Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 17, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:08:43

Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (16 April 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Folks, this is the second hour of Truth vs. News Incorporated.
	I'm Donald Reiner, producer, JD.Consultants at ProTimeMail.com.
	And we're right in the middle of talking about Dianne Feinstein and all the good things that she's done, or not, and what's happening in that.
	And I know you've got some comments on that.
	Go ahead.
	Well, I just think we're going to see a big clearing out of the Democratic Party.
	We're going to see Feinstein leave.
	I think we're going to see a bunch of other lame-duck people leave.
	They're going to try to rebuild a lot of the party.
	I have no idea who they're going to try to put in, but I think they're going to have to clear out some of these people that have been in office for decades.
	Yeah, and... Treehouse.
	Sooner the better.
	Meanwhile, prosecutors admit cops instigated violence on January 6.
	The kangaroo coot of the January 6 trial of the Proud Boys hit a snag when it was discovered that Biden's secret police—they call them the FBI—had infiltrated the defense team with a spook!
	They'd infiltrated the defense team!
	The trial has now revealed there were twice as many FBI informants in the Proud Boys on January 6th as there were actual Proud Boys.
	Not an exaggeration.
	I'm reminded of the communist cell meetings of the 40s, where every member of the cell was an informant for the FBI.
	You know, separate prosecutors have admitted in filings they want to keep surveillance videos secret because they prove undercover Metro cops were instigating violence at the protests.
	It looks like everyone was instigating violence at the Measles Trump protests except for the actual Trump supporters.
	A Trump supporter named William Pope is representing himself, and he seems to be doing so rather ably.
	Against charges, he briefly entered the Capitol on January 6.
	He filed a motion calling for video footage shot by three undercover Metro cops to be unsealed.
	Prosecutor last Friday filed a counter motion claiming the video should be kept secret.
	The government's reasoning, as stated in writing, is that Pope wants to try the case in the media by raising videos of cops instigating violence.
	That's their argument?
	Yes.
	When the government filed its counter motion, someone leaked video from three undercover Metro cops.
	Pope immediately pointed out in court and to the Atlantic Times, this is exactly why all the videos need to be released.
	The officer clearly incited that area, and we still don't have video from all the other undercover Metropolitan Police, said Pope.
	As numerous informants at the Proud Boys demonstrate, we are only just beginning to scratch the surface on FBI involvement.
	The leaked video shows two of the undercover cops walking just steps behind Ashley Babbitt.
	One of them states, somebody's gonna get shot.
	A few minutes later, Ashley would be viciously, savagely, brutally murdered by one of Nancy Pelosi's cops.
	By the way, I believe that was staged, but there it is.
	She was shot dead by a dirty cop, despite being five foot nothing tall, posing a threat to absolutely no one, peaceful, unarmed, an Air Force veteran.
	Here's some select quotes from the undercover cops who were shouted at members of the crowd while they were dressed in pro-Trump costumes.
	Come on, man, let's go.
	Sounds like wine.
	Come on.
	Go, go, go.
	Keep going.
	Keep going.
	Come on.
	In a prior filing, Pope wrote that the video clearly evinces undercover law enforcement urging the crowd to advance up the stairs and scaffolding on January 6.
	The government may claim incidents like this did not happen, but the facts—the videos—show they did.
	Prosecutors are arguing if the identities of the undercover cops who were inciting people to go inside are revealed, their lives will be put in danger.
	Some of those dangerous white supremacist insurrectionist Trump-supporting fascist Nazis will knock them down and kill them.
	Count me scum.
	Take all.
	The governor expects the court to take their word on it that January 6th happened just like they say it happened, and no, no, no, you can't see the videos.
	And oh, by the way, speaking of the Proud Boy trial, it's on a hiatus while the judge tried to figure out what's even happening.
	There are five Proud Boys on trial, including the group's leader, Enrique Tarrio.
	But Mr. Tarrio is an FBI informant himself.
	At least ten additional FBI informants have been found to have been swirling around the five.
	10 FBI agents for five defendants, and that's just those who have been revealed during the trial.
	One of those has been having conversation with the defendants and their lawyers in a clear illegal violation of attorney-client privilege, and oh, the trial is also revealed.
	The FBI tried to get one of the Proud Boys to make Molotov cocktails and bring them to the protest.
	Scott, your thoughts?
	Well, The process of the case and the legal environment, Don knows this too, the judge can dismiss all charges.
	The judge can declare this is fraud, the evidence of fraud is overwhelming, the defense files a motion to dismiss and everything is dismissed.
	The undercover police that were shown in these videos inciting the violence in the crowd, they need to be dragged before the judge And as witnesses to testify, who told you to do this?
	Why did they tell you to do this?
	Where's the order?
	Where are the emails?
	Where are the phone conversations?
	Where are the records of your order to engage in this sort of practice?
	This just didn't come up from a cop that had nothing to do and just thought he'd go to a protest and pretend he was a Trump supporter.
	No, this was a very elaborate, calculated, psychological operation used to push Trump's reporting people up onto the Capitol and photograph it as an insurrection day, and that's exactly what they did.
	They pushed all the people up there and they engaged in what looked like an insurrection, and they defined it as an insurrection.
	We knew it was problematic in the beginning.
	I was there November 2020.
	I was presenting the AFL-CIO documents and the SES documents and the phone calls that they were having, among others, that were analyzing this.
	We presented it to Cindy Powell and General Michael Flynn and Joe Flynn and Rudy Giuliani, an assortment of people, and Pat Byrne.
	And no one seemed to do really anything, which causes me suspicion, but the entire show has been nothing but a show.
	Now, you have some real dumb Trump supporters who love to wave big Trump flags and have big jaws of tobacco in their mouth, and America!
	I mean, there's some real idiots, but there's some real good patriotic people, too.
	But the idiots are the ones who got swept up in this and got pushed up and used and manipulated to go up on the Capitol grounds and be photographed.
	And some people have died.
	There were like four people that died.
	Two guys were killed by grenade concussions when they shot grenades at them, concussion grenades.
	Killed two guys.
	One woman was beaten to death with a billy club and a cop.
	So, you know, on a constitutional oath level, This needs to be brought up in front of the court and brought up in front of a jury, brought up in front of the American people, because these cops were committing treason.
	They were committing a seditious conspiracy themselves.
	That's the thing.
	Democrats love to project what they're doing on other people.
	No, these cops, these FBI, these Democrats, and these RINOs were committing seditious conspiracy because they were Violating the Constitution of the United States.
	They were defrauding the American people.
	They were engaging in insurrection themselves and trying to blame it on someone else.
	We are seeing that we have nothing but diseased, rotten individuals in the FBI, in the CIA, in the Capitol Police.
	I agree with you wholeheartedly, Jim.
	The Ashley Babbitt shooting was false, theatrical, dramatic, and fake.
	You don't get shot in the neck five feet away by a nine millimeter gun and not be knocked on your butt, not see a big flash, not have blood pour out, not have blood pouring out from the artery that's been nicked.
	all over the floor and when they picked her up there was one silver dollar blob of of blood that was on the floor and then of course when they got her in the ambulance outside then there's all sorts of blood that appeared on the white sheets and stuff but the moment when she was shot and she lay on the ground for like a minute two three minutes that's when all the blood would have been spurting out and it would have been soaked on the ground it would have been soaked on the ground it It would have been soaked on her body.
	She would have been writhing and moving in panic mode because her adrenaline would have kicked in.
	When you're shot, it's like being burned.
	When you touch a hot stove, you don't say, I think I'll pull my hand back now.
	Your adrenaline kicks in, your body instinct kicks in, and you jump back.
	And she didn't jump back.
	She didn't have any of the physiological reactions of someone who shot.
	Again, Democrat theatrics meant to, I think, trigger the veteran community into a massive uprise by pretending one of their own had been killed.
	That didn't happen.
	But the entire January 6th event, and I'm glad people are representing themselves, that's the only hope that you have of justice, is representing yourself and speaking out.
	Because only then can you be guaranteed to stand up for the truth.
	Lawyers that are representing these people, Like you just exposed, Jim.
	They are frauds.
	They are infiltrators.
	You have spies in there.
	You have deep state operatives in the defense team.
	So this needs to come out, and I'm glad Pope is doing it, and I think Tucker Carlson hopefully will pick this up and then seal it as well.
	Jim?
	Very good.
	I thought your description of how it should have gone had the shooting been real was just masterful.
	Paulie, your thoughts?
	I think at this point it's unfortunate that I have to say this, but I really don't trust any sort of protests or public events at this point.
	I would really advise anyone to really go and do that.
	I think it's just basically all entrapment at this point.
	There's people embedded in all of that now.
	I mean, it's so hard online.
	I mean, there's so many trolls and people.
	Informants and everything people just trying to ruin the lives of people at this point and then so to go and actually do that in person.
	I would not recommend that to anyone at this point because I think it's only meant there meant to destroy people's lives and trap them.
	Even if you're just talking to the media at this point, they're just going to take everything out of context.
	try to wreck you.
	I think we're all, each one of us is pretty familiar with that, the ways in which they will stop at nothing to try to ruin people at this point.
	So I would just advise against it at this point.
	I know that's, it's really sad to have to say that as an American, but I mean, what do we have for First Amendment at this point?
	Really nothing.
	They've really torn that away from us.
	Yeah.
	I think those are very telling comments, Paulie said.
	Meanwhile, bombshell photos, video of UN sponsored human migration camp during Gap, where global migrants assemble for transport to the United States.
	This is very, very disturbing.
	Writing and Founder Mike Adams interviews War Correspondent Michael Yawn, who's on-site at the U.N.
	Migration Camp at San Vicente in the Darien Gap in Panama, where both the U.N.
	and the U.S.A.
	are funding mass human migration activities that shuttle migrants from all over the world into the United States.
	Migrants streaming through this U.N.
	camp, including from the Middle East, Europe, Haiti, China, many South American citizens.
	I was able to speak with a Chinese couple in Mandarin and confirm their country of origin, mainland China, with their destination, the United States.
	If you're wondering why Chinese nationals are pouring through the Darien Gap in Panama, you're not alone.
	Very few Americans are aware of this bombshell story.
	And Michael Young is breaking the news to a global audience.
	A massive expansion of the camp is currently underway, helping funnel more migrants across the Darien Gap, where they'll be transported to the U.S.
	border to illegally cross into the U.S.
	with the help of the U.S.
	Department of Homeland Security and the Biden admin.
	I say this is further proof of my claim.
	They're bringing in 100 million migrants into the United States, and the Biden admin is openly helping them.
	The UN organization putting this is the IOM, carrying the tagline, Making Migration Work for All.
	The IOM issues press releases about mass migration moving through the San Vicente Camp.
	Michael Young joined me with a video tour of the facility, featuring buses, tents, a Western Union money order, rape kits distributed to women by OAM with chemical contraception bills, plus reports of mass rapes, violence, and other examples of human suffering.
	Here are some screenshots to give you a preview.
	Welcome sign featuring multiple languages from around the world in Espanol.
	It says, Migration Reception Station of San Jacinto.
	Notice the OIM logo, Una Migracion, which refers to the IOM website in English.
	The IOM website shown above.
	Notice the logo featuring a shattered world, a split world in which a family is installed in a swirling pattern indicates planet Earth.
	The message is clear.
	Use family migration to shatter the world.
	There's a lot of expansion for the UN Immigration Camp, or new construction is planned to greatly increase the human throughput for the facility.
	Here's a Western Union MoneyGram station where migrants can receive funds to continue their journey into the United States.
	Look at one of the buses' tents where migrants are processed and transported north ahead to the United States, all funded by the USA and the United Nations.
	Here's a group of mostly Haitians very happily excited to be given government assistance to bypass legal migration routes and simply be transferred to the United States and dropped off in all cities, courtesy of the Biden administration.
	This woman, speaking in Spanish, displays the OIM United Nations rape kits that are distributed to those who move through the camps.
	USA and UN expect these women to be raped.
	So they give them rape kits, which are essentially chemical abortion pills.
	See the full-turn report in the video interview on Braytheon.
	Scott, your thoughts?
	Well, if I was a military commander, I would be having snipers take out every tire of every I would be blowing them up.
	I would be engaging in war, asymmetric war.
	This is an invasion of the United States, so every invader needs to be stopped or killed.
	Every transport needs to be stopped or blown up.
	Every source of departure needs to be stopped.
	If you're going to fight a war, fight it like it's a fight, not a patty cake session.
	So, that's how this is handled, by violence and bloodshed and destruction and stalling fear.
	You use special forces to go in there and do that.
	You use psychological operations.
	You destroy every banner, every radio, every TV that is broadcasting this.
	You shut down every source of nourishment for this cancer.
	So, United Nations You know, activities, all of these parties, they are parties to a crime against the people of the United States.
	And every nation that is facilitating this, from Panama up.
	Of course, the President should have, Trump should have, and the Congress should have repealed and annihilated and stopped the refugee resettlement program.
	This whole nonsense has been used as the crowbar to pry open the United States for a law that was passed for people fleeing communism and tyranny.
	That's not the case here.
	So this has been a complete abuse of America's original refugee resettlement program.
	I I found this out when I was in the Bush administration, and I tried to get South African farmers into the refugee resettlement program because they were being raped and killed and tortured by the black marauding savages in South Africa.
	And what happened there?
	I got yelled out by a black savage named Josephine Robinson at the Department of Health and Human Services, a Bush administration official, because she didn't want white South African farmers on the refugee resettlement program.
	So there's a racial issue here.
	This is part of the Kalergi Plan, but I, you know, Jim, again, is this part of the judgment that's coming upon America on so many different multi-dimensional levels with the invasion across the southern border?
	You know, I think it's going to come to a neighborhood near you, and it's going to get more violent because, again, The people that are coming across the border, dumb as a bag of rocks, some of whom are criminal.
	You have a bunch of Haitian young men coming across.
	That spells nothing but trouble.
	These people don't have any skills.
	They're not educated.
	What happens when they move into a Martha's Vineyard or somewhere similar to that?
	Well, it's inevitable that criminality is going to follow.
	and kidnapping and drugs and the other form of mafia sort of operations.
	So I think you're unless this is stopped violently by the United States Special Forces military and others, it's going to continue to metastasize and infect this country to a point, you know, you're you're going to have grotesque levels of violence and sadly, the only people that are trained to engage in this sort of asymmetric guerrilla warfare are the veteran community.
	But even they are going to be targeted by their own government, their own police, their own FBI when they try and secure their communities from this invasion, Jim.
	Just think of the simplicity.
	If you want to destroy a nation and its culture, just dump a whole lot of totally unqualified, ignorant, needy people into the system.
	I think they're promoting it.
	They're for it.
	They're not just agreeing with it.
	This is happening with the complicity of the Biden administration, with their complicity.
	And the United Nations, how repulsive can you get?
	Pauly.
	I'd say it's more than complicity.
	I think they're promoting it.
	They're for it.
	They're not just agreeing with it.
	They're doing it.
	Right?
	Don, that's what we're documenting here, for God's sake!
	Of course they're doing it!
	That punctuation mark, yeah.
	Unbelievable!
	Holly?
	Yeah, I think I watched some of that video.
	It was hard to watch.
	It was really heartbreaking to see Mike Adam's show on Brighton there.
	The organization of the migrant camps in the cities and how much money it is for them to travel and how there's different strata of people who can afford to take the bus or who can have to try to march through South America and how it's multi-pronged with many different countries involved, many different governments.
	Many different NGOs and all the money that goes to fund all the mass migration, the collapse that has to happen in these other countries like Venezuela and others manufactured economic collapse.
	I think that's where a lot of it starts with.
	And then from there, they're allowed to really shift people.
	I know this might seem a little bit off topic, but I recently rewatched the movie Gangs of New York, which is probably like a 20 year old movie at this point.
	And it was about mass migration of the Irish, as we were just talking, into New York City and how the gangs were utilized and how people people were poor.
	And then there's Tammany Hall and they were having people vote early and vote often, which is so much what we're seeing right now with the Democratic Party using the people for votes, using them to manufacture these gangs, using them to create riots, which we are seeing now in our major cities right now, where which we are seeing now in our major cities right now, where you've got a bunch of desperate people rioting and then also using them as military forces as well, which could be
	So I've done some genealogy of my family and I learned that someone, one of my ancestors was about 15 or 16 years old.
	He escaped the potato famine, which was really a manufactured economic genocide, came over to the U.S. on the boat, 15, 16 years old, immediately signed up for the Union Army.
	I think probably promised citizenship if he fought in the Union.
	He was listed as a deserter like three years later.
	So it's pretty fascinating to see how obviously the Union was using these people just I think they said at least 25% of the Union army was just immigrants, migrants, not even US citizens, people that didn't even know what was going on and just thrown into this war as a as a way to try to destroy the United States, I think, in a lot of ways, break it up.
	And I know that's kind of an alternative view of history there.
	But I think we are going to see that here in the United States, where we have all these young men flooding into the United States, and they're just going to be used.
	They don't even know what they're being used for.
	They're just going to be used to destabilize the United States.
	We see that already.
	You know, the great difference between all the earlier migrations, such as those you're recounting here in the film, is they integrated with American society.
	We're not even requiring these people to speak English.
	You know, there was a report I was listening to on the radio saying they had a community where they had 156 different languages.
	Give me a break!
	How idiotic is that?
	You cannot have a community, a nation, if you don't speak the same language.
	I just want to say... They began the proliferation thinking it was respectful to say let Hispanics speak Spanish.
	No, everyone has to learn English.
	That's a precondition, Holly.
	I just wanted to say quickly, I served on a school board for six years and in the Portland, Maine school board, they had over 60 different languages being spoken at that school because there were so many migrants and the teachers or parents were complaining that they couldn't even get anything done.
	It was like a Tower of Babel because no one understood what anyone was saying.
	They couldn't even teach basic math or because there wasn't a base language for anyone.
	And yet we would have administration come in with the latest Harvard study saying that diversity was so great and it was fantastic.
	We had all these different languages because kids might pick up one of these 60 different languages.
	And meanwhile, we were failing in any sort of basic ruling of what an education was.
	So very frustrating.
	Heard that and saw that firsthand.
	Great points, Holly.
	From where it's all happening, where America is being destroyed, with the advice and consent of Harvard, for God's sake.
	To hell with them.
	See, that's what you were talking about a little bit earlier, Jim, about what the fix is to that.
	That's exactly where these fixes come in.
	is on a local level.
	People need to rise up and go into their schools and their boards and overthrow them and put in new boards that say, "English is the language of our school district.
	If you can't speak English, you're not coming into school." You shouldn't be in school anyway, unless you're a citizen of the United States or you've got a green card or whatever it is.
	But you cannot have this kind of multicultural approach.
	And to hell with the Department of Education, to hell with the governors, to hell with the Congress of the state that try and pass this nonsense.
	It's a local issue that needs to be contained by the local schools and towns and communities and counties.
	This is where this inevitably is going to go, because it's what Holly describes is a complete dysfunction of society.
	It's virtually impossible to exaggerate the profundity of the damage being done to America and its culture by these moves that the Democrats embrace with such great enthusiasm, from migration to multilanguage destruction, you know, censoring books and all this other happy horseshit holly.
	I know you have more I just want to say I'm not I'm not trying to be heartless here like my heart goes out for people seeing the rape kits seeing that video on on from Mike Adams show about them having a handout rape kits and they're talking about women crying they're being raped in front of their children.
	I mean this is horrible I can't imagine.
	Well, that's a good example.
	trying to come up here into the United States with the promise that they are going to have opportunity.
	And meanwhile, our economy is collapsing.
	People who are here in the United States who are middle class can't even find housing or jobs right now.
	So my heart just goes out for the fact that these people are being used.
	I'm not trying to be heartless here in any way.
	Well, that's a good example.
	Let me just say, again, putting on the military hat, if I was, if I was, you know, you need to, you need to prune this problem one branch at a time.
	You just don't go after the whole tree.
	You have to snip it in portions.
	Layering of the psychological operation.
	So one thing that should be done is you put up signs from here to Timbuktu along this migration route, signs with visual images You rape a woman, you're shot in the head, you're hung, you're killed, you're executed.
	Put it in multiple language.
	Battlefield justice.
	You don't get a trial, you don't get two weeks, you get one day, if the evidence is strong and the video is there, or there's a woman that says, this man raped me, yeah, you do the genetic whatever, the guy's, he's executed.
	That's what you do to rapists.
	You execute them.
	And you make it public.
	And that eliminates a lot of the rape.
	The failure to do that...
	Is allowing, facilitating, is encouraging the rape of these women.
	So that's what I would do, is be absolutely brutal to the rapists and put it everywhere.
	You do this, you're dead.
	Jim?
	Scott, it's even applicable for mass looting and rioting.
	You know, you've got to use lethal force.
	The Democrats don't want to use any force.
	They're encouraging criminality.
	I mean, these are the worst possible governors for America or for any Rational, sane, moral state.
	I mean, I cannot... I choke up thinking about what the Democrats have done to America.
	It is ghastly, it is savage, and it's irredeemable.
	May they rot in hell for this, or face firing squads or other forms of compensation for what they've done, Hawley.
	I don't have anything.
	I'm speechless at this point.
	It's hard.
	I agree.
	Talk about fitting our theme here.
	Microaggression and cancel culture.
	How the left is using micro-oppression to control free speech.
	Cancer culture is rapidly evolving and expanding like a single-strand RNA virus with no checks to its genome, another mind virus that's inserted itself into a new host population.
	Combine the phenomenon with a weaponized offensive accusation of microaggression, and the two are the latest examples of how sensitive the left has become to any and all perceived slides.
	The situation is so extreme that for those of a certain gender or color, Simply being accused of committing microaggression puts them at risk of losing their livelihood.
	This is particularly true in academia.
	And, of course, those of the gender or color are whites and men.
	The definition of micro is clear—very small or microscopic.
	As a man with roots from the Deep South, I often slip into referring to people I'm addressing as sir and ma'am.
	That's how I was raised, frankly.
	I sometimes slip up and say, yes ma'am, just what my mother would want me to say.
	For me, this is a sign of respect, just as yes sir is a sign of respect, something I can't turn off easily.
	I was raised this way.
	The fact a man calling a group of women ladies seems pretty benign to me.
	Firstly, I've been known to refer to men as gentlemen.
	I certainly don't view using those words as microaggression, but evidently in the minds of some it is just that.
	Ladies, the plural form of lady, a woman who has a high social standing and refinement, a woman who is the head of a household, a woman, especially when spoken of, or two, in a polite way.
	Former principal loses superintendent job for calling women ladies.
	The use of the word ladies in addressing two female officials caused the Massachusetts School Board to rescind a job offer for superintendent to the district's former principal, igniting social media backlash, street malleys, a recall petition, and even death threats.
	Shame on the school committee for participating in cancel culture, wrote the East Hampton Education Association in a Facebook post slamming the decision to recant the offer to Vito Peroni, who currently serves as an interim superintendent at nearby West Wingfield schools.
	Ronan announced publicly the board had rescinded its offer in an executive session because he had committed a microaggression by sending an email to the East Hampton School committee chair, Cynthia Kozinski, and the committee's executive assistant, Suzanne Colby, in which he addressed them with a greeting, Dear Ladies.
	The exact definition per the front page of Google of macroaggression?
	Any interaction between those of different races, culture, or gender that can be interpreted as non-physical aggression.
	Of course, there's nothing on the front page that suggests the usage of the word microaggression, mind you, and it itself is microaggression, but frankly, it is, isn't it?
	According to the definition, the word microaggression has now been expanded to include all non-physical aggression.
	So why not just use the word aggression?
	This new concept being a thing is clearly something we should come to know and understand, so we don't commit anything that might be construed as such.
	Insert sarcasm image.
	Honestly, when did Americans become so damn sensitive?
	Maybe this idea of microaggression doesn't have anything to do with microaggression or even aggression, but everything to do with the left controlling the narrative on the right.
	Could the outright cry of microaggression be another type of microaggression or maybe even oppression by the left?
	Thomas Sowell, back in 2015, wrote an essay about this.
	The left's microaggression obsession is indicative of its micro-totalitarian tendencies.
	Professor, the University of California, Berkeley have been officially warned against saying such things as America is the land of opportunity.
	Why?
	Because this is considered to be an act of microaggression against minorities and women.
	Supposedly it shows you don't take their grievances seriously and therefore are guilty of being aggressive toward them, if even on a micro scale.
	You might think this is just another crazy idea for Berkeley, but the same concept appears in a report from the flagship campus of the University of Illinois, Urbana.
	If you sit in a room where all the people are white, you're considered to be guilty of microaggression against people who are not white, who will supposedly feel uncomfortable when they enter such a room.
	Microaggression protests have spread from campus and coast to coast, from Berkeley to UCLA to Harvard and Fordham, and include Oberlin and Illinois in the middle.
	Academic administrators have too often taken the well-worn path of least resistance by regarding the most trivial or even silly claims of victimhood with great seriousness, even when that involves undermining faculty members held in high esteem by most of our students and our professional colleagues on campus and beyond.
	Word games are just one of the ways of silencing politically incorrect ideas instead of debating them.
	The concept of microaggression is one of many tactics used to stifle differences of opinion by declaring some opinions to be hate speech instead of debating those differences in a marketplace of ideas.
	To accuse people of aggression for not marching in lockstep with political correctness is to set the stage for justifying real aggression against them.
	I agree with this 100%.
	I mean, the most amazing thing is almost a decade after the word entered the consciousness, it's still being weaponized to take down individuals or even organizations, people on the left deemed not progressive enough.
	Take the example last month.
	A visiting federal judge at Stanford was attacked at a Federalist Club forum by outside student agitators.
	Protesters refused to let him speak because he was perceived to be anti-trans due to a ruling he made in 2020.
	This is a ruling the judge would not allow a man who'd been in prison for eight years for child pornography to officially change his pronoun.
	Ergo, the judge was judged as being anti-trans.
	This action singled out the judge as being the biggest microaggressor these protesters could think of.
	Their aggression was amplified by an associate dean with oversight for the forum, who was at the event and supposed to be monitoring it.
	Heck, she even joined in the fray.
	Microaggression meets aggression.
	Last week, professional swimmer Riley Gaines was violently attacked at San Francisco State because she stood up for women in professional sports.
	The response of the university was as follows.
	Following the mayhem, Jamilia Moore, Vice President for Student Affairs and Enrollment Management, emailed students thanking them for taking part.
	It took tremendous bravery to stand in a challenging space, Moore wrote.
	I am proud of the moments where we listened and asked insightful questions.
	I'm also proud of the moment when our students demonstrated the value of free speech and the right to protest peacefully.
	After the statement was tweeted out, gains thundered.
	I am sorry, did this just say peaceful?
	I was assaulted?
	I was extorted?
	Held for ransom?
	These examples prove the point that way back in 2015, Sewell was right.
	A progressive left, and in particular transgender activists, are using the idea of alleged past micro-transgressions to justify an aggressive response, even violence.
	This is not acceptable in a civilized society.
	Let's stop with the nonsense and get back to being sensible.
	Let's not as a society tolerate the weaponization of words aimed to oppress one side over the other.
	Let's stop these micro-oppressions and get back to the idea we don't have to share the same ideology, but we do have to follow the rule of law.
	Claims of micro-slides by those who wish to control the narrative are actively seeking to constrain the Overton window of acceptable discourse by restricting free speech and people's ability to earn a living.
	This is not okay.
	After all, if a word has a preface, micro-attach to it, how important can it be?
	Scott, your thoughts?
	Well, we've talked quite a lot about the psychiatric, psychological, emotional diagnosis and profiling of these individuals, but I'll do it again.
	These individuals that pursue the transgender, microaggressive, bullying campaign have come from broken families, broken parents, homosexual parents.
	They've been lithiumated.
	They've been diagnosed with some sort of mental, emotional fracturing, and they've been given drugs in their early stages of school.
	They've grown up without any moral centering.
	They don't have what We had enjoyed in classical America in the pre-1980s, you know, 90s.
	In the 1990s, America started to crumble.
	Before that, you had grandparents, you had aunts and uncles and cousins, you had extended nuclear family, you had friends of the family, you had neighborhoods that looked after each other's children, you had mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, men and women, You know, creating a community, a tribe, a clan.
	And again, the Scottish clan I grew up in was, you know, emblematic of what I'm describing.
	And you have a deep salinity in your identity.
	These people, the trans community, the yelling and screaming and schizophrenic groups of society that go to these academic hearings, are really mentally unhinged individuals.
	I did a good interview with Stanley Ridgely, who's a professor, and he described there are, besides academia, there are groups within the administrative component of colleges and academia that are aggressively pursuing this They're not bright.
	They're not academics.
	They're not brilliant people.
	They may have a Ph.D.
	ideology in universities.
	They're the ones who are pushing this from an administrative point of view.
	They're not bright.
	They're not academics.
	They're not brilliant people.
	They may have a PhD in administration, but they're not creative intellectual heavyweights.
	But yet they are the parasites in the universities that are driving a lot of these things, such as the renouncement of a job for the individual who called these ladies, ladies.
	So, So, you know, again, I think we're witnessing a mitosis in society.
	You've got those who are just full of aggression and anger and screaming and they're not, they don't know why.
	They're mentally broken, mentally unhinged people.
	But as I've said before, I don't care.
	I don't care how broken and schizophrenic they are.
	I care about my family, my children, my clan, my people who I share identity with and association with and culture with.
	Those are who I choose to associate with.
	And those who I don't associate with and don't choose to associate with will be kept out of my boundaries like rabid dogs.
	And when they cross that boundary, they won't be a living rabid dog any longer.
	I think we're entering that phase, Jim, because it's not that conservatives want bloodshed or want to fight or conflict or anything like that.
	They don't.
	It's that the left has gone so stark raving mad, they're pulling their hair out, they're unable to resemble anything of a human decency, disposition, sophistication, cultural, you know, give and take, any of the traditional
	You know, temperaments or things that we enjoyed, you know, for the last hundred years, that's gone in this wokeness, this political correctness, the safe spaces-ness.
	And it's really the cancer is killing the body politic.
	So I see this resulting in a lot of complete breakdowns of colleges and such.
	I've already told, you know, friends of friends who have youngsters that are about to, you know, thinking about going to college, don't go.
	Don't go to college for the sake of college, because it has turned into a cesspool of moral disease and decadence and insanity.
	And unless you're going to acquire skill, there have to be alternatives to what the modern academics are, Jim.
	Of course, I've done a lot of work on the philosophy of language, which is really an indispensable tool of philosophical analysis.
	Sewell is a well-known guy, and what really he's describing is what's known in logic as begging the question by the presumption that the use of that language is wrong or inappropriate.
	Begging the question in logic means taking for granted a conclusion that requires independent determination.
	It's used now commonly just to mean invites a question.
	That's not the proper meaning.
	Begging the question is taking the conclusion for granted without arguing it, and that's what they're doing linguistically here.
	So this is logically, morally, and on other grounds offensive, and it absolutely is a form of aggression by the left.
	Well, I just think it's heartbreaking because the definition of a woman or a definition of a female or a lady has been taken away from us.
	on the left or right, there's no doubt.
	This is a beautiful description, dissemination of what's going on here.
	Holly, your thoughts. - Well, I just think it's heartbreaking because the definition of a woman or a definition of a female or a lady has been taken away from us.
	It doesn't mean anything anymore.
	It doesn't, Riley, you know, she lost her career.
	She's been threatened.
	I mean, her life has been threatened.
	And because she is no longer to define able to define who she is anymore in relation to people who think that they control.
	Definitions and language and I think you're absolutely right Scott about colleges.
	They need to be punished.
	They need to realize that no one's going to want to go there and get into all this debt to be harassed and brainwashed and put into this debt slavery for all these student loans that don't even mean anything for the most part anymore.
	It's so heartbreaking to say that because that's Uh, that's part of advanced society, uh, is that people should be educated and instead they've turned into indoctrination and it's turned into a war zone.
	And I think, uh, the fact that this individual was fired or not offered a job because they use the term lady, I think that's, it's meant to promote this, uh, transgender, transhumanist is, is the transhumanist program that they're putting forward, right?
	And the fact that to use the term lady, there's, there's a responsibility to that to be called a lady.
	It is a term of honor.
	It is a woman who has self respect.
	It denotes responsibility to behave like a lady.
	I remember my parents saying that, you know, act like a lady when When you're a young girl so I think it's a rejection of that desire to have personal responsibility to be ladylike means to have to embrace the feminine to be a woman to be charming to be pleasant to the all the things that make an actual woman into a lady is it's meant to be a term of respect and endearment and
	To reject that and to demand that people can't use that term anymore means that it's impossible to be a lady anymore.
	Jim, if I could add one thing on that.
	Holly nailed it.
	That is a crucially important part.
	And to piggyback on that, the notion of chivalry, of honor, of heroism, of courtly manners of young men, young boys, you know, act like a gentleman.
	That was always, you know, in the boy Upbringing as well.
	And it is so important to understand that, the difference between the courtly, chivalrous nobility of a gentleman who inherently possesses the ability to defend a lady, a maiden.
	I mean, there are nostalgic, chivalric dimensions to this.
	A gentleman are also prepared for violence to defend a woman's honor, and a woman and a lady conducting herself.
	Who can find a virtuous woman?
	Her price is above rubies.
	They have focused on annihilating those distinguishing characteristics of temperament, of manners, of distinguishment, in the morass or the cloud of the fog of the grayness of, you know, the transgenderism.
	There is no male or female.
	They're all the same.
	And to put a final point on it, You know, to combat this really requires—when I was in counterterrorism, they always taught you have to mock the terrorists, mock their stupidity and their tactics, because it takes away their respect.
	We have to mock this insanity of transgenderism, of there is no male or female, there is no ladies or men.
	We have to mock that, because the majority of American society Do not embrace this nonsense, this asinine insanity of transgenderism and wokeism.
	They don't stand up and get into fights, but the majority of people don't back it.
	They don't like it.
	They know something's wrong.
	But we have to stand up and begin to speak out.
	on our own particular platforms where we are, that this is mental insanity, it's delusion, it's a psychiatric problem, and everyone that is trying to advance in society are sick individuals.
	We can't tolerate and allow this to be seen as an alternative ideology or viewpoint, because then it infects.
	Yeah, we got another story here.
	Here are a couple of them I want to work in.
	I will piss on your grave teen trans activist threatens Idaho governor after ban on child sex changes.
	A teenage Idaho school board member took to social media to launch a profanity-laden tweet at Idaho Governor Brad Little after the two-term Republicans signed a law that put a stop to gender-affirming treatments, such as hormone therapy and puberty blockers being administered to minors.
	After you, Governor Little, 18-year-old Shiva, Raja Bhandari wrote in the now-deleted tweet, I pray you live a long life so you can bear witness to the pain you've unleashed on Idaho's children and families today.
	When you die, though, I'm pissing on your grave.
	A foul-mouthed high school senior also sits on a school board where he himself is enrolled.
	Following the deletion of the tweet, Rahandy issued an apology, writing, Out of respect for my colleague below is my statement addressing my last tweet.
	I remain steadfast in my love for Idaho's trans community and in my rage at our leaders over passage of this hateful bill.
	I have received some concerns that the language in my last tweet was inappropriate and inconsistent with my position as a school board member.
	Here it is.
	Those were my thoughts only, do not reflect the views of any organization with which I am affiliated, nor do I endure to condone such a statement or language in a board meeting.
	My strong language is reflected of my anger, Baba.
	Of course, my tweets are my own only, do not necessarily reflect their views.
	By signing H.B.
	71, Governor Little wrote a growing number of states whose legislators have taken swift action in the midst of widespread national outcry from citizens, many of whom are moms and dads, in fear of losing their parental rights, begging for legal protection if we put in place a shield to our most vulnerable demographic, children.
	From medical treatments the likes of which we have never seen before, treatments stemming from a dangerous ideology manifest in real life irreversible physical, emotional, and mental damage.
	The signing of the law makes Idaho one of many states that take a hard stance against a relentless attempt by extremist trans rights groups backed by far-left politicos to infiltrate, dominate, and mandate all sectors of society.
	from education, sports, and entertainment to science, medicine, academia, parental rights, and a justice system.
	Idaho, Dones, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Dakota, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
	On the list of states, they have successfully provided legal protection for minors and the rights of their parents.
	Many have seen a retaliation for the refusal to stand out in the face of trans right extremists and activist groups.
	Lawmakers refuse to bend to the demands of these factions, find themselves threatened, and mock.
	Chief Rabab Adari's response to Governor Little's signing, publicly stating his desire to desecrate the remains of another human being as a mean of retribution, is a reflection of the extreme situation in which the United States and much of the Western world currently finds itself.
	Scott, your thoughts?
	Well, Shiva Abradari sounds like a CIA name, but if it is a real person, it certainly is not a typical American reflecting American values and American culture.
	But this is, like we said before, this is the aggression and the hostility and the madness of this transgender left Uh group and quite honestly Tucker said it well a few weeks ago he said Christianity and the transgender ideology are never going to be able to be uh mutually uh you know, agreeable.
	They are in direct clash and conflict.
	That means violence.
	That means bloodshed.
	That means war.
	And that's what they bring when they have conservatives come and speak like right against San Francisco.
	They are waging war against her.
	They would kill her if they could.
	Don't ever forget that.
	These transgender lunatics are full of bloodlust and violence, and they're trying to intimidate and bully people into submission.
	Even Grinnell, that sodomite homosexual that Trump appointed stupidly to being National Security Director, he let it slip out.
	Well, I think the gay community like being loud.
	What he's really saying is the gay community are going to be louder and more aggressive to advance their ideology and advance what he wants.
	Grinnell wants homosexuality in every country on earth.
	So, the enemy of a man are those of his own household, those of his own party, and Trump allowed some of these scumbags to be in his administration.
	And again, it is an incompatible ideology.
	The transgender, sexual schizophrenics, and the Christian traditional values, as well as the traditional values of other people, whether it's Hindus, Asians, that are traditional values people, there is a tremendous clash.
	And I think that clash will result in the bloodshed and the annihilation of a lot of these left-wing transgender lunatics, which, again, may be part of the long-term false flag, FBI, CIA eruption of hostilities in this country.
	I think we're going to go through pangs of conflict like we've never had in our existence.
	Jim?
	No doubt.
	Holly, your thoughts?
	Thank you.
	Well, I think Idaho is a pretty conservative state, or it was.
	I think it still is in a lot of ways.
	I know a lot of Californians are moving too.
	Idaho much of the chagrin of the lot of a lot of people in Idaho right now so maybe the politics are changing over there to a degree, but this individual is 18 years old so they should be treated like an adult and should be made to resign for from office because I, I don't think anyone else.
	If you're any other school board member that would say something like that would would People would call on that person to resign and they'd have to step down.
	So it doesn't really make any sense that this person would continue to stay in office and as an adult as well.
	And then Riley Gaines, I mean, she was on Tucker Carlson, but she's Even said she doesn't even really consider herself a conservative or even political for that matter.
	She just wanted to be able to compete as an athlete and as a woman and yet she gets thrust into this situation where she's got to pick sides and act like she has to be contentious for just being who she is.
	She hasn't changed or modified herself in any way.
	But yet she has to defend herself on that basic premise and I think, like the article clearly states, this really isn't even about transgenderism or about minors changing their bodies.
	This is about the state owning and controlling children and minors in every single way and destruction of the family and having the government and corporations and NGOs controlling children and people from birth to grave and getting rid of this concept of even being a parent or having parenthood.
	Obviously, as we've discussed before, a child can't get a tattoo at six years old.
	They can't join the military.
	They can't drink alcohol.
	All these things are good.
	I think we should put limits on people until they're 21.
	Honestly, I think the way that people are so infantilized nowadays, young people are so mentally incapable, it seems like, making even basic decisions at this point.
	At the same time, people seem to be more and more immature into their adulthood.
	They're also giving them the responsibility to fundamentally change their reproductive systems.
	Obviously, this isn't what it's about.
	It's about destroying and sterilizing people. - Yep.
	Riley, how insane have the Democrats gone?
	We celebrated Title IX.
	It was recognized that women's sports deserved as much support or public recognition As independent form of competition as men.
	And now we're destroying all that?
	For the sake of some disguided theory about there being, what, no sexes at all?
	I mean, it's just the stupidity of this.
	It's grotesque.
	Biden is trying to change Title IX to say, if you're a school and you don't allow girls to run in boys' races or boys to run in girls' races, you won't get Title IX funding.
	That's a violation of the act.
	It's a violation of the congressional intent.
	It should be challenged in the Supreme Court.
	Biden cannot change Title IX to say every school has to have this transgender ideology.
	That's what he's trying to do.
	It's so insane, though.
	I mean, the whole idea of this identity politics is supposed to be, you know, who you are, your sex, your race, blah, blah, blah, define who you are.
	But women deserve the opportunity to compete against other women, girls against other girls.
	I mean, it's just It is a form of insanity, Scott.
	I don't know how this came to pass.
	Holly, what the hell has happened here?
	This is so stupid.
	This is so colossally immoral.
	It's so immoral because it's not treating persons with respect.
	This is a case where treating everyone as though they were the same when they're manifestly not the same is a gross form of immorality.
	Give it five years, ten years, there won't be a single biological born female competing in any female sport.
	It just won't.
	Statistically, it won't happen anymore.
	You're not going to have the United States here in five years.
	That's right.
	We're going to have a brave new world of desolated dregs of society with, I mean, pockets of conservatives It's been wonderful in the past.
	It's gone to hell in a hand basket so fast.
	No doubt about it, Don.
	You know, the police state is dangerous too, but the country is not going to last as we understood it in the past. - It's been wonderful in the past.
	It's glad to help when it handbashes so fast. - No doubt about it, Don.
	Meanwhile, Bud Light is in full-blown panic mode after this disastrous woke fail blew up in his face.
	Americans are growing sick and tired of companies lecturing to them.
	They simply want quality products without politics.
	Now Bud Light is in full-blown panic mode after one disastrous woke fail flew up in his face.
	Anheuser-Busch is the latest company to get woke and go broke.
	Bud Light, one of the company's flagship brands, recently announced a sponsorship deal with a transgendered activist, Dylann Mulvaney, which angered many fans.
	Happy March Madness, Mulvaney said in a video announcing the deal, just found out this had to do with sports and not just saying it's a crazy month in celebration of the sports thing.
	Bud Light is giving you the chance to win $15,000.
	Share a video with Easy Carry Contest for a chance to win.
	Good luck!
	Mulvaney's been heavily criticized for making a mockery of women with videos celebrating his newfound girlhood.
	The backlash to Bud Light was swift and severe.
	Collective push people too far with a radical transgender movement.
	And Anheuser-Busch has revealed that it cancelled an event with a beer brand's iconic Clydesdale horses.
	As Ozark First reported, local Budweiser distributor Will Fisher Distributing decided to cancel all the Swingfield-Clydesdale showings citing safety concerns for their employees.
	This is a common public relations tactic.
	In the middle of a PR catastrophe, blame the critics for being toxic and potentially violent.
	In order to claim victim status and demonize those with whom you disagree.
	Many wondered if the Mulvaney sponsorship was fake because he released a video on April Fool's Day.
	However, Anheuser-Busch confirmed it was real.
	Anheuser-Busch worked with hundreds of influencers across our brands as one of many ways to authentically connect with audiences across various demographics and passion points.
	A company spokesperson said, From time to time we produce unique commemorative cans for fans and for brand influencers like Dylan Mulvaney.
	This commemorative can was a gift to create a personal milestone and is not for sale to the general public.
	Several celebrities have expressed their dissatisfaction with Bud Light.
	Kid Rock recorded a video of himself firing a rifle in case his beer wiped him out.
	I will be deleting all in-house or bush products from my tour Hospitality Rider.
	Country music star Travis Trent announced on Twitter.
	I know many other artists who are doing the same.
	Country artist John Rich also removed Bud Light from his Nashville bar.
	When companies pander to the woke, left-wing, outraged mob and ignore their core audience, they should pay the price.
	Here you have what happened.
	I mean, this was just stunning.
	If you watch it, it is repulsive!
	She says!
	I mean, she's going for Bud Lightnin' and she doesn't even know what is March Madness?
	I mean, this is just insane!
	Insane!
	And get this.
	Here's another, a very appropriate response from a, you know, as though it had been a country-western theme.
	And here's another, introducing the new Budweiser Clydesdale team.
	How about that?
	Scott, there we are.
	There we are, the dregs of American society turning into the hissing and the monstrous demoniac which sin and rebellion inevitably turns us into.
	And having this grotesque, pervert, sodomite, schizophrenic young man, man, not a woman, man, pretending to be a woman, is absolutely despicable.
	And I will be the last person and I will die fighting with a knife in my teeth against anyone that tries to project this ideological fanaticism on anything that I resemble.
	Women are the glorious creation by God.
	They possess the wonderful traits of motherhood, of wife, of delicacy, of gentleness.
	Women are the producers of of a society that is healthy and nurtured and well-balanced.
	Not men who cut off their penises and do some sort of drastic surgical alteration of themselves.
	They are schizophrenics.
	They're demoniacs.
	And I think the sooner American society recognizes that and completely rejects these corporate practitioners of perversion, the better.
	Jim?
	Holly, your thoughts? - Well, I think it's just indicative.
	I think it was like, what's a ESG or social credits for something that they, Budweiser and all these big corporations have to follow with BlackRock.
	So it's not even about money anymore, like people who act like, oh, we're fighting against capitalism or something that this doesn't even have to do with that anymore.
	It's about an agenda.
	About the collapse of society and the United States and anything that represents America and pitting each other off from this and then destroying, you know, something that's like, and so we see the attack on men as well.
	So something men like beer, you know, Americana and beer, men drinking beer and Bud Light and Bud and whatever, connecting that to To men and grilling, you know, and drinking a beer and now they've completely flipped it on its head.
	It's meant to be an insult to men.
	It's meant to be an insult to women because it's someone that's dressed up trying to look like Audrey Hepburn or something trying to drink a beer and just promoting that.
	So it's just meant to just discuss and confuse everyone.
	It's just meant to just create chaos and it's not about money anymore.
	Yeah.
	Chaos.
	Social upheaval.
	Incoherence.
	Moronism.
	Total cultural destruction.
	It's a war, Jim.
	It's a war.
	Beyond belief.
	Absolutely beyond belief.
	Don, take us out.
	Yes, Scott.
	It is a war.
	And it's a war against truth and honesty and what's right.
	release of all this information, breakthrough military secrets and things.
	And we can't have those secrets because those secrets reveal something called the truth about what's really happening in America.
	We can't have that.
	No, this is a show called Truth vs. News Incorporated, where we do go into the truth.
	And it's shocking, and it's really gotten worse in the last three or four years here.
	But Truth vs. News.
	April 16th.
	Share this one.
	The world has gone wacky and we gotta try to get it back on track.
	And I don't know if that's possible, but let's give it a whirl.
	So God bless and thank you so much for watching this and sharing this as possible.

▲