All Episodes
Previous Next
July 19, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:17:00
Need to Know News (18 July 2023) with Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Mazowin, Wisconsin, joined today by Brian Davidson from Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news we need to know.
Owen Stevens is on a special assignment.
Biden orders the activation of 3,000 reservists for European deployment.
Since February of 2022, the U.S.
has deployed over 20,000 additional troops to Europe, bringing U.S.
troop levels on a continent over 100,000 for the first time since 2005.
The mobilization of 3,000 reservists signals the U.S.
military is strained by maintaining a large troop presence in Europe.
A spokesman for the U.S.
European Command said the authority will not change our current force posture levels.
Those authorities will ensure long-term resilience in EUCOM's continued heightened level of presence.
Pentagon said the reservists will support Operation Atlantic Resolve, the name for U.S.
military activities in Europe that have come in response to events in Ukraine since 2014.
Meanwhile, the Babylon B nails it.
Zelensky activates 3,000 U.S.
military reservists.
Kiev casualties continue to mount in the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, causing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to make the decision to call up 3,000 U.S.
military reserve soldiers.
I need all the forces I command at my disposal, Zelensky said, announcing the activation of American troops.
These young men and women have been well trained to defend Ukraine, and now is the time to fulfill their purpose.
As reports of Russian military advancement continue to filter in from the frontline, Zelensky, the commander of all U.S.
armed forces, determined his best option was to call in reinforcements.
Petting on officials were quick to comply.
We're here to follow orders from the top, and it doesn't get any higher up than Mr. Zelensky, said Pentagon spokesman John Kirby.
If President Biden takes orders from him, then we'll do whatever he says as well.
A whole full might of the United States military is at his beck and call.
Though some pockets of opposition to the move were present within the Congress, the vast majority expressed full support.
It's our job to stand by our leaders in times of war, said Utah Senator Mitt Romney.
We'll provide whatever President Zelensky needs.
I've already got an appointment to shine his shoes the next time he's here to speak to Congress.
At publishing time, Zelensky was reportedly preparing to scramble U.S. fighter jets to intercept incoming Russian air support while ordering all American missile launch sites to ready their nuclear payloads.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, it's becoming so obvious to everybody who's paying attention to the details, and I'm not saying I've got every detail, but the details are you've got a puppet in Biden and you've got a puppet in Zelensky.
And it seems like the puppet masters are exactly the same, working towards exactly the same directions.
They have the power to tell Congress what to do, and it seems like even the rhinos in Congress are following along.
Zelensky obviously is keeping on the track even though he's in a very very awkward position related to NATO membership and he's doing whatever they're telling them to do.
It's become so clear that whoever the puppeteers are are banging the war drums so hard that everybody is falling into line in terms of Deploying whatever resources they think they've got their hands on to get this war started, and they've been banging the war drums for a long time over there.
I would see this as even sort of a very strange extension of the Cold War, even though roles have reversed quite a bit, and we're going to see that a little bit more as we go into today's show.
The fact that the Babylon Bee can pick up on that Zelensky is controlling the forces, even as sarcasm, shows that it's becoming obvious and clear to everybody else that they're just doing what they're told to get this war started with Putin.
It's a shame 3,000 reservists, as if we haven't committed enough money already to this, now we're going to go over there and continue to beat the war drums right On the border of Russia and Poland with 3,000 more reservists that are supposedly going to beef up NATO forces in this proxy war.
I wish we could drop all the middlemen altogether and get this thing negotiated.
But obviously, whoever the puppeteers are, they don't want to see anything negotiated.
It's now been over 500 days that we've done zero negotiation with Russia, and we've continued to press their buttons.
And push all these angles and Zelensky's doing the world no favors.
He's showing his ass in terms of how he's treating the Orthodox Christians over in Ukraine and how he's treating Russia and how he's canceling the election.
Oh, this is a war for democracy.
So we're going to cancel the election.
This is getting very old.
It's getting very ugly.
And I see NATO and the puppeteers as being put in very, very precarious positions.
In relation to Russia, so much so that now all of a sudden we've got to deploy cluster bombs, which, I mean, caused over a million casualties in Cambodia and Laos as a result of all the years.
And I'm not sure if it was a million.
I read some numbers on it earlier.
I might be a little confused about it, but there's been a lot of people that have been killed with undeployed cluster bombs over in those areas, even as far back as undeployed from the Vietnam War.
So, this is appearing to get very desperate on behalf of these globalist puppeteers.
You're absolutely right, Brian, and of course our children are especially vulnerable because they pick up the little bomblets thinking they're some kind of toy.
Meanwhile, here's a fascinating report.
Vilnius NATO Summit reveals plans for global domination.
The declaration adopted this week by heads of state and government of the 31 NATO members is a blueprint for global war.
Only a fraction of the 24-page document deals with the central issue of the summit, the war in Ukraine.
In the rest, NATO declares its intention to impose its will on the entire world.
Hardly any continent or region is left out in what the document calls NATO's 360-degree approach.
The focus of the initial part is on the conflict with Russia.
Putin is denouncing language that rules out from the outset any solution to the war at the negotiating table.
There can be no impunity for its war crimes, and all those responsible must be held accountable to NATO demands.
A precondition for peace is Russia's complete and unconditional withdrawal, in language directed at Putin and states.
In light of its hostile policies and actions, we cannot consider Russia to be our partner.
Much of the media commentary is focused on the fact that while the Communist asserts Ukraine's future is in NATO, it does not lay out a specific timeline for membership.
Instead, it states Ukrainian membership will occur at a future date when allies agree and conditions are met.
For tactical reasons, the major NATO powers, especially U.S.
and Germany, decided now is not the time for formal Ukrainian membership, which would trigger Article 5 and deprive Biden Admin of the politically useful fiction, the U.S.
is not at war with Russia.
It leaves the door open for Poland or other neighbors to deploy, with U.S.
approval, troops inside Ukraine without committing the entire alliance to a formal declaration of war.
The maintenance of legal ambiguity does not mean NATO is not enormously escalating the war.
Ukraine being endlessly supplied with military and financial support to continue the fighting and bleed Russia wide or so they would desire.
The new communique Declares Ukraine's path to full Euro-Atlantic integration has moved beyond the need for the Membership Action Plan established in 2008 because Ukraine has become increasingly interoperable and politically integrated with the alliance.
Ukraine could not possibly satisfy those requirements, incidentally.
It adds, we remain steadfast in our commitment to step up political and practical support to Ukraine as it continues to defend its independent sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will continue our support for as long as it takes.
The U.S., Germany, and other NATO countries pledged further substantial military assistance.
The G7 countries, all President Villanous including Japan, which is no NATO member, pledged extensive assistance to Ukraine.
Having instigated the war over Ukraine, the U.S.
and NATO are utilizing it at horrific cost to the Ukrainian people to orchestrate a vast and global military escalation.
This applies first to the conflict with Russia itself, which is taking on a European-wide character.
Perhaps even more significant than the Communique is the war plan, running a total of 4,000 pages, adopted at the Conference, detailing troop and weapon deployments throughout Eastern Europe.
NATO's rapid reaction force will be increased from 40,000 to 300,000 soldiers.
The Communique refers to the plans to ensure timely reinforcement of Allies in line with our 360-degree approach.
We have committed to fully resource and regularly exercise these plans to be prepared for high-intensity and multi-domain collective defense.
Since NATO's last summit in Madrid a year ago, it has laid a veritable siege ring around Russia.
At that time, it invited Finland and Sweden to join and adopted a strategy policy that envisaged a massive increase in NATO troops in Eastern Europe and a significant increase in military spending.
The implementation of the decision is now well advanced, Finland is a NATO member, and the last obstacles to Sweden's accession have been resolved at Vilnius.
As a result, the land border of NATO member states with Russia has more than doubled in size and moved to within 150 kilometers of St.
Petersburg.
The Baltic Sea has become a NATO sea to which Russia has access only via a small corner in St.
Petersburg and the besieged enclave of Kaliningrad, a situation, by the way, that's evolving rapidly.
The conflict with Russia itself is part of a blueprint for global domination.
A central focus was on China, accused of employing a broad range of political, economic, and military tools to increase its global footprint and project power.
It's damaging the alliance's security with malicious, hybrid, and cyber operations and confrontational rhetoric and disinformation.
The summit declaration asserts a deepening strategic partnership between the People's Republic of China and Russia, and their mutually reinforcing attempts to undercut a rules-based international order run counter to our values and interests, which appear to be anything but democratic or even humane.
As with every document produced by imperialist powers, the NATO communique is rife with hypocrisy.
The U.S.
and European powers talk about defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity when they themselves have launched wars of aggression in every corner of the globe.
They insist on the absolute right of Ukraine to choose its strategic partners, that is, to join NATO, but deny that right to China and Russia.
They insist on the right of NATO to provide unlimited arms to Ukraine but treat any military assistance to Russia as a veritable act of war.
When the document speaks of upholding a rules-based international order, this means an order in which every country must do the bidding of the imperialist powers above all of the United States.
Toward this end, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been transformed into a Frankenstein monster, asserting its interests and values in every part of the globe.
The Black Sea region is of strategic importance to the Alliance.
The Middle East and Africa are regions of strategic interest.
The Indo-Pacific is important for NATO.
On what map, one might ask, does the Middle East, let alone the Indo-Pacific, touch the shorelines of the North Atlantic?
Even in the Arctic, in outer space and cyberspace, NATO wants to ensure security.
A cyber attack in service of pretext for war, a single or cumulative set of malicious cyber activities, could reach the level of armed attack, could lead the North Atlantic Council to invoke Article 5 of the Washington Treaty on a case-by-case basis.
Article 5 obligates all NATO members to provide assistance to a member under military attack.
Particularly ominous are repeated references to nuclear war, which has entered into the calculation of the imperialist war planners.
We will individually and collectively deliver the full range of forces, capability, plans, resources, assets, and infrastructure needed for deterrence and defense, including for high-intensity, multi-domain war fighting against nuclear-armed peer competitors, accordingly it states.
We will strengthen training and exercises that simulate conventional and, for Allies concerned, a nuclear dimension of a crisis or conflict, facilitating greater coherence between conventional and nuclear components of NATO's deterrence and defense posture across all domains and the entire spectrum of conflict.
The document exposed the political bankruptcy of the strategy of the Putin regime, which pursued a policy aimed at putting pressure on the imperialist powers for security guarantees.
But the U.S.
and European imperialist powers do not want compromise.
They want world domination.
Despite the obvious failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive, the U.S.
and NATO will do everything to perpetuate a war no matter how many Ukrainians are killed.
Russia, in my opinion, wrongly stated here, has been drawn into a trap from which it can find no exit.
No, I say no.
Russia asserted its right to defend itself by intruding in Ukraine for all the right reasons.
The longer the conflict drags on, the greater the pressure on Putin to either escalate or capitulate.
Why would they capitulate when they're winning hands down?
Within the framework of the capitalist-based politics of the regime, there is no palatable middle ground to be found.
That is correct.
But the policies of NATO as a fine expression in the Communique have a thoroughly delusional and reckless character.
The grandiose plan for world conquest and domination stems from the crisis of global capitalism.
For more than 30 years, the U.S., supported by its European partners, has tried to make up for the decline of its economic dominance through military force, with devastating consequences for Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and other countries.
They have only one answer to the incompatibility of the social and international character of modern production on the one hand, and private property and the nation-state on the other, on which capitalism is based.
A violent re-division of the world under their domination.
This is also already the cause for the first and second world wars.
The war plans of the imperialist powers will enormously escalate the growth of social conflict.
The document pledges all signatories to commit at least 2% of their GDP to war.
However, it states, in many cases, expenditure beyond 2% will be needed to remedy existing shortfalls and meet the requirements across all domains arising from a more contested security order.
And who will pay for it?
The escalation is at the same time as the assault on social programs, wages, and jobs of the vast majority of the population of the working class.
The Summit participants are well aware.
Throughout the document, there are veiled references to internal conflict.
It refers to the need to boost our national and collective ability to ensure continuity of government, enable civil support to military operators, and promote societal resilience.
It even reverses the possibility of using Article 5 against domestic opponents of government, not state actors, who target our political institution, our critical infrastructure, our societies, our democrat system, our economies, and the security of our citizens.
They're known here in the U.S.
as domestic terrorists.
NATO's claim to impose its will on the whole world borders on madness.
But it's the madness of a ruling class with its back against the wall.
For all their saber-rattling and threats, the members of NATO held their summit under conditions of extreme crisis.
The ruling elites of the major imperialist powers are desperately trying to hold everything together, including between themselves and within their own governments above all.
They confront growing social opposition from the working class.
The end of war will only come through fusing the developing struggles of the working class with opposition to imperialism.
The objective conditions are developing rapidly.
This year has seen mass protests and strikes in the U.S., France, Germany, the U.K., and other major capitalist countries.
