All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 2, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:56:48
The Raw Deal (2 September 2024) with Mike Sparks and James Roguski
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I need somebody.
Help!
Not just anybody.
Help!
You know I need someone.
Help!
When I was young, I was so much younger than today.
I never needed anybody's help in any way.
But now these days are gone and I'm not so self-assured Now I find I've changed my mind, I'll open up the doors Help me if you can, I'm feeling down And I do appreciate you being around Help me get my feet back on the ground Won't you please, please help me
Well, this is Jim Petzer, your host on The Raw Deal right here on Revolution Radio Studio B this Labor Day, the second day of September 2024.
I may or may not be joined today by Keith Rogers, my regular co-host, but I also have two special guests, Mike Sparks, who's an expert in defense.
And we'd be talking about the war in Ukraine and James Roguski talking about the UN plan for increased global government.
Which would be catastrophic if they are able to join.
That will be wonderful.
Meanwhile, I have a totally alarming report that could change the course of the world's history.
Namely, that Vladimir Putin has been arrested in Mongolia.
Now, I'm looking for confirmation, but I have a very good source.
Ukraine has recently called upon Mongolia to arrest him when he arrived for a visit, which happened today.
This is a week ago.
Ukraine, Friday, called on Mongolia to detain Russian President Vladimir Putin when he visits the country next week, saying the country should honor the International Criminal Court's warrant for the Russian leader.
We call on the Mongolian authorities to execute a binding international arrest warrant.
The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry said in a statement, Russian President Putin will visit Mongolia.
Here it says, Tuesday, his first visit to an ICC member since the court ordered his arrest last year.
The court said Mongolia has the obligation to cooperate, though Kremlin spokesman brushed off suggestions he could be arrested, saying there are no worries about the visit.
Well, my report is correct.
That idea of no worries was mistaken, and the situation is, in my opinion, catastrophic.
We have here the one man who has been responsible for maintaining peace in the world.
Here's the report.
Arrested, though he put the arrest warrant in the trash when he disembarked from his plane, that he was arrested.
NATO's pissed off.
Oh, wait a minute.
Here are we getting a contradictory report.
That's so, though, do his arrest way through, the rest weren't in the trash as he disembarked, NATO's pissed off that he wasn't rescued.
Zelensky, I don't know what the truth is, can't confirm either story.
All right, that's a clarification.
Glad to have that in on hand.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
has given Ukraine carte blanche for attacks inside Russia.
This is very, very bad.
Biden admin is getting ready to make more concessions to Ukrainian President Zelensky by allowing him to use almost any U.S.
weapon for strikes, including inside Russia.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Maria Zakharova said in a comment, In response to a recent remark by Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Sang, who confirmed that the Kiev regime has been allowed to use U.S.
weapons in its terrorist incursion in the Kursk region, the Russian diplomat noted that the U.S.
establishment has thrown common sense out the window, believing they can do whatever they want.
Ukraine had been given full card block for operation on Russian regions.
Moreover, the Joe Biden administration, and remember, this is a second major fake Biden, four inches taller than the earlier, who appears to have died in Las Vegas, followed in short order by the statement, not on White House stationary, not on White House stationary.
That he was withdrawing from the race with a forged signature, and because he hadn't therein endorsed Kamala, we get a ridiculous tweet saying he didn't endorse Kamala.
I mean, this is all so shoddy, shabby, and unbelievable if you look at it objectively.
That's because they replaced him with a guy who showed up then shortly thereafter on the White House portico, four inches taller, good stride, looking like a basketball player, just absurd.
Further report I have is that this new Biden thing is being played by actor Jim Carrey.
Of course, he's spending time on the beach now in Delaware.
Further report.
Zelensky, getting ready for more concessions to Zelensky by giving him free reign to use almost any U.S.
weapon, including for strikes inside Roma, Sakharov, and Maintain, describing the U.S.
position as increasingly pursuing escalation.
Being driven by ambitions of world domination, Washington has been intensifying tensions with Russia as it seems to implicate a strategic defeat on our country.
This is Zach Brova speaking, and it is not looking to avoid escalation despite statement by a number of high-profile US officials.
Meanwhile, Lavrov, who is the most experienced diplomat in the world today, warns the US World War III will not be confined to Europe.
They have a mindset of a master sitting somewhere out there overseas and believing to be totally safe and secure, thinking that not only Ukrainians, but also Europeans would be willing to do the dirty work and die for them.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov Tuesday.
And why am I getting the, well see, okay.
These are, yes, this report is from Tuesday last, but terribly important, totally relevant.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the United States that if war in Ukraine escalates to a wider military conflict, a potential World War III would not be limited to battlefields in Europe.
I'll take a question from journalists two and a half years after Russian President Putin's invasion, and we know, of course, that was not a conventional invasion.
That was really an effort to defend the people of the Donbass from a slaughter that was shaping up by the Kiev regime.
Lavrov was asked to address a recent report in The Guardian about Zelensky wanting to use long-range Storm Shadow missiles that threaten Moscow and St.
Petersburg to force Russia to the negotiating table.
As a British newspaper explained, Storm Shadow missiles were developed primarily by an Anglo-French collaboration made by European joint venture MBDA, which also has an Italian partner.
But because some of its components are supplied by the US, The White House has also agreed to its use inside Russia.
It has so far refused to do so, fearing an escalation of the conflict.
Lavrov declared this is blackmail, an attempt to pretend that the West seeks to avoid any excessive escalation.
In reality, they are full of mischief.
Avoiding escalation is not what West is after.
To put it in a plain language, you're simply picking a fight.
The longtime Russian minister also pointed to various remarks from John Kirby, White House national security communication advisor, along the lines of what he said Friday.
We've been watching escalation risks since the beginning of this conflict, and that ain't gonna change.
We're always going to be concerned about the potential for the aggression in Ukraine to lead to escalation on the European continent.
But Here's the key point.
Lavrov said, for Americans, any talk about the Third World War comes down to something that would affect Europe alone, and God forbid if it ever happened.
This is quite telling, since this idea reflects a mindset of the American planners and geostrategy experts who believe that they can simply set the whole thing out.
I think that it is important to understand in this situation we have our own doctrine including one governing the use of nuclear weapons.
An effort to update it is underway.
Moreover, these Americans are well aware that provisions it set forth, this fact, trap the bias from the Freudian slips they make when they say that having a third world war would be a bad thing because they do not want Europe to suffer.
This is what the American mindset comes down to, that of a master sitting somewhere out there overseas believing to be totally safe and secure, thinking that not only Ukrainians, but also, as it turns out, Europeans would be willing to do the dirty work and die for Europeans would be willing to do the dirty work and die We've now been hearing speculation about authorizing Ukraine to use not only the Storm Shadow missiles, but also US-made long-range missiles.
Now, All we can do is confirm once again that playing with fire is a dangerous thing for men and women in charge of nuclear weapons across the Western world, but they are playing with matches as if they never grew up.
While there are nine nuclear-armed nations, the US and Russia collectively have roughly 90% of the global arsenal.
The Kremlin launched its invasion in February 2022 as the US and Europe have armed Ukraine's soldiers.
Putin and other Russian officials, along with NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg, have stoked fears of nuclear weapon use.
Mikhail Sharonet, who represents Crimea, which Russia Annex from Ukraine a decade ago.
That was all in accordance with international law, involved a referendum, all totally above board.
In Russia, State Duma told TASS Tuesday, the U.S.
should consider the consequences of giving Ukrainian troops long-range cruise missiles.
The ball is now in the U.S.
court, but it's quite difficult to play the game because it will have to take reality into consideration.
And carefully weigh everything before passing the ball to Ukraine, which aims to drag the U.S.
and Europe into a potential World War III, Sheremet told the Russian news agency.
Undoubtedly, the U.S.
will try to implement its far-reaching aggressive plans to provide cruise missiles to the Kiev regime.
They will probably try to do that through Europe, which they have under their thumb.
But in any case, The price of this decision will be too high for them to pay, leading to the loss of their own statehood.
Earlier this month, Ukraine attacked Russia's Kursk region and scarred out a slice of territory in the biggest foreign attack on Russia since World War III, except, of course, it has been defeated.
Russia said Western weaponry, including British tanks and U.S.
rocket systems, had been used by Ukraine in Kursk.
Givis confirmed using HIMARS to take out bridges in Kursk.
Washington said it was not informed about Ukraine's plans ahead of the surprise incursion into Kursk.
I can't believe that.
The United States also said it did not take any part in the operation, but if they're using our weapons system, we were complicit.
Multiple Russian government officials have made it clear they don't believe those U.S.
claims.
Still, Based on interviews that Anna Tolivan of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft recently conducted with members of the Russian establishment, including former diplomats, members of think tanks, academics and business people, as well as a few members of the wider public, the majority want an early ceasefire roughly along the existing battle lines.
Most of my conversation took place before the Ukrainian invasion of the Russian province of Kursk, as far as I can make out, however.
This Ukrainian success, since, of course, reversed, has not changed basic Russian calculations and views.
In the end, Russia's negotiating position will be decided by Putin, with whom I have not spoken.
Nobody I spoke to in Moscow.
Claimed to know for sure what Putin may be thinking.
However, the consensus was that we made terrible mistakes at the start of the war.
Either pragmatist taking military advice and recognizing military reality.
No doubt about that.
Checking to see if there's any update here in relation to this Putin report.
I think the latest we have to conclude is that it was a mistake to suggest that he had actually been arrested.
I believe that is not the case, but that Ukraine was urging that it should happen, and there is an international criminal court warrant out for his arrest, which I do not believe to have been justified, but it exists.
Meanwhile, turning to Gaza, France's chief rabbi urges Israel to finish the job.
France's chief rabbi, KM Corsa, justified Israel's brutal war on the Gaza Strip in a television interview on 26 August, urging the Israeli army to finish the job.
The rabbi described Israel's indiscriminate strikes on the besieged enclave as acts of war instead of Israel's actions.
That is, all of Israel's action in the Strip.
Yes, mass murder, children, women, starvation.
Bombing galore are necessary to protect its nationals.
That's utter rubbish.
We even know October 7th was a false flag, where most of the dead appear to have been killed by Israel.
Although so far, I mean, because the Hamas didn't take some hostages, there appears to have been an Hamas effort.
But most of this was staged and exaggerated and minimally allowed to happen by Israel, which then aggravated the death count by firing on those at the music festival with their own attack helicopters to run up the death toll to justify the brutal assault in Gaza.
It's an act of war that no country in the world can talk like Israel is doing, and I have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of.
And now Israel is conducting the fighting, said the Chief Rabbi of France, in response to a question about civilian casualties.
When asked if he were critical of Netanyahu's policy in Gaza, he said, I'm never uncomfortable with a policy that consists of defending one's citizens.
In response to a question on whether he condemns Israeli massacres against civilians, As he condemned Israeli deaths on 7 October, the rabbi said they are not of the same order.
Of course they're not, because he's a Jewish supremacist, right?
The Jewish lives matter.
Other lives don't.
The lives of the goyim do not matter.
The other races, after all, only exist to serve the Jews.
This is just outrageous.
You can see he's a full-time subscriber to the extreme Zionist position, which appears to be dominating politics in Israel and do have warranted this slaughter, the wholesale slaughter of Palestinians.
A member of the French Parliament, Aymeric Caron, blasted the rabbi's comments.
Calling them an apology for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
He got that right.
Chief Rabbi Ham Korsiant calmly declares he supports the ongoing genocide in Gaza, that it is deserved, and makes clear his hatred of the Palestinians.
These are crimes punishable by law.
And here I thought religious men were supposed to defend moral values and the sanctity of life.
A total of confirmed deaths in the Gaza Strip was of 40,534, a majority of them women and children.
Another 93,778 have been wounded as a result of the war.
Now let me add, more realistic estimates have it up to 200,000.
Lots of bodies buried in the rubble.
The undercount is staggering.
There are massively more deaths than the official account is reporting.
I mean, after all, they want to annihilate over 2 million.
They're just getting started.
The Israeli army has repeatedly targeted schools and UN facilities housing displaced Palestinians.
Diseases spread across a besieged enclave due to the war.
UN experts, the EU and Human Rights Watch They've all said Israel is using starvation as a weapon against the people of Gaza.
Absolutely Kobrak!
How brutal can you get?
Meanwhile, Israel's plan for Gaza comes into view.
Unit 601 of the IDF's Combat Engineering Corps is clearing a vast swath of land across central Gaza, splitting the 25-mile-long territory into two parts.
The so-called Nazarian Corridor, Highway 749, which crosses Gaza from east to west, will provide faster transportation for IDF troops operating in the area, and will also function as a vital part of Israel's security corridor, separating the north from the south.
There is no doubt that military outposts will be established along the corridor, as well as locations along the west coast.
The aim of these actions is to protect the development of new settlements that will be built north of the corridor.
In short, the Israeli government is using its war in Hamas to divert attention from its real objective, which is the expansion of the Jewish state on Palestinian lands.
We have a map here that explains More and more of what's going on, but just have no serious doubt about it.
It is happening.
It is happening.
Absolutely stunning stuff.
More.
Not surprisingly, Israel's activities in the north have resulted in mass evacuations that have intensified the suffering of the traumatized population.
According to the Palestinian Chronicle, the United Nations announced Tuesday that Israel issued three fresh evacuation orders for over 19 neighborhoods in the north of Gaza and Deir al-Bash, bringing the number of massive evacuation orders to 16 in August alone, which leaves only 11% of the Gaza Strip untouched by the evacuation orders.
As we noted earlier, The Palestinians are being driven from the north to make room for new settlements that will be built sometime in the near future.
The Netzerian corridor serves as a critical buffer zone separating these new colonies from potential attack by Palestinian militants.
Israel intends to maintain control over Gaza by putting restrictions on movement and by designating areas where Palestinians can gather, in other words, Palestinians will be refugees in their own country.
Here's an excerpt from an article on the World Socialist Web.
Gaza's population, which stood at over 2 million before the start of the genocide, is now crammed into an area just 41 square kilometers, or 11% of Gaza's total area, with the remaining 89% being placed on evacuation orders by the IDF.
The United Nations warned the area is lacking critical infrastructure and basic services, while aid provision is limited due to access and security issues.
A severe overcrowding with a density of 30,000 to 34,000 per square kilometer has exacerbated the dire shortage of essential forces such as water, sanitation and hygiene, health service and protection and shelter.
UN forced to suspend food distribution as Israel places 89% of Gaza under evacuation orders ahead of the article with a map showing how it's being timed.
This is Netanyahu's plan in a nutshell.
Shrink the Gaza concentration camp to a mere 11% of its original size.
Transfer the population to the designated location.
Partition the territory to allow for settlement activity and expropriation of gas reserves off the coast.
Neutralize any opposition to Israeli expansion.
Here's a video from Channel 14 that confirms IDF is planning to permanently occupy the Gaza Strip.
Surprisingly, an article posted Wednesday on CNN confirms our analysis and admits that Israel, most of our plans admit cutting the Strip in two.
Maintain a permanent operational foothold in the area.
And while the author does not verify our theory on settlement development, readers can draw their own conclusions.
Israel would never put so much money and effort into an operation that didn't extend the borders of the Israeli state.
Here's CNN.
A satellite image from March 6th reveals that the East West Road Which has been under construction for weeks, now stretches from the Gaza-Israeli border across the entire roughly 6.5-kilometer-wide strip dividing northern Gaza, including Gaza City, from the south of the enclave.
The IDF told CNN they were using the route to establish an operational foothold in the area to allow the passage of forces as well as logistical equipment.
PM Netanyahu unveiled a plan obtained by CNN to a security cabinet back on February 23rd for a post-Hamas future for Gaza, including the complete demilitarization of the enclave and the overhaul of its security, civil administration, and education systems.
Palestinians living in Gaza fear Israel's post-war security plan will further restrict their freedom of movement.
Israeli road splitting Gazan 2 has reached the Mediterranean coast.
Satellite imagery shows.
Yes, no doubt about it.
Satellite imagery shows.
Wow!
Stunning stuff.
And I have no doubt that the master plan is indeed to destroy Gaza and turn it into Israel.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Bye.
Thank you.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio.
Freedom Substance dot com.
The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Hey, everyone.
It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern. 8 p.m. Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com, the people station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well, I'm very pleased to have been joined by Mike Sparkson.
In the meanwhile, where am I going to serve as an advisor to the Department of Defense on Especially on the type of military to use in different forms of combat.
For example, we observed that in relation to Iraq, they were going to use a lot of improvised explosive devices in Afghanistan too, and that unless they were willing to run the risk of a lot of men losing their limbs, they should use tracked vehicles.
He was overridden by a general who wanted men to lose limbs.
Mike, this is just a horrifying story that they insisted on not using track vehicles because he wanted to develop robotics.
Have more men with artificial limbs, Mike, that's so disgusting.
But it's indicative of the dissent of our military and the quality of leadership we have in America today.
Your thoughts?
It gets worse.
We actually had generals, you know, come together And choose a wheeled vehicle that can't even fit inside the CH-47 Chinook to fly over the landmine.
They chose the vehicle because it's wheeled and for emotional reasons instead of practical functional reasons.
You know, I explain this to people all the time and they just roll their eye, but I'll give it a shot here.
At the end of the Vietnam War, We learned one thing that worked in Vietnam, and that was light-tracked armored vehicles could go anywhere in the jungle, in the swamps, and pour out fire in all directions.
Lots of ammo, because the vehicle is carrying the ammo, not on your back.
So they called them the Green Dragons, but we call them the Gavins, because they're named after General Gavin who created them.
But the point is, it worked.
The Armored Cavalry, whatever you want to call it, worked.
So at the end of the war, the Army got together and they said to the light guys, look, this works.
You need at least a bullet protective vehicle that can go anywhere.
It's light enough you can use it for your light stuff.
You can parachute with it.
It swims across lakes and rivers.
It's go anywhere, low maintenance, tastes great, less filling.
It's our vehicle, the heavy guys are saying, but it's light.
It's the same weight as one of your five-ton cargo-capacity trucks.
And the light guy said, no.
We don't want to look like you, the track guys.
We're going to go for a new Jeep that'll be wider, so we'll be less prone to turning over, which is the Humvee.
And that is a horror story in itself.
Thousands of people have died, a friend of mine, dead, Captain Ernie Blanco.
I told him before he left, do not ride in this Humvee.
Do not leave the wire in this Humvee.
At least go in a five-ton cargo-capacity truck.
We call them FMTVs, Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles.
Anyway, you can sandbag those things, at least.
Nope.
You know, the commander usually has to run around Like a horse in the old days to rally the troops and keep them in formation.
But he was running around in a Humvee and a little kid set off a bomb and went right through his door.
Wasn't even armored.
Dead.
Thousands dead, Jim.
And maimed for life.
Mike is just catastrophic.
These generals would sacrifice our military, the good men and women of our forces, Whom, by the way, the army is unable to recruit today because it's gone woke.
I'd like your opinion on that.
But before we get there, the latest from Ukraine and Russia, this intervention in Kursk, which appears to have been mapped out, probably using AI to find forms of vulnerability in the Russian defenses, has been defeated.
The front lines of Ukraine are virtually collapsing.
Russia appears to be prevailing completely.
Resorting now to long-range missiles, the U.S.
has authorized the use of deep strikes inside Russia using American weapons.
I think this is a catastrophe.
The spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, who's absolutely wonderful, and their, of course, leading diplomat, Sergey Lavrov, have warned that if this breaks into World War III, it's not going to be confined to Europe.
The US seems to act as though they're not going to be touched.
He's warning it's going to extend to the United States, I have no doubt.
Russia is now in the process of changing its nuclear strategy.
Because the West has done so to allow first strikes.
This is just terrible, Mike.
I mean, it used to be when both sides declared they would not be the first to use nuclear weapons that we had a position of stability.
Now we have a situation of astonishing instability.
Your thoughts?
Right.
Remember, I said that they made the decision to go with the Humvee.
So you've got half of the Army and all of the Marine Corps in these wheeled vehicles that cannot maneuver.
So there are five forms of military force in the world.
You've got supernatural, you've got psychological, you've got engineering, you've got firepower, and you've got maneuver.
Maneuver is decisive.
Maneuver is when you take the center of gravity of the enemy's capital city or wherever, you know, all their supplies and the leaders are, ends the conflict.
Okay, that would be marching on Kiev and taking down Zelensky's regime, ending the war.
That's maneuver.
We have been advising the Ukraines how to fight poorly with our wheeled nonsense.
You know, the wheeled vehicles are road and trail bound, obvious, and they're getting cream, and then you jump out of them, and you may think you're moving really fast, I mean, from your point of view, hey, I'm in physical fitness.
You know, I've been looking at myself in the gym.
I've got six-pack abs.
But from a distance, you're not moving squats for a first-person vehicle, first-person view, right?
FPV drone.
You're not making enough distance to evade being targeted.
And these drones are just going straight into the vehicles and the men on foot and just turning them into pink mist.
I got videos posted on Our BitChute channel.
You go to, you know, bitchute.com and you put in DenimicPara007.
I just posted several videos.
It's horrific!
The Russians are creaming these guys because of our advice.
Our military malpractice.
In open terrain.
Ukraine.
You could theoretically hide In the old days, you know, in vegetation, but now we have heat sensors.
We can see through the vegetation and see the glowing body.
First person, you know, view, drone goes right into the heat signature, explodes, turns everybody into pulverized mess or pink mess, barbecue.
It's, um, our military incompetence means that the Ukraine You know, Army cannot decisively win, and they cannot maneuver.
You see what I mean?
So, in contrast, they're going to firepower to lash out at the Russians.
It's not going to bring out a decisive, you know, event that will end the war in their favor.
And what it will do is it runs the risk of escalation, where the Russians say, that's enough.
You've targeted too many of our civilians, you've killed them.
And we're going to go to the next step.
Now, the only thing that's holding them back, the Russians, is Article 5 of the NATO Treaty, that if Russia attacks any NATO member country, the others have to join in on the war.
That's what they're hoping for happens.
You see what I mean?
The Article 5 provoking Russia to do that.
But if Russia gets, you know, damaged By these missiles, you know, targeting civilians, and Putin and companies say that's enough.
They will horizontally escalate, so to speak.
They won't be just confining the war to, you know, Kiev.
But in my personal opinion, they should march on Kiev and end it.
You know, use maneuver just like they did in 1945, the end of the war.
March on Berlin.
Put the regime down.
That's going to cost some men, you see what I mean?
Maneuver requires you to uncover yourself from your position in order to move.
And you're always going to be more vulnerable that way than if you stayed and not moved.
You know what I mean?
By a factor of three to one.
You know, Napoleon's advice is you must attack with at least three times of what you're trying to evict.
You see what I mean?
But the Russians have got the numbers.
They're reluctant to lose the men, but I think the Russian people are getting fed up.
So I expect the next move will be a decisive multiple access maneuver on Kiev and the war.
That's what I do.
You believe Russia will undertake a direct attack?
Belarus is a mess of troops on the border.
Do you think they could be used for this purpose?
Yeah, it would be what we call a maneuver access.
You'd have several maneuver accesses so that Ukraine can't focus on one and stop it.
There are just too many.
During the Civil War, our own Civil War, Sherman figured that out.
He was brilliant.
He divided his army into two, so there was a left wing and a right wing, and Johnson and the others, you know, the Confederates didn't know where he was going to go, and Sherman said, I didn't know where I was going to go either.
He was going to go wherever the Confederates Put up a resistance, he would go the opposite direction.
In other words, he'd have two wings moving on Atlanta, and then, you know, to the East Coast.
So basically, he would go wherever the enemy wasn't, and then it would unhinge him.
So this is maneuver warfare, is what it's called.
But you gotta understand that the cultural change of the army took place starting in 1980 with the Humvee nonsense, and then it was further solidified by the Clinton era.
They wanted wheeled peacekeeping vehicles, which are even more horrendous because they're heavier and pressing down harder on air-filled rubber tires, which are vulnerable.
And they wanted the image of looking kinder, less, you know, threatening.
But when you go to a foreign country, they don't give a crap whether you're in a track tank or a wheeled ice cream truck.
They're going to see American invader and it's time to evict.
You see what I mean?
You don't gain any brownie points of any significance.
But they forced it down the Army's throat through General Shinseki.
And General Shinseki has a lot to account for.
The people that are dead and maimed because of him.
He's a political appointee, as you know, and he did the bidding of the Clintonistas.
And they wanted real peacekeeping.
And it's ineffective in war.
The strikers, we've lost so many, you know, hundreds of strikers and hundreds of men.
And these eight-wheel vehicles, theoretically with eight wheels, spread the load, but it doesn't work out.
It just doesn't work.
We've known this already.
We already learned this in World War II and in Korea.
The vehicles must be tracked.
Will it require more maintenance?
Not really.
We never did any maintenance on our 113s.
We just turned them on every time we wanted to use them.
So that's nonsense.
It's the same maintenance as a Humvee.
So, they're used as an excuse, though, because deep down inside, you're not going to like this, Jim.
But I found in my experience, most people in the U.S.
military just want the duty day to end and go chase pussy.
They're interested in sex.
They're not interested in warfighting excellence.
They might go to the gym and work out and look at the mirror so they can pursue women better.
I'm sorry, but someone's got to say this, Jim.
They're not interested in combined arms warfighting.
The maneuver we need to decisively end conflicts, they're not interested in it.
So when that doesn't work out, then you resort to firepower and you're lashing out, which is what's happening.
It's just a face-saving measure, but it's dangerous.
You're provoking the enemy.
Let me say several things about that.
Having gone woke, having all this DEI, you know, who wants to join a military where you're going to have to shower with transgenders?
I mean, that's insane.
So they're not able to make their recruitment goals or none of the branches.
I don't believe even the Marine Corps is making its recruitment goals today.
Which means we have a shrinking military.
They're treating that as though we're somehow virtuous, trying to turn a lemon into lemonade, but it's obviously a catastrophe.
That means we're increasingly dependent on nukes because we do not have the capacity to conduct a conventional war.
In fact, the Russians are so superior in production of munitions, such as artillery shells, Over the United States, and it's not even remotely competitive.
I think that means the United States is going to have to resort to nukes.
It does have a vast nuclear weapons arsenal, but the Russians are superior to the US in terms of their weaponry, their ballistic missiles, their anti-ballistic missile systems, the S-400, S-500, Their anti-submarine torpedoes are phenomenal.
Their anti-ship missiles cannot be stopped.
I see a catastrophe for the American military engaging in a war with Russia.
Your thoughts?
Right, but it's firepower.
Everything you were talking about is firepower that we're, you know, lashing out at the Russians because we lack maneuver.
We cannot evict the Houthis from anti-ship missile firing positions On the Yemen Peninsula.
Because the lack of maneuver is the result of previous corruption in the military.
You've got the light infantry narcissists who are not interested in combined arms warfare.
It's a narcissist thing.
They got the HUA badges.
And I'm all in favor of that, but why can't you use mechanical advantage also?
Is your penis going to fall off if you come out of an armored tracked vehicle?
tank and the ramp goes down, are you going to lose your manhood because of it?
But what's happening is that has been added to with this nihilism, which is what woke-tardism is.
It's If I want to have sex or poop, if I want to cut my genitals off, if I want to call myself a man when I'm a woman, all that stuff is considered human rights by your woke-tards, your liberal leftist people.
And they think it's a manifestation of the First Amendment of our Constitution.
That we have to go to this lowest common denominator.
So what happens is in the services of, you know, the firefighting services, the police, and now the military, you've got a problem with kinetic physical reality slapping you in the face saying, if you do this stupid, silly nonsense, you're going to die.
You're going to get a bunch of people killed.
So that's what's happened.
Our military can't maneuver.
It now can't even show up to the fight.
Because of the wolf card, because you're not going to have enough people willing to be in this, you know, nut house.
It is a dangerous thing already.
People die in training all the time before we even go to war.
So you're just magnifying everything to where you have a complete moral collapse, which is that people are not joining the military at all.
So what will have to happen is the American people are going to have to say, look, We don't care about the First Amendment.
When it comes to pragmatic things like firefighting, police, and the military, we have to make a damn decision about things.
Make some value judgments and say, this cannot fly.
We can't have anarchy in these functional areas of our society.
They won't work.
They'll stop doing those functions for society, and society will be threatened.
The existence of our society is being threatened now by this.
Military incompetence.
That they're saving face, lashing out with firepower, escalating the conflict, you know, horizontally to where it's going to land on, you know, American shores.
See what I mean?
See how the connection, how these chickens have been coming to roost for a while?
Yeah, when you say restricting, you mean transgender rights?
You mean promoting the transgender, the DEI ideology, because it's Yes, you're going to have to make that value judgment.
You're going to have to say yes to this, no to this.
And that's not in cahoots with the First Amendment.
The First Amendment says anything goes.
You do anything you want, unless it's a threat to the public.
You know what I mean?
But that's in the fine print.
You've got to go to a Supreme Court ruling in, I think, 1869, where they said you cannot have multiple wives.
They said we gotta draw the line somewhere else or you're gonna have human sacrifice.
And we do have human sacrifice.
Got people doing it.
So the problem is the First Amendment of the Constitution is immoral document.
It's basically saying anything goes.
And then they're saying we should be able to apply it in the functional areas of the police, you know, the military, firefighting, and just gonna get your people killed.
You see what I mean?
The reality is contradicting our wishes for various delusions.
Mike, this may be outside your ballpark, but I began this show with a report I just had that Vladimir Putin had been arrested in Mongolia under a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court.
Now, that report appears to be false.
Putin has shown contempt for the warrant, but Ukraine was urging Mongolia to arrest him.
Had that happened, how would it affect the equation?
See, I think it would be a catastrophe, just as I'm incredibly concerned about Trump being incarcerated on Rikers Island on the 18th of September, which I believe is going to happen.
So I want to get your assessment of both.
Let's talk initially about the hypothetical, which appears to be Paul's, of Putin being arrested in Mongolia.
How would you assess an event like that happening and the consequences thereof?
You would have to, in Mongolia, have a small group of people realizing that they're surrendering their life when they did that, because what they would do would be basically an action of a coup.
During an action of a coup, you take the current ruler and you, you know, immediately kill him or you guard him and have a circle around him, an outer circle to try to keep the inner circle safe.
But the people resisting the coup are going to come down on you and converge.
And then you're dead.
Everyone involved in the coup removal of the current leader are dead men.
So you'd have to have at least 20 dead men.
People willing to die to, you know, remove Putin like that.
They're going to die.
That's all there is to it.
The Russians aren't going to put up with that.
So the problem is I'm worried that Trump doesn't have 20 men like that.
I think if he goes to the sentencing, I've been saying this all along because I've had experience one time, I didn't have the right license plate.
So I had to go to court.
And if I didn't pay that fine right then and there, I was going to jail for just a stupid out-of-state license, right?
So that's how jerky-asshole they are right there.
So they hate Trump, and I've been saying it all along.
If he shows up to that sentencing hearing on the 18th, I don't think he's leaving the building.
I think the cops are going on, maybe even the leg irons to humiliate him.
He's going to go to jail.
He's going to go to Rikers Island, and he's going to be Epstein murdered.
The Secret Service isn't going to protect him.
We've already seen that with the Butler incident.
All the Leos were in on it.
They, deep down inside, resent Trump.
They're nihilists, too.
A lot of them are Freemasons.
And they look at Trump as a rich guy.
They resent him, just like they resented JFK.
So, if he thinks that the Secret Service is going to protect him in Rikers Island with, like, a wing set aside to himself, he's going to get Epstein.
So, my advice is, and I've been telling it to everyone I can, I think he needs to cross the Rubicon.
Do you know what that means?
When Julius Caesar was given the choice, he had to either cross the river and enter Rome as an individual citizen where he would be arrested and murdered, or he crossed with his army.
Because the government had gotten to the point where all the people were corrupt.
We're at that point.
Someone's got to say, look, this 1787 U.S.
Constitution is a pile of crap.
It's been taken over by a secret society, Satanists.
It's beyond repair at this point.
We got to get them out and ain't going to happen by some kind of a peaceful voting process since they, you know, stole the election four years ago.
Who's to say they're not going to do the exact same thing?
So I wouldn't go.
We have a report of troops, they appear to be federal, you know, not National Guard, but actually some branch of the Army already occupying hotels around the courthouse in New York City, evidently to put down what are expected to be protests by the public to Trump being sentenced to Rikers.
What you're suggesting is Trump has to make the decision of whether he's going to comply with the law, like Socrates and drink the hemlock, because his life expectancy is going to be dramatically reduced if he's sent off to Rikers.
Even if he has a Secret Service detail, he's going to be incredibly vulnerable there.
And his life expectancy, I think, is going to be very, very brief.
Or to rally the public to his support given the corruption of the courts and the federal government.
And that's what you're suggesting he ought to do.
Right.
Send a representative at the thing.
Saying if you want to do, you know, community service or, you know, wear an ankle bracelet, you tell my representative.
But I know the game you're playing.
If I show up in court, you're going to chain me away and I'm going to die in a metal cage.
He's got to assert his own self-preservation on here and also for the future of the country.
So I think he needs to cross the Rubicon and say, look, the system's rigged.
It's populated by people who's already violated it.
No, I'm not going to go to the sentencing.
That's what I would do.
I wouldn't go.
Yeah.
You still there?
We've got to cross the Rubicon.
Everyone thinks the United States is just going to be peacefully fixed by the 1787 Constitution that it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
It's the thing that's incubated the mess.
We're in the mess we're in because of the 1787 Constitution.
Not having enough safeguards, whether it's reality fraud, 9-11s, election stealing.
The way the document's constructed is faulty.
And we need to recognize it.
It can't be fixed.
So we've got to drop something, you know.
We've got to drop this god, tin god of the 1787 U.S.
Constitution, if we're going to save this country.
And, you know, Thomas Jefferson, of all people, said, you know, But what we concocted may not work after a while, and you gotta get the start over again.
Don't be lazy.
Wow.
I don't know that there's anything wrong with the Constitution.
It's a failure to implement it.
I mean, it's the corruption that's gradually creeped into our government.
It's a failure to adhere to its provisions and the rule of law that seems to me to be at fault.
No, I'll give you one example.
There's no enforcement arm of the Constitution.
There's no armed men saying, you violated this, this, this of the Constitution, you're under arrest.
There's no enforcement mechanism.
There's no reality.
There's no reality fraud mechanism.
I'm glad you're here, Mike.
I'm glad you are here.
Oh, thanks.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
was it a conspiracy Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Go!
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do, and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
It is no secret that a so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
them.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Over and beyond the military conflict with Ukraine, where there's a risk the United States may wind up in a nuclear exchange with Russia that will be very adverse to us.
And, of course, a political turmoil that's going to surround the, what I'm convinced is going to happen, the arrest of, the incarceration of Donald Trump on the 18th of September, where already army forces are in the area.
Well, Jim, thank you very much for having me.
to not go but send a representative.
We have a threat from the United Nations, and I'm very pleased we've been joined now by James Rogoski, who wants to talk about a plan for increased global government coming from that direction.
James, it's very timely.
Please share your thoughts.
Well, Jim, thank you very much for having me.
I hope you can hear me just fine.
Tomorrow at 1:00 PM, Eastern Time, that would be Tuesday, September 3rd at 1 p.m.
Eastern Time, is the deadline for nations to break the silence on what the United Nations calls the Silence Procedure regarding a document called the Pact for the Future.
Now, this is a series of three documents that they've been negotiating for well over a year, And the way they do this is the negotiators from all of the 193 member nations have been working on this document, the pact for the future, for well over a year.
And they've reached what they feel is a consensus document that all of the negotiators have agreed to.
And last week, they put it into what they call the silence procedure, where the governments of all of the 193 nations have a short period of time to state any rejection that they might have of any aspect of the document.
Very similar to if you've ever been to a wedding and they'll say something like, speak now or forever hold your peace if you have any objections to this.
So it's highly possible that some nation will have a comment to reject some of it, but the My point behind all of this is the vast majority of the world is completely in the dark about what is going on at the United Nations.
Yes, fill out what the threats are that are being concealed by language that may be euphemistic.
Because I think there are real genuine threats here.
Dr. Rima Labow has been very emphatic about her 10 million patriot challenge to oppose what's taking place at the UN, and I think you're absolutely correct, James.
Most of the people, including virtually all Americans, have no idea what's going on or the threat thereby represented.
Essentially, it's a play by the United Nations For more money, more power, more authority.
They're tying it together with the Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030, which, you know, to not, you know, overstate it, pretty much enters into every single aspect of your life and society.
They want to have, you know, their fingers in controlling almost everything.
There's five sections in the pack for the future.
And the fifth one is transforming global governance.
And essentially, they want, you know, more power and more authority to be given to the United Nations, all the way up to and including the last couple of sections, which talked about the governance of outer space.
Now, a lot of the language, you know, sounds very good.
It's very tricky.
You mentioned it just a moment ago, Uh, how they have, you know, euphemisms for things.
And, uh, it's something that they proposed three separate documents.
One of them is referred to as the pact for the future.
Another is a global digital compact, things like artificial intelligence, global ID, central bank, digital currency, and things like that.
And a couple of weeks ago, They put a third document, a Declaration on Future Generations, through this same silence procedure where all of the nations had an opportunity to voice their rejection of it.
And interestingly enough, it was rejected.
So they're back to the drawing board on the Declaration for Future Generations.
They have not said which nation or nations Voiced an objection to some of the text, but they did point out which sections were found to be objectionable, and there were quite a number.
Now, for people who say, oh, you know, there's nothing you can do to stop it.
It can't be done.
They're just going to do whatever they want.
Well, last year, at this same time of year during the UN General Assembly, they had four declarations that they had entered into this procedure.
And on the very last day, last year it was September 17th, before the meetings were supposed to start on the 18th, 11 nations got together, wrote a letter to the President of the General Assembly at the UN, and rejected the declarations that they were hoping to slide in, you know, last year.
So, this is possible.
We just really need, you know, one or more nations Yes.
to speak up and say no.
And the way they operate this, you can see very clearly that your silence is viewed as consent.
If you use the example of being in a wedding and the priest or minister says, if anyone speaks up and objects to it, if you remain silent, you're essentially acquiescing to whatever it is they're doing.
They tell us what they're going to do, and they prey upon our lack of awareness or our procrastination or our distraction, you know, probably more than anything.
The media distracts people with everything else under the sun.
They don't report on things of importance.
And so it slides right in without anybody objecting to it.
It's an old lawyer trick to say that if you don't say anything, you agree to this.
It's the basis of the 14th Amendment does that.
And there's a whole group of people opposed to that, pointing out that the federal government grew out of control at the end of the Civil War with the 14th Amendment.
And that says that basically, if you don't say squat, you are basically a slave to whatever the government says, because you didn't say anything.
It's an old, dirty lawyer trick.
The country's too widely dispersed to be able for anybody to know everything that's going on.
The founding fathers, it wanted temporary senators.
What that meant was that your two state senators were in direct contact with your state legislature, what they were doing in Washington, D.C., subject to recall.
What are you doing?
Oh, I don't want you to vote for that.
You're recalled.
That was changed with the 17th Amendment, floating the senators out there for six years.
So now there's no connection.
Between what you can do in one day by going to the state courthouse and what's going on in Washington, D.C.
There's no adult supervision of what they're doing in Washington, D.C., and then on a national or, sorry, global basis, what's happening at the U.N.
Mike, let me just add to that.
I think your point about the 17th Amendment is actually extremely important.
It's just like the Democrats would like to make the election of president a matter of a national election.
Because the Democrats, you know, pile up in the big cities, they can outvote the Republicans in any national level.
This is why the founders had the genius degree at the electoral college.
So smaller states would not be neglected by the majority rule.
That could occur if it were left up to a popular vote.
That would leave them out in the cold.
Changing the election of senators from being done by the state legislatures really severed the legislatures from control over national politics.
I think your point is impeccable and it ought to be restored.
I think that would be a really important move to no longer have senators Elected by a popular vote, but rather by each state legislature as a constitution originally envisioned.
James, your thought about that and other points Mike has raised.
Well, you know, I very much agree.
And it comes to the core understanding that the federal government, you know, back in 1787 was actually created by the states, not by the people.
And so, you know, that's part of the reason why the Electoral College was set up as it was, you know, we're not a quote unquote, democracy, we're a federation of individual countries, really, individual states.
And, you know, maybe it's a lack of civics class, or just a fundamental lack of understanding of, you know, how the country was founded to begin with.
The 17th Amendment certainly did alter the dynamic of how the Senate is chosen.
I basically agree with what you had to say.
Well, basically what happened was 10 states didn't ratify it, so we could easily start with that and get it thrown out and then we'd have some adult supervision.
Direct supervision of what's going on in Washington D.C.
at the state courthouse level that you and I could take a day off from work, go to state courthouse and say, what are they doing?
Well, they're thinking about giving Ukraine a nuclear weapon.
Is that a good idea?
No, it's not a good idea.
Don't vote for that.
Oh, I'm going to vote for it.
No, you're not.
You're recalled.
You're recalled immediately.
We're going to send a new person, a new senator.
See what I mean?
The senator is not supposed to be a super congressman.
The founding fathers knew that, that the senators were supposed to be the adult supervision for the state having direct connection to federal affairs.
Well, very much so.
That awareness, you want to take a wild guess as to what percentage of the American public are aware of what you just said?
Next to zero.
Probably zero.
They don't understand nuances like that, but they do understand that if you give somebody a blank check, and you can also print your own money, What's going to happen, and that's what's happened, that the CIA's number one weapon is printed money.
Not funny money.
It's real money.
They actually have the U.S.
Mint print money so that they have suitcases full of cash to bribe people overseas and make them do things.
So it's not funny money.
It's real money.
It's even worse with the United Nations and our quote unquote Ambassador Linda Thomas Greenfield.
Let me take just a moment for people who use Twitter, because it's probably about the only way to contact or get a communication to the UN Ambassador.
The handle is at U.S.
A.M.B.
U.N.
U.S.
Ambassador U.N.
So, at U.S.
A.M.B.
U.N.
For people who want to speak out about this, Send a tweet to your United Nations ambassador saying that you want the Pact for the Future to be rejected.
Now, I understand that the United States is not likely to reject this, but there is a possibility because in these documents, hidden in language that most people would not recognize, There's a worldwide movement, and it may very well be justified.
There's an argument to it, and the discussion should be had, where some of the aspects of the Pact for the Future talk about totally restructuring the Security Council of the United Nations.
Many of the nations around the world are displeased that the US has used their veto time and time and time again to stop, you know, actions by detailing whatever the Security Council might be doing.
And there's a movement that's been going on for well over a decade to add new permanent members, you know, maybe India and Brazil or other nations, and to change the structure, totally reform how the Security Council operates.
I think we're probably more likely to see An organization from the BRICS nations come up and become stronger and stronger to the point where the United Nations, you know, becomes disbanded just because of lack of interest, because the nations that are forming the BRICS alliance have pretty much had it with the United Nations and the way the Security Council operates.
So it's entirely possible that the United States could object to some of the things that are going on here.
These are discussions that need to be had.
I'm not saying I have all of the answers or the solutions or what should be done, but these are things that are being discussed quietly in these negotiations, and the vast majority of the population is completely and totally in the dark, and you're certainly not going to hear any intelligent conversation coming from politicians in this election season.
Yeah, what they're trying to do is play upon the geographical dislocation of these people acting as representatives, but they're not acting as representatives in good faith.
They're not constantly going back to their constituents and trying to figure out what they want.
It's obviously, it's an Illuminati thing.
These people are under their Illuminati control and they're doing the lawyer game of saying, we didn't hear any complaints.
So that means consent.
Exactly.
Exactly.
So I encourage everyone to raise your voice, whether it's on social media.
It's the pinned article that I have on jamesroguski.substack.com.
It's entitled Global Governance.
And that's the main aspect of the document that they're trying to push through.
They're going to be meeting the 22nd and 23rd of September.
So there is still time for people to get up to speed and become aware of what the UN is doing.
And like I said last year, they tried to slam through four declarations and 11 nations around the world rejected that.
And you know, their plans didn't go as they had hoped.
James, let me ask.
James, what's your assessment of relation between the UN and the World Economic Forum, which obviously wants one world government, but from Jerusalem, where the population has been reduced to half a billion, 500 million, which include the elite Jews who are going to rule the world in each of their 2800 slaves i mean this is a unbelievable vision but that's what they are promoting
do you see any connection between the u.n and in its efforts and promoting globalization and one world government and the world economic forum well i don't i don't know how much time we have jim to talk about this but i i see it as um an example of the problem with what i think is really fascism and fascism being defined as you know government and corporate world working against the people the weef
my understanding is that they have a clear contractual agreement with the united nations and And so hold on just a moment.
It's the United Nations.
Or is it, you know, the United Corporations of the world?
And, you know, we see this with the WHO, where, you know, a lot of the money It comes from foundations and civil society organizations, nonprofits, call them what you want.
It's essentially the oligarchs of the world donating money to organizations that buys influence.
And then when that seed money is followed by government money that funnels back to the corporations that started the whole process, You should be able to see the corruption that is endemic in, you know, an intergovernmental organization such as the UN or the WHO being taken over by the corporate world.
And, you know, they don't listen to the will of the people unless by the people you mean those who are running, you know, the corporate world.
It's quite obvious once you see it, you know, you can't unsee it.
They're not doing the work of the people of the world.
They're doing whatever their donors want them to do.
Mike, I want to get you in here, but let me just clarify.
I suppose what I'm asking is, obviously the WEF represents a Jewish supremacy movement for the Jews to rule the world.
Do you see a parallel?
Is the UN in competition with?
Well, I think it would be more obviously that the UN is, I think, in conflict with the BRICS nations.
The BRICS nations are all part of the UN, but they're building their own organization.
They've got new payment protocols to replace the SWIFT system.
They are now trading in their own currencies.
It's very clear that they are building a structure that is, I don't really like using the word parallel, but they're building a new structure that suits their needs because they've realized that the five nations that have veto power in the Security Council of the UN are probably never going to give that up.
And the only way they're going to wrest control away from France and England and Russia, China, United States, Russia and China have already essentially stepped aside to create their own United Nations.
It's just called BRICS.
And so the competition of the UN and the IMF and the World Bank and everything else is that these nations are, you know, building their economies to the point where they are now a factor in, you know, trade of grains and everything else.
They've got their own payment systems.
So, you know, one of the issues with the swift payment system was that the nations knew what kind of trade was going on.
Now the United States and, you know, all the others are in the dark about how much grain is being traded between Russia and China.
Well, if it doesn't go through the SWIFT system with US dollars, we have no idea.
And so price discovery on products is now out of our hands.
So there's been a power shift that's quietly happened that practically nobody is talking about.
And the UN, I think The UN is headed for the trash heap.
And, you know, where does that leave the nations that have tried to control the world through the United Nations?
We're on a downward spiral.
Those are wonderful points, James.
I love them.
Mike, your thoughts?
I think the world economic forum is going to be perfectly content to work within the world, you know, peaceful future that the UN is concocting.
They think that they'll be able to steer it from the inside.
I would call it a parallel effort.
It may sound like it's not directly in collusion together, but it's a parallel effort, and they're comfortable with it.
So the answer to your question is yes, Klaus Schwab is in favor of this pact for the future.
Anything that looks like a duck quacks like a duck is a duck.
In this case, it's the New World Order.
Waddles like a duck, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
James is extremely interesting tell me about the urgency of acting in relation to the moves that are about to take place.
Well the deadline is one pm new york time tomorrow tuesday third and the reality of it is.
The power brokers you know the people who.
Um, are in the seat as, you know, ambassador to the UN or whatever representatives, um, they don't listen to the people.
And so, you know, the effort of this is to get people to understand even more deeply what is going on where these people are speaking in your name, they're speaking on behalf of your country, but they sure as hell don't listen to you.
And, and the more people come to understand You know, if you think that voting for Democrat or Republican is going to make a change, these people don't listen to us.
They listen to their corporate donors.
They listen to the ones who pay for the campaigns and benefit.
Those payments are not donations.
They're investments.
And if a corporation or an individual or some foundation or group is supporting Both sides.
They're making donations to Democrats.
They're making donations to Republicans.
They're buying influence and they see it as an investment because, you know, one piece of legislation can totally alter the landscape of their world in business.
So, you know, they don't really care if it's a Democrat or a Republican who wins.
They bottom both.
And, you know, once you realize that, you know, it's It's a corporately run system where these organizations, whether they're foundations or civil society organizations, nonprofits, NGOs, by whatever name, they exist to maintain their own existence.
And they're not there to solve problems.
You know, just to use as one, you know, the American Heart Association, Solved all, you know, heart-related health issues.
They would have no need to exist anymore.
These organizations are never going to solve the problems that they want you to donate money to, you know, they purport to try to solve the problem.
They're just bureaucracies designed to feed the bureaucracy.
People get very, very good jobs to write a bunch of papers and funnel money around.
The system is just It's a disaster.
Stand by, we'll be right back with James Rogowski and Mike Sparks, and we'll open the lines for your call.
Stand by.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
We'll be right back after this message.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSledge.com, the people station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuke on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, the call-in number is 608-957-8727.
608-957-8727.
We already have a first caller on the line, but before I take him, James, I want to ask your opinion about the role of the UN with regard to the migrant invasion.
Is this a U.N.
Army?
We have reports of the U.N.
working with D.H.S.
in Panama to bring all these invaders into the United States.
And is there a North American Union in effect, in your opinion, or not?
Your thoughts.
Well, one of the aspects of the five page declaration on future generations address that issue is actually the one that I most oppose from that document.
Let me see if I can dig this up for you real quick.
Section 32 in there would agree to, and I'll quote it, strengthen cooperation among states to ensure safe, orderly, and regular migration between countries of origin, transit, and destination, including through expanded Pathways for regular migration.
This is the kind of thing I'm talking about.
This is in the five page document that they put through the silence procedure a couple of weeks ago, and it did meet with objection, so they have not yet settled in on that.
They're essentially saying all of the nations of the world would agree.
To have, you know, open borders and migration be a regular, you know, expanding pathways for regular migration.
Now, there's a difference in terminology between immigration and migration, right?
Words matter.
And so this is the exact aspect of it.
Migration is something that has to be reviewed.
Well, you know, migration is usually due to displacement.
You know, I encourage people, you know, do a search for the definition of the terms immigration and emigration and migration and so forth and so on.
You know, when there's war or conflict or famine or, you know, whatever.
It's an excuse.
It's automatic.
We have to accept it.
I think the question is whether you have unrestricted immigration, which appears to be the UN position, or whether it's only legal and regulated by the nation states.
Because the UN, like the WEF, is wanting to move against nation states, against nationalism, against sovereignty.
That's their overarching agenda.
James, continue.
We have another caller standing by too, but go right ahead, James.
Yeah, you know, I think you've both already said it, along with what I've said.
They want this to be, you know, the accepted norm.
And we are currently in a position where they're saying, hey, all of the nations are going to agree that this is the accepted norm, unless people speak up in objection to it. - Well, look at the absurdity of this situation when you have one very wealthy nation that's achieved a lot.
You're just opening the doors to the exploitation of that nation, just as we are being destroyed by this mass migrant invasion.
It's a catastrophe.
And because the Biden administration is wholeheartedly behind the destruction of America, it's going on a pace seemingly without any opportunity to oppose it.
Though Trump, of course, is promising once in office to tighten it all up and undertake the largest deportation program in American history, which I would welcome.
Let me take in our first caller.
Let's see.
I've been from 816.
Is that Brian 816?
That's me.
I just want to point something out.
When people talk about BRICS, that Elvira Nasser Ali, whatever her name is, she's the head of the Central Bank of Russia.
She's a World Economic Forum person.
She's one of Schwab's global leaders.
Well, I was talking about that the other day, and someone said, oh, they're good, don't worry about them.
Well, I found an article where someone read the charter for the Central Bank of Russia.
And it's Rothschild owned.
And to me, and you look at BRICS, it was started by some guy with Chris Weinert said Goldman Sachs.
I thought it was Lehman Brothers, a guy named O'Neill.
And does anyone think the Rothschilds are ever going to give up their ownership of their central banks, whether they're in BRICS or not?
You know, it just wouldn't make sense.
You know, you look at the old Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union had their money printed by the Rothschilds.
The red star of the old Soviet Union stood for the five sons of Mayor Amsel Rothschild.
So to me, what with BRICS, eventually they would end up doing to BRICS what they do always.
Mayor Amsel Rothschild said, I don't care who writes the laws, I just want to print the money.
And we always end up in the same The black hole that we always end up in.
Excellent point, Brian.
Before I invite the replies, I want to bring in the 408.
Paul, your thoughts?
Best way to lead the opposition is to lead it.
Yeah, yeah.
I want Mike before.
Go ahead, Paul.
Yeah, thanks.
Interesting discussion.
You know, one of the things I would say is there's at least two or three or so parallel Discussions here taking place that are, you know, I would say interwoven, connected by the same thread.
I am afraid to admit that, you know, I think the good professor here has it correct with his assessment earlier, and I'll point that out specifically in a moment.
But, you know, on the one hand, you're talking about, you know, internal affairs of nations such as the United States and so-called representative government, elections of senators and, you know, such things as that.
Versus this international idea, or what I would call a supranational idea, that's trying to, you know, they're attempting to implement through such things as UN resolutions or UN declarations.
But there's a thread that goes back centuries.
When you spend enough time on this path, on this road, and you take in all the various materials, right?
What is the thread?
What's the agenda here?
Who's behind this?
OK, and I think it's fairly conclusive that it's not a Buddhist agenda.
It's not a Christian agenda.
It's not an agenda of ethnic Japanese.
OK, it's not an agenda of racially superior Germans.
OK, all this stuff has been trotted about.
And of course, it's except for the, you know, the Buddhist stuff.
I just made that up.
So Jim knows where I'm going.
Everybody knows where I'm going.
OK, this is only A demonic Jewish agenda that has been written about for centuries and centuries and centuries.
Satanic theosophists are not all Jewish.
Most of them are not Jewish, but they are part of it.
Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike.
He's always trying to make it Jewish, but is Obama Jewish?
No, he's not Jewish.
Yeah, I know you're gonna, Paul's gonna do this.
He's always trying to narrowly pin it on the dude.
It's wrong.
Now let you talk.
Go ahead.
And do your Jewish hate thing.
Yeah, but you're wrong.
Obama's not Jewish.
Hillary Clinton's not Jewish.
Biden's not Jewish.
Obama's mother is Jewish.
Jim, can I just finish my point?
I gave Mike the boot.
He was getting carried away.
Go right ahead.
I'm tired because he does the same goddamn thing.
He tries to parse this with the not all argument.
Paul, Paul, Paul, Paul, Paul, I'm giving you the floor.
Just continue.
Go ahead.
I'm going to make a goddamn fucking point.
Listen to me, please.
I'm so sick of this not-all argument, which is not an argument.
It's an observation masquerading as some kind of an argument.
It's to save people to say, oh, well, not all blacks are thugs or criminals.
Yeah, we get it.
So I don't understand why this guy, Mike Sparks, has to do this all the time when I'm making a simple point and I'm basically agreeing with him.
Paul, I've given him the boot for crying out loud.
I got it, but that's OK.
Just let me go.
Don't interrupt me.
I'm almost done.
You are wasting your time talking about it.
Make your point.
I don't fucking, oh God.
You know, just, I hate it when you fucking do that to me, really.
Honest to God, you're gonna go insane.
I wrapped it up, okay?
No, you don't use this time.
You're going to.
Mike, not here.
James, do your best to deal with the issues there.
A bit of a scramble.
I'll take a thread that I think I agree with.
The actual truth of what is behind all of this is occulted.
It's hidden.
We're always being divided, whether it's Republican, Democrat, Nationalist, Globalist, I absolutely will agree that it is good versus evil.
And this is the age-old battle.
What we're dealing with is, you know, we're raised to believe that our representatives in government are supposed to work for us.
They're supposed to do, you know, what we the people want.
But my God, that's been a story for my entire life and everyone else's that's alive today.
Um, it, the systems have been corrupted as they always tend to be because the type of people who get the jobs, you know, run for office or get the bureaucratic positions are control freaks.
They think they know better than everyone else.
And regular people who are good hearted, you know, kind, considerate, and just want to get along with their fellow human beings and live their life, care for their family, you know, their community and all that.
We typically don't pay attention to what these evil people do when they find themselves in a position of power.
And so there's two types of people.
There are those who believe in freedom and they let everyone else live their lives and, you know, you do you and I'll do me.
But then there's a group of people who want to control every single aspect of everyone else's life.
And essentially, you know, they're the ones who are committing the crimes and setting up a system that makes it more and more and more difficult and is parasitic From the people who, you know, go to work every day and actually build the world, you know, build, build the roads and the bridges and the dams and the homes and the computer systems and everything else.
There's a parasitic class that wants to control the working class and they all have many different names and there's many, you know, different groups and whatever race, whatever religion you're going to find.
I was listening and editing.
A video that I put on an article that's coming out hopefully later today.
A presentation by David Redmond, who is a emergency management expert in Canada, and he was talking about the time he spent in the Canadian military where there were 5% of the people in his battalion all the time.
You know, there's many different leadership roles.
Who would just do everything they possibly could to get away with whatever they could get away with.
And, you know, they, if, if they were allowed to get away with it, you know, maybe 15% of the remaining members of the battalion would look at it and then they would try to get away with it too.
Hey, they're doing it.
Why don't we do it?
You know, his perspective was 80% of everyone else.
Was just trying to do their job, trying to be a good soldier, you know, be a good human being.
It's 5% of the population will just suck the life out of the rest of the world if we let them.
And call them whatever name you want to call them, whatever group might, you know, predominate in there.
You're going to find it in every society, in every race, every religion.
The vast majority of people I think are good.
But that, you know, small set of rotten apples are continuously trying to spoil it for everybody.
Good stuff, good stuff.
And Brian, you have further thoughts of your own?
Well, what he's talking about is there are people of light.
If you're the light, you've got seven key attributes to you.
Power, glory, perseverance, peace, joy, universal love and truth.
And that's us.
And then you've got the demons, the scumbags.
With them, it's, you know, power, control, conniving, anything they can do to get ahead and destroy things.
And, you know, it's understandable how we end up in the situation we're in, because we're not connivers, we're not schemers.
We're not like them, and so it's easy for them to kind of get over on us.
So anyway, and we can't.
And usually, usually you see it and you know, you see it in darkness and secrecy.
And, you know, so when you see the United Nations quietly in the background, you know, negotiating agreements amongst nations to transfer power and authority to themselves.
It's pretty easy to see through their fancy words that, you know, they're just trying to gain more control over the lives of regular people.
And they pretty much know that the media is going to do everything possible to distract regular people.
Regular people are busy, you know, making a living trying to struggle to, you know, put gas in their car and heat their homes and put their kids through school and everything else that regular people want to do.
Um, and they don't have time to, you know, be reading through 100 page documents, um, explaining how they want to take over control of your life.
And so that's what this is really all about.
Um, the United Nations has a deadline of tomorrow at 1 PM for the nations to object to any aspect of this document.
Hopefully, um, many nations will object to something because it's It's difficult for 193 people to decide.
You know, if you had a party with 193 people and you were trying to settle on what kind of pizza to order, you'd be there for a year and a half trying to get them all to agree on what to put on their pizza.
So it's highly likely that there's going to be disagreement about these documents.
I'm just trying to raise general population's awareness of this is how they play these crazy games.
They're negotiating.
Okay, well, thanks for taking my return call here.
You know, what I was trying to say, and I had this whole developed thought process, and this occasionally happens, as you know, Jim, but I'd like to get the best, the gist of it in if I can.
Overall, as you know, and I've used this term before in your show, it's like we're living in a science fiction movie, really.
When you think about all the topics that you cover, right, and some of the things that I bring up, that other guests, Sophia Smallstorm brings up, all these various agendas going on.
Now, there's a thread that connects them all.
Now, the thread might not be as strong with some versus others, but when you look at the World Economic Forum, Who is that?
What is that?
The UN, the United States government, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, all these players on the stage, right?
What is it that they all have in common?
There are common threads, and in the end, it's not a genteel discussion where you're not supposed to say impolite things.
I don't believe in that anymore, because the hour is late, right?
I mentioned this the other day, and it's true, because I continue to observe it, right?
There's almost no more bug splatter on my windshield at all.
Almost no bird droppings on my windshield at all.
And there's this fine, sticky mist that occurs, it seems, several times a week now.
It's like the size of, and when you look at it in the light, like under a street light, it's refractory or reflectory.
It looks like little, you know, small, small crystals, like smaller than the size of the head of the pen.
Looks like it's just been screened over the whole car, screened over the windshield.
Other people have noticed this too.
So what's going on there in many ways are destroying the natural world.
I've brought that up before.
Okay.
Yeah.
And I don't, I hope I never ever have to deal with the not all argument again.
To me, it's just not just insane.
It's inane to point out who is or isn't a certain, you know, uh, ethnicity or not, or part of a certain ethnicity because you've seen the evidence.
And so have I, and so have many listeners to this show, of exactly who is driving this bus.
And it's not us.
It's not white supremacists.
So I'll leave it at that for the moment.
Thanks for listening.
No, Paul, I think your points about destroying the natural world are of overwhelming significance.
I mean, you make what some might think is a pedestrian observation.
You're not getting any bugs on your windshield.
I mean wow without bugs and without birds and you're not getting a bird dropping life on earth is going to be unsustainable i mean it's amazing the complexity of the human ecosystem in relation to the nurturing environment and there's an artificial intervention to change it.
Which may or may not be undertaken with knowledge of the evolutionary ramifications, but they are dramatic.
And the extinction of the species is at risk.
Yeah, go right ahead, Paul.
I mean, I think you're on point.
Well, you heard Sophia on Monday, last Monday, talk about the soil and what's occurred.
Now, part of the destruction of soil fertility was just overuse.
That's on our part.
But the soils can be managed properly, but there is no agenda to manage them.
So that tells you what kind of government we have.
I mean, I've read stuff, when you read stuff from the late 1800s and the early 1900s, it's beautifully expressive.
Their mastery of the English language is so far above what you see today.
And they talk about the foundation of any civilization is the soil.
And so, again, this is all just part, in my opinion, I don't really think Any of us fully understand what's going on.
You know, we get glimpses here and there.
So your guest is right when he's talking about the word occult.
But if there's forces behind the players that we see on the stage, then OK, I'll accept that.
But the players we see on the stage are and have been overwhelmingly Jewish.
And I mean, you've had other guests point out, I mean, come on, what are the odds that A female Jewish mayor of Mexico City, right?
I mean, it just goes on and on in all these different countries.
You can see the influence.
Victor Hugo himself probably told you, I know he told me in one of our podcasts, that he's amazed at how much knowledge the Chinese and the Russians have about the Jewish influence on their history.
He told me that regular everyday Chinese people, when he was living there, were aware of the The history of the influence of the Communist Party in China by Jewish handlers and Jewish financiers.
And the average American walking around the street here wouldn't know that, but they do over there.
So again, we have to identify the enemy is and we have to understand their agenda.
And then, like I said, I don't want to bash people over the head with it, but sometimes I can't resist when, you know, like I said, the hour's late.
In my opinion, it's not time for Political niceties or, you know, a genteel discussion.
Thanks.
Paul, I appreciate your calling back.
I thought that was very appropriate.
And I think everything you've said here is right on the money.
So I'm glad that you came back on the air.
James, I can't begin to tell you how much I appreciate your joining me today.
Let's get a kind of a final round here.
Brian, do you have a final thought you'd like to contribute today?
Yeah, those Jewish Chinese, they're called Hakka.
H-A-K-A, Mao Zedong, Chou Enlai, they're Hakka.
And Obama is Jewish.
He's Shabbat in Francus.
If his mother's Jewish, then he's Jewish.
Her family owned Armour Meatpacking Plant in Kansas City.
So, the other guy was wrong.
I'll just leave it at that.
Paul, a final thought, Paul?
Well, again, thanks for letting me have a little airtime.
I'm sorry I lost my cool there.
That's okay.
I was doing my best, you know.
I won't let other guests talk over you any more than you over, you know, my call.
You're doing fine, Paul, today.
I'm glad you called back.
You have been very articulate this last portion, I think.
Especially valuable and illuminating.
I think you're right.
The time is short.
And for political niceties or correctness, I think the future of the species is at stake.
I agree completely, Paul.
And you'll be happy, by the way, Sophia will return next Monday.
Oh, good.
Good.
Yeah.
Well, you know, again, she's one of many voices out there.
There's many Yeah.
So do we all.
Very articulate.
You have sub stacks that cover this issue, but it is frightening and I don't like it.
I wish I could just enjoy my retirement, live a comfortable life and not think about these things.
But when- - So do we all.
Yeah. - Yeah. - Paul, you've been very articulate.
James, I wanna give you the duration here to just expound again on what's going on with the UN where they can learn more.
And I'm just very grateful for your joining today. - Well, thank you very much for having me.
I appreciate that.
All of the work that I do is on jamesroguski.substack.com.
The hard part of that is my last name, R-O-G-U-S-K-I, jamesroguski.substack.com.
And every time I get the opportunity, I give everyone my phone number.
You're welcome to give me a call directly.
310-619-3055.
If anything has happened over the last four and a half to five years, what I think has happened is personal relationships have been shattered.
You know, most people, their support system is, you know, family, friends, neighbors, people you work with, you know, people you go to school with, whatever your life focus is.
And, you know, a lot of people, you can no longer count on Family and friends and neighbors because they've got such a different opinion of what's going on in the world.
It's as if they've lost their mind and maybe they have.
And so what I think everyone needs to do is I don't know that reconnecting is an option because some relationships may be gone, but we need to form new relationships and identify our allies.
Thank you for listening to Revolution Radio.
▲
Export Selection