All Episodes
Previous Next
June 14, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:51:26
The Raw Deal (15 June 2023) with Mike Sparks
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I still don't hear Jim.
Are you on there yet, Jim?
Mitchell, have you got Mike?
There you go.
I hear you finally.
Have we got Mike?
Is his last 47666?
On his phone number, because I was had people calling me about some other stuff that was going on.
So yeah, I think that's yeah.
OK, let me add.
Let me get him in here and you can start.
706-575-4292.
706.
Okay.
All right.
We'll work on that.
All right, Jim.
What a catastrophe.
Okay, you let me know when he shows.
I will.
We got the Burisma owner allegedly recording a Biden bribe conversations as an insurance policy and the FBI covering it up, just as you are saying, my friend.
Senator Chuck Grassley dropped another bomb in the recent made of Biden corruption headlines.
The Foreign National allegedly bribed Vice President Joe Biden and kept 17 secret recordings of both Hunter and Joe as an insurance policy.
This is huge.
According to the Washington Examiner, the Foreign National is a Burisma owner, Mykola Solzhenitsyn.
Two of the recordings are allegedly between him and Joe Biden himself.
The 10 to 23 produced in that House committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversation with him.
17 total recordings, Grassley said.
They were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case he got into a tight spot.
Attempt 23 also indicates then Vice President Biden may even involve Prisma and Point Hunter Biden.
More than that, the FBI made Congress review an unredacted, unclassified document in a classified facility.
That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress.
You want to defund them, please try the FBI.
They deserve it.
So the FBI covered up the claim that Burisma's owner had secret recordings between him and the Bidens as an insurance policy, according to Grassley.
Here's more from the Washington Examiner.
The U.S.
Attorney's Office in Delaware is handling the ongoing federal criminal investigation into Hunter Biden.
It's allegedly up to U.S.
Attorney David Weiss, a Trump-appointed holdover, to decide whether to indict the President's son.
In February of 2021, Joe Biden asked, all Senate-confirmed U.S.
attorneys appointed by Trump for their resignation, with Weiss, for our exception.
I'd say he had to be exception because he was already on board the Biden bandwagon.
In other words, my inference would be that Weiss was already dirty.
So what is U.S.
Attorney Wise doing with respect to these alleged Joe and Hunter Biden recordings that are apparently relevant to the high-stakes bribery scheme, Grassley asked?
Sources previously told The Examiner, the Burisma owner, had discussed an alleged bribe of $5 million to Joe and $5 million to Hunter.
According to the FBI owner and informant who heard this from Zolchevsky, whom I believe to be Tony Bobulinsky, by the way, who is the Biden's financial manager.
The sources said Zolchevsky said he believed it would be difficult to unravel the alleged bribery scheme for at least 10 years because of the number of bank accounts involved.
His alleged reverence of Joe as the big guy appears independent of the apparent reverence to the now president as the big guy by a Hunter business associate during negotiation with Chinese intelligence-linked businessmen.
A China-related reference occurred in a May 2017 email, not made public until October of 2020.
And it's just been spoke.
The FD-1023 includes allegations from a confidential human source that the head of Burisma, Ukrainian energy company, energy company hired Hunter to serve on its board to use his father's influence to stifle an investigation from then Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin into the firm.
Shokin was removed from his post in 2016 and the FD 1023 indicates that two Biden family members received five mil each for their trouble also on Monday.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer subpoenaed Hunter's former business partner, Devin Archer, demanding to sit for a deposition.
In a letter to Archer's attorney, Comer wrote Archer had played a significant role in the Biden family business dealings abroad, including but not limited to China, Russia, and Ukraine.
Additionally, While entertaining these ventures, your client met with then-Vice President Biden on multiple occasions, including in the White House.
We have much more.
An independent forensic review of Hunter Biden's laptop by CBS confirmed hundreds of communications between Hunter and Archer, specifically emails suggesting working meals were arranged before or after her Burisma board meetings.
Archer is widely believed to have facilitated Hunter's entry into Burisma's board.
Meanwhile, and we're sure it's unrelated, Biden had to cancel meetings today to take care of a sudden root canal.
Remember, Burisma exacubated Hunter and Joe Biden at 17 recordings of them as an insurance policy, according to 51 intel agents.
That's just Russian disinformation.
Now, mind you, Tucker has been calling out what's going on with the indictment of Trump.
I think he's got it exactly right.
Listen up.
He's getting a staggering number of views on Twitter and deservedly so.
Well, I'm going to have to find it.
I had it going.
Stand by.
Here we go.
The Biden administration arrested Donald Trump this afternoon.
They had him arraigned and fingerprinted in a Miami courthouse, like the accused felon he now technically is.
These were the first steps in a process that is designed to put Donald Trump behind bars for the rest of his life.
Cable News carried every moment of it live.
It's unprecedented, they told us, with what looked like shock.
But they were shocked.
They knew this was coming.
Everyone who's paid attention knew it was.
What just happened was always going to happen.
It's been inevitable since February 16, 2016.
That's the day Donald Trump made a blood enemy of the largest and most powerful organization in human history, which would be the federal government.
Despite what you may remember, it wasn't anything that Trump had said about immigration or trade with China or rapists from Mexico.
Those are the stories that dominated the headlines that year.
Trump's a racist, they screamed.
Stop him!
But inside Washington, that was just noise.
None of it really rated.
Identity politics doesn't mean much to permanent Washington.
What matters, then and now, is foreign policy.
The invasions and occupations and proxy wars.
The decisions that determine which global populations will thrive and which will die.
The policies that come with trillion-dollar price tags.
The ones that, over time, have made the counties around D.C.
the richest suburbs in the world.
In Washington, that's what actually matters.
And it's obvious when you look carefully.
When there's a debate about anything else, for example, the debt ceiling, both sides take their assigned positions and they start yelling at it.
But when Congress decides to start a war, no matter how foolish or counterproductive or obviously disconnected from America's core interests that war may be, when that happens, the leaders of both parties automatically jump behind it like circus clowns.
And then they stay there, sometimes for decades.
They defend that war relentlessly, against all evidence, until somebody finally rings the all-clear bell, and they can begin to admit that actually, maybe it wasn't such a great idea.
We meant well, but it just didn't work out.
The good news is, we've learned a lot of important lessons.
In the end, they usually do say something like that, but only after emotions have cooled and the damning details have begun to fade from collective memory.
It's an apology that's not actually an apology, much less repentance, and it's yours too late to matter in any case.
But until then, that's all you're getting.
Until then, no dissent is allowed.
That's the first rule of Washington.
But somehow, Trump didn't bother to follow it.
He was from out of town, so maybe he didn't know it was a rule.
Maybe he just didn't care.
Either way, seven and a half years later, we can point to the precise moment that permanent Washington decided to send Donald Trump to prison.
Here it is.
It's from the Republican candidates debate in Greenville, South Carolina.
We should have never been in Iraq.
We have destabilized the Middle East.
They lied.
They said there were weapons of mass destruction.
There were none.
And they knew there were none.
There were no weapons of mass destruction.
We should never have been in Iraq, Trump said.
We destabilized the Middle East.
Now, by the time Trump said that, a lot of Republican primary voters were starting to reach the same conclusion.
How could they not?
But it was the next line that doomed Trump to today's arrest.
They lied, he said.
There were no weapons of mass destruction, and they knew there were none.
Now, when he said that, a few in the crowd booed.
Most just sat there in silence, stunned.
Can he say that?
He said it anyway.
And by saying that, he sealed his fate.
That was the one thing you were not allowed to say, because it implicated too many people on both sides, which on this topic is really just one side.
Hillary Clinton was guilty of it, but so was Paul Ryan.
All of them were guilty.
They all knew they all lied.
And to a person, they hated Donald Trump for exposing them.
After that, it was pretty clear that even if he did get elected president, Trump was going to have a very hard time controlling the federal government he was supposed to be in charge of.
Most impermanent Washington decided that thwarting Trump was the single most important mission in their lives.
Everything depended on it.
Many of them said so publicly.
But others didn't say so, publicly.
In fact, the stealthier ones took another path.
They ran toward Trump, not away from him.
They sucked up to him.
They ingratiated themselves for the man they intuitively understood was susceptible to flattery, which Trump is.
And they did this in order to subvert his new administration from the inside.
There were a number of these, and you could spot them immediately.
They were flatterers.
Invariably, the ones who flattered Trump the most hated him the most and disagreed the most strongly with his views.
You saw them in the hallways of the White House and at press conferences.
They were there slobbering over their boss with elaborate self-abasement, as if they were addressing a monarch or a god.
It was a scene from the Ottoman court.
It was filthy and decadent, and it was false.
Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, Mike Pompeo, Lindsey Graham in the Congress, they all called Trump a visionary genius up until the moment he lost power.
And then they unsheathed their real agenda, as always the neocon war agenda, and they piled on with maximum force.
Here's Mike Pompeo, for example, on Fox News this morning.
President Trump had classified documents where he shouldn't have had them, and then when given the opportunity to return them, he chose not to do that for whatever reason.
When somebody identifies that, you got to turn them in.
So that's just, that's inconsistent with protecting America's soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines.
And if the allegations are true, some of these were pretty serious, important documents.
So that's wrong.
May future historians hoping to unlock the mysteries of late Empire Washington study that clip, because it will reveal everything.
That very same Mike Pompeo, the one who's sneering at Donald Trump on TV this morning, that guy, served Donald Trump as both CIA Director and as Secretary of State.
It was the two most powerful jobs in the federal government.
And as he worked in those jobs, Pompeo promised, in fact he swore, to support the president's agenda.
Why?
Because that's the way a democracy works.
You vote for a candidate in the belief that his appointees will carry out the policies that you voted for.
It's not about the president, it's about you, the voter.
But Pompeo didn't do that.
He didn't even try to do that.
In fact, he undermined Trump's often-stated commitment to peace and non-intervention abroad at every turn.
His every waking hour was devoted to fomenting war in some faraway foreign country or other.
Iran, Syria, Russia, North Korea, the list goes on.
But rather than telling Trump that he disagreed with his ideas, as a man would, Pompeo toted up to Trump, a man he despised, in the oiliest, most over-the-top way imaginable.
Ask anyone who worked in that White House at the time.
Who is the appointee most likely to tell Donald Trump on a daily basis that he was handsome, virile, sleek, and powerful?
Pompeo.
That would be the consensus answer.
Those of us who saw firsthand Pompeo's relentless kowtowing will never forget it.
It was indelibly repulsive.
No one with self-respect could do something like that, but Mike Pompeo did it effortlessly, with relish and verve.
Now, this same person is telling Fox News viewers that he fears for the safety of our military—our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines, in the improved phrase—because Donald Trump took some classified documents home and didn't immediately return them to the National Archives?
What a lie that is.
Mike Pompeo knows that's a lie.
He spent his entire life in Washington.
Washington is a city where internal memos about Labor Day are classified, because everything is classified.
Your government has classified more than a billion federal documents, most of them boring and pointless and a danger to no one, and locked them away in secret where you can't see them because you may be an American citizen, but not really, and therefore you don't have the necessary clearances to know what's going on.
And by the way, none of this is done in order to make America safer, any more than COVID restrictions were designed to keep you healthy.
No!
It's a caste system.
That's the point.
And you're the untouchable in this hierarchy.
Mike Pompeo knows that.
Everybody who works in Washington knows that.
How many secret documents do you think Dick Cheney took home with him while he was running the Iraq War?
How many did his wife read?
She never had a clearance.
We'll never know the answer because there is no chance Dick Cheney will ever be investigated or his staffers will be told to wear wires in his presence.
Will he ever be indicted for this?
Of course not.
Dick Cheney is a neocon.
Donald Trump is not.
Dick Cheney supports war with Russia.
Trump does not.
That's the difference.
The rest is just a distraction.
The prosecution of Donald Trump is transparently political.
He's literally Joe Biden's main political opponent.
He's polling over 60% among Republican voters right now.
So Joe Biden is doing what no president has ever dared to do.
He's using law enforcement to lock up his chief rival.
That's happening right now.
Anyone who denies it's happening is lying to you.
But actually it's worse than that.
Trump's prosecution isn't just political, it's ideological.
Nobody with Trump's views is allowed to have power in this country.
Criticize our wars and you're disqualified.
If you keep it up, we'll send you to prison.
That's the message Washington is sending.
Not just the Democratic Party is sending, but both parties are sending.
Like so many Republicans, for example, the supposedly conservative governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, spent yesterday totally ignoring the destruction of the American justice system.
Instead, he signed a highly important bill called the Crown Act, which, according to the celebratory tweet Abbott sent commemorating it, will, quote, prohibit discrimination based on textures and hairstyles historically associated with race.
In other words, in Texas, cornrows are now protected by law.
Having unapproved views about Ukraine is not.
That's fine with most elected Republicans.
They find Trump tiresome and embarrassing.
Their donors hate him.
They will not be sad if he dies in jail.
But what about voters?
What are they learning from this spectacle?
Well, mostly they're learning that they have no power at all because nobody cares about them.
But they already knew that.
Unlike so many of our elected leaders, they have been to America recently.
They know what it looks like.
Have you seen it?
If you've got a few days this summer, find out.
Take a road trip and see for yourself.
Drive 500 miles in any direction and then come home.
How are things looking?
Well, they should look great.
The federal government spent $6.5 trillion last year.
That's more than any government has ever spent, ever.
So at the very least, you would expect pristine public roads.
Oh, no.
That's not what you see when you drive around this country.
There are potholes and Jersey barriers everywhere.
Looks like Tegucigalpa before the Chinese decided to rebuild the infrastructure of Honduras.
We don't have China buying our roads.
So they're falling apart.
You think the people you would pass on your road trip would look happy and prosperous.
Again, this is a very rich country.
But a lot of them don't.
Quite a few appear to be strung out on drugs.
You see them shuffling by shuttered storefronts in small towns.
And you wonder, as you see all of this, where did all the money go?
It's certainly not here.
Well, it's in Washington.
It's in Fairfax and Loudoun counties and in leafy, perfectly manicured Northwest D.C.
And of course, a huge chunk of it went to Ukraine, to Zelensky and his friends.
Not because you voted for that.
You didn't vote to give it to them.
You never would.
But because Joe Biden and his many allies, from Chuck Schumer to Mitch McConnell to Paul Ryan, and every single news anchor on all of television, all of them believe that Ukraine, its borders, its future, its infrastructure, are all more important than the town that you live in.
They sincerely think that, and it's obvious.
Everyone in power thinks that, except for Donald Trump.
Whatever else you say about him, Trump is the one guy with an actual shot of becoming president who dissents from Washington's longstanding pointless war agenda.
And for that, that one fact, they're trying to take Trump out before you can vote for him.
And that should upset you more than anything that's happened in American politics in your lifetime.
Even if you don't plan to vote for Donald Trump, even if you would die before voting for Donald Trump, which is your right and a lot of good people feel that way, even still, The destruction of our democracy, which is the right of voters to support any candidate they want, even candidates who don't want war with Russia.
The destruction of that should keep you up at night.
Yes, Donald Trump is a flawed man, but his sins are minor compared to those of his persecutors.
In this life, we don't get to choose our martyrs.
We can only choose our principles, and America's are at stake.
Well now, that was very successful, brilliant piece by Tucker.
I think he really did nail it.
He's done a sensational job of it.
And we've got so much corruption in Washington, but the bottom line, they're trying to take him out before you can even vote for him.
Nothing like this has ever occurred before.
The legal basis for doing this is completely shabby, as I shall explain in detail after we return from this break.
The legal basis for doing this is completely shabby.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as this made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, FreedomSubs.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Hey, everyone!
It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up.
And the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
Take guns, impose tyranny.
It's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all the marbles.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m.
Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zendra Siak at FreedomStitch.com, The People Station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Ordinarily, I'd be introducing Mike Sparks at this point, but we've been unable to reach He's got a messy background in U.S.
Army, U.S.
Marine Corps.
He has lots of thoughts about what we can do to work our way out of the mess we're in.
In his absence, there's a sensational critique of the troubling timeline, which rests upon an untested legal theory from the epic times.
Which I want to share with you.
The Espionage Act has never been used to prosecute in this sort of settings as a former federal prosecutor.
The indictment of former President Donald Trump for holding military documents and obstructing the government from taking them is built on a novel legal theory that has multiple weaknesses, according to several lawyers and other experts.