All the governments overseeing the escalation are despised, and there is massive, blatant opposition to war in the international working class.
The task is to make this objective movement politically conscious, to develop within the working class an understanding of the need to connect the fight against inequality and exploitation with the fight against imperialist war and the capitalist nation-state system.
We urge those who agree with this perspective to join and build the International Committee of the Fourth Internationale and its sections, the Socialist Equality Parties, where I must say, though I do not agree with the Socialist Worker Parties, I think their critique up to this point is spot on.
Brian, your thoughts?
Oh, This is getting to be such a tangled web, so let me see if I can highlight some of the high points and tell you where we are today.
We start messing around fixing up the elections in Ukraine about 2008.
We promise the newly elected puppets in Ukraine that we're going to help them go to war against Russia and Hold on to their independence from Russia for a long, long time.
We're going to make them strong.
We're going to build a mall on every corner, and we're going to produce all this farmland.
And here's all the promises we're going to give to Vladimir Zelensky and Ukraine, as long as they'll go ahead with this war.
So they step into it.
Russia long plays it.
America uses it as an excuse to deplete all of our current munitions and replace them so the military industrial complex can have their war and have everything else.
Meanwhile, NATO finally gets around to figuring it out.
They have their summit and they're like, "Hey, you know what?
The very fact that Ukraine's in war is sort of disqualifying them from joining NATO.
Even though we supported Ukraine to help them join NATO, now they're disqualifying.
Now they're doing war crimes with cluster bombs.
So that doesn't really make them a good fit for NATO anymore either.
So Jen Stoltenberg comes out and Germany comes out and basically stabs Ukraine in the back and says, you know what?
This thing's getting a little bit too ugly.
We're not going to continue to help you out with this.
Good luck, but no, you don't have any chance of NATO troops frog jumping over your troops to fight Russia on the front.
And as a matter of fact, we're going to back out and you're no longer really going to be welcome here in NATO.
Wait a second.
But America promised!
America gave a bunch of money to people and America promised that we would help get them into NATO and we would do whatever it costs.
But it's failed.
And so now you've got the NATO summit going, hey guys, this is just getting a little bit too ugly.
We can't continue this.
We didn't expect Putin to be so reserved and hold back.
We thought that he would lash out with a nuclear bomb or whatever it happened to be.
And that, you know, open and shut case, NATO all of a sudden gains world domination.
Well, Putin outplayed them the whole entire way.
What a bunch of idiots!
And look at America!
Can our word be trusted?
Anywhere?
Anymore?
Oh, we're going to promise Ukraine all this, and we're going to promise them that, and we're going to take them into a war with Russia, and we're going to promise them that we're going to go ahead and fight until the end, and then when it gets down to the times get tough, and all the munitions are running out, and now we're sending in 3,000 measly troops into Poland to help protect...
America has mud on its face.
All of these Republicans have mud on their face.
We have stabbed Ukraine in the back with this thing.
It's turned too ugly.
There's nothing left to do except allow Russia to annex Ukraine.
Very, very good, Brian.
Very, very nice.
tuck tail and run, and then would just replace whatever regime in America or whatever NATO country with whoever comes next, because nobody can show their face in the global stage anymore.
That's how bad it's getting.
And what is the out?
I don't know.
I have no idea.
Very, very good, Brian.
Very, very nice.
Meanwhile, Biden cocaine scandal takes a weird turn.
The White House delivers a surprise accusation.
Many Americans are concerned that an illegal drug was found in the White House.
Cocaine was discovered in the West Wing, where many staff and reporters gathered.
People have been demanding answers, including former President Trump, who suggested the Secret Service could easily find out who left the drug, thanks to security tapes.
Let me add, I know a former Secret Service agent who said this could have been solved in 30 minutes.
The White House has not been honest about this incident.
At first, it claimed the drugs were in the library.
Then it suggested the Secret Service would not find out who left them there.
Now, when Biden's top goons are putting forward a claim, few are going to believe.
I'm a post-millennial.
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan hinted that cocaine found in the White House likely came from construction workers working in the area for renovation instead of from the Biden family.
He said, I'd make a point about the Situation Room because I think there's been a lot of questionable reporting on this.
The Situation Room is not in use and has not been used in months because it's currently under construction.
Uh-huh.
Biden's National Security Advisor, a Biden admin, yes man named Jake Sullivan, claims to believe the cocaine was left behind by a construction worker.
Because, you know, most construction workers bring illegal drugs with them when they work, and they use those drugs while working at the White House.
And kudos to you, Jake, for throwing a nameless blue-collar worker under the bus.
Isn't Uncle Joe the working man's friend?
Not when their cocaine is lying around.
Does Biden really think we're going to believe this nonsense?
Since when do construction workers, or anyone else for that matter, gain access to the White House without going through security?
Do you mean to tell me one of the workers was able to get inside with a bag of cocaine?
Is it more likely the drugs were smuggled by someone who had enough privilege that he wasn't subject to routine security checks?
Perhaps someone close to the President himself?
Keep in mind, Sullivan's not involved in the investigation.
He seemingly has no solid information from the Secret Service or law enforcement.
He's merely a lab dog for Biden with a history of covering up hacks to protect his failed administration.
We don't know who left the drugs, but we'll bet the farmer wasn't a construction worker.
Takeaways?
Vice National Security Advisor blamed the cocaine on construction worker Jake Sullivan, citing no evidence.
Claimed someone working in the area left the drugs.
The White House have been trying to hide the blame for whoever left them behind.
Brian, your thoughts?
The gaslighting on this particular issue stops.
Never.
I don't believe for a second that they don't know who left the drugs and what I feel bad for and I know this is sort of a term that a lot of people use but you know the good guys in the FBI and the good guys in the Secret Service you know there are some guys out there that do the best they can and I always kind of thought of the Secret Service as the elite of the elite of the elite but For years, I've believed that they get rid of the true patriots and replace them with people that they know that they can control.
I want you to think about this situation.
Every ex-Secret Service guy out there knows they could have solved this thing, and they're going to throw the Secret Service under the bus on this thing.
Oh, they can't figure it out.
Well, what if it had been anthrax?
Oh, we couldn't figure that out either.
Okay.
It's, it's absolutely ridiculous and it's, it flies in the face of, you know, I think it's going to be a situation like this.
And if we did, if we had a less compliant media that actually told the story, you'll be, you'll start to see more whistleblowers coming out because these people are insulting The few remaining patriots that are in the government.
I don't even know how many there are.
