All Episodes
Dec. 6, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:56:44
The Raw Deal (6 December 2024) with co-host John Carman & special guest James Perloff
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Not just anybody.
You know I need someone.
So much younger than today.
I never needed anybody's help in any way.
Oh, now these days are not so self-assured.
But now I find the pain in my mind.
I know I love the God.
Tell me if you can, I'm feeling now.
And I do appreciate you being around This is that Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B, the sixth day of December 2024, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B, the sixth day of December 2024, coincidentally
I'm very delighted if, as my guest, Jane Perloff, we're going to be addressing his research on the Trump cabinet.
Which includes so many Zionist zealots.
Before we get there, however, I want to begin with a few news stories by way of background and obtain James' comments thereupon, because some of them are fairly disturbing.
Putin, of course, has declared that Russia can hit decision-making centers in Ukraine with his Roshnik missile.
This is this fabulous hypersonic missile.
That delivers six pods, each of which have six missiles, so we're talking about one weapon delivering 36 warheads.
It travels at multiple times the speed of sound.
It actually hits at 11 Mach.
It's an unstoppable weapon.
He is seeking to telegraph to the west.
That this would be a bad idea for the war to continue, especially for NATO to attack Russia.
But I'm not at all confident the message is being received.
James, your thoughts about this?
Yeah, the threat is very real.
And, you know, when Biden authorized the Throwing a long-range U.S. missiles from Ukraine into Russia.
Putin knew that only U.S. technicians could do this.
It was really an act of war by Biden.
I was very concerned.
I was so concerned that day that I called up all of my representatives' offices, congressional offices, and said, you know, Congress needs to exert this unconstitutional act of war.
I think Putin is going to be very reserved about I'm taking this beyond Ukraine, but the threat is very significant.
One thing I have noticed about Trump's cabinet, while they are very anti-Iran, none of them seems particularly interested in continuing the war in Ukraine that I've seen, at least so far.
I'm not worried about the war with Russia unless it comes in as an ally of Iran right around on the pike where I see North's fierce hawk-like attitude amongst the Trump cabinet.
Yeah, very good observation.
Tucker has interviewed the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, who is by far...
Minister Lavrov, thank you for doing this.
...experienced...
...in the world today.
Let's make a little bit of their conversation.
...in any case...
Minister Lavrov, thank you for doing this.
Do you believe the United States and Russia are at war with each other right now?
I wouldn't say so, and...
In any case, this is not what we want.
We would like to have normal relations with all our neighbors, of course, but generally with all countries or not, especially with the great country like the United States.
President Putin repeatedly expressed his respect for the American people, for the American history, for the American achievements in the world.
And we don't see any reason why Russia and the United States cannot cooperate for the sake of the universe.
But the United States is funding a conflict that you're involved in, of course, and now is allowing attacks on Russia itself.
So that doesn't constitute war?
Well, we Officially are not at war.
But what is going on in Ukraine is the...
Some people call it hybrid war.
I would call it hybrid war as well.
But it is obvious that the Ukrainians would not be able to do what they're doing with long-range modern weapons without direct participation of the American servicemen.
And this is dangerous, no doubt about this.
We don't want to aggravate the situation, but since Atakams and other long-range weapons are being used against mainland Russia, as it were, we are sending signals, and we hope that the last one, a couple of weeks ago, the signal with the new weapon system called Doreshnik, Yes.
It was taken seriously.
However, we also know that some officials in the Pentagon and in other places, including NATO, They started saying in the last few days something like, well, NATO is a defensive alliance, but sometimes you can strike first because the attack is the best defense.
Some others in STRATCOM, I think, Yukinen is his name, representative of STRATCOM, he said something which allows for An eventuality of exchange of limited nuclear strikes.
And this kind of threats are really worrying, because if they are following the logic, which some Westerners have been pronouncing lately, that, well, don't believe that Russia has red lines, they announced their red lines, these red lines are being moved again and again and again.
This is a very Serious mistake.
That's what I would like to say in response to this question.
It is not us who started the war.
Putin repeatedly said that we started the operation in order to end the war, which Kyiv regime was conducting against its own people in the parts of Donbas.
And just in his latest statement, the President clearly indicated that we are ready for any eventuality, but we strongly prefer peaceful solution through negotiations on the basis of respecting legitimate security interests of Russia and on the basis of respecting the people who live in Ukraine who still
live in Ukraine being Russians and their basic human rights, language rights, religious rights have been exterminated by series of legislation passed by the Ukrainian parliament and they started long before this special military operation since In 2017,
legislation was passed prohibiting Russian education in Russian, prohibiting Russian media operating in Ukraine, then prohibiting Ukrainian media working in Russian language, and the latest, of course, there were also steps to cancel any cultural events in Russian.
Russian books were thrown out of libraries, And the latest was the law prohibiting canonic Orthodox Church, Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
And you know, it's very interesting when people in the West say we want this conflict to be resolved on the basis of the UN shatter and respect for territorial integrity of Ukraine, Russia must withdraw.
The Secretary General of the United Nations says similar things.
Recently, his representative repeated that the conflict must be resolved on the basis of international law, UN charter, General Assembly resolutions, while respecting territorial integrity of Ukraine.
It's a misnomer, because if you One, to respect the United Nations Charter, you have to respect it in its entirety.
And the United Nations Charter, among other things, says that all countries must respect equality, of states and right of people for self-determination and they also mentioned the United Nations General Assembly resolutions and this is clear that what they mean is the A series of resolutions which they passed after the beginning of
the special military operation and which demand condemnation of Russia.
Russia get out of Ukraine territory in 1991 borders.
But there are other United Nations General Assembly resolutions which were not voted but which were consensual.
And among them is a declaration on principles of relations between states on the basis of the Charter.
And it clearly says, by consensus, everybody must respect territorial integrity of states whose governments respect the right of people for self-determination.
And because of that, represent the entire population living on a given territory.
To argue that the people who came to power through military coup d'etat in February 2014 represented Crimeans or the citizens of eastern and southern Ukraine is absolutely useless.
It is obvious that Crimeans rejected the coup.
They said, leave us alone.
We don't want to have anything with you.
So did Donbas.
Crimeans held referendum.
And they rejoined Russia.
Donbas was declared by the putschists who came to power a terrorist group.
They were shelled, attacked by artillery.
The war started, which was stopped in February 2015. And the Minsk agreements were signed and we were very sincerely interested in closing this drama by seeing Minsk agreements implemented fully.
It was sabotaged by the government which was established after the coup d'etat in Ukraine.
There was a demand that they enter into a direct dialogue with the people who did not accept the coup.
There was a demand that they promote economic relations with that part of Ukraine, and so on and so forth.
None of this was done.
The people in Kyiv were saying we would never talk to them directly, and this is in spite of the fact that the demand to talk to them directly was endorsed by the Security Council.
And they said they're terrorists, we would be, you know, fighting them and they would be dying in cellars because we are stronger.
Let me just add, you know, I'm a huge fan of Lavrov.
And by the way, we've been joined by John Carman, who's my Friday co-host, James.
LabRob is explaining, you know, a bit of the history here.
Tucker is doing these sensational interviews.
This may be the second most important after his interview with Vladimir Putin.
But LabRob is going back to review the bidding about the history, the coup of 2014, where we began interfering in the internal affairs of Ukraine.
And of course, at that point, they began aggressive actions against the Russian-speaking ethnic Russians in the Donbass.
Vladimir Putin was eventually compelled to intervene because they were about to undertake an all-out slaughter of the Donbass.
It was going to be a genocide, such as we've seen taking place in Gaza.
So I greatly admire Lavrov.
I greatly admire Putin.
He has, in my opinion, shown remarkable restraint in the face of all kinds of provocations where the West and the United States have been acting in a duplicitous manner.
Lying, fraud, deception.
The Minsk Agreement uses a cover to beef up Ukraine for a war.
They actually want to take all of Russia.
Which the Russians understand, but the West, the American people, have no idea of the realities of the situation.
James, your thoughts on all of the above?
Well, I absolutely agree with you.
I wish we had more ministers in America like Lavrov.
I hadn't seen that interview just now that Tucker did with him.
And he speaks common sense and truth throughout it.
I don't have any disagreement with it.
He's obviously seeking a peaceful resolution to a problem that was started by our initial overthrow of the validly elected government of Unyakovic, which led to Poroshenko and Zelensky being in power.
And again, Russia making this move not only to protect the Russian citizens in western Ukraine who want to be part of Russia, but NATO clearly broke its promise not to keep moving closer to Russia, and Zelenskyy wanted to become a member of NATO and have nuclear weapons right on Russia's border, which we wouldn't want nuclear weapons from Russia on in Canada and Mexico, would we?
So, he's talking common sense throughout this.
I admire the man.
This is the longest I think I've seen his remarks, but even Tucker was keeping silent out of due respect and seemed to be a boring way to say.
And he, like Russia, deserves respect and the idea that Zelensky could say, well, if we're allowed into NATO and if Russia withdraws, we can have peace.
How absurd is that when it was Ukraine's desire to become a part of NATO that initiated much of this in addition to the attacks on the Donbass?
James, I mean, the Zelensky NATO position is frankly absurd.
It's indefensible in light of historical events.
Yeah, and I also point out that the Russians are simply fighting to keep their own borders secure, whereas the United States goes halfway around the world, whether we're invading Vietnam or invading Iraq or invading Afghanistan.
In our national interest, why do the Russians not have The right to protect their interests on their very own border when Zelensky's threatening to put nuclear weapons there.
It's obvious that the Russians are talking common sense here.
I wish we had more folks like they do on our side.
Yes.
John, you have joined us now.
Would you care to comment on the latest developments with Russia and Ukraine?
The missile they have, it seemed to me, was to telegraph a message.
That's a really bad idea to try to take on Russia militarily.
You know, with the six pods, each of which have six warheads, 36 missiles, delivered at 11 times Mach.
Your thoughts, John?
You guys remember the Bay of Pigs, right?
I was approaching on the United States, John F. Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the missiles that were being installed in Russia.
It's the same thing.
But I still support what Putin is doing.
I like Lavrov, and like you said, he does have restraint.
But I want to ask a question.
Do you guys remember when Ukraine was allegedly given sovereignty status by the United Nations?
Are you talking about when the Soviet Union broke up?
Nope, nope.
I said, when did the Ukraine get recognized by the United Nations as a sovereign country?
Meaning it never has been, John?
Yeah, that's the way to say it, Jim.
I just asked a question, and if nobody knows, I'm asking the same question.
They were never recognized as a sovereign country.
They are still part of the Russian territory, and then they've got some actor who's in there.
It's just a big ATM. That's all it is.
That's all it is.
Democrats are using it as an ATM. You mentioned a Bay of Pigs, and of course, the Joint Chiefs unanimously recommended invading Cuba.
Well, we know now JFK, of course, wasn't in favor of it, didn't want the U.S. to be associated with it.
They were persisting even after the Bay of Pigs fiasco.
It turns out Russia already had Tactical nuclear weapons in Cuba!
Tactical nuclear weapons in Cuba!
So, had we followed the Chief's recommendation, I'm not at all sure we'd have a United State here today.
James, your thoughts?
Yeah, that was a very dangerous situation, certainly comparable that Kennedy's concerns about Russian nuclear weapons in Cuba is very comparable to Putin's concerns, and I don't see how you can consider them contradictory.
You don't want the rival nation to have nuclear weapons virtually on your border.
So what Kennedy did, and he could have been even more aggressive about it, but demanding the withdrawal of Russian nuclear weapons from Cuba is very similar to the position Putin's taken, and I don't see how anybody can see them as contradictions.
Behind the scene, of course, he agreed to removal of Adniss rockets that were nuclear equipped from Turkey, but it wasn't announced.
He and Khrushchev had a good working relationship.
I have a sense there are back-channel discussions between Trump and Putin that are ongoing today.
James, your thoughts?
Well, I wouldn't be surprised.
Trump has always wanted a good relationship with Putin, as I mentioned.
None of his cabinet members seem hot to trot to continue the war in Ukraine.
They're more about Iran.
I have a feeling that...
Trump would quickly reach a settlement over Ukraine with Russia.
It wouldn't surprise me because my article, my most recent article published called Donald Trump in Orwell's Doublethink.
We have these contradictory ideas introduced.
Now, Trump is, if he makes a peace deal with Ukraine and Russia, brokers a deal there, Then he will be hailed as the savior who kept us out of World War III. And then he'll be hailed as a man of peace, a man who kept his word, but it will give him an open hand for war on behalf of Israel and the Middle East.
And I think if you look at his cabinet, they're all hot to trot for naught.
I think that's kind of how it's going to play out.
He will get peace with Russia and Ukraine, but he will go for war with Iran.
Yeah, we're going to go there, James.
I do appreciate.
I had to stop Sherlock and see if I can get back to some of those stories.
Here we have baby Escobar, Russia and Iran ready to obliterate HTS in Syria.
And of course, HTS is a successor to ISIS, which was a successor to Al Qaeda, all of which were financed and sponsored by the United States and Israel.
So I'm troubled by this.
Israeli settlers are continuing their atrocities, torturing Palestinian groceries, cars, buildings.
Amnesty, as all these years later, concluded Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Surprise, surprise!
Meanwhile, terrorists took temporary control of Aleppo.
Al-Qaeda-linked militants seizing the Syrian city of Hamas.
U.S. offering to withdraw troops from Syria in exchange for Assad cutting ties with Iran ain't gonna happen.
Let me say, James, the reports I have.
Russia has intervened on behalf of Syria.
And I have a report that there was one of these huge strings of convoys of these brand new Toyota pickup truck paid for by the U.S. taxpayer for the HTS, you know, a fan saver that Russia just went down the convoy and blew up every single one of those trucks.
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, dun, dun, dun, dun, dun.
Rather analogous to that highway of death.
After April Gallup gave Saddam Hussein the green light to invade Kuwait and then Bush Sr. double-crossed and slaughtered the Syrian army after giving them a very abrupt withdrawal from Kuwait notice,
another Yeah, I had a blog post a few years ago about what's really happened in Syria.
It was a talk with a Syrian Christian lady I know, and she has friends and family members who went to school with Bashar al-Assad and have written I wrote an extensive blog post after Trump launched 59 cruise missiles on Syria.
It was called 14 Reasons Why That Was Really a Bad Idea to drop cruise missiles on Syria.
But you told me something I didn't know, which was that Bush had killed Syrian troops after the Kuwait affair.
I had not been aware of that.
But, you know, Lindsey Graham and the rest of them have been hot to trot for regime change.
And it's been looking very dangerous recently with ISIS making new offensives now, taking Aleppo back in Syria.
It's very worrisome.
I do hope that the Russians will again intervene on behalf of ISIS. The Syrian army has been through so much, so long in Syria.
It was an unnecessary war to try and overthrow Assad, who's a good man.
You know, him and his wife, they're two of the few World leaders, I really respect.
They're good people.
They have the best intentions.
They're people at heart.
And been fighting back these terrorist defenses for a long time.
So I hope that the Russians do go in and just annihilate.
I mean, I don't wish death on anybody, but I hope that they drive back this latest ISIS offensive.
It appears they are doing that, that Putin is being more aggressive now and standing up for Assad and for Iran.
And Eskobar has it right.
They're prepared to wipe out this HTS effort, which is outrageous.
Iran is a great power, a peaceful power.
The demonization of Iran is absolutely stunning.
And for Trump to make some outrageous claims, such as that, If Hamas doesn't surrender the hostages before his inauguration, they're going to incur a more forceful response than America has ever delivered in its history, which is a staggering thought, James, given that we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so we're going to nuke Gaza.
I mean, what are we supposed to make of this?
Which feeds right into your...
Your concerns about this scientist character in the cabinet.
We got a break here.
We'll be right back with James Perloff and John Carman.
Stand by.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as this made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech.
in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio Radio Radio Radio.
Revolution Radio Radio Radio.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8:00 p.m. 8:00 p.m. e.
Eastern Time on Studio B with host Zan Garcia The people station The opinions expressed on this radio station its programs and its website by the hosts guests and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
It's my great pleasure to have James Werloff here to give his assessment of the Trump cabinet.
I've got part of the cabinet here listed on the screen, and we can screen share if James would like to do that.
There is more of the cabinet here, of course, and that's Pretty disturbing on a lot of counts because there are so many who appear to be rabid Zionists, and that's something that James is going to address.
So please, my friend, take it away.
I'm very glad to have you here today.
Okay.
Well, back in 1988, I wrote a book that turned out to be a bestseller.
It's called The Shadows of Power.
It was...
It's still selling today.
It's sold well over 100,000 copies.
I don't know how many.
In that book, we address the domination of presidential administrations by members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
And in my 1983 book, Truth of the Lonely War, Pat from November 2013. I said, since this 1921 founding, which small organizations produced 21 secretaries of defense, 19 treasury secretaries, 18 secretaries of state, and 16 CIA directors, and then, of course, is the Council on Foreign Relations.
What we noticed in alternative media of the 1980s was that the establishment, now we call it deep state, but then we called it the establishment, was putting their men in the key positions Secretary of State to control foreign policy, Secretary of Defense to control wars, Secretary of Treasury to control the money, and CIA Director to control intelligence.
And they didn't mind so much if a minor position like Secretary for Veteran Affairs was not CFR, but they wanted the key positions.
Now, my own belief is that the CFR is a little bit less important these days.
My own belief is that after 9-11, you know, one of the architects of the Twin Towers said that the towers represented David and Nelson Rockefeller.
And I believe that 9-11 marked a shift from the old line, Rockefeller, Morgan, Skull and Bones type guys, advocates of world government, to a new era of The center of power, even though there's overlap, would be the Zionists and the neocons.
But the strategy is the same.
You put these key people into the key positions.
And if you look at Trump's cabinet, I haven't reviewed all his nominees, of course, but my website, JamesPhillips.net, my latest blog post is about, principally about his cabinet.
So I actually start out We can get into this if we have time, but I started by quoting a 2019 post by Pastor Chuck Baldwin on all the key promises Trump made during his first administration, and then I run down all the things Trump did, and it must be about 20 things for Israel during his first administration.
I hear people today saying it's not going to be that way this time around, But I quote a guy, he's a former Marine, who worked powerlessly to elect Trump.
I voted for Trump myself, by the way, this year, as well as I did in 2016, because Kamala Harris was wrong on every issue.
How do you want a president who's wrong on every single issue, right?
That's like Hillary Clinton, right?
But he says, you know, I did everything I could to elect Trump.
Now I'm seeing pics that reflect our earliest criticisms.
And so it's a member of this coalition, MAGA, right?
I raise the alarm.
Millions of people don't like the Neocon picks.
The problem I have in the second I've been criticizing these choices, MAGA comes out of the woodwork to bully me back into line.
That's the plan.
A litany of insults that I should join the lift.
Not the president.
It's not my choice.
I don't know how to play 5D chess.
We talked about it in the beginning.
It's cultist.
It's delusional.
It's loyal to a man, not a country.
As long as I'm a good boy and cheerleader, everything is fine.
The second I say, wait a minute, that's not okay.
Take on the hardliners.
That's not okay.
It's never going to be okay.
It's a form of censorship to bully a person from having the same opinions.
He says, you don't know me.
I'm a United States Marine.
Running towards the fire is something ingrained in my bones.
And he goes on.
But I'm experiencing the same thing.
You know, people criticize me for criticizing Trump's choices, even though I certainly didn't want Kamala Harris as president.
But let's go down the cabinet.
If we have a time, we can go back and talk about...
Would you like to screen share and go to your blog?
You know, I'm not that handy with screen share, but I'll give you the quotes and people can see the material...
I actually made transcripts of the courts from his people so that I can just use them.
But let's go down some of the key cabinet positions.
Again, they want the key people.
So for Vice President, he's got J.D. Vance.
Now, J.D. Vance is a protege of Peter Thiel.
Who founded with CIA money, that's public information, the company called Palantir, which specializes in surveillance information gathering.
Now, not only is Theo, let's mention this because a lot of Trump supporters have traditional values.
He's an openly gay man who married to a man.
Peter Thiel, Palantir, His company is partnered with the IDF in providing information to target Palestinians, and that's worrisome.
His company partners with the IDF to target Palestinians?
I don't like that one, James.
And then, okay, let's go to...
Trump was told by his supporters, don't pick Mike Pompeo as your Secretary of State again and Nikki Haley as your UN representative.
Well, Instead of, we got his evil twin brother, Marco Rubio.
Now, Marco Rubio is endorsed by AIPAC. I have the screenshot of AIPAC's endorsement of Rubio on my web post.
And here's what an unheard article by Thomas Franzi said about Rubio.
For a long-time hawk, We spent most of his political career promoting neoconservative foreign policy, particularly on Iran and the Middle East, and advocating U.S. military action abroad.
In the eyes of many MAGA supporters, he is a quintessential representative of the establishment wing of the Republican Party that Trump has long railed against.
Rubio was a strong supporter of the war in Iraq, the bombing of Libya, and the Obama administration has failed to attempt a regime change in Syria.
Dutch ally of Israel is closely aligned with the views of Benjamin, not New's government.
Rubio has consistently taken a hardline stance against Iran.
In the current conflict, he has defended Israel's every move in war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Here's what Rubio himself says.
He says, quote, He's not taking a...
Let's listen to both sides of the point of view.
He's a hardline, anti-Palestinian, pro-Israel.
Now, I want to go to Pete Hegseth, who is still in the running for Secretary of Defense.
He says, quote, Of a Western civilization.
He equates American patriotism with supporting Israel.
Now, I've got a video clip of him.
My video clips are short, like one or two minutes, but it's in Israel saying America's got Israel's bear.
He says that, he talks about the miracles, the miracles of 1917, that's the Balfour Declaration, the miracle of 1948, which is Israel's founding.
The miracle of 1967, which is a six-day war when Israel seized the Golan Heights in East Jerusalem.
And the miracle of 2017 when we made Jerusalem the capital of Israel instead of Tel Aviv.
And then he says, there's one more miracle coming, and that's the building of the Third Temple.
If you know anything about that, it's a satanic plan.
That's the plan of the Antichrist.
So that's Hegsitz, who also, by the way, Hegsitz, I also have a clip of him Telling Fox News that we should be willing to bomb Iran's schools, hospitals, churches, and mosques because they might have wet missiles in them.
And that's how, he says, how the Islamists do things.
That's not the kind of guy I want as my Secretary of Defense.
I want somebody who's thinking about America, not about defending Israel.
Now, Scott Besson, again, they go for the key guys, right?
He's going to be Secretary of the Treasury.
He was former Chief Investment Officer at Soros Fund Management.
This is Dreading the Swamp.
He's openly gay.
And he says, quote, let's make Iran broke again.
He says, we're going to make America great again.
Let's make Iran broke again.
He's openly pro-Israel.
I have quotes on that.
Mike Waltz is going to be National Security Advisor.
You might recall that Trump appointed John Bolton to be his national security advisor, the most war hawk neocon that there is.
Somehow he didn't understand that, but everybody in alt media knew that.
Anyway, Mike Walsh, The Hill says he has, quote, staked out hard-line positions on supporting Israel in his defense against Iran and Iranian-backed proxies like Hamas.
And a Jewish insider calls Waltz, quote, strongly pro-Israel, hawkish on Iran, end quote.
Okay.
Now, for a UN ambassador, now this is pretty important because the UN, at the UN, we have veto power.
And for years, we've been vetoing UN resolutions against Israel, sometimes as the only nation to do so.
All right.
Elise Stefanik, the new UN ambassador, She's not Nikki Haley, but she's her evil twin sister.
This is what she says, and you'll see the video on my web post where she said this, quote, This means crushing anti-Semitism at home and supplying the state of Israel with what it needs, when it needs it, without conditions, end quote.
Now, I'm thinking, aren't we the American taxpayers?
Shouldn't we be allowed detachment conditions?
We're giving billions of dollars in foreign aid.
And she poses with Netanyahu with a big smile on her face and other Israeli leaders.
And you'll see the pictures on the web post.
John Ratcliffe is going to be the CIA director.
The Jewish Virtual Library says, quote, Ratcliffe has been a vocal supporter of Israel.
His legacy includes strengthening the U.S.-Israel partnership in cyber defense through the passage of the United States-Israel Advanced Research Partnership Act in 2016. On Iran, Ratcliffe has praised Israel military strikes on Iranian targets, seeing them as a vital component of the Trump doctrine of maximum pressure, end quote.
Now, Kash Patel is going to be a new FBI director.
He says, quote, we need America to wake up and prioritize Israel, end quote.
Now, one person who I kind of like, who is appointed to an important position, is Chelsea Gabbard.
You know, when she was running for president, she was about the only Democrat that talked sense.
She condemned the wars in the Middle East.
She's going to be the director of national intelligence.
But...
Interesting.
There was a recent interview, and I have a clip of it on the blog post.
She wants to end the Ukraine war, but she blames it on Russia.
And I'm thinking, doesn't she know anything about how the 2014 coup that we stayed, Victoria Nuland and the CIA, overthrew the legitimate government of the Ukraine and installed the new government that's now run by Zelensky?
And does she not know about Russia's reasons for going into Ukraine?
Did NATO broke its promises and moved Zelensky wanted nuclear weapons.
She also advocates continuing military support of Israel against Hamas.
I'm thinking, does she not know what Ron Paul saw on the floor of the house that Netanyahu built Hamas?
You know, this is really an Israeli project to offset the PLO. And even one of the Israeli Prime Minister, Barak Ahud, I just saw a recent clip of him saying that Netanyahu built Hamas.
Obviously, this whole October 7th thing was one of a long series of false flags by the Israelis in order to expand Israel, annex Gaza, and exterminate the population there.
Very, very obvious.
Okay, and then we have the Attorney General nominee is Pam Bondi.
And Pam Bondi says that students who claim to support Hamas should be visited by the FBI. And I'm thinking, you know, we were complaining before about the Democrats weaponizing the FBI. Now she's saying, if you support Hamas, the FBI is going to visit you.
I'm thinking this is like reverse weaponization.
Now, Kristi Noem is going to be the Director of Homeland Security.
And I think the reason, she's the governor of South Dakota.
We've got a clip of her.
This year, she passed an anti-Semitism bill that equates criticizing Israel with anti-Semitism.
Not every criticism of Israel, but a number of them like saying that they're racist, things like that.
Enumerates the various racism that Israel would be considered anti-Semitic.
Okay, I think that's why she's been picked as collective Homeland Security.
very worrisome because if she and bondi agree that criticism of israel is anti-semitism and it's a hate crime are we going to be rounded up for what they're doing in england now because they'll be posting a meme or expressing an opinion um against uh israel um you know originally um matt getz was going to have that position of attorney general and he dropped out very quickly i want to point out to him about matt getz and robert f kennedy because these are a couple of basically what I consider
good guys and And the timing of their nomination by Trump was very interesting.
On November the 12th, Ron Paul, who had supported Trump, came out and did a video criticizing Trump for appointing neocon after neocon after neocon news administration.
Well, obviously something had to be done to stymie the criticism.
So the very next day, November the 13th, he appoints Gates and the next day he appoints Robert F. Kennedy.
Well, Gates is out of the running very quickly.
One of these all-time charges of, he had relations with a 17-year-old girl.
You know, they did this with Kavanaugh.
They did this with Judge Roy Moore.
It's a typical thing.
You bring this up from the past and you get rid of the guy.
But Robert F. Kennedy, I love the stand he took against Big Pharma, against Dr. Fauci, against the COVID vaccine.
But, you know, I've seen him as savage by congressional committees as being anti-scientists, and he eloquently defended himself, but I'm concerned he's not going to get the majority vote he's going to need for approval in the Senate.
Or if they bypass the approval process for Robert F. Kennedy...
They'll toss him out later as being anti-science, that he won't actually stay in that position.
But this is what I'm calling double think.
Trump is putting all these neocons, but to throw us into confusion, you give people two contradictory ideas.
He's pointing these big guys like Robert F. Kennedy and Matt Gaetz, so he must be patriotic, right?
Anyway, that's kind of my position.
I think I mentioned...
The key positions that the establishment of the deep state always likes to dominate, they are all going to neocons at this point.
And that is very, very worrying for the future of our foreign relations.
And by the way, you mentioned something that Trump said, and I just want to add to that, you know, on December the 1st, we're only talking, what's today?
The 6th.
So this is five days ago.
Trump hosted Sarah Netanyahu and I mean, your son, you could stay in the United States avoiding military service during this war.
He hosted them at the Trump International Golf Course for dinner on December 1st.
And according to news reports, they discussed the importance of winning the war in Gaza.
So the very next day, December 2nd, what were they talking about?
The very next day, Trump posted this on social media.
He says, talking about Gaza, he said, it's all talk, no action.
What does he mean, no action?
We've destroyed about half the buildings in Gaza that killed tens of thousands of people.
It says, please let this truth so to represent that if the hostages, I know you already said part of this, are not released prior to January the 20th, the date that I'll probably zoom off the president's height, there will be hell to pay in the Middle East for those in charge who appropriated these atrocities against humanity, admitting the hostages.
Those responsible will be hit harder than anybody who's been hit in the long and storied history of the United States of America.
How can they release the hostages?
Probably many of them are dead from the indiscriminate Israeli bombings.
And so what's he saying here?
Like you said, and I put this in my article too, that if he's going to do the worst thing we've ever done, it's going to be worse than Nagasaki and Hiroshima if you take him literally.
So is he going to just complete the process of extermination, genocide that I've not begun?
This is crazy.
This is insane.
It puts our military at risk, opens up to a war in the Middle East.
And by the way, there's a lot of Muslim, as you know, a lot of Muslim refugees in the United States.
If we go to war against Islam, you could have warfare in the streets here in America and in Europe, which We've already seen it expressed through criminal acts.
Very bad.
I don't like Trump's cabinet at all.
I could enumerate the things he did of Israel in his first administration starting with his inaugural speech and the campaign commercially made for Netanyahu before he even was thinking of writing for president.
It's just a long and storied history.
You want to talk about that?
He has a long and storied history of Zionism because of Trump, and everybody's appointed to key positions, shares that view.
Very, very concerning.
James, what you have elaborated here boggles the mind.
I mean, if you pick them on bits and pieces here and there, what you've done is put them together to make all the puzzle clear.
And it's disgusting.
I'm very, very upset.
And as you say, virtually it's a full-blown, pro-Israel, anti-Iran, Zionist war cabinet And if there's anything that I would oppose, it's going to war with Iran, the greatest peace-loving nation perhaps the world has ever known, not having launched a war of aggression against any other state since 1775, James.
And of course, the Constitution was ratified in 1787. George Washington elected our first president in 1789. So for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic, Iran has not launched in a war of aggression against any other state.
Would that could be said of the United States, which has been the leading warmonger and aggressor among all nations and the world throughout our history, sad to say, but never more so than in the 20th and 21st.
It's just disgusting what's taking on here.
John, your thoughts about all of the above.
Yeah, I monitor all this intel worldwide.
I monitor the Middle East.
I know this stuff about Syria is not good because that's getting them involved in the Gog, Magog, Megiddo issues coming up.
And I don't know if you guys remember that supposedly Zelensky was firing missiles or some sort of attacks down into Syria just to get back at Russia, because Russia has interest in Syria, which goes way back to when Trump Had that phone call with Putin saying, hey, we're going to bomb that airbase.
You might want to get your guys out of there.
And he had an hour notice.
I've never heard of this stuff.
Here's Netanyahu supposedly notifying people in Iran on military targets three to six hours because of the time it takes to fly jets all the way over to Iran.
And Iran is conducting proxy wars, whether they say direct or not.
So there's a lot of activity going on behind the scenes that people just are not paying attention.
You know, the stuff with Aleppo and all that, that's very serious stuff.
I have contacts all over.
I mean, people I even know locally that are from those regions.
So there's a lot of stuff going on where they're having these proxy wars, back and forth, back and forth.
I'm not really happy with a few of the selections on the Trump list.
But as we say back at the White House, it's musical chairs.
They're going to get in there.
If they feel comfortable with it, they do it.
They seem to be a little bit more impromptu on the choices because a lot of these people don't have a background.
You know what I mean?
They're politically backed as opposed to somebody with a real background.
Thomas Homan would be a good one for the border czar.
I could be a border czar, but I'm not interested in the Border Patrol aspect.
I'm interested in the corruption in the Customs Service and a special task force.
Tulsi Gabbard, that's a good one.
See where that goes.
She's got a background.
And whether she's a member of the WEF, like Daryl Issa, who's a congressman in San Diego County, or not, you never know.
Because a lot of these groups, they're just tags that they put on their ribbon.
You know, patch.
That's it.
They're just adding ribbons.
But there's a lot of people involved that, you know, the United Nations groups, the World Health Organizations, all those other ones.
I support Robert F. Kennedy.
I've been in touch with him before.
And I was suggested to apply for a position.
What is it?
The MAHA, Make America Healthy, Great Again type thing.
And that's a good aspect.
He's going to make some changes.
Get them in.
That's the whole point.
Get them in first and then they'll rearrange and maybe fine-tune the choices is what I'm anticipating.
Well, James has been reviewing reasons why Tulsi and RFK Jr. may be short-lived deployments, and that Tulsi seemingly attributes a conflict with Ukraine to Russia, which is simply, frankly, absurd.
And I don't know, James, could that just be rhetoric?
I tend to think of Tulsi as being a truthful, honest, straight shooter.
I always have, too.
I'm just surprised by these remarks, yeah.
It's disturbing.
Remember the Matt Getz thing?
He thought for sure he would have been in there.
Now all of a sudden, oh no, he may have dropped out.
They're going to have to get a replacement because of the other previous charge stuff that they claimed they weren't going to bring up.
That's what Congress does.
They're all spies against each other.
Congress has compromised.
And I just had a call from an office this morning.
I won't say who, but it's like, well, I'll see how far they will go with the information.
And if they don't, it doesn't matter.
They sell intel back and forth.
That's what they do in Congress.
It's the worst.
So anyway, just had to throw that in there.
Well, you may have misunderstood about Ukraine.
There are Ukrainian trainers down there for this resistance.
There aren't any missiles coming from Ukraine down to Syria.
Advisors.
Yeah, advisors, right, right, right.
I think the Russians are going to take a short shift of all that nonsense that P.P.E. Escobar was reporting.
I'm very dismayed by your report, James, because I hadn't thought it through.
You've been very systematic about it, and that's a terrible lineup.
I mean, what can we anticipate?
Are they actually going to go to war with Iran because Russia and China aren't going to stand for it?
I mean, there's already a defense treaty.
Way back in 2008, 2009, I was flown down to Buenos Aires to give lectures on JFK and 9-11, and on one occasion I was invited to address a mosque.
And I spoke to the head privately and explained how Iran needed to develop a mutual defense pact with Russia and China.
And I think now, all these years later, that's coming to pass.
Iran is no pushover.
Iran is like 78 times the size of Israel.
Iran can take out Israel.
Israel cannot take out Iran.
So I think that in talking about proxies, look, Hamas, yeah, had an origin because The Israelis want to create an alternative to the PLO in the Yasser Arafat.
But I think it's assumed a life of its own.
Hamas is, I think, a bona fide Palestinian organization, and they have been slaughtering the IDF. When the IDF can't even beat Hamas in Gaza, how could they possibly think they could defeat Hezbollah in Lebanon when Hezbollah is 10 or more times more powerful James, you know, the reports I've got, and it's from people like Scott Ritter and Colonel McGregor who know what they're talking about.
Hezbollah has been beating, whacking the hell out of IDF in Lebanon, and the idea of a ceasefire was something much needed by the Israelis to regroup.
We're here on a break.
We'll be right back with James Berloff and John Carman.
Stand by.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bull hoards during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do, and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
That time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Revolution Radio.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths, and because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10pm Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing Unparalleled Broadcasting Excellence in 1997. That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
I'm here on Raw Deal with co-host John Carman and special guest James Perloff, and we're talking about how many of Trump's appointments to his cabinet are zealous Zionists, anti-Iran.
Looks like a war cabinet to conduct a war against Iran.
Russia's not going to allow Iran to be defeated.
Iran is very capable.
It'll be supported by the Houthis, among others, who have proven to be a valiant fighting force, by Hezbollah, by Hamas.
I think it's a really bad idea, but then you cannot Don't underestimate the stupidity of those who are leading these nations today, even, I think, in this regard, right up to Donald J. Trump.
I mean, I'm just appalled by this.
Here we have a longer list, James.
I'd just like your take on each name on the list, most of which we have not addressed as yet.
Susie Wiles, Chief of Staff, your thoughts.
You know, I'm going to have to pass on that because I'm focused on the main appointments to key intelligence and, again, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Treasury, Secretary of State.
There's a lot of names on that list I have not investigated, but why don't you give us your comments on Susan Wells?
Well, she ran his campaign.
She's very good.
She does come, I think, from the big pharma industry.
But as I see her, she's a professional.
She'll just do the best she can for whoever she's working for.
And I expect her to be 100% loyal to Trump.
And I cannot see that as a bad appointment.
John, if you want to chime in on any of these, you're welcome.
Stephen Miller, go ahead.
My opinion, first off, is any time These people get a sign.
You have to ask the question.
It's kind of like looking further down the list.
How much money did Elon Musk put in?
Et cetera, et cetera.
One of the richest men in the world.
And then they get a high position.
Let's look at Stephen Miller, who got Homeland Security.
What law enforcement background qualifies him to be anywhere near Homeland Security, let alone Customs, Border Patrol, Immigration, or any of the national security agencies, which I actually worked, let alone some of the other ones like Secret Service?
So it's like, every time I see him, when they don't put somebody who has actual background, Thomas Holman would be a perfect choice for Border Czar.
And he is, and of course he is.
We haven't got that.
Exactly.
He is a great choice.
John Ratcliffe, you've already addressed.
Joseph McGinley, White House Counsel.
I can't say much about him.
I imagine he's highly competent.
Stephen Whitcliffe, Special Envoy to the Middle East.
Any thoughts about him?
Again, Evan investigated him.
I mean, obviously an important post, though.
Predictable, though.
Predictable.
He's going to be a dedicated Zionist like, Mike Honkaby mastered Israel.
The guy's a buffoon!
I mean, I cannot believe this!
It's a token of an appointment is what we call it.
Say again?
It's a token appointment.
That's what we call it back in D.C., back at the White House, because he was a former governor or whatever.
Sarah Huckabee was public affairs official.
That's a good choice.
She was.
But this guy's been allowed to go into an ambassador position?
Is he Jewish?
Is he American?
What's his background?
He has said if there were always outspoken fundamentalists, he's a Zionist 100%.
He said if there were to be a Palestinian state, that's fine, outside of the borders of Israel.
How insulting is that?
By the way, Can I interject one thing?
Because I was present during the Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin peace talks with Jimmy Carter, and they were suggesting that they could give land in Egypt to the Palestinians, which would actually give them their own section of land, and that's when they assassinated him in March 81 or whatever it was.
Same month that Hinckley went after Reagan.
That type of thing.
But you see, they won't give an inch.
But look how insulting that is to the Palestinian people.
Yeah, you can have your own state, but not on your own land.
Israel does not have an entitlement to this land.
It's absurd.
There's no legal, there's no moral, there's no historical justification for it whatsoever.
James, would you agree?
Right.
Well, DNA testing has indicated that most of the people in Israel, the Ashkenazi Jews, if they call them, I'm half Jewish myself, according to family background, on my father's side, But that they are not actually descendants of Abraham, which is the biblical claim.
Some of them are, but in the 8th century, and this is in Wikipedia, in the 8th century, the kingdom of Kazaria, by proclamation of the king, the entire land converted to Judaism because he wanted to resist being overtaken by Muslims or Christians in Constantinople, so he picked Judaism as the third choice.
And they became Jewish by conversion.
They were not descendants of Abraham, and they were the people who eventually, driven out by invasions, went into Poland and Germany and became The bulk of the people who call themselves Jews in Central Europe and then went down to Israel.
But most of them, at least according to DNA testing, are not actually descendants of the Middle East or of Abraham.
Even if you use the Bible as your justification, they don't have that justification because they're not.
But that's a misinterpretation of the scriptures anyway.
They're Ashkenazis.
They're from modern-day Ukraine.
This is ridiculous.
Meanwhile, you know, Mike Huckabee, I think you got it wrong, John.
It's not that he's a token appointment.
I think that token appointments are Tulsi Gabbard and R.K. Jr. because there he's offering them to suggest his administration is other than it is.
Huckabee, front and center, that's what Trump's all about.
I mean, he's absurdly unqualified.
He's totally doctrinaire.
He's a theological zealot.
He's 100% Zionist.
I think he's a great guy to have out there if you want to understand what Trump is really all about.
James, your thoughts?
Yeah, I wanted to mention that in 2022 I wrote a book called Missing Saints, Missing Miracles, and I converted to Eastern Orthodoxy in 2017. There were many reasons for that, but one reason was the The fact that the evangelical churches which are attended have been taken by Christian Zionists.
But in writing that book, I read all seven volumes of the Synaxarian.
It's The Lives of the Saints of the Orthodox Church.
Now, this is drawn from 2,000 years of manuscripts from Ireland, Italy, Serbia, Greece, Russia, hundreds of manuscripts.
And, you know, it's got seven volumes, over 4,000 pages.
I read them all.
Now, the purpose of the book was nothing to do with honoring Zionism.
But what I do want to mention is that if you look through those 4,000 pages, how many Christian Zionists were there in the historic church?
Zero.
Not one of them.
It was a Zionist who thought that the Jews should be returned to Israel.
That's a modern concept.
There may have been rumblings in the 19th century, but basically it was the Schofield Reference Bible in 2017, which reinterpreted the Bible to mean that Christians should support this.
And then, because seminaries were bought out and taken over, these ideas were indoctrinated, and the pastors in turn indoctrinated the congregations.
But this is a false idea.
It was never part of the historic church.
In fact, if you read those seven volumes, those 4,000 pages, you see that the Jews and Christians were in constant conflict.
You do not see real Christian unity, which is being explained today by people like Mike Huckabee.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Then we got Mike Walsh.
You've addressed Elise Stefanik for the UN. She's again an outspoken Zionist.
He's Elton Secretary of EPA. I'm a little less certain about what he's going to bring to the table.
Any thoughts?
Well, I mentioned in my blog post, I didn't have time to look at the entire cabinet.
I contributed on the foremost position.
So what he What his views are as head of APA, I do not know.
Yeah, yeah.
Tom Holman, we've all endorsed.
He's a terrific pick.
I do think Trump is serious about the border.
I think that's gonna happen.
Chrissy, no mixed bag as you've explained.
Pete Heggs, that's very mixed bag.
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy for this new Department of Government efficiency.
I think that's all to the good myself.
I think they're superb choices and that they're gonna do the government a lot of benefit.
I could see a reduction by as much as 50% in the administrative overhead of the government.
James, your thoughts?
Well, I hope that's true.
You know, Elon worries me a little bit in as much as he's advocated in the past a lot of deep state things like neural links to your brain, your brain being connected to the internet, putting up 5G satellites, electric cars, advocating basic minimum income, which is a, you know, it's a communist world economic forum idea.
Personally, Although he advocates free speech, I have been utterly, totally shadow banned on Twitter for three years now.
And the guy...
You haven't been restored?
You haven't been restored?
I've not been restored.
I don't know how they make their choices, but...
The way they do it is they asked AI how many views my tweet should get based upon the number of followers I have, and AI told me you should be getting 3,000 to 4,000 views per tweet, even if it's not retweeted.
But what I found is Automatic has got an algorithm set up, so as soon as it reaches between 172 and 120 views, it's shut off.
Yeah.
If it gets retweeted, it'll go a little higher than that.
But the people that retweet it usually are people who don't have very many followers themselves.
So, you know, Mark appointed an executive for the World Economic Forum to be CEO of Twitter, and she said, we won't limit your speech, we'll limit your reach.
And that's what they're doing.
By limiting your reach, they are limiting your speech.
So 99% of my followers on Twitter Never see my tweets, and that's a breach of faith by Twitter with its own people because they sign up to follow me and they're not allowing them to see my tweets.
So I have some personal doubts about some of his sincerity, but I do believe that the idea of having a Department of Government efficiency is a great idea, and that said a number of good things, and I would certainly love to see The waste being cut out of the government has plagued us for so many decades now.
The biggest item of expenditure in the federal budget is just under debt.
We're borrowing so much money.
We definitely need a department like that.
We're out of business and we don't want to abolish the Fed or declare a moratorium on the debt or print a single coin worth $42 trillion.
I mean, we got to do something like that.
Because this is catastrophic.
This is economic suicide.
And the whole, you know, it has been said that compound interest was the greatest evil ever designed by the hand of man, and I'm afraid there's an awful lot of truth there.
Ramaswamy, I like tremendously.
When they had the presidential debates, he was head and shoulders above the others.
He's so much more intelligent and articulate.
I like the guy.
Your thoughts, James?
I've heard good things said about him.
I don't know enough to make it an educated comment.
All right, John, you speak up if you want to add further thoughts.
Meanwhile, we got Dan Scaravino, assistant to the president, deputy chair for staff, James Blair, assistant to the president, deputy chief of staff for legislative, political and public affairs, Taylor Budovich, assistant to the president, deputy chief of staff for communication personnel.
I don't know enough about any of them to even comment.
Marco Rubio, what a disaster.
I mean, the idea of this guy being Secretary of State is an absurdity.
It's an insult.
I cannot believe that he actually did this.
Tulsi, of course, I have great affection for Tulsi.
I think she's fabulous.
I do worry about a couple of her attitudes and maybe a little bit of ignorance here and there.
Pam Bondi, Well, I was big for Matt Gaetz, and you know, as you've observed, James, they used an old-style technique, you know.
Look what they did to Brett Kavanaugh.
These women came in and just lied their faces off, up to the extent of claiming gang rape, all nonsense, all complete rubbish, and the Democrats knew it.
They were just dooges.
So this thing with Matt Gates, apparently he had a friend who was in a position to be responsible for driver's licenses, and he gave these girls fake driver's licenses so they'd appear to be older than they were.
Go ahead, James.
Yeah, apparently he didn't know that she was underage if he did have a relationship with her, which he denies.
But I was laughing because you mentioned Kavanaugh and how they, you know, Judge Roy Moore is the same thing.
They bring these women out of the woodwork with no evidence.
And the phrase that we used at that time was, women should be believed.
But ironically, after that, when the transgender movement arrived, they said, well, we can't define what a woman is.
Yeah, yeah.
Whatever the new normal du jour is, you know, crazy good stuff.
Right.
So, of course, RFK Jr., we all have high hopes for him, but how long he's going to endure is a very good question, as you properly raise it.
Brooke Rollins, Department of Agriculture, don't know enough to say.
Dean Sauer, Solicitor General, don't know enough to say.
Doug Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, would you believe, James, that the Biden admin has quietly removed a condition to give veterans preference for civil service positions?
They've taken it out, just as they didn't send absentee ballots to our men serving abroad.
These are, in my opinion, you know, the grounds for impeachment.
I mean, these are so grotesque and insulting.
It's horrific.
I mean, have you ever seen a more corrupt government?
No.
The one that we have today?
I don't think we have.
Just to interject something.
To be fair, a lot of these people don't know, so Trump is depending on somebody else, like a lot of other previous presidents.
Unless they know them personally, They will go out of a certain category they know nothing about and ask another staff person, who would you choose?
So they're giving him input back and forth.
Just to be fair, so that you understand, was it directly based on Trump's information direct?
Does he know them personally?
Or is he getting advice or bad advice from a staff person?
No different than when he fired John Kelly and Mad Dog Mattis, you know.
But look, that's his...
This is not Trump's first rodeo.
He's got to know how to do it right.
And I do think Jared Kushner behind the scenes is still having tremendous influence.
I regard Kushner as Mossad.
I think his marriage to his daughter, Ivanka, was arranged by pharagnomes.
In other words, I think she induced him to fall in love with him.
He's kind of a wimp.
I think she deserved a real guy.
Wait a minute, Kushner's father just got a position.
Yeah, that's right.
He was made ambassador to France.
There you go.
And this is a guy who was guilty of criminal offenses whom Trump had pardoned at the end of his first admin.
So, you know.
They're all going to make money.
I'm telling you.
This is not good.
Then we got, as I say, Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General Jay Clayton, a U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
That's most important because it includes a city and therefore major financial institutions and the like.
Douglas Burgham, Secretary of the Interior.
Now, from what I have heard, that's actually a good appointment, that this is a good guy.
God knows, I'm open to learning more.
Your presentation today, James, was just devastating.
Then we have Stephen Chung, Director of Communications, Jerry Goh, Director of Presidential Personnel, Chris Wright, Secretary of Energy, William Shariff, White House Staff Secretary, Brendan Carr, Chairman of the FCC. Have you paid attention to that one, James?
That's certainly a very important one.
Looking at the federal communications, but again, there's so many names on this list that I have not investigated at all.
I was trying to really focus on the key...
No, I know.
I know, I know.
This is not faulting you in any way, shape, or form.
Sheen Duffy, Secretary of Transportation, Harold Luke Nick, Secretary of Commerce.
Mamet Oz, Administrator, Senator for Medicare and Medicaid.
Now, this guy's a TV personality.
I'm flabbergasted by that one, James.
Yeah, I do have a little bit on him in my blog post.
He is a big vaccine advocate, so gender advocate.
His wife, he says, won't allow his own children to be vaccinated.
Kind of interesting.
But there's a picture of him posing with Marina Mbrovovic, you know, the Satanist artist, which is kind of weird.
I don't know why you'd have a TV personality running Medicare and Medicaid.
I Yeah.
Sounds like his wife would have been a better choice.
And he got Leonard McMahone as Secretary of Education.
This is the wife of what?
Was it Worldwide Wrestling or Mixed Martial Arts?
I mean, this is kind of weird.
This is an old buddy in Trump.
Carolyn Leavitt, Press Secretary.
Matt Whitaker, Ambassador to NATO. Peter Hoekstra, Ambassador to Canada.
Scott Messett, Secretary of Treasury.
Scott Turner, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
Marty Mankery, FDA. Anyone comments on any of them?
I mentioned him before that he is hopefully gay, but he said, let's make Iran broke again.
So he has some kind of plan in that direction as Secretary of Treasury, I would assume.
And he also is very pro-Zionist.
You know, Iran is actually open to...
Diplomatic relations with Trump.
They'd like to work something out with Trump.
Why not?
Why not just sit down?
We never did with Russia, by the way, during this whole war.
We just started right away with weapons and sanctions.
Nobody wanted to go and actually sit down with Putin from the American government and say, let's see if we can work out a piece of settlement like this, you know?
It started with negotiations instead of war.
It's an eminently rational, knowledgeable, competent leader of the most powerful armed nation on the face of Earth.
So why not?
How stupid not to do that.
Then we have Dr. Dave Weldon for CDC, Jeanette Nash, Surgeon General.
I think she's kind of a crank.
Dr. Alex Wong, Assistant President for National Security.
Sebastian Gorka there.
What a dumb choice.
Sebastian Gorka?
James, this guy's a lunkhead.
He's a firebrand.
He's, in my opinion, a colossal idiot.
I'm just very disturbed by that.
I don't know him, but if he's a firebrand and he's senior director for counterterrorism that could be Absolutely awful choice.
No, he's like a John Bolton type on steroids.
Russell Thurode Vaught of her management and budget, probably highly competent because Trump does care about finances and business practices.
That's Haley, Director of Domestic Policy, Kevin Hassett.
Director of National Economic Council.
This guy is good.
Director of the NIH. He comes out of Stanford.
He's an anti-vaxxer.
He knows COVID back and forth.
That is a simply excellent appointment.
And I don't know how to explain it in the context of some of these other colossally stupid ones.
James, your thoughts?
Yeah.
Like I said, my article is titled Donald Trump and Orwell's doublethink.
And I actually started out talking about false flags, how we would get confused about some of these events like the Boston Marathon bombing.
I remember listening to your podcast on the mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017. Yeah.
This one guy supposedly inflicted 500 casualties firing from a 32nd floor window at night over a distance of over 400 yards.
When he reached his room, he was dead.
We ignored reports of multiple shooters that didn't look.
In fact, there was hardly any blood on the ground.
The Red Pill Expo after that, and I sat next to a girl, freely by chance, who had been, sat next to her at a meal, and she'd been at the event.
I said, was that staged or was that real?
She said, definitely real.
There were people to the left and right of me who were dying.
I was crawling through that field.
And then John Rapoport of No More Fake News, he came up with a very good explanation.
He says, with some of these mass shootings, it's a combination of fakery and reality.
What that does is it throws us into doublethink.
We think, I do this myself, we think in terms of either or, either it's fake or it's real, but we divide in the alt media over these events saying, well, either it's fake or real.
And I think that what happens with, again, this goes back to like Reagan, when he would have swaned himself with swamp creatures like George Bush, etc.
George Pratt Schultz.
He had Cheney and Rumsfeld in his administration.
But he also put in a good guy like Secretary of Interior, James Watt.
And so it creates a double thing, contradictory ideas.
And I think that Trump is kind of doing this.
He's letting some good people in so that you can always argue that he's making the right choices.
But there are really key positions.
The really most important ones, whether it's foreign policy, finance, intelligence, are the real neocon Zionists.
You're right about, you're wrong about Las Vegas.
In a pre-recorded soundtrack, they had like 500 crisis actors in the crowd.
This woman was totally ignorant or just duplicitous to the extreme.
The only bot we have was...
I listened to some of your podcasts at that time.
Yeah, it was absurd.
Bay shooting.
Listen, listen, we're going to open the lines for callers.
I call you 9-5-7-8-7-2-7-6-0-8. 9-5-7-8-7-2-7-6-0-8.
I will be right back.
I will be right back.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support.
This has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio. . . Radio. . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
Eastern Time on Studio B with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSleeps.com, The People Station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it.
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, I've got to say that after lifting to James' presentation, that while there are a couple of sterling appointments here, Jay Batacera for National Institutes of Health, Tom Homan for Borders Office, RFK Jr. for Health and Human Services, I'm going to include Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence on the whole.
This is a Zionist cabinet.
And not one that's prepared to put America first, but rather Israel.
I don't like that.
I was so supportive of Trump.
I thought he'd be far more even-handed.
And honest, James, I find this highly disillusioning.
I don't fault your research at all.
I think it's impeccable, and I'm very distraught over all this.
We do have a caller here, but if you'd like to comment, James, first, and then I'll bring him in.
Well, we can bring him in.
I was going to mention, enumerate things that Trump did in Israel during his first campaign, the first administration, which makes it surprising that he's made these neocon appointments.
But let's go ahead and pull up the caller.
Is this 816?
Brian, join the conversation.
Yeah, when you mentioned Tulsi, you know, I remember way back when, Jim, I said, look, she's on the Council on Foreign Relations.
That can't be good.
And then I remember, you know, Hillary getting up in front of the Council on Foreign Relations and saying, I can't wait to carry out the orders you give me is basically what she said.
So She's beholden to them.
If they're going to tell her to say this or that, she's going to do it.
And the one that surprised me today was the Ayatollah in Iran, Rouhani or whatever his name is.
He's on the World Economic Forum.
So, you know, every nation has a deep state and they kind of control everything.
If they weren't in control, we'd have All these free energy devices released, we wouldn't have these central banks controlling us, but they control every nation.
And Rouhani is part of that, and unfortunately Tulsa is too.
And the thing that drives me nuts is, where did all these people from India come from?
When I grew up, we never had people from India, you know, in our government.
So it just shows you they're like, Russ Winter says, turtles on a fence post.
Who put them there?
How did they get up there?
So anyway, that's all I have to say.
Well, I don't quite agree with all of that.
I have a higher opinion at Tulsi.
I don't think this World Economic Forum thing means anything in terms of being claimed to be a member, so I discount that.
The Ayatollah is all out for Iran.
He's not a globalist, the opposite, so I reject that.
We have another caller from, let's see, 518. Join the conversation, please.
Hey, Jim, can you hear me?
Yeah, go ahead.
Okay.
All right.
I'd like to ask James.
I know he's written, you know, a number of books and he's dealt with a lot of evil people.
Who, in his opinion, was the most evil or is still the most evil of all of the culprits that he's written about over the years?
That might be a general question, but, you know, he's written about some, you know, some of the big guns out there from David Rockefeller on down.
And I was just wondering who he thinks was the most evil and the most influential or the most negative force in our country.
When you said the most evil, I was going to say Benjamin Netanyahu, for sure.
In our country, that's a great question.
I mean, so many people to pick from Bill Gates and George Soros.
And as far as Biden goes, I would say he's the worst president in U.S. history, but not the most influential.
He's simply been manipulated in his senility.
Henry Kissinger, another big player.
I mean, he's the one who dragged Nixon over to China and started The turn of China into a technocratic communist state.
Those were all some of the really evil people.
Of course, John D. Rockefeller comes to mind.
I don't know if I could pick out one person in American history at the top of the list.
But if I was talking about the world, I think I'd be picking Netanyahu.
Yeah, that's a good choice.
Good choice.
John, you had some comments you want to add?
Go ahead.
Yeah, that was a good comment in the fact that it just supported, I told you guys earlier, was that it depends on who the staff members are to the presidents.
And you just mentioned Kissinger.
I used to protect that guy, too.
And he had a big influence over Nixon.
So if you put these people and surround the president with certain people, Dick Cheney, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ron Carter, Rockefeller, Kissinger, you could go all the way back and look at who their chief of staff, Department of State, or other higher ranking person that's right Department of State, or other higher ranking person that's right there at the White House or next to it, they'll be there.
Those guys are going to have the influence because that's where the president goes to ask the question, hey, what do you think about this?
What do you think about that?
And that's going to guide us all down this path, whatever it may be.
And I was going to bring up Peter Navarro before it gets ignored down on the list.
Peter Navarro is a U.S. attorney.
I actually met and talked to him years ago.
And he spent, what, two months in prison.
And you got to understand, I hope these guys are getting all their pardons lined up, because they need to be pardoned, some of them, you know, like a few of us, you know, out here.
But the thing is, if they get rewarded with a position, I trust this guy.
And he followed the whole idea about immunity and confidential communication with the President of the United States.
People still fought it.
The Democrats are scum of the earth, and you could quote me on that, because they keep doing it even though it's illegal.
Fat Alvin Bragg is another example, and they do it anyway.
They're satanic.
They don't care.
That's the whole point.
They need to be removed, all of them, period.
Okay, go ahead.
James, go back to Brian, James.
James, go ahead.
If you want to enumerate some of those failures of Trump in the first term, that would be good.
I think we can expect the continuance of.
Just to list him off, before he became president, he was the only American celebrity to do an election campaign commercial for Benjamin Netanyahu for Israeli television.
Then, in his campaign, he said that our allies must pay their own defense costs.
That was a repeated thing, but he exempted Israel from that reform.
Then, you mentioned Ivanka Trump, but she converted Judaism to marry, you know, to build a new Kushner family into that.
And Derek Kushner raised money for the IDF. He fired Philip Weiss from the New York Observer for criticizing Israeli occupations of Palestine.
And Kushner, when he was under President Trump, Kushner's special assistant was Abraham Berkowitz, first cousin of Howard Friedman, former president of AIPAC. Then in his inaugural speech, this is the first inaugural speech where Trump He promised to, quote, unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism, which will eradicate completely from the face of the earth, and, quote, more word words.
That inaugural speech usually is, that inaugural speech is followed by a benediction immediately by a Christian clergyman.
In this case, it was, for the first time ever, an Orthodox rabbi, Rabbi Marvin Heyer of the Simon Weisenthal who quoted Psalm 137, Quote, by the rivers of Babylon, we wept as we remembered Zion, I forget thee, or Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its skill.
And then in February, his first full month in office, Trump imposed new sanctions on Iran.
That same month, his first full month in office, he had now at the White House as a guest.
His ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, was a pro-occupation hardliner.
April 2017, he's barely been president for two or three months.
He fires 59 cruise missiles on Syria.
And he does that again in 2018. He fires over 100 more cruise missiles on Syria.
By the way, ISIS would launch new strikes.
It's almost like we were the air arm of ISIS. And there was no evidence for these chemical weapons attacks.
Second Strike was based on a video posted by the White Helmets, which is an arm of Al-Qaeda.
And the government said, look, here's the people in the video you saw in the hospital emergency room.
They were victims of smoke inhalation.
They're not dead.
They're all alive.
And Trump fired the missiles anyway, even though the Pentagon must have told them you cannot dismantle chemical weapons by blowing them up.
You just spread them into the atmosphere.
But we're firing the missiles on Damascus.
Bestly populated area on the allegation that they were taking out chemical weapons.
In 2017, he did a $350 billion arms deal with his Saudis who back ISIS and sent additional troops to Afghanistan saying he could win the war there.
He recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, which is part of this whole Luciferian scheme of building the Third Temple that It's supposed to be an international city.
He didn't have the right to do that legally.
There was a lot of things he didn't have the right to do.
Like in March 9, 2019, he recognized Syria's Golan Heights now belongs to Israel.
What's that got to do with being President of the United States?
In November 2019, Pompeo announced that the United States recognizes all Israel settlements in the West Bank as no longer violating international law.
That was a reversal of previous U.S. foreign policy.
In 2019, Trump issued an executive order which equated anti-Zionism to anti-Semitism, which almost confused Jews in America, like Nurtur Kater, which burned the Israeli flag.
Are they anti-Semites?
Well, then January 2020, he ordered the drone strike assassination of General Soleimani, the general who did— That was unvergivable.
That was an unforgivable act of treachery.
Yeah.
We're just there about this.
The Department of State claiming he would be on a peace mission, and then we annihilated him.
We violated Iraqi sovereignty.
But most of all, we tarnished forever any honor that has ever been bestowed upon the United States.
That was a disgrace.
My Syrian friend told me there was a time when people looked on America as a friend, but Now everybody in the Middle East knows that America can be your friend one day and turn on you the next.
Well, we did that with Saddam Hussein, you know, we're supporting Saddam Hussein.
Rumsfeld was over there during the Iran-Iraq war.
We turn on him, right?
Same thing with Osama Bin Laden.
First we're his friends, then we're the enemy.
Same thing with Ho Chi Minh.
The CA, or OSS, as it was called at that time, we backed him and armed him and trained his men.
And then we have a war with him.
It's always that way in the United States, you know?
You're the good guy one day and you're the bad guy the next.
Yeah.
I wanted to enumerate those things just to bring out that we can expect more of the same, I believe, from Trump.
And the proof of that is the neocon.
I couldn't agree more, John.
James just finally said it, which is what I was going to emphasize.
It's CIA controlled stuff, the deep state.
Sometimes we're not told what the president's really doing, and it's by the military industrial complex and or deep state CIA. A lot of those guys are heads of their country.
We're CIA puppets.
Okay, right?
So, you know, Saddam Hussein, and they tried to go after, you know, Gaddafi, but he wasn't.
He disagreed with him.
They could control him, so they killed him anyway.
It goes on and on about how they control.
So we're being misinformed in the United States, which is why I maintain context all over the world, so I can get more information and intel, you know, because we're still being lied to.
The deep state, CIA, it's...
Look at John Karakow's...
John Karakow's got some good stuff on Abu Zubaydah.
Yeah.
Brian, I've heard the thoughts from you.
Yeah.
Today on...
Which one was it?
I think it was Veterans Today...
They had a thing on the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski, and it was so illuminating.
They talked about his manifesto and in his manifesto he said the problem with this coming technocracy is it doesn't work for humanity.
The controllers of the technocracy want it to work for them and it's not good for mankind.
And he talked about the liberals and the conservatives, the fascists.
He's down on all that stuff.
He said we have to get back to nature and get away from this stuff.
And he was just so spot on.
That guy really knew what was going on.
I look at it today and then I think of You know, when they talk about your own nothing and be happy in these 15-minute cities and all this crap.
And he's just, it just makes your jaw drop when you read what Ted Cazinchi wrote.
I love that, Brian.
He had a handle on it.
Frank, go ahead.
Give us further thoughts of yours.
Hey, Jim.
Well, to follow up on what Jim was saying, you okay?
The things he was saying that Trump did, I can list the things he didn't do that he promised he would do.
You know, the wall was number one.
Jail and Hillary is number two.
I mean, they were the big chance at his rallies.
You know, he was going to bring the troops home from the Middle East.
That didn't happen.
He was going to get along with Russia.
He was going to overturn Obamacare.
He was going to get a vaccine commission going, a voter integrity commission.
He was going to fix the infrastructure.
He was going to bring back Las Stegall.
He was going to defund sanctuary cities.
You know, but I'll tell you, Jim, as you and I have talked in the past, You know, two days after that 2016 election, you know, Trump and Obama had that one-on-one meeting.
And I believe what John says.
I think the CIA runs the show.
And I think they run it through Obama.
And I think Obama's running it through Biden.
But I think that Trump got compromised.
If people recall, they had that meeting.
Okay, it's a one-on-one, nobody else around.
So that's the time to tell somebody something.
You know, there's no bugs.
Nobody can hear anything or whatever.
So I think Obama got Trump and told him, look, here's what's going to take place.
And I mean, that meeting, that one-on-one lasted an hour and a half.
They'd only go 10 minutes or so.
That's what Trump was expecting when he got there.
And when Trump went into the meeting, he was happy.
You could see his eyes were shut.
But when he came out, I'll tell you, it was an hour and a half later, and he looked like he saw a ghost, okay?
And he was forcing some smiles when he met with Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan and stuff.
But they had a body language reader, actually.
And she came out and she said that he became fearful of something.
And I believe that.
And if people go back and if you go to Daily Mail and go in there and check one-on-one Obama and Trump and you look at some of those photos, it looks like he has fear in his eyes.
And I really think he got compromised then.
And, you know, he's our only hope now.
Obviously, we couldn't go with the other side.
But, you know, a lot of people are banking on him doing a lot.
And, you know, I hope he does some of what he promised.
You know, let's get some of these illegal immigrants out of the country.
I mean, you know, he's got some heavy lifting to do if he's going to do some of this stuff.
But I hope to see it.
Yeah, yeah.
Good stuff.
Good stuff, Frank.
James, your thoughts?
Well, as a matter of fact, in my article, in addition to that listing of the pro-Israeli moves, I have a list of, and this actually I'm quoting Pastor Chuck Baldwin.
He did an article in 2019 called Trump Lied, and he elaborates there on Many lies told by Trump, like saying that WikiLeaks is amazing.
Then he says he doesn't know anything about Julian Assange.
That's not my thing.
So many promises that he broke.
The caller mentioned investigating Hillary.
Of course, that never happened.
He was linking vaccines to autism.
Now he was saying kids have to get the shots.
He said it'll be the most pro-Second Amendment President in American history.
And then he passes the bump again, and he says, take the guns first and do process second.
And that leads to what's called the red flag, confiscation laws, where people are disrespected of maybe being a bad person, their guns taken away.
So, a lot of things that Trump said he was going to do, he didn't do, and so I don't pay too much attention to a politician's rhetoric.
He had great sound bites going into this election, you know, great, you know, I'm going to fight the deep state, and all that.
Is that really going to happen, or is he going to push for a Middle East conflict with this, as you called it, a war cabinet?
Yeah, very distressing, very distressing.
John?
No, I'm listening carefully.
I am a behavioral analysis profiler, by the way, so I understand perfectly.
The comment is that if they saw that man come out of a meeting and they showed that he was distressed, Facial features and reactions in the face.
That's significant because that's what I do all the time.
And you wonder because we've had presidents.
Kennedy was threatened by LBJ and other people were threatened.
They have no problem telling the president certain stuff that the Secret Service ought to intervene in.
Seriously.
Even Abraham Bolden, I used to talk to him, still in touch with him.
And he said, yeah, he was wondering if he was going to have to intervene with the alleged argument.
But technically, he was there.
He heard the argument.
And LBJ and Robert F. Kennedy were getting chewed out by LBJ.
You know, that's crazy.
You know, but that's hindsight.
But still, it's an indicator of the stuff that actually goes on behind the scenes at the White House that people just don't get.
You know, there's a lot of things going on.
And if it's not smooth, they need to keep it in consideration.
They have threatened the life of the president at some point in time.
That has to be a constant thought through everybody's mind.
Lyndon was an uncivilized brute.
And he was brains behind the assassination of JFK, forced himself on the ticket in Los Angeles in 1960, so I got to have him taken out and ascend to the presidency and saw a sordid tale indeed.
James, further thoughts?
You just really convinced me that Trump is 100% Zionist, that he's going to make Israel great again, but it's going to be at the expense of the United States, sad to say.
Right, and one other concern I have about this coming year now, I know that I've been written to by people who are very avid Trump supporters, they think that we're headed into an era of prosperity and peace.
I don't think so.
And one of the things that I'm concerned about, I agree with you guys about the borders are, and obviously the illegal immigration is probably the worst thing to happen under I understand it's been over 10 million illegal immigrants came in.
Getting rid of them, some people think it's going to be easier.
I don't think so at all because the blue state governors, you know, when I wrote a pre-election post-November 1st, I said I predicted that Trump would win and I also predicted that people like the governor of my state, the lesbian Laura Healey, would not cooperate.
And sure enough, within a week of my making that prediction, she went on the air and said Massachusetts will not cooperate with federal authorities.
And the deportation.
And now many blue state governors are saying that.
So I foresee a possible civil war type situation.
You may have George Soros sending out Black Lives Matter and Antifa, like you did after the George Floyd incident, maybe surrounding James, there are federal laws on the books that you cannot...
Give comfort and aid to illegal immigrants.
You cannot protect them from ice.
You cannot give them food or shelter.
It's all a violation of law.
So I think these states have gone way over the edge.
They surely have to know better.
I mean, it's a...
Insane politics because they're coming here.
They're a massive drain on society.
They change the demographics.
They draw away all of our resources.
They're creating calamities in education.
They don't even speak English.
They're not prepared for school.
What are the teachers to do?
This is a catastrophe brought upon us by the Democrat Party.
They bear all the responsibility.
It's godforsaken what they have done to America.
How about high treason?
There you go.
The blue states cannot interfere.
There's a law in the books.
You can't interfere with a federal officer or an agent in the performance of their duties.
And if these states claim they don't want to take these guys and deport them, they can arrest governors.
Nobody's above the law.
They can make an arrest, a federal charge.
Let's start with Gavin Newsom and Whitmer.
You know, the governor of Massachusetts, governor, let's arrest them and set a sterling example.
Perfect idea, Jim.
James?
Oh, yeah.
Well, my concern is that...
I have a friend who was in military intelligence, and by the way, I want to compliment John Carman and your choice of him.
His personal experience lends so much to this program.
But I'm a little concerned that some of the Deep State's program may get installed under Trump.
If things got bad enough, you know, I have a friend of military intelligence who's also a devout Christian, somebody on trust, because he believes there's going to be an economic collapse, but they want it to happen on Trump's watch, so the conservatives will get blamed.
Yeah, if that happens right during Violence over the deportations.
And you remember, my mom, this July 19th of 2024, there was this outage, power outage, was blamed on this security update of the global IT outage, where computers, airports, restaurants, they couldn't function for a whole day.
Now, some people think that's a trial run for the cyber attack that Klaus Schwab has been predicting.
And if they instituted that right in the middle of violence and an economic collapse, and there was Supply chain breakdowns and empty supermarket shelves.
People couldn't call the police or the fire department because of the outage.
You could have chaos, and Trump might invoke martial law.
Under the Constitution, he can suspend habeas corpus or due process.
Section 1, Article 9. In the event of invasion of public safety, you talk for public safety, it's always, you know, TSA is for our safety, COVID lockdowns are for our safety, climate change restrictions are for our safety.
You might say for our safety, we have to suspend the Constitution, and we have to, this is a valent state where the events of Palantir Corporation come in very handy, and with an economic collapse, you might get digital currency,
and with James, you're 100% correct.
Frank, your thoughts here.
All right, Jim, for my last thought here, Tulsi Gabbard, you know, I know you're a big fan of hers, as am I. You know, I know Brian said before she was involved, I guess, with the World Economic Forum, which I think she was invited over there.
I think she found out what they were about.
You know, they were looking at her.
She's a minority.
She's a female, you know, and she looked like she's attractive, obviously.
She could be taken off a shooting star.
So I think they tried to get her.
But I think she got over there.
She saw what was going on and she backed off.
And I love Brian's perspective.
I love hearing him call all the time, okay?
But also, we've got to remember, I think Putin was invited to the World Economic Forum also, okay?
And I've got to think right now, he's probably the most person standing up against their future plans, you know what I mean?
The reset, I think he's, you know, their number one adversary.
So he left there also.
Export Selection