The case has been portrayed in the media as being about Trump's retaining classified documents from his presidency.
However, the charges sidestep that issue and instead use a clause in the Espionage Act that criminalizes a failure to hand over national defense information.
The indictment further alleges that Trump and staffer, Waltine Nauta, hid some documents When the government demanded them through a subpoena, the alleged Espionage Act violation imposed a high burden of proof and raised the question of whether the statute should have been applied to begin with, and if not, whether the underlying investigation should serve as a basis for obstruction charges, some lawyers told The Atlantic Times.
Now, as you're listening to Tucker, remember, this whole thing is contrived because Trump is Not enthusiastic on pointless wars that do not benefit the United States.
And I'll tell you, listening to Tucker, I'm rather convinced now that Dick Cheney has been playing a key role behind the scene.
Dick Cheney is an evil figure who did massive damage to the United States.
He was the executive director on the ground.
According to Michael Rupert's Crossing the Rubicon, based on publicly available sources, on 9-11, Dick Cheney was profoundly involved in orchestrating the events of 9-11 on behalf of Israel.
Israel, not the United States.
Remember how many times I've explained, not only is our media dominated by Israel, but our Congress.
Cynthia McKinney, recall, revealed the pledge on Iranian television during an interview.
She told me afterwards she thought everybody knew.
Nobody knew that new members of Congress were asked to sign a pledge that put the interests of Israel ahead of even those of the United States, the interests of Israel ahead of the United States.
So why are we all in in Ukraine?
Because Israel wants Ukraine to be the new Israel.
And they're willing to fight the word of the last American soldier.
And Biden is all in because he's a dedicated Zionist who puts the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the United States.
That's why it's Ukraine first, America last.
With a Biden administration, Trump threatens all of that.
Trump threatens the war economy.
Trump threatens everything that these guilty, gutless bastards stand for.
The way they've been looting the United States and destroying our government and our way of life and abusing the Department of Justice and reducing the United States to the status of a banana republic.
Well, the Epoch Times, which I recommend just as I do Tucker Carlson, is giving us a devastating critique of the shabby way in which they've gone about it.
The key issue here, then, Is the interplay between the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act said Will Sharpe, a former federal prosecutor?
The Presidential Records Act of 1978 stipulates that after a president leaves office, the National Archive and Records Administration takes custody of his official records.
The law allows former presidents To keep personal documents such as diaries, journals, or other personal notes not used for government business.
If a former president or vice president finds presidential records among personal matters, he or she is expected to contact NARA, the National Archive and Records Administration, in a timely manner to secure the transfer of those records to the archives.
However, The Presidential Records Act is not a criminal statute.
If a former president refuses to turn over some documents or claims obviously official documents as personal, the worst he could face is a civil lawsuit.
I repeat, the Presidential Records Act isn't a criminal statute.
If a former president refuses to turn over some documents, Or claims obviously official documents as personal.
Or worse, he faces a civil lawsuit.
There's little case law in such matters.
In 2012, Judicial Watch tried to force former President Bill Clinton to turn over dozens of interview tapes he kept from his presidency.
Clinton claimed the tapes were personal, and the court sided with him.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
What so far as to argue that the court had no way to second guess a president's assessment of what is and isn't personal?
Listen to that.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
What so far as to argue that the court had no way to second guess a president's assertion Of what is and isn't personal.
Since the president is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records, Jackson wrote.
However, The Department of Justice is now arguing that former presidents can be charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 for possession of documents that they kept from their presidencies.
That's a totally novel legal issue, Sharf says.
It's never been tested before.
The Espionage Act has never been used to prosecute in this sort of a setting.
Some lawyers I believe the Espionage Act can't be used this way because it wasn't meant to be used in such a fashion.
Before 1978, former presidents owned all documents from their presidencies, including any national defense information.
There's never been any suggestion that their holding onto such documents violated the Espionage Act before 1978.
Former presidents own all documents from their presidencies, including any national defense information.
There's never been any suggestion that they're holding on to such documents violated the Espionage Act.
Congress has been very, very clear that the act that applies to presidents and former presidents is a Presidential Records Act.
The act that applies to everyone else is the Espionage Act.
Which has different requirements, said Jesse Binal, a lawyer who represented Trump in another matter.
Mike Davis of the conservative Article 3 project voiced a similar opinion.
Even if a president declassifies his presidential records and takes them when he leaves office, he can still get charged under the Espionage Act.
Promise that theory won't fly with the Supreme Court, he said.
Criminal intent.
Much of the indictment rests on the allegation that Trump kept national defense documents willfully with criminal intent.
Yet the document falls short in providing evidence for such intent.
On May 11, 2022, The Department of Justice obtained a subpoena compelling Trump to turn over all documents with classification markings, including electronic.
One of the key claims is that Trump instructed NADA to move boxes of documents around before his lawyer came to search the boxes for documents in response to the subpoena.
NADA allegedly moved 64 boxes Out of a storage room where Trump kept items and documents from his presidency and moved them to Trump's residence at the resort.
Nauta then moved back 30 boxes shortly before Trump's then-lawyer, Evan Corcoran, searched the storage room for the subpoenaed documents, according to the indictment, which refers to security camera footage obtained from Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort via a subpoena.
The indictment alleges that the boxes were moved to hide responsive documents from Corcoran.
It presents a text message in which, not as sad, Trump told him to put some boxes in his room.
There's no word of whether Trump, in fact, went through the boxes, and if so, what he was looking for.
On August 8, 2022, when the FBI raided Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in West Palm Beach, 102 documents with classified markings were found in the storage room and in Trump's office.
Just mentioned, by the way, as Tucker observed, even internal memos about Labor Day are classified in Washington, D.C.
Over a billion documents are classified.
You think they have serious content that deserves some kind of classification?
Obviously not.
The vast majority is just a paranoia practice of Washington to keep everything secret from the American people.
Continuing.
Some lawyers have argued that Trump should have challenged a subpoena in court because it was too broad.
It's likely that Trump had many documents with classification markings that have been declassified.
Reams of such documents are available online.
These are documents with classification markings but have been declassified.
Reams of such documents are available online.
You begin to get the idea, by the way, of how the Democrats are contriving, fabricating, desperate to find any basis whatsoever, any shred of evidence, no matter how obscure or actually legally meaningless it might be to smear Trump.
So you're to take him out so you won't even have the chance to vote for him exactly as Topker nailed it.
Also continuing, the subpoena mentioned nothing about national defense information which doesn't need to bear classification markings.
The indictment states, I think that means that There can be national defense information doesn't have to have classification margin, but it's still national defense information.
The indictment state that Trump's alleged climb of willfully retaining 31 specific national defense related documents started on January 21st, 2021, after he allegedly caused boxes of material from his term to be shipped to Mar-a-Lago.
I mean, this is a day after.
Biden assumes office.
Details about moving the boxes to Mar-a-Lago remain unclear.
Newsweek reported that 27 boxes were shipped to Trump's home by accident.
Trump's former lawyer, Timothy Parlatore, said the documents were moved by the General Service Administration.
The indictment doesn't explain how Trump was supposed to know of these specific documents.
There's no evidence of any criminal intent on Trump's part to take and keep these documents.
There are serious, serious legal infirmities in the arguments that they're using, Scarf said.
And I add, but of course, they don't actually have anything legitimate or bona fide on Donald Trump.
My God, after Russiagate, which we now know was manufactured by Hillary and paid for by We're campaigning the DNC.
Two unwarranted impeachment efforts.
All kinds of other nonsense, including the raid at Mar-a-Lago, which appears to have been improper on multiple grounds.
The rape trial and these other legal nonsense trials in New York.
The Democrats are out to get Trump.
They're out to get Trump.
And remember, I mean, that absurd rape thing where a woman couldn't even remember the year she was raped?
Does anybody believe that?
2005, 2006, she can't remember the year she was raped?
Or was it 95 or 96?
A woman who's been raped not only remembers the year, the month, the day, the hour, the minute she was raped.
I mean, this is so absurd it should have been tossed on its face.
The woman's a lunatic!
And by the way, did you know she has a book where she claims to have been raped by multiple prominent figures?
I mean, this is a fantasist.
This is someone completely deluded.
No serious prosecutor would have ever brought such a case unless they did so willfully, meaning with criminal intent, which, of course, was a smear of Trump.
I mean, the Democrats are petrified of Donald Trump from top to bottom.
And many on the other side witnessed Dick Cheney.
Tucker mentioned Paul Ryan.
Both parties are into the war, a constant war, that that's a basis for the American economy to keep blocking General Dynamics, Raytheon, Boeing, in business with lab huts.
They don't care what war is going on.
They don't care who's in the right.
They don't have a side.
They just want to sell weapons and make money, big bucks, at your and my expense.
I think Tucker has done us a profound service by making those observations.
That's exactly when Trump began to alarm and incur the wrath of the establishment in the American government.
When he called out the Iraq War as being based on lies.
And remember Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby were deep into this.
I mean, remember the lies outing a. Covert CIA agent.
Was running the most important covert program in American intelligence to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East was outed by.
Scooter Libby at Cheney's Direction, it appears, to punish her husband for saying that when he went to Niger to look for evidence, a yellow cake being sold to Saddam Hussein, he couldn't find any.
There was no evidence.
It wasn't true.
It was fake.
Dick Cheney, of all people, does not like to be embarrassed.
Dick Cheney, of all people, doesn't like to be called out.
He's a monster!
If you want to learn more about him, read this book about the Monarch Program and his abuse of young girls.
I mean, it's just stunning, stunning, stunning, the degree of corruption.
And because so much of it is tied into pedophilia, Pizzagate, all that, this is another reason why they go after Or try to trivialize or minimize anyone who's exposing what's going on.
Transformation of America.
The trance.
C.E.
Turning America into a trance.
Formation of America.
Read about Dick Cheney and a lot of other people.
You're going to be horrified.
Well, I wanted to break in and let you know we've had Mike here for a few minutes if you didn't know.
OK, I'll bring him in.
I'll bring him in at the top of the hour.
OK.
If the espionage charges will withstand judicial scrutiny, the additional obstruction charges shouldn't stand on their own, he argued.
There's a longstanding DOJ practice that you don't indict for obstruction.
Or really any process-related crime, unless there's underlying criminality, Chef said.
So if the DOJ launches an investigation into something, somebody allegedly obstructs that investigation, but it turns out the investigation itself wasn't well-founded, that typically won't result in an indictment.
When it comes to investigations involving Trump, however, prosecutors have commonly brought process crime charges alone.
Such as in the case of Trump's former national security advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, and his 2016 presidential campaign advisor, George Papadopoulos.
I think in this case, especially, you're seeing this weaponization of process crimes that the FBI has begun to use, where they will, under some flimsy or circumstantial premise, Open an investigation on somebody for something and then during the course, hope they can bring charges that are process crimes.
Said former FBI agent and whistleblower Steve Friend.
The Clinton Treatment.
There are indications that Trump is expected to be able to deal with the government similarly to Clinton's wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
In a CNN town hall earlier this year, Trump said, based on the Presidential Records Act, he was allowed to negotiate with the archives on what he could and couldn't keep his personal archives.
Archives has rejected such an interpretation, but Trump was likely referring to the 2012 Clinton case.
The indictment also indicates Trump questioned his lawyers on whether he could handle the subpoenas similarly to how Hillary did in 2015, when her lawyers infamously sorted through her emails from the State Department tenure, had about half of them deleted, claiming they weren't work-related.
The FBI later found thousands of work-related emails were missing.
I think something like 33,000?
Would it be better if we just told them we don't have anything here?
Trump allegedly asked and recounted the Hillary episode multiple times.
Nelson, those were absolutely valid legal questions for Trump to raise.
You're saying, well, wait a second.
If legally Hillary's lawyers were able to do this and it worked, why can't we do it the same time?
Prosecutorial misconduct.
The case has been brought by Jack Smith, a former federal prosecutor appointed special counsel by Merrick Garland on November 18, 2022.
Smith has been criticized by Republicans for allowing his prosecutors to go rogue, both in this case and in his prior role as head of the DOJ's Public Integrity Section.
I now recall how a decade ago, Prosecutors under Smith violated a defendant's constitutional rights before a grand jury, leading the court to dismiss charges against the defendant.
In the same case, prosecutors seized his client's phone and failed to use a filter team to prevent the investigation from seeing Bernal's privileged communication with his client.
In the Trump case, Smith failed to get a judicial order to pierce Trump's client attorney privilege.
That issue could be re-litigated, Bunnell suggested.
I think you're going to see motion to suppress evidence based on the violation of attorney-client privilege.
Trump lawyers may also seek to remove from trial evidence obtained during the Mar-a-Lago raid on the ground the search warrant was overbrought, according to William Shibley, a former federal prosecutor.
We now represent many charged in relation to the January 6th protest and riot.
The issue is a failure to describe with particularity the items to be seized.
Simply broke.
Bonnell also predicted attempts to have the case tossed for prosecutorial misconduct.
Parlator told the media he saw multiple incidents of such misconduct when he voluntarily sat down for questioning before a grand jury.
One of the prosecutors accused him of refusing to answer a question that pertained to privileged attorney-client relations, and Berlantori had to remind the juries he wasn't refusing, but was barred by ethical rules from answering.
There have also been reports that prosecutors implied to the attorney for Nata that his application for jobship in Washington could be tied to his client's willingness to cooperate.
That's another clear example of prosecutorial misconduct, but all said arguing that Garland's appointment of Smith betrayed his bias.
Personnel is always policy.
Merrick Garland knew exactly what he was getting when he appointed Jack Smith, the special counsel.
He appointed a zealot.
He appointed a Trump hater.
He appointed somebody he knew was going to stop at nothing to go after and get Trump.
Glad to say we got Mike Sparks here right after this break.
Music You're listening to Revolution Radio at Freedom Slips.
We'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Oh!
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do!
and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, You burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio.
Revolution Radio.
Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths, and because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
Join Dr. OTT every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
Eastern, and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, I'm very pleased to be joined today by Mike Sparks, who has an extensive background in the military, both the U.S. Army.
Army and U.S.
Marine Corps.
He has had a role in advising the Department of Defense about the type of equipment that's most appropriate for a certain type of combat situation and explained that going into Iraq, that if they used wheeled vehicles, there were going to be a whole lot of improvised explosive devices, a lot of Military were going to lose arms and legs that they had to use track vehicles.
And he was overridden by a general who wanted to have servicemen lose their arms and legs so they could pursue the development of robotics.
It's just grotesque.
Mike, you have a pretty good handle on what's going on here.
I'm just delighted to have you back on the air.
Your thoughts, my friend, pick up wherever you like.
Yeah, it's a horrible situation.
Before I go into this specific situation, which is probably the most significant event that's happened in our nation since, believe it or not, the Kennedy assassination, the verification that we have human anti-gravity craft has been established in the public two days ago by the Herrera testimony.
So usually I hang out in the world of low technology, which is If you have low ground pressure with track vehicles, you can avoid roads and trails and landmines, which are an old idea.
They try to cover it up by calling them IEDs to make it sound like it's a new threat.
When we've had landmines since the Civil War, we've had huge landmines went off in the Civil War.
So it's to cover their ass that they make up these new buzzwords.
But the situation has not been Where I've been negligent and not being aware of what high technology military developments have been going on.
In fact, I get criticized for doing that.
No one wants to hear about flying saucers.
So I made my own new buzzword called anti-gravity crap.
So that way people know exactly what I'm saying, what you're saying, right?
And you're not saying the origin.
You've got another guy, Richard Dolan.
I want to just like give him a fist sandwich.
Trying to say that they're alien reversed.
You don't know that they're alien.
If you see a unidentified flying object, it's unidentified flying object.
That means all you could see is it looks like some kind of tangible physical object that is hovering, which means it doesn't need to move forward in the air to create air pressure differential lift, okay?
Or it doesn't, it's not buoyant to, um, Float, necessarily, like a lighter-than-air blimp, okay?
So, you say what you see, and nothing more.
And that is, it's an anti-gravity craft.
It's not being held by gravity.
Then you'd have to decide what causes it.
And so, after years of me describing this history, that anti-gravity craft became prevalent after World War II, And going back to possible characters who could have had these craft, you have to go to the Nazi flying saucer dating back to 1942.
Now you can go to all UFO sightings throughout history, and that is what people will try to do to make a case for extraterrestrials, but they're also ignoring throughout history we've had elves, gremlins, and demons.
You've had Fairies, you've had supernatural evil beings masquerading as other things, gnomes and whatnot.
So the two possibilities for UFOs are human or some kind of supernatural entity.
Okay, now the natural entity would be the extraterrestrial, so the idea is a created being.
Okay, now obviously Since we've had our influx, and no one wants to face this, Jim, so I'm very angry that people don't want to face this.
The fact is, there has been thousands of UFO sightings since World War II.
That demands some kind of explanation.
Okay?
That explanation has to be in that wire diagram of either, you know, extraterrestrials, demons, or humans.
Okay?
The evidence is that they're humans because they're emitting slag, and they're doing sightings, you know, over the Boeing plant where the B-47 nuclear bomber is being made, or over Roswell, New Mexico, at the Air Force, Air, Air, Air, Army Air Force Base, then became Air Force Base, where the B-29s were for the 519s that got the bombs in Japan.
They've got a flying saucer over Fort Knox, Kentucky, where the gold is.
The Nazis are notorious for loving gold.
The conclusion is, if you look at all the facts from the T-46 that was shot down over Mount Rainier, that was being hunted by Kenneth Arnold, who, to me, seems to be a lieutenant colonel from the OSS, his 20mm cannon fire is something the Germans did.
Mostly in World War II.
We only had one plane that had a 20mm cannon, P-38.
We were .50 caliber people.
So, it is clear that the vehicle was shot down by an anti-gravity Nazi flying saucer.
And all of this hoopla over flying saucers, starting with the Kenneth Arnold incident, blaming E.T.
is cover story.
The very two first officers in the U.S.
Air Force, it's fixed in history, were two guys trying to move that slag to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and that slag that we emitted out of the human anti-gravity Nazi flying saucer caused their P-25 To malfunction, catch on fire, they manned the plane, and the air crewman in the back, enlisted guys bailed out, and the two officers died.
That means the day the U.S.
Air Force was born, the two first people that died were messing around with Nazi anti-gravity craft.
And guess who was there in that area at the FBI office?
Guy Bannister.
Yes, the guy that was involved in the Kennedy assassination.
The X-Files.
is all derived from the FBI looking into flying saucers and trying to cover it up by blaming it on E.T.
using reverse psychology.
Oh, it's not flying saucers.
It's not alien.
Oh, no, no.
No, they're not alien.
There are no alien beings.
Send people in black suits to harass people, the men in black thing.
This is all U.S.
Air Force, U.S.
military, psychological warfare dating back to 1947 is to blame Everything on E.T.
All UFO sightings on E.T.
Because what are they hiding?
Well, from 1947 to 1953, they're hiding that we didn't end World War II properly.
Over 250,000 Nazis escaped to Argentina and Antarctica.
Supposedly, the legend is that Base 211 in Antarctica didn't have enough people there To generate enough group herd immunity.
They were getting sick, so they moved back to Argentina.
So that's the word.
Back in Argentina, there's over 3 million people who are German in Argentina, and it's a well-known secret they're Nazis.
They're living above ground, then they live below ground.
And then the rumor there is from Henry Stevens' book, Dark Star, the baby boomers, the Nazi boomers, The second generation just didn't want to play the game anymore.
They didn't want to fly the anti-gravity craft anymore.
There's a health risk.
If you fly these things for too much, you know, our consultations kind of seem to think 100 hours in these anti-gravity craft, you lose 10 years of your life.
And the new generation of Nazis down there in Argentina just said, no, we just want to live life of Coca-Cola and blue jeans.
So the idea there is that the Nazi flying saucers in Argentina are collecting dust.
But they could be found, to prove this point.
Now I said 1954.
In 1952, there was a show of force over Washington, D.C.
Ten flying saucers flew over there, telling President Truman, who was a stooge of the Rockefeller Illuminati, to back off.
You back off trying to destroy the German base 211 in Antarctica.
I know this is startling stuff to hear, Jim, but I'm not holding any punches anymore, okay?
So he did, he backed off, and we went on our own crash program to develop our own human anti-gravity craft.
Thinking from William Lynn, who wrote a book called Pentagon Alien, so I talked to, personally, is that around 1953, seven years after, you know, 1946, 47, we, the United States of America, had our own anti-gravity craft.
Therefore, most of the sightings of UFOs take place in the United States.
It is my professional guesstimation that 75% of all UFO sightings are human, anti-gravity craft.
The other 25% are demonic.
You've had UFOs connected to the occult all along with Ruth Payne and the Nine.
You can talk to Peter Lavenda and read his books, that they would use the occult to conjure up flying saucers.
The Germans were inspired initially by the occult with Maria Orsic, okay?
The real society.
So the ideas themselves are coming from demons.
This crap that they're trying to pin it on aliens is a cover story.
It's always been demonic, even if it was to get technological insights.
It's been demonic.
And it doesn't make sense.
It's not that big of a deal.
If you're a supernatural being, which I have talked to during deliverance ministry, I've dealt with demon-possessed people.
So I've actually talked to, Jim, non-human intelligence.
So don't give me this crap that it's such a big damn deal.
It's not.
If you're living forever, of course you're going to have better knowledge of things.
Of course you're going to be able to mimic, you know, dear departed loved ones.
When I was dealing with the demon possessed people, they were able to mimic the person that they were living in, to the voice and everything.
So they could definitely mimic their dearly departed loved ones.
So this ghost thing is again, demonic.
So, you know, a few days ago, we had giants appear and terrorize, guess where?
Las Vegas, Nevada.
There's a correlation between people who are, sorry, ungodly people and demonic terrorism of them, whether it be demon possession, oppression, or creatures and UFOs fucking with them, okay?
So, a couple days ago, we had 10-foot giants appear in somebody's backyard in Las Vegas, terrorizing those people.
Now, the point of this Herrera incident
In Indonesia is so important because it shows without doubt at a public inquest basically what Greer was doing he came forward with compelling testimony on under oath that he saw an anti-gravity craft loading weapons in pelican case containers and bodies into an anti-gravity craft that was on the ground
Near this flood to tsunami earthquake area.
And when he took his fire team, I don't think he was in charge, he was one of the fire team members.
Six man team and fire team's four.
So the fire team plus, they went on foot to confront the soldiers that were there loading the anti-gravity craft.
They basically fucked him.
They basically said, you had no right to be here.
We're going to kill you.
They disarmed them, took their weapons away, took their ammunition away, which is a big embarrassment.
You know, Jim is a Marine.
So it's stuck in his mind for 14 years.
This took place in 2009.
That the special forces guys had ACOG, which is Advanced Combat Optical Gun Sight, which I helped create, Jim.
That's clearly human, all right?
Created by the Trijicon Corporation.
I talked to the guy before he died and got them to make the ACOG so that it would have an ability to work with sunlight and not be totally dependent on the tritium insert, which can go bad after 10 years.
So here, my own night reflex site is on the M4 carbines Or rifles, he called them M4A4s.
Anyway, that these bad guys were having.
And so, after they loaded the anti-gravity crap, they gave them their rifles back, G9s, or carbines, whatever.
And they went back to their base, which was, in this case, a sea base on a ship, then later to Camp Hanson, Okinawa.
A lieutenant colonel there, with no nameplate, now come on, Who wears a class A uniform without a nameplate, okay?
Unless you're evil and you don't want them to know your last name.
He told him to shut the fuck up, never talk about this, and sign a T, a secure compartmentaletic secret non-disclosure agreement, which he did.
And so he's been bothered by this for years because, you know, you take a rifle from a Marine, that's a big emasculation.
Obviously, he was there and there was no officer with him.
So, so much for that strategic corporal bullshit.
Those guys were ordered around by these special forces guys.
Eight of them, is what he said.
And there were six of them.
And so, they confronted the Marines.
And, fortunately, the Marines weren't killed.
But they did have their video footage taken, because they went drinking together.
So, while they went drinking together, The Spooks, we don't know who they were, went to their foot lockers, opened them up, took his Panasonic video camera, and took the five cell phones from his other buddy.
So now you get a situation of reality fraud, Jim.
You and I have talked about this for years.
The United States of America is such a large country, 3,000 miles wide, 2,000 miles deep.
We don't have the ability to take a day off from work, go to the state courthouse and say, look, I don't like what's going on here.
Do something about it.
And then your state senators would do something about it because they're temporarily appointed.
That was destroyed.
That connectivity between the we the people and they the government in Washington, D.C.
was destroyed in the 17th Amendment.
Right now, if you want to have your day heard, you've got to go to Washington, D.C., and that's what these three whistleblowers did.
For Greer, they had to travel a long distance to go to a national forum to get their, you know, public inquest.
But our system is completely crap.
You were talking earlier about all these legal dirty tricks.
That's all John Adams Freemasonic crap.
The United States Constitution was created by Freemasons by lawyers, for lawyers, so they can be completely employed forever.
I think the country's fucked.
It's not a very good country.
The Constitution's not a very good document.
It's a document where we just argue like a bunch of lawyers.
Our nation needs to be run by kinetic people.
If I was in charge, we would get rid of the Constitution, rewrite it so it has a moral code, and it would have the professional classes of our country should put forward their presidential candidates.
You know, around 12.
You know, doctors, lawyers, No.
Mostly engineers, firemen, military people.
We'd have kinetic people offering their candidate to be President of the United States like they do in China.
The reason why China is so effective is they got engineers running the country.
Not lawyers.
Lawyers are bullshit.
Okay?
This is all bullshit.
People aren't getting things done kinetically.
And unfortunately, while they've been telling us, you sheeple, don't worry about things.
Don't need to be direct involved.
1945, that was a mistake.
We're not going to do this again.
Microbureaucracies are going to handle every national problem.
You just go to sleep and just make babies.
Or die.
Better.
You know, we don't want you around.
That's what Illuminati doesn't want people.
We think the planet's overpopulated.
We want to get rid of 7.5 billion.
But the point is, these microbureaucracies that run every aspect of our life have Mandarin Helm supremacy.
Meaning, I paid the dues.
I went to this school to become a Mandarin and to become a G-man.
I run the country.
I'm in charge.
It's my turn to be in charge, not you.
You shut the fuck up and let me run the country.
And that's what's happening right now.
The country is headed towards World War III with Russia because these micro-bureaucracies run the country.
Not we the people.
We are not macro, directly involved in the national affairs of our country anymore.
Like I said, with the severing of the states from the federal government with the 17th Amendment, the senators are supposed to be there temporarily, not for six years, floated out there and controlled by special interests, i.e.
the pedophile Illuminati.
No.
They don't want the average person being involved.
The average person needs to shut up and just be a consumer.
So this is why we're in the mess we're in.
But there is good news in this by this guy Herrera going forward and showing without a doubt that there are human anti-gravity crafts.
This means that if they try to do a fake alien invasion, we will have in the back of our mind, wait a minute, how do we know that these are actually alien flying saucers?
We have our own.
We've had our own since 1953.
See, Jim?
This is a very good thing.
This is why it's so damn important.
Why I'm on your show.
Why am I making this point?
That we need to wake up the American sheeple and realize we have flying saucers.
Mike, you covered a whole lot of stuff I didn't anticipate coming, but I wanted you to have a platform to present what you think is most important.
Basically, what you're suggesting is, if the Biden admin now tries to intimidate the American people, say, to impose martial law because of a purported alien invasion, That there be every reason to believe it was in fact manufactured that the.
And I gravity craft that would be involved in fabricating this alien invasion or in fact human in origin not alien not extraterrestrial.
And that therefore we should be.
Aware in advance that they might try to pull such a stunt, which, you know, it may sound far-fetched, but honestly, Mike, at this point in time, they're so desperate about and worried about losing control because so much of the public is becoming aware and awake that all this is going on is ridiculous manufactured Happy horseshit to manipulate public opinion.
I think more and more are becoming aware.
I wouldn't put anything past this Biden admin and who the hell knows who's really running it.
We know it's not Joe, who appears to have died in 2017.
Some actor wearing a facemask manipulated by Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, George Soros.
Who knows behind, you know, the mask, but it's all disgusting beyond belief.
Is that basically the bottom line of what you're sharing with us here today, Mike?
Yes, it is.
That's an excellent summary, Jim.
And you brought up another reality that people don't want to believe, which is that they can make latex masks that are so good, you won't even know that that person is fake.
And even if you're, like, within the personal, you know, zone of, we'll say, one feet around your body.
They're so good, these disguises you can't even tell.
Again, the American people think that the life is a he-hawk.
They think it's a TV show of people with a straw in their mouth.
We're living in 2023.
People can be hypnotized against their will to murder other people.
We have anti-gravity crap.
We can have disguises put on people and they look legit all the way up close.
The American people need to wake up where James Bond is real.
That's why I wrote the damn book, is to remind people this is all not fantasy.
Ian Fleming wrote those books to remind people that this is going to be used already in a simple fashion.
It's only going to get worse.
And so we have a problem in our country of reality fraud.
Before television, we had to prove everything in court.
I see several developments converging in a very unhappy scenario.
I mean, the woke military, between the VACs and putting trannies in the military and all that, they really destroyed the American military, which I believe they're now going to repopulate with illegals.
They're going to bring them in.
They're advertising a path past citizenship.
Where the illegals are going to be perfectly willing to fire on the American people.
They're not going to have any hesitation.
That's one element I see.
Another element is the January 6th business.
I'm convinced that was done to promote the concept of domestic terrorists.
Look at some of the parties they want to qualify as domestic terrorists.
They want to include militias.
Proud boys, oath keepers, Trump supporters, mega voters, even moms who are opposed to, you know, converting their kids, having them change their gender and all that stuff.
These are all now a big category of domestic terrorists.
Now, I think, Mike, your point about declaring martial law is absolutely crucial.
Absolutely crucial.
Right, and I sent you some stuff yesterday.
Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, I want to elaborate on this.
Mike, Mike, the point I'm making is once they declare martial law, they can round up all the domestic terrorists and shoot them.
I mean, to be subject to a summary execution, you know, under martial law, these are domestic terrorists.
They're going to have that right.
I encourage everyone to watch this film from 1991 called The Czechist about what happened in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution.
Millions of citizens who had done nothing wrong were rounded up and shot, the equivalent of domestic terrorists today.
We'll be right back with Mike Spark.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomsubstance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Radio, radio, radio, radio.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSledge.com, the people station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
And Mike, of course, we know how the government has purchased $4 billion in military weapons by agencies that aren't related to law enforcement we know how the government has purchased $4 billion in military weapons by Those are caches for the militants coming across the border and invading our nation.
And they've been given cell phones.
I have a solution.
to tell them where to find the weapons.
I think this is a major threat.
I think the elements you're talking about combined with what I'm talking about to represent a major move to impose martial law and eliminate, literally physically eliminate, the political opposition, just as the Bolsheviks did in Russia following the revolution just as the Bolsheviks did in Russia following the revolution there.
I have a solution.
I have a way to burst that bubble.
The FBI regulations of the United States Code of Federal Regulations 28, Section 0.85 says, The unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in a fervor of political or social objective.
That's the definition of terrorism by the FBI.
It says the unlawful use of force and violence Against persons or property.
A mom that doesn't want their child gender mutilated isn't using unlawful force.
All of those people are not using unlawful force.
So what we should do is throw it right back in their face and have signs or t-shirts made saying, I'm not using unlawful force or violence against anyone.
That's what we need to do, is play their little John Adams game, and poke their little bullshit terrorism term, and say, according to terrorism, I have to use unlawful force to be called a terrorist, I have to use it.
But Mike, all these legal niceties don't matter once they've declared martial law, and you're really suggesting a way they could justify it?
Like an Operation Blue Beam 2.
I mean, they could use holograms as well, but if you say that we have bona fide anti-gravity craft, obviously that'd be pretty convincing for people who have no idea that it's out there.
And by the way, anyone who'd like to call in to talk to Mike or me about these rather crucial issues is welcome.
540-352-4452. 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
I mean, Mike, think about you're talking about using, you know, laws to defeat a lawless government.
But that's not going to have any impact at all.
Yeah, but Jim, you've got to look, you've got to look how to win this fight.
You've got to use every weapon at our disposal.
First thing we have to do is not let them characterize us as terrorists, because according to their own fucking law, it says you have to use force or violence.
Mike, you gotta drop the F-bombs, okay?
Got it, got it, got it.
I understand you can't handle that.
I understand that this country can't handle that, but I understand that we must fight on every level and not give them the ground of calling us terrorists.
We can do that now.
But Mike, they're already calling us terrorists.
That's what January 6th is all about.
We're not fighting back properly.
If we're fighting back properly, we'd have t-shirts and posters and signs and we'd be saying stop calling people that haven't used unlawful force or violence terrorists.
That should be our legal fight.
We should be fighting that now before we go to guns.
That's what I'm saying.
We can talk about guns later.
You don't give the enemy a legal precedent excuse.
They're manufacturing it now.
I mean, the idea of seeking to combat it is, of course, the right idea, but who's going to do it?
I mean, everyone's all in against Trump.
Trump, to me, is the one guy who could lead this fight, that he's got the national support from enough of us.
And, you know, the overwhelming majority of NRA members and gun-owning Americans are sympathetic to and supportive of Trump.
I know lawyers that have public voices, Judge Napolitano, the lady on Fox.
You just contact those people and say, you know what you could do for us right now?
Stop them calling people that haven't used unlawful force or violence terrorists.
How do we do it?
How would I do that?
I'll email them.
I'll email them.
I'll email them after this interview is over with.
I'm just telling you that, you know, to create a strategy to win, we've got to attack from all angles, psychological and kinetic.
Okay.
Listen, we got a regular caller joining the conversation.
Paul, Paul, Paul, and I'll get back to you as soon as I can.
Thanks.
I thought we had him on the line.
Record your message.
Yeah, Paul, you're welcome to call in, Paul.
Please do call in.
540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
The idea of counteracting the domestic terrorist designation is a good one, Mike.
- Kill it, kill it, kill it, kill it.
Yeah, Paul, you're welcome to call in, Paul.
Please do call in, 540-352-4452, 540-352-4452.
The idea of counteracting the domestic terrorist designation is a good one, Mike.
Of course, I agree with that completely.
You would think it would be happening with outstanding organizations, say, like a judicial watch Alan Dershowitz ought to be speaking out against it and a whole host of others.
I think we may have Paul here now.
Paul, Paul, join the conversation.
Paul.
Yeah.
Oh, my God.
Best show ever.
You are really taking the raw deal to the lunatic fringe, Jim.
And I got to say, I love it.
So I'll have your guests know that I pray every night in front of my shrine to Hitler in front of my swastika wallpaper for the tall Nazis from Antarctica and Argentina to come here and take over.
God, I can't wait till it happens.
I told you that they are not doing that anymore.
The baby boomers of theirs are not interested in advancing the Fourth Reich.
They want t-shirts and blue jeans.
Oh, but I wish they were, boy, I tell you.
I wish they were.
What do you mean?
You've got to believe Hitler was right.
You know, they want to see a fascist kind of country, so we have some kind of stoical framework.
And the problem is, it's immoral.
Nothing wrong with being hardworking and stoical, but you've got to be moral.
The Nazis are not moral.
That's their problem.
I mean, they got all kinds of cool shit that people like, but why do you have to be a snob?
Problem is, it goes to their head.
They say, I work harder than you.
You type B personality people, you're undermentioned, let's kill you.
Or their favorite, you know, scapegoats, the Jews.
Just work hard and make other people work hard, too.
There's nothing wrong with that.
But why do you have to be a snob?
The facts are that there are a bunch of flying saucers that happened at the end of World War II.
You'll have to give some kind of acknowledgement that they came from somebody, the flying saucers.
You don't, people don't want to believe it, but you know, there's thousands of sightings.
Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike, let, let Paul get a word in edgewise.
It's usually around Paul.
Go ahead, Paul.
Yeah, so there's a lot of interesting things swirling around here.
So there's elements of what I would probably call accuracy and truth with elements of rampant speculation as well as misinformation.
So the first thing I'll say is, you know, you're buying the Jewish propaganda lie about how terrible and mean the Nazis were.
Okay.
And I think, uh, you know, you're talking to somebody here, Jim Fetzer, who's done research on the lie of the Holocaust in the internment camps.
I didn't talk about the Holocaust.
I did not talk about the Holocaust.
I'm talking about- Mike!
Mike!
Now, let's talk about Britney Spears.
Come on, this is changing the subject.
I'm talking about flying objects.
Who created them?
Mike.
Don't care about the holocaust.
Mike, this is my call.
This is not your call.
I gave you unlimited opportunity to present your view.
I want... Well, I'm not going to stand quiet to somebody using their little straw man tactics.
Mike!
Mike!
Shut up!
Scarecrow tactics.
Mike!
God damn it!
I was not dressed in... Mike, you and your little Jew hate thing!
Mike!
Mike, now run!
You fucking faggot!
You should shut the fuck up!
You stick to the subject!
I came on here to talk about anti-gravity crap!
Shut up!
I'll fucking talk when you stop talking!
Shut the fuck up!
You shut the fuck up and you talk about anti-gravity crap!
I don't want to hear about your little holocaust whining!
You just talk about the Holocaust on a Holocaust show!
You talk about that when there's a show on it!
You talk about it when it's the subject matter!
Right now, we're not talking about the Holocaust!
Mitchell, I'm sorry!
I'm sorry!
No, no!
You just try to cater to the Jew-hater people!
Talk about the Holocaust on another show, dude!
No, you shut up!
You shut up!
You shut up!
You get your own show!
You get your own show and you talk about the Holocaust!
You schedule a show and you can have this guy come on and talk about the Holocaust all you want!
Do we need any more proof that this guy is a liar?
No, no, the proof is that you are a little worm that comes in here and you want to do your little Holocaust denial thing.
This guy got triggered by a word that I was trying to basically use to illustrate this idea he's talking about how immoral the Nazis were, how immoral the Germans were, how they were snobs.
I just used a single word and he got completely triggered, okay?
Paul, I know.
Paul, listen, I know.
I have had him dropped.
This is just crazy.
Listen, Paul, you were being very reasonable.
You were sorting things out.
You said there was a real mix here.
I could not have agreed more.
There's a real mix there.
Some truth, some fiction, some facts, some speculation.
I liked what you were doing.
And the fact that Mike went flying off the handle is beyond me.
I mean, go ahead, Paul.
The floor is yours.
We got Brian standing by.
We'll bring him in, too, to complete our conversation.
Yeah, yeah.
I'm anxious to hear Brian.
I've really grown to like his calls and his insights.
OK, well, let's bring in Brian to take a deep breath here.
Brian, go ahead.
Join the conversation with Paul and me.
Brian.
Well, one thing that I want to point out is I'm the one that does that Kundalini Yoga Chakra Dhyana, and you fill up with quantum mechanical energy, and your third eye works, and you start seeing your past lives.
And one of the things I saw in my past lives is I was a Nazi wife.
My husband was a Nazi.
I saw my death.
I saw American GIs shoot me, okay?
And, um, that I know from that I start getting dreams that I was actually bisexual in that lifetime and my lover was this Malia Olsik, okay?
So she was, when he talked about the Thule Society and the Vrattles Society, the Thule Society was a delight.
And the dark do like they do with everything they take things over they took it over and then it became evil.
She was actually a Pleiadian that she channeled how to build that flying saucer down from the Pleiadians and.
You know, they dropped everything when it went dark.
When the evil took over the National Socialists, then the Pleiadians dropped everything.
But, you know, that's what they do with everything.
The Nazi Party in World War II under Hitler was good.
They were doing good things.
You know, like anything the dark do, whether it's the movement Christ had or anything else, they take it over from inside and they ruin it.
Just like today when you look at what's going on with the Kraken and the Azov battalion in Ukraine, it's nothing like what it was under Hitler.
So that's what I'd like to say.
Paul, pick it up.
I'm open to your thoughts.
So that was some fun, too, with the past lives and all that.
So, you know, listen, I mean, I did start out with some humor, obviously, to kind of maybe provoke him, to be honest with you.
I kind of knew he was subject to being triggered.
I had no intention to trigger him with the word Holocaust, OK?
I really did not.
Paul, I didn't think for a second you were trying to trigger him with the word holocaust.
I did not think so.
I was astonished by his response.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Right.
But he seemed to be, you know, mixing in this mixture that he brought, you know, he did seem to be fairly anti-German or anti-Nazi.
And just when I hear the word, you know, immoral mixed in with Then as compared to today, you know, we obviously know what the Jews are trying to do is completely immoral, right?
So there's not going to be any argument for most people that understand the powers that be.
We all know that it's not the Nazis that are running this world, and it's not the Nazis that are running this country into the ground.
Okay.
So I just, I thought I would kind of just throw that in the mix, but it is an interesting, shall we say, stew that you have, because I don't discount these so-called anti-gravitic crap.
Which, by the way, it's sort of a misnomer because it's electromagnetism.
I have actually some papers I purchased years ago at a seminar.
It's called The Patents of T Townsend Brown, and maybe Brian's heard of T Townsend Brown, but he was actually levitating sandwiched metal alloys around a pole.
Basically, he took a metal disc and he tied him to a metal pole, like on a tether, and just using electrical current, He was levitating these sandwich metal discs back in the late 20s and the early 30s.
So this electromagnetic technology has been around for a long time, and essentially I used to go to a lot of these UFO conventions.
They're very interesting, but I would typically discount about half of what I heard or saw, but the rest of it I was quite open to.
And multiple researchers have said that the electro-gravitic, that's what they called it, electro-gravitic research, was fairly mainstream until probably the early 50s.
And then it all went dark.
And there was major companies, General Dynamics, General Electric, and some of these companies were doing research in this.
So I have, I have no doubt that there's manmade craft by us, as well as other people.
And to what extent there's alien involvement, or even, you know, my Catholic friend used to always talk about demons.
You know, to be honest, Jim, I think we're just beginning to understand this crazy world we live in, and I don't I don't discount any of it.
Yeah, well.
I mean, he said a lot.
He covered a huge amount of territory.
I had no idea all this was coming.
I thought your response was very appropriate and reasonable, and I was rather taken aback, even flabbergasted when Mike flew off the handle like that.
I mean, you know.
He's a very smart guy.
He's done a lot of good stuff in the past.
I just was trying to let him know I want all points of view and that you were entitled to say your beast, as he was entitled to say his, and he had said his, and I wanted you to say yours.
Brian, did you want to add anything further yourself?
I did.
There was an excellent article on veterans today.
There was a time I stopped, you know, reading their articles when Gordon Duff said we had to get the VAX.
I mean, that did it for a long time, but that's gone now.
So I picked it back up.
But Gordon Duff had an excellent article on anti-gravity.
And how, uh, what they, what they do to make it work is these flying saucers run a microwave, uh, uh, energy on the outside of the hall and it gives it buoyancy.
And it went into detail and it was, it was excellent because it was around the time that, uh, they had those articles on, on the, the nuclear aspect of 9-11.
And so I always kind of remember that, that that was there.
And yeah, the Bell, you could even buy a model of the German flying saucer if you, you know, get online.
There was a company called Squadron that had a model of it.
They actually had the thing functioning.
When was this?
When was this you could get a model?
Oh, you can get it online.
Yeah, you can buy a model of the German, I think it's, I'm trying to remember the name of it.
It was through Squadron Shop.
If you punch in online, you know, Squadron Shop, they're out of business now.
And German Flying Saucer, I'm sure it'll come up.
I can't remember the name, but yeah, you could, there'll be some on the internet because they mass produced it.
And it wasn't long ago, probably about four or five years ago.
What might have been better to anticipate when Mike launched into all this business about flying saucers and so forth was the framework that a Biden admin might try to pull off an alien invasion as a warrant or rationale for declaring martial law.
Because I believe that is now their objective.
I think that everything is lost.
Even this Trump indictment isn't going over.
Trump support after the indictment is higher than it was before the indictment.
Everything they try to bowl here, no matter how illegal, how ill-founded, how fabricated, how massive in its propagandistic aspect, is failing.
It is not working.
I mean, I wouldn't be talking about the Czechists and the mass slaughter after the Bolshevik Revolution if I did not see the elements being put together to do that here.
And it's because Americans are so naive and gullible that I'm trying to make us aware that this is a real threat.
And I have no doubt about it.
Paul.
So I want to ask.
Yeah, I want to ask you a question.
So no, I actually I need to see this Czechist.
I have not seen it yet.
So I want to check that out.
But, but Jim, you know, this could have been predicted about Trump either not being effective or actually getting more support after this indictment.
To me, I would have predicted that, and I'm thinking these people have to be smarter than me.
And so I'm wondering, do you feel that they may have done it on purpose?
In other words, I mean, they could they had to be sitting around going, OK, wait a minute.
We indict him on some of this nonsense.
He's going to be more popular than ever.
So should we do it?
I mean, I don't know if that calculus is out there, but I don't know.
They think they got him.
They're just going they're scraping the bottom of the barrel, Paul.
They're so desperate to try to defeat this guy.
Tucker was nailing it, you know.
He's a threat to the whole establishment on both sides, the war economy, the military-industrial complex.
I mean, go back to Eisenhower warning us about it 100%.
One of the reasons Jack got whacked, of course, was he was pulling our forces out of Vietnam, and the Joint Chiefs didn't want that to happen, so they threw in on the assassination of the president.
I mean, it's just outrageous.
Tucker's done a good thing.
I think the politics, they just want to keep him off of the ballot and they're going all out.
But I'm telling you, I'm convinced now, when you look at the borders, Trump put out an announcement the other day, what he's going to do when he becomes president was really, genuinely cleaning things up, securing the border energy independence again, going after all these miscreants in office.
And they fear because they know now at this point, I mean, knows how to do it.
I'd like to think so.
I want to believe.
It's very difficult for me to trust, but I'd like to think he's a threat to the establishment.
That's what we all want.
Paul, look at the evidence!
There's never been a figure in American history so vilified by the press and the politicians ever, ever, ever.
Russiagate true impeachments are made on Mar-a-Lago, the rape accusations, all this happy horseshit.
They fear this guy to the core.
They are scared shitless of Donald Trump.
Well, I will only say this.
I will agree about the opposition.
In other words, the visible opposition.
I will say that the political theater is as strong and ridiculous as I've ever seen.
That's true.
I don't know why I would fear one guy, because as history has shown, any one guy can be dealt with and taken out.
No, it's like JFK, it's even like Adolf Hitler, it's even like Joseph Stalin, it's even like Mao, it's even like Fidel Castro!
One person can make a huge difference when they can assemble and marshal support on a massive scale.
This is why they took out Jack, they took out Martin, they took out Bobby.
When you decapitate the leadership...
So why wouldn't they take him out then?
I'm just speculating.
I'm not saying they are or they're not.
I'm not saying they're not thinking about it.
I really don't know.
I can only go based upon what the evidence shows.
They're resorting to character assassination.
They're trying to be more subtle about it.
I mean, that's all.
Paul, do you understand there have been a dozen attempts to assassinate Trump?
One was using a drone firing into his bedroom in Mar-a-Lago, and if they hadn't replaced the glass in the window with bulletproof, he would be dead today.
I don't know that.
I know you've said... I'm telling you, Paul, okay?
So, you know, I'm sharing with you.
I mean, I grant you, you know, You're very good at sorting things out for yourself.
Brian, we're almost at the end.
Brian, would you like to add some thoughts about today's show?
We've got really mixed highs and lows.
Yeah, I have a feeling, my sense is they want that major uprising over this so that they can instigate their Cheka scenario that you've been talking about.
I wouldn't put it past them, so that's what goes through my head.
I think that's good.
Brian, I think that's good.
They want to provoke an uprising so they can declare martial law and all of us are domestic terrorists and give us a bullet in the back of the head.
Paul, you watch the checkers.
You're you're going to be very strong.
I I'm telling you, that's what's going on.
Yeah.
A final thought.
All OK.
Yeah, I just I just see it as a failure, at least now, because the Russian people did not have the arms that we have.
I don't see any success if they try to pull this martial law check.
This is why they're trying to take our guns, Paul.
This is why they're trying to take our guns.
Mike Sparks, thanks for coming on.
Paul, Brian, excellent comments.
Mitchell, great work as always.
Everyone, spend as much time as you can with your family and friends and people you love and care about.
▲
Export Selection