I have a feeling that they pick people because they can be manipulated and because they can be controlled.
How else do you explain this?
That all these ex-Secret Service guys or FBI guys are not coming out here and just blowing their horns all over the place.
Except that the media won't hear their story.
Nobody wants to come out with it.
Nobody wants to come forward unless they've got other people coming forward.
This is getting to be ridiculous, and I hope that at some point, somewhere, there are some patriots in this organization that will be willing to sacrifice even a fraction of what we've sacrificed to play this game.
I don't say that lightly.
Playing this game has resulted in quite a bit of heat on Jim, I've had my own issues here and there related to lots of this, and I know that other people on our shows have.
We take more heat than these guys do.
Look at all the responsibility they have.
Look at all the systems that they're given.
Look at all the surveillance apparatus that they have for us, and yet a private investigator can come up with more information, good information, than they can?
It's getting to be ridiculous.
That they continue to gaslight us on this level.
And I think that at the end of the day, this is going to get really ugly for this administration.
I don't think we're going to see two more solid years of the Biden administration.
Something's going to happen.
There's going to be some event that drives martial law.
I don't think they're going to let the elections go forward.
This thing's all just too ugly.
Meanwhile, the Republicans don't seem to care about the cocaine in the White House.
I wonder why.
Right, yeah, excellent, excellent comments.
Meanwhile, the Babylon Bee once again nails it.
D.C.
residents concern crack house on Pennsylvania Avenue will drag down the housing market.
Washington, D.C.
Local residents and landlords in the D.C.
area are concerned after rumors surfaced that a nearby home on Pennsylvania Avenue has become a dangerous crack house.
It's just not fair!
I work hard to maintain my property only to have real estate value plummet when this riffraff moves into the neighborhood, St.
Carla Biggins, the owner of a middle-income apartment building that offers units at the reasonable price of just $15,000 per month.
I always see sufficient people coming and going from that place.
It's what sits all on edge.
Lord knows what kind of shady things are happening there.
Yuck!
Local authorities confirm hard drugs were recently found on the premises, but warn they would likely never find the perpetrator because the owner of the crack house pays their salaries.
It's too much to expect wreck fuds like us to do anything about this shady crack house, says spokesperson for the FBI.
This neighborhood has been going downhill for a long time anyway.
There's nothing we can do.
Residents are being encouraged to take their concerns to the next City Council meeting, where they will be ignored.
At publishing time, D.C.
home values already plummeted to an average of only $12 million.
How well they do.
Meanwhile, how techno-communism will institute the D.C.B.C., the Central Bank Game Plan, in under three minutes.
The entire global financial system is now essentially a techno-communist, black-op, money-laundering crime scene.
Central banks, their Wall Street conspirators, and the major corporations are all colluding in ushering their hyper-centralized CBDC dystopia.
This, of course, is digital money.
The central bank currency will, of course, be inextricably tailored to the AI social credit score scheme.
The screws are tightening on the One World Government precisely because they're acutely aware that PSYOP 19 is backfiring, and they're now cornered.
That makes them especially dangerous now.
Whether it be PSYOP market crash, PSYOP UFO, or another pandemic in PSYOP 2324, What is certain is that these techno-communist sociopaths will unleash yet another great reset problem they hope will induce the maximum societal fear and compliance reaction for which they will most magnanimously swoop in with their dystopian solution.
This article is written by Brandon Smith.
At the end of June, government leaders and think tank powerbrokers from around the world met at the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact in Paris.
Participants included U.N.
Secretary General Antonio Guterres, U.S.
Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen, IMF Managing Director Christina Georgieva, and World Bank President A.J.
Bangor.
The supposed purpose was to find financial solutions to goals of tackling poverty while simultaneously curbing planet-heating emissions.
As with all climate change-related events, the discussion inevitably turned to international centralization of power and the formation of a global consortium to fix the problems that they claim sovereign nations cannot or will not fix.
However, I'm seeing more and more in the past couple of years a convergence of narratives.
Central banks and international banks are now suddenly more concerned with carbon taxation and global warming than they seem to be concerned with stagflation and economic collapse, likely because this was a goal all along, and economic collapse is part of the plan.
Globalists are now combining the climate change issue with international finance and monetary authority, in other words.
They aren't hiding the fact that the global change agenda is part of the Great Reset agenda anymore.
They're even suggesting the threat of climate change uses a springboard for giving global banks more power to dictate the circulation of wealth over deconstructing the existing system so it can be replaced with something else.
French President Emmanuel Macron told delegates the world needs a public financial shock to fight global warming, while also creating equity for less wealthy nations.
He argued the current system was not well-suited to address these challenges.
Presenters noted the International Economic Framework had been battered by a number of crises, including the pandemic and war in Ukraine, but focused on the spiraling cost of weather disasters intensified by global warming as a reason for the ongoing destabilization of financial systems.
This is obvious nonsense, but it fits with the narrative programming globalists are trying to engineer by linking economic decline to global change in reality.
There is zero evidence global weather events are any worse today than they were over a hundred years ago, before carbon-producing industries were widespread.
There's no proven connection.
between carbon emissions and any specific weather phenomena.
The claim is a fraud.
There is no man-made climate crisis, as I've outlined in evidence in previous articles.
But how many people will be fooled into thinking there is a climate crisis, and what can that hysterical fear be exploited for?
Barbados Prime Minister Mia Motley, like many globalists, advocated for reimagining the role of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund In an era of climate danger, she argues, what is required of us now is absolute transformation and not reform of our institutions.
UN leader Antonio Guterres said the global financial system, conceived at the end of World War II under the Bretton Woods Agreement, was failing to rise to modern challenges and now perpetuates even worse inequalities.
In other words, he's angling for a new woke Bretton Woods.
We can take steps right now in a giant leap toward global justice, adding to his proposed stimulus of $500 billion a year for investments in sustainable development and climate action.
There was also a plan presented to use the IMF's special drawing rights basket as a mechanism to produce global liquidity.
Keep in mind that the fiat stimulus measures of central banks and the interest rate policies of global bankers are what caused the current economic crisis to begin with.
It wasn't COVID, it wasn't the war in Ukraine, and it certainly wasn't climate change.
It was the banks and their use of monetary manipulation that triggered 40-year high inflation, which has led to central banks hiking interest rates into economic weakness.
The strategy is consistently called debt implosion and stock market disasters in the past.
The bankers and globalists are the source of the problem.
They should not be put in charge of fixing it.
Yet here they are, seeking to take control and institute a sweeping reset plan for the calamity they created.
But where is all of this leading?
Last year, the U.N.
suggested developed and emerging economies like the U.S.
and China would have to pay a kind of wealth emission tax of at least $2.4 trillion a year into a fund for climate change development.
Well, that would be distributed to poor nations.
Redistributed by whom?
Well, the globalists, of course.
Other ideas include taxation on fossil fuel profits and financial transactions to raise climate funds.
Meanwhile, they plan to attack oil and gas until prices become so high the general public won't be able to afford them.
Macron in particular backed the idea of an international tax on carbon emission from shipping, ostensibly to make overseas freight more expensive in order to reduce manufacturing demand.
This expands on the strict carbon rules already being implemented on European agriculture.
These all seem disjointed plans to simply inflate prices or different forms of taxation and force the public to consume less goods.
But there's a much bigger scheme at play here.
It's important to understand that climate change is nothing more than a vehicle to deliver a fully centralized global economic system, likely under the control of the IMF, BIS, World Bank, and UN.
The annual payments by wealthier nations into global institutional coffers is an act of tribute, a show of fealty.
It's also a way for groups like the IMF to create systems of greater interdependency.
Invest sums of money are flowing through globalist institutions and they become the arbiters of how that wealth is redistributed.
They can also build a system of rewards and punishment.
They can punish countries that don't follow their dictates and give advantages to countries that toe the line.
In terms of a new Bretton Woods.
I suspect this is all culminating in a currency crisis, which the globalists will use as an opportunity to finally introduce their central bank digital currency.
And once CBDCs are implemented, their ability to dominate the population will be complete.
A cashless system with no privacy in transactions and the ability to shut down the buying power of individuals and groups at will It's a totalitarian dream scenario.
It's no mistake the public is being constantly bombarded with global warming propaganda these days.
The powers that lead need an existential crisis as a fear generator.
When people are afraid, they don't think rationally and will often turn to the worst possible leaders for relief.
And a global threat requires a global response, right?
Climate change disaster narratives, if the public embraces the propaganda, and you can hear it every day on your television reports, check it out, will allow for a wide array of systemic changes that have nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with financial dominance.
National wealth taxation and redistribution, the imposition of the World Bank and IMF as a mediator for global funds, the use of the IMF's SDR basket as a de facto global currency umbrella, the injection of CBDC and a cashless society.
None of these things have any bearing on climate change, even if it were a legitimate threat.
But what about the scorched earth model?
If the ultimate intent is to destroy the economy to the point that most industry dies, trade retracts, and the population plummets because survival becomes untenable, then one might argue that the globalists are saving the planet by getting rid of people.
I suppose if you think keeping the population in perpetual third world status will save us from global warming, then you might support such an agenda.
Whether the goal is simply economic micromanagement or the forced liquidation of production, the outcome would be more power for internationalists and less freedom and prosperity for everyone else.
They can spin it however they want, but when the elites call for a financial shock, they are really calling for a dramatic throttling of the system so it can no longer maintain the existing populace.
When they call for global taxation and tribute in the name of equality, they are not trying to make everyone equally rich.
They want everyone equally poor.
And when they call for the centralized oversight of nations for the sake of saving the planet, What they really want is global governance.
Do not comply.
Brian.
I appreciate the article.
And just before we went into the article, I had said that we had sacrificed Quite a bit.
And even in comparison to these guys, they get their government salary.
And just now while Jim was reading the article, I realized that a Sandy Hook proponent just went onto my Google and reviewed our company and said that nobody should do business with us because we question Sandy Hook.
So he gave us a one-star review.
Now, I've spent 12 years building one of the best reputations in Texas on that company, and we're being assaulted by guys like this on a daily basis.
Guys, they want to shut us up and shut us down.
Now, let me point out what I think is very important about that particular article.
The term climate change is used so that these global financial instruments understand who belongs and who doesn't.
And if you were to go back and study Pizzagate, you'd find out that many of times those people don't do business with other people that aren't doing the same things that they're doing.
There was a guy by the name of Ronald Bernard who did a YouTube sort of tell-all video about what happens in those sectors, and they said, The details of the deal don't necessarily make as much sense in terms of will we do business with you rather than can we trust you?
And he was basically saying this is more about the Epstein network and what was going on with that blackmail operation.
I'm trying to make a parallel here.
What they were saying is It doesn't necessarily matter how much money we'll make.
If we'll do business with you, what matters is, can we trust you not to tell our secrets if we let you in on how our secrets work?
Now, Epstein ran one of the largest, and I would say it was a Mossad-based, blackmail, honey-trap type operation in the world.
People, many people voluntarily got involved in these particular apparatuses.
They went to Epstein Island on purpose.
They did the things that they were told because they were told that as long as we can trust you that you play along within the game and we've got this We've got this dirt on you, then we can, we'll allow you to play as a part of the global banking and currency system.
I am saying that climate change is euphemism for, can we trust you to be a part of the system?
Can we trust you to be brainwashed, dumb, and stupid enough to come in and play in a way where you can be compromised?
And I think that's how exactly how it's playing.
Now here in America, We're given certain liberties, certain rights, as you will, or freedoms.
The freedom to associate with whoever we want.
The freedom to travel between states.
The freedom to do what we want with our money, for the most part, as long as we pay our taxes.
The freedom to hold and bear arms doesn't necessarily guarantee the right to do it, or the liberty to do it, but it does guarantee the right to do it.
And what I'm trying to say is the whole purpose of CBDCs is control.
If we know who you associate with, if we know how you're spending your money, we can control you.
Look at how they figured out who all was there at January 6th.
The FBI did a subpoena to Bank of America to find all transactions or all ATM transactions and other types of transactions that happened In DC, or in that area, during that, so they could create a comprehensive list of everybody that was possibly there.
They don't have the right to that information on me.
And the more of that information they get, the more they're spying illegally, without a warrant, on me.
They don't have a warrant, they don't have probable cause to search me, yet they know what my bank transactions were just because I happen to be in this particular place at this particular time.
It's the same with my cell phone.
They don't have the right to know what information, who I call, who I don't call, what websites I go to, or what I don't go to.
And this is what this hubbub in DC was about last week, was that many conservatives were saying to the FBI, are you collecting this information?
If so, how are you using it?
The whole purpose of CDBCs is a control operation because sooner or later the people are going to figure out who they are and what they represent and they fear us.
We have more power than you think.
As long as we continue to stay on point and stay on the truth, we'll be able to fight back against that apparatus.
Excellent points, Brian.
And frankly, your research all by itself blows apart the whole Sandy Hook narrative.
It's incredible that you would be attacked, but it's because they fear you.
Meanwhile, Tucker shuts down top 2024 candidate.
May have ended his campaign with one brutal question.
What's happening?
It looks as if Tucker is quickly becoming a major force in the 2024 presidential election.
He was already on fire after Fox canceled his show.
He moved to Twitter and has an audience more than twice the size, actually.
Tucker was drawing about 3 million on Fox.
He's drawn around 60 million on Twitter.
That's 20 times the size.
Rumor's about his launching his own network.
And even more seemed to be coming down the pike for this unapologetic conservative thinker.
Over the weekend, he hosted a Republican presidential summit.
Actually, he was featured at a Family Values Summit in Des Moines, Iowa.
His vote were the top names contending for the nomination.
You better believe he did not hold back.
During a sparring session with former Vice President Mike Pence, Tucker unloaded on his support for the Ukrainian war.
And the newsman shut down Pence before his campaign could even take off from Twitter.
Tucker instantly ends Mike Pence's career in 60 seconds.
Tucker nukes Pence on Ukraine 8.
Every city in the United States has become much worse over the last three years, and your concern is Ukrainians?
Mike Pence actually said about the issues of the state of the cities, that's not my concern.
What a blunder.
Wow.
That was painful to watch.
Tucker Glass Pence, for his support of U.S.
spending billions to bankroll a war, we're not even a part of.
Meanwhile, as he observes, every city in the United States is worse since Biden took over.
He demanded Pence defend his stance on the country sending more weapons and money to keep the fight going.
Pence hardly had words to defend his stance.
Pence looked like a boxer on the ropes, unable to put words together.
The audience was clearly on Tucker's side.
Cheering so loudly, Pence seemed frazzled and daunted.
The sad reality is, most Republican candidates support Biden's bankrolling of the Ukraine war.
They don't seem to care that Biden, who has a history of colluding with this profoundly corrupt country, continued his run in what appears to be a very corrupt regime.
At the same time, Biden is letting millions of illegals enter our country, ignoring the decline of U.S.
cities, letting inflation rage out of control.
Pence claimed we can do both, spend billions on an endless war and save our communities.
But he didn't seem to know how that could be done.
Tucker may have ended his campaign right there.
Takeaways?
Tucker confronted Mike Pence for his support of the Ukrainian war.
Pence appeared unable to provide a strong response.
Pence, like other GOP candidates, supports sending billions to Ukraine while America suffers.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I don't have too much to say about this.
I have been paying attention to what I can.
I listened to the 45 minute, like it was a keynote speech offered at the Blazes conference.
I forget the name of the conference, but Tucker did a very good job questioning the narrative during that speech.
And that was after the Mike Pence interview, which obviously from Pence's perspective was like, The most suicidal thing he could have ever possibly said is that he just doesn't, it's not his concern what happens with the American people and the American economy.
But the bigger question that arose in my mind as a result of watching that interview between Tucker Carlson and Mike Pence is, who applied the pressure to Donald Trump to get Pence in that position when it was obvious that he wasn't the who applied the pressure to Donald Trump to get Pence in that position when it What kind of deal got cut?
Where did it get cut?
So many different people that and Pence obviously in the end sort of stabbed him in the back by not coming out during the next election cycle and saying, hey, something stinks about this whole election.
As 175 million Americans were saying at the same time in unison, hey, something smells funny.
Even if you were on the left, the lefties say, yeah, we cheated.
So what?
That's what we had to do to beat wicked Donald Trump.
But do you do you think Donald Trump maybe has grown up a little bit since that four years where he was president?
You think he understands a little bit more about the dangers of appointing rhinos to positions that are going to end up hurting him and stabbing him in the back?
Pence, I don't see why anybody liked Pence.
I don't see what it was about Pence that said that Trump had to decide that Mike Pence was the right guy.
This guy is so milquetoast and so weak They claim he's a Christian.
They say he goes to church and he's this and he's that.
I haven't seen a single strong position from this guy at all.
I see him as nothing more than another Rhino.
playing the game, trying to jockey for a political position, taking interviews with whomever he can, wherever he can, however he can, and trying to get limelight to keep his political apparatus going so that he can continue to get the pieces of the action that he's currently getting.
Mike Pence, go away already.
Oh, Ryan, I couldn't agree more.
He's a pathetic individual.
He has nothing to bring to the table.
I believe it was probably geographic balancing because he was a Midwest governor and all that, but he was a terrible waste of time and betrayed Trump at the January 6th when he could have sent back disputed state legislators for the legislatures of those states to decide which electors should be counted, and he failed in that and thereby betrayed the country.
He is worthless and deserving of nothing but contempt.
Meanwhile, BLM rising again?
The far-left Marxist BLM movement, known for urban terror, worsening racial relations, that means using its donations, is celebrating its 10th anniversary by launching a Defund the Police Week of Action.
That is, support your local criminals.
Read it that way and you'll understand what's going on.
Earlier this week, the BLM Global Network Foundation published a digital ad renewing 2020 rallying cries for defunding police departments the left-leaning AP News Agency reported.
They're also asking elected officials nationwide to sponsor a draft proclamation declaring July 13th Black Lives Matter Day.
To hell with that!
As we continue our push to defund the police, invest in black communities, and reimagine safety in our communities by making them overwhelmingly less safe, we need our elected official to focus on the people, not police, BLM founding board member Deshane Parker declared.
The safest places around the world don't have more police, more jails, more prisons, or harsher sentences.
They have better access to economic opportunity, quality education, stable housing, and health care, she claimed.
AP points out BLM was founded in 2013 as a reaction to the defendant's acquittal in the fatal shooting that claimed the life of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.
Mark was one of the earliest symbols of a movement that now wields influence in politics, law enforcement, and broader conversation about racial progress in and outside the U.S.
Various BLM subgroups and activists use the anniversary to issue renewed calls from renewed push to defund police departments, probably the single worst idea ever advocated by any political group.
The BLM's 10th birthday comes after a recent Supreme Court ruling that stymied President Biden's $40 million plan for student loan release and banning Affirmative Action in college admissions, where the $40 million plan was to buy votes from students.
According to prominent movement activist Malina Abdullah, the Supreme Court decision mean the need for BLM's existence could not be more clear.
What this moment means is we have to absolutely redouble our efforts and redouble our commitment to making Black Lives Matter, said Abdullah, head of BLM Grassroots Incorporated, a collective of organizers.
