All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 9, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
01:57:11
The Raw Deal (9 August 2024) with co-host John Carman and featured guest Hunter Green
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm so sorry, not just a big father.
You know, I need someone.
When I was young, so much younger than today.
I couldn't believe that anybody's helping anyway.
I don't know these days, but darling, I'm not so self-assured.
I know it's not in my general mind.
I know I'm not alone.
Tell me if you can, I feel down.
And I do appreciate you being around.
Don't get my feet back on the ground.
Won't you feel it?
Please tell me.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host here on the Raw Deal, Revolution Radio Studio B, this ninth day of August, 2024, joined by co-host John Carman.
We expect the arrival of our featured guest, Hunter Green, momentarily.
But I begin with some of the latest news reports coming from abroad.
Quite a few reports to discuss, including events taking place in Kirsch, which, Which may or may not have substance to them.
The suggestions I've received is that in fact they are More on the order of Assyria, but they're getting a lot of publicity.
Here we have a map of what could be described as a counteroffensive.
What's most important, however, is that since this is Russian-occupied territory, That is, in effect, an attack on Russia, and a Pentagon spokeswoman has declared that the U.S.
is fat and happy with Ukraine using U.S.
weapons in the Kursk oil blast.
The Pentagon said Thursday Ukraine is allowed to use U.S.
weapons.
It's an offensive in Russia's Kursk Oblast, which began on Tuesday.
Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh was asked if Ukraine's use of U.S.-provided weapons in Kursk was consistent with U.S.
policy and declared, it is consistent with our policy.
Singh framed the attack on Kurs as a defensive operation against Russian attacks from across the border.
Singh, the U.S.
has supported Ukraine from the beginning to defend themselves against attacks that are coming across the border, ignoring the fact that, of course, the Russians are there in the first place because Kiev was planning an all-out assault on the Donbass to slaughter
The Russian-friendly ethnic Russians in their regions, who had been subjected to artillery attacks since the coup was carried out in 2014, displacing the Russian-friendly president with a Western stooge.
At that point in time, they began launching artillery strikes into the Donbass, and by the time of the Russian intervention, when they were about to launch an all-out assault, very similar to what the Israelis have been conducting in Gaza to slaughter the people of the Don Pass.
Thousands, thousands had been killed.
Now, my dear friend and colleague Scott Bennett has done an interview on Russian TV talking about what's going to happen here, suggesting Ukrainians are going to be dispersed around the world and conduct terrorist acts as a new ISIS.
Let's cross live to our guest, Scott Bennett, former U.S.
officer.
Many thanks for joining us on the program.
It's nice to see you today.
So Kiev is claiming that this attack on the Kursk region was intended to strengthen its negotiating position.
I'm just wondering why now?
What does the timing signal?
Well, Nikki, let me just say first, my heart goes out to the people of Belgarod.
I was in Belgarod a couple months ago, and I feel very badly when it is Shelled by these U.S.-Ukrainian forces, and be advised there are legal actions in the U.S.
being taken right now in Congress to stop that by those of us who've been there.
That being said, this represents again, as you know well, a massive miscalculation and a distortion of the Ukrainian mind that has been brewed by the U.S.
CIA brainwashing them into believing this nonsense that somehow the Russian mind and the Russian military and the Russian political establishment is some sort of knuckle-dragger, two-dimensional retarded being, where quite the opposite is true.
Russia is one of the most sophisticated, intelligent, unified countries on the face of the planet, and moral countries, I would say.
So Ukraine's massive miscalculation and thinking that it can accelerate a kinetic action into Kursk, into territory of Russia, which is a declaration of war, mind you.
And they are very fortunate that Russia is not reacting in a way, recognizing this as a declaration of war or else Ukraine may be on the map tomorrow.
But I understand Russia's slow, strategic, long game and its long agenda.
But the timing of this, of course, is because Ukraine and Kiev and Zelensky and his Group of thugs, criminals, and drug addicts have completely fallen apart.
They're desperate.
They're being branded as terrorists.
They're killing civilians, and it's only a matter of time before they're thrown into the dock, and we see a replay of the Nuremberg trials for every last one of them, including, hopefully, some of their minions and financiers in Washington, D.C.
Just a quick note for our viewers before we move on.
The reports about shelling in Belgorod City, they're unverified at this point.
We're keeping a close eye On this situation.
Coming back to Kursk for now.
We know thousands of civilians have been displaced and dozens more injured in this attack.
I'm just wondering how justified can these attacks be, these tactics be for the sake of Kiev's so-called negotiating position?
Well, it's not normal for a normal mind.
Of course, Ukrainians are not a normal mind.
They're frantic, they're often drug-induced, they're psychotic, they have been brainwashed by the U.S.
into believing that somehow they're going to prevail against Russia, and they were foolish enough to believe that the United States and Britain were going to stand behind them.
But now what you see is the emergence of a failed state, and worse, a terrorist state.
Maria Zakharova is exactly right when she portrays that in the future you will see Ukrainian terrorists rampaging around the world as we've seen in Africa, and they will be doing the same thing in the United States and Europe, I believe.
They will now become the new ISIS, the new terrorist cat's paw for the West to try and wage a long-term guerrilla war, a long-term war of attrition against Russia.
And for that reason, Russia needs to be absolutely resolute and complete when it goes in and abolishes this entire government and resurrects something in its place that is neutral and that is peaceful.
Right now, we're just seeing terrorists run amok, killing pregnant women, shooting up cars.
They're desperate to believe this is somehow going to cause Russia to pause.
Instead, it's going to have the opposite effect.
It is going to double the resolve of the Russian soldiers, it will quicken their tempo, and you will see Ukraine once again losing tens of thousands of men they don't have, men that they're grabbing off the street that don't want to be thrown into war.
You're going to see Ukraine crumble all the quicker because of its own actions against itself.
I think God's done a good job, eh?
that they've incurred massive losses in recent months.
Now we know the Russian Defense Ministry has reported that Kiev has lost over six months. - I think Scott's got it right.
That's exactly what's going to happen.
Scott Ritter talks about the devastating blow of Russia's Isklander missiles on the supply routes of Ukraine, but it's already been blocked.
He, of course, has been subjected to a recent FBI raid on his home.
Rather stunning.
There are rumors Zelensky has bought a 75 million wine estate in Italy.
I wouldn't be surprised that that should be the case.
While Putin has asked Iran to hold back, to postpone its attack on Israel, it is sending lots of defensive weaponry, including it appears S-400s, which no doubt are going to be welcome There are those who observe that they're covered here, but I believe this is an authentic report.
The New York Times, as cited by the Times of Israel on August 5th, reported that Iranian officials claim Russia has begun delivering advanced air defense and radar systems to Iran.
Following Tehran's request to the Kremlin, local Iranian media have corroborated Tehran's request, and two officials, including a member of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, have informed The Times that these deliveries are underway.
The equipment in question is likely the Russian S-400 anti-aircraft missile system.
However, it should be noted that BulgarianMilitary.com is not independently verified that it is in fact the S-400s that are being transferred.
I suspect they are, but of course that is not a certainty.
It would, however, make perfect sense.
Meanwhile, it's well known and multiple Middle Eastern sources report Iran has weapons that the Israeli Iron Dome cannot stop.
We already knew that from their earlier attack, when while they were successful in shooting down all the conventional missiles and drones, they were unsuccessful with any of the hypersonic missiles, all of which hit their target, taking out the two airports from which the attacks on the Iranian consulate in Damascus had been launched and also a command and control center where they took out some 40 Mossad and IDF officers who are running the shop.
Meanwhile, Scott Ritter warns Iran's next strategy is going to shame Israel into a disastrous defeat.
Eric Hovde made it clear he wanted Roe versus Wade overturned.
And now that he got his way.
Get there.
but Politics, of course, abounds now on YouTube.
There's hardly a video you can find that does not have a political ad.
So we're going to be there.
Scott Rehr has been heroic, in my opinion.
Absolutely wonderful.
Smile off my face.
I'm smiling because of the failure of the Israeli enterprise and everything that Israel stands for.
It's a glorious moment.
I used to love Israel.
Traveled there frequently.
Loved the Israeli people.
I don't anymore.
I actually am at the point where I no longer sympathize for them or empathize.
Israel is a force of evil, and it cannot exist.
It's literally a cancer in the Middle East, and if it continues to exist, it will destroy the entire edifice.
It's not anti-Semitic.
It's not anti-Jewish.
It's anti-Israel.
The concept of a greater Israel.
So, when Israel has for the last several... I mean, since the... Remember, Hezbollah only exists because Israel invaded southern Lebanon in 1982.
It's a resistance organization.
It exists to resist Israel.
Israel still occupies parts of southern Lebanon, the Sheba farms.
I know Israel put forward some nonsense about it belongs to Syria and they have documents that it's Lebanon.
Israel knows it's Lebanon.
And so Hezbollah continues to exist.
Israel has tried to isolate Hezbollah as just a militia, an illegal armed group that needs to be done away with.
Hezbollah, on the other hand, has become a political party that has become part of the Lebanese government.
A major part of the Lebanese government.
Very successful.
And Hezbollah is well thought of.
I mean, there's a lot of corruption in Lebanon.
A lot of political parties don't have the trust and confidence of the Lebanese people.
It says something when Hezbollah does have the trust and confidence, even amongst those segments of society, the Christians in particular, the Sunnis, that might otherwise be inclined to be opposed to Hezbollah because of sectarian reasons.
Hezbollah has become synonymous with Lebanon.
