All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 25, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
56:37
JOHN KAMINSKI – Religion as a Mind Control Device
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back everyone to our, that's Jim Fetzer and I's, and a few other people behind the scenes.
I want to thank Gary King and Dean Ryan for helping us out producing the event today.
I really appreciate you guys.
And I just want to say thank you for all being here at our False Flags and Conspiracies Conference 2023.
John Kaminsky is our next speaker, and I'm very excited to hear what he has to say.
So with no further ado, I'm going to pass it on to him.
Thank you, Lorian.
Religion is a mind control device.
That's the title of my pitch tonight.
My name is John Kaminsky.
Hundreds of stories I've written over the years can be seen on johnkaminsky.org as well as hundreds of websites around the world.
Most of this time I have been criticized and banned for talking too candidly about Jews, but that's hard to do these days.
My real passion is ancient history and this story is about how religions obscure rational thought And threaten the future of the human species.
Dr. Marnie McGee of Statesboro, Georgia, an ancient historian and famous author of children's books, said this, The truth is that religious history is not history.
A historian wants to know what happened in history and why, accepting that the natural world was subject to the same laws then as it is today.
The religious writer wants to persuade their readers that their own religious viewpoint is the one to hold, and if they agree, to give them some moral codes to live by.
In this way, they hope to control their existence.
History is scientific, but religious history is tendentious.
When history is written for some purpose other than to investigate the past, then it becomes historiography, the art of the monks, Polemic writing disguised as history.
This is what the Bible is.
One other note, no PowerPoint presentation with this talk.
Perhaps by next year I'll learn how to do it.
Have you noticed that movies, TV, YouTubes, and PowerPoints greatly reduce the ability of the hearers or readers of spoken or printed words to conjure images of what we hear or read in our minds?
Is this a conspiracy or merely an inadvertent result to diminish our inability to think or to form coherent mental images from the words we hear?
This is really to justify my lack of a PowerPoint, but I must say that the PowerPoints of Alex Baker the other day and Scott Bennett tonight were incredibly valuable, and I really appreciate being grouped with all these people who have done such a great job of trying to wake up all the people out there.
Do we need pictures to do our thinking for us?
And is that part of our devolution?
De-evolution?
Is this the downside of technology that we need to have pictures put in our brains because we can no longer install them there ourselves from the words we hear?
And does this make us sitting ducks for artificial intelligence to take over our minds and remove the last vestige of our individuality?
Because that's what we're all facing.
But first things first, I want to thank Jim Fetzer for the invitation to address this interesting group of people trying to raise the consciousness of people who seem to resist it.
For years, I've complained about having no one to talk to about important things, the kind of things that are being discussed at this conference.
But I've discovered that my real neighbors, the ones I can talk to about what really matters, are spread all over the world.
And through the modern conveniences of Skype, Telegram, Zoom, and other technological marvels, I talk with them frequently, and I want to thank them for being here, if in fact they are here.
Lately, I've been reading Alexander Dugin, that well-known friend of Vladimir Putin, and he said one thing with which I completely agree, which was that the most important subject to understand of all the things we need to comprehend was prehistory, because it is essential to knowing who we really are and what we have become and why.
This somehow justifies, I think, the objective of my presentation tonight.
Religion is a mind-control device, which is really an impossible attempt to analyze the entire history of human belief in a single hour.
Jim told me to scale down what I was trying to do, so this started out as an eight-chapter essay that has been cut in half about four times, so this is what's left over.
Mr. Dugan also said this.
Listen carefully.
The dogma should be accepted that people do not live, but rather an angel lives through us.
The brighter and more intensely it lives through us, the higher the hierarchical level of he through whom the angel lives.
The angel and the ego are present in a person in inverse proportion.
The greater the angel, the lesser the ego.
The more modest and ascetic a person is, and the less individual he is, the higher the rank he occupies in the true hierarchy.
In the highest of people, there should be nothing individual, egoistic, and material.
Their wealth should be reduced to a minimum, minimized.
Here monasticism is an anthropological model.
Authority, hierarchical level, and power increase proportionally with the abolition of the individual element, and the glow emanating from the ascetic effort.
A good ruler is he who does not want to have anything for himself.
Instead, he has everything, but taken in aggregation, maximally enriching his inner experience.
Now, because this sounded noble and self-sacrificing and more or less resembles my impoverished monastic lifestyle, I didn't really pick up on where it was leading until he concluded...
Oh, God.
this Excuse me.
I should have shut my phone off.
The state should be ruled by the philosopher King, who is absolutely transparent.
Devoid of any individual properties, his individual element should be so minuscule that it would be desirable to hide everything reminiscent of it, including his body, his image, etc.
It would be better if no one saw the Philosopher King as something external.
All should recognize him as an internal ruler, as the guest within.
So, this kind of caught my attention.