Ten years in, we're getting a glimpse at what would happen if there were no Black Lives Matter.
The country would be a hell of a lot better off, let me say.
We're not just going to fight when it's popular.
We're going to fight because we need to fight.
Brian, this is just disgusting.
Your thoughts?
Well, BLM is nothing more than old socialist Bolshevik tactics designed to stir up a population and Keep you from looking at what's important while they make a bunch of noise and rattle sabers on it at what's not important.
As I said in one of our previous shows lately, the tension between black and white in America.
Seems to be much worse than it was 10 years ago.
10 years ago, I could go and function in a black community.
I can no longer do that.
I have to send in a black investigator.
If I want to interview black people, the outrage and outcry among even the inbound callers to my company, just for the very fact that I'm white, causes a lot of problems for us.
If I don't tell people what they want to hear, that seem to have that black voice on the other end of the line, then they tend to get more upset with me than they used to.
I think it's nothing more than a way to keep our society divided, to lock the black vote down, to tie it into Biden.
And I'll point this out, Biden's supposed fundraising numbers are much higher than they've been in a long, long time.
And I don't understand how that could possibly be.
The man's not I don't think anything makes sense.
And how in the world is Black Lives Matter?
Apparently what's happening is that Trump is becoming so strong that it's the anti-Trumpers that are donating so much money and he's outpacing everybody else.
So how this makes sense right now, I'll never know.
I don't think anything makes sense.
And how in the world is Black Lives Matter re-upping after all their legal problems related to all the money that they've stolen, related to everything that they've done wrong?
Even the Black community is beginning to recognize that that BLM founder lady has a $10 million house and hired her artist brother for security for some ridiculous number.
Everybody's beginning to see how bad it really is, yet the money just keeps flowing.
Why?
How?
Where?
What?
And then, of course, there's all the Democrat donors that James O'Keefe exposed, that people that had given once or twice, they're approached by a private investigator who knocks on the door and says, how much money have you given to the DNC?
How much money have you given to this campaign?
Oh, I gave $100 last November.
And he's like, well, I fear on record that you have 360 donations, one every day for the last 360 days.
That's impossible.
How could that possibly be?
The whole thing is a fraud.
They're obviously using money to prop up a small apparatus that's Bolshevik-style, tear us up tactics and divide us.
America is beginning to see through it all.
Brian, you got it exactly right.
Well said.
Meanwhile, Biden's $39 billion student loan plan could face a legal battle.
The Biden admin calls it a student loan safety net.
Opponents call it a backdoor attempt to make college free.
I call it a way to buy votes from young people.
And it could be the next battleground in the legal fight over student loan relief.
Starting this summer, millions of Americans with student loans will be able to enroll in a new payment plan that offers some of the most lenient terms ever.
Interest won't pile up as long as borrowers make regular payments, right?
You can count on that.
Millions will have monthly payments reduced to zero, and in as little as 10 years, any remaining debt will be canceled.
It's known as the SAVE plan, and although it was announced last year, it's been overshadowed by Biden's proposal for mass student loan cancellation.
But now, after the Supreme Court struck down Biden's forgiveness plan, the repayment option is taking center stage.
Since the ruling, Biden has proposed an alternative approach to cancel debt and shifted attention to the lesser-known initiative called the Most Affordable Repayment Plan Ever.
The typical borrower who enrolls in a plan will save $1,000 a month.
Republicans have fought against the plan, saying it oversteps the president's authority.
Senator Bill Cassidy, ranking Republican on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, called it deeply unfair to the 87% of Americans who don't have student loans.
The Congressional Budget Office previously estimated over the next decade the plan would cost $230 billion, which would be even higher now than the Forgiveness Plan has been struck down.
Estimates from researchers at the University of Pennsylvania put the cost up to $361 billion.
Emboldened by the Supreme Court decision on cancellation, some opponents say it's just a matter of time before the repayment plan faces its own legal challenges.
Here's what to know about it.
The U.S.
Department of Education offers several plans for repaying federal student loans.
Under the Standard Plan, borrowers are charged a fixed monthly amount that ensures all their debt will be repaid after 10 years.
But if borrowers have difficulty paying that amount, they can enroll in one of four plans offering lower monthly payments based on income and family size.
Those are known as income-driven repayment plans.
Income-driven options have been offered for years, generally kept payments at 10% of a borrower's discretionary income.
If a borrower's earnings are low enough, their bill is reduced to zero, and after 20 or 25 years, any remaining debt gets erased.
As part of his debt relief plan announced last year, Biden said the Department of Education would create a new income-driven repayment plan that lowers payments even further.
It became known as the SAVE plan, intended to replace existing income-driven plans.
Borrowers will be able to apply later this summer, but some of the change will be phased in over time.
Right away.
More people will be eligible for zero payments.
The new plan won't require borrowers to make payments if they earn less than 225% of the federal poverty line, $34,800 a year for a single person.
of the federal poverty line, 34,800 a year for a single person.
The cutout for current plans, by contrast, is 150% of the poverty line, or 22,000 a year for a single person.
Another immediate change aims to prevent interest from snowballing.
As long as borrowers make their monthly payments, their overall balance won't increase.
Once they cover their adjusted monthly payment, even if it's zero, any remaining interest will be waived.
The Education Department says it will notify borrowers when the new application process launches.
Those enrolled in an existing plan, known as Repay, will automatically be moved into the same plan.
Borrowers will also be able to sign up for contracting their loan services directly.
It'll be available to all borrowers in the Direct Loan Program or in good standing on their loans.
The admin announced last year it would make fixes to correct mistakes in tracking payments that qualify toward forgiveness under income-driven repayment plans as a result.
The Education Department said Friday.
It'll wipe out $39 billion in debt held by more than 800,000 borrowers.
Officials said eligible borrowers will be informed beginning Friday—that would be last—that they qualify for forgiveness without further action on their part.
Brian, your thoughts?
Obamacare was passed, the PPACA was passed, Barack Obama comes through and he promises everybody that they'd get free health care.
What did you hear from the poor community that wasn't paying attention?
Oh, Barack Obama's been elected, Obamacare's been passed, where am I gonna get my health card?
When am I gonna get my health care card?
When's it gonna show up at my door and make my life so much better?
I'm gonna get free insurance.
Oh, Obamacare's been passed!
One of the most misguided attempts to gain votes I have ever seen.
Has Obamacare meant anything to any of our listeners?
Maybe a few people have had the ability to have their health insurance extended, but prices have skyrocketed faster than inflation.
Who got their Obamacare?
Where did the insurance ID cards Start to get issued.
What happened?
They were just some menial changes in industry regulation that caused more paperwork, more government oversight, more bureaucracy, and billion-dollar websites to get them under control, of which they never really got off the ground.
Exchanges?
Oh, okay, now I can go get to be a part of an exchange where Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana can compete for my business while I'm here in Houston.
What good is Blue Cross Blue Shield Montana to me in Houston, Texas?
That's a Montana network.
Sure, it's cheaper.
They want to compete down here for my business?
I need to have a local network that can do it.
That's precisely what the PPACA did.
It made a couple of other adjustments here, adjustments to the way the COBRA worked, adjustments to the way You could renew your insurance, but one thing it definitely did was get everybody in line in terms of your new effective date is January 1st, your new deductible is going to look like this, and you're going to have the gold or the silver or this, and all of these were just simply different designs of the same thing so the government could commoditize the entire business.
Do you think for one second that Joe Biden And this government bureaucracy plan that's going to cost X amount of money to implement is anything more than a promise to a bunch of campaign vendors that they're going to get the opportunity to administer this wonderful new program.
And what, these kids are going to be running around filling out their 500 pages in triplicate to get their money back from the U.S.
government?
Nothing.
The government.
Listen, young people.
Listen, listen to me carefully.
Nothing the government touches gets easier or better.
Nothing.
It's a lie.
We're trying to buy your vote with it.
You want smaller government, less intrusion into your life, less in taxes coming out of your check, less, less, less, smaller government, bigger freedom, more opportunity to make your own future.
If young people would understand this, I have no doubt that they would change their party from Democrat or whoever it happens to be that's hitting the fancy of the academics to conservative, smaller government, more liberty, less government entanglements.
That's how it ought to be.
And if young people could see it, this bureaucratic bloated government that allows the feds to come into states and push everybody around and throws money to their vendors and throws money to their partners that are giving them money for their campaign.
That's all it is, is a big money laundering scheme.
With an FBI to enforce and support the government's position that makes the government and the government's partners richer.
This is all a sham.
Brian, you nailed it 100%.
Wonderful.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
A week ago, I participated in a Bon Voyage for Kevin Barrett on the right, a dear friend of mine.
We've collaborated on 9-11 events and a host of others for decades.
Absolutely sensational guy who is moving to Morocco.
He put out this notice about our celebration, which was at a local pizza ranch.
My first outing since my surgery.
This is from Kevin, celebrating Jim Fetzer's recovery from heart surgery and my impending escape from the USA over lunch on Tuesday.
I'm sorry to be leaving the beautiful, driftless region of western Wisconsin, and I'll miss the lively, open-minded people like those who showed up for lunch with Jim Fetzer and me last Tuesday.
But I can't say I'll miss being in the neocon-occupied USA.
Well, the USA maybe a little bit, but not the neocons.
Meanwhile, now, final thoughts.
Brian, yours.
We should all be talking about smaller government.
We should all be, look, I don't really feel like I need anything more than my local sheriff to take care of my, to make sure that I can get trespassers off my land.
All I see the police doing is driving around, giving out tickets, responding to a few accidents here and there.
And then doing some 911 responses.
I don't see anything really great happening on any level anywhere.
I know the police, they give you more, but look at the rest of your government.
What are you getting for what you're paying?
And can it be consolidated?
It's federal government that comes down from the federal level that controls everything that happens, even down to your local county and city council.
They're all sitting there going, Oh, we can't lose our federal government, our federal money.
So we got to make sure that y'all wear your masks before you enter the city courthouse.
We got to make sure that you do this because we can't lose our federal money.
Ooh, educational institutions.
Oh, we got to make sure we have our federal money and we adhere to all these Federal standards before so that we can get checked off on our academics and get our money from the state which gets its money from the federal level, at least 50% of it, the feds are in the way of absolutely everything we could do it better without them.
If the states and the governors would What we need to be doing is taking a look at our politicians in terms of who is out there that wants to independently stand and get themselves loose from federal apron strings.
That's what needs to happen.
That's what we should be looking for.
And if we're going to go look for a politician, it ought to be a politician that says, no, I represent these people, not federal interests and not contractor interests and not this money.
It's these people that I represent.
And those are the guys that we ought to be trying to promote to Different offices in our society.
Well, Brian, it's just a joy to do shows with you.
You're so thorough and thoughtful and it's...
An obvious propaganda move for you to get a one-star review for panoramic investigation from somebody who's never utilized your services.
And if indeed anyone wants to get the score on Sandy Hook, check out what Mike King published on realhistorychan.com, what I republished on my own blog at jameshfetzer.org, what State of the Nation has also republished
Entitled, Jim Fetzer Explores the Sandy Hook Psy-Op, and ask yourself, what would it take to convince you that Sandy Hook had been a FEMA drill, presented as mass murder, to promote gun control?
Would you appreciate seeing the Sandy Hook manual for the event itself?
How would you like to see the Connecticut FEMA having the Sandy Hook exercise right on its schedule of forthcoming events?
Replete with a map of how to get from its headquarters in Bridgeport to Dickinson Drive, where the school is located.
Would you find that convincing?
How about looking at aerial photographs of the school and discovering, while it's presented as an elementary school, it has no playground?
It doesn't even have Handicap parking.
It couldn't have been legally operating, and it wasn't even originally an elementary school.
It was a special-needs school.
Or how about photographs from inside the Connecticut State Police files showing their own photographs contradict the official narrative?
For example, In a hallway where you're supposed to find the bodies of Dawn Hawkspring, the principal, and Mary Sherlock, the school psychologist, in pools of blood.
There are not only no bodies, but no pools of blood.
How about in a classroom?
Well, there should be Skid's bodies everywhere.
There are not any bodies and no blood.
There aren't even any student desks or chairs.
No teacher desk or chairs.
That was all uncovered by Brian Davidson, who's just a masterful investigator, a brilliant guy, who's exposing evidence that in and of itself shows the whole thing was a scam.
The whole thing was a sham.
The whole thing was a hoax.
So yeah, I'll be getting five-star reviews.
I recommend.
Ryan should offer a link.
Go at Mike.
King is done by featuring a piece that other websites would pee in their pants over even contemplating.
The people are desirous of the truth.
You deserve the truth.
We're doing our best to give it.
But mind you, those we're exposing are going to do everything in their power to discredit or demean or discourage you from learning what actually happened.
American history is very different than what you read in the books, and God knows what's going on today is completely different from what you read in the mainstream media.
Thanks for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection