All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 9, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:29:06
Need to Know News (8 December 2024) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, Needed On News, and Sunday, December the 8th, 2024, let's take a look at our topics and have opening statements.
We have the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference next weekend.
Brian and I won't be doing a show that weekend.
We're going to the wars.
And a whole series of what the Trump and team promises and the challenges with the FBI. The murderous do-land thievery.
The DEI lawfare on toxic masculinity, so-called to neuter patriots.
The border invasion and consequences, our satanic debt system.
Making America healthy again.
The Dem Party destruction.
And finally, very interesting clip from 1914, an English baby hospital that looks to be like some sort of manufactured baby farm.
And that might go a long way of explaining how come the normies can't think.
They may be programmed to do exactly what we see that they're doing.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, we had a bit of a dramatic week this week in terms of dealing with lawyers and courts related to probate that's coming up for my wife's parents' estate.
I expect that that's going to continue to be something that drags out and drags on for a long time.
Other than that, Business has been really slow.
I've sort of raised my prices and I'm just sort of trying to get rid of some of the smaller files that I used to take on and just sort of focus on the high dollar value files and the high net worth clients.
So that has really cut down on the workload and allowed me more time to do research, which I've been, you know, I'm going to be a speaker at the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference.
I just looked at the schedule and it looks like I'm on like Sunday, I'm going to give you the 10,000-foot overview of Ashton Forbes' research, just sort of in a condensed manner.
Enough so that the participants that have never seen anything related to this MH370 stuff can understand what it is that we're talking about.
But really more important to me, I want to do some high-level analysis of what I think it means for the future of humanity if we let this sort of zero-point energy concept, free energy stuff get loose.
What it means for the future of warfare, what it means for global developments and the cabal, because I think that's who ultimately controls it.
And then, you know, what it could mean for us and what the future could look like for us.
Also, I think I'm going to sow in some spiritual warnings, because I can guarantee you that this technology wasn't something that was born yesterday.
It's been around for quite a while, and it's just a matter of, okay, we finally figured out how to harness it, so now what?
So I think it ought to be a great conference next weekend.
I'm hoping that everybody out there in the audience attends.
I've spent the weekend on the False Flags and Conspiracies conference for the last three or four years.
Well, since the first year it came out, I think it was 2021. Yeah, it was 2021. And I got to tell you that it's been one of the most...
Every year, I listen to a few presentations that stick with me for the rest of the year.
Now, after going to it all this time, you've got a bunch of knowledge and a bunch of research.
It's a great way to get introduced to a lot of other speakers and personalities that contribute to our Our entire data set.
So I would encourage you to try to bust out the weekend and attend.
You can always put the football game in the background and listen.
But yeah, it's an exciting time right now and I'm looking forward to doing this presentation.
Excellent.
Thank you.
What's your presentation on, Carl?
It's on AMREV 2 and World War III. It's kind of the best working title that I can give to it, the historical context and the status of that.
But really, the war has been going on for all recorded history on We the People.
And as a professional historian, I'll give my take on that.
I wanted to do one more thing here before we get started.
Listen, I took a shot.
From some people in the comments, because I haven't talked about Scott's death yet.
I haven't had a moment of silence.
I can assure you that it hit me right between the eyes when I first heard about it, because off the record, I knew Scott was...
Cycling off for a while from doing the shows with me on Sundays and Mondays, which is what we used to kind of alternate between Sundays and Mondays.
He had told me as soon as he got back from Russia while we were off the air that he had suspected that he had been poisoned.
He thinks it happened sometime prior to getting on the airport to depart for America, or maybe it happened during the flight trip.
You know, I didn't know Scott from a personal perspective all that well.
There was a lot of things I found out about him after his death that I didn't know.
I didn't really even realize he didn't have a family.
He didn't have any kids.
He didn't have a wife.
Therefore, you know, the question is, can I get a hold of the autopsy?
And Do I need to?
I believe he's a martyr.
I don't believe that he died of a natural-based pancreatic cancer at age 54, as healthy and as spry as he was.
And then I don't believe that his partner died under mysterious circumstances as well, you know, within a couple of weeks of his death.
So I feel kind of sick about it, but I know this.
Scott was a solid Christian.
Scott did believe in the Lord.
He might not have always said exactly the right thing.
And to me, absent from the body is present with the Lord when you're a Christian, and it's better for him.
So in a sense, I'm going to miss him down here on earth, but I'm Look, the Bible says very clearly, Paul says, I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far, but it's more necessary for you that I remain in the body.
And I'm convinced that Scott made his contribution and God decided, hey, come join me.
We're going to make a martyr out of you.
We'll find that out at the end, post-judgment, but that's what I believe took place.
Very good.
Well said, brother.
And part of the presentation that I have at the False Flags Conference is to take a look exactly at the point is that the purpose of our existence here, the members of our audience and us, about 2% of humanity, as near as I can tell from my personal experience, is we're messengers.
And we're just facilitating a choice.
And that there will be, this is the great awakening, the great choosing.
And I don't know what the creator has in store.
And in terms of A concern for our own well-being.
You know, so far out of our hands.
We are all relatively super soft targets.
And we're just in...
For me, I just see it.
We're in the Creator's hands and I'm here to serve.
And this is a war against...
Previously unimaginable evil.
People talk about fear porn.
Well, baby, once you really take a look at the capacity and the history of our enemy, all the fear porn kind of manages to disappear because they really have done all that stuff.
And they would invent more tortures given if they had the power.
So it's a whole big history and a lot of it is just out of our hands and God bless Scott for his work and for his commitment and I'm with you is that for whatever reason if we're taken home early then as an individual that Scott is in a far better place.
Alrighty, let's consider the False Flags and Conspiracies conference.
Jim is going to be the host, and Lorian Fenton is producing it, and Gary King is going to be doing host work, and he is always in the background doing production.
It is free, 24 speakers, 9am to 10pm.
Central Time.
And all you need to do is click up here where it says free tickets and there are 500 tickets.
And you can just spend part of the time there.
That's fine.
There's no need for any full commitment for that.
I think that I was there not even half the time last year.
It'll probably be the same thing this year.
Anything else that you want to say about the conference or jump into the topics?
No, let's just jump into the topics tonight.
Alrighty.
Okay, to the war.
On what planet is this self-defense?
And all you need to do is take a look at the law and the pictures, and it's not self-defense.
It's planet Talmud is what it is.
Planet Talmud, that's self-defense.
The Talmud teaches that they should kill generations and generations and generations of their enemies so that they don't come back and kill them later.
Wipe them all out.
So it's planet Talmud is what it is.
Yeah, and we got a story from that perspective.
Ben Gavir says Netanyahu is open to expelling the Palestinians from Gaza, and we knew that was coming.
And the next article is going to be saying that he is mulling the possibility, that's a favorite word, 206 priceless archaeological heritage sites destroyed by Israel and Gaza, Palestinian official.
And this is the site one for Israel.
And Israel's war with Hamas in the spirit of Amalek.
And the idea is that if you're going to win a war, you need to win it forever and therefore to wipe out the seed of your opponent.
And that is part of the spin on here.
And that is part of the opportunity of everybody else to take a stand against the psychopathy And to remove the possibility of these judicidal maniacs.
But that's the whole world that we live in.
All of these wars are...
Let me comment on that one real fast, okay?
I spent six years in very serious biblical studies type courses.
I can tell you that I don't believe that the Jews...
Have as much of a claim to Father Abraham as they would have us believe these days, okay?
Matthew, I think it's chapter 23, is the parable of the vineyard, and basically what Jesus does is he tells this story about how A rich nobleman had a big vineyard and he gave it to some servants for a period of time to take care of it while he went on a long trip.
And he finally got around to deciding that he wanted to collect on his portion of the harvest because he owned the land.
And so he sent one of his servants down to the vineyard to collect a percentage of Whatever's there.
And of course, the tenants, by this time, they had gotten wicked, they had gotten greedy, and they had gotten hungry.
And so they decided, hey, let's go ahead and kill this messenger, and then we won't have to worry about paying this bill anymore.
So then he sends another servant, and it's the same thing.
It's destroyed and killed.
And then finally he says, well, I'm going to send my son.
So here you got about as close of a representative as you can possibly get.
To these guys.
And let's see what they do about that.
Well, they decided to kill him too.
And so the moral of the story is that God said that he would take away that vineyard from them forever and throw them in a place where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
And then in many other parts of the Bible, it talks about the real sons of Abraham are the ones that follow what he says.
They obey the spirit and heart of what Abraham meant.
So that to me very clearly says that they had had sort of the scepter of righteousness pulled out from underneath them.
And I will tell you that That is not the first time that that took place.
You can go all through the Old Testament.
And there were so many points where God was this close to just saying, I've had it, I've had it, I've had it.
I'm going to destroy you.
And then he repented and changed everything.
So the reason that I bring this up in this context is here is this Israeli publication that writes this article about, Hey, we're fighting in the spirit of Amalek from the Bible.
And, you know, uh, We're going to go out there and we're going to defend us in this righteous And we're going to have God's spirit with us to help us take out our enemies.
So that said, that gives the context.
And I asked Carl to sew this next little video in to sort of remind you of what really is taking place here so we can understand the context of what's really taking place here.
So let's show the next video and then I'll make a comment.
Okie doke.
I have not seen the video.
Hit it full screen.
I can try.
Sometimes it'll...
Okay, let's see what happens.
Yeah.
Nope.
Didn't work.
Hang on.
It won't allow to do the full screen, but let me just...
Okay, we'll just play it.
People can get the point here pretty easy.
This isn't a complex video to understand.
One thing I know is clouds are great.
So here's your October 7th footage, official.
Here's your October 7th footage, official.
Here's your October 7th footage.
Now, I'm sorry, which day?
Oh, October 7th, blue skies with hardly any clouds.
Blue skies October 7th.
Clear.
Beautiful day.
Snapshots of horror.
Cloudy day.
It needs the world to remember what triggered Israel's war with Hamas.
It's made of the carnage that unfolded here on the 7th of October.
I think you get the point.
I think that video goes, you know, close to 10 or 15 minutes, but I think we've shown enough, okay?
Definitely two different days of filming on two separate days for the horrific October 7th attack.
Now, You tell me, if you think that the monotheistic God of the universe, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus, would need to conduct a false flag event with filming on two different days to set the stage for a righteous destruction of the people of Palestine, Do you think that's what the real God would do?
And I'll make the argument that these people are a fraud.
They're a fraud, fraud, fraud.
Fraud.
The whole thing was a fraud.
It was nothing more than a real estate deal with a gentrification angle built into it for super rich and famous people that helped Israel continue to secure and expand its borders.
It's a fraud.
And how many people have been murdered?
What has happened as a result of this?
It's disgusting.
It's disgusting, disgusting, disgusting.
Yeah, and that's been in the entire history, and not just Israel, but all the countries, and that these lie-started illegal wars of aggression are to control resources, both natural and human.
And the death toll, they don't care.
They're without empathy.
They are disconnected.
The Israeli Mossad targets the ICC prosecutor.
This is the gray zone going after the story that Mossad threatened the ICC prosecutor over the war crimes inquiry.
And that's what you do, too, is that you got to dictate reality or attempt to be a dictator and not allow for any other free conversation or Consideration of the facts.
Israel's war on Gaza.
A broad range of international media tell the same story.
Surely the photos don't lie.
And I want to point out that Meryl Nass, the author, we feature her work often.
She says, I am proud to be a Jew.
I am ashamed and appalled at what the Israeli government is doing in my name and with my tax dollars.
This is my effort to stop them.
And in war, This is what you gotta do.
You want to diminish the power of your enemy and you do that by polarizing the issue and making it be clear that what we're talking about is the enemy are the ones who are engaged in the criminal behavior and you get as many people as you can on the other side to demand their Or they're somehow being prevented from causing more harm.
And the Satanists on the other side, they have to have war.
They engage in war all the time.
NATO chief warns Trump of quote-unquote dire threats to the U.S. over the peace deal in Ukraine.
So there's no option for peace from the people who are the psychopaths.
They're saying, oh, you see, if you have peace, then you're just going to get attacked.
So you have to be the one engaging in wars because you're the good people and they're the bad people and we've got to protect the good people from the bad people and they're the bad people and we're the good people even though we're the ones who are engaged in war, we're engaging in the war because they're the bad people.
Brian, any other thoughts, brother?
You know, I think in our community there We get a little bit confused about who's really in control.
And I don't blame our community for doing it because there's very little information related to, you know, the real identity of the Kabbal, whoever the Kabbal is.
Kabbal obviously would be short for Kabbalah, which is a very similar type of religion to what the Jews practice in the Talmud.
It's also incredibly similar to ancient paganism on many, many ways and includes all sorts of Deities or Elohim with negative intentions that includes Baphomet and Molech and, you know, you name it in terms of the territorial spirit that is anti-human and anti-God that has no redemption whatsoever.
That said, it's a little bit of a rant, but the Cabal are the bankster's The Council of 300, the high-level group of bloodlines That control the secret organizations and guide the secret organizations.
And here in America, the cabal is represented or controlling what we would call the deep state.
The deep state would be the American leg of the cabal here in America.
So now that we've identified the target, all we have to do is figure out how to root them out and separate them from us, if that's even possible.
And the question that's always coming up among our listeners is, is Donald Trump against the cabal?
Or is Donald Trump with the cabal?
Or is it some sort of combination of others?
Or does he change his mind and flip-flop?
What's the story?
Well, I think in a world as complex as this, it'd be incredibly difficult to come up with or to allow somebody into office that truly had a pure heart and a pure spirit all the way through.
You're talking about a religious theocracy type of prophet type of guy to be installed in such a dirty world as politics as America.
So you're never going to get Sort of the pure white driven snow sort of guy.
I look at Nixon and I listen to the Nixon tapes to sort of have an understanding of it.
I thought Nixon was a pretty good president and that I agree with the latest sort of analysis of Nixon that it was all a set up that the deep throat guy was all a set up and it was the whole thing was set up.
But if you go listen to his tapes Nixon's like, ah, the Jews this, the niggers that, this, this, this, this.
You know, he's always running around trying to fight off his enemies, and he does the best he can to sort of box them all up so that he can at least say, well, this is what they think, and this is what they think.
And, you know, there's a lot of generalization that takes place.
Because if you were to listen to, if Donald Trump were to listen to the opinions of 300 million Americans, he wouldn't have the processing capability to do it.
So you've got to group them all up.
That means that all these interests that have power, that have influence, the Adelsons, the Jews, you know, you name it, they're all going to have a piece of his ear if they've got enough money to get a piece of their ear.
So he's got a tough job of just sort of rooting out all the noise and trying to decide who's good and evil.
And a perfect example of that, we just listened to an article or we just saw an article from Meryl Nass, a Jew.
You know, let's talk about it.
There are some good guys out there.
Jonathan Cahn, a Jew.
Ron Unes, a Jew.
Brother Nathaniel, a Jew.
You know, wait, okay, so what are we just going to continue to brush them all with a big generalized brush?
Or are we going to be realistic about it?
There are evil people and there are good people.
And by your actions, I will define you and put you in the box that you belong in.
That's the best way I can look at it.
Other than that, politicians get a bit of a pass because they've got to get things accomplished in what we call a representational republic, also known as a democracy.
Very difficult.
If a democracy was truly a democracy, we'd all be wearing masks right now.
And with those Satanists, of course they want to have a group to hide behind.
It is going to be the Jewish religion.
And then, of course, the propagandists are going to try to paint anybody accusing the power structure in order to further protect the power structure.
They're just going to say, ah, they're against the Jews or even pretend...
Themselves to be against all Jews or to kill all Jews, blame all Jews in order to further insulate and protect that group on the inside who are calling the shots and are engaged in exactly as you're saying, by their fruits, you shall know them.
And in my experience, again, I talk a lot in the comments, at least anyway, of the approximately 100 individuals of that religion I know, almost all of them are non-practicing.
Most of them haven't read the book, and they haven't really thought about it.
And many of them are colleagues I work with, and they are as on fire for the truth and justice as anybody else.
And in engaging in a war, you want to get all the assets on your side.
You want to make it as easy as possible in order to crush the enemy.
You want them isolated.
And in terms of this war, where for all recorded history and all of the agencies and the power of the enemy, it's a big job, so you want to make it as easy as possible.
All right, we have several sections on the Trump team promises and challenges.
We have the FBI. I want to play this clip with Jimmy Dore.
As a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who defended a lot of these types of cases, what you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6th, because if you can show that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation.
Forget what the videotape shows.
Come on, we know they were involved.
There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building.
We said that when we watched the video.
Yes.
There was a congressman who's interviewing Christopher Wray and he said, did you have FBI assets dressed up as MAGA informants inside the Capitol before the riots started?
And the head of the FBI, current head of the FBI, Christopher Wray, said, I cannot answer that.
And the congressman said, the answer should be no!
So that means yes.
Here's him talking about January 6th.
I think as a former federal prosecutor and a public defender who def- And with that, the idea of the FBI, the FBI, their purpose has been in order to instigate crimes.
They were key and central to the cover-up of JFK's assassination, the murders of MLK, RFK. They are a criminal arm of the government.
All of them are really engaged in the opposite work of what they say.
So the Federal Bureau of Investigation is the Federal Bureau of Protection of their criminal masters and in order to remove, to criminalize, and to remove anybody who is a threat to the power of the cabal.
Brian, your thoughts?
January 6th was a traditional false flag.
We've seen this a thousand times.
They set up state actors inside the crowd.
They dress them up.
The state actors have a job to do.
It's a scripted job, and they're trying to bring along whatever passerby or witness happens to be there.
Now, I've seen false flags use, to some extent, real people.
I mean, was 9-11 a false flag?
Of course it was.
Was it blamed on Saddam Hussein, on Of course it was.
Was there 3,000 real people killed inside those World Trade Centers?
In that particular false flag, there was.
Now, your normal school shootings, no, nobody gets killed.
Those are routine false flag events where they use a pure actor set.
And then there are some sorts of hybrids that take place, such as January 6th, where you had innocent people that were along for the ride wanting to take a tour of the Capitol that got caught up in it.
And ended up in jail for a long, long time.
One of them even was accused of stealing Nancy Pelosi's computer, and she's still fighting that case.
So you've got all sorts of false flags.
The bottom line is, it's a deception designed to make your enemy look like they had committed some atrocity.
And we've seen it a thousand times over a million different ways.
They'll use mannequins, they'll use fake blood, they'll use Whatever they can.
They'll even use a fake shooting.
Remember how fake the Ashley Babbitt thing was?
So this is old school tactics.
They've been around a long time.
Our job is to expose them.
That's about all we can do because there's only so many people that are going to come listen to, you know, a bunch of conspiracy theorists on bitch shoot versus the mainstream media because it's much easier to settle back into your couch and let that...
Let that television screen mesmerize your mind so that you're more apt to take in the message consistently over and over and over again.
And if that lie gets told often enough, it's going to become the truth in terms of, oh, wow, now Wikipedia says it's the truth, so it must be the truth.
Very good.
Thank you.
And we have covered the trend with that, that CNBC and CNN now have fewer viewers than the Hallmark Channel.
Playing classic movies and women's features.
Alright, next.
The Trump team promises and challenges the murderous do land thievery.
And here, this is Blossom Inner Wellness in Hawaii, and they're asking the right questions.
What resource did Hawaii General Plan Management use for climate change?
And they're doing the work that is typical with what we do is we take the official story and we look at it and we find the lies and the inconsistencies and we ask questions and we expose the official obfuscations, refusals to answer and their lies in return.
And we have here the actor playing Biden pledges Africa another billion dollars to rebuild homes damaged by natural disasters and while ignoring millions of Americans still waiting for hurricane help.
So part of the opportunity.
And the challenge of the incoming Trump administration is that we have seen these due started fires in order to get people off the land and to steal the land.
And as far as I can tell, the official story of Trump coming in is silence on that.
There is no mention that we are under attack by our own government with directed energy weapons.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, I watched about 20 minutes, maybe 25 minutes of that Hawaiian conference.
It sounds to me like the people are beginning to get it in terms of, hey, wait a second, how come we keep using this word climate change as sort of the key word for why we should be taken off this land and why it ought to be too complex for us to build and be here?
How come we keep hearing the word climate change as sort of the excuse for the construction of these new 15-minute cities that are going to be able to be implemented with emergency safety protocols in the event of certain types of activities.
And the people are beginning to wake up and kick against the goads in terms of, hey, under no circumstance are we going to allow another martial law to come in here and freeze up all of our assets, freeze up all of our voices, And shut us up so that you can go ahead and take the land to make your 15-minute city Truman Show paradise.
You know, that's what these 15-minute cities are, these little fabricated, customized, highly secure NGO There's prisons that are protected from, you know, critical thinking.
Oh, it's an eco-chamber, a bubble.
And that's what these Hawaiian citizens seem to see coming.
As for the next, the next one was what?
It was the one billion of aid for African nations to rebuild homes damaged by natural disasters.
And yet we still haven't done anything with the Americans affected by the hurricanes in North Carolina.
Let me help you understand the latest video from James O'Keefe.
To understand this.
In this video, he has hidden, I think he sent in a gay, or somebody who was pretending to be gay, to date the Environmental Protection Agency's special advisor for implementation, and they did this five-minute video where the special advisor's like, Yeah, man, we got to spend all of our money.
We got to get it out there because we know once Trump comes in, all that money is going to be gone.
So we got to move it out.
We got to move it out fast, fast, fast.
He said, it truly feels like we're on the Titanic and we're throwing gold bars off the edge as this guy's scrambling to send billions and billions of dollars out to all of his NGO buddies and all of his To buy as much influence as you can before Trump comes in here and shuts the whole thing down.
And so this Brent Efron fag guy Basically, without realizing it, blows the cover off of the last minute spending spree that takes place to sort of buy a cover of protection and justify the emptying of the coffers prior to the new king coming into play.
And that's exactly what is taking place with this billion dollars being sent to Africa.
How many straw huts can you build with a billion dollars?
I mean, seriously.
Like a billion dollars.
No, it's just a payoff.
It's just another...
It's like Kamala Harris' $5,000 fingernails and her million dollar productions.
It's the same thing.
We're going to burn through all this money before the new king gets in place.
And I really hope that The Department of Governmental Efficiency can make some recommendations to Congress, not that they're gonna give a damn, but make some recommendations to them to cut back this waste and abuse and fraud and criminalize it once and for all.
I mean, there's got to be some sort of limitations on these Democrats who have control of these coffers.
It's ridiculous.
Thank you, Brian.
Yeah, it is ridiculous.
Alrighty, next.
Next challenge.
DEI Lawfare on Toxic Masculinity to Neuter Patriots.
Penny for your thoughts, El Gato Malo.
There is a fight for civilization.
Choose your fighter.
So there's the prosecutor.
And she is Jewish.
She is a lesbian.
And the prosecutor is a former U.S. Marine.
And the story is, is that a guy who was homeless, who had been arrested 44 times, mostly for violent crimes, he was making lethal threats, including to a mother with a two-year-old child.
And the Marines stepped in, neutralized the threat.
The cops refused to give life-saving mouth-to-mouth For that guy?
And then the choice is going to be, who are you going to back?
Choose your fighter.
Let me address that one just real quick, okay?
Your local bazillionaire, kajillionaire, cabal member knows that there's a tremendous amount of money to be made within a chaotic environment.
In addition, as long as people are scared, there's more money to be made for the security industrial complex.
And as long as wars continue, including potentially even civil wars continue, there's money to be made.
It is times of peace and rest where true capitalists can come in and build a new company and do something well and get the loan and build that business.
It's in times of chaos that the banks don't want a loan to the smaller guy and it makes it much more difficult to get your business idea or get whatever off the ground to make a living.
And so I think that these global cabal of banksters It supports these sort of liberal, lesbian, Jewish prosecutors to sort of ensure that we have a certain level of chaos in society because the more things are swirling around in the midst of a storm, the harder it is to see who the enemy is that just did the geoengineering that caused the storm.
Well stated.
And in terms of a solution, I'll put into the show notes at BitChute that, I guess about 10 years ago I had read approximately 50 economic cost-benefit analyses all demonstrating that we save money by ending homelessness.
90% of the people who you offer a shelter, they work their way out of the shelter within a year because they want more for themselves than a shelter.
You provide them with job training, a safe place, you have them off the streets.
One of the things that was not accounted for in these professional economic cost-benefit analyses...
Is the cost to businesses when you have these dangerous, foul-smelling individuals urinating and defecating in the streets to discourage a good, healthy business environment?
You save money on every application, every example.
Alright, another challenge.
Border invasion and the consequences.
New York City is now home to over 58,000 criminal migrants, including more than 1,000 gang members, according to ICE. And that is going to...
Now, I don't know anything other than that report that we just saw of part of the problem on the subway with Mr. Penny.
But that 58,000 is going to be a problem.
And that's it for that one.
And if you have Trump promising to vacate the United States from all of those illegal migrants, then that is going to be a significant logistical challenge.
And I'm not sure about how the details about how they're going to plan that out.
I don't know if they're going to give the details.
I don't know how serious they are.
On executing that, we have covered that some of the Democratic leaders are promising to obstruct federal justice and to uphold the illegality of their presence here.
So we'll see how that plays out.
That is going to be a significant challenge.
Brian.
Well, in the context of this, I'd like to remind you that we have the right to remain silent, and that means under certain circumstances, we can refuse an unlawful search and seizure as American citizens, which means in theory, regardless of the color of my skin, they don't have the right to just walk up to me and ask me for my ID. Now, let me ask you a question.
Do the migrants even have ID? Do they even speak the language?
I mean, sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.
But how?
How are you going to divide and separate the migrants from the Americans unless you have to wait for them to be detained for committing a crime?
Because you can't just go out there and violate the rights of all Americans.
And I love this, the newest sort of police audit movement that's been developing on YouTube over the last few years, where people go out there and peacefully exercise their rights only to get harassed by cops.
I think High Impact Flicks covers it, and there's a number of different YouTube channels where people go out and sort of audit the local police forces.
But why do I bring that up in the context of Donald Trump promising to rid us of the scourge of these infected rats that have come across the border?
I want you to think about the real nature of that.
Our Constitution has not been suspended yet.
So how in the world are you going to identify who's here illegally and illegally until you detain them on suspicion of a crime in order to identify them?
So we got a big problem here.
A real big problem here in terms of these people are probably here to stay no matter how much our Wonderful leader Donald Trump tries to convince us that the new Border Patrol guy, Tom Holman, is going to somehow have some magical power to walk into Chicago or New York and cleanse it of 58,000 illegals.
How is that going to take place?
So, we've got a major problem.
We're going to have to figure out a way to assimilate the ones that don't cause problems.
It's going to probably have to happen some way, but it's going to have to be a long, drawn-out, committed process where if you commit any crime whatsoever during the time where you're waiting to go through this process, you're gone.
And you're just going to have to go educate yourself about what a crime is and isn't here in America, because you got to understand, you got to live within the context of society.
Now, have we been beefing up the security forces?
Oh yeah, what do you think these false flags are all about?
They're about building a massive security force that's capable of sacking These communities.
But again, if one man has rights that are violated within that community, there's a lawsuit waiting to happen for whatever police force or police person that violated them.
So I don't think it's going to be as easy as anybody thinks.
How in the world do you take a look at a sea of people and automatically decide that these people belong and these people don't unless you have absolute 100% lack of personal security, meaning They adopt facial recognition devices with 99.999% accuracy and can cross-reference with American-issued ID and say this person is a citizen and this one's not.
And if we go there, I don't know if I want to be a part of it anyway.
What a mess.
I mean, you're talking about What was that show, Black Mirror?
Or, yeah, it was Black.
I mean, you're just talking about an insane level of a surveillance state in order to accomplish that.
Maybe that's what Donald Trump's going to try to accomplish with Tom Oman, to get rid of these people.
Maybe not.
I don't know.
Yeah, we'll see.
We'll find out.
We, with Joe and Chris, played a clip of Killary from maybe 20 years ago, saying exactly as Brian was suggesting, that if somebody is here illegally and they get caught for a crime, they're out.
They're out.
And then going back into the 1950s with Eisenhower with, I believe it was Operation Wetback, they went to the large employers and looked at it from that perspective of who was lawfully employed and who was not.
And that would be sufficient prima facie evidence that somebody is being employed who does not have the legal status to be employed.
But we'll see.
I'll tell you, I had a client that had a very large lawn mowing company, and I managed the company's health insurance, which meant I had access to the employee payrolls and the health election information.
And I can tell you for certain that I remember running into a problem With a health insurance application that I'd gotten, and this does not sound like a small story, but stay with me,
where we had seven different guys that were sharing the same social security number operating under the same name that had purchased six or seven different health insurance supplemental policy programs under all the same social security number within the group.
And I remember You know, kind of stepping into the CEO's office and saying, this ain't gonna fly.
What do you want to do with this?
Because I can't collect one premium and cover seven different households.
So what are you gonna do?
And he's like, well, we can't change our policies.
These guys all take shifts.
They all sit on lawnmowers and, you know, they all get one paycheck and they decide to split it among themselves.
Yeah, that's how crazy it was.
That's how crazy it was.
Because they found a social security number that would work for all these illegals.
Yeah, it happened.
It's real.
Yeah, and you know, As an inner-city Los Angeles teacher, most of the students that I had working for LA Unified, I volunteered to teach at the hard-to-staff schools, and these people are scrambling,
these people are working so hard to give their kids an opportunity for a better life, and almost all of them are here illegally, and they're only here because the options for employment here are better than at home in Mexico.
Alright, next, our satanic debt system.
I want to give Ken O'Keefe a couple of minutes here.
Up here, oh wait, it doesn't say Federal Reserve Note, it says United States Note.
That means the US government, which every government has the ability to do, Canada used to do it, Germany did it, a whole bunch of other places did it, and guess what?
They got really good results.
You know what they did?
They managed to go ahead and keep any debt at a very reasonable and payable level.
Now, this United States note, that's not at interest.
It's not a private bank.
And JFK was dead within six months of issuing this $5 note.
We could solve the problems that we face right now.
I have said over and over, like a broken record, the head of the snake is the financial system.
The reason why they hate people like Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, John F. Kennedy, oh, and the last one, a man named Adolf Hitler.
He outlawed usury.
Jesus didn't like usury either.
Now, the history tells us that we shouldn't entertain anything possibly good about this man.
But I'll tell you what I know I like and I respect.
He ended the usury that now translates to, I don't know what it is here in the Netherlands.
In the UK, I think it's like six, seven trillion pounds.
In America, we've just hit 34 trillion.
First off, even if we ventured to pay back the debt, there isn't enough money in circulation to even pay it back.
So who are we in debt to?
They want to say it's China.
They want to say it's this.
They want to say everyone but the Federal Reserve Bank.
And who owns that?
It's a private bank.
Am I anti-Semitic for pointing out that the Rothschilds-controlled Federal Reserve Bank has indebted not only America, the Bank of England?
Who owns that?
They've owned.
The Rothschilds have owned that since the 17th century.
Yeah, and that's big and that has implications for it and this is the article that I have if you'd like me to brief you on the topic of monetary reform and public banking is that there are technical solutions that end the problems in our economy almost instantly and the value of those two reforms It's about a million dollars per U.S. household.
And I say this with every academic and professional certainty based upon the data and the expert testimony of people promoting this idea, and this is based upon published research via the Claremont Colleges.
And with what Ken was talking about, this is the green Federal Reserve seal And it just says this note is legal tender.
And it just says the United States of America, and that's what we're familiar with.
What he was talking about is what Kennedy issued.
And this is the red seal.
Let me take it out of here to get rid of the glare.
And that's issued by the Treasury Department.
And it's still just $2, and it just says it's a United States note.
And going back to where we might have in the future, this is a 1935 silver certificate.
And this says, this certifies that there is on deposit in the Treasury of the United States of America, $1 in silver payable to the bearer on demand.
So if you didn't like the paper bill, you could exchange it.
And if we go back a little bit further, this is 1917. The bills used to be bigger.
I'll give you a There.
And this again says this note is legal tender for $1 and will pay to the bearer $1.
And that would be based upon the stated value at the time of the exchange.
So, that is another challenge and opportunity of the incoming Trump administration, and I have heard nothing officially.
Just Trump saying that he wants to make America rich again or something like that.
But no details on its face, just absolutely stupid to the collapse of this inversion of a monetary system, a debt system that must be great reset.
Brian, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's going to have to get great reset.
For a second, let's just theoretically understand the dollar.
It's a unit of labor.
Back in the olden days, you'd dig a ditch and you'd get paid your unit of labor.
And when your units of labor added up to the value of a dollar, then you could go trade that labor for a note that would allow you to go purchase something of one dollars worth of unit of labor.
Here in America, we make our money through units of labor and Part of that labor is the intellectual process and actual physical process of buying something at a low price and selling it at a higher price.
It's an asymmetry of information that allows our intellectuals to skip the digging ditches part of the labor.
And go right to the buy low, sell high scenario.
Now, let me ask you a question.
What does the Federal Reserve buy low and sell high?
And when you go issue more dollars with quantitative easing, are you really out there issuing them as units of labor?
Allow me to remind you about what that guy just said and throw a little context in it.
He said, oh yeah, Hitler was able to outlaw usury and Hitler was able to rebuild the currency after the hyperinflation kicked in post Treaty of Versailles and that's what the National Socialist Party or the Nazi Party really became.
Now, when the Nazi party went into full bloom, full blossom, they were basically cultists at that particular time, and some of the atrocities they committed were just as bad as the ones the Russians committed, and the Bolsheviks committed, and all the villains of history were willing to commit.
How did they get there?
Units of labor are what brought them their German mark that helped them recover.
What the government did is they came out and they said, listen, if you go out there and work on the project that we need for our infrastructure, we will issue you a certificate that allows you a mark that allows you to go buy X amount of bread and cheese and whatever.
So it was direct...
And the people all got together and they were so happy and we're going to work because the government is now giving us a unit of labor that's equal to a unit of labor in terms of purchasing power.
And hey, we all got together and you know what?
We're coming back.
Well, why was coming back so important?
Because they had been humiliated.
And destroyed one of the most powerful nations in the world, one of the most prideful group of people, German citizens, had been humiliating and brought to the lowest place possible before they were willing to rise up, work together, build the National Socialist Party, and become what they became, a group that could have taken over the entire world.
Now, That said, what do you think our youth is worth in terms of units of labor?
What does the next generation look like in terms of units of labor with automation, with all the intellectual property that drives the robotics and the workforces and the ports and everything like that?
I can guarantee you that a unit of labor leans much more heavily in favor of the company that owns the intellectual assets than it does of the man who controls the machine.
Those people will make a lot of money, but by going this direction, when we go this direction, you better expect that we're not going to get motivated to put units of labor into play like we ought to, unless we have to go through hitting rock bottom, which means that America may indeed unless we have to go through hitting rock bottom, which means that America may indeed America may indeed have to deal with all the things Germany did.
And then we may indeed come out on the other side just like the Nazis.
Why would we be any different?
Do you really think that you've got something special?
Are we this religious people anymore?
Do we still go to church?
Do we still understand the morals and the platforms that drive us?
Food for thought.
Yeah, in terms of what the Germans did, it was a partial application of monetary reform, and monetary reform is creating money for direct investment into infrastructure.
And the benefit of that, you get triple benefits.
You get the improved infrastructure, you get up to full employment, and to the extent the infrastructure contributes to a stronger economy, Above and beyond the cost of the investment, you get overall falling prices.
The only real limits to the economy is labor and resources.
So, as far as we can tell through the limited applications throughout history is that that again would be a no-brainer.
And the other one, public banking, is that you create credit if you issue Monetary reform, that's creating money as a positive number.
If you want to create it as a negative number to control the supply of what you're using for money, then you should do it in-house and at cost.
One state, North Dakota, has their own bank.
The other 49 do not.
So they sell debt securities through the Wall Street brokers to maximize the profit of the investors.
But in North Dakota, they...
In-house and at-cost, baby, and they're the only state with increasing budget surpluses.
The advantage of that is on the 30-year life of these bonds, it doubles the nominal cost of what you borrowed.
So you can eliminate 50% of the cost.
It is a no-brainer, but people don't know it.
And unless we have, you know, I keep saying that we need this breakthrough, otherwise these ideas, it isn't going to matter.
From time to time, I do contribute to the listserv among 2,000 advanced placement macroeconomic teachers led by a PhD professor who is the moderator.
I think he's a professor at Tulane.
And I have been forbidden from introducing any current events into the discussion.
And I was permanently banned from the AP U.S. government discussion board when I brought up during the Obama administration saying, hey, here's the war law after two treaties, and on its face, Obama's wars are just continuing the illegal wars of aggression of the United States.
Does anybody see it any differently?
Here's the documentation, and it is published research.
They banned me from Contributing anymore, they kicked me off the listserv with just saying that, Mr. Herman, it's not appropriate to consider the legality of war in a college-level U.S. government class and with no opportunity to discuss that with anybody or to ask for any further explanation.
So they would have kicked me off.
So I just put things in from time to time.
And a couple days ago, one of the teachers on the AP macro board said, you know, they're changing the AP psych test.
And I'm wondering if anybody has any information of what might be on the horizon for the AP macro test.
So I saw that as enough of an opportunity that says, yeah, one of the things that's going to be on the horizon is this acceleration of the national...
And aggregate debt, that has to be great reset one way or another, and that, of course, on the horizon, we can all see it coming, will greatly change what we teach and what we test for students in economics.
Does anybody see any other way?
Out of this because the net cost of servicing the national debt is approaching a trillion dollars.
That's pushing near to $10,000 a year for the average American household making about $50,000 a year.
And if you make whatever you make, if your household makes $150,000 a year, then You know, your cost for the interest to the national debt every year is going to be almost $30,000 a year.
And nobody responded.
And that's been the history of even among the educated people who you would think would show some interest.
Nothing.
All right.
Maha.
You have an anti-RFK article in the global development publication, DevX, reveals much about DHHS's international involvement that might benefit from change.
And they're talking about, so the propagandists in the media who are controlled and owned and criminally complicit and necessary for the empire Of course, they're attacking RFK2 for his questions on the jabs and in general for the whole regime and all of the institutions to keep us stupefied as they try to literally cull and kill us.
We have the assassination What we're shown, anyway, the UnitedHealthcare CEO, Brian Thompson.
And the idea of the denial rates by insurance companies, UHC leads the group with 32%, and that is to maximize their profits.
They do so by denying claims, wanttoknow.info.
This is my friend and colleague Fred Burks, former State Department official as Health Information Center.
And this is a great amount of resources, but in order to just give you an idea of the playing field, we do have an expert witness, Dr. Marcia Angle.
She is the former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, and she is a professor emeritus at Harvard's Medical School.
The combined profits for the top 10 drug companies in the Fortune 500 were We're more than the profits for the other 490 businesses put together.
Over the past two decades, the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs.
A marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the U.S. Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself.
And she wrote a book on that, and it's about as on fire as you can get.
We have here George Webb doing pioneering work as UnitedHealthcare CEO Killer, a School of Assassins graduate.
And he's taken a look that in the history of generating assassins and what the evidence shows that what we might have here, and I think this article here shows two different pictures, and these are two different jackets.
So you got this guy and then this guy, but what this jacket shows further down is pockets.
And the other guy does not have...
Let's see the other guy here.
Here we go.
So we have pockets and no pockets.
Web is pointing out that how assassins are trained is you put a couple of them on the ground and you want to cause confusion.
So he's asking the appropriate question that it looks like this might have been a team hit, a professional hit.
And I don't know.
We have vaccine researcher Peter Hotez announces a whole litany of viruses to be unleashed on America, but not until the clock strikes midnight on January 21st, 2025. Quote, we have some big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st.
Yeah, and Hotez, we have featured him before on one of the leading pimps.
For the culling of the sheeple.
Good news, the pandemic treaty negotiators conclude their week-long meeting in Geneva right now without an agreement.
Ding dong, the treaty is dead.
That would be nice.
We shall see what develops from that.
And then we have warp speed.
How long can the big lie be maintained?
We have the House Oversight Subcommittee acknowledged a lot of the lies and the crimes in their 520 page report, but they also have the big lie that the vaccines saved lives.
So, of course, that is going to be a high point of concern.
And those are promises and challenges coming into the Trump administration with making America healthy.
Again, Brian, your thoughts, brother?
Well, I guess in this situation, I'm going to gravitate towards the articles related to the CEO, the current CEO of what has become the megacorporation, UnitedHealthcare.
I don't think they're quite as big as the blues are.
And I say the blues, I mean like Blue Cross Blue Shield Alabama, Blue Cross Blue Shield Texas, the different blue organizations that have different geographical rates.
I don't think they're quite as big as those blue organizations are.
Blue is a type of organization that's a little bit different than traditional insurance.
And UnitedHealthcare is generally known as a traditional insurance type of company.
And just so you understand, United Healthcare, when we first got in the business, was sort of a smaller regional healthcare player that had spread out to many different regions.
But what they had done that made them the mega company that they are today is that they changed the...
It was the CEO at the time, a guy by the name of William McGuire, who basically rolled out what was called a contingency compensation arrangement.
Which was a way to double the bonuses and incomes for the brokers, the middlemen, who would help them distribute their high profit product.
And I say that when it comes to health insurance, some people are very profitable and some people are not profitable.
It's always a gambling game.
But I can guarantee you, every time the dice are thrown, there's middleman fees that represent about 30 cents on the dollar.
There's fronting fees, there's fixed fees, there's financing fees, there's administration fees, there's compliance fees, there's enrollment fees, you name it.
I mean, 30 cents on the dollar are middlemen that are almost completely unnecessary.
But it's the middlemen who run the lobbies That buy off the politicians and make sure that the system isn't changed.
And what's happened over the last 20 years is that as United Healthcare has grown because they offered a contingency compensation arrangement to their Quote, unquote, marketing partners, which basically is just a seedy, dirty way of saying we're going to give you a backdoor bonus that's not tied to any particular employer client of yours, because we would have to disclose the commission on the client itself.
But instead, we're going to give you an annualized backdoor bonus based on the entire block of business that you place with us, and that way you don't have to disclose it to your clients how much money you're really making.
What was William McGuire, who rolled out sort of the mega contingency compensation arrangement, And the next thing you know, all the big brokerage houses were like, hey, whatever it takes, we got to sell UnitedHealthcare because look at this, we're going to have an extra house at the end of the year for every one of our top executives in terms of just our bonus for selling this profitable business.
Now, what that did Was it got the brokers to start sort of rigging the bids so that the really healthy, profitable business went over to UnitedHealthcare and the dirty dogs that had huge age sex factors and bad geographical factor, those dirty cases, they ended up getting kicked down to the smaller guys.
And of course, the smaller guys suffered massive losses as a result of taking on, you know, a group with You know, an age sex factor of 69 and, you know, 69% over 50, female.
And, you know, once you take on a risk like that, you just can't collect enough premium to put in the pot to pay for all the expenses that are going to come out of the pot.
So what happened is you had a separation in the market where UnitedHealthcare sort of rose to the top in terms of getting all the cream.
And everybody else that had sicknesses inside their group, severe cancers, preemie babies and such, sort of dropped down to the bottom and ended up sort of dropping out of the health insurance market because the costs, you just couldn't collect enough money to pay for those sick groups.
So fundamentally, what took place was that UnitedHealthcare offers this This massive bonus, right?
And so let's talk about the benevolent Elliot Spitzer, the Attorney General of the State of New York.
You might remember his name.
Do you remember him?
He got caught with a prostitute or something like that.
But he was, you know, a big swinging dick back in the Clinton administration and others.
Anyway, Spitzer gets wind of a bid rigging strategy down in North Carolina regarding some of the brokers.
Well, what the brokers were doing was that they'd...
They'd go find their small third-party administrator, their local small third-party administrator, and say, look, we need you to issue a quote that's like 60% higher than what you would normally take it with.
And if you do that, we'll give you this other group over here that's a little bit more profitable for you.
But we just want to see that big, fat quote.
And then they would use the quote to say, oh, look, UnitedHealthcare's pricing is so good.
Because look at this, a little TPA comes in right here.
So it was a bid rigging strategy that got uncovered on a school district and a number of other different school districts related to these brokers trying to get these backdoor contingency compensation arrangements.
So it was greed that drove the massive growth of UnitedHealthcare.
And then, of course, given enough time and enough money, well, so Spitzer comes in and he's, oh, I'm going to bust this up.
I'm going to put the foot down.
It was just a shakedown.
Because he got the big brokerages, Mercer, Marsh, no, it was Marsh at the time, settled their portion of the lawsuit.
They settled out of court so that nothing would change in terms of industry standards.
They settled out of court for $1.6 billion.
At the time, Marsh's entire annual revenue was $1.3 billion.
So they paid off Spitzer and New York so that they could continue to play the game.
And nobody else picked up the case.
No other state attorney generals picked up the case.
That's how rotten, just rotten, the system is.
Of course, I was a part of it.
I have been a part of it, and I'm thinking about going back into it.
Deny, defend, yeah.
But what I think is really going on here in terms of conspiracy, I don't know if this guy was really shot or no.
I don't know if you really have a dead body or no.
I don't know if you really have an assassin squad or not.
I don't know if the pictures all match.
If the pictures don't match, you would think the detectives would have picked it up.
Maybe the detectives used facial recognition technology and got some doppelganger, or maybe they used some sort of body shape indicator and got some doppelganger when they stripped through, you know, 30 million people at the local subway.
I don't know what they've got.
I don't know what they think they've got, but I can tell you this.
This is setting the stage for making the health insurance companies the villain.
And by the way, UnitedHealthcare is a villain.
They're no hero to anybody, anywhere, anytime.
They're just not a hero.
They are a villain, but they're no more villain or less villain than all the rest of the villains in a villainous game that includes hospitals that are just as villainous when it comes to their billing structures, and even some doctors that are just as villainous when it comes to their billing structures.
That's a long story short.
I don't want to give you guys a lecture about it, but I'm going to tell you something.
The whole damn industry is rotten.
And no, the government cannot fix it by creating a one-size-fits-all health plan that's going to serve the groups with the nasty age sex factors, as well as the groups that have all the millennials that all they do is have babies and they never get sick.
Now that's a gravy group.
You're just collecting premium.
You don't pay any claims.
The old one, you can't collect enough premium to pay the claims.
Anyway, a little lecture on it because I have a lot of history there, but I'm telling you that the entire structure is rigged to not allow younger, fresher, competitive players to come in and play.
Now the cost of entry into that business is so high because of the compliance demands that you basically have to be a billionaire To be able to purchase a piece of the game, and then you'd have to be able to be so spry in terms of your ability to put together product offerings that are attractive to employers and brokerages that it's a really tall order.
Big money game.
I appreciate Brian's expert testimony.
And that represents the challenge that if we are to have a honest system that actually produces profits and a product that is worth having, the challenge for that is tremendous.
Deregulation is the only way.
The only way is to allow fresher minds to compete with a blank slate.
You don't have to live by all the compliance demands.
May the best idea win.
Good luck.
There's going to be some failures.
We can't protect everybody all the time.
Good luck.
Invite the newer, younger, fresher players to come in with better ideas and then you might have a chance of reforming the system.
But you've got to let those younger players like David versus Goliath go up against UnitedHealthcare.
And they can because UnitedHealthcare has a massive legacy computer structure that can't adjust for anything.
It's like driving a 600-ton tank in terms of their systems.
It's crazy industry.
It is crazy.
All right.
Dem party, speaking of crazy, are the Dems self-destructing?
And we have here a story of the Dem mega-donor spills the tea, says the party leaders never wanted Kamala.
This is Lindy Lee.
And her story is that she knows for sure that on the inside, what the Dem leaders wanted is they wanted to have a blitz primary in order to choose another candidate besides Biden.
But what Biden did instead is he immediately endorsed Kamala, and that kind of damned the leadership into going into that direction.
And the optic for that is a non-democratic process for, again, Kamala.
I mean, I think they chose the least popular candidate as Biden's VP candidate after choosing the worst presidential candidate in Biden.
White House reporters fume at Propaganda Pierre for lying about Hunter Biden pardon in a brutal press briefing.
And some of the feelings are spilling over into this.
And Propaganda Pierre's line is saying, look...
He did give his word as a Biden.
And he did keep his word as a Biden.
Except he changed his mind.
Just over a weekend.
Based upon, you know, because Trump is bad.
Otherwise, he would have kept his word.
It's only because Trump is bad that they had to change it.
And, of course, that isn't going over very well in the political environment.
So, you know, I have to wonder who is writing these scripts.
They seem irrecoverable.
Preemptive pardons in Banana Republics, a preemptive pardon of Anthony Fauci and others would not be a legal action but a political action that one might expect in Equatorial Guinea.
So, that is a good point.
There is no preemptive pardon.
And the limit of the pardon of the president is against any federal crime that has received a conviction.
That's the limit of it.
That's what the pardon means.
But that might not stop in the show of the script of just issuing blanket pardons for whatever.
It has to destroy the definition of a pardon.
And again, in terms of the legality, those who...
Those of us who know a little bit about the law, it's tragic comic, but it's in every area.
Anybody who knows anything about what they're looking at is tragic comic and just prima facie illegal.
Brian, your thoughts?
I absolve you.
I absolve you from your crimes.
What do we have, a pope in office?
It's ridiculous.
Ridiculous.
Look, I understand there's a time and a place for a presidential pardon when national security is at risk or some other issue.
I mean, you can put a lot into the bucket of national security, but this is pretty ridiculous.
As for Corrine Jean-Pierre, she's been a clown since day one, raggedy Ann.
Nobody believed anything she said that took her, you know, I'm surprised that the press continued to show up at the press briefings as gaslighting and disgusting as she actually was.
Peter Hoteth, you know, was that his name, the guy, the reporter?
Oh, Peter Doocy.
Doocy, yeah, he did a good job of pinning her.
Quite a bit.
But what a joke.
I mean, I hope...
Do we have a press secretary for Trump yet?
Yeah, I don't remember who it was, but a female.
It's not Alex Jones?
No, no.
They decided that they would get somebody else.
Oh, too bad.
I would have gone for Alex Jones.
Is that Tucker Carlson?
Oh, no.
He doesn't want the job.
Yeah, look...
That job was nothing more than a gaslight job.
I don't know what else to say about that.
And what were the rest of the stories that I think I missed them.
So anyway, yeah, that's kind of all I have to say about that set.
Nobody believes there's no credibility whatsoever.
And that might be the point of the script, and that's great.
All right, finally.
So, if the Satanists are in charge, and going back to the Old Testament, they attempted to create human beings not discerning good from evil to work in their gardens and made in their image, this is a film clip From an English hospital in 1914 and it is part of a longer film clip that I looked at and these are newsreels or so they're saying.
Now these are revealing and what you're about to see is about 30 babies of similar age and they are going to be treated as a commodity.
They're not individuated.
They don't have names yet.
And the question is, where did they come from?
I'll turn the sound off.
It's just fake anyway.
I mean, they're just grabbing those things.
They don't have names.
They don't have parents who are there waiting for them and care for them.
Now, that has implications.
That means something.
So those babies had to come from somewhere.
And what I'm suggesting is what we're talking about with Tartaria, with the destruction of at least one human civilization, and the idea that our opponents have relatively high technology compared to us.
That if they would want to create a slave race, then you've got to get that party started and they can GMO human beings.
And again, the idea of the clue from the Old Testament is to make them not be able to discern good from evil.
Okay?
Take a look at our world in the present for the people who are the audience members considering this information who have attempted to communicate basic facts for even our survival to the normies, to the sheeple, and discovering that they do not have the capacity to engage in factual conversations.
And I'll put into the show notes just the preview for the recent iteration of Westworld with Anthony Hopkins.
And those creatures...
In that story, if they came across information that disrupted their scripted programming, they were programmed to look at something and not be able to see it and simply respond, doesn't look like anything to me.
So maybe, just maybe, assuming that that newsreel is authentic, then you have to come up to an explanation about where all those babies came from, somehow hatched at the same time, and somehow being treated as not individuals.
Brian, your thoughts?
It's mesmerizing to me.
I mean, there might have been some event that led to some sort of baby boom, like maybe a return of a ship of sailors that had been at sea for a year that all had doting wives waiting at home.
And they all got pregnant on the same night, I suppose.
And maybe some of that frequency generation technology that was floating around and being tested was able to split embryos and cause a number of different sets of twins and triplets and quadruplets.
Who knows?
I can't possibly explain it without understanding more context behind it.
All those babies looked exactly the same age, the same color, the same, you know, but I know, you know, they looked about to be of the same health.
So I would suspect that Well, I don't know what to think about it.
Boy, I wish we had more.
I'd take on about six or seven of them babies right now.
It wouldn't bother me.
We could probably hire somebody to help us out with it.
I happen to be a guy who believes that you should have more children.
This is from a guy that Only had one.
My wife had two of her own.
And now as empty nesters with our youngest daughter being off at college, I can pretty coherently say my biggest regret in life was not having more babies when I was younger.
And so now I try to dole out that advice as much as possible to the younger generation.
Because, you know, I've just got a bunch of damn dogs crawling up my legs all the time, and it's not as good as babies.
All right.
Well, thank you, brother.
Final thoughts.
Hang in there.
It's the 8th of December.
Next weekend, we're going to have the False Flags and Conspiracy Conference.
That's going to be the mid-part of the month.
We still don't have a breakthrough event, and a breakthrough event, that's going to be something that is going to shatter the normies' ability to To believe anything that our leaders are going to be saying.
So it's still a dangerous, volatile time.
And just hang in there.
Something will break.
Brian, final thoughts.
You know, the Peter Hotez thing, you know, coming off with a list of all the scary diseases that were going to break out on the day after inauguration, that stinks.
That stinks to high heaven for me.
And It makes me wonder, you know, when they had their sort of post-COVID review of all the policies and all the things that they tried and all the psychological tests that they brought out, what did they find was effective and what did they find wasn't effective and why was it effective?
And, you know, I imagine that they're in there wargaming the next sort of supernatural event.
But right now, my instincts are leaning towards the fake alien invasion.
As being sort of the big hit that causes Trump to have to set up another huge federal agency or, you know, fund Space Force.
More wars, there could be another nuclear war, something like that, or EMP going off.
Look, they've kept American citizens on American soil pretty safe for a long time, with the only enemy being, you know, our own community in terms of violence and stupidity.
But I don't know how they're going to hit us, and I don't know if the cabal intends to dethrone American hegemony.
I get the feeling that there's really not another society that should have sort of master power over America, but I am concerned that the new technology being in the hands, and you'll see this during my presentation with the False Flags and Conspiracies Conference,
but I'm deeply concerned about who has control of this new old technology that's being deployed and being exposed to humanity.
For the first time, what's that going to look like?
And how are they going to use it to enslave us?
Because they're certainly not going to use it to enrich us.
They're going to enrich themselves.
They have an asymmetry of information that's vastly beyond our ability to comprehend.
Now, if your normal American citizens and people that understood physics and things like that could get a hold of it, maybe we could have some competition.
But my instinct is that the government is going to do the same thing they did in health care, which is pass a big law to restrict competition and make sure that whatever the new technology and power is stays in the hands of their partners and friends rather than out there in the community thinking.
Think about all the water engines and, you know, competitors for traditional gas engines, hydrogen engines and such that have never gotten off the ground because of government threats.
I expect that the same thing is going to take place.
The government's going to pick its partners and pick the winners and the losers, just like Facebook.
And all the others.
Amazon was obviously a selected winner because they didn't have to pay postal fees, you know.
So I don't know.
We'll see how it goes.
See how it goes.
Yeah, we will see how it goes.
Thank you very much, Brian.
Thank you, Patriots.
▲
Export Selection