All Episodes
Previous Next
June 7, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
53:39
Need to Know News (6 June 2023) with Jim Fetzer
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joining me today where, alas, neither of my excellent commentators, Owen Stevens or Brian Davidson, are able to join me today.
Putin under attack.
Explosion from British storm shadow missile rifts through Russian held port.
This is not going to endure the UK, which provided these missiles to Vladimir Putin or Russia.
But he shows the moment facilities were hit with a suspected storm shadow missile, Britain's most potent non-nuclear missile, which can strike range 150 miles.
Russian state media, RT, one of the most reliable news sites in the world, said there had been casualties and destruction from the strike.
Russian-installed official Vladimir Rogov said nine reported injured.
You can see the smoke more from the port on the Sea of Azov.
Chaos was also unleashed inside Russia today with the border region of Belgorod facing renewed attacks from the air.
This was just a feint.
It turned out to be not a significant attack.
Ukraine is the only country publicly supplied with these missiles by the UK, where Britain has also become the first country to provide long-range precision missiles to Ukraine.
The 2.2 million pound-per-unit missiles will allow Ukraine to strike deeper into Russian-held territory.
They were suspected to have been used earlier this month, when Russian MP Viktor Voteladsky sustained injuries after an attack on May 15.
It was first developed in 1994, but the Storm Shadow was first used by the French Ministry before used by Britain.
Here we have an indication of areas where fighting is continuing to take place.
Now, as storm missiles work, they're deployed from a fighter jet.
They follow a low-flight path guided by GPS and terrain mapping as they approach the target.
It gains altitude and then goes up, then comes down.
The fire and forget missiles are pre-programmed before a mission.
Speed off at up to 621 miles an hour, reaching targets up to 350 miles away.
miles an hour reaching targets up to 350 miles away.
Meanwhile, night coming to Ukraine, First explosion tundred in Dnipro and Slovyansk.
On the evening of June 3rd, Russian forces launched a new wave of strikes on Ukrainian military facilities, which may very well have been in response to the use of the Missile.
The British missile.
The targets were in the city of Dnipro and in Svobodsk in the DPR, which is under control of the armed forces of Ukraine.
They were carried out by Exclander missiles.
Ukrainian media showed footage from the city confirming at least one facility destroyed.
Local residents shared videos some shelters were closed during the attack and civilians could not hide there.
No doubt because Ukrainians wanted more civilian victims, injuries, to use with public relations against Russia.
More is coming.
Mind you, There's no possible way that Ukraine can win this war, and that means what's going to happen then?
Some are predicting Ukraine is basically going to give up the ghost and NATO is going to pour in.
Mind you now, Russia is overwhelmingly military superior to NATO, the U.S., all these countries combined.
And that's not even to bring China into the fold.
And if China should enter the war too, I mean, believe me, they are not beatable by Western powers.
So we can anticipate a calamity.
Mike Adams gave a broadcast today that I reviewed just now suggesting that he has reports of American planes being taken out of mothballs at great expense.
And that he anticipates it's going to take about three months to get all this equipment ready, that it would only be done if the U.S.
were to anticipate a major war.
They're being sent both east and west, both to Poland, it appears, and to the Philippines.
Mark my words, the Russians will destroy them in the Philippines as soon as they arrive.
The only miscalculation in Mike Adams' report, in my opinion, was he suggested the Russians may begin using tactical nukes.
No, I do not believe.
When it goes nuclear, Russia is going to go all out, massive assault, all NATO countries, United States, 100 million dead in the first hour.
At this point, I do not see how it is avoidable.
So, you know, there's a point at which you can bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.
Meanwhile, I say, spend as much time as you can with the people you love and care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.
How often have you heard me say that?
Meanwhile, Democrats, of course, play by their own rules.
Turns out they fabricated January 6th evidence to illegally sway public opinion.
This is what they do.
While the entire Democrat-led House committee that investigated the January 6th so-called insurrection was a giant sham, it seems the desperate leftists may have taken things too far in their effort to paint Republicans as domestic terrorists by doctoring evidence to help them sell their narrative.
A review of original raw footage and interviews uncovered that the Democrats added audio to a silent piece of security footage to make it seem more dramatic.
This happened in several instances, which was done in complete secrecy.
The Democrat committee tried to keep it quiet by failing to disclose they had edited the footage in any way.