And so when Israel now says they want to destroy Hezbollah, Lebanon realizes what Israel is saying is we're going to destroy Lebanon.
And Lebanon has made a decision that it's not going to go gently into that good night.
That they will fight side by side with Hezbollah.
That's why I smiled, because I love it when evil is defeated.
And this is the defeat of evil.
Israel is an evil institution.
There's nothing good that comes out of Israel.
It stands for nothing positive.
It's an illegal occupation regime that has brought death and destruction to the region.
The only good that's come out of Israel is the good that it does for itself, the self-promotion of a perversion of the Jewish cause through Zionistic institutions that have nothing to do with promoting Judaism, everything to do with opposing or oppressing the indigenous Arab population of the region, the Palestinian people.
Gaza is just a horrific tragedy.
Daily, on a daily basis, we're reminded of the evil that Israel does and what it's doing.
And by extension, again, when I say evil, understand that because Israel is literally an extension of America, this is the evil of America as well.
Sorry to say that to my fellow citizens, but if we promote Israel, we promote Zionism, we're promoting evil.
And therefore we are evil ourselves.
You know, it's a disease that's infected everybody.
It's infected Republican Party.
It's infected Democratic Party.
It's infected MAGA.
It's infected independents.
I mean, we have a handful of people.
Jill Stein is, you know, Cornel West, who have articulated, but they're in a distinct minority in the United States.
The majority of Americans tend to support what's going on.
They support the continued existence of Israel without understanding or able to articulate what Israel is.
Yes, we're horrified by the imagery that comes out of Gaza.
But when you support Israel, you then support the notion that the Israelis are a superior race, a superior people, that the Palestinians are somehow inherently inferior.
And now you're buying into the notion of human animals, which is what Israel uses to describe, terms Israel uses to describe the Palestinian people, human animals.
And when they're human animals, I mean, yes, I cry when I take, I mean, my God, I don't want to look at cows being butchered, but I damn still, I still go to McDonald's and eat their damn burgers.
I'll still buy a steak.
You know, I just pretend the evil doesn't exist.
But at the end of the day, I mollify myself by saying, they're just cows.
That's God's greater plan.
They're put on earth to feed me.
In the second you stop viewing the Palestinians as anything other than humans with the same rights as everybody else, you're literally relegating them to be cows, to be slaughtered, to be slaughtered.
And that's what's happening.
This is pure butchery.
I mean, Gaza has become a butcher shop.
When you see...
I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message.
This is America's...
Let me just say, I mean, Scott Ritter was so affected emotionally by the slaughter taking place in Palestine that he froze up.
Now, there's been some speculation at this FBI raid on his home, which he said was conducted in a highly professional manner, was in response to his acknowledging that the U.S.
Army now has been reduced to 450,000.
Active duty.
That's really not much of a combat force.
As I reported yesterday, NATO is contemplating, in its delirium, having a force of 800,000 to confront Russia.
They want to invade Russia.
That would be the ideal.
The bankers want to loot Russia.
They want to break it up into segments, where Vladimir Putin inadvisably reported how the Natural resources of Russia were the equivalent of $80 trillion, which brought envy to the mind of every Western Zionist, raw child banker.
They want to invade, destroy Russia, loot it, Break it up for parts.
Just as we have done in Iraq, we were after the oil.
In Afghanistan, we're after the mineral wealth, especially the lithium.
In Libya, again, the oil.
When I learned that the very first act of the rebel group in Libya was to found a new central bank, I knew something was terribly, terribly wrong.
Meanwhile, we have a Hylian situation here in the United States where, best captured by the single most interesting article I've yet to read about the campaign, Kamala Harris' substance-free campaign is an unprecedented challenge.
Here's the key to beating it.
I want to share a fair amount of this and get the response of co-hosts John Carmen and Hunter Green, who I'm pleased to say has joined us.
It's quite possible no presidential challenger in living memory had a better month than Donald Trump from June 27 to the end of the Republican National Convention.
First, Trump showed up to CNN headquarters in Atlanta for a presidential debate, only to find himself beating up on a sad old man with a vacant stare on his face.
Then he was treated to weeks of Democrat infighting as they struggled to push out their supposed party leader and fought among themselves over who would replace him.
Oh, and he survived an assassination attempt, saved by a timely tilt of the head, and then just maybe the hand of God.
Trump's nigh-miraculous survival wasn't just good fortune.
It didn't just give him sympathy and support.
It actually gave direct proof of what a great man he is, or so it would appear.
Placed in dire physical danger, Trump rose to the challenge, refusing to panic, refusing to cower behind his bodyguards, put to a test that no American leader ever—almost no American leaders ever—are the test of being in immediate physical danger.
Trump showed true heroism and true leadership.
The Trump race was headed for a landslide outcome.
Forget 270 electoral votes or even 300, with old Joe's mumbling, Back in the race, winning 350 was a very real possibility.
I think he could take all 50 states against Biden.
But it's tough to say goodbye to that possible future, because it was a beautiful one.
But hey, no great victory was ever easy.
A few days after the Republican convention, Democrats finally did what they seemed incapable of doing all year, took a difficult, decisive step, and did so quickly.
Within 24 hours of Joe Biden announcing he would not stand for re-election, the party unanimously pivoted behind Kamala Harris as its new champion.
Yet, as I reported here, Joe appears to have died, or the fake Joe, because this is not the real Joe, who actually died in 2017, as best I've been able to ascertain, on the flight into Las Vegas, where the pilot of Air Force One notified the control tower they had to return to Washington because they had a dead body on board.
Had it been anyone other than Joe, of course, they would have landed, he would have gone about his business, and they would have unceremoniously removed the body from the plane.
As soon as they got back, of course, we had this statement being issued, not on White House stationery, that he was withdrawing from the race.
It had a forged signature.
It was clearly an illicit document concocted by the administration to conceal.
And then we have a new Joe, four inches taller, whose strides, unlike the little baby steps we've seen of the Biden being replaced here, Where a colleague of mine who read an email she wasn't supposed to read has reported that they replaced him with the actor Jim Carrey, but Carrey is now playing the new Joe Biden.
And remember, as I've explained many times, they have a voice box or the equivalent that enables you to project the authentic voice, just as back in The campaign with Trump against Hillary.
That wasn't Hillary on the debate stage with Bernie Sanders or with Donald Trump.
It was a younger, thinner, healthier, far more attractive version who had the voice of Hillary.
Why the media never called it out is beyond me, but they're not calling out that we got a new Biden who's suddenly grown by four inches.
Jimmy Dore's noted.
Joe Rogan has noted.
And of course, I've shared it with you long since.
For many Americans now, the pivot to Kamala was a welcome surprise.
A common fear was Democrats would swap in an entirely new figure like Michelle Obama, letting them cut bait on the unpopular Biden admin and install someone with far better poll numbers.
To many, the party's decision to stick with the least popular VP on record is a stroke of good fortune.
But we must reluctantly pour cold water on that notion.
Kamala's arrival has transformed the 2024 election into a toss-up.
Forget all that talk of a landslide.
Kamala now has a real chance of winning the November election by running the most shapeless, messageless, and incomprehensible campaign in American history.
Sound ridiculous?
It's not.
As of this writing, in fact, Kamala has pulled slightly ahead of Trump in election betting market.
Get this.
They're now betting 57 to 47 that it's going to be Kamala beating Trump.
RFK Jr.
down to 2%, Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, 1.
But how could this happen, you ask?
Her approval numbers are as bad as Biden's.
Yeah, not anymore.
Already the AstroTurf job is taking effect.
Come on, personal approval numbers are up.
Way up, in fact.
Here's Newsweek.
Kamala Harris is now more popular than Joe Biden or Donald Trump has been at any point in the 2024 election cycle, according to a new survey.
A morning concept full of 11,538 registered voters, and that's a huge poll, by the way.
Between July 26 and 28, found 50% have a favorable view of Harris, 46% an unfavorable.
According to the polls, to Harris's four-point net favorability is a higher rating than Biden or Trump have posted all cycle.
The latest Morning Consult survey is significantly higher than the one conducted a week before, when her favorability was 43% and 51% had an unfavorable perception.
So what's going on?
At the root, The Democrats' new opportunity comes down to this.
Kamala Harris is one of the phoniest candidates in history.
By the special circumstances of 2024, give her the chance to run an entirely phony campaign.
What do we mean?
Kamala lets Democrats reset the issues.
We'll be right back.
John Carman and Hunter Green.
John Carman and Hunter Green.
John Carman and Hunter Green.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio.
FreedomSubs.com.
The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Hey, everyone.
It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern. 8 p.m. Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomsteps.com, the People Station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Those who watch the video version of today's show will see I've been showing here a political cartoon where you have Governor Walz wearing a button, the Summer of Love Governor.
and a hat.
Make America burn again.
This is a guy who was involved in the George Floyd riots.
He did nothing to put him down.
He allowed the looting, the arson to take place, and grotesque.
I spent 19 years in Minnesota, and all I've heard about this governor has been bad, bad news.
I'm very happy that Hunter Green has joined us today, and Hunter, I'd like to get your take, because it appears now that You have a background with Hollywood Screen Actors Guild and so forth, and Kamala's running a completely artificial campaign.
She's trying to find a way to overcome the absence of crowds.
The last interview that she and Joe Biden, the last appearance they made before the 2020 election was in Phoenix, Very rare they had a joint appearance.
And guess how many turned out to watch them on the eve of an election where he was claimed to get more votes than any other candidate in history?
Zero.
So they've been compensated by having Kamala piggybacked.
They had an event here in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, with a local musician who's very, very popular.
So he turned out the crowd for the musician, brought in Kamala and made it look as though they were there for her.
I mean, Hunter, tell me, where is this going to end?
It's very clear they've given her training now.
She can't smile.
She can't cackle.
She's got to act very serious.
When she announced Waltz as a running mate, I watched most of her presentation and all of his, and she clearly has benefited from this instruction.
She has been to acting school.
Hunter, welcome.
Your thoughts?
Good morning, Dr. Fetzer.
Yes, I have some background in acting and as well working on Wall Street and City of London on technology projects for Fortune 50.
Companies and banks.
So I have some experience dealing with fakery from the accounting side and technology and banking and on the on the Hollywood side.
So the fakery is fascinating.
And so yeah, as you mentioned Kamala may have gotten a few people to show up because of the popular music acts and We remember Hillary.
Hillary herself did this back in 2016.
She would have popular music acts show up at rallies to try to show some fake popularity.
So they're playing that game, and the fakery is so intense, it's hard to know what to believe, obviously.
So we look at this poll you showed.
Maybe there's some Factual stats there, maybe not.
It is a betting company, so I think that would be harder to fake.
I guess we'd have to do some forensic financial analysis.
Who are placing the bets?
What's the money behind that?
Could there be some wealthy people or institutions manipulating that betting market to make it look like Kamala's more popular than she really is?
It's a little bit hard to fathom that that many people would want to support Kamala.
They like to say Kamala versus Kamala.
Even her name seems some fakery around how you pronounce it.
But I mean, everybody knows.
Kamala lied for years about the cognitive abilities of Biden.
And I see your CV, your resume, you have professional experience looking at cognitive science.
And so I think you knew very well the lack of cognitive ability of Biden for years.
So Kamala went out there, didn't tell anybody, pretended like he was sharp as a tack.
And her herself, we wouldn't have to wonder about her cognitive ability because I went to college.
I lived in L.A.
for years, Hollywood.
I have a lot of experience observing people that are on drugs, how they act.
And it's a fact that.
Many times when she's speaking publicly, she's on something, whether it's bong hits or some kind of depressant or anti-anxiety drugs.
She even has kind of the accent sometimes.
There's a certain accent sometimes people have when they speak.
So definitely she's on something.
The content of what she says is often very loopy, lacks any logical sense.
And so those are my opening comments.
I love all this.
I think it's sensational.
I'm so glad you are here on Wednesday on this very show.
I played a four-minute clip of Kamala talking about unburdened by the past.
Four minutes of her saying the same meaningless stuff over and over and one of my hosts just screamed, stop it, I can't take it!
I can't take it any longer.
She is a complete airhead.
She's the most vacuous figure ever on the American political stage, by my judgment, and I'm just astonished.
But they think they can fake it all the way through.
Continue, Michael.
I just wanted to interject because she indulges in what some are calling word salad, and there are medical experts who are saying this could be symptomatic of Possibly autism or perhaps even schizophrenia.
She, we all know, made it politically on her back by her choice of boyfriends.
Brown, who put her on a couple of commissions in California, launched a career.
And as the Attorney General, she had a horrible record.
She is very severe on drug offenses, even though it's clear she indulges herself.
And even when they had evidence of the innocence of someone who was on death row, she refused to allow him to be released.
I mean, it's outrageous.
And you've lived through that more recently than I. Go for it.
Yes, I grew up in California.
And the interesting thing is, it seems to me that there's a lot of things being done on purpose at the very high levels.
The trillionaires, the people who have the most influence in the world, because we're seeing, it seems like, on purpose, a lot of absurd things going on.
Biden being an obvious zombie for years, even in 2020 campaign, we could see that he was saying a lot of crazy stuff that made no rational sense that someone that's senile would talk like, and then now we have Kamala doing this, and it seems to me it looks like a demoralization campaign to demoralize the Western world, the United States, Western Europe,
Yeah, you have Macron who looks like he's married to a person pretending to be a woman.
Right.
And some of it, you know, we can laugh at, even though it's tragedy.
But, you know, sometimes you have to just laugh to serve as a survival mechanism.
But yes, I mean, it's actually kind of funny.
And if you wrote this as a movie script talking about Hollywood 10 years ago, if you wrote this, nobody would believe it.
Oh, that's too ridiculous.
You know, you can't have this senile guy in a debate.
With this reality show guy from New York and just the scamdemic and it just goes on and on that it's not believable, but it's happening.
So I do think a lot of this is it seems to be on purpose, like the Donald Trump shooting.
It's like they didn't even try to make it look like they were giving him even a tiny bit of Security, so whether you think the Donald Trump shooting was faked by the Donald Trump people, or you think it actually happened where they tried to shoot him or or a combination, whatever people believe about that, you cannot debate the fact that.
What we saw there, they obviously gave him no security, and they didn't even, when I say they, the Biden administration, whoever's in charge of Secret Service, etc., and the local police, they didn't even try to make it look like they were trying to protect him at all.
So to me, that kind of feeds into my theory that these things are kind of done on purpose for the public.
Hey, look, we didn't even try to protect Trump.
That's part of some kind of clown world demoralization campaign to humiliate the Western world.
Yeah, that's all great, Michael.
I love it.
I love it.
John has an observation about her husband.
John, fill us in.
Oh, yeah.
I'm not sure if you caught it on the news this morning, but second gentleman, as they call him, Kamala's husband, he was in Paris, France doing a speech because he's Jewish.
And he's telling people that he's proud of it and all that.
So I guess he's trying to get the support of the people out there.
They're going through this thing with the war in Gaza and all these other things going on because the Ukrainian stuff back and forth.
F-16 is going to Ukraine this week.
It's crazy what they're doing.
I got a friend, Nick, back there.
He's in Paris right now, and I've had him on shows before, but I touch base with him like daily, so I know what's going on.
But yeah, back to Hunter.
I welcome Hunter.
I'm going to ask that we contact each other because there's a SAG question going on.
And how they treat some of the actors on certain documents.
But yeah, I'm at Secret Service and I'm analyzing these photos and aerial photos constantly.
They're still not accurate.
They've got at least two to three shooters.
One of them was even a counter sniper in the building.
And he had the exact same scoped area to the grounds in the rally where Trump was sitting.
Why would a counter sniper be facing towards the crowd?
Towards the stand.
You see what I mean?
It doesn't make sense.
I sent you the diagrams, Jim, on Skype.
I don't know if you could share it, but there's a lot of failures with Secret Service, as you know.
And I've pointed stuff out since the Hinckley incident when I interviewed Hinckley in 76.
Well, the Secret Service has embarrassed itself before Congress when they're trying to get to the heart of the matter, concealing information, not making it available, giving bullshit stories about—it appears pretty clearly that there was a real plot in the works to assassinate Trump.
But I take it the Trump campaign got wind of it and flipped the script to turn him into a superhero.
He's now taken off the bandage.
There's no sign of any injury or damage to his ear.
I wonder whether they may not have, as in Las Vegas, used a pre-recorded soundtrack in Las Vegas of a machine gun firing interspersed with three-shot blasts, because American military weapons now fire in three-shots blasts, supplemented by special visual effects in the middle of the Mandalay Bay Hall On the fourth floor, light flashing to coordinate with the sound.
But I had an audio expert noticing that the sound was very high quality all over Las Vegas, which would have been impossible had it been a legitimate actual shooting.
And we put it together that they had a pact The audience there, with maybe 500 crisis actors from crowds on demand, an outfit you may know, Michael, based in Los Angeles, to act as though, you know, something bad was going on.
Then another shooter come out, fire into the crowd, you saw the plaster of his muzzle, no bullet impacts, as he was using blanks.
And then as Scott Vanity we saw, and Scott and I did shows about Las Vegas, when you have Steven Paddock lying in the suite of that 32nd floor wing from which a sheriff claims there was the only location from which shots were fired.
There are shell casings on top of the blood around his head.
And as Scott noticed, some of them were from CO2 gas-propelled pellet gun cartridges, others from blanks.
But the prop masters just seem to have thrown down a handful, you know, paying attention to the fact that if he's already dead, any shell casing would be under the blood, not on top of it.
And when the SWAT team came in, they immediately confirmed none of the windows were broken out.
So the whole thing was a total sham in Las Vegas, with the possible exception of the one dead party who may or may not have been this Steven Paddock.
Michael.
Are you talking to me?
Yeah, go.
Give us your thought.
Yeah, sorry.
Yeah, so that's so interesting about the crisis actors and the fake shootings.
That subject is very fascinating to me, actually.
I was doing some more research on your case with Sandy Hook and, you know, a lot of people say, oh, that just sounds so crazy.
But, you know, if you look at Dr. Betzer's background, there's a lot of credible
work he's done over the decades and if you go to the University of Minnesota website it has his resume there and all his many of his accomplishments and over 30 books even as the conspiracy books are listed there as well as his academic books and this is serious stuff and I actually did a little bit of detective work on your Sandy Hook case so I looked at the legal document where you show a couple Document Forensic Experts and a Private Investigator.
And I saw that the Private Investigator has a real website.
He's got a video on there.
He's talking and he's got his credentials there.
This Private Investigator said that the person in court claiming to be the father of a kid that died, the Private Investigator saying, well, no, that's not the same person that was originally named years prior when the Sandy Hook event occurred.
Same with the son that they're claiming died.
That's a different person.
And so you said, hey, let's have a DNA test done.
Let's compare the person we're seeing in court currently.
Compare that to the original so-called father.
