Need to Know News (20 July 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Petzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California, and by Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
Meanwhile, we're bringing you all the news you need to know.
Serious situation in relation to Ukraine.
The Russians have completely blockaded the Odessa port after a massive missile and rocket attack.
Slaughter of men forced into the Ukrainian army continues.
Here we have an analysis.
We won't watch it all, but we'll watch our part.
Hello, my dear friends!
You're on the Military Summary channel and today we will discuss the situation in Ukraine on the 19th of July of 2023.
Today we have significant number of updates, so let's start.
The Ministry of Defense of Russian Federation, the Russians, have officially announced the trade and naval blockade of Odessa port.
They reported that at 12 p.m.
of the local time on the 20th of July they will block this port and they will consider every single ship heading in direction of idea support as a ship who has munition and ammo on board.
The Russians haven't reported that they will destroy or attack these ships but I believe that the Russians are going to raise the stakes and if they understand enough for sure they will do and they will make some actions against that ship.
Furthermore, the Minister of Defense reported that currently it is very dangerous to be in this area because of mines, because of significant number of mines in the Black Sea.
I'll remind you that the previous night the Russians made significant missile attack against Odessa.
During the videos that we get during the previous night we haven't received and we didn't understand the real number of forces and real number
of missiles and drones that the Russians were used but today during the day we got some kind of pictures from the raiders and these pictures as I understand was made by the Russian forces they published this and they gave these pictures to the open source and basically on these pictures you can see a lot of red dots a lot of red icons and every single red icon red arrow is either missile or drone or rocket or maybe even a plane or air forces
So, as you can see, there were a significant number of missiles of all these types of weapons that were launched in the direction of the Odessa region.
And basically, according to these pictures, we see that there were at least three directions of the Russian attack.
The central direction was in Odessa.
So, according to that picture we see that one of the waves of attack was in direction of Odessa and the missiles and rockets were flying above along this direction.
The second direction was in the south.
You see this one?
And the second direction was heading in direction of the southern part of Odessa region.
And there was the third direction.
And the third direction was about the southern part of Nikolaev probably area we can say.
And this is the third wave of attack.
So basically the Russians attack a lot of facilities, a lot of big number of military positions, military objects all along the bank of Black Sea River in Odessa and Nikolaev region.
We had a lot of videos of those explosions and this is one of the probably video that show us the significant results of those missile attacks.
We see a lot of explosions, heavy explosions in the city along the ports and this morning the Russian sources published and Ukrainian sources published the photo of the results of those attacks and this is the photo of Odessa port and basically the Russians destroyed the part of the port that Ukrainians were using for
for packing the ships that arrived in Odessa port furthermore the Russian sources published another video not a photo it's satellite photo of Odessa Airport this video is geolocated this one and basically this photo shows the fire on the territory in the vicinity of the airport so basically we see that as a result of missile attack the Russians managed to destroy The warehouses, ammo depots, fuel depots and so on.
But, and this is just a video and photo confirmations of results of the central middle part of attack.
And according to the picture we saw of the waves of attack, the Russians also were attacking the southern Odessa region.
There are a lot of airports in the NATO countries and the United States of America tried to use this region for building military infrastructure, for drones, for Let me say, there's more, but it's all positive for Russia and bad for Ukraine.
Carl, your thoughts?
That was a primary target, as I understand, for the Russians, because the recent Ukrainian attack of drones and Navy drones that Ukrainians were using were made from the southern part of Ukraine, not from Odessa, but from this area, and the Russians were trying to destroy it.
Also... - Let me say there's more, but it's all positive for Russia and bad for Ukraine.
Karl, your thoughts? - Well, so the Odessa port is attacked, okay.
And then it's blockaded.
All right.
And we got mines.
Okay.
So that's typical war stuff.
We're 1.5 years into the war.
And for me, the most outstanding characteristic of the war is the destruction of the US UK, France, Germany, NATO's position to reject what had been established under Minsk and also the current ongoing peace terms of the Russians.
And that is just democracy for the eastern part of what was Ukraine, not anymore with Crimea and the Donbass voting for their independence and political allegiance with Russia.
So the West doesn't want democracy and they don't want peace.
They want to go ahead and spend these billions and billions of dollars to Ukraine while the destruction of the countries, the US, the UK, Germany, France, and NATO continues.
So this is a extraordinary condition and we keep wondering how long it could go on, but it's going to go on further.
It's just remarkable how bad the Western nations are looking. - Brian. - Well, remember what nations are giving up in order to be in NATO and what they're giving it up for,
First of all, they're giving up 2% of their gross domestic product, basically, but they're able to join a military alliance that's supposed to keep them safe and give them access to the latest technology to help them win a war.
Russia's smoking Ukraine, and Ukraine theoretically has access to almost all the tech that NATO would have access to.
As a matter of fact, Ukraine now is getting cluster bombs from the United States, which is a war crime in and of itself, in order to try to fight the Russians.
It's my understanding that the Russians have them outgunned so much so that for every 700 rounds that Ukraine released.
60,000 rounds are released by Russia.
So, Russia has everybody completely outgunned and Russia has apparently planned in advance and knows how to thwart the drone attacks that Ukraine has been trying.
So, ask yourself this question going forward.
If NATO forces And the Western Alliance cannot help Ukraine beat Russia any more efficiently than they are.
Why should they give their portions of their sovereignty plus 2% of their gross domestic product to NATO for military purposes?
The problem that NATO has is very, very bad and right now they're openly discussing leapfrogging Ukraine's Troops to help them try to win this war, which is going to make the situation much, much worse all around.
So not only have since, since the Minsk agreements have been exposed as completely false and the Western word can't be trusted to do anything in terms of negotiations.
If Ukraine can't possibly pull this out, even with the help of NATO, even though they're not a member.
That shows how weak NATO really is, so why would you join NATO?
I know that I haven't thought through all of this, but BRICS had 40 new applications.
Now, BRICS is obviously a financial platform, and UN is obviously sort of a military support platform, and theoretically a human rights platform, but it appears to me that many of the nations that have managed to maintain their independence are siding with the independent BRICS platform, even though it's financial versus military.
Maybe it's not the same sort of thing, but NATO's looking really, really weak right now.
And I guess the question is, why would you join NATO if they can't help Ukraine beat Russia and join them?
It's very bad for NATO.
It's very bad for the United States.
The whole thing is just ugly.
Everybody's word has been tossed into the wind, with the exception of Putin, who's just apparently very wisely dragged this thing out so long that it's become such an embarrassment.
I think NATO is going to lose their position globally as sort of the go-to Western alliance organization and What's there to replace them?
I agree completely.
It seems to mean there would have been a peace agreement long ago, surrendering to Russia, Crimea, the Donbass, and whatever else it wanted, but for Israel's desire to have all of Ukraine and surrender not a square inch to Russia, not Crimea, not Donbass, or any of the rest.
Israel wants it all, and they're going to fight this war to the last, soldier of NATO.
Carl?
And to make the West look even worse, you're talking about that 2% price tag to contribute into the coffers for NATO.
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the 1990 World Summit for Children that the political lobbying organization Results.org, where I was a key volunteer, We had that for heads of state in 1990, and we came in, along with many of the other peace groups, and said, hey, so, you know, the Soviet Union is no longer a threat, and the money that you're giving for self-defense should be reinvested.
And we came in at 0.7% of the gross national income, the GNI, to contribute to the end of poverty.
And that had all of the support, including with the CIA, saying the best way to defeat terrorism is to end poverty.
And so we had all the agreement, everybody said OK, and then the US, UK, France, Germany, all those developed countries went home and reneged on every promise, public and private, to end poverty.
And since 1990, the cost has been roughly somewhere over 400 million human lives destroyed by this ongoing intentional policies of poverty.
So the idea that the West cares about democracy and human rights and people is absolutely refuted by the picture and what Jim said.
It's so powerful.
The commitment to war and destruction.
It's a stark choice and we're just trying to help that choice become visible.
And to underline one of Brian's points, the word of the West is useless.
You can't have a negotiated settlement.
This is all going to be raw power politics and Russia is in control.
Meanwhile, Biden Bumbling NATO debut.
Guess who's laughing now?
Joe Biden's brain goes haywire during NATO presser in Finland.
His latest European tour, this time to attend various NATO meetings, is going about as well as you'd expect.
The following day it became painfully clear why Biden skipped a dinner.
He was like a lost puppy, stumbling and shuffling around as other NATO leaders tried to show him the way.
It seems he's in a perpetual state of confusion, never quite where he should be or what he should be doing to top it off.
He even misstook Vladimir Zelensky for Vladimir.
Oops!
Embarrassing, to say the least.
Biden pulls out his pre-selected list of reporters to call on at his press conference in Finland.
Curtis Hoek tweets, CNN's Arlette says, you're seeing the GOP grappling with tying abortion rights and defense issues, including a block on military promotions by Senator Tuberville.
Biden's brain malfunctioned as he attempts to read from his script in Finland.
The fun didn't stop there.
When it was time for Biden to take questions from the press, he whipped out a cheat sheet with a preselected list of reporters to call upon.
Seriously?
Is he playing a game of bingo or running the country?
Two questions were all he took.
One was a completely ridiculous and biased one from the CNN reporter we've just heard.
Can we please have some balance and fairness from the press?
Get to the main event.
The brain haywire moment everyone's been waiting for.
Brace yourself, folks.
Here's a transcript of Biden attempting to introduce some foreign official.
Frederiksen, Denmark, the Minaret, the Ministry, the miniseries, Colbannon, Daughter of Ireland, the Daughter of Ireland, you can tell that's a 40-something, I'm thinking of whom, Daughter of Iceland, whom I want to say I think we've had a very productive summit.
I can't even begin to comprehend what he was trying to say.
It's like watching a toddler trying to recite Shakespeare.
Why on earth are Biden's handlers still putting him in these situations?
It's a clear-ass day, and he's struggling with basic speaking and reading tasks.
It's incredibly unfair to him and, frankly, embarrassing for the country.
Yeah, any doubt.
Here it is.
Fredrickson of Denmark and the Ministry of Cobalt's daughter of Ireland.
Daughter of Ireland.
You can tell that's a 40-inch clip.
I'm thinking of home.
The daughter of Iceland.
And I want to say, I think we've had a very productive summit.
Fredrickson.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, I want to point out that we covered the beginning of Biden's Finland visit, where he attempted to gobble on an infant coming out of the airport with that film clip that we showed, and the infant trying to escape, but there was no place to go.
Two questions for a press conference from
CNN with that one softball question, whatever the other one was, it just gets more and more peak clown show, and it is just... I both like it, I'm attracted to it, seeing the destruction, I like the destruction, and at the same time, I'm also repulsed by how ridiculous it is, and of course, how dangerous it might be to everyone on Earth.
Yeah, it's damaging to Biden and the Democrats, but embarrassing and belittling of the United States in the eyes of the world, Brian.
Well, we knew he was a puppet.
We just didn't know he was stuffed this badly.
You know, if they want a puppet, go find at least a well-spoken one like Barack Obama.
This guy is a clown.
It's terrible.
I guess what I foresee as a result of Joe Biden is a complete loss of respect from the rest of the world.
I mean, they've got to be waking up to the fact that we allowed this to take place somehow, and they've got to be thinking, well, they must have had their elections fixed like ours are fixed, because there's no way the American people would elect this guy over Donald J. Trump, a world Phenomenal in terms of leadership and in terms of appreciation around the world.
The fighting never ends with these Democrats.
They have, I mean, they have their head in the sand about what is going on here.
It doesn't seem like they have an alternate plan whatsoever.
I'm sure there are factions within the Democrat Party that are talking about Gavin Newsom and maybe somebody else, but it might just be Simply too late.
And of course, today was the great day of the censorship hearings, which RFK Jr.
went to.
And the gaslighting was so obvious that they were just doing everything they could to keep this away with the hearings yesterday related to the Biden business deals.
If you go to, I think it's house.oversight.gov.
Let's see if I can find this.
It was really good.
Maybe I closed.
No, it's oversight.house.gov slash the Biden's influence peddling timeline.
The House has put together a very clear cut case of how the timeline has developed with whatever Biden is or was over all the years, taking all this money for all their different, all their family members.
I mean, why pick a puppet that's this corrupt?
Why not find a puppet that has a good face?
Something doesn't add up about this.
And if they continue this track, you can be guaranteed that that nasty tiger called the Globalist Deep State is going to be cornered prior to the next election cycle in 2022 or 2024.
in 2022 or 2024.
And when you corner a tiger, they lash out.
So I've predicted that there's not going to let this election to happen.
They're going to find a reason to shut off the lights and then roll out the CBDCs with some sort of false flag or some sort of event.
I really predict that in the next two years, they'll have no choice because if they let Trump get in there and Trump is capable of cleaning up the Department of Justice and the FBI, these people will never, ever, ever hold power again.
And I think they're going to fire back like there's no end to it.
Rhinos too!
Those are great points, Ryan, and that's why they're piling on with one absurd indictment after another, plus to distract from all the evidence emerging about the Biden crime family.
They feel if they can talk nonstop about Trump, no one will piece it together.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene exposes Hunter for trafficking women and shows graphic images of his sexual activities during a hearing.
Wednesday, House Oversight Committee held long-awaited hearings on two IRS whistleblowers exposing the wrongdoing that took place during their investigation with U.S.
District Attorney David Wise into Hunter Biden.
During the hearing, MTG argued, Hunter participated in trafficking women, asking whistleblower Joseph Ziegler.
During your testimony with the House Ways and Means Committee, you stated that through bank records, you identified Hunter was paying prostitutes related to a potential prostitution ring.
She went on to explain that an excerpt from a suspicious activity report talks about human trafficking in regard to Hunter and Owaska and payments he was making.
What is even more troubling to me is that the DOJ has brought no charges against Hunter that'll vindicate the rights of these women, who are clearly victims under the law.
Adding the investigative team was looking into investigation of the Mann Act, which forbids transportation of individuals across state lines for sexual purposes.
Here is proof.
Hunter paid prostitutes to his law firm, Owosko PC, and trafficked his victims across state lines in violation of the Mann Act.
Not only that, but IRS whistleblower confirmed Hunter committed tax fraud by deducting payments to prostitutes from Owosko's taxes.
Marjorie Taylor Greene tweets, Here's proof!
Hunter paid prostitutes his law firm and tracked his victims across state lines.
Now that IRS whistleblower confirmed Hunter committed tax fraud by deducting payments to prostitutes.
MTG just presented evidence Hunter Biden trafficked women, tweeted Anna Pauline Luna.
In addition to showcasing how Hunter potentially engaged in trafficking women, she also displayed multiple images of Hunter's sexual activities during the hearing.
mcjohnson tweets listen to the panic from the party of women when you expose them to the predators sex traffickers abusers and epstein clientele they really are here's one of the images she presented hunter recorded multiple sex tapes with prostitutes he had made out of his law firm's bank account Watch!
Shows Hunter sex pics to the Oversight Committee.
Quite stunning stuff.
Spicy for Washington, D.C.
Carl.
Well, again, this is part of the both attraction and the repulsion, both at the same time.
But my favorite part about what happened was yesterday, two Democratic congressmen, I don't remember their names, but they were on, I believe, CBS, and they said with a straight face, it is true that we have a two-tier justice system, but it's rigged against Hunter Biden.
And then they went on to say that for what Hunter did.
You know, other people have done that and they weren't charged with any crime.
So the gaslighting is just the most extreme.
And part of me just goes back to Baghdad, Bob, with the first Gulf War with the press secretary.
Maybe it was the second Gulf War who claimed that Iraq was defeating the Americans all the way until this press conference was interrupted by American soldiers bursting into the press conference room to arrest him. - Thank you.
So we have the, we documented a couple of weeks ago, something close to 500 crimes based on the information from Hunter's laptop.
And the Orwellian inversion It continues, and it is that extreme polarization that in, at least in some areas of political theory, the more and more polarized you get, the greater the tension is between those two positions.
Something is going to have to snap.
And, you know, I keep saying it, I didn't think it could go this far, but it's gone this far, and it's going further.
So we'll see what happens next.
What stunning hypocrisy from those two congressmen!
God!
Brian?
Well, I think Jeffrey Epstein's sex-tape archive just lost a bit of its value, being that now it's being exposed that this is what these people really are.
Don't expect Hunter to be anything less than a chip off the old block, and of course Joe Biden goes back years with his Lies and deceits and absolutely ridiculous statements about everything that's taken place and now you've got Hunter the Crack Addict slash multi-multi-multi-millionaire art dealer and esoteric inflector that, you know, it's insane.
I heard one Democrat liken it to, well, what if we showed pictures of Ivanka?
Well, let me ask you a question.
Has Ivanka ever been involved in anything like this?
I mean, I doubt those pictures even exist.
But what I see coming out of this is that, number one, the rhinos are going to start to sweat, because who knows what compromising information is out there on them, and who knows where it is.
We know that these sort of photographs exist.
We know that there are factions within the government who use them to control people.
We know that there are private agencies and industries.
Hell, we know that the Israelis for years have been using blackmail techniques to try to control billionaires and politicians and oligarchs around the world.
So the fact that Marjorie Taylor Greene sort of Stepped across the line with the etiquette probably will result in her being removed from whatever committees she has left and isolating her even more from the rest of the decorum created by these legislators.
I don't know how it's all going to play out, but the cat's out of the bag.
And while it may appear that it's only Hunter Biden that's being threatened by Marjorie Taylor Greene, I guarantee you that every single congressman that was in that room is worried that maybe the cat would get out of the bag with their stuff too.
So hopefully it was a shot across the bow that gets everybody to straighten up for a while.
But I think, you know, The new hammer, the new stick in town is going to be, do you want to end up on Marjorie Taylor Greene's chalkboard?
You better do what we want or we won't protect these pictures.
We'll see how it goes.
Well, there are nude photos of Ivanka that are studio quality.
I mean, nothing Perverted about him.
On the other hand, there are AOC porn tapes out there that they're calling deepfake, but I guarantee you, it's her.
No doubt about it.
I mean, you're opening a huge can of worms, Carl.
Yeah, that huge can of words of what Jim was talking about with the Israelis behind a lot and Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
All of that blackmail is going to be used.
And the further along that I get, the more I come to the conclusion is that we've never really had a political system at the top.
It's all orchestrated propaganda and narratives being rolled out.
And the real work, the planning work, is in the false flags to justify the narrations.
And that this type of blackmail that we're seeing is one of the reasons why Congress is so easily controlled.
Once you get that compromising information, then the politician is in the bag.
That was Edgar's practice to get sex dossiers on all the members of Congress so he could troll them, and then the mob had a sex dossier on Edgar so they could control him.
Meanwhile, Biden family business paid $7.3 million from Burisma over the years, including when Biden was vice president.
Speaking before the House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, Ziegler confirmed the Biden business received a total of 7.3 mil beginning in 2014.
How much money did Hunter and his business associate receive from the Ukrainian company Burisma, Comer asked him?
Burisma paid to everyone involved $6.5 million.
Burisma also paid Blue Star Strategies and a law firm hundreds of hundreds of thousands, bringing the total of Burisma payments to over $7 million.
Is that correct, Comer asked?
That is correct.
$7.3 million, Ziegler said.
Between 2014 and 2019, this brings the total amount of foreign income streams received to approximately $17 million, Comer stated, after which Ziegler confirmed.
In April 2014, Hunter joined the board of Burisma just two years before Biden forced the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shulkin, who was investigating Burisma.
Despite Hunter's lack of experience in Ukraine or the energy sector, he was paid $83,000 a month, a million a year, just weeks after his father was announced point person on U.S.
foreign policy toward Ukraine.
According to an FBI informant file, Joe and Hunter each received five mil from Mykola Zolchevsky, the founder of Burisma, after Joe threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine until President Poroshenko fired the prosecutor.
Comer also asked to witness how much the family business made from other deals in Romania and China.
How much did Hunter and his associates receive from the Romanian company?
The approximate total transfer would have been 3.1 mil to everyone.
Shell companies linked to the Biden business received millions from entities in Romania.
One of the largest in 2015 came from Gabriel Papasucci, who worked with CEFC.
The CEFC-controlled state energy, HK Limited, a company linked to the 1.3 collective payment to the Biden family members, the committee revealed.
So the Biden Family Suspicions Activity Reports.
The committee discovered a Biden associate, Rob Walker, received a $3 million wire transfer.
Four Biden family members—Hunter, James, Haley, and an unidentified Biden—received a collective $1.3 million cut from the $3 million wire transfer.
This is the same guy He accused prosecutors of not acting ethically or appropriately.
The anonymous whistleblower alleging political misconduct revealed himself as Special Agent Joseph Ziegler, a gay Democrat, 13-year veteran of the agency's Criminal Investigative Division.
He testified before the House Oversight Committee alongside his IRS supervisor, Gary Shapley.
Who came forward and made a publicly blow the whistle on the political misconduct of prosecutors during the federal probe.
I recently heard an elected official say that I must be more credible because I'm a gay Democrat married to a man.
Ziegler, previously known as Agent X, said in his opening statement, I'm no more credible than this man sitting next to me due to my sexual orientation or my political beliefs.
I was raised and has always strived to do what is right.
I have heard from some that I'm a traitor to the Democrat Party and that I'm causing more division in our society.
I implore you that if you were put in my position with the facts as I have stated them, you would be doing exactly the same thing regardless of your political party affiliation.
I hope I am an example to other LGBTQ people out there who are questioning doing the right thing at potential cost to themselves and others.
You should always do the right thing, no matter how painful the process might be.
The IRS Criminal Investigator accused prosecutors and attorneys with the Delaware U.S.
Attorney's Office and Department of Justice TAC Division of not acting ethically or appropriately in the investigation and said he believed he and Shibley did not have a seat at a table.
A lifelong Democrat said that throughout the investigation he witnessed a corrosion of ethical standards and abuse of power that threatens our nation.
He said the federal tax investigation supported criminal charges much more serious than the misdemeanor tax charges he's scheduled to plead to next week as part of his plea bargain.
Ziegler explained there were several instances in which prosecutors did not follow the ordinary process, slow walked the investigation, put in place unnecessary approvals and roadblocks from effectively and efficiently investigating the case, including prosecutors blocking questioning and interviewing of Hunter Biden's adult children.
He testified he made the decision to come forward after multiple attempts at blowing the whistle internally at the IRS, and pointed out that, by coming forward, he was risking his career and reputation, as well as his casework, outside the Biden investigation.
I believe that the Delaware USAO, U.S.
Attorney's Office, and DOJ tax have a clear target on me and my supervisors back.
They are just waiting for an opportunity to pounce.
My own agency retaliated against me and threatened me with criminal conduct in response to an internal email I sent to IRS leadership.
Even after years of essentially being left on an island when it came to this investigation.
It is not my desire to become a martyr for this case, and I fear effectively ending my career.
I did not ask to be in this position, nor did I want to be.
He detailed how the Biden-appointed Assistant U.S.
Attorney Leslie Wolf Blocked his plan to search Biden's storage unit in Northern Virginia.
He said Wolf objected to issuing a search warrant, arguing it might create more issues, meaning might find more evidence to implicate him in more crimes.
She allegedly suggested IRS investigators get what they needed through a records request.
I told A.U.S.A.
Wolf that I completely disagreed with her, that we weren't following the appropriate investigative steps, and that I thought she might be acting inappropriately, as indeed she was.
The IRS investigators said cert warrant requests were shot down.
Then he came up with an alternative plan.
I asked AUSA Wolf if they could not tell the subject or his counsel that we know about the storage unit and see if he accesses it for 30 days when the records request was due.
If at this time he did not access the storage unit, we know that he was not combined with a records request and could move forward with a search warrant.
Ziegler said Wolf told him she would think about it.
He said he told Shapley about the idea, and Shapley said he'd bring it up to the SAC and U.S.
Attorney David Weiss, which he told me he did.
From what I was told, U.S.
Attorney Weiss agreed that if the storage unit wasn't accessed for 30 days, we could execute a search warrant.
We later heard that AUSA Wolf and DOJ Tax Attorney Mark Daly had ultimately reached out to Hunter's Defense Council and told them about the storage unit Once again, circumventing our chance to get evidence from potentially being destroyed, manipulated, or concealed.
Singleton testified he wanted to interview and get records from Hunter's adult children and other members of the Biden family regarding expenses paid for the adult children as well as potential credit card expenditures and Venmo payments, which were deducted on Hunter's 2018 tax return.
Wolff allegedly shot down that idea as well.
Telling the IRS that it would get them into hot water if we interviewed the president's adult grandchildren.
The whistleblower stated this was, again, abnormal and a deviation from normal procedure.
He noted on May 15, 2003, he learned that he, Shipley, and all the agents in the International Tax Group were removed from the Hunter Biden investigation and that would be transferred over to a brand new agent and supervisor from another group in the Washington, D.C.
field office.
Ziegler asked Congress and a Biden admin to consider a special counsel for the Biden investigation and all the related cases and spinoffs that have come forward from the investigation.
Carl, pretty damning stuff.
Damning, yes, yes, yes.
But you have Charisma paying the Bidens over $7 million, according to an expert witness from the IRS.
Okie doke.
That is prima facie pay to play.
That's a prima facie crime, and that would require an arrest.
Anybody trained in law enforcement would say, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's an apparent crime and process, of course, an arrest.
And the comedy in this, the tragic comedy, is the comparison as well.
You throw in corporate media and the rhetoric and compare what they did with the factless Russiagate, proven now to have been a PSYOP paid for
By the Clinton campaign, and you have what the media talked about, that factless Russiagate, crimeless impeachment, the election fraud, and the contrast with that is just tragic, comic, and it's, again, simultaneously I feel better and better seeing the script roll out, and worse and worse with how much it's going to take to get this breakthrough.
So, Ziegler said that he was accused of being a traitor to his party.
That is an excellent example of being able to flip the script, and I hope that he learns and sees that he is actually defending the party and defending his country against the traitors who want to have this pay-to-play system continue.
So he's a whistleblower in hell.
He said, I don't want to be a martyr.
Sorry, pal, it's too late.
It's a badge of honor and he's going to graduate to something else, but he's not going back to the system that he was in.
And that's just the way it's going to go with him.
And I do appreciate him for that stand.
And I think everybody who watched that guy give any part of the testimony could feel the integrity coming from him.
Yeah, excellent.
Excellent.
Yeah.
Comments, Carl.
Brian.
Wow, that was good to see some whistleblowers coming forward to open up the can of beans.
That was nothing compared to what happened just a few hours ago.
And today is Thursday, about 2.45 Central Time, but Grassley released the Unredacted four-page PD 1023 Federal Bureau of Investigation reporting document and see the only thing that's in that document that's redacted is a few names and phone numbers.
Other than that, I can see why this is such a big deal.
If I'm reading this correctly, and I just now took a close look at it, but Burisma wanted to get into the Houston oil and gas trading business.
They were suggesting that they could just form their own entity and get into the game.
The Bidens, Hunter and Joe, both got together and Convinced them that they should pay them $5 million a piece to help them and then suggested that they go buy a $20 million already established entity so that they could bypass the regulations.
And in exchange for the $5 million to Hunter and the $5 million to Joe, they would get Zoloshevsky, who was the prosecutor that Biden bragged about having Having gotten fired, they would get him off their back and then help cut the deal to buy the oil and gas industry.
And reading into this, you get to pages two through four, and it looks like an absolute shakedown.
As a matter of fact, many of the Russian words that are translated and things that they're saying are that they were basically forced Coerced to make those payments in order to get into the deal that they didn't want to be inside the deal, but they were inside the deal.
So they didn't want to be in it.
So what did they do?
They recorded 17 phone calls and had all their text messages.
And of course, this whole 10-23 was dated.
It was dated.
They won't give you the date.
Oh, June 30th, 2020.
June 30th, 2020.
So this 10-23 existed showing how corrupt that they were since June 30th of 2020 inside the FBI.
And now here we are, July 20th of 2023, and we're first getting wind of what's actually there.
Now, does it matter?
Obviously this document has enough for Joe Biden to get impeached.
Because it clearly makes the correlation as Joe Biden is the big guy that took the payment or was part of, it was, they said, they explained it as 5 million to Hunter and 5 million to Joe, basically within the document.
And so they knew a long time ago.
So they've been gaslighting us this entire time in order to keep this thing under wraps, trying to control it.
It's a big deal.
It's going to result in impeachment, but I have a fear that the RINOs just simply don't have the stomach to go through something like this.
Everybody's going to get a slap on the wrist because the last they want is major turmoil, major turnover in either the Senate or the House, and they don't want that bureaucracy gone because the bureaucracy protects the RINOs just as much as it protects the Democrats.
This whole thing could get very, very ugly from here on out.
It could.
Use it as an opportunity to pull Biden out, move Kamala up and put in Gavin Newsom as VP, then get Kamala to resign for whatever reason and get Michelle in there as well.
Because then they could claim to have virtue by discovering, lo and behold, Biden's corrupt.
We had no idea.
And because we uphold the rule of law, we're going to act to impeach him.
They got to get him out.
They got to get him out.
Because he's a total loser, his support polling is down to 9%.
This would be one way to do it and try to, you know, restore a semblance of a modicum of integrity on the part of the Democrats in Congress.
I'm not saying it will happen, but I wouldn't rule it out as a potential scenario.
Carl?
And another trick that they might try is you had the rhetoric just this week of Mitt Romney and a few other rhinos saying that they were considering switching party to the Democrats, and that would be one way to cut the votes out from the Republicans.
Yeah, yeah, that wouldn't surprise me.
Manchin should have long ago, of course, turned Republican.
There's more than one way to play that game.
Meanwhile, here's Miranda Devine.
Democrats are so dumb and cynical.
Representative after representative trying to inject race into the IRS whistleblower hearing.
All they have is Trump and race.
Both equally irrelevant in a hearing about DOJ obstruction of a criminal investigation into the Bidens.
Well said, Miranda.
Meanwhile, mental health roundups.
The next phase of the government's war on thought crimes.
There are no dangerous thoughts.
Thinking itself is a dangerous activity, said Hannah Arendt.
Get ready for the next phase of government's war on thought crimes, mental health roundups, and involuntary detentions.
Under the guise of public health and safety, the government could use mental health care as a pretext for targeting and locking up dissidents, activists, and anyone unfortunate enough to be placed on a government watch list.
If we don't nip this in the bud and soon, this will become yet another pretext by which government officials can violate the Firth and Fourth Amendments at will.
This is how it begins in committees across the nation.
Communities across the nation.
Police are being empowered to forcibly detain individuals they believe might be mentally ill based solely on their own judgment, even if they pose no danger to others.
In New York City, for example, you could be forcibly hospitalized for suspected mental illness if you carry firmly held beliefs not congruent with cultural ideas.
Exhibit a willingness to engage in meaningful discussion.
Have excessive fear of specific stimuli or reviews.
Voluntary treatment recommendations.
While these programs are ostensibly aimed at getting the homeless off the streets, when combined with advances in mass surveillance technology, AI-powered programs that track people by their biometrics and behavior, mental health sensor data, tracked by wearable data and monitored by government agencies, threat assessment, behavioral sensing warnings, pre-crime initiatives, red flag gun laws, and mental health first aid programs.
Aimed at training gatekeepers to identify who might pose a threat to public safety, they could well signal a tipping point in the government's effort to penalize those engaging in so-called thought crimes.
As the AP reports, federal officials are already looking into how to add identifiable patient data, such as mental health, substance use, and behavioral health information, from group homes, shelters, jails, detox facilities, and schools, to a surveillance toolkit.
Make no mistake, these are building blocks for an American gulag no less sinister than the gulags of the Cold War Soviet Union.
The word gulag refers to a labor or concentration camp where prisoners, often political prisoners or so-called enemies of the state, real or imagined, were imprisoned and punished for their crimes against the state.
The gulag, according to historian Ann Applebaum, used as a form of administrative exile, which requires no trial, no sentencing procedure, was, An ideal punishment, not only for troublemakers as such, but for political opponents of the regime.
Totalitarian regimes like the Soviet Union also declared dissidents mentally ill, consigned political prisoners to those disguised as psychiatric hospitals.
Yes.
where they could be isolated from the rest of society.
Their ideas discredited and subject to electric shocks, drugs, and various medical procedures to break them physically and mentally.
Carl, could you assist in addition to?
In addition to declaring political dissidents mentally unsound, government officials in the Cold War era Soviet Union also made use of an administrative process for dealing with individuals who were considered a bad influence on others or troublemakers.
Author George Kennan described a process in which the obnoxious person may not be guilty of any crime, but if, in the opinion of the local authorities, his presence in a particular place is, quote, prejudicial to public order, unquote, or, quote, incompatible with public tranquility, quote, incompatible with public tranquility, unquote, he may be arrested without warrant, may be held from two weeks to two years in prison,
and may then be removed by force to any other place within the limits of the empire and there be put under police surveillance for a period from one to ten years.
The age-old practice by which despotic regimes eliminate their critics or potential adversaries by making them disappear or forcing them to flee or exiling them literally or figuratively or virtually from their fellow citizens It's happening with increasing frequency in America.
Now, through the use of red flag laws, behavioral threat assessments and pre-crime policing prevention programs, the groundwork is being laid that would allow the government to weaponize the label of mental illness as a means of exiling those whistleblowers, dissidents and freedom fighters who refuse to march in lockstep with its dictates.
That the government is using the charge of mental illness as the means by which to immobilize and disarm its critics is diabolical.
With one stroke of a magistrate's pen, these individuals are declared mentally ill, locked away against their will, and stripped of their constitutional rights.
These developments are merely the realization of various U.S.
government initiatives dating back to 2009, including one dubbed Operation Vigilant Eagle, which calls for surveillance of military veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, characterizing them as extremists and potential domestic terrorist threats because they may be disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war.
Having been there and recognizing the United States had no business being there, of course they'd be disgruntled and disillusioned.
Coupled with a report on right-wing extremism, current economic and political climate fueling resurgence and radicalization and recruitment, issued by the Department of Homeland Security.
Curiously enough, a Soviet term which broadly defines right-wing extremists as individuals and groups that are mainly anti-government.
Rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local, or rejecting government authority entirely.
These tactics bode ill for anyone seen as opposing the government.
Thus, what began as a blueprint under the Bush administration has simply become an operation manual for exiling those who challenge the government's authority.
An important point to consider, however, is that the government is not merely targeting individuals who are voicing their discontent, so much as it is locking up individuals trained in military warfare who are voicing feelings of discontent.
Under the guise of mental health treatment and with the complicity of government psychiatrists and law enforcement, these veterans are increasingly being portrayed as sticking time bombs in need of intervention.
For instance, the DOJ launched a pilot program aimed at trained SWAT teams to deal with confrontations involving highly trained and heavily armed combat veterans.
One tactic being used to deal with so-called mentally ill suspects, who also happen to be trained in modern warfare, is through the use of civil commitment laws, found in all states and employed throughout American history, to not only silence but cause dissidents to disappear.
For example, NASA NSA officials, National Security Agency officials, attempted to label former employee Russ Tides, who was willing to testify in Congress about the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program, as mentally unbalanced, based upon two psychiatric evaluations ordered by his superiors.
NYPD officer Adrian Schoolcraft had his home raided Handcuffed to a gurney, taken into emergency custody for an alleged psychiatric episode.
It was later discovered by way of an internal investigation.
His superiors were retaliating against him for reporting police misconduct.
Schoolcraft spent six days in the mental facility, and as a further indignity was billed for $7,185 for the treatment.
Marine Brandon Robb, a 9-11 truther, was arrested and detained in a psychiatric ward under Virginia civil commitment law, based on posts he made on Facebook, critical of the government.
Each state has its own set of civil or involuntary commitment laws.
They are extensions of two legal principles.
Parens patriae, parents patriae, Latin for parent of the country, Which allows the government to intervene on behalf of citizens who cannot act in their own best interest and police power, which requires the state to protect the interests of its citizens.
The fusion of these two principles, coupled with a shift toward a dangerousness standard, has resulted in a nanny state mindset carried out with a militant force of the police state.
The problem, of course, is that the diagnosis of mental illness, while a legitimate concern for some Americans, has over time become a convenient means where the government and corporate partners can penalize unacceptable social behavior.
In fact, in recent years, we have witnessed the pathologizing of individuals who resist authority as suffering from oppositional defiant disorder, defined as a pattern of disobedient, hostile, and defiant behavior toward authority figures.
Under such a definition, every activist of note throughout our history, from Mahatma Gandhi to Martin Luther King Jr., could be classified as suffering from an ODD mental disorder.
Of course.
This is all part of a larger trend in American governance, whereby dissidents is criminalized, dissent is criminalized and pathologized, and dissenters are censored, silenced, declared unfit for our society, labeled dangerous or extremists, or turned into outcasts and exiled.
Red flag gun laws, which authorize officials to seize guns from individuals viewed as dangerous to themselves or others, are a perfect example of this mindset.
As the Washington Post reports, these red flag gun laws Allow a family member, roommate, beau, law enforcement officer, any type of medical professional to file a petition asking a person's home be temporarily cleared of firearms.
It doesn't require a mental health diagnosis or an arrest.
With these red flag laws, the stated intention is to disarm individuals who are potential threats.
Well, in theory, it appears perfectly reasonable to want to disarm individuals who are clearly suicidal or pose an imminent threat to themselves or others, where the problem arises when you put the power to determine who's a potential danger in the hands of government agencies, the courts, and the police.
Remember, this isn't the same government that uses the words anti-government, extremist, and terrorist interchangeably.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow.
Well, that first tweet, I want to just remark that yes, ad hominem and race baiting seems to be most of what our opponents have.
And I want to connect this to the idea that all they have is force and fraud.
That's kind of the catchphrase of Ricardo Bosi of Australia One, which is the oppositional party against the criminal ones in Australia.
So, Our government was to try as crazy to question authority or official stories, huh?
Huh.
Well, it seems to me that's the most un-American position you can take, given the foundation of our country was Americans being able to discern that our own government was in violation of the laws, and that Americans not only questioned and challenged, but had armed defense against Our own government attempting to disarm Americans.
That's Lexington and Concord.
And for MLK, yeah, he gave a speech at SMU a few months before he was assassinated by the Deep State.
And here at BitChute, I'll put the documentation to demonstrate the King family civil trial in 1999, where the verdict of the jury was unanimous that our own government assassinated Martin.
Martin was hearing that stuff the last year of his life when he went after the Vietnam War.
They called him maladjusted, and his speech at SMU invited everybody to become maladjusted to a society of such ills and such moral depravity.
So, mental illness, huh?
All right, well, let's flip the script, and again, the people who are giving these orders, running a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire, Gunning toward nuclear war.
They're the crazy ones.
If we're not free to criticize our government absent coercion and constraint, it means nothing to be an American.
Brian.
They are going to set us up.
They have been setting the stage to shut us down as a community.
For a long, long time, Jim Fetzer, Brian Davidson, Carl Herman, all the other guys that are part of the team, we're just a small sort of temporary face for a whole group of people that have recognized what a false flag is and how it works.
There is a one particular writer.
He works for the 21st Century Newswire.
He goes by the name of Sean Helton.
He's written a number of articles about false flags, and what he studies in his articles is the commonality among something called a known wolf.
Well, for all these years, he's been going over all these different false flag types of events and documenting how these people such as Nicholas Cruz and Adam Lanza and, you know, the other names that they've come up with, The Sutherland Springs, they're all somehow known to authorities as being maladjusted, troubled people prior to going out on these shootings.
And then the shootings take place and it's like, oh yeah, we had 23 police reports.
We had 15 police reports.
We had this.
And so Helton has made a very extensive archive and index of all these different false flags where the shooters were somehow known to the authorities in advance.
Now, it's always been my, well, it's been my theory for a while.
that the false flags are there to drive military type spending to set up an apparatus that will be able to shut down people that would theoretically the pre-crime idea the people that would theoretically commit these types of false flag type shootings and so therefore when they engineer the false flags they've got a lot of commonalities it's a it's a maladjusted youth
Who is wearing military gear, who has a surplus of military weapons, who may write a manifesto against the federal government or against governing authorities.
And then they go off on innocent young children within schools, creating a fear factor that allows them to spend money because educational institutions are basically government institutions.
So over the years, I've been reading Helton as much as I can.
He doesn't write about it as much anymore as he did for years, but he's got a very extensive list over at 21st Century Wire.
Just look up the term known wolf and start reading and reading and reading and see the commonalities among all these events.
Now, here's my point.
Whether they can Shut actual people down or or not.
Because of these.
Being able to identify them as a potential threat.
They will roll out people that they consider to be threats and they will continue rolling out the false flags with the same modus operandi to get more of that security spending in place over time so that they can create this governmental wall between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and, you know, the rich versus the poor.
I have seen this apparatus from an artificial intelligence perspective working already.
I spent a lot of time in some conspiracy forums under a sock puppet account Posting some of the things and floating different theories about the things that I had researched and sure enough inside one of those forums the artificial intelligence identified me as a suicide risk.
Now I'm about as properly adjusted as you can get.
When it comes to thinking these things through and being capable of throwing out a real conspiracy and identifying a real conspiracy and, you know, deciding the difference and then being a productive member of society who sort of keeps us going in the right direction.
But this artificial intelligence in this community identified me as a suicide threat, tried to get me help.
And because I was questioning the narrative, and I think that one was Nashville where I was going through it.
Yes.
No, it was the one that happened right after Nashville.
What was that?
Louisville or St.
Louis.
There's so many of them.
I have a hard time keeping them all together.
My point is they're going to use artificial intelligence to identify people like us that have arms and stocks of arms Well, I think you're right, and if they took you out, they'd make it look like a suicide and say he'd been previously identified as a suicide risk.
So I think you got it right, Brian, up and down the line.
when the lights go out, we're going to be the first targets.
That's my theory.
Well, I think you're right.
And if they took you out, they'd make it look like a suicide and say he'd been previously identified as a suicide risk.
So I think you got it right, Brian, up and down the line.
I agree with everything you've just said.
Meanwhile, Judge hands Trump an unfavorable ruling in the Eugene Carroll case This is a woman who claimed she'd been raped by Trump but couldn't even remember the year in which it happened.
How absurd is that?
This is a case where the New York State Legislature created an opportunity to file cases that were long after the statute of limitations just show this one could be filed against Trump.
A federal judge in New York dealt Trump's legal team a blow, rejecting his request for a new trial upholding a five million jury verdict in the civil case brought against him by writer E. Jean Carroll, who appears to be a fantasist.
She has a book, I gather, about which she described multiple rapes by multiple famous personalities.
How bizarre.
Judge Lewis Kaplan denied Trump's motion.
The case relates to a civil lawsuit she brought against him in 2022, accusing him of battery and defamation.
She alleged Trump raped her in a Manhattan department store dressing room.
Here it says in 1996, but you see that's misleading because she couldn't remember if it were 1995 or 1996.
And later defamed her in 2022 when he called the incident a hoax.
No doubt, it was a hoax.
In May 2023, a nine-member jury handed her a win in the suit, although it found she did not prove Trump had raped her, but instead determined he had sexually amused her.
The jury awarded two million in damages and three for defamation.
Lawyers for Trump, who's repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, appealed the decision, asking him to lower the award for damage in a less-than-ordered new trial.
The area to $2 million for damages was excessive, as they concluded he had not raped her at Bergdorf Goodman decades ago.
In his 59-page ruling, Judge Kaplan said he considered all the arguments raised by Trump's legal team and found them all unpersuasive.
The jury in this case did not reach a seriously erroneous result.
The verdict is not a miscarriage of justice.
Trump lawyer Joseph Takabina did not immediately return a request for comment.
However, Trump's attorneys have filed a notice of appeal against the $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages and against all adverse rulings in Judge Kaplan's decision.
Ms.
Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, unrelated to the judge, said Ms.
Carroll hopes to collect the $5 million.
She looks forward to pressing forward with a separate lawsuit against Trump with a trial set for Jan.
15, 2024.
No doubt to be very tied into the campaign for president.
In seeking a reduction in damages, Trump's attorney called the $2 million for sexual abuse grossly excessive, because such abuse included groping Ms.
Carol through clothing as a far cry from rape.
And I don't believe even that occurred.
The judge said it fell flat, as New York law defines rape far more narrowly.
The jury didn't arrive That award $2 million for groping her breasts or her clothing, wrongful as that might have been.
Instead, they found he had forcibly penetrated her vagina with his fingers.
Writing this meant a legal definition of rape, and merits a $2 million award.
The finding that she failed to prove she was raped, within the meaning of the New York Penal Law, does not mean she failed to prove that Trump raped her, as many people commonly understand the word rape.
Unbelievable.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that is unbelievable.
So you have a 1996 Civil claim, 1996, for $5 million, based upon the testimony of this woman.
I have not invested the time, nor will I, to go into the details to find out what the actual body of evidence was that she brought.
It was my understanding that it is just her testimony.
But this is lawfare, and it's just ongoing, and until we have a The script flipped for the big people to be arrested.
Then anybody who takes on the deep state is going to be subject to this type of lawfare assassination attempts being labeled a risk for suicide and ongoing and ongoing and ongoing.
Among the grounds this obviously should have tossed is not even knowing the year, she couldn't specify the date and denied the defendant the right to defend himself with an alibi.
How can Trump show where he was, someone other than Bergdorf Goodman, on a specified date when no date is specified?
This case had no legal merit whatsoever.
It was a sham and is reflective of the corrupt state of the law in New York.
Brian.
Well, they're not going to stop trying to pile it on Trump if he really is a threat to them.
Although it's not official yet, it looks like that he's going to be charged with a violation of a Civil War era civil rights law that went back to the Ku Klux Klan and the Ku Klux Klan down in the South.
And Jack Smith Referred in his letter that he had recently written to Trump saying that it would be the indictments would be rolled out very shortly.
That the grand jury investigation is had some statutes that were used, but one of them hasn't been used since the Civil War and it goes back to.
Or post Civil War, it goes back to enslaving African Americans and civil rights.
So it doesn't surprise me they're going to try to pull up everything they possibly can, even doing historical revisionism or taking things that were not illegal back then that are illegal now.
I mean that's exactly what they've done.
It's a fool's errand.
They're going to continue to try.
MAGA is going to grow stronger.
Just take a look at the boycotts that are taking place, the outcry that's beginning to roll forward.
Take a look at Trump entering a stadium full of people versus Biden entering even a room.
It's ridiculous.
They're going to push it too far.
The American people are going to see right through it.
It's going to be a landslide election for Trump.
I don't see anybody else coming forward and even competing.
However, Just as Joe Biden got 82 million votes in 36 counties, I wouldn't expect any of those counties to change.
It's just that now the people that are involved in fixing the elections know they're going to be under a microscope.
The question is, are they going to be willing to sacrifice their lives and their freedom or the rest of their lives potentially in jail with the felonies to to make sure that Biden continues to get those 36 counties.
I don't know that that is going to happen or isn't going to happen.
But with a new DOJ in place, maybe there'll be some more prosecutions that actually make sense.
I think they're all petrified that if Trump gets back in, they will all be toast.
Meanwhile, Tucker received one new job offer that will leave you speechless.
Since Fox fired Tupper in April, conservatives wondered what would come next.
Could it come in the form of a 2024 presidential race?
Tucker received a job offer that'll leave you speechless.
He turned in a standout performance moderating the Iowa Family Leader Summit.
This was the first opportunity for multiple GOP candidates to appear on stage and answer questions about issues conservatives care about.
The star of the summit was Tucker.
Who destroyed the campaigns of establishment-friendly candidates like Mike Pence and Asia Hudson, with questions about Ukraine, January 6th, the COVID vac, and chemical castration of minors.
Tim Scott was another establishment Republican whom Tucker exposed as a fraud.
Scott's moment in the barrel came when Tucker asked a simple question about, as president, would he round up and deport masses of the tens of millions of illegals living in America?
We know anyone using a fake social security number.
Why not just drop them off in Tijuana?
Bye-bye, Tucker asked.
Instead of answering the question, he joked he would put Tucker in charge of figuring out deportation policy.
I'm going to appoint Tucker as my bye-bye ambassador to figure this out, Scotty Clark.
So, we're going to work together on this, and I am looking forward to it.
Tucker senses evasiveness, wondered why he had to obey America's laws, but illegal aliens get a free pass.
I have to obey the law from someone from Haiti, does it?
Or what?
Tucker said.
What, they come because they know no politician will say, come on, you're leaving, just like they don't put up with this in Japan?
Washington Examiner columnist Byron York noted in his write-up, Scott could have simply said he would deport illegals, and outlined in Proud Strike how he'd go about doing it.
Instead, Scott's refusal to answer questions revealed he would not be deporting any illegal aliens.
Scott's lone moment came when he repeatedly avoided the question of whether he would deport the millions of illegal border crossers who enter the United States during Joe Biden's presidency.
His non-answer suggests, no, he would not deport those millions of border crossers.
Why not just say it, York wrote.
Ron DeSantis started out as a great anti-Trump hope of the GOP donor class, but after stalling in the polls in second place, GOP donors began looking elsewhere.
They were always more comfortable with Scott, who comes from the Paul Ryan wing of the party.
And since GOP donors support amnesty for illegals, Scott wants to signal to this group he'll play ball with our pro-amnesty, pro-open border agenda.
Unbelievable.
Meanwhile, Tucker's GOP hopeful campaign, he ended one with this shocking interview.
This was one of the biggest cattle call events of the summer for Republican presidential candidates.
Iowa, of course, as a first state on the GOP primary calendar, Candidates were looking to make inroads with evangelical voters, a key demographic in the state's caucus.
Most of the top consenters, besides former President Trump, were interviewed by Tucker at the event.
For long-shot candidates, the interview was a chance to gain momentum.
But the interview with Tucker was the end of the campaign for former Arkansas Governor Aza Hutchison.
Who served as Homeland Security under former President George W. Bush, running as a Trump-hating rhino.
He sat down with an interview for Talker a month before the first GOP debate, where he crashed and burned.
Hutchison vetoed a bill banning sex change operations for children as Arkansas governor.
He defended the veto at the time, saying the bill was vast government overreach, and that Arkansas shouldn't get involved in every medical, human, and ethical issue.
Tucker impressed him on his stance that life-saving, life-altering surgery and puberty blockers for confused kids, changing genders is treatment, Tucker.
I hope we'll be able to talk about sensitive issues, he replied.
Well, This is one of the biggest issues in the country.
I would think every person in this room would agree it's an essential issue because these are children who are being altered permanently, and you can defend that and that alter and that change if you'd like.
There's really no debate on whether or not it's permanent.
I just said that it was important for parents to guide kids through these gender transitions.
The former Arkansas governor, clearly feeling the heat, tried to hedge by saying he opposed kids being taught radical gender ideologies and choosing bathrooms based on their chosen gender.
But you said children should be able to choose their gender, and parents should be able to affirm that.
And the state has no rule in getting involved, Tucker said.
So how is that different?
You're saying a child shouldn't be able to choose a bathroom, but he can choose his sex?
I don't understand.
Hutchinson claimed he opposed the government pushing an agenda in schools, but refused to back off his support for grisly medical treatments for kids that change their gender.
His anemic fundraising and polling support that amounts to a rounding error meant Hutchinson's campaign is already running on fumes.
But defending kids receiving surgery and hormones to change genders ruined what small chance he may have had.
BlazeTV co-host Glenn Beck, whose group televised the event, compared Hutchinson's performance to watching the Hindenburg go up in flames.
Tucker ended his presidential campaign as one of the biggest rhinos in the GOP field.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, more amazing updates.
So, you have Senator Tim Scott reveal that he has no plan to enforce immigration law.
Huh, that's a big deal.
And Tucker did also destroy America Is Not My Concern Pence, and then he destroyed the former governor, child mutilation is okay if it's called gender reassignment, Hutchinson.
So, The gap between what Americans think a politician is and what is being exposed now at breakneck speed relative to all previous history is just extraordinary history that we're living through.
And it just feels that the importance of these stories is just immensely building and building.
Yes, yes.
It increasingly appears that the only road to electability is the MAGA road.
This is a problem for rhinos.
I predict Trump wins the presidential election and all the rhinos that continue to have their seats in Congress become Democrats and change parties, thus making it virtually impossible for Trump to continue doing what he's doing, giving a majority in the House and in the Senate.
To the Democrats because the rhinos switch parties because they've been exposed or somehow offended by Trump.
So Trump's job is not going to be done six years from now when his eight years are up.
He's going to have to bring somebody new in and hopefully it's somebody like a Carrie Lake or Byron Donalds, somebody out there that's got he's going to have to have somebody who's a part of the apparatus.
Working with him, it might be MTG, it might be Byron Donalds, it might be Matt Gaetz, might be others, but there's going to have to be a peacemaker somewhere in the middle between Donald Trump and the RINOs, or you're going to end up with some very strange events.
This is the first time I've seen a third party actually have some traction, and I'm beginning to believe that MAGA is not just an arm of the Republican Party, but indeed a third party.
In and of itself, that just simply doesn't have a label quite yet.
It's hijacking the Republican Party.
Very discerning comments, Ryan.
I like all that.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send FanMailProicon to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here I did an interview with Scott Bennett on his Global Great Awakening show.
You can check it out.
It's on, among other things, on my Twitter account, at Jim Fetzer.
You can track it down.
Excellent interview with a bonus at the end.
Meanwhile, Jim, an awesome show, talking about the show with Scott.
Remember that George Floyd matter was also a well-planned fake false flag event to try to create racial chaos.
Riots were planned in 33 cities in advance, and balls for kerosene and bricks were shipped in.
Kerosene was used because they believed gasoline was too dangerous.
USG operatives were flown in and run right through the TSA, according to a witness I talked with.
The police were ordered from D.C.
to stand down.
This order came right from the top.
The police were furious.
As we found out today, well-respected attorney Todd Callender found out using a FOIA request, most recent D.C.
polls, politicians never took their oaths legally.
I sent you the video on this.
Obama, Hillary, and all later U.S.
government officials never took legally binding oaths.
This, of course, means our whole top government is fraudulent.
I also remember CB was a pentagram deployed by a weapon, and that's, of course, the coronavirus, designed to mass murder, disable, and torture millions in America across the world.
Really, the Vax.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Well, a strategy that is evolving might be is that because of the destruction of the Democratic Party, what if our masters decided to destroy both parties?
Just take down the GOP, too.
Or have the GOP have an announcement, just like the DNC said Biden is our candidate for 2024.
How about if the GOP leadership said Trump will never be our candidate again?
Because he's a convicted criminal and an insurrectionist, blah, blah, blah.
So it is so troubling seeing these events and yet so hopeful for the exposure of the criminal.
Both elements are happening at the same time.
And the only final thought that I have is to thank our audience members, similar to that gentleman who wrote, and just continue to stand for intellectual integrity and moral courage.
The destruction of our opponents is, seems to be moving forward very quickly.
And yet we still talk about it week after week, but we shall see what evolves.
Brian, your final thoughts.
The mass American mind is not ready yet for a total destruction of both the Republican and the Democrat Party.
The Democrats are obviously losing their sanity very quickly making these latest hearings about race and about Trump.
It's obvious that they're gone.
And And of course, you've got things like the Lincoln Project and other rhino based platforms that are out there trying to oppose with everything they can.
But even they're seeing the writing on the wall that that whatever that is cannot be resisted.
So I believe there's going to be a lights out event.
Now, there's one moment in time that I'll never forget related to Donald John Trump that I noticed.
That I don't think anybody else noticed, but I saw it.
Do you remember after the Las Vegas shooting, there was theoretically a guy that was shot in his legs and he stood up and he saluted Donald John Trump when he entered the room?
Well, Trump really gave him the cold shoulder.
He walked in, took one photo and walked right back out of the room, barely saying a word.
And I always thought that that was a good indicator that Donald John Trump knew that that guy was faking it just as much as anybody knew that he was faking it.
To me, it was a real moment where Trump had to do what was politically necessary, which is enter that room and let that guy stand up.
Sean Hannity, of course, had to show it on Sean Hannity Tonight.
What a patriot would stand up after he's being shot in the legs, you know, to welcome the president, commander in chief.
The whole thing was ridiculous, but I could see on Trump's face and in his body language that he knew what was going on.
He's not a fool, and he turned around in that room, maybe it was a hospital room, stage, whatever, and he walked right back out.
I think we're seeing something that's changing, and the only question that I have, the more I begin to isolate it, is when the lights come back on, who's going to have the football?
Because there's going to be an event.
They cannot continue to allow this civil war mentality to just roll it, you know, let the dominoes fall where they may.
The deep state will lash out and they'll lash out with everything they've got.
They're cornered.
It's ugly.
So, I think they're going to turn out the lights.
When the lights come back on, is it Donald, John, Trump, and MAGA that's standing with the political football?
Some sort of weird planned on deep state apparatus that gets back into place.
Wonderful comments.
Carl O'Brien just sensational.
Yes.
If he'd been shot in the leg, as advertised, he wouldn't have been able to stand up.
The whole thing was fraudulent.
Paul Craig Roberts received letters from a military surgeon who said all the alleged witnesses at Las Vegas were fake.
He also received one from a trauma surgeon reinforcing the point.
The whole thing was fraudulent.
It was actually a movie.
They used a pre-recorded soundtrack broadcast over the PA system of machine gun firing, and then used visual special effects in the main part of the Mandalay at the fourth floor, light flashing as though it were machine gun firing, and occasionally, three-shot blasts are upped to simulate American military weapons, but no one was actually shot.
A Facebook friend of mine at the time contacted the three closest hospitals to the concert area and asked if anyone had come in with gunshot wounds, and all three reported no.
We had no admittees with gunshot wounds, and the third conveniently added, If you're talking about that drill, no one was shot, just check with the police.
Mona Lexis Presley checked out the bios, the background, and all the purported witnesses and found to the extent they were real, and not merely Photoshopped variations of themselves, they died in different states, on different dates, and from different causes of death.
She even obtained the Police report for the area surrounding the concert for 24 hours, from like 9 p.m.
the day before the shooting to 9 p.m.
the following day, and the only events reported were burglary, disorderly conduct, recovery, assault.
There was not a single gunshot wound involved when the coroner for Clark County was required to release The autopsy reports on the victims, he solicited them from six or eight or nine different coroners, erased the names, made up phony numbers and put them out.
It was unbelievably fraudulent and fake.
I find it encouraging that Trump appears to have not been deceived.
If you want more, Go to my blog, JamesHFetzer.org, look for JimTheConspiracyGuy.com or The 65 Shows, and scroll down to Las Vegas.
You will be dumbfounded.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with family, friends, and people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
Have a great weekend.
Actually, we got one more day to come, and then we'll be back on Monday with more of the news you need to know.