All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 20, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
53:26
Q&A Session 1: Alexander “Ace” Baker – Brian Davidson – Fred Leuchter – James Fetzer
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, welcome back to the question and answer session.
I do have four questions in the Q&A.
Before I get there, I want to add, Brian Davidson, as I was preparing to go to the Supreme Court of the United States, Because I've been denying my right to a trial by jury in Wisconsin, which has a very peculiar summary judgment scheme that allows a judge to set aside any evidence he regards as unreasonable.
And he basically regarded all the evidence I had that nobody died as Sandy Hook, as unreasonable, even declared.
During the scheduling conference that all my research on whether Sandy Hook was real or not had nothing to do with the accuracy or the truthfulness of the death certificate for a decedent that says right on the death certificate he died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds.
And I've got to say, as a professor of philosophy who taught courses in logic for 35 years, I've got to say that was a mind-bender.
The point I'm now making is this.
By the time I worked my way up to the U.S.
Supreme Court, I was putting together appendices to substantiate my claims, my case.
It included the FEMA manual.
It included the Connecticut FEMA schedule.
It included the Connecticut FEMA map.
It included the photograph of the crime scene vehicle.
Already there, which Brian had ascertained had occurred late afternoon on the day of the shooting, even though the windows were not broken out, which means they hadn't finished taking the scene.
Plus, he got into the Connecticut State Police files and discovered photographs and records that blew the whole case out of the water, which I included in Appendix E.
Including down a hallway where the principal and the school psychologist, their bodies were supposed to be lying in pools of blood.
Ryan had photographs of the hallway, no bodies, no pools of blood.
And in a classroom where there was supposed to be a pile of little bodies, Not only no pile of little bodies, and no blood, but there were no student desks, no student chairs, no principal, no teacher desk or chair.
All the furniture was shoved up against the wall.
So he not only uncovered evidence that it wasn't a mass murder, but evidence that it wasn't even an operating school.
And I put that in the appendices.
I thought, wow, wait till the public sees this.
Because for these court proceedings, as a rule, the public has access not only to the filing, but to the supporting appendices.
Not in this case.
When they published my brief for reconsideration on the last page they added, Additional information is available from the clerk of the court, and they did not make them public, no doubt because they would have blown it out of the water in another finding of Brian.
Was that the Connecticut State Police had removed all the metadata from the photographs.
So the date and location and so forth where the photographs had been taken had all been removed, which I interpret as evidence of consciousness of guilt.
Now, Brian, I want to invite you to take the first question from me about—you know, I really just want to tell you how impressed I have been with your research.
You are so thorough and so meticulous.
Tell me about your experience with the Connecticut police files.
You're muted.
Still can't hear you, alas.
Gary, have we any idea?
You can't put it together.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Okay.
It says his mic is on.
You mean you're not blocking it?
No.
What else can we do?
Maybe while we're trying to sort that out, if I could maybe just jump in here and make a comment on the legal perspective.
I know a bit about your, you know, you, Jim, were sued for defamation and got, you know, got blown up on a summary judgment.
So I just want to say, In any kind of lawsuit, you have the facts and the law, and the plaintiff alleges a whole series of facts, this, that, and the other thing, and it's supposed to add up to a violation of this law.
But under our system, The jury is supposed to be the trier of facts, and the judge is only supposed to be the trier of the law, which is supposed to mean that the judge is just there to make sure that we have a fair proceeding.
But judges were never supposed to actually decide Cases and of course now they've stood that completely on its head and case after case after case it is judges who are deciding cases and one of the main ways this is not just your case but this comes up in a lot of the cases that I'm involved in and that I see over and over again is they take what are actually
Factual disputes, like in your case, you know, was the death certificate authentic or incomplete or whatever?
And, you know, was the witness who appeared and claimed to be Lenny Posner actually that guy?
And many other.
These are factual disputes that supposedly under a jury trial system, only a jury can decide.
And they convert those into legal disputes.
And a legal dispute can be dismissed, on a motion to dismiss, or can be decided on a summary judgment.
But in both of those kinds of procedures, supposedly the court, the judge, is supposed to assume as true everything that, in this case, that Jim Fetzer alleges, the non-moving party, Everything that they allege is true and then can this case be decided purely as a matter of law?
But over and over and over again, I see that they take these cases that have Major factual disputes in them, and they somehow convert them into legal disputes just so it never goes to the jury, because the jury is what actually we, the people, actually can depend on.
And so that's just been my observation.
It's not just you.
It's been many, many of these cases.
Ace, you're spot on.
You're absolutely right.
And Bonnie asked a question about how the 14th Amendment enters in here.
The 14th Amendment is equal justice under law.
I use it as a contrast case because the summary judgment procedure in Wisconsin is so peculiar.
Texas.
In Texas, they would have done just what they said.
They would have assumed everything, you know, assumed hypothetically everything I claim.
It was a FEMA drill, nobody died, blah, blah, blah, for which I had a mountain of evidence, and then see if the plaintiff bringing the suit can agree.
And only if the plaintiff bringing the suit can agree can they go forward with a summary judgment, because then there's no dispute over the facts.
That was the reason why I was willing to respond to the very peculiar complaint that had a complete death certificate with a file number, town and state certification, which asserted in the text of the complaint was not materially different from the scan of the death certificate I'd published, which had none of the above, which I recognized was ridiculous, but I thought it was important to get all the evidence I had into a court of law.
So the 14th Amendment is, it turns out that really very much as ACEs imply, none of the Sandy Hook lawsuits, whether it's Remington or Alex Jones or mine, has been decided on the merits.
None of them went to a jury.
They were decided on the basis of assumption or presupposition, or in the case of Alex Jones, failure to satisfy discovery, even though no one has an idea of what his failure was supposed to be.
They were all fraudulent, mine being the most odd and peculiar, because I got so much evidence in there for the judge to dismiss, including Get this.
The report's not of one, but of two forensic document experts who said that, and at that point were four death certificates in evidence.
All four of the death certificates, including the one over which I was being sued, were fake.
All four were fake.
And the judge just set them aside as not helpful.
Brian, I'm glad we got you back, my friend.
Go ahead, say whatever about the Connecticut files and Well, the Connecticut Files were an interesting exploration for me.
When I first was introduced to them, Sandy Hook wasn't my specialty.
I had personally studied some events.
But didn't know everything, so I decided to start sort of tabula rasa with Sandy Hook, and I went straight to what was considered to be the official publication of the Connecticut State Police related to the events on Sandy Hook.
And I began to gather, index, and archive, because like many events, they make sure that the files that are released to the public are just enough to Show that they did something, but not enough for anybody to actually put all the puzzle pieces together.
So what I did was I took what I considered to be the earliest and most reliable evidence, which was the photographs that were released by the quote-unquote crime scene photographers, which were real people that worked for the Connecticut State Police.
I then had to figure out Where each photo was taken at, I had to literally place it on a map of the school, what exactly they were looking at.
I had to cross-reference with other documents that were buried deep inside the file.
And remember that the file that they released was over 7,500 pages and absolutely no rhyme or reason to it.
Similar to the report that was done in the JFK thing, it just was a poorly assembled report where it was clearly designed so that people would have a hard time.
It would take a very diligent and studious investigator to go through it and figure out what it actually meant.
By taking what I considered to be the key, earliest, and most reliable evidence, figuring out where it was taken, when it was taken, how it was taken, and what happened, I was able to reassemble what I believe to be the truth of how events unfolded.
And my conclusion was that the events were generally unfolded as a staged Platform I found bullet holes that didn't make any sense things that were just simply glossed over unaddressed.
I found.
Reports coming from groupers that didn't add up at all.
And the deeper I dug, the more it became clear to me that the event was just an entirely staged event.
Now, the fundamental problem you've got to understand about exposing these events is that all of these people who have signed these documents can now be impeached If it's ever exposed that the event didn't happen, which means that the police officers that took the reports cannot be examined or they would lose all credibility in all the cases that they've ever been involved with.
So it is, in my opinion, and as I wrote in the notes there on the chat, Sandy Hook is a fortress which they must protect in order to protect the integrity of the officers that have been involved in helping to stage and carry out the events.
Related to it, the deeper anyone digs, the more they're going to find that the only plausible solution, which puts all the facts together, is that the school was not functioning properly, that the school was not indeed running like it was, the actual events did not take place as they had been stated, the reports didn't add up, nothing made any sense, so the only possible explanation You have to conclude, as an investigator, is that the entire thing was staged.
It's the only thing that lines up with the evidence that was diligently parsed through by me and many others.
I'm not the only researcher on it, but it's just impossible.
The events did not take place as stated, and again, the only conclusion is that It was all a fraud designed as a Homeland Security drill taken live for the purposes.
Many people believe it's for gun control.
I don't.
I believe it's simply to drive security apparatus spending and to justify the spending that they're currently doing inside these events.
They just, they got to build those budgets and build those employee counts and build those roles.
And there are people that are dedicated at whatever cost to make absolutely sure that those That those things are protected, that those budgets are protected.
Very nice, very nice, Brian.
There was one more question Bonnie had for you that you mentioned, a place where we can find information about how to use a Wayback Machine and other research tools.
She couldn't hear something about that ended in .me.
She wondered if you could elaborate it.
And Brian, others asked about the book.
If you could just repeat the title of the book, they are very keenly interested in that.
Okay, so my job and my role in this community is not just to do the work.
Anybody can teach a man to... anybody can feed a man a fish.
Teaching other people to fish is more important.
And the second problem that we have in this community, and it's a fundamental problem, is that we don't have a central repository for reliable analysis of these events.
We try to rely on BitChute or Rumble.
So I've had to develop my sources where I publish and where I hold, hoping that these sources will remain in place.
Of course, those sources are just computers run by people.
I like Ole Damagard's.
If you go spend $500 with Ole Damagard, you can have access to his personal archives, which I upload to all the time.
Also, I like 153 News because that guy doesn't pull any punches.
He'll put anything on that channel.
But you always have to think critically and do your own work.
Now the most important component of parsing an event is to gather the earliest and most reliable evidence.
So for that you need a tool set.
Now I use a tool set Generally, and the platform is called Stark.me and all it is is a program that indexes bookmarks, but they allow you to share pages that are engineered for open source intelligence so you don't have to go through the work of Building your own open source intelligence platform, unless you really want to learn it.
But if you go to Stark.me and find an open source intelligence page, now the pages that they add are just simply an opening page for your browser, but they have all sorts of links that are categorized and indexed, which are great for downloading information.
Now, how does the book play?
This is called Open Source Intelligence by Michael Bizzell, and what he does is he trains police forces to do what I do.
And I've been studying his stuff now for six or seven years, maybe eight, going through each volume because things change really quickly.
And I use that to figure out, okay, how do I do this?
For instance, how do I use a string inside the URL to sort my Google results by date?
Literally, there's a series of codes that you have to paste into any Google search, which will then sort those Google resorts by date, and then I can go to the earliest date that this particular idea or concept or article came out, and I can find the link, what does it link to, and then I'll use something like a video download helper,
Or there's YouTube video download converters and all sorts of things that allow me to extract information that I'm seeing in the browser and place it into my file so that it's saved and salvaged.
Because what will happen inevitably with these events, very simply, is that they will delete.
Your local media station will delete those earliest reports, those earliest interviews, those earliest things that don't stick with the narrative.
There are controllers in place to make sure that the Google version and the Wikipedia version of events all remain generally cohesive in their narrative.
And so they delete and eliminate all that old evidence.
Well, I save it, and then I upload it into Oli Damogard's Dropbox files, as well as 153 or Rumble, or I just simply save it onto a large local drive, which I have.
So open-source intelligence, to me, is simply the process from an investigator's perspective of saving, finding and saving, everything that originated from An event within the first five or six hours, then it comes, it goes straight to critical thinking.
Once I have all the data, and it usually takes me about three to five hours post-event to download everything that I think I'm going to need, then I have to go, I go back to Jim Fetzer's critical thinking course that he taught a few years ago.
I, and I literally analyze Images, frames and videos to determine what's being said.
Is it credible?
How does it fit into the narrative?
And I literally do the work of building the narrative to prepare a video that I can deliver on Bit Shooter 153 News that's going to show my analysis of events.
And I think my analysis is very good because I'm capable of Breaking it down frame by frame, showing where there's real bullets, where there's fake bullets, where people really get hurt, where they don't, where people are CGI'd in, what happened at what point in time.
And I'll use a shadow analysis where I can literally determine the position of the sun on any given day on the calendar.
Figure out the length of the shadow, the height of the individual, who is the individual, do they really fit?
There's all sorts of things that I'm going to do to any group of videos and photos that originate from a scene to determine how authentic it is.
And of course, just like all the other events, and I've said I've now I've studied about 130 of them, the vast majority of the work that I've done has indicated that these events are staged, grills, taken live, lots of people get paid lots and lots of money, and there's a lot of carrots and sticks to keep these people involved and keep these people quiet.
And when the question arises, where did the money come from?
It's the federal government.
They're perpetrating these to promote their political agenda.
I mean, this is not subtle.
And it's all up.
FEMA is under Homeland Security.
FEMA is running these drills.
FEMA is paying out the community's big bucks.
They find a community with a dilapidated school, they propose, look, we'll give you the money for a new school if you participate in this drill, and you have to sign non-disclosure agreements.
So those who participate are worried that if they speak out, they'd be sued by the government for violating their nondisclosure agreement.
But imagine someone who'd signed one about Sandy Hook being sued.
What kind of a lawsuit would it be for the government to say, you didn't keep quiet about our Sandy Hook hoax?
They were going to punish you.
It would be an absurdity.
So the government has put itself way out on a limb, but they're going wholehearted for it.
And I'm convinced, by the way, that Eric Holder to this day is managing these events.
Now, we may come back to Brian, but I have a question for Fred.
This is also from Bonnie Falkner.
Fred, you mentioned you invented the lethal injection, and you did mention that it's a terrible way to die.
She thus asked if you could just elaborate a bit on that and, you know, You're such an expert in these modes of execution, Fred.
I know no one in your ballpark, even remotely.
Can we hear you, Fred?
You got on mute.
- Yeah, can you hear me? - We're good.
What is the question specifically?
The question is really just about, you know, modes of, uh, I think Bonnie was just concerned that you had devised a method that induced such a painful death.
I think, you know, do you have mixed feelings about it?
Would you like to elaborate on these modes of escape?
Are any of them humane?
You know, Fred, I used to think the guillotine was the most humane.
And then I've learned you're still conscious for seven or eight minutes after your head's been lopped off your body.
I mean, my God.
I would rather, if I was being executed, I'd rather be electrocuted.
If it's done with the right voltages and the right times, I will pass out in 1 240th part of a second.
And that's 24 times as fast as my nervous system can record the pain.
So my body is going to be burned, but I'm not going to know it.
Okay.
As far as lethal injection goes, lethal injection in theory should work well, but there's too many problems that you have to deal with.
Most of the people that are lethally injected are former drug users.
They have collapsed vascular systems and you can't get a catheter in the right place at the right time.
They have to do IV cutdowns, which means they have to go into the carotid artery, or they have to go into the groin to find a decent vein to get it into.
So, but theoretically, I mean, we deliver, if we use the right chemicals, and they're not using the right chemicals any longer, because there's a problem now with the European Union, they won't sell us sodium thiopentathol if we use it for executions.
So as a result, what else can we do?
Well, nobody wants to listen to me anymore, but I've told them, we need an anesthetic.
The idiots are grinding up sedative tablets and you don't go to sleep with a sedative.
It just takes the edge off your nervous situation.
So we need to put the person to sleep.
And I've said, Michael Jackson had the answer.
He used propofol.
So let's put our people to sleep using propofol.
We still can use the pantheronium bromide, which paralyzes the respiratory system, so you can't breathe.
And then the third chemical is potassium chloride, which depolarizes the heart muscle, so you die.
You have to have heart death in order for a person to be executed, because that's the only death that's recognized by the law.
So let me say, the problem is nobody's using the right chemicals anymore and they're torturing people to death.
Now on the other side of the coin, and it's also the same thing as people say, what about firing squad?
It's fast.
No, it isn't because the average guard that's on the team that's shooting you, they're not good shots.
So there's no guarantee that that's going to work.
Electrocution is certainly the fastest and it'll put me away if you use the right voltages and the right times.
Now, as far as the gas chamber, that's a major issue because it's a terrible way to die.
You're suffocating and you can't even get a drop of air into you because the body suffocates because there's no place in the blood for oxygen to be carried.
So if I suffocate you, you're going to, you're going to be breathing at least lasting for a while because you've, you've got blood already and you've got oxygen in your blood, but that doesn't happen with that.
The minute you breathe the cyanide, it bonds with the, uh, the blood and it, the cyanide destroys the hemoglobin in the blood.
So it can no longer bond with anything else.
So as a result, you wind up with no oxygen, And carbon monoxide in your body and you die, but it takes eight to 10 minutes and it's a terrible way to die.
So I certainly that that I consider the worst way.
And of course, as you said, the guillotine, that's terrible, because your head is sitting there looking at the executioner for 10 minutes until finally your brain stops working.
It's unbelievable!
And I used to think it was so humane.
The Green Mile, of course, Fred, shows An electrocution where he didn't saturate the sponge and it's just grotesque what happens there.
We just stumbled over it again the other night flipping through watching, you know, for a show to check out.
Let me comment on the Green Mile because Stephen King did not do his research properly.
A dry sponge would simply mean no connection.
And the person would just sit there and nothing would happen.
Yeah, that's the problem.
Great point, Fred, wow!
Yes.
And so as a result, they made a whole movie on that and people think that the dry sponge is the problem.
But I dealt with that situation with Jesse DeFaro in Florida when I went down and I stopped executions for seven months down there.
And the situation down there was they used defective electrodes.
And they used too little voltage.
And according to Ohm's Law, when the voltage goes down, the current goes up.
Current generates heat.
And what happened with the pharaoh, it melted the solder on the electrode.
And when it did that, the electrode came apart.
There was a burn on the top of his head, a burn on the side of his head, and a burn on his cheek.
And that clearly says that the electrode came apart.
The state quickly threw the electrode away and they found an old one and they said, here's the electrode.
That's not the electrode.
The electrode melted and came apart.
So, you know, but that was a terrible way for Jesse DeFaro to die.
I think they boiled his blood before he died because the voltage was too low.
And that's the problem now with, as I mentioned earlier, I put a complete system in for Tennessee, but they had it modified, so the voltage is too low.
That could happen.
The only difference is that I use large electrodes.
My electrodes aren't soldered.
In the helmet, I use thrust washers that when you tighten it up, it forces the metal against the metal.
Between executions, you can unscrew it, sand it or use a piece of steel wool on it and put it back together again.
Never use anything that's going to melt when you're doing the execution.
But they've reduced the voltage down to 500 volts.
It should be at 1500 volts.
So it causes more current to rise and it's going to take a longer time for the man to pass out.
So It's probably going to hurt.
They're probably going to boil his blood.
But that's what they do all the time down in Florida, because the fellow who designed the system, his name is Lee Wieckant.
He died a few years ago.
He's an electrical engineer, but he thinks that execution should hurt.
So he designs an electric chair that hurts.
Thank you very much, Fred.
Got a question from you from Edward.
Good echo.
Namely, stepping back, do you think successful voluntaristic communities need a common religion or value system for their members?
Well, I think that's up for people to decide.
Um, I think, you know, the right kind of government for you is whatever you would voluntarily sign up for.
So, I mean, one of the basic things that people think they need a government for is protection.
Okay, so I could imagine.
A protection agency that I would sign up for.
In fact, I do.
I have a security company that I've hired that has like an alarmed response if should something happen to my house.
And my neighbor also has a security company, but it's a different company, right?
So that's the first thing is to understand that I don't have to have the same Protection agency as as my neighbor does, right?
So I think it's perfectly natural under freedom.
If you have freedom of association, it's perfectly natural for people to want to associate with people.
Who are most like themselves and just historically, this is just simply a fact and people when left relatively free do sort themselves out along racial lines along lines of language, common language.
And common religious or spiritual beliefs, right?
But there's nothing that says that that has to be what you want, right?
If you're a person who wants to associate with people very, very different than you, that would be okay, too.
I mean, the key word is just voluntary.
And we should, you know, coercion bad, voluntary good, right?
Ace, Bonnie has a question for you.
You mentioned a BDF in your terrific Great American Sci-Opera.
Are all of those resources available at the pmjmp.org website?
If not, where?
Your research on the planes, she regards as definitive.
Bravo, she adds.
Bravo.
I appreciate that.
Yes, if you go to pmjmp.org and just search for Psy Opera, there is a page that comes up and there are, it's a blog post actually, but the search function works and there are links to all of the chapters of that.
And also, I'm going to publish, so I've put up a PDF file of this talk that I gave this morning, and I'm going to make a website out of it.
Hopefully, I'll get to that this week.
It'll have all of those links, including the links to my own work and to so many other resources that I think are good on all of these false flags.
Bonnie has a question for me.
Do I think Israel was the main driver behind the Kennedy assassination, as well as those of the other Kennedys?
Bonnie, actually, the driving force behind JFK was Lyndon Baines Johnson.
It all originated in Los Angeles in 1960, when Jack beat LBJ for the presidential nomination.
He invited Stuart Symington, senator from Missouri, to be his running mate, but gave him overnight to think about it.
Bobby went by the Johnson suite to extend a pro forma gesture.
Never imagined he'd have the least interest as a powerful majority leader of the Senate to run with Jack and was just dumbfounded when he jumped on it.
He threatened to expose it.
Jack had Addison's disease and wasn't expected to live a long, healthy life.
That among his paramours had been a beautiful woman who was a spy for East Germany, and that information he got from Edgar, J. Edgar Hoover, who despised the Kennedys, and that if he were not on the ticket, then any legislative proposal sent down from the White House would be dead on arrival, because in his position as a majority leader of the Senate, he'd bottle them up.
Jack and Bobby tried to figure a way out, but Lyndon had them boxed in, and they had to accede to his demand.
The only time in his history that JFK had to reverse a political decision One of Johnson's wealthy backers learning of this development burst into the Johnson's Week cursing and swearing, because now Lyndon will help JFK become president.
Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and explained what they had in mind.
He came out all smiles, saying he thought that was an excellent plan.
Later, Bobby would declare publicly JFK would not survive his first term and that he would die a violent death.
When the time came, Lyndon sent his chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
Israel participated and put one of the shooters up, and they're those who try to expand the reach.
But my assertion, and I believe it's backed up by, for example, Phil Nelson's brilliant book, LBJ Mastermind of JFK's Assassination, and Roger Stone's book about LBJ as responsible for the assassination of JFK.
So the conclusion of my research, given the early origin bonding, this is before Jack had come to Loggerheads with David Ben-Gurion, and yeah, yeah.
Ben-Gurion wanted Israel to develop nukes, and Jack didn't because he thought it would unleash a nuclear arms race.
But that was way after Lyndon had already established the parameters by forcing himself onto the ticket as a vice president.
Because bear in mind, Once Jack's dead, Lyndon's calling the shots.
There were assurances that nobody involved in the assassination would ever be punished for it.
He was in the position to do it.
He assigned Edgar the role of only investigative authority, which shut off all the investigation in Texas and elsewhere, several in the House and the Senate, some of which were actually making progress.
They were all shut down.
And when Edgar had all the evidence moved from Dallas to Washington, which was totally unnecessary, they swapped out the Mannlicher Carcano that had actually been used in the Dow tax for the one found in the book depository.
It wasn't the only weapon there for the one actually used in the assassination.
The shooter on the top of the county records building who shot Jack in the back It implanted a Mannlicher Carcano bullet fired from the one used from the Dow Tax to, you know, implant evidence in a Mannlicher Carcano using a .30-06, a larger caliber with a plastic collar known as a sabot, and a custom load to implant the bullet.
But you explained why it didn't have a greater penetrating power.
That was a Dallas deputy sheriff by the name of Harry Weatherford.
I mean, we have nailed this down pretty tight, but that's the basic origin.
And I, again, if you read Phil Nelson's book, just the first few chapters, you'll discover what an extraordinary guy was this LBJ.
I was having a conversation with Madeleine Duncan Brown With whom Lyndon had an affair that began in 1948, bore him a son, Stephen, in 1950.
bore him a son, Steven, in 1950.
And Madeline was saying to me, John Conley was asked to describe Lenin He couldn't do it.
And I said, well, Madeline, he said it would take all the adjectives in the dictionary because he had so many qualities for good, but also for evil.
So it would take them all.
I mean, that was a really wonderful.
She is a dear person.
She wrote about it, Texas in the morning.
She explained how when they'd have these affairs, he'd wake up, he'd throw open the windows, typically in the Driscoll Hotel and say, God, I love Texas in the morning!
And how the night before the assassination, she was at the home of Clint Merkison Sr.
Not a large gathering, but prominent figures like J. Edgar Hoover, she thought maybe it was in his honor, because Hoover would stop in Dallas on the way to California to the racetrack.
Which happened to be owned by Clint Mergeson Sr., and whenever Edgar put down a bet, well, amazingly, his horse would win.
And Linden showed up unexpectedly late in the evening, and they had a conference in a meeting room, which was a ratification to go forward with the assassination.
And afterwards, he strode over to Madeleine, and she said she thought he was going to whisper sweet nothings in her ear, and instead he said in a tapeled tone of voice, after tomorrow I'm not going to have to put up with embarrassment from those Kennedy boys.
That's not a threat, that's a promise.
Said he called again the following morning before the assassination and repeated they had a rendezvous at the Driscoll Hotel just six weeks later on New Year's Eve and she confronted him with rumors rampant in Dallas that he stood the most to gain personally and whether he'd been involved and he blew up at her and told her the oil boys and the CIA had decided that Jack had to be taken out.
But I guarantee you, Lyndon had already devised the plot in Los Angeles in 1960, and if you can get your hands on it, there's a wonderful book by Noel Twyman, a retired engineer, published already in 1997, entitled Bloody Treason.
Well, he goes through all the possible scenarios that would bring about a successful assassination plot, and it involved tying together the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the Secret Service, J. Edgar Hoover, and Lyndon Johnson.
And now any of those parties could have managed to bring the others together, but it was LBJ who brought it all about.
So, when I say the best way to understand—and you can find this in many of my Presentations about the assassination.
If you go to Bitchute Channel, Jim Fetzer, one for example on the 18th of November, just before Oliver Stone would release his new sequel, Which turned out to be meaningless about the magic bullet.
Turns out there wasn't any magic bullet.
It's not even anatomically possible for a bullet to enter back here and come out here, because cervical vertebrae intervene, as David Mannick, MD, PhD, demonstrated by taking a patient With similar chest and neck dimensions and created a CAT scan, it's not even anatomically possible.
So when they do those reenactments, they use, you know, molded figures that lack a feature that distinguished Jack Kennedy, namely his backbone.
You could even say he was killed because he had a backbone, to give you this phony story.
But it turns out Sam Kinney He was the driver of the Secret Service Cadillac, who was given a bucket of water and sponge to wash out the blood and brains of Parkland, discovered the whole bullet, took it inside, left it on the structure, but told his best friend and neighbor not to reveal it until his death.
Today we had the oddity that Paul Landis, who is another member, is taking credit, but it was Sam Kinney.
And if it were Landis, you know, this is pretty damn peculiar.
He withheld the information.
I think Sam just found it so embarrassing when they were so deep into the cover-up that he felt it would be too dangerous to reveal before his death.
So those are the key elements I have yet to address here and recommend.
So the great question, Bonnie, But Israel, no, on the case of Bobby.
Now, I think Israel had a bigger role with regard to Bobby.
I mean, look, and with regard to 9-11.
They have the practice of blaming their enemies for their events, right?
By wage war, by deception.
So who was blamed for 9-11?
Well, there's a furious phone call from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine claiming responsibility.
Are you kidding me?
This is a sophisticated op involving four aircraft, you know, they're claiming 19 Islamic terrorists.
I mean, it was absurd.
And yet they just happen to have at hand Archival footage of Palestinians rejoicing, they played it as though it were contemporaneous.
The Palestinians were thrilled after this attack on the World Trade Center, when the Palestinians were just as slack-jawed and stupefied as anybody else.
That was primarily an Israeli op.
It would be revealed the plan was to take out the governments of seven countries in the next five years, beginning with Libya and Iraq, ending with Syria and Iran.
Paul Craig Roberts believes that current events now with Hamas and so forth are designed to finish the plan to create a greater Israel, which takes out big chunks of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, all of Jordan, Lebanon, the greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates.
So Israel played the predominant role in 9-11, where Dick Cheney was on the ground executive director from a bunker beneath the White House, as Michael Rupert established in his Astonishing book crossing the Rubicon based upon public sources.
And then finally, regarding Bobby, who do they claim Sirhan Sirhan?
We had a psychiatrist who claimed he'd actually hypnotized Sirhan for the CIA.
And he implanted in him, and I think the trigger was a girl in a polka dot dress to fire, fire, fire to distract.
And while they were distracted by Sirhan, the security guard, Dane Eugene Caesar, shot Bobby from an inch and a half behind the right ear.
Kept shooting as Bobby fell.
Three more shots, two of which hit Bobby.
One went through his clothing.
Bobby grabbed him and his tie clasp can be seen on the floor as he's dying on the pantry.
But the fact is that while they had a brilliant medical examiner, Thomas Noguchi, who had detailed exactly how the crime had been committed, it conflicted with the L.A.
Police Department report.
And the outcome was Noguchi was fired.
But that's what happened.
As far as Jon Jon is concerned, my prime suspect is Hillary Clinton.
He was going to run for the Senate.
That's the only person that Hillary couldn't have beat.
I don't think she broods competition well.
She wasn't a happy camper.
The fallback is W, his father.
He had actually been in the Daltex supervising the anti-Castro-Cuban firing the three shots with Amanda Licker-Kaukana when he was arrested coming out of the Daltex and used his cover as a Texas oilman.
I mean, he was never booked, but he was questioned and then released.
And we have photographs of W in Dealey Plaza at a loss because he doesn't know where his father is.
We also have photographs of Edward Lansdale, the Air Force General responsible for assassinations around the world, including Operation Phoenix in Vietnam, who appears to have positioned the shooters and determined the sequence of shots.
And we not only got him walking past the three tramps whom I'm convinced would back up Patsy's if Lee Oswald hadn't panned out.
And waiting to speak to George H.W.
Bush about the successful completion of their mission.
So that's pretty much the bottom line.
If you can get Noel Twyman's book, he was the first to put a big picture together.
Let me see if there are other questions here to address.
Well, Peter O'Connor asks about Dulles.
There is this book, you know, The Grand Chess Board that claims Alan Dulles was responsible, but that's just to take the heat off of LBJ.
I mean, listen, you can go all the way back to The Men Who Killed Kennedy with Nigel Turner.
And when he did the last three episodes, seven, eight, and nine—seven was a smoking guns—Nigel interviewed me and David Mannick and so forth, where I reiterated or explained 15 indications of Secret Service complicity in setting him up and covering it up.
The Mafia couldn't have done that.
The autopsy x-rays had been altered.
The Zapruder film had been revised.
They even substituted a different brain.
You've got to realize the mafia couldn't have done that.
The mafia could not have extended its region to Bethesda Naval Hospital to alter x-rays under control of medical officers of the U.S. Navy.
Navy and the Secret Service.
The KGB couldn't have substituted someone else's brain for the brain of JFK.
The anti-Castro coupons couldn't have got a hold of it as a brooder film.
There are parties like Josiah Thompson who claim that Zubriovim couldn't have been altered, because we have the chain of custody in the hands of the Secret Service, which is begging the question, because the Secret Service was involved in the whole damn thing.
In fact, it was the driver, William Grier, who pulled that limousine to the left into a halt, because JFK was still alive, to make sure he'd be polished off.
Let me see if there are others.
Oh, Bonnie's asking, there are claims that Johnson is Jewish.
I do gather he had a grandmother who was Jewish, if you want to extend that argument.
But you see, I say, it wasn't the Israel, it wasn't Mossad.
I mean, it was Lyndon Johnson and his ruthless ambition to be president of all the people.
So that can't be true, but not altering We've got Jack Ruby claiming he shot Lee, supposedly to spare Jackie the pain of coming to testify.
I'll tell you something, Rouse N. Kaye, who is a chiropractor, has been really obsessed with a shooting, Ruby shooting Oswald, and believe it or not, this is where truth is stranger than fiction.
They actually used a FBI guy by the name of Bookout in Jack Ruby's clothing to shoot Lee.
I think they felt Ruby wasn't reliable enough.
While the shooting took place in the basement, Ruby was upstairs in his underwear, because he'd taken his clothing and put it on Bookout.
But Tim K has done absolutely brilliant work.
About the trim of the hair, the background, the hat he was wearing, features of the face and all that.
They immediately grabbed and concealed him and put a bag over his head so you wouldn't realize it wasn't Jack Ruby.
I mean, that's another untold story.
So, let me see if we have any more here.
Jim, let me take the stage for just a second.
Go ahead.
Again, since I'm in the business of helping people to see this stuff for themselves, because I don't believe you can just listen to somebody and make your conclusion.
There's too many disinformation people out there.
So, you need to do your own research.
You need to learn the basics about doing your research.
One of the fundamental basics is whenever you have a question, you need to ask yourself, where does the answer to this question exist?
Does it exist in somebody's mind?
Does it exist on some government document?
Does it exist in some open source intelligence archive or some website?
Does it exist in some book?
Where does the answer exist?
And that way, when you start to approach your questions and concerns, for instance, I saw a few questions and answers about this event or that event.
The best approach is to create a plan of attack to get the answer to your question by trying to figure out where it exists and then trying to extract that information from that source.
Then you have to literally Engage your brain, put your critical thinking skills into gear, and start to say, what makes sense?
What platform, what puzzle pieces go where?
And if you do this, and if you do this well, and if you practice, you'll be able to analyze and break out just about any event that takes place out there to determine, is it real and authentic, or is it another staged event?
And I think the large majority of them That I have studied, and again I only study it because it's suspicious, but the large majority of them that I've studied have proven to fit into the cohesive image of this is staged, this is operated, and this is run.
And I don't care how many people are involved, when you have a budget like FEMA does of 29 billion 800 million dollars which is the FEMA budget this year just for FEMA.
There is a lot of people that can be bought, there's a lot of favors that can be done, there's a lot of people that can be taken out of trouble, and there's a lot of carrots and sticks that you can apply to people when you have an agency like the FBI and other Department of Homeland Security type agencies that are in there to provide pressure to get people to play along.
Wonderful addendum, Brian.
I can't thank you enough.
Ace Baker, Fred Luchter, Brian Davidson, you've been sensational.
We're going to take a break here, five minutes, for a bit, stop, whatever.
▲
Export Selection