All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 16, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:19
Need to Know News (15 September 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Carl Herman, Mission Viejo, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas, here with the news that you need to know on this Friday, the 15th of September in 2023.
All right.
The categories that we're going to be talking about is the state of freedom, the state of the nation of Hawaii, some resources for 9-11, economics data, and really the argument that you already have enough to withdraw consent and demand arrest of the leaders for the scam that they're doing in economics.
And I'll have more details with that and then some battle updates.
All right, so first up, We got state of freedom.
So the idea that Trump is being prosecuted is being criminalized for just questioning the most blatant election fraud.
And I guess I'll throw in the show notes here to the odds that 2020 was honest, which is ridiculous by a number of 50 to 60 zeros behind it.
We have, but we have progress.
So in New York, you may be aware, audience, that the governor set up a camp and that the letter of the law was that the governor, Kathy Hochul, could just order somebody to the camp.
Without any type of an argument.
So I just want to play a minute of what this attorney said, and she received a standing ovation for what she did say.
Commissioner of Health.
There we go.
gave the Commissioner of Health the unbridled power to pick and choose which I lost it there, Carl.
Here we go.
Thought it might be my internet.
We're having quite a storm come through right now.
Thank you.
She's surprised.
So that is an excellent step forward.
And then we have James.
Jim Fetzer's side with Joaquin Hagopian and the there is some action that courts are overturning some of the violations.
And, you know, this article goes through all of the details for you, but the idea that the state of the case of Missouri versus.
I forget the name of it, but that First Amendment challenge has been upheld, and here is Missouri and Louisiana.
And then with the Second Amendment, with what we're going to get into more with the governor of New Mexico, attempting to make it illegal to carry for 30 days, just because she says it's an emergency.
Um, that order was blocked by a federal judge.
And if you need any type of documentation to just say no to any health orders, here's my best resource.
And again, in 1 minute, the state of an emergency.
Has to have beyond control local resources and they don't demonstrate that they gave us a bait and switch with those PCR tests and I thought that one of the most damning areas of evidence is that I asked my school district demanded and I responded with I asked the 14 most authoritative California government agencies to explain their ordering authority and all of them refused and that's like 35 pages of the most ridiculous tragic comic Excuses and obfuscations and refusals to answer.
So, the WHO and the CDC, nobody has a sample of COVID-19.
They all admit this, that the test was designed with generic flu stock.
And then they say the flu disappeared by 99%.
Anybody who was given this bogus overcycled test that tested positive for a dead remnant of flu in their body was counted as a COVID death.
And that we have all this, these deaths, but the deaths and the injuries, if you get them within 14 days of a shot, then that's ascribed as a, as damages from having COVID from somebody unvaccinated.
The vaccine safety studies haven't been filed since 1986.
Masks are refused, refuted.
The leaders don't wear the masks.
And then we have similar to Governor Hochul in New York, the DHS, They say if you challenge these orders, you're a domestic violent extremist.
And then the CDC has a plan for these camps as well.
So, Brian, your comments on any of that?
Well, okay, so let's start out with the standing ovation Uh, attorney Bobby Flower Cox, um, got a standing ovation for oral arguments in New York courtroom.
This is pretty rare.
She was representing petitioners against.
Governor Hochul's administration defending the rights of New Yorkers against what they deemed as draconian and unconstitutional isolation and quarantine camps implemented by the Department of Health.
Sort of the same thing that's been happening in New Zealand, Australia, China, and all these other nations out there where they went with the heavy-handed approach towards COVID.
The lawsuit was originally filed in April of 2022 in the state Supreme Court.
The regulation in question allowed for mandating Isolation and quarantine orders for individuals without concrete proof of sickness or exposure to diseases listed in the regulation.
And the regulation granted the Department of Health the power to force indefinite isolation and quarantine upon citizens of any age for any reason.
And I'm glad to see that the courts are finally beginning to reverse Some of this draconian policy related to what it means during the course of a quote unquote pandemic.
You know, I'm very tired overall of government deciding that our rights are trumped by our safety and our health.
This attitude that They can take away our rights in an emergency for the sake of public health has to change among the government.
I see the government really is sort of a shakedown opportunity.
They get bigger and bigger every day.
Their ticketing and fining schemes are so overreaching.
It's like they're designed to continue to support a larger and larger Government, and I'm glad to see that the courts are finally making a move toward freedom.
In the context of that, I had watched Trump's interview with Megyn Kelly, which was a pretty long interview.
I watched it in large part last night and, you know, I had to storm out of the room a couple times.
My wife was a little upset and so was I about Trump saying, hey, you know, we didn't know what it was.
We didn't know how bad it was going to be as if that somehow gave them the right to run those mandates.
You know, you hope that a system of checks and balances is going to work in a situation like this, but this government has gotten so big and so out of control that It has no problem stomping on the individual rights of persons.
And I'm starting to really identify with all the YouTubers that are playing the sovereign citizen role in terms of their interactions with the police as a result.
I now see the police as more of an enemy.
Then a friend as more of a threat to my freedom than as somebody that's there to protect me.
I can protect myself.
Thank you.
The only problem I've got with protecting myself is that you guys are going to come in and evaluate my movements and my motions to determine if I've broken the law and then you're going to come after me.
I had an actual situation like this this last week where it was just Pathetic.
I had called the police because the judge had ordered me to post some documents on a guy's door, and the guy came storming out of the house when I went with the hammer and the nail to post them to the door, and there's no doubt that I took some liberties with what securely fastened it to the door meant, and I used a big-ass nail.
The guy come rushing out of the house and brum-rushed me.
I called the police, but what was interesting about it was The police were absolutely no help.
Here I am following the orders of the judge.
And then this guy comes out and it's assault.
I wasn't harmed and I could have clearly defended myself, no problem, but I did the right thing and I called the police.
The police listened to my side and then they listened to his side and then they read the orders and they're like, yeah, it does say securely fastened, but then they approached me with their body cams on and basically took the position that well, he had the right to because I had a hammer in my hand.
And if I'm going to go ahead and file the assault charges on this guy, they're going to go ahead and follow up with assault charges on me for aggravated because I had a hammer in my hand and the hammer was Could have been perceived as being used as a weapon.
All of that said, that's an interesting position for the police to take, given that I was the one that called the police on him, I was the one doing my job, and I was the one following the judge's orders in order to do it.
