All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
14:34
Dr. Tom Cowan - Intro to Webinar June 26, 2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, welcome everybody.
Today, June 26, 2024, another Wednesday webinar.
Today we're definitely going to be doing questions and answers since I keep promising to do those and we've, people are kindly sending in a number of questions so it seems only fair to get to them.
Not sure that there's any announcements.
I just posted a interview with Kelly Brogan, which everybody should check out.
And she's doing a, I think, a free masterclass tomorrow night, Thursday night.
So you may have a chance to sign up for that.
And the only other thing I wanted to say before I got to the questions is, There's the good news is we're getting a lot more activity.
I've been saying this for a while on the no virus virus debate and a lot more people are weighing in on it.
I mostly hear about these things.
I must admit I don't tend to read the whole articles or watch the videos.
It's just hard for me to sit through most of them, but Anyways, I'm sure you'll see them.
Michael Palmer wrote another rebuttal, and apparently he doesn't believe in one of the fundamental laws of life, which is, if you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.
I think everybody should remember that.
I try to remember that.
But apparently he doesn't believe in that, so he keeps digging a further hole.
I think Drs.
Tenpenny and Pilevski weighed in, and I think one of the ways of describing a lot of what you'll read and hear is actually an interesting word, which I had to look up to get the exact meaning of, but I've heard it a lot.
It's a variation on the W.C.
Fields quote, that if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
And the word is sophistry.
So I did look up what that word means, because I wasn't sure.
And it said, subtle, tricky, superficially plausible, but generally fallacious method of reasoning.
And that's pretty much describes exactly what you'll hear from most of the people who are trying to fight back.
What's so interesting about it is they don't seem to realize that This is a tremendous gift to the perpetrators of this fraud and the whole flandemic sort of thing, because as soon as we get rid of the virus argument, including the lab-created and lab-engineered nonsense and all that,
We end up in two places.
One is a whole lot less fear of what your neighbor or friend or crowds are going to do for you because you realize there's no virus to pass between people.
So you start living life a lot less fearful, which then improves your health and everybody gets better from that.
The second thing is at some point people will start to investigate what actually does make people sick and there is a possibility then that that actually leads to a much saner and healthier and better world because people will stop doing the things which are actually making them sick and actually making people around the world sick
Which has nothing to do with these imaginary viruses.
I just wanted to give an example of one of these sophistry type arguments.
I don't have the quote here to show you, but you can probably take my word for it or go look it up.
It had to do with the idea that you can't prove anything in science.
And so they criticism of us, us being the no virus people is we have this extraordinary, extraordinary high, like burden of proof that we're putting on the virus people.
And so because of that, and because you can't actually prove anything in science, they say that they we will never be satisfied.
And you can never prove this one way or another.
So it becomes just an irrational, ridiculous argument.
That, of course, has nothing to do with what we're saying.
We all realize and I certainly realize that you cannot prove something doesn't exist, because if somebody ends up finding it or proving it does at some point you would have been proven wrong.
But what you can do.
And what it is that we're doing is we can investigate the claim, for instance, that the virologists say that when you get a cytopathic effect, CPE, in a cell culture, that proves there was a virus in the sample.
That's what they say.
In fact, that is how they proved For decades that there was a virus, they put an unpurified sample, or actually partially purified, they never put an actual virus on a cell culture, and then did it without the virus and see if you got a cytopathic effect.
Now we have proven, and there's many, many examples in the literature, That you get a cytopathic effect even without a sample and even without putting something on which could contain a virus.
So we have disproven that that procedure proves there is a virus.
And then the reality is, if that's what you're going to claim is the proof of the existence, And that is clearly, and I would think even at this point, everybody agrees.
Now, even the virologists say, right, well, sometimes you have viruses that they don't cause CPE.
So it turns out, on the one hand, they say, you get a cytopathic effect, that proves there's a virus.
And then they turn around and say, or if you don't get a cytopathic effect, that proves there was a virus that was harmless, and it was just living happily in the cells.
And that's basically sophistry nonsense.
sense.
So, that has been disproven.
Now, that means you have to come up with some other way to try to prove that that thing exists.
And they did, actually.
So with HIV, they said, well, viruses, HIV, has different proteins than the lymphocyte that it infects.
Let me just be clear about that.
You got this lymphocyte—it's a kind of white blood cell—it's in your body, and they say this person's T lymphocytes are infected with HIV, and the HIV has different proteins than the T lymphocyte.
Obviously, because it's a different organism, right?
So it's got to have proteins which are unique to HIV.
So that's the claim.
So then you do a study.
This was the Gelderblum study.
You do an electrophoresis.
In other words, you examine all of the proteins in an infected T lymphocyte.
You get, I think the number was 28 proteins, right?
So those are the proteins that were from, allegedly, the T lymphocyte and the HIV.
Okay?
So then you do a T lymphocyte that couldn't possibly be infected with HIV, and you do the same procedure, and lo and behold, you get the same 28 proteins.
Now that's a very easy thing to sort out if you're willing to think, which means that all of those 28 proteins came from the T lymphocyte.
There was no HIV proteins.
There are no proteins that are unique.
Whether they're in different ratios, that has no relevance because obviously one is in a sick person and one is in a well person, so one could imagine they have different proteins, but there are no HIV proteins.
And if there are no HIV proteins, then it's not a distinct organism.
In other words, it's not different from the T lymphocyte, which means it's not there.
Which means you've disproven that as a method of claiming the virus exists.
And so that's what we mean by proving things.
And they turn that around using sophistry to Try to confuse you so that you don't think in a normal way.
And as I keep saying, that's because most doctors and scientists seem to have a thought disorder, which I think we should have a new syndrome called Medical School Acquired Thought Disorder.
could be also, there's a variation of it, or a variant of this, which is called PhD program acquired thought disorder.
And that is contagious, and it is rampant in our system.
And so a lot of people have come down with that disease.
And it's pretty easy to spot if you're just willing to take a few minutes to actually think.
Okay, hopefully that's clear.
So you'll know you can get a good laugh when you read and watch these different people trying to demonstrate their knowledge of virology.
One thing I forgot to say last time.
Because I forgot to emphasize, there is a third reason why people get this wrong.
So the first two I outlined, one is that they have one of these thought disorders that I just outlined, the medical school or PhD program acquired thought disorder.
So that's the common one.
And most people have a similar kind of thought disorder where they're not able to actually think through the process.
So that's the most common reason why people get this wrong.
And then there is a very few, a very minor subset of people who are have nefarious interests so they're basically lying and they have different financial interests or power interests or something and i don't think that happens very much but it is possible and it probably does happen some
there is a third reason which i forgot to emphasize which i would say is a legitimate reason which is that you just don't care and this is common For instance, I've said this many times, like, I know nothing about car engines and carburetors.
In fact, truth be told, I don't even know whether modern cars have carburetors, or whether somehow that's an old-fashioned engine technology which has gone by the wayside, and modern cars don't even have carburetors.
Frankly, I don't know.
And mostly, if somebody tried to explain it to me, I would probably kind of go blank.
Because frankly, I don't really give a damn about carburetors, and I don't really give a damn about cars.
I've only in my life chosen cars because I could afford them, they were reliable, and got me where I wanted to go in reasonable comfort.
And further than that, I didn't have any particular interest in cars.
Fair enough.
We all have subjects like that.
The point, though, that I want to make is you are never going to hear me make public criticism or arguments about for or against the existence or the function of carburetors.
I'm not going to do that because I know I don't know anything about it, and that's fair enough as long as you just don't weigh in on it.
So I don't know why these people who don't actually take the effort and time to look into it, they could just say they just don't care.
Whether it's viruses or not, what difference does it make?
I mean, I don't agree.
If you're a medical doctor, it seems like you ought to know that, but you know, fair enough.
If you don't want to know, you don't want to know.
Just don't weigh in on it and pretend you're writing these scholarly papers about Or videos about critical thinking and arguments for the viruses, because you just don't know.
▲
Export Selection