And let's compare that so-called dead kid.
To another person with a different last name, because the people you think they actually are, I guess they're their father's son or brother, right?
So basically, the private investigator agreed and said, yeah, this is fakery and let's do a DNA test.
The judge refused.
And and then I looked at the document experts listed in your your court documents.
Those are real people with real resumes that have their phone number address their, their history of work.
So that's very concerning.
So.
Um, I guess one question I would have is with these events, like you mentioned, the Trump shooting, the Las Vegas event, you have hundreds or thousands of, really, thousands of people witnessing.
Now, I didn't randomly meet a couple people that were in the crowd at the Vegas event, just by chance.
They thought it was real.
They saw people get shot near them.
But, you know, as we know with special effects blanks and blood packs, you can make it look real, right?
Maybe that's what happened in front of these people.
But I'm just wondering how, you know, I guess my question with you would be something like Sandy Hook, why fake that?
You mentioned they want to control everything.
So what is that they want to control?
How come they want to control so many aspects where they just wouldn't allow a real event to happen and then promote that real event?
Well, they're not actually out to commit mass murder.
They're actually out to have a PSYOP to affect the American people.
So it turns out that Eric Holder came down to Newtown in 2006.
And offer the community $114 million to participate in this scam that I think was sold on the pretext of illustrating to the American people what could happen if we don't take away their guns.
They had auditions.
They signed non-disclosure agreements.
They reap benefits.
They don't pay any taxes.
They get free college.
It goes on and on and on.
They're actually still raking in a million bucks a month.
As a money laundering operation through the Sandy Hook hoax.
So I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, that we established the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and that it had been a FEMA drill to present it as mass murder to promote gun control.
One of the contributors to the book, Michael, a fellow named Paul Preston, was himself a school administrator who supervised active shooter drills.
And he was so troubled by what he saw being broadcast from Newtown that day that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, all of whom confirmed to him it had been a drill, no children had been harmed, it was done to promote gun control.
So you're getting that right from the Obama Department of Education.
It's all in the book.
And, you know, it's just amazing.
That's why they had to ban the book less than a month after it went on sale in 2015 and brought this totally contrived lawsuit against me so they could staunch the blow because I released the book for free as a PDF.
That was a curveball they didn't anticipate.
And it's been downloaded millions of times.
Now I've created a redacted version anyone can download.
Just go to my blog, jameshfetzer.org, and go to the article, Fake News, The Truth vs. Alex Jones, which is right now on the fourth page when you look at the list of articles.
And you can download both Nobody Died at Sandy Hook Redacted and the Sandy Hook Truth Memorandum, where I collaborate with Robert David Steele.
For then-President Donald Trump.
You can download them both.
I only had to take out one sentence in the Sandy Hook Truth and the three sentences in a couple other passages in the book.
You can get them for free.
You can download them directly.
And would you believe, Michael, because I've been in contact with participants in the event for several years now, they tell me everyone involved loves the book, and they're only pissed off that I'm being abused by the judicial system.
And they've been very helpful.
One of them, for example, is let me know where I can find the Connecticut FEMA schedule, where you find their list of events that day, including Exercise L366, right on the Sandy Hook FEMA schedule.
That's the Newtown event.
And they even sent out a map of how to get from Bridgeport, Connecticut, FEMA headquarters, down to Dickinson Drive, where the school's located!
So, you know, I mean, the evidence is simply overwhelming.
I really appreciate you doing that homework on it about the credibility of my sources and who I am and what the hell is going on here.
Yours.
Yeah, I think it is suspicious that the judge would not allow basic evidence and did a pre-trial preliminary judgment conviction of you in civil court for over $500,000 or whatever the amount was.
That's a lot of money to just not even have a trial, no jury.
The U.S.
Constitution says you must have a jury amongst your peers.
And to just have a judgment not allowing evidence And he actually narrowed the evidence I saw only to the death certificate, not allowing you to bring any other evidence.
And even for the death certificate, even that, he did not allow you to bring evidence.
From the two document forensic experts to the private investigators and the DNA evidence, he wouldn't allow you to bring any evidence.
And so that's very suspicious, I must say.
And in a previous conversation, you mentioned that They even, they mean the Deep State, whoever, CIA, FBI, whoever, faked one or more local newspapers.
As far as their archives, because that's another bit of research I did.
There's some sites that tried to debunk what you're talking about.
One of them said, well, look at the local paper near Sandy Hook, look at their archives, and they have years of articles with photos and text descriptions about the school.
Their activities, their assemblies, their faculty, their students, and they did.
I spent about 30 minutes just randomly clicking through different articles for different years leading up to the date of the shooting, December 2012, and they had a bunch of articles with photos of students and the faculty and describing what was going on.
So it looked like the school existed, but you mentioned that actually a lot of that was faked.
And I was just wondering, how do we know that's faked?
What is the evidence that they faked that?
Well, I've got a tremendous amount about the condition of the school.
We have a contractor who went over there in 2010.
He just happened to be visiting a friend in Monroe.
And unbeknownst to him, the friend was going over to Newtown to pick up a couple of school desks on the cheap for his kids to use at home.
He himself was a contractor.
He noticed a deplorable condition and how the caretaker said they expected to demolish the school because it was loaded with asbestos.
This is one of multiple proofs.
Wolfgang Helbig, who's a school safety expert, put together a fantastic array of photographs about the deplorable condition of the school.
This is a high-rent community.
Wolfgang and I actually traveled there together in 2014, and if you viewed, for example, a soccer field, it was meticulous.
Every blade of grass was the same height.
I mean, you couldn't believe the high maintenance they were displaying.
But this school, completely different.
And get this, Michael, you'll love it.
It wasn't even an elementary school.
It was a special needs school.
And that's something that's been concealed from the public.
They put the name elementary on it and then waited years for it to get weathered.
So when they presented it, it could be, but it only had one entrance.
According to the official, it came out by Steven Sidinsky III, there were 489 students there.
Honestly, that building couldn't hold anything like that.
Subtract 20, you got 469 who need to be evacuated.
The driveway, the one driveway, was so clogged you could have got an emergency vehicle in there if you wanted to, much less a string of buses sufficient to evacuate 469 students and 70 staff.
In other words, the whole thing was fraudulent from beginning to end.
Wolfgang That's been a lot of time on the schools, and in fact, I've now learned, in creating the images, they used three different schools.
Some were from this special needs school, some were from Newtown Middle School, and some were from Chalk Hill.
So they got photographs that are all supposed to be from this Sandy Hook Elementary, which doesn't even exist.
I mean, until now, there's been no Sandy Hook Elementary, but they got a grant for 50 mil to build a whole new school, which is seven times what it...
So what was this going to be, the Taj Mahal of elementary schools?
That's what you got there.
I mean, it's just a monstrosity.
It's ridiculous.
There's an awful lot of evidence, Michael, that goes from diverse sources to substantiate all those claims.
But it's easy.
See, they knew, of course, there would be some investigation, so they planted some stories with Ed Muck up.
For example, the Newtown Bee claimed to have an interview with Don Hawkspring as a principal after the shooting.
But Don Hawkspring was supposed to have been one of the first killed, so they had to try to Muck it up.
You know, how can they have an interview with a principal when she's already dead?
I mean, it's just amazing, Michael, how many blunders.
This was actually done in a very sloppy manner.
And I think that's part of the way they've had to resist so massively anyone looking at it by bringing even the absurd Judgment against Alex Jones for nearly a billion bucks for saying the school was, you know, that it was a hoax.
He even had a reporter on the scene there, Michael, who was interviewing neighbors who said they couldn't understand why students were there because the school had been closed long ago.
Wow, that's wild.
And as far as these crisis actor outfits, over the years, has anybody come out as a current or former crisis actor and said, hey, this is what I did.
I helped fake the Las Vegas shooting or Sandy Hook or any other kind of Famous shooting like that.
Has anybody come out?
Hang on, Michael.
We're heading to break.
I'm just delighted you are here.
Absolutely delighted.
And we'll get John's take, too.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a drill, this is a drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Come on!
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do!
And we must fight back!
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Radio.
It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths, and because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr. OTT every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
Eastern, and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well, Michael, in response to your question, remember, they've signed non-disclosure agreements.
They worry they could be prosecuted by the government, though I think it's fantastic to imagine Prosecuting a crisis actor for not concealing the fact they participate in a hoax that was made more by the government.
I'd love to watch that.
But remember now, I'm in contact with two of those who were cast as characters at Sandy Hook.
Who was cast as Emily Parker, this little blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl.
You may remember one of her sisters was sitting on Obama's lap.
A lot of people thought that was actually Emily, so how can she be dead and sitting on Obama's lap?
She was put in there by her mother.
We actually have photographs of her on the roadway as the event was taking place.
The other was the daughter of the town clerk, Debbie Aurelio.
Her name is Victoria Aurelio.
She was cast as a teacher, Victoria Soto, who heroically gave her life for her students.
And they're both, of course, alive and well.
And Vicky was recast at Uvalde.
So I was contacted by their mutual friend, Steve Lucia, who may know more about the Sandy Hook event than any other person on planet Earth.
He knows all the players, everything about all the last details.
He's got a photographic memory.
He reached out to me over two years ago to say how He and his friends were supportive of me.
It turns out they all really, I may have mentioned, really like the book because it's honest.
They don't like how I've been abused by the legal system and how at one point I was speaking to Steve.
Margaret Alice Cottle is the actual name of the girl who was cast as Emily Parker.
You may remember Robbie Parker was supposed to be her father when he came out of the building all jocular and then paused and looked at the assembled press.
Hyperventilates again in character and then start talking in a solemn voice about the loss of his daughter Emily.
Having the presence of mind to mention her donation website.
Well, he's not even her father, he's her uncle.
And he got photographs of her with her sister, but they're actually her cousins, okay?
So Margaret is speaking to Vicki on the phone because she'd been recast in Yuvalde, Aziva, Morales.
See, that's another thing.
They recast them and they get more money.
And Margaret asked her, how much were you paid?
And right there, she told her $210,000 to reprise the role of Uvalde.
I'm talking to Steve, I'm hearing Margaret and Vicki have this conversation.
And you look at the photographs, they've now swapped it out.
The original photographs of Eva Morales, there's no question it was Vicki, but she was asked to put on 38 pounds for the role, Michael.
She was asked to put on 38 pounds for the role.
Now they've swapped in some Hispanic-looking woman, so you had to have trouble finding it.
But I got original photographs there.
And of course, she's been candid, I mean, among our group here about the whole business.
And they've even tried to approach Steve for playing a role as a crisis actor, but he hasn't been willing to sell his soul yet.
It's a fascinating situation, Michael.
Go ahead.
Lay on.
Oh, by the way, it's Hunter.
Hunter!
Yes, yes!
Why would I say—forgive me, Hunter.
Hunter Green, of course, absolutely.
My apology, Hunter.
That's a great name, by the way.
I love it.
Go ahead, Hunter.
Thank you.
At first, I thought you were addressing John, and then I thought, no, it's not Michael.
It's John.
It must be you talking to me.
That's okay.
No problem.
Our first time doing a podcast like this together.
Yeah, that's fascinating.
You brought up an interesting point, you know, because I asked you, you know, why fake it?
It'd be easier to have just a real event, but you brought up a good point.
Well, then they don't have to kill a bunch of people.
They don't have to worry about retribution from family members.
Hey, you killed my family member.
I got to come after you or maybe being legally prosecuted for murder or mass murder.
So that's another good point.
And then we can control more aspects.
And you said the other day, eventually, you usually have some whistleblowers come out and you have even for Sandy Hook, it just takes time sometimes.
So those are all very good answers to those common questions, I think.
And yeah, the money is astounding, and it's suspicious they would make Remington go bankrupt.
Now, the other day you mentioned you thought the gun manufacturer for the gun they accused in Sandy Hook, Remington, may not actually end up having to go bankrupt.
I think Alex is in on it.
I mean, he's going along with it.
He's now saying, of course, it was real.
He's claiming he was misled by professors and school safety experts.
Yeah.
Could you explain that?
Well, I think Alex is in on it.
I mean, he's going along with it.
He's now saying, of course, it was real.
He's claiming he was misled by professors and school safety experts.
Of course, he means me and James Tracy, who did an early brilliant critique of Wayne Carver's press conference, which verged on incoherence, for which he wound up losing his job at Florida Atlantic.
And then Wolfgang is a school safety expert.
But would you believe, well, we are all in the book, including Paul Preston.
Alex, during a video deposition today, could say, never read the book.
Well, if he never read the book, how was he misled by those of us who are in the book?
So something's very incoherent there.
And there is, as I may have mentioned already, this, you can download the book now, go to Fake News, The Truth Versus Alex Jones, where they did a whole video.
Robert Barnes said how he was in the courtroom in Austin in the Alex Jones trial, and it was unlike any courtroom he'd ever seen, that they had three cameras there, one just focused on the jury, that looked to him like a made-for-TV movie, and he got it right!
It was a made-for-TV movie!
On HBO.
HBO, yes.
Yeah, unbelievable, Hunter!
Unbelievable!
Yeah, it's kind of mind-blowing and a little bit scary, but it's interesting.
So you think the gun manufacturer yourself, even Alex Jones, will eventually not have to pay?
Yeah, let me say, I think that it was the insurance people.
See, I offered to enter as an expert witness in all these cases.
To explain how there's never been a judicial determination that anyone died.
They were all settled on procedural grounds, presupposition, discovery for Alex.
Nobody can understand what, because they had everything he'd ever said, even on video.
In mine, of course, it was by excluding all my proof, by simply not allowing it to be entered as evidence.
If the judge doesn't admit it as evidence, then it doesn't count, see?
So that's what he did, even though I had a mountain of evidence, very detailed, very specific.
I gather more and more virtually on a daily basis.
And as you observe, Brian David has done a couple absolutely brilliant affidavits, one where he got into the Connecticut State Police files, And discovered they had removed all the metadata, Hunter, so it couldn't be admissible in a court of law.
Obvious indication of consciousness, a guilt.
And you got photos down the hallway where there's supposed to be Don Hoff's ring and Mary Sherlock, the principal in the school psychologist line in pools of blood.
No bodies, no pools of blood.
He goes into a classroom where there's supposed to be a stack of little bodies.
No bodies, no blood, but also no desks, no chairs.
Furniture, what there was, pushed up against the wall, meaning he not only discovered evidence it wasn't a mass murder, but that it wasn't even an operating school!
Wait, did you say somebody went right after the shooting and did not see the bodies as expected?
Did you say?
Listen, the Connecticut State Police were running the show behind the scene, and they were photographing everything.
And he got into their files.
So who's this?
Brian Davidson, the PI from Texas.
Okay.
He got into their files.
This guy is brilliant, you know.
He knows how to do this research.
I went to his website last night.
Yeah, I went to his website last night, actually.
Yeah!
I mean, I love the guy!
And now he's done this new affidavit.
In fact, that's what held me up in bringing my motion to open judgment for extrinsic fraud and fraud upon the court.
I had to wait for his affidavit because it was he who established that the The witness who testified in Madison under the name of Leonard Posner is not the same person as the Leonard Posner from the crime scene, whose photograph has appeared millions of times around the world.
I knew right off the bat he was too young and too small, but I didn't have the proof.
And as you observed, when I tried to establish the proof, the judge cut me off.
He even, when I sent a video depo to Wolfgang Halberg for his confirmation that we're not the same person, the judge held me in contempt of court.
and assigned lawyer fees, which doesn't happen in Wisconsin.
650,000 lawyer fees to go along with the 450,000 that the jury would find in damages.
Even though they never presented any bill for any medical expenses, any loss of wages, they just made this up out of whole cloth.
Hunter, it's just outrageous.
What has happened now is I learned enough about what had happened and how they did it to reopen the case.
and now I've rattled the judge.
So he's committed a series of procedural blunders that I've been able to take right to the Court of Appeals.
And, you know, they try to garnish money.
I went to the Court of Appeals.
They said, you can't garnish money from non-debtors because they were wanting to take my wife's half of our federal and state tax returns and other reimbursements for expenses for my daughter.
A $100 gift card for her birthday?
And the court—get this, Hunter—the Court of Appeals said you can't do that.
He went ahead and did it again!
He went ahead and did it again!
So I'm telling you, he's really been mucking up, I'm telling you, in such a way that now, when he rejected my motion immediately without soliciting a response from the plaintiff in my reply, I filed a request for relief because he had violated the Wisconsin Rules of Civil Procedure, and he did it again!
And then one of the positive attorneys, because I had all this devastating proof there, asked to seal it.
But see, and he went ahead and sealed it.
So three times he violated the basic procedure where you have a motion, you have a response, and a reply.
So that's up before the Court of Appeals, too.
I mean, it's just outrageous what he's done here.
And they're trying to seal Proof I have that was never admitted as evidence, so they're in a quandary.
See, he didn't admit it as evidence so there'd be no disputed facts.
If there are no disputed facts, he, the judge, can rule in the form of what's known as a summary judgment, when there are no disputed facts and it's just applying the law.
So he excluded all my proof as evidence so there'd be no disputed facts.
I mean, that was a technique he used, and now I'm calling on it up and down, and now the Court of Appeals is aware, the chief judge of the courts in Wisconsin here, Dane County Courts, is aware.
I think he's under the microscope, and I've got the opportunity, I think, here to have the whole thing reversed.
It's freedom of speech.
You should have the right to have an opinion.
And, you know, for defamation, you got to show that you purposely lied about people and they can't even show that you're showing your evidence to back up what you believed.
And it's just basic to me.
Just I want to put out there.
I don't want to be sued.
So I'm not saying.
I'll tell you how bad it was, right?
I don't believe it's all fake.
I'm just asking questions.
I'm just asking questions.
I'm not defaming any-- That's right.
That's absolutely right.
I'll tell you how bad it was, right?
I was being sued over three sentences in a book I co-authored and co-edited, and another in a book to which I contributed multiple chapters.
Yet he wouldn't declare that I was a media person.
He wouldn't acknowledge that I was a journalist.
I gave him a synopsis of my history as an investigative journalist, including paid gigs, and he refused to do it to lower the bar.
So he wouldn't have to show I'd been negligent.
Well, I hadn't been negligent.
So in order to make sure they didn't have to Overcome an insurmountable obstacle.
He simply never ruled that I was a journalist.
But how can he do that?
He said he read everything.
So he read my submission about my history as a journalist, and after all, I was being sued for sentences in a book I'd co-authored and co-edited.
I mean, how can I not be a journalist?
Hunter, it's that bad.
It's that blatant.
It is grotesque.
I want to get John back in here because I know he's got some thoughts himself.
Go ahead, John.
Share.
Yeah, can we ask John, because John has background in U.S.
Secret Service, law enforcement, private investigator, U.S.
Customs Service.