But these cops, they don't care.
They took the side of their local citizen that pays taxes in their jurisdiction, and they decided to come after me.
I had to exercise my Fifth Amendment rights just to get out of there, but I couldn't believe it happened.
And this is another example of how the police are becoming, in my opinion, out of control.
They cannot hold a job in the normal sector.
They take a job with the government, And then they get these nine to five syndrome ideas in their mind, like they're on some sort of power craze, because they have a badge.
And our studies from the private investigation industry indicate that a police officer is only good for about seven years.
And after that, they get jaded.
And the large majority of them turn very bad very fast after about seven years of work on On average, so.
I'm tired of the government overreach and I'm glad to see a standing ovation in this New York court.
What was the next story?
The next story we had.
Uh, we had Joaquin and just the yeah, take a look at the 1st and the 2nd and potential 14th amendments, but taking a look at the courts are beginning to overturn.
These orders and then the federal judge blocked the New Mexican governor from that gun and yeah.
Yeah, the next the New Mexico thing was just a clear case of a puppet.
A puppet trying to test the limits of the law.
The Second Amendment's clear.
The Supreme Court had made it clear.
Even the New Mexico Constitution itself had made it clear that they were to make no law interfering with the rights of gun owners to protect themselves, persons, and property.
And yet they did it anyway.
And she gave the excuse on one of her interviews that she did it Simply for the purpose that she wanted to retest the law and she thought it was fair.
Now, I think the New Mexican citizens are going to rebel a great deal beyond this.
We know that the local sheriff rebelled and said he wouldn't do it.
And then the governor had to appeal to the state police to try to enforce her order.
Every time I'm confronted on the streets with a mask mandate or anything like that, I'm going to ask the officer to go ahead and give me a citation.
For noncompliance so I can make an argument to the judge.
And I've asked them to do that three or four times and they simply haven't done it.
They've just said, what, you know, what are you just here to cause trouble?
What are you just here to cause trouble?
Like, hey man, your job is to protect my rights, not to enforce those damn orders.
And so I'm, I'm really losing right now with, with my ability to handle These police officers, I'm finding them to be more of an enemy to good citizens than they are a help to anybody out there.
Of course, I've got good friends in the force that I think are pretty good guys.
But it doesn't change the fact that I chose to set up a business and operated on my own for profit, and they chose to go and work for the government off of the citizens.
They pay their their bills and their fees and their even their own wages by handing out tickets to normally law abiding citizens for stupid little things like a brake light or not having a blinker light on or, you know, going five miles and over at 10 miles an hour over.
It's ridiculous.
I'm getting tired of the overreach and I'm glad that I don't live in Harris County.
I live outside in Chambers County and one of the surrounding counties, one of the more conservative ones.
I have a great relationship with the local sheriff who happens to be president of the Texas Sheriff's Association.
And we've had a lot of discussions about this stuff over golf here and there.
And I think he's genuinely concerned for me and for the citizens of the county that the government is overreaching.
I'm glad to see Hagopian write another long article.
These things can be difficult to read and they're difficult to summarize because he takes so many different approaches to it.
But yeah, I'm real proud to see Hagopian continue to put out great work.
I think he ought to write more books.
Yeah, he's great.
I do want to say I had a conversation with the Mission Viejo business owner.
I won't say what business.
I don't want to put a target on this guy beyond the targets that he may already have.
So I asked this guy, so no, no, he volunteered.
We got into it.
I forget how we entered into it.
But the topic was, he says, yeah, October 4th, we're hearing that they're going to have another mandate and restrictions.
And he was just looking sour about it.
And he said, I will not comply.
I says, what'd you do last time?
He says, we shut down for a week and it became clear that we would be out of business within three weeks if we continued.
So we stopped.
But fortunately, Mission Viejo is unincorporated and it's operated by the sheriffs and the sheriffs weren't putting up with that shit.
And I said, if they have this contest again, brother, it's going to look a lot different.
I look forward to that battle.
And he just nodded his head.
So we'll see.
And one of the arguments that is not in that article, I'm going to put a footnote.
In that article to add this because it's a good legal point so title 21 is US federal law and according to the Constitution in article 6 that's going to be supreme over anything that the state does through their legislature and especially for any non binding mandates or orders or requirements title 21 operates above the.
The CDC and the FDA, and it says, based upon the Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg trial, there is no forced medical experiments.
People are free to say no without any coercion, without any negative consequence.
And that should be what everybody salutes to.
No medical experiments.
It's an experimental medical product.
You can say no, and there's no negative consequence.
The mask, that's an experimental medical product.
You don't have to do that.
Social distancing, you don't have to do that.
Take an experimental product like a shot.
You certainly don't have to do that.
But yet, in this Orwellian world, we'll see if we get another round of this.
We shall see.
All right.
I think they're going to try.
I think they have to try because they're going to lose the election in too many places.
Places that they can't control.
They have to press this as hard as they possibly can to continue with their mail-in voting fraud schemes.
And continue with all of their different angles to get it done.
Otherwise, they're going to lose power if they lose power and the dominoes begin to fall, the entire structure could go down.
So, I see that they're not going to have any choice, but to implement another round of draconian measures.
With another January 6 style false flag or COVID style quote unquote pandemic or emergency of some sort.
They're going to have to hit us pretty hard this time if they want us to comply and back down because there's too many citizens that have woken up and I have a feeling that it's pretty close to half or more.
That have woken up to the fact that all of this is just a goddamn fraud.
And it's all designed to just drive a bigger government, a more powerful government, and a stronger machine.
So I think they're going to have a real hard time.
And a lot of strong men are beginning to stand up.
I want to see more.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And I agree.
They can't back up.
They can't slow down because otherwise what they've already done will catch up to them.
So they have to go forward.
They have to lock us down and they have to get dictatorial control.
Otherwise they're done.
So yeah, it'll be game on and we shall see.
All right.
And that leads to the introduction.
We're going to go into the state of the nation of Hawaii.
And if you allow the government to break the law for an emergency, they will create emergencies to break the law.
Here's a resource we've been talking about this over the last month now, and this guy is a fire captain and I had demonstrated through his testimony.
From what he looked at with the fires going back to 2017, 6 years ago, I was writing about this and this is the documentation that the.
Damage that we saw in Maui is not physically possible from a fire just the same as it was not physically possible in the Northern California fire.
And we've talked about this and all the documentation and the explanation is there.
You had James O'Keefe.
In on the ground, finding what you were talking about, Brian, that the police officers were just basically lying, saying that you can't take photographs on public property.
And as well, in here, James is talking to an attorney for filing a lawsuit.
So, step by step, we shall see.
I think the people of Hawaii Are definitely awake, and they already have sufficient background to remove their consent and demand arrests of these fake leaders because the whole history of why is it was stolen.
This was dole and the.
His fruit and sugar, his pineapple and sugar empire, working with the Marines to violate the treaty, and this was acknowledged by President Cleveland in 1893.
McKinley annexed them.
And then Clinton, in a hundred years after the fact, said, oh, yeah.
We stole Hawaii, but they didn't do anything about it.
So really, the resolution to this would be for the Hawaiians to be able to determine for themselves where they want to go.
And this is Mike King in the anti-New York Times that I do recommend.
And he's saying that the New York Times is putting the information out saying that it's the information that Hawaii wasn't somehow a climate change virus coming from China.
Yeah, nice try.
And that's what we have for Hawaii.
Brian, your comments about anything on, on Hawaii?
Yeah, so basically that came out in Edward Hendry's newsletter and basically it's retired fire captain Matt Dakin Claims that Lahaina was immodulated by direct energy weapons, which he believes were also used in the October 2017 Tubbs Immolation and the November 2018 Paradise Immolation.
Dakin noticed the same anomalies in Lahaina as he witnessed at Tubbs and Paradise and he believes that directed energy weapons We're used to break the molecular bonds of material causing it to turn to dust.
He cites the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on 9-11 as another example of directed energy weapons.
So, you know, the challenge with tying this to 9-11 is that you're talking apples and oranges.
I believe that it was some sort of directed energy weapon that caused that fire.
The hurricane was supposedly 500 miles away.
I saw destruction that I considered to be abnormal to my novice eyes.
But when you have a fire captain that's evaluating the earliest and most reliable evidence and the photographs that came out from that destruction, who begins to notice the anomalies and how they Adhere to the same patterns that took place in other places where directed energy weapons were supposedly used.
You've got a lot of credibility there.
Now, he could be called in as a witness in court on something like this and probably would be considered an expert witness as a fire captain on how this stuff could possibly happen.
What we don't know is what the military has and what the military's willing to do with it.
And I find it very difficult to believe that there is a group of people within the military that are successfully and actively resisting the nefarious use of these particular weapons simply because we don't see the headlines.
We don't see the talk about people being court-martialed over standing up and standing firm for What's right and what's therefore mighty?
I'd like to see more professional people come out.
I don't like the fact that Dakin correlated it to 9-11 because I believe that they were different types of weapons that were used.
Obviously, the World Trade Centers were substantially more thick and rich with steel and concrete than, you know, these Houses in Lahaina and these cars.
But from what I saw, it definitely correlates to some sort of outside source.
And most of that, I think for me, the number one issue is that all these boats 200 and 300 yards off the shore We're all burned up equivalently as if some sort of beam went over the head.
Plus, you have all the reports about the chemtrailing or the abnormal spraying of the atmosphere prior to the event.
Now, if you've got a hurricane 500 miles away, why are you still running planes to spray over the area on the day before?
You know, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but I think that their technology has definitely gone this far, and I think their technology also includes the ability to conduct weather warfare, as well as natural event warfare, such as earthquakes and others, like we've seen in Turkey and Portugal recently.
So, I have no doubt that they have the capabilities of using these weapons.
We know that they've been able to use these weapons on a smaller scale.
As a result of the testimony we have from Bill Binney, who, as you remember, was the one who exposed the DNC server.
That happens to be Catherine Horton's husband, and he's shown how they've used directed energy microwave-type weapons to do targeted harassment and targeted sort of gang stalking and targeted sort of Induced schizophrenia and all sorts of medical issues that have developed on his body as a result of exposure to some unknown force.
So.
The question is, if they can use it on a big scale.
And they can use it on a small scale.
How long is it going to be before those of us that are loud enough exposing enough are the ones that become the, the.
the victims of these weapons?
And I don't know the answer to that question, because I think as time gets shorter and shorter and shorter for this deep, dark state, they're going to become more and more focused on doing everything they possibly can to preserve they're going to become more and more focused on doing everything they possibly can to preserve power prior to being exposed for And so that's sort of like you're cornering an injured animal.
They're going to react with everything they've got.
And I think that day is coming and it's coming soon.
We shall see how the judgment day comes out on that particular event.
But I sure would like to see nooses and other types of justice being employed other than these corrupt, slow walking, dirty judge courts that we've seen so much of lately.
Thank you.
Excellent comments, brother.
We are in the fog of war.
We're not going to be able to see too much.
And for our audience, you just can't get discouraged.
That's just the name of the game and the seats that we have.
And Brian and I have talked about this before, but as a trained historian, the physical evidence is what is most powerful and most convincing.
His work too, because the laws of physics can't be breached.
And for the facts of these fires, having damages that is not physically possible by any known fire.
And a fire captain and somebody who trains firefighters would be an expert witness for sure.
And that just makes sense to anybody just casually observing.
And for the chemtrails, monkey works!
Um, YouTube, his channel, he had a show about two or three weeks ago just detailing these planes flying up to an altitude and then going back and forth creating that chemtrail pattern and those flight logs These are non-commercial flights.
So, all you would need to do is to demand who is up there, what are they spraying, to be able to get some answers.
And the targeted individuals, yeah.
Up to, I think over 10 years ago, I was contacted as one of the two writers on Washington's blog to be able to just share their stories.
And I had the feeling that one out of out of three or four that I allowed them to go ahead and just write what they had experienced.
And I think one of them may have been a plant disinformation agent just to to waste time.
But yeah, that's a real thing.
And we have to win this.
There is no escape.
Patriots, we have to be able to expose and end these criminals.
Otherwise, they'll go after everybody.
All right, next.
Okay, just with, there we go.
With 9-11, I just wanted to give a resource here from Jim Fetzer's site.
Jim is, I consider, to be the strongest person, the strongest individual to be able to explain, document, and prove what happened.
And this is just another interview with Jim.
That is not a difficult case to make that the government story is not plausible.
And for those of you who are homeschooling or thinking about homeschooling, I did want to share the lesson that I developed for teaching 9-11, JFK's assassination, and the possibility of E.T.
life is critical thinking case studies by making the strong, the strongest.
