Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 27, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

17:18

Medicine: The Killing Fields - Dr. Sam Bailey

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	When I first graduated from medical school in 2005, I felt an initial elation that I had made the grade, passing all the written and practical exams to take my place amongst the ranks of qualified doctors.
	I was licensed to prescribe powerful and restricted pharmaceuticals and perform all sorts of procedures on patients with the belief that the quote science was backing us all the way.
	However, something felt wrong in those early days.
	And initially, I thought it was just me.
	I tried working in different areas of medicine, and even created an award-winning consultation service.
	But there was still no way to escape the background unease.
	It wasn't until 2020, with the onset of the COVID-19 fraud, that I fully woke up to the perverted nature of medicine, or more precisely, allopathic medicine.
	Let's have a look at why Dr. Elric Williams reached the same conclusion in the 1930s and how the medical cartel has vastly expanded its power and magnified its death and destruction since then.
	Music by Ben Thede
	Mantic notions about doctors' motivations and characteristics.
	They are just ordinary people.
	Perhaps their only distinction is that they are able to score very highly in high school and university examinations.
	It would be reasonable to conclude that on this front, they tend to be at the higher end of intelligence metrics.
	But as will become apparent, these metrics by themselves may not result in wisdom or critical thinking.
	Mostly it favours being able to recite back whatever has been given to you by the institution.
	My husband Mark capitalised on this while he was at medical school in the 1990s and found that he did not need to attend lectures or take notes.
	He simply read the prescribed textbooks once and sat the exams, while keeping busy with extracurricular activities.
	To Mark it provided his first insights into the scam of the medical system, which he left behind in 2016.
	His only regret was that he did not get out of it earlier.
	There was no possibility to critique the material we were given.
	In fact, coming up with theories of your own usually resulted in low grades.
	It was prescribed dogma.
	Now from an academic's point of view, let's say a professor of archaeology, he or she have invested their whole career in a particular model of the past.
	That model was already set when they went into the profession.
	Right there, the very moment they start doing their first exams at university, a filter is being applied.
	If they are in any way outside the accepted teaching, if they are suggesting that things are not as they are taught, then they will not pass those exams.
	or they will not do well.
	In a way, in order to do well academically in that field, you have to buy into the existing model.
	'Cause if you don't buy into the existing model, your paper will be marked down and you will not get the results that could eventually lead you to becoming an academic.
	So by definition, academics are already people who've bought into the model. - At least one of my lecturers had the honesty to admit that most of what he was teaching us would probably be considered wrong at a later stage of our careers.
	But that fact wouldn't be in the exam so it was met with a round of nods and I suspect quickly forgotten by my colleagues.
	At that point I thought it meant that medicine was getting better all the time.
	Later on it struck me that it meant that lots of harm had been done to patients in the past And the pattern could repeat itself indefinitely.
	Wrong beliefs and interventions being replaced by new ones.
	In the COVID-19 era, these engulfed the world.
	Medical practice in the modern era is almost exclusively based on the allopathic paradigm.
	The online public encyclopedia Wikipedia Deceptively states that allopathic medicine or allopathy is an archaic and derogatory label originally used by 19th century homeopaths to describe heroic medicine, the precursor of modern evidence-based medicine.
	Well, they used to be proud to call themselves allopaths, but it looks like they have caught on to the fact that allopathic medicine is having increasing PR problems.
	We can also see that they are not the only ones involved in the cover-up campaign.
	The Merriam-Webster Dictionary entry for allopathy was also changed during the COVID-19 era.
	In May 2022 it stated, A system of medical practice that aims to combat disease by use of remedies, as drugs or surgery, producing effects different from or incompatible with those produced by the disease being treated.
	And then in November 2022, a system of medical practice that emphasizes diagnosing and treating disease and the use of conventional, evidence-based, therapeutic measures, such as drugs or surgery.
	Evidence-based.
	That's not part of the definition, and more on this soon.
	In any case, the original description, which has been called cut, poison, burn, in reference to both cancer treatments and allopathy in general, is more accurate.
	While most doctors acknowledge that the history of allopathic medicine is full of horrendous mistakes, they appear to believe that the major problems have been ironed out.
	However, new tests, drugs and procedures are typically rapidly adopted without the practitioner doing any research of their own.
	These are supposed to be intelligent people, right?
	So why do the majority of them have blind faith when they are issued with new protocols?
	When it comes to seeing the big picture and nailing it with words, there are very few that can match John Rappaport, the veteran investigative journalist who has been exposing medical fraud for four decades.
	He's been on my channel twice, and this is what he had to say in a recent Substack article.
	NIH, the US National Institutes of Health, is the largest medical research facility in the world.
	It has 18,000 employees and runs on an annual budget of $45 billion.
	I once suggested to Jim Warner, a White House policy analyst under Ronald Reagan, that somebody should do an audit of NIH and determine exactly what medical advancements the agency had actually made during its long history.
	He thought that was a terrific idea, but nothing came of it.
	I assure you an audit would reveal much less than meets the eye.
	Much less in the way of useful discoveries in technology, along with mountains of useless and fraudulent science.
	But NIH stands as a centre of knowledge and a symbol, a reference point, a proof positive that medical science is marching forward.
	It's a very expensive public relations tool.
	How could we not accept and signal our obedience to medicine when we have such an awesome modern cathedral for its research?
	Ditto for the CDC and the FDA.
	Both infernally corrupt agencies.
	Concocted science is the modern version of spiritual revelation.
	The Roman Church, while it was carrying out witch hunts and inquisitions, replete with confessions obtained through torture and capped off with death by burning at the stake, was claiming Jesus himself had passed the keys of the kingdom to the church, and he tacitly approved its policies.
	These days, debilitating, brain-damaging and life-destroying vaccines are the scientific revelations the Church of Federal Medicine stands for.
	Concocted science.
	People accept science as fact based on the impression that actual knowledge is being discovered.
	PR people make sure this impression is delivered.
	Dr Robert Mendelsohn, author of Confessions of a Medical Heretic, talked about how the nature of medical practice had descended into a cult by the second half of the 20th century, as was apparent in this interview.
	I'd like to point out that medicine today is not a science.
	Almost nothing in medicine has ever been scientifically proven.
	Medicine today has become a religion, a belief system.
	The doctor is the high priest of that system, and he's a very powerful priest, because who else can tell you to take off your clothes and you'll usually do it?
	The doctor practices in a temple, which he calls a hospital, which I call a temple of doom.
	Another one of Dr Mendelsohn's quotes was, If I had to characterize doctors, I would say their major psychological attribute is fear.
	They have a drive to achieve security.
	Plus that's never satisfied because of all the fear that's drummed into them in medical school.
	Fear of failure.
	Fear of missing a diagnosis.
	Fear of malpractice.
	Fear of remarks by their peers.
	Fear that they'll have to find honest work.
	While we are focused on the medical profession here, it is apparent that the problem goes much deeper to involve almost all professions.
	In his 2001 book, Disciplined Minds, a critical look at salaried professionals and the soul-battering system that shapes their lives, Jeff Schmidt exposed the desperate situation that most professionals find themselves in.
	While most people would think the professionals they consult are acting in their best interests, Schmidt points out that it is not what drives and controls them.
	The individuals in the system are highly conditioned to serve the system itself in order to maintain orthodoxy and political agendas.
	Dissidents and freethinkers are weeded out, which leads to an obedient workforce.
	And despite feeling empty, they accept their fate in order to maintain their position and collect a salary.
	Interestingly, shortly after writing the book, Jeff Schmidt was fired from his position as editor of the academic journal Physics Today.
	After a public campaign and a legal battle, he was judged to have been dismissed without good cause, awarded damages and reappointed by the Journal, whereupon he swiftly resigned.
	The purpose of bringing these themes into this video is for people to consider what they think they can gain from entering the medical system, which is almost entirely allopathic in nature.
	While we are not denying that some aspects of emergency care can be very useful and even life-saving, these are in the minority of interactions people have with the system.
	The vast majority of allopathic medicine is not and cannot be good for you.
	When looking after our own family, I can safely say that Mark and I have nothing to do with around 90% of the allopathic medicine we were trained in.
	Nobody in our household has vaccines, and nobody takes pharmaceuticals.
	Our kids all enjoy remarkable health, with our two-year-old having no sickness apart from one runny nose in his life to date.
	The tragedy is seeing their peers with asthma, obesity, and even diabetes.
	while going back to the system that gave them the problems in the first place.
	COVID-19 was the full manifestation of medical establishment insanity as the policies and responses became as vicious as many of the allopathic methods themselves.
	We had the high priests of "the science" and millions of health professionals around the world blindly following their declamations.
	It didn't matter if what was being espoused was contradictory or clearly leading to harm.
	On that account, despite medical schools teaching the principles of medical ethics, this is almost entirely lip service.
	The phrase, primum non noncare, As I wrote in the foreword for Terrain Therapy, while it may seem a harsh critique of our profession, I have come to realise the truth of it.
	what they do.
	As I wrote in the foreword for terrain therapy, while it may seem a harsh critique of our profession, I have come to realize the truth of it.
	When Dr. Barbara Starfield revealed in 2000 that around 225,000 patients were dying annually in U.S. hospitals due to medical errors, it should have been one of the scandals of the century.
	Keeping in mind that this does not include the iatrogenic deaths and injuries happening outside the hospitals, it is clear that the medical pharmaceutical industry has blood all over its hands.
	It is indeed only a medical system, not a health system. - The problem goes even deeper because deaths in many areas are recorded as due to fictional viruses or due to cancer rather than what was done to the patient.
	A system that by design covers up its gross failures while protecting those carrying out the harm.
	The physician can bury his mistakes but the architect can only advise his client to plant vines.
	Frank Lloyd Wright.
	While the novel The House of God is said to be a satirical take on medicine, to me there are many aspects which cut to the truth.
	The book has sold millions of copies and is often read by doctors during their training.
	The protagonist newbie doctor, Roy Bash, comes under the influence of a more experienced doctor, known as the Fat Man.
	The fat man explains to him that medical tests, drugs and interventions inevitably harm chronically unwell patients and can end up killing them.
	He advises that better outcomes are achieved by doing nothing.
	In other words, letting nature take its course is superior to anything that medical practice can offer.
	Many readers no doubt appreciate the humorous aspect of this rule of thumb in the book, but the sad reality is that it is true.
	My personal journey started off being a doctor in the system, but now I'm appalled by it and view most of the hospitals and clinics as disease-maintaining factories.
	I still get lots of requests from people wanting me to be their doctor because they are so horrified by their own doctor's behavior in the past few years.
	Aside from the fact I have no time left in my schedule to see patients and gave up my license several years ago, My advice is to generally steer clear of any establishment medicine.
	I don't recommend 99% of drugs and avoid all vaccines.
	Many medical tests, including alleged screening tests, are more harmful than good as they lead to unnecessary interventions.
	Mark and I cover some of the specific blood tests and investigations during our monthly Q&A sessions.
	There is no hybrid system that I can recommend here either.
	People who achieve perfect health do it by staying away from allopathy.
	I'd like to give the final word to Dr. Elric Williams, who like Mark and I, started off as an allopathic doctor before realising it was largely toxic, stopped what he was doing and moved into the naturopathic paradigm.
	Doctors do not know what disease is, nor how it is brought about.
	Doctors completely unaware of their significance or purpose are taught that acute illnesses These are acute diseases, which they must prevent or cure.
	With this object, they employ a battery of destructive agents, notoriously more dangerous than the ills they are supposed to cure.
	Poisonous drugs, vaccines, radiation and mutilating surgery are their weapons.
	Perhaps the worst crime of modern medical so-called science is the increasingly effective suppression of acute illnesses.
	Usually successful suppression has one of four consequences.
	1.
	The sufferer is killed.
	2.
	A foundation is laid for chronic and often incurable disease.
	3.
	Nature, if she can, will, after period intervals, stage more of these would-be spring cleanings or healing crises.
	4.
	Nature may effect a cure in spite of treatment, in which case the doctor will claim, and probably get, full credit for recovery.
	Dr. Elric Williams.

▲