All Episodes
May 19, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
16:12
Naomi Wolf Details Her Latest Jaw-Dropping Findings Regarding Pfizer's Bioweapon Injections
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Joe Biden has named his nominee to succeed former director Francis Collins at the National Institutes of Health.
Biden submitted his nomination for Dr. Monica Bertagnoli, a cancer researcher and an oncologic surgeon.
Bertagnoli has the highest possible qualification for the job.
That being the deep-pocketed tie she has to Pfizer, of course.
According to independent journalist Jordan Schachtel, in an article posted first to his dossier sub-sac and then reposted on the Daily Clout, Bernard Noly received over $290 million in grant monies from Pfizer between the years 2015 and 2021.
And according to the Heritage Foundation's Daily Signal, the Pfizer funds made up 89% of her research grants.
I'm sure Pfizer's feeling pretty good about the investment they made in the good doctor.
As you can see in this disclosure, the pharma giant giving Bertagnoli over $45 million in grants in the year 2021 alone.
She also had another key qualification for the job.
Dr. Tony Fauci told the Washington Post he personally advocated for her nomination.
Welcome to the United States of Pfizer, where a pharmaceutical company can knowingly cause harm to the American public and still get one of their own installed in the top spot of the nation's top public health institution.
Harm such as outlined in another bombshell report from the War Room Daily Clout team known as Report 71.
Musculoskeletal adverse events of special interest afflicted 8.5% of patients in Pfizer's post-marketing dataset, according to the report, including four children and one infant.
Women were affected at a ratio of almost 4 to 1 over men.
And 3,600 musculoskeletal events were reported in the first 90 days, with 44% being classified as serious, and 50% of those events occurred within 24 hours post-injection.
Joining us now is the Daily Clout's Dr. Naomi Wolf to discuss all this and more, and we remind you that you can get the War Room Daily Clout's book on the Pfizer documents, a compilation of their reports, on the Daily Clout store at dailyclout.io, where it's available for you in ebook form, or you can order the paperback version for a friend, even.
Hi, Naomi.
It's good to see you.
I can't wait to hear your reaction to what appears to essentially be Pfizer's nominee for NIH director.
That's right, Emerald.
It's exactly as if there was a city in which the mafia had taken over and committed a bunch of murders and maimed people and caused other harms.
And then a new police commissioner came in and appointed a member of the mafia to oversee any possible investigation of these murders.
I mean, Amy, you know, you and I have been talking about the crimes that my team has unearthed for some months now.
And if anything confirms the scope of the crime, It's that Pfizer's own employee, basically multi hundreds of millions of dollars employee has been appointed to oversee whatever investigation to destroy any evidence to delete any emails before there can ever be an investigation.
Naomi, I have to wonder how hard Pfizer is lobbying in Washington, D.C.
to get her confirmed.
I would think that there should be some Senate holdouts on her confirmation, particularly Senator Rand Paul, who's been very vocal with his criticism of the NIH, and particularly Dr. Fauci, who apparently has been cheerleading her nomination.
Right.
I mean, I have to be frank, Emerald, and say that this is a moment at which the Republicans have got to step up and show that they are not the uniparty.
You know, they know now, because they watch the news outlets that have been covering this catastrophe, what Pfizer has done and Moderna.
We're getting the new Moderna release due to a successful Aaron Siri lawsuit in a month or two.
And it's probably going to be worse than Pfizer.
So we know now what these pharmaceutical giants have done to the American people, to the next generation.
As you know, there's a new horrific report detailing even more crimes, especially against women.
So what are Republicans for?
What's the point of having an opposition party, respectfully, if they don't use the leverage that they do have now in a confirmation process and speak up so that we don't have someone hired by the murderers overseeing the murder investigation?
Yeah, apparently they only speak up when it's time to go on TV and to fundraise, but I think this time they're going to have to hear from their constituents and see if someone will finally stand up to this pharma cabal.
I do want to talk about the report you just referenced.
I referenced it at the top of the show.
It just came out.
This is Report 71 that has shocking statistics regarding musculoskeletal issues.
Can you just explain that for our audience?
Sure.
I mean, this is the one, you know, I have, I have loved ones, healthy, young, 22 year olds, 23 year olds who are, you know, limping because, and they don't even know why.
And so many people, you know, as we've discussed, have shoulder replacements, their ankles gave out, their knees gave out, you know, again, healthy, healthy adults who never had joint problems.
Well, now we know why.
Joint pain is the number one side effect in the Pfizer documents.
The CDC never told you that.
This Report 71 is about musculoskeletal harms, as you mentioned, and there were 1,614, or 44%, serious adverse events in the data set, in Pfizer's data set, which is over 8% of all of the adverse events.
in the data set, in Pfizer's data set, which is over 8% of all of the adverse events.
And if all 114 cases with specific diagnoses such as arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, syndrome and polyarthritis are serious, That leaves 1500 serious adverse events in addition with no definitive diagnosis.
So in other words, this is how Pfizer does funny math.
It's really like more like almost 3000 serious arthritic events in this data set.
Again, women suffered more than men, catastrophically more than men, and This is a pattern we've seen throughout.
This is about the sixth report, different organ systems, that shows a three-to-one, four-to-one, or eight-to-one women suffering versus men.
So this injection is a war against women.
So it's four-to-one female to male.
These were in non-elderly adults, so healthy, younger people, not the people you'd expect to have arthritis, and four children and one infant.
And I just want to note, Mengele-type experimentation, this injection was not approved for children and infants at the time that Pfizer did this experimentation.
Half of the smoking gun, half of the adverse events occurred within 24 hours of receiving the injection.
All of them started within 32 days of the injection, which is a relatively short period of time.
50% were either not resolved, resolved with sequelae, meaning other side effects, or unknown outcome.
At the time this report was released to the FDA, in other words, half of these almost 3,000 people were still suffering.
Were these predominantly that 44% with serious adverse events or quote Pfizer's words, likely disability, quote, a significant persistent or permanent change, impairment, damage or disruption in the patient's body function or structure, physical activity or quality of life.
So, Basically, Pfizer's injection cripples people, especially women, and they knew it.
This is the number one adverse event in the Pfizer documents.
They didn't tell you, and right now as I speak to you, Emerald, millions of Americans are going to their doctors, and I know some of them, saying, you know, my muscle, I can't move my muscle, I can't move my knee, I'm in so much pain.
Having joint replacements, hip replacements, knee replacements, Ankle surgery, because this injection, again, causes inflammation, which is a contributor to arthritis and joint pain, and it also goes through every membrane in the human body, and cartilage is also a membrane.
So, that is a summary of Report 71.
I have something even more horrible if you have bandwidth for it, but I should pause there and let you, you know, talk to me about what I just shared with you.
Uh, you know, we, I think it's important that everyone hears the full truth, even if it's hard to hear.
So if you could go ahead and share what else you have, I think, I think you have to.
Okay.
I'm going to, so this, this, uh, my finding from yesterday, which is kind of the, that confirms the question of core knowledge and confirms exactly what we're up against here.
It derived from a debate I had with Steve Kirsch, who's a well-known vaccine critic, mRNA vaccine critic, in California over the weekend, in which I was sharing with him the injuries around reproduction.
And I said, to me, this clearly looks intentional.
The injections designed to harm women, especially reproductively.
And he said, Maybe, you know, it could certainly be greed, but I don't see evidence that it's intentional.
Well, I literally googled, do lipid nanoparticles affect fertility?
And two seconds later, I'm looking at a 2018 NIH study, and then Amy Kelly showed me a 2017 NIH study.
and then Amy Kelly showed me a 2017 NIH study.
Both of them confirm that as long ago as 2017, everyone in the lipid nanoparticle world knew that lipid nanoparticles destroy fertility.
And I've got to read you this quote, and not just female fertility, but male.
And not only that, they change sexual behavior.
Quote, nanoparticles can pass through the blood testis barrier, placental barrier, and epithelial barrier, which protect reproductive tissues, and then accumulate in reproductive organs.
Nanoparticle accumulation damages organs, testis, epididymis, ovary, and uterus by destroying sirtoli cells, latic cells, and germ cells, causing reproductive organ dysfunction that adversely affects sperm quality, quantity, morphology, and motility, meaning how effective sperm are at insemination, or reduces the number of mature oocytes, which are eggs,
And disrupts primary and secondary follicular development, which is how eggs turn into fetuses.
In addition, nanoparticles can disrupt the levels of secreted hormones, causing changes in sexual behavior.
End quote.
And that's a 2017-2018 study.
Clearly, these shop manufacturers are well aware of it.
There is no... I mean, there's really no way trying to spin around the fact that they knew this and did it on purpose.
Right, Naomi?
I mean, it's... I would take it this one step further.
This reminds me of those riddles in which the murder weapon is kind of part of the scene.
I believe now seeing this and especially that it changes sexual behavior and who knows what that means.
It could mean makes people confused about gender.
It could mean makes people not want to have sexual intimacy, not want to build families, not care about that.
And we're seeing reports of that with young people that they just don't care about courtship, about intimacy.
So many young people confused about gender identity.
You know, a new category, which didn't even exist except as a very rare kind of mental health issue, asexuality.
Like when I was growing up, nobody was asexual.
It was, you know, if you were celibate, that was, that was your choice, but asexual wasn't a thing.
Now it's, you know, LGBTQIA, the A is for asexual.
We don't know if these lipid nanoparticles, you know, we don't know what else they're in, right?
Dating back to at least 2017.
I just found out to my horror that there, Now in injections for anesthesia in the dentist's office, right?
But we, how can I put it?
To me, it looks like the lipid nanoparticles, everything else is a ruse, right?
They knew that this material would change sexual behavior.
They knew it would make men less masculine.
It would make men like hormones go to things like broad shoulders, strength, masculine strength, upper body strength, deep voices, The ability to grow a beard, the ability to father a child, all the things you need if your country's invaded, right?
I mean, not fathering a child, but strength, male strength.
And hormones in females, of course, also help with conception, fertility, bonding with your baby, nursing your baby, love.
I mean, I wrote a whole book about how hormones are about attachment.
You know, that there's this biochemical response in the body to sexual intimacy that, you know, oxytocin is a hormone.
You know, that bonds you to your mate, that bonds you to your child.
Lipid nanoparticles don't just change, you know, whether men will become adult mature men, whether women will become adult mature women, whether either can reproduce.
They may actually dissolve, which explains so much.
Like I wrote an essay about this a year ago, that when you hug vaccinated people, you can't feel that intimacy, that heart energy.
Well, this material, Literally dissolves the hormonal processes that create love and attachment and make people want to have sex and have babies.
And then it degrades their ability to have babies.
Everything we've seen, everything my team has laboriously brought to you over the course of last year, the damaged placentas, Amy Kelly's report on the damaged testes, the damaged latex cells and Sertoli cells, you know, the problems with menstrual processes,
All of that is right here, you know, fully established in the lipid nanoparticle space, where people who work with lipid nanoparticles know that this will happen if they inject people with lipid nanoparticles, and they know it will happen to children, that they will not grow up to be normal, adult, sexual, healthy people capable of forming families and reproducing themselves if they inject the children.
This is the smoking gun, in my view.
Well, I mean, their rhetoric over the last couple of decades, they've long decried toxic masculinity and said there's too many people on earth.
And you know, anecdotally, I just noticed that a lot of women I knew that had recently had babies and were vaccinated, they are having a hard time forming that bond, that initial bond you have with your child.
When you're flooded, I mean, when you have a baby, you're just flushed with the love and the hormones and the oxytocin and you're just, it makes me so sad.
It makes me so sad, Naomi.
Thank you for the great work you're doing.
Being willing to come on and tell the hard truth because people need to hear it.
And we're hoping that the Republicans hear this when they're looking at confirming that NIH nominee.
Thank you so much.
Reminder, you can go get the book at dailyclout.io if you have not done so yet.
If you have done so, maybe you should get it for a friend.
Thanks, Naomi.
Export Selection