippy spinny and die.
Well, when that constellation was pulling up, and the point with the sports cars is that if you flip a car sideways, the cars on the side that have been holding the victim car in position have to make a very quick getaway not to be involved in the same situation.
Accident.
So for this reason, it's a good idea to have cars that can go very quickly, right?
You know, within a split second.
So you can really get out of the zone.
Anyway, so that was, you know, pulling up.
And the way I got out of it is my background information, the inside of our cars under surveillance.
Bill and I know that because, you know, people have quoted conversations we had in the car.
And I thought, okay, if they pull something off, they would want to monitor my reaction.
So I assumed that they would have direct surveillance and listen to me.
So what I said is, hey, let's race.
And I made a dangerous maneuver pulling between two of these race cars.
And basically, I waited until I could see a truck come up in the distance.
That was very crucial.
And I pretended to race them.
And I really tried to do these maneuvers to pretend like I'm trying to get ahead of them.
And because they're idiots, they actually thought, oh yeah, yeah, she wants to race.
She saw the race cars and they were trying to regain that same formation around me, but further ahead.
So I pretended to press down the accelerator.
They wanted to zoom ahead to lock me back in.
And instead of going forward, I pulled right back in behind the lame duck truck.
As close as I could, and I stuck there in the slow lane just last minute.
But it's kind of dangerous, but if you know the game, you can, you know, pull this off.
And as I said, I could only do it because they've tried that shit with me before in Europe.
So anyway, but it was not nice at all.
It was kind of scary.
You know, you're doing already 70, 74 miles per hour.
And then you have to do these maneuvers.
And looking back, I mean, this wasn't a friendly gesture at all.
Somebody went to the expense of hiring these cars for the day, having a sufficiently crappy Jeep with enough power that you can actually flip the car, but you don't really care about the Jeep and all this.
Imagine the level of planning, the level of money, and the level of just not really giving a rat anymore, even though you know that Trump's going to be inaugurated in a couple of days, right?
Well, a couple of days, a couple of weeks.
So anyway, that was just to get there.
And anyway, after I went to Mar-a-Lago, I made an entire list of all the crap that happened.
Basically, after I went to Mar-a-Lago, the next thing that happened is my pain torture started.
I had to go to Walmart to get myself ice packs.
As I parked my car outside Walmart, they sabotaged my car.
So when I came back, the ABS system didn't work.
Other faults came up.
And suddenly the steering was really hard to turn.
Then I drove home fine.
Everything otherwise was fine.
A car was parked right outside the little house I had on.
I had hired with all the lights on.
This is all going to go into a police report, by the way, so I don't want to bore you with all the evidence here, but it will be in a Palm Beach police report next week.
And then the next morning when I wanted to leave, the speedometer was broken.
So I drove all the way home with the speeds, both the analog and the digital speedometer showing zero.
The night before the speedometer was fine.
So tell me how all this can happen unless the FBI breaks in and gradually sabotages your car.
So car sabotage was the underside, the ABS system, the steering, and then the speedometer.
All these problems come out of nowhere, and you park the car and it's fine, and then when you come back, suddenly there are all these problems.
So it doesn't really make any sense.
Anyway, so it was really intense, but the best thing about this trip to Mar-a-Lago is that the trap really worked.
In the end, the guy who was filling out the Secret Service incident form, He said to me, so explain this thing with the letters again.
And I said, listen, when you think that the FBI might be stealing your post, what can you do?
You can send another letter where you say you will turn up that day And then, if you turn up, and then he said, oh, and they didn't get the letter, and I'm like...
And then he even said, so this was a...
And he stopped, and I'm like, yes, a trap.
This was a trap, okay?
Now, as far as I can make out, the FBI, sure as capital F, got my letters.
The Secret Service seemed to sign for it, according to the tracking code.
Um...
But the Secret Service, really, on the day, or at all, had no idea of several sets of letters arriving.
So this is really something for the Secret Service's Mar-a-Lago, who have some integrity left, and also Donald Trump, because it's his private property, to figure out what actually happened.
I mean, it's fair enough if people think that I'm a kook, I'm not really reliable, and I shouldn't really be listened to.