Assignment that I could do for critical thinking skills.
And again, this goes to the really mental, scholarly, academic work to discern what is objective reality from spin, from opinion.
And then once you have the evidence down, then you engage in civil conversations and you take a look at different perspectives and analyses and it has to come to the place of what are we going to do about that?
Um, including the possibility of doing nothing, but that is the.
The steps that you take is you evaluate the evidence, you get people from different points of view pointing to see, to show what they see, and then you have a discussion about it, and then you come up with something to do, and you're, and here on BitTube, if you want to take a look at several examples of ad hominem attacks from government disinformation agents, they're on every, every show, and once you understand the game that they're playing, all you got to do is call it out, because these people, the detractors,
Are not going to deal with the evidence they have to distract from it and the concept of prima facie.
That is the top academic and legal standard.
If you can make a case that on its face, this is what we see as the facts.
Then that is unless somebody has something better, then that's what we go with that has the legal power to decide a case.
And so I'm just wanted to offer that as a resource for people who may be turning more and more to homeschools and with Jim as the.
Principal expert and Jim's contribution.
Let's see, let's just go to the next one.
And Jim's contribution as a scholar is to do what makes the most amount of sense, is that you recognize through the work that it takes as a scholar to explain, document, and prove something, anything.
It takes work, and Jim understands and has experienced the limitations of his professional skills, and you need academic training and really professional experience to really go deep into some area, and Jim has gotten together experts from various fields who do have the academic training and the professional experience to be able to point to the various aspects of what happened on 9-11.
All right, brother, anything else you want to talk about with 9-11?
Well, with 9-11, just a second here, I had something.
Okay, so obviously Jim points out very well in this article that the idea that 19 hijackers armed with box cutters and knives took these planes and destroyed the best security system in the world and took down two of the largest, strongest buildings
Around and obviously, Jim is going to go through this arguing all the different holes and he's going to present counter evidence to support the alternative theories, including controlled demolition.
The use of mini nukes and the possibility that the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers were not real planes, but holograms, which I agree.
And Jim also discusses some of the motivations behind the attacks and the names of those people involved and the faces of those people involved.
Jim does a good job with analysis.
I have my own style that's a little bit different and I learned it back in college in sort of an alternative education type platform.
But I am one who firmly believes that if you want to confirm or deny a story, the last thing you do is go with the hearsay evidence that comes afterwards.
So, for instance, if I'm going to analyze what I believe to be a fake shooting, I am going to spend most of my time when I'm researching it finding the earliest And most reliable evidence that originates from the scenes, the earliest photographs taken, the earliest interviews, the earliest evidence and statements that originated in whatever media source, whether it's corrupted or not.
But I'm basically going to throw out everything that happens 24 hours later as unreliable or as disinformation in some sort.
So I'm going to go down to sort of Round Zero and make an evaluation of that.
And that's how I've done most of the false flag research and presentations that I've done.
So, of course, it was pretty easy to break open Uvalde.
It was pretty easy to break open Buffalo.
It was pretty easy to break open Sandy Hook because we had all those early photos in the Connecticut State Troopers files.
Pretty easy to do Charlottesville and Nashville.
And the other ones that I've spent my time on.
Now, the problem that I think Jim runs into, and I could argue that anybody's going to run into, is that you have to have a foundation for understanding what is true.
And of course, my foundation is largely built on The things that our ancestors believed to be true, and the earliest and most reliable evidence that corroborates and supports that evidence.
And let me give you an example of that, okay?
You've got a lot of people out there that say that the Bible is unreliable.
It was written over 3,000 years by 46 authors and 66 different books, all coming from different backgrounds and generations, that it's been changed.
The arguments go, it's been changed, it's been modified, it's been updated, those damn Jews have twisted it.
I can tell you something, anybody who studies what the original scribes did and how meticulous they were about it, Knows that these people were very careful about doing the very best they could to preserve the Word of God.
And to give you an example, not just of what I believe, but of scientific evidence, take the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1976 in a cave in Koran and predated anything we had about the book of Isaiah.
We had fragments of also remember those were handwritten documents on all different types of skins and papyrus and whatever that we had.
And this particular series of scrolls were fragments that predated everything we had by 1000 and 1500 years.
So.
If you take a look at the progression of the documentation, being that they're handwritten copies passed down from point A to point B, and then that handwritten copy has three different copies made in it, all of which have their errors, that creates those families, and those families, and those families, and then those families are brought together and combined, and then finally you get the majority text in the King James Version of the Bible, which is, we took the majority of all the fragments that we had,
And we came up with what we thought it was.
Well, the majority text, the later texts are what's existent.
OK, the newer texts, the ones that are farthest down in the family tree, have the majority of the fragments that are there.
So when you go to the earliest and most reliable source and you reach back as far up the tree as you can possibly get, you find That what the Dead Sea Scrolls proved was that it didn't, the Bible did not change.
It was almost, it was brought down nearly perfectly through thousands of years to what we have today.
Now, this is something that our founding fathers and our ancestors took very, very seriously.
They believed it.
And of course, that goes to the issue of God.
And I'm one who believes that God is a God of order, that God is the one who designed and created the universe, the heavens, the earth, us, our bodies, everything.
He put it all into motion, separated himself from it after allowing sin to fall upon us for a very specific purpose.
Now, why do I say this in the context of Fetzer's article?
Why do I say this in the context of you?
And your article teaching 9-11, JFK assassination, H8ET as critical life theories is, I say it because I believe that if you get the foundations wrong about our identity and our existence, if you fall into the wrong area of the competing theories, my theory, the one that I adhere to, the one that I believe is that we were created.
And the Bible is about as close as you can get To any story of original creation, about what happened.
And I believe it makes all the sense in the world.
And then other people come along and say, no, no, no, no.
An accident, a cosmic accident, floating through the time, billions of years pass.
Second law of thermodynamics doesn't play.
All of a sudden, out of the primordial ooze launches life and life gives life to life.
Amphibians become turtles and monkeys and man.
I throw that entire argument for existence out and I look for what the founding fathers of all of our scientific studies did.
All of the greatest founding fathers of our scientific studies sought to find the truth in nature, sought to Discover the secrets of how the system worked and how the system was made.
And they observed and documented these facts, wrote down their theories, put the scientific method, the original concept of the scientific method, to play.
