Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 13, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:40:01

Need to Know News (13 July 2023) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Petzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California, and by Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with the NATO summit, beginning without any victories on the Ukrainian front.
	In fact, the Russians are beating the hell out of the Ukrainians.
	They've been suffering the heaviest losses in spite Can't force them to launch a new wave of large-scale assaults that are being annihilated.
	After constant attack by small infantry groups, called by Russians a Mosquito Offensive, Ukrainian forces finally launched new larger-scale.
	Two days before, they managed to break through up to 500 meters into Russian defenses in the town of Rabatino.
	However, they were attempting to secure, not having success under the heavy shelling of Russian artillery.
	Indeed, We've all heard about the sending of cluster bombs to Ukraine, which is offensive and immoral and wrong, in violation of international treaties the United States, however, has not signed.
	But as to compensate for the failure to provide 155 howitzers or munitions, the United States will take another year or more To be able to provide that, which means the Ukrainians are without artillery.
	And as I've mentioned before, in warfare, it's not the infantry or the tanks that bring about the most death, but by far the artillery.
	The Ukraine assault groups have replenished graveyards of NATO tanks.
	Footage of the spot that the columns failed to pass through the minefields before they can reach Russian positions.
	More and more Western vehicles are turning to scrap metal by the unprofessional operating procedure of the Ukrainian military, because basically all the professional Ukrainian military have been wiped out and they're reduced as civilians with minimal training.
	Heavy battles are ongoing all along the front lines, where the Ukrainian military attempts to gain at least some victory suggest the party the multi-billion dollar aid paid by NATO.
	It will not happen.
	Meanwhile, the UK is hoping to fight a war with Russia with only 40 tanks?
	This is completely absurd.
	The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has stripped the West of its True colors, as to which side they buttress, as if to prove that Ukraine can count on them, the UK vowed to support Zelensky's troop with weapons, including tanks, even though it has only 40.
	Admiral Sir Tony Radican, UK Chief of Defence, Revealed on the 5th of July, his country has no tanks, no army, it's all just bluster.
	For the record, UK was the first to send tanks and other heavy weaponry into the conflict.
	Just go out and cry, eat, tweet, and fight Russia?
	Britain had just 40 tanks and around a dozen frigates and destroyers to go to war, the lowest figures of modern time.
	According to him, Britain has around 200 tanks on paper, but only 40 were prepared to go to war.
	We're at 19 frigates and destroyers.
	We reduced to 17 because some were very expensive.
	Then you got maintenance and retrofit, maybe 11 or 12 are ready to go.
	In other words, there's nothing Russia could contribute militarily.
	The figures are the lowest in modern times.
	MB suggests the UK would struggle to fight a war against Russia.
	In fact, it would be all over before it began.
	For example, Putin's army has lost over 2,000 tanks, but has many in reserve.
	Meanwhile, France—and this is true insanity—is going to provide Ukraine with long-range cruise missiles.
	This is a colossal blunder.
	President Emmanuel Macron announced Paris will join London in providing long-range missiles to Kiev.
	They will send the Scalb air-launched long-range cruise missiles, a significant number according to Macron.
	Paris would not allow them to use the missile to attack Russian territory.
	Fat chance.
	That is to say, they will allow them to be used to defend Ukrainian territory, but how can they possibly control the way in which they'll actually be used?
	Call your thoughts.
	Well, first, the historian to me has to set the context that this is an ongoing war of aggression by the US, UK, NATO led by them.
	And the reason it's an ongoing war of aggression is because from 14 to 22, the Ukraine, backed by the developed countries, have been using those artillery shells that Jim mentioned to kill 14,000 in the Donbass when they refused to accept that puppet Zelensky.
	It's a war of aggression because They refused the peace terms of Putin and Russia and anybody reasonable from the beginning of the conflict, stating that, hey, just give independence to the Donbass and to Crimea.
	Let them choose where to go.
	And of course, they wouldn't align themselves with the same country that killed 14,000 of their fellow people over the last eight years.
	With that 40 tanks and with France upgrading what they're going to send, that the optics for the so-called developed nations is just becoming more and more tragic comic.
	Nobody supports what they're doing in this war, and they are so at risk with And I'm with that famous line in the movie Gandhi.
	management with their COVID policies.
	And I don't even think that their election fraud dealings are going to be able to save them.
	It's just the end for these parasitic, propagandistic, competition, public servants, also known as the small fringe minority.
	And I'm with that famous line in the movie Gandhi.
	If you haven't seen the movie Gandhi, I do recommend it, where Gandhi just says, you know, we're going to get our independence.
	It's like looking at an apple tree and ripe apple.
	It is going to fall.
	You're not exactly sure when, but it's coming down.
	And that's what I'm seeing with this war.
	Nice points, Brian.
	Well, I'm glad to be back in the office really for the first time in about a month.
	My family's been dealing with some issues related to hospice with my father-in-law, which is why I've been spending so much time up at the lake house with my wife, is to make sure to watch things as they continue to decline there.
	But it was nice to be back in the office today and have a few hours to prep for this.
	And part of my prep work today was to really go back over and refresh my mind as to the true nature of the Cold War that began following the end of World War II.
	And it appears to me that we set up NATO to sort of guarantee that the global elite could continue to pull, continue to control what was happening on the Western Bloc.
	And the way it really came clear to me today was the Eastern Bloc versus the Western Bloc.
	Take a look at the Berlin Wall.
	In East Germany, you've got the Western bloc, which was pretty much the Western side of Europe and the NATO-organized countries that were on one side of the wall, and then you had the Eastern side bloc on the other side of the wall, and that was sort of the divide.
	The U.S.
	and the Western nations and NATO would have influence over the Western bloc versus the Eastern bloc, which was really aligned with Marxism, Leninism, and other sorts of Socialist type regimes.
	So it appears over time that the roles have almost reversed and think about the Russia-China connection and how China has set itself up so well over the last 12-13 years building massive amounts of roads that enable them to connect the rural areas to the urban areas.
	And therefore, their manufacturing base has increased quite a bit.
	And it seems like that there's been a lot of investment to get a Chinese-style program in place, whereas on the West, we developed our structures very, very similar.
	Based on what happened in World War II, we developed our interstate system so that we could move goods around and make sure that we could move industry around.
	What I'm seeing is that over the years, it appears that the roles have reversed quite a bit.
	And now it seems like Russia is continually fighting for their own ability to control and manage their own future.
	And the Western countries have really sort of whipped everybody into line like the old socialists used to do.
	So I just think it's a real interesting study and I'd suggest there's about five or six articles at UNZ.com that I reviewed trying to bring it down.
	But right now you're seeing a lot of things happening with NATO coagulating together as a single force and trying to bring everybody in.
	And of course Russia is still defending it.
	Defending Ukraine, trying to keep them from joining NATO.
	And this is an old, old war that goes back in some people's history to 1918, 1919, 1920, and beyond, even as far back as the Bolsheviks.
	So, the more I try to isolate this actual scenario, the more I see the Eastern and the Western division, and I'm beginning to understand why we are so dedicated to winning This war when and or at least even making it appear to win and holding it out as long as we possibly can.
	So as for the Ukrainian offensive and the situation with the NATO Summit, yeah, of course, they want to have everybody join NATO.
	Just it just strengthens the Western blocks, which are all under control.
	Obviously, Russia is going to hold back on that and continue to ally themselves with the other socialist nations.
	And that's leads to where we're at today.
	Just to elucidate this, your point of view, Brian, I see this as Israeli-driven.
	They want Ukraine to be the new Israel.
	That they, or Khazarians, are actually descended from the Khazar region, which is now today's Ukraine.
	They've worn out their welcome in Palestine.
	And because our Congress is Israeli-occupied territory, as is our media, Yeah, Biden making absurd statements about being there as long as it takes when the U.S.
	has, in fact, no bona fide national security interest in Ukraine whatsoever.
	Jacob Rothschild, no less, of course, declared Vladimir Putin to be an enemy of the New World Order and that the New World Order could not move forward without Ukraine.
	Therefore, I believe, since Russia has taken Crimea and the Dunbass and other areas and will never relinquish them, I think the New World Order has actually been brought to a halt.
	Your further thoughts?
	Well, I don't know about the New World Order being brought to a halt.
	I see them having slowed down quite a bit with their attempt to institute the New World Order relating to COVID.
	And today, I believe the rest of the world is waking up to their methods and means and seeing the gaslighting that's taking place with the mainstream media and the control.
	Now, I completely agree that Israel's behind, they're doing the puppeteering in terms of controlling the West, which is controlling NATO.
	Which is controlling the other nations like this, but if you look at this as an element of the old Cold War, you can see a lot of long history that's not going to be broken overnight because we're cutting some trade deals with Russia and grain and you know, I agree with you that it's it's Israel pulling the strings.
	The question is how many of these Controllers are part of the global banking control.
	How many are part of Israel?
	How many are part of U.S.
	oligarchs, as you'll have it put?
	And, you know, I don't know the answers to that at the very top of the food chain, but I can tell you this.
	There is no leader in the U.S.
	that I would trust to be anything less than a puppet right now.
	Very good.
	Very good.
	Excellent historical perspective.
	French riots show that decades of mass colonizing immigration could lead to collapse as the former head of French counterintelligence.
	In a discussion about immigration, Pierre Broadchan, who is the head of France's counterintelligence agency from 2002 to 2008, is a warning, Finding full expression in the week of violent rioting and looting that has taken hold of France after the shooting of this Algerian teenager on June 27th.
	If we do nothing or we do little, we're going to head either toward a progressive implosion of social trust, that is to say, toward a society where the quality of life will collapse, or will it become less and less pleasant to live, or by successive explosion toward or will it become less and less pleasant to live, or by successive explosion toward a confrontation that will make France a country where one will be
	Now in an additional interview with Le Figaro, he exposes the deadly cocktail of a society of individuals based on openness and democracy and the arrival of entire disparates with totally different cultural backgrounds.
	The least that can be said is the former Counterintelligence Chief's analysis stand in sharp contrast to the Interior Minister's analysis, according to which the riots are not linked to immigration, as only 10% were foreigners.
	In his eyes, the non-white youth causing the mayhem, often invoking the Quran, have no link to immigration because they are French citizens.
	He contradicted himself, however, saying that, as the average age of writers were 17, they were born under the presidency of Jacques Chirac, and it's too late to control immigration anyway.
	Sadly.
	This is a perfect illustration of Beauchamp's pessimistic observation when he said he did not think there is currently enough courage among the French political class to do what is necessary to avoid the worst-case scenario of confrontation.
	Closing borders in the name of the precautionary principle, the police way, has never been seriously considered in our country.
	Here, after the rioting, which has seen over 700 members of security forces injured, some 4,000 arrested, many towns and cities devastated, the reason is a mixture of humanitarian and economic interests.
	For example, the desire to import cheap labor.
	Rochon said the changes that have led to the current decomposition happened in the 70s, when France made a transition from a modern nation-state to a society of individuals.
	Together with the immigration of workers, France began to experience what became an immigration of settlers.
	The transition to a society of individuals has created what he calls a Scissors Effect.
	Internal partition is a natural inclination of the multicultural societies of Western Europe.
	This is not new.
	He remembers as French ambassador to Hungary in 1989 to 1993 after the fall of communism.
	He'd also hear from his Hungarian interlocutors.
	We are lucky we can see firsthand the damage that non-European immigration is causing in your country, and we certainly do not want to imitate you.
	In everyone's eyes, we are now the sick man of the continent.
	The Security Council of G7 and the G20 laments the former head, as France is indeed the country with the highest proportion of inhabitants, with non-European immigrant backgrounds.
	And immigration figures have been setting historic new records under Emmanuel Macron, just as they have here in the United States under This guy who calls himself Joe Biden.
	Others, such as neighboring Italy where mass migration began in the 2010s, when Berlusconi's right-wing government was overthrown with the help of Brussels, Berlin, and Paris, know very well what's happening in France will now likely happen in their own country in a decade or two if nothing is done.
	An illustration of this apprehension can be found in an article in the Italian conservative daily paper, The Roots of France's Ill and Fear that Looms Over Italy.
	Meanwhile, a large majority of French are strongly opposed to what increasingly appears to be a dangerous social engineering experiment by the liberal elite.
	Something Eric Zimmer has called a Rubentrop-Molotov pact between Western liberals and Islam against the white, heterosexual, Catholic French men.
	Indeed, 74% of French now think there are too many immigrants.
	62% would want France to disobey EU treaties and EU law to stop immigration.
	The latter is an important point, especially in light of the ruling by the European Court of Human Rights against Switzerland extending the right to family reunification even to refugees who have only temporary resident permit and not asylum.
	Let us not forget, EU member states have the obligation to abide by the rulings of the ECHR, which would make the calamity all the worse, not just as single individuals are here, but bringing in their whole families, which could be three, four, or more, quadrupling the problem.
	It's worth pointing out, first of all, isolated riots have been commonplace for 40 years in every corner of the country.
	Under the technocratic label of urban violence.
	Noting things have evolved to the point where no one pays any attention to them anymore as though they were part of the landscape.
	Somewhere between 100 and 200,000 may have taken part in the urban violence, creating a situation more dangerous than in 2005, when similar rioting took place in France's suburbs.
	Nothing comparable had happened since the French Revolution of 1789.
	And this time, even provincial towns have been affected by troubles alongside the centers of big cities in contrast to 18 years ago, when the riding was constricted to the so-called insensitive neighborhoods.
	I would describe the present catastrophe as an uprising or revolt against a French nation-state by a significant proportion of the youth of non-European origin present on our territory.
	Will we draw the right lessons, given the country's vital prognosis?
	Will we consider remedies other than another plan for the suburbs?
	Things being as they are, I doubt it.
	His words echo those pronounced on the CNews French News Channel by Gendarmerie Colonel Philip Kalos.
	We need to analyze this situation, not in terms of what's happening now, which is terrible, but what could happen if it gets out of hand.
	There's obviously anger in the suburbs, also anger in the middle class at good people, France's working people.
	There's also a great deal of resentment on the part of law and order, who are often abandoned by politicians.
	The level of exasperation and resentment, the level of violence above all the fact that in certain areas, there's a real hatred of France, with weapons circulating, means a potential explosive.
	And just because there are fewer vehicles burned or businesses attacked does not mean the potential risk is decreasing.
	It's worth noting, after a week of chaos, the French government has not renounced its plan to legalize the stay of hundreds of thousands of illegals who work in sectors lacking labor, which is going to greatly reinforce the pull factor for illegal immigration in Europe.
	According to a July 7 poll about which political leaders French trust most, where respondents were asked to give their first and second choice, 32% said they trust none.
	27, Marie Levin.
	22, her party chair, Jordan Bardella.
	Only 20, President Emmanuel Macron.
	13, Eric Zemmour, who is depicted as being more to the right than Marie Levin.
	Macron's interior minister came only fifth, trusted by 12%.
	It was only 11% trust the prime minister as their first or second choice.
	Interesting.
	The leader of the center-right party, Eric Collodi, with only 6% of the French who trust his ability, lags behind.
	Our left leader, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, 9%, and Fabian Rousseau, 8%.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, first, taking a step back for these colonizers, is that the colonization of the world is kind of whitewashed in the history books that we all learned in high school.
	But essentially, this was looting.
	This was taking over land and installing puppets, taking over the governments, and then consistent with the current bestseller, John Perkins' Economic Hitman, control the resources, natural and human.
	And we can associate that with crimes against humanity because That is so egregious, the looting of the resources and the stealing of the land that the local population has to make do with very poor quality land.
	And they die by the millions.
	Approximately a million children die every month from preventable poverty.
	And that's from those policies so that the resources are funneled through the corporations to those developed countries.
	And the U.S.
	and those developed nations, they want A semi-porous border.
	It's intentional.
	It's a joke.
	They let these people in, and they want to be able to have this race to the bottom with cheap labor.
	Now, with Results.org, we helped.
	We were a leading voice for the 1990 World Summit for Children, the largest meeting of heads of state in world history at that time.
	And because we had gotten free agreements from all these developed nations to end poverty, They've promised this since 1969.
	I'll put the documentation in the show notes here at BitChutes, rigged on all promises, public and private.
	And they said to our proposal, hey, how about a global minimum wage to keep these people on their side of the border?
	And they laughed it off.
	They said that that would not be on the table at all.
	And another thing with the anger sparking these riots is that the economic data The top 1% of income earners, or asset owners, now own more assets than the bottom 99% combined.
	Now, people may not have their hands on this data, but they feel enough, they see enough, and the optics that we were just talking about for France, given all these weapons for war, and demonstrating that they cause the chaos that produced this migration, and they're just piling on all the way to World War III, So, there isn't going to be any justice.
	There isn't going to be any peace.
	These people will not calm down until the truth is fully exposed regarding the COVID crimes against humanity, the war crimes against humanity, and the tremendous looting that has gone on historically and continues to go on through the economic hitman style of John Perkins. and the tremendous looting that has gone on historically and Brian.
	Well, Build Back Better is synonymous with the Great Reset.
	And in order to build back better, you must first destroy.
	Now, Barack Obama had appointed a guy by the name of Rivkin, Charles Rivkin, who was a Hollywood, a Jewish Hollywood Executive to be the U.S.
	Ambassador to France, and I'm guessing this is back around 2010-2011.
	Well, WikiLeaks leaked one of his most important memos on the WikiLeaks platform, and the memo was a seven-point Bolshevik tactical plan for how to upset the white culture of a nation, and because France had such a white, heavily white Westernized culture, they had to focus on France in particular.
	Now, how much of these French riots, don't they feel a lot like the George Floyd riots?
	You have an event that happens, the media covers it, initially the media is on the police side.
	Then they snip up the media just enough to get everybody agitated, and then the media switches sides, goes back to the other side, and then whips up the black population against the white police society, causing a rift.
	And then there's a whole bunch of Lawsuits that begin to roll out about discrimination and the race activists and the elites are all involved with it over and over and over, continuing to amplify the situation, causing more destruction, causing more divide.
	This is Bolshevism 101 with the goal of continuing to break France like they've broken America with the media, the propaganda, and the Bolshevik tactics that they've been practicing for a long, long time.
	So I see this as just simply running the same play that we ran with George Floyd during COVID when they tried to pile everything on top of us now.
	Now they just used it in France.
	But remember, if you're going to build back better, you have to destroy.
	And this is a great way to do it.
	Excellent commentary.
	I think you're right on.
	And meanwhile, The Biden admin is even opposing merit-based military promotions, wants provisions for race and gender.
	How outrageous is this?
	It's not as though we aren't having enough problems recruiting anyone for the military.
	No one wants to join a woke military.
	No one wants to take showers with trannies or gays.
	No one wants to participate in a simulation of a military organization.
	We're suffering massively and now they want military promotion to be based on race and gender rather than merit?
	The White House responded to the proposed NDAA, outlining a number of provisions the administration opposed for the potential creation of a Space Force National Guard to roll back some of the diversity, equity, and inclusion policies Biden enacted at the beginning of his administration.
	Strongly opposed the House's sweeping attempts All these sections.
	To eliminate Barbara's long-standing DEIA-Abertson-related initiatives.
	To promote a cohesive and inclusive force as though having a bunch of blacks and women who are unqualified and militarily incompetent strengthens our military.
	A statement from the Office of Management read, as articulated in the 2022 NDS, One of the Department's top priorities is building a resilient Joint Force and Defense Enterprise.
	But how can you do that independent of merit and competence?
	The DoD's strategic advantage in a complex global security is the diverse and dynamic talent pool from which we draw.
	Except that those who are diverse are less qualified than those who are not.
	We rely on diverse perspectives, experiences, and skill sets to remain a global leader, deter war, and keep our nation secure.
	Clearly, total bullshit.
	DoD is committed to developing and maintaining a dignified, respectful, and safe workforce.
	How about a military that can actually fight wars and win?
	Legislation that reduces DoD's ability to create a positive work environment and fully leverage the best our nation has to offer?
	They're supposed to be the best because they're gay or lesbian or bisexual?
	Puts the department at a strategic disadvantage.
	Ridiculous.
	Representative Jim Banks called the White House rebuff of the provision he wrote, both the Merit Clause and repealing Biden's DEI initiatives, a badge of honor.
	Adding, openness is a cancer that will destroy our military from the inside out if we don't stop it.
	The Merit Clause makes no mention of race or gender.
	A candidate shall be evaluated on the basis of qualification, performance, integrity, fitness, training, and conduct.
	No determination may be based on favoritism or nepotism, so no quota may be used.
	Representative Chip Roy supported the move to strip DEI provisions from military promotions.
	What we're trying to do is move to a colorblind, race-neutral worldview, where we're focused on building a national defense and a military focused on blowing things up and killing people, not on social engineering wrapped in a uniform.
	The Biden admin does not appear to share that view.
	Meanwhile, Senator Ron Johnson observes the Hunter Biden isn't one scandal, it's actually three scandals in one.
	It's not right to imagine the Hunter Biden case as if it were one scandal.
	It's more like three, he observes.
	Biden family influence peddling one.
	Federal agency ignoring crimes from Democrats in plain sight, two.
	Blizzard Media ignoring the whole shebang three.
	He's certainly got it right.
	There were a few new lines of evidence for the Senate to draw upon for his argument first.
	There's a missing whistleblower who, after testifying about Biden family maleficence to the FBI and New York prosecutors, saw that Hunter's Chinese associate was prosecuted with the Biden family name carefully let out of the proceedings by the very same prosecutors the whistleblower told.
	Biden was never charged, but suddenly the government has come up with allegations the whistleblower, an Israeli citizen, is an arms dealer.
	Second, There's a very noticeable difference in the dollar values of money spent investigating Trump as compared to investigating similar cases with a Democrat involved.
	The difference is night and day.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	The U.S.
	meritocracy is a key element of the American advance and the American dream, and you want to be able to have Your vote count with the best candidate for whatever job it is that you want to have public interest in having.
	And as well, you vote with your dollars for the highest performing, the highest quality goods and services.
	So to be able to undermine that, it becomes official policy of racism or sexism or whatever ism.
	And again, this is just the downgrading of the optics of leadership for 81 million votes President Commander-in-Chief Joe Biden.
	Now, interestingly enough, AMREV 1.0, one of the main objections was that it was a guarantee to the people of that time, the Americans, the British Americans at that time, that there would be no standing army.
	But there was one.
	There was.
	And this idea of nepotism and favoritism was part of it.
	The British would have their connected family officers just in the colonies making money.
	And everybody who looked at them could see that and figure out that we're paying for these people.
	And who are they here to guard against?
	And they figured out that soon enough when they went after the Americans' guns.
	So that three scandal story, that is brilliant.
	And that is starting to connect the dots.
	And that is part of the process that the American public is going to have to go through to withdraw consent and demand arrest.
	The pay to play is ongoing, huge, normal, that is business as usual for these psychopaths.
	And then there is the you have to have the complicity, the criminal complicity of the organizations that are supposed to be enforcing the law.
	They're going to be doing the Orwellian opposite.
	They're going to be facilitating it.
	And of course, you have to have corporate media telling the people obfuscating and projecting and saying that they need to arrest Trump for something else.
	So the progression of this exposure is I'm very optimistic about it, as you can tell from the tone of my voice.
	And paradoxically, at the same time, it has to go in the direction where our opponents are going to get more and more wrapped up and they're going to have to threaten more.
	They are more exposed.
	They are more at risk and whatever resources they have for self-defense, they're going to utilize them.
	Brian.
	him.
	Well, I've always seen a merit-based military as necessary in order to lead.
	Men respect other men that have done a good job leading them, and men respect other men that have the credentials to be capable of leading them.
	The problem that you've got with wokeness is that it's a cult of personality.
	Who can be the most woke?
	Who can be the loudest?
	Who can be the most brash?
	Who can come up with the newest, latest LGBTQ...
	And just that whole LGBTQ thing is ridiculous because one of the words in there is bi.
	LGBTQ, the B is for bisexual, indicating two sexes.
	So these people are out of their mind.
	Now, I believe that They want to create the cult of wokeism inside the US military so that it can be controlled using the keywords and using the traditional drivers that are in place and so that they can eliminate any of the real patriotic front that might develop inside the military.
	So Independent, strong thinking men that don't just simply follow orders that are also very good leaders must be disposed of because they run the risk to the new world order of being capable of leading other men into a rebellious position from within the military.
	Now, switching gears into the Hunter Biden story, I think the question is, What's the real price to pay in the New World Order?
	Because it's not eight million dollars over a few years.
	That's just the tip of the iceberg that our IRS whistleblowers and others have been able to come up with.
	The real price to pay in the New World Order are contracts that come as a result of false flags, having the capability of steering massive sums of money to corporate Donors and vendors and military industrial complex vendors is is the real price for being in the New World Order.
	Take a look at what's happening with the NWO.
	I'm sorry, the BlackRock sort of social credit score for businesses.
	So the fact that the Bidens as puppets have been accepting bribes is small potatoes compared to the bigger crimes that are taking place.
	The problem right now that they have is that as a result of the efforts of a few people and the Strange balance of power that they can't really have.
	You've got Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, you got Jim Jordan, you got Chuck Grassley, you got a number of other guys that are beginning to expose the fact that nothing is what it seems.
	And therefore, as a result, our faith in our government system is eroded thus critically.
	Preventing their ability to continue to pull off the same games that they've been leading toward.
	So I predict that we're going to see the pendulum begin to swing the other way and then the Rhinos will get control.
	I predict that they're going to go ahead and purge our Congress of the Patriots, especially the Loud Mouths that are exposing things and the MAGA Trump supporters that are creating sort of a A resistance force that can't be controlled.
	I mean, just take a look at what happens in a stadium when Joe Biden enters versus what happens in a stadium when Donald Trump enters, and you'll see that the political popular view of how our government ought to be run is swinging dramatically right now.
	I predict that nothing's going to happen with the Hunter Biden scandals.
	They'll continue to gaslight us with new stories.
	And the very fact that they won't tell us who left the cocaine in the White House tells us everything we need to know about who left the cocaine in the White House.
	Yeah, it's absurd.
	The Secret Service can't solve who left cocaine in the White House?
	It's preposterous.
	Carl?
	Yeah, you got cameras all over the place.
	And in addition, the cocaine was found on an envelope.
	Okay.
	What happened with the fingerprints for that envelope?
	And as well, Secret Service is refusing reporters FOIA requests for information.
	And so it's just the optics are just horrible.
	Yeah, they claim they have closed the case and are unable to identify who was responsible.
	It's just absurd.
	Meanwhile, this is a slightly longer clip, but so many issues have been raised about Trump in relation to Israel.
	I think it's worth our time.
	Many of our less astute and overly passionate brethren on the so-called far right remain very critical of Donald Trump over his alleged subservience to Israel.
	But what they don't understand is that Trump's professed love for Bibi Netanyahu in Israel was all part of a strategic deception necessary in order to conceal the secret war that he was waging against the ultra Zionists of both Israel and America.
	To better understand this geopolitical reality, a review of the central theme of the 1974 classic film, Godfather Part 2, is in order.
	The main storyline of Godfather 2 centers around the deadly chess match played between Michael Corleone and the cunning and powerful Jewish mobster, Hymen Roth.
	After surviving an assassination attempt ordered by Roth, Michael plots his revenge.
	A subordinate of the Corleone family, Frank Pentangeli, wants to immediately start a mob war and kill, quote, that Jew in Miami.
	But Michael patiently countermoves by pretending to not know that it was Roth who had given the order to kill him.
	To set Roth at ease until he can get the information that he is seeking from him, Michael visits him at his home in Miami and tells the mighty Jewish gangster what a great man he is.
	Roth and Corleone plan a casino business venture together in Cuba.
	Roth treats Michael like a son, while Michael continues to show the utmost respect for Roth.
	But all along, behind the friendly facade, the two are actually plotting against each other.
	Near the end of the film, Michael finally wins the chess match when Hyman Roth is assassinated at the airport.
	A lesson to be learned from the following film clips is this.
	Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. - I want you to help me take my but your enemies closer. - I want you to help me I want you to help me take my revenge.
	Michael, anything.
	What can I do?
	Settle these troubles with the Visano brothers.
	Mike, I don't understand.
	I don't... Look, I don't have your brain for big deals.
	But this is a street thing.
	That Hyman Roth in Miami, that...
	He's backing up those son-of-a-bitches.
	I know he is.
	Then why?
	Why do you ask me to lay down to him, Mike?
	It was Hyman Roth that tried to have me killed.
	I know it was him.
	Jesus Christ, Mike.
	Jesus Christ.
	Look, let's get them all.
	Let's hit them all now while we got the muscle.
	My father taught me many things here.
	He taught me in this room.
	He taught me, keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
	Now, if Hyman Roth sees that I interceded in this thing, in the Rosato brothers' favor, he's gonna think his relationship with me is still good.
	Habib.
	Habib?
	That's what I want him to think.
	I want him completely relaxed and confident in our friendship.
	Well, there's more there, of course, but perhaps we have enough to get the idea.
	Mike King suggests that Trump isn't fooled by the Israelis and has a master plan.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Mike King of the Anti-New York Times.
	And the real history channel followed him for over a decade.
	And he and I are in general agreement that what is happening behind the scenes is pretty much what Q has put forth to the general public.
	And that idea has to take a look at who is in control.
	So you take a look and see who has the high ground, who has the strategic advantage.
	And this goes into, and I'll put it in the bit shoot notes, a 47 minute documentary from Charlie Freak, to be able to demonstrate that the Trump 2017 tour was the showing that he had, Trump was in control of all those other political leaders in the UK, in the heart of Europe, with NATO and the G7, in Rome with the Pope.
	In Israel.
	So, that would be connected to, in 2016, after Trump was elected, that the head of the snake was somehow cut off of the bad guys.
	Now, I have no way to demonstrate the veracity of it, but as we have been talking about, we can see the result, and this is, you know, seven years later, of the optics looking so horrible for our political opponents.
	And in terms of the art of war, the idea that when you're in a position of strength, is that you do want to show weakness so that your enemy is not prepared and complacent.
	And if you happen to be weak, you need to be able, one of the defenses to be able to not be attacked in an area of weakness is to project some sort of a strength.
	Now, all that said, we're just commenting our opinions in the fog of war, and there's just no way that I see that we can verify the factual information except that, that tour in 2017 by Trump.
	And if anybody wants to see the strongest argument informing what Mike King is talking about, in my optimism, take a look at it there and come to your own conclusions.
	Brian.
	Well, I agree with Carl that it is foggy inside the fog of war.
	There's no doubt about it.
	And I've been thinking a lot about if there was such a thing called the white hat, the only way that white hat could be effective is if nobody believes he's wearing a white hat.
	And remember, when Trump lost that election, Supposedly, in November of 2020, coming out of that, over the next few weeks or a few months, all of those that were in the inside believing that there was something called the White Hat began to say, there is no such thing.
	There is no God.
	We're all going down.
	But notice that Trump hasn't skipped a beat at all.
	I mean, the man has stayed positive.
	The man has stayed clean.
	The man has dealt with Attack after attack, and I mean sloppy attacks, like the document scandals.
	I mean sloppy attack, the rape allegation.
	Sloppy attack after sloppy attack after sloppy attack.
	And now we're being told, okay, cocaine in the White House.
	Tell me that's not a distraction.
	I mean, Go back to the Franklin affair if you want to see the corruption in the White House.
	I can't believe this is the first time cocaine's in the White House, and yet they come out and announce it like it's some sort of big story.
	It doesn't add up.
	Nothing's adding up about any of this.
	And then you've got, of course, things coming out about these bribes related to the Bidens.
	Doesn't it feel like it's fabricated in some way?
	It's almost as if there's a battle between Our founding fathers and artificial intelligence, but the founding fathers are sitting on the high ground with their constitution and their, their carefully thought out words of wisdom.