That's all fine.
But then, what if the FBI did steal them?
Because it would imply that there's a mole working for the FBI at Mar-a-Lago.
After what happened to Trump, I don't have to explain the gravity of that, right?
The FBI, I'm about to present to you, the FBI tried to kill Trump, and there seems to be an FBI mole At Mar-a-Lago in the Secret Service, right?
So maybe Trump would like to know about that.
Maybe Sean Curran would like to know about that.
Only they know, did they get the letters and did they have no time or did they think, ah, you know, whatever nonsense.
I can understand that.
And in fact, I would almost be happier if that was the answer.
But...
Based on everything I've seen, the evidence I have of the car sabotage, of people trying to kill me on the highway, me being tortured so hard by remote control, I couldn't even drive back the next day.
I had to stay overnight in a hotel.
Next day in the morning when I came out, there were people outside the hotel waiting for me, who left exactly when I left, right?
Again, two people who didn't look like they spoke any English.
I would call them FBI gang stalkers.
So all that happened.
It really took a lot of investment.
So the FBI got my letters for sure.
They got it, took it very seriously, seriously enough to hire six concept cars to try to kill me.
And yet the Secret Service has absolutely no clue.
So anyway, this was actually a very, very important exercise.
I hope I, you know, I conveyed the importance and I really hope that Trump and the Secret Service will look into it because what I really want is I want to keep Trump safe until he's inaugurated and, you know, during his presidency because we really, I mean, I like the guy personally.
But also we really need him all around the world, right?
So the biggest, most important thing is his safety.
So I just wanted to tell you guys to put all this into context because this is the back story just from Monday about what happened.
I was at Mar-a-Lago on Monday the 9th at 10 a.m.
as it said in the letter.
I was there exactly, you know.
So...
That happened.
And today, when I want to give my presentation to give all the evidence, right, suddenly there's an entire power cut that wipes out the town exactly at the time when my talk was announced on the schedule.
So anyway, it looks like the FBI is really going berserk.
But now let me show you actual concrete evidence.
So when I talked about how After the Butler assassination attempt happened, I said to Bill, I'm not going to bed until I have conclusive proof.
The one that I found by the next morning, and I should say I spent hours, I never used a gun.
I'm from Europe.
We don't really mess around with guns that much.
We live in very safe countries.
Never even saw a gun up close or touched one.
So I had absolutely nothing.
I had to spend hours listening to gunshots until I could tell the difference between subsonic versus supersonic suppressors and this sort of stuff.
And I was really trying to understand the sound because the sound profile sounded off to me at the assassination attempt.
Now, I don't want to talk too much about the sound profile.
A guy called Chris Martinson, who I respect a lot, he's got very good information about finance.
I know him as a finance guy.
He did an in-depth analysis about the sound profile that I find very good.
As a physicist, I really loved it.
I reproduced some of it.
I have my own analysis like that.
But I don't really want to focus on it because when it comes to the intelligence agencies, I like to put frickin' faces to the crime.
So my focus was, I want to see their fucking face.
And yes, there are also oddities in the sound profile.
So for example, at least for some time, I'm not sure if he went away from this, Chris Martinson believed that he found evidence of two shooters in the sound profile.
This is very important because if you look at cell phone data, I also had the impression there might have been two shooters.
If you look at cell phone data next to the AGR building, so with Trump downstream, you're looking at the AGR building and you're between the shooter on the roof And this second two-story building, all the cell phone data from there, that area, seems to have a different sound profile between the first three shots and the next five.
Those eight shots seem to have come from the shooter slash shooters.
The other stuff were police snipers and that stuff.
But these three plus five are very important.
Now, I understand why Chris Martinson might have reached a conclusion that there might have been two shooters.
I reached the same conclusion and then I realized that with cell phones, because of the way the microphone is, a small angle turning towards the actual source can change the sound profile quite a bit.
I would actually have to go through the FBI's cache of sound profiles from those cell phones to come up with a final conclusive answer.
There's some evidence to indicate that only the first three shots were fired from the guy on the roof, and the next five actually came from a second-floor window, probably the one closest to the shooter, Up there.
If that's the case, the backup shooter, and by the way, the intelligence agencies always build in redundancies into these things.
If one guy fucks up, there's a backup because people fuck up all the time because they're all idiots, right?
But if that's the case, the second shooter, this is extremely important, actually, and people need to do a proper analysis.
The second shooter who fired the set of five would have been the one who shot Corey Comparator.
In other words, the murderer of Cory Comprator might still be out there and it might very well be one of the police snipers if all this holds up, right?
It needs to be looked into and actually there has to be forensic analysis.
I actually personally believe that Trump should have never given the analysis of his own assassination attempt out of his own hands.
He should have collected all the cell phone data himself He still can, if he puts out a call to all the patriots, they will upload their cell phone data.
He can have an independent collection from the FBI or he waits until inauguration day and then he gets the FBI's cash.
But either way, he has to be in control of this, right?
Because the FBI will just string him along.
Now, when you have that data, this is the very first thing that needs to be looked at.
Another thing about those three plus five shots is that the trigger rate, how quickly you pull the trigger.
The first three have a certain rhythm, the next five a completely different rhythm.
The next five have actually twice the trigger rate.
That is consistent with an amateur pulling the first three and a professional sniper who shoots every day, all day, and has done so for years, firing the next five.
So these are all these considerations that still need to be looked at, and there has to be a proper forensic, scientific, high-tech investigation into this.
There must be, because there's a very sizable chance that Cory Comperatore's murderer, and also those are the shots that injured the two people, James Copenhaver and David Dutch, in the bleachers.
Those are all shots that would have been fired by shooter number two, who might actually be a police sniper.
So, important stuff.
But as I said, that is for...
If the Secret Service or Trump's people ever listen to this talk, this is what they have to pay attention to.
That is super important, but I'm not going to talk about it today because I cannot...
You know, conclusively pin it down.
I just want to talk about a few things where I can pin it down actually with very high certainty.
So I'm trying to go through it at a very quick pace here.
But let me show you evidence number one.
That's the one that I found, which finally allowed me to go to sleep after 12 hours of researching this.
Let me show you.
This is the...
Here we go.
Ah, here it is.
Sorry.
After the power cut, my entire laptop just reset and I have to reload it.
Okay, so let me share my screen and let me blow it up here.
And I want to show you the Washington...
Sorry, the...
Sorry.
The Wall Street Journal.
The Wall Street Journal's video.
It's called How Donald Trump's Attempted Assassination Unfolded.
I will actually...
I'll show you the URL in the screen so you can look it up yourself.
So this is the YouTube video.
This is the one that finally had the smoking gun evidence that I was looking for.
And I should also say that I found it because I was looking for it, okay?
So when I said to Bill, I'm not going to bed until I find evidence, The way I looked for evidence that the intelligence agencies did it is by factoring in how they go about doing it.
If they pull off anything like a false flag operation, you know, an assassination attempt like that, They have the main actors and then they have an entire cloud of people watching, backup, you know, doing all sorts of maintenance jobs.
So when the intelligence agencies do anything, it's like when you find cockroaches in your house, if you find one, there are at least like a hundred around you.
The same with the intelligence agencies.
If you spot one intel agent, there's at least a dozen, if not dozens, maybe a hundred around you, depending on where you are.
Now, that was pretty much the case on January 6th, right?
The FBI had so many infiltrators.
I think now they admitted to 26. That's bullshit.
I have more gang stalkers following me around on the average day.
So they had so many infiltrators.
Infiltrators at January 6th, the FBI had to do an internal audit to find out who was who.
Right?
You don't have to do that when you only have 26. Now, at the Butler assassination attempt, I already operated under this thing.
The whole thing is so ridiculous.
Yes, the intelligence agencies did it.
So, let's look for these minions.
Now, these minions, I mean, you saw the main shooter they all relied on, right?
He couldn't even...
I mean, thank goodness!
He couldn't shoot at this short distance.
But my goodness, right?
What an idiot!
Now, it's just downhill from the main shooter.
He was the main actor.
So imagine what a bunch of absolute, you know...
Complete morons the FBI is operating with when it's downhill from the main guy who has to pull it off, right?
So what I did is I was looking for traces of those minions being so freaking dumb that they give the game away.
And thankfully I found them after 12 hours.
So I found this in this video.
And what you will see, and I'm going to just tell you, you know, up front, is you will see two people who are ducking before anybody else, right?
Now, when you are ducking, And it's actually at the speed where the human brain doesn't even have time to process what happened.
You just hear a sound.
Everybody who wasn't in on it didn't know.
Oh, everybody said, oh, we thought it's firecrackers, right?
At first, your brain has to identify the sound.
It has to identify that actually heard the sound.
Right?
Then it has to think, what sound is it?
Then it has to...
To the brain, it has to occur that, oh, it might be a shot.
Then you have to have time to get scared.
And then you duck.
Right?
That's a normal process.
And in the crowd, you will see how many seconds it took everybody to do that.
Now, the other thing you need to know about that part of Pennsylvania is that it's hunting country.
So, a lot of people in the crowd are hunters.
They are used to shots being fired, hearing shots, and still...
The majority of the crowd took just a certain number of seconds to react to it.
There's also a lot of veterans, some from active war zones.
They have been shot at endless number of times.
They have just like muscle memory to duck, right?
To save their lives.
And yet, even they didn't react as quickly as these women.
In the crowd that I found.
So in other words, it is direct smoking gun beyond a doubt proof that these women knew that shots, shots would be fired.
They knew that it's something to duck from.
Alright, so keep that in mind when you watch this video.
Do you guys see it when it's on the large screen?
Because I have to make it as big as possible.
So, what I would like to show you is over here, as I'm playing the video...
It looks fine, Catherine.
Actually, did I share with sound?
Let me just share it one more time, okay?
Let me just stop the share and do it properly because then you can also hear the text.
So here we go, right?
Now, sorry, let me do this one more time.
Let me do it one more time.
Share sound.
Okay, so watch this, all right?
Now, what I would like you to focus on is these two women.
They're very hard to see.
You will see this woman over here.
I hope you can see my cursor more clearly when she starts moving.
This is a blonde woman, and in front of her is a brunette woman.
What you will see is that this blonde woman is going to duck, and then she's going to extend her arm and pull down this woman here.
I'm going to show you in real life, in real speed, that's the The way I picked it up.
And then I'm going to show you slowed down so that you can actually see what happened.
So let's just play.
While Trump speaks, the Secret Service snipers are still facing the gunman's direction.
We then see an agent on the north roof pick his head up just before shots ring out at 6.15.
Secret Service agents rush to pull Trump to the ground.
I hope you saw that.
It went very quickly.
Let me just back up a bit.
And then let me just now dial down the speed so that you can actually consciously see it.
Quality playback speed.
Okay, let's go as slow as it gets, okay?
Now, I'm going to turn it to mute because it's very annoying to listen to, but look at this blonde woman here and look at how quickly she reacts compared to Trump.
She goes down before Trump's hand even reaches his ear.
If you slow it down, you'll see.
As soon as she hears the gunshot, she is down.
And it's not just like, oh shit, I dropped my iPhone.
Let's pick it up.
No, she goes down and she's gone.
Then you see her arm and she pulls down the woman in front of her, which, you know, as a result, I assume is her colleague.
So look at this.
Watch.
Where's the cursor?
I lost my cursor.
Yeah, watch this woman here.
It's still playing.
It's just that slow.
Um.
An agent on the north roof.
Pick his head up just before shots ring out at 6.15.
Okay, keep it down before everybody else and jump.
Listen to the air.
After that.
Did you see that?
By the time the second shot rings out, the second woman is down.
I'm gonna play it again, and this time I will not be as annoying.
I'll let you just listen to it 6.15 Now when you have these intelligence agents and you run these investigations at no point will the culprit literally wear a jumper with yellow FBI written on it
I wish it were that easy.
So you have to turn on your brain cells and you have to think, but you can factor in laws of physics, you can factor in laws of biology, laws of cognition, and this It's smoking gun evidence, and it has vast repercussions, okay?
Like, it has so many consequences from this even existing.
So it directly means that there were two infiltrators.
I will call them FBI infiltrators, and Bill will say, yeah, it could be CIA too.
Yes.
But when the intel agencies pull off something like that, as I said, you know, British intelligence is already fused.
They would use people who have local experience.
So you would use local people.
They would use FBI people.
So these people are very likely FBI. But what those two people are is that they have a monitoring function.
They were there to make sure that everything went according to plan, right?
They might have had a function to signal to people to watch certain things being put in order, maybe warn others if those things didn't happen and so on.
But they were in the crowd and they knew that shots would be fired and they ducked before everybody else.
They ducked so fast that Trump who actually felt the pain and had an instinctive reaction couldn't touch his ear as fast as these women went down.
Knowing that shots would be fired is not even sufficient to pull this off.
You need to know when exactly shots were fired, because if you just sit there for 10-15 minutes, it again becomes very difficult to react like that.
What happens is that the mind wanders, you start thinking about your shopping list or whatever, what you're going to do that afternoon, and then suddenly an event takes you by surprise.
So the fact that these women reacted this fast also implies that they had some sort of signal to know when exactly the shots would be fired, right?
Now, there's a second woman, sorry, the third woman.
These were two women here.
There's a third woman in the crowd who also was highly timed.
She showed absolutely no reaction, no surprise on her face that actually shots were heard.
Hang on, let me just bring that up.
It's this one here.
This one was found, let me show you, by...
Give me one second.
Sorry, this power cut really swatted me sideways.
So it was found by Matt Wallace and I can show you his Twitter post or ex-post.
It's at MattWallace888 and I think he's the CEO of Twitter if you actually look at it.
So I am referring to this particular tweet of his.
All right, and I'll show you the video.
So Matt Wallace at MattWallace888 and he says, pay close attention to the woman in the black hat.
Now I downloaded that video for you and I would like to play it.
So this is the video, just a moment.
Okay, so let me share my screen.
This is, again, smoking gun evidence.
Now, this shows another aspect of a Secret Service operation like that, which is just ruthless psychopathy, really.
So, let me share with sound.
Okay, now, this is the video he uploaded.
He is basically filming his TV at home.
It was a Fox News broadcast that had the perfect angle to see this woman, and now look at what she does.
Oops.
Hang on.
How do I press play when, uh...
Hang on.
The zoom controls are basically blocking me from playing this.
Let's see.
Does this work with a spacebar?
No.
Watch this shit, dude.
Watch.
Watch.
She sits down.
Yep.
Watch this.
Puts the sign up.
She's completely normal.
And then watch.
What the fuck?
What the fuck?
People are freaking out.
And she's filming.
And she's just like, right there.
She's not even freaking the fuck out.
What the fuck?
Yeah?
That's what everybody should be asking.
What the fuck?
But there's more than that, that Matt Wallace is not pointing out.
There were two more, I mean, three more things.
Number one, she's wearing a black hat.
Black hat operative, right?
People in the intel agencies, people in IT will recognize the reference.
So she is marked with a black hat.
Could be coincidental.
But then also what's not coincidental is kind of, again, encoded in the physiology and the cognitive reaction is that you will see it's not even a micro expression.
It's a macro expression of glee.
She smiles just before, you know, she goes down to To get her phone and start filming, you will see a smile and you can see it.
She's fairly thin, but you can see her cheek.
So if you smile, your cheek goes up here and you will see that.
So watch that and then just think, is this likely to happen like that?
If these shots were completely unexpected, could you, even if you're a psychopath, go like, oh yeah, let's film this.
No, you couldn't because you would think, hey, holy shit, were those shots?
Were they shooting the president?
Is he dead?
A lot of questions would go through your mind unless you know exactly what's going to happen and you're very keen to just basically film Trump die.
All right?
So...
Just look for the smile.
And the other thing is, look for the nod.
She does an emphatic nod into the camera so she knows she's on camera.
Or she's signaling somebody along the same beamline so there's some sort of communication.
And then this happens.
So let's just watch this again.
No.
Watch this shit, dude.
Watch.
Watch.
She sits down.
Yep.
Watch this.
Puts the sign up.
She's completely normal.
And then watch.
What the fuck?
What the fuck?
People are freaking out.
And she's just like, right there.
She's not even freaking the fuck out.
What the fuck?
Okay, that's Matt Wallace narrating it, right?
And that's a very, very good question, but also the important thing is that she was nodding just a second before the shots were fired, and it was almost like, you're good to go, kid.
It was almost like that signal, right?
So, it could be.
Online, people were trying to find out who she is.
Some people suggested she was the assistant director of the FBI. The assistant director of FBI, the looks of that woman kind of matches this one.
I cannot comment.
With a baseball cap and sunglasses, I don't know the assistant director of all enough.
I am not going to comment on this.
I'm just going to put this out as smoking and evidence that I, too, based on this footage, believe that this woman was in on it.
The two women who ducked in the crowd, they can be found, they can be identified.
There's higher resolution image of the crowd.
I think Tucker Carlson even has better footage.
You can get a very clear picture of the faces and the FBI and actually the Secret Service also could find them.
So the two women who ducked can be found, this woman can be found, and people can identify who they are.
Now, the one thing I really want to get onto, right?
So these, we already have three people with foreknowledge.
I want to put in a quick one, which is really, you know, I really want to get onto something else, which is how the first two women and this woman knew so precisely when exactly shots would be fired, right?
But before I get to it, I would like to present to you a fourth person, Who also knew that shots would be fired or a very high-speed event would happen and set his camera to record that event and that person is the journalist who recorded that famous photograph with the, what you want to call it, the bullet trace.
It's this one here.
So this is now the New York Times article And what you need to realize about this...
By the way, as a physicist, I've got some questions about this image.
First of all, where's the bullet?
Is the bullet this little gray thing here at the front?
Because this is a cavitation track and it's created by the bullet.
So there's no instance As far as I can make out, where the cavitation track can leave the bullet.
If you see, for example, supersonic jets flying, the cavitation cloud is attached to the back of the jet.
If it accelerates, maybe there's a way to actually leave it, but the bullet doesn't accelerate.
So The cavitation track should end at the back of the bullet.
Now, is the bullet here inside the cavitation track?
Is it at the very end?
I don't know what the bullet for this weapon would actually look like.
It's important because if there's no bullet, then there should be one.
It means that this image is fake and somebody just made it up for the drama, which would almost exonerate the photographer.
I mean, he would have committed fraud, but it would exonerate him from the more serious charge of being a co-conspirator to having tried to murder...
Trump.
And as a result, having, I don't know what, manslaughtered or also killed, right?
Cory Comprato and injured two others, and he's a co-conspirator to that.
I don't know.
If I had the choice, I would rather be found guilty of having forged this image.
But it's an important question.
So first of all, in the original picture, can you actually see the bullets?
Can a bullet leave the cavitation track?
I don't think so.
As a physicist, I would like to know the answer.
But let's assume this is a true image.
To record an image like that, you must set your camera to, I think, 8000 frames per second or something ludicrous.
The YouTuber Viva Fry did an interview with a war photographer, somebody who just, you know, records war scenes and has been to all the theaters of war as a photographer.
And that guy knows all about photography and also does high speed photography.
And he said this setting To record something like that would be only a setting you would use if you want to, for example, do a little video showing a hummingbird's wing flaps or something, or a bumblebee's wing flaps.
It's such a ludicrously high frame rate.
It's not practical for normal photography.
So my question is, how did this photographer know to set his camera To this setting at this very moment.
As I understand it, if you press, you know, record, you take 8,000 pictures basically per second, right?
Every time you snap, you have like a couple of hundred or several thousand.
You wouldn't go around the valley of recording images like that.
So I want to know, is this real?
And if it is real, how did the photographer who recorded this know at that moment to change his setting to this?
What I'm trying to get at is that all these people Had not just knowledge that a high-speed event or an actual, you know, shots being fired would happen, but they also had very careful knowledge of when exactly it was going to happen in the rally, throughout the rally.
So as an investigator, it led me to think, okay, there must have been some sort of sign.
And I realize I run over time.
I just want to present something very, very quickly here.
Three more things.
Please indulge me, Johan, because it's very important.
So I was looking for the sign that could have actually coordinated all this.
And unfortunately, my laptop got hacked and I just realized the FBI deleted the actual evidence videos.
But the only thing that I could find that would even remotely qualify as a sign that could be seen by both the shooters and the people in the bleachers It was actually the woman on the horse carrying the flag.
Now, the image of that woman on the horse that was running up and down or riding up and down the fence line has been deleted from my laptop.
I can't find it, but you can find it online.
There's reports of witnesses who were on the fence line under the AGR building talking about, oh yes, there was this woman riding her horse up and down.
Now, nobody in their right mind takes a horse to a Trump rally, right?
Not even people who are a bit loopy Because of the liability, if you take a horse to large crowds, you never really know how a horse will react.
Even police horses can be funny.
But as a private person, a police horse is covered by, you know, liability insurance.
As a private person, if your horse kicks or tramples somebody, it can get very expensive very quickly.
And because of the recklessness of taking a horse to an event like that, you wouldn't necessarily be covered by insurance, right?
So what you need to...
Take into account is the fact that there was a woman on a horse by the fence line just about 100 yards away from Trump with the loudspeakers and all these people doesn't make any sense.
I mean, first of all, the fact that the fence line wasn't secured doesn't make any sense.
But who in their right mind, if they want to attend the Trump rally, maybe even if they want to wave a sign around, would go out to the paddock, get Blackie, clean Blackie, saddle Blackie, and then take Blackie to that event?
It doesn't make any sense.
However, if you're looking for a coordination sign, that is perfect.
So I tracked the location of this woman on the horse on the day.
And what this woman did is that, if you look from Trump's direction to the AGR building, this woman on the horse, as it got to the time of the shooting, kept to the left.
To that corner of the AGR building.
Now, she was on a horse.
People who were on the ground could see the shooter.
On the horse, she would have seen the shooter clear as day.
Yet, she didn't make any attempts to warn the snipers or warn police.
On a horse, you can move very quickly, right?
She didn't try to go across and warn anybody.
She can be seen on police officers' body cam footage, stationary at one end.
And then she rides across in front of the shooter whom she could see very clearly from the height where she was, especially because that edge of the AGR building is higher than even the bottom corner of the AGR building itself, right, on the left hand side.
As seen from the bleachers.
And then she writes, just before the shooting, in front of the AGR building, holding up her flag.
Now think about this.
This was a low building, low, slopey roof, right?
The shooter is crouching just under the roofline, and there's a woman sitting on a tall horse, and she's carrying a flag.
Now the Trump flag would have been right in front of the shooter's face.
Right?
If you want a sign which is you're good to go, that is it.
And everybody in the bleachers can see the freaking horse in the distance.
You can see it from the bleachers if you can look through that gap, right?
So these people who were ducking and also the woman in the black hat was looking in the exact direction.
And if the woman on the horse was the you got to go sign, everything fits perfectly together.
So, I actually strongly believe this is exactly what it was because on the police body cam footage you can see her cross in front of the shooter with the freaking flag.
She briefly pauses under the trees on the other side of the AGR building until she is sure that the police officer who briefly pulls himself up on the roof doesn't actually disturb the shooter and when she convinces herself that she's actually walking away from that point,
she turns her horse and rides as quickly as she can Up the fence line, and then later on you can see her on body cam footage right along the grass verge, so between the tarmac of the car park on the grass, back under the water tower going up north.
So you can see her gallop away at high speed.
Now that's what I would do if I knew that shots are about to be fired and I sit on a flighty animal.
Right?
So everything fits together.
She hangs around.
She doesn't warn anybody.
She can see a shooter on the roof, yet she rides with her horse right in front of his face.
She could have gone the other way.
No, she actually rides in front of him shortly before shots are fired, pauses briefly to check up on the police officer and what he's doing, and then rides off as quickly as she can.
And that's when, after she's gone, that's when shots are being heard.
So I strongly believe that the woman on the horse was in on it.
She's a necessary component.
She was necessary to coordinate this.
Everything fits with the timing.
But, you know, really, that is smoking gun evidence, right?
So I think it was absolutely necessary.
Now, basically, Lorene, I realize I've overrun completely.
Do I have two more minutes?
Yeah, two more minutes and Joaquin, we'll start you at 15 after.
Okay, okay.
So let me just wind this up.
I'm so sorry.
My talk ended up in a havoc today.
So basically, I'm absolutely convinced that the woman on the horse was the you got to go signal.
There is a precedent for this from the JFK assassination.
And it was called, that was the umbrella man.
So if you look up the JFK assassination, the Daily Mail actually did a report.
I think it was called, who was the umbrella man or something like that.
So the very last person before shots were fired at JFK was somebody standing on the grass.
It was a super sunny day and that guy was holding an open black umbrella.
Now that umbrella man, I think, served the same purpose.
If anything happens with the intel operation and things fuck up, You basically would close the umbrella and say, guys, the whole operation is off and then all the shooters know to, you know, just hold back.
It's always better to pull back than to make it obvious that you screwed up.
So Umbrella Man was important if you have multiple shooters and Professor Fetz is one of those people who showed me that there were multiple shooters, right?
There's lots of evidence.
It was absolutely necessary for an intel operation and I similarly believe that the woman on horseback was absolutely necessary as well, right?
So that's the stuff on the day and then I have one more minute and I just would like to show you how the assassination attempt on Trump was announced exactly three months and three days before and three months, three days is important because 33 It's a Masonic reference.
It's a Crown Corporation reference.
So just for those who want to investigate this seriously, I would like to give you the reference.
It's...
Hang on, where is it?
Here.
So this is a video that was uploaded, and it's absolutely serious, guys, because if we think about the, you know, President Trump nearly having been murdered...
This is very, very serious indeed.
There was a meeting with police officers on the 10th of April.
And in this video, you can see that the police officer appears and then poses next to Trump with an ace of spades on his uniform.
Right?
So if I can just...
Gosh.
This is just the...
Been in a car accident in North Carolina?
It can be scary and confusing.
Deal...
If you look at young people, they're always looking for challenges and pushing limits.
We all remember.
Everybody's super happy.
And then what happens is that at some point this guy behind him turns up and on his vest is an ace of spades thrown And now you get the other guy
The Ace of Spades is set, and in a moment you can go away from the top.
He's smiling right next to Trump.
Trump has absolutely no...
He doesn't even notice this is happening.
And the picture is being taken with the ace of spades next to Trump.
The relevance of the ace of spades is that it's known as the death card.
Also in 2003, the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, brought out the so-called Iraqi deck of cards.
And they were a deck of cards with the most wanted people in Iraq whom they wanted dead.
Now the ace of spades was the president, Saddam Hussein.
And here we have the ace of spades being posed next to Trump exactly three months and three days before the assassination attempt.
So as a result, I also think that this guy is involved.
This particular thing I ran past the local police Officers here in our town, they are both former Marines, they recognize the ace of spades, and they both knew it was a sign of death.
So in a sense, we have the announcement, we have the you are all good to go sign, the horseback, we have people with full knowledge in the crowd, and we have the whole thing, and the FBI is not talking about it at all.
Wow.
I don't even know what else to say, but wow.
Thank you so much for getting back online with us and doing your presentation.
It was fabulous.
We just don't have time for questions and answers today, but I would like to invite you and your husband to do a special with me at some point, and I'll make it available to everybody on Zoom to come on in.
And maybe we'll do a couple hours if you'd like to do that.
And then they can ask their questions from today in a future video, if we can do that.
And my apologies to you, Achim.
Oh, yes.
I'm sure.
I think he's okay.
I think he's all right.
Did you see him earlier today at all?
I couldn't.
No, I couldn't.
Sorry.
He's in Bali.
He was sitting somewhere in a public square and a little gecko was going around his head on the wall.
So I knew he was in a foreign country because you don't see that often in America.