Multiple current and former Capitol cops, as well as key lawmakers and congressional aides, have confirmed closed-circuit cameras at the Capitol do not record sound, confirming their buyout was added by Democrats after the fact.
The panel was supposed to clearly mark any video that was dubbed with another audio source and did in some occasions, but not in others, suggesting they were trying to deceive the public into falling for their January 6th propaganda.
That's exactly how it would be done.
What the American want to know is the truth.
This was nothing but a Hollywood production, said Barry Loudermilk, Republican of Georgia.
Of the joke of it, an investigation of their apparent efforts at doctor evidence.
Goodman, he spent 18.5 mil—that's what we were told—to write up a dossier against Trump and create a Hollywood production.
When I looked at the videos, it's clear that the Capitol Police security film, there's no audio whatsoever, so it was dubbed for dramatic effect.
That shows what they were trying to do, sway public opinion, not just get the truth out.
It's been quite clear this was a Democrat goal from the start when it came to January 6th.
The desperate leftists set up the whole thing so they could use it to create a narrative that Republicans are a threat to the country.
And though the results of their effort were underwhelming, they kept pushing their agenda until they got desperate enough.
They altered evidence in their favor.
Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz said the altered video evidence warrants an investigation and a forensic exam by Congress, which could result in serious repercussions.
Well, if this is true, if they really did dub the tapes without telling the public, if a lawyer did that, he would be disbarred.
It would be fraud.
If a person introduced that as testimony, disclosed that it had material added, it would be a form of perjury.
We have to be able to prove that forensically without any doubt, and we ought to be able to get the evidence of who added the words where they came from.
We have to get all the facts.
Once the facts are known, if it confirms what you've said, it's a very serious ethical, perhaps even legal, breach.
I do agree.
Alan Dershowitz, Oh, he has certain shortcomings appearing on the list of those who flew in Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express, for example, which he dearly loved to erase.
He's among the most brilliant constitutional lawyers in the United States, willing to come to grips with major complex controversial issues.
So I like Dershowitz in spite of his transgressions, which no doubt will eventually be exposed.
Meanwhile, we have a rather brilliant piece by Patrick J. McShay.
You might live in a police state if... He begins with a couple of quotes.
A society that puts equality in the sense of equality of outcome ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom.
Use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force introduced for good purposes will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.
Observe Milton Friedman.
Our world is not divided by race, color, gender, or religion.
Our world is divided into wise people and fools, and fools divide themselves by race, color, gender, or religion.
Observe Mohammed Safa.
Brilliant.
Very appropriate to today.
The following is based on what's happening in our country every, every single day.
You might live in a police state yet.
You might live in a police state if your government adds poisoning cancer-causing ingredients to your food and water supply.
You might live in a police state if the FBI visits your home regarding your peaceful protests against abortion.
You might live in a police state if the director of the National Institute of Health predicts a pandemic three years before it happens, and you find it was all planned by your country's Department of Defense.
You might live in a bleak state if the outgoing president and leaders of his party conspire with the premier law enforcement agencies, F.E.I., C.I.A., NSA, and D.O.J.
to spy on the leading candidate of the opposition party, to plot and lead a coup against him, impeach him based on lies, get caught red-handed.
And no one gets in trouble, and most of the media refuse to cover it anyway.
You might live in a police state if the party that pledged unity installs racist and divisive policies that target nearly 70% of the population.
You might live in a police state if the party in power that talks about freedom and democracy openly works to destroy both.
You might live in a police state if millions of citizens are homeless while illegal immigrants are flown to the city of their choice, given loaded debit cards, free smartphones, put up in hotels, and given free meals.
You might live in a police state if your president is caught taking tens of millions from your enemies in his cabinet filled with dual citizens of another country.
Help him cover it up.
You might live in a police state if the president pledges to never mandate experimental and dangerous mRNA vaccines, and then mandates those vaccines.
You might live in a police state if the party in power says meat is bad, calls for farmers to stop growing food, and that's telling us how bugs are tasty.
You might live in a police state if they work to release violent felons from prison and arrest heroes who are stopping crimes.
You might live in a bleak state if the President is a dementia patient and dual Israeli citizens are running the country.
You might live in a bleak state if the President praises transsexuals and homosexuals and demonizes Christians and veterans.
You might live in a bleak state if DNA contamination and cancer-causing urgent SV40 are found in mRNA vaccine you are forced to take.
You might believe it, at least they'd have children under 18.
Need a letter of consent from their parents to go on a school trip to the zoo, but no permission to give a child a dangerous vaccine or be sexually groomed by their non-binary teacher.
You might live in a police state of drag queen shows where kids are held on your country's military bases.
You might live in a police state of twelve cops wrestle you to the ground for carrying a gun when you possess a legal carry permit.
You might live in a police state of you're a six-time Super Bowl winner in a park near your house when a nosy cop tells you to go home or face arrest.
You might live in a police state if they're letting felons out of prison and start arresting law-abiding taxpaying citizens for not properly social distancing.
You might live in a police state if a presidential candidate is credibly accused of sexual assault and the media won't even cover it.
You might live in a police state of a crazy billionaire sinking billions into burking corrupt pharmaceutical business and plots to implant a Mark of the Beast microchip to everyone on the planet to track and enslave them and everyone seems okay with it.
You might live in a police state of the same creepy billionaire goes from creating backdoors for computer viruses to engineering backdoors for coronaviruses.
You might live in a bleak state of the governor issues an order that forbids you to cut your grass.
You might live in a bleak state of your governor okays the use of kayaks and canoes but forbids the use of ski boats and ski jets.
You might live in a police state if you find out the pandemic that ruined your life was planned by billionaire Bill Gates because he was bored and needed something to do after he left Microsoft and he really does hate useless eaters, everyone not a part of his clique.
You might live in a police state if the government moves ahead to approve 5G, a bioweapon, despite objections of doctors, scientists, and other professionals for horrified and vehement objections.
You might live in a police state of a dozen cops wrestle and drag a man out of a city bus thrown to the ground and handcuff him for not wearing a face mask.
You might live in a police state of the billionaire, that bright politician and health official demand a vaccine for you and your kids, refuses to vaccinate his own.
You might be living in a police state of your Department of Agriculture lets millions of pounds of food rot, while demand at food banks soars and people are going hungry.
You might be living in a bleak state of your military is destroyed to your nation's food bank, deployed to your nation's food bank to ensure stability during a contrived crisis.
You might be living in a bleak state of the illegal aliens who just got here getting more government assistance than your mother's social security after working for 40 years.
You might be living in a police state of your national police agency, the FBI.
What's with your Department of Justice to set up and entrap the new President's National Security Advisor and put him under criminal investigation?
You might be living in a police state during a contrived pandemic.
Corporations aren't running creepy, dystopian, and savvy commercials warn you to stay inside, wash your hands, be safe, and again, don't forget to wash your hands.
You might be living in a police state if they pretend to be a model of democracy to the rest of the world while illegally spying on their citizens, politicians, and judges.
You might be living in a police state if corporate fat caps write your laws and control your politicians through lobbying and excessive contributions.
You might be living in a police state if there's been a 4,000% increase in no-knock military armed SWAT team raids in the last 30 years.
You might be living in a police state if your police departments are using military tactics and weapons against your citizens.
You might be living in a police state if police make it a policy to shoot family dogs who aren't threatening in any way, a common practice alas today by American police departments.
You might be living in a police state if your country has 5% of the world population but 25% of the world prison population.
You might live in a police state, be living in a police state if your national security agency gathers nearly 5 billion records every day, tracking the smartphone locations of its citizens.
You might be living in a police state if your national security agency intercepts computer shipments of plasma hardware on new systems.
You might be living in a police state Impersistent public apathy allows corrupt unelected officials and corrupt politicians to throw their country into lockdown and enact police state measures based upon lies.
You might be living in a police state of children as young as six, arrested at school for throwing tantrums and other minor offenses.
You might be living in a police state if your police department isn't as interested in protecting and serving as they are in beating, tasering, and arresting fellow citizens.
You might be living in a police state if the police steal more cash and personal property from a citizen through asset forfeiture in a year than they lose to burglars.
You might be living in a police state if your policemen tend to shoot first and ask questions later.
You might be living in a police state if police departments spy on law-abiding citizens using aerial surveillance and facial recognition software.
You might be living in a police state if your government's intelligence agencies and military perform grisly and horrific experiments on citizens and soldiers they regard as little more than lab rats.
You might be living in a police office if 17,000 police departments are using military-issue equipment.
You might be living in a police state if 80% of asset forfeiture cases result in no charges against the homeowner.
You might be living in a police state if your government allows a collection of trillions of your citizen phone calls, emails, videos, social media posts, and the Supreme Court okays the government's collection of your DNA for future minority report-type experiments to further invade your privacy.
You might be living in a police ADF over the objection of parents.
Your child's school announces that new sex education classes will include graphic discussion of homosexuality, lesbian, anal sex, and use of sex toys to be taught to children as young as five years old.
You might be living in a bleak state if your local library begins having weekly drag queen story hour, encouraging parents to attend and bring their children to hear drag queens read to their kids sponsored by corporations.
You might be living in a bleak state if children who are citizens are forced to get vaccines in order to attend school, while illegals need no vaccines to attend.
It shouldn't matter what our political affiliation is when it comes to our God-given inalienable rights in law and order.
But if any party forgets that we exist in this country on the principle that we have individual liberty to make decisions ourselves, that political party should be abandoned as members considered traitors to the U.S.
Constitution and the Republic.
There's an old expression, bring the house down to kill the rats.
Is that what our controllers did to our great country with his phony pandemic as China Joe, destroying the country for the globalists, along with those who won't accept the New World Order's form of tyranny?
Trader Joe's Jewish DHS Director Mayorkas, a dual Israeli citizen and funding American University with tax money, has brainwashed students into believing that Christians and Republicans are Nazis and has illegally opened the border to five million illegal aliens in just over two years.
Trader Joe's cabinet is filled with dual Israeli citizens who hate white Christians.
Who is warning that a new, more deadly virus is on the way?
Meanwhile, Russia claims they collected evidence of avian flu pathogens with lethality rate of up to 40% on humans at U.S.
biolabs in Ukraine.
Why are U.S.
taxpayers funding us at the biolabs in Ukraine?
Are they planning the next pandemic?
Kevin McCarthy proved his RINO credentials by agreeing to a horrible compromise on Biden's debt deal.
Who does he think he's fooling?
Bad news for Americans.
98% of 87,000 IRS agents, by the way, who are armed and required to be willing to apply lethal force to taxpayers, are here to stay after McCarthy caves in to Democrats.
What's going on now has much more to do with power control, the death of the dollar, and destruction of our Bill of Rights, brought about by Mr. Gates' engineered pandemic.
The economy is a disaster, Trader Joe is outspending Trump, and the Kenyan at a wicked pace, and the weak Republican don't have the support to stop him.
Americans are currently experiencing life in a soft police state.
If we permanently accept any of these new edicts of control, especially the Hood Pandemic Treaty, we will never get our country back.
Accept nothing less than the freedom our forefathers fought to ensure for their children, grandchildren, and every future generation of Americans.
Let me say, I've gone through this list by Patrick McShay three times now.
He's got it exactly right.
He's got it exactly right.
And not only are they pushing the pandemic treaty, where if they could get 67 votes in the Senate, we're done for, for sure, because it gives the World Health Organization the right to override the Constitution.
But Biden and Dems have been promoting they want to sign the Small Arms Treaty of the UN, which would set up a registration and confiscation of weapons from Americans.
That's the only reason we still have survived to this day the Second Amendment.
Don't forget it!
If you're not armed and capable of defending yourself, don't count on the cops.
Remember, they want to defund the police.
They don't want you to have any way to protect yourself from what's coming.
And by the way, Eric Adams in New York is floating the idea of residents taking migrants into their homes.
Mark my words, that's the agenda.
Bring the migrants in.
We're supposed to take them into our homes and eventually turn our homes over to them, right?
If we don't, they're gonna take our homes or they're gonna kill us.
I'm telling you, this is for real.
You know, there was a time I thought this was all nonsense, bizarre, paranoid thinking.
I'm sorry, the evidence is there.
It's not paranoid.
And remember, Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
Mark my words.
They are out to get us all.
Meanwhile, the movie they really don't want you to see, What is a Woman, with Matt Walsh.
This is brilliant.
Completely brilliant.
I've said it before, I'll say it again.
This film What is a woman?
Is it as important to contemporary American culture as Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick's absolute masterpiece about the threat of nuclear war is to the world at large?
It's that important, and it is so well done.
Matt Walsh just happened to have the perfect temperament, the perfect demeanor, To handle this, and it was brilliantly edited.
I'm just telling you, you've got to watch this.
I'd even say more than once.
It's that good.
Treat yourself.
I put it on Twitter.
It's lots of places.
It's up to 200 million views.
200 million views.
Remember, the pop of the U.S.
is only 330 mil.
30 million illegals.
They're bringing in, by my count, 100 million.
Minimal.
In fact, I think the U.N.
has an agenda to bring in 600 million illegals.
That's twice as many as there are present legal residents of the United States.
I mean, that's what the United Nations means to America.
A pathway to our destruction.
Don't miss it.
What is a woman?
Completely brilliant.
Meanwhile… Surprise, surprise!
Even USA Today is reporting the life expectancy problem in the United States is bigger than we ever thought.
The country's life expectancy problem gained renewed attention in recent years from the COVID pandemic, after seeing the largest drop since World War II.
As U.S.
life expectancy continues to plummet, A new report found the country has been at a life expectancy disadvantage since the 1950s, and it's only gotten worse since then.
Let me tell you, categorically, that's false.
Life expectancy has steadily increased up until now.
Steadily increased.
So you got USA Today being used as a propaganda organ.
A study published in American Journal of Public Health shows more than 50 countries have surpassed the U.S.
in life expectancy since the 1930s, and a handful of states may be partly responsible.
The scale of the problem is bigger than we ever thought, older than we thought.
The number of countries outperforming the U.S.
is much larger than we thought.
Said study author Dr. Stephen Wolff, director emeritus of the Center on Society and Health at Virginia Commonwealth University.
The findings offer a new perspective on U.S.
life expectancy and shed light on how to reverse the trend.
As an answer for why some people live to be over 100.
Yes, we can see dramatic increases in life expectancy in the 20th century, mainly as a result of public health advances such as vaccines and sanitation.
Notice that's a plug for vaccines and Big Pharma.
The report shows growth continued into the 50s, with U.S.
life expectancy ranking 12th highest in the world, but growth rates began declining in 1955 and by 1968, U.S.
had fallen to 29.
The decline became much earlier than many researchers had thought.
Let me say, there's something funny going on here, because U.S.
life expectancy has steadily increased up until of late.
So they're using a comparison with other nations where life expectancy increased even more to suggest that we're somehow falling behind, but I think that's factually false.
U.S.
life expectancy was increasing, and even if it were, by comparison to other countries, not increasing by as much as those other countries, it nevertheless was increasing right here in the United States.
When asked when this problem began, he cited the 1980s, because we haven't gone back far enough to see what happened before.
That there was a decline in the 50s raised the question of what was going on then.
I don't believe her.
What did eight deaths do to COVID?
Nearly 107,000 drug overdose, COVID puts U.S.
life expectancy lowest in 25 years.
It's much more great than that.
And it has nothing to do with COVID, per se.
It has everything to do with a vax!
Life expectancy growth rate rebounded in 1974 and decelerated in 1983.
Provisional data shows life expectancy has dropped to 76.1, according to the CDC, the lowest since 1996.
The study relied on estimates from the UN Population and U.S.
Mortality Database Which could skew exact rankings and year-over-year changes.
Yes, our databases are not reliable.
The general takeaway, however, remains the same, said Michael Eagleman, Associate Professor of Sociology at Wisconsin-Madison.
That's, of course, where I reside.
The timeline shows how life expectancy may be heavily influenced by systemic factors larger than individual health choices.
Taking the historical perspective teaches us things are not predetermined.
Things change.
That means there's a possibility for more improvement in the future.
The work looked beyond the same small sub-span of peer countries like the UK and Canada, typically included studying live expectancy.
Expanding the Bulldogs, good country with population over 500,000.
The report found 56 countries had surpassed the U.S.
in life expectancy since 1950, including some with smaller economies, lower population, and different government systems.
Middle-income countries made enough gains to catch up and then surpass the U.S.
during times of the country's acceleration slowing.
By 2019, the U.S.
ranked 40th among populous countries, lower than Lebanon and Albania.
That's fairly astonishing.
Countries that don't necessarily have all the support systems and infrastructure and policies that exist in higher-income countries are still outperforming the U.S.
What are they doing in those countries that have enabled their people to live longer?
Since the fifties, life expectancy grew at a different pace throughout the country.
Northeastern and Western state experienced the fastest growth, while South Central and Midwest are in the slowest.
The cluster of states really played an outside role producing the poor rankings.
States doing very well like Hawaii, New York, and other high performers rank some with the same life expectancy as some of the healthiest countries in the world.
This supports previous research showing how policy decisions affect health outcomes and ultimately life expectancy.
The things that influence health and longevity are operating on multiple levels.
The story of our health goes far beyond anything we can personally control.
This, by the way, is just a reflection on the Vax.
Reports of miscarriage still birth by year.
Look how they skyrocketed from the Vax!
Skyrocketed!
Skyrocketed!
Don't let yourself be played.
What's most striking about that article is it doesn't talk about the Vax.
The Vax is the number one.
This is a cloak, a camouflaged attempt to conceal that the Vax is changing our lives, perhaps permanently.
I mean, it's ghastly what's going on here.
This is a feeble effort, using USA Today as a propaganda outlet, to try to whitewash the role of the Vax, or try to lay up the impression that The U.S.
has been suffering from population decline issues for many years.
It ain't true.
I guarantee you 100%.
That is false.
It's been since the introduction of the Vax.
And of course, that was the whole idea.
That was the point of the Vax.
And it's working.
Meanwhile, Senate Overturned Biden's big giveaway program.
Wow.
How nice.
It should happen.
For the cheers of fiscal conservatives across the U.S., a majority of the Senate voted to block Biden's plan for student debt relief, which would direct billions from student loans to the taxpayer.
Biden's Student Loan Relief Initiative, adopted by the Education Department last year, has been tied down in the Supreme Court.
It provides for giving borrowers $10,000 or up to $20,000 for some recipients in government loans.
Thursday, the majority of 51 U.S.
Senators, including all 48 GOP, 2 Democrats, and 1 Independent, Approving a Congressional Review Act resolution to block Biden's plan.
Who are those two Democrats?
I want to give them a hug and a kiss.
The Senate introduction was introduced by U.S.
Senator from Louisiana, Bill Cassidy.
The GOP initiative was supported by Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and John Tester of Montana.
I applaud you.
Independent Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema, a former Democrat who caucuses with the Democrat Party, also backed the Republicans.
God bless you, Kyrsten Sinema.
I may be an agnostic, but you deserve praise.
We preserved the ability for folks who don't have the income, who've lost their jobs, took a low-paying job, to be able to get relief for their student loans, Cassidy announced.
What this reveals is a student loan pause.
This kind of, it doesn't matter who you are, whether you're in need, those folks who are getting their student loans transferred to the backs of American taxpayers, it's not forgiven.
It's transferred.
In May, the House passed a companion bill with 218 in favor and 203 against.
Biden made it clear he will veto the bill.
As per the Congressional Review Act, Congress can adopt resolution of disapproval to block President's executive orders.
However, the resolution can be vetoed by the President.
In August 2022, he announced the Education Department would forgive student loan debt of up to $10,000 or $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients for those earning below $120,000 annually or families making below $250,000 annually.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the plan would cost the federal budget $400 billion.
Meanwhile, a journalist attacked for reporting both sides.
That's not permissible in America anymore.
There's only one side to any issue, the Democrat side.
A local Baltimore media journalist reported on a guy in Severn, Maryland, arrested for carrying an AR-15 near a school bus stop in defiance of the state's gun control laws.
Pauly Taylor, a reporter who reported the story, tweeted a preview of the upcoming segment.
He said tonight on WBAL-TV 11.
Elementary school students have reported a man was armed with an AR-15 at the bus stop where they get off to and from school.
The tweet said the man claimed he was protesting the gun control laws under Governor Wes Moore and the parents told and the parents really said their children were scared.
The message concluded that a five and six argument from both camps wouldn't be heard.
People were unhappy with Taylor's decision to present the narrative as one with two sides.
The report began with a parent's mobile phone video of the bus letting students off at the stop.
It showed a man across the street openly carrying a long rifle, as is lawful in Maryland.
Jamie Sparrow, the parent, said the man had been there for three weeks.
Sparrow said the man with the rifle said he and the others were looking at him like a bunch of scared bowling pins.
Sparrow was concerned because if they were the pins, the man with the rival would think of himself as the bowling ball.
A man with a rival as DeGeneres McAdory said he's just doing it to prove a point, and he's legally allowed to do what he's doing.
His goal is to reduce the amount of crime in the neighborhood.
I'll bet it had that effect, by the way.
He's also protesting the governor's gun control laws that take effect on October 1st.
He said he illustrates guns are safe if handled by the right people.
Governor Moore Call the man cowardly?
I don't know.
I think he had a lot of balls to do it.
McAndory said he settled his differences with his school and would no longer protest during pick-up and drop-off hours.
I mean, why would the governor call him cowardly?
I mean, he's got the lawful right to do it.
Frankly, it takes a lot of courage to stand up like that for your rights in America today, especially.
So I think on the contrary, he wasn't cowardly, he was heroic.
But the reporter was being attacked for being willing to present both sides of the issue.
That's really the point here.
We should always be hearing both sides of the story, even if we think one side is contemptible, irresponsible, not well-founded factually in the line.
But with regard to anti-gun issues especially, we never get both sides of the story.
You never hear that Americans use guns to defend themselves millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives.
They only have to show the perps assaulting them that they're armed and they skedaddle.
They don't have to fire the weapon.
200,000 lives saved annually is gargantuan compared to the 70,000 gun-induced deaths per year estimated, over half of which are suicides.
It's a half of 70,000 and 35,000.
35,000 from gun violence, gang wars, and all that.
Mostly blacks killing other blacks with handguns.
So you can compare saving 200,000 lives annually with the 35,000 that are lost.
I mean, that's five times as many are saved by the defensive use of guns.
That would be lost if we took those guns away.
Why aren't we hearing the two sides of the story?
Because the anti-gun side is very weak.
They don't want to face argument, so they're going to use all kinds of sterile maneuvers to deprive us of knowing the truth, which makes it very obvious that the Second Amendment has an important role to play even in self-defense.
But you never hear about the defensive use of guns—never—from the mainstream media.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk says Target will face shareholder lawsuits amid pro-LGBT controversy, no doubt about it.
As Target stock is taking a beating amid conservative backlash over the decision to sell LGBT-themed items and clothing, Twitter CEO Elon Musk said it's just a matter of time before Target faces lawsuits for destruction of shareholder value.
Musk made the remark in response to a tweet by conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
You post about J.P.
Morgan downgrading Target's stock after suffering its longest losing streak in decades.
Over the past month or so, Target's stock dropped by double digits amid conservative calls for a boycott against a changing connection to its decision to sell LGBT-themed apparel, including onesies for children, and books instructing kids about the use of transgender pronouns.
Several days ago, David Morgan downgraded Target's stock from neutral to overweight, with a Wall Street bank saying too many concerns with a retail giant.
We believe this share loss could accelerate back into school and linger into holidays given consumer pressure and recent company controversies, wrote analyst Christopher Horvers for MarketWatch.
This could turn target traffic negative after an impressive run of 12 consecutive positive quarters.
Musk responded to Kirk's tweet about target stock downgrade, predicting the company would face shareholder lawsuits.
Won't be long before there are class action lawsuits by shareholders against the company and board of directors for destruction of shareholder value.
Very nice.
Kirk responded, saying shareholders should organize to get politics out of the hyper-political corporations of today.
A Target spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
While Target said a week ago it had removed some items that sparked the greatest controversy, it did not go into detail about which.
The company also reiterated its continuing commitment to the LGBTQIA plus community and standing with them as we celebrate Pride Month and throughout the year.
Since introducing this year's collection, we've experienced threats impacting our team members' sense of safety and well-being while at work, Target said.
Given these volatile circumstances, we're making adjustments to our plans, including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior.
Target is among major brands, including Bud Light, that are facing backlash for supporting LGBT causes.
Several other countries, companies including Petsmart, Chick-fil-A, and Walmart are also facing boycott calls due to their endorsement of the LGBT agenda.
Experts say a big factor in Encouraging brands to promote transgender ideologies is an attempt to score points on environmental, social, and governance ESG standards.
Target CEO Brian Cornell was asked about the backlash against more companies.
I think these are just good business decisions, the right thing for society, and a great thing for our brand, he said.
The things we've done from a diversity, equity, and inclusion standpoint, it's adding value.
Referring to policies that a number of prominent conservatives have panned has left us in woke.
It's helping us drive sales.
It's building greater engagement with both our teams and our guests.
Those are just the right things for our business today, he continued.
When we think about purpose at Target, it's really about helping all the families.
And that all word is really important.
The Target Chief added the focus on diversity and inclusion and equity has fueled much of our growth over the last nine years.
Target, Which is one of the biggest retailers in the United States has long-paced boycott calls.
In 2016, calls for a boycott were sparked when Target released a policy allowing men who identify as women to use women's bathrooms.
How insulting!
The boycotts against pro-LGBT companies has come into sharper focus in recent months.
Erin Elmore, a contributor at Turning Point USA, argued calls to boycott Target are not necessarily conservative.
It's common sense.
Most parents don't support Satanists or little boys wearing girls' bathing suits, she said.
Some controversial Items carried by Target include a onesie for infants that say, Biden Proud, a children's book with the title, Was the Night Before Pride, a book telling children how to use transgender pronouns, a handful of t-shirts with similar slogans.
Target also drew backlash for tuck-friendly swimwear, but a spokesperson said the swimwear wasn't made for children.
A number of prominent conservatives called for boycotts at Target, accusing the Minneapolis-based retailer of grooming and exploiting children.
I cannot state enough how important it is for people to choose not to shop at Target.
There's never been a company that has been more pro-transgenderism than Target.
Candace Owens, conservative commentator, wrote earlier in May.
I like Candace.
The boycott at Target and other companies have triggered calls for protests from supporters.
We have to remember that Pride started off as a protest, as Representative Robert Garcia told his party's LGBT Caucus recently.
It cannot just be a celebration anymore.
We are being systematically attacked.
Garcia was the first openly gay mayor of Long Beach fired to winning his House seat in 2022.
Pro-LGBT group Human Rights Campaign.
Set in a May 25th press release.
Pushback against rants like Target and Bud Light are blatantly organized by extremist groups.
The boycotts serve as a wake-up call for all businesses that support the LGBTQ plus community.
We've seen this extremist playbook of attacks before.
The goal is clear.
To prevent LGBTQ plus inclusion and representation, silence our allies, and make our community invisible.
Let me just say categorically, that's just bullshit!
That's just bullshit!
I'm a different strokes for different folks kind of a guy.
I don't care about anyone's sexual preferences, gay, straight, lesbian, it's all fine with me.
But have a corporation push this on the American public by having all these displays and all this aggressive, confusing politics with retail.
That is what is objectionable.
And no one's being an extremist if parents are upset by all this horseshit going on in the schools, trying to convict their kids into transgenders, having drag shoes, having books for little kids about anal sex and masturbation.
To hell with that.
I stand with the parents of America.
As a parent of America, I say, to hell with you, Target, Bud Light, Kohl's.
Fish Fillet, to hell with you.
You're on the wrong side of these issues.
What you're doing is immoral and corrupt.
Immoral.
To the last we oppose it, you're going to know it.
Pay for it.
I'm all for freedom and democracy being expressed by using the pocketbook.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Trust us.
The vaccine is safe and will protect you.
With our help, Ukraine is winning.
The SEAL team killed Osama bin Laden.
...and ended the reign of terror.
Your money is safe in the banks.
The Fed is conquering inflation.
The belief in evil is an excuse for intolerance.
Pedophiles are just another misunderstood sexual orientation, no less legitimate than homosexuality.
The criminalization of truth in the Western world, writes Paul Craig Roberts, California blacks have voted themselves millions of dollars per person in supposed restitution for slavery, even though California never had slavery.
And the restitution has to be paid by Hispanics and Asians who never owned slave.
Bizarrely, today in California, white Americans constitute only 32% of the population, even among these.
The probability that any descended from fray voters is remote.
Final thoughts?
Well, just mine.
I think the anti-woke agenda is very good, very positive.
Shows we haven't quite lost the last shards of integrity in our bodies, especially parents standing up for their kids.
I can't think of anything more American than that.
As far as a war in Ukraine, I'm repeating.
Situation is very grim.
When you have the least competent members of your society leading the nation and making the most fateful decision, you can expect a bad outcome.
That's what we're getting, a bad outcome.
And actually, the proper way to cast it is in terms of deliberate, intentional destruction of America, opening the borders, Let me repeat.
The mayor of New York, where half the hotels are filled with migrants at city expanse.
I mean, they get housecleaning.
They're destroying their rooms.
They're destroying the hotels.
He wants you to take a migrant into your home, I'm telling you.
That's the ultimate plan.
If you don't want migrants to move into your home, to take your home, and, I submit, kill you in the process, you better arm up.
Make yourself safe.
Be prepared to defend yourself, because I guarantee you 100% the police are not going to be there to protect you.
So, I close again.
Spend as much time with your friends, family, the people you love and care about.
Literally, we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection