All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 11, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:24
Need to Know News, August 10 2023, with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Carl Herman from Mission Viejo, California, joined by Brian Davidson from Houston, Texas.
Jim Fetzer is Michael Rivero, one of my favorite websites, WantToKnow, not WantToKnow.info, which is another one of my favorite websites, but what really happened?
Michael Rivero has been one of my favorite websites for like 15 years.
He's had a regular broadcast, radio broadcast, on Republic Broadcasting!
And Jim has been invited to take Michael's spot upon Michael's retirement.
That's what Jim is doing today.
And after two weeks, he's going to be doing a regular gig there.
And Jim will be feeling it out to see if he wants to kind of bring the need-to-know news onto that format, which is a much broader audience.
I don't know how much bigger it is.
The math teacher in me is asking myself.
But it's a bigger audience.
We might do something traditionally with Need to Know.
We'll figure it out and we'll let you know as we go.
Jim did prepare a slide deck.
And I'll show you this first.
So this is the Republic Broadcast Network and Michael Rivera's show.
And that's what Jim is going to be taking over.
Yeah, I think Jim is exploring it.
I don't know if he's made a firm commitment yet, but there's nothing wrong with us giving Jim a little bit of support.
He's been obviously with some of the health issues.
He's still, you know, going hard, but there's nothing wrong with having a backup plan and Carl and I practicing through this stuff without him is is just fine.
Just so y'all know, you know.
I don't talk a lot about myself here and I don't talk a lot about things that are going on in my life, Um, you know, I've got a private investigation company out of Houston that does pretty well.
Um.
Comparatively, there's bigger investigation companies and there might be better investigation companies, but I have a real nice balance going on here in Houston.
I've been running that for about 11 years.
My name is Brian Davidson, in case people don't know, and I live on the east side of Houston.
I spend a lot of time on the water.
I try to spend a lot of time in the falls hunting, although I need to probably lose some weight and get some better shape this year, so we're going to be doing that.
I am married.
I have a couple of daughters.
One is bi-marriage and one is my own.
My daughter lives up in Sandpoint, Idaho with her husband.
They're very serious Christian people and follow on A lot of the footsteps that that her mother and I had when we were younger.
I come from a business background.
Actually, a lot of people don't realize that about me because I just don't talk about it.
And basically, I got burned out on corporate corporate sales and I was doing a lot of multimillion dollar.
Very high end deals for the first half of my career.
And then I just got burned out on that whole corporate sales team and late nights and drinking with clients and traveling around all over the place on flights all the time.
And I decided to start a private investigation company thinking it was just going to be a transition for me until I could figure out how to set up my next round of sort of big money companies.
And I was just so happy with the lifestyle that it provided and the money that I was making.
Uh, even coming off of that big other career that I decided to stay and now it's, you know, one of the top ranked private investigation companies in Houston.
If you look at Google, which means I get a lot of calls from people off the street and off of Google that are general public and they, they might not know a lot about what to expect from a private investigator.
So I got to walk them through that.
And I probably get.
Oh, between 3 and 7 inbound calls a day that I need to return from potential new clients.
Um.
I kind of cherry pick and take the things I like, and I don't really take the things that I don't like a lot of it's civil domestic work.
Some of it's criminal work.
Um, a lot of it's big surveillance contracts for lawyers and things like that.
So that's kind of a nutshell who I am.
I'm dedicated to the conspiracy theory industry and movement.
I've always followed Jim very closely since, you know, I first heard about Sandy Hook, which, you know, I thought it was insane the first time I heard it.
And I got ahold of some of Jim's research and articles on Sandy Hook.
And that was sort of what got me hooked.
And then shortly after that, of course, at that point, it's just reading with very little And then shortly after that, I think it was June of 2016, Orlando Pulse nightclub broke loose.
And I said, Well, I got to figure this out for myself.
And it didn't take me Oh, it took me about probably four days to be sure that it was a false flag.
And it took me about three weeks to be absolutely positive and create my sort of Orlando Pulse nightclub research vault.
And then, you know, it took me a while to sort of work through the whole cognitive dissonance process where, you know, I had to realize that Bill O'Reilly was not telling me the truth.
I said, how deep does the conspiracy go?
And so from there, I started studying Every conspiracy I could get my hands on, of which I threw out 75% of them and held on, and I found that at the end.
The ones I could really sink my teeth into were the ones that I could research myself, which were the false flags.
So I stayed in the game, and now I've got a research vault that probably includes 10 or 11 folders, and then snippets of a bunch of other events.
I'm getting ready to invest in Olay's research vault, and I've just upgraded my skills with Adobe Premiere Pro to sort of remind our audience with more videos as to how they conduct these false flags.
At this point in time, after studying it for Four or five years.
I think I have a really strong understanding of how they actually execute the operations.
Although there's still a lot of real gray areas for me.
But one of the biggest eye-openers for me was visiting Uvalde just a day or two.
I think it was 24 hours after the event Supposedly took place and of course just spending the time down there walking around the campus during the press conferences and seeing all the reporters and and seeing how they had set up the perimeter and how they executed the operation comparing that with My experience, I started to feel like, okay, now I know where the photographers were stationed.
I know why it supposedly took the police so long to enter the building and finish up the work.
I understand how they get the cars in and out of the parking lots now.
I understand how they, the playgrounds, how to recognize that the playgrounds are out of date, which I, I personally am one that believed that Uvalde School District, that that school had not been operating for quite a while.
I understood how they set up the plants.
And the actors around the campus to sort of approach journalists and looky-loos.
I understand how they cleared out the houses in the immediate vicinity of Uvalde or told people not to open their doors and how they sort of kept the operation going.
So I developed a lot of theories through Uvalde and others.
And now, of course, I spend a lot of time.
People can go and find my analysis on Nashville or You know, there's just a lot of them out there that I've covered over the years.
Buffalo was a real good one, because it was so obvious.
And so, I'm here with you.
I try to give my take with Jim, and I try to partner up with Jim to give my take on current events.
Jim and I don't see eye to eye on every single issue, but I can get along with Jim.
I understand where he's coming from.
I've taken his critical thought classes and really encouraged him and worked with him over a long time.
I hope some day Jim will be like me, but I think he's going to have to go through some more cognitive dissonance of his own on some issues before he's open to really understanding what the conspiracy really is.
And, you know, of course, for me, it took sort of a religious eye opening to get to the bottom of it and begin to understand what's at the bottom of all the rabbit holes.
But not everybody has the luxury of me, which was Wow!
getting to completely blank out my slate and start fresh and rewrite the truth from what I could actually observe and document.
So that's my that's my 10,000 foot overview of my life for people that are new to the show.
Wow.
Well, thanks for that.
And is my observation of Brian's contribution to Need to Know is exactly his professional experience of having a trained eye.
And when you earn a living by doing something, there's a different type of commitment.
And you hear it expressed in, yeah, after four days, I thought I had enough.
That's a lot of work you can do.
In four days.
And then to be sure, as a professional, to be able to present something, that's a trained and valuable experience.
And also, as a historian, I just want to establish that the work that Brian has already done is sufficient for everybody to get to what I think is going to be the endgame point, at least at an individual level, to withdraw Consent and demand arrests of the leaders and God bless you for wanting to do more.
For me, after 46 years, I so appreciate, and I'm as curious about the crime du jours as anybody, and as an academic, if you are serious about being able to explain, document, and prove, and put your professional name behind it, it does take work.
And at this point, I'm semi-retired, and it's like, it doesn't matter, it's just another one, and they're gonna have another one tomorrow.
And then more.
So that's part of my balance for this.
All right.
Well, Jim did prepare a slide deck and we can go through it and see if we want to talk about it.
Brian also brought some stories onto the table.
So let's just go ahead and jump in here.
All right.
So we have a first story of what we're being shown is the end of the war.
And this Kharkiv is about 250 miles to the east of Kiev.
And it's just a progression where we're seeing more and more growth.
That the money invested into Ukraine and that ties into maybe I'll jump into the first story that Brian had brought up, but this is all just making the case that our opponents got nothing.
Or at least that's what was shown.
Yeah, what's interesting is that Russia seems to be confusing the enemy.
Recently, they're using GPS jammers and radar chambers and all sorts of new technology to sort of block off the Ukrainians from communicating and from understanding where they're at and where they're going.
And it seems like they're breaking out some of the more high tech guns to counter the American guns.
You know, you just got to ask yourself, you know, if they've been fighting this World War Two style ground warfare for this long, and it's 2023, when are they going to start breaking out the big technology?
Of course, I had that discussion on Sunday last week with Scott Bennett.
I said, hey, when are we going to break out the big guns?
And they're like, well, when we need them, we're going to start bringing out the new tech.
So it appears that they've just been burning through an old arsenal and now they're ready to move on to a new arsenal and it's starting to get more advanced and neither team has really showed their cards.
What I want to remind you guys about Ukraine is that it's an excellent opportunity for America To test different types of weaponry, sort of low-tech weaponry, medium-tech weaponry, and see how it works in real combat without us having to lose actual shoulders.
Now that means that the Ukrainians themselves are cannon fodder, and you can expect that from a puppet regime that sold out everything to Washington D.C.
and federal elites.
They're going to, they will have had to make a deal with the devil to get into this position where they're willing to fight with or start a war with Russia.
To get there so it's starting to get ugly and people are starting to get double crossed and I just think things are getting very very ugly.
Now.
There's a lot of old history between Russia and Ukraine and there's a very similar mindset to Ukraine in Russia that it's sort of like Taiwan like they broke loose from us.
They belong to the motherland.
They went another direction, but there's still a common language.
There's still a lot of common history.
And one of the reasons Putin is held back on this war is to not destroy Many of the important historical architecture and archives That were a part of Ukrainian culture and Ukrainian history.
Those people are very serious about their history, very proud of it.
And Putin has got a lot of points with the Russian citizens as well as the Ukrainians.
Although he's killing people, he's at least not taking down these important historical sites.
So just something to be aware of in the context of understanding the entire situation.
Yeah, with what you're talking about, too.
The Vietnam War and the Pentagon Papers, one of the disclosures of the Pentagon's own documentation of the war that was, of course, top secret, non-public, and Daniel Ellsberg got his hands on it and decided to make it public because it demonstrated the illegality of the war on neighboring countries.
And one of the points Seem to be clear to me is that the US military and the US leadership had to have live.
Combat weapons testing.
That if you were serious about having the strongest military in the world and you were without empathy, for sure.
Then have some sort of a false flag war and test out your weapons and develop them.
And plus you're able to get more graft from that as I want to talk about with... Yeah, the military-industrial complex gets to get rich while testing their weapons on real people in real environments with real With real casualties and they get to figure out which weapons are most effective.
That's that was an insane.
Quote, unquote, positive of that war.
And of course, if you ever saw the documentary Fog of War with McNamara, he claimed that the whole Vietnam War was a function of the Cold War to stop the spread of communism, which I agree.
And I have always agreed that I thought communism needed to be slowed down, but I thought that we would make an attempt to replace it with some sort of real democracy.
Instead, it looks like throughout our history, we've made attempts not to replace communism with real republics or real democracy, but instead with real puppet regimes that can produce more for the military industrial complex and banking cartels.
Remember, there was a movie called The International with Clive Owen.
And in that movie, there's a guy that gets assassinated and just prior to him getting assassinated, he does this interview with Clive Owen and the guy says, hey, remember the real purpose of war is to create debt.
And I've always believed that that was something that was true about these wars, to create debt so they have to pay you back.
And one of the things I want to remind you of is that Ukraine is technically taking on debt.
This money, according to, I think it's called the Land Act, Here in America, the money that we're giving to them needs to be repaid.
So it's creating a tremendous amount of debt and a lot of people are not privy to the fact that we're not just handing them all these tax dollars.
We got we got a sort of IOU coming in terms of what we can recover from that people group and that land and that nation in terms of minerals and in terms of farming properties or terms of trade for a long, long time.
You got to remember, we just now paid off.
I think it was something in 2020 or 2002.
I just can't remember, but we we just recently paid off a lot of the debt from some of the old World War Two stuff that we did.
So I think it was a no Britain paid that debt to us.
They had borrowed a lot of money for us to get into World War Two.
And they finally finally settled that balance sheet, which was, I mean, just crazy when you think about it.
It is all crazy.
And I want to bring up related that story that you sent us from Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and the Assistant Editor to the Wall Street Journal.
And it is about the graft and all the money, of course, doesn't go to the military and some of it goes to black box operations and as well with Vietnam as well.
Labeling, smearing the situation in Vietnam as communist.
This was a democracy and the history that is taught in every textbook, but including lies of omission by leaving things out.
I just want to give people a brief description of the history of Vietnam in one paragraph.
So, after World War I, Ho Chi Minh wanted to have a democratic and independent Vietnam, not be a colony.
They were denied.
And then the same thing after World War II, and they were denied.
And the U.S.
ended up paying for up to 80% of France's military costs to keep it as a French colony.
And finally, after a major battle, the French said, we're out of here.
And then the U.S.
started supplying the aid, and we put in a puppet in the South.
And the U.N.
had voted for an election to unify the country after a two-year time period where the North would be Operated with Ho Chi Minh and the South would be operated with a U.S.
approved puppet.
When it became clear that the Vietnamese would reject the same fucking type of capitalist manipulators as the French were, then they canceled the election and that led to the live weapons testing for over a decade.
So really when, as a professional, when I say that the U.S.
is not Constitutional Republic, but it's a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire.
I can explain, document, and prove that with complete academic certainty.
And I would be delighted to debate anybody who would want to deny that history.
And it's war after war after war leading all the way up to the present.
All right, uh, let's go to some of... back to Jim's stories, and we'll go back and forth and just dance with this.
All right, so the next story that Jim had was just a psyop with what the Democrats are saying about the possibility of impeachment, or actually the certainty of impeachment.
The documentation is that the Biden's accepted, I think, is up to 20 million dollars.
And the Democrats are going to, they're going to gaslight and they're going to discover, they're going to try to discover, despite the documentation, some of which you're seeing here and we've talked about a lot, they're going to try to just push this off.
Brian, anything you want to say about the denial of the Democrats with the coming tsunami of evidence?
Well, you know, what I'm hearing in different channels out there is that the Dems are starting to create as much distance they can from Biden.
Whether or not impeachment is the right thing for America, the purpose of impeachment is to create sort of a judicial platform that gives the committees The ability to discover certain information to prove it as if we don't have enough proof already.
The question is, oh, so we're going to impeach Joe Biden while he's just going to go nuclear and he's going to step down and pardon his son before he does it and pardon himself and he's going to move on out and then the Dems are going to have to find somebody else.
What I heard earlier today was that they're looking very carefully to try to find a replacement.
They're scrambling to try to find a replacement already because this thing's gonna go down.
I don't like to play the same games that the Democrats played with Trump in terms of these fake impeachments in January 6th and this Russian collusion, all this garbage, because I think it just, it gives us a bad face.
But when I say us, I'm not even sure I really believe that I'm a Republican anymore.
Except to the extent that I'm so far against the Democrats.
I think what you're seeing here, and this is something Steve O'Bannon was talking about here today, is an emergence of a new class, an emergence of a new third party, as you will, one that doesn't necessarily divide.
But think about the possibility, which is what Bannon's been talking about.
What if Trump were to team up with RFK Jr., because RFK Jr.
is slighted by the Democrats?
You'd have MAGA plus all Democrat abandoned ship people, you know, all the wake up crowd that's among the Democrats.
I mean, that could be the beginning of something that could threaten both the Republicans and the Democrats.
And I think that both the RINOs and the Democrats would go with the nuclear option.
I don't know exactly what the nuclear option is, but I imagine that it has something to do with turning out the lights or some sort of major false flag event if Trump was to get that strong.
So I think Trump has to play his cards a little closer to the deck.
I like the fact that he's not going to do the debates, which a bunch of Republican nobodies, and he's got nothing to gain and everything to lose with the gotcha and all the attacks.
Remember that there's an old theory That number two and number three and number four and number five are all going to team up, are all going to duke it out with number one in order to create the vacuum of power and the vacuum of space so that one of those people has a better chance to fit into that vacuum.
Of course, I think the Democrats are still hanging their hat on that they might have the ability to get some sort of legal issue that could keep Trump off the ballot.
You know, because he's a felon.
As a matter of fact, we even have a story in the group today about Trump being accused of being a flight risk.
They were trying to decide how to set the bail.
And I think it's just ridiculous that they even talk like that.
Like, are they out of their minds?
This guy could run the show.
So that's my take on the whole Biden situation right now.
I think at the end, an impeachment Is a mistake in my opinion, except to the extent that for those stragglers who are still out there, sort of not knowing what the heck is going on, the proof would be about as clear as day to everybody out there about how corrupt this particular platform of Democrats is.
And then the questions will begin to arise.
How was Barack Obama involved?
And was he such a hero to the American people?
Of course, those of us Already know that he was not he was simply another type of puppet that said he was just more well spoken than Biden.
Yeah, with the Biden situation, the first thing that always jumps at me is to remind people that's not Biden.
This is some psy-op.
This is some actor wearing a mask definitively proved by the shapes of the ears and the breadth of the forehead and the evidence that we have like Biden scratching his mask because it's not skin.
It's not skin.
And so we're in some sort of a psyop, and there's nothing we can do except watch from the sidelines and see how it develops and wonder how much of this isn't scripted.
I mean, if Biden himself is scripted.
So we'll see.
The owner of the previous Washington's blog, where I was a writer, he was the first one that I noticed that came up with the term post-partisan, which I quickly said, oh yeah, that nails it.
So who can align themselves with these political parties, these psychopaths?
I mean, until...
Until the Republican side can tell the truth about CIA Director Bush and his involvement with the Kennedy assassination, and then the assassination on Reagan, and then the little war criminal puppetition of Bush and Cheney, who could associate themselves with those people?
And the RINOs, and the, let's see, what was it called?
What affair was it?
Franklin affair?
Franklin affair.
Right, right, right, right.
So there's no associating yourself with any type of leadership.
And then at the left, just look at the clown show that we got going on now.
So, yeah, it is intriguing to speculate.
Upon how this show is going to move forward to facilitate a choice of where to stand and to polarize that choice and to make sure that people are aware of the consequences.
And maybe it will be somehow.
We had, I think it was a month or so ago, you had Mitt Romney talking about leaving the Republican Party.
So maybe they're setting it up.
For the potential of RFK Jr.
demonstrating to those who register as Democrats and saying, look, so you got a choice.
Where do you want the future of the Democratic Party to be?
And you can see that they have censored me.
They're not having any debates.
And all of the things that they say, they're calling him an anti-Semite.
And to polarize it by saying Trump and me.
Let's go, baby.
Because that would be clear.
We have four more years of Trump and then eight of RFK Jr.
So to split and destroy the Democrat Party.
The Republicans could do the same thing.
And Trump could say, enough of this.
It's time to divide ourselves from the rhinos.
There's all kinds of ways that it could go, and we're just speculating, and it's kind of fun to think about where it might go.
Alright, anything else, brother?
Or go on to the next story.
No, I think that, you know, they denied RFK Jr.
Secret Service protection, which is like the first time in history.
And they said, well, we're not close enough to the election.
We don't know if you'll be even have a chance of being a nominee.
And RFK is like, what?
Y'all assassinated my uncle.
You're not going to give me...
It's like, it's insanity.
It's insanity that they would deny RFK Jr.
secret service protection at this point in time.
But they said, no, our policy is only go to year out.
Well, that's not true.
I mean, Walter Mondale and all these guys, they go way back with, hey, as soon as it looks like you're in the game, you can have secret service protection.
But now all of a sudden, Oh, we got a tight budget when it comes to Secret Service, and we're real limited on resources.
I guess it's because there's too many 75-year-old, 300-pound men who are threatening Joe Biden on Facebook that they need to get out there and murder.
So I guess they just don't have enough room in Secret Service left.
Yeah, the event that I went to for RFK Jr.
in San Diego, the security guys, they were all in black suits, white dress suits, thin black ties, and they had all the equipment.
All of them had fresh haircuts and had the communication gear, and most of them were in shades.
And I thanked all of them I came across.
You're right.
It's just bullshit to say, oh yeah, yeah, they shot your dad when it was really, as RFK Jr.
has begun to hint.
Now he hasn't brought out the full ammunition.
He doesn't need to.
He doesn't need to.
I would!
No, you don't need to.
He should stay right where he's at, focusing just on what he's focusing on.
He should keep it positive.
He should move forward.
And he shouldn't give the lying mainstream media any cannon fodder for saying, oh, he's a conspiracy theorist.
He should just quit with that and just, just, okay, the past is the past.
Let's talk about moving forward.
That's exactly, in my opinion, what he ought to do.
And that's going to win a lot of hearts and a lot of hearts and a lot of Democrat minds to him.
Because I think the Democrats are starting to wake up and say, Joe Biden was really a huge mistake, as if they haven't already.
So that could put RFK in a really strong position.
Yeah, and what if RFK does that and tells the Democrats, you know, choose.
You want to stick with Biden for another four years?
Or you want to come over with us?
You won't get the chance!
Look at the chance the mainstream media will bury it.
Look, we've seen them censor and destroy.
I mean, they tried to destroy Trump, but what was so funny about Trump is he just laughed it off.
They're going to continue to go after RFK Jr.
the same way, but I think everybody's beginning to realize that CNN is just a CIA puppet.
Everybody's beginning to realize that Rachel Maddow speaks no truth anywhere, anyhow.
Everybody's beginning to realize that Russiagate was an entire setup, and so was January 6th.
Matter of fact, they just announced yesterday that the January 6th committee somehow destroyed the archives.
How could that be?
That was a mistake.
Somebody pressed the delete button, I guess.
That's what they'll have us believe.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, so for this story... This is more...
Of just the, uh, the maneuvers that went on for the timing of the indictment of Trump with bullshit.
And, um, you know, I have no idea that that's going to play out for, uh, it's just as weak as everything else.
So I don't know if any of that is going to end up sticking at all or just with the same history that we've had before of everything that our opponents have tried.
I have a conspiracy theory that I've been toying around with.
It's fun.
I don't know if there's much truth to it, but it's pretty interesting.
The more I thought about it, the more it was a little difficult for me to shake it.
Like, no, that's too far.
That's too much.
That's too much.
But let me ask you a question, Carl.
What happened right after Trump was elected when he went to Saudi Arabia?
That was a very interesting ceremony.
You had that orb-holding thing, but then you also had what I understand is an official sword dance, which communicates a transfer of power.
And this is part of what I'll put into the show notes here at BitChute.
Charlie Freak, he did seven hours of documenting that trip and all of the comms with it, and there's a 49-minute summary of that.
I have not been able to.
I looked.
I tried to research what this sword dance is about.
And I don't know anybody from Saudi Arabia who could confirm it for me or tell me a little bit about it.
But if that is true, then that is a definitive, that is a demonstration of a transfer of the political leadership exactly as Q had promised.
So that was a very interesting Saudi Arabian trip.
What do you see with that, brother?
Okay, so let me just throw this out there as just a nutball idea.
Just a nutball idea.
I don't think that we, the normal day-to-day American people, have a clue what's really going on behind the scenes in terms of what the struggle looks like.
I think that every day they sit down and make the headlines and decide how to drag us along and gaslight us a little bit different.
But let me point this out.
It's my understanding that when Trump went to Saudi Arabia, he took off, he took with him a bunch of boxes of information, which was so incredibly damning to certain Saudi Arabia oligarchs and politicians and, you know, high important people that Saudi, that the real ruler of Saudi Arabia, he took note of all those boxes was like, Oh my God, thank you, Donald Trump.
You have delivered us from this evil.
Now we're going to go arrest all these people and we're going to put them to trial.
And we're going to get rid of this plague that's happened to our way of life and our government.
And it was, in theory, a good thing.
And so they did the sword dance and brought Trump on.
Well, so where did Trump get these documents?
What was in these documents?
And what was in those boxes?
And why were the Saudis so thankful?
Now, we have a problem here in America.
Boxes of documents.
What if there was indeed an agency that had been tracking this pedophile network for years?
What if there was indeed an agency that had been using illegal techniques?
You know, and I mean illegal on the surface, to track this massive pedophile network.
But the problem that they had is since it was obtained illegally, it couldn't be admitted to any sort of court record.
Under any circumstances, because then you'd have to admit your means and methods for how you came about it, and you'd have to show that you've got it by criminal intentions just as well, and boom, it's not admitted as evidence.
So what if the Mar-a-Lago raid had a bunch of boxes of important documents that showed this corruption, and what if by the By the feds going in and getting these documents, those documents became discoverable in some sort of an indictment hearing.
And what if those documents contained sort of the smoking gun evidence, and now all of a sudden they can be entered into evidence because they had been discovered in Mar-a-Lago as a component of Trump's estate.
And so now Trump has the ability, and then of course the Dems appear to be falling for it, Jack Smith, Appears to be the guy that's going after it.
Next thing you know, Trump is given this massive opportunity to re-litigate November the election, the November 20th election, using the documents that were inside the Mar-a-Lago estate.
It's a crazy theory, but if you follow it to where I think it's going along its meandering trail, You end up with Jack Smith as actually an operative for the Trump campaign, who is playing the Democrats to get Trump to allow him to enter this stuff into evidence.
And he's playing his role really, really well as sort of the bumbling, fumbling tool and toy of the Democrats.
And it's all going to turn out that this evidence is going to come out in court, and now it's going to be admissible in all sorts of different trials and hearings.
So it's a fun theory.
The question is, Could it possibly be true?
I just don't know.
I don't know.
I'm at 95% that it is.
One of the clearest voices I've found talking about the pro-Q side is Juan 07.
And the overall story, as I understand it, is when NSA had the capability To take down the usurpers, those who are operated with those hidden families and powers and principalities that are directing them, then NSA had it all.
And that's what Q kept repeating, we have it all.
And in Charlie Freak's documentary, exactly as you said, Brian, they brought out the dossiers and that the individual Leaders, really, puppetitions, were offered a choice of, you're working for us now, and you're going to follow orders, and we're going to give you scripts to read, which you should do pretty good at, because that's all the fuck you've ever done.
Or, you don't want to cooperate?
What's in that dossier is going public.
And they all capitulated, because these people, they have no loyalty.
They're not in it for love.
They have no connections.
Like, all right, you got me.
I'm hired.
Okay, so yeah, so you remember John McCain's funeral?
John McCain's funeral?
Right.
Now, of course, there was people that did this sort of slip of tongue that John McCain had been hung for treason.
Right.
Of course, this is just some crazy theory.
There's nothing out there.
You know, by all of our appearances, it appears that John McCain just died.
Of course, we knew John McCain was a deep state, you know, rhino the whole time.
But all of a sudden, all these high-end, high-powerful people get a little note in an envelope, and everybody's curious about what the hell's in the envelope, because they all sort of go white.
What if it said, we have it all, sign, Donald J. Trump, NSA?
Oh, they'd be sweating.
They would be.
They would be.
And you brought up the point, too, and one of the things that Q Repeated often is how do you introduce evidence legally?
And that would be 1 way that if you told the story, right, you could do it.
The mechanics of the US government, they can work.
They're just trapped in bullshit and judges denying.
Evidence and judges is like the show trial of Jim Fetzer with Sandy hook.
That's 1 way that you could do it with the 60 court cases for 2020 of.
Whatever it is, 57 of them being thrown out and then for the complete tail of the capitulation.
Of the politicians in that 2017 road trip that Trump took, then going to Israel and doing the same thing, going to the Vatican, doing the same thing, going to the European continental leaders and doing the same thing.
And then going to London.
And basically it was the same thing, and those people had new masters.
And then they were acting out this script.
And the amount of time, according to it, is that if we really did... So I can demonstrate that the U.S.
has been a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire for a couple hundred years.
And I'll have that documentation here, I bet you.
Okay, let's take that.
Let's just step into that possibility and imagine if our opponents had 200 years to capture everything, how entrenched they would be.
How long would it take to clean that out, even if you had the commander-in-chief, even if you had military articulate leadership that could present briefings of our quality to the junior officers and to the men to demonstrate, yeah, we've all been had.
But We're taking it back, baby.
So, I see that as completely plausible in where we're at, but, you know, Fog of War and where our seats are in the stadium, most of it is speculation.
But what do you do with the evidence?
You have it piled up in the east wing of the Pentagon and you have it hit by a missile.
Or what do you do?
You pile it up in the building that Timothy McVeigh hit.
Oh, it's all destroyed.
Sorry.
It's all gone.
We lost it all.
Just like the January 6th stuff.
Oh, we hit the delete button.
Just like the technology to go back to the moon.
Yeah, yeah, we lost that too.
All right.
Let's go on to this one.
This one I like.
So this is corporate media, and they're telling a narrative of Obama is fearful of Trump.
So when you force our opponents to admit that they've lost ground, then they come up with some bullshit story.
And the bullshit story they came up with is Obama cautioned Biden that 45 should not be taken lightly.
So they're admitting that intensely loyal, supportive, conservative media.
Oh, they're pretending that the media isn't owned by them.
And a polarized country.
So those are the talking points of what they did.
And it has three points for a reason.
These people are intensely clever, and three talking points is what the history and the research with effective speeches, especially focused in politics, is stick with three.
Literally, humans aren't bright enough to remember four things, but if you stick with three, then that has the greatest punch.
So then they have a bullshit poll saying that Trump and Biden are tied at 43%, and And Obama's going to do... So they're trying to throw Obama's brand also in the mix, so that the Democratic sheeple will associate Biden with Obama, who may be certainly less tarnished than him.
So they just go ahead and they're admitting that it's close.
Well, you remember in 2015 Donald Trump was running for the president and of course all Hillary's advisors telling him he doesn't have a chance and the Democrats are saying, oh, we want to run against Donald Trump.
We want to run against Donald Trump because he's just a big cartoon and he's going to be easy to beat.
And this is, you know, Hillary and her staff out there talking smack.
As a matter of fact, they weren't even worried about Uma Abedin and what was going on with Anthony Weiner.
They were just like, hey, we got this in the bag.
Of course, Bill Clinton was in the background going, hey, I'm married to her, but listen, you better be careful about Donald J. Trump.
Don't underestimate him.
And he kept saying that.
And even Carville even was saying it.
You better, hey, you better, you better hold back.
Everybody's thinking, oh, the Democrats have it in the bag.
And I remember my daughter, Was coming out of University of Wisconsin and it was election day and I emailed her something like that.
And she said, oh, Hillary's got this by a mile.
And I said, don't be so sure.
I think Donald Trump is going to take it.
Of course, woke up in the morning and I was right and she was wrong.
And she said, dad, I don't know how you, of course, in her fishbowl.
She thought it was dead on going to be Hillary Clinton the entire time.
I was looking at it a little differently, and I thought Americans had been pretty much fed up.
But then again, I was looking through a different lens.
So this article about Obama.
I think sort of is.
Oh, here's the wise old Obama trying to sort of.
Headed off at the pass so that he can continue to save face and preserve his legacy as I predicted it.
I predicted it.
Joe Biden have a chance against Donald Trump.
Oh, like that's a real big prediction right now.
Whatever.
So I see that the the overall arching narratives.
It could collapse.
Any moment.
I think we're there.
It could blow up instantly.
It could be up.
So Peter Doocy, the actor Biden was had some event and did you see that little interchange with Peter Doocy?
comes over and around a barrier to ask him about the, let's see, the question was the allegations of him receiving money, I believe.
And he could have a sharper question.
So they're still just, they allowed Joe Biden to say that it was all a lie.
Which is always helpful testimony.
I mean, when these people are talking, you should say, oh, tell me more.
But Ducey could have said, is that the Jordan's Committee released documentation that Hunter and you received $20 million from Burisma.
What was the exchange of service that you provided to receive that money?
Try to get a little sharp question.
Yeah, we already know.
Part of it was to make sure Shokin didn't come after Burisma.
And of course, as all criminals do, the brazen criminal Joe Biden gets on national television and brags about it.
Hey, we got Shokin fired.
It seems to me that that money had a lot to do with it.
Maybe that was just the first stage of the operation and it's like, hey, Let me show you that I can get choked and fired by leveraging this billion dollars of U.S.
taxpayer money, theoretically, that was going to go to Ukraine.
And I'll show that I can get choked and fired to sort of do a show of force.
And then you guys just make the transfer later to kind of thank me and buy the next contract, you know?
Yeah, yeah.
And that's pretty obvious what happened.
And Burisma's owner testified that that was true.
And he says, yeah, yeah, I wanted the guy, I wanted our You can't prosecute us because we're dirty.
They'll find a pot.
Well, hell, Joe, we're all dirty over here.
We just need to play dirtier than the next guy.
Yeah.
We'll give you $10 million to help us play dirtier than the next guy.
Okay, I'll play dirty.
I'll leverage the American people and the American taxpayer and the American goodwill over this one single prosecutor, and I'll show you how powerful we really are.
So do you think, or do you see it also that it could be any time?
I mean, literally any time where this charade could just blow up?
I don't know.
I don't know.
You know, people have been sort of predicting sort of an apocalyptic economic collapse of some sort for a long, long time.
I mean, going back to the 60s and 50s, there was people with their nuclear bumper.
Bunkers and then in the 70s there was sort of the Jesus movement that sort of went headed to the hills and of course you had a bunch of different religious cults that have developed over the years and you've had a lot of people that were preppers that just you know spent all their money on their sort of cabin in the woods and of course now they're just rotting and dying so here we are in 2023 and
You know, for all the things I have to say about America, for all the lies and all the deception and all the deceit that just turns my stomach, one thing I can say about it is we probably deserve to be a third world country, and yet we're still where we are.
We still have a semblance and modicum of prosperity.
So somehow, through all the terrible things we've done, whatever these guys are doing, they've managed to protect American prosperity.
Now, good times make weak men.
And here we are.
The boomers that were before us are now dropping off.
At least the boomers had some adversity.
A little.
And of course, the generation before them had it even harder.
They were World War II.
But now, here's us.
What, we had the Gulf War?
That's our adversity?
We got to see a couple of our high school buddies go over there and blow the shit out of some Iraqis?
That's our adversity?
That's our fight that we've had to be through?
I'm 50 years old.
I feel weak in comparison To my fathers and my father's fathers.
I don't have to.
I don't have to go out there and tend the garden, although I do.
I don't have to go out there and do the dishes.
Because I got a dishwasher.
I don't have to worry about my food going bad because I have a nice refrigerator.
I don't have to worry about it.
Oh, and if by the way, if I feel like going to get a burger, I'll run down to McDonald's and get myself a $6 hamburger.
I mean, it's like there's no.
And if I'm sort of feeling lazy because I spent a day on the road, then I can sit down on the couch and turn on the tube and veg out and kill my brain for the next seven hours.
Our generation is this weak.
Think about how weak the next generation will be with their cell phones and their 24-7 TikTok.
We will collapse.
And I think that's been the plan all along.
You know, both of my grandfathers were lied into the American Expeditionary Force in World War I. My mom's dad was a tradesman.
He was a pneumatic engineer for the braking systems of trains, and he was stationed in Paris, and he had fond stories of French food and French women.
And my dad's dad, refused to tell any war stories.
And my dad said that he had, he was pretty sure that he was in the trenches, but whenever the topic came up, my dad would say he would just turn darkly serious and just say, I do not tell war stories.
And then my father, my wife's father, my only uncle, They were in World War Two.
My dad was a little too young.
He was trained as a tank driver and some of his classmates were sent off to the Battle of the Bulge and were killed.
My mom's brother, his hair, he was a captain, his hair turned white.
After the war, immediately back in.
And my two brothers and I, we asked our Uncle Jack of what did he do in the war?
And his answer was he, he made sure he had all of our attention.
And he said, boys, you don't want to know.
And I don't want to tell you.
And that was that.
Now, our generation.
This is the, from our planners, this was going to be the finishing blow.
The PSYOP, the kill shots, the mandates, the great reset, the eat bugs, the great culling.
And then the ones who would be left would be so programmed, and as you said, this sense of so weakened.
And then they would be the kind of the raw material that they could program and and adjust and genetically modify into.
We can only say a slave race, but really this animal farm type race is more accurate because so much.
If their vision was successful, imagine the expansion and the opportunities of adrenochrome farming for you.
Yes!
Join a bright future!
It would have to expand exponentially.
And then, you know, once you've really won the planet, the R&D that you could pump into that for the highest quality adrenochrome possible.
Yeah, organs.
I mean, there's slaves, you got money, you don't.
I mean, there's Hollywood and Netflix have been telegraphing that maneuver for quite a while, that there would be a class that could just live forever because they could just go get fresh organs and, you know, and oh, there's a repo agency that comes around and repossesses them.
So there's, there's a lot of, you know, what does the future hold?
A lot of conjecture and a lot of talk on that.
I think it's interesting to make the discussion and have the discussion as to where we are.
We have to deal with the here and now right now and kind of figure out what's going on.
And I think the next year or year and a half is going to be very telling as to what's really going on.
Yeah, yeah.
We'll see what develops.
We'll all see what happens together.
And yeah, we did get telegraphs in the movie industry, you know, with Idiocracy, where they're kind of driving us in.
There was a movie with Ewan McGregor.
It was an island where the humans were basically replacement parts.
Yeah, they had clones.
Yeah.
In theory, you know.
Yeah.
Oh, they cloned Dolly the Sheep in what, 1989?
Yeah, there's no clones out there.
Don't worry about it.
Move on.
Yeah, yeah.
Makes you think of the Alien series with Sigourney Weaver and what she discovered of how they got to where she was as a clone.
Yeah, that was an interesting story.
Waymar, Weimer Corporation or something.
paid for them to go out there and mine the ores and then they find out that they were really out there to pick up the aliens.
It's all science fiction, but in all this fiction, there's somebody's imagination that just was able to conceive of it.
And you wonder, you know, you wonder if there's sort of a premonition there.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, I'm sure that you would do it if you take any venture seriously.
If you need to send people out there to be consumed by the aliens, then you would come up with a cover story.
Of course.
All right, so this... We've been on for an hour, so maybe we'll just go a little bit... Yeah, let's find something else.
Okay.
So this is just propaganda trying to tarnish anybody, challenge him.
And, uh, this story here, this is just more theater.
Oh yeah.
Oh yeah.
That's theater.
Gavin Newsom.
That's theater.
I mean, California is the worst run state.
I mean, I can't think of a place that's worse except for maybe Detroit or, you know, there's some terrible places, but California, give me a break.
I mean, look what Nancy, look what happened to San Francisco.
I mean, what a mess.
Yep, yep, yep.
And this is a nice little point here in this undercover video where Nancy Pelosi's daughter is saying a nice line here that if January 6th had no guns and no plans, then that's exactly... Yeah, that was clearly a staged setup.
I don't even think there's anybody that is left that doesn't understand how they gaslight us into January 6th insurrection.
Yeah.
We can play a little bit of this.
See, I think time is going to remember January 6th.
Right now, people would feel like, you know, there's two things.
Media needs stuff to fill.
I mean, if you watch TV on January 6th, it's like, January 6th, 24-7.
As time goes on, it's going to be less.
So I think also people are going to lose their office, their jobs.
The people that were there will lose their jobs.
It's not going to mean anything if you weren't even there.
Listen, I really, um, I know you're not the bad guy.
I mean, I haven't found the bad guy yet.
Listen, I really, I know you're not the bad guy.
I mean, I haven't found the bad guy yet.
If there is, I know you're the bad guy.
You're like a scared people bad guy.
But the thing is, why I asked you the question, like, so what was the plan?
Is that if there was an interaction, you were supposed to be in line, launching your You're in the military.
You know this.
You must have no plan.
Exactly.
You sit down overnight with your soldiers.
You go over.
All right.
You're going to go here.
You're going to go in by this side.
At this time, we're going to take over this.
There was none of that.
Exactly.
And Exactly.
That's well stated.
Well, I hate to say this out loud, but I felt that the protest should have been at the big old obelisk sitting in the middle of Washington, D.C.
It's just that damn monument.
to masonry and masonic symbolism that massive obelisk slash ashera pole fertility symbol that matches what's in vatican makes me sick and it reminds me of sort of the deep state apparatus now they've of course tried to reformat the symbol into some symbol of great patriotism but if you just look at the layout you just look at the look at how it really sits
this is this is a monument to masonry freemasonry which is another breed of a very old fertility cult and you You know, I had a 32nd-degree Freemason the other day tell me that there's nothing in Masonry that's not in the Bible, and I laughed.
I mean, I literally stood in the driveway and laughed at him, and I said, you know, we tend to want to bring people into our fold.
And we don't lie about it, and we don't need secret handshakes to do so.
We don't have to hide the fact that we are what we are.
Either you're going to be proud of it or you're going to be ashamed of it, but it is what it is.
We don't have to go hide in some sort of super secret ceremony and sort of pat each other on the back and have some sort of rituals performed in order to be a part of something important.
As a Christian, I mean, we're at church and we invite everybody and their brother to come on down, no big deal.
But these guys, hey, you got to go through this ritual and this ritual and this ritual to get you into it.
And I see masonry as, if not a major source of the trouble.
I look at the world's sort of mega troubles in terms of radical Zionism, Judaism.
I look at it in terms of the Jesuits and the special orders that are a part of Vatican.
And I look at it in terms of Freemasons as sort of the gatekeeper class.
And I see these globalist bank or bankster cartels and the pedophile network that sort of controls the billions and billions of dollars as part of it is sort of the quadruple axis of evil.
So it's not the White House that I'm after.
It's not a black guy that I'm after.
It's not.
And government, really, what is government?
A lot of people.
that are doing their jobs.
Do you know government represents 15% of the U.S.
population government jobs of some sort?
1.5 out of 10 people works for the government and is funded by the government.
That means you have eight and a half people working to fund one person's salary, plus all the overhead, plus all the expenses, plus the retirement and the medical and the dental, plus the buildings and the structures and the air conditioners and the brand new trucks that you see all the government agencies have.
Government is the rotten machine that our founding fathers tried to avoid going corrupt.
Remember, they wanted smaller government.
Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense, the Declaration of Independence, because of the pilgrims coming over from an over Where they had to, you know, they had to serve the Lord and serve the king.
And they had all these regulations that made life impossible.
So they wanted religious freedom.
So they all come here.
So you got this rugged individualist class that founds America.
And they're like, hey, if we're going to make this run, it's going to be home of the free and land of the brave.
We're gonna go ahead and give them the structure to do it, and the structure is you all organize your well-run militia, and you guys have freedom of speech, and government's supposed to be small, of the people, by the people, for the people.
Now government represents 15% of all working-class adults?
Boy, something has gotten out of whack.
And that's why I like what happened with the Supreme Court decision last week.
Did you see that?
It was called Chevron.
The Chevron.
That was the legal issue was called the Chevron doctrine.
And what the Supreme Court came out and said is that the ATF can no longer make their own policy.
Because what had happened is that the power structure would have these bureaucratic entities, which would then be able to make their own policies, which they would enforce as law.
So the ATF was the big policy.
The big thing was the gun stocks.
And ATF was like, we're going to make our own Make our own rules related to these gun stocks, because we're bureaucrats and we're put in a position to enforce this.
And so we're going to interpret it this way.
Well, the Supreme Court came out and said, no, no, Congress has to pass a law.
If you're going to enforce it as a law, other than that, do your damn job and stop making policy law.
And that's what they did, which could represent a massive change in the way America is governed, because these guys just don't have the calendar time To consider all these different issues, which is just so people know why we have these big, thick 6,000 page bills, is because you have all these different pet issues that belong to every politician in the game.
And if you want to get a vote, you slip their pet issue into it.
That's why you get multi-million dollar, hundred million dollar bridges and over to nowhere and all sorts of garbage stuff.
And then, of course, once their budget gets a certain level, It just has to get bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger.
More people, more people.
We don't have enough.
We can't do it.
The government's completely out of control.
But government is the symptom.
It's the symptoms of a sick political class that doesn't understand what Americans really are.
With government and the appreciation of how much our opponents had captured after hundreds of years of work.
They had everybody.
They had everybody.
The political leaders are just script reader puppetitions.
They're given their talking points and they create false flags and narratives to push that.
And the government really is split up into two main areas.
One is a cover story where policemen pretend to, they do their job.
And all the people do their job, like teachers.
Yeah, they do their job, and they think that they're supporting a good system.
The U.S.
is similar to the Capital District in the Hunger Games.
People are proud to be here.
It's much better than the other shitholes, where there were open John Perkins economic hitmen, slaves to the system.
And the other part of it is exactly what you're saying.
It's the bureaucrat class.
And those people, if you really have a parasitical system, then they try to remain hidden.
And the bureaucrats attempt to dictate policy, to interpret the law as applied to their agency, to carry out the law.
That's what they're going to say as a cover story.
And then they'll just say whatever they are ordered to say by the order givers.
For the Washington Monument, have you seen the documentary series by architect Scott Onstott, Secrets in Plain Sight?
No.
Okay, good.
I'll put the link for our peeps, and I'm just going to go ahead and share this, and then we'll have any final comments.
Oh, that looks like a good channel.
Lots of neat stuff in there.
Yeah, so this professional architect, Scott, and by the way, for the Washington Monument, after reading the law... Let's go here.
For the Washington Monument, Scott goes... Yeah, there it is.
Sick, sick, sick stuff.
That's a hexagram.
The very top of this is the Masonic Lodge of Washington, D.C.
Yeah, that's a hexagram.
That's a pentagram.
Oh, you know, the more you study symbolism and the more you get down to the deep, deep, deep meanings behind it, there's the all-seeing eye.
The more you begin to realize that there is really a conspiracy of madness.
Yeah.
And I mean madness behind it.
They're serious about this and they do apply this geometry.
to get the result that they wanted in numerology.
And Scott, so as a professional architect, he wrote a paper that was published in a professional journal.
And he just cited, golly gee, all these capitals of the earth, they, they all incorporate this geometry.
And as soon as that got out, all kinds of people gave him information.
And he began producing documentaries.
And in these documentaries, the very first one, The Secrets in Plain Sight, which I recommend, that's four hours of material.
And since then, he has, I think, made three more documentaries.
So it's just wonderful information.
And it's secrets in plain sight, and you can find it in all kinds of I'll subscribe to that channel.
That looks like a lot of fun for a weekend.
Yeah, yeah.
It's an excellent documentary.
Well, all right, brother.
Any concluding remarks that you wish to make?
Man, are we out of time already?
Did we just chatter along like that that whole time?
Yeah.
You know, I guess my concluding remark would be a little story.
I'd spent I'm back at home now, but a lot of people know that I was up in Jasper pretty much all summer.
And that was at the lake house because we have a family member that's having a medical emergency and my wife had to be real close.
And anyway, in three weeks, I got three, what I consider to be completely frivolous driving violations, Class C misdemeanors.
I got two and my wife got one.
Now I hadn't had something like that in a long, long, long time.
And then all of a sudden to get three and one.
Well, by the time the third one hit, it was so frivolous.
It was like a yellow light.
I was like, what the heck?
Oh, and my, my registration sticker had been expired for like seven days.
And they, they kind of threw the book at me and I, you know, this feels like a fundraising scheme.
And so I got a little upset when they had set my calendar date to go to court on this ticket, only 11 days, which the statutory minimum is 10.
My calendar day to go pay the ticket was 11 days later.
And on like the 10th day, I got a call from this little clerk trying to get me to take a plea and get my money.
And she called it like eight in the morning.
I was just not in the mood, like what?
And it was a spending spree this summer, so I wasn't really feeling like paying that ticket, and I wasn't really feeling like making a plea, and so I kind of got a little snippy with her, and she got upset.
You could tell she was upset because she was sort of taking it personally, and maybe I was trying to make it personal, but I didn't, like, I kind of treated her like a collections agent, you know, just... Well, I went down to finally resolve it because I said, I want to see that video before I pay this ticket, and if it's true that that, like, I'll pay it.
But I need to see that video.
And so the court clerk was like, well, I don't really like this guy.
He's been a real jerk to me on the phone.
And, you know, obviously she's been sitting around in her small town talking about her interaction with Brian Davidson.
And, um, so I go in and I watched the video sitting with the judge and the judge is a good old boy.
And he's like, I know so-and-so, and you know, so-and-so, and we all, cause courts, you know, and, um, I could tell that she was really personally hurt.
Now she's just a young little lady.
And so when I was walking out, I said, I'll just plead guilty and pay it.
I'm done with this.
You know, they got me.
They got me by about a quarter of a second, but they got me.
And I could tell she was just personally hurt about the way I'd talked to her.
And so, because I kind of saw like a collection agent for a small town, just trying to get money from me, just like small town government.
That's what they do.
Which is probably wrong because she's a government employee.
Well, I gave her a hard time.
She was hurt.
And she basically just kind of slapped it on me.
And she said, you know, you treated me like a dog.
I was trying to help you and you treated me like a dirty dog.
And I'm just sick about it.
And I'm just, you know, I'm glad that you're here, but I'm sick about it.
And I thought about that.
And so I came back to my office and I was embarrassed when she said that.
Cute little girl from a small town.
You can just tell she, you know, sort of, you know, just, I felt bad about it.
And I came back and I started reflecting on the issue.
And I said, what caused me to act like that?
And I began to realize that it's my overall frustration with government.
It's my overall frustration with government getting, I need a permit for this.
I need to pay this tax.
I got to pay this burial tax.
I got to pay this Mary tax.
I got to pay.
I got to pay this.
I got to go get permission from these people in that permission.
And then I got cops pulling me over on the side of the road for doing 55 and a 45.
And it's like it was my overall frustration with government.
And so upon introspection, I decided to draft an email to her.
And let her know, hey, I'm sorry about that.
I feel embarrassed completely.
But I want you to understand that my frustration, it wasn't personal.
You're a lovely person.
The people from your town are all lovely people.
I'm just frustrated that I feel like the government is taxing me for driving down the street.
And to me, it feels like a tax when you're just going to pull over a Lexus because it's driving through your small town truck.
And matter of fact, the judge even said that to me.
He even told me that when I was reviewing the paperwork.
Reviewing the video, he's like, well, you're driving a Lexus.
What'd you expect?
In a truck, you probably would have gotten away with it.
And it was true.
It was true.
Anyway, so I went back to the office and I thought, you know, I need to help this young lady understand how I feel.
And I wrote her this big, long email outlining articles, government, what it's for, serve the people.
And of course I prefaced it with, I'm very sorry.
I treated you that way.
I'm embarrassed.
And it was unfortunate.
I hope you take the time to read this email because it wasn't personal and I wish you the best.
And then I wrote sort of a treatise on government and she fires back the next morning.
She fired back an email to me and she says, she says, so thank you so much.
For some reason, your words hurt more than they normally do.
And I appreciate everything you're saying.
I grew up in a house that, you know, we didn't have air conditioning, and we didn't have heat for two years, and mom and dad were gone, and it was finally repossessed, and we always had to deal with all these challenges.
And I, too, feel the same way you do, but I'm glad to have this job.
And I thought about that.
Being in this community, you tend to hate government.
But I gotta be honest with you, it's the big Fed-level stuff, you know?
The big FBI, CIA, IRS, EOC, just all these big federal, I despise them.
I feel like they're just not worth my money.
I need local law enforcement.
And why am I paying for all this?
And anyway, so my point in closing remarks is, folks, Don't, don't do that.
These people work for the government.
They're trying to do their job.
Government should be smaller.
A lot of them probably shouldn't have a job.
Yes, they get medical and dental and retirement.
They get it all for free, but they're still just people trying to do a job.
And not everybody has an opportunity like a lot of us to be independent or retired or separate or, you know, have our own money.
And so just, just don't do it.
Don't do what I did.
The condition that we're in just, In general, my closing remarks is that we've all been poisoned, tortured, and mind-controlled.
We're in a type of hell.
Okay?
And we can quantify that, as I often do, is that our masters annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot Trillions.
And the extent of it is like the television show.
I never really watched any episodes, but my wife was watching some of them.
It's a show called The Bad Place.
Have you heard of that one, Brian?
Nope.
So the premise of The Bad Place is that these people have died and they're in hell.
But they're told they're in heaven, so that the torture becomes more exquisite.
And gradually, the characters begin to question, why do these bad things keep happening to us if we're in heaven?
And they have an angel, who's actually just a demon, gaslight them all the time about why these things happen.
But finally, they figure it out.
Finally, they figure it out.
Oh, and we're not happy.
We thought we'd be happy in heaven, but we're not happy.
We're we're in the bad place.
And it all makes sense to them.
And then they look back and they see they were torturing us the whole time.
Yeah.
So there is going to be a background where.
Dante said, and I take it to heart, abandon all hope.
He who enter here and I have to remind myself all the time like sometimes I get optimistic and and then something disappointing happens is, oh, I was hopeful again.
It's like that Charlie Brown with the football thing and Shakespeare's hell is empty.
All the demons are here and they really are.
Except that, again, I'm at 95%, is that what we're seeing is a script playing out.
And I'll put the Charlie Freak documentation link at bitchute.
But I would predict that all of these narratives are going to poetically come to a close all at once.
And that is going to be the end of the Ukraine war, the end of the Biden Pay to play the coven crimes against humanity, the exposure of the great reset, but for the ordinary people who are so programmed, they're beginning to question reality, but they, I think.
The economic shock is going to be what's going to happen with the BRICS gold-backed currency, and I'll put an article here in BitChute with my complete explanation of that.
But basically, if people are looking to invest and they have an option to have your currency backed by gold, or the U.S.
crazy inflation where the actual rate is twice The official stated, right, and just go to shadow stats for economist John Williams documentation at the graphs of what the real inflation rate is.
I think there's going to be a shock event, but all of this is scripted.
I do know for sure an academic certainty and that's going to be in that economic essay is that we do have the superior mechanics ready right now, baby.
And that's basically called monetary reform and public banking.
And there are even paradigms beyond that.
When we escape from the suppressed technology, when we get free energy, there's going to be a lot of great options.
So, hang in there, patriots.
Withdraw consent.
Be able to point to the documentation if that becomes necessary.
And, you know, I'm sharing what I can as a professional scholar to help you out, just to have... it's not going to make anything else easier.
It's probably going to do nothing to make you more successful if you're like me and my family members.
I'm just trying to wait it out and be as helpful to them as I can.
All right.
Well, Brian, thanks, brother, for being here.
And to our audience members, thank you for all that you do for your intellectual integrity and moral courage.
And it is tough.
And we're just sharing and we've taken a lot of losses and a lot of lumps on this journey the same as you.
Anything else you want to say, brother?
Nope.
All right.
Jim will be back tomorrow, Friday, and all of the next two weeks, I believe, or at least one.
No, he's going to start on the 21st.
So that's in 11 days.
So next week, he'll be back except for next Thursday, where he is going to be on Michael Rivero's show hosting once more.
And then again, he's going to be feeling it out as he takes Michael Rivero's place and determine The content which may be at least a partial transfer from what we're doing here to there.
▲
Export Selection