Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 14, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:36

The Raw Deal (13 May 2024) with Keith Rodgers and special guest James Roguski

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody.
	Help!
	You know I need someone.
	Help!
	When I was younger, so much younger than today.
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	But now these days are gone and I'm not so self-assure.
	Now I find the gentleman and open up the doors.
	Help me, you can't have feelings.
	And I do appreciate you being around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, right here on Revolution Radio Studio B, this 13th day of May, 2020.
	We have a return engagement from James Roguski, who is going to talk about Democratic oaths.
	There are all kinds of medical issues involved here today.
	We'll turn to that after the opening review of some of the latest news.
	The Russian northern offensive begins.
	We have, of course, tremendous evidence that the Ukrainian lines are collapsing, that the war is basically won.
	Nevertheless, and I find this rather startling, UK Daily Mail reports Putin fires his bungling defense minister and parachutes and Kremlin puppet with zero military experience in sign Russia's hardline president wants to take personal charge of the Ukraine wharf.
	Vladimir Putin has fired his bungling defense minister and replaced him with a puppet with zero military experience and a wide-ranging reshuffle of his most senior cronies.
	Putin sacked his longtime friend, Sergey Sogut, 68, and instead shifted him into the role of secretary of Russia's National Security Council.
	Reports say he has proposed little-known civilian economist Andrei Milusov, 65, to replace Sholgu as defense minister in his new government.
	Kremlin press spokesman Dmitry Peskov explained the timing of the decision, said it needed the defense ministry to stay innovative and better utilize defense expenditures to win in Ukraine.
	Your move appears to be an astonishing snub to Sholgu, the man Putin put in charge of his war-close ally and Russia's longest-serving minister.
	Until now, Putin had stood by Sholgu despite a string of military setbacks in the first year of the campaign in his public feud with Wagner mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin, who launched a bloody insurrection last year calling for Sholgu's removal.
	The reshovel is the most significant Putin has undertaken since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine beginning in February 2022.
	Lest there be no misunderstanding, it was really a defensive action, a special military operation to protect the people of the Donbass, who are Russian-speaking, Russian-friendly, ethnic Russians overwhelmingly,
	Who had been subjected to constant artillery barrage by Kiev since the coup of 2014, engineered by Victoria Nuland, using 5 billion of your and my taxpayer dollars to remove the Russia-friendly president and install a Western puppet of whom Zelensky is the latest incarnation, a complete stooge.
	Meanwhile, in Gaza, Scott Ritter has unveiled Israel's Rava offensive as a strategic blunder with dire consequences.
	Let's check out.
	The actual military strength organization and disposition of not just Hamas, but the other resistance forces operating in Gaza are sensitive to that operation, and they don't Say yes, this is how many losses we've had.
	Yes, this is what we've done.
	They keep it, you know, secret for strength organization and disposition of not just Hamas, but the other resistance forces operating in Gaza are, you know, are sensitive to that operation.
	And they don't, you know, they don't Say, yes, this is how many losses we've had.
	Yes, this is what we've done.
	They keep it, you know, secret for a reason to keep the Israelis guessing this is guerrilla warfare.
	This is unconventional resistance.
	And so you don't want to give the Israelis any indicator on whether or not their operations are being successful or not.
	The reality on the ground is that the Israeli operations have not Um, in any meaningful fashion.
	Um, you know what Israel, what, what, what goes into a, uh, an Israeli assessment that they have, um, destroyed a battalion is, uh, I think more reflective of conventional linear analysis than the kind of more abstract analysis that you would have to do with dealing with a resistance movement that is designed, uh, to operate independent of central authority.
	underground, designed to hide itself from the enemy and only appear when necessary to carry out a strike against the enemy.
	So, you know, if Israel bases their understanding of Hamas and resistance, resistance capabilities on a peacetime understanding of above ground structures, then they're missing the point because Hamas was never meant to survive above then they're missing the point because Hamas was never meant to And in a war that involved Israeli troops moving into Gaza, Hamas would always go underground.
	And I think you have to evaluate Hamas from the underground potential because that's where their combat potential lies.
	The United States intelligence estimates, at the same time Israel came in with their own assessment, the United States said they believe that only 35 percent of Hamas's combat capability had been eliminated.
	The Thank you.
	The Al Qasim Brigades, discussing with Hezbollah about whether or not Hezbollah needed to intervene, gave Nasrallah a different assessment.
	They said only 10%.
	And that was not a statement made for public consumption.
	It was a statement made from one resistance organization to another.
	That may have been overly optimistic on the part of Hamas, but I think the truth lies somewhere in between.
	That Hamas has lost more than 10% and less than 35% of its combat potential.
	This means that the Israelis are dead wrong about their assessment of Rafah.
	And we know this because we know that when Israel withdrew from northern Gaza, Hamas re-emerged.
	When they withdrew from Khan Yunus in the central part of Gaza, Hamas re-emerged.
	You know, what exists in Rafah, So he pronounces it Rafa, because I have been calling it Rafa.
	of Hamas as an above the ground organization.
	And the reality is Hamas will go underground in Rafah and will continue to resist. - Sorry, that's Rafah, because I have been calling it Rafah.
	We have another article about Israel's brazen and reckless invasion of Rafah from the listening post. - I'm taking care of myself.
	We gotta skip the commercial, of course.
	Al Jazeera gets shut down in Israel just as Israeli forces move into Rafah.
	Is Italy's Prime Minister, Giorgia Maloney, out to turn state-owned television into state-controlled television?
	And halfway through India's six-week-long election process, we examine the narratives both in the mainstream media and on the social side.
	This past week offered a brief moment of hope for the approximately 1.5 million Palestinians trapped in Rafah, supposedly the last safe space for civilians in Gaza.
	Hamas had accepted the terms of a ceasefire agreement.
	It looked like lives would be saved.
	But on Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the proposal fell short of Israel's key demands, and now an assault on Rafah is underway.
	Coinciding with all of this has been the closure of Al Jazeera's news operation in Israel.
	Our news coverage, TV broadcasts, and website are all blocked there.
	That measure may shield Israelis, at least temporarily, from the horrors that are being inflicted on Rafa, but it will not stop this network from covering the story.
	What it does signal to the world though, and the Netanyahu government's allies abroad, is that Israel's so-called democracy is not what it's cracked up to be.
	I think we can all agree with that.
	It's not a democracy at all.
	It's a Jewish state, an apartheid state.
	What's taking place here is grotesque.
	Meanwhile, an Israeli envoy, and this is just one more example of how Israel is seeking to dictate and manipulate the United States, says the U.S.
	must cut U.N.
	funding if Palestinian statehood is endorsed.
	I mean, this is so obnoxious and insulting.
	Ambassador to the U.N.
	Gilad Erdogan, Says a draft General Assembly resolution recognizing the Palestinians as qualified to become a full U.N.
	member goes against the founding U.N.
	Charter and would give the Palestinians a de facto status and rights of a state.
	If it is approved, I expect the United States to completely stop funding the U.N.
	and its institutions in accordance with American law, Erdogan says, noting that adoption by the General Assembly would not change anything on the ground.
	Under U.S.
	law, Washington cannot fund any U.N.
	organization grants full membership to any group that does not have the internationally recognized attributes of statehood.
	U.S.
	halted funding in 2011 for the U.N.
	cultural agency UNESCO after the Palestinians became a full member.
	I find it ironic that the Israeli ambassador would be talking about law when Israel is grossly violating the law here.
	Again and again and again, international law, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter by slaughtering the Palestinians.
	Meanwhile, we have a Holocaust remembrance ceremony being exploited to fuel anti-Semitic moral panic.
	Glenn Grunewald.
	So one of the things we have been trying to emphasize is that so many of these recent abridgements of free speech and civil liberties is accompanied by a fear-mongering campaign trying to institute a moral panic in the United States, which is based on the idea that there is now a minority group in the United States that is in grave danger.
	That has no safety any longer in the United States, that is vulnerable to all kinds of attacks, namely American Jews.
	Now, this narrative of minority groups being endangered by systemic bigotry in the United States, by unsafe rhetoric that's inciting violence against them, by the desire of people to attack black people or trans people, is one that has provoked a scorn of almost everybody on the right when offered by literally any other group.
	And now suddenly that same narrative that has received so much contempt from so many people on the American right virtually everybody is being offered but this time in defense of a minority group that a lot of people on the American right feel an empathy toward or a connection to and now suddenly all of this victimhood narrative this safetyism narrative this need for special protections for a minority group the same script that the right has been scorning for a decade now suddenly is being accepted in almost every
	Establishment faction in Washington.
	Here was Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, who, along with Joe Biden, went to the Holocaust Remembrance Ceremony.
