Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 28, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:21:08

What You Didn’t Know About the C19 Vaccine — Dr. Mike Yeadon

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	My goal today is to give you, calmly and rationally, evidence I hope will unequivocally persuade you of a couple of things.
	One is that these gene-based injections that they call vaccines are deliberately, intentionally, carefully, skillfully designed to injure, to maim and to kill.
	That's their only purpose.
	That's one thing I want to persuade you of and I'm going to spend a bit of time on it.
	What else?
	I'm going to also just briefly connect other things that are going on.
	I'll say what it is so I can briefly come back to it later.
	So, we are facing the denouement of a plan that was put in place 1960s, 1970s.
	And fundamentally, rich, powerful people have decided that there are too many of us useless eaters.
	They intend to seize totalitarian digital control, I think, of every human on the planet, and then systematically to kill most of us.
	Something like 90% or 95%.
	90% or 95%.
	No one is coming to save us, but we can save each other, ourselves and our community.
	The reason I say there's no cavalry coming over the hill is you might hear some of the things I tell you and think, God, this is awful.
	Well, I'll just keep my head down and wait for it to be solved.
	It's not going to be solved if not by you.
	Absolutely everyone who knows something that is utterly convincing telling you that We are being misled.
	We are being lied to systematically.
	If I give you some information, maybe it augments things you already know or suspect.
	Once you're left with the absolute certainty that what's going on is not what you're being told, I think, like John and myself, I can see my friend Sasha here as well, you have an obligation to your family, to your friends, to your community, to the world.
	You've got to speak out in whatever way you can, because if you don't, It's as simple as that.
	So let me just start.
	I'll say a few words about basically trying to establish my credentials so you can decide whether you're believing why you should.
	So I've been a scientist all my life, a biologist.
	I was always fascinated by how things worked when I was a child, machinery and so on.
	And that translated into understanding biochemistry and pharmacology and stuff like that.
	I always wanted to be a scientist.
	I always wanted to be an applied scientist and not a civil servant.
	And so I kind of stumbled my way through a first-class honours degree in biochemistry and toxicology, then a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, and then I joined the pharmaceutical industry and I spent my entire life in it, both in big pharma And then in what we call the biotech sector, it's sort of small startups.
	I went to university late because I had a very unusual childhood.
	My mother died when I was a toddler.
	My father was absent.
	You know, clever man, professional man.
	And I would say, with the benefit of hindsight, that my upbringing was characterized by extreme neglect.
	I didn't recognize it as such, but it gave me It prompted me to have a very rich internal life.
	I think about things a lot.
	And so I've realized from quite early on in life that I kind of think about things different from other people.
	It's unsurprising.
	That's really all I was left to do.
	In my early teens or early mid-teens, my father put his head in one day in the evening and said, stepmother, your mother and I are emigrating to the US, and we wondered whether you wanted to come.
	And I said, well, I want to finish my education.
	He said, I'm glad you said that, because we didn't want to take you anyway.
	So that was the end of my family.
	And two weeks later, I was dropped on the doorstep of a couple I'd met once with a battered suitcase, and that was it.
	Now, that family, Daphne and Benny Burke in Hampshire, Jewish couple, saved my life.
	Their last child had just left university and gone, and so even though I was about a foot and a half taller than them, they would kid on to people that I was their long-lost fourth child found under the bed.
	So they loved me without reservation and insisted that I worked hard at whatever I was doing.
	Because my father refused to send any money for means-tested university grants of today, I couldn't go because he wouldn't pay and he wouldn't disown me.
	So I went to work for three years, manual work, all weathers, hard hats, steel toe cap boots.
	So I can assure you, by the time I went at 21 as a mature student, I knew why I needed to get an education.
	And I scored the highest first class honours degree the university had ever awarded in that discipline.
	So I'm reasonably clever and I'm willing to work very hard.
	I finished my PhD in a day or two under three years, which is most people take four, four and a half.
	And I fell into the first job at Wellcome Research Laboratories.
	They needed a new postdoc to work on respiratory medicines.
	So that's pretty much how I chose my field.
	And again, if you're keen and you work hard and you're thoughtful and you learn from other people, you get on.
	They put you in charge of things and then more people And so by my 40s, I was in charge, I'd moved to Pfizer.
	I was in charge of everything to do with research in respiratory new medications.
	And I stayed there 17 years, something like that.
	And I finished as Vice President and Worldwide Head of Allergic and Respiratory Disease Therapeutics.
	So I would be the senior most person in the largest drug company in the world for respiratory.
	And then, unfortunately, as things happened, Pfizer's fortunes waned, they decided to close the UK search base.
	And so my journey into the independence world of being in biotech started.
	So that was 2011 to about 2017.
	And it turns out, because I've been courteous and professional with visitors in the past, People in biotech who are always pitching their little companies to big companies in the hope they'll get bought.
	People remembered me, and they thought, oh, there was that guy, the respiratory guy.
	And I literally got a couple of calls out of the blue saying, would you like to do some consulting work for you?
	I've got a new company, and blah, blah, blah.
	And so again, a few months later, while still in FISA as an employee, but with the permission of my boss, since I knew we were leaving because it was closing, I found myself I had a great time for a few years.
	I worked for 30 biotech companies, 30 through zero, several of whom are now bloated and worth billions of dollars.
	And along the way, it occurred to me that there were compounds, experimental compounds in Pfizer That the intellectual property, that is the patents, that gave them any potential value were going to be abandoned because there were no champions for those programs after I'd left.
	By the way, I worked hard to try and get buyers for whatever we had in our portfolio.
	And we were successful.
	So Mylan, the world's second largest generics company, came in and acquired our respiratory portfolio of experimental drugs and an inhaler.
	and set up a UK arm purely on the basis of the pitch I made to them.
	Then they did the deal after I'd left, and they then got the products for the market.
	So we weren't wrong what we were doing, we were just a bit slow.
	So yes, so I realised that there were experimental drugs that I thought had been pretty good, that they were early stage, still covered by patents, but they were going to be abandoned.
	And so as I moved around the biotech world mentioned my story to various venture capitalists, they said, why don't you start your own company?
	And it literally never crossed my mind.
	But since I thought about it, I thought, I know roughly how to do this.
	I know all of the disciplines.
	I've met lots of biotech people.
	I could do this.
	So along with a couple of others, former colleagues, we prepared a pitch and went to various private capital owners And it only took 70 pitches in 15 months.
	You have to be determined.
	And some chap in San Francisco, after 20 minutes, stood up and shook my hand and said, sir, I will be your anchor investor.
	So I formed a company called Ziarco, Z-I-A-R-C-O.
	We span out from Pfizer and into that company using that gentleman's money, private money, started with a little biotech.
	We had a very good idea as to what to do different with these molecules.
	And I think staff raised a bit of money, did a clinical trial.
	It worked really well.
	Novartis eventually, in a fierce bidding war, acquired the company for what is known in the biotech world.
	They're dealing in thousands, millions and so on.
	It's either an adequate amount or it's an obscene amount of money.
	They actually joked at the table.
	Was it a good deal or an obscene amount of money?
	And it was the latter.
	So because I'm not greedy and I was delighted to have my, I had my little few shares.
	You sell all your equity, but I had a few shares.
	So I had plenty to retire and I just retired.
	I was doing a little light consulting in 2020.
	And then I happened to be noticing on the television, you know, our public health officials were telling us daily about this COVID virus.