	And the artificial intelligence is simply looking a couple moves ahead at basic stuff.
	To me, to me, something is going on that's way bigger than Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.
	In the White House.
	But there is no information out there that's credible.
	That's helping put the pieces together, which leaves us in a position where we're simply crossing our fingers and hoping that things are going to get better.
	The pendulum is going to swing the right way and justice is going to come out.
	But when was the last time we saw an actual prosecution?
	I mean, it hasn't happened.
	It hasn't happened.
	So what makes me think we're going to see it now?
	Somebody prosecuted for treason?
	Give me a break.
	Without an Department of Justice, without gallows, without guillotines, the system is not going to change.
	So we might as well make the best of it with what we have, keep our families healthy, feed ourselves, and take it one day at a time until we see how this whole thing shakes out.
	Powerful points, my friend.
	Powerful points.
	Meanwhile, outrageous!
	Lefties begin denying service to Trump supporters based on the Supreme Court decision in 303 Creative v. Linus, which was either a great moment of American jurisprudence or a day that will live in infamy.
	There are accusations floating around that a piece of evidence referenced by each side was falsified.
	There are whispers of attorneys being disbarred over the matter.
	That didn't take long, did it?
	Even before leftists were equipped to stand up in outrage, state the ruling gave them the right to refuse service to conservatives, especially Trump supporters.
	CBS reported that Michael Imperiale, known for his role in The Sopranos, Goodfellas, and White Lotus, declared that bigots and homophiles were forbidden to watch his work.
	He stated in an Instagram.
	USA!
	I've decided to forbid bigots and homophobes from watching The Sopranos, The White Lotus, Goodfellas, or any movie or TV show I've been in.
	USA!
	Thank you, Supreme Court, for allowing me to discriminate and exclude those I don't agree with and am opposed to.
	USA, USA, sick.
	I know Sopranos has been lauded as a landmark program, but from what I've seen, it was an incredibly violent depiction of a sadly dysfunctional family.
	This problem was exacerbated by the father's involvement in organized crime.
	Ask formerly-maid-man Michael Firenze about how mob life can affect a family.
	So no Sopranos?
	Well, get by!
	Michael Imperioli may think he and his body of work will tower over us above for eternity, but so did Ozymandias.
	Some left-leaning shop owners and entrepreneurs have followed suit, posting signs at assorted venues informing conservative Trump supporters and the usual suspect they are persona non grata, should take their business elsewhere.
	The fear, panic, and regret these business owners had hoped for did not materialize.
	American Wire had some examples of the reaction.
	I accept these terms.
	Telling people not to shop at your small business to own Republicans.
	We only sell to churches that fly a pride flag.
	Since the Supreme Court had ruled that businesses can discriminate, no sales to Trump supporters.
	Here's another.
	It's better than unknowingly filling the pockets of business owners who are closeted leftists that transparency is appreciated.
	Here's another.
	The rationality and reasoning of the left has all the depth of a bumper sticker.
	Here's another.
	This is what people used to call cutting off your nose just by your face.
	Here's another.
	That's the most imaginative going out of business sign I've ever seen.
	I agree.
	If someone doesn't want my business, I'll just go elsewhere.
	I don't want to do business with someone who hates me.
	I would never patronize a business that reviews service as someone based on their race, religion, national origin, or even sexual orientation.
	But 303 Creative vs. Elena's was not about refusing service.
	It was about forcing someone to endorse a belief.
	Without that ruling, a neo-Nazi group could waltz into a Jewish bakery and demand a cake in the shape of a swastika.
	The Westboro Baptist Church could request a gay web designer create its new website.
	A church could approach a gay bakery and ask for and expect a large sheet of cake that reads, God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
	And in each of these situations, The business owner would be legally compelled to comply, despite the dictates that their conscience or beliefs.
	But none of that matters to the left.
	To the denizens of progressivism, the law is a cudgel, not an equalizer.
	The law belongs to them, not to everyone.
	The law exists to affirm and enforce their feelings and their agenda.
	So let them ban Trump supporters, conservatives, Christians, and whoever else may offend their tender and sacred sensibilities.
	Let them congratulate one another for their tirades and let them go broke.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, as a teacher in Central Los Angeles, as a younger man, I would frame this idea with students with the experience of a lot of us in Los Angeles.
	One of the greatest meeting places of cultures on the planet.
	And that, uh, I would say, so what do you think that you would prefer?
	The money that you could get doing business or just some fear based hesitancy against somebody who looks different.
	And everybody could relate to that and had a lot of stories that, uh, that you really appreciated different cultures when you were doing business with them.
	and you could produce something productive with somebody else.
	And the idea of racism for children, it's far easier to communicate to young people because for them, it's just the quality of the person, it's the energy, it's the feel.
	You can even go far down enough to children, that children, if there's a good feel to a person, they'll just come up and give somebody a hug or a dog.
	And conversely, if somebody seems to be a little negative, Children will feel that energy and as will your dog.
	So the go woke, go broke rule seems to apply here as well.
	And the fundamental issue that we're really talking about is entering into a contract of, would you like to do business with me?
	This is what I'm offering.
	This is what I propose that we do for payment.
	And then you negotiate.
	And if somebody, see for me, if I saw that sign, I would love to go in and to have a little bit of a conversation.
	And you know, you could lie a little bit, but say, what exactly are your complaints against somebody who supports Trump?
	And then expose, bring out the misinformation, the disinformation, and just dance with it and play with it.
	But man, I think that those comments for the story is going to prove true, and that that business owner is going to find out, basically, 81 million votes my ass.
	Brian?
	It is becoming obvious to me that what academia is pushing is a religion it is becoming clear that wokeism is a new form of religion dressed up with a word like science or dressed up like with words that are very progressive and very liberal that break the bonds the old stench of culture and society and replace
	it with a new a new design that doesn't even include things so as patently obvious as man and woman the The religion, like many other religions throughout the history, you can go through church history and study them, study thousands of them in terms of cults.
	They've excluded, separated, broken loose from society.
	Now, that's not what Christianity did.
	Christianity said, go ye into the world and make disciples of all nations.
	You know, but what has happened over the years is that certain groups have gotten so self-righteous that they believe that they're separate and superior and many times it's led to straight-up mass suicide or mass killings that have taken place as a result or in the name of religion.
	Look at the Crusades.
	Look at, you know, what's happened with the Vatican Church.
	Look at all the The terrible things that have happened in history.
	Look at the Nazis as a religion, as a Jew-hating religion that wouldn't deal with it.
	When people get stuck into these sort of sub-cells or echo chambers, they tend to exclude everybody that doesn't look or feel like them.
	I think we're beyond that.
	I think we're above that.
	And I hate to see this religion coagulate because I have a feeling That these people are going crazy.
	Now, the good news is a lot of people are beginning to see it and break out.
	There are liberals all over YouTube that have been going to Trump rallies, and as a result, they're breaking up, waking up, and stepping out from the traditional bonds of the brainwashed fools that are out there saying every white man's a racist.
	They're all going to hurt you if you show up at a Trump rally.
	So I think the farther the pendulum swings, the more likely it is that more and more people are going to come out of the brainwash call.
	So I think that's what we try to do here is put out a show where you can illustrate that people are capable of independently thinking.
	Whether or not we're always good at it, we certainly try.
	Excellent, excellent.
	Meanwhile, former Anheuser-Busch exec finally admits Bud Light's Dylan Mulvaney partnership was a mistake.
	Bud Light has lost over $27 billion since teaming up with transgender influencer, and where that work comes from baffles me.
	Dylan Mulvaney burned an ad campaign back in April.
	Now, former exec at Bud Light's parent company is admitting the Mulvaney partnership was a mistake, adding he was shocked by it when it first came out.
	Anheuser-Busch CEO, that's speaking of the current CEOs, failed to fix the Bud Light crisis.
	He must quit now and let someone else write this sinking ship for the sake of ordinary Americans 401K, says Brand's ex-president of sales, Anson Fredericks.
	He spent 11 years working for Anheuser-Busch as president of operations until April of last year.
	In a new interview, he admits he was shocked by how much money his former company had lost since the Mulvaney campaign.
	I think I'm even more shocked about the lack of clear response that the current CEO has delivered during this crisis.
	He said Whiteworth, Brendan Whiteworth, had three chances now to speak out, most recently in the week leading up to July 4th, the number one beer selling week of the year, to have a clear response and get customers back.
	He appears to have been reviewing to an Inearth Whitbergate of CBS at the end of June, where he declined to rule out teaming with Mulvaney again in the future, instead of trying to distance his brand from Mulvaney.
	He tried to dance around questions about the infamous ad campaign.
	There's a big social conversation taking place right now.
	Big brands are right in the middle.
	It's not just our industry or Bud Light.
	It's happening in retail and fast food.
	So, for us, what we need to understand is deeply understand and appreciate the consumer and what they want, what they care about and expect from big brands.
	Frederick said, Woodworth should have said, of course, this partnership was a mistake.
	We wouldn't do this again, because we've lost billions in market caps.
	Our brands are down almost 30%.
	All of a sudden, we're putting our suppliers at risk, laying off hundreds of people from jobs.
	There are going to be more employees at risk if we don't find a CEO who can somehow address the situation, get the customers back, who are always loyal to Bud Light.
	And move the company forward.
	That's why he's calling for Whitworth to step down and be replaced by a CEO who has a clear vision.
	Bud Light was the largest brand in the U.S.
	because it was remarkably apolitical.
	It was always about sports, always about music, always about bringing people together.
	That's why it was a mistake.
	They did this campaign in the first place because they were unable to come out.
	Here's Olly London tweeting, Former Anheuser-Busch exec has said the backlash or boycott is getting worse and worse after the brand reported a significant drop in sales for the fifth week in a row.
	Anderson Frederick said consumers feel like they're having an impact.
	The campaign was a mistake.
	Anheuser-Busch will not be doing campaigns like this moving forward.
	We'll get back to things that bring everybody together.
	Hopefully that could protect the jobs at Anheuser-Busch, jobs at Wholesalers, and get the company back growing in the right direction.
	He concluded by advising current execs, harking back to what Bud Light always was, which is a great beer, great to drink at football games, and didn't become part of the debate.
	It's safe to say Bud Light has learned less than to go broke in the hard way.
	While it's looking less and less likely the brand can ever be saved, starting with a new CEO might be the place to go.
	It's not like Bud Light has much more to lose, so starting fresh with new leadership might be the best ideal.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, this is an interesting Story and topic.
	So the CEO wants to continue to have the opening to hug Dylan some more, huh?
	Well, I think that the economic data is pretty clear about that.
	And, you know, Brian made a good point about Dylan when this first came out, that this is a 27-year-old biological male who fantasizes more about being a girl, not a woman, but a girl.
	And mathematically, if you wanted to get a grasp on really what we're looking at, a bell curve distribution is going to explain pretty much everything in life.
	And if you had a bell curve distribution where on one end you have qualities associated with maleness, with masculinity, and on the other end for femininity, and maybe you would have two overlapping bell curves with that, about 2% Okay, so we have that going on.
	with the various polling data, it's about 2%.
	Self report as being more sexually attracted to the same sex than the opposite sex.
	Okay, so we have that going on.
	And that is gonna be associated to the experience and expression of qualities of the gender that you weren't born into.
	Okay.
	And we've all observed people who are biological male and they have definitive stereotypical feminine qualities that they're just a softer type of guy.
	And we've all know biological women who have more of the hardness and the firmness and the energy associated with masculinity.
	Okay.
	So we have that.
	That's part of the human being spectrum.
	All right.
	Now, the part that is destroying Budweiser is the connection to putting that on the children for their mutilation of body parts.
	That is the part that has ended Bud Light and any association with those people who do not distance themselves from pornography in our schools.
	And then the preying upon the grooming of children to consider any type of an association with adults in sexuality, the sexualization of children.
	But really, it is the mutilation of those children that has destroyed that brand.
	So most people are not going to dance to the heart of the matter that it is about protecting the kids in corporate media.
	But you can definitely see the impact for the sales.
	And from a business perspective, Yeah, that CEO, the board of directors should get rid of that guy.
	And the article points out he's had his chances and if they're going to.
	attempt to keep that brand alive, then they would do that.
	But in these days of wokeism, you would say the same thing that the Democratic Party would take other actions other than what they're doing if they wanted to salvage themselves.
	So there may be this destruction that might be written in somehow, but certainly any ordinary business that would want to survive would get rid of that CEO.
	Brian?
	Well, Bud Dite just needs to replace Dylan Mulvaney with Jim Caviezel from the sound of the new movie. - Thank you.
	Look, if it's about selling beer, the message ought to be, we don't care who you are.
	We don't care what color you are.
	We don't care where you drink or who you sleep with.
	It ought to be just about as straightforward Is that we're not here to press an agenda.
	We're here to have a good time and we're here to sell you some beer and we sell good beer and we've made a new new brand for you.
	And it's it just it's I don't care beer whether they can achieve that and not deal with the the backlash that comes from the very loud religious progressive community is the question like Carl said, it's a small group.
	That is very loud and very active and they need to be put down and put back into their place in terms of getting along with other people.
	They can't get along with anybody except for people like them.
	They are literally like the Nazis.
	It's so strange how they're the anti-fascists are so fascist.
	They every time they point the finger, there's four of them pointing back at these people that are shut up, buckle down and get a job.
	But I don't see Bud Light doing that, and I think that what we're seeing here is that it's so obvious now that the American public is beginning to wake up to the lies of society, and Sound of Freedom is a perfect example.
	Here we have a movie that keeps the theaters quiet, and I took Jim's advice, and I watched The movie, you told me to watch the Russian mass assassination.
	What is it called?
	The Czechist.
	The Czechist.
	What a sick experience.
	I had a hard time.
	I mean, I imagine anybody who takes the time to watch it is going to be on the edge of insanity.
	There is a point in this life where we have to wake up to the fact, the ugly truth about where this is headed and what's it doing.
	Do I regret watching The Checkist?
	No.
	Do I want to watch The Sound of Freedom?
	No.
	Do I know it's happening?
	Yes, and that's why it makes me sick.
	Will I watch The Sound of Freedom?
	Yes, I will, at the right time, at the right place.
	But I remember when I started, first woke up to the reality of what was in the John Podesta emails and the Hillary Clinton emails and the Barack Obama emails related to WikiLeaks, and it absolutely made me sick.
	As a matter of fact, it's what made me want to believe so much that a Q movement or a white hat movement
	was real was because of the horrifying, sick, disgusting nature of adrenochrome and Hollywood control and people being appointed into these roles, none of it being merit-based, but the sexual favors that had to take place to get roles to be in movies and the power and control structure that was so dark and satanic made me absolutely sick.
	And it's one of the reasons that I read the Bible to Clear it out, renew my mind, and keep my head somewhat in check, because I think the deeper you dive into satanic Freemason literature, symbolism, the very nature of the darkest things of this world, the more you have to balance it out.
	On the other side, so I guess I'd like to see Bud Light go through a conversion of a sort and sort of confess their sin to the American people and say, this is business and we want yours.
	Great advice, Brian.
	The best I've ever heard about how they could cope.
	Meanwhile, globalists call for an end to private ownership of all cars.
	The Western global elite continue to demonstrate they have more free societies that generated their fortune and continue to thrive because the power and influence they already have isn't enough.
	We already know the WEF, led by the entrepreneur Klaus Schwab, has advocated an end to private ownership of property and privacy.
	That, of course, is the fundamental theme of communism.
	It wants to usher in a new period of tyranny and authoritarianism that mimics the kind of government ruling China.
	Now, a WEF partner has advocated for an end to private vehicle ownership.
	Which would, of course, force everyone to live in squalid megacities by taking away or controlling all movement.
	This was allegedly going to solve the fake crisis of climate change, which has supposedly been about to cause global apocalypse for 50 years now.
	But give up your car, you stupid president-trusty experts.
	No, PJ Medias, Catherine Salgado.
	She named the organization and had it.
	The Arup Group, listed as a partner by the insidious WEF, released a 2019 report demanding consumption of clothing, cars, electronics, and food has to change for everyone, except the elites, of course, or climate change will kill us all.
	The report touts net zero carbon goals, totally ignoring the fact carbon is essential for life on Earth indeed.
	Increased carbon actually helps plants, including food crops, thrive.
	And humans and animals need it too.
	But neither Arup nor WEF is interested in objective science.
	Only a narrative that impoverishes most citizens gives the elite exponentially more control.
	According to the data, the world has not witnessed global warming over the past eight years.
	A recent study discovered CO2 emissions from fossil fuels are insufficient to induce global warming.
	They hold particular relevance to the Arab group report indicating private cars are not on the brink of causing a climate catastrophe.
	Iraq Along with its report, co-creators and founders of the university elite, C40 Cities and Citi Foundation, appears unconcerned about scientific evidence.
	Despite accumulating data that undermines global warming, which was measurable even before the release of their report, their objective appears to be to foster complete dependence on the elite for transportation.
	This aligns with the W.E.M.
	proposal of a digital I.D.
	social credit score, which would be required for most activities and purchases, and their vision of a world without private ownership.
	In such a scenario, all commodities would be subject to government approval.
	Here are some key quotes.
	Upon construction, Cities need to change what type of building and infrastructure are built as to what materials are used on transport.
	Private car ownership needs to end and the shared vehicles replaced have to use less material and be longer lasting.
	Urban residents need to adopt a largely plant-based diet.
	Mostly replacing blind with less energy-intensive forms of long-distance transportation.
	Change how clothing and textiles are consumed.
	Keep electronics and household appliances longer.
	C40 cities need to meet their deadline 2020 commitments.
	Stop production-based emission peak by the early 2020 before collectively halving by 2030.
	To achieve net carbon neutrality by 2050.
	This report's C40 cities focus on reducing emissions with six consumption categories.
	Buildings and infrastructure, food, private transport, clothing and textiles, aviation, and electronics and household appliances.
	She wrote sarcastically.
	No beef or nice clothes for you.
	You will have nothing and you will be grateful to your beneficent rulers, who totally plan to give up all their comforts too, right?
	Sort of like how they fly their private jets to exclusive locations to blather about emissions.
	It may be a hard sell, however, waiting for buyers to come, unsold electric vehicles piling up in car dealerships.
	The number of unsold electric cars in the second quarter tripled compared to the past year, signaling weakened demand for the segment.
	In the second quarter, the average inventory for EVs topped more than 92,000 units on the ground at dealer lots.
	on the ground at dealer lots.
	This is up 342% compared to the second quarter of 2022.
	During this period, the new EV days supply, the average number of days a warehouse holds inventory before selling it, rose 166% to 92 days from 38.5%.
	While the base of EV sales is up, it is not rising as fast as inventory builds.
	Original equipment manufacturers are facing a field of dreams moment.
	They have built inventory, and now they wait for buyers to come.
	This is one of the hottest topics we've had this year.
	Brands like Jaguar, Infiniti, and Lincoln had the highest days of supply at over 100.
	Lowest numbers were among Toyota, Honda, Kia, and Lexus, each brand having less than 30 days.
	Tesla continued to dominate the luxury EV segment with a market share of 25.5, followed by Mercedes at 12.5, BMW at 12.2, Lexus at 11, among EVs priced above $50,000.
	Ford held the biggest share at 22.1, followed by Chevy at 12.1.
	Unlike other parts of the world, U.S.
	citizens remain on the sidelines when considering an EV purchase.
	According to an April 2023 report by consumer intelligence company J.D.
	Power, more Americans are unwilling to buy EVs.
	In March, 21% said they were very unlikely to consider an EV, up from 17.8% in January.
	A proportion of people who said they were very likely remain flat at around 26%.
	Lack of public charging infrastructure and price have been the top two concerns for the last 10 months, along with related issues involving range anxiety, time required to charge, and power outage and grid concerns.
	Electric vehicles are being promoted mainly by Democrats, who are putting in place policies that provide incentives to consumers who buy such vehicles and subsidies to companies that manufacture them.
	The programs, however, are coming under criticism.
	In a July 5th video, Sean Payne, President of the United Auto Workers, expressed concern about the Biden admin policy of handing out benefits for EV plants.
	The big three automakers—Ford, GM, and Stellantis—are taking billions in government subsidy to go electric, but those benefits aren't trickling down to UAW members.
	According to the union, when GM shut down its traditional vehicle plant in Ohio in 2019, workers were on track to make $30 an hour.
	When the new EV plant was opened in 2022, they were being paid just $16.50.
	On track to make $20 only after seven years.
	Former President Trump.
	And a 2024 presidential candidate has slammed the government's EV push, driven by Biden's ridiculous regulations.
	Electric cars will kill more than half of U.S.
	auto jobs and decimate the suppliers that they decimated already.
	It's going to decimate your jobs.
	It's going to decimate more than anyone else's state of Michigan.
	Earlier, during a rally in Atlanta, Trump promised he will be ending on day one the EV policies of Democrats once re-elected.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	This is the W.E.F.
	You will own nothing and be happy.
	So these people, when they say that they want to basically socialize automobiles, all right, it's interesting.
	I would recommend that we they never do this.
	They just give the talking points that have gone through their focus groups that are the most bullshitty acceptable.
	But if you really drive into this and say, tell me everything, tell me why.
	And then you're going to get the because of climate story.
	And now the people who have the academic training and the professional expertise, of course, can destroy that argument.
	From my take on these people, you know, anything that they say, anything that they push, withdraw consent, and demand their arrest for what we can already prove are the crimes in the background.
	Now, for the WEF and the Great Reset, you know, I would just point out, and I do recommend three talking points if you do want to attack.
	There's been a lot of research for Giving speeches and talking to people, and three points can be kept in memory, but anything beyond that is more difficult.
	So for the Great Reset, these are the same people who are failing to acknowledge the condition of an exponential growth in total debt.
	The US government is 30 plus trillion in debt, all the developed countries combined, 50 trillion.
	That's the Orwellian opposite of prosperity.
	Now, the WEF doesn't want to acknowledge that, but they say they have a new answer, a new system for us, when their previous system created exponential debt.
	Huh?
	They failed to mention.
	The competing ideas of monetary reform and public banking going all the way back to support from Ben Franklin writing a pamphlet saying that when the government is the bank, you don't need to charge taxes, what they found in colonial Pennsylvania.
	Going to 86% of economists when asked in the Great Depression, do you think it's better to the system of the Federal Reserve of creating this exponential growth curve that became clear even by the 1930s?
	Or should we have the capacity as well to create what we use for money as a positive number and have credit be something that is public rather than private?
	To have these debates, to have the information, to have the facts presented in front of the people, they'll make the right decisions, but not otherwise.
	These are the same people that designed the system where 1% of the asset owners own more than the 99%.
	And you, the same people who have that system now crushing people, including a million children every month from preventable poverty that we talked about before.
	So you have a new solution, but you don't want to address the failures of your past solution, huh?
	Or alternatives, huh?
	So the idea that our opponents have to censor these ideas is they have to censor any oppositional ideas because they're Proposals, they're policies, they're dictatorial, they're autocratic, they're for a plutocracy and an oligarchy, not for the good of the people.
	They want to have a two-tier system, similar to what we were talking about, a two-tier justice system with the Biden family and everybody else.
	Now, for the state of the EVs, I had sent you guys data earlier.
	The closest VW dealer to us, at Mission Viejo, is in Irvine.
	And I checked their lot.
	They have 195 new vehicles for sale out of all the different models.
	100 of those are the all-electric ID4s, which I think is a very nicely made car.
	Before we moved from San Ramon down south, the closest Honda dealer to us, Dublin Honda, because we also have a 2019 Honda Civic Sport, their lot Only has about 25% currently of their former inventory out of all their models.
	And I asked them about that the last time I took the Honda in and they said that it was because of a chip manufacturing shortage.
	So there is a lot going on in the background, but basically with all of these promotions, all of these ideas, all these schemes being pushed at us, just you don't have to worry about understanding it or not understanding it.
	Just withdraw consent based upon what we can already prove.
	I want the government to build my roads and get out of my way.
	I want them to be able to allow the system to work the way it's supposed to work, and I want them to get out of the way.
	I think it was Senator Kennedy that said it best when he was interviewing One of these EPA ladies, he said, if electric vehicles are so good, why do we need to subsidize them?
	Why do people need all these tax credits to be able to get them?
	It's my understanding that Carl's exactly right about the overproduction and filled lots with electronic vehicles.
	I mean, if I leave a battery sitting out in my motorcycle or my boat for more than a year, that thing is wasted.
	I mean, I have to keep a trickle charger on almost every battery that I got.
	We can't come up with better batteries than that.
	And yet you want me to go buy a battery powered vehicle that costs more than the vehicle just to replace the batteries?
	It feels all wrong and reminds me of perhaps why we pulled out of Afghanistan and all of a sudden the Chinese got control of all those Afghanistan lithium mines.
	Now it turns out the Chinese are shutting down or limiting their exports only to a few select countries in order to get a hold of their Chinese lithium exports.
	Of course, Elon Musk and Tesla with their Giga Press, you know, instantly pressing together all the cars and having their robots put them together.
	It seems like production is a little outweighing demand.
	Now I see a lot of Teslas out there on the road.
	Great.
	Good for them.
	But, uh, This is oil and gas country down here in Texas, and we like our gas, and we like our cars, and we want the government to stay out of our way in terms of what we're going to buy and what we're not going to buy.
	And as a matter of fact, I'm sick of the... You know the reason there's no more small trucks around?
	The government has changed the fuel efficiency ratings sort of by weight.
	To control a lot of that, which is why the manufacturers aren't producing anything but large trucks anymore.
	Just the whole thing doesn't make any sense.
	I wish the government would get out of the way and let the free market do what it must do.
	And I'd like to see hydrogen engines.
	Why lithium?
	Why batteries?
	I mean, I've heard that hydrogen engine technology is really advancing and that Toyota is running with that.
	So why lithium?
	Unless there's some sort of contracts being steered to certain Powerful people that are supporting certain powerful politicians that's at the bottom of it.
	I think the whole thing stinks to high heaven.
	Well said, Carl.
	Output documentation here at BitChute for www.wanttoknow.info in their energy section.
	There is compelling evidence that we've already had energy breakthroughs and that Brian is absolutely right.
	This is antiquated technology going back well over a hundred years and that the commitment to control us is antithetical to the release of new technologies.
	They want to control everything and have us be afraid and go back to them for answers to false flag started crises that they'll create over and over and over again.
	My understanding, there are cars that run on water, for God's sake, so the whole thing is a total sham.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Fan and fan mail, BroerCon to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	Here we have adverse reaction, just wondering.
	Beverly writes, I saw this on Yahoo.
	Ultra processed foods have been part of American diet for a long time, but now doctors are seeing kidney stone issues in children?
	Could the jab be contributing to this as well?
	Maybe not, but you have to wonder, especially since no study will be done to determine if there is a link.
	I'm willing to bet Beverly's got it right.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts.
	Carl, yours.
	Yeah, I do appreciate Beverly and all of our audience members for intellectual integrity and moral courage to go after the truth and to have this war based upon what you have been taught, what you feel has been true, what corporate media has fed you, what political and economic leaders have in their talking points, versus the feeling that you get in response that you're being lied to and you're being played and you're being used.
	The idea of what we consume for food is going to be one of about a hundred in magnitude importance and the gap between what our bodies actually consider and need and will thrive with in terms of ingredients put into our body for energy versus the performance that we get and the outcomes that we're going to get based upon what we're told by officials
	Safe and effective food, huh?
	That's going to be the same as everything else.
	So, here we are in the middle of July of 2023, and there is no end in sight.
	Yet, you see the course of events and the optics that we were talking about.
	Our opponents are just Being viciously exposed.
	And yet, the show goes on.
	And it will go on.
	And it will go on until we have this breakthrough event.
	Now, I do not know how to cause this breakthrough event.
	Part of the definition of a breakthrough that I really appreciate is going to be unimaginable and unpredictable.
	So something is going to snap.
	And with that, I do predict that we are going to have the Emperor New Clothes ending to this show.
	But until we have the breakthrough event, all we can do is stay strong and be proud of ourselves with the quality of what we think and what we say and what we do.
	And for sure, we can have small actions that we can take with families and neighborhoods, friends, community.
	Ryan, your final thoughts?
	A couple of technological developments that I read about this last week.
	we're watching is ridiculously fearful in terms of the story that we're witnessing.
	Brian, your final thoughts.
	A couple of technological developments that I read about this last week.
	Number one is that Russia has banned the use of any Apple-based telephone within the FSB or within any of its State Department governments, and that's because they've uncovered certain spyware that they are saying has been installed and that's because they've uncovered certain spyware that they are saying has been installed as a result of the CIA's working along with Apple to
	So they're busy replacing all their phones with whatever the Russian version is that they think they can trust.
	And then secondarily, It has been announced in France that the government will be deciding when and how to shut down social media to control the riots in the future.
	So let's assume that the France thing is being whipped up into shape and Russia recognizes the ability to use phones as spying devices.
	We know that the government has gone through every phone that was inside the DC area and on the January 6 time and then cross-referenced that phone's data along with debit card data.
	To come up with their list of January 6th agitators so they could make their arrest list.
	They cross reference the information that came from Bank of America with gun stores to determine who's bought what and what of the January 6th.
	People could be true gun running.
	People or gun buying insurrectionists so the technology to me is out of control and it seems to me that the great reset or whatever it looked like is going to simply be maybe shutting down the Internet.
	Shutting down the lights for a while so that they can get the military in position to get things under control, declare martial law, and keep us sort of locked up for a little while.
	They'll probably use another false flag of some sort, such as a large chemical bill or explosion or something like that.
	Uh, or not chemical, but biological attacks.
	Stay inside your house, shut it all down, lock it all up, and then they'll institute the Great Reset.
	At least they'll try.
	But I have a feeling with the way the pendulum is swinging right now that if Donald Trump gets into office, and that's still two years away, I don't think they're going to allow it to happen because they're so far advanced on their Great Reset agenda that they simply can't allow the pendulum to swing that far out.
	I'd expect that it's going to look like something like, stay in your house, don't talk to your neighbors, don't come out, and let's shut down your Facebook so that we can shut down any dissenting voices.
	They'll turn off Facebook, they'll turn off Twitter, they'll turn off YouTube, and they'll just simply control everything that happens.
	So be prepared, have a nice library, and make sure in your library you have basics on how to distill water and get clean water, and how to grow food, and how to Survive on your own.
	A couple of handbooks on survival ought to do you up, at least to start out with.
	Of course, you need resources as well, so stock those pantries and stock the seabanks.
	Wonderful, wonderful commentary, Brian, Carl, both.
	I so appreciate your participation.
	I feel the Supreme Court has offered contradictory rulings about getting rid of affirmative action in colleges, meaning not discriminating on the basis of race, for example.
	I understand that if it were done purely on merit, Harvard would have an undergraduate that was exclusively Asian American.
	On the other hand, They're allowing cake makers and others to discriminate on a basis of what basically comes down to politics.
	It seems to me that discrimination is such that individuals ought to adhere to their role responsibility as bakers, as lawyers, as cooks, As paramedics, and treat everyone who is an appropriate patron with respect, regardless of their politics, regardless of their sexual orientation.
	This idea of shutting your store because you don't like someone's politics is profoundly un-American and undemocratic.
	I condemn it in the strongest possible terms.
	We've seen in Bud Light, of course, a stunning illustration of going woke and going broke.
	But whether that's generalizable across the board is a whole other matter.
	It seems to me that the law ought to require no discrimination on the basis of race or religion or sex or color or politics.
	That, I think, might put an end to a lot of this.
	Meanwhile, do spend as much time as you can with your family and the people you love and care about.
	We still do not know how much time we have left, though the Ukrainian war seems to be simmering down.
	Back tomorrow.
	Actually, yes.

▲