Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 12, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:39:57

Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (11 February 2024) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hey folks, welcome back.
	This is the second hour of Truth vs. News on February the 11th, Super Bowl Sunday.
	We've got a super show that's going to outshine that ball game, I think.
	And we're going to get a very good start on a very personal story here.
	I think it's going to be great.
	Go ahead.
	Well, thank you, Don.
	Indeed, we have a native officer.
	They didn't hide anything, showing the realities of the Northern Military District in the Donbass, would you believe?
	RT journalist Olga Kerley made a documentary about Donbass featuring American NATO officer, actually former of course, Scott Bennett, whose son built everything for himself.
	The author of the front line diary of an American officer, in an interview with 360, told how she managed to lure an American to Donbass and save his life there with my own eyes.
	According to Curley, Bennett did not have to be persuaded.
	He himself wanted to come to Donbass to see with his own eyes.
	The author of the film knowed the operation was secret.
	The American was taken from Sheremetyevo and without visiting Moscow went to Donetsk.
	There were fears that the special services knew about his arrival in the Donbass.
	We took a lot of risks and he knew it.
	The documentary makers showed the NATO officer something you would never see on American television.
	We didn't hide anything from him.
	We showed him everything.
	We simply took him along the route, often spontaneously.
	The military correspondent told 360 journalists, Yulia Minnikovskaya, Kirby did not ask to go to the rear and was not afraid of difficulties, did not complain about the smart conditions all the time.
	The American never ceased to admire the Russian spirit.
	We wanted him in the thick of it.
	We wanted to show the truth of the West.
	We wanted him to communicate with local residents, live in a basement with our soldiers, so he could eat our military porridge in the dugout on the front line.
	The American saw with his own eyes special social objects fired from HIMARS I saw with my own eyes that the West is destroying the population of Donetsk.
	Kelly Ward Bennett is going to speak before the U.S.
	Congress.
	This is not a drop in the bucket.
	This is one American who can get millions of views.
	I'm sure he will be heard.
	This is heavy artillery, the journalist said.
	Meanwhile, 70 GOP senators voted to advance a $95.3 billion Ukraine and Israeli aid package without a controversial border provision Republicans have rejected, which would have legalized illegal immigration.
	So much for that border security deal.
	The Senate now poised to move forward with a bill that would provide billions to Ukraine and Israel, setting up an eventual clash with House Republicans.
	Wednesday, 17 Republican senators joined with Democrats to begin debate on a version that no longer includes any of the border security provisions.
	Hours earlier, the bill failed after Republicans panned the bipartisan deal they'd originally demanded.
	Among those voting to proceed was Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, whose support for Ukraine aid is increasingly at odds with the rest of the GOP.
	Meanwhile, Representative Ana Paulina Luna is introducing a bill mandating frontline duty in Ukraine for members of Congress supporting Schumer's $60 billion proposal.
	In a bold post on social media, Luna addressed the leak, saying, Whoever leaked my bill, congratulations, you played yourself.
	I make no apology.
	My bill, the Schumer Act, would require members of Congress to fight on the front line in Ukraine if they support Schumer's call for America's sons and daughters to fight.
	To whomever leaked my bill.
	Congratulations!
	According to the Daily Mail, the legislation would require members of Congress who advocate providing military support for Ukraine to enlist in the Armed Forces to serve on active duty in support of a contingency operation.
	The bill states, If a member of Congress advocates for providing military support for Ukraine, the member 1 shall enlist in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, or Coast Guard, and 2 shall be assigned for not fewer than 6 months to active duty in support of a contingency operation.
	Here's the amount of money we've spent.
	Total $75.4 billion, humanitarian $2.7 billion.
	Financial, 26.4.
	That's actually paying for the Ukrainian government.
	Security assistance, 18.3.
	Weapon equipment, 23.5.
	Grants and loans for weapon and equipment, another 4.5.
	Scott, tell us about it.
	Well, Representative Luna is very right, right on the money.
	And that is a good bill that commands people to serve and fight and match where your mouth is.
	And I think it's going to gain traction.
	And I think the heavy artillery in this whole operation, Jim, is the compounding of the Democrats and these left-wing rhino types all at the same time.
	It's a political maneuver.
	It's a political war.
	It's a political shift in America from the states standing against the southern border and how that is going to assume a right upward flank against Washington by expansion all the way up until.
	West Virginia of states that will be in agreement with the 25 and the 25 will quickly become 3540.
	So 3540 states are reoriented themselves.
	And the the world is siding with those states, those republics, again, the republics of the United States of America.
	And which is the Republic of America.
	So there's there's a whole C shift coming.
	The other thing about the politicians in Washington, D.C.
	when Olga says this is heavy artillery, this guy will be heard.
	She's right.
	And it's not because I did anything.
	It's because the Lord God Almighty did everything and put gum under my shoes as he walked me through certain places.
	And all of these politicians have been notified of the shell game of terrorist financing operations that involve the Biden-Obama administration, and Hillary Clinton, and the Clinton Foundation, and the Clinton State Department, and Covington & Burling, and Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer, Roger Zakheim, Dov Zakheim, Michael Chertoff,
	The whole operation, Brad Birkenfeld, Ed Snowden, Booz Allen Hamilton, Hawaii, Tampa, McLean, SOCOM, State Department, CENTCOM, Pentagon, all of this is about to pour out and these people will be held accountable.
	And in finality, that impact upon our own Congress is to rectify our own country.
	This is what's going to happen.
	We're about to have a rebirth.
	And I liked how that article started when she said she lured him to the Donbass and gave him a rebirth.
	Well, I wouldn't say lured.
	I was enchanted with the idea of going to Russia.
	I mean, some of the most beautiful women you'll ever meet in the world, I think, are from Russia.
	And I've known Russians and trained with them, and I lived with them, too, when I was doing my Master's.
	I know the people, and they're gregarious, and they're very conservative.
	I know them in so many different realms, which makes this whole thing so tragic.
	And I also know, based on history, as you do too, Jim, I mean the 1990s, you and myself, and I'm sure Brian, and I know Don, understand The train wreck that occurred in the 1990s that completely embittered and mutilated Russia in our relationship.
	And that mutilation led to tragic, you know, leprous sort of appendages and hope and faith and trust that were amputated, you know, like like flicks of ash.
	So was Russia's affection and desire to unify with America, as it could have.
	But it was, I think, the Jewish-Zionist presence that originally manifested and then took root in the cancer of Ukraine.
	So I went over the film that they debuted or they put together.
	The article says it well.
	And some miraculous things happened.
	I'll just say some things that they they didn't include.
	You know, I was stopped at the airport in the beginning right after a 17 hour plane ride and you go in and The three guys came up to me and talked to me, you know, why are you coming in Russia?
	How long you in military?
	And I said, you know, here, here, and I showed him my phone and I had videos that I had done on RT and different Russian commentators.
	I said, here's, here's who, because they can't really speak English.
	Oh, I know him.
	Oh, yeah.
	So they knew that I was hanging out and talking with their buddies on RT or 360 or Sputnik or Press TV.
	And the three guys got together.
	Could we look through your phone?
	Yeah, sure.
	Go ahead.
	So they just kind of did that.
	And I said, OK.
	And about for 20 minutes of typing and putting stuff together on paper, they stood up, walked out, came back in, said, OK, welcome to Russia.
	And that's how I got in.
	And I jumped in a van.
	I met with Olga and our Tom, Avtom, and Olga is Olya, outside the airport doors.
	Just when you get out, you know, after customs.
	They were there waiting.
	Skål!
	Skål!
	So they went over and said, do you want to stay in Moscow or go to Donbass?
	I said, let's go to Donbass.
	I wanted to get out as fast as possible because I thought I'm going to be swarmed.
	So we jumped on a bus.
	The driver was a military guy.
	Artyom was a military guy.
	Olga was a military mercenary.
	I won't give tattoos or anything because I don't want identifiers.
	We drove about 10 hours to the halfway point to Donbass and stayed at a hotel and then the next day continued on another 10-12 hours.
	Long, long way.
	Like all the way down from Maine to Florida.
	And we rolled in and then went to Soledad, Avdiivka, Mariupol, Donetsk, Gorlovka.
	All these places kind of looked the same.
	They were all piles of rubble amidst a country that resembled Detroit or Kentucky with slag heaps, you know, something out of the Out of the Silence of the Lambs when the agent goes to Ohio.
	I mean, not a glitzy town at all.
	But it was miners, it was miningville, like Pennsylvania.
	So this whole conflict, and I won't go into it, people know where we stand on it, but this whole conflict that has occurred, I mean, going down there, Being in the military areas, you know, the hotels, the people were always charming and stuff, but these hotels have been hit too.
	But then, the worst part was driving up to Soledad, and the whole road had been bombed out by drones.
	You gotta get rid of your phones, and drones are always flying over.
	But the road was so badly bombed it was like driving through an egg carton and you're a Tonka toy, right?
	Or a Matchbox car.
	That's how bad it was.
	But it was a fascinating trip.
	It was a great trip.
	I'm going back to go to the premiere of that film and I'm sure we'll have a better report then Let me say, Scott, I think you were the perfect choice for this.
	Did they pick you because they'd seen you doing interviews on RTs, Sputnik News, and the like?
	I think that's where it will open, but I had been doing Russian TV documentary kind of things since 2015, 2014-2015, and I still think our... I was on Peter Lavelle's Crosstalk in 2015, and I talked about terrorist financing and shell game.
	I think that's where I rang the bell, and I met Peter Lavelle when I was back in Washington.
	Again, we sat down and had lunch.
	Nice guy.
	But they had me on there, and right after that is when Putin went into Syria.
	And a lot of the shell game material regarding Syria and Iraq had financial interests of the Russian campaign.
	So I think Russia picked up on that.
	Keep us posted, Scott.
	We're going to want to feature parts.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Number one, I want to make a quick correction on the last hour.
	I attributed rocking around with a plumb bob to Isaiah.
	That's incorrect.
	Once it goes to Amos, I had forgotten that.
	It's been a long time since I've read those two.
	Secondarily, if you want to understand the people, it's really very, very important to travel to their country.
	If you have the means, I highly suggest you try it.
	I spent most of my time overseas in Asia, up near the Himalayas and in China, around Beijing and Shanghai.
	Look, you just can't substitute book knowledge for that type of information that you're getting.
	And I'm reminded of the story in the movie where you've got Robin Williams and Matt Damon.
	What was that movie called?
	Good Will Hunting.
	Good Will Hunting, where Robin Williams is sitting down with the young man, Matt Damon, and says, you know, your insults don't mean anything because you don't understand a damn thing because you haven't been around.
	And once you've been around, once you've seen the Sistine Chapel, you understand it much, much, much better than something that you read in a book.
	And so that's all I'm going to say on that particular issue.
	I'm glad that you have the knowledge and the insight to be able to bring back to our listenership, and I'm really proud of you for making those trips.
	I don't know if I'd select Russia in terms of my destination of choice, but different strokes for different folks.
	Obviously, you're tougher than me.
	I think it's fabulous.
	All of it.
	Absolutely wonderful.
	Zelensky firing not even a Band-Aid is Ukraine's strategy bleeds out.
	Zelensky's sacking of the popular army chief as a colossal political gamble reflects increasing desperation in Kiev.
	Zelensky's dismissal of the army chief as a colossal gamble seems increasing.
	An increasing mood of desperation and background lies in the failure of last year's offensive, the attempt to shift blame and draw up a new strategy.
	The Ukrainian defeat led to a rather discredible blame game in Washington with the U.S.
	military and some Ukrainians suggesting if Saluni had taken their supposed advice, concentrated the force of the attack on a narrow front rather than in several places simultaneously, Ukrainians could have broken through.
	It's a rather odd argument, because it was just such attacks on narrow fronts the Russian army tried several times immediately following the invasion that led to repeat disasters.
	It ignores the fact that just as U.S.
	satellite intel allowed Ukraine to identify local Russian concentrations and To concentrate in turn, so Russian satellite intel does the same when it's the Ukrainians attacking.
	The truth is, by the summer of 2023, the Ukrainian army simply did not have the superiority in manpower and firepower That would have allowed it to break through heavily fortified lines manned by the numerous and well-armed Russian enemy.
	To have succeeded against these odds would have been quite an exceptional and unusual event in military history.
	Nor is there any significant prospect Ukraine will be able to succeed in the future.
	Even if they receive new Western weaponry over the next year, Russia will be using it to further fortify its defensive lines.
	His dismissal also reflects the fact that General is long been seen as Zelensky's most dangerous future potential rival, given his prestige in the army and popularity among the Ukrainian people.
	We don't know how Zuhlany will react to his dismissal.
	Perhaps he's made a deal.
	However, Ukraine is running out of men.
	Russia has more than four times Ukraine's population and is conscripting more of them, as well as improving its tactics and weaponry.
	The Ukrainian army has been drained by huge casualties and growing unwillingness of the population to serve.
	The average age of Ukrainian soldiers is now 43, far too old for full military effectiveness.
	As a result, Saluni became more and more insistent on the need to expand and toughen conscription.
	It was backed by the soldiers, who became entwined with a growing anger at corruption in Kiev and evasion of service by sons of the elite.
	Moves to tighten conscription and increase penalties for evasion met strong resistance in the population among politicians, a result Perhaps of the unwillingness of the deputies to see their own children conscripted.
	The initial version of a law strengthening conscription was defeated in the Ukrainian parliament.
	Zelensky's reintroduced a softer version.
	Probably won't be nearly enough to compensate for Russia's far greater population and resources.
	Not only they're running out of men, they're running out of tanks, as military struggles repair machinery damaged by Russia.
	Russia.
	The Ukrainian military is currently facing a severe shortage of tanks, as Russia continues to destroy much of their fleet.
	While other tanks have sustained damage, Kihyd lacks the ability to repair.
	This is from Foreign Affairs Magazine, reporting a substantial number of Leopard 2 battle tanks received from foreign states, principally Germany, are no longer in service.
	More than a quarter have already been destroyed by Russian troops.
	The German-made tanks used by Ukraine were lauded as game-changers, but the outlet says Ukraine is quickly discovering they are hardly invulnerable superweapons.
	Foreign Affairs reports of the fewer than 100 Labradors in service.
	At least 26 have been knocked out.
	Others cannot be used due to repair and maintenance issues.
	That Kiev does not have the type of infrastructure in place that needs to maintain that fleet of tanks.
	Here you got one Thomas Nicol, if Russia wins.
	This is a bit of hysteria, which I believe that the Putin interview completely deflates.
	Republican obstructionism could lead to global disaster.
	Ukraine and defenses are in danger of being destroyed and overrun because House Republicans refuse to provide ammunition and aid.
	If Russia wins this war, the consequences could be catastrophic.
	What could happen?
	Ukraine is fighting for the lives of its people in its very existence, running out of ammunition.
	If the U.S.
	doesn't step in, Russia could eventually win this war.
	Frankly, it's already been won.
	Despite the twaddle from propagandists in Moscow and a few academics in the U.S., Russia's war is not about NATO or borders or the balance of power.
	The Russian dictator—actually democratically elected—Vladimir Putin intends to absorb Ukraine into a new Russian empire, and he'll eradicate Ukrainians if they refuse to accept his rule.
	Europe is in the midst of the largest war on the continent since Nazi panzers rolled from Norway to Greece, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine is by far the most important threat to world peace since the worst days of the Cold War.
	In a less febrile political era, defeating Russia would be the top priority of every American politician.
	The Republicans in Congress are fixated both on their hatred of Ukraine and on their affection for Russia.
	What nonsense!
	Their relentless criticism of assistance to Kiev has had its intended effect, taking a bite out of the American public's support for continuing aid, especially as the war has been crowded out by a torrent of more recent news, including Donald Trump's endless legal troubles and Israel's campaign in Gaza.
	So it's time to think more seriously about what might happen if the Republicans succeed in this irresponsible effort to blockade further assistance to Ukraine.
	The collapse and dismemberment of a nation of millions is immediately at stake.
	That should be enough for any American to be appalled at the GOP obstructionism.
	But the peace of the world itself could rest on what Congress does or does not do next.
	What would it even mean for Russia to win?
	A Russian victory does not require sending Moscow's tanks into Kiev, even if that were possible.
	The Russians have taken immense losses in manpower and armor, and they would have to fight house to house if they approached the capital.
	Putin is reckless and a poor strategist, but he is not stupid.
	He knows he doesn't need to plant the Russian flag on the Mother Ukraine statue just yet.
	He can instead tear Ukraine apart piece by piece.
	Meanwhile, NATO gets ready to enter the war amid Kiev's defeat.
	NATO patrons clearly understand the defeat of the Ukraine military and are preparing a further evacuation.
	Escalation of the war against Russia.
	London reportedly proposed to its allies to consider deployment of the NATO Expeditionary Force to Ukraine.
	The chief warmonger supposes to covertly convey highly manoeuvrable NATO forces from the border areas of Romania and Poland To take defense along the Danube River.
	That would allow the release of the necessary military reserves of the Ukrainian army to send them to the front.
	The operation may include a peremptory strike by the armed forces of Moldova and Romania on Transnistria, as well as deployment of the NATO military on the territory of Norway and Finland to disperse Russian forces and launch strikes on strategic infrastructure facilities in the northern regions of Russia.
	Thus, according to London's plan, NATO will allegedly undermine Russia's offensive capability.
	Moscow will be forced to launch negotiations.
	Britain reportedly intends to complete a preparation of such a scenario by May of this year.
	The plan does not correspond to the will of European countries to fight Russia by using others' force, but London is sure that the ongoing Russian advance deep into Ukraine will persuade them to take decisive action.
	In fact, The NATO military has long been deployed in Ukraine, disguised as mercenaries and military instructors.
	Today, the Western warmongers are only looking ways to legalize the NATO presence in Ukraine.
	Here's Tucker.
	Pretty much everything that NBC News and the New York Times have told you about the war in Ukraine is a lie.
	The Russian army is incompetent, they claim.
	Ukraine is a democracy.
	Vladimir Putin is Hitler and he's trying to take over the world.
	Thankfully, the Ukrainians are winning.
	None of that is true.
	Every claim is false, the last one especially.
	The Ukrainian army is not winning.
	In fact, it's losing badly.
	Ukraine is being destroyed.
	Its population is being slaughtered in lopsided battles with a technologically superior enemy, or scattered by the millions to the rest of the globe as refugees.
	Ukraine is running out of soldiers.
	As that happens, the question will inevitably arise, who's going to replace them?
	If the Ukrainians can't beat Putin, who will?
	The answer, of course, will be us.
	American troops will fight the Russian army in Eastern Europe.
	That's most likely.
	And the assumption is, we'll win.
	But will we win?
	Probably not, says former Army Colonel Douglas MacGregor, a decorated combat veteran who advised the Secretary of Defense in the last administration.
	The U.S., says MacGregor, is on the brink of a catastrophic war that could very easily destroy us.
	Few Americans seem to understand that, but they should.
	Doug McGregor is now the CEO of our country, Our Choice, and we sat down with him recently.
	This conversation is worth hearing.
	Doug McGregor, thanks for joining us.
	How would you assess and describe the state of the war in Ukraine right now?
	That's an important question, and not enough people have good answers at this point.
	I think all of the lies that have been told for more than a year and a half about the Ukrainians are winning, the Ukrainian cause is just, the Russians are evil, the Russians are incompetent, all of that is collapsing.
	And it's collapsing because what's happening on the battlefield is horrific.
	Ukrainians now we think have lost 400,000 men killed in battle.
	We were talking about 300, 350,000 a few months ago.
	In the last month of this supposed counteroffensive, which was to sweep the battlefield, they lost at least 40,000 killed.
	We don't even know how many people have been wounded, but we know that probably upwards of 40,000 to 50,000 soldiers are amputees.
	We know the hospitals are full.
	And we know that Ukrainian units at the platoon and company level, that's with anywhere from 50 to 150 to 200 men, are in piecemeal fashion surrendering to the Russians.
	Not because they don't want to fight, it's because they can't fight anymore.
	They had so many wounded, they can't evacuate them.
	And commanders are saying, well, if I can't evacuate my wounded, I'm going to surrender, because otherwise the wounded will die.
	And so they call the Russians.
	They all speak Russian.
	And tell them on the radio, look, I've got 50, 60 wounded here.
	I'm going to surrender because I don't want them to be killed.
	And the Russians from the very beginning have always treated the Ukrainian soldiers very fairly and very gently.
	And so they know they're not going to be abused or mistreated.
	They know they can actually be exchanged for Russian prisoners in the future.
	So they surrender.
	And I think we're going to see this army that we've been spending so heavily on increasingly melt away.
	And it's pretty much.
	That's, of course, an earlier interview with McGregor, but it's so telling in relation to current temporary propaganda.
	Scott, your thoughts.
	Yeah, McGregor's not been in the Don Bass or seen these things yet.
	It would be good for him.
	I like to pray that his health strengthens.
	He is one of the great assets that we have in the intellectual bank of American military thinkers and historians and analysts.
	Very, very capable man and good-willed and good-hearted and
	would be a brilliant Secretary of Defense under the Trump administration, would be a brilliant Vice President, Jim, to be honest with you, which would have been interesting if General Douglas MacArthur had become Vice President for Eisenhower, you know, but there's one general too many kind of thing, or even Truman, but Truman was a snake in a sense.
	McGregor nails a lot of what we're going to see happening.
	Here's, in a nutshell, Russia's temperament, its disposition, its strategy is going to lead it to victory in Ukraine like a woman clearing smoke out of a room that comes from a kitchen fire.
	You know, with gradual, rhythmic, slow pacing and a resolve to finish until the air is cleared, so will Russia clear the air of Nazi sounds and screams and trauma and terror and violence and burning and antagonisms.
	All of this was started by the hatred and the violence and the antagonism, which was birthed Out of the Maidan 2014 coup d'etat.
	And that is the energy that needs to be analyzed that appears in every article, broadcast, commentators, words, disposition, and tonality towards the, you know, Russia in general, but Russia specifically in the Ukraine theater.
	And they use all sorts of Angry, accusatory, violent, insulting, demeaning, even psychologically, mentally, you know, sociopathic.
	That animates their interpretation.
	But the thing is, Jim, it's the direct opposite of reality.
	The opposite of all the hostility to Russia is reflected in the substantive reality of what's in the hearts and minds and the words and the actions of the people over there.
	Ukraine has fallen into a brainwashing MKUltra rewriting of history that really was triggered in 2005, the color revolution, when Friends of mine who were in the agency overseeing the election operations, they installed the guy who had his face all poisoned.
	I can't remember his name, but I've pronounced it before.
	But he was married to the blonde Ukrainian woman that was picked under Kilpatrick and Reagan and Bauer and all those guys in the 1990s, late 1980s.
	She was 90s, and she married this president that the CIA then, of course, put into Ukraine, and that was the first color revolution.
	That was the first coup d'etat.
	And they did it by having three rounds of an election that the pro-Russian guy won both times, twice, and certain powers forced a third vote.
	And it was in the third vote that this American proxy was elected, allegedly.
	So that was the first manipulation of the election.
	And it's gone down a train wreck ever since.
	Barack Obama, you know, cultivated the bioweapons labs positioning from 2008 up to 2016.
	That was Obama.
	That was Lugar.
	That was Biden.
	That was, you know, Biden in particular.
	Headed up the financial, money laundering, child sex trafficking.
	I'm sure that's where they gave Biden a taste.
	And you see that in Hunter Biden with his photos of the 13, 14-year-old girls.
	In panties, resting their feet on Hunter Biden's chest and stomach and legs in a massagic, massagetory, sort of subtle, suggestive language in photograph.
	That whole area was originally in the Obama, Biden, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry orbit.
	And then the color revel and a Victoria Nuland And John McCain, again McCain and Lindsey Graham, they overthrew in 2014 and caused this avalanche of genocide, hatred, annihilation, murder, killing, and vicious, violent, almost Orcian out of Lord of the Rings behaviors and mentality.
	I interrogated, questioned gently, but it was an interrogation and this guy knew it.
	I interrogated Ukrainian prisoners of war, some of whom were hardcore right-wing Asimov battalion members, who had tattoos all over them, and swastikas, and runic symbols on their calves, and their arms, and the shields, and all of it.
	And these men were not mouth-dripping, mouth-frothing fanatics, but they realized they had made a mistake.
	And some of them had been in prison, some of them had, you know, come out of Broken environments, but that's what the CIA always does.
	They always pick these broken people to use them, and they marshaled them using drugs.
	Same Ukrainians, in a sense, that came to Washington on January 6th.
	These same operations were orchestrated with the use of drugs, with the use of Nazi spiritual propaganda of a wicker or Wiccan sort of flavor.
	That permeates a lot of it and gets you really the dragon's teeth.
	And these are the guys that I met the cameraman in Donetsk who had found the young woman who had been raped and had her stomach branded in the form of a swastika and then had a knife cut the trace of the brand of the swastika in her stomach and killed her.
	And I'm sure organ harvesting and other things have been done.
	That is the face of evil, Jim, that MacGregor needs to see, Ritter needs to see.
	I saw, and I saw others who had seen that evil.
	And it was their patience, again, and their kindliness that made me see the Russians and the Russian soldiers and the Russian nurses in the old Donetsk area as Christ saying, Paul, Paul, or Saul, Saul, why do you persecute us without me?
	That's what the Russians have been saying to the Ukrainians in every way.
	And Boris Johnson overthrew it.
	Biden overthrew it when they tried to make a peace deal.
	But Zelensky, Jewish, fake Jew, Khazarian, Ashkenazi, little comedian, little piano playing with your dick, possible fag.
	I don't know, but there's...
	That guy is brought in.
	That's a joke.
	That's a joke that was put on us.
	And of course, Klaus Schwab's, no, I'm sorry, George Soros' son, getting made a minister and signing over portions of Ukraine to companies.
	Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street.
	Russia knows all about that, too.
	And China does, too.
	Remember, China hates Soros with a passion.
	Because of his crippling of the Asian money in the 1990s.
	But all of this, Jim, long-windedly, is just to say there's going to be a healing victory from Russia.
	And I'll put it this way.
	I'll end it this way.
	Russia is a nut, a nut that is very, very tight.
	We are a cheap wrench made in China that doesn't have the torque integrity to turn that nut.
	We will break!
	We will not loosen Russia.
	In fact, Russia is only going to tighten down more, and you're going to see all of Europe leave the insanity and separate.
	What's going to happen in the United States is also going to happen in Europe, and you see that right now with the farmers standing up, throwing manure, blocking streets, and saying, we've got machines that will kill you, Mr. Police Officer.
	Don't mess with us.
	Jim?
	Well, I probably have a more simple, simplistic perspective of this particular war, but I see those Ukrainians as nothing more than cannon fodder for a useless military-industrial complex that wants to launder 150 to 200 billion dollars worth of money into the hands of people that they'll let into the club.
	It's unfortunate that that's the way the world sees it, but let's face it.
	These soldiers have been regarded as nothing more than material to be expended in war.
	These people have been deceived into believing that they have a form of useful leadership in Zelensky, who's nothing more than a puppet and an actor for the World Health or the World Economic Forum and all the rest of the Zionist cartel controlled bankers and London and the rest of the world.
	These people are puppets and they ought to be very, very upset.
	They never had a chance from the beginning to beat Russia.
	Russia's got a massive military structure with hypersonic missiles that are able to defeat anything.
	Russia's been nothing but patient, letting it go down.
	They are just simply military weapons to be used to weaken Russia in the continuing quest for global domination, where if Russia is a chess piece that falls, they will achieve their global domination.
	They can't beat Russia because Russia has such a staunch, orthodox mentality and mindset that is set up, and they believe in themselves as a people.
	They still believe in something.
	The rest of the world has teetered and fallen.
	Look at America.
	We're now into trans this and gay that and black this and purple this.
	It's such a mess.
	We've fallen.
	Now all we're doing is getting rid of the old ammunition and replacing it with new ammunition under the auspices of fighting some sort of moral, righteous war.
	What about this war is righteous and moral?
	What is it that we are fighting for?
	What are we doing?
	It doesn't make any sense at all unless for the military-industrial complex to burn it all up.
	So that's my summary of it.
	Maybe it's simplistic.
	Maybe it's wrong.
	Maybe not.
	That's the way I see it.
	I think it gets through a lot of smoke and mirrors, actually, Brian.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, 250 U.S.
	cargo planes, at least 20 ships, have delivered more than 10,000 tons of armament and military equipment to Israel since the war on Gaza began.
	This is from Covert Action Magazine.
	Unfazed by the International Court of Justice genocide case brought by South Africa, even more deadly weapons are on the way.
	Times of Israel reported NOS bought 250 cargo by 20 ships and delivered more than 10,000 tons of ammunition and equipment to Israel since the onslaught began in October, and this was as of January 25th.
	The same article stated that the Israeli Defense Minister-Director visited Washington To finalize, a purchase of 25 F-35 stealth fighter jets, 25 F-15 fighter jets, and 12 Apache choppers from the U.S.
	In late December, Times of Israel reported the Israeli ministry had made almost $2.8 billion in additional purchases from the U.S.
	In addition to $3.8 billion in military aid, the U.S.
	provides Israel annually On January 26th, 17-judge panel at the International Court of Justice at The Hague ruled that South Africa had a solid foundation to bring its case of genocide before the world's highest court.
	As of this writing, the IDF has killed more than 26,000 civilians, injured 65,000 more, while reducing much of Gaza to rubble.
	The ICJ case may very well implicate the U.S., which provided most of the weapons used to kill Palestinian civilians in violation of the laws of war.
	Palestinian journalist Ramzi Baroud wrote, The fingerprints of U.S.
	weapons are on the body of every Palestinian killed in Gaza, from the Al-A'ida Baptist Hospital to U.N.
	schools to every house and every street.
	According to Barrow, never before in the history of the U.S.
	relationship with the Middle East has Washington been so directly involved in an Israeli war.
	The closest was the 1973 war, and even then, U.S.
	involvement arrived a week later and was hardly as direct.
	In December, Amnesty International carried out an investigation determining Joint Direct Attack Munition, JDAM, manufactured by Boeing in St.
	Louis, Missouri, were used by the Israeli military in two unlawful airstrikes on homes full of citizens in the Gaza Strip on October 10 and 13.
	Fragments from the bombs found in the rubble.
	These strikes on the al-Najjar family home in Deir al-Ban and al-Abu Amus family home in the same city killed a total of 43 civilians, including 19 children and 14 women.
	In both cases, survivors told Amnesty International there had been no warning of an imminent strike.
	Amnesty has also raised alarm at the use of white phosphorus bombs in Gaza.
	In violation of international laws, it may have been exported from the U.S.
	In 2008-09, Operation Gas Lad, Israel used white phosphorus bombs that were produced in Louisiana and Arkansas.
	A target of anti-war activism during the Vietnam War.
	White phosphorus bombs are designed to burn people's flesh to the bone.
	Another weapon widely used—BLU-109 2,000-pound bunker busters made in the U.S., which, according to ABB, has killed thousands after being dropped in densely populated neighborhoods on the Gaza Strip.
	Scott, it's just awful.
	Never before have we, in the history of man, had episodes where babies and one-year-olds and two-year-olds and three-year-olds are now having their arms and legs amputated because of violence inflicted upon them by Israeli military and other operations.
	Never so many children having their faces blown off and blinded.
	that we have now and this is just pure evil pure pure and simple evil that that's that's uh unacceptable on any level but we're seeing it and we're seeing all of this this blind drunk
	Maniacally retarded psychopath attitude or brain programming by the automatons in the Senate and in the House, but in the Senate particularly.
	The automatons, the mediocrity of mind.
	It is striking to me that we, America and Americans, would have such people of devoid capability at the highest area of our polis.
	is a confirmation that this is all a fraud because this is impossible to have such people in positions.
	They're picked, they're put there, they're compromised, they've been videotaped, they're schizophrenic, there's whatever issues.
	They've been bought and they've been put in and they're limited in their talents.
	So we really do need to divorce ourselves of Washington, D.C.
	Anything that was established or incorporated after 1870, 1871, return to the United Republics of America, and have a constitutional convention in 2025 to make that the first statement.
	The United States of America shall be known as the United Republic of America.
	That should be the constitutional convention that Trump and Tucker call as president, vice president.
	I think that's the best calculation for a political victory.
	And the thing that's gonna result is if these Muslim and Arabic countries aren't alive and aren't real, then they'll continue to do nothing.
	But I think the opposite is going to happen.
	You're going to have individuals and religious leaders inspire millions to take guerrilla warfare to Israel.
	Because we've just seen in Rafah, Israeli snipers shooting women carrying babies.
	Kill the mothers and try to kill the babies.
	But guys with sticks from around corners are trying to get the baby because the woman just fell dead in the street, shot by a sniper.
	So Israel is doing genocide.
	It's doing murder.
	It's doing demonic evil.
	And I think the world is going to coalesce around it like a, like a, you know, I've said and I'll say again the only way to stop this is through a coordinated naval operation where hospital ships and material ships provide food and clothing and blankets and everything of necessity with Turkey, Russia, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and an UNRWA boat leading
	Landing on the sands and setting up peripheral public markets in emergency triage and mass units and expand it 5 miles within 30 days and 10 miles within 60 days and 25 miles within 90 days, if not double that.
	And also lease the territory to China, to Russia, to Iran, or to BRICS, that territory of the Gaza Strip that is populated by these BRICS property ships and humanitarian aid, and make it a BRICS diplomatic compound that's leased to the Palestinian people, government authority, whatever.
	But that takes it out of the orbit of Israel.
	Israel can't bomb Turkish, Chinese, and Russian ships standing together.
	This isn't the USS Liberty Part 2.
	Israel would really be annihilated by Hezbollah, by Syria, by Iraq, by Iran.
	They're slowly squeezing the neck of the serpent, and they're going to do it very easy and gently and slowly until it cracks.
	And that's going to be the end of Netanyahu.
	That's going to be Israel being deconstructed as a result of just a swarming around it, like the film World War Z, where Jerusalem is surrounded by zombies.
	That's going to be occurring on a less dramatic level.
	And it's going to lead to the political surrender of every person living in Israel with an amnesty for the crimes that Israel committed in the past.
	Brian.
	Make no mistake about it, what's happening in Israel and Palestine right now is a genocide of the Palestinians.
	Just this last week, a couple days ago, the EuroMed Human Rights Monitor issued a report and a statement showing that Israel was attacking the ambulances and the hospitals, making sure that people that were injured cannot get to the hospitals.
	It is a full-on genocide.
	Now, why are we supporting it?
	If you look under the hood and you start asking questions, why are they supporting this invasion on our southern border?
	I would venture to say that these American politicians who have sold out, these Democrats and Republicans who have done that, are planning to use this as a model to take out the rest of what's remaining of the white Christian American society as well.
	They're getting ready to activate, probably, if they're running with Biden, then they're probably getting ready to activate their forces here in America.
	They're going to do a false flag similar to what October 7th was.
	If Biden runs, they will certainly cheat on the election.
	The false flag will take place blaming MAGA or whites or Christians, whatever.
	It will be directed against Mexicans or against politicians or against something else.
	They'll activate their military industrial complex and they'll start a war on us.
	They're just trying to figure out how surgical they actually have to be.
	And I think this is the test of taking out these small Palestinians in Israel.
	It's a test to figure out how to surgically strike and get rid of their competition.
	And I think that the Democrats and the Republicans in Washington, D.C.
	have made a deal with the devil where they've said, OK, Israel will support you in terms of genociding the Palestinians if you support us in terms of genociding MAGA.
	Now can't you see it coming?
	Can't you feel it?
	They're going to run with Biden.
	They can't run with Kamala Harris.
	I don't know if you saw the drunken debacle that she put out as a statement this last week, but it was an absolute mess.
	They can't run with Biden because nobody has any confidence in him whatsoever.
	So what's left?
	Leave Biden on the ticket, cheat the election, create a false flag and blame it on us.
	That starts the internal war, the civil war, the strife.
	They activate the military component that came across the border using a same false flag style and do it to us as well.
	I think that we are looking... And dress them up as MAGAs.
	Dress them up as MAGAs.
	Yeah, let's dress them up.
	Let's take these feds and dress them up and let's go with more pipe bombs and let's go with more January 6th style bullshit and let's blame Whitey.
	I mean, haven't they been doing it?
	It's so easy for the Jews to control the mobs in terms of Black Lives Matter, in terms of Antifa, and in terms of the academic youth that has no idea what's going on.
	And the Jews have a history that goes back thousands of years of controlling and activating the mobs.
	They're the best in the world, and there's nothing like it anywhere at all.
	So we've made a deal with the devil, and our politicians have done so the same.
	And I think that that deal with the devil is we will make sure that the Democrats remain in power through the military activation of their cells here in America, and I think we're the next target.
	So if we don't stop what's going on in Palestine, which we will not and have not, then why wouldn't they release the same techniques here in America?
	Very disturbing.
	I wish I could say I thought you were wrong.
	Meanwhile, Biden gave a little explanation about why the finding of a special counsel that he was not going to be punished because he was an elderly man with a bad memory turned out to be a fiasco.
	Get this.
	As you know, the special counsel released this finding today about their look into my handling of classified documents.
	I was pleased to see he reached a firm conclusion.
	That no charges should be brought against me in this case.
	This was an exhaustive investigation going back more than 40 years, even in the 1970s when I was still a new United States Senator.
	The special counsel acknowledged I cooperated completely.
	I did not throw up any roadblocks.
	I sought no delays.
	In fact, I was so determined to give the Special Counsel what he needed, I went forward with a five-hour in-person, five-hour in-person interview over two days on October the 8th and 9th of last year, even though Israel had just been attacked by Hamas on the 7th and I was very occupied.
	It was in the middle of handling an international crisis.
	I was especially pleased to see Special Counsel make clear The stark distinction and difference between this case and Mr. Trump's case.
	The special counsel wrote, and I quote, several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear, continuing to quote, most notably, after giving multiple chances to return classified documents to avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
	According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.
	In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations, including his home, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation." I've seen the headlines since the report was released about my willful retention of documents.
	These assertions are not only misleading, they're just plain wrong.
	On page 215, if you had a chance, I know it's a long, it's a thick document.
	On page 215, the report of the special counsel found the exact opposite.
	Here's what he wrote.
	There is in fact a shortage of evidence that I willfully retain classified materials related to Afghanistan.
	On page 12, the Special Counsel also wrote, for in other documents, the decision to decline criminal charges was straightforward.
	The evidence suggests that Mr. Biden did not willfully retain these documents.
	The evidence says I did not willfully retain these documents.
	In addition, I know there's some attention paid to some language in the report about my recollection of events.
	There's even reference that I don't remember when my son died.
	How the hell dare he raise that?
	Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself, it wasn't any of their damn business.
	Let me tell you something.
	Some of you have commented, I wear, since the day he died, every single day, the rosary he got from Our Lady of Every Memorial Day, we hold a service remembering him, attended by friends and family and the people who loved him.
	I don't need anyone.
	I don't need anyone to remind me when he passed away or passed away.
	Simple truth is, I sat for a five-hour interview over two days of events, going back 40 years.
	At the same time I was managing an international crisis, Their task was to make a decision about whether to move forward with charges in this case.
	That's their decision to make.
	That's the council's decision to make.
	That's his job.
	And they decided not to move forward.
	For any extraneous commentary, they don't know what they're talking about.
	It has no place in this report.
	The bottom line is the matter is now closed.
	I'm going to continue what I've always focused on.
	My job of being President of the United States of America.
	Thank you and I'll take some questions.
	President Biden, something the special counsel said in his report is that one of the reasons you were not charged is because, in his description, you are a well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.
	I'm well-meaning, and I'm an elderly man, and I know what the hell I'm doing.
	I've been president, and I put this country back on its feet.
	I don't need his recommendation.
	How bad is your memory, and can you continue as president?
	my memory is so bad i let you speak that's that's that's my memory has gotten worse mr president my memory is not my memory is fine my memory Take a look at what I've done since I've become president.
	None of you thought I could pass any of the things I got passed.
	How'd that happen?
	You know, I guess I just forgot what was going on.
	Mr. President, Mr. President.
	Do voters have concerns about your age?
	How are you going to dissuade them?
	Do you fear that this report is only going to fuel further concerns about your age?
	Only by some of you.
	Mr. President, Mr. President, Mr. President, you are cleared of criminal liability today.
	Do you take responsibility for at least being careless with classified material?
	I take responsibility for not having seen exactly what my staff was doing.
	It goes in and points out.
	Things that appeared in my garage, things that came out of my home, things that were moved, were moved not by me, but my staff.
	But my staff.
	Mr. President, for months when you were asked about your age, you would respond with the words, watch me.
	Many American people have been watching and they have expressed concerns about your age.
	That is your judgment.
	That is your judgment.
	That is not the judgment of the press.
	They express concerns about your mental acuity.
	They say that you are too old.
	Mr. President, in December, you told me that you believe there are many other Democrats who could defeat Donald Trump.
	So why does it have to be you now?
	What is your answer to that question?
	Because I'm the most qualified person in this country to be President of the United States and finish the job I started.
	I did not share classified information.
	I did not share it.
	With my ghostwriter.
	I did not.
	Guarantee you did not.
	But the special counsel said it.
	No, I did not say that.
	Thank you, everyone.
	Thank you very much.
	I did not share classified information.
	I did not share it.
	With your ghostwriter?
	With my ghostwriter.
	I did not.
	Guarantee you did not.
	But the special counsel said it enough.
	No, he did not say that.
	Okay.
	He did not say that.
	Mr. President, what other...
	Let me answer your question.
	The fact of the matter is, what I didn't want repeated, I didn't want him to not, and I didn't read it to him, was I had written a long memorandum to President Obama why we should not be in Afghanistan.
	And I was—multiple pages.
	And so what I was referring to, I said, classified it.
	I should have said it was—should be private, because it was a contact between the President and the Vice President as to what was going on.
	That's what he's referring to.
	It was not classified information in that document.
	That was not classified.
	When you look back at this incident, is there anything you would do differently now?
	And do you think that a special prosecutor should have been appointed in the first place in both of these cases?
	First of all, what I would have done is oversee the transfer of the material that was in my office, in my offices.
	I should have done that.
	If I go back, I didn't have the responsibility of that, that was my staff was supposed to do that, and they referenced that in the report.
	And my staff did not do it in a way that, for example, I didn't know how half the boxes got in my garage.
	Until I found out, staff gathered them up, put them together, and took them to the garage in my home.
	And all the stuff that was in my home was in filing cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked.
	It was in my house.
	It wasn't out in, like, in Mar-a-Lago, in a public place where... And none of it was high-classified.
	It didn't have any of that red stuff on it.
	You know what I mean?
	Around the corners?
	None of that.
	And so I wish I had paid more attention to how the documents were being moved and where.
	I thought they were being moved to the archives.
	I thought all was being moved.
	That's what I thought.
	Now what was the last part of your question?
	- Whether a special counsel should have been appointed in this case and in the case of your rival, former President Trump. - I think a special counsel should have been appointed.
	And the reason I think a special counsel should have been appointed is because I did not want to be in a position that they looked at Trump and weren't gonna look at me, just like they looked at the vice president.
	And the fact is, they made a firm conclusion.
	I did not break the law.
	Period.
	Thank you all very, very much.
	Let me just say, CNN reported Biden made three false claims about the special counsel report that you have just heard.
	Senior reporter Daniel Dale Friday, Biden made three false claims at his Thursday press conference.
	Biden said, all the stuff that was in my home was in filing cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked.
	Dale said, just not true, John.
	The report from the special counsel It includes photos, shots of a box sitting in President Biden's Delaware garage.
	The special counsel described it as a badly damaged box sitting amid a house full of detritus.
	So there was some material that was in cabinets, locked or lockable, as the president said, but not all of it.
	And that open, unsealed damage box included, according to the special counsel, highly sensitive, top-secret material about the war in Afghanistan.
	Mine said none of it was highly classified.
	I didn't have that red stuff around the corner.
	They all say that.
	The claim they didn't have any material that was quote-unquote highly classified is also not true.
	The Special Counsel reports that the President possessed multiple highly classified documents that were indeed marked as being highly classified, including some marked as top-secret S.C.I., Sensitive Compartmentalized Information.
	That's a very high level of classification.
	Whatever coloring they had, the special counsel said they were clearly marked as highly classified.
	Biden said, I did not share classified information with my ghostwriter.
	Dale said, so he's saying he didn't do it?
	He can defend himself?
	But he also said the special counsel didn't say that he did share that classified info with a ghostwriter, except John.
	The special counsel did say that explicitly.
	Her wrote, quote, Mr. Biden shared information, including some classified information, with his ghostwriters.
	So there it is in black and white.
	Does each statement give you major concern?
	Polls have shown Biden's state of mental health incompetence has become the greatest issue of the campaign.
	At 81 years old, Joe Biden does not have the necessary mental or physical health to be president for a second term.
	62% agree.
	Meanwhile, special counsel report put Biden's age and memory in the spotlight.
	After an inquiry concluded Biden was well-meaning, But out of poor memory, he angrily fired back in an attempt at political damage control.
	All right, trailing Commander Trump—and this is Mike King of the anti-New York Times—in multiple balls and weakened by the day, the whiteout imposter Joe Biden was just out a death blow, no pun intended, which just sank his make-believe campaign very close to the breaking point, and we're only in February.
	From the article, The decision Thursday not to file a criminal charge against President Biden for mishandling classified documents should have been an unequivocal legal exoneration.
	Instead, it was a political disaster.
	The investigation into Biden's handling of the docs after being vice president concluded He was a well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory and had diminished faculties in advancing age.
	Such startling assertions may prompt a firing emotional attempt at political damage control from the present within hours.
	In essence, what the special counsel, a Republican named Robert Hoare, has declared is this.
	Yes, Ryden broke the law when he was vice president, but he was already senile then, and his mind is really toasted now.
	So we're not going to charge the poor old man.
	Our words, not hers.
	How are Biden people supposed to respond to this?
	Imagine he is not senile.
	He knows perfectly well that he broke the law and remembers everything.
	No, that won't work.
	Well, Trump, Megalan, and all of Conservative Incorporated having a good old time tearing down Biden over this assessment of his mental state.
	Fake news, now under White House submission, has gone wall to wall with her damning diagnosis.
	The proper interpretation of this development must be constructed within the context of the ongoing military-run psychological operation.
	It's not a question of forecasting the future, like predicting the outcome of a legitimate boxing match, but rather of guessing what the script it ended will be, as in a rigged professional wrestling match.
	In other words, the question to ask here is not How will this affect the 2024 presidential race, but rather, what are the White House up to now?
	We think we may have an answer.
	Until now, the editorial board of the anti-New York Times has abided by an editorial decision and not comment on persistent speculation within the community that Big Mike Obongo would replace Biden as a Democrat demon rat nominee.
	There just wasn't enough there there.
	With a concurrent combination of the media's recent mainstreaming,
	Of the draft Big Mike theory and this early pummeling of Joe Biden would certainly fit a dramatic script in which the D's summer nominating convention dumps a badly damaged and senile old man in favor of the only universally recognized demon rap name in America capable of staying toe-to-toe with Trump, Saint Michelle versus Commander Trump.
	Now, that would be epic.
	If Trump and the White House are running this whole show, and according to Mike King they are, what would it benefit the plan to trounce Big Mike instead of Creepy Joe if this switch does turn out to happen?
	There would have to be a specific reason.
	Might this be personal for Trump?
	Who among us who has viewed the events could ever forget the public humiliation which then President Bongo subjected an offenseless Trump to at the 2011 White House Correspondents' Dinner?
	Seated at his table, Trump was made to stew in his own juices as the arrogant, girly man mocked him from the podium over conspiracy theory claims regarding Obongo's birth certificate.
	It is a fact, well known to Trump and enemies alike, that he loves getting even with those who have truly wronged him.
	What better way to do so than to savagely run head-to-head against Big Mike and, by logical extension, his husband, Bathhouse Barry?
	Who knows?
	Maybe by the time such a campaign is done, nor me done, we got to learn that Big Mike actually has a penis, as those of us who have followed well know.
	You can see it there.
	And now he let his beard grow when his husband was no longer President Scott.
	Well, the double standards there and, of course, the double standard mocks justice and the mocking of justice shows you have no rights, you have no fairness.
	When you don't have justice, you don't have a soul.
	That's the very clear impression that that's the agenda is to make an American without a soul.
	And this is the instruments and the tactics for doing so.
	Destroying the soul, destroying sexuality, transgenderism, transhumanism, atheism, divorce, anti-family policies, homosexuality, masquerading as normal and nuclear.
	But you don't have a soul when all of these things are done.
	And American people are going to interpret that from these acts of injustice and double standards, from the failure to prosecute Biden, who, you know, anything that's classified with the mark classified as secret and such, Uh, cannot be made unsecret by anyone except the president, so you don't take stuff that's marked that way or it's a clear-cut drop.
	If you're not, if you, yeah, you could have a secret classification, but, and again, I've been through all this training and in-doc, you can't take anything anywhere except from one skiff to another, period, and only if you're a courier Only if you've got that clearance.
	Biden was never president, so he couldn't declassify any of this.
	So the double standard is going to add to the momentum of the wave that's going to crash upon this country very, very soon.
	And everything that I'm reading and hearing and seeing is a demonstration of the absolute irredeemable political corruption that this country is suffering with the automatons in Congress, with their throwing and wasting U.S.
	money that could be spent building roads, doing other things, building Uh, development zones on the border, instead wasting on a Ukrainian Nazi savage lunatic regime doing savage lunatic things such as biochemical weapons and other things.
	So this is also going to be impounded upon Americans because internationally we're seeing they're not changing.
	Right now they're going after Hungary.
	They've just had the president of Hungary Her name is, let's see, Kalin Kovac or Novak.
	Katalin Novak is the Hungarian Prime Minister.
	She's just been forced to resign because of mobs and thousands allegedly in the street about her pardoning of someone that had sexual child material.
	But to remove a president, that tells me there's something a lot more there.
	And given the Orban threats against his economy, and this now forcing the president, I would probably bet she was threatened with death or something like that.
	But if they're doing this to Hungary, Another color revolution, another thing that they did to Ukraine they try to do in Georgia.
	They're going to do the same thing to the United States.
	They're going to dress up a bunch of Mexicans and Hispanics as MAGA and drive them around to act like rabid lunatic dogs, biting and snarling and shooting and destroying property.
	And all of the things that we've allowed to be done to Gaza and Donetsk Don't be surprised if that happens to certain places in the United States.
	And anything's possible with the overflow of weapons.
	All of the explosions and violence of these weapons is going to become more and more common simply because of the propensity of weapons to be everywhere, Jim.
	Well, you make that very important point, President.
	Trump was president and had ultimate declassification authority.
	Anything he wanted declassified would be declassified.
	He had the staying order.
	Anything he took with him was automatically declassified.
	Biden as vice president did not.
	And while Biden had stuff in his garage and all that, Trump had an approved vault that both the National Archives and the FBI had to keep it secure, which Biden also bravuricated upon in his press conference.
	Really shocking, the shamelessness, the lying, the incompetence.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	Trump likely won the 2020 election after all.
	After extensive analysis using raw survey data coupled with mail-in vote totals, we conclude the mail-in voter fraud almost certainly changed the 2020 election outcome in all six crucial swinging states—Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia.
	According to the legacy news network, social media platform, various deep state actors, and other corrupt institutions, the 2020 election was the safest and most secure in history, and anyone who questioned Biden's victory was a wacky election denier.
	That has been the dominant narrative for the past three years, which has produced a chilling effect, causing many to forego constructing a deep dive concerning whether the 2020 election really was as safe and secure as we have been told.
	It's incumbent upon the 50-state to ensure their voting systems are as safe and secure as possible.
	We still have time to make necessary changes.
	In other words, have rampant mail-in voter fraud been present in the 2020 election?
	Trump would have been prevented in the 2020 election.
	Donald Trump would have won the electoral college and been re-elected to a second term.
	At this point, you may wonder how I can be so sure that the election was tainted by mail-in voter fraud.
	The answer is simple.
	The voters have told us so.
	In late 2023, the Heartland Institute in Rasmussen conducted a simple survey to gauge the degree of voter fraud in the 2020 election.
	We asked 1,085 who participated about their voting behavior three years prior.
	To our surprise, the results showed at least one in five mail-in voters admitted to committing ballot fraud in the 2020 election.
	Here's another.
	Mail-in-ballot broad study finds Trump almost certainly won in 2020.
	A new study examining the likely impact fraudulent mail-in ballots had in 2020 concludes that outcome would almost certainly have been different without a massive expansion of voting by mail.
	The Heartland Institute study sought to gauge the probable impact of the mail-in ballots cast for then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Trump, would have had on the overall outcome.
	The study was based on data from a Heartland-Rasmussen survey in December that revealed roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.
	After the researchers carried out additional analyses, they concluded mail-in ballot fraud significantly impacted the 2020 election.
	They also found absent the huge expansion of mail-in ballots during the pandemic.
	Often done without legislative approval, President Trump most likely would have won.
	Had the 2020 election been conducted like every national election has for the past two centuries, where the vast majority of voters cast ballots in person rather than by mail, Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected.
	Over 43% of 2020 votes were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S.
	history.
	Scott.
	We knew it was bad.
	We've already had that proved before.
	Here is further confirmation.
	Yeah, you know, we're seeing all these things quickly being compounded, and I think, you know, the transition, the political breakup is always the end result of all of these things.
	This is a cycle in history that we haven't seen since 1900, essentially.
	You know, 1900, essentially.
	You saw it in 1945 by war, but that wasn't as tectonic as 1900.
	And before that, you saw it in Civil War only in America, but also to an extent 1776.
	Well, 1776 was the big one.
	All All of these things are driving us towards a new awakening, a new consciousness, and that's you're on one side or the other.
	You're on the side of openness, transparency, conversation, rhetoric, language, truth, historical analysis.
	Analysis being the key word.
	Analysis using shared definitions and language and historical references and interpretations of those.
	For the impact on both the present and the future.
	And that's the problem.
	No one in the United States is looking to the future except the young people who have a future.
	Everyone under the age of 30 is very horrified by what Israel is doing and wants nothing to do with them or the military or service of Israel or Netanyahu.
	And this applies all over the world.
	Israel, the United States, Britain, Europe, and of course Muslim and African countries.
	So what was begun in the World International Court of Justice is only going to Build in momentum.
	It's going to sort of ricochet like a pinball, but it's going to build up momentum and energy, and that ultimately is going to swing backwards and totally deconstruct Israel as a political entity.
	And I don't think there's Samson option.
	I don't think any of their propaganda is going to take root, especially if 90% of the population is vaccinated with COVID-19.
	Jim?
	Nice.
	Meanwhile, after Biden finally admits there's a border crisis, you won't believe who he blames.
	The U.S.
	has been exposed to a monumental crisis affecting citizens all across the land.
	From small towns along the southern border to major cities, the crisis is hurting this nation's citizens.
	For years, the current president has appointed lackeys in the federal government.
	Have not only allowed but encouraged this harm on the people of the country.
	Government leaders have lied to Congress about the border being secure while allowing millions of illegal immigrants to flow across with abandon.
	As the 2024 presidential election gained steam, Biden and his team came up with a brilliant way to handle being called out for the border crisis they created.
	He's pointing his finger at the citizens who pointed out a problem for years and blaming them.
	President Joe Biden blamed former President Trump and makeup Republicans for the broken border system, and his administration expected failure to convince Congress to pass a $118 billion bill.
	That would allot $20 billion for border security, but $60 billion for Ukraine.
	Democrats are calling the spend-happy bill a border security bill when it just gives billions more to fund projects that warmongering political allies want to promote.
	Border security won't be the highest priority within this bill.
	Biden, knowing the bill's in serious trouble, goes public with his speech to blame his political opponents for not getting the money it wants.
	Now, all indications are this bill won't even move forward to the Senate floor.
	Why?
	A simple reason.
	Donald Trump.
	Biden said during a public address earlier in the week.
	Biden claimed to know what Trump thinks, saying the bill is bad for him politically.
	And that's the reason he's being opposed by Republicans in the House and Senate.
	Biden continues his blame game, saying Trump is responsible for the record levels of illegal immigrants streaming through the border.
	He conveniently left out the fact his own policies and lack of enforcement of the law created the crisis that erupted during his advent.
	Meanwhile, migrants tell journalists they intend to vote for Biden in the 2024 election.
	Illegal immigrants appear to be under the impression they'll be allowed to vote in the 2024 election and say Joe Biden is their man.
	Independent journalist and YouTuber Nick Shirley spoke to asylum seekers in Denver, Colorado Monday when asked whether he thinks asylum seekers have the right to vote.
	One migrant replied, those that are legally have access to vote.
	While some municipalities allow non-citizens to vote at the local level, federal law does not allow non-citizens to vote in national elections.
	And the path to citizenship for the 8 million-plus illegals that Biden has allowed into the country is expected to be a years-long process.
	Multiple migrants, however, told Shirley in Spanish they intend to vote for Biden.
	Who are you going to vote for, the reporter?
	Joe Biden, the reporter replied.
	He's helping us here.
	I believe the majority for Biden, a man said.
	He's the one helping us.
	Biden, another woman agreed.
	Of course, Biden, another man explained.
	He likes supporting the migrants.
	He's a very good person, another told Shirley, and Trump is a different thing.
	Denver has seen a huge influx.
	Over the weekend, Elon Musk accused the Biden regime of importing millions of migrants because it wants to create new Democrat voters.
	Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas issued written guidelines, making it clear illegal presence alone is not ground for deportation.
	Criminal charges, conviction, or gained membership alone are not up for deportation.
	You have to be a convicted axe murderer right here in the USA to be deported.
	That's because every deportation is a lost vote, Musk added.
	They're importing as many voters as possible before the election.
	In the bet-you-didn't-know category, Homeland Security Mayorkas issued written guidance making it clear that Illegal presence alone is not ground for deportation.
	Criminal charges of conviction or gang membership alone are not enough for deportation.
	Wow, Scott.
	Well, that's ultimately what we're going to see is the invasion across the southern border is going to quicken all Americans to take a choice, either choose to be conquered and slowly raped and dismembered and everything that you have taken away from you and your world turned into a shithole where you're eating with the swine longing for the day when you can return to your father's house, which was America of the 1940s and the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s.
	And that longing, like it did in the prodigal son story, is going to provoke Americans to stand up and get violent against the violence.
	Now, there are going to be those of us in the very beginning, even before it starts, are prepared to be violent against the violent.
	But many are going to take a long time to wake up.
	And I think that's just the natural order of things.
	And this is going to be something that will take on a two to three year period.
	And of course, I think you will have during the two to three year period.
	The Trump-Tucker administration, if Trump is taken out, it will be someone else, maybe Doug McGregor.
	It won't be Nikki Haley.
	No one would want and follow her.
	It won't be any of the establishment types.
	In a sense, people can live without a president if it's not someone that they'll follow.
	So we're going to witness a Jefferson, Davis, Abraham Lincoln moment where there's two republics, and one is the United Republics of America.
	Under the Republic of America, and the other is the state Bolshevik, socialistic, communist, bureaucracy, deep state, military-industrial complex, you know, 1984, where Hillary Clinton lectures everyone on morality, and Biden sniffs their daughters, and Lloyd Austin just sends men and women in uniform to die in Ukraine, in Gaza, in the Persian Gulf,
	I don't think that's the reality Americans are going to tolerate, but they're going to get increasingly violent against it because the Democrats have already had their conscience seared by a hot iron.
	They can't feel anything.
	They don't have any love of truth.
	That means they have love of lies and all of the fornications.
	Very well said, Scott.
	and the materialism and the selfishness, and the hedonism that is within the human heart.
	That's their world.
	And I think the majority of people in the world and the United States are going to go in the opposite direction.
	But it's going to be a violent tear as the old wineskin tears away from the new wineskin.
	Jim?
	Very well said, Scott.
	Meanwhile, Bud Light execs are going all in on the Super Bowl, Hail Mary, and a desperate to save its sinking ship.
	I'm The Super Bowl today is the biggest day of the year for advertisers, so I'm continuing to buy into the idea that big games, commercial breaks, are an event in and of themselves.
	A boycott broke out against Bud Light after the brand partnered with controversial woke extremist Dylan Mulvaney, serving as a warning to this year's Super Bowl advertisers.
	Super Bowl commercials this year!
	are avoiding woke extremism and radical left-wing politics.
	Corporations are playing it safe, acknowledging many working-class Americans are struggling with the skyrocketing cost of living under Biden's economic policies.
	Life generally is more difficult for consumers, Zorio vice president Michelle Dennigan told Variety.
	They are more constrained.
	Oreo is running a Super Bowl commercial featuring reality star Kris Jenner.
	I think you'll see those blands that lead into nostalgia, humor, emotion at the Super Bowl.
	Those brands will resonate with the consumer, Deegan added.
	Corporations are playing it safe during major marketing campaigns, according to Northwestern University marketing professor Tim Kalkin, who has studied Super Bowl commercials for years.
	Because of the rise of social media, corporates realize an ad can manage to annoy people or cause a backlash.
	No one wants to put their career on the line.
	With a certain piece of Super Bowl footage, there is a huge incentive to be cautious.
	Bud Light's Belgian parent company, Anheuser-Busch, pushed a left-wing political message during previous Super Bowl commercials in 2017.
	Budweiser ran a pro-illegal immigration ad during the big game.
	That was an obvious reaction to former President Trump taking office at the time this year.
	Anheuser-Busch had returned a more traditional advertising campaign for the Super Bowl, which was decimated by the Bud Light boycott.
	The company is running a commercial for Michelob Ultra featuring Argentine soccer star Lionel Messi and friends partying at a beach shack.
	Bud Light Super Bowl commercial will feature former NFL quarterback Peyton Manning, musician Post Malone, and NFC president Dana White in an ad introducing the character of Bud Light Genie.
	The embattled beer brand is returning to its marketing roots by using humor and celebrities after going all in on woke extremism, nearly finished it off for good.
	With angry consumers still boycotting Bud Light after its woke tabacco, they could be ready to put the Bud Light genie back into the bottle, I doubt it.
	Meanwhile, veteran sportcaster Joe Buck predicts a bad story coming out of the Super Bowl.
	It won't stay in Vegas.
	FF, a false flag?
	Did legendary sportcaster Joe Buck just predict a false flag to occur at the Super Bowl?
	It's up for interpretation.
	But he says, point blank, he has no desire to be in Vegas for the week of the Super Bowl.
	Me either.
	But this has a very bad feel to it.
	Check this out.
	Shadow of Ezra.
	NFL announcer Joe Bach has come out and said he has no desire to be in Las Vegas this weekend because he feels something bad is coming.
	In the announcement with the name Buck, announcing another Buck Pass event as they did with 9-11, Volkswagen Buck Passing mean the same.
	Here he is, predicting something bad.
	Fox News reported, ESPN Joe Buck, the veteran Play-by-play boys for Monday Night Football.
	Tony DSP stationed in his hometown of St.
	Louis.
	He had no desire to be in Las Vegas for the Kansas City Chiefs take on the San Francisco 49ers.
	And it's certainly not because he thinks it's going to be a bad game.
	It's the bad that can happen before it for those attending.
	It's a lot of logistics, a lot of congestion, the opening drive on 101 ESPN, I'm not that way.
	I'm not looking for the Maxim party and going out all night.
	It's just not my thing.
	And then you combine that with Vegas.
	There's going to be some story.
	There's going to be something that happened because it's Vegas, and it won't stay in Vegas.
	It's going to be a big something that happens.
	I don't know what it is.
	I have no idea.
	I just think that it's going to be a mess in my mind.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	A big NFL football player gets paid $20 million by Pfizer to do a jam commercial and starts dating a global pop star who endorses Biden, and the team just magically makes it to the Super Bowl, and y'all just think it's a love story?
	Scott, very disturbing.
	Well, you know, we're seeing a lot of it.
	We're seeing it replicated in different places.
	I think, you know, the Super Bowl, again, you're going to see probably a halftime show with all sorts of devilish appeals to lust and things like that.
	You know, there, again, there is part of the culture that is going to become increasingly demoniac, that is going to become increasingly Schizophrenic, unkempt, demented, twisted in their thinking, darkened in their thinking.
	All of this is going to follow the progression as we've seen in the COVID-19 vaccine.
	And unless there is a therapeutic or miraculous delivery from this system, that's Sort of an inevitability.
	So the real mental twilight zone in this country is still coming upon us.
	And that, of course, can quicken a dissent into, you know, a sociopathic, psychotic meltdown as international war.
	When you have brains and people unable to think anymore, it's very logical that war and violence and all sorts of weapons will be unleashed.
	So that's the other thing that is going to be upon us is the mental breakdown within our own societies.
	And that mentally broken political, military, police establishment, how they manage the weapon systems that we've accrued for over 100 years.
	I think you could see problems there unless the communities rise up and really take back the whole country and ostracize Washington as a cancer.
	That's the only way to look at Washington, D.C.
	as a cancer.
	And the Supreme Court in a sense needs, it means nothing, but it should be kind of suspended symbolically, and of course the presidency will be suspended because there won't be a president, which is okay.
	You will have Trump on one side if he survives and lives, or someone else, and then you'll have who in Russia, who in Iran, who in China, Do they recognize?
	Do they recognize Biden or Trump?
	And that's going to determine the President of the United States, is the world and who they choose to interface with.
	If it's not the conservatives, then it will be against the conservatives.
	Jim?
	Well, let's hope Joe Buck's got it wrong and the Super Bowl isn't enjoyable.
	It begins in an hour and a half from now.
	Don, take us out.
	Yeah, so well.
	I will think it's not all right.
	And yes, the Super Bowl is coming right away here, and we'll see if what we're having this show is accurate or not.
	And I hope that it really, uh, nothing major happens that is bad.
	Anyway, thanks so much for watching.
	This has been a long show, but it's worthy of getting out and sharing with people.
	So please watch and your comments are welcome.
	And we'll see you next week.
	And thank you so much for Thank you all for just being with us.
	I appreciate your comments from your fans and really love to get out and get the word out that nobody else is putting out.
	It's Truth vs. News Incorporated and that's exactly where we stand for truth.

▲