All Episodes
Previous Next
May 29, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:52:05
The Raw Deal (29 May 2023) with Brian Davidson and David Scorpio
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Getting to be real nice this time of year there.
We have another problem with the connection, the sound connection.
I'm assuming now I'm linked to the server that I'm in fact going out.
Mitchell thought he had it back, but when we tried to connect again this morning, it didn't work.
It didn't connect.
I'm very pleased, however, on this Memorial Day to have as my featured guest David Scorpio, with whom I've had a long relationship.
Scorpio and I have probably done, I don't know, 120 shows together.
And Brian Davidson is here as well, where Brian and I have been doing a great deal of research together.
Brian, of course, is licensed Private investigator in Texas.
He did an appendix for my Supreme Court petition for reconsideration in which he got into the Connecticut State Police photographic files and discovered that the photos in their records where they were documenting every aspect of the case, where they were running the Sandy Hook scam behind the scene, contradicted the official narrative.
And demonstrated, in my opinion, conclusively, not only was there no mass murder, but it wasn't even an operating school.
For example, in one of the hallway photographs, where according to the description, we should see two bodies, a principal, Don Hawksbring, and the school psychologist, Mary Sherlock, in pools of blood.
There's not only no bodies, but no pools of blood.
In a classroom where we expect to see piles of bodies of little kids, we not only have no piles of bodies of little kids, but no blood and no student desks, no student chairs, no teacher desks, no teacher chairs, which not only indicates it wasn't a mass murder, but it wasn't an operating school.
Now, Scorpio and his Friends, Mike Sledge and Clint, I refer to him as Eastwood, but I've been clarified.
Paul told me he calls himself Clint Eastwood and Doors, which I hadn't caught, I freely admit.
After featuring Mike and Clint, at the suggestion of Paul, did a sequel on the 14th of May.
Really, I don't know what words can be used to describe this program.
I've got a couple images from it, but let me say I was pretty floored.
I listened all 200 minutes, and I gotta say, Scorpio, you guys blew me away.
So I wanted to have Scorpio in here, you know, since he couldn't make the earlier program.
Offer his thoughts.
I'm gonna explain more of what's going on here.
Let me get in.
However, we're gonna I thought we'd focus on Buffalo because that seemed to be the one that they were most attacking.
New Zealand and Buffalo, where they stage a reel.
Danny may be joining us, but he's not here yet.
I suppose everyone knows I am a former Marine Corps officer and that I specialize in collaborative research by bringing together groups of experts to sort out these complex and controversial cases, beginning 30 years ago with JFK.
Or even, uh, no less an eminence than Vince Mugliosi in his magisterial reclaiming history of 1500-page tome attempting to resuscitate the Warren Commission report.
Observe that mine were the only exclusively scientific books ever published on the assassination, I believe, today.
There are others, including a five-volume set by Doug Horn, Inside the ARRB, and David Manik now has two books about the medical evidence, where David and I, he is my longest collaborator, has both a PhD and an MD, and is board-certified in radiation oncology.
He's a leading expert on the medical evidence in the world today.
Has published two books, and he's working on a popularized version with Jerry Corsi, which is all to the good.
Danny was unable to join on one of these vans.
Danny, of course, has a 35-year-old background in law enforcement.
Everyone, how anyone could argue, he wrote me a note that New Zealand was real, was absurd.
You have CGI video.
Buffalo was ridiculous.
The latest Texas mall event was almost comical.
The shooter is reportedly 33 years old again, which comes up as it goes.
Of course, 33, as we know, is one of the key signs that you're dealing with a stage event because they booted everywhere, posted everywhere.
Brian and I, let me mention, created a law enforcement false flag stage event checklist That was to be used to sort out what's going on.
We went through quite a few indications when you're dealing with a false flag.
You can download this from my blog.
I encourage everyone to do that.
Go to jameshfetzer.org.
I'll briefly review it by way of background.
The authors collectively have 40 years of private investigative research and critical analysis of politically significant but factually anomalous events, where aspects are puzzling because they do not add up, and where consideration must be given to whether they may have been staged or faked and blamed on other parties to promote an agenda such as gun control.
Here's some rules of thumb indicating that you could be dealing with such a situation, which means they're highly reliable, but not infallible evidential indicators, early signs.
No surge of EMTs, no string of ambulances, no Bedivac choppers called.
Authentic public medical resources, as a rule, do not participate in stage events.
They may be needed for bona fide medical emergencies.
So you do not see them at Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon bombing, Orlando, Parkland, Las Vegas, Buffalo, or Uvalde.
If they have only token presence, that's a strong indication you're dealing with a stage event in Boston, for example.
Police would not allow real empties to approach the victims who were amputee crisis actors.
Further confirmation, no blood, no body, just dead shooter.
At Sandy Hook, the parents were not even permitted to see their children, who were identified using photographs, apparently because they only existed in the form of photographs.
In Boston, there was initially no blood, which only showed up later and came out of small orange duffel bags.
In Parkland, We have a 57-second video showing a black training dummy with no head and no arms lying on a pool of fake blood and fake cops rushing in and out to boot.
Further proof, conflicting stories, crisis actors, instant publicity.
Calls for gun control from parents who are not displaying appropriate signs of grief are a tell that they are not in a state of grief but promoting a political agenda.
Orlando was egregious.
At Sandy Hook, donation sites were posted before the alleged shooting had even taken place.
In Buffalo, A black eyewitness reported speaking with a white supremacist shooter for an hour the previous day and was reporting the timing of the shots to a tenth of a second in Uvalde.
Two dads for the same kid.
A school teacher from Sandy Hook made an appearance in Uvalde, too.
Corroboration.
No investigation.
Calls for action.
Massive coverage.
When every talking head is giving the same pitch about the horrific shooting and demand for gun control, for most of these are designed to promote the Democrats' gun control agenda, often with the complicity of local law enforcement and even of the FBI.
It becomes entirely apparent this was a staged event to promote a political agenda, an egregious example of which was a Jussie Smollett hate crime, timed to benefit the anti-lynching bill of Kamala Harris and Cory Booker.
Quite an example, the Buffalo grocery store mass shooting, always, of course, mass.
Videos there are available.
You've all seen the Raw Deal 1 June, the Raw Deal 3 June.
The links are given.
Training videos.
Reviewing a dozen or more with quick takes, exposing them as fake.
How to spot a false flag, part one.
How to spot a false flag, part two.
Or the July special with Bill Binney and Dr. Katherine Horton.
How to spot a false flag.
Volkswagen Conspiracies Conference 2020.
More resources?
Check out my BitChute channel and my blog, which should now have an H in it there.
Background.
Disarming law-abiding citizens does not make them more secure.
The nonsense being peddled by past and present Democrat administrations would bring about a minimum of 200,000 additional deaths of Americans By depriving them of the defensive use of guns, which the gun grabbers and their media do not report.
But it would make the easier stew for the invade by a foreign power, which may be the point.
Check out the Second Amendment and the politics of gun control.
Conspiracy theorists.
Those who expose these false flag and stage a ban are liable to be attacked as conspiracy theorists, which is a form of self-defense by the government.
Conspiracy theorists are exposing crimes the government does not want exposed because, more often than not, they lead back to the government.
Don't let yourself be played.
If you know what's going on, then you should be a conspiracy theorist, a conspiracy analyst, or a conspiracy realist.
Check out James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., thinking about conspiracy theories, JFK and 9-11.
You can download from the Internet.
Jim Fetzer, what's wrong with the conspiracy theories on hoons.com?
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to silence us with links.
Meanwhile, let me mention One of the themes that Scorpio and his associates have emphasized is that I and Danny and Brian are supposed to think everything is fake, all shootings are fake, which is of course literally simply absurd.
Just look at Chicago Police Department statistics, for example, for shooting incidents in the last seven days.
49 just in the last seven days in Chicago.
I'm not disputing those incidents are real.
They're also not complex.
They're also not controversial.
They're also not being used to promote a political agenda.
In fact, it's one of the great ironies of the gun control debate.
The city in which they have the most extreme gun control measures, Chicago, has the highest gun violence.
Now, I not only bring about collaborative research and publish many videos going through in detail, piece by piece, evidence after evidence—that's my stock in trade—but I published books about Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, even the moon landing.
I bring together dozens of experts.
In the case of Sandy Hook, there were 13, including six PhDs.
The evidence was that it is meticulous, it's thorough, it's detailed, and yet these conspirators gone wild, as they call themselves.
Jim Fetzer's raw dog deal parts one and two with Scorpio and Sledge and this Clint guy just were savaging everything, said we ignore the evidence, we never discuss the evidence as though we made it all up.
I listened to all 200 minutes of it last night, and frankly, I was appalled.
I think I've never heard a more repulsive radio program broadcast in my lifetime.
200 minutes must have had 500 to 1,000 different obscenities, profanities, ad hominems.
I mean, it was just absolutely littered.
I had perhaps hesitated with regard to the very first comment about this program as to whether to regard it as accurate or not.
It reads, Scorpio and his degenerate gang of idiots and brothers from Shit Mother, Shit Spin, Scorpio the scum artist who like to stab people in the back, don't have nothing to offer, just attacking people who try to wake those weeping normies and Jew eyes Christian.
Go F yourself, Scorpio, with your crap and take the military intelligence idiot office Mike Addy with you to hold your candle.
Get lost, you effing idiot.
They weren't so kind.
I mean, it was with single, you know, attacks on me would string together three or four of these outrageous descriptions.
They said something was fake about the show, But they were talking about Scorpios having been there, when of course he was not.
I just added what I thought was about as mild, just a background for people to understand, and this was I did before I actually listened to the show last night.
Something is fake, since Scorpio did not show and wasn't even on the program.
I sent them all links to my research on New Zealand and on Buffalo, Brian Davidson, PI, has done definitive work, including shadow analysis showing different parts were done at different times.
Just take a look at this and compare with our dribble here.
They really didn't cite good reason to question any of our research, including that of Danny Suris.
I don't get it.
Pathetic.
This is what I sent Paul to share with Brian, but for Paul to share with them, which may or may not have happened, Scorpio can confirm.
Show on New Zealand and Buffalo Friday.
Paul, Brian, Paul's his regular caller to my show, called just now and explained he was in a group discussion last night with some smart guys who think both New Zealand and Buffalo were real.
He proposed doing a show about this, I suggested Friday, and I'm now saying him links to earlier work on New Zealand and our stuff on Buffalo.
I would be glad if you could join.
We can make it a Zoom conference call so we can all be looking at the same images and video.
You did such sensational work on Buffalo.
I'm just a bit flabbergasted there'd be any doubt.
Paul can forward this to them with the links below.
Let me know, Jim.
The links to the New Zealand shootings, were they real or a political stunt?
The raw deal, Ryman Davidson on the Buffalo shooting 20 May.
The raw deal, Brian Davidson on the Buffalo shooting 23 May.
The raw deal, 6 June on false flag stage event checklist.
Let me add now a couple of very specific points, and then I want to invite Scorpio to address them.
Among the points I made that suggested to me these guys really are not at all familiar with my work was one. - Yeah.
Mike said he'd visited my blog and that it was 90% speculation.
Well, anyone who visits my blog and sees 90% articles published by other people, there's nothing speculative about my blog.
I don't believe Mike Gaddy had ever visited my blog.
You're attacking our work on Las Vegas.
When we got to talking about Las Vegas, I think it was Clint, who was saying, how many were there, 10,000?
He did not even know how many were in the concert area at Las Vegas, which of course was 20,000.
It was obvious to me, because they were saying, when I mentioned, I believe, some of the medical experts.
We had an Army military surgeon who wrote about it.
We had another drama surgeon who wrote about it.
All of which is documented in my videos on Las Vegas.
I must draw on 50 different sources.
And here you have this.
I think it was Clint implying that I just manipulate the data.
Well, I didn't manipulate any data.
I don't do that.
Those were letters that have been written to Paul Craig Roberts.
And that he had been published.
All this is in the public domain for crying out loud.
They were even attacking Mona, saying they thought she had a made-up name.
How shallow and superficial is that?
Mona has done such brilliant work.
She investigated the obituaries for the Las Vegas victims and discovered they were based on persons who died in different states or on different dates or for different causes of death.
Not only that, she turned up the crime rate map which surrounded the concert area for 24 hours from 8 p.m.
the night of the event to 8 p.m.
and the only events that were listed were non-violent disorderly conduct, repossession of a motor vehicle, stuff like that, not a single violent event.
I also included one of my Facebook friends that called the three closest hospitals And she enumerated the hospital, gave a phone number.
I verified what she said, asking if they'd had any omission of gunshot victims from the concert, and they all denied no.
They all said they had no gunshot omission from the gunshot, and a third added, if you're calling about the crisis drill, nobody was harmed.
I think you ought to contact the police now.
Scorpio, I welcome criticism.
I have praised you to the sky in the past as among perhaps even the most thoughtful commentator I ever had.
But surely this was beneath you, Scorpio.
I was shocked.
Now, if there's anything to be redeemed here, then I want to use that opportunity, because frankly, honestly, I couldn't have believed my ears, Scorpio.
And you were very much in it with them.
You were not taking exception.
You were not defending any of us from these scurrilous attacks.
And frankly, I was disappointed beyond belief.
But I continue to have respect for you and wanted to have you here.
So go, I'm going to give you as much time as I've just taken to respond to any, anything I've just said, go for it.
Okay.
Well, Jim, first of all, I want to thank you for having me on the show and, um, you know, In regards to the F-250 Report Show, I think you need to realize that first of all, part of the show content is humor.
It's, you know, it's like a Dean Martin roast.
It's sort of an edgy mix of humor, insightful commentary, and criticism of the so-called truth movement.
So, you know, I thought everyone here was all, you know, for free speech, and we were just kind of having some fun with the topic and criticizing at the same time.
It wasn't meant to be any kind of direct attack or hatred towards you.
I think everyone on the show said they still like you and respect you.
Now, First of all, I want to make it very clear, our positions, yours and mine, are not diametrically opposed.
I believe Sandy Hook, I think you pretty much have the story nailed down on Sandy Hook.
I think it was basically a government fabricated event from top to bottom, every aspect of it.
But I think what it's happened over time and same with a Boston bombing by the way.
Those are two blatant examples of absolute fakery.
But I think what's happened after these events is somewhere along the line these people who run these operations realize that you know what it's probably easier just to go ahead and kill people.
Rather than orchestrate all these crisis actors and orchestrate this huge event where there are so many flaws.
I mean, Standing Hook has been torn apart by so many different researchers that the flaws there are too numerous to list at this time on this show.
Everyone, I think, is acquainted with the subject.
But you have to realize, you know, just because you have a crisis actor and they've signed some nondisclosure agreement or something like that, you know, those people still have to be monitored by the intelligence agency.
It's not like you just let them go their merry way for the rest of their lives.
They have to be monitored and looked after to make sure they don't have a change of heart and get a conscience and realize, wow, that was really terrible.
I shouldn't have been involved in such a nefarious activity.
And then, you know, start talking or maybe they get drunk one night and start talking.
No, there's all kinds of scenarios where these people have to be sort of looked in on and I think it's logistically very difficult.
So I think somewhere along the line, they realize, hey, you know, let's use mind controlled killers or take people who were already insane, and simply push them over the edge.
Now we know for a fact that this government, first of all, has no problem killing people.
I mean, I think we could all agree on that.
This government has killed lots of people in false flag attacks in the past.
9-11, for example.
You know, there are some researchers who think that nobody died at 9-11.
That all the victims were fake.
There's no, nobody died.
You know, so I don't believe that.
The exact number of people that were killed is certainly up for debate, but people were killed at 9-11, so we know this government has no problem killing people.
And we also know for a fact that beginning sometime in the early 1950s, as the Korean War was sort of coming to an end, That the United States government started to seriously research into mind control and search for a so-called Manchurian candidate.
Because from the research I've been doing, really, when soldiers started coming back from Korea who were captured and were so-called forced to do videos and renounce the United States and say all these things, after they came when soldiers started coming back from Korea who were captured and were so-called forced to do videos and renounce the United States and say all these They stayed with their stories that their Korean captors had told them.
And so this concern, you know, people high up, and this is sort of the origin, or at least the public origin of MKUltra.
So I believe that's been going on at least since the 1950s, probably longer than that, is my guess.
But at least we can verify that since the 1950s they were doing this kind of research.
And so you combine that with the fact that this government willingly kills people, they've handed out a death shot to millions of people, convinced them to take the shot, knowing full well they'll be killed.
So I don't think it's a stretch of the imagination that some of these shootings are real.
And they simply used a mind-controlled victim or someone who was already mentally ill, who intelligence agents simply pushed over the edge and convinced to do something crazy.
Then you liquidate or terminate the shooter at the end of the event.
No fuss, no muss.
You don't have any loose ends.
So the guy comes in and kills people and then the shooter's killed.
End of story.
There's no loose ends to have to tie together or to manage.
So that's where I'm coming from in short.
And so I'll hand it back to you and we'll go from there.
Very good, yes, yes.
You have a general conception that would be simpler, as it were, to simply use demanded individuals a government can readily detect to actually kill people.
And no one would deny that's not even logically possible, meaning there's nothing self-contradictory about describing going about conducting these events in that manner.
But it's also physically possible, meaning there's no laws of physics, biology, psychology that would inhibit that from happening.
So I certainly agree, and Brian's not going to deny, that that's a possible scenario.
I don't go into these events taking for granted they're fake, but if I see the signs, I may say there's a presumption that it's probably fake, but then look at each of the cases individually.
I mentioned, and it never emerged, even at least hinted, During this onslaught against the three of us, did I bring together groups of experts?
I mean, that's what I am known for.
That is going to be my enduring contribution, bringing together groups of experts.
So it's not merely my sole opinion.
With JFK, my God, how many did I bring together?
The best students to ever study the assassination, world authority on the human brain and expert on wound ballistics.
Ph.D.
in physics, also an M.D.
mantic, another Ph.D.
expert in electromagnetism to study the film, a physician who was in trauma, room number one, looking after the alleged, you know, the dead president, and then two days later, his alleged assassin.
This is what I do.
This is my specialization, bringing together experts.
Sandy Hook, 13 experts, including six Ph.D.s, We concluded the school had been closed by 2008.
Turns out it actually closed in 2006.
Wasn't even an elementary school.
It was a special needs school.
Look at aerial photographs.
They don't even have a playground.
They don't even have a playground.
This is supposed to be an elementary school and they don't even have a playground?
Yeah.
And that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control where we even find the manual.
Now, Scorpion, what I found most offensive about this entire program, it implied I do all this evidence independent that I just make this stuff up as though I or Brian or Danny were some kind of loons who just grasp after straws.
That was so insulting.
That was so wrong.
And when I saw They didn't even know how many had been participating at the concert in Las Vegas.
I knew this was a sham, because they literally did not know what they were talking about.
Literally.
And for Mike to claim he'd gone to my blog and 90% of its speculation, when 90% isn't even by me, was further insulting.
And that you were right there as a part of it, Scorpio, that just, that hurt, I gotta tell you.
Okay.
Well, uh, Jim, uh, not to change the subject here, but I'm, I'm getting reports from people that are trying to listen that we are not on the air, uh, on revolution radio.
It's dead air on, on studio B. Wow.
So, you know, I've had a couple of different people with him with that.
So, all right.
All right.
I'll see.
Yeah.
Bad day for that problem to happen.
Yeah, the problem with the...
Studio A apparently is playing Alex Jones, but Studio B is...
I'm getting reports that it's dead air.
Yeah.
It's Memorial Day, man.
Everybody's listening.
That's a shame.
Yeah.
Well, we'll get it.
You're still going to have this up on your bitch suit.
Well, I don't know, trying to contact, uh, one of the tech guys or somebody and find out what's going on.
Cause apparently the phone number is not working either to call in to listen live.
The phone number is not working.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, huh.
Well, David, let's just you and I talk for a second.
Let's go ahead and do it.
Hold on just one second.
I'll let you go, Brian.
But Jim, in response to what you're saying, ultimately it doesn't matter if there's 10,000 or 20,000 people at the concert.
The point they were trying to make is that that's a lot of crisis actors.
Or people who were involved that could have seen if the whole thing was completely fake, what it may have seen something they shouldn't have a lot of loose ends.
So I think that's the point they're trying to make it first and secondly, you know, That show is partly comedy, and I think everyone here supports free speech, and it's sort of an edgy mix of comedy and insightful commentary, and it's not for everybody.
I mean, I don't think the show would be allowed to play on Revolution Radio or any other network, so we have our own independent network that the show's on.
But anyway, I just want to reiterate that point to you.
Yeah, that's good.
That's good, Scarpio.
- Yeah, yeah.
So, okay, and Brian- - No one is suggesting there were 20,000 crisis actors in Las Vegas.
And this is another pattern I found throughout the show.
Everything was exaggerated.
Everything was creating an aversion that was so ridiculous, it was easy to attack.
I didn't see a single responsible attack throughout the entire 200 minutes.
We know, we know they hired crisis actors from crowds on demand.
I documented it in the videos.
They had about 500, because they had to pay people who were reacting saying, oh, I'm shot, or, you know, react as though it was real, when it wasn't.
They were playing a soundtrack of a machine gun firing over the PA system, and then they were using coordinated special effects, like A light flashing in the fourth floor of the Mandalay Bay to coordinate making a real machine gun.
I did mention, by the way, during the show, we even have video of a guy stepping out in the crowd and firing on the crowd, but no one's hit because he's firing blanks.
We have that.
We have an assistant director stepping out to tell a couple they got to redo their scene because it wasn't satisfactory.
I mean, the evidence of Las Vegas is overwhelming.
There is no way Anyone who actually watched one of my presentations on Las Vegas would make the claims that were coming from Clint and Mike during that show because I was so ridiculously divergent from what I was actually doing in the program and the thoroughness of the doc.
I specialize in evidence-based reasoning.
That's what the hell I do, Scorpio, and you guys were acting as though I don't ever console evidence at all.
That was just so disgraceful, so fabricated, so irresponsible.
Look, I want to let Brian jump in here.
But, you know, saying something looks fake on video is not necessarily evidence.
And I think that's part one of the criticisms that was level.
And, you know, as far as Las Vegas goes, you know, I The problem I have with that is that I actually know some people that live in Las Vegas, and one of my friends I've known for many years knows someone whose relative died in Las Vegas.
So I'm not saying that's enough proof for me to think it's real, but that's, you know, Why would this, you know, my friend lie to me or make something up?
I mean, you know, this is real life accounts from someone who actually knows a guy whose family member was actually killed.
I can't tell you why they'd lie or make it up, but I can guarantee you 100% they are lying or making it up.
Give us their name.
Listen, every single case we've got, Mona has investigated.
She discovered one of these most cases was a guy who's actually moved all over the country because he turns out to be a crisis actor himself.
He's going where the money is.
They're paying big bucks to these crisis actors.
My source is from Sandy Hook from Newtown, two of whom participated.
One is supposed to be Emily Parker, real name Margaret Cottle.
The other, Victoria Aurelio, Vicky Soto, also Eva Morales.
In Uvalde.
They both explained some of the crisis actors in Nashville, for example, have been trained in Connecticut.
And while Vicky got $210,000 to reprise her role at Uvalde, they now jacked it up to $310,000.
I don't know what they may have been paying in Las Vegas, but give me the name and we will check it out.
I do this.
We follow it up.
Mona will track it down and see what she comes up with because I'm open.
But when you got video that shows a guy stepping out in the crowd and firing off, but there's nobody hit because he's using blanks.
When you got the assistant director coming up and tell them they got to redo the scene, when you got lights flashed.
I'd like to see that video, Jim.
I'd like to see that video.
Well, why didn't you watch my goddamn Las Vegas?
You're going to criticize it without watching it?
This is where I fault you.
This was so irresponsible, and there was nothing humorous.
I defy anyone to listen to that whole 200 minutes and find anything humorous there, was there?
Okay, well I thought everyone here was an advocate of free speech.
There was not a shred of humor there.
It was disgusting.
It was vulgar.
It was obscene.
It was low-life, Scorpio, and I'm really embarrassed that you were right in their pitch.
Okay, that's fine.
You can have an opinion what you want.
But I thought everyone here was an advocate of free speech.
And since when is everyone getting so offended by words on a podcast?
I thought I thought where the truth movement and everyone's open to new ideas and, and and anything goes.
And, you know, we're not gonna be offended and, you know, mind control by political correct ideas.
It was just, you know, so I just think you should lighten up.
And, you know, it was just, you Some criticism, but I do think there are some legitimate points made.
I really do.
Well, let's go.
Let's go and search in the show today.
Let's search for the legitimate points, and here's the reason why I'm so disturbed.
I didn't find any truth in there at all.
This is a true thing.
This was debunking those of us who are expanding our efforts, even publishing books.
I defy you to tell me any of you have read even one of my books.
I'm certain You've never even read one of my books because the remarks you are making are so contradicted.
They are so contradicted by everything I do.
I have several of your books.
I have several of your books.
What?
Tell me which books of mine have you read?
I have the Sandy Hook book and I assume it didn't go to the moon either book.
Good, good.
That's actually my favorite, and I suppose it didn't come from me.
And no one's knocking your research on Sandy Hook or the Boston bombing and, you know, the Kennedy assassination, that sort of thing.
But look, I think we're letting the government off the hook here.
If we're saying, hey, it's all fake.
They're not really killing people.
The government wouldn't do that.
Yes, they would.
They kill people all the time.
And I think that we're having the wrong discussion here.
Like, is it fake or is it not?
The whole point here is that these are definitely false flag events.
So I want to make it clear.
I don't think these are some kind of organic thing where, you know, even though there's no shortage of mentally ill people in America today, America has become, you know, a free range, open air insane asylum for so many different reasons.
There's lots of mentally ill people in America today, but I do not believe that these are organic, you know, events that just happen on their own.
There's no question these are orchestrated by the government with the express purpose of getting, you know, gun control in the future.
And I think they're playing the long game because when the younger people come in and, you know, sort of take power over the government, a lot of these younger people are already ready for gun controls.
It's the older people, Generation Xers and the boomers primarily, who are against it.
Once you get into the millennial population, the beliefs towards guns have already changed quite a bit, and it's due to this constant pushing of You know, these fake events, and I mean in terms of being a government controlled operation, but I think we're letting the government off the hook.
If we say, hey, the government's not actually killing people.
Yes, they are killing people.
They kill people all the time.
They're actually engaged in a mass culling of the population right now through the death shot.
And as I said before, 9-11, thousands of people were killed in that.
It's debatable how many exactly, but there's a whole list of false flags.
Look, Pearl Harbor was a false flag.
We know that.
It's been proven beyond a doubt.
The book Day of Deceit proves it beyond a doubt with primary source documents that the FDR and his crew not only knew the attack was coming, but they did all they could to provoke it and even moved, you know, all the old ships into the harbor so that they could be blown up and actually recalled A lot of people's leave so there'd be as many people aboard the ships when the attack happened.
So America has a long history of killing its own population and civilians as well as their own military.
Yes, yes, yes.
And no one, certainly not Brian or I, would deny it's possible these are real events.
That's why we investigate them in such detail to establish one way or the other.
And I know we want to look at, if not New Zealand, Buffalo.
I've got it set up so we can look at Buffalo in detail.
And you can explain why you think Buffalo involved real deaths.
And Brian wanted to jump in.
That's exactly where I go.
So let's let him.
Oh, no, no, no.
Brian is being very patient.
And I want to invite his extended commentary here.
Brian, yours.
Well, okay.
So I'm not supposed to take it personally that these guys said this.
Okay.
No problem.
I'm a professional.
I have a license.
I have a business.
I happen to run the top rated private investigation company in Houston.
So don't take it personally.
Well, it's just my personally.
I mean, go ahead and tell me what you found.
So let's just, let's just slow down a little bit.
Okay.
I had nothing against these guys.
I didn't know these guys.
I had nothing.
against them.
They're part of, as far as I'm concerned, they're part of the truth move.
And I was willing to have a discussion with these guys.
So when it was my turn to talk during the show, I talked about the sigh and psychological operations.
I talked about cognitive dissonance.
I talked about why people get stuck between two mental positions and they got to fall one way or the other.
That's where the show went bad.
I mean, it went bad right there.
The That guy took offense, took personal offense, at me talking about cognitive dissonance in the psychology of psychological operations.
Okay, Brian, let me address that point.
Okay, but I want to address that point.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt, but I want to address that point.
Go ahead, Brian.
Now, you know, when I go do analysis, what I do is I pull the earliest and most reliable evidence.
I don't come with aftermarket.
I try to get the earliest video, which is why on Buffalo I did it that way.
Uvalde, what did I analyze?
I analyzed the earliest and most reliable video I could find.
Same with Nashville.
It's always about finding the earliest and most reliable video that originates from the scene, and then parsing and analyzing that particular piece of footage.
Now, I could come at it from 500 different directions, but I choose to go with the earliest and most reliable analysis.
To me, that's fair play.
And I don't know, I don't understand why that makes me speculate.
I'm not giving conclusions about what happened here.
I'm simply showing it slowed down with some analysis.
And I don't understand why that's not acceptable as evidence.
Why that's not evidence.
Okay.
I want to address the point you made about cognitive dissonance because when you said all that, you were basically implying that somehow, you know, we weren't woken up and, you know, we're still in the matrix and like, I just want you to be be clear to you.
I've been researching this stuff for like 30 years.
Mike Sledge has been in this about 30 years.
Clint's a little younger than both of us, but he still he has a very deep understanding of what's going on here.
So the idea that we're suffering from cognitive dissonance is, is just what I said.
It wasn't directed at you, Scott.
Why would I do that?
Y'all are part of the community.
I was talking about in generally, how they pull off a psychological operation.
Now, if you inferred it, But don't say I implied it.
There's a difference.
I didn't imply it personally.
You inferred it, if you inferred it at all, because I was talking about, in general, how they pull them off.
Well, it sounded like you were talking to Mike when you said that.
But that's fine.
Either way, it's fine.
I'm not offended by anything you said.
It doesn't matter.
I don't know the guy.
The guy took it personally.
Okay, no problem.
I was willing to let it slide.
But, you know, he just kept going and kept going and kept going.
Now, that said, why Given my style of analysis, focusing on the earliest, the most, why is that not persuasive evidence?
Why is that not acceptable?
I don't understand.
Well, we need to go into specific things.
We're talking very generally, like, if you want to present some of your evidence about the, let's say, the Buffalo shooting, I'd very much like to go through that again, because I have to say, after seeing the raw footage of the shooter's video, it looked pretty damn real to me.
It really did.
And I, you know, it's a shame this is not on Revolution Radio.
I'm really disappointed.
There's complete dead air still on Revolution Radio.
None of this is going on air.
It's actually very disappointing.
We're doing this to basically nobody right now.
Zero people are listening.
I don't know what the problem is on Revolution Radio's end, but it's completely dead air.
I hope there's somebody in their studio trying to figure out what's going on.
Well, let me see again if I can find a way to connect.
Okay, so you were there during my Buffalo presentation and you say it looked real, so therefore I'm wrong.
Well, Yeah, I think it's real footage.
I really do.
And, you know, we can go through it, you know, piece by piece or whatever.
But I'll tell you one of the most convincing things is at the very beginning of the video, where he shoots this woman outside of the building, and she falls face forward without even moving her hands forward to protect her face from hitting the ground.
So either they had a rubber stage, you know, like a wrestling ring for her to fall in on the parking lot.
Or they paid a crisis actor a lot of money to take a face plant and basically crush her face into the into the pavement of the of the parking lot.
Right after he shoots this woman, he shoots out the front window, you can see the bullets hitting the front window.
So, you know, Um, I don't think you can say you can't completely discount that and say it's all fake.
I don't see how you can do that.
I honestly don't.
Let us, uh, let us, let us go there.
I had set up for us to review, uh, New Zealand.
I'm skimming through this.
and drives to the Linwood Moss.
- We were talking about the Buffalo shooting.
- Buffalo is based on New Zealand.
Scorpio, you're aware of that, right?
- There's two separate events though.
I want to be clear too.
I want to do every event separately.
I don't want to lump things together because they're all separate.
- I'm skimming through this.
Give me a minute for crying out loud.
It has a quality of a video game with loads of phony images.
It's bad.
You can get 10 years in New Zealand for having the video on your desktop.
I've included the whole thing in my, you know, go to the 65 shows in New Zealand is one of the very first.
We did a whole lot about New Zealand.
I mean, this is, oh, here's a crucial part of it where you can see that it looks as though shell casings are being emitted, but they never hit the ground.
They disappear in midair.
Notice the painted up gun, which again is something we find in Buffalo.
This was done with CGI.
They have these shell casings emitted, and it was not happening too fast.
They just, they put them in, they put them in.
This is a pretty good little clip just to show that can be done.
And because of the painted up Pueblan, you'll see how obvious it is that we're talking about a New Zealand variation in Buffalo.
Never hit the ground.
You never hear the sound of metal.
Very good here.
I'm going to give it one more minute to lay this out.
Then we'll turn to Buffalo.
All right.
With no hitch action.
There you go.
There you go.
The mosque, all that comes in, room full of bodies already.
This is just to give you a sense about the video.
This is so amateurish.
You got the driver driving around.
He's got his toy guns and I'm just pointing out it's going to be very much like what happens in Buffalo.
I'm not going to belabor it because we want to go to Poorly scripted, poorly acted, anyone can see it's fake.
All the signs of a false flag, an amateurish one.
The Linwood shooting involved marginally better acting than Vickery.
Gratuitously called out Donald Trump as a symbol of white identity.
So bad you can get 10 years.
Here they have, you know, some crisis actors lying.
This is from Linwood.
There's more.
I mean, they're doing this all over the country.
Here's now Buffalo.
Yeah.
Hang on.
Hang on.
Go ahead.
Let me respond to some of this.
Um, you know, first of all, What the hell is Amos doing in New Zealand?
That's a question we should be asking.
Secondly, you know, these live stream GoPro camera, um, you know, videos are very low quality and they have very low streaming quality.
So there's going to be anomalies on them.
There's definitely some weird things in that video, but again, that does not necessarily mean that nobody was killed.
I mean, I go through a document, it's in spades, you got a guy shooting him point-blank and there's no blood.
He falls down, he walks into a room and the bodies are already there.
He comes up and he fires in and blows a little wind, there's no blood.
Scorpio, have you watched my stuff on New Zealand?
Absolutely, absolutely.
But Jim, when someone's shot, there isn't always a huge pool of blood immediately.
Huge pool of blood.
When he comes back, they've added the fake blood.
Scargio, I'm beginning to question your critical faculties.
This is astounding to me.
You think New Zealand was real?
What do you mean real?
Do I think people may have been killed there?
Yes, I think people may have been killed there.
It's possible.
I'm not going to say for certain on that one, but I think it's possible.
Yes, the people were killed there.
And yes, there's all kinds of weird anomalies in the video, but that does not mean that this wasn't a government operation used to take away people's guns and clamp down on the internet.
And I think the other trap that you guys might be falling into here is by saying, okay, everything's fake.
People can make the argument that you are very, being very callous.
You don't care about the pain and suffering of other human beings.
And it looks, I'm just saying that it's a criticism that normies or the general public could easily make is that you look very callous and aren't interested in the suffering of people who might've had their family members killed.
I'm not saying I believe that personally though.
Look, let's go to Buffalo.
Let's go to, let's go to Buffalo and see what you have to say there.
But I think if you want to go point through point on the, the, the, uh, New Zealand shooting, let's do it.
But you can't show 15 different things and expect me to respond to all of them.
Oh, no, I wasn't expecting.
I was just showing that it's all out there for discussion.
Not that.
No.
Again, it's really a shame that this is not on air.
We're not talking to anybody right now.
It's really a shame that of all the times that Revolution Radio completely goes dead, it's right now.
I think it's odd.
And it's a shame that we're not talking to anybody right now.
I mean, maybe we should reschedule this.
I don't know.
It's absolute dead air still on Revolution Radio and the phone numbers don't work to call it.
I know I've gone back to try to connect with Mitchell and I'm not having success.
Let me try again.
I'll pause the recording and see if I can get us.
Well, it's just weird that of all times it's now this whole studio goes dead.
Uh, well, the deal has been Scorpio that Mitchell was hit with a weather problem and we've had difficulty connecting since I've had to go directly to the studio.
Well, I mean, Brian, I mean, look, some of that was just comedy.
Like you ever watched a Dean Martin roast.
Some of that's what it was.
Some of it, you know, and look, it wasn't meant to be in a personal attack on anyone.
It was comedy.
I hope you guys can understand that it wasn't.
You know, part of what we do is we poke fun at the conspiracy movement because there are some serious flaws, I believe, in the truth movement and that's why it's so completely ineffective right now.
Okay, yeah, there's the video there.
So, look, it wasn't meant to be an attack or nobody called you guys liars.
We never did that.
No, it's true.
You want me to enumerate what we were called in there?
Have you listened to that?
I was there.
Edward, retard, idiots.
I mean, by God, this was the most disgraceful thing I've ever heard on the radio ever, ever, ever.
You go list.
There must be a thousand ad hominems and obscenity directed at me and Brian and Danny.
A thousand in 200 minutes.
You go back and listen and count.
I think you must be so immune to it.
You, you don't even notice the repulsive things that are being said right there in front of you that you were endorsing.
Again, it was comedy.
It was comedy, Jim.
It wasn't a hundred percent serious.
So if you can't see that, it's fine.
It wasn't meant to be an insult towards anyone.
Think of the old Dean Martin.
Think of the old Dean Martin roast from back in the day.
That's what it was.
I look, I enjoyed those.
It was nothing like a Dean Monroe says it was all out.
Take no prisoners.
Burned to the ground.
I mean, it was scorched earth.
I've never heard anything like it.
Brian, do you want to add before I've got the video set up to look at?
Are we recording now?
Okay, you are recording.
Okay.
Yeah.
All right.
All right.
Good.
No, I don't.
I don't have it.
Look, I think I think it was unfair.
It was worse than unfair.
And again, I didn't mean to imply that y'all... What I was saying was, I was giving an explanation for how, when the whole thing went bad, for how people synchronize the events.
Is it real?
Is it fake?
I happen to be one that falls on the side of, if I can find something fake, I'm going to argue, or at least try to put all the puzzle pieces together, that the whole thing's fake.
Then there's people that are, it's real.
They're going to argue for, they're going to put the whole thing together as real.
But the hybrid is the one that I cannot understand.
I don't understand it.
Because how can you have some portions of the event, which are absolute impossibilities, combined in the same intellectual box?
I have a hard time with synchronization that way.
Yeah, sure.
I don't think anyone said that there's such thing as, you know, a hybrid event where there's like crisis actors and people being killed at the same time.
No one said that.
It's absurd to even contemplate that.
But I do think there's a possibility that with some of these events, you actually had multiple shooters who were involved in this.
And then you had one guy that takes the fall.
Because it's not beyond the realm of possibility that you could take burned out and jaded, twisted, ex-Special Forces guys who were just willing to do anything and set them loose and kill people.
and then have a fall guy there that gets shot at the end to take the fall.
So that's not beyond the realm of possibility.
There's a lot of different scenarios that could happen, but I'll make it clear.
I'm not ever arguing that these are organic events.
That's not at all what I am trying to say or anyone else is saying.
Well, you've made an important clarification, Erskine, because I thought that was your argument, that these are hybrid events, that some people are killed and others are crisis actors.
No, no, no.
Not at all.
No.
So you think, you think Buffalo and possibly New Zealand were legit throughout?
You think that's a possibility, given your familiarity with the evidence already?
I think New Zealand may have had multiple shooters.
Uh, and then you had, I mean, the whole thing stinks to high heaven.
There's no question about that.
The government was involved in this thing from top to bottom.
And there's definitely anomalies in the video, but that does not necessarily mean that nobody was killed.
That's my point.
Now, you know, we just interviewed Max Egan recently.
Uh, I don't know if you've heard of him, but he has a pretty big, you know, following of people and he, he was convinced that.
I went after Max Egan on this.
I thought he was being a shill.
I repudiated his claims about it.
So yeah, I know Max Egan.
And I think he could not be more wrong.
I mean, it was very disturbing for Max Egan to come out and suggest Christchurch shooting were real.
I was floored by that, Scorpio.
But then I'm beginning to learn that I shouldn't take anything for granted.
Well, I'm not, you know, I'm not, you know, I just on the Christchurch, I'm sort of, you know, open to different possibilities on that, because, you know, the bottom line is, we don't really know what happened with these.
And we don't, here's the other thing, none of us know what a mass shooting looks like in real life, because we've never actually been at one.
And when you see video, there's going to be anomalies because it's very low quality video number one.
Number two, the streaming portion of it is very low quality.
So there's going to be weird things that happen in the video because of just the you know, the low quality nature of it.
But I don't think we should let the government off the hook and saying they're not killing people.
Maybe they are killing people and they do it all the time.
We have a government that doesn't care about killing people.
And I actually believe that there's another element to this where they're actually sacrificing people to create suffering and create a negative vibration.
But that's, you know, on a metaphysical plane, that's not provable or part of the evidence.
How's exposing the government, creating sham shooting events as pro-terrorism, letting the government off the hook?
I don't get that.
Because if the government is actually killing people, it's much worse.
It's much worse if they're actually killing people, and I think they're capable of doing that.
Well, of course!
Of course!
I mean, who's gonna argue?
Pearl Harbor, 9-11, all that?
Of course, Scorpio!
I mean, this is so effing obvious, you know?
The point is that what's actually going on is more subtle and manipulative, in my opinion, more biabolical, because they're using taxpayer money to pay these communities to run these scams for political purposes, and the timing I mean, they are exquisite in their timing.
They need an event to support a piece of legislation.
They orchestrate the event.
Jussie Smollett being the most blatant example thereof.
Yeah, yeah, that was amateur hour.
But you know, I mean, I agree.
They do orchestrate these things at the right time.
And that can be done using mind controlled assassins.
And it can be done using mentally ill retards who are simply pushed over the edge by intelligence agency handlers who are experts at manipulation and drugging people or whatever other methods they may use to push someone over the edge.
I think there's drugs they can give these guys that make them The people who are already mentally ill to begin with, of course.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, let's look at Buffalo and perhaps we can come back to New Zealand.
Here is the Buffalo footage.
Let's take a look.
Drives in, drives around, got the painted up gun just like New Zealand.
You can see it there.
I mean, you should stop it right there, you should stop it right there, Jim.
Well, we're going to come back frame by frame.
We're going to come back, Scorpio.
I just want to introduce, this is just an introduction.
Yeah.
Hey, I got to say that all looks pretty real to me, especially at the very beginning.
I mean, Scorpio, we get that.
We get that.
I mean, see the body.
Uh, you know, sort of, uh, the whole body there just reverberated and flinched from the shooting.
Uh, you know, so, uh, and then notice he doesn't shoot the white guy.
I think he actually apologizes to him.
Brian, you want to pick up on this?
Well, I have a photo from the event immediately after.
It was the very first photo I could find from the event.
It was taken from just to the left of the shooter, where it looks down at the woman in blue, in theory.
I'd have to take a closer look at it.
I believe she's a dummy.
I believe she's been CGI'd in, which is why I did the shadow analysis on that shadow.
Which, okay, that wasn't persuasive enough.
Okay, that's fine.
Now he turns, now he turns.
Okay.
Wait, let me address this point.
So you think that the woman shot at the beginning outside the store is CGI, that there was no woman there?
And it was a CGI insertion?
I haven't made a conclusion, and nor did I make a conclusion in the video itself.
I looked at everything else.
I admit it looks real, but looks real doesn't make it real.
Yeah, I'm fine with that, which is why I did the analysis.
I didn't make a statement about that.
I did the analysis frame by frame.
Yeah, well, the woman hits the pavement pretty hard.
And that's a real person.
She took a face plant into that pavement where you would certainly break your nose and God only knows what else.
I'm willing to I'm willing to concede that it looks persuasive.
That doesn't make the whole event persuasive.
No, the next thing he turned, he turns the gun to the left and he shoots five shots through the window.
They went up when a bullet hits a Two-liter bottle of soda pop.
What happens to that bottle of soda pop?
It explodes, correct?
Well, yeah.
So these five bullets, we're being told, go through the windows and then turn left to where the shooter takes that kill shot.
And then they turn left and they've knocked down those two women.
So these bullets go through that window, take a left-hand turn around that corner, and then hit these women, and the soda bottles are spilled out onto the floor.
No carbonation, no spraying, no nothing.
That's what happens.
So, I don't believe those five shots are real at all, because it's impossible for those five shots to go through that window, hit that bottle, open up that bottle, spill it on the floor, not leave anything, leave nice brown soda on the floor, plus take out those two women, who were sitting 30 feet to the left of where the wall is at.
I just have trouble believing that they're going to CGI a video that very few people are going to see.
And that looked awfully real.
I just don't believe that's CGI.
I really don't.
I'm sorry.
Okay.
I don't care.
Okay.
I don't, I don't care how they pulled it off.
It's some sort of special effect.
I don't have to have that particular answer.
I'm looking at everything I can analyze.
But the problem is you're, you're approaching it from the standpoint is I want to prove it's fake.
Yes, that's right.
That's right.
But you can't do that.
You have to, you have to, you have to be neutral in your assessment of things.
I don't have a predisposed conclusion.
I don't have a predisposed conclusion.
Actually, from a logical point of view, Scorpio, it doesn't matter.
after Actually, even if you have a conclusion in mind before you look at the evidence or look at the evidence and have a conclusion in mind, because it's a logical relation, which is timeless and isn't dependent on psychology or which came first.
Well, sure, but if the evidence is there to substantiate fraud, I mean, then it's fraudulent.
I don't think you should approach... I don't think you should approach an event with a predisposed conclusion.
I understand that, but I'm arguing a side, just like two opposing attorneys in court.
One's arguing one side, one's arguing the other side.
If you don't believe my analysis, that's fine.
I'm arguing one side of it, which is, I think, it's a fake event.
And I'm not really arguing either side, frankly.
I'm just telling what I've seen from my own observational skills.
And I'm an artist.
I do highly realistic paintings, so I know a lot about light and shadow and what looks real, what doesn't.
That looked real, and I don't see how you explain away that woman doing a faceplant on concrete or pavement.
I do think it's possible.
I do think it's possible.
I don't know how they do it.
had like a fake uh you know parking lot with a rubber stage or something i mean i don't think it's possible okay should we go back to the to the video i do think it's possible i do think it's i don't know how they do it i think it's possible how did they do it That's what I just said.
I don't know how they did it, but I do think it's possible to do it.
You've reached a conclusion.
That's why I didn't make any conclusions, Scorpio.
I didn't make any conclusions.
I just presented my analysis.
Well, that's a weak argument, I have to say.
Well, I don't have to argue every point for every person, everywhere, all the time.
I argue it the way I see it.
What about those frames that we got set up here?
I'd like to go through those with you, Brian, and then we'll return to the video.
Start here, Brian.
Okay, this is what they consider to be the most convincing part of it.
I don't know how the man in the back, in the trunk, falls down.
The gun is never even aimed at him.
He falls down.
This woman falls down.
It looks convincing.
We got nice bright shadow there.
I did analysis of it.
I presented it.
It is what it is.
And I don't necessarily know how.
I don't have to explain every single tiny anomaly.
I'm trying to persuade the argument based on the evidence that I've seen.
And that's persuasive evidence.
It's not courtroom evidence.
I don't never claim to be ready for day one in court where I'm going to be reviewed by a jury of my peers with a judge deciding what's hearsay and what's not.
I'm trying to do the best I can with the information that's available to me, which is the earliest and most reliable evidence.
This is a good one because you got the guy in the trunk beginning to fall and he hasn't even been shot.
The shooter just finished firing three rounds as he moves a muzzle to the left.
He's now allegedly struck the woman with the first, missed her across the front of the body with the next two.
He thus could not have shot the man at the trunk with any rounds so far.
The second and third could have struck the black car in the background, but there are no bullet holes in the car.
The woman is the alleged shooter, continues to pan his weapon to the left, even shooting at the person near the car.
The man at the trunk falls to the ground as though he is shot, but he could not possibly have been shot since the shooter never passed the front of the woman with a muzzle and a gun during that time.
Notice there are no bullet holes in the car, even though the shooter Shot pass a woman into the car with the latest two rounds.
I think this is pretty powerful.
Are you talking about, are you talking about the woman in front of the building that's lying there?
Yeah, sure.
Well, she could have been a homeless person that's lying on the ground and they shot her.
No, no, no, no.
I'm talking about the man at the back here who there's never even been a muzzle pointed in his direction, and yet he's falling to the ground.
I mean, I think this is pretty telling.
Are you missing that point?
There's a lot of reasons why the guy might hit the ground, you know?
No, no, no.
There's never even the chance he's been shot, Scorpio.
There's never the chance he's been shot.
The gun is never pointed at him, Scorpio.
Play it again.
Play it again.
Sure, sure.
Well, that's why I'm going through these frames.
I mean, you know, this is so important.
Let's just watch it again, you know?
Oh, we will.
Sure, we will.
Yeah, I just want to highlight what we have here in the still frames.
A woman being shot with a burst round.
Then she starts to fall.
The man at the drug is already falling, even though there's no chance he's been shot.
Again, he's now on the ground already, but there's no chance he's actually been shot.
OK, let's go back to the video.
Here we go.
No, that's right.
That's right.
Here we go.
Right here.
Let me replay that.
He never points the muzzle at the guy at the back of the car.
Never.
But the guy's on the ground nevertheless.
Garbio, I can play it again and again.
You know, the bullet could have passed right through that woman though.
Brian has already addressed that.
Brian.
Well, it's possible the bullet could have passed right through her.
Yeah, but it wasn't pointed at him.
The bullet projectory in a straight line would not have hit him even had it passed through the woman.
And Brian made that point.
He made that point.
You got a you got a fake body there.
Okay, well, that's a minor.
Let's keep going with I mean, look, that's not minor.
If you got if you you agree, there are no hybrids.
And if you know, I never said well, no, no, we already addressed that.
And if you got a hybrid event, either people are killed or they're not.
There's no hybrid event.
You're not going to have crisis actors in an event where people are being killed, obviously.
It's not possible.
So what do you think of Grady?
Do you find his testimony to be persuasive?
Who?
Grady.
The black guy.
Well, yeah, but I'd have to see the footage again to comment on it, frankly.
Scorpio, you made the point yourself.
You know, no self-respecting white supremacists are going to spend an hour talking to a black guy.
That was your point.
Well, yeah, but I'd have to see the footage again to comment on it, frankly.
And, you know, maybe he was just doing, you know, intel, scoping out the place.
You know, I don't know.
Listen to this, Scorpio.
He said the second shot was 1.7 seconds after the first.
Do you find that credible?
I'd have to hear the whole thing again, Jim.
Oh, come on!
Did you have a stopwatch to start when the first shot fired?
How would he know when the first shot was going to be fired?
And who the hell is going to be measuring it?
I don't know how black people think, Jim.
Scorpio!
I don't know how black people think.
You are discrediting yourself.
You are taking a position that's so stupid on his face.
I cannot believe you are making this decision.
Jim, Jim, I'm saying I need to see the footage again before I comment on it.
That's what I'm saying.
So I'm not discrediting.
Hypothetically, assume I'm giving an accurate moment.
He said the second shot was 1.7 seconds after the first.
I'd have to hear it in context with what he was saying before I can comment.
I said, assume that what I'm telling you is accurate, because it is.
He said the second shot was 1.7 seconds after the first.
Is that credible on its face?
Well, it's a strange thing to say, yes.
But that isn't evidence of anything.
It's a manifest absurdity!
How could he know when the first shot's going to happen, Score, if he ought to start timing it?
How would he know that?
He's maybe he's trying to sound intelligent.
I don't know.
I'd have to hear it again.
I would have to hear the footage again before I can comment on it.
That's what I'm saying.
like that.
I am floored.
Floored.
Jim, I would have to hear the footage again before I can comment on it.
That's what I'm saying.
Let's go with more of the Buffalo footage.
Yeah.
They also made a big deal about the produce.
I wasn't talking about the produce.
I was talking about the grocery store is empty.
Where are the customers?
You got these crisis actors.
Yeah, but where are the rest of the customers?
They aren't there.
You don't even have anyone in the pharmacy.
Well, there's some dead people on the floor.
And let me say, look the guy, look, wait, hold on.
I want you to look at that footage again.
Let me go back here.
The guy's body shakes after being shot.
And you think, and you Scorpio think this is real, right?
You think the shooting this guy in the head is authentic?
You think this is authentic?
It looks real to me, yes.
Let me go back here again.
I mean, none of us know exactly what a mass shooting looks like.
Do you understand that a head would blow apart?
None of us have actually physically been in a mass shooting, so we don't know exactly what a mass shooting looks like.
I think we need to all admit that.
I don't know.
Did it end there, Brian?
Was that the end of the video or did I?
No, well, here was my point, and I don't know if anybody remembers this.
There are two versions of the video.
I think I proved that.
I think I proved that there are definitely two versions that exist.
There is one that was live and one that they Passed off as live because I found a screenshot two screenshots from other videos that did not exist that were different from this one and one of which had the logo live and one of which did not so.
All I 1 thing that I find completely conclusive about it is that when he puts those initially puts those 5 shots through the window.
Okay, we're being told that those five shots result in those women inside the store falling down and those pot bottles, coke bottles, whatever, having exploded.
By the time the shooter gets up there, which is what, six seconds, seven seconds later?
Those bottles are already on the floor, nice and neat.
Those people are laid down with the exceptional one.
But what they're saying is those five rounds that went through the window, went through the window, turned left, went 20 feet, knocked those two women down.
Plus, knocked somebody's shoe off in the middle of the aisle, which you'll see a pink shoe, on the way, and left the carts unattended in the grocery aisle, and those pop bottles, in seven seconds, exploded all over the floor, and nice and neat, it's all done.
So, I know there are two... there are at least two runs at this, because otherwise those Coke bottles still be spraying all over the place.
They took a 2-2-3 run.
They're not.
That coke is on the floor while he's standing there.
Then he turns to the woman and he puts a full-on round right through her head at point-blank range, clear as day.
And you see no blood.
That, to me, is completely impossible.
That those five rounds, down that hall, around that corner, knock both women down, knock this thing down, knock the display thing down, knock the Coke bottles onto the floor, no carbonation, no spraying, and here he is, now he takes a headshot, which ought to make her head explode like a melon, which is what we showed what it looks like for a human, for a... Wait.
Yeah, I remember that video.
It's the exit wound of a bullet like that that's large, not the entrance wound, and it depends on the cranium.
A lot of things, what happens, you know, I don't know if you ever watch any of these videos, but I've watched videos of some of these Mexican cartels executing people.
There's even a video where the guy gets his head sawed off with a chainsaw.
Okay, this is real footage for sure.
This is like, you know, cartel stuff.
And even with the guy getting his head sawed off, there was surprisingly not that much blood.
And some of this when someone takes a shot, it depends what is hit exactly if an artery is hit or not, what and the exit wound is always larger than the entrance wound.
So there's a lot of different things that can go into it.
And yeah, allow me to just make a point.
The human body has approximately 7 liters of blood in it.
I believe that's 7 or 10.
I think it's 7 liters of blood in it.
If the heart is a pump, the heart pumps that blood and the blood goes to the area of least resistance.
So if there's an exit wound, In theory, it may have closed up and it may have held some of the blood in.
I'm willing to concede those points.
If that human heart continues to beat because it wasn't instantly killed, that blood is going to go to the area of least resistance, which may or may not come out of an exit wound.
Right.
But the thing is, is that you're seeing the bodies for merely a second or two.
He's going on to the next victim.
Boom, boom, boom.
So you're not seeing what happens afterwards.
You know, it takes time for blood to run out of the body.
There's not like a giant pool of blood the second somebody's shot.
Which is why I showed the video, the clip from YouTube of a rubber head with a skull in it.
Being hit by a 223 round and showed what it looks like.
The whole head exploded.
Yeah, but that's a rubbered simulation.
You can go and find videos of Mexican cartel people actually killing real people.
Brian, let me just finish.
You can see videos of Mexican cartel people actually killing real people and what it actually looks like, not a simulation.
So I would, if you want, it's gruesome.
Go and look at some of those videos and you'll see it really depends on the situation as to what happens.
Okay, I'm still willing to concede that.
That's fine.
I have no problem with that.
Listen, I want to go back, actually, to New Zealand.
Let me find the parts of this video that are so convincing as fakery, where he comes up to the He drives up, he parks.
Okay, this is all right.
Here you go.
Let me go back.
He's going to park here and then he's going to get his weapons out of the car.
Then he's going to walk up to the front of the mosque.
He's met by someone at the mosque and he's gonna shoot him.
No blood.
Falls down.
Walks up.
Fires some more.
Then he goes into a room where the bodies are already stacked up.
So just check it out.
Just watch the scenario unfold here.
Do you see that fire?
Do you see the light flashing there?
There's no bullets coming out of that lab, but there right there is striking!
These are toy guns!
Toy guns He's about to shoot his first victim Watch
he wants it all the bodies are already stacked up *gunshot* *Nicholson spell*
He can walk over and fire him, "Oink" boy!
Take a look in there!
*gunshots*
Oh, my God. my God.
Oh, my God. my God.
Yeah, it's pretty bizarre.
That's where they added in.
Notice the casing never hit the ground.
The shell casing never hit the ground.
Well, there's casing on the ground there.
There was Kaysons on the ground on that last shot.
Oh, shit.
It's a bitch.
Oh, shit. shit.
Looks like we won't get to burn today, boys.
Well, there's more, but it's pretty much on the same order.
In my opinion, this is a farce.
But Scorpio, do you think what you just witnessed was real?
Well, there were shell casings at the end of that that dropped on the ground, if you've noticed that.
But yeah, sure, there's some anomalies there.
Again, I'm not 100% on the New Zealand thing.
I'm open to the idea that people were actually killed there.
And it's just awful seeing a mosque Frankly, in a place like New Zealand or America, frankly, it's part of the degradation of our culture, the destruction of our culture.
And, you know, whether or not it's 100% real, I really do think that it's possible that there's some actual people killed there.
But I'm not 100% on the New Zealand thing.
That video really isn't as convincing as some of the other ones.
I saw your presentation with Danny Sirius.
I watched the whole thing on the Allen, Texas shooting.
Yeah.
And I don't think, honestly, I don't think Danny presented any real evidence at all.
He just said, look, that's a fake body.
It's not even real.
Look, there's no blood.
Look, you know, this looks fake to me.
Look at the CGI when he gets out of the car.
Again, that doesn't seem like real evidence to me.
And frankly, he said, look, the blood doesn't coagulate like that.
Blood does coagulate after someone dies.
I actually looked it up last night.
Within a half hour to an hour after being shot or killed, blood coagulates.
You got the cop lying on the sidewalk and there's rippled.
I mean, it looks to me like a plastic sheet of fake blood.
I mean, do you think that cop was really killed and that was real blood?
Well, look, yeah, I do.
I think that was a real shooting.
And look, these videos are low quality.
The GoPro streaming of it's low quality.
So you can't be surprised that there's anomalies in the video.
And I saw a close up of the body of the shooter.
And it looks like the whole back of his head was blown out.
You know, I've seen a couple different shots of that.
I saw the video of the guy walking around in the store, you know, with with a shopping bag and dad is like, he's not reacting right.
He should have been projectile vomiting.
You know, when he saw the dead body like that, you know, people react to traumatic situations in different ways.
You can't say that everybody should be projectile vomiting when they see a traumatic event.
You know, I don't think that is accurate or or evidence, frankly.
So you think Allen, Texas and Buffalo and maybe New Zealand were legit real mass murder.
I'm convinced that the Allen, Texas one was real just from the evidence I've seen so far.
And again, I'm open to if something new comes along that's convincing, I'll certainly change my mind.
I'm not, you know, so this is written in stone and I'll go to the grave believing this.
I'm not that way at all.
But from what I've seen so far, yes, it looks real.
And that looked like a real body there on the ground.
And again, I just think it's difficult to manage all these crisis actors.
There's a lot of loose ends, like logistically for the government to have to keep an eye on these people, make sure they're not talking.
It's a lot of follow up.
You don't just sign an NDA, then that's it.
It's over.
You know, you've got to keep an eye on these people because what if one of them talks?
What if one of them gets drunk?
And starts telling his friends or has a legitimate change of heart and, you know, suddenly has a conscience and wants to reveal the terrible things he was involved in.
These are the kind of things that could actually happen in real life.
And I think they realize it's easier just to kill people, use a crazy guy, shoot people, and make sure that the shooter is terminated at the end of the operation.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I've already said what's important, which is I don't believe that there's hybrid events.
Either it's real or it's- I didn't say there's a hybrid event, Brian.
I didn't- Jesus, Scorpio.
Why do you take it so personally?
I'm not taking it personally.
It's not personal.
Don't say that I said there's a hybrid event.
I never said that.
I didn't say- I didn't say you said that!
Then why are you talking about hybrid events?
Because he wants to explain his position.
But I thought you were responding to what I said.
Just relax.
He didn't interrupt you.
Go ahead.
That's true.
Look, I said I don't believe that there are hybrid events.
Either it's real or it's fake.
If you find the anomaly, the impossibility, then you have to put the pieces together, assuming that that impossibility exists.
Once you apply that impossibility to an analysis, then everything has to fall into place.
My goal with these things, and I'm still studying, I only woke up in 2016, I'm still studying, I'm still learning, but my goal is to put all the pieces together the best I can.
Now, something else that you have to remember, Is it like with Buffalo?
I presented that less than 72 hours after the event.
72 hours is what it took me to do my analysis and put that information out there.
Was it all perfect after 72 hours of research?
No, I didn't even say it was.
I was just simply presenting what I found.
Same with Nashville.
Again, it was about 72 hours after the event.
I put out my first analysis with Giuseppe.
We don't get it right every time, but my goal is to put the pieces together and explain the impossibility.
And the only model I've found to explain it is that the whole thing's fake.
Find all the fake stuff.
Present the information.
Is it court ready?
No, that's a different evidentiary burden.
I'm looking to persuade, to get people to look into it on their own.
Because I believe by looking into it on their own, people will wake up.
And in the end, that's my goal with the whole thing.
My entire presence here is to just get people to wake up.
And it's okay if people want to settle back into their couches and turn the mainstream media on and let the programming continue to flow.
If that's how they want to live their life, that's how they want to live their life.
And that's not personal.
That's in general the psychological side of psychological operations.
I do think yeah look to me you know I'm open on the Nashville shooting but to me it's very credible that a mentally ill tranny and these people are deeply sick they're mentally ill there's this whole campaign to make it like it's normal to be trans it's not these people are deeply disturbed individuals and they're not by any stretch of the imagination normal so I could see the possibility that one of these weirdos
Uh, it's very angry, uh, and hormonally imbalanced and mentally imbalanced, decides to go kill, um, people in a Christian school that, that she or he, whatever it attended, uh, and get revenge for all the perceived wrongs that they think those people did.
Especially when you have a government agent of some kind working behind the scenes to control this person and to push them over the edge, possibly with drugs.
And who knows?
There's other, I think there's other technologies they have too.
So again, we're not diametrically opposed.
I believe these are government operations.
They're psychological operations designed to manipulate the public.
And I think one thing that's important to remember about these mainstream media people, the most common way they lie is through lies of omission.
They don't tell you the background information or the full story.
They'll just tell you a small little sliver of information, but it's not enough to understand what's actually going on.
But usually the mainstream media does not lie about dates and times and names.
You know, they have to keep that stuff Fairly accurate because they can be sued, you know, and all this so they can be sued for defamation.
Now.
That's the big thing.
Everybody's defamed, you know, you know, we got a super three quarters of a billion dollars for defamation, you know, so I just I think lives of omission are the biggest thing that the mainstream media does.
Well, I'm really Taking it back, if you think Nashville could have been real, I mean, you got the perp driving up, the parking lot's empty.
You got the perp shooting the way in, setting off alarms.
No one's running anywhere.
The school of mirrors will be empty.
Yeah, the school of mirrors is where people were hiding, you know.
The alleged woman has a long neck.
The perp has a short neck.
The purpose wearing one type of sneaker that's black and white.
But when we see the body, it's a different type of sneaker and they're red.
They're colored.
There's no question.
These aren't the same sneaker.
There's no question.
This is not the same person.
It appears to be a young boy, maybe 18 years old, who's playing the role of this 28 year old transgender.
I mean, frankly, Scorpio, anyone who would buy into Nashville after looking at the critiques I provided with I was Brian or Danny.
I mean, something's wrong.
It's not with the analysis.
That is as blatant and obvious a fraud as we could possibly have.
Well, there's something definitely wrong with all of these events because they're not being presented truthfully, but that does not necessarily mean that nobody was killed.
And this government enjoys killing people.
I think they're actually feeding, uh, you know, entities through these events.
And I think war is the ultimate manifestation of this, this mass sacrifice.
They give us all these reasons why we have to have a war and we're supposed to root for one side or the other.
But, uh, you know, as far as the, the, the shoe goes, uh, that's pretty grainy footage.
It's really bad footage.
And, um, I've seen other shots of that shoe.
Yeah, the sneaker.
Yeah.
I've seen other other shots of that shoe that seem to contradict that it's two different shoes.
So we're going to try to make it up and cover it up after the blunders exposed.
Brian actually showed down on the cam body cam footage and show there.
They're not firing real bullets.
They've got that kind of a plastic projectile.
Brian, would you like to elaborate on this?
Cause it's devastating.
You don't see it unless you slow down the frames, Brian.
I'd like to see the footage.
Yeah.
Okay, well, it was on Giuseppe's show, just like when I initially presented Buffalo, it was on Giuseppe's show.
That show is still available.
It's still out there.
It hasn't been deleted.
And I basically run a frame-by-frame analysis on it.
I do show a projectile.
I show the impossibility of firing in 1.02 seconds four rounds at that range on a 45 degree offset with the AR-15.
To be able to pump off four rounds without any recoil on the rifle is something I consider to be an impossibility.
But again, I presented what I was able to glean from the analysis that I did.
I did study as much of it as I could in 72 hours, put the pieces together in a frame by frame analysis and presented what I thought was compelling evidence that The entire situation was fabricated, and this is how, was the theory.
Now, was I there?
No.
Do I have primary documents?
Yes.
I have primary video that was released by the police at 8.38 the next morning, so I'd consider that to be primary on their YouTube channel, and I put all my analysis into that primary source, the same as I did with Buffalo, the same as I did with Uvalde, and the same as I did with Nashville.
Well, you know, I haven't seen your, your presentation on the Nashville shooting, so I can't really comment on it.
But, uh, you know, I'm certainly open to seeing evidence that it was not real.
Uh, but, um, you know, so I can't really comment on that one.
I haven't seen your presentation to be honest.
I understand.
I understand that.
I just, you know, the reason that I agreed to come on to the show with Jim today was to present A rebuttal to the program that you and Mike and Clint, where you guys absolutely hammered us.
We're not insane.
We're not schizophrenic.
We're not crazy.
We know exactly what we're doing.
I found it.
Do I take it personal?
Yeah, again, I'm a professional private investigator.
I work off of Michael Bezell's platform for the most part, Open Source Intelligence.
This is the 10th version of the book.
It's what's accepted as best I can with everything that I can.
And yeah, it's an attack on my professional credibility as well as me personally when somebody comes out and says I'm absolutely crazy and insane because I see it differently than them.
I don't think anyone called you insane.
I think there was a criticism of the evidence.
But we did poke some fun.
You know, we did poke some fun.
And it was all... you have to understand that show was partly comedy.
And, you know, if you take it the wrong way, that show's not for everybody.
Our show's very cutting-edge.
It's... I don't think it would be allowed on any networks.
It's outrageous in some ways.
But I do think we back up the comedy with some very insightful commentary and some legitimate criticism of the so-called truth movement.
That was the point of it and I didn't mean to insult your profession or anything like that.
I don't think we talked about your abilities as a private investigator or your career.
We talked about the I think it's impossible for anyone to watch and take what you just said at face value, Scorpio.
one of you guys but i do think that there is some good legitimate criticism mixed in with the humor i think it's impossible for anyone to watch and then take what you just said that pays value scorpio i mean it was an excruciating experience for me to even listen to all 200 minutes and the and the attacks on danny i thought were especially reprehensible i mean brian and i are accustomed to nonsense
rubbish scurrilous claims in And this, this, this 200 minutes was abounded with them.
There must have been 200 scurrilous claims.
I don't think Danny presents false and denigrating and just meant to be, you know, Ad hominem, pure ad hominem, with no basis, no substance.
Frankly, I was shocked.
And especially because I have held you in such high esteem, as you know, in the past, I was floored.
You were, it was like three pigs in a trough, Scorpio, and you were right in there with them.
There was no question about it.
Okay, that's fine.
Every word you said.
I got you.
You don't like the show.
We got it.
That's fine.
But I'm very critical of Danny's work.
I'm very critical of Danny's work.
And I wish he had been here, because I'm actually more critical of Danny's work than Brian's.
I don't think Danny gives any evidence in the things I've seen.
It's just like, that looks fake.
That's CGI.
That's fake.
Look, that's a test dummy.
It's not a real body.
I think it's damaging to credibility to say some of the things he says.
People should be projectile vomiting if they see a traumatic incident.
That's not true.
People respond to trauma in very different ways and it's not predictable how people are going to respond.
Some people actually will laugh During a traumatic situation.
And I'm not talking about Robbie Parker.
I mean, that was a whole different thing.
But, you know, people respond different ways.
And I'm actually more critical of Danny's work than Brian's.
I wish he had been here.
Well listen, let me say, Danny and I have been doing collaborative research for years and years and years.
I have never found him to be wrong.
He's very patient, he's very painstaking, and he has 35 years of law enforcement experience.
You talk about someone who's been there up close and personal.
But that's appeal to authority, Jim.
Scorpio, listen, I'm doing my best not to interrupt you.
Let me finish.
You're attacking Danny, I'm sticking up for you.
He even pointed out to me that the evidence that Kobe Bryant crashed was phony and fake, and when I looked at it, he was 100% correct.
I have not known Danny Sarris to be wrong on a single issue, and you certainly have not convinced me he's wrong about any of those to which you take exception.
You're entitled to your opinion.
I respect that, Scorpio.
But frankly, anyone who could take Nashville seriously really has lost it, in my opinion.
It's no longer credible.
Nashville is so blatant.
You think I'm no longer credible?
That's fine, Jim.
I think Danny Siris doesn't present any evidence.
I watched your whole presentation on the Allen Mall shooting.
He presented no evidence other than that's fake, that's CGI, there's not enough blood, that's a crash test dummy.
That's not evidence, Jim.
I think it's actually damaging when you say everything is fake without any evidence and I think the government kills people.
They do it all the time and I think you should be open to the possibility that some of these shootings are real and that they're killing people using assassins or mind control agents or people who are just mentally ill that are pushed over the edge by a handler.
There are all kinds of real shootings, Scorpio, and if any of these had been real, I would have been glad to draw that conclusion.
But Allen, Allen, Uvalde, Nashville, you know, Buffalo, not to mention Sandy Hook, Boston, Orlando, Parkland, and all that.
Every one of those was fake, and I'm just telling you, Danny presented no evidence at all.
But you say that, but you're using the word evidence selectively.
It's ridiculous.
He's presenting nothing.
I watched the whole show, Jim.
A stack of bodies there at Allen.
It's got a dummy on the top with his mouth open.
That's obviously a dummy.
You've got a woman lying there missing her left arm.
Where the hell did her left arm go?
There are other anomalies there.
Danny's been a student right on it.
And the idea that a police officer with a wave of fake blood, you know, when it's got a... It's clear that is not even a blood, that's a plastic sheet.
I mean, I'm just shocked.
But look, Scorpio, you are good to come on the show today.
I wasn't at all certain you would make the appearance, and I'm glad you did.
Hey, I told you I'd be here, Jim.
I've never blown you, wait a minute, wait a minute.
I've never blown you off ever anytime we were scheduled to do a show.
I always showed up and I showed up today and I wish Danny had been here because I, you know, I watched your whole presentation on the shooting in Allen, Texas.
And I thought it was very weak.
I have to be honest.
I don't think he presented any real evidence at all.
And just to sit there and say it's fake looking, there's not enough blood.
And blood does coagulate after someone is killed.
I looked it up.
It happens about a half hour to an hour depending on temperature and conditions.
So blood does coagulate after someone is killed.
Well, listen, I want Brian to have an opportunity for a final thought.
We've had two hours that was mostly uninterrupted, and yes, it didn't go out, and I'm sorry about that.
And the technical glitches, I'm not very good at it, by the way.
I thought it was particularly bizarre when Clint suggested I would moderate the sound volume.
I don't even know how to control the sound volume on Zoom.
Well, I believe that.
But, you know, Danny did accuse Clint.
I only wish I were technically more competent.
We might have got this on the air today with everyone on Revolution Radio.
Yeah, me too.
But, you know, Danny did accuse Clint of being a paid disinformation agent, and that's actually pretty humorous because the idea that Clint is collecting a check and he works for the CIA.
I had a different guy accuse me of working for the Syngenta Corporation, okay?
So, I mean, it all gets pretty humorous after a point.
Well, listen, after all the smears, they were calling my show, what, the psych room?
Uh, there's something seriously wrong with Clint.
I mean, clinically, mentally, that's my opinion.
Clint is a very sharp guy, really.
Clint, Clint's a very intelligent young man.
He really is.
He's very well researched and he's not mentally warped.
Anyone can listen to that show and draw their own inference.
I just say, in my opinion, there's something very, very wrong with a guy and it's runs very deep.
Brian, I want you to have the last word here today, please.
Your thoughts.
Well, I'm going to, I'm just simply going to present a theory that began to develop as I finished up my Nashville research.
And the theory goes that, and it's still a theory.
I got to prove it.
It's going to take me time and it's going to take me energy, but everybody's presented these events as that their primary motivation is gun control.
And while I understand the primary motivation.
As being gun control long term if they're expecting some sort of crash or something like that, and they want to make sure that we're not there to kill the security apparatus that protects that separates us from the from the global elite.
So, I believe that there are instead events that are designed to generate revenue in the form of contracts.
Government contracts to redesign schools, government contracts to beef up a security apparatus, government contracts to basically continue building a bigger wall of separation between the people and the global elite.
And the way that they do it and the reason that there's consistent manifestos You saw in the New Zealand, he picked the gas cans out of the trunk.
There's always this overwhelming threat that some crazy someplace somehow is going to lose it one day, go buy a bunch of guns, and he's going to get all done up in his military gear, and he's crazy, so he's going to ride on his rifles, and he's going to go out there and conduct these mass shootings of little tiny children at schools is for effect.
The effect is to get the general public who is unaware of what's really happening to Believe and buy into the story and become drones, literally lemmings, to go push for these new laws, these new spending bills, these new security structures that are going to go into place post-event.
So in my opinion, they fund very, very well.
I don't feel that my work is unprofessional.
yet to prove it.
I admit that.
And again, when I do analysis, I analyze primary evidence as quickly as I can so I can present it while there's still an appetite out there for the information.
I don't feel that my work is unprofessional.
I don't feel that my work is somehow not acceptable because it doesn't have courtroom-level evidentiary stuff.
I don't feel that my work is unprofessional.
I don't have primary witnesses other than video.
I don't have affidavits.
I don't have whistleblowers.
I don't need that.
My goal is not to prepare all this information for a courtroom setting.
My goal is to prepare this for the people who are beginning to say, hey, This isn't adding up what's with all these shooters shooting up the schools and the media tell another one another one another one.
My goal is to get those people to break loose from the fog of the mental war that they're under the psychological side of the psychological operation and to see these people for what it is.
I'm out there doing something what I consider to be very good.
And to take a hit like that, after all the volunteering that I've done, and all the time and energy I put into this movement, it makes me sick to withstand an attack like that.
I understand it happens, and that's the nature of the beast, and it is what it is, but...
I'm not crazy.
I know exactly what's going on.
Okay, well, no one ever said you're crazy.
But look, I wanted to say that I agree with your point you just made that there's multiple layers to every event.
There's multiple layers of motivation.
And I think the things you covered are definitely true.
They want to increase the security apparatus, build new schools with higher security.
Expand the government.
This is all very true and gun control.
No question about it.
But just as far as the Nashville thing goes, you know, I think the reason they had a tranny is they want to show that every single person, every type of person is potential terrorist.
Even a tranny, even, you know, so that way, it precludes the need that everybody has to be monitored and watched because we're all potential terrorists.
I think that is the reason why they're they're sort of profiling every different type of person is a shooter, including a tranny.
Well, Scorpio, you showed up, my friend.
I respect you for that.
You have the final word, and I'm so glad you were here.
Now there's more grist for another show with your chops.
Thanks for being here, everyone.
My apologies for Revolution Radio failure contact.
Thanks to Brian for being here.
Too bad Danny couldn't join.
I have great faith in him and in Brian, and we're going to continue to persevere.
▲
Export Selection