	Because I've been around forever in the UK scientific scene, despite my boyish good looks, my young, youthful looks, I know lots of people who are seen in the pharmaceutical industry and are in public health.
	I wouldn't say they're friends, they're people I know.
	So a guy called Sir Patrick Rallance was on the TV, he was the Chief Scientific Advisor then to the governments, and he was saying things in Q&A and making a presentation that I knew wasn't true, And because I knew him and that we'd shared a common training, I knew he knew they weren't true as well.
	So it doesn't matter if it's a slight thing.
	It was like you don't lie in an interview.
	You're not a professional person like that.
	And then he did it again on something else.
	So quite quickly in February 2020, I knew the government was lying to me.
	How many times is the right number, ladies and gentlemen, that your public health officials will lie to you about a public health emergency?
	The answer's zero, isn't it?
	Once you've done it once, you know something is afoot.
	And then when we got to March, first lockdown happened.
	My wife reminds me at that point, I was running up and down the stairs saying, muttering apparently, we are in so much trouble.
	Because I knew, I knew that lockdown is a completely mad response to a moderate respiratory health threat.
	I'll just say why.
	You can't give people a disease you don't have.
	Only people with florid symptoms can infect other people, assuming that you even buy the virus as the transmissible element.
	So I'm just describing the sort of normal understanding of it.
	I have to tell you, I've now got serious concerns about that model, but it's easy to explain and empirically that's what happens.
	If you don't have strong symptoms, you can't give it to somebody.
	If you've got symptoms, you're ill.
	If you're ill, imagine if you've had flu, I've had flu, You don't get a choice.
	You involuntarily withdraw from social interactions, workshops, and so on.
	And so these things are automatically self-terminating.
	And the people who are already at home in their beds or in the hospital, perhaps, are the ones who are the sick ones, the ones who could be a source of infection.
	All healthy people aren't giving to anybody else.
	You can't give what you haven't got.
	And if they tell you about asymptomatic transmission, They're lying.
	They're absolutely lying.
	And once you understand that, that you can't give something to someone else you haven't got, surely you will realize that lockdown is going to imprison millions of healthy people who are not a risk to anybody else.
	Right?
	And I knew that.
	I've been a respiratory physiologist, pharmacologist, anatomist all of my life.
	I knew it was nonsense.
	And so we had the lies, and then we had the lockdown.
	And I realised that, at the very least, lockdown has come to utterly smash the economy.
	So before, I should also say, all the countries, almost all countries, quote, lockdown at the same time, or within a couple of weeks, all around the world.
	Let me just tell you that I've read at least 20 national plans for pandemics.
	None of them mention lockdown.
	So it's never been used before.
	It's completely stupid.
	It was an idea from some MSc person's thesis about 15 or 20 years ago.
	So once you realise, and just being logical, once you realise that Scores of countries locked down within a few days of each other.
	An absurd idea that was not in their national pandemic plans.
	At that point, ladies and gentlemen, you've got to believe me.
	That's just that absolute unequivocal proof of supranational plot.
	I don't know, that might be the UN or the WHO or the WEF or whatever.
	It ain't your country deciding to do it.
	Someone gave the call and they all did it.
	So then we went on through the year, and they lied to us about everything.
	Is there a major health threat?
	No, there wasn't.
	You've got to put a mask on.
	Masks don't work.
	Why don't masks work?
	The only way masks could work is if they filtered your air.
	As you breathe out, your air would have to quantitatively be filtered through the matrix.
	And as you breathe in, your air would have to be quantitatively filtered through a matrix.
	like a sieve.
	For a start, those masks don't have enough air holes in them.
	You couldn't breathe in and out through them.
	If you get a blue medical mask and hold it tight across your mouth and nose, you'll suffocate.
	So they are not filters.
	They've never been filters.
	They are splash guards.
	Splash guards.
	Their purpose is, when worn by medical staff, to make sure that nasty blood, pus, spit, semen, whatever, urine, from a patient does not enter their mouth and nose.
	That's their only purpose.
	They're not filters.
	So you can, now you know, now you know for 100% certain that, oh, you've got to be masked.
	It's like, it's utter bullshit.
	I've just told you somebody spent his entire life in it and they've explained why they don't work.
	And they were never designed to prevent pathogen transfer, you know, between a doctor and a patient or vice versa.
	I could use the rest of the talk telling you about how every single major narrative point they told us about the pandemic and measures and ultimately the vaccines.
	Every single major point was a lie.
	Not a mistake.
	Not close to the truth.
	Absolute lie.
	Not a single thing was true.
	So here we are.
	Then I'll skip over all the rest of the lies and tell you where my manatee horror got to by the late summer.
	I started looking at the detail of vaccine programs because I thought, well, vaccines, you know, surely they'll be at least safe.
	You know, it's a benign thing, right?
	Vaccines.
	My kids got vaccinated, as did I. Well, for a start, there aren't any genetic vaccines.
	So that straightaway tells you it's a completely different category of products.
	But worse than that, when new medicines are invented by colleagues of people like me, they're not randoms.
	Someone's thought about what they're trying to do to block their histamine receptor or block a particular enzyme.
	So once you've thought about what you're trying to do, you try and find a molecule that will interact with that target in such a way as to bring about I hypothesize will be beneficial.
	Yes, so molecules that eventually come to you, and at least some medicines are good.
	There are lots of dodgy medicines, I'm afraid.
	I wish I'd paid more attention to what other people were doing in my whole career.
	All I can tell you is if you are good and you lead by example and you hire good people, it feels like you're living in a good world.
	I just didn't realize that there were lots of other people who weren't playing that game.
	who are willing to, for example, fake the data if it didn't support what they wanted to do.
	Something that has never occurred to me.
	It's like, what's the point of being a scientist if it doesn't go your way and you just cheat?
	But people did.
	So, molecules are chosen through, as I say, hypothesis, design, testing, and then eventually you're what we would call, we would nominate a candidate to go into clinical trials.
	That process is called rational drug design.
	And I distinguish it from, say, randomly screening plant extracts.
	And do you know what?
	Most of the really good drugs in pharmacopoeia are derived from plants and fungi and so on.
	And the Johnny-come-latelys of most of the 20th and 21st century science.
	We've added some others, but God and nature did a good job of combinatorial There are plenty of really good medicines that come from bugs and so on.
	Other than those, when humans make molecules they do it by what's called rational drug design.
	I know where I want this to go.
	I know how long I wanted to be there.
	I know how potently I wanted to interact with the target, how selective it must be.
	Must it be absorbed from the stomach?
	Do I have to inject it?
	Can I inhale it?
	What's the dose size?
	Is it stable?
	Can I formulate it?
	Is it patentable?
	That sort of thing.
	A rational drug design.
	That's what I did my whole life, including my PhD, by the way, that I worked on.
	a whole series of related molecules, the fentanyl class, oddly enough, lopids.
	My skill is not, I was lucky, not just in drug discovery, pharmacology and learning from medicinal chemists, metabolism experts and so on, formulators.
	So I learned all of those things at work.
	But my first degree, by fate, was mechanistic toxicology.
	Probably the only course in the country that taught it, because there were two experienced professors who were very passionate about it, and I thought it was interesting, and I took the course.
	But when people are injured by, you know, inadvertently, by an industrial chemical or a drug from a drug company, there's a reason why that's happened.
	Mostly, we never really understand it, because if you've got a dangerous drug, it gets dropped and no one uses it.
	Not much incentive to look.
	But a small number of things we have worked out what went wrong.
	And so that gave me, you know, in all of my career, not only was I trying to work with colleagues to make sure we get the right profile, but it's like I know several of the motifs, the ways in which drugs can fail and be toxic in the past.
	And so I say all of that as preamble so that I hope, because this is true, that when I looked at the design of these gene-based injections, gene-based vaccines, I could do so, I could stand in the shoes of the designer.
	It's like, what were you trying to achieve when you did this, when you did that?
	Now, obviously, I'm not saying I'm a mind reader.
	What I am saying is when I looked at it, I could see several obvious, I mean unmistakably obvious things wrong with it.
	You don't need to be particularly clever.
	Bye.
	Probably my level would be good.
	Certainly anyone working in that field knows what I'm going to tell you is true.
	So for a start, the whole concept of giving you a messenger RNA or a DNA vaccine, that critically encodes a non-human protein.
	How do you think your body plays nice with itself?
	Unless you're unlucky and smitten by arthritis or something.
	But most of the time, your immune system plays nice with you, and yet it absolutely goes to war if you're infected.
	How do you think it does that?
	And the answer is, your immune system is trained to not attack self.
	When you were in your mother's womb, your immune system was busy deleting all immune cells that could recognize you.
	And literally, they have programmed cell death, venerable lesion.
	And so everything that's left is not you.
	And your immune system has tremendous diversity.
	It can pretty much respond to anything that's foreign.
	And it does so.
	That's how it protects you.
	So if you take an injection that force is filled in your body, would you ever take it up and make a protein that's not you?
	What do you think is going to happen?
	The answer is autoimmune attack.
	lethal autoimmune attack, wherever in your body this material goes, your brain, your ovaries, your heart, your blood vessels, it's going to make, it doesn't matter what it is at this point, it's going to make a foreign protein.
	They tell us it's a piece of the virus, I don't know, spike protein, but it's a protein that's non-human and doesn't belong in you.
	I'm telling you this and emphasising this now because I think that underscores most of the toxicities.
	That's why there are so many varied side effects in all sorts of anatomical locations and with different delays.
	And that's because I think there's one or two fundamental mechanisms of toxicity and they're manifesting themselves differently depending on how your Russian Roulette jab landed in your body and how much of it.
	That, I think, is a satisfactory explanation of why there are 100 different side effects.
	No one else has suggested it.
	I'm suggesting that's the reason.
	Furthermore, every single gene-based product that they will threaten you with, and your children, and your pets, they all cause your body to express something that doesn't belong there.
	And all of them, axiomatically or prompt, by your immune system, lethal immune attack on every cell in your body that takes this damn cell up.
	This isn't a mistake.
	Mistakes were not made.
	It's not a slip up.
	It's not a slight difference of emphasis.
	It's categorically wrong, dangerous, and it can only cause injuries.
	Some people recover from those.
	Some have injuries that never go away.
	That's why I would call it maiming, including sterilization, and others just dying.
	And what I'm telling you is it's absolutely unequivocal that these toxic injections were toxic by design.
	Intentionally toxic.
	It's a shock if you didn't know that.
	Imagine what it's been like carrying that information.
	So that's the first thing.
	If it's foreign, that's bad, and it will hurt you and kill you.
	The next one is they did choose the so-called spike protein, the bit that's the sticky out bit from the ball and stick model that they terrify you with on telly every night.
	That, according to virologists, that looking like the buttons on a floating naval mine That bit is not silent.
	It's biologically active, and it's thought to be a poison that can initiate blood coagulation.
	And again, probably John Irene was seeing platelets being aggregated together.
	Not a normal clot that involves fiber and fibrinogen and red cells, but platelets all being stacked and pulled together.
	By design, these bastards did this on purpose.
	They picked something that had Toxicity to various blood components and some nerves, at least.
	And then it would trigger this autoimmune attack.
	Then, I've worked in numerous programs.
	They often fail, so you end up starting lots of programs.
	And when you're starting kickoff meetings, you're thinking about your scope in here.
	It's like, what have we got to do here?
	What has the competition been doing?
	And so on.
	Now here we are, we were supposedly in a public health emergency, which was definitely not what they described.
	There's not been a global pandemic.
	It's been a global pandemic of lying and wrong tests.
	Probably in New York and Bergamo in Northern Italy, something else happened.
	Everywhere else, and even in New York afterwards, there wasn't a pandemic.
	There was an initial event to kill lots of people.
	And of course, that was blared out from the media.
	So, regardless of that, the design of these vaccines I've just explained are dangerous.
	It causes your body to express something that doesn't belong there, it's not human, that will induce autoimmune attack.
	It's unavoidable.
	Also, to compound it, they chose a protein that is known to be biologically active, at least earlier, previously described by proteins that have the properties I characterise them as having.
	Then I talked about starting a programme.
	If this was a genuine public health emergency, I'd be having discussions with my colleagues.
	Then I would phone my opposite number.
	If I was at Pfizer, I would phone someone at Johnson & Johnson or AstraZeneca because I know the vaccine guy there.
	I'd phone them up and say, I think the public, in order to avoid us all failing for the same reason, we should make sure we're doing different things for orthogonal risks.
	So, for example, if we pick spike, he might pick nucleocapsid.
	You don't have to pick the same part of the pathogen to make a vaccine.
	You can pick whatever you like, as long as it's different from human and ideally as distant as possible.
	But they all chose the same thing.
	Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Pfizer all chose to express spike protein.
	She told me this afternoon that there were four other minor vaccines, gene-based vaccines, that came to market around a little bit later.
	And she's been able to confirm that of the ones for which she's found an answer, which is what is it made of, three out of three also spike protein.
	It's like, this is nuts.
	I think you know that even if you're not a drug discoverer.
	If there are lots of ways to skin a cat, lots of combinations that might succeed, the last thing in the world you would do is the same as everybody else.
	And the reason we never did the same as everybody else is, if you're already behind them, what makes you think you'll catch them?
	And if the other people are successful, they'll beat you.
	And if they're unsuccessful, you will also fail for the same reason.
	So I'm very familiar with these arguments.
	I knew it was wrong when I noticed they were all doing the same thing.
	And I'll explain why.
	Definitely dangerous and will be toxic.
	And then, but here's the last thing.
	I didn't find this out for about a year, middle of 2021.
	I came across a paper that described the lipid nanoparticles.
	It's like a piece of grease, but it's sophisticated grease.
	Factable grease.
	Lipid nanoparticles encapsulate the messenger RNA Because apparently, well it is very unstable, the molecule mRNA.
	So it has to be protected in this special lipid.
	I was reading this paper that said something like, lipid nanoparticles, an unappreciated reproductive toxicity risk, question mark.
	That is a peer-reviewed journal article from, I think, 2012.
	So, of course, I was a dog.
	I read this.
	What I can tell you is that these lipid nanoparticles, all that have ever been tested, in every species in which they've been tested, they accumulate in the ovaries.
	They accumulate in the ovaries.
	And that was known at least eight or nine years before the pandemic.
	They chose a formulation It was well known to accumulate in the ovaries of the people who were injected.
	And I believe every girl, might be a woman, a baby, the older woman who's been injected has got this stuff concentrated in their ovaries.
	And that's because the motives of these injure and kill as many people as possible.
	So that's the main testimony I'm going to tell you why the vaccines are definitely injurious.
	Mistakes were not made.
	Even an incompetent blind fool in charge of the vaccine program, they honestly couldn't make one of these mistakes because they're so, if you think of them as alarms and warning signs, this would be like an air raid warning sign.
	Full blast, about 18 inches from your left ear.
	It's that bad.
	You can't mistake this.
	And they all did it.
	A tiny story.
	I wrote to three of the four companies, senior vice presidents, that were responsible amongst other things for the vaccine programs in their companies.
	So presumably COVID.
	One of them just completely blocked me.
	My email got totally blocked.
	The next one more or less sends a reply saying, go away, you're dangerous, and managed to get me de-platformed from LinkedIn and other places.
	And the third one came back saying, more or less, what's going on?
	Let's have a chat.
	And I spoke to that person, and I explained what I've just said here.
	It was the longest silence I've ever heard.
	He had not been in Big Pharma.
	He'd been in biotech for almost all of his career, and only the last five or six years gone I genuinely don't think.
	I think he was too busy and had no idea what was going on in the half-dozen departments below him.
	Anyway, a few months later, he did the remarkable thing of resigning without explanation, nor did he have a job to go to.
	That would have involved sacrificing at least a single figure number of millions of dollars in compensation.
	I've never seen anyone do that in my entire 32-year career.
	Only if they're ill or they get hired somewhere else.
	No one just leaves with that explanation, leaving money on the table.
	So I got through to him, I think.
	So the vaccines, these are definitely designed to harm people.
	And I won't say any more, I don't think, because John has described ably everything John said is true.
	That the increased all-cause mortality is worse now than it was in the so-called pandemic year.
	And the younger you are, the bigger the uplift.
	So not very many young people die normally.
	It used to be a mantra, young women don't die once they've solved the obstetrics and gynaecology risks.
	Young women generally don't smash their car into a brick wall at 100 miles an hour.
	Not very many of them jump out of buildings or shoot themselves in the head.
	These are all the preserves of young men.
	And so they don't, young women don't die.
	So when you start seeing 20, 25, 30 year old, you know, the age of my two beautiful daughters, dying suddenly, and the children describe the cases, you know, that's the sort of thing that's happening.
	It goes from a small number to, I think it's gone up like twofold.
	But it's, it's up everywhere.
	I will give a tiny little bit of hope, my hope, to those who've been injected, because, you know, why would you not trust I have the ammunition to know I should reject it, and I did, and I persuaded my family to reject them, and as many people as I could tell.
	But I don't blame anyone who got jammed.
	I would say the manufacturing was so utterly bloody chaotic.
	You can't develop a manufacturing process that produces reproducible, same stuff in each file, kind of output, in under four years.
	There's a guy called Hedley Rees, R-E-E-S, and he writes on Substract, he has longer in biopharmaceutical manufacturing than I have in research, and he was all over this.
	It's absolutely hopeless.
	I think maybe Sascha might later talk about This sort of area, so I'm not going to talk about it any further, but you shouldn't subject, please don't allow yourself to be subjected to any gene-based vaccines.
	Personally, right now, I wouldn't touch any vaccine.
	I don't trust what they're doing now.
	The fact that these materials are injurious, and we can see it, and I knew it would be, and I wrote an open letter, and of course, the ceiling fell in on me.
	That's when my life changed.
	The BBC, the national broadcaster, run a program about what a bad person I am.
	Numerous journalists wrote pieces against me.
	Google modified my profile.
	If you search for me in 2018 or now, you'll find I'm now a very bad person.
	But that's artificial.
	Someone has put time and effort into making sure that if you search Dr Mike Eaton, you'll find out that he's an anti-vaxxer darling and accused of spreading misinformation.
	No, no, I'm the most qualified ex-pharmaceutical company scientist speaking out.
	But I did just check this before the call because that looked a bit silly, but it wasn't true.
	A lot of people just simply won't believe this plot.
	I'm afraid there is.
	There is.
	The media, I think the media is owned by about six corporations.
	I think 90-something percent of the world's news media is owned by six corporations.
	That means six people who all joined the World Economic Forum as company members.
	They've all given lines to take to all the TV, radio, newspapers.
	Lines to take and things you're not allowed to say.
	And guests you can't have on.
	Seriously, it's as simple as that.
	I could write the script in half an hour and then say, make it so.
	And it literally will trickle down to the managing editor of BBC News, something like that.
	And then they have a word with the presenters, and it's done.
	It's done.
	That's it.
	It's not difficult.
	But the other thing is, so the news media lying to you every day And they're still doing so.
	There's the old joke.
	If you don't watch the TV, you're uninformed.
	And if you do, you're misinformed.
	It used to be funny.
	Turn your television set off.
	You cannot learn anything useful from the TV.
	It's completely corrupt.
	It's designed to frighten you.
	Fear is one of the best ways of stopping people thinking.
	It's very hard to think clearly when you're told that there's a A horrific, natural event coming towards you.
	You're going to die if you don't get jabbed.
	People stop thinking.
	Turn the television off.
	Throw it away.
	I threw mine away three years ago in June.
	I've never watched a single program anymore.
	I listened to BBC Radio 4 for 41 years.
	So it just shows.
	Anyway, so I'll move on.
	But I want to just mention the censorship.
	The censorship of the media is unbelievable.
	And they are materially responsible for the destruction of your modern civilized world.
	And the other ones who are responsible for it, God damn them, are the people who signed the Hippocratic Oath at least mentally, the doctors.
	I couldn't have done it.
	I would have resigned.
	I did resign once as a young man from a company when I discovered fraud that management wouldn't address.
	I said, I can't work here.
	I was from your department.
	I said, that's not the point.
	And I left.
	So, people who say, oh, I can't.
	I've got a wife and a family.
	We had a premature newborn, and I was the only breadwinner.
	I still resigned.
	Okay?
	I had confidence I'd get a job in a month, and I did.
	So, I don't want to hear this bullshit that you can't take a risk.
	If you don't take a risk, we are going to die.
	And before that, we'll lose our freedom.
	I think Because I've been able to look into this.
	I've mentioned the plot.
	I had no idea that when we were told to do this lockdown stuff, and there was censorship through the media, as I realised quite quickly, it was censorship.
	I thought, how the hell did they get this all done so quickly?
	And then, you know, the lockdown, what did they call each other?
	Or is the one person making 108 calls?
	And it's like, the answer is no, ladies and gentlemen.
	They all knew what to do as they had rehearsed it.
	Pandemic simulations, tabletop pandemic simulations have been run starting at Andrews Air Force Base in America in the late 90s and they've continued like every year or every 18 months since.
	And if you look up Oh, I've forgotten his name.
	I'll have to find his name later.
	No, I've found it.
	Paul Schreyer, P-A-U-L, and then Schreyer is S-C-H-R-E-Y-E-R, Paul Schreyer, and YouTube.
	The programme's called Pandemic Simulations, Preparation for a New Era?
	And you won't be able to watch that programme without coming to some of the similar conclusions I've come to.
	They've been practising this Now, you may have noticed that there weren't any pandemics prior to 2020.
	Nothing much.
	There might have been an outbreak of flu in Hong Kong in 1968, or was that Woodstock?
	But, you know what I mean?
	It's like, it never happens.
	They told us about Spine Flu in 2009.
	It's an absolute fraud.
	It's an absolute fraud.
	I've spoken to the person who discovered it.
	It's an absolute fraud.
	I won't leave at the point other than to say, Paul Stryke is a serious, independent journalist.
	I've made a number of programs for TV.