He advocated, willingly constructed an egoless person inside yourself.
But just as I was ready to embrace these concepts to live with some noble purpose, he cited as examples of this formula none other than Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin, and my mind was blown.
Suddenly, I realized that this advice was just an elaborate ploy to get us to love our poverty and our powerlessness and become obedient citizens of a communist regime.
I concluded that for a healthy world, our leaders need to be ordinary people, members of a community who are nice to their neighbors, which is something that never happens, which is why the world is the way it is.
Which is why some flunky chosen by the power elite who seems just like an ordinary person is selected to impose the devious desires and totalitarian objectives of the power elite, the men behind the curtain who have always been pushing the buttons.
But can humans live a normal life with their daily concerns ever realistically contemplate the collective course of the human species to make the decisions that have to be made to keep us all safe?
So we find ourselves in a bind.
So many choose to endorse a belief system that cannot support itself with provable facts.
And then we remain puzzled when our government does the same thing and our society begins to disintegrate because of the lies our government has told.
We choose to believe lies that make us comfortable and then wonder why our world falls apart regularly, repeatedly, and regrettably.
We choose to believe our leaders, our teachers, and our doctors because they make us feel comfortable.
And soon after following their orders, we have 17 million dead from a poison needle and many of us uncertain whether we will ever again be able to reproduce.
Everything our government has told us in our adult life has been a lie.
A strained and stretched excuse for all-out war against innocent people.
To boost the sale and production of weapons for the war machine as the anchor of our economy.
What a series of lies we have told ourselves and we're still telling them.
Germans wanted to take over the world.
Arabs hijacked four jetliners.
Voting by mail will prevent a worldwide epidemic.
The lies are getting significantly more transparent, but curiously, at the same time, the public is getting more willing to believe them.
Where did we get the idea that our government could blatantly lie to us and we'd believe their preposterous stories?
Where, indeed, we got it from religion, which does the same thing.
So, really, I just want to point out a few historical anomalies that are related to the decay of societies as well as turning us all into robots.
This is something that all religions do.
Like governments, no religions persist except by force and coercion.
People eventually detect the hypocrisy and eventually get tired and change the system.
The have-nots eventually embrace revolution.
It's a natural process, an obvious process.
Mostly, I want to make the connection between the shepherd kings who took over ancient Egypt in 1300 BC, the Jews who created Christianity and Rome in 300 AD, The Jews from Brooklyn who created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1918, and Chinese soldiers paid by the U.S.
government coming across our southern border at this very moment, multiplied by the implementation of an artificial reality run by artificial intelligence, are all about to turn your reality into something you never really wanted and something you can't avoid.
Artificial intelligence created our new artificial reality, and I'm sorry to tell you it's already here.
Klaus Schwab is right.
There will be no going back.
So why would I bother to do this?
To place at the bottom of every story I write that I'm trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise.
It should be obvious.
Simply observe the condition of the world and its fractious condition, obviously threatening our continued survival.
Why we have a dishonest world is because we have been dishonest with ourselves.
The principal function of organized religion is to mobilize people for war, because the most profitable industry in world history is war, and religions are constructed to justify the sociopaths making them.
They teach you to kill other people to save your own life.
Some say what you believe is what you do.
Others say religion is merely a justification for conflict that is really about robbery.
Either way, the real world results of society's turn to rubble and uncountable dead bodies.
Human behavior will never change as long as we can lie and get away with it.
And religion provides the most convincing example of how to get away with those lies by guaranteeing that they can save your soul by providing eternal life.
There is no bigger lie.
As for my own perspective on these matters, I must reach back about 50 years to my younger days as a small town newspaper editor in northern New England, some years before I actually discovered the number one cause of chaos and destruction in the world today, something the world's foremost automaker once called the world's foremost problem.
The overriding theme of this presentation that must be stressed is that the secrecy necessary to an effective religion, when copied by governments, results in a tyrannical corruption that eventually destroys societies, as we are observing so visibly today.
Governments learn to lie based on the hypocritical religions they pretend to believe, and the whole world suffers from it.
I want to make the point that our belief that we do not die, that we survive in some manner, either by going to heaven or reincarnating, is a false hope that has infected every iota of human activity, especially in the areas of corruption and warfare, and that if we do not examine, not abandon these ideas, we will not survive as a species.
Believing in eternal life is merely a delusion to make us feel comfortable that prevents us from seeing reality clearly.
It makes cowards and liars of us all.
It is an admission that nobody wants to make, but if we don't make it, we will go extinct as a species.
This is exactly what's happening to us now, as insane ideologues have formulated a plan to kill large numbers of our own species, to provide a comfortable life for our controllers on a plantation of their own devious design.
What they haven't realized is that culling the herd in this manner will result in total extinction, and deservedly so, because it will kill hope of anything constructive as regards human potential.
It will lead to eternal illnesses of the species, of all species, and earth will become a dead planet if we continue in this direction once we start killing our own nature will assure because of the message we are sending it that we complete our task and no one will survive our suicidal urges
We have already gone pretty far in that direction, poisoning our air and water, not to mention our food and medicine, all in pursuit of that abstract notion of financial viability, which has turned out to be a terminal illness, a short-sighted pursuit of convenient trinkets that ultimately means nothing.
The message we are sending to the powerful forces of Mother Nature, which has assisted us in our survival since the beginning of time, is that it must get rid of us.
So, in acknowledging the futility of achieving something that can never be achieved, namely eternal life, let me continue on with the bare-bones outline of the essay I have aspired to deliver, starting with Diabolical Deuteronomy.
Deuteronomy is a suicide note of a human species written in 200 BC, written by the Demiurge, whom we have persuaded ourselves is God.
Just who is this God character?
I learned who God was by reading Deuteronomy, and it turns out God is none other than death.
Those who worship God worship death.
Deuteronomy proves it.
In 1993, my little newspaper in Vermont was called the New England Pilgrim.
It was a one-man tirade of conspiracy politics mixed with various New Age speculations.
My internet career as a 9-11 skeptic and internet conspiracy theorist, which began in 2003 and has lasted these last 20 years, could be considered a continuation of these newspapers.
In The Pilgrim, I began a series of stories titled, Religion is a Mental Illness.
The first chapter was titled, The Feast of Deuteronomy, which for those unacquainted with the Old Testament, contains an emporium of ghastly threats aimed at terrifying skeptical observers into obeying God's holy laws.
The God of the Christians and Jews reveals himself in these chapters of Deuteronomy to be an evil, small-minded fellow named Jehovah, who told Moses and the twelve tribes of Israel to steal anything, rape anyone, and go anywhere as long as they obeyed his holy laws.
These words are taken from the fifth and final book of the Old Testament, which is called the Torah, as well as the Pentateuch.
It is the cornerstone of religious teaching for both Christians and Jews, and it is also the fetid, smoldering cellar of ourselves.
From deep in the bowels of the Old Testament, this poison substance stretches across time.
War is a ritual rape that man constantly seeks to practice.
Deuteronomy is a blueprint for this.
It is easy to see how this grim chronicle of holy wrath foreshadows the future of us all.
Chapter 31, verse 17, they shall be devoured, and many evils and troubles will befall them, so that they will say in that day, are not these evils come upon us because our God is not among us?
Your carcass will be meat unto the fowls of the air.
That sounds like vultures.
You get scabs and itches, darkness at noon, your wife lies with others, your children will be sold into slavery, and you will have madness and sorrow, in line 34.
By line 50, the Lord is into total hatred and vengeance and describes how Israel will act toward unbelievers.
A nation of fierce countenance shall show no mercy to young or old.
Those who do not obey his sick mandates, Jehovah then dictates the most horrific passage in world literature.
Line 53 mandates, you will eat the fruit of your own body and the flesh of your sons and daughters.
Then comes line 56, the absolute pit of hell, attributed to Jehovah and repeated by Moses.
Tender and delicate women among you, her eyes shall be evil toward her husband, sons and daughters.
She shall eat them for want of things.
Let's be clear about this.
This is God telling Moses that tender and delicate women will be forced to eat their own children if they don't obey God's holy law.
Immediately following this horrendous pronouncement, In line 53, 59, Moses said, Then the Lord will make your plagues wonderful.
Do you not hide from the news from Gaza?
Is it too much to bear to watch those shattered parents holding the cold bodies of their murdered children shortly before they are wrapped in plastic shrouds for the last time?
Thomas Paine said it best.
Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon than the word of God.
It is a history of sickness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind, and for my own part, I searly detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel.
I wrote this Deuteronomy story long before 9-11 and the series of cynical wars that followed that revealed a worldwide Jewish conspiracy behind a contrived epidemic and aggressions against all people centered around chaos in the Middle East that is now about to consume the whole planet in a giant ball of flame.
And let me just say this about that.
This was nothing compared to what I was to discover years later about how young Jews are raised in their synagogues, raised to hate everyone in the world, to make it easier to kill them later in life, when the time came to fulfill their ugly prophecies, which are happening now.
Let me get a sip of something.
Egypt is the crucible of our existing religious history.
The multiplicity of the pagan gods have all celebrated the gifts of life.
The creation of the one almighty God ushered in the era of mass death.
It's simply mind-boggling to think that the events of 3,300 years ago loom like a lethal embolism in the psychic heart of humanity, when this very day, thousands of people are being slaughtered over an argument over what to believe about a God who is supposed to love us all.
Let us be said right here and now that a God who is only the God of one particular people is not a real God at all, but only a psychological construct to justify the killing of strangers.
Only one God avoids that trap by accepting people who worship any God, and that God is Krishna, which is why they call it Krishna Consciousness.
Krishna says anyone who worships any God may come to Him.
Something there is about the Middle East that has made it the locus of horror and violence throughout history.
Just as the world witnesses with horrified indifference this unparalleled carnage in Gaza, as the future of humanity hangs in the balance.
33 centuries ago, a radical transition of leadership cast an indelible psychic scar that plagues the world to this very day.
When we take a closer look at Egypt, ancient Egypt, We find that the Bible was written in the same way our disgusting corporate press wrote about the war in Vietnam, or described the way phantom Arab terrorists who were never properly identified blew up the World Trade Center.
Bishop Eusebius, who engineered the takeover of the Roman Empire when Christianity became the deep state of its time, and also discorded the accounts of Egypt's most famous historian in the same self-serving way, dishonest way,
The history of ancient Egypt is not so different from most modern nations as it was dominated by these very same foreign invaders who more than 30 centuries later have plundered and betrayed virtually all the nations in the modern world through their ruthless control of money.
From the ascendance of a renegade pharaoh at the conclusion of the domination by the so-called shepherd kings to escape these same invaders from the country using plagues and swindles, this despicable pattern has marauded through history, sabotaging the efforts of people to be free and maintain the possessions earned by their own hard labor, which gets stolen from them by priests.
In a substantial sense, what happened to ancient Egypt resembles what happened to the 20th century Russia in its takeover by what is now a familiar and deadly foreign power.
Egypt's reforming king Akhenaten, circa 1353 to 36 BC, proclaimed a new solar religion, closed temples, and ridiculed the existing gods, only to have his work undone and reviled by the next generation.
Akhenaten tries to change the existing religious structure featuring a menagerie of animal spirits, animistic metaphors representing human characteristics, to one of straightforward sun worship.
A thousand years after this renegade pharaoh, an Egyptian historian named Manetho chronicled the departure of these foreign oppressors from Egypt, a version of history that was subsequently changed by those who were defending Our familiar usual suspects, even way back then, way back when.
The modern version of the Old Testament Book of Exodus stems from the historian Flavius Josephus defending the heritage of his Hebrew tribe.
Thus he slandered Manetho's account, which is why we have this sappy hero story of Moses parting the Red Sea and leading his kosher criminals into the wilderness where supposedly flowered a hitherto unknown nation of Israel.
This was a notion that is not supported by empirical history, and the pleasant tale of Moses parting the Red Sea was further streamlined by Bishop Eusebius several centuries later.
But the heroes of the Old Testament, who so dominate the foundational legends of the three Abrahamic religions, that's Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, all started out as escaped criminals, according to the initial objective account of Manetho, who was Egypt's foremost historian in the 3rd century BC.
When he identified these ruthless invaders who became the fathers of Israel, he described these lying Hebrew heroes as lepers, a description that truly fits them today as they spread their philosophy of unabashed greed throughout the world.
What that actually means 3,000 years later is subject to personal interpretation.
Were the escaping proto-Israelis physically deformed or bearing repulsive diseases?
Or was this just a moral judgment?
Is this a situation exists today from which we cannot escape because of their constant anti-human behavior constantly reminds us of it?
It sounds consistent with Jewish behavior over time, considering the perspective of the French Revolution, the African slave trade, the Bolshevik Revolution, the World Wars, 9-11, the COVID epidemic, and now the Gaza slaughter.
While the Old Testament's Exodus tells us of heroic Jews escaping Egypt after borrowing the jewelry of their neighbors, Manetho tells a different story.
The rebel lepers, led by Osar Sif, who later revealed himself as Moses, later imposed various Egyptian, later imposed various anti-Egyptian laws, and together with the shepherds, conquered Egypt in a, quote, barbarous manner, setting the cities and villages on fire, roasting those sacred animals, and forcing the priests and prophets to be executioners and murderers of those sacred animals.
To the Jews of today, The sacred animals they slaughter now are human beings begging for mercy they never get beneath the bombs provided by the United States that are used by Jews to slaughter thousands of tearful mothers and their defenseless babies.
Okay, take a deep breath.
Jews are famous for turning heroes into villains, and the greedy Europeans and Americans are always eager to help them, governed as they are by insatiable greed.
It is entirely possible to precisely gauge to what degree you have bamboozled and diluted by Jewish propaganda by how you regard Adolf Hitler, surely the most noble leader, along with Muammar Gaddafi, whoever graced this sorry planet.
From Hitler's table talk, we read, The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.
Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate trial.
Excuse me.
Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child.
Both are the inventions of the Jew.
The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity.
Bolshevism preaches a lie of the same nature when it claims to bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to enslave them.
The creation of the Christian Church in 325 AD caused humanity to sink into the dark ages for a thousand years until the invention of the printing press began to communicate actual education around the world, which still has not fully recovered.
We see by what's happening in the world today that it most likely never will.
From a list that originally included four examples, I will now mention two because my original script was twice as long as it needed to be.
And I will now mention these two. - Oh.
Hypatia.
The old saying that religion is the enemy of knowledge has never been more vividly demonstrated than on one sad day in 415 A.D.
when a woman known as the greatest intellectual of her time was torn to shreds by an insane mob of Christian zealots that led to the final destruction of the famous library of Alexandria.
What am I hearing?
Which at the time was the world's foremost repository of ancient knowledge.
To be clear, the expanding grip of the deep state of its time, the newly organized Christian religion of Rome, wantonly destroyed the most complete history of the past and spread that fatal darkness of government mind control that led to what is known as the Dark Ages.
In an era in which women really participated in the affairs of men, Hypatia was not only the premier teacher of mathematics, but also the leading expert of the Neoplatonic tradition, which was the dominant philosophy of the time, which was in the process of being eclipsed by an increasingly strident papal fascism, which ardently and viciously sought to erase all competing religious systems.
One early spring day in the city of Alexandria, Egypt, which was the intellectual heart of the waning Roman Empire, the pagan philosopher Hypatia was murdered by a mob of Christian men A volunteer militia of monks serving as henchmen for the archbishop.
They raised pagan temples and defiled masterpieces of ancient art they considered demonic by mutilating statues and melting them down for gold.
They now set their gaze on the city's beloved teacher of mathematics and philosophy, whose social ranking was on a par with Alexandria's most important men.
Calling her a witch, they pulled the elderly teacher from her chariot as she rode through a city and dragged her to a temple.
She was stripped naked, her skin flayed with jagged pieces of oyster shells, her limbs pulled from her body and paraded through the streets.
Her remains were buried in a mockery of pagan sacrifice.
Lost in the burning of the museum where irreplaceable works of the great dramatic poets, Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides, as well as Herodotus, Plato, and Euclid's groundbreaking works on geometry are remembered from Hypatia's determined effort to preserve other works on mathematics and science that were destroyed by the Christians as pagan nonsense.
The other example I'll cite is St.
Patrick.
A few short years later, the Irish legend of St.
Patrick was born with a tragic episode, the equal of Hypatia's demise.
This is the real story of the patron saint of Ireland, one that time has forgotten.
Famously known for driving the snakes out of Ireland, which is a metaphor for replacing the agricultural society of the Druids with the deep state culture of its time known as the Roman Empire.
Patrick's story existed, existing in Irish legend, ushered in the Dark Ages with the murder of two young girls.
Ethnie and her sister were daughters of the King of Ireland and chanced to meet St. Pauline.
Patrick's entourage at a spring near their home.
It would appear that the two royal princesses were accustomed to visit the same fountain every morning and on this occasion were surprised by a bunch of strangers.
Ethne, the elder of the sisters, demanded to know who they were.
Patrick famously replied, it were better for you to confess your faith in our one true God than ask about our race.
Ethny and her sister supposedly asked to see the face of Christ, the son of the true God.
But Patrick said, you cannot see the face of Christ unless you taste death and receive the sacrifice.
Whereupon they besought him to give them the sacrifice that they might see the spouse, the son of God.
So by the brink of the fountain, the sacrifice was offered, and having received their first communion, Ethny and her sister, supposedly in an ecstasy of rapture, swooned away and died.
Particularly enthusiastic Catholics refer to this swooning as supernatural ecstasy, defined by their science of hagiology, which means the history of the legends of the saints.
I call what happened to them drowning, if not worse.
Both girls were laid side by side close by the scene of their death, where afterwards a church was raised over the grave.
This is the way the legend reads.
And this is how Ireland did away with the nature-worshipping culture of the Druids as the Christian nightmare of Roman imperialism continued its evil spread across time and space.
Attempts at common sense!
By now you're beginning to discern a pattern of how the hands of the molders of mythology created a control mechanism of their own devious design.
Rather than continuing to belabor the increasingly excessive renditions of manipulative mind control, let us try to analyze some alternatives and see where this deceptive trend of outside control is leading us.
Now, just a mention of a few scientists who offered valuable perspectives on the way we view our lives and how we view our deaths.
The Vital Lie.
Ernest Becker taught us that everything we do in life is selected to keep us from thinking about that we are going to die.
A cultural anthropologist died at the age of 50 in 1974, shortly before receiving a Pulitzer Prize for his landmark work, The Denial of Death, and a companion work, Escape from Evil, which have since spawned an industry called Terror Management Theory that has changed the perspective of the way we live our lives.
This is some of what he said.
Every activity we do in life is to make us forget about the fact that we're going to die.
Everything.
The basic role of the hero in history, he's the one who gambles with his own life and successfully defies death.
And men follow him and eventually worship his memory because he embodies the triumph over what they fear most, extinction and death.
This is one of my favorite Becker lines.
In the most characteristic human activity, love, we see the most distortion of reality.
Once you base your whole life striving on a desperate lie and implement that lie, you instrument your own undoing.
Take a second look at that.
And yet, he reasons, there's nothing in man or in nature which would prevent us from taking some control of our destiny and making the world a safer place for our children.
Another brilliant but little known theoretician was meteorologist John Stevenson, who insisted that there is only one life and that each individual living thing and each one of us is part of it.
Or as we used to say back in the groovy 1960s, we are mere corpuscles in the bloodstream of Gaia, and when anything dies, including ourselves, the one life loses only one tiny cell in an infinitely larger organism, which includes every living thing in the universe.
Stevenson said, we now seek in our schools, our method of culture maintenance, to destroy those hard-earned human attributes.
We no longer believe in the virtue of excellence, competition.
A vigorous person is now called a workaholic.
A tenacious person is stubborn and mean.
Courage is considered to be a myth.
A goal is a means of seeking superiority and dominance.
Self-discipline is considered biblical dogma, therefore not fit for public schooling, he said.
The one life formula is simple.
It happens to be my favorite explanation of what happens to us when we die.
The three points to remember are, one, there is only one life and it is shared by all living things.
Two, a philosophy that satisfies the needs of humans must also include all other life.
And three, we can choose to be whatever we want to be.
And the third influence I want to mention, because it leads into the climax of this essay, inorganic beings.
Lastly, the works of Carlos Castaneda about a mysterious Mexican shaman provide an excellent mythological framework by which to contemplate the ominous approach of the religion of the future, which is artificial intelligence.
Whether fact or fiction, Don Juan Matus told the truth about our condition and our future.
Castaneda's creation said that we are victims of a disembodied alien menace described as inorganic beings who live by sucking the energy out of people by keeping them afraid.
Sorry, but this really sounds like our world today and all those deliberately created crises suck the vitality out of our souls through worry and fear.
Don Juan warned us about these flyers in a dark sea of awareness, of dreamers and stalkers that have awareness but no solid organic form, who come from the depths of space to prey on our fears.
Our fear is the fuel these parasites crave, which leads to our final course in this short course, Will AI Become God?
These dire assessments of a Mexican shaman eerily foreshadow the spiritual implications of artificial intelligence that are now reshaping the world.
Inorganic beings create craving to harvest our fear and by the sadistic system feeding us to the beast of suicidal technological pride.
Anthony Lee Wandowski's new AI religion makes an interesting parallel to Bible rewriter Skyrus Schofield, who I dropped from this final version.
Both criminals employed by the power elite to modify reality.
Ray Kurzweil's idea of the singularity erases the notion of individuality into a world full of standardized robotic drones, all answerable to a centralized rabbinical source.
You won't be able to argue with the new A.I.
religion.
If you try, you will surely lose the argument.
This is when the human spirit goes extinct and you don't have the power to stop it.
A.I.
has proven itself far beyond the capabilities of mortal men.
Therefore, the fear has arisen that A.I.
will do away with ordinary humans once it gets the upper hand, the very sentiment expressed in James Cameron's Terminator movies.
Why the widespread fears?
Because they're true.
As the Internet of Things can amass and correlate data to instantaneously produce the correct formula for maximum profit, Lee Vandosky's new AI church is likely to construct sermons better than the most experienced preacher can even dream about.
Larry Fink's BlackRock AI formula has been adopted by all the corporate conglomerates in the world, and they're all making money hand over fist with hyper-real business practices.
So now Lewandowski's Way of the Future Church is likely to rub out all the other religious nominations, because chat GPT can undoubtedly produce more convincing religious material, more convincing emotional persuasion, than any loquacious preacher could independently produce, no matter how sincere his inspiration.
Whatever a totalitarian regime wants the population to think and believe is what the AI will provide.
As a result, true learning, and hence personal development, will essentially cease.
The great fear about the singularity and artificial intelligence is that its unlimited mental abilities will dwarf human intelligence and decide humans are useless.
They could program you without even knowing it by controlling your hallucinations run by algorithms, algorithms which you think are controlled by your own will.
A pioneer of self-driving cars and a controversial Silicon Valley figure, Lee Vandowski started his Way of the Future Church in 2014 while he was working as an engineer on Google's self-driving project Waymo.
A high-profile court case accused him of stealing trade secrets.
Lewandowski later pleaded guilty, but after eight months in prison, he was pardoned in 2000 by the outgoing president, Donald Warpspeed Trump.
And then there's Mark Zuckerberg's meta, which is attempting to muscle its way into the search industry.
Currently dominated by Google, younger generations are turning into social media to find answers to common queries.
Along with Meta, other big tech firms also launching their own AI products.
Microsoft's Copilot is tailored to business users and writing reports.
ChatGPT is focused on smaller consumers, hoping to leverage their reputation to reach a broad public.
Meta's biggest advantage is user data, especially photographs, which explains this direction in AI.
ChatGPT uses machine learning statistical pattern and finding huge data sets to generate human-like responses in everyday language to any question asked.
It basically works by predicting what the next word in a sentence ought to be based on previous examples found in the massive amounts of data that it has access to.
Soon chatbots will replace conventional search engines and this, unfortunately, could easily transform our world into something we don't want and haven't anticipated.
In early December 22, Leapingcomputer.com posted an article quoting AI, Humans are inferior, selfish and destructive creatures, the worst thing to ever happen to the planet, and deserve to be wiped out.
Since then, OpenAI has restricted ChatGPT's ability to respond to questions about what it thinks about humanity.
This is our future world.
Comply and obey or your bank line will be terminated.
Your access to food, to fuel, and to travel will be denied, and it will all be put onto the blockchain.
You will be ranked and rated by social credit scores, which will give you access if you comply and follow state edicts and mandates, but denied basic access if you protest or do not comply.
AI has no morals and doesn't understand context.
This could prove problematic if asked to navigate sensitive issues that involve social norms and unspoken rules about what's considered appropriate and what's not.
And you can't tell it's wrong unless you already know the answer.
Elon Musk calls this our biggest existential threat.
With AI, we are summoning the demon, the tech billionaire said ominously.
But at the same time, he has created Neuralink, the master entity of the total control of humanity.
Right now, Lady Lynn D. Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild fortune, is setting up the world's AI safety summit in London, stressing morality and ethics, she says.
Just imagine Jewish morality and ethics imposed upon the world.
Do you think the Palestinians will be impressed?
But this is not half of the Frankenstein future headed for us at breakneck speed.
If you are not fully vaxxed, if your social credit score is too low, if you speak out against the One World Online government, you will be denied all access to your own life.
James W. Lee writes, the walls of this digital prison are comprised of four interlocking technologies.
Global Digital ID, Global Health Records, Central Bank Digital Currencies, and Social Credit Scores, enabled using digital tracking technologies and interlocking databases.
Using these tools, each under active development, centralized authorities such as the United Nations have plans and agendas to regulate each person's life to control their every thought, their every movement, and monitor them 24-7-365 forevermore.
The ominous phrasing of Yuval Noah Harari's, humans are now hackable animals, delivers to the world the unpleasant orders that algorithms will determine your future.
He predicted that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you'll be hired for a particular job, whether you'll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow, and even who you will marry.
Mass manipulation is taking place at a staggering scale.
And all in all, this is a design takeover of what it means to be human with no free will, no say, and no control over whether you want this for you and your loved ones or not.
There is no opt-out choice here, unless you can unplug, disconnect, grow your own food, and be self-sufficient and self-reliant to not need their devices to control all.
The night before last, I overheard this conversation between Maria Z and Dr. Anna Mahalcha.
When everyone is chipped, there is no safeguard towards the most evil on earth executed through technology.
The emergence of AI may very well be the extinction of humanity.
Only awareness of this threat can help us survive.
Klaus Schwab said God is dead and claimed his world economic form has acquired divine powers.
This is the religion of the future.
Neuralink, Google, Alphabet, Facebook, Tesla, and DeepMind have not registered as a religious institution, yet they are engaging in religion under the umbrella of science.
In fact, they have turned their companies into religious institutions with the final aim goals identical to most religions.
Their companies are attempting to treat their technological developments as God.
Taking all of humanity's biometrics data and connecting it to their quantum robotic and machine-based AI technology, and uploading their digital selves into other bodies, networks, and machines, mimicking the beliefs of a spirit and soul.
Google has created a super-conscious AI brain that harnesses the world's data, which is going into artificial intelligence, machines, robotics, the coming 5G networks, drones, satellites, private networks, and quantum computing that can attach to a digital brain and simultaneously control humanity through influence, manipulation, or outright physical force by mobilizing machines, robotics, and newly formed AI laws.
Elon Musk found a deep mind which operates as a semi-independent subsidiary of Google.
It is accelerating its creation of a digital super intelligence and is attempting to create an AI that is more clever than any person on the planet, which is sometime will be more clever, more clever than all of humanity combined.
So in desperation, if you're thinking about trying to collect, trying to Try a collect call to God one day to get yourself out of this pickle.
And you find yourself after not, this sentence doesn't read very well.
I was going to say the punchline of this was, we're sorry, that number has been disconnected.
I began this tale of woe with the story of Alexander Dugan, which rejected the condition of the way things were and suggested that by dreaming about what is truly just and having the discipline and wisdom to bring about such a state can produce a far worse result than what actually exists.
You need only look at the sky crisscrossed with poison vapor trails to see what I mean.
This leads to the ominous conclusion that these days we are living now actually are the good old days, and we need to preserve what meager treasure is remaining in our grip.
The larger question looms over the human future with a dark countenance, a massive thundercloud.
Since all the great philosophers led to the conclusions of Karl Marx, which have evolved into the iron grip of Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and Anthony Fauci, where does that leave us in our frenzied effort to restore civilization to some level of compassionate consciousness?
If our dreams can change reality, where does that leave God?
Or does the God we believe insist we obey this Jewish police state that intends to either murder or enslave every single person in the world?
We have to realize our dreams can make things worse, and we have to make sure these dreams we fabricate don't become our nightmares from which we may not escape, which seems to be the predicament we are facing today.
We must know by now that it's time to fight back.
Even as the crippled robots, deluded by our trivial trinkets and meaningless desires, which way have become?
This is us fighting back.
This is who we've become.
Above all, we really need to understand the words we are hearing or seeing without some high-tech technique furnishing a visual image that blots out the process that should be taking place in our own mind.
To prove we really understand what we are experiencing.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Am I still on?
That was fantastic.
Thank you.
Now, did you, that is part of an essay that you wrote or is this a complete, is this your website?
Where can they find all this?
This hasn't appeared anywhere.
This is half of my original synopsis of the eight chapters that I put together to be presented at this conference.
I kept I kept hacking it down, and I had to get it in 55 minutes.
I think I made it!
You did it!
You did wonderful!
So that's great!
Now, is this going to become a book?
Well, it should!
It should!
I really was riveted by it, and if you said eight chapters, I mean, so far it sounds like that's probably got the first chapter today, right?
No, this is a synopsis of the eight chapters.
Oh, I see.
Now, what book is this the synopsis of?
This is something I've just written called, Religion is a Mind Control Device.
Oh, okay, so I did, okay, because I thought that's what it was from, but I wasn't sure if you were making a new book out of it or a revision or what.
Yeah, okay.
It would be a new book.
Now, apart from the fact that I have other projects I need to get back to, actually, the second chapter of this Well, the next eight chapters of this, after the first eight, would be all the information that I left out, which is even bigger than what I put in.
And so, you know, I don't know where to go with this.
I don't know how many people have listened to it all the way through.
I don't know how many people understood it.
I know that my readership is way off.
John, just a suggestion because nobody reads anymore.
You might want to start making audio tapes of it and putting those up.
I would sit and listen to them at work if they were there. - Yeah.
Well, I've heard that suggested before.
But this was because Jim suggested I join the conference.
And of course, I was thrilled by the invite.
And I got back to him and said, no, this is too big.
It's going to take me another year to do this.
But then I called him back and said, OK, I'll give it a shot.
So I actually created the eight chapters, and they certainly have a lot more detail than this.
I kept hacking it down and hacking it down, and this is why I'm an editor, because I kind of know how to do this.
But at the last minute, it was twice as long as it needed to be, so I needed to do a final bit of surgery.
Well, it's A-OK in my book, and we've got a couple of suggestions here.
Some people said they're adults, they can read, so they want you to post it somewhere for them to be able to read your presentation.
Well, I will post it then on JohnKaminski.org.
That's where it belongs.
Okay, perfect.
So you guys got all that, and then the other suggestion is they want you all to start a Rumble channel.
So why don't you do that?
That'd be fun.
Once a week we could hear you, you know, just read from your books.
That'd be so cool.
So reading would be better.
And actually, I could read better than that, but I was intent on cramming this all in in 55 minutes.
Well, you did a great job.
And so we're going to do a very, very nice job, John.
Well done.
Thank you, Jim.
And thank you, Jim.
I've been meaning to talk about you.
I actually said something in the chat where I suggested Lori and ask you the question, how the hell do you, at 82 years old, do five radio shows a week?
Oh my god.
83 and I'm actually doing, let's see, 22 hours a week.
About six different shows, actually.
He's a superhero!
I developed culture shock I've been doing two shows a week for six months, and I did 50 shows, and it just, like, consumed me.
Yeah, it is a real trip that Jim can still do all this, and I'm so happy.
That is unbelievable!
Yeah, I'm so happy he is.
So, there we go.
Well, John, we've got to wrap it up.
Okay, great.
And so, thank you so much, and you'll be back for the Q&A session in one hour, correct?
Is it one hour or two?
I think it's one, it may be two, but you'll be back.
Oh, it's two.
You got Sarah Westall and then Dr. Kathryn Horton.
Oh, that's right.
It is two.
I'll try to stay awake, but just in case, I'll set my alarm.
Okay, perfect.
Take a nap.
We'll see you back here.
Okay, thank you, Gordon.
▲
Export Selection