Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 23, 2024 - Jim Fetzer

01:15:42

Sasha Latypova Presentation to the Corona Investigative Committee, Jan. 12, 2024Sasha Latypova Presentation to the Corona Investigative Committee, Jan. 12, 2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Sascha Latipova, I hear you with us.
	Yes, hi, hi again.
	Hello, good to see you.
	Hi Wolfgang.
	Hello.
	Yes, we spoke to you a while ago and we would like to, you know, like get up to speed of what you've been like researching in the meantime or what your findings are.
	And I think Wolfgang listened to one of your presentations in Sweden and was kind of thrilled, like, I mean, not thrilled by the results, but by what you have found out.
	It would be great if you could introduce yourself to audience who might not know you yet.
	Wolfgang.
	First, thank you that you come, and also I'm very fascinated about the dialogue I heard with Catherine, what you had with Catherine, and it was so, I think we have to speak out, you said at the end, and I think that's exactly what we should, and I hope you help us a little bit.
	Yeah, great.
	Yes, so to introduce myself, my background is in pharmaceutical research and development, mostly on commercialization of new technologies.
	In drug development and related to that, of course, since I was working in regulated industry, you know, I had to learn all the regulations because as a provider to pharmaceutical companies of various services, we were responsible for staying in regulatory compliance.
	So, all my 25 years or so spending in pharmaceutical R&D, I was acutely aware of pharmaceutical regulations, FDA regulations, and also international.
	They're harmonized through international conference on harmonization with Europe and with Japan.
	And other countries follow these regulations.
	So, you know, when I first started looking at what was going on with this whole COVID situation in 2020, I immediately became very concerned with what was being done first with the suppression of hydroxychloroquine and vitamins and ivermectin as a perfectly fine treatment protocol for respiratory illness.
	And so that triggered a lot of concern in me because I saw regulators acting completely contrary to what regulations say, to what practice, you know, practice of medicine regulated at the state level would dictate.
	And so that was immediately kind of put me on alert and I started looking into what's going on.
	And then later on when they started sort of pushing propaganda about mRNA vaccines, as you know, everybody has to be miserable until we quickly put on the market these completely untested technologies.
	Well, that was just kind of the red line for me.
	And I started specifically looking into VAERS adverse event reports.
	I also had some knowledge about mRNA technology from my previous experience in pharma.
	I knew about at least one case.
	A really bad situation at Paracel Contract Research Organization, which was testing a drug for a small biotech, which subsequently went out of business, but they killed several healthy volunteers in that study with this technology.
	And severely injured others.
	And so that, you know, I knew that it was extremely dangerous.
	And when they started propagandizing it as a vaccine for everyone, including pregnant women and children, that was just, I thought it was just horrible.
	And so I started looking at the VAERS specifically because that was the only data available to me.
	Um, publicly at the time and then from then I kind of proceeded investigating, you know, why is regular, you know, I don't, I don't stop at the answer.
	Oh, regulators are not doing their job and all pharma are corrupt, which a lot of, you know, unfortunately people looking into this, uh, from what we call health freedom movement, they stopped at that and they continue for three years.
	Essentially, you know, it's not useless, but it has diminishing returns activity.
	Constantly publishing, oh, look at all these side effects.
	Look at FDA is not doing their job.
	Look, pharma is corrupt.
	That's not an answer.
	You have to understand why this is happening for three years and four years and nothing.
	And there's no prosecution, no change of anything.
	None of the governments in the world People seem to notice or when they notice they say it's all okay.
	Why are all these products adulterated with plasmid DNA?
	Why all the regulators admitted that's the case and said it's still okay and they're still safe and effective.
	So that's my next level of research and that's what I can discuss today in my presentation because I'm not satisfied with the answer farmers corrupt.
	And I'm not satisfied with the answer FDA is not doing their job.
	We all have to question what is actually behind this and what is driving this.
	Yes.
	So, I don't know.
	Can I share my screen?
	Okay.
	All right.
	So, in this presentation, what I want people to understand is this whole business of Emergency use authorized medical countermeasures.
	So these are key words that everyone needs to learn.
	And this is how the governments in the world are able to put poisonous products on the market, call them vaccines and therapeutics, and continue pushing them even under what we know are illegal mandates in violation of informed consent.
	So this whole presentation is describing in context of pandemics as scams to push these unregulated illegal medical countermeasures on the market and call them healthcare products.
	So first, let's review ancient history 100 years ago.
	So this is published in British Medical Journal in 1922.
	1922.
	So the predecessor to WHO before 1949 was what was called International Sanitary Convention.
	It was basically a conference between numerous countries that were involved in international trade and travel.
	And there were different number of countries would attend it.
	Usually about a dozen of countries representatives would come for several months to negotiate these conventions about sanitation measures on ships primarily that were carrying trade and travel and other activities such as pilgrimages.
	What these conventions were concerned with and they went on for about 100 years from 1850 to 1948.
	These conventions were concerned primarily with diseases related to sanitation and water treatment and crowding, such as cholera, typhus, smallpox, plague, these all bacterial, except, you know, smallpox is claimed viral, but I have concerns about that too.
	Anyway, so the main concern always was cholera, which is bacterial and carried by water, and that was You know, ship would come into port and they will have cholera because they didn't have proper sanitation.
	So, that was the focus of the conventions and respiratory illness was never a focus of it.
	Nothing related to flu or anything sort of respiratory illness related.
	In fact, you know, we're all told about the Spanish flu that killed, you know, 50 million people worldwide in 1918 and 1919.
	And I reviewed the proceedings of these conventions for 1912, and then the next one was in 1922, which is what published here.
	So about three, four years after huge pandemic, world ending pandemic that killed 50 million people worldwide, not a single mention of the word flu, influenza, respiratory, anything in the proceedings of this convention, which went on for about six months.
	In 1922.
	So I'm telling you, this is a historic document, very fine, that nobody was ever concerned about Spanish flu.
	It wasn't the same.
	It was invented years later to propagandize fear of viruses and this whole idea of viral global pandemics, which actually cannot happen by nature or by science, by anything, by any metric.
	If they were possible, we wouldn't be here.
	So they do not exist.
	It's fiction.
	Now, of course, this fiction continues.
	And importantly, it gets pre-programmed in everyone's head through media, internet.
	Hollywood is a big place where they create these Fear porn shows and movies like Outbreak and Virus and Zombie Virus and all those things that are very entertaining, but people get pre-programmed by this to respond with fear to trigger words that then later on are put in the news like this.
	Okay, so again, that's another one that they're propagandizing right now, RSV, which is total scam.
	But they're driving this fear through the internet and through the news saying that, you know, everyone's dying from RSV now, go get vaccinated.
	In every grocery store we have again propaganda, I go to buy food and it's on the PA system propaganda continuously.
	RSV, RSV, flu, get the flu shots, get 10% discount on your groceries if you get, you know, seven vaccines here in the pharmacy, in the grocery store.
	Okay, so that's what they do.
	Now, what happened with COVID, that was another scam pandemic.
	It wasn't a pandemic, it wasn't even an epidemic.
	It was largely driven by They may have distributed some poison agent.
	There are various theories of what that might have been.
	Probably some sort of a synthetic toxin that produces the reliable signal or more or less reliable.
	I mean, they had to still cycle PCR to about 40 cycles.
	But they could at least get some consistent signal somewhere to claim there was a virus.
	But largely, we know that this whole COVID pandemic was driven by, first of all, several key locations such as New York, New Jersey, Boston, and I believe Belgium, account for majority of the global cases.
	And then specific hospital murder protocols, which are still being practiced, by the way.
	As of September of last year, my relative in upstate New York, they tried to kill her with this exact protocol.
	So I have firsthand experience with exactly what happens.
	The elderly people who may have respiratory issues during this season get scared by the news into, oh, we have a novel virus circulating.
	If you have fever and sneezes and coughs, you have to run to the hospital.
	And then in the hospital, they fake test you with the PCR test.
	It's 97% false positive at 40 cycles.
	And we were told with my relative, Test repeatedly for COVID until you get positive.
	That was on the phone with the ER.
	So they test repeatedly until you get a positive.
	Then they assign you to this COVID ward where they isolate you, dehydrate you, oftentimes remove food.
	Early on they would remove everything, food, fluids.
	They would ventilate them because they would scare all the healthcare staff that this person has Novel deadly virus.
	You are all exposed.
	Didn't give them protective equipment, except we had shortages, so that the hospital staff is fearful and ventilate them just to keep them, you know, not to be bothered by interacting with them too much, right?
	So, and then using midazolam, using remdesivir to fail kidneys, to fill them with fluid, and then call it pneumonia, call it COVID.
	Huge fraud on death certificates as well, especially in Massachusetts.
	My colleague, John Baldwin, I don't know if you've invited him, but if you haven't, you should.
	He has this whole investigation.
	He has access to death certificates in Massachusetts.
	He can conclusively prove all of this was complete fraud.
	And then they were incentivizing financially all the hospitals to call anything COVID.
	So giving them 20% increase the bonuses if they use Remdesivir.
	In California, that would be one COVID case could have generated half a million dollars in billing to the hospital plus 20% bonus.
	And there are many cases now litigating this.
	I don't know, you know, how they're progressing, but I'm hopeful That this will be further uncovered by those legal cases.
	So, in any case, this is, I'm just describing how they faked COVID pandemic.
	Now, many people are not aware that we're still living under COVID pandemic.
	In the United States, a PREP Act declaration for COVID was extended until end of this year, December 31st, 2024.
	And they also extended Marburg and Ebola pandemic declarations and a few others.
	So Marburg and Ebola specifically is now where under Marburg and Ebola pandemic globally.
	Do you guys know about this?
	Until December, And again, so they are just using these as, and I'll explain why the PREP Act is so important in the United States, but there are similar laws that are in play in Europe and other countries like Canada and Australia and New Zealand and UK.
	So, I'm going to talk about legal structure underpinning all these scams, pandemics, and why they're announcing them continuously and why they're using this mechanism of countermeasures.
	So, as I said, this is a very similar structure that's being used in Europe.
	We know definitely in Europe there is a law about countermeasures.
	If anyone is searching for this, just look for keyword medical countermeasures.
	Or emergency use authorized countermeasures and you will find those this similar legal structure in the US.
	The legal structure consists of numerous statutes, but there are three key pillars of law that is being utilized here.
	The first one is public health emergency declaration, which is done by these prep act announcements I showed you on this page.
	So these are the announcements that Health and Human Services Secretary.
	Issues in first person because it's only his opinion that matters.
	It says I determined that there is a pandemic and I am issuing this declaration.
	So that's how public health emergency declaration is getting made.
	No criteria are necessary.
	It's just his opinion that he thinks that there isn't a pandemic and that's sufficient.
	So you can't actually prove that there isn't pandemic because he doesn't have to change his mind.
	There is no data required for him to issue it or undo it.
	It's just he says so.
	Usually he says so because WHO said so or WHO told him to think that.
	And that's how these pandemics get announced.
	And the same goes for European health ministers.
	But the law about public health emergencies was put on the books in the United States in the 80s under Reagan.
	Prior to that, the U.S.
	Constitution never anticipated such a thing as a national public health emergency.
	And in fact, in its implementation in law, it's equivalent to announcement of war inside the United States.
	So it's the same as announcement of war and the Constitution never anticipated anything like this.
	But in the 80s, our government in their infinite wisdom decided that there is such a thing and we're going to put it on the books and we're going to suspend normal governance, constitutional law.
	When we announce this.
	And the announcement is going to be based on the opinion of one person.
	So that's how they do that.
	And that's why PREP Act declarations are very important.
	And you can search Federal Register and see which ones are active.
	The second pillar is the whole set of law around emergency use countermeasures, which I will explain in detail.
	But these are the things that they're calling medical countermeasures, but countermeasure can be anything.
	It's a very vague term.
	If, you know, I have a lock on the door, it's a countermeasure against breaking in.
	And so these countermeasures things get funded by the U.S.
	government, Department of Defense, and they're purchased under Defense Production Act authority because, as I said, the public health emergency is equivalent to war.
	And they're also using other transaction authority as purchasing because that mechanism is particularly secretive and they typically use it in purchases of weapons.
	Which is maybe justified in the purchases of weapons because you don't want, you know, advertise what's your technology in those weapons.
	But in this case, they're using the same exact mechanism.
	They're buying advanced weapons for buying what is supposedly a healthcare product, you know, for public health emergency and for this, you know, global crisis of a pandemic.
	And finally, the third pillar in the U.S.
	is a shield.
	It's called PREP Act, was introduced in 2005, and it removes any liability for covered persons using covered countermeasures on conditions that they followed orders of health authorities.
	And it's particularly, it's preempting all state rights, just the federal government, HHS, Says you will use Remdesivir and so far, nobody has been actually successful litigating against it.
	There are some showdown brewing between Texas, for example, and the federal government on multiple things, including the border crisis and including this, but that still remains to be seen whether they're going to be successful or not.
	There is no PrEP Act in Europe, but in Europe and other countries, the effect of the PrEP Act was synthetically made by the predatory contracts that the countries were forced by the EU Commission to sign, you know, blindly with Pfizer.
	So it's actually, in effect, it's the same as if you have PrEP Act in your countries by those contracts.
	And those contracts, as far as I know, they're still secret.
	Nobody has still produced them.
	In full.
	So those are the three pillars.
	Now let's look at the EUA countermeasures.
	So the countermeasures are, while we're told that these are pharmaceutical products, by statute, by law, they're not investigational.
	And that's a critical, critical piece.
	So just remember the word, EUA countermeasure, not investigational.
	So people don't understand that even in my industry, we were all confused by, on purpose, To not understand this key point.
	And so the statue says that use of the product and the product itself is they're not considered a clinical investigation.
	Clinical investigation is a clinical trial.
	So if a product is non-investigational, You cannot have a clinical trial for it.
	It's a legal impossibility.
	So that's the key point.
	I'll address it in more detail.
	And if you cannot have a clinical trial, then you cannot have an approved product ever.
	Because the product, if it's not investigational, there's no process.
	So you can't have clinical trials, so you cannot have the legal process for assembling the evidence.
	And then you don't have the legal process for review of that evidence, according to all these sections of Food and Drug and Cosmetics Act, to be in compliance with all the pharmaceutical regulations.
	So, just keep that in mind.
	EUA countermeasures are not investigational.
	You cannot have clinical trials.
	You cannot have compliance.
	And if you don't have compliance, you don't have an FDA approval.
	So, what did happen with these EUA countermeasures?
	Well, let's review.
	Actually, so just to give you a brief education about Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act and regulations and how these EU countermeasures fit in it.
	So prior to this whole business of HHS declared public health emergency, on the left hand side here, I'm showing you two normal avenues, regulatory pathways for putting drugs and devices on the market.
	And those are all investigational.
	And by the way, you know, FDA was put in place and, you know, its powers were extended to regulate investigational drugs and devices.
	So you can have an investigational drug in clinical trial programs.
	So if you have a new chemical you want to put on the market as a drug, you have to go and open IND investigational new drug application with or exemption with FDA and then negotiate your clinical trial protocols and proceed and fulfill them and then the FDA has to review it so they're obligated to review it.
	They're obligated to review it under law.
	Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act prescribes in minute detail how the approval must happen So FDA doesn't make law and that's what people also don't understand.
	FDA doesn't make law their administrator subject to law.
	They are supposed to follow Food and Drugs and Consummatics Act.
	And so that describes all these investigational pathways.
	In the late 90s, they introduced this expanded access use, the second box in gray.
	Expanded access use was a pathway, additional pathway, also investigational.
	To allow access to novel pharmaceuticals and devices for people who were terminally ill, dying and couldn't participate in clinical trials normally.
	And so that expanded access use pathway was opened for them, but it's still subject to all the IND rules and regulations and temporary only for one year.
	And it had in it emergency use language.
	And that's how everyone, all the pharma experts got confused by that emergency use language because we all assumed that was what they were talking about when saying, oh, we're going to emergency use authorize these vaccines.
	We thought it was that.
	But it wasn't.
	It was something completely different.
	So it turns out there is this EUA countermeasures section, completely separate section in FDCA that they stuck in.
	It's called paragraph 564 that says for the emergency use countermeasures, Under public health emergency, none of these investigations apply.
	Investigational rules apply or regulations apply.
	It doesn't require IRB approval.
	It doesn't require informed consent.
	So informed consent is not applicable to these things at all.
	The only criteria by which they go on the market is, again, opinion of one person, HHS Secretary, who says that he thinks that they may be effective.
	And there's nothing else.
	No clinical trials.
	I'll show you the detailed evidence of this.
	Clinical trial data is not required.
	And as I showed you on the previous slide, it's a legal impossibility to collect clinical trial data.
	for a non-investigational product.
	And thus they coexist with fully FDA approved versions magically, although there are no fully FDA approved versions.
	The only way they can ever coexist is in the case, let's say for example, there is a drug, well, we can even use hydroxychloroquine example.
	We can say hydroxychloroquine is an approved drug and it is investigational and it's approved for malaria and for autoimmune diseases.
	Now, if we announce a public health emergency of Marburg and we say we can use hydroxychloroquine as a countermeasure, in that case, it's not approved.
	But legally, you know, it's not approved for Marburg.
	But it can be used for Marburg as a countermeasure and also have an approved version for malaria and autoimmune disease.
	That's possible.
	Now, however, something that has never been approved for anything before cannot have.
	Two versions coexisting.
	And that's why in the U.S.
	a Comirnaty was never shipped.
	Only EUA version was shipped.
	Because they know that it's not legal.
	And they're kind of very careful following the law.
	So everything that Pfizer has done in the U.S., practically everything, is fully legal.
	Even though it's horrible and adulterated, misbranded, they lied many times, all of this is legal under this set of rules.
	Now, this is a slide from FDA's legal counsel, their own lawyers, explaining the process of how these EUA countermeasures go on the market.
	And as you can see, so yellow box is my own annotation, so all these blue boxes are theirs.
	And as you can see, the public health emergency can be announced by DOD Secretary, DHS Secretary.
	In this case, it was announced by HHS Secretary, Health and Human Services.
	All he has to do is write a memo, such as this PREP Act declaration, to say, I think there is a public health emergency and circumstances exist.
	And so that's number one step.
	Number two step, he asks FDA commissioner to issue Emergency use authorization for these countermeasures because he thinks they may be effective.
	That's it.
	There's no box here that says, oh, we need clinical trials, we need data, we need FDA approval.
	No, it's just HHS Secretary says we have a pandemic and HHS Secretary tells FDA Commissioner to issue EUA countermeasures authorizations.
	There's no termination criteria.
	Again, Only they can change their mind.
	There is no judicial review.
	There is no congressional oversight.
	So by doing this, they preempt the entire Constitution of the United States and they usurp the power into the administrative branch of the government, into HHS and DOD together.
	And there's no stopping criteria for this.
	They can continue in perpetuity.
	This is just a citation from the law to assure you that what I just said is true.
	It says that the only criteria here for issuing authorization is HHS Secretary opinion that it may be effective.
	Nothing else.
	And to further assure you, this is a citation again from the U.S.
	law saying that there are no required standards of quality control manufacturing, no inspection of manufacturing facilities, no other compliance with FDA regulations, as these countermeasures shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded no matter what.
	So this explains to you why all the regulatory bodies, EMA, FDA, TGA, and Health Canada, they all agree that there are plasmid DNA contamination in the Pfizer vials, but they still say it's safe and effective and they do not use any enforcement action, no investigation, no pulling these things off the market because by law, they are not deemed adulterated or misbranded ever for any reason.
	As long as agency secretaries keep saying and FDA keeps repeating that risk benefit is justified and we think that they're safe and effective.
	That's it.
	So another slide from FDA lawyers, and I highlighted it, they were discussing this in, I believe in 22.
	And so they're just explaining internally this whole business of medical countermeasures and pathways.
	And they're saying, you know, without these mechanisms, we would be violating Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act.
	But because we have this magical pathway that we ourselves created, we're no longer in violation because we just stuck that new paragraph into the FDA NC Act and said everything that's deemed illegal for pharmaceuticals is now legal for countermeasures.
	And here's a key piece of evidence of Pfizer and Moderna and other vaccines having switched to this non-investigational pathway by October 2020.
	So in October 2020, there was a meeting at the FDA discussing the vaccines.
	This is before the approval of this.
	So the approval was in December or issuing of authorization, sorry, was in December.
	In October 2020, there was a question asked.
	This is from a transcript of this meeting.
	A question was asked from Doron Fink, Who was at the FDA at the time and now he's enjoying his rewards at Moderna.
	And he was asked.
	Well, are you going to use this expanded access use pathway, which I was previously showing you in the gray box, the investigational pathway where they're allowing, you know, terminally ill, desperate situations, people to use unapproved medicine.
	And he specifically said, no, we're not using that expanded access use pathway because that's an investigational pathway.
	And we would be required to have IRB informed consent.
	And comply with clinical trial regulations, implying that we don't want to because we need to get on the market even faster.
	So that's why we're switching to emergency use authorization of countermeasures pathway, which is non-investigational, and we don't have to do those things.
	So we're not supposed to comply with informed consent rules.
	So here's his own words.
	And this is a timeline that I put together of what actually happened here.
	So in March 2020, there was a public health emergency announcement.
	By April of 2020, all pharmas opened investigational new drug Exemption applications with FDA essentially announcing that they were on the investigational pathway.
	So it's a manufacturer self declaring with FDA that we're embarking on this full approval investigational pathway.
	We're going to be in compliance with FDA regulations.
	Then, what happens?
	By October, we know that they switched from that investigational pathway to the EUA, as Doran Fink says in the meeting.
	Now, I know that Pfizer specifically switched to this pathway by July of 2020, because that's when they started mass-producing commercial lots, which they later on shipped after the EUA was issued.
	And it would have been illegal to mass produce.
	They produced about 30 million doses at that time between July and December.
	And it would have been illegal had they been under the IND.
	But since they switched to EUA, likely in July, they made that switch.
	Now it's fully legal for them to mass produce unapproved and untested product because EUA allows them to do that.
	And so EUAs were issued formally by the FDA in December and by a bunch of EMA as well and other regulators all over the world.
	And then in August of 2021, we have this magical BLA approval.
	So full FDA approval is issued for these products.
	Claiming that they've satisfied these IND requirements.
	But there was actually no legally collected data, clinical trial data, because since July, at least, or middle summer, these companies switched to the EUA pathway.
	So those clinical, supposedly clinical trials that they were running became non-clinical trials.
	They're no longer Required to be in compliance with the regulations.
	So here's the letter saying that we're giving you the BLA approval and referring to these two clinical trials.
	And there were no other clinical trials, by the way, since then.
	So these were the only two that remember with 40,000 subjects supposedly, but only 170 cases.
	Anyway, so Peter Marks, or FDA, is saying you now have full approval based on these two clinical trials, but they're not clinical trials.
	They're non-investigational studies.
	And so that's why my conclusion here is these claimed FDA approvals are fakes.
	FDA is the is the federal agency and the administrative state representative that is certifying the fraud.
	So they're the highest authority that certifies the fraud, claiming that these products are fully approved when they're not fully approved.
	And since then, They have been introducing different versions without actually any data.
	You know, there's maybe like 200 patients where they will inject them and say, oh, we have antibodies for what?
	Nobody knows for what.
	And then claiming that that satisfies IND requirements.
	It doesn't.
	It's completely illegal.
	So, the vaccine BLA approval is based on non-investigational use of a drug, which is a deception.
	It's a fake.
	It's fraud.
	Vaccines were originally ordered as prototypes and demonstrations, also fakes, by the DOD contracts.
	Clinical trials were never ordered, never paid for by the U.S.
	government, and they are actually not legally possible for EUA countermeasures under public health emergency.
	The good manufacturing practice or clinical practice or distribution practice compliance is not possible to enforce.
	So you could do it voluntarily if you want to as a manufacturer, but the regulators cannot enforce it.
	And that's why they never done anything about contaminations or side effects or deaths.
	Due to the EUA countermeasure status and PrEP Act, full immunity and preemption of any state level action.
	And I wrote this for Costa Rica, but it's actually for any country in the world.
	People were deceived into illegal medical experiment with no informed consent.
	Now, there is also no clear mechanism, regulatory mechanism, to take these dangerous adulterated EUA countermeasures off the market.
	The FDA has refused to issue recall of COVID-19 vaccines no matter what, no matter how many people are dead, injured, how many miscarriages and how awful what we find in the vials and numerous thousands of tests and numerous even peer-reviewed publications on this.
	They still refuse to take it off the market because they're not required to.
	And the pharmaceutical regulations, you know, put this whole category of product outside of FDA law.
	And so, as I said, FDA actually doesn't make law.
	So they're administering what's on the books, which is an illegal law, making this poison now legal.
	And there's no criteria for you to remove it.
	We have been, you know, I've been testifying at the local government level, the county levels in several states.
	We've done some some successful testimonies in Idaho, for example, several counties issued county level resolutions to To essentially ban these shots in their counties, at least for children.
	So we've been successful on the local level.
	But local counties don't make law either.
	They can just issue these resolutions.
	But that's kind of the grassroots level, which has been successful so far.
	In a few locations, and that's what I recommend people to do, is to actually just go at the local level to your police or sheriff or county commissioner, whoever, you know, municipality, and try to make them aware, educate them, and have them express this opinion that this should stop.
	But at the federal level, forget it, or country level, forget it.
	So what is happening with these pandemics in general?
	They're scams.
	They're biochemical and informational war, globally, waged on all the people by their own governments.
	And so what happens is, like in the US, they deploy massive public debt under emergency pretense, because HHS Secretary says, I think so, because WHO Tedros told him to say this.
	So that triggers trillions of dollars in stimulus that then gets laundered through this mechanism.
	So they claim there is a viral pandemic, drive panic through media.
	Then they institute these lockdowns, masking procedures to induce misery until we have the savior of vaccines, which are, as I described to you, are completely illegal poisons and unregulated, pushed on the market by the military.
	And in combination with hospital protocols to drive the death rates.
	And then they proceed to gaslight the victims, censorship, massive censorship of scientists who have any conscience to speak up or doctors.
	And then persecution of dissent, as we know.
	Many people, you know, even put them in jail and remove their licenses, remove their ability to practice, wage all sorts of lawfare, media smears on them, you know, so that's what's going on.
	And then they claim the next one day, you know, we have RSV, we have Marburg, we have Ebola, and that just continues in perpetuity.
	And through this mechanism, so they print money, Huge debt, put huge debt on the public, launder it through this mechanism, appropriate funds to themselves through these contracts.
	So the contracts go to the preferred people who own those companies, the Pfizer, Moderna, you know, and Moderna is owned by the U.S.
	government anyway.
	It's the CDC company.
	So CDC appropriates this to themselves.
	And whoever controls those companies gets the profits and how the flow of money gets diverted to the To the cronies of these people.
	And as far as all the public health emergencies in conclusion, what I would like to say, they're all scams.
	I've walked you through a few.
	It's a huge discussion and kind of outside of my scope, but I think I've shown enough evidence to say they're pretty much all scams.
	And their globalist scams to steal and launder money, to remove human rights, to establish one world government, grab central power by unelected private interests that control incompetent puppets that they install in these administrative states that are basically neutered of any governance.
	They just administer whatever the controllers tell them.
	And then to direct these massive contracts for non-regulated biological poisons to their preferred, you know, interest to the cronies and perform this fraudulent healthcare protocols.
	My recommendation currently is to do not accept any vaccines for anything.
	Stay away from any injections that converting all the historical traditional vaccines, if you believe in them, they're converting them into mRNA technology anyway.
	I would avoid other injections as well.
	And in general, I recommend to minimize interaction with healthcare whenever possible, because as I've shown you, it has been weaponized against the people.
	So thank you.
	And I can take questions at this time.
	So basically, when they say, oh, we do not have any concerns, it's safe and effective and so on.
	It's just basically like a it's blah blah in a way, because it's not even necessary for them.
	So it's like a, it's like a pretext kind of, or it's like a, um, you know, like a, um, just a bubble of speech basically.
	And in reality they could say, you know, we don't give a, uh, we don't give whatever, um, because it's, um, we, we can, because we can do it.
	We can just like put it out and whatever we find out about it, it doesn't matter because we are entitled to do this.
	Yes, exactly.
	But they want to maintain the veneer of legality.
	So they want to pretend that everything is fine, there is governance, there is regulation, the FDA is very rigorous, rules, all has been followed, because they want to continue fooling people into injecting themselves more and more and more.
	Under these different pretenses of pandemics.
	So they do need the veneer of legality.
	But as I've shown you, it's emperor has no clothes.
	They're completely naked.
	All it's based on them saying this mantra of safe and effective, safe and effective, safe.
	That's why they've repeated it in media.
	So like Mockingbird, you know, the Operation Mockingbird, just to imprint it in everybody's head that, you know, if government says vaccine, it means safe and effective.
	Yeah, so that's how they run the scam.
	The other field of investigation is how could they bypass all these checks and balance mechanisms?
	You know we have journalists, we have all this, we have scientists, we have critical institutions normally we used to have and how did they succeed to bypass all this?
	You just spoke about the medical regulations and about this, they bypassed, they made some tricks and nobody understands the The fine regulation and the difference between between this military use and emergency use, how they call it, and on the other side, this extended use.
	And so you have to have to be insider to understand the difference.
	And this is why they managed to succeed.
	But all the other things, all the all the I don't know how they get the media, for instance, how they succeeded.
	How did they do this?
	Oh, media is easy.
	I mean, that's just money.
	So they basically, I mean, the globalist interests control all the mainstream media, you know, like the big billionaires buy Jeff Bezos and, you know, they buy Big publications such as New York Times and Washington Post and all these big newspapers, even when they're losing them, you know, $100 million a year, they still maintain them.
	Because why?
	Because this is so critical to control the media.
	Obviously, we also know that the CIA and NSA and other intelligence agencies control the social media, and that's how they do the censorship.
	So that's been uncovered as well.
	So media is number one, what they want to control so that they can control the narrative.
	It's become really difficult for them.
	So it used to be very easy when it was just, you know, print press.
	You control the printing press and then you control what people think.
	But with the internet, of course, it became much more difficult.
	And now we can still put the news out.
	We can still put this information out, even though we're limited and prosecuted and suppressed.
	But it's still getting out.
	And so that's what they're very, very afraid of, is that we're still allowed to speak somehow.
	They can't fully control the internet.
	They can't fully control social media.
	I write on Substack.
	So, you know, Substack is a platform for kind of news blogging and various, you know, you can do media, you can do video.
	And that's been the place where all this information is very accessible, very available.
	A lot of good writers there, a lot of good investigators.
	So I highly recommend people, you know, subscribe, subscribe to my publication.
	It's free and you can see all this information in detail.
	But that's what they're afraid of because I think places like Substack now has, it's larger than CNN, it's larger than Fox, any news combined because there's so many users on it and they can't control it.
	And the other thing is that there were those competition between the blocs, political blocs, Russia, China, US, and the Asian states, and Africa, South America, they all had their special interests and they were not trusting each other.
	Why does it happen now globally suddenly?
	How did they manage that there is no opposition?
	Or is there opposition?
	Is there some hope that Some region of the world will not participate and will say no, we'll save you, but we will tell the truth and so on.
	Well, I mean, I'm still hopeful that some region of the world will do that.
	But if people think that it's going to be Russia, I want to disabuse you of that notion.
	It's not.
	Russia is actually implementing all these globalist biosecurity state, the central bank digital currency, digital IDs, and they're actually like ahead of everyone on that, ahead of plan.
	But if you say this?
	It's not, I don't believe anymore in any war, which is where Russia and... Oh yeah, that's a fake war.
	That's definitely a fake war.
	How can, if they play together this big game, how can they do some war against each other, seriously?
	It only, so the wars too, they are a show.
	There is, sure.
	Yeah, so by saying fake war, I'm not saying that the victims and the, you know, the explosions and all that.
	That's definitely real.
	And I have, I am from Zaporizhia, from Ukraine myself, and I have relatives and friends there.
	And I, you know, all of this is real.
	They're getting bombed.
	But Russia is not fighting the West.
	They're just laundering money through the war.
	And training mercenaries.
	So, for example, in Ukraine right now, the economic situation is terrible.
	Let's say, you know, a few, maybe a year ago, like something like $6,000 to $10,000 a year in the region where I'm from was a decent salary.
	It was like, you know, something to be proud of.
	Now they're making pennies in the normal economies.
	Businesses are shutting down because they're getting bombed all the time.
	And it's a big industrial center.
	And so nobody has money for regular jobs or business.
	People are unemployed.
	But if you are in the army and being trained as a mercenary, you get $150,000 annual compensation.
	This is where our U.S.
	money is going and European money.
	This is where it's going.
	It's going to destroy regional economies and destroy people's lives, but train the mercenaries that then they can relocate to other countries and make them.
	I think the plan is to make them into U.N.
	army.
	And to import them into other countries, because when you have and you want to do, you know, some sort of atrocity, lockdowns, policing, killing people, throwing them into the quarantine camps, the local arm, the national armies, you know, people who have allegiance to at least allegiance to the to the country, Typically would refuse to do that.
	So the globalists need to do this reshuffling.
	We train them in Africa, we train them in Ukraine, then we ship them over to America to do that, to commit atrocities for us.
	And where do these mercenaries come from?
	All kinds of countries.
	So as I said, my friend told me what's going on in Ukraine.
	So there's a mercenary army being trained in Ukraine for this fake war with Russia.
	But then historically, so like right now, we have millions of people coming over the southern border.
	And they're coming from China, military age men.
	I mean, they have excess of men.
	And so military age men from China, from Africa, from all kinds of places, from South America.
	Again, they use these fake global conflicts to enrich themselves, the weapons makers, and then also to train people to be fighting their wars for them.
	They have tried to make so many wars already with mercenaries in Iraq and in Afghanistan, they did so.
	This was a mercenary business, a very big one.
	I made a report to the Council of Europe about this, and it is horrible what happens.
	You know, you see the people from, they were Bangladeshi soldiers with blue helmets, you know?
	And the Bangladeshi, the generals of Bangladesh, They sold their soldiers to the UN, and they got the difference.
	The soldiers were paid the Bangladeshi salary, and the generals in Bangladesh, they got the money from the UN, which was far more.
	And so they lived from selling their people to foreign countries as soldiers.
	And this is very lucrative.
	It's paying off very well for them.
	It's it's trafficking.
	I have I explained it to people.
	It's it's human trafficking has it's you have to think they think of humans as cargoes as product.
	Yes.
	And they're different products.
	So there's like military age man trained as mercenaries.
	That's one type of product.
	Women and children are slaves.
	That's another type of product.
	So that's that's what's going over the border.
	And yeah, they it's a huge business and they get paid.
	But who's running that business?
	So typically in the US, DOD, Department of Defense, has been running that for decades actually, but in a smaller, more underhanded way, but now it's much more in the open.
	But it's the US government, DOD, I know for sure, they typically contract with private entities, the same way they did with the vaccines.
	They will unload their dirty work on private contractors like NGOs and cartels.
	They collaborate with cartels.
	So it's both illegal and legal, sort of.
	And they hide it.
	They hide it in the national budget, the US budget.
	The Pentagon budget was very big and then suddenly it went down because they just paid it from other budgets.
	They just took it away from the military budgets, and they made some private business out of it.
	Yeah, they make it into private.
	And also then, once it's a private contractor, you can't FOIA them.
	You can't say, oh, you have to open the books, you have to tell us what you did.
	They're like, no, no, it's a private commercial interest.
	And so that's how they afloat it.
	Also, Pentagon, obviously, is missing 20-some trillion dollars that they lost somehow, and they can't account for.
	So that's how they do it.
	They siphon all this money, give it to the private entities.
	You can never find, you know, heads or tails.
	And then they continue doing trafficking weapons and people over the borders and doing all this.
	In such a big enterprise, which is dealing with those mercenaries, they are not national enterprises.
	They are here and there.
	They can just move very rapidly.
	They changed their name.
	I followed some of them, like Sandline, which was in Africa fighting.
	Afterwards, it was a UK thing, and afterwards, it always changed the name, always changed locations, split into several parties, and was reunifying, buying one, buying each other.
	They have satellites, they have everything you need to observe everything, and it's a very big, big business.
	It's intelligence.
	It's not only shooting.
	The intelligence business is as strong And they are also very interested in all the data we give.
	And they sell the data and they just use it.
	And it's totally getting out of control, of national control.
	Yeah, so yeah, so as I said, it's the same mechanism as in this war business, this health care, which is also war business, just poisoning, mass poisoning, and media, and you know, pretty much everywhere that you have this mechanism of, and that's what they call public-private partnership, right?
	Which is, you know, fascism really, but it's what they call public-private partnership, and that's how they do it.
	No, they were so much under pressure that the U.S.
	Army gave to officers two years of leave so that they could work in a private military company for two years.
	Because they were paid so little in the normal service, they were allowed to go there and earn some more money and afterwards could come back.
	And this made the whole bundle of private-public interest.
	They got to know each other.
	You can't distinguish anymore the interest behind Yeah.
	So these people who are working at the Department of Defense, or maybe it's also like the sort of secret like intelligence agency, like CIA or whatever, you know, the more clandestinely working folks.
	So, like, I always thought of these careers that you, well, I mean, like at least here you apply maybe after studying law or whatever.
	You know, and then you go in there or like you founded some student fairs or like however that works, you know.
	And we have here actually, like I saw in a magazine, like a lot of, you know, ads now that you should work for these Bundeswehr, these BND, like for instance.
	Like here, the secret service, basically.
	But that's not like a civil servant career, maybe, or whatever career one would have thought this is, maybe, in the past.
	But it's now more you get entrepreneur type or business or financially driven folks.
	Who work there for a while and then use this revolving door, what Wolfgang just said, and then make money in this through their contacts in the agency and through like funneling all that money, having ideas for like maybe criminal activities and so on.
	So it's basically like a legalized, pseudo legalized version of like a mafia type constellation.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	The structures are exactly like Mafia.
	And also the control mechanisms that they exert over their, especially their rising stars, the ones that progress through the ranks, are also Mafia, including abuse, including sexual abuse, including violence, forcing them to commit heinous acts, videoing it.
	And this is children trafficking stuff.
	And that's how they control them.
	Because just as mafia, they're entering criminal enterprise.
	And for the criminal enterprise to continue doing what they're doing, they need to tightly control everyone.
	That's what it is.
	The whole thing, the development started when the Iron Wall was going down, because before there was a competition between the Eastern Bloc, the Western Bloc and so, and when the Soviet Union dissolved.
	You know, for instance, from Ukraine, there were the military people from Ukraine who started selling all the weapons to Africa.
	There was a very big business selling all the Kalashnikovs and all this stuff to people.
	And I think this was, they found out that you can earn a lot of money with this combination of being connected with the military or with the state, on one hand.
	And just sucking out everything you can from the state, from the people, and sell it somewhere.
	And this is, I think, this was a very, very big, big step for such mafia structures.
	Yeah.
	And but do you think it's also a network?
	I mean, we have all these other networks of like Bilderberg or like whatever, the Freemasons.
	I'm just, you know, like some some names.
	I mean, people are suspecting that there might be like closer ties, you know, like to Control thing or like some big families like some influential or like Black Rock or so on.
	Do you think like behind this whole structure like private-public partnership in this DoD and and you know with the weapons dealers and so on, do you think that the people are you know like flowing into these organizations that they come from this Additionally, you know, come from this, you know, societies, whatever, network connections, is that in addition?
	Or are these people DOD and so on, the head of the snake, in your opinion?
	Yeah, so I'm not sure who is Ultimate kind of had, I know that DOD is a huge, huge power all over the world.
	And obviously they control the largest, you know, weapons and money and poisons and everything, bio poisons, chemical weapons.
	So the DOD itself is a big I think the snake is like this multi-headed dragon hydra, right?
	So like this is one of the big main heads in the DOD.
	And then there are others, obviously.
	But the clubs, the Bilderbergs, the secret societies and so forth, I think those are more mechanisms of control and establishing hierarchy.
	As I said, so like for example, these clubs in prestigious colleges such as, you know, Skull and Bones and other secret societies in Harvard, Yale, MIT, those are the feeders into the elite.
	You know, that's where they, you know, take the rising stars, you know, they get educated there and they progress into some leadership positions.
	So those clubs are used for exerting control.
	So that's the ones where they perform these You know, sexual violence rituals and some of them are even, you know, human sacrifice rituals and so forth.
	Again, they're kind of like, I would say, ideological networking and control mechanisms.
	There is this very, very big organization which is called the World Economic Forum.
	And where they educate very openly global young leaders and the young young leaders, the followers of them, and where they openly cooperate with very big banks and they make them president in some states.
	Each election there is a new candidate from Goldman Sachs in Greece.
	It's all like this.
	It's a very big network.
	Of people helping each other to govern and to earn money with it.
	Yes, exactly.
	And if you notice the new trend of installing these completely incompetent young, very young, heads of state, like in Finland recently.
	Germany was the predecessor.
	Yeah.
	So now we have, so it used to be all like, you know, 90-year-old senile old man.
	Now we have these like, oh, here we have a 30-year-old woman or guy, and they're installed as the head of state.
	So that's another extreme.
	You know that this person is incompetent.
	You know that they're controlled.
	They have been installed there as a puppet.
	So, and they behave as a puppet, and they're clearly not intelligent either.
	So that's how they do it.
	They have controlled persons that they've groomed somehow through this process, assembled control files on them, and now they're put in these positions to just follow the orders.
	Because they were concentrating on national parliaments, I think there is one chance that within the Federal Republic of Germany, for instance, we have 16 Länder, we have 16 presidents, we have 16 constitutions and 16 responsibilities for education, for health and so on.
	And if there is a Minister President who is not a global young leader yet, He could say, oh no, I don't want to follow.
	I have my responsibility.
	And he would be very successful now because people understand what's going on.
	Many people understand.
	And if there would be someone who says, no, I don't follow.
	I have my own responsibility.
	There is my constitution and I follow the constitution.
	And if there is not only one, but if here one and there one, so if there are several spread over Europe, for instance, Regional responsibilities who say no, this would be a great movement.
	I see some chance and we should more focus not on those stupid governments, national governments who are corrupt and we can forget them.
	We have to concentrate on the next level.
	Yes, exactly.
	As I said, that's where, that's the only place we have been successful so far, is the local, actually like local county governments, essentially, county commissioners, they're not government, the county commissioners.
	And those are the places, and at the local level, that's where they need the enforcement.
	At least in the US, we have a great system, we have sheriffs, which are elected police, not the government police.
	And where we have constitutional sheriffs and that movement is growing, it's the sheriffs that are saying, you WHO can come up with whatever nonsense you want.
	National, you know, the federal government can come up with whatever nonsense they want.
	Even the state government can come up with nonsense.
	I'm just not going to enforce it here.
	They are the heroes, yes.
	And that's what needs to happen.
	The farmers are on the street now in Germany.
	They are with their tractors blocking all the streets this week.
	And the farmers have a very good connection to regional structures because they sit on their land, they don't travel around the world.
	They are on their tractors and they go slowly so they cannot go far.
	They are very good.
	They are close to their environment.
	They used to have their banks, their own banks, and they used to have their own societies to trade.
	Small societies and the EU tried to break it up to make it big ones and they were trying to break up the system.
	But there are many pharmacists who still know that there are regional structures that functioned for many decades and were very successful.
	Perhaps they've restarted such things, I hope.
	Yes.
	Restarting the local banks.
	In the U.S.
	there's some movement to have... So North Dakota, I think, has its own bank.
	Tennessee.
	Yeah.
	And Tennessee is establishing at least a gold depository.
	I know Texas also is in process of that.
	So some states started a movement away to at least create like state banks or at least a depository for gold.
	But locally people can establish credit unions, trading mechanisms, all that.
	So that's what we advise people to do.
	Establish your local governance, talk to your local magistrate.
	And see if they can be persuaded to help people out.
	But at the national level, or WHO is also this whole like IHR amendments business.
	While it's important, it's largely a distraction because they already established all that.
	It's already in place.
	It's just a show right now.
	So what we're telling people, urgent action is at the local level.
	I mean, it's also since you mentioned that they're looking for people to groom and then maybe putting together such a, you know, like a dossier with their whatever wrongdoings and so on, so that they can bribe them or like be in their backs and have like, you know, embarrassing facts about them put together.
	Then, I mean, that's simply not doable.
	If you're looking at like whatever, like 200,000 sheriffs or so, you know, That's right.
	You can't do it, but you can completely control these people, like maybe whatever 50 people deciding in the EU.
	I mean, of course, you can put a dossier together, like on all of them.
	So it's really like the local activities.
	But would you see the WEF?
	Like a breeding place for this whole thing?
	Or is it more like a think tank, like a coordination section, where people are drawn from, but it's not in direct cooperation with the DoD?
	Yes.
	So, yes, it's a WEF.
	It's a coordination.
	And like when they meet in Davos, basically all the deal making is done off of the, you know, main conference agenda.
	So it's all like in the side meetings and which is actually normal practice in any like any industry conference I ever went to.
	Yeah, there is a main session and there's some lectures you can go to, but you are there just to make network and make deals with your counterparties through the industry in a different setting, like other conference rooms you rent somewhere around.
	So that's the same way WF is functioning.
	And it's just a coordination body.
	Main things happening outside.
	There are other avenues.
	It's kind of like a parallel WEF I ran across.
	It's called Something Sustainable Capitalism.
	You know, they love these words.
	So, Council for Sustainable or Inclusive Capitalism or something like that.
	Inclusive, yes.
	Yeah, it has heads of like JP Morgan, Bank of America, you know, me over there and all these big corporations.
	So, all the huge corporations, huge banks.
	And the Vatican.
	But yeah, so all of that, and that's just another club that they have.
	So they have numerous places where they can meet and network, but it all happens, you know, like private meetings.
	It's never going to be on their main agenda.
	And it's possibly the same people, like in all these... It's all the same characters.
	Wow.
	We have a lot of things to do.
	Well, thank you guys for inviting me.
	I would like your texts you write in Substack.
	They need to be translated in other languages.
	Do you have a plan?
	Oh yeah, absolutely.
	I mean, feel free.
	I make it in free access for like six weeks, then it goes into archive and I And my paid subscribers get access to all archive.
	But yeah, if you guys want any article or you think, you know, you want to translate it.
	I could make my sub stack and just make translations from published translations of yours and others.
	Sure, yeah.
	Substack is a great resource.
	There are so many great writers there.
	And that's kind of like my main site where I get my news and reading.
	And it's also long form, so it's much more thoughtful.
	Who is the owner of Substack?
	So it's private.
	Their leadership is quite accessible.
	Now, you know, I don't entirely trust them, but at least so far they have been kind of censorship free.
	Also because it's a it's a subscription service.
	So it's not like it's not like Twitter.
	Mm-hmm.
	Which is advertising-based.
	There's no advertising and it's all subscription-based.
	And when it's subscription-based, you can't claim that like, oh, you know, I'm a platform and I can exert sort of censorship onto you because people are subscribing to you.
	So you're now actually interfering with commerce.
	We're much more protected.
	Although, you know, they can always break the law as I've shown you.
	But At least in this case, we're more protected than people on open platforms like YouTube, for example.
	Okay.
	Well, Sascha, thanks so much.
	This has been very insightful, although it's also a little bit depressing, I must say, because it really seems to be a rather big kind of snake with a lot of heads, maybe.
	A lot of heads.
	Yeah, a giant amount of heads.
	But we have to watch it closely and I think it's really the best idea to set up things locally because then you have so many things going on everywhere in the world that even that snake cannot look at all that stuff that's going on.
	Exactly.
	I think we are the biggest snake.
	Yeah, we're much bigger.
	They're afraid of us and they should be afraid of us.
	And we shouldn't be afraid of them at all.
	That's my message.
	We have millions of heads.
	Yeah, we should all trample on the tail of the snake because then it's going to be, you know, gone quite quickly.
	Shouldn't concentrate on all the heads.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Thanks ever so much.
	I think it's great that you're doing all this research and it's very insightful and you present it like in a way that it's also becomes very, you know, in your face what's going on there.
	I like very much your paintings.
	Thank you.
	Oh, thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you very much.
	I publish them on Substack as well.
	Okay, great.
	Yeah, thanks ever so much and we'll stay in touch and then, you know, get updated anytime when you have something new.
	Thank you.
	Thank you Vivian and Wolfgang.
	Have a great evening.
	Thanks a lot.

▲