All Episodes
Feb. 19, 2024 - Jim Fetzer
58:00
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (18 February 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, and welcome, folks!
This is February the 18th of 2024, one day before Presidents' Day on Truth vs. News Incorporated, and we celebrate Presidents' Day and honor all those good presidents from Washington and Lincoln all the way up to Biden, to honor all the good things that they've all done to us.
And we have a great panel today that's going to show you It's really happening in the world at this rough time.
And we have Jim Fester's Most Dangerous Mind in America.
Of course, he's written that book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
That's really an outstanding bar of books.
It's been censored.
He also has about JFK, and about 9-11, and about 40 other books that should be in your library.
They're all outstanding historical books.
And then we have Scott Bennett, Well, I'm delighted that Chris Weiner can join us today while Brian's on assignment.
Chris does brilliant analysis.
I've been impressed with him for many, many years and just really happy he could join us today.
My pleasure, guys.
Let's go for it.
What's happening over there in the Middle East?
Well, get this, the most heavily fortified city on the entire planet in Ukraine has officially fallen to the Russians.
Artem Vekov, from where the Ukrainian army has shelled the rebel civilians of Donetsk for 10 years, has fallen to Russians after, with many reports of Ukrainian forces, in an absolute rout.
There will be lots of tactical, strategic, and political implications.
Few Ukrainian defenses are behind that city.
They put so many eggs into the one basket.
Counting on the deep Soviet-era nuclear bunker system and defenses built since the end of the Civil War to make it impregnable.
But here's some of the tweets.
Based on operational situation around Evansburg, in order to avoid encirclement and preserve the lives and health of servicemen, I, this is their commanding officer, decide to withdraw our units from the city and move to defend on more favorable lines.
We will return glory to Ukraine.
It ain't gonna happen.
Ukraine has announced a withdrawal from Adverka within hours.
The bloodiest battle of the 20th century so far will be over.
More Ukrainian tanks fleeing.
Kiev has given the order to abandon.
Will they make it to safety while burning?
What a disaster.
Another fire reported inside the citadel.
Russia has closed the blitzer.
Most of Ukraine's left at work will be prisoners of war.
Remember how CNN and Bloomberg Proved endlessly that cutting Russia off from SWIFT was like using a nuke, and there was no way Russia could survive?
Think about it.
Meanwhile, further reports Ukrainian army routed troops abandon their weapons as they flee.
Good day!
For the best of very bad news, a strategic Donbass city in the cities of Adygea have been liberated from the NATO Bakuyev regime, according to a terse report from Moscow.
With Ukrainians in flight, Russian soldiers are clearing the last pockets of resistance.
They have completely captured the city, with the Russian Defense Minister having made the announcement Saturday some 1,500 Ukrainians were killed as they retreated, leaving weapons and equipment behind.
The seizure of this significant city moves the front line further away from Donetsk.
It thus shields ethnic Russian civilians from daily bombardment by Ukrainian forces.
Situated just 20 kilometers away, Advika had been fortified and used as a staging ground for such attacks in 2014, during which thousands of Ukraine's own citizens have been killed, mostly by NATO-supplied weapons.
We can take great pride in that as a member of NATO.
Under the continuous rolling fire of Russian troops, only scared formation of Ukrainian militants managed to escape the city.
Camp lost 1,500 in the 24 hours before it was liberated.
Those fled left weapons and equipment behind.
Measures are being taken to fully clear the city of militants.
After appointing a new commander-in-chief, who surged elite Western-trained units into Adygea in a failed bid to hold the city, President Zelensky conceded Saturday the order had been given to retreat.
Mike Walsh, journalist, wrote, A humiliated Western media for 24 months has confidently predicted a Ukrainian army victory parade through Moscow's Red Square is strangely mute.
The historian says it's likely the murder of the anti-Putin Alexei Nablov by CIA or MI6 was carried out to coincide with the news of the city's collapse.
He's gone to say he's reminded of a statement issued by Westminster press flunky, it's a good day to bury bad news.
With a bastion almost completely encircled, Zelensky called the order to abandon the city absolutely logical.
Following the capture, Russian forces will continue their offense to liberate the Donetsk People's Republic from Ukrainian nationalists.
A Ukrainian defeat here had been predicted by officials in Washington and Western journals for weeks.
Earlier, White House National Security Spokesman John Kirby blamed the loss of the city on the drying up of Western aid.
Zelensky, after a disexcused Saturday, accused his Western matrons of creating an artificial shortage of weapons.
Scott, I think it was inevitable.
Your thoughts?
Well, it was.
We said this from the very beginning of the conflict.
Ukraine never had a chance in its conflict, war, whatever you want to call it, against Russia.
And in fact, they have been remarkably, I mean, stupid, reckless, and suicidal in their entire posturing.
To think that the West is going to be their shield endlessly when they've been used as nothing more than a tool by the West to siphon as much material as they can and impregnate them with biochemical labs and use them as fodder, 500,000 dead soldiers for a practice run against Russia.
Now you've seen the Russian volunteer army, really, not the official military, not the official ranks, not the official backup that Russia has, but a volunteer army from all over Russia has descended into these regions that the Ukrainians have blown up and terrorized and tortured and mutilated these people since 2014, killing women and children and bombing schools and playgrounds and kindergartens and old folks buildings.
I mean, these aren't Warriors who do that.
These are monsters and cowards and drug addicts.
So it's about time that Russia's final prosecution of this is coming to an end.
So I think you're going to witness a quickening.
You're going to witness a complete dismemberment and.
Disintegration of the Ukrainian military, and I do think you're going to have a military coup d'etat that ultimately overthrows Zelensky and the Parliament.
That's what I've said is waiting to come using a Cromwell model.
But I think this is a pivot point, of course, too, because as the Russians accelerate and drive in their final days of taking Ukraine, and I think they'll be very politically sensitive to how to reform it.
But as Russia does this, you're going to see NATO and the West pivot and turn their attention to other theaters of conflict, whether it's trying to trigger a war in the Middle East against Iran, trying to trigger something against Yemen, or maybe both, or even doing something in the Chinese-Taiwan straits.
The West never admits failure or error.
It only moves on in silence to the next victim.
So I think For that reason, you're seeing all sorts of PSYOPs and false flags generated from Kansas City chief shootings to the Nalvany killing to, you know, all sorts of other things are about to pop.
And indeed, the Biden administration prosecuting three people that went to a Russian conference 10 years ago.
I think this all confirms we're witnessing a tremendous desperation in the Biden administration in the deep state.
Jim?
Oh, I agree, Scott.
They're gonna try to bury the whole thing.
Chris?
Yeah, you mentioned Navalny, whatever, the guy that supposedly MI6 had been caught trying to, or had caught him supposedly trying to stage a color, a revolution, a coup, or whatever.
Yeah, I think that, you know, they do this type of thing with many of these NGOs, George Soros being a perfect example in many of the Soviet bloc states after the fall of the wall in the 80s and into the 90s.
You know, they talk about NATO expansion and encirclement.
And, you know, Clinton laughed it off.
And, you know, Putin and Yeltsin both brought it up.
And I think they both been betrayed by many of the agreements they've signed with the West.
And the Americas are basically, I think, a proxy state of the United Kingdom and the Zionist element, the Jewish central bankers, the guys that manage the money for the black nobility and the royals of Europe.
And I think really this whole corporate infrastructure that they've placed in and the banking systems through central banking and these NGOs have obfuscated the origin of many of these proxies.
But nonetheless, I bet if you follow these proxies up the ladder in these parallel infrastructures they have in place in national infrastructures and business or even in these military industrial complexes, They all lead to the same group of people, the intelligence services and the central bankers.
And once again, as I mentioned, Profitius Albion is very much involved with this type of thing.
And if you notice, they did this type of thing in Europe for, you know, six to eight hundred years, if not longer, as far as the Guelph and Ghibelline Wars or the War of the Roses or things like this.
Where the Black nobility, the same bloodline, cadet branches of each other, are on both sides of the war, sacrificing fighting-age male population citizens, terrorizing them to diminish the social contract under the illusion of improving it.
So I think, really, this is all about money, at the end of the day, and sound money.
And I think that you're seeing a clash in the two systems between the BRICS IMF systems, BRICS going to a commodity-backed currency, And IMF World Bank countries are going to more of a credit-based.
A digital cryptocurrency.
And I think that, you know, technology is important as far as embracing these two things.
And I think this is a big part of the way they'll settle these type of things.
Rather than using a free market, they're going to use military might and economic might and just pretty much play big fish, little fish.
I like what Scott said about the Cromwell model.
He's absolutely right.
This is the the illusion that is put on the common citizens, the rabble that should normally have to fight to uphold their freedoms.
And in many cases, you know, they lose sight of these these urgencies.
And I think that these are necessary in order to deliver in many of the diminishing social contracts that they tend to put on or the further control mechanisms.
Very similar to the workers' paradise or the communist manifestos, the springtime revolutions in the 1848, the 1848ers, these Europeans coming into America and then fueling both sides of the Civil War economically, socially, and through the media.
This seems to me the same playbook that they've run for hundreds of years on the unwitting populations.
And I think that really for the first time, humanity's seeing through this shit, and I think these guys are really going to have some trouble.
Good.
Very, very nice.
I don't think the role of the U.S.
as a stooge has ever been more apparent than under Biden.
It looks obvious, Betts, doesn't it?
I mean, like, this ham-handed stuff, it's like, it couldn't have been scripted worse.
I mean, look at what he did with the SWIFT system, driving Russia off of that, and then taking, what, $300 billion of their assets?
Look at what they did with Obama and the Magnitsky, the Browder, the Steele, the Skripal.
I mean, goddamn, how much stuff are they going to put out here and try to destabilize Russia, or when they get caught with their election fraud, then blame it on Russia?
Russia has been like this Nice.
mysterious scapegoat of the Clinton Foundation going back to 2016.
And I don't think they had the kind of involvement that they were hyping in the media at all.
And I think this attitude, this adversarial predicament that they put on is a manufactured one.
And I think that, like I said, the Gladio B program, they need a strategy of tension like a Cold War 2.0 to play both sides against the middle to get us racing for this technocratic feudal prize.
Nice.
Very nice.
Well, the question becomes, what's the point of saying money to Ukraine when the war is lost?
And yet here we have the Senate passing a $95 billion military aid bill for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, passing by a vote of 70 to 29.
Twenty-two Republicans and nearly every Democrat, with the exception of two—Peter Welsh of Vermont and Jeff Merkley of Oregon—voting against, while Bernie Sanders also voted no.
And, of course, he's an Independent.
The bill's fate in the House is unclear.
Mike Johnson, Speaker, said he might not even bring it to the floor for a vote.
Interestingly, Bills involving expenditures are supposed to originate in the House, so it is, in my opinion, a bit of a peculiarity that this one originated in the Senate, no doubt to imply pressure to the House to support it.
In the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate, the House will continue to work its own will on these important matters.
He had rejected an initial $118 billion bill, including about $20 billion for border spending, but that entailed legalizing illegal immigration.
He was right to oppose it.
It was outrageous, as Trump observed, better to have no bill than a bad bill.
Democrat proponents could work to get enough signatures for a discharge petition to bypass leadership and have a vote on the legislation in the House, but that would require the cooperation of some Republicans, and it's unclear how many of the progressive Democrats in their own party might oppose the bill because of its unconditional aid for Israel.
Meanwhile, and this is disturbing given what I'm going to explain, McConnell urges Mike Johnson to allow a vote on Ukraine and Senate Majority Leader.
He said he hopes Speaker Johnson won't block the just-passed foreign aid bill.
Why it matters?
He told Politico.
He doesn't have any advice on how Johnson does it.
What I do think is appropriate is for the House to be able to work its will on Ukraine, which obviously was the most controversial part of what we did.
Actually not.
It was doing nothing about border security.
The debate over the package has taken months to lay bare GOP divisions over Ukraine and how to address a border.
Former President Trump opposed a foreign aid bill.
He demanded any aid be given in the form of a loan, something his allies are now beginning to echo.
McConnell told Punchbowl News he disagreed with Trump's recent comments on NATO and that it was extremely unhelpful.
Here's a staggering total of what's been given to Ukraine so far.
$2.7 billion humanitarian, $36.4 billion financial.
That's basically to finance the government of Ukraine.
$18.3 billion for security assistance, $23.5 billion for weapons and equipment, $4.5 grants and loans for more.
Meanwhile, and I move forward to this story, all hell is breaking loose after a top Republican senator revealed the truth about Mitch McConnell.
He has a long history of selling out and cutting deals with the Democrats.
His days of stabbing conservatives in the back, however, may be coming to an end.
All hell is breaking loose After my own senator, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, revealed that the Senate, having ran through the bill with $60 million for Biden's War of Ukraine, $14 million for Israel, $5 million for Taiwan, having no border security measures, turns out he didn't even put them on the table.
McConnell is being called out for cutting a deal with the majority leader, Schumer, Ron Johnson explained McConnell did not even put border security on the Senate negotiating table with the Democrats.
My suggestion was to tie funding specifically to border metrics that Biden has to continue to get those numbers down as he gets, say, $5 billion a month, Johnson said, unbeknown to us.
Leader McConnell told his chief negotiator, James Lankford.
The border metrics threshold and enforcement mechanism wasn't even on the table.
Johnson's fed up with McConnell's history of selling out.
Voices desire to see a new leader.
A lot of us are speaking out against McConnell and his ham-handed approach, creating this debacle, quite honestly, for the American people by not exacting border security out of the Ukraine deal.
It was a brilliant idea.
Johnson revealed McConnell had betrayed us all, didn't even put it on the table.
He only cares about securing another $60 billion for Ukraine, possibly for the kickbacks.
The weakening of the president's authority is, under current laws, worse than doing nothing.
Passing that bill would have been worse than doing nothing.
Polls show the border crisis is not a top issue for the American people who want a secure border and to see the flow of illegals into the U.S.
brought to an end.
You have an American public strongly in support of closing the border because you realize there is no border policy.
It's a clear and present danger, facilitates a multi-billion dollar business model of the most evil people on the planet—drug, human, sex traffickers.
That's what the American people want to see.
McConnell's betrayal, however, is nothing new.
He's made his entire career cutting deals and stabbing conservatives in the back.
A border crisis may now be the straw that finally breaks a camel's back and ends McConnell's tenure as GOP Senate leader.
Here's a fascinating aside.
Representative Malia Luna introduced a bill maintaining frontline duty in Ukraine for members of Congress who support Schumer's $60 billion bill.
I love it!
To whoever leaked my bill, congratulations.
You played yourself.
I make no apologies.
My bill, the Schumer Act, Would require members of Congress to fight on the front lines in Ukraine if they support Schumer's calls for American sons and daughters to fight.
Love it!
According to the Daily Mail, the legislation would require members of Congress who advocate or provide military support for Ukraine to enlist in the armed forces and to serve on active duty in support of a contingency operation to build states.
If a member of Congress advocates for providing military support for Ukraine, the member 1 shall enlist in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard, and 2 shall be assigned for not fewer than 6 months to active duty in support of a contingency operation.
Brilliant!
Love it!
Scott, your thoughts?
Chris, Scott unavailable.
Your thoughts?
Well, you know, the bill is very powerful in that you're commanding members of Congress.
If you're going to declare war or military adventurism, you're going to be the first ones picking up a weapon and serving on the front lines.
This is something they should push.
Right on, McConnell.
Right on, Lindsey Graham.
I don't care.
And there's no age discrimination.
I don't care if you're 90 years old.
If you have the balls to vote for a war and send someone else's kid, then you're damn well going to be the first one off the boat.
And this is exactly, precisely the remedy.
To get us off of this crazy Patriot Act train that they've passed, thinking that they can go around to any nation, any government they want and crumble and break it up and do everything else that Lindsey Graham and John McCain and Mitch McConnell and all of these neocons and rhinos have done.
So I think we're Seeing the truth behind Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer and these others, to see that Mitch McConnell doesn't do anything about a border invasion is telling.
And let's never forget, this invasion is not happening.
It's being allowed.
It's being encouraged by the United States traitors on Capitol Hill and in the executive branch.
It's not being done by the American people.
It is the opposite of what the American people want.
But the government is specifically Schumer and Mitch McConnell and the rest of these people are committing treason.
They are actively inviting an invasion of the continental United States, the overthrow of a Republican form of government in exchange for some tyrannical third world retard nation That they think they're going to cash in the chips and the IOUs that China gives them, especially Mitch McConnell.
I think we're at a time where only revolution, civil war, and a military tribunal that takes these people and looks at it as a civil war act, an act of treason against the Constitution.
That's the only remedy.
As the U.S. holdings begin to loosen and crumble around the world, I think you're going to see a quickening in the desperation in the words, in the minds of these people on Capitol Hill.
Jim?
Very good, Chris.
Yeah, I think, Scott, a way to look at this is possibly as war crimes.
That's more of the thing than treason because, like, the nature of nation-states and their allegiances are certainly more than meets the eye, and you almost got to go beyond the theatrics and the propaganda and the patriotism nostalgia that is being provided and produced.
In my opinion, I think that the whole at the root of this stems back to like a thing that Wilkerson said about Royal Dutch Shell Survey around the 2000.
They said that basically there's two ways to handle the control of the world's resources moving forward.
It's the blueprint or the scramble.
And what Wilkerson said is, these companies and these bankers are going on the scramble, which of course meant the creation of BRICS in 2001 from Goldman Sachs, 9-11, the Zionist War of Terror resource grab through corporate entities and through mercenaries and things of the sort.
And of course, going on to this, and at the root of this, I would say, is three goals.
population control, resource control.
And in my opinion, it seems to be a straight power concept going back to like George Kennan and some of the stuff that he writes about.
This is about control of the population, social engineering through the Judeo Masonic secret societies.
And these guys have been part of this country and the ruling force of the country, I think for a long, long time.
And I think that these are the same guys that are subverting it from within at this point in time.
They have an allegiance that's obviously something bigger than the United States or their oath of office or their fiduciary duties or things of the sort.
I've Just to give a historic reference, and I don't want to get on too much of a rabbit hole, but in 1824, William Morgan came out with a disclosure about much of this stuff.
And John Quincy Adams actually ran as the anti-Masonic candidate and won the election in 1824.
Obviously, he's a Freemason, but somehow or another, he ran under that ticket.
And this leads into, like, to talk about the 1848ers and the European bankers of Jewish descent coming in and creating the pretenses in the media and in the social engineering, the Dred Scott, the Kansas-Nebraska Acts, things of the sort.
The railroad resource grabs, the Indian Wars, to create the pretenses for the Civil War.
And if you look at the generals on both sides, they're all high-level masons.
They're all, some way or another, clandestinely knights of the British Empire, or the Order of the Garter, or things of the sort.
So, this goes back a long, long ways, you know, before this was the Golden Fleece, going back to the 8th century BC in Greece, and then beyond that with Cyclopean masonry, or the minotaur labyrinth in Crete.
The Minoans, I guess you would call them.
This is really the way they do it, and you gotta have two sides and control opposition of these wars for maximum carnage, for optimum yield, and to build your empires on the backs of widows and orphans.
I know most people could not possibly fathom this as a possibility, but this is, in my opinion, seems to be more of a likelihood and probably more of a reality than is being admitted at this point in time.
Fascinating.
think that it really needs to be addressed.
You don't hear anybody, no Tucker Carlson, no Donald Trump, any of these assholes talking about this, and this is the elephant in the room.
Fascinating.
Yeah.
Meanwhile, we had a major event taking place the day before he Here's the report.
The House of Representatives is probably going to hold a second impeachment vote tomorrow for Mr. Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, who says the Biden administration is not responsible for the crisis at the border.
Madeline Rivera is in Washington with the latest comments from the DHS Secretary.
Madeline, good morning.
Good morning, Steve.
House Republican efforts to oust Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas failed last week by one vote, but House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, who's being treated for blood cancer, is expected to be back on Capitol Hill this week, and that could give the GOP the bump it needs to impeach Mayorkas.
Mayorkas calls Republican allegations that he defied federal immigration laws as baseless.
He also says he and President Biden are not to blame for the record-breaking number of illegal crossings at the southern border.
Listen.
It certainly is a crisis, and we don't bear responsibility for a broken system, and we're doing a tremendous amount within that broken system, but fundamentally, fundamentally, Congress is the only one who can fix it.
There is no question that we have a challenge, a crisis at the border, and there is no question that Congress needs to fix it, and we're doing everything we can within that broken system.
Even if House Republicans impeach Mayorkas, the Democratic-controlled Senate would likely acquit him.
Brian?
Uh, so it's going to be very interesting.
It looks like Scalise reports they could get that impeachment done.
I'm Steve Doocy.
I'm Brian Kilmeade.
And of course, we did have the impeachment take place by the narrowest of margins.
The GOP-led House tally was 214 to 213, with three Republicans voting with the Democrats against.
This came after they had failed by a single vote last week.
House Republicans claim Mayorkas has committed high crimes and misdemeanors for his handling of the southern border.
Other constitutional experts claim the evidence doesn't reach that high bar.
I can't imagine how it does not do that.
He has obviously failed to faithfully uphold and execute the laws of the United States assigned to his responsibility as Secretary of Homeland Security.
What happens next?
Highly unlikely, Mayorkas will be convicted in the Democrat-controlled Senate.
They're still waiting on how to respond.
Move ahead with a trial and then acquit or move to dismiss, given their view it's blatantly political.
There you see the actual vote total.
Biden slammed the Republican lawmakers for impeaching him.
The vote he claimed was a blatant act of unconstitutional partisanship.
This impeachment already failed once on a bipartisan vote.
Instead of staging political stunts like this, Republicans with genuine concerns about the border should want Congress to deliver more border resources and stronger border security.
He said, here are the three Republicans who voted against.
Ken Buck of Colorado, Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, Tom McClintock of California.
Meanwhile, 300 Chinese entered America illegally yesterday alone, with 20,000 since October.
Customs and Border Protection has seen an alarming increase in Chinese nationals.
Last year, illegals from China were the fastest-growing demographic at 37,000 encounters since the start of the 2024 fiscal year in October.
They've already encountered 20,000 Chinese nationals on pace to shatter last year's record.
During 300 illegals from China crossed the U.S.
yesterday, the daily average of 150 per day.
The increase in Chinese nationals is raising national security concerns, duh, especially after CBB reduced the number of questions processors are required to ask from 40 to just 5.
Here you see the increase in Chinese migrant crossing.
What do we got here?
The U.S.
is talking about preparing for a war with China.
Well, I would say China is preparing for a war with the U.S.
by having an army of its own invade the U.S.
now.
Our committee has been informed some of these Chinese nationals are affiliated with the People's Liberation Army and the Chinese Communist Party.
Surprise, surprise!
The fact that the Chinese Communist Party does not allow U.S.
border officials access to Chinese law enforcement databases makes identifying dangerous individuals more difficult.
Indeed, the increasing number of Chinese makes identifying potential infiltration by CCP intelligence agents more difficult too.
The Chinese Communist Party has deployed agents in the U.S. in the past to threaten political opposition and other dissidents, often using friends and family as leverage.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the impeachment of Mayorkas is certainly warranted and welcomed.
This is nothing short of a conscious, intentional act to undermine the Constitution of the United States and orchestrate this invasion for demographic replacement political purposes.
And when Mayorkas says they're doing everything they can, there's nothing else they can do, this is for Congress to fix, that is a flat-out lie.
The fact of the matter is the President of the United States is the Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces.
The United States Armed Forces must be activated and utilized when an invasion or some sort of a military-level activity against the United States is occurring, and that is precisely what is occurring with the invasion on the southern border of these people from South America, Central America, and China.
This is not just a seeping and a trickle and people wanting to come in.
This is an invasion.
Therefore, the military has a role, and it hasn't been treated like that.
And that is precisely what the Republicans ought to triumphantly and constantly proclaim.
This is an invasion.
Where is the military?
And quite frankly, the House Ought to have military experts testify to say, what is going on?
Who is coming in?
What are you doing about it?
Northern Command is supposed to be defending the continental United States.
What have you done?
What is the Biden administration ordered you to do?
These are the questions and the instructions that Congress should give to the military.
There's no other agency that can set up guns and all required instruments of war to repel an invasion.
The military is the only one.
And the fact that they haven't had a full military hearing is very telling.
If you're going around screwing around with federal agencies and borders and customs and homeland security, they're a bunch of Yahoo bureaucrats that have nothing in common with people who serve or have served.
The only solution to this is a military solution, and the fact that the Biden administration is not activating the military to do this tells you everything, besides the fact that they've ruined the military, of course, too.
Jim?
It does, that they're all in on this border invasion, Chris.
Yeah, think about this.
If the whole concept of nation-states and the UN nations that we have were not a construct of, say, the central bankers and the Rothschilds to really extract taxes and border taxes and control and military infrastructures and things of the sort for security, if it was not something like that, if it was not a matter of national security to protect the citizens or even to have a resource of fuel or silver or things that are essential for warfare that they're trying to declare on three fronts,
Why aren't they concerned at all with any of these things?
You know, like, I don't think it's a failure.
I think it's a betrayal from our officials in terms of this.
I think that we are being knifed in the neck.
These people are being subsidized to invade in addition to them coming here on their own or paying coyotes or whatever it is.
There's a network built that's working with the Intel services and maybe even the State Department to some extent to do this.
I think that there's Christian and even Jewish, especially Jewish NGOs that are funding these people to come in.
These guys are getting Obama phones, subsidies, EBT cards, Section 8 housing instead of veterans in preference of things like this.
So, I mean, there's a there there.
And the fact that nobody's even talking about this makes me wonder what the fuck is going on.
And beyond that, the thing that I think it is, is it's being funded by the same guys that are trying to replace us with AI and automation and robotics.
The same guys that sent our military children and young men into the graveyards of empires, into minefields they've laid for the last few decades, knowing they're going to get blown up and then come back and need robotic prosthetics and integrate into Neuralink and all this DARPA tech shit they're trying to put on us.
So yeah, I think they're really, this is a long-term, you know, big plan with many departmentalized facets, and this is yet but one of the operations.
And I think that the whole endgame goal is Greater Israel 2050 and this technocratic feudalism that they're trying to put on the social credit score, all that shit.
We are at we are in the midst of World War Three.
It has been declared upon us by the people that have used the nation state and the corporation as proxy.
And I think now with the quantum financial system and atomic settlement, they don't need the nation state or customs or border patrol anymore.
They can directly Take it right out of the transaction on the spot in a second.
So if you control that encryption and you control that technology, which they do, and of course, they're lending the optic that they don't like Bitcoin and things of the sort.
But, you know, that's a different video in itself.
Where I'm going with this, Fats, is there's a whole new economic system that's being shoved in under our nose.
And this war, this destabilization, all this stuff, this cultural debasement, this monetary debasement, and this debt is all part of it.
So make no mistake.
We are at war.
Every seven, eight billion people in this world are at war with 1%.
Chris, I think you got it right, and we don't even know it.
You know, the American people don't have any grasp or understanding.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
is a migration pact, a flawed Europe, with 75 million new migrants, believe it or not.
European Union passed a new pact dubbed the Suicide of Europe, which could lead to 75 million new migrants flooding the continent.
Wednesday, the European Parliament Libra Committee passed the Act, which formalizes distribution of migrants to member states while punishing those who refuse to take them.
Countries that attempt to retain their national identity will be hit with severe financial penalties.
National rally parliamentary wing leader Marine Le Pen warned the pact would be the suicide of Europe, and it represents an organized plan of submersion of Europe and the nations that compose it.
Watch.
Uli Lundsen tweets, Migrant men throw heavily pregnant women off a bus, slamming her to the ground embarrassed, leaving her writhing in agony.
Member states will have no choice but to accept migrants are facing an enormous financial penalty of €25,000 per migrant.
The question is, how many will they force on us?
Now they're deciding that.
So they're creating rules that give Brussels the right to say how many migrants they'll distribute, said the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
So several countries have indicated they do not agree.
We do not want to implement it.
In the end, we're facing a very unpleasant turn of events.
Or Bond questions why Eastern European nations are trying to offload migrants to Hungary if they're so financially profitable.
An analyst at Hungary's Migration Research Institute, Robert Konczaj, said migrants distributed to Hungary normally end up leaving for Sweden and Germany, which offer bigger welfare payments.
The redistribution system could create intra-EU flows from the countries where they've been relocated to the countries they actually want to leave as typically the destination countries have not changed.
However, it may now be necessary for other EU countries to welcome these migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.
The real problem is the enforcement of EU's external borders would be less or not at all, which is what's really needed.
The EU has no incentive to impose proper border controls.
The new leader of Frontex Recently called for open borders vowing to appease left-wing pro-mass migration activists.
Nothing can stop people from crossing a border.
No wall, no fence, no sea, no rivers, and hauns, luchans.
Meanwhile, get this, the U.S.
granted the U.N.
$1.3 billion last year to aid illegals invading America.
We're paying for it.
United States taxpayers are being milked of money the U.N.
and other agencies are spending to aid illegals crossing the border.
Based on available data, more than a billion in funding from the government has been granted to agencies assisting migrants.
We are actually funding our own border crisis, Todd Bensman, a senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, an anti-mass migration think tank observed and provided ultimately by United States taxpayers.
Before Biden termed as President, America sheltered about $500 million a year to the International Organization for Migration, a U.N.
agency.
But beginning in Biden, the funding skyrocketed to nearly $1.3 billion in 2023, more than double what it had been under former President Trump.
As per government spending data, most of the money comes to the Department of State and USAID for international development.
A total of $547 billion over two years, ending in 2023, has been voluntarily contributed from the population, refugee, and migration segment under the State Department.
The UN's regional refugee and migrant response plan, updated for 2024, is requesting $1.6 billion To be distributed to 17 Latin American and Caribbean countries.
It's also receiving U.S.
grants.
allocated $372 million in cash and vouchers and multi-purpose cash assistance during 2024 for 624,300 migrants in Central and South America headed for the border.
They also directly received cash for what UN emergency manual calls cash-in envelopes.
They know the border is wide open.
According to the U.S.
House Committee on Homeland Security, there have been 6.2 million encounters at the southern border.
In addition, 1.7 million got away since Biden took office.
Well, they say, you know, we're coming now because Biden's letting us in.
Bennisman, who's been at the forefront, found that this international organization for migration and other NGOs helping migrants make the dangerous trek from South and Central America, including at a migrant camp in Reynosa, Mexico, where he was told in 2021 families of four were receiving about $800 a month on a debit card.
The virtual post knows long lines of migrants waiting to receive them.
Many American families, I'd observe, are not in a position of having that kind of support from their own government.
Republican-proposed bill to defund U.N.' 's illegal immigration operation.
Even sanctuary city mayors have been crying for help, admitting their local governments are at the breaking point or worse because the GOP lawmakers took the liberty to introduce legislation that would eliminate U.N.
migrant funding It's possible that that could come to pass.
The bill would require the Government Accountability Office to conduct an audit of all past federal funding for U.N.
agencies involved in migration.
They are financing the U.S.
border crisis, Representative Lance Gooden at Texas said.
The U.N.
is using our own tax dollars against us.
U.S.
policymakers can no longer stand by while elites in the U.N.
and DPOs actively finance an invasion of our sovereign territory.
It's time to sand up and cut off funding these corrupt globalist institutions and tell respect for our territorial integrity and appreciation for our generosity is restored.
Secure the border!
There's more on it, but that's plenty.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the tragic comedy and irony and outrageous aspects of this is that the will of the American people is being actively, intentionally, purposefully thwarted, and the opposite is being done.
This is not a border crisis.
This is an invasion of the United States.
And there's no nice way to say it.
And whether these people are women with children or military-aged men, it doesn't change anything.
This is an invasion.
And the only way to repel an invasion is by setting up fences and trenches and countermeasures, and the military and the police and the volunteer forces to man those.
This is deadly serious.
This is going to, if it's not immediately stopped, And I predict they're only going to increase or try and keep up their flow as long as these Democrats are in office, and rhinos and fake Republicans certainly don't stand up.
They're going to continue this massive invasion, unless, of course, Uh, Texas, uh, Abbott, the 25 states supporting Abbott, step in and by all means necessary, including use of deadly force, stop the invasion of the United States and treat it like the military crime and the invasion that it is.
There's no other way to describe this.
And, uh, that's why the, uh, the House also needs to impeach Biden, nevermind just Mayorkas.
They need to impeach Biden and they have to Demonstrate a certain degree of outrage and passion and fury and fervor if they're going to generate the kinetic public support.
No, no.
I mean, the public are, for the most part, really stupid and disconnected and numb.
And the way to engage them is to shock them, is to prick them, is to slap them in the face, is to say, are you ready for your daughter to be raped or your son to be killed?
Do I have your attention now, Mr. and Mrs. Jones?
Good!
Because this country is being invaded and you may not give a shit about what your life is, but your children and your grandchildren are going to look at you and either thank you or spit in your face because you are creating an America for tomorrow that your children and grandchildren are either going to be slaved, dead, or eating bugs while illegal immigrants suck off the tit of big government that these Democrat fascists are bringing in.
And these Democrats are going to do everything they can to put white people at the bottom of every single social service and ladder of social escalation that they can, just because they are that common and vindictive and demonic.
There's nothing good that is going to come out of any Democrat in any political office with regards to this.
And if any are standing up opposed to this, then I'd say they're not really Democrats, thank God.
But this is something that really needs to be accelerated.
Republicans have to win this and dominate this discussion, and the way to win it and dominate it Is to, again, define it, redefine it, and triple-redefine it as an invasion, an act of treason, a crime against humanity, a war crime, and bring it to every state.
And members of the Federal Congress should be calling out, saying, you know, Rand Paul and others should be saying, the Republicans and the Democrats and Libertarians in Texas and the Texas Senate and the Texas House All should be activating their military, their volunteers, their guard to repel this invasion because the government in Washington D.C.
is actively committing treason.
So the Republicans in Congress need to be the best friend and advisors to the state representatives.
And then you'd see some synergy when they get that encouragement from federal people like Rand Paul or others, Massey or others, saying, don't look for any help up here in Washington.
All of the people up here are traitors, including Mitch McConnell.
I want to see these people get bloody, bare-knuckled, Very good, Scott.
I mean, brass knuckle knife fighting with all of these Democrats in the subject.
This is not the time to be courteous and nice.
This is the time to be absolutely a ruthless sledgehammer where all of these Democrats are a mole waiting to be whacked.
Jim?
Very good, Scott.
Prips?
Yeah, I almost think that the invasion and the infiltration is more of the dual Israeli citizens in Congress and the bankers that are running the government and using these type of apparati for their own enrichment and to protect their shipping lanes and their resource extraction campaigns in foreign places.
And I think really the border is one of many things they're using to destabilize us.
I think the real picture needs to be focused maybe on the banking, even if you get into that.
And the fact that these guys are insolvent, they're running Ponzi schemes and they can't pay basically Peter to pay Paul without having to steal or topple countries or steal their resources.
And in many cases, that's why these immigrants are fleeing these tropical paradises, because those very same forces are just taking everything by brute means of force with cartels and, you know, many of the black market type stuff, black ops or white ops.
And it's it's disgusting to see how the world has turned in terms of this.
And as I mentioned, it's almost like a resource grab and it's the scramble.
So, you know, it's a little messy, I'd say.
Uh, as far as these immigrants invading, uh, the country, I agree it's an absolute problem not dismissing it, but I'm saying this is the most heavily armed population on Earth.
If these guys, F-A-F-O, uh, they're gonna have another thing coming for them if they think the cartels were, were, uh, heavily armed where they come from and they're running out of, uh, wait till they, uh, piss off the middle class.
So yeah, I think it's going to be an interesting situation that's coming forward and I think it's being manufactured with this intensity and speed by design with the polarization through social media and in bots and teams and things of the sort.
This is a whole new spectrum of warfare and we don't really even know what we're up against.
But I have to say, any plans in the hands of the enemy are probably doomed to fail.
And this enemy has full spectrum surveillance over everything.
Every smart fridge in town knows your plans.
So I think at some point in time, we're gonna have to make a serious commitment towards that and maybe disabling many of these
Disadvantages that we call smartphones and smart technology and things of the sort and really making some severe wartime business decisions In addition to looking after your food supply your water supply air and many other things This is a full-spectrum war and these guys are behind it on all fronts so I think the invasion and the debt speaks for itself in terms of The people that are really getting away with the serious crimes here Scott, your further thoughts?
I wanted to add one thing, what Chris had said.
There's one aspect to this, Jim, we haven't really engaged and defined, and that is, the moment this goes kinetic, the moment someone has to use a gun, To shoot and kill an illegal alien to defend their wife or their mother or their child or their friend or their, you know, to prevent a carjacking or something like that.
The moment this goes kinetic is the moment that person's life, who had to pull the trigger, changes forever.
And in one sense, when they have to go kinetic, and I'm not talking people who, you know, do anything improper, but when you get a sense you're about to be attacked, you're about to be robbed, something bad's about to happen, you make a decision, I'm going to defend myself at all costs, I am not going to die, I'm going to kill,
The aggressor who's going to try and do something, when that person makes that mental commitment to himself and to his God, and that situation unfolds where they have to pull their weapon and kill, that's the moment the whole thing is going to change because that person suddenly becomes committed.
It's like they've jumped off the boat and they're on the beaches of Normandy.
Now they are on a trajectory of marching forward.
Now they're active.
Now they're kinetic.
Now they're not taking orders anymore.
They are in survival mode.
They're giving them.
It's important to understand the psychological shift because it will cause an avalanche of other things.
It will cause, if someone has to use a weapon to defend themselves, they'll say, okay, I've had to do it once.
Now it's gonna, I'm gonna have to do it again.
I'm gonna have to train others to do it.
Now things are taking on this downward avalanche.
And I don't mean downward and then You know, it's some illegal activity, but this is something the Democrats don't understand.
It's like going to war.
When you get into a firefight, you're never the same again.
Once you've been into a firefight, once you've smelled the blood, you've had it spot on you, you've been into a kinetic situation, You are always in that kinetic situation, and every other situation of the future is much easier to get kinetic.
It gets easier, just like going to war.
Every firefight gets easier, because you've done it before.
This is something that's going to develop very real.
With the American patriots, the American citizens, the American veterans who may have to take up their arms to defend themselves.
Once it takes that role, once it crosses that level, expect a massive push, a massive explosion, a massive blossoming of a patriotic militarism that we haven't seen in this country since 1775.
And that's how I see this going.
They don't realize, once they ignite a situation where military vets and others have to commit, now it's only going to develop, and these persons, these vets, these groups, are going to be committed to the eradication of their streets, of their courts, of their towns, Of similar criminal activity.
So it's important to understand the change that's going to happen in the individual when they get into their first firefight, that's going to commit them to an ongoing war that nobody understands.
Jim?
Very good.
Very good.
Don, take us out.
Oh boy.
This is February the 18th, right before President's Day, and it looks like we mentioned the word impeach on President's Day, and other things are happening, and wars are at hand.
This is a crisis time, not a time to celebrate.
Come back, folks, we're going to have another hour of exciting news that you need to know.
So we look forward to seeing you then, but share this widely, because if you don't do it, nobody else will.
Export Selection