And so where Jim, I think, goes wrong is that he's always trying to sew in what I consider to be the wrong theory of our existence into The way he views the world.
And I can tell you, the way I view the world, everything makes sense.
I don't have any of the major, in my opinion, I don't have any of the major foundational problems that a lot of the other ones have.
The problems with time, the problems with history, the problems with creation.
Everything works for me.
And so when I read any article or see any event, I'm always looking to find The guiding hand of God behind it, and I can see it, and it brings me peace, and I feel good about it.
That's all.
There are some questions that we all answer, but few ask.
And one of the foundational questions, or some of them, include, like, who are we?
What is this place?
Where did we come from?
Why are we here?
And we all answer those questions.
True.
And if, for most people, if you press...
I'm giving some perspective as a history teacher and talking to teenagers, you know, because in that in that article that I shared about teaching, I would ask students.
Hey, you know, if you do okay with the history that we present and we get a little ahead.
I'll give you a lesson of your choice.
Anything that you want to know, if you could ask anything about what happened on earth, anywhere, what would you most want to know?
And we would take like three days and put all the answers on the board.
And one of the questions that I didn't put into the article title, which I gave the link to, is, was Jesus for real?
Because they really wanted to know and that would be, I mean 9-11, JFK.
And extraterrestrials.
I mean, they're curious about that, but not as much as with the passion and what I could see in their eyes about was Christianity real?
And professional historians have devoted more attention to the sources of Christianity than for any other individual.
And, you know, I can lay that out.
And the students found it ironic and opened their minds up.
Because I'd say something like, look, you know, you're told all the time the importance of academic excellence and these academic tools to be able to be successful in reality.
All right.
Well, so history are the tools to know who did what, when, where, and what other objective facts can help you with the subjective question of why.
Shouldn't you apply that to religion?
And they would say, yeah, so if you're going to church, And they're not serious about applying these questions.
How serious are they to their topic?
So, I'm with you, brother, that it is the fog of war and, you know, if I had to give a summary, an overarching summary of my own personal conclusions, is that the Bible is going to be true and it has been attacked over the centuries.
It has been, everything has been in the hands of, we could put it into Satanism.
The leaders of our society practice Satanism, and if you had to define that, it's going to be evil.
And if you had to define evil, the best dictionary definition I ever found would be a preference for service to self over your interest in the well-being of others.
So we're in this captured, deeply evil system, and yet here we are and it's being exposed.
That's interesting.
And part of what gives me peace, brother, is that if you are a person of faith, And you have concluded through your experience, or from whatever sources, that there is a Creator, and the Creator is loving.
And that this is some sort of loving experience and expression here, or experiment.
Then, what do you have to worry about?
What are you concerned about?
If this being is all-powerful, and I would make the argument, oh, then that person controls time too.
And this person could go back, just like if you're watching a movie, you could go back a scene.
Well, if God is all-powerful, if something happened and it didn't really work out, he could go back a scene, too, and just say, so what are you worried about?
And that is a basis of, I think, faith that allows one to go forward in good faith effort.
Now, at the same time, paradoxically, because everything is paradoxical, except for sometimes, which is another paradox, is that we are obligated to do our best.
I mean, we are faced with these opportunities to experience and express what makes us feel the best.
And philosophically, I don't know.
I'm not feeling my social studies roots.
And part of what the students found of interest, too, is social studies, history, government, economics.
It's literally the study of being with people, which is everybody's favorite topic.
How you relate to yourself and others is going to be the source of your life.
And to do so with virtue is going to be the key.
So the name of the game is to pursue virtue in however you experience and express it.
But you know, a lot of studies has been done for that in consideration and analysis.
And people have different virtues that they're attracted to, but basically power, love, creative intelligence, harmony in the arts, concrete knowledge, Faith and efficiency, that pretty much captures it.
And if you just pay attention to being the most virtuous person that you can in your own experience and expression, you know, I think that no matter the difficulties of World War III or MREV 2.0, you have a fighting chance for that.
So thank you for bringing that right up, partner.
All right, I want to go to economics.
With the actor playing Biden and their team claiming that the economy is looking stronger and stronger now, income is going down, inflation is up, and I'll include in here, into the show notes, the economic data from ShadowStats, which demonstrates that inflation, if you took the 1980 definition of Inflation, then the inflation rate is three times higher than the official one.
The 1990 definition of inflation is going to be twice of what we have.
Child poverty rate in the United States has more than doubled.
And we have currently the last data that I looked at, which is in My article here in one of the bunches of data points is that 20% of Americans spend at least a year of their life in poverty.
And I want to make the argument that what we have is fundamental fraud.
We have an exponential debt curve.
And that exponential debt curve is by design.
And there's no way that you can get around that to be able to call What we use for money, it's actually debt, and they call it money.
They call it a monetary system.
And we have 1% now own more than the 99% combined, and the books are cooked.
They laugh at us.
They mock us.
You have John Perkins, the economic hitman with two bestsellers, kind of explaining the state of the world.
You have friends and colleagues of mine able to walk you through the two tools that have been discussed for over 200 years, beginning with Benjamin Franklin of monetary reform, which is, because we only create what we use for money as a negative number, you could create a certain percentage as a positive number and directly invest it into infrastructure.
In infrastructure, investment has three big benefits.
You have up to full employment, if you want it.
You have falling overall prices because infrastructure is going to make it easier to get work done.
And you're going to have upgraded infrastructure.
And the benefits of monetary reform and public banking, public banking is instead of selling debt securities, you could just create the credit as the government and cut your costs in half.
It's about a million dollars of benefits.
Uh, per household.
And when you look at the history of who has promoted this, I mean, it really is a slam dunk no-brainer.
And while we're always talking about homeschoolers, if you want my, uh, work that is kind of set to students and economics, then there are those.
Links are for you.
But really, my point is to withdraw consent, um, Yeah, that's all that we got from there.
And that because we have fundamental fraud, and we can quantify the damages into Catherine Austin Fitz and Robert David Steele, they quantified in the hundreds of trillions of damages.
I just stop in the tens of trillions of damages that we can definitively prove we're being looted by.
And Because of the benefits are so obvious when they're pointed to, and there's no counter argument.
One of the arguments that that I have here is from Simon Johnson, who is an economist at MIT.
Simon is the former chief economist for the IMF.
And he and the chief economist of the World Bank, they both resign because they discovered that those organizations are doing the opposite of what they say.
They say that they're there for helping people, but they're actually impoverishing them and putting them in debt and under control to oligarchs.
Said, you know, we can't get any debates.
They won't.
RFK Jr.
says that nobody in the vaccine industry will debate him.
Yeah, that's true.
Nobody will debate us.
Nobody will debate you or Jim and nobody will debate Simon Johnson on these economic.
He wrote a bestseller called 13 Bank 13 Bankers and he literally literally calls the US economic system a banana Republic.
So another area to withdraw consent.
And if you need documentation and the facts for our economic system and why you are justified with withdrawing consent, demanding arrest, there you go.
All right, brother, go ahead.
Well, that first article by the Activist Post talking about the middle class is increasingly becoming the impoverished class and the poor are increasingly being pushed into the streets is basically, in summary, it's That the middle class is facing increased financial difficulties due to rising inflation and the decline in real median household income.
The cost of living has become oppressive and more than 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.
The flow of credit is getting very much tighter and financial institutions are starting to say no much more often.
As a result, many formerly middle class Americans have been pushed into poverty and homelessness is on the rise.
The economy is not doing well under Joe Biden and things are expected to get worse is basically how the article goes.
And I would argue, you know, if you want to just pick a president based on economics, do you want a President Biden who sucks everything he can out of everybody he encounters everywhere along the way?
Or do you want a guy like Trump from an economic perspective that knows how to build and grow money and use it properly to grow it into small fortunes?
And you can argue that Trump isn't actually that guy, but he's certainly that guy a lot more than Joe Biden is that guy.
Ask yourself the question, how did Joe Biden get so rich?
And you'll find out.
That he had no business whatsoever.
There was no machinery to his richness.
There's no organization behind it.
He didn't bother investing in infrastructure and architecture.
I was just having that discussion this week with some of my older business partners because I too am in the middle class and I can feel it.
It's beginning to feel more piercing to me than it ever has before.
My company is one of the top rated private investigation companies in the Houston area.
And I've done a good job to build what I've built over the last 11 years.
And it's by private investigation standards, relatively impressive driving between three and seven inbound calls a day for people that want to give me some amount of money, whether that be small or big.
It's a nice little marketing machine.
I also have to go out there and work on the streets and have the product being my investigative reports.
But I can tell you something that.
It's a small industry, and I even running this in this company that by private investigation standards appears to be very successful, it's not enough.
Every day I find myself spending a thousand here, 500 there, 300 there, another thousand there, 2000 there, 3000 there.
I have a wife that stays at home and takes care of the house and me and the kids and everything else.
That's an expense that has to take place.
I have to keep all the cars on the road.
I have to cover all the insurances and all the tickets and all the things that happen, all the licensing fees and all the government regulation that takes place, not to mention all the taxes that have to be loaded up, saved up and submitted to different various entities of the government along the way.
So that said, I'm no dummy.
I can see the writing on the wall.
I'm not going to get rich from doing it.
It's something that I did out of pleasure and out of passion, but it's not something that I did because I could make a lot of money.
So even this week, I found myself sitting in some of my old offices with some of my old business partners who've been begging me to get back into the finance game.
And we had nice long talks, and I think that maybe I'm going to try to lean that direction.
It's going to be very difficult to wear two hats for a while, but I can see the writing on the wall.
The X amount of thousands of dollars that I bring in every month is not going to continue to outpace inflation.
And the fact that I'm self-employed, and the fact that that number every month goes up and down and up and down, does not put me in a position to go out there and get credit.
So I'm exactly what this article is talking about in terms of the middle class.
I might flow a lot of cash, but that doesn't mean I have a tremendous amount of credit in terms of, hey, I need to go borrow $300,000 to build my business.
Or to build some portion of my business.
Fortunately, I was wise enough to build a business that didn't require a whole lot of infrastructure and was largely service-based.
But not everybody has the same opportunities that I managed to forge in this particular life.
So, I'm actually talking today about making a move laterally or even downward.
In order to have more upside potential because of the squeeze on the middle class.
So I I feel it just like the author of that article feels it and I understand exactly what they're doing.
The next article they began to talk about the poverty rate in America and it's doubled and you're talking child poverty right now.
My mom was broke and I'm not going to say impoverished.
She worked her butt off to raise us.
Did very, very well, but I can't tell you how many meals I had to eat that were hot dogs and liver because we just couldn't buy the quote-unquote nice stuff in the stores when I was growing up.
We could barely keep enough gas in the car and roof over the head for a single mother with three young children that was abandoned by her husband.
Anyway, the child poverty rate has more than doubled from 21 to 22, according to the Census Bureau.
The U.S.
poverty rate is measured by the Supplemental Poverty Measure, and it was 12.4, and now it's got a rise of 4.6 percentage points from the previous year.
The poverty rate for children has more than doubled, increasing from 5.2 to 12.4, which is a record increase in the history of America.
And the Census Bureau attributes the significant rise in child poverty to inflation and the end of an emergency programs that were implemented during the early days of the pandemic.
The expiration of stimulus payments and enhanced child tax credits in 2021 contributed to the spike in poverty rates.
So the government argues that they're in poverty because the government can't pull them out of poverty.
Talk about a web of insanity.
They're in poverty because they're fatherless.
They're in poverty because their families are breaking apart.
They're in poverty because they're forced and faced with things that they cannot have.
And now add to that, and just to put the screws on children, inflation has been a major factor in the worsening economic situation.
The Labor Department reported that the largest monthly increase in the Consumer Price Index in August 2023 was a rise of 0.6 from the previous month.
So we had almost a 1% rate of inflation from the previous month.
And if prices continue to rise at that rate, the entire rate of inflation would be over 7%.
Now remember the old cost of living index that used to be like 3% per year now actual inflation is measuring up to upwards of 7% and the impact is devastating on the middle class with more and more households not being able to buy bread or gas putting them in situations where it continues to be a downward spiral take on top of that the fact
That the schools require the children to spend so much money to supplement the garbage financial structures that they have in place.
And I think it's just absolutely terrible.
I wish I could take some of these children under my wing and bring them into my house, help raise them.
I wish I could do more for families that are like this.
I just have to focus on what I can do for who I can do it for and do the very best I can to be able to help guide people out.
I can tell you something about if you're one of these people that are struggling with this.
Let me give you a secret.
Okay, you ready for a secret?
Every dollar that's made.
Everything you see, every city, every road, every light, every car, every piece of insurance that gets bought and sold, everything in the grocery store, in America, all makes a profit because of the asymmetry of information.
It's because somebody knows how to buy low and sell high.
It's knowledge.
You don't need to have a lot of infrastructure and a lot of money behind you to set up a service business that can get a good reputation using Facebook or Google or whatever.
What you have to do is know your trade.
Know the information.
These days, people can make a lot of money in America.
Oh, ask the brokers.
They make a ton of money and they literally do nothing for it.
They're brokers.
They know knowledge how to buy low and sell high.
They know how to Buy the insurance products and bundle them up!
And sell them for a higher price over here.
It's all knowledge.
Everything that happens.
And with the advent of artificial intelligence, there's absolutely no reason why any person with a brain that can read and can function in a normal basis with a computer can't make a lot of money because artificial intelligence is going to change the entire landscape.
It's going to take all that knowledge and isolate it and help people really Zoom in and guide people into wealth that we've never seen before.
We're going to have another tech boom, but this time it's going to be an artificial intelligence boom.
You'd be shocked what artificial intelligence can do that in the past took somebody who earned three, four hundred thousand dollars a year.
Now it can be done with a guy at home with chat GPT.
It's going to completely change the landscape of how wealth is made in America.
We can get the parasites at the top arrested.
We have all sorts of suppressed technologies that will make our economy unbelievably thriving.
Since the 1950s, we've been promised 20-hour work weeks by taking the advantages of technology.
But of course, none of that has worked out.
And as I said before, we're in a situation now where the 1% own more than the 99%.
own more than the 99%.
And it is tragic comic.
And we have the solutions.
We have, but we need this breakthrough in order to arrest these people at the top and have a fair chance to be able to consider the facts moving forward until that time.
It's we're in the war.
And speaking of the war, I do want to give some update with some of the battles.
Dr. David Martin.
Calls for the destruction of the World Health Organization.
This guy is sharp.
We did not have a pandemic.
We had a genocide.
So for him in the video to be able to go to the World Health Organization and to be able to say what he had to say in 23 minutes, I did listen to that interview or that speech very strong and just laying out the facts and we have the who on one side demanding Greater authority to centrally declare health emergencies and order us what to do.
And the rest of us are going to be saying, nah, you're, you're psychopaths.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, they warn against mask mandates.
And this is important.
This organization has been around since 1943.
So that shows to me that there's enough professionals who got together and knew enough of the data and wanted to put it together.
And they did.
And they did.
And the some of the battles are going to be through the optics and the New Mexican governor, New Mexico governor, deciding to ban weapons was a target of the Babylon Bee with these two headlines.
And I like this one too.
Whom harmed America more?
Osama Bin Laden 3%, Obama, Bush, Biden at 97%.
Obama, Bush, Biden at 97%.
And the tragic comedy of what we have is you have the White House response.
And the White House response is, despite the evidence, the documentation that the Biden family had $20 million of payments given to them, the White House sent out a notice encouraging the corporate media to not cover the impeachment measures.
Now, the key.
Phrase for me to take a look at their strategy covering impeachment as a process story Republicans say X but the White House says Y is a disservice to the American public who relies on the independent press to hold those so I think they're making the argument is just don't cover the argument.
Of course, all you have is one side of the story and corporate media is going to or the White House is encouraging corporate media to continue just with one side of the story and we'll see how that plays out.
I don't think it's going to work out.
I think that we're going to have a breakthrough moment.
I think that there is going to be an economic Breakdown, breakthrough, revelation of the limitations of this debt system, and I think that's going to be what really sparks the next moves on the board, but we shall see.
Brian, your thoughts on any of those battle stories?
Yeah, the White House has got some balls, don't they?
They send a letter to the heads of all the major American press outlets, the heads of the major American press outlets, urging them To subject Republican charges of corruption within the Biden family to quote unquote appropriate scrutiny during the coverage of the upcoming impeachment hearings in Congress.
The memo is accompanied by a 14 page dossier aimed at debunking claims against Biden.
Uh, leveled by the Republicans in Congress and argues that covering impeachment is a process as a process story is a disservice.
The American public who relies on who relies on the independent press to hold those in power accountable.
Just that comes just days after an appeals court chastised the Biden administration for attempting to suppress speech on social media platforms.
So, These guys, again, they'll stop at absolutely nothing to continue to press their angles and keep people from becoming awake, which is what it's all about.
Because it never fails.
Remember, as people get older, they tend to get more conservative.
They get more conservative because they begin to realize that the folly of their youth did not have everything thought out.
And the more you think and the deeper you go, the more conservative you become.
The old saying that if you were young and you weren't liberal, you had no heart.
But when you're old, if you're not conservative, you have no brain feeds into this.
And I think right now what's going on is the mainstream media is desperately clinging To their reputation, I guess you'd say, that they are the ones who are to bring news to the desperate and hungry American people.
Well, the alternative news has more impressions.
Just look at the advent of Tucker Carlson.
Um, in terms of dropping off Fox and jumping up on Twitter to bring more impressions than Fox News altogether just on one show shows, it illustrates what a conservative hero can really look like.
And I'm not saying that Tucker Carlson has everything right.
I'm not saying he has everything wrong, but he seems to be getting a little closer every day now.
The other article was sort of a we knew it all along about the American Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Their statement came out challenging the effectiveness and ethicality, I believe, of mask mandates for respiratory viruses.
It argues the AAPS, American Association for Physicians and Surgeons, argues that not only are the mandates ineffective in stopping the spread of respiratory virus, but they also pose potential health risks and infringe upon individuals' rights and inform medical consent.
But to me, the biggest outcome of masks, and I believe one of the greatest reasons They were implemented was to protect their gang of Antifa thugs that they had spent so much time building and harvesting that would bring so much turmoil to the United States over those days, those early days of the pandemic and Black Lives Matter.
If they couldn't be seen, if they were forced to be wearing masks, look at what happened with the crime.
Look at how it was all taken off.
It's very, very difficult to prove who that person was who committed that crime because they were wearing a mask.
Nobody could recognize them.
Nobody could pick them out of a lineup.
Nobody could say that was the one.
They were all dressed in black.
They all had umbrellas over their heads.
Now, the Chinese, they use umbrellas to keep the surveillance cameras from being able to run facial recognition.
They wear the masks, but the Chinese facial recognition has gotten so good that it can pick up people with masks.
And even better, they force everybody to use an app on their phone with a QR code in order to travel on any public travel systems, meaning they can track their phones with that same app.
It's only a matter of time before the same lack of anonymity takes place.
And just last week, I think we had an article about a baseball game rolling out facial recognition.
I know I use it all the time in my research, trying to find people and trying to find historical information about people, social media sites, blogs, interest works, sports records, things like that, that are all part of an investigation.
So it's becoming much more difficult to be anonymous these days.
And I believe that that was the whole purpose of masks was to cause us to, number one, psychologically shut up.
Number two, isolate us from others that might listen to us or go our direction or join up with us in our battles against an overreaching government.
And number three is to protect the criminal element in society, allowing them to To create havoc which distracted from the real problems that we have in America and allowed them to continue to push the leftist agenda inside government circles without being exposed on a day-to-day basis.
All of it has to stop.
Excellent.
All right, well, we'll go on to our final thoughts.
We've been chatting for an hour and 15, and I'm gonna say a few things from your excellent comments, Brian.
Those 14 pages that the White House gave to the media as background to be able to attack the arguments that Biden should be impeached, that was a great example of just all that they had was straw man arguments and testimony.
So this is a joke.
The real evidence, and I think what most Americans would agree, would be the documentation of the $20 million paid to the Bidens.
And of course, those 14 pages didn't attack that at all.
And this is for now in the impeachment.
Proceedings is that there is an obligation for the proponents for impeachment to lay out the case and to have it to put it on the table of evidence that here's what we have for the documentation for this 20 million dollars and then they have at it and they ask questions about it and if that.
Passes the scrutiny, and to be able to show that, yeah, $20 million was paid to the Bidens, and then the questions would be, in the testimony, if that is true, then what services were provided for that $20 million, and that's not going to look good.
For the differences between liberals and conservatives, my dog heard my wife and daughter going out the door.
May, May, it's okay, you can go look if you want, but don't bark in here.
I would tell students in my history, government, and economics classes that everybody is both liberal and conservative, and it's really an issue by issue question.
May.
Thank you.
All being liberal means is that you're gonna try something new and we all do try new things.
And if you had to give a percentage of how often are you trying something new?
And I would talk to students and the answer is about maybe 10% of the time.
And so then the rest of the time you're just following your routines of what you've conserved because those are productive behaviors for you to have a good life as best as you can determine, right?
They say, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And if people do want to be liberal and try something on their dime and their time, woo, baby, you go for it.
And if you come up with something good, bring it back to the rest of us because we'll be curious about it.
And ironically, everything that we conserve at one time was a new idea.
So the liberal ideas that are effective and that we try and incorporate, we conserve and that becomes conservative practice.
So that's kind of another area of paradox.
And different individuals have different balances and different areas where they feel differently of whether they're going to be experimental or not, and all that is good.
But again, the facts are going to drive the stories and anything that you want to discuss.
Having a label on somebody as liberal and conservative may be counterproductive to the actual policy question.
That we're considering is what are we going to do about X or Y?
Okay, well, you know, come up with a proposal and let's talk about the facts to best inform you with making a choice about where you want to stand on any particular.
Instance and for these for those masks that is a great point that did hide the criminals and I didn't include it into the story, but one of the guys in Seattle who was fomenting to burn down a police station and they did start a fire in the police station.
He was sentenced to 40 months, which is a good progress.
So the overarching picture of what happened.
You had the pandemic declared, and you have the masks, and that allowed for the mail-in voting for the election fraud, and then the J6 was the false flag in order to cover up the election fraud, and that's what we're dealing with with this.
So, on to final thoughts.
In our wide ranging discussion and consideration of these facts is that we're still and this is a continuation of what I see.
Nothing has really changed.
We need some sort of a breakthrough for these facts to register.
To the extent that there is a critical mass of the public who have withdrawn consent and they're demanding arrests.
We've looked at some of the advances with that.
Macron, we covered this on Wednesday, The Macron went to the largest stadium in France.
They put him out there and he was horrifically booed for over a minute.
And if Joe Biden, the actor playing Biden, if he went to a major stadium, they won't do it.
Or I would love if they would.
I would love it if they would.
So we're close.
And with Brian saying that, I don't know, maybe we're 50% there.
Maybe we are with all of the contractors we've had here in Mission Viejo with various house projects over the last since February.
Maybe a ratio of 20 to 1 because I talked to him and these conversations do turn to these types of topics and all of them are have withdrawn consent.
And they see that this is criminal and crooked.
They don't know what to do about it, but they do not consent to this.
And the only guy who I say is the exception is you start talking about this, he started backing his head away and his eyes got dirty and he looked afraid.
I stopped pursuing that topic.
Maybe he was a campaign donor to Biden and Harris.
He might have the bumper sticker on his car for Biden and Harris 2024.
So Patriots, just hang in there.
We do need a breakthrough.
And if you do want to consider that we have friends in high places, I do often, to be able to contextualize everything that we see.
Brian, brother, your final thoughts.
When you understand theology, Satan makes sense.
And I know people are going to have a hard time with that.
Evil makes sense.
It makes all the sense in the world to me in the context of understanding what happens after this life and understanding what influences are in place in this life.
And while I would sound preachy to take the time during this show to Lay it all out for everybody.
I assure you that it makes perfect sense in my mind why Satan exists and why evil exists.
But I want to remind you of something, and you all know it.
The hearts of mankind are desperately wicked and deceitful above all things.
It's only our will to conform to what we were originally created to be that keeps us in a position Where we choose to be moral and we choose to be ethical.
It's a will to conform to what we believe life originally was.
So that said, I want you to understand something.
The reason that I get to sleep like a baby in all this confusion while I'm sitting in the cheap seats is that I understand.
After years and years and years of studying and reading why it all happens exactly the way it does.
And I would suggest that if you're one of those people that are out there and you're very confused and you're very tied up and you're very upset and you're very angry, give me a call.
Let's talk about it.
But maybe I can set you straight in terms of some of the big picture issues that are really at play.
Now, I'm not saying I understand everything.
But I'm saying I understand enough and I understand exactly why it happens the way it does.
And I get to sleep like a baby.
I mean, like a baby.
Thank you, brother.
All right, audience.
Hang in there.
Have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection