All Episodes
Previous Next
June 24, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:50
Need to Know News - June 23, 2023, with Carl Herman, Chris Weinert & Owen Stevens
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Carl Herman from Mission Viejo, California.
We are filling in for Professor Jim Fetzer as he recovers from triple bypass surgery.
I'm joined today by Chris Weiner in Fort Myers, and Owen Stevens from Rochester, New York, for all the news you need to know.
Come screen my share, or share my screen.
At first, from yesterday, we did have some technical difficulties.
I played this video of Dr. Hotez giving five minutes of hypocritical, narrative-changing stories.
Have you guys seen this video, by the way?
Yeah, I've seen that video.
Yeah, Joe Rogan was actually just talking to RFK, if anybody hasn't seen that.
That's a really, really good expose into Peter Hotez.
Yeah, it is good.
It is good.
So this one, if people want to see that video, it's there.
I'll also put it in the show notes.
So for my first story, I want to talk about the censor of Adam Schiff.
And this is from the House Judiciary GOP.
And this kind of outlines that we have the Orwellian opposite.
We have the inversion of reality coming from our political opponents.
And this just shows the basic movement of information.
Now, from the Kremlin to Dolan to Danchenko, I don't know about that, but what we do know is that our most official government documents now admit that Danchenko was lying, giving the information to Steele, and that the Clinton campaign went through Perkins Coy and Fusion GPS.
They paid Christopher Steele for the dossier that went to the FBI, and that led to the FISAgate.
And that led to Schiff's information, and Schiff promised that he had, what did he call, a smoking gun.
But what we found out now is that none of the information was verified by anybody, and it was made up.
And it was made up by the Clinton campaign looking for political dirt.
Now, Adam Schiff got censored, and I want to show this clip for just a couple of minutes here on the floor when that was going on, and the people around him are the Democrats that are going to be cheering Adam on.
And what we're looking at is the inversion of reality, as we always do.
And our political opponents, they are going to pretend, they're going to project their factless prosecution onto the Republicans, and they're going to act as if The censor of Adam Schiff is politically motivated and not based on fact.
So, just watch this for a minute.
Now, I like it.
I'm kind of giving my analysis before we go here.
I like it because all of these people are on film, going on record, deciding who they want to stand with, and the American public has the opportunity to be able to discern, do they want to allow this in the House of Representatives, where this guy who came in with no facts and Election meddling, election interference, but I'll play the circus show.
So here we go.
They're chanting his name.
And there's Schiff right there.
And they're interrupting the proceedings.
By his adoption of House Resolution 521, the House is resolved.
The House of Representatives censures Adam Schiff, representative of the 30th Congressional District of California.
I will begin again.
By its adoption of House Resolution 521, the House has resolved that the House of Representatives sentience Adam Schiff.
The House of Representatives
by its adoption of House Resolution 521, the House has resolved that the House the House has resolved that the House of .
It goes on.
You get the idea of the interruptions.
...information.
And I think what the Dems are trying to do is to bait The Republicans to kick him out, which they would have been justified of doing, but they didn't do it.
And then the following day, I want to play this one for one minute for Nancy Pelosi with how she spun it.
And this is interesting.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I thank the General for yielding and for his great presentation today.
Today, we are on the floor of the House, where the other side has turned this chamber, where slavery was abolished, where Medicare and Social Security and everything were instituted, they've turned it into a puppet show.
A puppet show.
And you know what?
The puppeteer, Donald Trump, is shining a light on the strings.
You look miserable.
You look miserable.
The only advantage to all of this is that instead of reversing what we did on the IRA to save the planet, or reversing what we did to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, you're wasting time.
Adam Schiff is one of the greatest members of that.
Gentlemen's time has expired.
Gentlemen's time has expired.
The gentlelady's time has expired.
You said his is expired?
The gentleman from Maryland's time has expired.
For three years we heard from Adam Schiff about Russia, Russia.
I do like this guy through the American News Network.
So my analysis of this is that Pelosi is now showing how the Democrats are going to spin this, and they're going to blame it on Trump.
They want to isolate Trump, and they want to somehow frame this that if only the American people would get on board and get rid of Trump, everything can go back to the normalcy of the Bushes and Mitt Romney, and that's what they're going to try.
It's not going to work.
So this is a stark choice that the American public faces of will they go with the facts and the facts demonstrate that the Democratic leadership factlessly engaged in the attack on the sitting president.
And I just read a few minutes ago that Trump is going after him legally.
So we'll go to Chris first.
Chris, what do you see with this brother?
Unmute it.
Sorry, I didn't think you were going here first.
All right.
Well, you know, I want to point out some of the things you're talking about baseless claims and that kind of triggered something in me.
I think about all the baseless claims that they really dismiss any sort of concerns from the American public or even the Republican party in terms of the Democrats.
There's certainly ones to put out some baseless claims in terms of the Steele or the Scrippell memos, even the Magnitsky-Browder stuff earlier on in the Obama administration.
The DNC primary would be a good one.
Talking about vaccine deniers or election deniers or things of that sort, you almost have to have a black belt in jujitsu to understand how they use these inversions in terms of flipping the rhetoric and certainly bringing the emotion.
Speaking of a few more inversions, if you really think about it, think about the ones that they put out in terms of COVID and the threat to the elderly or to the children.
Think about the medical responses that they went down with.
Think about Dodd-Frank in terms of inversions.
Supposedly they're to protect the people against the banks and in actuality it makes people Secondary creditors to their own deposits.
Citizens United getting the money out of politics.
You got Sam Begdon free, literally walking free.
You know him literally having enough money to buy an election and then certainly launder a bunch of money through his crypto exchange.
And, you know, think about the omnibus bill that Obama put through with Smith-Mundak being rescinded.
Now, propaganda is legal, and it's certainly obvious and evident what that's done and how that's working.
Think about in terms of terrorism after 9-11 and the resource grabs they used to justify that whole notion with, you know, while terrorizing the entire global population.
Think about how they've used inversions on race or gender or rhetoric in terms of these provoking emotional responses and limbic reactions.
These people are certainly weaponizing the younger generations and targeting them with not only their perversions but with their perverted and inverted politics.
It's really interesting to see how much effort they're trying to put into the youth and trying to hijack that.
When I was growing up in my teens and 20s, in the 90s, they were doing the Rock the Vote thing and, you know, all this other stuff to, you know, to try to get the kids involved.
And now it's just a whole new blitz that they've got going on.
It's not like they want them involved in politics.
They want them involved in the social engineering things.
So maybe they're one and the same, but it seems like it's a lot different now than it was then.
There's a lot more areas of battlefields, we'll just say in terms of these kids and being targeted and how they reach them.
Then Chris Owen.
Yeah, this is a really interesting one.
Censoring is not something that happens very often.
There's only been three House members censored in the entire 21st century.
There was Adam Schiff a day ago, there was Charles B. Rangel, that was in 2010, and there was Paul Gosar, a Republican, in 2021.
So all in the 2000s, right?
All in the 2000s within the last 12-13 years.
It's just really interesting to see how, if you heard the tape and what they were yelling, you can hear chants of people yelling, shame, shame, shame.
They're basically at each other's throats calling each other names.
But I liked what, I think, what Representative Lauren Beaubair said.
She said, She said that Schiff was a crook who represents the worst of a permanent Washington using his position of trust to lie to the American people, which is exactly what I think Democrats are doing and most Republicans actually.
I think they're all liars.
So she also said if Adam Schiff has a shred of human decency left, he would resign from Congress in disgrace.
His tombstone should be one word.
Liar, she said, of course, all this over Trump, all of this over Trump and Russia, all of this fake.
This has been disproven, did not happen.
And I just really think it's I don't like looking at Congress or watching Congress.
I don't enjoy it.
I don't.
I'm 23, and I'm really disillusioned with Congress.
I'm disillusioned with the people there, the things that I see there, the conversations that we're having, for goodness sake.
We're having conversations about what females are and what men are, about the distinctions between females and males in 2023.
And so for me, I have a tough time going from one clown show to another thing.
And then I'm supposed to believe that it's not a clown show as well.
No, for me, once you expose yourself as clowns, then you're clowns forever.
And there's nothing that I can do, and I'm not going to look into anything else that goes on in Congress as serious or as heartfelt.
I'm not going to view them, and I don't think you should either, anybody listening, view them as people who have your best interests at heart.
I don't believe that that's the case at all.
As you all know, they have their best interests at heart, and that'll always be the case.
Yeah, withdraw consent.
When I was a teacher of U.S.
government courses in AP U.S.
government, I would play little clips to the students and I would just ask them up front, I'd say, Raise your hand if you actually enjoy listening to political leaders give a talk, educate you, inspires you, and nobody would raise their hand.
And then I would go further and say, hey, raise your hand if you kind of get the feeling that they're talking, but the purpose of the talk is not to inform you, it's to have you tune out.
And that resonated most with my students.
Alrighty, let's go to Chris with what he has, and I'm going to show my screen here.
And Chris, you were going to talk about the Gates Foundation, the Grand Challenges in India.
Go ahead and go.
Yeah, all right, cool.
I don't have any articles, but just in general, I want to talk about how the Gates initiative was kind of synonymous with Modi coming in and the economic resets that they were putting on in India.
They rescinded the 500 and the 1,000 rupee note.
in the 1000 rupee note, this is around 2013 or so, 2014, 2015 in that area, the three year span, where a vaccine program was rolled out at the funding of the Gates and many of the other usual suspects in terms of the alphabet agencies and the ones that were trying to push the COVID thing here with us around the world, World Health Organization.
And most of these things are kind of tethered with IMF loan conditions.
In other words, if you don't go along with these initiatives, these vaccine programs, these education programs, you don't get funding from the central bankers.
So, you know, Carl we're gonna maybe go a little bit more into that later but you know it's a good little teaser for the people listening right now, because you've done some amazing work in that line of work, trying to bring blending to the poor and certainly the Indian and American populations around the world and, you know, definitely, you know,
It's a class warfare that's going on and I just want to point out how this has really been really accelerated not only in terms of going into China but into India and it's in Africa and these African nations in Central and South America too.
These third world countries are being turned out by these billionaires and these initiatives and I think they're hand-in-hand and synonymous with one another.
They have the, I remember we were talking about the BTC thing too, we'll get into that a little bit, but this all ties together and I know it seems like it's very departmentalized in terms of the formations and in terms of what they're rolling out.
But if you really think about it, it is a full spectrum of stuff that's being waged.
In this case, not only on the Indian population, this is a precursor to what's been brought into the United States now, and what I think they're doing now, forcing people into, you know, the digital currencies, the cryptos, trying to rope the younger generation into that type of stuff, because they're really going away with the competition.
And as I mentioned to you, Carl, There was, I believe when they took the 501,000 rupee notes back, there was hundreds of thousands onto like the billion mark of farmer suicides, just because they had no currency to exchange.
They had no way of selling their products, their farming goods, or even buying them for that matter.
So citizens and farmers were really, really in a bad spot there.
And in the midst of this type of liquidity crunch and this cash rescinding thing, they roll out the better than cash thing and try to roll them into this Vax initiative too.
So it seems like it's a departmentalized thing.
But like I said, this is a lockstep formation.
And all the stuff that we've been talking about for months, if not years, all ties together with this.
And I really think it's important for people.
This is not a one-off thing.
These guys really made their bones in India and Africa and these other places with these vaccine initiatives.
And even, like I said, a transition to digital currency.
This is the imposition of the technocratic feudalism that they're trying to put on the entire world.
And I think it's really relevant to talk about not only how many people were injured economically by this cash rescinding thing, but also how many people were physically injured in terms of like the polio vaccine or some of these other ones that Gates rolled out.
I mean, this guy killed or murdered, you know, into the hundreds of thousands as well.
So, you know, they have 1.2 billion people there.
But really, you know, I don't think they're really interested in sparing them for medical research projects just because they're, you know, in abject poverty that's been imposed on them for hundreds of years by the same empire.
So interesting stuff.
Interesting how they've always, you know, targeted these populations that are certainly not armed and certainly not able to defend themselves.
Then they actually have, you know, most Indians that I know are very spiritual people.
They're very peaceful people.
And, you know, they're really exploiting some of these haplotraits, many of these populations, too, to really exploit them with this full spectrum.
So, back to you, Carl.
I just wanted to kind of comment on that.
I know it's a little bit of generalization, but I really think it's relevant and people need to research into this.
I'm trying to encourage them to not take what I'm saying on this.
Look into this yourself.
And, you know, I'd like to hear your thoughts on some of this stuff, too, Carl.
And, of course, The other younger gentleman who's restoring my faith in humanity.
Yeah, rock and roll.
That is kind of the purpose of the format, is to let people loose with what they find is most important.
And yeah, I will have something to say with your upcoming part about microcredit.
But we can say that this is a global empire, and it always has been an empire, and they are connected.
When the so-called developing nations try to speak out, one of the essays that I'll show today, later on, is that when I believe five of the African leaders spoke out against COVID, or maybe it was three or four, but all of those gentlemen ended up dead within a few months.
So that is how they keep control over them.
And in terms of How they take advantage to rape the countries around the world in this neocolonial empire, I like the brand of John Perkins, the economic hitman, is that they just go to the top and then they just arrange the contracts like a mafioso and a protection racket up front for that.
When these really are crimes against humanity, we can demonstrate that about a million children are dying from preventable poverty every month.
And the definition of crimes against humanity, these are policies that you know, or you should have known, is going to cause great harm.
And through the economic hitman, basically, it is the Western nations, the developed countries that take all of the valuable resources.
They don't take them, but they contractually take them with bargaining away those resources and To control the local human resources to maximize those profits.
Owen!
Yeah, I always like to answer this by thinking of ourselves as the commodity for these people.
Our bodies are the commodity.
I really think that our God-created, made-in-God's-image bodies, that's exactly what they want to hack.
That's exactly what they want to destroy and control.
But as much as I think that farming is a big issue, and we've seen that even in a place like the Netherlands where farming is a big issue, Bill Gates also buying Hundreds of thousands of acres of farmland and it's I don't think it's any coincidence that you see Indian farmers being affected and our ability to create our own food at least food that is not genetically modified that does not contain things that are going to fundamentally change your genes for the rest of your life and basically turn you into a sugar addicted slave.
It's interesting that they're attacking that and I I'm not surprised to see that, but I want to draw the attention to money specifically as it pertains to CBDCs and cryptocurrency, at least in the States.
And it's tragic to see what's happening in India.
I'm not surprised they're pushing a CBDC agenda there.
It's going to be all across the world.
But South Dakota Governor Kirstie Noem actually talked about this quite a bit.
She raised the alarm on a bill that was changing the definition of money as we know it.
What this bill did is this bill in several states, not just South Dakota, there's actually a tracker, it's in Texas, it's in Arizona, it's in Maine, it's in California, it's in Oregon, it's in Washington.
All of these, what it does and what it's aiming to do is change the definition of money.
What it wants to do is revoke Bitcoin as money.
It wants to revoke Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies as money per se, so that the government issued Cryptocurrency, the government issued CBDC, is the only form of cryptocurrency and there is no competition from private people who are exchanging blockchain.
And now it's going to be just government issued, government run, basically run, and we know what that means, government run, basically just means run by the Run by the globalists, run by DC, and that's what they want.
They want a programmable coin that becomes our new form of money that can be turned off and on at the whim of our government.
Doesn't sound like something that sets the stage for more freedom.
It sounds like something that sets the stage for tyranny.
I'm not sure.
If I jump in real quick, I was going to ask him something.
What are your thoughts about the XRP and the Ripple case that's going on with the shakedown with that whole thing?
Why do you think that they're going after XRP in the way that they are, but not Bitcoin over the same type of situation?
Why do you think they're slapping XRP with all these legal things?
I'm not sure.
I haven't looked into the specifics of Bitcoin.
My theory is that Bitcoin is a government operation from the get-go to shoehorn in the crypto.
But I don't know.
Maybe they're trying to diversify the ownership, but as far as I know, up to about a year ago, 90% of the Bitcoin was held in 12 wallets.
So, like, that makes me wonder, you know, and if these guys, you know, like, you hear the ransomware guys getting tracked all the time and literally traced to, like, their doorstep or whatever, you know.
So, like, I think that Bitcoin is really something that is like a breadcrumb type of situation.
You know, I don't know.
My thoughts there, but I just wanted to get the thoughts of the younger guy and see what his thoughts were, because I'm an old geezer on this stuff, man.
It's a new beast for me.
I don't use Bitcoin at all, but what I do know is that something called the FedNow Service was just launched by the Federal Reserve.
And what the FedNow Service is going to be doing is intricately linking banks with the Federal Reserve and allowing the Federal Reserve to basically be the central control center for all other banks, which to me seems as if they're setting up a system where it's going to be centralized control.
It's going to be globalist control.
But I think mainly what this troubled me about the story that I told you previously was that they were banning non-government-issued cryptocurrency.
So if cryptocurrency is government-issued like Bitcoin, if that is secretly government-issued, then of course that's fair game.
But anything that would be – I mean I guess I would be pointing to something like Dogecoin – Like if Elon Musk or another wealthy billionaire wanted to come out with a new type of private coin, that's something that the federal government has an active interest against because they want the control.
They do not want anything to have value other than something that they can provide, they can back, and that they can control.
I also was going to announce that I'm upstarting a new cryptocurrency called FOMO coin.
Don't miss out.
You better act out.
No, I hear you.
This is good.
I'm sorry we're a little off script, but man, this is good stuff.
I really wanted to talk to the younger guy and see what his thoughts were about that.
I'm glad you see through this, what the CBDC is all about and what they're trying to do with the next generations, because this is big and the younger kids need to understand this and hopefully not be used against their own best interest in the hopes of finding an alternative to the U.S.
dollar and the Federal Reserve.
All right, Owen, your first story, go.
Yeah, so my first one, there's actually multiple I can start with.
Can you remind me which one I'm starting with?
Oh yeah, it should be on screen here.
JP Morgan.
Yes, you got it.
I see it now.
Yeah, this was a really, really interesting one.
One of the documentaries that I watched recently, and I hadn't seen this documentary and everybody had watched it.
It's a documentary on Netflix about Jeffrey Epstein.
And I didn't really want to watch it just because I viewed The whole thing is so disturbing and so graphic.
I didn't want to see those images.
I didn't want to see what it was all about.
It really was disturbing.
And it wasn't the right time for me.
And everybody's going to have, I believe, a time where a lot of the things, the deep state issues are going to be coming to a head.
They're going to be pursuing information like never before individually, not relying on CNN, not relying on mass media, but really, really diving into the truth.
I think that's going to happen.
And that absolutely was the case for me.
So when I watched this documentary, I noticed just how peculiar the whole situation was that for years, Jeffrey Epstein was basically allowed to do what he was doing.
People knew about it.
maybe knew about it.
Now, we don't know the full extent of that, but we know that, you know, billionaire rich people were flying on his plane, including people from JP Morgan that were just indicted.
I know that was a big story a while ago, but U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC officials slapped a $4 million fine, which is nothing to them, JPMorgan Chase, after the multinational finance service, allegedly deleted 47 million emails, 47 million communications amid a dozen civil securities related investigations.
So basically, we're expected to believe that in the middle of one of the largest investigations into child sex trafficking involving JPMorgan, that 47 million emails vanished from thin air.
The commission alleged that the JP Morgan securities deleted millions of emails and instant messages, so that's why they got the $4 million fine.
They were willing to pay that, probably even $50 million.
They don't care.
According to the settlement order, the messages were deleted from 8,700 mailboxes belonging to as many 7,500 employees who had regular contact with Chase customers.
Why delete these emails?
Why do this?
Why do this?
What says to me, and I'll end here, is that this is a lot bigger than we think it is.
47 million emails is a lot of emails.
How big does this thing go?
How many people are involved?
How many people know about it?
How many businesses are involved?
We know how intricate this pedophile network was with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates and Donald Trump.
Not Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, sorry.
Donald Trump was allegedly a part, but he actually, interestingly enough, Banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for this exact reason, for hitting on one of his staffer's children.
So I do not believe that Trump is involved with this pedo ring.
Actually, I believe Trump is actively trying to expose this pedo ring as he arrested over 6,000 major child traffickers in the first year of his presidency.
But this is a shocking development.
I can compare it to the Hillary Clinton email scandal as well.
But I just think that we all need to be paying very close attention to what's happening with JP Morgan and these companies, and hold them accountable.
Never let this go.
Don't just forget that this kind of stuff happens, that these crooks get to get away with these kinds of things.
Because justice is the Lord's, as always, so let's just be praying that it is served.
I'll put in the show notes the documentation that I have that JP Morgan, the too big to fail banks, they are engaged in the Orwellian inversion, the satanic inversion of what they say that they're supposed to do.
They don't operate a monetary system, they're operating a debt system.
That's mathematically, mechanically certain, and that's kind of the genesis of how come we have this exponential growth curve of total debt.
There's no way Yeah.
of getting out of that.
Yeah.
And they know that they're doing it.
That's why they're trying to get into the Great Reset is they're trying to get another game so that they can herd us into that and actually cull and herd us into that.
So in the article, it said, I like the quote, JP Morgan takes our record keeping seriously, very seriously.
We would never have associated ourselves with Jeffrey.
So all they're going to do is virtue signal on the back end.
But, you know, we can quantify their fraud literally in the hundreds of trillions of dollars in this bank's scheme.
So you're right.
We shouldn't put up with it.
We should do what you were talking about with listening to the politicians is that only listen if you're entertained by it.
But other than that, withdraw consent and demand their arrest.
Chris.
Yeah, no doubt.
It's like watching wrestling without the ring, but yeah, it's pretty much the same concept.
You know, Morgan is really, think about how much they paid.
That is absolutely the cost of doing business.
When you think about how much counterparty risk they have and their financial instruments, $56 trillion in derivatives alone.
They're manipulating silver and gold, the LVMA, the LME, all this stuff.
They have hypo-allocated, hypo-leased metals.
They've got just about every sort of thing in mortgage-backed securities.
It could be tied to Epstein, to Madoff.
All this stuff ties together, and it's absolutely coming to the surface.
And really, what they're doing in the media is trying to put these minutiae-type stories out there, like it's serving a modicum of justice.
And it's really more of an insult and a cost of doing business and a slap on the wrist.
That's like busting Hunter Biden for jaywalking when he's got, you know, whatever else he's got.
You know, I mean, I go down the list and really take up two hours.
But, you know, this is what you're seeing with Morgan in terms of this as well.
And I think that really the liability that they have from that counterparty risk and all these hypo allocated situations and these contracts and these derivatives.
Wow.
Not to mention ties to Epstein, Madoff, and just about every other financial shenanigan that's going on.
And you think J.P.
Morgan was the benefactor of many of these exchanges and banks that are being busted and bankrupted and forced into this mergers and acquisitions situation where they're all being subsidized by the Fed and then brought under the House and Morgan, again, just like Lehman and some of these other firms were, or bears were, in the 2008 crisis.
So yeah, this is some pretty crazy stuff.
You can pretty much guess that Morgan is one of the three major houses that run the Fed.
And I think they're the ones that are also in many cases the cabinets of the swamp creatures that are playing the two party game.
Yep.
All right, let's go into round two.
We're doing three rounds of stories each.
Right.
The NHS, Director of End-of-Life Care, confirms doctors lied about COVID being a cause of death to create an illusion of a pandemic.
This is a new story.
So in the UK, they have admitted that They didn't count correctly.
And they counted to over-extenduate the number of people who died from COVID.
And this is the Twitter thread on it.
And this, we'll see what happens with this.
We know that this has also been true in the U.S., and this is the essay that I share over and over again.
This is my best shot, and one of the data points in my best shot is their admittance.
Well, actually, let me go through a couple of the areas of the fraud.
There's been no isolated sample of COVID, and that's admitted to by the CDC, the WHO, and it's now over 100 leading health and science institutions.
These tests, these overcycled PCR tests.
We've created these false positives and we're told that flu disappeared by 99% at the same time.
And then there's this part, which is basically mirrors what the UK just admitted is that our own leading officials in their documentation and in their testimony, they say, yeah, yeah, if anybody tested positive and they died of whatever, we counted it as a COVID death and there were financial incentives as well as that.
And then there were a bunch of other damning points here as well.
So again, once you've received enough, there's no point, there's no reason to go ahead and continue to believe these psychopaths.
But what you really should do is just withdraw consent and demand their arrests.
Chris.
Yeah, wow.
That whole COVID thing was an absolute fraud and a hoax.
It You know, and it really conveys the argument, whether it was a bio-warfare weapon developed in China or wherever the heck by the U.S.
funding, it ultimately has been proven down to that.
And at some point in time, whether it was accidentally released or intentionally released, you know, I guess you can get into that.
And I guess when you look at not only the horrible miscalculations of safety and protocol measures, whether it's The metric of the PCR test, the mask, the lockdowns, the shutdown of small business.
This seems to serve just about every purpose towards this economic reset agenda being put forward by the World Economic Forum.
And strangely, with that type of success rate and that type of precision, 7, 8, 9, 10 different things, major things in a row that achieves all at once, I have to think it's not an accident or a happenstance or a mistake, especially when you got billionaires funding think tanks talking about these operations 20, 30, 40 years out.
So, you know, really the plausible deniability is kind of going out the window in terms of these guys making hustle files or simple mistakes and cold calculations pretty much coming to the forefront as to what this obvious conclusion needs to be.
And certainly that needs to be something in the focus of people when they're seeking justice.
You know, look at this, for example, Carl.
They had, what, five billionaires on that sub, right, looking for the Titanic, blah, blah, blah, then, you know, another JP Morgan fiasco, right?
They got five billionaires on this sub looking around, and this suddenly takes the headline of every media story for the last week.
Instead of really talking about 5 billionaires asphyxiating and crushed to death from the pressure of the deep, why aren't they talking about the 5 billion people that they tried to jab with this damn vax and the people that are being forced into this medical murder with ventilators and remdesivir asphyxiating to death and having their organs fail out as part of a medical calculation?
Not a mistake, but it's something that they know has a 90% kill rate or pretty damn close.
So, yeah, I'm really having a hard time, you know, going along with this, whoops, we didn't know, oops, we, you know.
I mean, it's almost like the problem, the reaction, the solution, each of them involves mass depopulation on every facet, mass deception, inversion, gaslighting, propaganda, public relations stuff.
You know, this is, this is something far more sinister than the average innocent person can wrap their mind around.
It's kind of like the Epstein thing that's going on with that.
And to add to that, I meant to add that in my last segment, think about Bohemian Grove.
I mean, there's been people that are going out against that in the 60s.
Kennedy talked about that.
JFK, before he was killed, actually talked about Bohemian Grove and Nixon and all them fags going out there and molesting kids in the woods.
I mean, this is stuff that they would have to know about if Kennedy knew about this stuff in the 60s.
And let me tell you, if Donald Trump's mentor was Roy Cohn, who he was, this guy was one of the people that took on McCarthy and Forrestal and had something to do with a lot of black blackmail rings going on for the most out of an Israeli.
So yeah, I would think Donald Trump definitely knows about this and whether he's part of it or not, I have no information to say that or not, but this is something that, you know, certainly not a nothing burger.
Like they're trying to make it sound like.
Awesome.
Owen.
Yeah.
There was a video that the national file recovered of Mary Rudick, who's an MD telling the director of marketing Carolyn Fisher and another hospital employee that she wants the hospitals to become more scary to the public quote by inflating the number of COVID-19 patients and by using messaging that who's an MD telling the director of marketing Carolyn Fisher and another hospital employee that she wants the hospitals to become more scary I.
I think that this was fear mongering.
I've said that a lot, but it brings me back to the vaccine and why it is COVID-19 was pushed the way it was and why it is that people were not supposed to get one.
They weren't supposed to get two.
They weren't even supposed to get three.
They were supposed to get four doses of this vaccine that was never approved.
that was never approved by the FDA, that still isn't approved by the FDA.
That's now getting recalled.
So imagine how many people have now taken something in their body that'll be permanently there unless they miraculously detox.
And actually, the good doctors are working on a solution for that right now.
But I really think that it's a tragic thing to see when our medical, I wouldn't even call it medical, what these evil, evil people, evil, evil people did this on purpose to innocent, innocent Americans who didn't know any better.
And I can remember the first, I don't know, you guys remember the first, you know, couple days of COVID and what it was like.
And when they told me that I had to go home from college, I said, what on earth is going on?
I have to go home?
From school like it just it was a shocker and it puts you a lot of kids.
I thought my age were shocked because school was done everything that they knew was done parties were done.
They were locked up.
So it really seemed like the lockdowns it made it seem like we were dealing with the most scary outbreak of an illness and a disease that has ever happened to them in their life.
And I can't blame people for being shocked and scared and horrified, but I do think it's hilarious that this ended up waking up people in the masses.
Massive amounts of people have woken up and realized, wait a second, this is crazy.
So I think this has backfired on them big time and I cannot wait to see what it's like when we have, you know, 50% of America that knows exactly what's going on, that's researched this stuff and is angry and knows Who to point the finger to.
No wonder Fauci is gone.
No wonder he resigned.
Yeah.
No wonder they got such a massive gaslighting campaign to try to keep that from happening.
I mean, look at how much money they put into that safe and effective thing.
They're going to have to put ten times that amount to just squash the outrage that's naturally coming from the two years that people have seen and learned and know better.
You know, the sad thing is these innocent people, they're only mistaken.
They're only Only trouble was trusting these people that don't deserve it.
And that's so sad to see how many lives have been destroyed, impacted from this.
I mean, so many people I know that have had issues with this or are really struggling or have died.
And my mom personally killed as well that way.
So it's definitely something that medical murder is something that I will definitely wake up every day of my life seeking justice and revenge for the people that I've lost just alone and other people that I don't even know that have been injured from this.
So those of us that have had this right from the get-go and we're warning about this at every platform we could, being shamed and censored out of basically our right to breathe and exist by these people, these tyrants that have taken over the medical industry and done this to us.
And then there are Judas goats that are out there fear-mongering and afraid for their own feeble lives without even knowing what they're talking about, telling you to trust the science.
This thing was absolutely sinister.
This makes the Stanford experiment of 73 or whatever, the jailers and captives and corrections officers experiment, that makes that look like a Mickey Mouse thing.
This is a culmination of the Phoenix Project, MKUltra, Mockingbird, and a bunch of other ones culminating all into one process right here.
And this is your generation's 9-11.
They're doing the same thing now that they did then with that, and the fear and the control.
So good on you for seeing this, and hopefully more kids your age will really take the same perspective that you have here.
All right, Chris, keep rolling with your second story here with the GS Research Report.
Bricks are born, so down to the lovely people at Gold in My Sacks.
Yeah, right on.
Good stuff.
Well, as I mentioned before, and people were like, link, link, source, source.
I've been saying for a long time that Goldman Sachs was the one that came up with the Build Better with BRICS initiative in June of 2001, conveniently a few months before 9-11, right around the same time Lucky Larry bought that insurance policy too, right?
So like there's people in the know that are pushing this out.
And I think Goldman Sachs is a prominent company that, like I said, picks most of the presidential cabinets.
And in this case, Goldman Sachs is the one that's coming up with this BRICS initiative.
And the reason and the only way they can get to BRICS is to undermine and dismantle the U.S.
petrodollar as the source of primary reserve currency and certainly to destroy the country and the people that are in there with this moral and political capital that is being foisted upon them by duplicitous people, we'll say.
And I think that when you get into the Goldman Sachs initiative and building the better bricks and you see the mistakes, quote unquote, that have been made, not only the Obama administration, but especially the Biden administration, to bring in not only the sanctions, to bring in the kicking Russia off swift, to bring in the anger and outrage to bring in the kicking Russia off swift, to bring in the anger and outrage with the Saudis and just all this different stuff culminating I don't think it's an accident.
I don't think it's a mishap.
I think, like I said, these people plan decades out and people really need to hear about this and need to think about this because I hear everybody talking about, oh, bricks, bricks, bricks, bricks, bricks.
But this is something, like I say, if Goldman Sachs put this thing out, they're going to do basically what the same group has done through a different corporate proxy, what they did in the first Cold War, where they're going to play both sides against the middle, running the Gladio program and just running people into their own buzz saws.
And this is really something that I'm trying to give humanity a fair warning about.
So you want to research this or look into it, go on the Goldman Sachs page, look into their own documentation themselves and see what they say.
And this, like I say, this COVID thing, this whole financial crisis and whatever else, and the Ukraine thing and everything else, It's filling in a population expectation that they had in World Bank reports, in Deagle, Pentagon reports, talking about getting the U.S.
population down to 70 million people.
So don't know for a second if this fact was something that was just an accident.
They are definitely trying to slim down the middle class, the American people and the American way of life.
They have to destroy democracy.
They have to destroy freedom.
And really, it'll do away with free markets and bring in authoritarianism like you wouldn't believe if people keep complying, thinking that they're going to comply their way out of tyranny.
This is something that people really need to see.
It's been foisted on us, thrust upon us, and really understand who's doing this and what they're working towards so that it can be stopped.
And like you say, Kyle, so that not only arrests can be made and justice can be served, but so that people don't really feed the beast that's going to destroy them.
You know, that's my concern here.
So there you have it.
Golden my sacks are special.
So I covered this about a decade ago among the thousand articles I've written since 2009.
Although this data point didn't make the cut for the summary paper that I'll include in bit you to be able to demonstrate that the financial system is completely corrupt Goldman Sachs.
They co-locate computers.
They do this through paying money to the New York Stock Exchange, and they get information about the trades coming in.
And you may know that about 99%, actually more than 99% of all the trades on the New York Stock Exchange are called flash trades.
They just take place in fractions of a second.
And what that is, is Goldman Sachs and the other ones who buy space in order to get the information, the trade volume coming in before the trades are actually executed.
They buy, sell, Very quickly into the market to scrape a few pennies off of prices.
So the fact that this is occurring and we report on this and not just me, but you know, hundreds of people report on this and point to it.
We all know that it's corrupt and that is the place of hope that I have.
If we have some breakthrough event that enough people have seen enough already where if there is a significant enough knockout blow to the Propagandists, the puppetitions, these psychopaths, that everyone else will say, yeah, let them be finished, especially if we can demonstrate superior mechanical systems and suppressed technology to show people that you really should go with us, the good.
Now, as far as bricks go, the possibility, if there really is a white hat, black hat war going on on the inside, And I am confident that that is the case, is that you would want to be able to control the idea of the BRICS, and that the BRICS have come out and linked the Russian rouble to gold is an encouraging sign for me.
And that said, we're in the fog of war.
It could go any way.
But I do find that point interesting.
I have really nothing to add to that.
It's not an area of expertise for me in terms of BRICS, but I do wonder how it links into this larger globalist agenda when we're talking about Russia.
Because at least for me, Russia is a country that tends to be, or at least as displayed by a lot of what's happening in Ukraine, a very anti-globalist system right now.
But I'm not sure what you guys think about that.
We'll see.
We'll see if White Hats are in control.
So it comes down to a basic question of who's in charge.
White Hats are in charge and they've already gone to the political leaderships and the financial leaderships and they've taken control.
It's a longer story.
I'll put my best evidence here and bit you for that.
But if the White Hats are in control, then yeah, they're going to take over Bricks.
If they're not in control, then the Dark Hats, the Black Hats, are going to be in charge of Bricks, and they're just going to leak out information to try to freeze Patriots while they take over total control.
All right, let's... I'm not betting on White Hats at all, man.
I think this involves the Small Hats.
Oh, I hadn't been screen changed.
Okay, so now I need to just go to this.
Owen, for your next story.
Yeah, this is really interesting.
So, for me, one of the first times that I really woke up to a lot of what was going on was when I watched a documentary, and this documentary was about Vanguard and And BlackRock, it was about these companies that had no idea, man, I'm maybe 19 years old, 20 years old.
And I got to be honest, no idea, no clue.
This stuff is really not talked about or discussed.
You don't learn this in high school.
You don't learn who really owns things in high school.
You don't learn that kind of stuff.
It's not meant for you.
They don't want you to learn that stuff.
They're not there to teach you about that.
And so I really thought that James O'Keefe, we all know James O'Keefe was fired from Project Veritas.
And I'm very interested to know why he was fired from Project Veritas.
That's not something that we know, but at least what they have said is that he Reached a mutual agreement with the board to, you know, remove himself, which I do not think is true at all.
But this is an undercover video.
I won't play the video for you, but in this video, it's the BlackRock recruiter basically admitting that they run the world and they buy out politicians, not only politicians, but you got to remember what BlackRock and Vanguard are.
They're basically these investment companies that own majority shares in all of the largest companies in the competing brands in the world.
So Coca-Cola, they own a majority share of Coca-Cola.
Pepsi, the competitor, they own a majority share of Pepsi, for instance.
Nike, they own a majority share of that.
All of your phones, electronics, car companies, oil companies, every single thing that you have.
It's interesting that Klaus Schwab said, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
And I actually think that we're already there.
I don't think that that's something in the future that he's talking about.
I think that's something that he's talking about right now, because everything that I have is owned.
They own a majority share in everything that's in my house.
And just because I bought it, what money did I buy it with?
And who controls that flow of money, right?
This is a system, it's a sham.
Fractional reserve banking is something that I often talk about, go into a lot.
And that goes back to the roots of the Federal Reserve and the roots of this system on Jekyll Island and how it was created, which I think as a history major myself was the coolest piece of history to go into.
And it really can expose the, you know, multiple families like the Rockefellers that are controlling the world through BlackRock and through Vanguard.
And I think that if anybody does not know about BlackRock and Vanguard and you want to learn more, definitely go check out some really, really great documentaries on.
I don't even know the exact one, but if you look on Rumble, you'll find them.
I don't know if you have a recommendation for a great documentary.
I'm forgetting the one that I watched, but it's good to expose what is actually happening, and it opens your eyes to the system in which we live.
Yeah, and it's telling us that that I have is that the top 1% now own more assets than the bottom 99% combined and following the money is something that you should always do to the extent that you can in 1990.
In 1990, results.org, the citizens lobby that I helped grow from a Southern California group to 100 U.S.
communities to seven countries, so we helped create the largest U.N.
summit For heads of state in world history, the World Summit for Children.
And what we discovered is that the developed, so-called developed countries, the former colonial nations, all reneged on every promise that they possibly could.
And the name of the game that we came down to it in conclusion, We had always talked about with other organizations like Bread for the World that the leaders were nagging on every promise to end poverty, and that ended up when I'll talk with Chris a little bit later for microcredit, even if it makes a profit, they were nagged on promises, is that it's all about control over the money, the domination.
Of the money and with every resource and that these people are just insanely evil and the definition of evil is just a service to self.
Now, with this, they end up eating their own and I think that's going to be part of the end game that we're seeing is everyone trying to throw everyone else under the bus to save themselves.
But.
Yeah, certainly that is a great article, and you get these organizations in there, and they literally are trying to control the world.
It's the endgame of Monopoly, where one person ends up with figuratively everything.
Chris?
Yeah, no, it's no honor amongst thieves, I agree.
I think they're going to eat their own to some extent.
You know, BlackRock owns 21% of all single family homes as of 2021.
In 2018, they own 3%.
So this COVID thing was very convenient for them to just snatch up a lot of real estate with Federal Reserve money at zero interest rates.
And certainly with fast track lending and things of the sort.
So yeah, they're really playing with people's pensions to drive their own children off the property ownership and certainly cornering the market in terms of accessorizing these futile efforts supposedly combat COVID.
You know, they own the 3M, they own just about everything.
And when you really look into the BlackRock and where it came from, it was a division of Blackstone, another Rockefeller company.
And during the Milliken junk bond scandals, the Drexel, Burnham, Lambert, Savings and Loan, the Keating Five, all that stuff, they were pumping money into this, that they were filtering not only from Japan, from other markets, from black market stuff, from the junk bonds, and it was all tied together.
This is before they had derivatives and cryptos and things like that.
But basically, the ill-gotten gains went into this BlackRock.
And it's a way to own just about everything, like you guys are saying.
And they own a lot of other investments, too.
And they have proxy frontmen out there, like Dan Gilbert or Jay-Z or any of these guys running their corporations for them.
So, these guys own major sports teams.
They own resource mining companies, logistics.
Just about every damn thing in the world, this is the way that they keep their wealth and hedge it around in different diversified portfolios.
So yeah, this is the standard oil of the whole entire Cisco logistics infrastructure.
I think they manage 12 trillion in assets, but that's just what they have on the books.
I can only imagine what they truly run and what they truly have.
And more importantly, this is BlackRock.
BlackRock is just an instrument for these guys.
They own many different companies that are probably, The same type of situation, whether it's acquisitions groups or, you know, things like that.
These oligarchs are taking over the world and using our central banking system to do it.
And I'm really impressed by the comments that Owen made about that because, you know, the younger generation has to see this.
If they don't, it's going to be at their own peril.
This fractional reserve banking system allowed them to dissociate not only from ledger banking, accounting, you know, Credit and debt and savings.
The whole concept of savings has been destroyed.
The whole fundamental basis of economics has been completely subverted by supply-side economics and what they're doing with fractional reserve banking.
So, yeah, we will owe nothing and like it because these central banks have pretty much taken over the world after World War II and use the national security apparatus to defend themselves against their own citizens and to insulate this type of power.
And to really take over all of trade.
You can control wages with this.
You can control property ownership, compliance, all kinds of stuff.
So where this is going is certainly not a good thing.
You know, I'd like to add to a point to one of the previous segments about the Obama trying to crack down online disinformation by having digital IDs.
Well, this is going to be tied right in with your CBDC, and you're going to be pretty much begging at the mercy of these, you know, oligarch monoliths for your sustenance if you don't really fight them and get them while Well, we still have a chance.
Chris, you better fight yourself, otherwise your social credit score isn't going to help you at all.
Oh, I'll fuckin' do it.
Alright, let's go on to the third story.
And the third one that I got is just episode six for Tucker Carlson on Twitter.
And he took an opportunity, I'm not going to play it, but I do recommend taking a look at it, is that he is talking about the whole concept of Bobby Kennedy just walking people through the data and in contrast to the gaslighting that you can expect on the other side.
And let's see, right now we got 20.6 million views.
I think that updates automatically.
Let me refresh the page and find out.
21 million views.
So basically, Tucker Carlson is just bombing, truth-bombing corporate media.
And I don't, you know, I've said this for, since the beginning of May, I didn't think that the The only choice.
I didn't think that our economic system could survive much past that.
Other topics here for that.
So I am highly encouraged that people are streaming to this independent media and the quality of the information that Tucker is giving is so high.
I think that that is a total benefit to the good guys.
And, you know, I framed this 10 years ago that we're in this Emperor's New Clothes condition, and that it just takes an instant, and who knows when that happens?
One moment, you got a bunch of kids pointing to the naked Emperor and Empire, and the adults are saying, shut up, and smacking their kids around for disrupting the peace and the dignity of the parade.
And then, according to the story, which I think will happen, and then one moment, all of a sudden, everyone looks up with their own eyes.
And the illusion is done.
We may even be there right now, because the story goes on.
And the story goes on is that the Emperor knows that people see, and he keeps pretending.
That might be what we saw in the well in the House of Representatives with the Democratic leaders saying, I don't, I don't.
They know it's done, but what are they going to do?
They can't back away because they Crimes Against Humanity, Wars of Aggression, complicity, criminal complicity with looting of hundreds of trillions of dollars we can associate with millions of deaths.
So they're going to play all the way until the end.
Chris!
Yeah, no doubt.
They are ways deep in the blood of the innocent, so they're certainly not going to be able to backtrack now.
It is do or die for them.
It is all or nothing.
So yeah, whether you're talking election fraud, whether you're talking financial fraud, whether you're talking COVID fraud, vaccine fraud, these guys really have one common word that seems to be coming into synonymous recurrence.
So I think it's only a matter of time and it's almost measurable before people really see through the gambit and I really think that them trying to weaponize the minorities against whites in the way that they are is kind of a failing tactic too because I think a lot of minorities see through this bullshit and many of them are much smarter than the people pandering to them or giving them credit for being.
You know, that's really a good thing there, and I'm glad to see that there are some intelligent people of different races that see through this and are saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, they're really trying to get you to do the dirty work for them.
So, yeah, I think at some point in time, maybe you're going to see the barrels turn against their own masters, or certainly you're going to see the straw bosses run for their lives or really drop the yokes in terms of the digital plantation and the technocratic feudalism.
I think these guys got caught overreaching.
Excellent.
And I think really the cover-up is worse than the crime because it makes it more obvious, not only of the guilt initially, but the mens rea of, you know, covering up and doing what they're doing to keep going on with this.
So, yeah, keep feeding them rope.
And then eventually one time maybe we'll actually put it to good use.
Excellent.
Owen?
Yeah, I'll mention Tucker.
I really like Tucker Carlson.
I think he's a really, really interesting guy.
I've met him briefly at a conference.
It was so interesting.
Me and my friend were walking into this conference at Turning Point USA and Tucker Carlson was coming down the escalator and he met us.
He was a really, really sweet guy.
Very odd, quirky individual, oddly enough.
He's got a really funny laugh to him.
He almost sounds like a goblin when he laughs.
It's really funny.
But I think that what he's doing with Twitter and what he's been able to do with Twitter and moving his show to Twitter, at the end of Tucker Carlson's Fox career, before he got let go, he was averaging, I believe before he got let go, he was averaging, I believe it was like four and a half million viewers a night.
Thank you.
Just an astounding amount of viewership, tripling what CNN was doing.
So Tucker alone was tripling.
What CNN was capable of bringing in on a nightly basis, which is amazing to see that, you know, the things that Tucker talks about, the things that he discusses, most people are interested and value that.
They do not want to listen to CNN.
And now that Tucker's gone, Fox is miserable.
They don't have anybody that anybody likes.
They're exposed for being exactly what they are, which is just a puppet, just like all of them.
There's six major companies that own all of the media in the world, Fox, is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who's controlled by one of those six media companies.
It's all known.
It's widely available information that there's basically 300 business executives that control the information flow for the entire population.
So you can imagine it's about the population size of San Francisco per one person is the kind of influence that one of these 300 business executives have.
It's a massive amount of influence that these top business executives have in the media.
And so I think that Tucker, regardless of why he was fired, probably because of his viewership as well as his views and values and what he says and the fact that he can't be controlled.
I love that.
We need more of that.
We need more people that are willing to lose a huge, huge thing, a huge, huge platform for truth, willing to lose a bunch of viewership for truth.
In fact, I don't think he lost any viewership.
I think he gained viewership.
And that's what's going to happen when we finally realize that it's not about the platform, the numbers.
It's about doing what's right, telling the truth.
Which is why I was so disappointed when a guy like RFK Jr.
goes out and says that I'm pro-choice, I'm pro-baby murder, who's the founder of Children's Health Defense, for goodness sake.
They're all fake.
You have to measure them by their fruits.
If they produce a bad fruit, it's a bad tree.
If it produces a good fruit, it is a good tree.
This has been known to us.
This is a biblical principle.
Let's start following it when we elect public officials and when we follow certain media personalities.
Yeah, and with Tucker, I'm not sure of the numbers, but let's say it was 4 million, and that little episode 6 had 21 million, and Fox's old position with Tucker in it has now dropped, I don't remember what it was, like 14th place now.
14th, yeah, crazy.
And that's the trend that I'm seeing is that everything that we see here appears to be backfiring exponentially upon our opponents.
So I'm very optimistic over the trend of events that we see.
Hey Carl, you mind if I jump in real quick?
Yeah, go ahead.
I was gonna say about the Tucker thing and many of these, Megyn Kelly's, all these Johnny Come Lately's, you know, I wish that they would have done this when the chips were down and they could have maybe saved some more people at least questioning this stuff at the right time.
I think them really going along with things like this, even Tucker with CNBC and after 9-11 going along with the War of Terror and all that shit, you gotta tell me these guys know better.
If they're any some sort of a respected journalist, then they gotta understand that they are certainly There's more to what's going on than what they're conveying, and I really think that they've been gatekeepers for a long time, and now that they're really trying to re-establish street credibility with calling out these things posthumously.
I know there's really no one else in the mainstream media that had the opportunity to do this, or if they did, they lost their jobs or their lives, but I would have really liked to have seen a little bit more from these people sooner about the things that they're finally just now coming around to talking about.
You said something that's important, which is that it is often life-threatening.
One of the people that actually questioned, I believe it was George Bush's connection with the Skull and Bones Society, a journalist that questioned him about that on live TV was found dead only a couple of days later.
So I absolutely believe that these people, these journalists who are employed by these media organizations, were in life-threatening situations if they were to convey or reveal the truth.
Yeah, Ruster.
All right, Chris.
Yeah, go ahead.
Third topic.
Go, brother.
Oh, yeah.
Well, the third topic, I thought, Carl, was going to be you and I talking about the micro-lending situation and tying some of this stuff together with some of your work that you had done with the Muhannad Yunus and some of the others.
If you don't mind maybe getting into that a little bit, I would love to just be a fly on Obama's face during this conversation.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I put on screen for the viewers, this is the notes that you sent, which are great work.
So, yeah, I'll give my overview here first.
So, going back to the 1990 World Summit for Children, you're asking a history teacher, so it's hard for us to...
Stop and determine how far back to go.
So, when I was 17 in 1977, I attended the Hunger Project's initiatory events led by Erhard and Buckminster Fuller and Peter Born, an international water expert.
And at age 17, I discovered that, yeah, we have all the technical solutions to end poverty.
Let's do it.
Let's go.
I created a UC Berkeley major to that end.
I was one of the key volunteers with results.org.
And the result of the 1990 World Summit for Children is that that was Bush Sr.
was president.
We couldn't even get the guy to commit to go to the summit at the UN.
I had to threaten him through the liaison we had to the White House.
And the threat that I made is say, hey, homie, he had for two months, he had refused to answer the question, will you go to the summit?
Two months.
And our liaison didn't know what to do.
So I said, I know what to do.
I know what to do.
So Monday morning, call up the White House.
Tell your contact that Bush has until Friday at 5 p.m.
his time to give us an answer.
No matter what he does, we're going to initiate our 200 publications.
And we're going to have our volunteers send letters to the editor.
This was 1990 and we're going to inform the public about the facts of the.
And we're also going to say that we invited President Bush two months ago, and he's had more important things to do to answer our question.
to reduce population growth rate.
And we're also gonna say that we invited President Bush two months ago and he's had more important things to do to answer our question.
And we don't even know why he hasn't answered it because he isn't telling us.
But we'll put the White House phone number down there and we'll invite the general public to call the White House and find out because we don't know.
That afternoon, Bush agreed to attend.
Now, they all attended, they all looked great, they all promised to do everything, and they did nothing.
We went back to the Republican leadership after the World Summit for Children and said, what gives?
They said to us, they said, we're afraid.
We were afraid that it's going to look like we're giving away too much to the poor.
And we reminded them of the polling data that Americans are willing to give 10% of their income to save the poorest of the poor, and the Republicans are going to go in at less than 1% to end the problem forever.
And I had a lot to say about the framing of this.
I said, look, You can win elections for the next 50 years on this issue.
You're going to say that the Democrats declared war on poverty 30 years ago, couldn't win it, and the Republicans come in and solve the problem because that's what you do.
And they said, no, we're still afraid.
I said, you hire me to lead this campaign.
I will end the political career of any politician that gets in the way of saving these children's lives.
They didn't want to do that.
So instead, what we did, getting to Chris's point, is that at results, we said, all right, we were backing the Clintons because they promised everything.
Of course.
They knew Mohammed Yunus, the founder of microcredit.
So we did a lot of work.
It took until 1997 for another World Summit for Heads of State.
Bill Clinton didn't show up.
He sent Hillary, but that was okay.
We knew that they had political aspirations for Hillary.
She showed up, promised everything, and again, they did nothing.
And we had corporate media lying about the summit and refusing to cover it the entire time.
I'll put into the show notes here at BitChute the lies that the New York Times told about this summit.
But we went back to the Democratic leadership after the microcredit summit when they were nagged on all promises and said, what gives?
And they said, we're afraid.
Of what?
And they said, we're afraid that it's going to look like we're giving away too much to the poor.
So I said, you're going to let these people die because you think that the American public are too stupid to understand that this makes a profit.
And they said, yes.
And we couldn't move them.
And at that point, I told my colleagues at Results that I was going to have to follow the money and that the problem was is that they were saying one thing and doing another.
Now, as far as microcredit goes, this was Muhammad Yunus.
He's from Pakistan or Bangladesh.
And he went to, I believe, Yale and got a PhD in economics.
And he discovered, through this whole process, that the PhD education he got from Yale in economics was worthless, because what was needed was access to credit to the poor.
Microcredit is small loans to the poorest of the poor, who don't qualify for a commercial bank loan.
They take this money and then they're entrepreneurs.
They'll buy a refrigerated cart or a hat-making machine and they can increase their productivity from doing stuff by hand ten times, a hundred times.
The data is that 98% of these loans, when we were working with this data, I don't know what they are now, But these loans were paid back.
Over 90% of these people leave poverty within a year.
The program makes a profit.
And the end result, Chris, of what happened and what we discovered and what you were asking about is that, of course, microcredit got captured by the profiteers who jacked up the interest rates from a non-profit human consideration and sharing model to being able to exploit those people.
And as to its status right now, the good news is that the lives saved through microcredit It's probably about half a billion now, 500 million.
So I am proud that I contributed to that.
But at the same time, all it was is another captured good idea.
And, you know, you take a look at what you invest your life in, you come up with something good, and then it gets taken and inverted by the black hats.
But that's typical about what they do.
Get turned out by the man, huh?
Yeah.
That's it.
Well, you know, Carl, it's admirable that you were doing that, and I really think that the whole point is about establishing control and dependency.
I don't think it has anything to do with, actually, they don't want educated people, they don't want self-sustainable people, they don't want people that can handle their bills.
They want people, you know, desperate for You know, deprived, you know, they certainly want to have that that situation because people are certainly more compliant in those circumstances when you have contingence as a measure of your survival.
So I think it's really amazing to see that both parties had done this.
And I also want to add that when you were talking about these things, this was before Clinton and them guys deregulated everything, the financial industry, the media industry.
So, you know, this was before six companies owned all the media.
This was, you know, when they actually had a chance at independent journalism or have a chance at independent credit or, like you say, microcredit or establishing these different financial systems.
The whole point is they want people on this Staples-Bain model where they can pretty much keep people dependent and keep the rich getting 99% of the resources like they currently have and have been doing.
So, yeah, it's funny.
You see these very same people talk about, what is it?
DEI?
Equity, inclusion?
Diversity, equity, inclusion.
Yeah, right.
And it's another one of these, like, inversion of rhetorics, where they get everybody on the emotional appeal, but certainly the deliverance will absolutely be based on the sense of betrayal.
So, yeah, I see through it, and hopefully the younger generation does too.
But, yeah, I think it's interesting to see each generation having to face these type of hurdles in the way that they have, and these same people just really just moving the goalpost, the yardstick, and everything else.
Yeah, I'm just rambling at this point, so if you guys want to take it, go ahead.
Alright, I'm good with that.
Owen, anything else on that topic?
No, all set with that.
Alright, final thoughts.
Me, I'll go.
After 46 years of engaging in The Great Awakening, since six years younger I was than Owen is now, I've come to the conclusion that there's nothing that we can do to affect the larger condition, apparently, by all appearances.
And we do have 100% control over what we think and what we say and what we do.
So paradoxically, while we do engage externally as fiercely And competitively as we can.
And I'll put in the show notes of BitChute, again, my two-year contest with Hayward Unified School District, where I gave it my all, of course.
Those are my best shots.
But I've come to the paradoxical position to see that this is almost, I don't want to say a game of solitaire, but you're really just heightening your own sense of virtue with your experience and your expression A virtue to be the best person that you can be under the circumstances.
Now that said, I do continue to see that we are on the very precipice and that It could be while we're talking right now that something happens in the exterior world to flip this thing for this Emperor's New Clothes moment.
It hasn't happened yet.
So all I can say is to the Patriots watching this right now, because that's all that we have, is people who are like us.
They see enough of the truth.
They don't know how to do about it.
And maybe the best thing that we can just do is to encourage ourselves.
Because once this breakthrough happens, I think our role is going to change dramatically.
So 2% in my experience are able to engage in these conversations.
That's 1 out of 50.
And I don't have to go too far into people's experiences to point to your interactions with your own family members, your friends, your colleagues, to see that how quickly they write us off.
I think it's just an energetic interaction.
But once the breakthrough happens and they are confused, we'll be right here.
And we've had enough practice.
Where we might be able to guide them through step by step and enter into this possibility of the Star Trek-like future that I do see is available and the unleashment of the technology.
If we could get rid of these banksters and get some of this tech, then it's a whole new ballgame, baby.
Chris?
Yeah, I too have been someone who spent a greater portion of my life getting in slap fights with those that suffer from cognitive dissonance.
So yeah, I definitely see that there is something changing in the world and awakening.
I think even like the change of human resonance is something to really talk about and think about because the energy that we put out biologically has been altered and it is going in sync for the first time since it's been measured.
So I think that there is a very, very A strong force, a wave of energy, of outrage that I hope will be, I guess, directed in the right way, in the right manner, and certainly not hijacked by the culprits that caused this outrage in the first place.
So, yeah, I really think that, you know, people are turning a corner and I think humanity is finally starting to wake up, but this is certainly not something to celebrate.
This is, you know, the first play in the championship game, so We really got to focus ourselves.
We got to be disciplined.
We got to be strong.
We got to be resolute.
We got to definitely understand who our enemies are.
And more importantly, create a lot of allies amongst each other so that we can really find a way to fight this.
This is not one person that can go against this on their own.
This is going to take the multitudes in many hands making light work of this.
I'll keep this very short and sweet.
You know, I'm very grateful to be on.
I love doing this.
And every time I'm on with Jim, every time I'm doing a radio show, it seems as if we're talking about one horrible thing after another.
And that's the point.
That's what these people have done.
The beauty and the good things and the things that I cherished growing up, I was maybe very sheltered.
Are the things that I love to focus on.
But the way that our media has indoctrinated us into a mass formation psychosis to accept and be desensitized to evil things.
Into things that are horrible.
Into things that are not good.
I really find it sad.
I take a movie like Bambi.
Bambi!
What a great classic movie!
Bambi's mother is shot in front of him.
These Disney movies, this media that we're watching, that we're taking in, sucking it in through our eyes, is filling us with hopelessness.
It's filling us with things that are not normal.
There's an attack on what is normal.
And a child losing his mom is not normal.
And a child losing his father is not normal.
Um, and all of these things that you hear, the vaccine and people dying of aggressive cancers because of the vaccine, people lied to and their family members dying.
Because of a vaccine is not normal.
That's evil.
And that's why I'm trying to take a break and bring myself back to Jesus bring myself back to things.
I know that are good and I found a verse in Corinthians 2nd Corinthians chapter 4 8 through 10.
I think this really describes our situation in America and across the world.
It says we are hard-pressed on every side, but not crushed.
We are perplexed, but we're not in despair.
We're persecuted, but we're definitely not abandoned.
We're struck down, but we're not destroyed.
We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body.
I think this is a spiritual thing.
It's a spiritual war, primarily.
That's what I will always rest my whatever color hat I'm going to wear.
It's going to be a Jesus hat.
And I got to be honest, if you're out there right now, I'd recommend taking a break from your phone.
Take a break from Instagram or Twitter or your computer and spend time with a book.
Spend time with a book.
Spend time reading something that's going to feed your spirit, that's going to feed you with something positive and not a story of misery and loneliness.
That's it for me.
Thank you, brother.
I did forget to go to your third story, and I will just point to it here.
I like the optimistic end that you have, but this is the third story.
Back to misery.
Back to misery is the paradox of both.
You don't have to talk about it, but yeah, there is this data.
That is unsettling for that.
So I would like to conclude this episode.
Thank you to Chris.
Thank you to Owen.
Thank you to our viewers.
And for all of you, please send your prayers and your good wills to Jim.
And have a great weekend.
▲
Export Selection