	And here's what he said about the alleged rise of this epidemic of anti-Semitism in the United States.
	Students were suddenly expelled, where these like those at Stroudsburg were at the heart of Renaissance and intellectual life. where these like those at Stroudsburg were at the heart Yeah.
	But it was at those same elite centers of learning where Jewish faculty and students were suddenly expelled, where anti-Jewish courses were introduced.
	Do you understand what Mike Johnson is saying here?
	It's so offensive when you think about it, both in terms of its intellectual dishonesty, but also its moral offense.
	He's speaking at a Holocaust memorial ceremony, and he's talking about the Nazi attack on Jewish students and Jewish professors, and he's trying to equate that to what's taking place in the United States today.
	There are no Jewish students being expelled.
	There are no Jewish members of the faculty being expelled.
	There are no Jewish students being violently attacked.
	In fact, he cites one example, which you're about to hear, that is a complete hoax.
	And the fact that the only example he can cite of supposedly having Jewish students attacked violently on American campuses is a hoax, that that's the only example he has, just proves the entire narrative that both he and, as you'll see, Joe Biden are both trying to push.
	But to equate what's happening on American campuses, where American students are exercising their first and only right to protest against their own government and the Israeli government's war policies, and trying to tell American Jews that they face a second Holocaust in the United States, and therefore the government has to step in with all these special protections and abridgments of free speech, is obnoxious and dangerous and deceitful.
	I couldn't agree more.
	And of course, for those who have studied the case, if you've done the research, you're either a Holocaust denier or a big fat liar.
	Here, I give you two links.
	The Holocaust narrative politics from science on the government rank, which is a short take.
	Much longer of video you see all the evidence for yourselves the official World War Two narrative historical factor mass illusion on my website at jameshfetzer.org.
	Remember according to the International Red Cross which is keeping copious records of the.
	Age, the sex, the ethnicity, the religion, cause of death of all the inmates.
	In 1993, they recalibrated the total and discovered, all together, all camps, 296,081 had died.
	Notice how far removed that is from 6 million.
	296,081 from all causes combined.
	Notice how far removed that is from 6 million.
	296,081 from all causes combined, none, none, not one of whom was put to death in a gas chamber.
	Indeed, Fred Lochter, the leading experts on gas chambers, visited the camps, came back and made a report at the trial of Ertz Zondel in 1911.
	There was nothing there that could remotely observe the function of a gas chamber.
	One would have thought a myth was dead at that point in time that it had a stake driven through its heart.
	But no, the Zionists are going to repeat and manifest the lie again and again and again, because Jewish political power is rooted in a Western sense of guilt over the Holocaust.
	So if people discover it's a big lie, they fear they're going to lose out on their political power.
	They're not going to be able to manipulate.
	Meanwhile, the Electronic Nevada reports Student Intifada sweeped U.S.
	campuses.
	I've been very heartened by this development, and the students are doing commendably.
	Here we have a report about it.
	Hello and welcome back to the Electronic Intifada podcast.
	I'm Nora Barrows-Friedman.
	Across the U.S.
	and around the world, students and faculty have been engaging in a wave of protests, demonstrations, and encampments on their campuses To demand that their institutions divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid and genocide, and they've been met with nothing but violent repression from police and smears from corporate media, pro-genocide lawmakers, and Zionist groups.
	Let's get right into it.
	Joining me to talk about all of this is Bryce Green, a student at the University of Indiana and a writer with fairness and accuracy in reporting.
	He was on the Electronic Intifada livestream about a month ago.
	Welcome back, Bryce.
	We're also joined by Bikram Gill, an assistant professor of political science at Virginia Tech.
	Both Bryce and Bikram were arrested on their respective campuses for protesting against the genocide.
	We're also joined by Sharif I, an organizer and filmmaker with Columbia University Apartheid Divest.
	Jake E., a member of Students for Justice in Palestine at CSU Los Angeles.
	And Samuel Ahmed, a member of Stewards for Justice in Palestine at UCLA.
	Thank you all for being with us today on the Electronic Intifada podcast.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you.
	Good to be here.
	Thank you.
	I want to begin with the students in L.A.
	and at Columbia to talk about what happened in the past few days at your encampments.
	Samuel, you're at UCLA.
	Let's start with you.
	Can you tell us about the attack, first by Zionist thugs on Tuesday night, and then the brutal use of force by the LAPD after that to clear the encampment?
	What happened over the last few days?
	Oh, okay.
	Sorry, I couldn't find the unmute button.
	It's okay.
	Yeah, honestly, as much as the Zionist attacks and the police response was abhorrent, I can't say that we were all surprised inside the encampment.
	Starting from Thursday morning when we set our camp up all the way until the final escalation, we have just seen an unprecedented amount of harassment.
	We were called names.
	I personally was called a couple slurs.
	Many in the camp report the same by these Zionist agitators, aggressors, whatever you'd like to call them.
	And we saw that as the UCLA administration refused to police them in any way, they grew bolder and bolder.
	Over Friday night, we had music blasting all night and loudspeakers.
	Saturday night, we had an amount of Zionist protestors that we'd never seen before, just taunting us and rushing our barricades and playing music until maybe 5 or 6 a.m.
	And then that was quickly followed by a need to expand in order to keep our encampment safe.
	And then following into Sunday with the largest Zionist rally we saw, Let me just add, I mean, there's no University of Indiana.
	There's Indiana University.
	I earned my PhD there.
	UCLA means a lot to me because both my parents graduated from UCLA, but the fact of the matter is it's the protesters who have been brutalized.
	Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, came out and said the Jewish students are in trouble, and the best he can do is a fake case of harassment of a single Jewish student.
	Glenn Greenwald is all over this.
	He's making the key points.
	Turns out Mike Johnson was a calamitously bad choice for Speaker of the House of Representatives.
	He has betrayed the American people again and again and again.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	Something else I find disgusting.
	Donald Trump slams Biden for halting bomb deliveries to Israel and siding with Hamas.
	Listen to this.
	Former President Trump is criticizing President Biden's decision to halt the delivery of bombs to Israel, which of course are being used to slaughter the Palestinians, accusing him of taking the side of Hamas terrorists.
	Remember, the terrorists, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
	I call the IDF terrorists.
	Hamas are freedom fighters.
	Trump claimed that delaying weapons shipments was a victory for Hamas, who had previously attacked Israel.
	That, remember, was a false flag allowed to happen at the least.
	There's a tremendous amount of evidence about it.
	Trump further accused Biden of siding with terrorists and questioned the safety of the American hostage and being held by Hamas.
	Biden had warned Israeli PM Netanyahu against launching the evacuative in Rafah, Region where a boss is believed to be located this morning reflects a growing division between Biden and Netanyahu as a Biden admin expresses concerned about the potential for increased tension and bloodshed.
	Well, I think actually, I'm responding to the tremendous outpouring of opposition right here in the United States.
	That no decent human being, American or otherwise, could possibly support the ongoing genocide taking place in Gaza and the very idea that Donald Trump would go on Hannity and say, you know, criticize the protesters.
	And say that they have to finish the job of slaughtering the Palestinians.
	They have to finish a job, but they have to do it quickly.
	In other words, Trump only complained about the slaughter of the Palestinians as Israel isn't killing them fast enough.
	Unbelievable.
	Now, by virtue of our discussion of the Democratic vote today with my special returning guest, James Rooksgate.
	I want to mention several medical stories here.
	Get this.
	Will you be surprised?
	Pfizer internal email showing employees received a separate COVID vax.
	Have you ever wondered why you never hear about Pfizer employee being injured by the mRNA COVID shots?
	They should be dropping like professional soccer players since a company vaccinated its entire workforce, but they're not.
	And there's a reason for it.
	A whistleblower has leaked an internal mail from Pfizer dated January 2021.
	And guess what?
	None of Pfizer's employees were given the same Russian roulette death shots as the general public.
	They got a special, separate vaccine.
	If you think back to 2021, there was a shocking incident when Vice CEO Albert Bourla was invited to Israel to meet with government officials.
	No one could travel in or out of Israel without proof of vaccination.
	Roy Shemesh admitted he was unvaccinated.
	The guy trying to get every government around the world to mandate his safe and effective product hadn't even taken the shot himself.
	Now we're learning that even when Pfizer employees did get vaccinated, they didn't receive the same shots as everybody else.
	Gee, are you surprised?
	Meanwhile, America's preparation for mass bird flu vaccination.
	It looks like we're going to have an instant replay.
	It's going to be deja vu all over again.
	And Peter McCullough, outstanding American Great Whistleblower Observes.
	Please enjoy the highly graphic review with iconic news anchor Lou Dobbs of recent developments concerning highly pathogenic avian influenza, H5N1 bird flu, and the one man who contracted conjunctivitis in West Texas and drew attention to a jump of the virus from animals to humans.
	About which many of us remain skeptical.
	The government response to bird flu appears to be threefold.
	We'll be right back with our special guest, and Keith Rogers here, too.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio.
	Hey, everyone.
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, the Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern. 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, let's start with Keith's.
	Some comments on the stories I've introduced today.
	Hey Keith, your thoughts. - Get me unmuted here.
	I think there's more going on at play here than what most people think.
	Number one, hello to James there.
	It seems like BB, I'm not sure what he's up to because he's made some Really relative statements here recently that should really made a lot of people mad.
	And that being the fact that he, uh, he's referenced the fact that no one helped him, uh, the Jews out, uh, during the, uh, the, uh, camps.
	Uh, and of course that, that there's just a flat bogus lie, you know, uh, uh, I'm not sure why he would have said that or anything like that, but, uh, The, uh, the fact is, is that so many of the, uh, you have to think about the, uh, the amount of people, uh, you know, like the, the storming of the beaches of Normandy and stuff.
	He's on the air, but anyway, uh, with the storming of the beaches of Normandy, the amount of law, the amount of lives lost, uh, from the allied forces.
	And he's always trying to make it sound like, uh, this constant victim hood.
	And that is raised, especially among the veterans.
	I've been noticing some comments on a telegram from people that had family members served during World War II.
	And then on top of that, with the double whammy there, is that the United States, on behalf of Israel, is also fighting a secondary war in Ukraine, which is actually back in the very Nazis at Their relatives fought to destroy during World War Two.
	And I'm not sure why Bibi is sitting there trying to sabotage relationships out of some kind of a guilt thing and then telling everyone that Israel is going to have to go it alone.
	And then, of course, the lies from the White House that they're not going to be supplying this or they're not going to be supplying that.
	But in fact, they still are that Blinken just announced another 200 million dollars in aid for Israel.
	I mean, The list goes on and on about what's, uh, it's, it's like total carnage.
	And no one seems to care because apparently right now, you know, as long as it's not your child dying or your loved one, uh, no one really gives a rat there.
	And then, uh, I'm not sure if you read your email earlier, but it seems like, uh, BRICS have announced this morning that Iran has obtained a nuclear weapon now.
	Very good, very good.
	I'm very pleased to hear that, Keith.
	Very pleased.
	I've been advocating that for so long, to bring about a situation of mutually assured destruction.
	Israel is a very small country.
	Iran is a very large one.
	Iran could withstand multiple nuclear strikes and still survive.
	Israel could be wiped out by one or two.
	Really fascinating.
	I'm so glad you mentioned that, Keith.
	I believe, by the way, the war in Ukraine is being fought so fiercely because the Jews are convinced they're going to lose Israel and they want to have Ukraine to be their new homeland.
	I think that, you know, we have multiple indications, including even Zelensky declaring he wants Ukraine to be the new Israel.
	I think that has been the agenda for some time.
	And why, in spite of the fact of taking massive losses They show no signs of abandoning the fight not withstanding russia victory one after another after another.
	James please join give us your thoughts about those stories and then we'll turn to that for example fives are giving it so many boys a different shot because i knew how deadly was their own product james.
	Well, I'm going to take the proverbial 30,000, you know, elevation view, 30,000 foot elevation view of this whole picture.
	And it's similar in a sense to what's going on with the WHO, and it's similar to what we deal with, you know, throughout everything.
	When you get down into the weeds of all of the details, what you find is it's designed To pit one side against the other and have the masses of people choose one or the other side.
	Well, what we're choosing between is evil on one side and evil on the other.
	We're not choosing between good and evil.
	We're not even allowed to see that choice.
	The Minsk Accords could have put an end to the Ukrainian-Russian conflict years ago.
	If the United States is so powerful If we wanted to, we could stop these wars in a heartbeat.
	I think that we are getting what our quote unquote leaders want.
	They want to separate people from each other because ultimately that lessens our power and authority.
	And so when you look at what's going on with the WHO, it's easy to forget the bigger picture.
	Which is not, you know, oh, do we need an amendment to the regulations or do we need a treaty or should we do this, that or the other?
	That's all hiding the core question of the biggest genocide in the world ever, which is called allopathic medicine.
	The Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex kills more people on a regular basis than all of the wars ever.
	And, you know, the big picture is lost in the detail.
	You know, the devil is in the details.
	And yes, you want to understand what is going on.
	The truth has been destroyed in our society.
	Media does not present the truth.
	Alternative media, some of it tries to get at the truth, but it's buried by a bunch of earmongering and name calling and side choosing.
	OK.
	But the bigger picture, the higher truth, OK, is that all of these discussions are taking our attention away from, well, wait a minute.
	What is it that we actually want?
	None of the people in political office are listening to the people.
	They're listening to their donors and their owners.
	And so what we have is a crisis that we're being distracted from.
	We don't, we don't live in a republic that respects our rights anymore.
	And the representative democratic functions that are supposed to, you know, enable us to express our demands of our public servants, you know, they've turned into public serpents.
	They speak with forked tongue and, and, you know, they're doing what their owners tell them to do under the guise of, you know, taking this, that, or the other side.
	And we have a crisis that is existential for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is the truth and facts and evidence and reality are being hidden under an onslaught of, you know, quite frankly, bullshit.
	Excuse me if I'm not allowed to say that on radio.
	My apologies.
	I've said it many, many times, James!
	Not a problem.
	Keith, go right ahead.
	Keith.
	Yeah, if you guys wouldn't mind here, I'm not sure how long your break is, but my comment finally got approved over there on Larry Johnson's page.
	And if you guys wouldn't mind, I'd like to read my comment to you to see the aspects of how I see it.
	Go ahead.
	All right.
	So we'll start.
	This is over on Sonar 21 there, and this is in comment to another interview.
	Just read it, Keith.
	Yeah, well, I just want to give a preface to it.
	But anyway, this is the fact that Larry Johnson just had another interview there and he made a few statements here.
	But so my comment here starts out with Pepe Escobar has recently been saying here that the BRICS members may have to make a new version of what is called the UN.
	The League of Nations failed, and it seems more and more that the UN here is compromised because whenever it comes down to a vote, The way the veto thing like that that works is always is destroyed by the United States and some outline islands that no one's ever heard of, you know, but anyway.
	But we have a through time here.
	These are headlines at the U.S.
	spied on the UN Secretary General.
	And of course, the U.S.
	spied on the World War Two allies.
	NSA shares brought it raw intelligence.
	Including America's data with Israel.
	Israel accused of planting mysterious spy devices near the White House.
	And of course, whenever you hear that, Americans are supposed to be worried about some spy balloon from China.
	But no one seems to care what Israel is doing in this country.
	That's almost like saying something about the USS Liberty like that.
	The UN was built on the grounds of an old slaughterhouse.
	This is, that's no joke there.
	It so sounds fitting there because of the fact that the League of Nations under Wilson there, that the UN failed to unite anyone unless it's a power grab for alleged climate change and that crap of Agenda 21 to sustainable development.
	And that's where Jeffrey Sachs is known for his things as well as a butcher of Russia.
	Anyway, the crux is that Israel can do what they want and wish with the United States government covering their crimes all the time.
	And then you had, again, like I mentioned that about the spy balloon, but what's important, though, is who's controlling the U.S., Israel, and the U.N.?
	Could it be those mother weffers at Brussels?
	Because it's bad enough that on X, formerly Twitter, that say I send a post out there, that I get a comment back from Twitter saying that while my post didn't violate U.S.
	laws or their platform, Germany Well, it's because it's on the Internet and the Internet is international.
	And if you were to question the Holocaust, for example, there are German laws against challenging the Holocaust.
	Not that I got the impression you were doing that in this instance.
	Right.
	But, you know, it's really better just to adapt your thoughts to our conversation here, Keith, because what you're sharing with us from your comments on the Johnson site really don't quite fit.
	I mean, I'm sure they were totally appropriate to that context, but I just like having your thoughts.
	I mean, even if you're adapting what you wrote there.
	Yeah, the important thing is how BB can sit there and issue a decree from Israel and instantly you have the entire New York Police Department and other police departments cracking down on the free speech here.
	This is the same thing from the WEF.
	It's all through Australia, everything, and they're using hate crimes.
	As portions of this, like the, there's been three or four stabbings down there in Australia.
	And now they're saying that people are getting radicalized through the internet.
	And that article though, that I thought was important here where it says enough for a minion and says, uh, it's a Jewish who's who of the cabinet to be, uh, Mike, uh, not Mike, uh, uh, EMJ, uh, E. Michael Jones was corrected there because a minion is 12.
	And it was research there that actually in the Biden administration, there's 457 Jews within his administration.
	So when anyone talks about how Biden, he can't walk, talk, climb stairs, ride a bike, he's not in control of anything.
	It's who's behind the scenes.
	And, you know, and that's what gets.
	Yeah, I think we would all agree with that.
	You know, it virtually doesn't require assertion, but go ahead, Gabe, finish it off.
	OK, and then the last one here, again, is for this.
	I mean, I'm not reading anything that's my own thought.
	These are actual news items.
	The Jews are the ones behind the Russian invasion of the Ukraine, and their goal is to create a new Jewish state to replace a failing Zionist project in Israel.
	The only thing I see that's bad about this whole thing is The American taxpayers are getting hit with this for funding not only the Ukraine war, not only the Israel war, but also the 37 million immigrants that have come from these war-torn areas that started right after 9-11 there when they went into Afghanistan, then Iraq, and then we've had Libya, Syria, and all this.
	Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people dead and everything like that, you know?
	And we, the taxpayers, are having to pay for this.
	If people don't see what's going on right now with the way that the U.S.
	economy is just right on the edge of teetering out a tank like that.
	I recall growing up there, sitting on my grandfather's lap there and listening to my great uncle talk about how they used to eat canned dog food for food to survive during the Great Depression.
	What's coming is going to rival, and I think this is where You've heard the saying where the CIA, what, about two years ago said that there's going to be a civil war and stuff.
	I think this is why also you see that all these governments, and you can Google this, all these governments are building up their defense around all of their institutions.
	The White House is putting up gates.
	Over in Germany, they're putting moats in and stuff, you know.
	They know something's coming.
	And you can imagine when whatever's left of those haven't got jabbed like that, when they When the entire thing cracks, and then we're seeing the hegemony of the US being challenged, and it's almost, Jim, like it's done on purpose that they're going to destroy this economy, build up China and stuff, because now China today is posting massive GDP gains.
	They can't stop Russia.
	It's like they're almost destroying this economy on purpose.
	I think they are.
	I think they are destroying it on purpose.
	Give us your thoughts, James, and I want to return to Pfizer and the Hippocratic Oath and all that because it's shocking to me how it seems the medical industry here was bought and paid for to promote the vax in spite of the fact that it's so lethal.
	Even Pfizer wouldn't give its own employees the vax.
	It was promoting a safe and helpful worldwide.
	Your thoughts, James.
	Well, you know, if at this point, after four and a half years of this blatant, blatant fraud, if people still cannot smell something fishy, they maybe never will.
	So one of the reasons that, you know, you had me back was we were talking about the classic Hippocratic Oath versus the revised Hippocratic Oath.
	So let me see if I can wrap this up in about five minutes.
	Centuries ago, the Hippocratic Oath was put forth, you know, for doctors to give, you know, upon entering into working in that profession.
	So, this is all from a website that is doctors.practo.com.
	That's DOCTORS, D-O-C-T-O-R-S dot P-R-A-C-T-O dot com.
	As a general rule, I don't talk about stuff unless I reference a source.
	James, is that like an alumni or something like that of a bunch of doctors together?
	You know, I'm not sure what the website backing is, but this is what I'm about to quote.
	OK, so some excerpts from the classic Hippocratic Oath.
	With regard to healing the sick, they have to realize this is hundreds, you know, centuries ago, there were no pharmaceutical drugs.
	With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet according to my judgment and means.
	And I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage.
	This is not about pharmaceutical prescription.
	I'll keep going.
	Nor shall any man's entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone.
	Neither will I counsel any man to do so.
	Well, if you go to the pharmacy, everything you buy there technically is a poison.
	That's why they have it under lock and key, and you have to get permission from your doctor to take any of those poisons or get them injected.
	And lastly, moreover, I will give no sort of medicine to any pregnant woman with a view to destroy the child.
	Now, just look at those three comments or excerpts from the classic Hippocratic Oath and ask yourself, does that align with what your doctor currently does?
	No.
	Okay, simple answer.
	Let me move on to the revised Hippocratic Oath.
	It was rewritten in 1964.
	This is one of the reasons why it sticks in my head.
	According to this website, that was done by Dr. Lewis Lasagna.
	He was the academic dean at Tufts University of Medicine.
	And one of the things that just really jumped out at me is it said, most especially, now this is in the revised Hippocratic Oath written by Dr. Lewis Lasagna in 1964.
	Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death.
	If it is given me to save a life, all thanks.
	But it may also be within my power to take a life.
	Hold on.
	What are we talking about here?
	Now, what any medical student may take an oath, you know, declare some kind of an oath today.
	It has been rewritten and rewritten and rewritten.
	So there is not a Hippocratic Oath.
	There are any one of a number.
	Pick, you know, pick a number out of the sky.
	Did your doctor ever swear such an oath?
	Are they living up to that oath?
	Well, there are some words in here.
	I'll keep going.
	This is the, you know, the doctor would be proclaiming these oaths.
	I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science.
	And that warmth, sympathy and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.
	You get that warmth, sympathy and understanding from your interactions with the medical, you know, the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex.
	I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.
	You know, taking tests and having scans done to tell you that, you know, you have some native disease based on the number, that's not the same as prevention.
	In the original, you know, in the original Democratic oath, I will devise an order for them the best diet And I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage.
	So if you reference the Hippocratic Oath, number one, you have to say, well, which one are you talking about?
	Because different med schools in different times have, you know, had their students claim some kind of an oath.
	Maybe they took it, maybe they didn't, and maybe whatever the oath that they took, You know, it was, is totally different than you assume it might have been.
	And I think this is really more a metaphor for how people are being lied to on a daily basis.
	Whatever it is you think you know about what's going on in Israel and Gaza, whatever it is you think you know about what's going on in Ukraine with Russia, whatever you think you know is going on with the WHO and the International health regulations and the proposed pandemic treaty.
	I can almost guarantee you that it's very, very far from the actual complete truth.
	And what we need as a society is for everyone to start exercising their powers of discernment.
	Now, I'm not criticizing you gentlemen.
	I think you're doing everything you possibly can to try to, you know, sort through the BS that's flying around all over the place.
	And, you know, you start looking at history and you realise that, you know, history is written by the victor.
	And the other side of the story might be closer to the truth.
	And when you're basing actions today on fallacies, right?
	Now, the core fallacy with what's going on with the WHO is, oh, we need more pandemic related products.
	Everyone around the world should have more diagnostics, more drugs, and more jabs in order to prevent the next pandemic.
	And if we would just go out into the world and find all kinds of new pathogens, bring them into the WHO-coordinated laboratory network, and make more products from the genetic sequences that are created in these labs, that You know, having a Wuhan Institute of Virology biolab on every street corner, you know, I exaggerate a little bit, but, you know, that is how you're going to prevent the next problem.
	No, that's how a small group of people are going to profit by creating the fear that makes people believe that, you know, a chicken can poop on a cow and that when you milk the cow, you know, their milk is going to harm you.
	So we have to kill all of the above.
	The insanity that is going on in this world seems to know no bounds.
	You know, the devil is in the details.
	But you know, I've twisted that statement around and I say that the angels raise people's awareness of the truth.
	And so the truth is slippery.
	It's hard to find.
	It's covered up by a bunch of crap.
	But what we're dealing with is confusion and deceit that It's not for our benefit, it's to our detriment.
	And, you know, the open-ended question here is, you know, who, and I don't mean capital WHO, it's not an Abbott and Costello regime, who do you trust?
	Where do you get good information?
	How do you, you know, have your fundamental assumptions and facts embedded So that the decisions you're making are based on some kind of solid ground.
	What I see going on is a lot of hearsay.
	Oh, I heard somebody said this.
	OK, and people respond to hearsay and you know facts to Dan.
	It's designed to get everybody fighting with everybody else.
	I agree.
	Hey Jim.
	Go right ahead, yeah.
	Hey, I uploaded a file into the chat there, if you could play that.
	You know, James, I was going to tell you, I was supposed to get some injections in my hip there.
	My whole body is breaking down.
	But anyway, they're putting this mRNA technology into everything, lettuce, all this stuff, you know.
	And so I says, does it have mRNA technology in it?
	She says, well, I can check like that.
	And then she says, But what if at the time of the procedure like that, we don't have that one and we have to use another one?
	And I says, well, check the other one then too, you know?
	But anyway, this video here was just posted here yesterday and it talks about these electronic pads that you sign at the doctor's office.
	You know, could you sign this like that?
	Anyway, if Jim would want to play that, it's a really interesting thing here because actually that pad contains within it Over six pages of medical information that you sign but you don't get to see.
	Hey, we'll be right back.
	Yeah.
	Right after this break.
	Stand by. Stand by.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on Bullhorns during the Marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	Revolution Radio.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. OTT every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, Keith had asked to play this video clever.
	I got it right here.
	Let's hear what it had to say.
	How many of you have seen this before?
	You know, like when you go to your doctor's office and they say, just sign here.
	Do any of you stop and say, what am I signing for?
	I had done that in the past, and usually, oh, you're just giving a doctor consent to see you.
	And of course, I would trust them, right?
	But not anymore, because I don't use this system.
	I would have to be on my deathbed and wanted to be saved.
	But anyway, the point is, Have them print it out, read it.
	This is what happened to my girlfriend a month ago.
	She finally decided, you know what?
	I'm not signing that electrical thing anymore.
	I want to know what it says because it's a contract.
	You're putting your signature down and the fact that they need your signature means they need you to consent.
	It took them a while to print this out because it was like six pages and I guess nobody had ever asked them to print it before so they didn't know how to use the system to do that.
	But once they got it printed out and she sat and read through it, you know what was at the end of it?
	You consent for your doctor to give you So know what you're signing.
	And this is not legal advice, but when you're going through a contract, you know you can't put a line through things.
	You can draw a line right through it and say, well, I agree to all this, but I don't agree to that.
	Put a line through it and sign it if you have to.
	Now, at the end of her appointment, she didn't sign it.
	She told him that.
	I don't consent to that.
	And of course, they still want your money.
	They still want to collect the insurance.
	Payment.
	So, they saw her anyway.
	No is the most underused word in our vocabulary.
	Now, I remember when I used to be a people pleaser and it wasn't until I read the book Boundaries.
	We need boundaries, people.
	And I started practicing saying no.
	So, if you're someone who has a problem saying no, just start out small.
	A girlfriend called me up and she invited me to one of those tea light parties, you know, when that was all the fad.
	And I didn't really want to go.
	And so I wasn't being genuine if I would have told her, yeah, I'll come to your party.
	So I said, no.
	Now, mind you, I'd never said no to her before.
	And so she was taken back in shock.
	And I think her feelings were hurt, but your feelings aren't my responsibility.
	I needed to set a boundary and say no.
	So if you're somebody who has trouble saying no, just start practicing with little things.
	Be genuine to yourself.
	If you don't want to go somewhere, don't go there.
	If you don't want to do something, don't do it.
	Learn to exercise the power of no and here's a great place to start.
	Stop consenting to things when you don't know what you're consenting to.
	I think that's wonderful advice, Keith.
	That was an excellent little video clip.
	Go ahead, your comments on it.
	Yeah, the reason I wanted to play that was for one reason.
	In Australia, people that were going in to have regular surgeries Signed those pads and in that.
	While they were under, they were given the jab.
	And that's where she was referencing.
	They were given the jab without their knowledge, but because of that form that electric talk electronic signature that they had given the doctor.
	They had no legal recourse and and they developed massive blood clots.
	I mean it is just sickening there.
	So again, You've heard the stories here where these doctor's offices are paid so much to make sure that one patient is vaccinated.
	And then if they get their entire patient client list like that, all vaccinated, they get like 30 some thousand dollars bonus.
	They really don't care.
	It's a money thing anymore.
	And that's I mean, it is sickening.
	And again, what gets me mad about it is is if you ask for a referral, you only get a second opinion.
	Can can I get a referral outside Of your little dominion here of whatever, you know, the hospital firm like that and all the doctors they have all tied together like that, you know, can I get a referral outside of your network?
	They don't like to do that.
	Right, right, of course.
	That's down there.
	Robin Argent, James, go ahead, pick it up right in your ballpark, right in your ballpark.
	I'll take this to another level because.
	This is an area of just, I feel, enormous confusion, OK?
	We have unalienable rights.
	In every society, there's sort of a social contract of, you know, how that society operates.
	And there's nothing that says that you cannot hand over those rights when you're engaged in commerce.
	You know, we're talking about universal commercial code rules of engagement when you're dealing in commerce.
	When you signed up for your Facebook account or your Twitter account, you check the box.
	You didn't read it.
	Every couple of months they send you an email.
	They go, Hey, we changed our terms of service.
	Okay.
	I got one word for all of this sucker.
	Okay.
	You're doing, you're doing business.
	You're dealing with contracts and what that woman said is very important.
	You can cross out a line and say, I don't agree to this and I don't agree to that and I don't agree to the other thing.
	But when you check the box, you're actually handing over your rights and freedoms in order to receive a benefit.
	Look in the mirror.
	OK, if if you have a blog, if you have a platform, if you have a website, And somebody sends you a letter to the editor and says, hey, would you publish this on your blog?
	You're not legally obligated to publish it.
	They don't.
	It's not a freedom of speech issue.
	It's not a freedom of the press issue.
	Everyone has the freedom to buy a printing press or a digital printing press in the form of, you know, set up a website on your own server and say whatever the heck it is you want to say.
	If somebody wants to publish something in your newspaper, in your newsletter, on your blog, okay?
	If someone came up to you and said, hey, I want you to wear this t-shirt with my advertising on it.
	Well, a lot of people do that.
	They wear Nike t-shirts and Adidas t-shirts and all sorts.
	Why are you advertising for someone else?
	OK, we have to understand that what the Constitution did and what the Bill of Rights did is not the same as what you do when you engage in commerce.
	The Constitution said, hey, all of the original states, we've decided that we want to give 18 enumerated authorities to a federal government.
	And then they said, well, wait a minute, that's not good enough.
	A couple of years later, they came back.
	There were originally 17, it got whittled down to 12, and it ended up as 10 in the Bill of Rights, saying, look, we just want to make sure you can't infringe upon, the government can't infringe upon this, that and the other rights.
	But if you're dumb enough to enter into a contract where you say, Well, you know, you're giving me some benefit, and so I'll give away my rights in return for that benefit.
	Nobody can stop you.
	And so don't come crying to anybody other than the man in the mirror when that business deal goes bad.
	Now, this is something that a lot of people just simply refuse to comprehend.
	If you're engaged with operating, you know, with your city government, Right.
	And you've got a business deal going with them where they pick up your trash and they deliver water and, you know, they have sewage, you know, to remove the waste from your building and you pay taxes.
	That's a business deal with a real estate corporation.
	That's not government.
	You're just doing business with a fancy real estate company.
	Understand that when you're doing business, look at marriage.
	OK, marriage has been turned into a business deal.
	Right.
	You give up certain rights and freedoms in regard for various benefits.
	And when the government sticks their nose into the middle of it and turns it into, you know, a legal contract with the government, you know, did you sign away control of your children as part of that business arrangement?
	You're totally free to do that if you want to.
	But why would you be so blind and ignorant of the contract that you're signing?
	What does it actually mean?
	Very simple rule.
	You should only sign contracts that you've written.
	Maybe you'll understand the ones you wrote.
	When you're looking at someone else's attempt to get you to sign a contract, do you know what they mean by the words that are in that contract?
	What's going on with the WHO?
	I'll give you one example.
	If I say the word suspect, it's going to call to mind a certain idea in your head.
	Well, in the International Health Regulations from 2005, the word suspect means someone who was in the vicinity of some contaminant or contagion.
	Does it mean you're sick?
	Does it mean you're a danger to anybody else?
	You're a suspect and you can be on quarantine.
	So you have to know what the words in these contracts mean.
	And so that video, I'm glad you brought the video up because that is so important on such a deeper, you know, both deeper and higher level, depending upon how you want to look at it.
	You have the right to sign away your rights, but they're unalienable, which means if you wake up and you go, wait a minute, what did I do?
	Then you can, you know, say, hey, no, you know, I'm recalling my unalienable rights and freedoms.
	I signed that under, you know, fraudulent circumstances.
	I want out of that contract.
	I don't want to give up those rights anymore.
	They're mine.
	And this is an enormous problem in today's world.
	Thank you for bringing up the issue.
	I have another one for you then.
	Go ahead.
	You go ahead.
	All right.
	I dropped another 38-second video in your thing there, but I wanted to read you a preface to this.
	We all remember when there was an alleged chicken egg problem, you know, shortage, and eggs were costing $10 and stuff like that, you know, for a dozen eggs.
	On the NIH website, it says, chicken egg yolk antibodies, the IGYS, block the binding of multiple SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants to the human ACE2 receptor.
	And on that, it says the abstract is the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still spreading worldwide and there's an urgent need to effectively prevent and control this pandemic.
	The study evaluated the potential efficacy to the antibodies as a neutralizing agent against the SARS-CoV-2.
	We investigated this neutralizing effect of the anti-spike S1 and the SARS-CoV-2 like that.
	As well as the inhibitory effect on the binding of the coronavirus spike protein mutants to the human ACE2.
	So, if you play that cute little video there, you'll see what they put in that spike protein, which is all made, and this is a BBC report.
	Okay, let me pull it up here.
	It holds it together and it allows it to stay 100% in that structure that's present on the surface of the virus.
	The shape of the coronavirus spike protein before the virus meets our cells is what triggers the most protective antibody response.
	So Keith must make the spike protein in the lab, locking it into exactly the same shape by adding another protein that acts a bit like a clamp.
	And that protein is a tiny fragment of HIV.
	OK, so the spike protein had HIV in it.
	Now, if you do a live science says that there's a 40 percent increase in what they call autoimmune diseases.
	And this is what some can normally call long COVID, that people were getting sick after this and they stay sick and they stay sick like that, you know.
	It's because these vaccines were built to destroy your immune system.
	And of course, they don't care because in the medical industry is making tons of money.
	And Jim, you've talked about yourself, but these turbo cancers and stuff, you know, why all of a sudden in people's lives is all these turbo cancers and stuff starting up?
	Well, it's because they've destroyed your immune system.
	Jim, I think we've got about 45 minutes left on our show.
	Is that correct?
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Okay, because I might take up the whole 45 minutes with my rant.
	Go ahead.
	With what has been said here.
	So put a governor on me and butt in any time you want.
	That's what I do with Hillary Clinton.
	I spent a good 15 years managing a couple of mom and pop herb and nutrition stores.
	And in that time, you know, I did enormous amounts of research, you know, to inform myself about thousands and thousands of natural products.
	And I was the buyer who met with, you know, sales reps and science officers from all the nutrition companies that we stock.
	And, you know, I decided what went on the shelf and what didn't.
	And there's this fundamental law in the idea of injecting something in your arm to protect you from a respiratory pathogen.
	Now, if you could imagine, you know, visualize your three dimensional body.
	If you breathe something in, it goes into your nose, your nostrils, your sinuses.
	You breathe through your mouth, it's in your mouth and your throat.
	Goes down into your lungs and then you breathe it back out again.
	Now.
	I'm not a fan of, you know, inhaled vaccines because there's dangers there as well.
	But from a logical argument, I would be a bit more open minded to.
	Well, if you breathed in the air that someone who was ill just breathed out.
	Maybe you could get infected, or maybe you could train your body to identify that pathogen, or whatever it might be, and it's the mucous membranes that line that cavity inside your nose, and your sinuses, your mouth, your throat, and your lungs, that in those mucal secretions, antibodies, antibody A, right, IgA, can
	be created to entrap whatever kinds of toxins or pathogens you might be breathing in.
	When you inject something into the arm, even if it worked as they claim it might work, those antibodies would be circulating in your blood.
	They're not capable of entering into the space in your lungs or your sinuses or your mouth or any of the mucous membranes.
	The concept is completely and totally fraudulent.
	Now, maybe, maybe you could gauge in the conversation of, well, what if you were seeking to have a injection vaccine or a snake bite or bee venom or, you know, any other stinging issue, you know, malaria or any sort of mosquito-borne ailment.
	If the pathway into the body is via an injection, meaning, you know, a sting or a mosquito bite or something like that, I could maybe understand the concept that you want to trained the body to respond to something like that in that fashion.
	But here's where this all just absolutely goes haywire with what was in that video.
	If a cow is exposed to any form of pathogen, it will make antibodies to pass on to its baby cow, and those are transferred in the milk.
	The same exact thing happens with chickens or any bird in the eggs.
	If the bird is exposed to pathogens, its eggs would be exactly the thing that you would want to eat in order to provide the antibodies that would protect you from that very pathogen.
	Now, obviously, when you cook an egg or boiled milk, it's all gone.
	Right?
	It's denatured.
	You know, when you cook an egg, the proteins denature and it's never the same as it was.
	But there are products on the market for decades that are dried egg antibodies.
	And I have a very perfect example of a customer who came in, their dog had some sort of very strange, I don't even know if I could pronounce it right, I think it was Klebsiella infection, and they utilized these egg antibody supplements, and the dog, boom, immediately was fine.
	He was going to be put down, okay?
	And so, the lack of knowledge, I'm not a Bible scholar, but I believe somewhere in the Bible, people will die for lack of knowledge.
	Right.
	The lack of knowledge is what is preventing people from having the ability to discern the lies that we're being told on a daily basis.
	Oh, some chicken was sick, so let's kill the flock.
	Some chicken passed something on to a cow, so let's kill the herd.
	Right?
	When are they going to do that to us?
	When are they going to say, oh, well, you know, one person had this ailment, so we have to kill all the humans to stop it from spreading.
	The insanity of this, you know, idea is just evil beyond belief.
	And the problem is that the general lack of knowledge of people, of how their own bodies work, That is making it so that the vast majority of people just listen to the hearsay.
	You know, I've been watching a bunch of videos about bird flu and the WHO's response to bird flu.
	And you get to the point where you can just see the BS oozing out of these people.
	And then you have somebody, you know, like Chris Cuomo come back, you know, two years later saying, oh, yeah, right.
	You know, now I think that, well, why would anybody believe him now?
	These people were such liars in previous years that they're now coming back and trying to present a different story.
	Why do they even get the time of day in your life?
	Stop listening to these people who do nothing but lie.
	They're proven liars and yet they're still in the news.
	How is that possible other than they're just distracting you from something else?
	I agree.
	It's what I find is sad, though, is is I don't know if you've, James, you've seen yourself here, but those people that go into these pharmacies and they ask to see the, you know, the product information like that.
	And it says intentionally left blank.
	Intentional means it's premeditated then.
	And you have to think of all those people that have expired because of the pharmacists that just hand that stuff out.
	It's no different than at Nuremberg when the chief defense was used, was that I was only doing my job.
	Well, you know, the bottom line is no politician is going to be our savior.
	If you're waiting for a savior, go find a mirror and look hard into the person's eyes that you're looking back at it in the mirror.
	The only ones who are going to save us are each and every one of us by, quite frankly, paying closer attention.
	How we are being manipulated.
	And step number one, you know, is divide and conquer.
	They get us to take a side on this, that or the other issue.
	So you're always arguing with people rather than looking at it and going, what is it that we want?
	What do we want?
	Do you want to keep going to the doctor to get a prescription or, you know, some sort of test or drug or jab?
	Well, I learned decades ago that the test And you know, all of the diagnostics, the blood tests, urine tests, the MRIs, the CAT scans, the drugs and the jab are fancy, very sophisticated customer acquisition tools.
	They can trick healthy people into thinking they have a disease and then prescribe a poison either to be swallowed or injected.
	They've got a lifetime customer because that's designed to destroy your health, not improve it.
	And if you go back to the Hippocratic Oath, you know, what was it back then?
	Oh, well, fix your diet and don't do anything that causes harm.
	Well, I challenge anybody to find any pharmaceutical drug that doesn't have a list of adverse events associated with it.
	That's not random.
	That's on purpose.
	The concept is, if you come in with a symptom, They don't investigate.
	Well, what is causing your body to respond that way?
	If it was your auto mechanic, you know, he would say, Oh, the light went on on the dashboard.
	Let me hook it up to the computer and see what that light means.
	And I'll go fix the problem.
	Right?
	No, if your mechanic said, oh, I'll just take the light out of your dashboard.
	It'll never bother you again.
	That's analogous to getting your gallbladder removed.
	Oh, you got some gallbladder issues that are, you know, putting up a warning light in your body.
	Let's just remove it.
	That's butchery.
	That's absurd.
	But, you know, it's one of the only thing that is more common than gallbladder surgery.
	It's actually on the cover of the book I wrote 18 years ago.
	It's called a wallet ectomy.
	You know, it's like, how can we get money from this patient?
	I actually I actually commissioned artwork to that effect.
	You can go to your doctor is a liar dot com.
	It's just a lie that their system is designed to diagnose you.
	By naming some set of symptoms so that it aligns with an insurance reimbursement code.
	I've said for years that, you know, I was born with a terminal illness.
	I was born with James Raguski Syndrome.
	I've been managing it pretty well my entire life.
	Eventually, it's going to catch up to me.
	But for the time being, I'm doing pretty well.
	If your practitioner is treating anything other than James Fetzer Syndrome, You know, which I hear, you know, is a very dangerous disease, but you seem to be managing it pretty well so far.
	Okay.
	But if they go, Oh, you've got Alzheimer's or Parkinson's or Lou Gehrig's disease or Bell's palsy or whatever, like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	My name's James.
	If you're not treating me as an individual man, woman, or child, you're lying.
	You're lying to yourself, you're lying to the patient, and you're not going to fix the problem by picking out a code and following a protocol for somebody else to see.
	Stand by, James.
	James, we'll be right back.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	Freedom Substance dot com.
	The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m., evening.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSedge.com, the people station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	James, go ahead with your further thoughts.
	Well, you know, it's always the same thought, quite frankly.
	You know, if you're trying to solve a problem, you really have to identify the cause and make a change.
	And what I've been witnessing with my research with the WHO is the problems have been misdiagnosed.
	And so the solution that's being recommended, if you just take the big picture with what's going on with the WHO, the whole set of negotiations is predicated on a lie or a bunch of lies.
	The nation's two years ago on December 1st of 2021, if you teleport yourself back to that moment in time, many people still believe that, you know, the jabs were wonderful.
	And so the relatively poor nations were not able to get as many as they felt they should, because other countries, I'll use Canada as an example, they put in an order for 400 million jabs for 40 million people, you know, 10 for each Canadian.
	And so the poor nations called upon the WHO to start these negotiations.
	Cause they wanted equitable access to pandemic related products.
	They wanted access to more tests.
	More drugs like run death is near and more jabs.
	Now.
	If those products truly were legitimate, and if the tests worked, and the drugs helped, and the jabs actually were vaccines, you could see the logic.
	Oh, you know, the wealthy nations are hogging up all this wonderful stuff.
	But that premise is flawed, and they are unwilling to challenge that premise.
	Nobody talks about any of that in these negotiations, because that's not really what they're about.
	What they're really about is they missed out on the profit from those products.
	And so what they're arguing about is they want a transfer of intellectual property, of manufacturing know-how, and investment capital so that the wannabe oligarchs in poor nations can have money flow through financial intermediary funds, basically laundromats for money,
	To invest in the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex's infrastructure to go looking for genetic sequences that they can scare people with, turn that into products that they can get other people to pay for, and then inflict upon their own people.
	Why?
	It's not for their health.
	It's for the distribution of wealth.
	Now, if you think it's anything other than that, I think you're barking up the wrong tree and any prescription, any, you know, solution is going to be misdirected.
	And this is what we're dealing with.
	We're dealing with, I'm not saying I know everything.
	I mean, I encourage everyone to always challenge me on every single issue.
	But the point is, if you're not identifying the cause, then you're dealing with treating the symptoms, and that never makes the problem go away.
	It actually confuses the issue.
	And whether you want to apply that to Ukraine or Gaza or United Nations or WHO, or dealing with your doctor about your health, this is the problem.
	It's always the same.
	Are we actually treating the cause of the problem?
	You know, look at the financial system and central bank digital currency and the Federal Reserve.
	You know, how far do you have to go back until you get to a point where you're like, oh, wait a minute.
	When, when in your health, do you remember not having whatever problem you might be dealing with?
	Well, something from the time you were well, till you first noticed the problem, Something changed.
	Something happened.
	Was it the passage of the Federal Reserve Act?
	Was it the passage of the National Vaccine Injury Act?
	Was it the Patriot Act or the PrEP Act?
	Where did we go off the rails?
	And until you go back and repeal those horrible laws, all of this unethical, immoral behavior is technically legal.
	James, can I ask you a question?
	Oh, you just did.
	Go do another one.
	Yeah.
	Well, I don't want to break your train of thought, though.
	Oh, go for it.
	I don't want to be like a Fox news host, you know.
	Anyway, I forget what USC code it is, but the United States cannot force commerce on anyone.
	And while you're talking about this, who and stuff like that, it also says that the United States cannot enter into any treaty with any state or country.
	And yet who is privately funded?
	It's not a state nor a country.
	So how can they enter into this so-called treaty with anyone?
	And I noticed I had sent Jim a thing here on Skype here where it says that the pandemic treaty falters as talks end.
	And it talks about how.
	That's fake news, unfortunately.
	It is.
	OK, so but, you know, what gets me is like listening to Rachel Maddow or Mad Cow, as they call her, and her talk about, oh, they're 100 percent safe.
	You can't spread the whatever like that.
	These are the things that get me is how much the media is in bed with these big corporations.
	There's a new one out now.
	It says traffic noise can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease study.
	And by every 10 decibels like that, your heart disease gets worse.
	This is as bad as when they came out and they said that men, predominantly men, who spend five minutes in the shower self-pleasing themselves can lead to a stroke.
	And I was thinking, oh yeah, this is going to be great.
	But it's the same thing.
	Children playing in the sun leads to heart attack.
	And I can't think of how many times we played in the snow.
	I mean, 30 below weather, played in the snow, played in the floodwaters.
	How come we weren't dying of these so-called climate change issues and stuff?
	Everything has been built on greed and profit, and as what the World Economic Forum would say, is it's all their shareholders.
	And I do have that one video where it's how to sell a pandemic.
	And this was the one about the H1N1.
	And it was all based on you insert an issue like you might say a pathogen that might have a Omicron variant.
	And all these virologists say you never vaccinate during a pandemic because it's useless like that, you know.
	And they always used to vaccinate with what they called a live virus because it was attenuated And that way your body would get used to it.
	But you can't do that with if there's a regular massive outbreak like that, you know, it should have been done before.
	But all this stuff is being based, as you clearly define, that it's all monetary based.
	And you'll also recall that they kept lying about the amount of people getting vaccinated.
	And then you hear stories about how the United States is selling its unused vaccines, which have expired.
	down to Latin America and stuff like that, and says, well, if they're sending, you know, expired vaccines, that means no one wants them here.
	And as you just said, because of the dollar initiative, they don't want to throw those things away, even if they're expired, and they'll slap those in the arms of someone else.
	Well, I think the first question that you asked was, how could the United States enter into a treaty with the WHO?
	And the one word answer is illegitimately.
	If you go back to 1969, I don't know if I've asked you this before, Jim, but can you recall where you were and what you were doing on July 1969 when they were purportedly Landing on the moon, whether it was on the moon or in Hollywood.
	July 20th, 1969.
	Do you recall what was going on in your life?
	It's a rhetorical question.
	Okay.
	At that same moment in time, the 22nd annual World Health Assembly was meeting in Boston.
	And on the 25th, they agreed to the international health regulation.
	I'm pretty sure as a nine year old, I wasn't paying attention.
	And I'm pretty sure that nobody else is paying attention either.
	Now, that never went to the Senate for their confirmation, their consent.
	What was built into that was a process, and this is how they all operate.
	They said, well, all of the delegates who are unelected, unaccountable, unknown, agreed to the international health regulation.
	And they gave all of the nations nine months To express their sovereignty, their national sovereignty.
	And if they had wanted to reject what had been agreed upon, they had nine months to do so.
	Well, everybody was talking about the moon.
	Nobody cared about what went on in Boston and time passed.
	Nobody objected.
	So on the first day of 1971, the international health regulations were accepted as a legally binding international agreement.
	Same thing happened in 2005.
	They made a whole bunch of changes.
	A handful of nations did write in reservations.
	But did you ever see any debate about that in the Senate?
	Did they give two-thirds consent?
	No.
	It's operating in a way that I feel is illegitimate.
	In 2022, they took it one step further.
	On May 28, 2022, almost two years ago, They claimed, the World Health Organization claimed, that amendments to five articles of the regulations were amended and adopted, but they never voted.
	They just said, yeah, we agree to this.
	But there's no record of a vote.
	18 months after that, almost six months ago, Rob Bruce, who's a member of the European Parliament, wrote a letter to Tedros, along with 11 other members of the European Parliament, and said, we don't see any record of a vote ever being taken.
	Could you provide evidence that these were actually properly voted on?
	Silence.
	Rob Bruce, two months ago, actually came to Washington DC and spoke to Senator Ron Johnson's meeting and told him very clearly that, you know, the amendments that were adopted in 2022 We're never voted on and the entire room with all of the people that you might, you know, think of our advocates in this, you know, battle that we're dealing with.
	It was a collective shrug of, yeah, what are you going to do?
	You know, it's amazing how people can ignore.
	Facts and evidence and be distracted by whatever the latest clickbait might be that people want to talk.
	Was that the one with Robert Malone?
	Amongst others, yes.
	I believe Robert Malone was sitting right to the left of Senator Ron Jones.
	Well, because you remember, they asked Robert Malone, was the COVID vaccines a vaccine or a gene editor?
	And he replied, a gene editor.
	It was not a vaccine.
	Uh, you know, interesting that you should mention that I'm I'm on the verge of publishing an article.
	Just got a couple of things I've got.
	Get into it.
	A gentleman reached out to me several months ago and was looking to investigate, you know, what are the unseen unexpected?
	Farms that could come from.
	And because he was more of a engineer as opposed to a medical professional, he utilized ChatGPT and started asking ChatGPT some questions and found that all he was getting was propaganda about how safe and effective and all that sort of stuff.
	And he took a different approach.
	He said, well, let me ask about gene therapies.
	And ChatGPT was, you know, wide open.
	It's like, oh, you know, here's all the problems with gene therapies.
	And then he asked the question, well, how are, you know, mRNA jabs different than gene therapies?
	And it was like, well, you know, they're pretty much the same.
	But then if you ask about the COVID-19 quote-unquote vaccines, you get propaganda.
	Okay.
	And so, you know, if you look into the known hazard of gene therapies gone bad, looks a lot like what we're dealing with, with the COVID-19 jab.
	Have you seen the TED Talk thing on gene therapy?
	I don't believe I have.
	I'll have to check that out.
	Well, if not, Jim can give you my email address, but I've got the video on my server.
	But in it, they're discussing how gene therapy works, and they show you a litter of mice, and then the pregnancy cycle and stuff like that, and they turn a litter of mice that were white into a litter of mice that are now black, all through gene therapy.
	And this is what's bothered me because everyone knows who this Harari is and stuff, and they're constantly talking about transhumanism and stuff.
	I've always been kind of curious about this genetically modified foods, and I've commented to several people about, when you grew up, you might have known one or two people who might have sounded like they're a little queer or something like that, but today, everyone seems to be that way.
	And it's to the point where I believe, this is my thought, That if they're actually pushing a vaccine that has got HIV in it and they're running another agenda of the LGBT and suddenly everyone's turning queer or whatever.
	Uh, this was just seeing the clips on Eurovision of, uh, we're queer and we're here to stay and stuff.
	I've heard that same years ago, like that, you know, I guess you were born in 1960 also.
	Yeah, so was I. We were talking about the Hippocratic Oath.
	One of the lines in the Hippocratic Oath, I'm just going to quote it, above all, I must not play God.
	Well, what are, you know, what is our medical establishment doing other than, you know, messing with the design of, you know, people's genetics?
	And you mentioned specifically Anything that might harm or whatever hinder the pregnancy, which is exactly what that Ted Talk was talking about.
	They're changing the genetic code during pregnancy.
	You know, there are things going on of which, you know, all of us are unaware.
	It's impossible, you know, to be aware of everything.
	There's just so much.
	And that's part of the plan is the overwhelming nature of just, you know, 8 billion people putting out tons and tons of information.
	There's no way anybody can be expert on any piece of it.
	And what's, you know, what's going on with the WHO?
	They published their financials about a week ago.
	In 2023, they had over 9,000 employees and they paid them an average of $131,000 a year.
	What did they do?
	Mostly put out propaganda information and whatever it is they may be doing.
	It's taken up 30% of their budget.
	It's a enormously bloated bureaucracy.
	Well, they spent.
	I think it was 300 million, maybe a quarter of that, on actual medical product.
	Now, maybe it's good that they don't spend more, because probably most of that, they didn't define it, was, you know, putting jabs into little babies in Africa.
	And so, what is it that they're doing, other than feeding the bureaucracy that feeds the bureaucracy?
	They want to be in position to control the contracts So if you throw seed money at something and it attracts other investment, you know, a couple of billion dollars can turn into hundreds of billions, if not trillions, if you're pointing it in the wrong direction.
	Well, 80% of their money is earmarked.
	It's donated.
	And the donors say, well, we want you to spend it on this.
	And it's a money laundering operation that is building up a corrupt cartel to drive the pharmaceutical model.
	They're not doing the things that maybe they originally started doing.
	Originally, it came out of the sanitary regulation, where if you go back to, you know, after the Civil War and before the First World War, and you think about, well, how are people living?
	Right?
	Well, just think about the fact that pathogens often find their way into excrement.
	Well, people weren't driving cars, they were riding horses.
	So there's horse excrement everywhere.
	People didn't have necessarily indoor plumbing and sewage and septic systems, and in various places that excrement would just wash down into the river or into the water table.
	And you know, if you're pooping right next to the well where you pull water from, you're likely to be able to transmit disease.
	It's not the jams that stop that.
	It's, it's sanitation.
	Yeah.
	That reminds me of something that you'd said there, because I noticed when they were putting this scare out in India, that so many people were dropping dead from COVID and it had pictures of bodies floating down the river.
	I forget the name of the river there, but I started looking that up prior to that.
	Well, that some people are sorry.
	So many people are actually poor.
	That they actually release their bodies of their loved ones into the river.
	So they're, they're always mixing thing.
	And I think one thing to really realize here is that's why so many jobs are cell related, because you don't know what's going up on the top like that.
	You're just part of the working members down below, kind of like when those maze type things, you know, You're doing your specific job, whether it's promotion or whatever like that, and you don't know what the finished product is, you know, that's way at the top of the cell.
	And I think that's, and I think that might in a way relieve the conscience of some people to where they say, I didn't know what was going on.
	Uh, I didn't know they were doing this.
	Uh, it's, it's, it's almost like the Pentagon when you read these things about so many of the Pentagon, the guys were watching the child porn.
	Well, it's because they're in their cells.
	their own little private domain, and they could type away on their computer and get away with it like that.
	But I do.
	It's just like all these networks.
	When you hear that famous line that this is a threat to our democracy, every single news station says it like that.
	All the politicians say it.
	It's a threat to our democracy.
	And they keep saying, we don't have a democracy.
	The thing you said a moment ago triggered a couple of bad jokes that I'm going to share with you.
	So my apologies in advance.
	I worked for 15 years as the carpenter renovating old homes in New England, and so I've worked with plenty of tradesmen, you know, plumbers, electricians, and so forth, and I learned the two, well actually the three fundamental rules of plumbing, okay?
	Number one, paydays on Friday.
	Number two is crap flows downhill because they make it at the top.
	And the third one is don't bite your nail.
	That tells you a lot.
	You know, it really comes back down to I really believe that average people are able to see through the stories on the mainstream media.
	The more people are educated, the more, uh, you know, I, I was watching somebody, um, introduce someone on a symposium and they said, Oh, you, you've got more degrees than a thermometer.
	Right.
	And so a lot of the people who, you know, have all of these degrees, some of them can be very wise and insightful, but a lot of them are actually just indoctrinated and they can't step back and see.
	That their theoretical ideas don't work in practice.
	OK, you know if you're a plumber, the pipes either flow or they back up.
	You know the water either gets delivered or it doesn't.
	You either done your job or you haven't, right?
	You flip the switch, the lights go on, it works.
	You know it's all good.
	The conceptual theoretical view of oh, We're dealing with a virus that we can't see, and an injection that is going to alter something to do in your cellular structure to make your body attack itself, and that's a solution to this problem?
	When you look at, theoretically, yeah, okay, fine, it's a nice story, but the moment you put it into practice, you have to lie about the results of the study in order to continue to convince people That your theory actually worked?
	The scientific method is never based on consensus.
	The scientific method is, okay, great, you've got a theory.
	The minute I poke one hole in your theory with one example that it didn't work, your theory's busted.
	Yeah.
	That happened before the trials were even over.
	They had to craft the trials in such a way That people who got a jab, waited 30 days, got another jab, and waited 13 days, they were still considered in the category of being unvaccinated.
	Well, that's fraud in the design of the study.
	Yeah, we're going to run out of time here, but I want to say this, James.
	I noticed this is how they work.
	Al Qaeda, ISIS, they had to pick an enemy that you couldn't see, and it was a virus.
	And Jim, have you heard about HR 7691?
	Tell us.
	Social Security is going broke, right?
	Well, now all the immigrants coming from Ukraine are being able to get Social Security here in the United States.
	Coming from Ukraine?
	Coming from Ukraine.
	It's President Biden just signed that bill.
	It's all money related.
	And of course, like say the immigrants are getting $2,200 a month.
	They are purposely destroying this country, bankrupting a trillion dollars every 90 days.
	Anyway, James, it's good talking to you.
	If you get my email from Jim, though, I've got a folder or two on my server there that just opened your eyes to a lot of stuff that I've found.
	It's like, I can't believe it.
	Plus, there's a 2009 security document from who you might be interested in.
	It's classified.
	Wonderful.
	Wonderful.
	Jim.
	Yes.
	Talk to us.
	Well, I think you've been covering a lot of territory. - Sorry.
	What do you think about the pharmaceutical industry having, you know, taken control of so many aspects of the law in the United States, court cases, the like, but medical practice in particular, rewarding physicians for Classifying patients as COVID for giving the vax and the like, James, it seemed to me there's a moral quandary here.
	I mean, grotesque violation of the Hippocratic oath that has yet to be abated.
	I'll give one sentence.
	The laws have been corrupted to make unethical immoral behavior.

▲