All Episodes
Previous Next
July 3, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
56:32
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (2 July 2024) with Don Grahn and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Truth vs. the News, and this is July the 2nd, 2024.
Oh, the heat of the summer of July 4th is coming.
Independence, or whatever we have, is what we're celebrating.
And it seemed like in the first hour we had quite a mess in the powerhouse of the presidency and things, so I guess this hour is going to be even heavier with more great tales from Jim and Brian.
Go for it, Jim.
Thank you, Don.
The question becomes, who's running our country?
Yep.
Phil Giraldi explains Israeli lobby cash dominates and perverts American election.
And do you know where all that Israeli lobby cash comes from?
Your pocket and mine.
This is American taxpayer dollar given to Israel to control American politicians and the nation.
Once upon a time, the United States of America was a constitutional republic.
That by design was constructed with checks and balances to limit corruption and constrain the ability of any branch of government to initiate certain potentially harmful actions, like going to war.
Which required approval by both Congress and the executive branch.
Of course.
That was 261 years ago.
And things change over time.
Today's America, which claims to be both a democracy and the issuer plus enforcer of international rules and norms,
is arguably among the most corrupt, if not the most, as well as disliked countries on earth, with a political perception exceptionally vulnerable to those with deep pockets who are willing to spend freely to obtain favors from the professional politicians and bureaucrats who now proliferate throughout the system.
If one measures the consequences arising from all the corruption, there's no better example.
Then the heavily lopsided relationship with Israel, which had been produced through the infusion of hundreds of billions of dollars coming primarily from Jewish billionaire and corporate sources.
Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, for example, famously gifted Trump with $100 million, in return received what he demanded, a U.S.
decision to move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
And a recognition that Jerusalem would be recognized as a country's capital, which was illegal under international law.
Additionally, Trump team headed by Israeli apologist Ambassador David Friedman brought about a recognition of the Jewish state's annexation of the occupied, formerly Syrian, Golan Heights.
Also an illegal concession And the de facto granting of a free hand to Israel for dealing with the Palestinians as it sees fit, which is currently playing out.
Trump was also in the midst of canceling a nuclear monitoring agreement with Iran, which is very much in the U.S.
interest, and the assassination of senior Iranian Revolutionary Guard Commander Qasem Soleimani, which was a war crime.
I believe pro-Israel policies have not developed in the U.S.
because of some actual affinity between the two nations, but rather because of great dollops of Jewish money liberally applied to politicians and journalists to create the myth of an actual beneficial alliance between the U.S.
and Israel to produce a narrative the public would be inclined to accept.
In this massive coordinated effort by what is euphemistically referred to as the Israel lobby.
There's no more active entity than the basically illegal American Israel Public Affairs Committee and its conjoined AIPAC Political Action Committee, which delivers the cash and also the intimidation of political candidates who do not embrace the Jewish state with enthusiasm.
Such dissidents are marked for removal through the servicing of opposing prospective candidates who are particularly well-funded and sure to receive exceptionally favorable press.
In the current round of primary just concluded, for example, AIPAC has boasted it achieved 100% success.
As an AIPAC-endorsed candidate won every district 224 races where an endorsee was on the ballot.
All 90 AIPAC Democrats who've had their primary race in 2024 have won.
These Democrats are strong pro-Israel voices.
134 ABAC-backed Republicans have also won.
Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics.
How does that work?
As international lawyer John Whitbeck has described the process, The primary reason why virtually all members of Congress prioritize the desires of the Israeli government over the interests of the American people are money and fear, particularly the fear all the money Israel vs. will devote ending your political career
Most notably, through primary elections, if you manifest anything less than unconditional support and or abject subservience to Israel.
In the most recent primary, New York State, AIPAC boasts for having devoted a record $15 million
A record amount spent on a primary to delivering exemplary punishment to end the political grip of Representative Jamal Bowman, a rare progressive in Congress who's been an outspoken critic of Israeli apartheid and genocide, among other damnation of Bowman's record.
He was inevitably accused of anti-Semitism.
Only a single such example every few years has proven to be enough to keep virtually all members of Congress in line.
One might ask former congressmen like Cynthia McKinney and others in a long line who've helped the wrath of AIPAC and its sister organizations.
That would include now-deceased Senators William Fulbright, Charles Percy, James Zabursek, Congressmen Paul Findley, Pete McCluskey, and Jim Traficant.
It has recently been revealed nearly all congressional candidates are routinely and openly approached by AIPAC representatives who ask in advance their views on Israel.
If they are cooperative, sometimes requiring a written statement of intent, they are given a pass, and you can count on financial support and favorable media.
If not, they are marked for removal.
And one can even sympathize with members of Congress for self-defined careers in politics, as again per Wittmach.
What is the point, when all around you are groveling, flat-out prone in subservience to Israel, in raising your head on a matter of principle?
Your head will simply be cut off.
Nothing will change for the better as a result of your sacrifice.
There is thus really no rational choice but to faithfully follow the orders of your AIPAC babysitter.
The babysitter is an AIPAC indoor staffer placed in nearly every single congressional office to monitor and report on Israeli issues, a development which has recently been revealed by Congressman Tom Massey while being interviewed by Tucker Carlson.
So guess what?
My high school sweetheart, U.S.
Representative Thomas Massie, shares news of his wife's death.
Shadow of Israel tweets, United States Congress confirmed Thomas Massie's wife died suddenly.
Massie's been very vocal about his position, which includes ending the Federal Reserve, stopping vaccine mandates, ending foreign influence from ABAC, No reason has been made available for the cause of her death.
Here we have Nancy himself tweeting, yesterday.
My high school sweetheart, the love of my life for over 35 years, the loving mother of our four children, the smartest, kindest woman I ever knew, my beautiful and wife queen forever, Rhonda, went to heaven.
Thank you for your prayers for our family in this difficult time.
Did Mossad just assassinate Representative Thomas Massie?
Why, because State of the Nation reports he's the only member of Congress who does not have a name like Babysitter.
And because he just did an interview with Tucker, blowing the lid off of Israel to complete command and control over both the House and Senate.
Read here.
Imagine you speak out against Israel, then suddenly your wife dies, and then Jews start telling you to reconsider your stance on Israel.
Well, that just happened to Representative Thomas Massie.
First, read this.
Thomas Massie says, Dr. Carlson, every GOP member of Congress has an AIPAC babysitter.
That extraordinarily revealing yet painful interview between Thomas Massie and Dr. Carlson took place on June 7, 2024.
Within three weeks, Rhoda Massie, the wife of U.S.
Representative Thomas Massie, is dead.
As of today, Representative Massey has not disclosed any relevant information regarding the death of his high school sweetheart, love of his life, and beloved wife.
Just as Israel's very public and brutal assassination of President John F. Kennedy was quite purposefully conducted in a manner as a warning to every other head of state never to even think about leaving the New World Order reservation, was this deliberately timed, massy hit, carried out as a sort of Damocles, hanging over the head of every single member of the U.S.
Congress?
There's no question about one thing.
Thomas Massey has proven to be by far the most consistently courageous speaker in the entire Congress.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, the Massey story when I first heard it was incredibly disturbing.
The more I think about it, you know, Massey's been so quiet.
Nobody really knows any details.
It was like a week before it was announced that they were up at Mount Rainier together.
You know, vacationing in Washington.
That doesn't sound like somebody who's plagued with pancreatic cancer, so there hasn't really been much of an explanation out there in the tweet world, except for this particular explanation, which seems to be on the minds and on the lips of everybody who's been studying what this is.
Massey comes out on Tucker, he talks about AIPAC, says he doesn't have an AIPAC representative.
Two weeks later, his wife is dead.
Well, she moved into witness protection.
Is she really dead?
What did Massey get himself into?
I just want to remind you of the power of this Jewish cartel.
Let's talk about the hedge fund industry.
In 2023, out of the top 20 richest hedge fund managers, 11 of them were Jewish.
Jim Simmons, Renaissance Technology, his net worth was $28 billion.
David Tepper, Appaloosa Management, net worth $18.5 billion.
Steve Cohen, Point72 Management, net worth $17.5 billion.
Carl Icahn, Icahn Enterprises, net worth $17.5 billion.
Millennium Management, Israel Englander, net worth $11.5 billion.
D.E.
Shaw and Company, run by David Shaw, net worth 7.9 million.
Renaissance Technologies.
Okay, this is one of the big hedge funds.
One of the six of the top 10.
Okay, six of the top 10 hedge funds.
Renaissance Technology, total assets $106 billion.
Two Sigma, total assets $67 billion.
AQR Funds, assets $94 billion.
Two Sigma, total assets, $67 billion.
D.E.
AQR funds, assets, $94 billion.
DE Shaw & Company, total assets, $45 billion.
Millennium, total assets, $57 billion.
And Davidson Kepner's total assets on the hedge fund industry, $40 billion.
BlackRock itself is just a tiny aspect of the entire commercial market.
Larry Fink, $1.27 billion.
Robert Capito, $470 million.
Susan Wagner, net worth $422 billion.
Barbara Novick, $224 million.
Ben Golub, $160 million.
Susan Wagner, net worth $422 billion.
Barbara Novick, $224 million.
Ben Golub, $160 million.
Ralph Scholestein, $375 million.
Those massive resources are at stake here when it comes to criticizing Israel in any way, any way.
And you've got to ask yourself, okay, why won't Trump speak up about it?
Why does Trump seem to have to play along?
You've got to consider that Donald Trump can be eaten, chewed up, And spit out by these guys who own the entire trading business machinations that run our nation as a whole.
It's a major problem.
And so the question ultimately is going to arise, OK, let's talk about the most powerful lobby in Washington, D.C., AIPAC.
OK, they've got a shadow handler for every single politician out there.
They're the ones that control the purse strings and the funds.
But it's Sheldon Adelson.
Who controls who's going to win primaries here and primaries there?
Who's going to be our selected candidate?
Who's going to not go in?
We have to deal with this problem from a national perspective.
This is a Foreign Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act issue, and it's my understanding That they're getting around this by making sure that the handler who handles the politician is an American and not Americans in the right investments.
That way the money doesn't come directly from Israel.
It is an American citizen who happens to be Jewish, who happens to be a member of the AIPAC community, who's making the right investments in these hedge funds and these management machines that gives them the resources.
And that's the way they get around claiming That it's foreign influence money that's running the show.
That foreign influence thing has been around for a long, long time.
We have a major problem here in America, and I'm glad.
That we're not a pure democracy, okay?
Because a pure democracy, if it was a pure democracy, we'd still be wearing masks and there'd be mandated vaccines.
Everybody would have fallen for the propaganda.
Very few people would have held out.
Right makes might, and being a small group of righteous-minded people, sometimes in a republic, a representational republic, can be more powerful than any other way.
Which I think even the Jews recognize that as a threat, which is possibly why Massie was targeted or his wife was targeted as a message to, hey, if you're going to speak up against something this powerful, we're going to show you not only can we take your money, we have the power to take your life with our assassination machine.
Remember, Mossad victory through deception Is part of how they wage warfare and they have no problem, no problem whatsoever treating the goy like the cattle that they see us as.
We're going to have to start standing up to it and we're going to have to start finding people of stout heart to do that, which I'm glad that at the end of the show today we're going to show you what a stout heart really looks like in our nation.
That was wonderful, wonderful, Brian.
I think exactly right.
Outline the full dimensions of what we're up against.
Meanwhile, Democrats hint at assassination response to the Supreme Court immunity decision.
Zero hedge.
Nobody likes to lose, but leftists take indignant defeat to a whole new level.
Though they claim to defend democracy in their spare time, Demon rats also have a tendency to abandon the democratic process when that process interferes with their intentions to remain in power.
Case in point, the Supreme Court's recent decision to give immunity from prosecution of Donald Trump in the case of some official acts taken during his tenure in office.
Leftists have responded with outrage to the 6-3 decision, with much of their political hope resting on the strategy of burying Trump in as many legal battles as possible to keep him from rainpressing again.
Democrats are now flooding social media and the newsfeed with suggestions that the Supreme Court decision makes it possible for Joe Biden president to eliminate the conservative competition as a part of his official duties.
Here's Tibbs of TikTok.
President Biden acting within the scope of his official duties.
Could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justice on the court.
Represents Zoe Lofgren, who appears to be a complete, unbelievable moron.
One of the worst.
Henry Sesson.
According to the Supreme Court, Biden could now send in Seal Team Six to take all of them out.
He could send in the military to take out Trump.
He has immunity for official acts now.
Just absurd!
What should Biden do with his immunity?
The tools for legally punishing presidents already exist, including impeachment and charges of treason.
And keep in mind, if Trump does not have immunity from previous actions as president, then neither does any other president.
How many skeletons are in the closets of men like Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama?
Beyond this, assassination of a political opponent or the conservative members of the Supreme Court is not recognized as an official duty of the presidency.
Democrats, as usual, take their conclusion to the dramatic extreme.
In order to provoke public fear through emotionally energized disinformation.
Leftists have been fantasizing publicly about murdering Trump for some time now.
However, These theories on how Biden could respond to the Supreme Court are not simple hypotheticals for the sake of argument.
There's an element of desperation and bloodlust there.
What they are really upset about is the fact Trump is free and clear to finish his election race against a mentally deficient Joe Biden.
They're also terrified Trump might return the favor and seek revenge if he gets back into the Oval Office.
Three out of the four criminal cases brought against Trump last year will now become irrelevant, likely preventing a trial in the federal election subversion case before November.
The fourth, the hush money trial, which led to his conviction this year, is considered the weakest of the efforts because it sought to turn misdemeanor charges into felony charges using an obscure statute.
It should be noted that presidents already have immunity from civil liability while in office.
And must be impeached for a violation before lawsuits can proceed.
The Supreme Court has simply extended that immunity to cover criminal prosecution.
Regardless how you might feel about Donald Trump, it's clear Democrats have been engaging in a strategy of lawfare.
The weaponization of the courts as a means to destroy a political opponent, instead of facing him head-on in the election arena.
A majority of charges made against Trump have been farcical at best, with little to no evidence to support the commission of an actual crime.
The Supreme Court is likely responding to this lawfare by limiting it to criminal cases outside of presidential acts, of which there are none.
Otherwise, the chicanery on the part of the Democrats would cripple the presidency for years to come, and every party and president from now on would have to engage in the same lawfare in order to compete.
Listen to this guy talk about it here.
How many false claims are coming from his mouth on this occasion?
This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America.
Each, each of us is equal before the law.
No one, no one is above the law.
Not even the President of the United States.
With today's Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed.
For all practical purposes, today's decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.
This is a fundamentally new principle, and it's a dangerous precedent, because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even including the Supreme Court of the United States.
The only limits will be self-imposed by the president alone.
Nearly four years ago, my predecessor, Send a violent mob to the U.S.
Capitol to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
We all saw it with our own eyes.
We sat there and watched it happen that day.
Attack on the police.
The ransacking of the Capitol.
A mob literally hunting down the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.
Gallows erected to hang the Vice President, Mike Pence.
I think it's fair to say it's one of the darkest days in the history of America.
Now, the man who sent that mob to the U.S.
Capitol is facing potential criminal conviction for what happened that day.
And the American people deserve to have an answer in the courts before the upcoming election.
The public has a right to know the answer about what happened on January 6th before they asked to vote again this year.
Now, because of today's decision, that is highly, highly unlikely.
It's a terrible disservice to the people of this nation.
I know I will respect the limits of the presidential powers I have for three and a half years.
But any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law.
I concur with Justice Sotomayor's dissent today.
She hears what she said.
She said, in every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.
With fear for our democracy, I dissent.
What a phony, fraud, lying, two-faced SOB!
Disgusting!
the American people dissent.
I dissent.
May God bless you all.
May God help preserve our democracy.
Thank you.
What a phony, fraud, lying, two-faced SOB.
Disgusting.
Brian, your thoughts, my friend.
That little speech just goes to show that his scriptwriters are still hung up on January 6th like they pulled it off.
That's I think everybody knows that the emperor has no clothes in terms of January 6th.
Okay, the Supreme Court ruling is significant.
The court did rule that former presidents have absolute immunity for actions relating to all their core constitutional powers, such as issuing pardons or vetoing legislation for other official acts Other types of acts, presidents have presumptive immunity, but prosecutors can challenge that if they can show the charges wouldn't threaten something called executive branch functionality.
There is no immunity for unofficial acts as president.
So I remember that movie where I think Harrison Ford was in it, where the president sent an unofficial group of assassins down to South America and they screwed up and got caught.
And then the president, you know, The whole patriotic thing that was a part of that movie.
I forgot the name of it.
The case was also sent back to lower courts to try to make a determination of which of Trump's alleged actions were either official or unofficial.
The decision does delay the trial in Trump's election interference case, which was scheduled for March 4th.
And Roberts, writing for the majority, emphasized that the president is not above the law.
Sonia Sotomayor did dissent and the court rejected the D.C.
Circuit Court's earlier reasoning that had denied Trump's immunity.
So, it's basically a significant development in finally defining the scope of presidential immunity and its implications for the potential prosecutions of formal presidents.
But here's the fundamental issue, okay?
I don't care what the law says.
If you don't enforce it, it doesn't matter.
There's still laws out there that say you can't cross the street on a horse.
There's no enforcement of these particular laws.
And this is the fundamental problem when you've got an American Bar Association that's so completely corrupt that it would pull Rudy Giuliani's, the New York Supreme Court pulled his bar license for, you know, basically continuing to support Trump.
Look, if you've got the bar association on your side, then you've got the judges on your side, then you're able to put the fear in the heart of everybody who's going to play along in the game.
And the arguments become moot when they're not equally applied.
The fundamental problem.
Joe Biden, hey, oh, this basically uncuffs Donald Trump.
Well, you know what?
He's been uncuffed since the beginning.
What laws hasn't he broken?
Take a look at the Hunter Biden-Burisma thing.
Take a look at the influence related to Those energy contracts and those prosecutions and the foreign interference related to those things that he's did as Vice President.
Of course, Barack Obama didn't have the Department of Justice that would do it.
And let's talk about, for a second, our Attorney General Merrick Garland.
He's so corrupt that they're about ready to pull the plug on this guy completely.
Congress is about ready to take him out.
Look at what they're doing on the border.
They're corrupt through and through, top to bottom, and they know that they've got an apparatus there that's designed to protect them.
Again, I'm going to go back to the same arguments I always lay out.
We have an institutional problem.
We have allowed our institutions to become corrupt by allowing the installation of People that are positively responding to people that do not have our best interest in mind.
It's an institutional problem and at the top of all of the institutions, the senior executive problem and others.
The bureaucracy all sits below them doing the yes man, no man thing so they don't have to risk their retirement funds or their current assets or risk losing their job.
It's an institutional problem at the very top.
What's drained the swamp?
Take out the, replace the institutions themselves or replace the top layer of the bureaucracy of the institutions.
Very nice.
Very nice, Brian.
Absolutely.
Positive.
You're right on.
Meanwhile, Russia warns Israel over Ukraine missiles.
West Jerusalem's potential transfer of patriots could backfire.
Moscow's ambassador to the UN has said, "Israel must be ready to face the consequence if it moves forward with the reported plans to supply Ukraine with U.S.-made air defense systems." Russia's permanent representative to the U.N., Vasily Nevinsya, has warned.
U.S., Israel, and Ukraine are in discussion to deliver up to eight old Israeli Patriot systems to Kiev, the Financial Times reported last week, citing persons familiar with the negotiations.
This could affect relations between Israel and Russia.
The Benzia warned on Monday, as Moscow assumed the rotating presidency of the U.N.
Security Council.
I believe that this could, of course, have certain political consequences, the Russian diplomats said.
Weapons, whoever they are sent by to Ukraine, will eventually be destroyed, just like other Western and U.S.
weapons.
That is obvious.
Back in April, Israel now plans to retire its M901B2 batteries, which are more than 30 years old, and replace them with more advanced air defense systems.
However, they have not been put out of service yet due to concern that growing tension with Lebanese armed movement Hezbollah could escalate into an all-out war.
The latest Financial Times report claimed that the deal, which has yet to be finalized, could see the Israeli Patriots first sent to the U.S.
before being supplied to Ukraine, which is experiencing a shortage of air defenses.
Throughout the conflict between Moscow and Kiev, Israel has only provided humanitarian aid to Ukraine, refraining from sending any weapons.
A year ago, the Jewish State rejected a demand by Vladimir Zelensky for Israeli Iron Dome air defense systems.
Russia has repeatedly warned that foreign weapons being sent to Kiev will not prevent Moscow from achieving its military goals and will merely prolong the fighting and increase the risk of a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO.
Here we have our dear colleague, Scott Bennett, being interviewed in what I take to be an airport.
You have just arrived from Belgorod, right?
We have.
We have.
I was in Belgorod with a fellow journalist from Australia, Johnny H., and we were touring Cherubinka.
We were touring the war zones.
We were hearing the drones and the HIMARS and the French hammer missiles.
Saw the devastated apartment complexes and the shrines of the dead children with the stuffed animals.
And the hardest part for me was going into a bomb shelter with women pushing their carriages with their little babies and reporting on my phone what I was seeing in English and feeling their eyes look at me with the understanding that it is your country doing this, it is NATO doing this, it is the United States doing this.
And at the same time, I saw the greatness of the Russian character.
I saw the true Christian spirit.
Because they never cast an angry scowl in my direction.
They never said a nasty word.
They never had a harsh tone of voice.
They really embodied the Christian spirit.
Love your neighbor as yourself.
And it really kind of brought me to tears when I was there, to sense the great character of Christianity in the Russian people, and at the same time feel so disgusted and ashamed that the United States and NATO is really waging war upon Russia by firing upon the city of Belderon.
And I have been in Donetsk and Donbass and Mariupol and Krovka and Solodar with The great director Olga Kiry and our cameraman Aftyan and our driver Sasha.
But this was different because this was inside Russia.
So I've assembled all the video and the photographs and I've written a letter that I intend to take back to the United States Congress and the United Nations saying very clearly Be advised, the United States weapons and personnel are committing war crimes and crimes against humanity by attacking Russian women and children and civilians in Belgorod.
Not military targets, civilian targets.
This is against the United States laws, against the Constitution, indeed against the laws of war.
The United States is being positioned as a terrorist regime.
That's putting the American people in danger.
So I intend to go back and present that as a legal challenge to say we cannot continue to allow Russian civilians to be attacked short of the United States declaring war.
And the Constitution says only the people can declare war and the American people have no problem with the Russian people.
The American people and the Russian people are naturally Cousins.
So, uh, I hope to go take that back and, uh, Slava Rusiya.
Yes, yes.
Well, this is why Russia will win in Endur is because it has great patriots that make great soldiers that never surrender and never retreat.
I've seen it when I was at the film festival and I was honored to be invited back and to be in Russia.
I see just a country that represents the best of traditional values, Christianity, heroism and courage and a time of heroes.
I can't imagine a better place to embody that than Russia.
It is a heroic nation.
Okay.
Thank you so much, Anthony.
Thank you.
Let me do this again in reality.
Thank you.
So, see you there.
Cool.
Really soon.
All right.
Excellent.
Thank you, gentlemen.
Keep in touch.
Yes.
How wonderful was that interview?
And we're so delighted that we have been sent the letter that Scott is delivering to the Congress.
Ryan, let me give the opportunity to screen share.
I'm going to make you the host so you can do that and share it with us.
Yours.
- All right, let's see if I can pull this off.
Okay, be patient with me.
I think you're all seeing this one now.
Okay.
Revised June 28, 2024 from Scott Bennett, former U.S.
Army officer and State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism Intelligence Analyst.
Regarding Report Disclosing War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, and Violations of the United States Constitution and United Nations Treaties and Agreements and International Law.
Basically, what he's doing is he's serving notice to all of Congress that he is going to present materials to them that include whistleblower disclosures and public policies that have not been, that are not classified It cannot be sealed by any government authority and they are the property of the author of the report made public by him.
It's all true.
If Congress fails to respond, investigate, and act on the report, it will be considered treason, misprison, and misprison of treason, misprison of felony, served legal notice of the following sworn affidavit by Scott Bennett regarding the crimes, war crimes,
Basically, he outlines the sections for treason and demands an audience with our Congress to present his findings and his report on war crimes and crimes against humanity.
So, he is really This is the analysis of it.
He is really sticking his neck out there for what's right in terms of what's taking place here and I truly do applaud him as a patriot for taking these at this.
I mean, he's got a family.
He's he's got to be concerned about this stuff.
But he released this report today showing how far he's willing to go.
To present what he considers to be serious war crimes to Congress.
Now the question is, does Congress care?
I'll take it to the International Court.
I'm not exactly sure what's happened, but it sounds to me like Scott's willing to go to the guillotine in terms of persecution for what's right.
And again, I say right makes might.
He's been a guy who's sacrificed a lot for this.
Now, on the other hand, let's talk about an analysis of, you know, basically what Putin's been doing.
He's been slow playing this thing the whole way.
This war has dragged out for much longer than it could have and should have if you were fighting a war.
If you put a dog into a fight and that dog doesn't go ahead and kill the other dog, it's only a matter of time before that other dog Comes in and gets you.
Why Putin has been dragging his feet so long, dragging this out, allowing it to expand to the point where there's talk about nuclear weapons.
Putin is now providing some of his materials to Syria and other nations that surround Israel.
I don't know if he's going to attack Israel.
You know, he's married to a Jew.
I don't know if that makes him sympathetic or not, or makes him a fair player or not.
And a lot of people are arguing that this entire Ukraine debacle, war, fake war, real war, spending war, is that there's something really, really wrong with it.
Let's just ask ourselves.
We just authorized another $16 billion of expenditures.
And where's all that money going?
Oh, it's going straight to their credits going to the banks that fund Lockheed Martin to allow Lockheed Martin to build bigger and better missile systems because we're getting rid of our old.
So are we giving that money to Ukraine?
We giving that money?
Straight back to us under the or straight back to our military industrial complex vendors to go ahead and continue to produce things.
A lot of people feel that there's something really stinky about this entire thing and I hope Scott was able to get to the bottom of it.
We haven't been briefed on all the details related to what he's been observing but I have a feeling that he's observed a lot of war crimes where it's basically just the Top elite people that don't mind sacrificing all sorts of citizens that could be problems along the way for this quote-unquote war.
Now, what I don't understand is, again, why Putin has continued to drag his feet on taking serious action.
You know, his war is really against the West, and I can't understand why he has been so Indecisive overall about actions that would be war-like in a situation like this.
Brian, I noticed it's an update of an earlier report.
If we're okay with you, I'd like to go through the whole report.
Would that be all right with you?
Put it back up and we'll go through it together.
I'll be glad to read.
Are we still?
Okay, let's go back.
Yeah.
All right.
This is the whole report.
Can you see it?
Not yet.
Oh, no.
Sure.
OK, there we go.
There you go.
OK, I'm going to begin with our first paragraph.
We advise all materials including videos, photographs, and written communication contained herein are to be included in the future as supplemental exhibits, are recognized as whistleblower disclosures, and as such have inviolable Protected status under United States and international whistleblower laws, agreement treaties, executive orders, decrees, and public policies.
They are not classified and are in the public interest and cannot be sealed or classified by any government authority.
They are the property of the author of this report and made public by him.
Be advised, all information contained in this report and exhibit is true, to the best of my knowledge, and is presented in good faith, consistent with the United States whistleblower laws and other laws, treaties, and agreements made by the United States.
This report demands an immediate congressional oversight investigation.
Be advised.
Failure to respond, investigate, and act on this report will be construed as treason, misprision of treason, misprision of felony, seditious conspiracy, and other violations of United States laws.
Be advised.
You are hereby served legal notice of the following sworn affidavit by Scott Bennett regarding crimes, war crimes, crimes against humanity, terrorist network support, violation of U.S.
and international law relating to terrorism.
Be advised, pursuant to the constitution of the, you are hereby served legal notice Yes.
Be advised, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States of America, international law, and the treaties and agreements made by the United States, you are hereby served legal notice of the following violations.
8 U.S.C.
Section 4.
Misprison of felony.
U.S.C.
1382.
Misprison of treason.
Crimes against humanity.
War crimes.
18 U.S.C.
241, 242.
Deprivation of rights under color of law and conspiracy to commit deprivation of rights, chemical weapons violations, and other violations of civilian and military law, both domestic and international.
Be advised.
Scott Bennett is a former federal employee under the George H. W. Bush administration from 2003 to 2008 and a United States Army officer while the top-secret, sensitive, compartmentalized security clearance ...and worked in Psychological Operations for United States Civil Affairs, Psychological Operations Command, U.S.
Central Command, Terrorist Financing, former General Special, Joint Special Operations Command and State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism Ambassador Del Daly, and Booz Allen Hamilton.
Be advised!
Additioner Scott Bennett has just returned from investigating and documenting war crimes in the land areas and region of Donbass, areas of Ukraine-Russia, including the cities and areas of Donetsk, Mariupol, Soledad, Gorlovka, Belgorod, St.
Petersburg, and other areas.
A film has been created recording this investigation, and the link to review this material is available at www.rt.com.
Be advised.
You are hereby served legal notice that Scott Bennett has firsthand knowledge of these facts and has personally witnessed and documented the illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral appropriation and application of weapons, finances, and personnel provided by the United States government, the United Kingdom, France, Poland, and Germany
In the above-mentioned cities and regions and other areas of Ukraine, Russia, be advised.
Weapons, financing, and personnel provided by the United States government to the government of Ukraine, and specifically its Zelensky regime, which is no longer the lawful governmental authority of Ukraine as of June of 2024, are being used in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Ryan, could you pick up?
You're muted.
good.
You're muted.
Okay, sorry.
Yeah.
Report on war crimes and crimes against humanity has continued.
Consequently, the Biden administration and the United States Congress and the U.S.
military are therefore unlawfully and making the United States government and its people a legally culpable party to international war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other violations of domestic and international law as a result of this criminal activity.
The government-imposed unlawful culpability places American citizens in a vulnerable legal position where they may be arrested, prosecuted, imprisoned, and executed as supporters of terrorism.
Be advised, this sworn affidavit by juror Scott Bennett, which is an exhibit for all legal actions in this complaint, investigation, and case, Establishes and declares to all parties within the U.S.
government and military and the citizens of the United States and several states that the following has occurred and is currently occurring as a result of the criminal misuse of American resources.
Non-military targets and civilian personnel, mainly mothers, children, and the elderly, are being intentionally and systematically targeted, fired upon, and destroyed by NATO, U.S., Polish, French, and Ukrainian personnel and weapons systems operating as allies and or agents of the United States, operating under the auspices of supporting Ukraine's Zelensky regime and agenda.
Be advised the sworn affidavit by juror at Scott Bennett establishes and declares that all parties in the United States government and military and citizens of the United States and several states that the following has occurred and is currently occurring as a result.
Of the criminal misuse of American resources.
Non-military targets are being attacked, irreparably damaged and destroyed, civilians intentionally murdered as a result.
Several female victims and eyewitnesses of these criminal acts have been interviewed by Scott Bennett on camera about this and these interviews and testimony and evidence demands an immediate congressional hearing and investigation about the matter in order to immediately and without delay issue corrective Declarations and actions by the U.S.
government and military and compel its allies to immediately acknowledge and take corrective action within their respective governments and military.
The following civilian infrastructure are being intentionally targeted and destroyed by U.S.
supplied weapons.
Schools, kindergartens, libraries, businesses, senior citizen pension offices, civilian apartments, housing complexes, vehicles are being targeted, damaged, or destroyed as a result of this heinous corruption.
Personnel in the Biden Administration have intentionally engaged in the above-mentioned activities these persons include, but are not limited to, President Joe Biden, Victoria Nuland, Anthony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Mike Johnson, and other names that are forthcoming.
We advise that in addition to the above-mentioned crimes in action, pets and animals, and the safety of human beings, Being victimized have also been targeted for destruction in violation of rules relating to the safety and ethical treatment of animals and other intentional rules relating to the husbandry of animals.
He advised chemical weapons are being deployed through drones and other delivery systems and used against civilian personnel.
The drones are being deployed and directed by Ukrainian personnel and their allies using Starlink Internet services provided by Elon Musk.
Testimony and evidence related to this is available on film at RT Documentary Films.
In conclusion, Scott Bennett has undertaken this investigation in great danger to his own life and property rights and has received death threats and threats of violence by Ukrainian personnel, government and media, as well as those operating as American NATO and other elements and agents claiming to advance and as well as those operating as American NATO and other elements and agents claiming to advance and support and defend the interests and the agenda of the United States, the European Union, NATO,
Be advised, you are hereby served legal notice that any attempts to initiate hostile communications or acts, threats, coercion, intimidation, violation of rights, arrest, confinement, interrogation, questioning, confiscation of property or other actions against Scott Bennett, either by the U.S.
government or others, will be construed as both a violation of Scott Bennett's inherited rights, protected by the United States of America and the California Constitution, And the international law and Scott Bennett reserves the right to take any legal action against any party, person, organization, or government involved in such action against them, including all members of the United States government, military, and its allies.
Be advised, Scott Bennett files this report as a whistleblower and demands to testify about this matter to congressional authorities and international bodies immediately.
Be advised any attempt to conceal or distort this matter and any failure by any United States government agency or agent to provide all protections to Scott Bennett and acknowledge or investigate this matter will be interpreted as a malicious and intentional act of seditious conspiracy and treason against the United States of America and other international crimes.
Be advised you have 10 days to provide written receipt and acknowledgement of this whistleblower report.
And provide the following response, the date and time of the congressional hearing on the matter on which Scott Bennett demands to be made a public hearing open to all U.S.
international citizens.
Number two, the immediate corrective actions and government communications to cease and desist the current violations of law committed by the United States government and its military and intelligence services.
Number three, the individual agencies and members of the United States Congress Military and intelligence agencies will be notified of this whistleblower report and any and official investigations that will result from the whistleblower report.
Guarantee legally binding of non-prosecution for any materials communications disclosed also known as non-prosecution agreements by all U.S.
and international law enforcement agencies.
All current correspondence may be sent to his address respectfully submitted Scott Bennett.
Well done.
Well done, Brian.
Well done.
Oh, wow.
That's excellent.
Yes.
Yeah.
I wish he had an agency behind him.
I don't like him operating independently like this.
He needs more cover.
It makes me scared.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Oh, it's the most.
So is that, I got up a studio for 10 shows here, but I think that- I don't know what's all in there.
Just think of Scott as putting himself in front of the tank and seeing him in square.
That's exactly what he's doing.
Nice analogy.
Nice analogy, Brian.
Very good.
Don, take us out.
Okay.
This almost took me out right now, this whole thing.
This is a super show.
You can't get this anywhere else, folks, and this is things that the whole world needs to see, this Scott Bennett stuff.
So please, share this widely with everyone you can imagine, and I hope that we'll be having a good show next week.
If you come back for more, we'll get this out, something else.
Thank you so much for watching here, and thank you.
Adios.
▲
Export Selection