Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 11, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:20:13

Need to Know News (10 May 2023) with Joe Olson & Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, Texas.
	We expect Chris Weinert, who's in Fort Myers, Florida, will be here shortly.
	Meanwhile, we begin the southern border bracing for a migrant surge, which, with Title 42 set to expire not just this week, but tomorrow.
	The U.S.
	is bracing for the expiration of a pandemic era border restraint.
	Officials fearing it will spur a surge of migrants and exacerbate an already challenging humanitarian crisis.
	No matter how much we're prepared, I don't think we're going to be prepared enough, said John Martin, director of the Opportunity Center for the Homeless in El Paso.
	I want to emphasize, more so than anything else, this is a national issue.
	We in El Paso, along with many other communities, just happen to be on the front line.
	While first implemented under a Trump admin as a response to the pandemic, Title 42 has been kept in place by the courts and used by Biden to deal with migrants at the border.
	That'll change Thursday, tomorrow, when the public health emergency and Title 42 are set to lapse amid unprecedented mass migration.
	Border Control agents, meanwhile, are irate after the Biden regime tips off at illegals.
	What points to avoid, as between 700 and a thousand and a million illegals gather to storm the United States?
	From a strategic standpoint, it's puzzling that DHS would announce, publicly via press release, Which entry points to avoid?
	Giving the evaders getaways a heads up they are coming already.
	Hearing from frustrated border agents saying the operation will now be worthless.
	El Belmiglan.
	Priscilla Alvarez News.
	Federal authorities will conduct an enforcement of an El Paso targeting migrants across the U.S.-Mexico border and were not processed by immigration authorities starting Tuesday, sources tell me, warning them.
	The Border Patrol responded to the Biden gaffe, except it's not.
	Nothing like publicly announcing dangerous people would be arrested while warning them ahead of time exactly where to run and hide to avoid it.
	The entire operation is a sad joke.
	Another pandering PR stunt.
	Serious law enforcement leaders don't behave this way.
	Meanwhile, last November, Governor Abbott of Texas declared an invasion on the Texas border, invoking the U.S.
	and Texas constitutions.
	With millions having crossed the border since Biden took the presidency and threw out Trump's successful policy to secure it, we have a staggering number prepared to cross the border again.
	Remarkable video from our Fox team shows an enormous line, hundreds of migrants who just crossed illegally into Brownsville, Texas this evening.
	A large majority are single adults.
	Here's some footage.
	Take a look.
	They are coming here.
	They're getting free goodies.
	Biden's encouraging them.
	U.N.
	and U.S.
	have a camp set up in Panama to promote all of this.
	Look how young, military age, how fit they appear.
	This is an utter, utter disgrace.
	This is an abdication of the United States as a nation.
	We no longer qualify as a legal legitimate state, in my opinion.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well Texas is absolutely disgusting.
	In the United States Constitution, if the United States government does not protect the states, the states have the right to protect themselves.
	In the Texas Constitution, if the United States government does not protect the Texas borders, Texas has the right to protect itself.
	We've been listening to the blabbermouth Rabbit Abbott for years now talking about how he's going to solve the problem on the border and he moves around a couple of shipping containers and calls it done.
	They brought down 1,500 National Guard to help with processing the paperwork on the border.
	And if you want to know how rotten our GOP is in this state, total 100% rhino, there's a great reporter, Laura Logan.
	Who was a CNN reporter in the Obama-orchestrated Arab Spring in Cairo, and she was raped multiple times for hours at that protest and left for dead.
	And just luckily, she survived.
	She came back.
	CNN said, well, you can't say anything bad about Arabs.
	So she said, OK, I quit.
	Then Fox hired her.
	Fox hired her for a couple of years, and then they said, well, you can't say anything bad about the election, so Fox fired her.
	They put her on Newsmax.
	Newsmax said, well, you can't say anything bad about the trans people, so Newsmax fired her.
	All a total bunch of bullshit.
	She happens to live in Texas, and she did a great interview with Steve Bannon on House Bill Number 20.
	It's the U.N.
	Open Border Bill that has been approved by the Texas GOP, and when they had a bill that came in to limit that, the Texas GOP sidelined it in the calendar committee, and it cannot be voted on.
	So we have no political representation by anybody in the state of Texas.
	There is a late report that EBIT is sending National Guard with riot gear to the border.
	We shall see.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, it's kind of interesting.
	For a long time, the Panama School was used to destabilize South and Central American countries.
	Now it's being used for the United States.
	It's amazing to see the amount of organization that's gone into these operations, we'll say, as far as using for-profit prisons and grooming gangs, as I mentioned in other podcasts.
	I think that they also are using a lot of things, the cartels, and it's a lot into the political infrastructure, the overworld and the underworld, we'll say.
	There's a lot of black market stuff that's been going on.
	I think really it's a lot of this stuff is used to fund a lot of these operations.
	Even furthermore, narco money, so to speak.
	And as it's being withdrawn and busted or taken out of the monetary system, you're seeing the suffering and that too, with a lot of instability in banking institutions as well.
	So yeah, I think there's a lot of interesting things that are going on right now.
	And it's time is going to be a very interesting show for the next few weeks, few months here, and all this stuff coming together.
	And I don't know.
	I just can't wait to see what happens next.
	I only hope some of the news is good.
	Meanwhile, Russia is holding its annual World War II Victory Day celebration.
	Let's take a little bit of a look at what was going on.
	Moscow, where the Kremlin has kicked off celebrations for Victory Day, a national holiday marking the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
	But those celebrations were overshadowed by Russia's own war on Ukraine.
	Moscow holds its annual parade to showcase Russia's military might.
	Several regions across the country scale back events amid security concerns and a lack of military equipment.
	And in just the last hour, we heard from President Vladimir Putin.
	He said he wants a peaceful future and claimed the true war is being waged against his country.
	Even as it marks Victory Day, or perhaps especially, Russia has not stopped its attacks on Ukraine.
	The Ukrainian Air Force says it intercepted 23 out of 25 cruise missiles, with an official in Kyiv saying 15 were destroyed over the city today.
	But more aid is headed to Ukraine ahead of a looming counter-offensive.
	The US is set to announce a $1.2 billion package as early as today, including drones, ammunition and air defence missiles.
	The package is geared towards the country's medium to long-term security needs.
	Nothing like throwing good money after bad.
	In relation to the victory parade in Wesker, Vladimir Putin gave a speech.
	There were many heads, not only of the Russian state, but of many others present.
	The parade began with the removal of the Russian flag and the banner of victory.
	The Red Square.
	The parade was commanded by Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, General of the Army Oleg Salyukov, received by the Minister of Defense, General of the Army Sergei Shagu.
	As part of the Foot Column 30 ceremonial calculation passed through, more than 8,000 military personnel, including 530 of the Special Military Operation.
	Vladimir Putin gave a speech, parts of which I shall share.
	Dear citizens of Russia, dear veterans, comrade soldiers and sailors, sergeants and foremen, midshipmen and ensigns, comrade officers, generals and admirals, fighters and commanders, our participants in special military operation, I congratulate you on Victory Day!
	Happy Holiday In honor of our fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers, who glorified and immortalized their names having defended the fatherland, at the cost of immeasurable courage and hewn sacrifice, they saved humanity from Nazism.
	Today's civilization is again at a decisive turning point.
	A real war is once again unleashed against our motherland, but we have repulsed international terrorism, We will also protect the inhabitants of Donbass and ensure our security.
	For us, Russia, there are no unfriendly hostile people, either in the West or in the East.
	Unlike the vast majority on the planet, we want to see a future of peace, freedom, and stability.
	We believe any ideology of superiority is inherently disgusting, criminal, and deadly.
	However, the Western globalist elite still talk about their exclusivity with people and split society, provoke bloody conflicts that upheaval, sow hatred, Russophobia, aggressive nationalism, and destroy family traditional values that make a person a person.
	And all in order to continue to dictate To impose on the peoples their will, their rights, their rules, and in fact a system of robbery, violence, and suppression.
	They seem to have forgotten what the insane claims of the Nazis for world domination led to.
	They forgot who defeated this monstrous total evil who stood up as a wall for their native land and did not spare their lives for the sake of the liberation of the people of Europe.
	Their goal is nothing new here.
	...of now a number of countries, where memorials to Soviet shoulders are ruthlessly and cold-bloodedly destroyed, monuments to great commanders being demolished, a real cult of the Nazis and their accomplices being created, and the memory of true heroes being erased and slandered.
	Such desecration of feats and fears of the victorious generation is also a crime.
	An outright re-launchism of those who cynically and openly prepared a new campaign against Russia, who gathered neo-Nazi scum from all over the world for this.
	Exorbitant ambition, arrogance, and permissiveness inevitably turn into tragedy.
	This is reason for the catastrophe the Ukrainian people are now experiencing.
	He became a hostage of the coup d'etat and the criminal regime of his Western masters—I believe they're speaking here of Zelensky—that had developed on his basis a bargaining chip in the implementation of their cruel selfish plans.
	For us in Russia, the memory of the defenders of the Fatherland is sacred.
	We keep it in our hearts.
	We pay tribute to the members of the Resistance who bravely fought against Nazism, to the soldiers of the Allied armies of the U.S., Great Britain, and other states.
	We remember and honor the feet of the Chinese soldiers in the battle against Japanese militarism.
	It's very important.
	Leaders of the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States have gathered here in Moscow.
	I see a grateful attitude to the feet of our ancestors.
	They fought together.
	I'm convinced that experience is solidarity and partnership.
	During those years of fighting a common threat is our invaluable heritage.
	A strong support right now, when an irreversible movement toward a more just, multipolar world, based on principles of trust and indivisible security, equal opportunity for the original and free development of all countries and peoples, is gaining momentum.
	He called for a moment of silence.
	The battle to decide the fate of our motherland has always become domestic, popular, and sacred.
	We are faithful to the precepts of our ancestors, deeply and clearly understand what it means to be worthy of the height of their military labor and moral achievements.
	We are proud of the participants in this special military operation.
	The whole country rallies to support our heroes.
	Everyone is ready to help.
	Pray for you, comrades, friends, dear veterans.
	In each of our families, participants in the great patriotic war are honored.
	We're standing on Red Square.
	The land remembers the combatants of Yuri Degorousk and Dmitry Donsky, the militiamen of Menin and Bozarsky, the soldiers of Peter the Great and Kurchatov, the braids of 1941 and 1945.
	Today, participants in a special military operation are regular servicemen and those who join the ranks of the armed forces during partial mobilization.
	These are fighters from the Lou Hanson Donetsk Corps, many volunteer combat formation employees of the National Guard, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, The FSB, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, and other special services in depart.
	Greetings, friends.
	I greet everyone who is fighting for Russia on the battlefield, who is now on a combat post.
	More, but it was a very appropriate speech.
	Joe.
	Yes, and it's a very sober moment, considering they're at full-scale war with NATO at this particular point.
	So a lot of the parade was a little bit subdued, and the Western news media is saying, well, he only had one tank, and it was a T-34, which has been in every Victory Day parade for 78 years.
	Because that's what they won World War II with.
	And so that was the only tank, and they only had two or three missiles, and they said, well, that's proof they don't have any tanks, and they don't have any missiles, and that means that Ziolinski is winning.
	Absolute insanity that they can twist absolutely every bit of evidence to create this stupid frickin' narrative that the neocons can still rule the planet.
	Saw a great video recently by Dr. John Coleman on He wrote a book on it.
	He also wrote another book on Tavistock.
	He wrote another one on Rothschild.
	And he wrote another one on socialism, the first step to communism.
	And he says that the Royal Institute of International Affairs has picked every president in the last 150 years and that they have completely manipulated American policy and politics with the benefit of the Oh, John, I couldn't agree more.
	Great statement.
	detail who those Nazi SOBs are.
	And they've created every war.
	And they're the ones that founded and funded Stalin and Lenin and Hitler and Mussolini and Mao and every other piece of crap that we've had to deal with for the last 150 years.
	It's time for this shit to stop.
	Oh, John, I couldn't agree more.
	Great statement.
	Chris.
	Yeah, there's so much double speak in that article that you were talking about there, about in the case of Ukraine being freed from Nazism in And in fact, I believe this government was put in place by George Soros NGO, neo-Nazis, Golden Dawn, and many of those operatives of that nature, I believe.
	So that's kind of interesting to see this whole historic inversion, as well as everything else with the official narrative.
	And they really try to obfuscate the associative perceptions that come along with these official narratives, as Joe was saying.
	These inversions and abuses of language in the official narrative are almost pretty close to being short of deranged or delusional, if you really look at it.
	It reminds me of a movie called Trainspotting, where Begbie's story, he tells a version of reality, his version of it, And compared to, let's say, in relation to the official narrative versus the actual truth.
	And there's been very limited connections to the truth with the official narrative, we'll say.
	But it does provide a very aggrandizing thematic protagonist narrative to the United States, historically speaking.
	And in reality, it's been a very oppressive and abusive nature of diplomacy for a long time, especially with economic abuse and the petrodollar and things of the sort.
	So, yeah, it's a very deranged and delusional basis of reality.
	And I just say that anyone that has questioned it, historically speaking, was given the witch trial effect from the mental health institutions and the APA.
	And, you know, as far as psychiatric diagnoses and CIA infiltrations, it's very much part of the propaganda and it attacks people's mental health that even, you know, question things that we call the official narrative, the conspiracy theorists, if you will.
	So I think they're going to really start going after people that have not only put these things forth, but have been absolutely correct in these things.
	I think they're going to try to do something to discredit us in general.
	And it's really part of the inquisition tactics of an authoritarian government that's being put on.
	It's part of the destruction of this country.
	And it's really, I think it's going to become a duty of the people to do something pretty soon if this stuff continues.
	I also agree with all of that.
	Meanwhile, further evidence that the United States no longer exists as a nation in New York.
	Trump has been found liable for sexual abuse, not rape, but a $5 million damage fee.
	A jury found former President Trump liable for sexual abuse and battery of writer E. Jean Carroll three decades ago.
	Though not liable for rape, awarded $5 million in civil damages against him.
	They found Trump defamed her in his reaction to her lawsuit, which was encouraged by anti-Trump lawyer George Conway and backed by Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman, an associate of the late convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein.
	The jury reached its decision after a few hours of deliberation after a trial where the judge, a Bill Clinton appointee, allowed character evidence, including infamous Access Hollywood tape, to be used.
	It was totally inappropriate.
	Trump did not testify, but rather used a video of his deposition where he explained he did not recall Miss Carroll and he would not have been attracted to her.
	Carol had trouble recalling the date on which the alleged sexual abuse took place, even the year!
	But the judge controversially allowed other women to testify they had similar experiences.
	Well, all totally unacceptable.
	Being unable to specify not even the year, how could Trump possibly marshal the defense and alibi?
	It was absurd, improper, complete politicalization of our legal system.
	Typically, such evidence of character, purporting to prove a defendant commits a specific act based on an alleged propensity to commit similar acts, is inadmissible.
	Because the case was not criminal, the plaintiff's legal team was also allowed to comment negatively on his refusal to testify.
	The jury was allowed to draw negative inferences from it, which, in my opinion, was also improper.
	Trump tweeted, I have absolutely no idea who this woman is.
	The verdict is a disgrace, a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.
	The Trump campaign issued the following statement.
	The Democrat Party's never-ending witch hunt of residents hit a new low today.
	In jurisdictions wholly controlled by the Democrat Party, our nation's justice system is now compromised by extremist left-wing politics.
	We have allowed false and totally made-up claims from troubled individuals to interfere with our elections, doing great damage.
	Make no mistake, this entire bogus case is a political endeavor targeting President Trump because he's now an overwhelming frontrunner to be once again elected President of the United States.
	The continued abuse of our great Constitution for political ends is disgusting and cannot be tolerated.
	Our nation is in serious trouble when claims lacking any evidence or proof or eyewitnesses can invade our courts to score political points.
	Sadly, for the enemies of American freedom and democracy, President Trump will never stop fighting for the American people, no matter what the radical Democrats deem up next.
	This case will be appealed, and we will ultimately win.
	The Daily Beast sought to apologize for her, claiming she's not the perfect victim, but that doesn't make her a liar, when there are every reason to imagine this was a made-up story.
	The columnist who accused Trump of rape said on-air, some people consider rape sexy, cue conservative outrage, but more awkwardness does not disprove her story.
	The writer of 75 sat down with Anderson Cooper to discuss her allegations that Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room sometime between 1995 and 1996.
	Carol told her story in a measured, sometimes humorous tone.
	The facts remained unchanged from what she had previously published.
	She refused to view it through the lens of hindsight.
	Even though her story ended with an attack, she said it began as a New York moment.
	The best New York moment.
	She recalled Bergdorf as posh and cozy.
	I just love it.
	Admit it, she still visits and enjoys the landmark department store today, 25 years after it was the scene of an alleged crime.
	Smoked with a lilting, diverging tone of a lady who lunges, causing more than one Twitter suit to wonder if she was drunk on air.
	While Carol may have been quick to laugh when describing the thought of getting Trump to try on some lingerie, the fun stopped as she began describing her raid.
	She sea-tailed Trump, banged her head against the dressing room wall, putting his hand on the back of her head to touch the point of impact.
	Until then, the former Miss Cheerleader USA's posture had been impeccable.
	Now her head sagged and her shoulders slumped.
	Recounting the merry lead-up to the attack, she'd broken breathless run-on sentences, but she got more to the point, reporting his misconduct.
	It was against my will, and it hurt, and it was a fight.
	You're saying there was actual penetration?
	Kubra attempted to clarify.
	She silently nodded wide-eyed and then offered a succinct, yes.
	Her raw, vain expression at that moment should be enough to convince anyone she is telling the truth.
	Unfortunately, a somewhat awkward exchange just before Cooper cut to commercial became a late-night snack for conservatives, who latched onto the statement as evidence that Carol's allegations are suspect.
	It asked her when he asked to describe the penetration that took place inside Bergdorf, rightly calling the non-consensual action rape.
	Carol countered saying, I was not thrown on the ground and ravaged, which the word rape carries so many sexual connotations.
	This was not sexual.
	It hurt.
	It just, as Carol trailed off, Cooper offered.
	I think most people think of rape as being a violent assault.
	And Carol handed Trump some ammo.
	I think most people think of rape as being sexy, she mused.
	Think of the fantasies.
	Hugh Cooper stammering and signaling for a segment break.
	What could possibly inspire Carol's inopportune, uncomfortable tangent on rape fantasies?
	Oh, I don't know.
	Maybe we can chalk it up to the stress, lack of sleep, general emotional mindscrew coming with accusing a sitting president of rape.
	Unsurprisingly, Donald Rupp Jr.
	does not take as nuanced of a stance.
	His 41-year-old son reposted this segment with his own added commentary.
	Enough is enough with this bullshit.
	We all get it, Mita.
	You hate the real Donald Trump.
	but giving every Avenatti-like wacko a platform because they will say anything for press kills.
	What little is left of your credibility?
	Let him do his job.
	The results speak for themselves.
	Bartney Holland tweeted, oh my God, this woman.
	You can tell this is so awkward for Anderson Cooper.
	Watch to the end.
	She just keeps digging a deeper hole for herself.
	Here it is.
	You don't feel like a victim.
	I was not thrown on the ground and ravished.
	The word rape carries so many sexual connotations.
	This was not sexual.
	It hurt.
	I think most people think of rape as a violent assault.
	I think most people think of rape as being sexy.
	Let's take a short break.
	Think of the fantasies.
	We've got to take a quick break.
	If you can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side.
	He's fascinating to talk to.
	Listen to that.
	She was even coming on to Anderson Cooper.
	You better be careful, man.
	Yo, yo, your thought.
	What?
	Put on blackface and put a noose around her neck, man.
	She could really give Smollett a run for his money, man.
	A complete whack job.
	Yeah, what's her reputation?
	Could she have that?
	So, yeah, and it ruined her reputation.
	Give me a break.
	She ruined it herself.
	Yeah, what's our reputation?
	Could you have that?
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Well, I'm just thinking of a couple different statistics, you know, throw a few numbers at you.
	Studio 54, 1980s, Donald Trump, you know, not penetrating sex, legitimate rape or whatever, or this, whatever they're calling this.
	Anything's possible.
	All bets are off.
	But I don't think he really did this and I don't think it was anything of the nature of what the headline is indicating.
	And certainly it seems to be like an effort to not only distract but to discredit Donald Trump or really to destroy any popular sovereign leadership that is being put forward in 2024.
	Like Biden's going to win by default as long as they kneecap all these other guys, right?
	It's crazy stuff.
	I think they're going to really have to get to the bottom of this whole thing and maybe send out Bachman, Todd, Aitken, Overdrive, and define this a little bit more properly.
	It seems to me like a 15-year political loop that we're going through in terms of this whole process and this thing.
	Anybody with more than a 30 second attention span can probably see this and see through this and understand it's kind of like one of those old pull string dolls that's run through all its sayings.
	In my opinion, they're really trying to do something to take down this country and anybody that's trying to lead it in any reasonable way towards national ideas or like the people.
	The people had such a great economy under Trump and then now they're going to be, you know, seeing what Biden's doing with it.
	And I think that maybe this could be part of a backup plan as far as bringing Trump in when Biden crashes this whole thing down, this controlled demo, the controlled revolution, and maybe even a controlled opposition to put on this whole thing.
	You know, as far as I'm concerned, whether you're looking at RFK, Trump, DeSantis, they all seem to put on that little beanie and go rock out against that holy wall in front of the Jewish wallet in Jerusalem.
	So I think that really any reasonable candidate could probably be a Jewish proxy until I see some sort of more evidence from them, a commitment from them.
	I really think this is more distraction to turn people away from some of the bigger issues.
	Not saying that rape is not a big issue, but I think there's a lot more concerns we have with our country than this whole thing, and I think that Donald Trump is being pulled through the coals on a lot of this stuff unnecessarily, and it's almost embarrassing for them.
	But especially after, like, think about Bill Clinton, you know, there's three more words I'll throw at you.
	William Jefferson Clinton, or even Hillary Rodham Clinton, Lady Macbeth.
	Very good.
	allegations against them.
	Videotapes come forward, laptops come forward, servers go missing, and they don't even get questioned for any of this stuff.
	The whole world knows, but the law enforcement agencies seem to be obtuse willingly, and I think part of the corruption.
	It really is.
	I don't know what else to say.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, the coronation of Charles III was, I dare say, an insignificant event well captured by this political cartoon.
	The British Empire is just disappearing.
	It has no more of the cloud it once bore.
	Wearing the crown is not really a great achievement.
	Meanwhile, worldwide net-zero emissions prevented by 2050?
	The price tag would be $1.5 quadrillion to reduce less than one-tenth of a percent centigrade.
	How much global warming would worldwide net-zero emission prevent by 2050, and at what cost?
	My dear friend, John Remington Graham, retired professor of law, reached out to an authoritative source in an endeavor to ascertain the truth about global warming.
	He received the answer, but with a request of anonymity.
	Here's their exchange.
	The Stagg Report, May 2023, can be downloaded here from my blog.
	He writes, My lord, my guess—and it's only a guess—is that Charles III will be king for about 10 years, give or take a year or two.
	Do you think he will shut up about the scare over global warming?
	I had my doubts, and I can see that the scientific basis for this ridiculous passion is quickly crumbling.
	Though it becomes more and more popular among politicians who love the idea as an excuse to grab and abuse power.
	A bogus idea can last only so long.
	What are your views?
	I know you must speculate, but would appreciate your thoughts.
	The reply?
	Well, when the climate king gets he attached, which you did not get from me, he will have to think again.
	My lord, I cannot verify your numbers, but can and do verify the thrust of your excellent essay, which recalls the Democrat presidential debates of 2020 in the United States.
	Bernie Sanders projected a cool one $16 trillion for getting rid of human emissions of CO2, which would make no difference to speak of, would eliminate all prospect of paying off student loans and keeping Social Security solvent and destroying the United States.
	This striking reality caused the subject to change in the debates and now climate change is only a talking point for a few in hopes that Few, if any, will meaningfully understand the hoax.
	I think the best presentation was by Professor Linsen at CWPF 2018 attached.
	Ten pages of text which say everything you need to know and circumscribes a practical limit to the utility of the idea for the powers of high finance.
	He replies, Actually, you can easily verify Stagg's numbers, for the calculation is impeccably and explicitly sourced, and nothing more than elementary arithmetic is required.
	Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana was told by administration officials at a hearing that U.S.
	net zero would come some $50 trillion, but as the Stagg Brief shows, that probably underestimated figure would prevent only one-seventieth of a degree of global warming.
	The value for money question is going to become more and more important as a stupefying cost of emissions abatement starts to bite.
	Once Stagg's calculation is more widely known, the end of the climate nonsense will be nigh.
	You can find the whole report.
	Turns out each billion spent would prevent less than 1 ten millionth of There's a whole lot here about it.
	I'm delighted Joe is here, since this is among his areas of expertise.
	China, India, and Pakistan, with more than one-third of the global population, are greatly expanding their coal-fired generating capacity Not least so as to accommodate production priced out of Paris-obligated nations by their increasingly costly and intrusive emissions abatement measures, the chief cause of the large and rapidly growing disparity between Western and Eastern electricity prices.
	There's a lot here with very substantial graphs.
	This all appears to be very carefully researched and sourced.
	Ultimately, The U.S.
	represents 15% of global emissions, even if the U.S.
	were to attain net zero.
	The contribution to reduce warming by 2050 would only be one-seventh of a degree Celsius and less after adjustment for exported emissions.
	There's much more here about exactly how all this can be calculated.
	It's really quite stunning.
	Since the UK represents 1% of global emission, global net zero might cost $1.5 quadrillion.
	So that each $1 billion spent on emission abasement would prevent 1 16 millionth of a degree of warming.
	But that very large worldwide expenditure would prevent less than one-tenth of a degree of global warming, of which UK net zero would prevent one percent or less than one-thousandth of a degree, and US net zero about one-seventieth.
	Substantially documented.
	Joe, yours.
	Yes, well, I was lectured for two hours during a luncheon in January of 2010 at the Houston Petroleum Club by Dick Linson, and that evening they had another two-hour lecture at Rice University, and so four hours in one day lectured to by that lukewarmest phony baloney.
	He does not know anything about radiation physics at all, and he's wrong.
	There's no warming at all, not even a little bit.
	Sorry, Dick, you're wrong.
	Jim and I have done 10 hour-long tutorials about all of the things involved in the climate fraud, including the green energy, the EPA, all of the phony baloney science, back radiation warming.
	Well, on Saturday, April 29, we did a 10th episode, and I will put a link to that because it also links the engineering professional societies that are in charge of keeping an eye on science and giving best practice post-grad education to registered engineers in the field of civil engineering, in the case of the World Trade Center buildings,
	And in the case of global warming with the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Ventilating Engineers.
	It's an hour-long lecture.
	It's very well detailed, very well footnoted.
	I'll put it down in the notes below.
	But I've challenged these people repeatedly, and I've been told Joe, it's just stunning!
	administration with ASHRAE that they get enormous amounts of research funding from the Department of Energy and they will not say anything that conflicts with the global warming hypothesis because that's their gravy train and they could give a shit less about correct science and they could give a shit less about the STEM students for being force-fed this garbage.
	Joe is just stunning.
	Chris?
	Yeah they can't break cafebie I'm telling you it's it's It's sad to see academics, medicine, all these areas of positions of trust and duty that are being compromised by the big banks and the unlimited amount of money these guys can pay to make the truth just be whatever.
	You know, as far as things go, I'm looking at the rise and fall of empires.
	Maybe it's a little unrelated, maybe it's correlated, but I almost think that they need to make China the new production center, you know, because it's much harder to track the proxies now.
	They're at much higher margins in terms of popularity and resources as well.
	The cruelty index, the caste system, the hierarchy system.
	has been imposed for generations there.
	Think about in terms of the rise and fall of empires and being brought through its stages, you know, one through eight, if you read into like Toinsbury or anything like that.
	It's almost something very similar with this Judeo-Masonic cabal and like put these populations through the suffering and sacrifice phases.
	I think this has a lot to do with like the Holodomir and stuff in Ukraine.
	Years ago, most of the people that are putting on the stuff that is depopulating many people now are from that region and I think had something to do maybe directly or indirectly with that.
	And I think it's tied in terms of historic cycles.
	So, yeah, I think that the humiliation cycle has been brought on to both Russia and China.
	And now I think that they're in a position now where they're just coming out of the humiliation phase and the rituals And in terms of social engineering, it's crazy to look in historical context, current events or past and see how they use these empires as proxies in the way that they do it.
	Both of them and how they really run them into the ground economically and loot them blind while putting out these ridiculous narratives until it all falls apart.
	So I think we're at that phase right now in terms of the stage of empires.
	And it's really scary to see the divide and conquer that's being used.
	And it's an old formula that's been used going back to Roman, you know, the cults of Rome, the Pontiff Maximus, except now the new Pontiff Maximus might be the NSC, the CFR, APAC, or even the NGOs that they put out to do this stuff.
	So yeah, the same formulas are being used on every generation, except this generation keeps yielding better tech for these guys to make debt slavery become more streamlined and more effective and efficient.
	In terms of this process, and we're even coming up with a way to digitally control that as well with the blockchain, and I don't think that's any mystery that they name it that.
	Nice, nice.
	Yes, yes, our enslavement is assured once we reach that point.
	Meanwhile, ABC Reviews there, JFK Jr.' 's comments about COVID vaccines.
	How stunning is this?
	This is what America has come to.
	ABC cut off a presidential candidate when he began talking about COVID vaccines, raising concerns about censorship.
	RFK Jr.
	recently announced a presidential run as a Democrat, sat down with ABC News for a lengthy interview released on April 27.
	After hearing Clebs, reviewer Lindsay Davis spoke to viewers.
	We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, she said.
	We've used our editorial judgment in not including an extended portion of that exchange in our interview.
	How in the hell could she know they're false claims?
	RFK Jr.' 's an expert in the field she manifestly is not.
	The claims in question were not listed.
	ABC did not return a request for comment.
	Davis indicated at least one dealt with the efficacy of the vaccines.
	Data show the COVID vaccine prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease, she claimed, without providing any citations.
	He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism.
	Researchers show vaccines and the ingredients used do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children, major medical associates like the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the advocacy Autism Speaks.
	She said what happened violated the U.S.
	law that bars media from censoring candidates for public office.
	ABC showed its contempt for the law, democracy, and its audience by cutting most of the content of my interview with host Lindsay Davis, leaving only cherry-picked snippets and a defamatory disclaimer.
	Offering no evidence.
	ABC justified this act of censorship by falsely asserting I made false claims.
	In truth, Davis engaged me in a lively, informative, mutually respectful debate.
	On the government's COVID countermeasure, I'm happy to supply citations to support every statement I made during that exchange.
	I am certain ABC's decision to censor came as a shock to her as well.
	Instead of journalism, the public saw a hatchet job.
	Before airing the interview, she described RFK Jr.
	as one of the biggest voices pushing anti-vaccine rhetoric, regularly distributing misinformation and disinformation about vaccines, which scientific and medical experts overwhelmingly say are safe and effective based on rigorous scientific studies.
	She did not mention how the vaccines are increasingly ineffective against newer variants, how the vaccines have proven to cause serious problems including heart inflammation and death on a massive scale.
	Critics decried ABC's editing.
	The most outrageous part of this is ABC gets to ream JFK Jr.
	about vaccines during the interview, then censor his ability to even respond while forcing us to blindly trust them that his claims were false, said John Ziegler on Twitter.
	All this after they were wrong about vaccines stopping transmission.
	Alex Loras noted that ABC never censored a visual like Dr. Anthony Fauci, who had made false and misleading claims about vaccine efficacy, including his claims on ABC, in January 2021, that if enough people were vaccinated, herd immunity would be achieved.
	They are going to censor the interview with the 2024 election and they won't even hide it, Loris added.
	At the end of this otherwise interesting interview with RFK Jr., ABC admits they censored extended portions during the discussion of the COVID vaccine.
	Downhole writer Scott Moorfield wrote on Twitter, if his claims are so easily disproven, why not simply disprove them instead of resorting to censorship?
	Joe.
	Yes, well it's amazing.
	When I was a kid, there was like 1 in 25,000 cases of autism, and now there's 1 in 25.
	So you tell me what a thousand-fold increase in 50 years has to do with possibly some vector, and we know for a fact that everything that's in those things is poison.
	Read the great book by Judy Makovich, Absolutely great book.
	I've got Kennedy's book on the real Anthony Fauci.
	I've read several chapters, but I haven't quite finished it.
	It's a long book, and I'm in the middle of finishing another couple of books.
	But this just came across the wire.
	Absolutely stunning.
	Elon Musk has announced his 2024 presidential run.
	Dude, you were born in South Africa.
	You're not a natural born American, if the Constitution still means anything.
	So, you know, absolutely ridiculous.
	And there's no excuse to ever get any vaccine again, because all of them now are loaded with You're an absolute idiot if you trust modern medicine to do anything.
	that are toxic.
	And we're in a supply chain situation where 90% of the vaccines come from China and the remaining 10% are made with Chinese produced ingredients with zero quality control and zero efficacy.
	So you're an absolute idiot if you trust modern medicine to do anything.
	There's a great video by James Corbett on the pharmaceutical industry and the routes to Rockefeller.
	I'll put a link to that because it's up on BitChute and it was posted like several years ago, but he reposted it recently.
	Everything he said in there is like 100% correct.
	We have a rogue pirate system that's running our medical establishment and And unfortunately, just like the engineers that are not standing up for science fraud and fraud with the demolition of the World Trade Center buildings, we have an American Medical Association that will not challenge the frauds that are being produced by Pharma, CDC, and FDA.
	So we have an absolutely spineless system of feedback and Verification across the board in every industry.
	It's absolutely disgusting that we have to put up with this level of abuse.
	In the autism case, there's a perfect demonstration of the corruption of ABC.
	There's a perfect correlation between childhood vaccines and autism.
	The more you vax, the more autism.
	The less you vax, the less autism.
	This is utter nonsense coming from ABC, and who the hell are they to impose themselves as censors of a medical expert like RFK Jr.?
	Not to mention their gross distortion of the facts of the matter.
	Chris?
	Well, you know, I'm thinking about this, about how a group of private bankers use public debt to basically create the initiatives to supply the propaganda to the radio networks, to the mainstream media.
	65% of their advertising revenue was coming from Big Pharma in these times, and they were all running around with this This rhetoric, this propaganda saying safe and effective, making these outrageous claims like this vaccine is actually helpful to people and it's not a poison apple or a Trojan horse.
	And people like myself and others have been saying this for years out.
	I mean, before there was even a COVID, it was five years out.
	I've been saying this and getting censored and banned and attacked with trolls and Lord knows whatever else.
	Right.
	So, like, I mean, if you think about the cover up and the amount of Money, time, effort, and they're putting out and maintaining an official narrative and putting this propaganda out.
	It should show the complicity, you know, the malice of forethought in the whole plan, but also, and more importantly, the cover-up.
	And I think it's almost, I don't think it's worse than the crimes, but it's indicative of some really bad crimes, the extent to which the cover-up goes.
	And if you look at the amount of disability claims, Ed Dowd does some good research on this.
	There's a few other guys that are just nailing it, and it's, It's good to really trust the statistical data that they're putting forward, because there's none to contradict it the other way.
	The burden of proof should be on Big Pharma, not on the victims.
	If this is unsafe, they should have pulled this, should have yanked it away from emergency authorization and all this other stuff.
	But instead, they kept going with it.
	I don't know they're going to really harm a lot of people.
	I heard that there's the numbers almost 29 million have signed up for disability and have been unable to work functionally full-time jobs because they've been injured from this thing.
	So I know a lot of people that have passed away that have gotten fast-moving cancers that took these things hard issues like you wouldn't believe.
	I mean seven, eight guys I worked with in the last two years.
	I mean These are real people that are having this happen to them, and, you know, the media's sitting there still telling you it's safe and effective.
	This is beyond sinister.
	Very, very well said.
	Meanwhile, Manning and Corsi's new book provides scientific evidence JFK was assassinated in a crossfire.
	In January, on January 22nd, 2023, The Gateway Pundit, in an article authored by Jerome Corsi, wrote the story that David Maddock, MD, PhD, has completed a 30-year study of the three JFK autopsy films in the Kennedy assassination collection at the National Archives.
	We can now report Mannick and Corsi are writing a book proving shots from the front and back hit JFK's head.
	That JFK was killed in a crossfire proves there were multiple shooters on November 22, 1963.
	Multiple shooters prove he was killed in a crossfire.
	I think they mean here a conspiracy.
	Mannequin Corsi's new book will be titled, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, The Final Word.
	The subtitle will be, Forensic Analysis of the Autopsy X-Ray Blue Shots from the Front and Back of JFK's Head.
	The cover of the book will also proclaim, X-Rays Blue Crossfire Proves Conspiracy.
	As about RFK Jr.' 's accusation, the CIA was involved.
	Both Mannix and Corsi respond Mannix's research proves scientifically with a certainty beyond doubt.
	The U.S.
	government was involved in the assassination as conducted a cover-up of the truth for 60 years.
	Nearly a year after applying to the Kennedy family, he received permission to view the JFK autopsy x-ray.
	JFK is closing in on the ballistic evidence from Burke Marshall, the Kennedy family lawyer with power of attorney over these restricted materials.
	In the course of nine visits, Mannix made thousands of scientifically precise optical density readings of the JFK X-rays.
	No one else had made anywhere near nine visits to examine these materials or taken so much data from the X-rays and photographs.
	I'm honored to be one of the only handful of non-government positions the family granted access to examine these still-restricted materials.
	From the optical density readings, I can prove scientifically with a certainty beyond doubt that the three JFK autopsy x-rays in the National Archives today are for juries.
	I can also prove scientifically with a certainty beyond doubt that JFK received three head wounds, two shots from the front and one shot from the rear.
	Mannick has a Ph.D.
	in physics from the University of Michigan.
	Actually, it's from the University of Wisconsin, and an M.D.
	from the University of Michigan.
	Starting in 1976, he has practiced medicine as a radiation oncologist, which, of course, is a treatment of cancer using X-ray therapy.
	I was angry that our historians had failed to solve this greatest of American mysteries.
	It was time for serious detective work, so I applied to the Kennedy family attorney.
	It took nearly a year.
	But finally, I receive permission to review the JFK autopsy x-ray photograph, JFK clothing, and ballistic evidence.
	So in 1993, I mean the first of nine visits to these artifacts, I believe actually the date it was 1992, Dr. Mannix and Corsi have given the Gateway Pundit exclusive permission to print the introduction to the book, which is here.
	Jerome, of course, his latest book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Why the Government of the United States is Unfit to Rule.
	For 60 years now, since November 22, 1963, the federal government of the United States has lied to us about the assassination in Dallas of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
	When JFK's limousine arrived at Parkland, Secret Service agents destroyed evidence by wiping his blood and brains from the limousine.
	Still today, U.S.
	intelligence agents continue to redact, classify, and conceal crucial documentary evidence.
	We begin by acknowledging our debt to the scores of JFK assassination researchers who have devoted their time and effort to illuminate what happened on that dark day in Dallas 60 years ago.
	After nine visits to the National Archives to examine the JF autopsy x-rays, David Manik, MD, PhD, Acquired forensic proof that JFK was hit by three headshots, one from behind and two from the front.
	Headshots hitting nearly simultaneous from the back and front proved JFK died in a crossfire.
	Dr. Manik, a radiation oncologist with 40 years of experience, has empirically demonstrated impossible features of the skull x-rays.
	Thus, the Warren Commission conclusion that Lee Oswald was a lone gunman Cannot possibly be true.
	JFK, Dr. Manik, can also forensically demonstrate the remaining three JFK skull x-rays are not the originals.
	He's proven they are altered copies of the originals and experimentally demonstrated how it was done.
	The alteration of both lateral x-rays masks the blowout at the right rear of the head from one of the frontal shots.
	The image of a false bullet fragment added to the AP anterior-posterior was placed there to help incriminate Oswald, thus creating the impression all the damage done to the skull and brain came from a single gunshot from the rear.
	That the x-rays are altered copies provides additional proof The Warren Report is disinformation.
	That the original x-rays are missing is further evidence of a cover-up.
	Lyndon Johnson advanced that by appointing one of the chief co-conspirators, Alan Dulles, to the Warren Commission.
	JFK had Dulles fired from his position as head of the CIA.
	The job of the Warren Commission was to chisel into stone the government's lie that a lone assassin had killed JFK with three shots from his Explorer window using an unreliable surplus Italian military rifle with an improperly adjusted scope.
	The federal government simply could not allow the public to learn JFK's assassination was a coup d'etat originating at the highest levels of the federal government.
	The government disinformation campaign began by altering evidence at the crime scene itself.
	It continued by destroying evidence of a crossfire, culminating in manufacturing falsified evidence designed to frame Lee Oswald as the lone gunman.
	The government disinformation campaign continues today through its effort to refute and discredit anyone who dares to expose its lies.
	After addressing the head shots, this book examined the wounds to JFK's back and throat.
	We demonstrate the back shot was a high angle shot, did not lodge deeply into JFK's back, came most likely from a rooftop behind JFK.
	It also suggests JFK's throat room derived from a frontal shot that did not traverse or exit JFK's body.
	This throat wound resulted in a shot from the south side of the triple overpass opposite the grassy knoll.
	That should be the triple underpass, by the way.
	Entering JFK's neck after transitioning the windshield, the most important conclusion is that neither shot passed through or exited JFK's body.
	Proving our inspector's magic bullet theory was a complete hoax.
	We're at a unique moment in our nation's history.
	After the federal government portrayed COVID as a deadly pandemic requiring a national lockdown, and the FDA approved a vax that did not prevent those vaccinated from COVID infection, an increasing number of Americans are beginning to realize we cannot trust the federal government to tell the truth.
	With the forensic evidence we present, here comes the uncomfortable realization a government citizens can no longer trust is unfit to rule.
	Dr. Manning's nine visits to the National Archives to examine the autopsy x-rays are far more than any other qualified expert.
	Furthermore, he's devoted 20 years of forensic thought to these issues, thus we have written this book in the first person, allowing David Mannock to tell his story in his own words.
	We have also decided to dedicate the book to Douglas B. Horne, a tireless researcher who worked closely with Dr. Mannock through the years.
	Dr. Mannock was in Washington to study the x-rays at the National Archives.
	Warren was Chief Analyst for Military Records on the Assassination Record Review Board staff.
	We consider Warren's five-volume book series inside the Assassination Record Review Board to be the definitive treatment of the federal government's disinformation campaign.
	Throughout the book, David will explain his research collaboration with Douglas Horn, demonstrating the degree to which they agree about the conspiracy that killed JFK.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, so I'm not real impressed with Jerome for a whole bunch of reasons.
	First of all, his doctorate is in economics, so that kind of limits what he has educational background in.
	But second of all, I had my first national interview with Dennis Miller March 12, 2015.
	The next day I was contacted by Costa Cosi.
	Can you be on our program next week?
	And I said, sure.
	I had already scheduled an interview on Monday, March 16th, with James Fetzer, and we did unequivocal 9-1-1 nukes, a two-hour Zoom that was placed on YouTube.
	The next day, on the 17th, I went to a Teak Fire meeting here in Houston and listened to Corsi for an hour and a half babble on about a bunch of different things.
	I took a copy of his book, Who really killed Kennedy, which I had already read, had him sign it, gave him a copy of our book.
	The next day, on the 18th, I was on Coast to Coast AM, 650 radio stations, 2 million listeners.
	And by the way, Dennis Miller had 400 radio stations with an equal amount, probably 200, because this was a daytime program, and he was a really popular radio host.
	Bottom line is, I don't have a whole lot of trust in him.
	He absolutely threw Roger Stone under the bus on the WikiLeaks stuff.
	He says, yeah, I'm pretty sure he got it from WikiLeaks, but I wasn't involved in any of that, so I'm not going to testify in his case.
	And Stone goes, you know I didn't get it from them, and you threw me under the bus so that you wouldn't get prosecuted.
	So that's the kind of character that we're dealing with on this guy.
	And I went to the JFK conference in Dallas in 2018, and I met with one of the best experts in the world, Dr. James Fetzer, and we had lunch or dinner every day for three days.
	The conference was a 10-hour event every day.
	I attended all 10 hours, three days in a row, and I guarantee you there's nothing at this point that Corsi can say that hasn't been said better by others.
	Well, Joe, I appreciate all that, actually, with the exception of...
	Additional shot to the head, which I believe was fired from the side of the head.
	Everything here we've just reviewed was published by me in a series of edited books beginning 25 years ago.
	In 1998, Assassination Science.
	Then 2000, Murder in Dealey Plaza.
	In 2003, The Great Zapruder Film Hoax.
	And it's not at all clear this book is going to engage in research on the Zapruder film.
	But David Mantic and I have been research colleagues for 30 years, beginning in 1992.
	Doug Horn came on the scene much, much later.
	I have tremendous respect for Doug Horn.
	I believe if you look at the literature seriously, David Lifton pioneered scientific research with his best evidence.
	Mythreek carried that massively forward with his definitive scientific studies, because these are edited books with the best experts to study JFK.
	Doug Horn then did very thorough additional research with Inside the A or B, and now David Mannick has published a new definitive study of his research on the x-rays in a massive volume of which this appears to be a popularized version.
	So just for the record, that's how it all adds up.
	Chris?
	Yeah, I'm skeptical of Corsi a little bit too.
	His background speaks enough and his track record is right there with it.
	So yeah, I'm not saying he's not right.
	It sounds like he's more or less taking what you said, Fetz, and now using this documented version of what went on in Dealey as the so-called truth.
	And I think that really when they do these type of things, when they have to admit stuff that is known to the people that have researched this seriously, at some point in time, they have to level with the people.
	They can't just keep bullshitting them.
	So I think that this is maybe one of those things where they'll get control of the narrative or maybe shave off certain things of the narrative or steer people towards different suspects or conclusions maybe.
	I haven't read his book, but I'm just saying statistically, traditionally speaking, this is how the intelligence operatives, as I would say he might be, would put out limited hangouts in such a manner.
	It reminds me of Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers.
	He was – A very honest and obvious admission of guilt by the Pentagon, but it was certainly a limited hangout in terms of being a misdirection and distraction away from like the Phoenix program or MTL or Mockingbird, you know, the coups, news, banks, and Jews, you know?
	So I think really, this is kind of a thing that the deep state has to do in terms of leveling with people on the word on the street.
	You know, think about the deep state since the Kennedy assassinations and the sort.
	Think about how they've established their own intelligence community that's beyond government oversight or, you know, it's total dark money skunk works.
	They have a breakaway civilization.
	They have 99% of the resources going to 1% of the population.
	They have life extension technology, space and time travel most likely, demonic interfacing most likely, and all these enterprises I think are going to be torn down in terms of the deep state apparatus and maybe even destroyed or written off.
	More importantly, writing off the liability and scrapping that.
	The big part will be the private sector soaking up all the IP, the production, the surplus, and the value from these inventions that have been funded with taxpayer money for pennies on the dollar, just like they're doing now with real estate and commercial loans.
	I think this is a predatory thing, I think, and it's where it's going to go to, in my opinion.
	So, timestamp, you know, take it for what it is.
	Maybe time will prove me wrong, but it'll probably prove me right.
	I think we're looking at, you know, a generation maybe closing a chapter on the JFK thing and finally getting to the truth.
	And maybe it's going to take the same deal of diligence with the COVID thing in terms of this generation and it being its magic bullet plague of the time and place.
	A ruse that was put out to steer people into this vaccine and the gain-of-function mRNA technology, biowarfare stuff that is being done against us from the private sector, this deep state, and even maybe our own government.
	Excellent.
	Yeah, Joe.
	Yes, another source that I would highly recommend is America's Untold Stories by Eric Hundley and Mark Groberg.
	And they've done dozens of hour and a half long programs on every one of the characters involved in the JFK issue.
	And then recently, I think it was started last year, they did a three-part series on RFK.
	And interestingly enough, that's going to be the subject of this week's TNT interview with Dr. Fetzer.
	So check in TNT Radio.
	It's from 6 until 8.
	I don't remember which segment Jim is going to be on, but it'll be one of the hours, either first or second.
	This Saturday night on TNT Radio.
	But one of the interesting things was they said that they had forced JFK to make a statement that he might accept LBJ as a VP.
	And when Robert heard the news, he stormed in and said, JFK, what'd you do that for?
	And he goes, well, I didn't really make that statement, but he's in the same hotel with us.
	So RFK goes down to his room.
	And he confronts LBJ and he says, you need to not accept this nomination.
	We do not want you.
	And he says, well, hey, look at this.
	J. Edgar Hoover had brought him pictures of JFK ends sexual acts with multiple different women, including one of the ones that was a mistress with a mob, and he said, I'm going to be on the ticket and there's nothing you can do about it or you won't be elected.
	And so RFK had to bite his lip and go back upstairs.
	And that was a feud that led LBJ and J. Edgar Hoover to both shoot RFK in 1968.
	So that's how nasty our government has been For at least the last 150 years.
	Yeah, good point.
	Hey, Chris, you mind if I jump in when you're done?
	Yeah, Chris, you go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, those guys also did a lot of stuff on Jolly West and also Gottlieb, Dr. Death from the CIA.
	A lot of stuff that, you know, for 20, 30 years I've been talking about and most people, you know, it seems to fall on deaf ears, but I've done a lot of similar research that I've come up with, and yeah, they've got some good shows on that too.
	So yeah, give credit to those guys and check them out if you get a chance.
	It's pretty decent.
	I'll put a link in the comments below this video when it's posted.
	Sure.
	Linda did force himself on the ticket, but my understanding is just a tad different than you described, Joe.
	Namely, Jack beat Lyndon for the nomination, and he invited Stuart Symington of Missouri to be his running mate, but gave him overnight to think about it.
	Bobby went by the Johnson suite to make a pro forma gesture of inviting him to run with JFK, never expecting he'd have the least interest.
	Instead, he jumped on it.
	He threatened to expose that Jack suffered from Addison disease, which meant he wasn't expected to live a long, healthy life, that he ...had among as many dalliances one with an East German woman who turned out to be a spy, and that if he were not on the ticket, then in his position as a majority leader of the Senate, he'd bottle up any legislative proposal set down by the White House, which would be dead on arrival.
	Bobby and Jack tried to figure a way out of it, but they were boxed in, and Jack had to rescind the only time in his political career a decision to with the invitation of Symington.
	When one of Lyndon's wealthy backers learned LBJ would be on the ticket with Jack, he burst into the Johnson's, cursing and swearing, because now Lyndon will help Jack become president.
	Bobby Baker took him into a bedroom and explained what they had in mind.
	He came out all smiles and said he thought that was an excellent plan.
	Bobby Baker would later declare in public, JFK would not live out his first term, that he would die a violent death.
	And in the sequence of events, Lyndon Johnson sent his chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place for the assassination.
	So we're in the right ballpark.
	One of JFK's affairs was with the wife, Marilyn Myers, of Cord Myers, who was in command of the CIA.
	Yeah.
	It was second in charge of operations.
	She apparently had a powerful influence on Jack.
	There's a whole book about it by It's a wonderful book, actually.
	Hey, Feds, do you ever hear the thing that Bill Clinton, the reason why he pardoned Fife Symington, Stuart Symington's son, the former governor of Arizona, when he was president, when he was going out of office, Clinton pardoned him.
	It was because he saved him from drowning one time when he was at Yale Law.
	He fell into one of the rivers and almost drowned, and he pulled Clinton out, and I guess he called in a favor, and Clinton gave it to him.
	JFK had a lot of dalliances, but they don't appear to have amounted to much.
	For example, Angie Dickinson said that her affair with JFK was the greatest 14 seconds of her life.
	And we also had the mayor of Dallas, who was his brother, Eric Cobell, was his brother.
	Yeah, high-ranking in the CIA as well.
	Kennedy fired him.
	He's talking about Earl.
	Joe's talking about Earl, who is his brother.
	Yeah, right.
	No, Kennedy fired the CIA brother.
	He actually retired Allen Dulles with fanfare.
	So there were several facts that Jerry Corsi didn't have quite right there.
	But, you know, I believe Mannix research is so important that the more people who understand what's going on here, the better.
	Meanwhile, We want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
	Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
	CIA now under immigration attack.
	Miscall the weaponization of immigration, Jim writes to me.
	Weaponized immigration is now the most salient tool of the globalists to destroy national borders or sovereignty, their ethnic identities, in order to create a completely new set of former nations filled with a total mixture of foreign immigrants.
	This is the globalist dream of the ages, and the U.S.
	government and the other Western governments are helping them implement this plan.
	If you like the idea of starvation or FEMA food lines, you will love this globalist effort to heterogenize the nation's population.
	Final thoughts, Joe, yours.
	Yeah, so I've got two final thoughts.
	One of them is that if you happen to get Pfizer-induced myocarditis, Pfizer has a treatment for you.
	It's spelled V-Y-N-D-A-Q-E-L.
	We'll say it's Videnel.
	It costs $21,987 for the full treatment of 120 capsules.
	So there you go, kids.
	They give you a disease, and then they've got a high-priced patent medicine that can limit the amount of symptoms that you have, but it will never cure the disease that they gave you.
	And then the next thing is, during the 60s, there was a very active peace movement.
	There's been nothing since the first Gulf War about any of the wars that the United States has been involved in.
	But one of the key songs in that particular era was a song that has verses from Ecclesiastes to everything there is a season.
	And I always liked that song, and I started doing a little bit of research on it.
	Turns out the original song was written and recorded by Pete Seeger in 1959, and it is the direct Bible verses from Ecclesiastes 3, 1 through 8.
	And it was turned into an absolute fabulous hit by a group called The Birds in 1965, and the only thing they added to it was the chorus, turn, turn, turn, which they used for the name of the song, which is one of the most memorable parts of the song.
	Absolutely a wonderful song, and it just reminds you that at one time, there was a large portion of the nation that was opposed to foreign wars.
	Well, that's a wonderful comment.
	You said you had two?
	Was there a second?
	Yeah, the first one was the myocarditis cure.
	Okay.
	Chris, your final thoughts?
	Yeah, it's pretty absurd.
	They've basically turned our natural immune system into a subscription service.
	And now they'll sell you a snake oil sale for everything to treat the side effects from a snake oil sale that they sold you the last time.
	And it's all funded by insurance and big money and tax dollars and public debt for private interest.
	And it's sad to see the amount of corruption And the amount of collusion that has been done in delivering this depopulation agenda that seems to be coming forth.
	And it's even more sad that the people that have had this right from the get-go, or even before it even happened, are being targeted in such a way and being demonized by this propaganda media that is out there.
	They've never had to pay the price.
	They never had to really deal with their malevolence or their I guess they're almost accessories in mass genocide.
	And I think that when time tells the truth and reveals what is done here, what has been done, that these people are going to have to be dealt with.
	And if they don't, then we have no reverence for justice or truth.
	Excellent, Chris.
	You and Joe, just sensational today.
	I'm just delighted.
	Let me pick up on three themes about the open borders, about the Trump trial.
	A country without border enforcement isn't a nation.
	A country that violates its own most sacred principles, in particular equal justice under law by politicizing its legal system, is no better than a banana republic.
	And a government that continues to lie to the nation about matters of the utmost seriousness cannot be taken seriously.
	For that reason, I conclude, as of tomorrow, America is dead.
	It was a great idea, but we didn't have the will, the fortitude to maintain the integrity of government.
	We became the captive of a foreign power.
	We have a Congress that has betrayed the American people and a president who's a miscreant, actually an actor wearing a mask, who is performing foul deeds on behalf of other sources who are manipulating him like a puppet.
	This is not only not sustainable, this means the nation, this once great nation, has come to an end.
	It takes me no pride.
	I'm not glad to arrive at this conclusion, but the evidence, the facts are there.
	It's inescapable.
	Spend as much time as you can with your friend, your family.
	Continue to love them.
	Enjoy what is left of our freedom, which I now predict to be very, very limited, because once they have a digital banking, it's all over and will only continue to exist as serfs and slaves.

▲