	That one was actually broadcast in Germany, in German, for a while, and millions of people in Germany saw it, and then it was booted off the telly.
	It's been on YouTube.
	I think it's on BitChute as well.
	Many people wonder, why has it not been censored?
	You know, probably, once it's elsewhere, you can't really censor it.
	But if you look up there, it's a one-hour, very well-made, very well-made and well commonly presented documentary, and you all know everything I know.
	They, the perpetrators, the rich people and their enablers.
	All the people that you've ever heard of in conspiracy theories, they're the ones.
	The Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Gates, the Bushes.
	And then, who knows, 20 names I've never heard of and I'm never going to know.
	It doesn't matter what their names are, you're going to do something different if you learn it's the Queen or not the Queen.
	It's like, I just think it's an absurd mission.
	But the rich entitled people have decided, and they decided this at least 50 years ago and some say longer, but they don't want to surrender anymore.
	And if we don't stop them, they will succeed.
	And I'll describe just how frighteningly simple it is.
	So put the, you know, Pulsefire WhatsApp documentary and then share the hell out of it, please.
	Because I'm telling you as an immunologist, I do not believe that severe respiratory illness pandemics are possible.
	Not possible.
	Something like a cold, in a normal world, a cold comes about because you've got a respiratory virus gives you symptoms.
	And most people will recover relatively well, and it's annoying.
	Most people would say you can probably keep going through a cold if you have to.
	It's important enough.
	So you can give it to everybody.
	I'm not sure about those grounds, but it sounds plausible to me.
	I think mild diseases, you can spread them everywhere because your own status doesn't change that much when you've got it.
	If you've got flu, I've had flu twice, whatever it is, and I was so sick on one occasion, I lost several days.
	You don't have a choice.
	If you've got influenza, influenza-like illnesses, you will withdraw from circulation.
	So if the model is symptomatic people, give it to somebody else.
	I've just explained to you, the more severe it is, The more certain you are to withdraw from circulation and the more transmission will be curtailed.
	And as an interesting counterpoint, Ebola, whatever the hell that really is, apparently kills something like 50% of the people it infects.
	But there's never been more than two outbreaks in the world, little local outbreaks at the same time.
	I don't believe it can be a pandemic for the reasons I've just explained.
	So why in the world is the WHO and Bill Gates and others wringing their hands on TV about, well, it could be a severe respiratory viral pandemic.
	That is explained.
	It can't be.
	That's why this never has been.
	So they've spent 25 years rehearsing for something that immunologically is impossible.
	Sorry.
	So that's what I was going to say.
	I haven't nearly finished, I've got some important things about family and resistance too.
	Oh yes, just a quick quote from my friend Nick Hudson.
	He runs a group called PANDA, P-A-N-D-A, in South Africa.
	It's a wonderful accent by the way.
	You might profitably look up Nick Hudson Scam.
	He points out, he thought a lot about it, he said, I've come to the conclusion, he said in his African accent, I've come to the conclusion that if the government tells you there is a crisis that's global, and if they only admit of global solutions, and finally, if they censor any competing or dissenting voices, we're in a threat.
	It's a scam.
	It's a scam.
	And that climate change is a scam.
	They're telling you it's a global problem, but they're exaggerating and very much changing temperature over the last 120 years.
	They've said it can only be solved globally.
	We'll all have to agree carbon targets.
	And if you try and say anything, if you try and explain that, excuse me, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas that saturates, so its effects are pretty much already saturated.
	Oh, and by the way, the CO2 increase follows the temperature increase.
	It doesn't cause it.
	This is absolutely established.
	If you, if you try and say those things, I've looked them up, and you bump into Mike Eden of Climate Change, or Sasha Latipova of Climate Change.
	People who are professors, 30, 40 years experience.
	Then as they started speaking out, they were booted out of faculty, and then centered on all main channels, you know, Facebook, YouTube, and so on.
	And you, You may not believe it, it's like, that's why you can't find these, that's why you don't come across too many dissenting voices.
	They smear them, they smash them, and they use IT to make sure that you never hear from them.
	That's why, that's why I say, now the things I've told you, I think you have a solemn duty, you have a solemn duty to pass them on to other people, and many of whom are going to reject it.
	So, as John said, you have to box clever a little bit, don't keep blasting away until they walk out or punch you in the face, but you have to be persistent.
	You will lose most of your friends.
	If you don't do anything, you'll lose most of your friends.
	Right?
	So, once you've got this realisation, it's not a nice gift, but you've got, I think, it's a solemn duty.
	And I think we'll win.
	I think we'll win if enough people do it.
	And if you manage to persuade one person, give them a big hug and ask them, can they take on the same condition?
	Will they please tell other people impress upon them the importance of doing something with the information.
	I've given 154-length talks and my concern is that only a small number of people have done anything with it.
	Self-protection, I'm delighted, but I really wish people had tried to protect their community as well because that's the only way we'll succeed.
	No one's coming to save us and there aren't enough, not very many New voices, almost none.
	So we've got the truth-tellers we've got, plus we've got you.
	You had the discernment to realise something was up, and the courage to start looking around and asking questions, and you were not satisfied.
	And that's why you're here.
	That's the only phenotype you need.
	But you must keep going from here.
	You know it when you orientate yourself to face the light.
	It's metaphorical light.
	Tell them the truth!
	It's so important.
	Telling the truth and not declining opportunities to try and rescue people.
	That's all.
	As Brooke was saying, I cannot know the outcome, but I can tell them what my actions are.
	So that's important.
	So if I haven't mentioned, yes, the censorship and the mass media and the damned doctors just taking the money, I think the doctors looked around and they saw people like me being censored asking questions about the vaccines.
	And I think they thought, I don't fancy that.
	I'll keep my head down.
	It's like someone else can sort that out.
	And I know doctors who resigned because they weren't going to shout at people and couldn't stand it, but not very many.
	And the rest simply won't talk to me anymore.
	So the censorship is huge in media and doctors, it was mostly self-censorship.
	But I'm going to prove to you that someone is, to use the technical word, ticking with the internet.
	Most people, when they look things up, open a browser in something like Safari or Google.
	Google Chrome, I think it's called.
	And you put the search term in and hit go.
	And that's because, I think, unconsciously, you believe that this is a generic activity, something that any search engine can do pretty much as well as any other.
	And you maybe even think, well, that's the proper brand name.
	I'll go with this one.
	Yeah, I used to think that, too.
	For fun, if you write doctor, so D-R, space Mike, space Eden, and stick it in Google and Safari sequentially.
	Don't do it now, please, because you won't be listening to me.
	And then put it in as many minority or tiny search engines as you can find.
	Now, if search is a generic activity, with minor exceptions, they all pretty much return the same information, right?
	If they don't, Then we really misunderstood how the net works, which is probably true.
	I just did a check on Google.
	I'm just a bad man who's a conspiracy theorist who's been written up with hit pieces and so on.
	In Yandex, Y-A-N-D-E-X, I can find about 50 interviews and two or three articles that say I'm a bad man.
	Now, how can that possibly be?
	Now, the answer is someone at the Google end has gone into their algorithm and they've modified it.
	And of course, once you think about it, it's like, yeah, of course they can.
	They could probably just get a student to do it.
	They just design a little subroutine so if anyone searches wholly or completely, you know, within other words or only this word, these people, this pick list, then do X, Y, and Z. You know, find worst ranked negative articles about.
	Whatever the protocol is.
	So if someone sees me speak in my city, of course they'll look me up and think, you know, he's a fringe guy, I'd better not go anywhere near that.
	So that's proof that they're messing with the internet.
	So, it's like everything you thought you understood is not true, unless it comes from your heart, from conversations with people you know and trust, your own family, everything else.
	Empathising, TV, you know, it's corrupt and untrue and designed to, you know, do bad things to you.
	So, I'm going to move towards what should we do about it.
	I have mentioned the climate change stuff is definitely a lie.
	Temperature has gone up and down.
	They've looked, I would say, the easiest way to explain it is ice cores.
	If you drill like a six inch diameter column of ice you can go down for miles in the Arctic.
	And the oldest stuff has been there for millions of years, and they put it up in a special protective bag, and then they take little slices, just like sedimentary rock in geology, and they can, it's like a clock running backwards, and they can measure the amount of CO2 in the air, in the bubbles in the ice, and they could make some other complex measurements for isotope ratios, and that was a proxy for temperature.
	And what we found is the temperature goes up, and then CO2 goes up hundreds of years later.
	And that's because the air takes ages to warm the cold, deep sea.
	And then when the cold, deep sea warms up a bit, the dissolved gases in it, including CO2, bubble out.
	And then when it gets colder, because we've moved further away from the sun or tilted a bit more, the air cools quickly.
	It takes 500 to 800 years to cool the warm, deep oceans.
	And then as the oceans become cooler, They are a more amenable place for CO2 and other gases to dissolve in it, and it goes backwards.
	That's the cause of CO2, really, rather than us, for a minor contribution, and CO2 does not, repeat, does not drive temperature.
	That's definitely Milankovitch cycles and other things to do with our orbit around the sun that moves from circular to elliptical, and on our north-south axis, we wobble like a gyroscope, beginning to fail, And these things superimpose and then go out of phase again.
	And that's why we end up with warmer periods and colder periods and then extreme cold periods and so on.
	This idea that, this hubris that a few billion people, you know, running a small internal combustion engine have changed the temperature of the world.
	You know, it's like, it's completely nuts.
	And the science does not support it.
	And any expert, however, who defends is smash-centered, Deplatformed, fired, and the Google will hide them.
	And I know at least four people, one of whom has won a Nobel Prize, and they all say pretty much the same thing.
	It's exaggerated, there is not a consensus in their personal view, there isn't the slightest chance of an existential threat from the climate, and the speed of change is such that we'll always be able to adapt to it.
	There you go.
	It's all complete lies.
	Humans flourish when we use more energy.
	The planet flourishes when CO2 is a little higher than it's been.
	It's averaged about 1,000 parts per million since it was made, since the atmosphere formed.
	We're currently at 410.
	Trees die at about 200, a little under 200.
	So we only just avoided life being extinguished.
	But then, you know, probably a cooling event occurred Sorry, a warming event occurred some hundreds of years ago.
	Yes, medieval warm period and that's what caused 500 years later CO2 to rise.
	It's, you know, if people are willing to trust the liars on the TV, most of them don't have qualification employment or anything, they're just spokespeople, then again we're lost.
	Once you do a little bit of independent research and always, always, always Stay away from the main, uh, main large company search engines because they will lie to you.
	If there's anything interesting and you search using Google, you will be misled.
	I use Google if I want to find the nearest petrol station, you know, uh, or to see whether I've got, whether they've got what I need in a local shop because they will give me commercial information that helps them and me.
	But if I've got the slightest thought about, you know, people or ideas or concepts or history, I never use it anymore.
	So there you go.
	So I'm just going to close with a few things that I agree with.
	I think it was John that said that this is not just a sort of technological coup d'etat.
	It's that bad.
	All our countries have already been taken over.
	It's not an impending coup d'etat.
	The government of Britain, for example, signed, with no debate, an act called Coronavirus Act 2020 that, in terms of papers, about two reams of paper, you know, a block of printing paper, about two reams of paper, I was told, that's how big the act was.
	That means they were writing it for months beforehand.
	The MPs were given it the night before the vote and they were told to bloody well vote for it.
	And they did.
	So, and what that did is more or less put control of the country into the hands of the emergency response people.
	Including people like Neil Ferguson who is funded by Bill Gates.
	It's public.
	So directly my once great country is pretty much being run by crooks being paid for by other crooks.
	It's that bad.
	That's why it won't make any difference who you vote for.
	That's why we have to save ourselves and we can only do that through communication and resolving not to cooperate with their plan.
	They cannot succeed except Unless we cooperate.
	If we cooperate, we're doomed.
	But let me find the things.
	Yeah, I've definitely got, oh it's written on my other page.
	Yes, the attacks are not just about alleged severe viruses and alleged vaccines which are harmful.
	It's sort of, I think it's called fifth generation warfare or something like that.
	It's like multiple All the time, all of the time.
	That's why I urge you to turn the TV off.
	You cannot get any useful information from the TV, and you've allowed them to pour this fear and propaganda into your head, day and night.
	Have a suggestion, a bit like giving up smoking or something like that.
	Just do it for tonight.
	When you get home, don't.
	Or the next time you have an opportunity, please, don't turn the television on.
	Put some music on.
	Put some nice music on and do something different.
	Maybe you can follow up something you learned today.
	Don't turn the television or radio on.
	Maybe traffic navigation information.
	But if you put it on, your brain goes into theta waves and you're straight away subject to whatever it's called, the psyops, psychological operations.
	The bamboozle, I think, Al Sagan, who's a really wonderful, clever guy, who wrote Cosmos, I think, he said that once people have allowed themselves to be bamboozled, they must never get the power back.
	And even if we later realise we have been bamboozled, we're too embarrassed about the bamboozle.
	So he was very concerned.
	This is in the 90s.
	So I've seen that clip.
	And don't let yourself get any more bamboozled than you have been already.
	I did mention, those of you who've been jabbed and you've been all right to date, there'll be some people in this world who will say, it's just a matter of time until we get that cancer that drops you in three weeks or you get a big blood clot.
	I guess it's possible.
	Well, I have chosen to look at things more positively because I've got a reason why you should.
	And that's that the manufacturer of these complicated products was so rough and so bad, and I've spent so much time talking to people who understand how it needs to be done in order to be reliable and reproducible, dose to dose.
	None of those things were done.
	So I think they did not have And they did not have the power to make reproducible product.
	So I think some people, if you've been injected maybe once or twice, maybe a bit more, and you have no side effects at all, and you're thinking, is this guy serious here?
	I haven't had any side effects.
	Maybe it'll all be delayed.
	It's like you might have got away with it.
	So, and as I always say, I used to smoke and gave up smoking 20 years ago.
	Today is a good day to resolve and not have another of these same injections.
	If you've got side effects, there are people sincerely working to try and relieve them.
	And who knows, maybe you can be helped.
	But if you've got no symptoms at all, please stay away from those damn needles, and you might be absolutely fine.
	There's no guarantees, but I've given you a reason why the manufacturing is so bad, but of necessity, because they haven't developed the manufacturing techniques to do it reliably.
	But ultimately, it's down to each person.
	I've decided late in life.
	And probably I was always like this.
	I'm not very medicalised, oddly enough.
	I do not routinely go to the doctor.
	I know some people who go for a general check-up, and I've said to them, you're not a car.
	If you go to the doctor, they will run tests and they will find things, and then they will probably ask for more tests, and then they'll probably put you on a medicine.
	And they're not good people.
	Sorry, that's not fair.
	There are probably plenty of doctors who are very good people.
	Unfortunately, most of them are behaving badly.
	If that wasn't true, we wouldn't be in this mess.
	So, you might have a lovely doctor, they're not behaving properly, or you wouldn't be in this mess.
	I don't believe, I think we've been sold a line that is, you need to go regularly in order to catch things early, and it's all bullshit.
	I think the most healthy thing for you to do is not to engage with the medical system at all, obviously, unless you are ill, you know, or you've had a trauma.
	So I'd rather not go near a hospital for any reason, but if I can break a leg, I guess I would accept their help.
	I would only go to my family doctor if I believe I've got an infection that I'm not overcoming.
	I don't think I'd go for any other reason.
	That's it.
	So your medical freedom depends on you simply asserting it.
	If someone says you've got to be jabbed or else, it's like, OK, or else then.
	So when I was told in 2021 that if I wasn't jabbed, I couldn't get on an aeroplane, my wife and I looked at each other and said, well, that's us not having any holidays for the next couple of years.
	But I heard people got jabbed to go on holiday.
	It's like, WTF?
	It's like, even if you were being told the truth, why would you take a novel, experimental, only fresh for the market product, stay and go on holiday?
	It's like, are you mad?
	And now you know what you know.
	When they tell you, if you don't get jabbed, then X. It's like, well, then X then.
	Right?
	If enough people just say, bring it on, then they lose.
	They're attacking They are attacking us in every way they can.
	And since this 50-year plan that I mentioned, you know, the Rockefellers and others, they founded the Club of Rome using a guy called Pecci, I think, who was funded by Agnelli, who was the biggest businessman in Italy.
	So it's another of these billionaires.
	Basically, they come up with the idea that the world was overburdened.
	Beyond its carrying capacity.
	It's just not true.
	There's no evidence for that whatsoever.
	No evidence for that whatsoever.
	But they just told you the world's overpopulated and you've chosen to believe it.
	Not actually true, in my opinion.
	And if anything, the biggest threat to humanity by the end of this century will be population collapse.
	Because the number of babies being had per mum has fallen below the places everywhere except sub-Saharan Africa, I think.
	And they will get there too in the next 20 years, especially if their standards of living increase.
	So we're pretty much at an asymptote peak population.
	It will naturally subside.
	Even if you think we're a bit overburdened, you just wait and it'll solve itself.
	But these myths and these fearful things have been put about for decades in order that you might think, well, it's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it.
	I've had two people write to me to tell me that pretty much.
	Yeah, they are killing us, but it's got to be done, right?
	Otherwise it'll all collapse.
	No, that's a lie.
	It's a complete lie.
	Climate change is a lie.
	Population is a lie.
	But they are definitely attacking you from every direction.
	I think I realised it was a spiritual war when I realised a few things.
	When the vaccines rolled out in 2020, beginning of 2021, they didn't just offer them to the elderly and vulnerable.
	Very quickly, they offered them to children at ever-reducing ages.
	It's like, they just told you, they didn't tell you, didn't they?
	You'll remember this when I remind you.
	They told you that children were pretty much not at risk from COVID.
	And the record showed people didn't die of COVID if they were, you know, healthy and under about 60.
	So why were they jabbing children?
	It's because they wanted to harm them, is the answer.
	I know you must be feeling terrible if your children get jabbed, thinking you were virtuous.
	And I understand that.
	It's like, same guidance.
	Today's the best day to resolve.
	So hug your children close, tightly, and never expose them to these fiends ever again.
	And certainly not these jabs.
	But it's not just medically that they were attacking.
	They were also recommending Injection into pregnant women.
	More than 60 years ago in Europe, not in America, Thalidomide, a drug used to suppress nausea, morning sickness and pregnancy, was used from the late 50s to the early 60s.
	It was associated with birth malformations that are famous and awful.
	Children were born either without limbs or shortened limbs.
	One of my best friends is a lady exactly the same age as me, My sister-in-law, and she got a missing hand.
	Despite that, she had an entirely normal career as a cook, by the way, and drive.
	So, but the point is, her mum took thalidomide between days 16 and 25, particularly related, didn't do anything.
	Americans, somebody in the FDA said, I'm not happy.
	Frances, somebody said she was not happy with the TOPS program and stood her ground and it was never approved in the US.
	That's back in the day when the FDA was working for you.
	Now they work for the drug companies.
	They're sponsored by the drug companies, and they rotate, they have a rotating door.
	So the conversation will probably be, Scott, if you can help us with these three counter drugs, then, you know, in a couple of years' time, if you're looking for a non-executive position or senior vice president job, just let me know.
	And, oh, he's just moved from the FDA to Pfizer.
	There's been four or five people at that level.
	It's that corrupt, they're not even hiding it.
	So, yeah, there's an awful thing to say, but it's true, I have to tell you.
	Not one public institution normally designed to protect the interests of the public, not one, is on its feet protecting the public.
	Not one.
	Not the EPA, not the FDA, not the CDC, not the police, not the doctors, not the media, I'm not even sure the churches are.
	It's an awful thing to learn.
	I feel the same as John.
	I wander around the streets, And I see all these people who are having a normal life, except I've noticed a tremendous number of people, especially younger people, shuffling, often with sticks.
	Something's happened.
	They've had a stroke, blood clots or something, and no one comments.
	It's like 30-year-olds, 40-year-olds with sticks.
	So they're attacking the family, jabbing your children, She had been pregnant with a woman, and I'll just explain.
	I didn't finish the story.
	Thalidomide taught us that babies in gestation are vulnerable to chemical assaults, biochemical assaults.
	And ever since that day, it's been a red line, the darkest of red lines.
	you never ever give novel medicines environmental medicines to pregnant women nowhere, never doctors know this Pregnant women know this.
	They'd even advise you don't eat soft cheese, right?
	You know that to be true.
	How come these lunatics said it's essential that you get your jab if you're pregnant, right?
	That just persuaded people to do it.
	And I don't know the exact details, but I have reasons to believe that it would cause miscarriage in some cases and birth malformations in others.
	And I think it has done that.
	And then the last one is people who had the alleged disease and recovered.
	Historically, we never do, we never vaccinate someone in those circumstances because their body is already up and out, right?
	It's already immune-primed.
	If you give someone an injection of the same stuff, you're bound to produce an immune crisis.
	But no, no, they were chasing them too, weren't they?
	People who were, you'd be safe if you had a jab as well.
	It's like the BS that was coming out, so they recovered, They wanted to jab them.
	Pregnant women, we never do that.
	Thalidomide.
	Kids, they weren't at risk.
	Why would you risk a gene-based product in, like, a 10-year-old that's going to have it for the rest of their life?
	Evil, evil, evil.
	But the attacks are not limited to that.
	They've been going on for some considerable time.
	Interestingly, about the same amount of time as the sort of climate change lies.
	They're 50 years old.
	50 years old.
	70s, about 50 years old.
	And around the same time, I noticed in my country, that there was a strong desire to get women out of the home and into the workforce.
	And it was impressed upon them how important it was and how good that would be.
	And it was egalitarian and so on.
	And so one by one, people stopped having mum at home anymore.
	Not everybody, but you know what I'm saying is true.
	And then they made it economically quite difficult to manage without two salaries.
	That's an assault on the family.
	It was quite Deliberate.
	I've seen it in a written document from the late 60s.
	Here are the eight things we'll do in order to break the family apart.
	Another one to break the family apart is to persuade you that not just should you be tolerant towards homosexuality, and we are, it's a small enough number of people.
	Make nice.
	It's not going to affect you.
	All people have been born to a woman impregnated by a man or his sperm.
	No exceptions.
	Why is it in the last five years we've been told there are seven genders, or is it 27 genders?
	I don't know.
	And if you say anything to say, are you really sure?
	It's like, no, you're a bigot, or a transphobe.
	It's the same people, different methods, same objective.
	And then I heard in Britain they are now educating primary school children below the age of 10 how to masturbate.
	Little girls, they're teaching them about I'm going to say it, because they're teaching it in school.
	Anal sex.
	They're whispering to them that although your mum, Carla, says you're a little girl, if you want to be whatever you want to be, you can be a boy if you want.
	And children can even undergo irreversible chemical treatment without their parents' consent in some countries.
	If this is not a satanic assault on the family, It's not reasonable, is it?
	It's gone from, you know, some people have different orientations, not man for woman and vice versa, but someone thinks that it's a minority.
	That's fine.
	But now it's like, if I'm a man and I demand access to minor female children's bathrooms because I've identified as a woman today, and if you dare say I'm not a woman, it's like you're a bigot.
	And you might even lose your job.
	These psyops are real.
	That's what's being done to people.
	You know what they do?
	People stop saying anything.
	They just think, I'm not going to say anything.
	And then they win.
	If you allow a known wrong to occur around you, or even participate in that wrong, you lose your moral compass.
	And then how are you going to stand up when the really bad things happen?
	You probably won't do it then.
	So I would say, do the right thing.
	I disagree with you.
	Do it the first time, you'll feel better.
	I call it standing in the light.
	So yeah, there's a lot of attacks.
	So I think, what should we do?
	It's like, protect your damn family.
	If you're in a fortunate position to have a long-term, stable relationship, God love you, raising your own children, it's wonderful.
	Make sure you get your arms around each other.
	And your brothers and sisters and your mum and dad.
	That's more important than anything.
	There's nothing as important as family.
	We all knew that.
	We were all told that.
	That's the last bulwark.
	We can survive together.
	We can succeed together.
	We can defend ourselves together.
	Separated, they'll pick us off.
	And they'll trap us with digital.
	I'll just say a few words about digital control because, again, it's something you can resist.
	That's all I'm going to say.
	I'm just going to finish then is I believe this is the frighteningly simple way they could take us over if they want to.
	You may have heard talk of digital ID.
	It could be a barcode or a QR code, maybe on your phone.
	And it can contain as much information about you as the designer chooses.
	So it's not just Doctor, my Eden, maybe my age, gender, date of birth or whatever it is, some basic medical notes.
	It's not that.
	British Citizen, it might say.
	It's not that.
	What is being contemplated and designed and will be put in place, and we just have to choose not to take it up, no matter the inconveniences, the QR code isn't a link to a small bit of information.
	It takes you to a website.
	Which will be like Dr. Mike Eden's website.
	And they can put anything, and they will indeed put everything in it.
	If you sign up for Digital ID, because you're told it's a convenient way of recording your vaccination status, so you'll need that to show if you've been jabbed.
	Oh, it's got your driver's licence on it too.
	Oh, and your medical insurance and your health records.
	Oh, and your money.
	If you sign up for Digital ID, I sincerely believe you as a human individual will vanish, be replaced by binary digit code, and you'll never get yourself back.
	So, you don't need a digital ID.
	There's no benign reason why everyone in the world has to have a digital ID.
	They're telling us you have to, but I promise you, I'm not going to have a digital ID.
	And if they say, well, Dr Eden, it means you won't be able to access your money anymore.
	It's like, okay, that's the end then.
	I'm not having it.
	I'm not having it.
	If you step onto that cattle chart, You're going to end up you know where.
	Don't step onto it.
	Don't step onto it.
	The killing machine is so simple and John has described it in action.
	You won't even notice it arriving.
	So I think what they will do is insist that everybody has digital ID and that's why I'm emphasizing.
	I think it's the last decision you get to make about the fate of humanity.
	If you take digital ID It will be, for the first time, a single global format.
	Yeah, we've got digital ID like a passport, but that's all it is.
	And we've got 197 different formats, one for every country.
	But this will be different.
	It'll be one format globally.
	It'll be interoperable.
	So when you beat yourself against, say, a regulated threshold, it will ask the computer whether Mike Eden, right now, can cross Maybe he had a stake last week, or didn't have a stake, or was nice or unpleasant about the Prime Minister on social media.
	That's interoperability, and it will record the decision, and it will let you in or not let you in.
	And I believe that if you accept digital ID, quite quickly after that they'll say, ah, the continued validity of your digital ID is dependent on you taking the latest WHO recommended vaccines.
	It's not us, it's WHO, independent people.
	So you better show up at the You won't be able to do A, B and C. And I think they will do a soft punishment first.
	You'll lose privileges.
	You might not be able to fly.
	You'll be limited to the amount of cash you can get out of your bank, even if you don't have the balance.
	And if you continue to not get vaccinated, I think eventually you will not be admitted through regulated spaces and through regulated thresholds.
	And in due course, every space and threshold will be regulated.
	We'll just be like those rats in those 1960s.
	Drive the rats mad.
	They were called mazes, weren't they?
	They looked at the psychology of animals.
	But if you don't take the digital ID, they would have to immediately punish everybody who's not going to take it.
	So it'll be sneaky.
	I'm not a genius, but I think I'll bring it in for something that people don't mind.
	attend a concert or something like that, things they want to do, and everybody else who doesn't want to go to the concert will think, no, I can forget it, I don't need it.
	But I do think that is the thing that it will contain all of your information, you will vanish, and you will become a digital avatar, and they'll make you get jabbed, they can make you do anything, they can literally make you do anything on pain of invalidity of your digital ID, which you will require before you can obtain any goods or services, travel across a regulated threshold, and probably even spend, you know.
	But the other thing they are doing is making it harder to obtain and to use cash.
	A cashless society is a society where you've lost the chance to choose to do what you like out of sight of the state.
	So, I didn't used to use much cash, but I generally was pleased it existed because I knew Cash is a guarantee of anonymity, transactional freedom.
	It's not their business.
	Yeah, it would allow me to commit crimes.
	I don't do that.
	The government's doing all the crimes.
	So getting rid of cash, the rationale that they'll give you is crappy reasons like, oh, it's supporting human slavery or people trafficking, or you know what?
	The people who are doing the people trafficking and the slavery are the people in senior, seniors in government and their puppet you and me.
	So they'll give you fraudulent grounds.
	Another one I've heard is in Scandinavia, they're so concerned that young children are accessing really extreme pornography online.
	And of course the way to avoid this is to have age verification.
	But the way to verify online is digital, isn't it?
	It can only be digital.
	So yeah, you wouldn't want to oppose an 18 limit for extreme porn, would you Mike?
	You don't want to keep signing up your digital ID.
	You do not need digital ID.
	I don't need it.
	Evidence of the last 63 years of my life.
	Lived peaceably, successfully, without digital ID.
	And I've explained that there are numerous reasons why, if you sign up to it, you provide control to probably Amazon Web Services.
	You'll be owned by Amazon Web Services or an Apple product.
	It won't be your government.
	It won't be local.
	It won't be a local server.
	These guys and girls regard us as useless eaters and spurtless.
	And the fact that they've allowed and to be designed and injected into billions of people, something is by design toxic and has killed.

▲