All Episodes
Sept. 3, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
39:31
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (2 September 2024) with Don Grahn, Soctt Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is truth versus the news and this is Labor Day on 2024 and a day that we are working here hard because there's so dang much news that is really messing up the truth so we have to stand strong for the truth and let you know what's really going on in this world that you need to know and I I saw the preview of the show and the stories are going to be pretty heavy today.
So, let's get ready for this last third of the year with the best people in the world to share the news with.
Here we have Jim Fetzer, the author of this famous book, Nobody Died, on Sandy Hook.
This is the one book that is Most controversial, still, although nobody I know has really been able to refute the contents of the book, they just don't like it because it tells the truth.
And we also have about, I gotta do this, Jim, American Nuclear 9-11.
We got 9-11 coming up here in about nine days, and I tell you, this book still stands strong, letting you know what really happened on that fateful day that changed America.
And another important one here, I suppose, is Go to the Moon.
Yeah.
And also JFK.
Well, that's important.
After how many years?
60 years?
Still hasn't been sold.
We're going to have to give you a royalty on sales, Don.
Yeah.
Here's a book, too.
How about this one?
About Nobody Died in Boston.
And this one here about political theater back in Charlottesville.
There's all kinds of things that Jim has done here.
He's a master of investigation and a real workhorse on his Labor Day.
He's labored for you, so you don't have to.
You just get to read it.
And, of course, we have the wonderful Scott Bennett, the man who wrote this fantastic book, Still a Game, when he was behind bars there.
And of course, I can't leave out Brian Davidson, the most influential private investigator who knows his stuff so well and expresses it and hits the mark all the time.
And speaking of hitting the mark, let's just start off with a big punch.
What's going on back here, Jim?
All right.
All right.
Done.
Well done.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
gave a Ukraine card blanche for attacks inside Russia.
Very bad.
The Biden admin is ready to make more concessions to Zelensky, allowing him to use almost any U.S.
weapon for any strikes, including inside Russia, according to Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who's extremely confident and very fetching.
Commenting on recent remarks by Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh confirming Kiev had been allowed to use U.S.
weapons, the Russian diplomat noted, the U.S.
establishment has thrown common sense out the window, believing they can do whatever they want.
Ukraine has been given poll card bond for operations in Russia.
Moreover, the Biden admin is ready for more concession to give him free reign for almost any U.S.
weapon, including the strikes inside Russia.
Being driven by ambitions of world domination, Washington has been intensifying tension with Russia as it seeks to inflict a strategic defeat on our country and is not looking to avoid escalation.
Meanwhile, Russia's Lavrov, this guy being the most experienced diplomat in the world today, warns that World War III won't be confined to Europe.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the U.S.
if the war with Ukraine escalates, a potential World War III would not be limited to Europe.
Taking questions from journalists two and a half years after the intervention, Lavrov addressed recent reporting in The Guardian about Zelensky wanting to use long-range storm shadow missiles that threaten Moscow and St.
Petersburg.
As the paper explained, Storm Shadow were developed primarily by an Anglo-French collaborator to meet by European joint venture, which also has an Italian partner.
But because some components are supplied by the U.S., the White House has to agree to its use inside Russia.
So far, it's declined to do so.
Lavrov declared this is blackmail, an attempt to pretend the West seeks to avoid excessive escalation.
In reality, they are full of mischief.
Avoiding escalation is not what they're after.
To put it in plain language, they are picking a fight.
A longtime minister might have various remarks from John Kirby, National Security Communication Advisor.
We've been watching escalation risks since the beginning, and that ain't gonna change.
We're always gonna be concerned about the potential for the aggression in Ukraine to lead to escalation on the European continent.
Lavrov said.
For Americans, talking about the Third World War is something that would affect Europe alone.
God forbid it ever happen.
This is telling, since it reflects the mindset of the American planners, who believe they can simply sit on the whole thing out.
It's important to understand the situation, including ours governing nuclear weapons.
Moreover, Americans are well aware of provisions.
The fact transpires from the Freudian slips they make when they talk about having a Third World War would be bad, because they don't want Europe to suffer.
This is what the American mindset comes down to, sitting somewhere out there overseas believing themselves to be totally safe and secure, thinking not only Ukrainians but also, it turns out, Europeans would be willing to do the dirty work and die for them.
Earlier this month, Ukraine attacked the Kursk region and scarved out a slice of territory.
This was actually written before it was turned back.
Russia said Western weaponry, including British tanks and U.S.
rockets, have been used by Ukraine in Kursk, where Kiev has confirmed the use of HIMARS to take out bridges.
Washington, though, is not informed about a plan ahead of the attack.
The U.S.
said it did not take part.
Multiple Russian officials have made it clear they don't believe the United States.
Based on interviews with Anatoly Ivanov at the Quincy Institute, he concluded, members of the Russian establishment, including former diplomats, members of think tanks, academic business people, as well as members of the wider public, Want an early ceasefire roughly along existing battle lines.
Most of the conversation took place before the Ukraine invasion occurs, as far as I can make out.
However, this Ukrainian success, which was temporary and has been reversed, has not changed basic Russian calculations.
In the end, Russia's negotiating position will be decided by Putin, With whom I did not speak.
Nobody I spoke to claimed to know for sure what Putin is thinking.
However, the consensus was, if I made mistakes at the start of the war, he's a pragmatist taking military advice and recognizing military reality.
Meanwhile, Russia had changed nuclear doctrine in response to Western escalations.
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Rabkov said Monday Russia will change its nuclear doctrine in response to Western escalations.
As we've repeatedly said, work is in the advanced stage.
There's a clear intent to introduce a correction to our nuclear doctrine.
It would be updated based on examination and analysis of recent conflicts, including everything connected to our Western adversaries.
He said it was too early when the doctrine would be updated.
That is to say, they would only use nuclear weapons under very specific conditions and were not going to engage in a first strike.
Unless, of course, Russia were directly threatened, which is consistent with the UN Charter.
The time frame is rather complicated, considering we're talking about the most important aspect of our national security.
Russia's nuclear doctrine was last updated in 2020.
It allows for the use of nukes if Russia faces a nuclear attack or a conventional that threatens the existence of the Russian tank.
His comments came amid fighting in Russia's Kursk Oblast, an offensive being carried out with U.S.
and NATO support.
The U.S.
is allowing Ukraine to use U.S.-provided armored vehicle bombs missiles inside the Russian territory.
The U.S.
claim it was not involved in planning appears to be false, where a Ukrainian soldier said last week Western intelligence was crucial for carrying out the cross-border assault.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, the cross-border assault, if we start from the latest events where Ukraine diverted essential resources for the Donbass area, sent them up into Kursk in a Battle of the Bulge blitzkrieg maneuver, And I've said this on Russian interviews.
It's like invading Nebraska and expecting that you're going to somehow control the majority of the United States or Washington or New York.
There's nothing in Nebraska.
There's nothing in Kursk.
It's a big area.
That's a big country.
I mean, it's vast and huge beyond any description.
But this has failed spectacularly because Not only has Russia now besieged and surrounded all of the cursed Ukrainian military units, but the diversion of those units away from the Donbass has allowed Russia to advance strategically at twice the accelerated speed, and it is now
Avalanching quickly and Ukraine is going to increasingly become disheveled and disoriented and disunified and with that disunity you will have increasing defections and retreats and surrenders.
So I believe they cannot recover from this disorganization, this fracture that is now going to be splintering and It's like, it's like, you know, breaking a window on your windshield.
It begins to spider fracture.
And before you know it, it infects and metastasizes into the entire windshield.
That's what's happening now with the Ukrainian forces in Donbass.
And Kursk will simply be besieged.
Russia doesn't have to push the forces out of Kursk.
It just needs to destroy every van or truck or plane or whatever tries to bring them in supplies, bullets, water, whatever.
And just let them freeze and starve.
Uh, and, and pound them, you know, occasionally, and they'll, they'll come apart.
So Russia is basically putting a band-aid on this boil and, and slowly drying it up, uh, rather than performing surgery and wasting, uh, people.
And that leads to the other earlier, uh, part of the story, Jim, of Putin's miscalculations perhaps in this entire adventure.
It was precisely because Putin, and I would say this is reflected in the larger Russian culture, Well, he did not and they did not want to expend any Russian lives.
They didn't want to spend Russian blood.
Russians are averse to war.
They've suffered more war than any other continent people on planet Earth.
I won't go into the whole historical dialectical here, but You know, Napoleon, Hitler, Genghis Khan, you've got endless internecine fights, you've got Poland against Russia, Austria against Russia, Germany, you've got all these things that has really exhausted, but it's also made it natural.
It's part of the natural temperament, disposition, culture, poetry of Russians to endure war.
It's like an ebb and flow of the tide.
And they're used to it, but they hate it.
They don't like it.
They don't look for it.
That's why they don't spend the military industrial complex amount that the United States does.
But they also have a love of their motherland and their culture and their central core of unity precisely because of the external forces that precipitate war and force them to galvanize, force them to concentrate.
It's quite a, you know, bizarre sociological phenomenon.
War is imposed upon Russia.
It strengthens the internal Russian core.
Russia responds and destroys the invaders.
And, you know, it goes back to normal.
They're very forgiving too.
So, this is reflected on Putin never wanting to fully go to committed to full war over Ukraine.
However, the absolutes were NATO cannot invade, NATO cannot set itself up, NATO can't put nuclear weapons or any other kind of weapons on Russia's border.
They've said that since the 1990s and then repeated it again and again from 1999 to 2014, and it was always dismissed arrogantly, blasphemously from the West until even up to the Minsk agreements, where Russia showed a little bit of its muscle.
And then tried to settle this and he was, you know, they were lied to.
The Minsk agreements was a waiting operation so they could try and reconstitute their forces again thinking that they were going to successfully invade, push back and break up Russia.
And Russia finally stepped in after the Donbass Republics declared independence and became their independent republics, just like the United States did in 1776 by declaring themselves independent from the British Empire.
So the Donbass region declared themselves as separate republics from the Ukrainian fascist state established by Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, John Kerry in 2014 and the coup d'etat that occurred.
And we've been in this really a flow ever since.
Ukraine's never been able to push back or win anything.
It has responded with terrorism.
It's responded by dropping grenades on little kids in playgrounds.
It's responded by sending drones and missiles into Belgorod, Cherebinka.
I know.
I was there.
I was pushed into the ground shelters with women pushing baby carriages.
That's something pretty much to wake you up in the morning.
But Ukraine's never won anything. It's only lost everything.
But Russia's not provoked an overwhelming war because it's wanted to keep the boiling point
just at simmer and not cause all sorts of, you know, spaghetti sauce to spash on the walls and
all over us and all over Europe and allow the neocon warmongers to say, you see, you see,
They're coming after you.
So we need every Brit and every German, any Frenchman to join in the French Foreign Legion, go to Ukraine.
They haven't done that.
The only ones who went over as mercenaries have been the retards of the society, you know, or just people who want to die, because that's the bottom line.
Uh, so now you're, you're at the last stage where winter is going to come in in the next month.
It gets very cold back there in October, I know.
Uh, and they're going to then, uh, start to just shut things down and probably shut down all of the electricity, the food and everything else around Ukraine and do a slow besiegement.
And let's not forget, Zelensky is not the president of Ukraine.
His term ended in May.
He's a usurper.
He is a false, uh, false dictator.
I anticipate as this, uh, Discombobulation increases because of the collapse of the Donbass and the Kursk operations you may see arising up against Zelensky.
The faster a civil war erupts in Ukraine against Zelensky, the faster the external war will collapse around Zelensky.
And finally, the outlawing of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine, that is not to be Forgotten, because that is the ignition of the gunpowder trail that will eventually lead to the keg of the massive division between three-fourths of the society, which are Christian, Orthodox, versus the one-third that are pagan or Jewish Zionist.
And I think that has always been their long-term agenda.
is to move Jewish Zionists out of Israel into Ukraine, but I think that's going to fail spectacularly too.
And if Putin is removed, you will have Medvedev or someone else step in, and they will be twice as ruthless, twice as efficient, and the West will get its ass kicked twice as bad.
Jim?
I think you're right.
It turns out we have a report, Anthony Blinken said Zelensky should outlaw the church.
I mean, that's insane, but we don't have a president.
We have these various officials who are acting independent, and the responsibility rests with a non-existent Biden, because we've got another fake in office.
It's an awful situation.
Let me say one final thing real quick.
The United States of America was founded on the principle of freedom of religion.
I think it's illegal and unconstitutional and unlawful, whatever the words are, for the United States government to take taxpayer money and advance a policy of religious extermination when we are founded upon the principle of freedom of religion.
I think there's a case that can say you can't give money to fund Ukrainian bureaucrats to outlaw religion because it goes against Every dollar that American taxpayers pay has to support and defend the Constitution, and you are supporting something that undermines everything the Constitution stands for.
But, you know, the hypocrisy's in it.
I like that, Scott.
Don't you want to squeeze in a word?
No.
Brian?
Wow, there's a whole lot to swallow right there.
I think if you're gonna paint the picture, a lot of people would prefer to use black and white to Paint an image of Putin.
It's not.
It's much more sophisticated than that.
He's a leader that has a lot of competing interests.
Will Russia allow Western influences to come in and begin to manage trade and capital?
Will the banking cartel continue to get deeper roots like many of the oligarchs would like?
How do I keep the working class people happy?
How do I deal with the fact that I'm, you know, I basically have 50 member Western allied nations that are lining up against us right now?
Look, from America's perspective, we've known since Hillary Clinton, heck, we've known since back to Reagan and beyond, that there's a Cold War.
Russia is a strong nation and the West has always been.
Concerned that Russia was too strong and too independent.
That's why they're considered the global chess piece in this game of the New World Order.
Western issues are pushing the New World Order.
Now, I want you to just look at it through their lens for a second, okay?
The biggest threat to the New World Order is moral, religious, the family unit, strong children, People with culture, they want to destroy that.
What do you think the LGBTQ agenda is all about?
What do you think?
Look, a couple years ago in Russia, maybe about three years ago, there was a group, a band called Pussy Rush, that was an LGBTQ sort of feminist outburst punk rock group.
And what they did was they desecrated Many of Russia's major landmarks and Putin came out and he had to make a decision because the issue was front and center within Russia at that particular moment.
Are we going to allow this corrosive agenda to dominate our society?
They ended up jailing a few of these members of the band for I think they got two years for basically causing a riot being that they were Doing this grand agenda in sacred places.
I mean, a lot of the Christians consider it to be outright sacrilege.
And Putin had a very delicate dance to do.
And so, when he came out and he began to deal with it, what he did was he took the John Adams and Emmanuel Kant angle at it, which is a society cannot be strong.
It cannot remain strong unless it has a religious moral foundation for which we, so it always has a compass to tell us which direction is right and wrong.
And I remember there was a big speech about it.
Putin came out and really dealt with the issue from, hey, we are a moral society.
We are about law and order.
We are about the family.
You cannot argue that this LGBTQ feminism thing is better than the traditional family unit here in Russia.
So what we have painted here, and again a lot of people want to say, oh he's a dictator, he's a bad guy, you know, but think about the influences that have been pushing in on this guy for years after years after years.
All these Western nations.
What happened in 2014 other than the failed Minsk agreements?
You had the basically capturing of of Ukraine and the installation of Zelensky that happened.
That was Russia's next door neighbor, their kinfolk that happened right next door. So basically,
in the end, we're at a position now where the West desperately needs that provocation to start
that great war to destroy that final chess piece on the other side of the board so that they can
institute their new world order and drive the agenda through. Russia will not bend that easily, but
Putin's under a tremendous amount of pressure to, hey, which direction are we going to go?
The good news is he's been very patient.
He's been very long suffering, much more than we would be if Mexico had missiles pointed at America.
And we're starting to launch them, which we're putting up with that with the cartels.
Basically missiles, the same thing.
Fentanyl missiles.
So all I can say is, you know, don't go labeling Vladimir Putin as black or white, good or bad, hero or villain.
There's way too much going on.
For simple labels like that, right now I would just classify him as a leader who's trying to keep control of a desperate situation that's declining very rapidly.
That's my assessment.
Both of you gave wonderful statements.
I'm very impressed.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, Francis G. Rabbi urges Israel to finish the job.
Ratza's chief rabbi, Chaim Korsah, justified Israel's brutal woe in Gaza, urging the Israeli army to finish the job.
He told French network BFMTV supports Netanyahu.
He described Israel's indiscriminate strikes on the besieged enclave as acts of war, and said Israel's actions are necessary to protect its nationals.
It's an act of war no country in the world would conduct like Israel is doing.
I think that's true.
I have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of in how Israel is conducting the fighting.
He ought to be if he had any decent sense of morality or humanity.
Asked if he were critical of Netanyahu's policy, he said, I'm never uncomfortable with a policy defending one's citizens.
Asked whether he condemns Israeli massacres against civilians, he condemned the Israeli deaths on 7 October, saying they're not of the same order.
Yes, not of the same order, because the Israeli, the Jewish lives are precious, the Palestinian lives not.
A member of the parliament, Aymeric Hamra, blasted the rabbi's comments, calling them an apology for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
He calmly declares he supports the ongoing genocides.
That is deserved.
Makes clear his hatred for Palestinians.
These are crime-punishable law.
I thought religious men were supposed to defend moral values and the sanctity of life.
A confirmed death toll is 40,000 plus.
Actually, I think around 200,000.
The Israeli army has repeatedly targeted schools and U.N.
facilities.
Disease has spread, and Israel is using starvation as a weapon against the people of Gaza.
Meanwhile, Israel's plan for Gaza comes into view.
You know, 106 in the IDF Combat Engineering Corps is clearing a vast swath of land across central Gaza, dividing the 25-mile territory into two parts.
The so-called Netzerim Corridor, crossing from east to west, will provide faster transport,
ride the F operating and function as a vital part of a security cordon separating north
from south.
There's no doubt military outposts will be established as are locations on the western
coast.
The aim is to protect the development of new settlements that will be built north of the
corridor.
In other words, the government is using the War on Hamas to divert attention from the real objective, the expansion of the Jewish state onto Palestinian lands.
Here you see an overall blueprint of what's going on.
We can see the two red lines between these crucial corridors that the IDF is going to maintain.
Not surprisingly, Israel's activities in the north have resulted in mass evacuation and have intensified the suffering of the traumatized population.
As the Palestinian Chronicle reported, The U.N.
announced Tuesday Israel issued three fresh directives for over 19 neighborhoods in the north of Gaza and Deir al-Bal, bringing the number of massive evacuation orders to 16 in August alone, which leaves only 11 percent of the Gaza Strip untouched by evacuation orders.
Palestinians are being driven from the north to make room for new settlements.
The Netzerim Corridor serves as a buffer separating the new colonies from potential attack by Palestinian militants.
Israel intends to maintain control by putting restrictions on movement by designating areas where Palestinians can gather.
In other words, Palestinians will be refugees in their own country.
Road Socialist Web Reports.
Out of the population, over 2 million before the start of the genocide is now crammed into an area just 41 square kilometers, 11% of the total area, with the remaining 89 placed on evacuation orders by the IDF.
The U.N.
warned.
The area is lacking infrastructure and basic services.
Aid provision is limited due to access and security issues and severe overcrowding.
Density, 30,000 to 34,000 per square kilometer, has exacerbated the shortage of essential resources of water, sanitation and hygiene, health services and protection and shelter.
UN forced to suspend food distribution as Israel placed 89% of Gaza under evacuation.
Here's the plan in a nutshell.
Shrink the concentration camp to a mere 11% of its original size.
Transfer the population to the designated location.
Partition the territory to leverage settlement activity and expropriate gas reserves in all the other areas.
Neutralize any opposition to Israeli expansion.
An article posted on CNN confirms our announcement, admits Israel post-war
plans involve cutting the Strip in two, maintaining a permanent operational foothold,
while the author doesn't verify our theory on settlement development. Readers can draw
their own conclusions. Here you see a map of what they have in mind.
Meanwhile, satellite image from March 6 reveals East-West Road under construction,
stretches from the Gaza-Israeli border across the entire country.
The IDF told CNN they're using the route to establish an operational foothold.
NetYahoo revealed a plan For a post-Amos future for Gaza, including the complete demilitarization of the enclave, overhaul of its security, civil admin, and education systems, Palestinians living in Gaza fear the post-war security plan will further restrict their freedom of movement.
Have no doubt about it.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, what jumps out immediately, of course, is when the Israelis initiated this whole strike back in October and November, I did an interview, several of them, with Press TV and RT and others, and I said exactly, precisely, What you just described about Gaza being broken up into sections except I said these are the sections that need to be divided by the BRICS nations by a flotilla of ships from Turkey, Iran, Brazil, India, China, South Africa.
Indonesia, coming to set up diplomatic posts, diplomatic portions of Gaza that they will lease from the Palestinian Authority, but will take it over and set up their own diplomatic and medical aid compounds, you know, economic development, all sorts of things.
They would go into Gaza and divide it up and create a pier and a port and own these sections, if you will.
And it never happened the way that I perceived it should.
But instead, it seemed that Biden and his administration were listening because not only did they build a pier, but now they're pushing the plan for partitioning Gaza into these big sections that I originally said should happen and could happen.
It's very unnerving, of course, because we know what Israel is going to do.
They're going to Uh, continue their genocide.
They're going to provoke action against Hezbollah and Iran to try and lure the United States into participating in a larger war.
But and and the US military is only only too happy to put its
assets in there because they're under the drunk delusion that they can
You know act with impunity and be not struck by anything where I think the opposite is true
You would have Russia which is already just Completed its strategic agreement with Iran
which basically will mean they will give Iran everything they need to survive and and and
Protect themselves and they will in turn give it to Hezbollah and Yemen and they will in turn
Destroy and respond to any Israeli or US aggression aggression.
And suddenly you have every American ship sunk to the bottom of the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, wherever they are, and you will have Israel beginning its collapse in on itself.
As missiles rain down and drones rain down from every direction and propaganda leaflets rain down telling every business, every shop, every toy store, every shoe store, every fashion store, every gay nightclub, every restaurant, every hotel, Leave if you want to live, because everything is going to be shattered glass and crumbling remains, and what Israel has done is going to be visited upon it, because of Netanyahu and his fanatical zealotry to try and demonize the Palestinian people as the Amalek.
And that's just not going to be tolerated.
And you're also going to witness in the long term, and I said this earlier in an interview, Israel is going to be ostracized from every nation, especially the Muslim nations, and the ostracization of Israel is the first step to the absolute political death of Israel, and I don't think anything can stop it.
Jim?
Brian?
Okay.
There's a lot going on here right now, and it's developing rather quickly in terms of Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.
Just last night there were massive protests in Israel among, and get this, it was the trade unions basically that let work off and let the workers off and encouraged their people to hit the streets to protest.
What are they protesting?
Well, what does Israel tend to do when there's trouble and division on the horizon?
They tend to put together a mob And send the mob out, get the mob all whipped up.
I mean that's how Christ was crucified.
They've been doing the same thing for years and years and years.
Now there's a 300,000 person mob out there demanding that Israel basically finishes the job.
Now remember the West Bank, a little different than Gaza, the West Bank is basically two square miles that had at one point in time three million Palestinians in it and over 700,000 Israelis.
Life there is crazy because Israel controls all these checkpoints.
The International Court of Justice hasn't been able to do anything about it.
They basically say, according to the Geneva Convention, the Palestinians get this two-square-mile plot of land, and that's what they're going to have to do with it.
Well, the Israelis are tearing it up.
Over what?
Over what they call 100 current hostages that are still there.
So you've got like Three million people whose lives have been absolutely disrupted.
Now they're talking about starvation, water problems, and food problems, and medical problems as a result.
Because Israel says that on October 7th there's still a hundred more hostages out there.
So activate the mob, put them out in the streets, so we can go ahead and finish this thing out while the political winds are in our favor right now.
In the meantime, Israel seems to be sort of dividing down the middle in terms of There's some people saying, hey, leave them alone.
Let's quit this.
This death and destruction is too much.
But on the other hand, hey, they want that land.
They want them Palestinians off that square mileage.
Now remember, that was Lebanese.
Basically, the Lebanese managed that property, that area, on behalf of the Israelis.
So, Or on behalf of the Palestinians.
So you've got a lot of conflict there, and there's been a couple of uprisings.
They call them intifadas over the years.
There's been the first intifada, which was, I think, 87 and 93 or something like that.
And then the second intifada, but they've all been put down as Israel has implemented a massive security infrastructure in place to do this.
So what is this all about right now?
Well, the people are getting torn up into this great mob.
They're telling them that it's over a hundred hostages that are still being held.
But basically right now Israel has a major division problem and they're trying to, within itself, and they're trying to get all the momentum that they possibly can to finish out the job and gentrify all that land and get rid of all them Palestinians.
In violation of international criminal law, which puts the Geneva Convention as well as the International Court of Justice at total odds in terms of who's the hero and who's the villain here.
You got two sides of the story every time, but what I just told you is basically what the Palestinian people have had to go through for the last, since 1967.
Excellent, excellent.
Scott has an urgent international interview to do, Don, so we're going to take our break early, and we're actually dividing our international segment from our domestic, so it works.
Take us out, Don.
Okay, we'll take us out here early on Labor Day.
We're going to rest and get ready for a hot second part, and so this is the 2nd of September, 2024, first hour, Very hot part and come on back for the rest of the show.
It's going to be wonderful.
Well, it'll be a wonderful story, but the stories are going to be very heavy about what's really going on and it's time to get prepared.
Right here.
Export Selection