So, John, what do you think about all this faking these kind of events and Sandy Hook and the Trump shooting?
Do you agree with Dr. Fetzer that they could fake so much?
Yeah, I listen to all the facts on these things and I profile for a living.
That's what I did at the border and in law enforcement.
I'm the guy that interviewed Hinckley in front of the White House in 76.
So, I mean, they failed at keeping that guy in.
But you guys are bringing up a lot of information here.
Mandalay Bay, I did a radio show years ago about the Mandalay Bay thing.
Paddock, that's the guy who was out Monday laundering for the government, literally wasting money on the tables, in the roulette, in the slot machines all day long.
That was his job.
And they found his body with gloves on his hands.
So that means there's no connection to fingerprints, to anything.
They could have come in.
Two guys came in.
They could have just killed him outright and then started firing from one of the windows.
Because two windows were broken out at two separate angles, which is very difficult to do if you're one guy fighting continuously or shooting this weapon that's supposedly automatic.
And I've heard the sounds.
There was no reload phase.
It was too long.
But they also had other indicators that one of the Saudi princes, not bin Salman, Mohammed bin Salman was something else.
It was the other guy's relative who may have been in the area about a quarter of a mile, less than several hundreds or maybe almost 500 yards to 1,000 yards away in helicopters making fire in that area.
So there's all kinds of information.
That indicates we're being set up on a scenario to make it look like one guy did it again.
It's always a lone male shooter.
Why don't they get straight and go do a lone female shooter?
Like squeaky Lynette Fromm or one of these other characters.
But it looks faked out.
Then you got Sandy Hook, which Jim is the expert on that area.
I was referring to a case we talked about was Audrey Hale.
That's another very specific place.
Now, what's bad about that scenario was the police had the person surrounded.
You're supposed to capture, arrest, take him into custody.
The person arrives was the designated shooter that day.
Uniformed officer puts on his body cam.
All they have to do is tap it, and it's supposed to reflect certain information like your name, your badge number, or date, time, minutes, hours, minutes, seconds running.
All that was blanked out.
That's a setup.
And then when he got into the actual facility, these other guys are already there.
They've got this person behind a sofa in a rest area or a lounge area, and then they don't arrest him.
He just comes in, they just blow the person away, and that's it.
That's it.
You don't have a witness.
They can't go back.
You're talking about Nass, of course, and I've done a lot about that, and when the When the perp comes in the door, he, she is wearing sneakers of one type, but in color.
Yes, yes, we discussed this.
Sneakers of a different make and color.
I mean, it's just embarrassingly bad, Hunter, how poorly they pull off some of these events.
Yeah, me and Jim broke that down on a previous show a while back, and there's so many indicators that there's the pattern.
They're setting it up so that they can do bad publicity about assault weapons.
Doesn't matter.
And you have to understand that sometimes they'll lie to these people, say, okay, we want you to go into this place.
It's already set up.
All you have to do is shoot targets or do whatever, and sometimes they'll say that they're going to go in there for another reason.
We don't know that, but that's how they will do it.
They will set a person up, or they intentionally go in there with the purpose of doing the job, and they're lied to about whatever they can be lied about, and they'll set these people up who are not all there.
You know, a lot of these people are not 100% just like Hinckley when I interviewed him.
Hinckley was not 100%.
He's got a mental issue, microwaves in his head, sexual related terms, and then Jodie Foster is what he was trying to talk about in front of the White House at 2 in the morning.
But I think he saw that movie Taxi Driver.
See, there's a profile.
A lot of these people are gamers also.
There's a profile for that.
They're nut jobs.
They're doing gaming.
They're using SSRIs, often in SSRI drugs.
Exactly.
And they get into this stuff, and when they get out there in the street, they don't know reality from the gaming or the mental fantasies that they're dreaming up.
So that's the kind of people they're putting out there.
And it's all part of the Democrat profile.
In 1976, you interviewed Hinckley.
Was he under suspicion in 1976?
Yeah, I engaged him purposely because that's what I do.
All six foot three of me at two in the morning.
That's my jobs to go patrol for terrorists.
I was doing the embassy security.
This time I was outside the White House before I got transferred to the inside of the White House complex.
And I engaged him intentionally because he was just hanging around just like a lot of other crazy people do.
So, it worked out.
It perfectly worked out, and the duty agent for Secret Service failed to get him to St.
Elizabeth's Hospital.
He says, oh, I want to talk to this guy as soon as I mention Jody Foster.
Says, okay, just make sure you spell my name right.
I got to go look for Carlos the Jackal, Ilyich Romero Sanchez, and get him to St.
Elizabeth's Hospital was my last comment.
In 76.
Five years later, March 30th, 81, He shows up at the Hilton and shoots Brady, Delahunty the cop, McCarthy, who didn't have his vest on that day, the agent, and somebody else shot Reagan with a flechette disc.
We don't want to mention Felix Rodriguez, ex-CIA guy, that that's the guy that's connected to the Vice President, Poppy Bush, who would have benefited.
Real simple.
It's all profile.
They think everybody's stupid.
That's why they keep doing it.
You try to warn them about Hinckley.
You try to warn them about Hinckley.
You were working Secret Service back in 76, and they didn't make enough effort to deal with Hinckley, even though you warned the authorities.
No, I detained him.
I purposely detained him.
We take him, put him inside the Northgate office, and they have an interview with an agent, duty agent of some sort.
People have a misconception about Secret Service, first off.
The agents sit in an office, and when they do movements, then they go out and get the car.
They have movements with the President, First Lady.
They have them around those areas.
The Secret Service Uniformed Division are also counter snipers.
Perimeter security.
Internal security.
Rooftop security.
Everywhere else security.
Across the street.
Blur house.
New EOB.
Everywhere!
But they don't know that.
They don't get it.
You know, they assume too much.
They don't watch enough movies.
You know, White House Down with Morgan Freeman and Gerard Butler is a good one.
Well, the day that Reagan got shot, it was common mainstream news that one or more of the Bush family were hanging out with the Tom Hinckley family, and they were close friends, the Bush and Hinckley family.
They were having dinner that night!
That night they were having dinner together, Hunter!
Imagine.
He was shot by a Secret Service agent pushing him into the car underneath his armpit with a blowshot that barely missed his heart, but he was conveying the message, let George do it.
Yeah, John mentioned somebody else shot Reagan, so how come they didn't kill Reagan?
Do you think they purposely did not want to kill him?
Or, you know, if it was a professional shooter, why didn't they kill Reagan?
Oh, no, no.
Flechette just barely missed his heart.
They were going to blame it on Hinkley, but it was a Secret Service agent who fired the Flechette when he was pushing him in the car.
He got the message, Hunter.
He got the message.
Let George do it.
So thereafter, basically, Bush was running the administration.
Now I've got a difference of opinion about that, but look up John Judge on YouTube.
John Judge, he passed away several years ago, but he had family that was with the intel community.
So there was a upper level area, which is like a lot of places, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan, you name them.
And there was a flechette shot by a CIA connected, not Secret Service, but you know, it doesn't matter.
The point is it wasn't Hinkley.
See what I mean?
So that's their deal.
They laid it out.
Now, he got out of a mental hospital a couple years back.
Same time frame, same date that G. Gordon Liddy died.
The exact same date.
Wow.
It was like an anniversary date 40 years later.
And I met G. Gordon Liddy in San Diego.
Shook his hand, whole nine yards.
But I met a lot of people.
But point is, they're still covering up.
They still use the lone male gunman thing, just like they're doing on this guy.
They say crooks, it's Rurik.
Every time they say Crooks, it's Ryrick.
It's not the same guy with the ears and the gauges, the earplug things that they wear.
That's a different guy.
But the way they look at the scenario, could have been two people that showed up.
Could have been one guy that went to the roof.
Could have been a law enforcement sniper who was positioned in the window area.
Why aren't they looking at that guy?
Oh, because he's covering the opposite way the Secret Service already had covered.
So, maybe.
But you see, the thing is, they're not covering all the bases.
They don't want you to look to the left on the AGR building and the gym.
They want you to look way off to where the tower is.
The tower's visual area was blocked off and there was nobody up there.
I've seen it within minutes after the attempt.
Secret Service on top of the rooftop the whole nine yards.
So, as long as they can divert your attention away from the actual shooter, they're accomplishing their goal, the deep state, because the actual guys got away, and they don't want you to know because they shot the other guy on the roof.
While they diverted the CST, the Counter Sniper Team... Stand by, stand by.
We'll be back with John Carman and Hunter Green, and we'll be taking your calls.
I'll put out the number right after this break.
Stand by.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
I listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
We'll be right back.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio.
FreedomSubs.com.
The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSedge.com, The People Station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathering from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, Calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
As I open the lines for callers, we're going to continue our conversation here.
But the number, if you want to speak to John, Carmen, Hunter, Green, and me about any of these issues, 608-957-8727.
John, you are completing the thought of yours.
8-727-608-957-8727.
John, you are completing the thought of yours.
Go ahead.
Yeah, it's got to do with the patterns and the fact that I did a radio show with somebody on Fox News the day of the incident on the 13th.
And yet, as day goes by and progresses, you have to monitor the stuff they're putting out there.
Some of these other Monday morning quarterback You know, armchair detective types will come back and try to draw diagrams and give their opinion about stuff, but they're still not accurate.
They don't have the background.
They don't see what I see.
Yeah, the bullet went by and hit his ear and it clipped his ear.
I get that.
I can accidentally nick myself and bleed all over the place off my ear.
That's, you know, people get a big deal out of that.
Not a big deal.
Pass that over.
The angles of the shots are very specific.
If Crux, a.k.a.
Rurik, is on a certain part Why was the rifle tossed off to the left at four to five slats over, which is about 15 feet away, and yet they had an open window off to the left of the AGR building that he was on, where he was shot.
And they saw people see him climb up on top of that building and he had a bicycle and a backpack nearby.
And he also sat at a picnic table because he's evaluating the area.
Nobody's checking him.
Police are inside the building not doing their job because it was too hot outside.
All these excuses.
I said, that's ridiculous.
You see, they're building and building a lie and continual thing about a scenario to let this guy come in.
He gets his rifle from a hidden area, maybe near the commercial-sized air conditioner units, gets it up on top, or it was already placed up there on top, and he went up top to take care of it.
The difference of the height is about 5 inches deep, so if you could lay down on the roof and 5 inches deep, you could barely be seen at the top of the ridge.
But the Secret Service had him allegedly 20 minutes before.
The alleged scenario is, They had to get permission.
I'm sorry, unless it goes back to Obama, you don't need permission to take out a target.
That's ridiculous.
That is so stupid.
It's a lie, right in our faces.
I worked at the White House.
You know, we have a new transmission between Obama and David Axelrod of late, where he's revealing he's been running the shop the whole time Biden has been in office.
Right, right.
Yeah.
Hunter, go ahead.
Any direction you want to go is welcome to me.
Yeah, and the thing about Mayorkas, DHS, goes back to Tom Ridge, but there's nothing in the policies and procedures manuals, directives or not, where you see a direct threat to the United States or the president or something like that, you take it out and you look for another target.
They're playing games with that.
Thanks.
Yeah, lots of questions.
Go ahead.
I really appreciate both your backgrounds and John's Secret Service law enforcement background.
So that's really credible and very interesting.
So, John, do you disagree with Dr. Fetzer?
John, do you think there was a real shooting, that Trump did not fake this, that Trump was shot at?
It's a real shooting.
Yeah, it's a real shooting.
Just ask the people that died there.
That's the that's the typical response as the guy that died as the other people get hit with bullets, but we need to know the ballistics of those bullets because we have people that know and I've got experts myself army and all that they qualified with 22 long rifle.
in an AR looking assault rifle weapon.
Air Force, Army, you name it, they use it for practice or for target shooting or whatever.
I've practiced since I was a kid all kinds of weapons and I know a lot about the stuff we shot at Secret Service and training at Beltsville.
But problem is, some people say, oh that was a 223.
Nope, that was not the report or the sound of a .223.
And nobody wants to talk about subsonic weapons.
Nobody wants to talk about subsonic ammunition like I used to use.
147, 148 grain, 9 millimeter.
Uzis are very, very effective in the ammunition they had back then.
And they still have subsonic.
Why is that, John?
Because they could silence it.
They could put a silencer on there.
You could put a two liter bottle of Coca-Cola bottle over it.
You could wrap it with a cloth.
You could do all these procedures.
But they don't want you to know that.
They want you to think, we only had three shots go off, and you get these other alleged experts claiming they had three reports.
No, there was about 8 to 10, almost 18 shots.
Just like Kennedy in Dallas 63, they finally came up with five actual audios.
Five shots.
See what I mean?
My question for you would be, if they had a professional sniper, how come they missed and did not kill Donald Trump?
That's a good question, because I'm a distinguished expert, and I'm not bragging.
That's 295 out of 300 consistently every month, every quarter, every semi-annual, biannual, and annual qualifications.
If a guy can't shoot a target at less than 140 yards, they would have kicked him out.
He wouldn't make it.
Remember, they picked from our division to go to be counter snipers.
Those guys had to be really good.
But the guy on the rooftop, Yerrick Crooks, or we do an acronym now called Yer Crooks, or Yerrocks, because they're lying to us.
If that guy couldn't hit his target, it was because he was shooting something else and he wasn't accurate enough.
He wasn't trained.
And a lot of these gamers are getting into this Kingsman thing where they train people to be assassins.
That's the latest gig.
They want to get in to be the thrill of an agent.
Go out and actually be an assassin.
Go out and do these things and make lots of money.
Well, it just so happens the guy Crooks Urich had money in offshore accounts in Cayman Islands and a few other places, up to 1.2, 1.3 million dollars.
I don't know why the weird number, but that's what they're coming up with.
What does that sound like?
Let me say, I'd be glad to be wrong about Butler.
That doesn't bother me at all.
What I love about it is it's simple enough and yet controversial enough that a lot of people are opening their mind to the possibility some of these events are staged.
Yes.
Just a jar a bit.
Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
All of a sudden, the light goes on and they're open to the possibility maybe they've been played again and again.
And of course they have.
So I welcome this event as kind of a Precipitating more open-mindedness and public discussion of false flags and stage events.
I think that's sensational.
No, that's an excellent comment, Jim, because it's exactly that.
People don't look at the patterns the way I do, and it goes way back.
So if they can cover up for Oswald, they got John Hinckley, all these other ones, they're going to keep doing it, and they're doing it even now.
You know, it doesn't make sense.
Maybe it makes it a little harder to do.
If more people are waking up to the fakery, maybe it makes it a little bit harder to do, maybe, if more people are paying attention.
Yeah.
So it sounds like maybe there was not a professional.
If it was a real shooting, as John believes, maybe they did not use a professional.
That's why they missed.
For plausible deniability, maybe they used an amateur that they could blame it on.
What do you think of that, John?
Yeah, you know, I'm thinking about what you're saying because you have to think about all the angles.
You can't be tunnel vision about any of this.
You have to go all the way 360 and you got to figure out why did they leave an opening within 140 yards where the guy could walk up to that perimeter and the cops are all inside the building taking a break because they think it's too hot.
There's nobody up on the tower.
They've already put out a fake CGI shadow on top of what looks like a tower.
Come on.
It was perfectly clear.
There was nobody up there.
They could have had a sniper up there, but they didn't.
A counter sniper.
And then they fired the guy, Jonathan Willis, for doing his job.
And then they should be charging people like Kimberly Cheadle.
We're talking high treason.
conspiracy to murder a president, former president.
That's high treason, that kind of thing.
But again, back to your question, they got one shooter.
That's the decoy shooter.
They take him out.
Shots are still being fired.
I'm moving left on the screen to look to the left of the buildings.
That's where the other shooter was.
Now they come up and say, oh, there was a counter sniper from the local Butler or Beaver County thing.
Really?
Was he authorized to be up there?
What kind of ammo was he shooting?
Where were the bullets?
And if he shot, he could have missed somebody, too.
You know, that story always comes up in Secret Service lore, is that, oh, it was a Secret Service agent in Kennedy's vehicle that turned all the way around with a .45 or a 9mm and shot the right side of his head.
I don't care how good you are, you can't do that.
You can't.
It's impossible.
That's the kind of BS that I have to look at.
And you go, no, look to the left from Crook on a screen.
Go to the left and left and left.
There's a bigger cone or a section of the pie that they don't want you to know about.
They want you to look over to the right to the grassy knoll and the tower.
Like a magician.
Exactly.
And the tree line.
The tree line is just as bad.
And remember, the rooftops are totally different.
The rally was up high and the rooftop where Crooks or Yurik was low.
They'll assume it's the same rooftop or it's too high or something.
No!
It was so low, a Girl Scout or a Boy Scout on the rally ground could look over and see the guy.
Okay?
Anybody could.
And they did spot somebody.
And they did yell out, there's a guy with a gun!
There's a guy on the roof!
15 minutes, 10 minutes, right down to 6.11 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
Listen, I'm willing to go wherever Hunter likes, but I am keen on this Kamala fakery.
Can they fake it all the way to the election?
I'm still registered as a Democrat and I'm getting notices, even though I've been voting Republican for Trump, about I haven't asked for my mail-in ballot yet.
You're going to cover Republican like I'm going to have to do.
The Supreme Court ruled out drop boxes, but then they ruled them back in.
How bad is that?
The same court within about six months reversing itself?
I have no doubt they're saying that for the scam.
We got all kinds of illegals saying they're already registered to vote.
Hunter, I think they are going to try to steal it.
And Kamala is just the worst possible.
But they love her because she's a non-entity doctor.
They can manipulate her just as they could this demented fake Joe Biden, subject to manipulation.
Barack Obama will have, what, a sixth term in office?
It's outrageous, Hunter.
Yeah, I agree.
They're definitely trying to cheat it.
There's Dr. Frank, a mathematician that basically showed mathematically how they stole 2020.
You know, more people voting that were registered to vote in many key areas.
And he gave a talk recently in L.A.
saying they're going to pull the same shenanigans this time.
Just real quick on the shooting again with Trump.
What's the evidence, John, that Yurik Was involved and I heard Senator Johnson had released some cell phone pings or something.
How does that work?
How do they get information on where a cell phone is and how do they release that publicly?
I'm just surprised that Senator Johnson was maybe able to get this information to release it publicly.
Is that true?
Did he get evidence that.
Yirik or someone's suspicious phone was in the area of the shooting and what ties Yirik possibly to the shooting?
Well, first off, Yerick is a totally different person.
I've sent the pictures before.
His right ear is kind of chipped up a little bit, like somebody bit him on the ear.
His hair color's different.
He's got different colored structures to his face and so forth.
But he did have gauges, so he's got the big holes in his lower lobes.
That's the guy that was killed on the rooftop.
They keep saying Crooks.
Well, unless he made a name change, that's something else.
The actual crooks, blonde, wearing glasses, and they did show a picture.
It looks like it could have been him if that accurate picture was taken at a certain date and time.
Now, we know another guy with an interesting first name of Hunter Biden, when he would take pictures with his cell phone of various things, and they blacked them out or taped them out or covered it up.
They ping it.
It gives off a special ping.
And the meta tags and so forth are bounced off satellites so they can locate your location.
Same technology exists.
My phone doesn't do that because I use a special satellite balance.
It's a smartphone, so CCP doesn't have a chip in it.
But the thing is, when they did his phone, they could pull up the same information.
He was going around with a scope to look at the GPS and the distance and so forth of the site that he was going to look at and so forth.
That's built up information, back information.
And they did capture the information off his phone, so they can say that, but that's whoever had his phone.
If I let you borrow my phone, and you let me borrow yours, they're going to think that one of us did something else, and then you give it back to them after the operation.
It's that simple.
There's all kinds of foul-ups, but at every operation or every parade route, they have a special electronics van.
This is Secret Service stuff, where they have countermeasures.
And we had a division called TSD, Technical Security Division.
Even when Obama came in, he had to turn in his BlackBerry so they could tamper with it and fix it.
And if he had a watch, they took his watch and they did some stuff.
They cleaned it out.
And maybe they left a little micro dot of something in there that they could trace, no matter what, because he's the president.
Same difference.
But every time they have a parade, Or an appearance, or he's going from one airport to a hotel or back and forth.
The black van is always there.
Look for the black van if they allow you to see it, because sometimes they won't let you see it.
But when Trump went on a parade route in Florida, you could see that black van.
That's what I was looking for.
All of a sudden, all those people in that area, They lost communications.
They couldn't talk on it and say, oh, he's coming by right now.
That's the same thing for a sniper.
They're going to want to say, okay, he's passing this point.
Get ready.
That kind of thing.
Or they might have diversionary tactics like in a military operation.
That's what those things are used for.
Secret Service will disrupt those communications via the satellite and locally so they can't use them.
Only Secret Service approved communications and transponders and transmitters and local law enforcement on special frequencies.
Okay, so it gets complicated up to a point and then after that you can't go into detail, but it is used, but they didn't use it a proper way.
They turned down the drones.
Hell, this guy had a drone within an hour or so or two before the deal.
Only assassins get to use drones.
Only assassins get to use the drones.
Only assassins.
Because service is not allowed.
You remember a guy named Sam Kennison, the actor, the comedian?
He was hilarious.
I saw him in San Diego in 91.
A guy sat next to me, and it was obvious when I was talking about something.
I worked at the border, and we started talking about border stuff.
He says, What if he flew a drone?
1991!
He's mentioning a drone across the border to smuggle.
I said, oh yeah, we've got countermeasures.
We could pick on stuff like that.
I immediately contacted my former agency, U.S.
Secret Service, and told them.
Within maybe several years, they already had problems with drones being flown around near the White House.
It is now restricted airspace.
You cannot fly a drone in 15.5 square miles of Washington, D.C.
So I've been a victim of drones in my area, and they try to fly below 300 feet, which is 100 yards.
And once it goes above 300 feet or more, it becomes an FAA issue.
See, Federal Aviation or not, whatever.
So that's a restricted thing on that.
They violate it.
There should be a way to capture it.
And route it back to who it belongs to because you can attach a weapon to it.
And I've discussed this.
Elon Musk and there's another guy has a technology.
If they've got a drone that flies around and they've got identifiers that are chipped into the computer, they could put a little probe that has an explosive on it.
They could locate it and drop a thousand of those in the whole area all around D.C.
And they could attack any person that's out there at the North Portico, on the lawn, South Lawn, Marine One, everywhere.
Everywhere.
So, everybody would be attacked, and that's the kind of stuff that's been put out.
They put it out in the movies, so I'm allowed to talk about it now.
See what I mean?
Public information.
The Yerrick thing's interesting, because Yerrick, the family of Yerrick, are friends with Dick Cheney.
Yes.
I think it was Liz Cheney or Dick Cheney's wife, years ago, publicly posted a happy anniversary to the Yeriks.
And apparently their son, Maxwell Yerik, was arrested back in 2016 for threatening people at a Trump rally.
So I guess this recent shooting Yeah, they were claiming there was a white van, which means if he was dropped off, but then there was the bicycle with the backpack.
That could be information that they dumped out there to make a profile.
Let me just interject, Dick Cheney was the executive director of 9-11 from a bunker beneath the White House.
That's true.
He's got bliss up with the Israelis and attacking the U.S.
and he hates Donald Trump.
Yes, and that's true, Jim.
I think that's very important, what you're observing there, Hunter.
Dick Cheney.
Yeah, and Liz Cheney led the 9-11 Commission, I mean the Jan 6 Commission.
Liz Cheney claimed that Donald Trump lunged at the wheel in the limousine, which is totally ridiculous.
Nonsense!
Well, Dick Cheney was the one that put the order to shoot the aircraft down in Pennsylvania also.
He has six teams.
He ordered it.
And according to some people, Tony Guy was the top local law enforcement at the Trump shooting, sheriff of Bexar County.
Tony Guy was there during the Trump shooting a few weeks ago, and supposedly he was involved in law enforcement with that Flight 93 in Pennsylvania.
Exactly.
All these people have a background, just like the guy that was the chief of police in Las Vegas.
That guy got transferred out after the FBI came in and took over the investigation of the Mandalay Bay.
Where do you think he went?
He went to Hawaii!
Lahaina.
Lahaina, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And by the way, the FBI took all the cell phone footage and laptop footage at Las Vegas and wiped it clean, Hunter.
That was the role of the FBI, to wipe it.
What was the purpose of the Las Vegas shooting?
Oh, just to further, you know, the gun control agenda.
Most of these have had to do with disarming the American people, which, of course, are the most heavily armed population in the world by far.
They also claim that there was a Trump relative in the area, which is why the Saudi brother of bin Salman may have been up there to to do an assassination.
But that's just a weird thing about that.
Could have been Junior.
Could have been anybody, you know.
That they always do that to throw it out there, just to cover up potential for just doing a shooting.
Yeah, that's a folksy remark.
Yeah, there was claims they were trying to assassinate some top Saudi official, but maybe that was just a cover story.
I think it was.
That's a cover story, yeah.
Anyway, back to that other crux.
It's still being found out, and they found out a van did go from Pennsylvania to Arizona.
There's a video, and I had it up, and I put it on my website.
If you go to OpenTarget, which is the name of my book, I haven't had it released yet, on a BitChu channel, a gentleman helped me out.
He's ex-military.
He's really good.
You may know Mark Sparks, or Mike Sparks.
Yeah, sure.
Okay, he helped me with that.
And there's clearly a picture of a female that comes out of a house that looks exactly like the real Crooks with glasses, except she's got breasts.
Well, my God, it's the same person.
It's a relative.
It's a female.
It's a sister of somebody.
You couldn't have made it up.
So, and these people have a background in explosives and selling commercial explosives to outside the country.
How about that?
It all fits another profile.
I'm delighted to hear about your book, John.
I think that's sensational.
OpenTarget.
And you have a website then, Michael, just set up, OpenTarget.com?
Well, it's on the BitChute where it says OpenTarget, USSS, Customs, John Carman Report for the BitChute channel.
But I've got customscorruption.com, go to page two, but I'm still in the processes of getting, trying daily to get it published.
But I've been told years ago it was so dangerous of information that you couldn't get it published in the United States.
So we'll see what happens.
Well, yeah.
Hunter, tell us more about you.
Where can people get information about Hunter Green!
Oh, right now I'm hosting and contributing to a radio show, FM radio in Los Angeles.
It covers from the Mexican border up through Santa Barbara County, KPFK 90.7 FM.
The name of the show is KPFK Rebel Alliance News.
It's a dry time, 6 p.m.
to 7 p.m.
Monday through Friday.
Covers all of Southern California, including L.A.
Orange Counties, Ventura County, San Diego, Santa Barbara County, and kpfk.org.
And then they can listen to the archive of the show, KPFK Rebel Alliance News.
Appreciate you mentioning that.
Well, that's fabulous, Hunter.
That's fabulous.
You have enormous reach there.
Your audience, just wonderful.
Love it.
And I've been so pleased to have you here today, Hunter.
I thought you added so much.
I look forward to having you back again, my friend.
It's a pleasure and I'll interview both of you and John and Carmen as well.
If you're interested, I'll interview you as well for the radio show.
We reach on average about 10,000 people a day on that show.
It's one of the flagship shows of this station because it's 6 p.m.
and it's part of the Pacific Network.
They own five stations around the country with hundreds of affiliates and it's only supported by donations from listeners.
So we don't get any corporate money, we don't get any government It seems to me individuals like you who have a background with Hollywood and all that are making a big difference in analyzing what's going on, because it's all political theater today.
some more freaky thinking than others. - It seems to me individuals like you who have a background with Hollywood and all that are making a big difference in analyzing what's going on 'cause it's all political theater today, almost 100%, Hunter, I'm just dumbfounded.
No, it's amazing.
You brought up the election.
Yeah, I mean, we saw so much of the evidence of 2020 shenanigans.
I mean, even years ago, ex-president Jimmy Carter co-wrote a paper about election fraud.
Jimmy Carter traveled the world looking at elections and even Jimmy Carter himself in writing.
He partnered with the Republicans.
It's been sensational.
I can't thank you both enough.
Everyone, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about this weekend, because we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection