All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 17, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
54:41
JOHN COLEMAN - Ukraine's Woes & Geopolitics
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Start now.
Hi there.
I'm John Coleman, and here we are at the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
And my presentation here is Ukraine's Woes and Geopolitics.
The history of the present war in Ukraine, but we're going to find out that it's A larger story, as I suppose all wars are, and then we're going to get into the future as time allows.
So indeed, I'm John Coleman, and I'm from Apakista Stasis, an Institute for the Humanities, and we focus on things like this, and in fact in the past I've given presentations on things related here, so I was so happy that Professor Fetzer and company invited me to do this presentation.
Because this really helps me put together a few ideas I've had in the ether over the years and also specifics about this.
This presentation is also the compilation of a few other lectures I've given in years gone by.
Obviously the war in Ukraine is ongoing and escalating as we speak.
It's remarkable, if I can speak bluntly, how much it's escalated and how much Frankly, NATO has picked at this wound and has played that game of chicken.
I never imagined it would continue to be this game of chicken by inches all these years later.
The latest chapter of Ukraine is from February 2022. Here we are entering 25. Here we are, three years more of provocation, so it is an ongoing story.
And as we'll find out, the Middle East plays a big role in this topic here.
We will also get into briefly the nature of fighting in this war.
I think this has been overlooked, but the scale of fighting and the nature of fighting in some ways resembles the First World War with the use of trenches and this sort of thing.
And we're going to find out that's because of some things very deep into Russian military history in terms of the focus on artillery and things like that.
All right, but out the gate here, I wanted to make a note here about timing.
Had this conference, which is being recorded in the guts of December 2024, had this conference happened even one week earlier than this day we're recording, the 15th of December in particular, had it happened one week, certainly one month before now, it would be a very different time.
And the point I want to make about the Middle East, which I would have to make regardless of the timing of this talk, that point would seem for most people to be peculiar, and yet recently with the remarkable, I don't say that in a good way, but the remarkable fall of the Assad regime, Once again, we realize the role of the Mideast in geopolitics, and it will buttress, I hope, the point I'm trying to make as to where the Ukraine war came from in the first place.
So timing is everything, and here we are.
And we must understand here at the jump that the events in the war in Ukraine and the politics around that, with the Russian Federation and NATO, They are directly linked to events in the Middle East and specifically to Syria.
They are two sides of the same coin.
Now we have three stepping stones.
As to where this war, a remarkable war, again, not in a good way.
The body counts are staggering, certainly in the hundreds of thousands.
How many?
Each side is going to fudge the numbers on the other side and their lethality.
Needless to say, tremendous human misery, tremendous destruction of culture, which as I believe on the part of NATO is deliberate, and indeed to say nothing of the living wounded and traumatized and so forth.
So we have three stepping stones here.
And the first one I'd like to begin with, especially as we're looking at the behavior of NATO, which I'm going to argue is the aggressor, the aggressor.
As an undisputed aggressor in this tragedy, we do have to understand the nature of liberalism.
And when I use this word, I'm using this in terms of the Enlightenment, in terms of that idea of elected government, and all of this sort of stuff from the 18th century.
So the capital L, liberalism.
And we have to understand if we get very deep into this thinking, first of all, that liberalism is evangelical.
And when I say that, I don't mean that in a religious sense.
But I mean that in the doctrine itself, it means to spread itself over the entire world.
If you get deep into this idea of the liberal capital L, the whole world in the 18th century is under the reign of kings, and it's under the darkness of the tyranny of kings, and so forth.
And then usually you have a revolution, and you hold some territory, and you allow the people to have a vote, and that gives that legitimacy.
And then you have to spread it.
And you can see that in the American Revolution.
Those seeds, so to speak, float over to France.
A lot of the early revolutionaries, what became the National Guard in France, fought in America during the revolution.
So France becomes a liberal republic.
Those little seeds go to Ireland in the failed 1798 rebellion.
They go to Haiti in their successful rebellion.
Napoleon, we'll say 10 years later, brings liberalism on the road, so to speak, and it germinates for 30 years and explodes in the revolutions of 1848. And continues, continues on through Woodrow Wilson and so forth.
But the point is that liberalism is evangelical and you cannot understand the war in Ukraine except you understand this aspect of it and that this evangelicalism, this spreading of the gospel of liberalism, will not be complete like any good religion until the whole world is liberated as they would say.
Okay, so the other aspect is there is a mystical aspect to liberalism, which is often overlooked.
We tend to think of it as a very secular thing, but there is a mystical aspect of bringing a new type of human being into existence.
And this is fundamentally, to my last point here, one of the deeper aspects of the war in Ukraine is that you're having a conception of man Which is diametrically opposed between the liberal deracinated man who has really no ties to any reality whatsoever, not to his family, to a religion, to a nation, even to biology at this point, and that is colliding.
That is directly colliding with the rebirth of Russian culture since the fall of the Soviet Union, where in that philosophy, the individual nests within an ethnos, a religion, a philosophy, a physical reality that they're tied to.
And so what we're seeing on the deeper aspect is this collision of two visions of mankind.
The Novus Ordo Seclorum of the completely deracinated automaton, if I can be blunt.
And then the Russian who has a much more traditional understanding of the individual.
And this is directly at play in the war in Ukraine.
We must not forget that.
Here is an image which I think sums this up very well.
This is a group almost certainly backed and started by Western intelligence about 10 years ago called Pussy Riot.
Lovely ladies, aren't they?
This is a rather tame picture.
I could have come up with more graphic ones.
This is a group of these individuals Making the fool here, in a church.
You see this collision between the chaos of the Western, capital L, liberal, the individual who has no sense of reality within the revived Russian Orthodox Church there.
So that's literally a snapshot of what I'm trying to say is happening on the bigger level in the war in Ukraine and even this larger conflict that's developing between NATO and the BRICS countries and so forth.
Okay, that's our first stepping stone in the distant origins of what's going on in this tragedy in Ukraine.
And now we get to the proximate origins of the conflict.
So you have the creation of NATO in 1949, and then at the same time, more or less, of the Warsaw Pact.
If memory serves, the Warsaw Pact, which was a Soviet alliance, obviously no longer extant to the Warsaw Pact, I think follows the creation of NATO. Of course, they're well known for their famous Article 5. If there's an attack on one, then all members are obliged.
That too plays a role in a lot of the brinksmanship and even more, that game of chicken that we're seeing, that idea of trying to provoke Russia into an attack on a NATO nation, really is the fantasy of these lunatics in NATO. Okay,
so we have indeed the creation of NATO, and then even with the end of the Cold War, like any good bureaucracy, you have to find a reason to exist, and you will make a reason to exist.
You will make work.
If you do not have work and you no longer have a Soviet Union you must oppose, you'll find a reason to exist.
Don't worry, honey.
So you do have the end of the Cold War.
And NATO, if you recall, I was a boy in the 1990s, but I had some very good social studies teachers in grade school.
And I remember this was a topic.
Even in junior high, we had Mr. Reynolds bringing this up.
You know, why does NATO exist?
He was asking the class of sixth and seventh graders.
And, you know, they had to find reasons in the Balkans and Since then, of course, NATO has gone on the road.
We've seen NATO in Libya making a mess there.
NATO has lately franchised out to South Korea or Japan lately.
I mean, it's becoming this monster, if it wasn't already.
Okay, so we have the end of the Cold War in 1990, and as we'll see, that too will play a role because of the nature of Ukraine and the creation of Ukraine as an independent country.
Getting back to liberalism, too, and this totalitarian aspect of liberalism, which is starting to show its teeth with the 2022 war and events since then, we want to remember at the end of the Cold War, that essay by Francis Fukuyama from Georgetown University, The End of History.
And that in 1990, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was this idea that liberalism had triumphed.
The main patron of all the communist states had fallen.
Yes, China carried on and Cuba carried on and a few others, Vietnam, but the main center had gone down the tubes.
It was just a matter of time for the other communist states to go as well.
There was this strutting around of liberals.
Again, I'm using this term, capital L liberals.
In the 1990s, The idea that history had ended, that there would be no further, obviously events would happen, obviously life on this planet would happen, but there would be no more evolution, as they would see it, of ideas, no more transition into other forms of government and so forth.
It was just this inevitable conclusion that the whole world would become these voting atomized, interchangeable global citizens.
That's the idea of the end of history, the idea that a dialectic of ideas and so forth was over, and liberalism had triumphed over everything.
All right, and then in terms of the proximate origins of this conflict, We have the creation of an independent Ukraine in 1991. And we have to understand very briefly here that Ukraine will use analogies.
Some of you old-timers might remember analogies.
You know, this is to this, is that, is to that.
I was talking to some present-day students, and they had never heard of this with the colons and the semicolons and things.
But let's try an analogy here.
So Ukraine is to Russia.
Historically, culturally, Ukraine is to Russia, what New England is to America.
What do I mean?
Meaning, if you know American history, American culture, American psychology, etc., you know that from the word go, that New England, culturally, psychologically, and so forth, has dominated the subsequent development of America.
Even though there were French and Indians here and British, Up in Canada, you had the Spanish out west at different times and even large Asian populations out west.
The dominant psychology and living ways were from New England to this day.
You cannot separate the two.
The same is true for Ukraine historically, culturally, religiously as well.
Christianity comes into Russia via Ukraine.
You have this queer thing which happens in 1991, where this kernel of what becomes Russia and Russian culture becomes its own independent state.
I could give a whole hour-long lecture about why that is.
It has to do with largely the Second World War.
And certain things that happened with the Germans in there and different associations.
It all gets very murky but the documentation is there and you can spend an afternoon at your library to get a little bit deeper in there.
But you should understand that there is this cultural And psychological and indeed linguistic.
Ukrainian is very similar to Russian.
There is this connection.
But in 1991, at the end of the Cold War, there is this political separation or, dare we say, amputation, which goes on.
This is the false...
And so in the best sense of that, I thought I would show you, having mentioned NATO and some of the proximate origins of this tragic war.
I keep using that adjective.
It's most appropriate.
I thought I would show everyone this image.
And this is actually the NATO headquarters, which I believe is in Brussels.
And being in the False Flags and Conspiracy Conference, I always thought this building looks a lot like, you know, folded hands.
It looks a lot like plotting hands and like a James Bond character.
And there are a lot of strange occultic buildings in the world, such as the memorial to the Twin Towers is a giant eyeball.
I thought I would bring this up.
It is most appropriate.
It does look like folded plotting hands.
There we go.
Now we need to get into the near origins.
Of the Russia-Ukrainian war, as Russia considers it the special military operation, and that has legal reasons.
That's not just linguistic BS. It has legal reasons the Russians have not yet declared a proper legal war in Ukraine.
It's a special military operation.
But in any case, what are the near origins?
We've looked at the distant origins in the 18th century and in liberalism philosophically and even spiritually, shall we say.
We've looked at the proximate origins in the 20th century.
Now we get to things closer to home.
And actually, to understand the Russia-Ukraine war, we have to go back to the Arab Spring.
This begins in 2011, at the very end of 2011 into 2012. And we recall different groups such as the Open Society Foundation of, speaking of Bond villains, George Soros.
Recall that they, and certainly Western intelligence, were playing around, just beginning to play around with this idea of color revolutions, using protests To flip governments.
Now, that is itself not new at all.
You can go back into the early modern period.
I have a very interesting book speaking about Spain in the 17th century, and they talk about the same faction and the same aspect where you can just create a mob and overthrow the local government and And you can go back even to the ancient world and see how the mob is used and controlled and steered.
So that itself is not new, but in terms of redeploying this old trick, the color revolutions of 10 and 15 years ago were beginning to be tried.
And where they really come out the gate, of course, were at this Arab Spring.
Now this had been tried before, but this is where it got traction.
Using discontent, no doubt a genuine discontent, and maybe even legitimate discontent, In the Arab world, which had largely ossified under these regimes that the Soviets had put in place.
Getting back to the 20th century history, the Soviets were very involved in the Middle East.
Just like American government has done, the Soviets installed all sorts of regimes in the Middle East and they went the way of all flesh and collapsed in 1991. But those regimes continued into the 1990s, into the 2000s, and there was this sense of Discontent in the Arab world, of stagnation, and I'm sure much of that was legitimate.
But what the color revolutions do is these outsiders, these Westerners, and in fact these globalists, swooped in, beginning in Tunisia with the dramatic The dramatic immolation of a street merchant sparked protests over the regulation in Tunisia and Ben Ali fled.
That, of course, much more remarkably occurred just the next month in 2012 in Egypt, Where the government was flipped after several weeks and months of protest.
And there was a very strange period where the Muslim Brotherhood took over Egypt.
And maybe for the first time, that question that had been knocking around conspiracy world, how much are those Islamicists independent from Western structures?
How much is that really true?
Because the color revolution produced the Muslim Brotherhood running Egypt?
Even they became so obnoxious that the Egyptians begged the army to kick out the Ikhwan, the Muslim Brotherhood, and bring in the present regime here that we have to this day.
There were other protests throughout the Middle East.
There were slight protests in Iraq.
Iraq at the time was very much still a mess and still really going through its Civil War period.
There were some in the Gulf, in Saudi Arabia and Oman and so forth, but those were very tightly dealt with.
And then, of course, Syria.
Syria elsewhere as well.
Lebanon was also a mess from the 1990s civil war.
But in Syria, in any case, their protest movement was cracked down upon.
Much like in the Gulf states, but there was a pushback.
Initially democratic forces, which soon enough gave way to Islamic forces.
We could spend a lot of time there, and if time allows in this presentation, I'll get more into the blow by blow there.
What's important as we're in a discussion on the Russia-Ukraine war is this event in 2013. And that is where Barry Cetera or Barack Obama or whatever the hell his name is, nobody knows anything about this guy.
It's quite remarkable as Mr. Mystery.
Obama in 2013 gives this address.
You can still watch it online there.
And this is the Red Line speech where Assad had allegedly gassed all these people.
This was a totally bogus story.
It was scripted and so forth.
But in any case, this was Obama's red line and we need to discipline Assad.
We need to do strategic strikes on Assad.
In reality, this was going to be a full-blown invasion of Syria.
The United States was going to do in 2013 what it had done in Iraq in 2003 and topple the regime.
Again, allegedly, you know, same damn story, right?
You know, chemical weapons and all these attacking civilians.
And we just needed, you know, the incubators and we all sat there.
But remember, the Soviets have a long history in the Middle East.
And to this last point, they also have a naval base.
They have a Syrian naval base, which, as I speak, is being negotiated with the latest cut-out ragtag gang of Islamists that the West has put in power, HDS. The Russians are negotiating for their base.
But this is the Tartus naval base, and I'll explain why that's important.
But nevertheless, Russia Intervenes in the Syrian civil war definitively in 2015. At this point, you really see the United States starting to back ISIS and other groups as well.
And that's why, if you remember the videos coming out at that time, the ISIS fighters had brand new American style uniforms.
You've all seen the American military uniforms that look very pixelated.
Those are the modern uniforms.
Very, very pixelated.
I guess that has some optical effect.
They had brand new weapons, brand new headgear.
They held their rifles just like the Americans do.
There's a certain way you can see how they hold their hands and things.
That's when you start seeing the big support of ISIS from the United States organization.
There were stories at the time, for instance, of the Iraqi government shooting down helicopters going into Syria full of American gear going into ISIS territory.
I'm sure that's been scrubbed off of Google.
But the TARDIS naval base So here we have a map of what was Syria.
Syria is being divided.
It's being divvied up.
You can say, as of this recording, there is no Syrian state.
There's a Syrian people and culture, but there is, at this moment, no Syrian state.
There was last week.
There is no state in Syria at this point.
It's just outside pirates coming in.
But anyhow, I trust you can see my cursor.
If not, you can just take my word for it.
Syria has on its west coast, which is the eastern Mediterranean, it has a naval base.
This is the Tartus naval base.
Now, if you know Russian geography, as I'm always telling the kids with a chuckle, you know, the irony with Russia is Is that it has one of the largest coastlines in the world.
And yet, the irony is that it's all frozen.
Russia, up on the North Pole, has all of this technical coastline, but it is all frozen.
This is the tremendous irony.
It's like having a mountain full of cans on a desert island, but no can opener.
And so in Russian history, there's always this need to get to warm water ports, whether that's in the Black Sea Or far out east, for Russia, in Sevastopol.
Well, Sevastopol's on the Black Sea, but they have another, Vladivostok, which is frozen, I think, half the year.
They have a port there.
So, you know, you're kind of hard up, if you're the Russians, for naval access.
So this was quite a breakthrough for them.
The Tartus naval base, again, on the west coast of Syria.
Okay.
So Russia has an interest there and that brings us to the confrontation.
Now all of this Middle East stuff, I want to remind yourself and myself, directly plugs in to the Ukraine war and it comes about at this time.
Where there is a confrontation between the Obama administration.
This is 2013. The TARDIS base is established in 2015. The Russians intervened in the Syrian civil war, dropping bombs on ISIS, etc.
in 2015. But the TARDIS naval base was in discussion before then.
There were Russian interests years before then.
And once again, Barry Sotero, agent named Barack Obama, gives the red line speech in 2013. Right?
Come on, boys.
We've got to invade him.
We've got to do it for freedom.
All the same pulling on your heartstring stuff.
I watched the speech today.
It's the same garbage that you always hear.
It's the same stuff Bush did and Clinton did with Bosnia, whatever.
Bush one did with Iraq in the 1990s.
Same sort of stuff.
Okay, come on.
There was a carrier fleet.
There was a carrier fleet in the Mediterranean ready to roll.
There was a full-scale invasion.
A lot of Americans don't realize this.
There was a full-scale invasion ready to pull the trigger, at which point Putin told Obama, back down or we will have a direct confrontation in Syria.
That too is not very well known.
And this happens in 2013. Barack Obama is ready to do the latest chapter of Neocon Inc.
and invade Syria.
We don't have time to get into Wesley Clark and his seven nations that he overheard going to be toppled in so many years, five years or whatever.
There's basically only Iran left as of this recording.
So that's very ominous.
In any case...
This confrontation is what precipitates what we're seeing now in Ukraine.
And this begins almost immediately after Obama was told to sit down and stand down by Vladimir Putin and the Russian Federation.
That brings us to the 2013 Euromaidan protest.
Having evidently come across a pot of neocon gold in the concept of the color revolution, The Arab Spring is just 2011. This thing is just getting up and going.
This stuff is really working.
We're toppling governance.
We knocked out Ben Ali in Tunisia.
We knocked out Barak in Egypt.
Assad is looking pretty rough by 2013 before Russia saved his behind.
Quite interesting that there was such little resistance this time.
We can talk about that if our clock allows us here.
But in any case, you know, these color revolutions also are a lot cheaper than invading Iraq or invading Afghanistan and things.
So hot dog!
Let's try that in Ukraine.
Let's get a color revolution on Russia's doorstep.
Let's pay back Russia.
You have to understand this.
This war in Ukraine is payback.
What you're seeing, this World War I type of fighting, this grinding down the hundreds of thousands of Slavic men, both Russian and Ukrainians, Dead.
They mutilated soldiers and civilians.
So many amputations and burned, etc., etc.
This all goes back to this confrontation when Barack Obama was told to sit down, little boy.
And like a child, Obama and the neocons behind him were resentful.
And that is what triggers the Euromaidan protests in 2013. Depending on how you see that, as I do, you'll refer to that as the Maidan coup.
This is not a completely legitimate protest.
Just like the Arab Spring, these war ground...
Okay, there probably was some discontent there, but these things are weaponized.
So that's why you may refer to it as the Maidan coup.
And this image, I hope, is worth the price of admission here.
This is Victoria Nuland, who is one of the most vicious, demonic women in the Biden administration.
And here she is.
John McCain was here at this point.
I think John Kerry was speaking at these protests which ended up toppling the Ukrainian government and putting in this Poroshenko fellow who himself was replaced by the The comedian, Volodymyr Zelensky.
But all that would be in the future.
Right now, what you're looking at is one of these stone-cold neocons just dripping in blood from Georgetown University and Yale or wherever she haunted.
Handing out cookies.
Jack the Ripper handing out cookies.
There's just something about this picture here.
Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.
The only thing in recent history that reminds me of the, I don't know, irony of this picture, or the whatever of this picture, would be a speech I saw from Zinyu Brzynski from the 1980s.
You couldn't pronounce that name any better than me, so...
And anyhow, Brzezinski, who's, again, another stone-cold globalist, secular to the core and whatever, he's out there in Afghanistan in the 1980s and he's speaking, Allah's on your side, men.
We're fighting for the cause of Islam.
There's something in this photo or the Brzezinski one where it's just so cynical and pulling on your heart strings and your culture strings and all that.
But people fall for it.
All right, so we'll take a cookie from Victoria Newland and move on here.
All right, so we also have to understand with the With the Ukrainian coming war, what we think is the beginning of the war in 2022, that in fact it's going back to 2014. Indeed, the duly elected government in Ukraine is overthrown by this color revolution controlled by the globalists Poroshenko's Putin at this time.
At this hour, certain aspects in Ukraine run riot.
And these are particularly the Ukrainian nationalist elements.
And so we start seeing a real, and this is how you know you're dealing with globalists, because you're dealing with divide-and-conquer people.
So you have a country with Ukrainian nationals and Russian nationals, especially in the East, and it's going to be the globalists that will press on that fissure as much as they can.
So you start seeing in 2014, almost immediately, this stress and this tension being exacerbated between the Ukrainians and the Russian nationals living there.
I shouldn't say Russian nationals, but the ethnic Russians, just like you might have Mexican people living in America.
They're ethnically Mexican, but they're American nationals.
The same idea.
So you can have people of other cultures living here.
You start seeing the teaching of the Russian language in schools becomes forbidden by Kiev.
This exacerbates things and makes people dig in one way or another.
You have the militia here, this Azov Brigade, which traces its origin back to Ukrainian nationalists that had cooperated with the Germans during that invasion there.
So you have a very ideological aspect, a truly racist understanding in this Azov Brigade.
Okay, and then you have something also I think not really paid attention to, and that's the splitting of the Orthodox Church during these eight years closer to 2022. I think this had happened in like 21, where you had the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was...
It was broken in half by the globalists and they had set up this schism.
As I mentioned, New England is to America, Ukraine is to Russia.
The church in Russia was under the jurisdiction of the patriarch in Moscow.
What the globalists do is they find discontent, schismatic people in Ukraine and they make them The Patriarch of Ukraine, they make this whole new Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and so it creates this split.
Up until then, the Ukrainian Christians had looked to Moscow for their religious instruction, etc., and now you have a division within the church and within the monasteries.
Even here we are two years after the invasion, you still have battles over property and so forth.
Again, the idea is to divide and conquer.
And divide and conquer the neocons do.
And so during 2014 to 2022, this isn't just happening in a vacuum.
People are arming up.
And so you have the Donbas War in 2014, which is the eastern part of Ukraine, which is where you have the Russian nationals.
So they're arming up and they're getting assistance from Russia.
And then the Ukrainian Azov Brigade is harassing them.
So you have a shooting war.
The shooting war did not begin in February of 22, but rather in 2014. It just cranks up in 2022. Okay.
And then briefly, before we bring things around here, the Russian-Ukraine war from 2022 until today.
So we have to remember in February that the initial Russian invasion is really an attempt to get Ukraine to back down.
Because at this time, too, you have discussions of Ukraine entering NATO. And that is something that the Russians will not book.
Any more than the United States organization was willing to have Soviet missiles.
Because, of course, if you have NATO, you're going to have NATO weapons and NATO troops on your doorstep.
And so just like in the 60s with the Cuban Missile Crisis, the United States Corporation did not want, sensibly, Soviet missiles in Cuba and made their intentions known.
And this is the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Soviets back down.
It's the same story, just I guess in reverse at this point.
Ukraine is not going to join NATO as far as the Russians are insisting.
That is a sine qua non.
That is non-negotiable.
And those talks were ramping up.
And so in February of 2022, On top of the harassment of Russian nationals and the smothering of Russian culture in the East, now you have the increased talk about NATO gobbling up Ukraine.
And we could even go into discussions that had happened between the newly formed Russian Federation in the 1990s and NATO and this promise that NATO had made that we will not grow, we will not move for them east, we will not move east, and so forth.
But those were not heated at all.
And so Russia invades Ukraine in February of 22 in order to get their attention In order to, you know, just like your father, you know, my mother might slap you or something if you're being hysterical or something, get a grip and so kind of get your attention.
There is this invasion, but it is meant to not gobble up, conquer Ukraine like they said in the West.
No, no.
At the time, it was meant to sober up Ukraine as a slap might do.
Initially, elements in Ukraine, including the Zelensky government, were willing to negotiate.
There were discussions happening in Istanbul.
A NATO nation, but as you will know, Erdogan is very much kind of on the fence with NATO, and he kind of does his own thing.
So it's kind of a mutually agreed upon area.
So in Istanbul, in March of 2022, you had a Russian and Ukrainian delegation, and they had an agreement signed.
They had an agreement signed.
And as a sign of goodwill, The Russians withdrew their troops from Kiev, which the West decided to rename Kyiv, because they have to play and change everything.
But the Russians withdrew from Kiev, and in retrospect, I believe it was Angela Merkel, subsequently, publicly said, we had no intention of regarding that agreement, just like we had no intention of regarding previous agreements like Minsk 1 and Minsk 2. We only did that, this globalist Merkel says.
We only signed all this stuff to buy time.
To buy time.
So again, this is the cynical nature of the West.
They don't respect themselves enough even to honor their name on the documents they sign.
So when subsequently Russia has decided not to negotiate or to go to some of these peace conferences and things like that, well now you know why.
Because they were led around by the nose in March of 22. Why would you waste your time going to Switzerland like last year or wherever they come up with their peace conference ideas?
Why would you waste your time?
They've broken three treaties already and they're continuing to poke at you every day.
Okay, another very interesting point in the Ukrainian-Russian war happened in 2022 as well, in the autumn September, if memory serves, and that was the Nord Stream pipeline attack.
There's no honor amongst thieves.
This attack, which was nominally directed at Russia, and there was a bogus story about civilian Ukrainian fishermen on a pleasure yacht.
It was a total nonsense.
It was American special forces.
Blew that up.
And Cy Hirsch, Seymour Hirsch, published that.
Quite a sensationalistic piece and quite a testimony to the abysmal nature of American journalism that he published his essay, his breaking essay, on the treachery of the United States towards, not Russia, towards Western Europe.
The blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline only hurt Western Europe.
Russia doesn't need Western Europe to sell its oil to.
Western Europe needs that oil.
And you'll recall at the time there was a great scrambling around for heating oil for that winter.
But the fact that Seymour Hersh had to publish this on Substack is an unbelievable testimony to the cruddy state of American journalism.
No offense to Substack authors, but the institutional media is completely used up.
I'm not telling you, conference participants, anything you don't know.
Okay, but that really was like a pimp.
The Nord Stream attack of 2022 was like a pimp slapping the prostitute.
You know, sit down, ho.
And that's what that was for the United States, slapping down Western Europe.
It's most sycophantish.
The most suck-up toadies for the United States and its globalist order is Western Europe.
And the United States just slapped, you know, shut up, ho, sit down.
That was a power play.
The Nord Stream attack was a power play, and the United States was telling the Western so-called allies, we're running the show here.
Don't think that this is an equal operation here.
Okay.
Almost completely forgotten, too, is at the same time, which is why you know something was up and why you know it wasn't independent fishermen.
Ridiculous story.
It's because there was a similar attack on Russian pipelines in the Black Sea at the same time.
Those were foiled.
The Nord Stream 2, I think, was their two pipes.
Nord Stream 2 was blown up.
The one in the Black Sea was not.
So that was averted, but there was the attempt.
There were, of course, the sanctions on Russia.
And now we get to the bigger idea of liberalism.
And we have five minutes here to bring the bird home.
But the sanctions were themselves an attempt to deplatform Russia as a state.
The sanctions were supposed to The sanctions really were an attempt to de-platform not a YouTube channel, not a political figure.
But an entire nation.
It was an attempt to set in motion this.
And there have been repeatedly, unbelievably, but there have been repeatedly attempts raised to denation Russia.
One of the distinctive characteristics of liberalism, capital L, is that you are only a legitimate nation, a legal nation, if other nations recognize you.
Traditionally, before liberalism, what made a nation legitimate was the fact that a group was able to control territory and it administered court systems that people respected.
By hook or by crook, if you had a problem, you went to this faction's courts.
That's basically what made you a nation.
Since liberalism, a nation also has to be recognized.
In fact, you could be a nation and not really control any territory at all.
And then you have some interesting examples of that.
There have been repeated attempts.
To denation Russia.
And this would put Russia in the same sandbox as the Taliban, actually, which is a functioning government, but has not been allowed into the so-called community of nations.
Anyhow, that's what to do.
And then another reason you can see hanky-panky in Ukraine, and that this is not really Ukraine's fight at all, is the participation not just of globalists and endless aid packages and so forth, but the shipping in of foreign fighters.
ISIS thugs, mercenaries, and in my belief, and this is like the sun's going to rise tomorrow, I mean, this is pretty obvious to me that much of what we call the Ukrainian army at this point in 2024, nearly 25, is NATO dressed up.
These are NATO troops at this point dressed up.
The Ukrainians have completely tapped out their manpower Probably at least a year back.
They have amputees, multiple amputees.
There were plenty of news stories on this in their army.
They have retarded people.
I've seen people with Down syndrome, people with the cell phone footage, and the commanders of the Ukrainian army, they don't know what to do.
What do you do when they send you Down syndrome soldiers?
With a stick.
I've seen soldiers with sticks.
I'm not making this up.
I saw one trench That the Russians had captured.
And there were chains.
The Ukrainian soldiers were chained in the trench.
The men were dead at this point.
But they were chained like slaves.
I've seen men.
New recruits.
Young recruits, quote-unquote, of 50 and 60 years of age, that's the level of manpower that they're down to in Ukraine.
Press gangs, like in the War of 1812, press gangs going around Ukraine, rounding up people coming out of the bathroom, coming out of concerts, and so forth.
There was talk, it failed, but there was talk of sending press gangs around Europe to round up Ukrainian nationals that had left the country.
So this entire thing is like a dead man.
The nation of Ukraine is like a dead man that's being pumped with blood from the globalists to keep it going.
It's horrible, really.
And at the end of the day, getting back to the deeper nodes of liberalism, at the end of the day, whatever the political result of this war is, you have destroyed a generation of men, both in Russia and Ukraine.
You've ground down their culture, you've split up their church, and you've moved one step closer to the capital L liberal idea of the completely deracinated, interchangeable, uncultured, unsexed We would be remiss in these closing minutes here to not mention outside players besides the globalists who have turned Ukraine into a pirate cove.
And of course, one of those would be China.
This is the belt and road.
I'm sure you've all heard of that.
The belt is this naval trade route, predominantly naval.
And then you can see the road is this land route.
And you can see, whether or not you can see my cursor, here in the Black Sea, you know where that is.
Here in the Black Sea, you can see it goes right up through Ukraine, through the Crimea, the belt.
Or rather the road part of the Belt and Road.
The road part goes right up through Crimea to Moscow.
So there are Chinese interests at play and we'll see how that comes to fruition.
Okay.
Finally, you know, this is one of the game plans here, breaking Russia up on ethnic lines and some political divisions as well there.
And again, you know, what you're going to see eventually probably with Iraq, Syria being divvied up and balkanized in the same here.
And bringing things all around.
This is my last minute.
Bringing things all around.
What we're seeing with the overthrow of the Assad regime, as well as the revived war in Georgia and the political protest in Georgia, which is the beginning of the real poking.
You have to see this is the globalists.
They have lost Ukraine.
The war in Ukraine is over.
That's the beginning.
It's just a matter of deciding the peace.
Even the globalists in the West realize this is another Afghanistan, another Iraq.
The thing's falling apart.
Everything the globalists touch military.
Literally everything falls apart.
That might even be a part of the order of chaos that they have.
Their order out of chaos.
Literally everything, all their schemes fall apart militarily.
So they're pulling out of Ukraine.
They're going to try to come to a negotiated settlement.
And so they have to stir up chaos in the Middle East.
So where to from here?
Well, the chaos continues.
Hopefully, and this is my last remark, hopefully cooler heads will prevail.
Hopefully the incoming Trump administration will be able to rein things in in Ukraine.
I don't know about the Middle East because of, frankly, the Israeli prominence in the Trump administration, but at least in Central Europe that will be the case, and hopefully the Russians can be calm enough until the Trump administration comes in at least to calm things down.
So thank you very much for your attention here at the False Flags and Conspiracy Conference.
I want to thank Dr. Fetzer and Lorien and everyone else who contributed to this, as well as you, dear participants.
You can write me if you have any questions or follow-up at afakistastasisinstitute at aol.com.
Thank you very, very much.
All right.
That was Mr. Coleman, who has an educational program in Connecticut.
And a great presentation.
▲
Export Selection