All Episodes
Previous Next
June 28, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:28
Need to Know News June 27, 2023, with Carl Herman, Brian Davidson and Owen Stevens
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Carl Herman of Mission Viejo, California, joined today by Brian Davidson of Houston, Texas, and Owen Stevens in Rochester, New York, for all the news you need to know on Tuesday, the 27th of June.
First, I want to take it to Brian with an update of our beloved Dr. Fetzer.
Brian.
Yeah, I gave Jim a call on Sunday morning just to see how he was doing, how he turned out.
He answered the phone.
He sounded great.
Instead of a triple bypass, They had gotten in there and decided just to do a double bypass and I'm not sure if they didn't like the risks on the triple bypass or if they didn't think that it was necessary.
So, it's been a little less invasive than we had expected.
They had him out for quite a while.
It sounds like.
So, but, I mean, he's 82 years old, I believe so.
You know, it's expected that there's going to be some issues or some console.
Some stuff, but he sounded great.
It was central standard time when I called him about 9 30 AM on Sunday, June 25th and had a 1520 minute talk with him and he he was more interested in talking about the show and how we're going to progress and what sort of adjustments we're all going to start making.
Then he wasn't talking about the surgery, but he's been being visited by his family.
Everybody seems to think he's doing really well.
I don't know yet when they're going to release him or you know how those circumstances are going to come about, but.
It sounds like the surgery went fine and he's perfectly happy and perfectly healthy.
And as far as I can tell, he's just itching to get back in the saddle.
I don't think he likes the idea that we're taking his airwaves away from him.
He's going to have to live with that for a little while.
For a little while, yes.
Jim was very confident going in with what he wrote and what he said.
And for those of you who don't know, I didn't know this.
Jim said that it's no longer the invasive procedure where previously they had to open up the ribcage and now they just go in on the side and go in there.
So, bless you, Jim, and we look forward to you coming back in whatever form, whenever you're ready.
So, here we go for our stories.
First up, I just want to take a look at this, uh, this quick tweet because it was so brilliant and, uh, cogent.
And there you go.
So the theme that we keep talking about is that whatever it is that comes from official stories is going to be the inversion of reality.
And this is a great way of taking a look at that and flipping the script on these guys.
My first story, and we are just going to do six stories today, which should be plenty of time, is this.
We have the IRS whistleblower's deposition.
And this is sworn under oath.
And the allegation of this is that DOG sabotaged the investigation of Hunter covering it up.
Of course, because all the lies coming from the official stories are going to be cover-ups of the real crimes.
And this guy, Weiss, What we have here, this is the main thing, is that this is an assistant U.S.
attorney.
So these are the prosecutors for the Department of Justice.
There's a little more than 5,000 of these in the U.S.
And this prosecutor said that they do not want to ask about the big guy when the statement from Hunter or 10 held by H for the big guy, that they're shielding that type of testimony.
They don't want to be able to fall into that.
And then we have this story about, so this guy, why he said that he had been Given granted ultimate authority over the Hunter Biden case and so one of the questions would be in a deposition of who gave you that authority to be in charge of that and I hope that what this means is that the cover-up is unraveling but
We've had so many cover-ups and they've been about at this stage of the ridiculous cover-up and the bullshit excuses and it's worked so far.
Now yesterday I did show that NBC had a poll showing that 74% polled by NBC.
Conclude that the country is going in the wrong direction.
So I overall feel that it's good news and I'm not going to be satisfied until we have this breakthrough.
The breakthrough is going to be partially defined by at least one big significant arrest that would start the cascade of the whole truth opening up.
Brian, your comments?
Well, first and foremost, I think the reason that we all think Joe Biden is a puppet and he's in place is that he's disposable at the moment that they need him to start conveniently forgetting facts.
He's a good target, Hunter Biden being less so, because he's younger and obviously he has more of his mind than his father.
What we're looking at here is the idea that the dominoes will begin to fall.
Don't hold your breath, though, because we've seen other situations like this.
And just like with the Hunter Biden prosecution, they don't have the guts or the teeth to take a bite out of this political establishment.
I suspect that Joe Biden Or this Joe Biden, Hunter Biden group.
Has been in this game for a long, long time.
I suspect some of the problems that are out there.
Ask yourself about Nancy Pelosi's husband and how many times insider trading may have taken place.
Ask yourself about some of Harry Reid's old deals in Nevada.
Ask yourself about what these Republicans are into just as much as what these guys are into.
Look, I want to be proud of this country again, and the House Ways and Means Committee seems to be the only Entity or the only committee that's dedicated to even taking a close look at this.
I really like what we're seeing from these guys for the 1st time.
It wouldn't surprise me if all of a sudden that committee was.
Re, engineered or reprogrammed.
I'm hoping to see some actionable intelligence that comes out of this.
But as you can tell, the faucet is still in drip-drip mode.
It's not in wide-open mode.
Otherwise, we wouldn't just be hearing about $5 million or $80,000 a month from Burisma.
We wouldn't just be hearing about a couple of gun pitchers after he swore on a gun form.
We wouldn't just be hearing about this stuff.
We'd be starting to get into the deeper stuff.
You'll know that we've got something we can dig our teeth into when they start talking about this child porn issue or they start talking about some of the real crimes that were on that stuff because taking bribes.
I suspect that that's.
Daily activity for these guys, and it has been for years.
Obviously, they're so comfortable with it from the text of the WhatsApp messages that they've been at this for a very, very long time, and they just don't really care, and they know that nobody's going to come after them under any circumstances anyway.
And the House Ways and Means Committee, frankly, doesn't have the power to decide what the Department of Justice is going to do.
Merrick Garland does.
And Merrick Garland is not on the team of right and on the team of justice.
He's just simply not.
So don't hold your breath.
It's nice to see the mainstream media coming into the story and actually beginning to cover it.
It sounds like the Titanic sinking wasn't a big enough story.
So they had to come up with the coup in Russia to sort of cover for it.
They're going to have to keep taking, you know, your normal, average, everyday stories and inflating them into oblivion in order to cover this one up.
Sharp.
Thank you, brother.
Owen?
Yeah, you mentioned something that I think is really important, which is the real crimes, the child pornography.
But I would be more interested to see what happens with child trafficking and what we're doing to expose what's actually going on.
I mean, I know we talked last time about JP Morgan being in a deposition and paying a lot of money, millions of dollars to settle over Epstein claims.
I think this to me is the most concerning issue.
There are more than 500,000 kids estimated to be trafficked a year in the United States.
It's a shocking number of kids that are trafficked in our country.
The exact number we'd have to You'd have to look it up.
Don't quote me on any number, but it's a shocking amount of kids that are trafficked.
And I think that we need to really be, you mentioned arrests.
And my question would be, what would bring that about?
And what do you think, what's a realistic expectation?
Because I find myself oftentimes, like a lot of people, I think, Trusting the news that comes out about possible arrests and justice only to be completely disappointed when nothing is done and nothing happens.
So as far as trial trafficking goes, that would be where I put most of my thoughts into.
That's something that is just a devastating reality of the country in which we live and We know that there are several Biden officials.
There are a lot of people who are on the left that are involved that are trying to cover this up.
And so I'd be interested to see who we're going to be going after.
I mean, one of the reasons that Trump said Hillary Clinton would be in jail, it's not just because of emails.
It's because of what was on those emails.
So I think that we should be doing as much as we can to get somebody like her behind bars.
That would be a great day.
Step-by-step.
By the way, J.P.
Morgan, in my research and taking a look at the genesis of owning corporate media, the oldest document that I found was a 1917 report of a congressman, the name will come to me, so this member of Congress wanted to have an investigation of J.P.
Morgan because he had received intelligence saying that Morgan had purchased the top 25 editorial boards of American publications to shape American opinion in two general areas to push America into World War One and to promote the Federal Reserve and this congressman tried to get a hearing to discover it didn't have the votes and that congressman discovered that
Those same publications that he was challenging derided him as being unpatriotic for the next election, and the guy couldn't win another election.
I'll put that article that's in the published research that I have from the Claremont Colleges on how long corporate media has been owned.
Okay, Owen, we're going to- Wait a second, wait a second.
I want to answer one quick question about arrests.
Okay.
This is like Law Theory 101.
In order to have an arrest, you need to have the elements of a crime.
On this date, at this time, or on or about this date, or between these dates, this particular statute was violated by this person known, the witnesses, this officer that's done the research of the witnesses, the complaining witness, So you've got date, time, county, or venue, this person in this place, this time, this place.
Once those elements are there, what happens is that this officer of the court, which would be a peace officer of some sort, would call in those details to a district attorney, who would then review to make sure that the elements are in place, and if they agree, That the elements are in place, then they'll accept charges on the spot, which allows for an arrest to take place.
So, if you're talking about federal crimes, federal jurisdictions, the police force in theory would be the FBI if it's stateside.
And if you're talking about state crimes, or even local crimes, it might be completely different with a local district attorney and then venue might change based on how the arguments all.
All talk it out, but you've got to have the elements.
This crime, committed by this person, on or about this date, a violation of this law, and they did this, and this is the witness.
So, who knows?
But that's what you need for an arrest, and they have plenty of that for Hunter Biden.
Yeah, and just to correct the number that I threw out there, it's actually 15 to 50,000 in the U.S.
The number that I cited was a global metric of child trafficking, around 500,000, just to make sure that everybody knows that.
Yeah, we know that number.
Yeah, that number's been around a long time, but the United States isn't quite that high.
No, it's 15 to 50,000 in the U.S.
alone, yeah.
As a retired teacher of government history and economics, I've had a lot of conversations with students and a lot of practice in talking about this stuff, and the highest level of professional and academic standard that I have for this is using the legal term of prima facie.
This goes back to Latin law, and it just means prima, first, facie, face, and that anybody is in power.
If you feel uncomfortable saying that these people should be arrested, you can feel very comfortable exactly what you guys are talking about to be able to Factually assert that, based on a body of evidence, it appears that these are crimes in progress that demand arrest.
And anybody can say, I disagree, and then they can engage in the evidence and you have a conversation about the evidence, but you're not going to get me into any trouble by pointing to the evidence and saying that it appears to you that, and on its face, this requires an arrest, this is an apparent Crime in progress.
All right, let's go to Owen.
Take it away, brother.
This this is a fun story.
Everybody will enjoy this.
So this is Adam or Rachel Levine, Richard Levine.
I always love any time I can get I can do a story about this guy.
I absolutely love it.
It's just entertaining to me.
But this Biden official, Rachel Levine, his name's Richard Levine, but he changed it to Rachel's a transgender employee.
I'm sure everybody is aware.
She wants, he wants, I screw up the pronouns so bad.
He wants to turn June Pride Month into a Summer Pride Month and basically celebrate the LGBTQ indoctrination marches, all of this that's been going on.
and extend that to the entire summer.
I'm not surprised that this is being declared right now as a summer of pride after several pride marches.
I don't know if you guys heard the news, but several pride marches featured naked men riding bicycles, exposing themselves to children, exposing themselves to Boy Scouts, Boy Scouts marching alongside drag queens in Seattle.
The Seattle mayor even praised the Pride Parade saying, you can feel the love as gay naked men expose themselves to children in Seattle in this Pride Parade.
And then shortly after that, LGBTQ month in the month of June is now extended for the entire summer.
For reference, we have one day a year that we celebrate our veterans.
We have one day a year that we celebrate those who have died in our nation's wars.
But now it seems as if we have an entire summer dedicated to pride, LGBTQ pride and perverse sexuality.
So I think this is this to me really is if you didn't think this was indoctrination, if you didn't think that this was the clearest, most in your face attempt to indoctrinate kids and to force this down our throats and to make this the calling card of most in your face attempt to indoctrinate kids and to force this down our throats and to make this the calling card of the United States of America and really change the That's really what I see happening right now.
It's despicable.
It's gross.
And you know this we have to understand who they're targeting.
This is about kids.
This is about children.
It's but it's no coincidence that they're exposing themselves to children.
It's no coincidence that they're pushing this in classrooms and trying to extend this as much as possible.
And you note if you look at the pride parades, the majority of people marching are young kids.
A lot of them are young kids who have been swept up by this tide.
I think it's it's just gross and There needs to be something done about this.
There needs to be heavy opposition from communities and parents that put their foot down and just say, no, this is not going to happen.
Awesome, thank you.
Brian, your thoughts?
They've overplayed their hand on the whole LGBTQ rainbow agenda and it's beginning to backfire.
We see this with Bud Light.
We see this with what's happening at the parks.
The normal people of America are beginning to hit back with Bud Light sales being down nearly 30 percent and you don't necessarily have to be conservative In other words, you don't have to be conservative to recognize that the progressives, the conservatives are those that want to preserve the culture of our fathers generally and preserve the customs of our culture, whereas the progressives are iconoclasts and they want to destroy it.
The progressives seem to be taking a more of a marathon approach.
Whereas the conservatives are spending too much time in front of their TVs instead of with their children, or not spending enough time with their children, allowing the progressives to drive through the academic system their agenda.
So their goal is cultural destruction.
They want to destroy the old, white, rich, white man And I think the LGBTQ thing is part of their agenda to change the culture over a longer period of time.
Now, they're moving far too quickly with trying to get America to accept this new progressive agenda.
And unfortunately, what's happening for them and for some of those people that are probably legitimately queer, Is that they're just being overrun by the in-your-face of the whole drag queen thing.
As for the bicycle scandal, I think that's much related to the Krasensteins who try to defend the gay bicycle riders on Twitter and the Krasenstein brothers.
It backfired completely as they were generally exposed for having the world's dumbest logic about it.
They were trying to justify it in terms of Is nudity accepted or not?
Oh, well, we allow nude beaches in these places, so we should allow the LGBTQ thing.
And a lot of the argument there is related to, well, just because it's nudity, is it sexual in nature?
And those are some questions.
Obviously, a man running around with an erection in full public is Vastly more offensive than, you know, some body part being exposed, like down in New Orleans where young college girls get drunk and show their boobs.
So there's some differences here, but it goes generally back to what's the line of decent and what's the line of indecent.
And the West Coast has been pushing these lines for years, much harder than it has happened on the East Coast, and a lot much harder than it's happened in the South.
You can get away with things in Portland, Oregon that would be... I mean, we would hang them high in Texas if some of the things that they allow in general public as art happened in Texas.
There would be a gang of rednecks that would tear your throat out if you did the things that they try to do in California and Oregon.
But that's all part of the progressive plan to change the culture, I believe.
I don't necessarily put it into the area of grooming the children completely as more of it is a cultural change.
And they want the children to be part of the progressive new red shirts or what was the Nazi tradition?
Brown shirts.
The progressive new army.
Was it red shirts?
Brown shirts.
Yeah, yeah.
The new young progressive army, basically the new Khmer Rouge brainwashed children that are willing to kill the old regimes.
This is old Marxism and old cultural change 101 and all we're seeing it is a renewed push.
Yeah, a paramilitary group that is going to operate outside of the law for the regime's dictates, all while the regime is going to virtually signal that, of course, we respect the rule of law.
Well said there, Brian.
Thank you, brother.
I agree that their hand has been overplayed, and I hope it's a function that their hand is being played for them, because the risk is extreme.
And that Seattle event, I did see one of the floats that was sponsored by Bud Light.
That'll help them even further.
And for Rachel Levine, the dude saying it should be a summer of pride, just like the Summer of Love of 2020, huh?
Now, for San Francisco, I can speak to that, having lived there.
I remember about 15 years ago, we had family friends coming in from Vancouver, and we were in downtown San Francisco and driving around, and we didn't know it, but that was a day of one of these gay parades, and the street got filled up, and we stopped, and the parade came by, because we couldn't move in the traffic, and there were a bunch of naked dudes there.
And our children, our daughters, were probably Eight, nine, ten, somewhere around in there.
I don't think they noticed, but I noticed.
And then, maybe about five years ago, we were in downtown San Francisco, and the same thing.
And it was just common for these audacious, naked, gay men to frolic naked.
It just isn't accepted, or apparently it's a condoned part of the culture.
In my U.S.
government classes and history classes, the idea of progressive and conservative, what Brian was talking about, is that I framed it similarly in that to conserve is to protect, and we all have habits that we engage in.
And I presented to my students that if you take a look at your actions, of what you actually do and talk about and honor, let's say about 90% of that is going to be conservative.
You're not making stuff up.
Like when it's evening time, you go to your bed to sleep.
You're not going to be progressive and think about sleeping on the refrigerator.
I mean, every once in a while, you may want to sleep outside.
Okay.
Now to progress is to have an idea of something, maybe an upgrade, or you may want to bring something in.
And so you try it out.
And my point of view is that the conservatives should appreciate the progressives for their experiments on their dime, on their time.
And if they think they found something valuable for public consideration, sure, bring it!
Because that's how we get improvements and breakthroughs.
And the irony is that what is progressive, if it is effective, becomes conservative.
So, My point to the students is that the idea of progressive and conservative is really an issue by issue condition about whether you're willing to try something and some some people some human beings are naturally progressive there.
They will try new things and some people are more.
Cautious and that's fine too.
They will wait until they see more of the evidence until they try something new.
So the idea of this synergy and this empowerment and to remove this ridiculous cartoonish notion to believe in a political party because they say that they're progressive or conservative is just just silliness.
All right, let's go on to our next story.
What a handsome guy.
Yes, yes.
Speaking of handsome guys, the story that I want to cover next.
So this is the political leader of India here.
This is at a tech conference and Biden was just go ahead and speaking and I want to play what he said, and I want to point out at the end, I'll play it twice, it's just 14 seconds.
I want to point out the reaction of the gentleman, including the political leader of India here, of how they respond to this.
And in order to do this, I can only do this on the smaller screen.
If I try to do it to the whole screen, then I lose the audio.
Sure.
Oops, here we go.
Anyway, I started off without you, and I'd sold a lot of state secrets and a lot of very important things that we shared.
One more time.
I was just thinking, anyway, I started off without you, and I'd sold a lot of state secrets and a lot of very important things that we shared.
That was heard by the people around Joe.
They're laughing at us.
The way they looked at him when he said that was like, what?
All right, here are your guys' comments.
They're laughing at us.
All of them.
Everybody's laughing at us.
The whole world is laughing at us.
I hope that the rest of the world knows that we're not As dumb as this.
I hope that the rest of the world knows that America did not pass 81 million votes for this guy.
I hope the rest of the world knows, as a result of this, that we are a people under siege from these politicians, these snakes, I mean, for him to say, I sold a lot of state secrets, it's either so second nature, or it's so ingrained in him, or he's trying to make some sort of confession.
Just absolutely the worst type of Freudian slip, if it is that, that you can possibly imagine.
And of course, we all know that the Bidens have been selling state secrets.
Hell, we have the receipts to prove it.
in the house ways and means committee.
So what they're just rubbing it in our face.
They're just making, they're just making us a laughingstock by allowing the stuff to slip out.
Yep.
Owen.
Yeah.
I, I think it reminds me of Barack Obama.
Um, It's worse than that.
But one of the things that when I was starting off my political career at the age of 11, I was listening to my dad who was talking, you know, he was listening to Rush Limbaugh, right?
And that's what that's what we would listen to in the car.
And my dad would be listening to Rush talking about how Obama was going across to other countries apologizing.
For America, basically apologizing for what we did, what we've done, racism, colonialism, the craziest things that you could that you'd ever heard of apologizing to the world and basically just bending the knee.
And I can remember how furious it made my my father, how furious it made so many others who had to listen to Barack Obama go and pander.
And back when we actually had a risk, I thought of this country as respectable and as a legitimate country.
Joe Biden did not win any election.
He did not win any election.
completely bought and owned.
But this is this is just foolishness.
This is this is foolishness.
Joe Biden did not win any election.
He did not win any election.
It's proven.
And we have the proof.
You know, you all you have to do.
One of the stories I saw Pennsylvania, I believe the story was it was a former P.A. Congressman pleads guilty to ballot stuffing for Democrats in the 2020 federal election.
We have people that have already confessed for this kind of stuff, for these things, and everybody knows that it's crazy.
And I think that people in other countries do as well.
One of the cool things, actually, is I work for a company called Citizen Go, and we're a global company, a global organization that runs pro-life petitions.
And this this it's it's in Spain that we have our headquarters in our HQ so I'm very it's worldwide in 12 languages so I'm very connected with multiple people across the world and Sweden and all over the place even in Africa and the consensus is from all of my co-workers who are from 12 different languages across the world that Donald Trump won That he was swindled.
They all know this is true.
They watch the same media that we do.
They take it in and they understand this very well, especially if they're conservative leading.
So no, I don't think that the world is... I think that maybe the leaders might be laughing at us if they're a part of this system and if they're in on it, but I think most people know exactly what's going on.
I think most people have been awoken to at least some of what happened in 2020.
81 million votes, my ass!
I want to take a moment and consider the idea that Brian talked about, that their hand is overplayed, and with this, to explain how those words could have gotten out of that actor's mouth.
And we've covered extensively that this is an actor, it's a guy wearing a mask, and we can definitively demonstrate that from the old Biden having dangly earlobes, this one not.
evidence where this guy's mask punches up in inappropriate or appropriate places for the contact for a latex mask, but inappropriate for human skin.
And that I will again put on the show notes for a bit to the evidence that, It's a 47 minute video, I believe, of the best compilation of evidence that this is a white hat military operation.
And one of the aspects of military operations that is not understood and disappointing to many people is that the visible presence of the military is going to be among the last steps that professional military leadership want.
They want to be able to affect action without ever being seen.
And the idea that if you could control and puppet...
The voice of your political opposition, and going back to what Owen was saying with Barack Obama, yes, indeed, he virtue-signaled and apologized, and he covered the American empire with the continuation of the Bush-Cheney wars, and no stop of the economic hitman John Perkins-style of the looting of resources.
What are the Democrats going to do, or what is the political opposition going to do, if Biden is being puppeted?
Are they going to try to impeach him themselves?
So, this is very interesting, and as always, I say everything in the absolute confidence that I can prove little.
To be able to make a factual claim, those of us who do that professionally, we need to do exactly what Brian was talking about, laying out the evidence, the elements of a crime.
We have to be able to point to objective evidence that's independently verifiable and have an explanation that is cogent to the existence of those facts.
Now, if people can go ahead and refute that stuff, go ahead.
And I am at 95% certainty that the ridiculousness of the show that we're watching, we have a range of possibilities.
The good side is that this is a white hat show that is working to get the American people to reject the psychopathic, virtue signaling criminals up front.
And the other side of the spectrum is that our opponents have always been in charge.
The entire human history And over 200 years of the United States, and I also would not be surprised if our opponents set this whole thing up, put it in our faces, showed us the evidence of their crimes, and then went ahead and beat us anyway, and just said, bitches, what are you going to do about it?
You have no power.
And part of my conclusion as well.
As I've said many times in previous shows, is that this is a real-world test of your spiritual, religious, philosophical background to see where you stand.
And the only comfort that I have is in what I can control, which, as I've said, is only what I think and what I say and what I do.
It might be that all of us are, at this stage of the game, powerless messengers.
Anything else you guys want to say on this one or move on?
Well, they already told us, bitches, you have no power.
That happened in the 2020 election.
I mean, that is exactly what happened at 4 a.m.
in the morning on election night when all of the servers clicked over all the votes for Biden and then they continued to gaslight us all through the night and the next day.
They said, bitches, you have no power.
Now, Carl, I'm going to say this about the white hat theory I think there might be something to it, and I'll tell you why.
When you see Hunter Biden show up with Joe Biden at the White House Correspondents Press Dinner and shake hands with Merrick Garland so shortly after this series of events develops, you begin to ask yourself, are they out of their freaking minds?
Are they just showing it to us?
I don't know, but that happened.
And these press secretaries have no excuse.
They won't answer questions.
Nobody is going to answer any questions.
What are they hoping?
That they can just make the wind blow stronger with the rest of the mainstream narrative and expect all Conservative-leaning Americans to stop asking questions about equal justice in America and the American way.
They're just going to teach the next generation of children that there is no such thing?
Our conservative values give us A justice department and a feeling for what's right and a feeling for what's fair.
I think of all the people that have gone away for IRS, different types of fraud, all the important people that have spent time in jail.
And this guy just gets a slap on the wrist and shows up with that at the White House Correspondence.
It's overplayed to the worst degree possible.
Well said, brother.
Anything else, Owen?
That's all for me.
All right.
Moving on.
Owen, take it away.
This is one of my favorite topics.
So when I was first really researching, you know, what was inside the vaccines, because I was really, really curious what all my friends were taking and why they seemed to love it so much and why they seemed to argue for it so much.
I discovered that there's something called, we've talked about this numerous times on the show, but graphene oxide, so this news story is really interesting because it's being exposed right now, I think more than ever, that freshly overlaid graphene oxide nanobots were found in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines.
So there was a document released by the Food and Drug Administration, FDA, under the order of federal judge Mark Pittman confirming the possibility of toxic Graphene oxide.
However, page seven of the study revealed that freshly overlaid graphene oxide is required in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
This intentional concealment by authorities and the mainstream media highlights their commitment to advancing their agenda while suppressing vital information that could question their power and control.
So I wanted to talk about what I really think is the plan with these graphene oxide particles that are inside this vaccine.
For people that don't know what graphene oxide is, it's a toxic heavy metal.
And this toxic heavy metal is shown to replicate and almost clot up.
So we hear a lot of people dealing with blood clots, a lot of people who are dealing with very thick blood, It's no surprise there at all because some of the vaccines all of them because there's different lot numbers for each vaccine vaccines that went out some of some people took a placebo some not everybody took the actual vaccine.
That had all of the negative, harmful, very life-threatening elements inside of it.
But a lot of people did.
And those people now, with this graphene oxide in their body, it's replicating.
And it's a very, very dangerous thing for your health.
But what's the plan?
Why include graphene oxide in there?
Why include a toxic element in there like that?
Well, they said themselves, I mean, this is one of the patents.
And the patent for graphene oxide in the vaccine says that they needed a toxic element in order to provoke an immune response.
They've done this since the beginning of vaccines with mercury and thymersol, which was included in many vaccines and basically in every single vaccine that you can think of.
Thymersol is basically mercury, another heavy metal that provokes a very hefty immune response.
But why use graphene oxide?
Why use something like this?
Well, early in the pandemic, I think that we were tracking the plan, and it seemed to me that it went in two stages.
And we've done the first stage, and now I think we're going to be moving into the second stage.
The first stage was Fauci-Bill Gates.
The models used by Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx that said 2.2 million people would die from COVID-19 were false, and that was about fear-mongering.
So they wanted a fear-monger.
Number two, the second step was the CDC-recommended COVID-19 protocols.
They called for the use of remdesivir.
Remdesivir was killing a lot of people in the hospitals.
It was patented by George Soros in conjunction with China and Gilead Labs that caused renal failure.
And then number three, the polyamory chain reaction tests were falsely calibrated to inflate the fear in the number of positive COVID-19 cases.
And we saw everybody knows that they were inflating those COVID-19 numbers.
People that were hit by a bus, for instance, were labeled as a COVID-19 death.
And then lastly, they wanted to demonize the use of the effective and affordable COVID-19 treatments that actually worked, including ivermectin, butasonide, and hydroxychloroquine.
So step two, after they did all that, step two, I believe, is going to be using these modifying nanotechnologies that have been discovered, that are proven to be in these vaccines, as well as 5G, to track people and surveil people.
Yuval Noah Harari even said, science is not about truth, it's about power.
Ideally, the response to COVID should be surveillance under the skin.
He also said, Trump is destroying the global alliance system.
So I'm really happy that Trump is an enemy of these globalists.
Klaus Schwab said, quote, the difference of the fourth industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing, it changes you.
If you take a genetic editing such as graphene oxide or the spike protein, just as an example, it's you who are being changed fundamentally.
So that is the agenda, I believe, to surveil us, to encroach on our freedoms, and to fundamentally alter our genes.
Start, brother.
Thank you.
Brian!
Well, as for surveillance, we all have one of these.
They can already do that.
You know, you don't need my bloodstream in order to surveil me.
You might need my bloodstream in order to kill me slowly with a combination of heavy metals and crazy 5G waves or something like that.
But there's a lot of ways to get rid of us.
The question is, who are they trying to preserve?
Now, I know that a lot of these pharmaceutical vendors and manufacturers, to me, it seems that money runs the world with these guys.
It's all about who can sell the most, the biggest blocks of these shots, and who can buy low, sell high.
This stuff's ready.
We've proven it can be injected.
What's the plan?
Now, if you believe that Donald Trump is at least read into the plan on some level, then why would he go out there and push this unless he knew that they were going to cull the herd anyway?
And so he dropped the hydroxychloroquine bomb or the ivermectin bomb.
I don't know what's going on.
I don't know why they're doing what they're doing.
I don't think there's enough information out there.
And one of the greatest things you need to understand about a PSYOP is that there can only be a few people in on it.
The rest of them are caught speculating as to what the true nature of this thing is.
I know from analysis of different false flags and psychological operations that not everybody's read into the same narrative or the same storyline.
And that there are definitely control mechanisms in place in terms of the daily morning press briefing or conference call about what's in the news today and what's going on today.
COVID turned a lot of people in front of their television screens.
It got a lot of people fearfully staying inside the house.
It separated neighbor from neighbor, father from child, mother from kids.
It separated the whole entire environment out in terms of breaking Our culture and our people up and getting us isolated and separated.
It turned kids who were getting indoctrinated in schools against parents.
It turned the mainstream media into a bumbling, fumbling mess.
I think it was more about a cultural disruption and maybe there was some science experiment behind it.
But you know, I don't think you need the science experiment to do the damage.
And if it's true that Trump is part of this Q White Hat group, What, did he control how many placebos got put out there?
Or was there placebos?
I tend to try to lean on the people that have the quote-unquote scientific knowledge and then blend that with my instincts about this, but I'm telling you that they didn't need to poison these shots to poison us as Americans.
They got us up here and that's 90% of the battle.
Filling the body, that's easy.
Well said.
The attorney licensed in California and in Germany, Reiter Vollmick, he demonstrated through the data that all of the deaths came from 5% of the batches of the shots across the board from the different manufacturers.
So it seemed like this was an experiment in progress, and I would conclude that the goal is exactly what was stated on the former Georgia Guidestones to cull humanity down to something less than 1 billion people as a slave race.
But I've gotten, you know, I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of waiters and waitresses.
I mean, I mean, I mean, aspiring actors and the idea.
That you would capture Hollywood for the most attractive packaging of propaganda.
I think that this is very powerful.
It has been used and is predictive programming and a lot of what we've seen in movies that I can think of hearkening to this idea.
Um, you know, the technology we have no idea and again with a common theme that we really don't know what's going on.
We're just here speculating in the fog of war and the only way that we can discover the progression of the actual state of the technology is going to be after a victory that includes arrests and then whistleblowers are going to come forward and then we're going to have public demonstrations.
About what the technology can actually do and going back to the bitches you have no power, Bobby Kennedy, RFK Jr.
He has written and documented the most game ending.
Facts that should destroy the vaccine industry.
But RFK Jr.
has had nobody accept a challenge to a debate in 18 years.
And you had this, you had Joe Rogan with RFK, and then this guy, Dr. Peter Hotez, had been on Joe Rogan.
And when Hotez bashed RFK Jr., Rogan Invited Hotez for the debate and Hotez said that he didn't want to debate RFK, not because of the science, but because he didn't want to turn it into the Jerry Springer Show.
And with my two-year battle with Hayward Unified School District, simply asking the obvious and required questions for these health orders to be forced subjects in a claimed medical experiment I'll put the essay my best shot, but I found so Hayward High School about 100 teachers there.
I had maybe about 6, 7 or 8 of mostly staff, not teachers who were on my side who could see pointing to the data, like federal title 21 federal title 21.
Title 21, okay?
U.S.
Constitution says that federal law is going to be supreme over anything that the state mandates, requires, or orders, or whatever, and Title 21 governs the CDC and the FDA, and it says no medical experiments.
You can't do it.
You have to have full cooperation with the subject, and this is based on the history of the Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trials, and the history that we received of medical experiments in World War II.
None of them would stand with me.
None of them came back to me with questions.
All of them left Uh, any affiliation with the professional learning committee that I had to be able to communicate this broad data, which include that we have the power to fully fund our school districts that the constant recruitment that we have.
By the military on our campus.
You know, we should really challenge the legality of the military actions, and I could go on and on with the stories with the data that I provided, but Carrie Cassidy of Project Camelot, she summarized it from her experience, is that some of us have been born with what she characterizes as a rebel gene that has our bullshit detectors be a lot more powerful than the general public, and I've framed it
In my 46 years experience working for the Great Awakening, which is simply the most important topics affecting the greatest number of people's quality of lives and the most amount of money that only 2% of the people can engage in these important conversations and 98% of them.
are a form of sheeple and so we have the psychopaths virtue signaling saying bitches what are you going to do about it we have us pointing to the data doing hero's work to be able to explain document and prove these ideas and as I showed yesterday we have the NBC poll from NBC itself Saying that 74% of the Americans think that we're on the wrong track.
So, wow.
Let's just move on, unless anybody has something else they want to say about it.
I mean, it certainly isn't boring.
It's got me on the edge of my seat, literally and figuratively.
All right, let's go on.
So for this, for the PSYOP that is the claimed Russian coup, let's just take a look at the map here.
So we have Ukraine, we have Kiev, and Belarus.
And from the story that we were told is that there was conflict between the Wagner Group and the Russian military and drama that was played out over the media a couple of months ago with the Wagner Group saying, ah, we're not getting our ammunition.
But look, if the Wagner Group is now here from where they started, welcome to Russia, bitches, if that was the deal.
Now, I do not know.
Here's other information.
These guys are usually sharp.
And the idea that the U.S.
would admit that they lost $6 billion.
I mean, there's no reason for the U.S.
to say, oh yeah, we lost another $6 billion.
They shouldn't.
But they were scripted, and they told us.
Now, it would be a great move, if these are the good guys in the white hats, to go ahead and bilk another $6 billion out of these guys and put it into the story.
And leading up to the main event here, I'm just giving you little previews here first, is that it might be if you take the premise that everything that we're told officially and through Hollywood is the inverse of reality.
Maybe the Great War is going to be very, very different from what we've been told.
And that certainly is one of the premises of the anti-New York Times.
And with this story, there's further analysis here.
So the New York Times is claiming that Belarus is fast becoming a vassal state of Russia.
Okay.
This is excellent to be able to take a look at the psychological projection and the usual tactic of our opponents to blame the good guys or a target SAP with exactly what the bad guys are doing.
And in this case, to blame Belarus as a vassal state is a puppet state, is that our political opponents led by the US and UK and NATO Is that that's all they do is they control, and they want everyone else to be puppet state to them, and you can see some of the headlines here from the Washington Post USA Today, and this book here is that they're claiming.
That any leader that they don't like is going to be some sort of a puppet or authoritarian.
I remember back in the first war, formerly known as on terror, Saddam Hussein had been characterized in the media, if I remember it correctly, as a strong man.
And that was one of the favorite phrases for puppets who were good boys to the U.S.
economic hitman model of funneling the profits of their natural resources using human resources to maximize those natural resource profits to the U.S.
and the U.K.
and the oligarchs corporations.
And when Saddam stopped being a good boy, he was called authoritarian as well.
And the article goes through line by line of all of the New York Slime's actions there.
And part of the preference or the preface for this source of information is that World War II Is the opposite of what we were told.
And you can take a look.
And read through this to be able to see some of the details here.
And for me, after 38 years, I have less and less interest to dive, to do a deep dive.
I've written a thousand articles since 2009, going over the history.
I've read, I've written and read a lot of this history.
And the bottom line is that it's just the opposite of what you're told.
Whatever we're told is the opposite of reality.
And it doesn't take much work to be able to point out that the official lies are going to be stories or the official stories are going to be lies.
And then, as a scholar, I can't do much more other than to demonstrate that the official lie is false.
And the best way of doing that is to go into the most authoritative documentation of the U.S.
government.
Which I've done several times.
I'll put a link to the shows that here on Bitshoot in the notes, and I offer them with every summary of these shows, that the official story is nonsense, and as Brian said before, being able to figure out what actually did happen, that's a whole other body of work, but pointing out the lies is going to be easy.
All right, gentlemen, have at it!
Well, I just started reading the 2008 release of Fletcher Prouty's book, The Secret Team, which was originally released.
And this is about the CIA.
I think it was originally released in 76 after the Kennedy Association.
And it's basically a tell-all about the CIA that was updated again in 2008.
And I found this particular paragraph in the preface to be very clear.
He says, I was the first author to point out that the CIA's most important cover story is that of an intelligence agency.
Of course, the CIA does make use of intelligence and intelligence gathering, but it is largely a front for its primary interest.
Fun and games.
The CIA is the center of a vast mechanism that specializes in covert operations, or as Alan Dulles used to call it, peacetime operations.
Or, in this sense, In this sense, the CIA is the willing tool of a higher-level secret team or high cabal that usually includes representatives of the CIA and other instrumentalities of the government, certain cells of business, and professional world, and almost always foreign participation.
It is this secret team, its allies, and the methods of operation that are the principal subject of the book.
So, in theory, this book is not about your FBI agents or even your CIA agents, but it's about the network that pulls the strings that is truly above or a part of or above the global banking cartels, the global power structure inside of each nation that is gathered together under one Or multiple operations, CIA, Mossad, you name it, KGB, whatever.
So we tend to look at the world sometimes with a microscope where we're taking a look at the false flags and breaking those ones out.
Those ones are kids stuff compared to what's happening on a global scale in terms of the type of information that we're getting that's making it out into Any narrative, any place, anywhere, anyhow.
Getting primary sources on what's happening in the minds of the global agenda or what's happening behind the scenes at these conferences that they have is virtually impossible.
This information is protected from on high by the Prince of Darkness himself, and I'm sure that there's more disinformation than there is actual information out there that's Reliable.
So you've got to go to your sources.
You've got to take a look and you got to trace back your history to try to figure out who these people were before they became who they are and how their families reigned over years and years and years of time.
The historical perspective is what gives us a better perspective as to who they are and what they'll do today because literally we get no information about how these people act or behave or what's on their agenda.
Strong.
Thank you, Owen.
Yeah, I am just starting to go down this rabbit hole of CIA intervention in our life and in my life.
And one of the things that I saw, because listen, I made a transition from a sheep as a college student at my freshman year.
You know, I really followed the narrative and I made this transition.
I made the move as my mom started to read these things and we started to, as a family, I'm very blessed to have a family that's I can't say that I would be here.
I can't say that I'd be awake to any of this without family.
And that speaks to how important it is to have people around you that can help you wake up to this stuff and the reality of what's going on.
And that's a blessing.
But as I made that, I started to look into MKUltra because I was always fascinated by MKUltra.
I was fascinated about the mind control experiments and the Manson family.
And I watched this movie, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, which is an excellent movie.
It's a great movie.
It's a twist on the Manson murder and everything that they did there.
But that really got me excited to look into it.
And what I realized is that the idea was that MKUltra ceased, that it stopped.
But the CIA never said that it stopped.
They never made a definitive statement that MKUltra had stopped or that they had any intention of stopping mind control experiments.
But what they did is they got a lot smarter about it.
They started to basically target Hollywood.
And so what I've been researching into lately has been CIA influence with Hollywood and media and what they've been able to do to indoctrinate the world into this, in America especially, with these Hollywood movies.
One of the movies that I like to point out is a movie called The Recruit.
It's got Al Pacino in it, and this movie paints the CIA agents as just agents that are going out fighting the bad guys worldwide.
They're going out, they're undercover, and they're the good guys.
And a movie like James Bond, for instance, that was written by the CIA.
James Bond, you know, what is it about?
It's about a really handsome, brilliant spy.
Every kid wants to be a CIA agent.
Every kid wants to be the spy going out.
And in this way, they've shrouded what they actually are.
And I thought it was really interesting to see how how deep the root is with the CIA in there.
I think it did start in World War Two, which is why I was which was why I'm bringing this up when you mentioned World War Two that the CIA actually began doing this.
I believe it was in the 40s or the or the or the late 30s that they started to do this kind of thing with with Hollywood movies.
But even in movies like Disney, how do you think Disney and Walt Disney paid for the massive swaths of land that they got in Florida to build Disney World or how do you think they paid for that?
You know, they paid we it was never it was never a Disney Expense it was something that private agencies Bought for them.
So I'm not surprised at all We know that Walt Disney's name appeared on several, you know pieces of paper along with CIA directors who were basically informing and instructing them what to do and how to You know basically put propaganda out there to indoctrinate the masses.
So I think that's something that if you haven't looked into that, please look into the CIA connection in Hollywood.
I think it's really fascinating and it woke me up to just how much media I was taking in that was CIA propaganda.
And you demonstrated it just by using the word transition with what you were talking about.
Try this on for size.
What if anything that is actually helpful and productive, our opponents, they've captured every agency.
So let's just assume what Brian was talking about earlier, that the bad guys, literally the worst guys, the demons, those Satanists, they're in charge.
So something good pops up organically.
Okay, so you go to the good and you offer them a deal to work for the Darkats instead.
Let's say that they say no.
All right, bitches.
Why don't we take over?
Like, I have no idea, I'm just thinking.
Let's assume that Walt Disney started out as good.
What would the agencies do about a good thing?
How about if the good doesn't become bad, you take over the leadership of the good and you turn it bad yourself?
What if what we see with Joe Biden has been happening forever?
You put in another actor, you claim that it's going to be Disney, and then you manage it from there.
Again, I have no idea, but If the Blackhats were, they would have to consider such a thing.
And it would be, it's going to be interesting.
Once we win and get full disclosure, how prevalent that strategy has been.
All right, anything else on that one, guys?
We're moving on.
Okay, Owen, go.
I love talking about carbon.
Love talking about it.
There was an Alex Jones, Joe Rogan podcast where they actually go into it with Tim Dillon, I believe.
And this is when I first started to think about this as I watched that.
And he and Alex Jones gets up there and explain something that I didn't agree with at the time.
And it made me think that he was a complete lunatic, that he was out of his mind, that he was crazy.
That carbon does not have an effect in every single thing that they're telling you.
It's really the exact opposite.
They're telling you that carbon dioxide is the worst thing possible for our planet when in reality it's regenerating and replenishing our atmosphere.
We have more trees on earth that have In the history of time right now, and that's because of the prevalence of carbon dioxide.
So The Light, which is an uncensored truth magazine based out of the United Kingdom, they published a powerful expose this month all about the alleged climate crisis, which is, editors say, doesn't even exist, does not exist at all.
This is something I'm sure that we've covered here before, but I've never seen something so blatant in the media just shouting this out As as these as this magazine magazine did so it said no climate crisis the title was no climate crisis carbon dioxide has zero effect on temperatures.
It blows to bits the myth that carbon dioxide and natural substance that all plants need in order to produce oxygen so that we can breathe has absolutely nothing to do with planetary temperatures.
They used two graphs and less than 300 words.
It does not take much to disprove this false, this lie.
Under the guise of promoting ecological responsibility, the globalists and their roving bands of climate fanatics aim to shift the world away from freedom and tradition into tyrannical hands of corporate greed and control to control carbon.
And what are we all made of?
What is our human body made of?
We are made of carbon.
The climate hoax is an attack on farming, food production, Documentaries bemoan the methane production of cows, while the growth and transportation of soybeans destroys rainforests and requires an immense amount of water, the article states.
CO2, it says, little is done to prevent celebrities and world leaders from flying in private jets from London to anywhere else in the world, while we must cycle to work.
Turn off all the lights and eat bugs.
We can't even use a gas stove.
New York even demanding that all of the wood fire pizza ovens, they have to emit 75% less CO2.
So New York pizza is probably not going to be as good.
That's one of the saddest things.
The article includes two graphs that illustrate as CO2 levels have risen, air temperatures have remained roughly the same or even decreased at different points throughout recent history.
So this is I think it's really important with the climate debate, the climate crisis, to really go into the facts on this, to really go into and have the data.
I did a show recently, actually, about VAERS and COVID-19 reporting and about how important it is that we have data that is memorized, that we can spout off, that we champion, because that's our sword against a lot of these lies.
And if we have this data readily available, it's going to be very hard for people who are falling to this lie, that are falling into this deception, to counter it.
Good.
Very good.
Thanks, Owen.
Brian?
Yeah, I think I knew shortly after they exposed the old hockey stick graph.
Remember the old Al Gore hockey stick?
Carl probably remembers this, but you probably don't remember this.
I had to watch that in science class.
Yeah, I didn't buy into any of this climate crisis, the Earth is our God, mumbo jumbo.
Ever in my life.
I don't remember for five minutes.
Well, wait, wait a second.
There was one time I came out of a college class and I was trying to impress a girl and I told her that because the leaves were brown that it was climate change.
So I guess I did get the indoctrination, but I never bought into it at all.
I've always saw the world as sort of our playground.
As sort of this place that was so beautifully and wonderfully made for us.
And I always knew that it was made with such precision and such balance and such structure that we couldn't break it up.
Now, there was nothing wrong with cleaning it up.
I have seen the rivers in Shanghai.
I know how dirty this place can be, and I never saw a problem with keeping it clean or making an attempt to recycle or making an attempt to to reduce the amount of garbage and waste that we put out there.
I was always careful about trying to follow the rules in the park and not leave.
Or only go to the bathroom where you're supposed to, and that's about the extent of the involvement I've been in.
I don't think I've ever bought a climate friendly vehicle.
I don't think I've ever bought something that had a pack in a package that said.
Was marketing itself as something that was climate friendly, but I have paid attention to making sure that we keep the yard clean and that I don't don't mess with Texas in terms of throwing stuff out the window.
I do my responsibility the best I can in terms of this, but the rest of it, it just doesn't even get a 2nd thought of the day for me.
Excellent story.
So with that, I'm going to go back to my mentor, Bucky Fuller, or one of my mentors, to demonstrate that we have the technological capability for a world that works for everyone with no one left out.
And Bucky framed it as that we're all, you know, this was when he was writing books 40 years ago, that we're all actually millionaires.
The idea of being a millionaire might be that you just own a house now that is, we're told it's worth a million dollars.
And we have no idea of the extent of our good fortune.
And part of what Bucky framed, and many people frame, is the balance of nature and that you have a synergy with the vegetation and with the animal life, with the animal life requiring oxygen and breathing out carbon dioxide and plants breathing in the carbon dioxide and breathing out oxygen.
So it would seem like you just want to solve the most Pressing problems first, and I'm going to meld this into my final thoughts, and that the most destructive actions that we witness as human beings of war and poverty.
And I would say the bankster looting in the hundreds and trillions.
I mean, these are relatively easy technical problems to solve, but we have the capacity to respond effectively for that.
But we don't have the political leadership in order to to make this happen.
And so we're left with scrambling for the public trying to organize and trying to make a difference on A local scale.
And this goes into my expression over 18 years with the political lobby group results.org for U.S.
domestic and foreign policy to end poverty.
And that, and by the way, Owen, you were talking about that you need to be armed with data.
And that's what we did too, is that we found in talking to members of Congress and really to anybody and just ordinary people, You need to have an effective, they call it an elevator pitch, but simply under two minutes, you would have to be able to explain and provide documentation.
And again, prima facie proof for what you're talking about and to educate the public.
And the final conclusion that I stand with and still observe and see no variation from is that all of us have done
Heroes work, professional work, to be able to outline and to provide the full details behind the outline of the facts of the world that we're in, which is this ridiculous Orwellian world where the leaders are captured and what they do is actually the opposite, the inversion of what they promised to do.
And yet, Here we are in the end of June in 2023.
We keep pointing to the data.
Bobby Kennedy, you know, says that nobody will debate him for over 18 years and we still need some type of a breakthrough.
And going back to the frame that I again mentioned is this is a real-world test of our religious philosophical and Moral principles is that, for me, my foundation is that all of this is somehow connected, and we are the creatures of something that created all of this.
Now, if you want to call that biology, if you want to call that life, if you want to call that God, all good.
It's all way over our heads.
But I think that we need a humble respect for how small that we are on the playing field.
And for me, you know, if you want to argue and complain about life, if you don't like something, all right.
You have what you can say.
You have what you can think.
And you have what you can do.
Go at it.
And I have in my working practice of philosophical, religious, moral self-expression, is that if there is something that seems obviously wrong, Like a million children dying in slow motion agony every month from preventable poverty?
Like lies started in Orwellian illegal wars of aggression?
Like criminals against humanity COVID?
Like bankster looting?
I feel obligated to tell people, you know, we have an alternative and they're lying to you, so we should do something about it.
And at the same time, just a total paradoxically, To totally surrender that to God.
And with what I'm most attracted to, virtues.
Being able to experience and express virtue.
Is that I just simply stand there and those are my people, those who stand with me.
And I have empathy for the sheeple.
I do think that we have a role to demonstrate something to them.
But again, we're powerless until we have some sort of a breakthrough.
And I think that the breakthrough is going to be on God's timing or life's timing or evolution's timing.
But, you know, in the meantime, we're just going to do good faith work.
And trying to keep a good heart, encourage each other, and appreciate our humble position on the board.
Brian, your final thoughts, brother?
Well, I can appreciate the humble position on the board.
I do not think that human beings are small.
I think from the newborn babe or the embryo all the way through to the Old man lying on a hospital bed, taking his last breath, that were all infinitely important.
I feel infinitely close to the God that built this universe, and I imagine that everybody has the same capability and the same connection that I do, through the right channels, through the right rules, and through the right situations.
I think everybody is very, very important, no matter where they're at.
And I want to save everybody I can that I can possibly talk to about what's important in this world.
And so.
I'm glad that people are joining our programs.
I'm glad that they come here with us on this journey to research false flags and different types of conspiracies and try to get to the end.
And maybe one of these people will end up being a contributor to our show once they realize some very, very large truth out there.
I've been through the cycle and the gamut, lots of different gates and lots of different obstacles I've had to throw out.
65% of my research because it just didn't add up when it was all said and done.
And I'm okay with that because I feel like every day that I keep on the right path, I'm getting one step closer to something that is actually true and that I can actually rely on.
I got a pretty good feel for things now at this age.
I think I've got that life figured out pretty well, but I imagine if I keep thinking what I'm going to look like when I'm 70 and what information I'm going to have.
So listen to those older people.
Sometimes they know more than you can imagine.
I really appreciate this conversation because it's right up my alley.
I don't think that we are small at all, but what I believe truthfully is that we were made in God's image, but also in God's likeness.
So if you looked at a photograph and you saw a picture of somebody, that's that person's likeness.
And we were made in God's likeness.
So I think that since that is the case, this is the reason I'm pro-life.
The reason I'm pro-life is because that child has been created in God's image and is Unfathomably loved and inestimably valuable.
And so there's no doubt about that for me.
I think what I'd end the show on is there's a lot of talk about what other people do wrong.
There's a lot of talk about, this is all I do, I'm on the radio all the time talking about what evil people are doing.
And one of the things that I've had to do lately and had and have to do always, especially as a man, is safeguard my eyes and what I'm allowing into my brain.
It's not just a fight against globalists.
OK, this is a fight against what you're taking in, the information that you allow yourself to access.
Are you watching pornography?
Are you allowing yourself to view things that are sexually inappropriate?
And we know that pornography actually assists in child trafficking.
So, we can't really be honest.
We can't really have integrity and talk about all of this stuff unless we're trying to live in total integrity ourselves.
So, I think that the only way that you can really be happy is through walking in total integrity.
Walking in total integrity and living your life in a way that is, you know, we talk a lot about values and we talk the talk, but we also have to walk the walk in terms of living a life and living these virtues out.
You know, I'm a married man at 23, and so what I'm trying to do now is live those values out.
I don't feel comfortable talking on radio if I do not put what I say on radio into practice in my own life first.
That's the most important thing, and it's the most transformative thing.
It actually leads to a lot of peace and happiness in your own life if you're exercising these values and living in a way that is full of integrity.
I think that's the most important thing.
I'd end the show there.
Absolutely.
I'll close the show.
Jim Fetzer, we love you.
Take care.
We will see you soon.
And for our audience, thank you for your intellectual integrity and moral courage and for trying to live the life.
I haven't read the book, but I'm well familiar with the title of Gandhi's kind of cumulative work, My Experimentation with Truth.
And Gandhi's life was the basis for Dr. King trying to figure out what to do with the shit show.
He discovered that we actually have
▲
Export Selection