All Episodes
Previous Next
April 4, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:27
Need to Know News (3 April 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, will be joining us in just a few minutes.
We begin with a report.
Ukrainian army has been virtually destroyed, according to the head of the Waggoner Group, by mercenaries fighting for Russia and cleaning their clock.
The head of the Wagner Group has described Ukraine's losses in the battle for Bakhmut as almost fatal for Kiev's entire military.
As of today, the battle for Bakhmut has almost destroyed the Ukrainian army.
His own Wagner companies have taken a serious beating.
He called the battle the general engagement of the entire conflict, meaning the key or pivotal move.
I believe that's right.
He says it's a turning point.
The Russian army alone will be left on the chessboard.
All other pieces will be removed.
The fight for Bakhmut has emerged as one of the most intensive and bloody engagements, both sides reporting significant casualties.
A Ukrainian leader, Zelensky, has reported that if Russia were to capture Bakhmut, the government would come under international and domestic pressure to seek peace.
Our society will feel tired.
Our society will push me to compromise.
Meanwhile, the Greek press has given details of the tanker strike on a NATO command center in Kiev.
It was deep underground, with many NATO and U.S.
officers.
Details of the alleged Russian missile attack in Kiev are provided by the Greek portal ProNews.
A Russian missile flying at the speed of Mach 12 destroyed the shadow headquarters.
It housed—it was at a depth of 120 meters.
They must have thought they were pretty safe.
Housed multiple NATO officers and advisers, more than 300 in total.
To date, 400 have been recovered, but you can bet they're all dead.
Most were British and Poles, but there were also Americans.
The publication of the Russian missile strike will affect the planned counteroffensive.
In addition, the losses incurred as a result will have an impact on the defense of Bakhmut in the coming days.
It will be seen to what extent it will affect the conduct of Ukrainian and Western operations and attempt to stop the final phase of the Russian offensive on Bakhmut.
It's basically a done deal as I see it.
There's no recovering.
But I think this hit on the NATO headquarters was very, very serious for Ukraine's ability to sustain war.
Your thoughts, Chris?
Yeah, you know, it's interesting.
I keep hearing this Wagner group.
That's something that I have to look a little bit more into as far as do some more adequate research on.
But from what it sounds like is they're being used to the same capacity which the U.S.
has used its mercenary forces in resource procurement in the Middle East after the War of Terror.
And to me, it seems like this is a propaganda war from both sides.
You're hearing that both sides declaring themselves the winner.
And really the loser is the people that live in Ukraine and around this area that are being forced to fight one side or another or just to to keep invading troops off their own land.
And most of these people have been drawn off their own land.
I think it's 50 percent of the population's either been killed or or, you know, refugee.
So so that's pretty amazing and astonishing and almost absurd.
The fact that this could be a result of such a failure of just diplomacy and a series of intelligence operations gone horribly bad, man, I guess it seems almost scripted.
You know, I hate to say that all the time, but it really, it kind of does, like to fulfill the Goldman Sachs BRICS initiative of 2001.
with 2001.
Okay.
And you mean the war itself, Yeah, this whole thing is just very much part of it.
The tensions that forced Russia off of U.S.
or, you know, petrodollar type exchanges like SWIFT, sanctions, things like that, even seizing Russian money and doing the same to even our own citizens is pretty abhorrent.
And I think that, you know, the people's reaction to whether it's diplomacy or COVID fear, this is a very scary.
Where did I get bumped off at?
Do you know?
I I was asking whether you meant the whole war being scripted, and you were beginning to elaborate further on that point.
Oh, sure, sure, sure.
Yeah, like the very ham-handed diplomacy and the failures of such, the very publicly failed coups, and successful coups, more importantly, in 2014, the United States Department really being caught overthrowing a democratically elected and providing another democratically supposed elected president for Ukraine.
Ukraine.
Very interesting stuff that has been brought to light.
Not only the forcing of Russia off the SWIFT settlement systems, but even sanctioning them, freezing their money.
And like I was mentioning, even freezing United States citizens' money for supporting truckers and the blockade and the COVID vax mandates and things like that.
So you're seeing an authoritarian form of government being forged around the world, whether it's from Russia, China, United States, United Kingdom, whatever.
It's all being funded and run by the same central planning commissions and bankers.
But ultimately, we're being scripted into this very efficient depopulation tactic that we'll know is World War III.
Very good.
Meanwhile, Meanwhile, Binary News call for a sweeping assault weapon ban.
This is, of course, predicated on the nonsense in Nashville, which is most ragtag, ridiculous, amateurish Volkswagen history.
President Biden said he's exhausted all avenues under executive authority to stop mass shooting, and it's now up to Congress to act.
He called on legislators to step in, as he's gone the full extent he can do, in the wake of Monday's horrific mass shooting, when it was nothing of the sort.
There were no students there.
It was an empty school, claiming six lives and three nine-year-olds.
That's just silly.
He termed the idea of owning a so-called assault weapon as crazy and bizarre.
The guy is just a buffoon.
He's just a walking cadaver.
He's a script reader.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
He called for reinstatement of a federal ban on assault weapons he helped spearhead in 1994, which targeted semi-automatic assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices.
He's on multiple occasions credited the action with lowering mass shootings, but it has done nothing of the kind.
The mass shootings are phony.
They're fake.
Here are gun owners of America faulting him, however, for making a joke about it.
There's nothing funny about potential hate crimes against Christians or teachers being disarmed by Biden's gun control.
It's time to arm willing teachers and repeal the failed Gun-Free School Zones Act.
As to respond to GOP Senator Josh Hawley's claim he believes Christians were targeted on Monday's school shooting, Biden told reporters, well, I probably don't then.
He said, no, I'm joking.
I have no idea.
How inappropriate.
Greggs argued that it wasn't the case that there was a reduction in mass shootings and the support of Wayne.
It expired in 2004.
A suspect identified as 28-year-old Audrey Hale is supposed to have entered Nashville Covenant School armed with three weapons, identified as transgender, killed by responding officers.
Officers searched and found what they claimed was a manifesto and hand-drawn maps.
The quick leak to the Second Amendment occurred is nothing new for the Biden White House.
The dust had yet to settle.
Motives were not yet clear.
But calls came to limit our rights under the Second Amendment.
Jean Bière, the Airsat press secretary whose only qualifications are being black, female, and gay, she's utterly incompetent as a press secretary.
How many more children have to be murdered before Republicans in Congress will step up and act to pass the assault weapons ban?
A timely and proper response came from Tom Cotton, tweeting it was in poor taste to blame Republicans for a vicious assault by a transgender killer who targeted a Christian school.
Indeed, inappropriate in the max.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, so they want to stop mass shootings, huh?
I think you should really do that.
And as a retired math teacher, I can assist with the quantification of who we should go after first.
Because, you know, if you want to stop the mass shootings, you should stop the most possible, and that would be the US government.
For the lie-starter to illegal wars of aggression they've continually is continually engaged in since World War II.
Over 200 arms attacks killing 30 plus million people.
Carl B. Hermann blog spot.
I'll leave a link for the essay series U.S.
Illegal that the U.S.
is allowing looting rogue state empire.
And for Biden to say that somebody wanting uh A rifle with high capacity of a high number of bullets in them, huh?
Okay, okay.
That's crazy and bizarre if you want one of those, huh?
No, no, no.
It's giving any more faith and credence to anything that our leaders say.
That's crazy and bizarre.
After COVID, after the Trump Arrest, raid, crimeless impeachment, factless resigate, believing anything they say.
That's crazy and bizarre.
And then propaganda press secretary Pierre.
She wants to ask how many more children need to be murdered?
Well first, that's a threat.
Given we've established that these are false flags.
But the answer to her question is, well, we'll see.
It depends how long it's going to take until we have this Emperor's New Clothes moment and people like Propaganda Pierre and the actor playing Biden are arrested for the obvious crimes centered in war, looting, and lying.
I've been doing a lot of reporting on Nashville.
The school was empty.
There weren't any students or teachers, secretaries, custodians.
When the alarm goes off, no one brushes for the door.
The parking lot is empty.
It's clearly done on a Saturday or a holiday.
Wearing one kind of sneakers coming in, another go when they're taken down.
I have a chiropractor, I've just published his piece on my blog, identifying that this is actually a young teenage boy.
Yeah, they really seem to be mailing it in with these hoaxes.
I don't know if it's maybe an IQ test or see who's paying attention and how much attention you're paying.
But they seem to really be going through the motions, not only on this little meticulous form of detail that maybe might require a little bit more complexity now that people are on to them and realize what they're capable of pulling, what they're constantly pulling.
So, yeah, you see a lot of incongruencies in facts for many of these occurrences, we'll just say.
And they seem to be like winks and nods, like I say, to the people that are in on this or maybe, you know, a finger in the face to people that are paying attention.
I say that a lot, but I really mean it.
And it's kind of interesting in terms of irony and inversion, we'll say, a group that's borrowing trillions of dollars per annum for the supposed national defense of this country going around selectively drone striking USA.
citizens and other citizens around the world for the sake of resource procurement for a private entity, to me seems to be, I guess, the wrong people to try to take weapons away from the citizens trying to defend their property from said government and other opposing forces.
And the fact that they're using these staged events to try to strong arm us emotionally and nudge us with these horribly violent acts and these elaborate hoaxes, false flags and entrapments.
To me, it seems, I don't know, painfully obvious, and I'm maybe understating it a bit, but what's really going on here.
And these drone strike administrations and these bio-warfare experiments on citizens really don't add much to this group's track record or street credibility, in my opinion.
You're certainly right about that.
Meanwhile Pelosi gets raked over the cold for saying that Trump must move his innocence in court after his indictment.
This is incredible!
This is number two in line to succeed to the presidency and she doesn't understand anything as fundamental as this?
Pelosi received a swift lesson in basic criminal law over her backward response to Trump's indictment.
The grand jury has acted on the facts and the law.
No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence.
Hopefully, the former president will peacefully respect the system which grants him that right.
This is incredible.
The problem with Pelosi's response is obvious.
The criminal justice system does not afford the accused the right to prove his innocence.
Rather, Americans are assumed to be innocent.
It's the prosecutors who have to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
And if a jury unanimously agrees, the government failed to meet the standard.
The justice system dictates the accused is not guilty under the law.
As Cornell Law explains, the presumption of innocence is not guaranteed in the Constitution.
However, through statutes and court decisions, it has been recognized as among the most basic requirements of a fair trial.
Mrs. Pelosi mistakenly says Trump can prove his innocence at trial But law in the U.S.
assumes the innocence of a defendant in the prosecution must prove guilt for a conviction, where Twitter added this correction to Pelosi's tweet.
It went viral, generating more than 10 million views and a tidal wave of backlash.
Here are some of the comments.
This is exactly the opposite of how it works.
Nobody is required to prove innocence in our system.
It's the 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendment, or any episode of Law & Order.
Kelly Armstrong, who's a representative from North Carolina and a lawyer, observed.
The right to prove innocence?
This is America, not Stalinist Russia, said Josh Hawley, also a lawyer.
Wrong!
So obviously wrong.
Most middle schoolers know this.
At least they used to.
When civics and the Constitution is respected in school, you're innocent and still proven guilty, said Rudy Giuliani, another lawyer.
This is exactly backwards, said Justin Amash.
Under our justice system, no one has to prove innocent.
The state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
You'd hope a former speaker would know the basics of law and be precise, especially in such an unprecedented and seemingly flimsy prosecution.
It's innocent until proven guilty, not opportunity to prove innocent, Ben Shapiro.
Another lawyer?
Nancy Pelosi is wrong here, dead wrong.
Does she really have no clue that Bernie is not on an amendment to prove their innocence?
Said Lee Zeldin, another representative and another lawyer.
Stalinist Pelosi.
Prove innocence?
It's innocent until proven guilty, moron, or at least used to be.
Mark Levin, a lawyer, again responded.
To be fair, Pelosi's not a lawyer.
How could she possibly know about the presumption of innocence?
At least she does now.
Meanwhile, ABC poll.
55% of Americans don't support the Trump indictment.
A news poll Showed a majority of Americans are not supporting the indictment.
Full release showed 55% are not backing the move.
The first time in history a former president has been charged criminally.
The result showed 32% oppose the indictment, 23% have not decided, 45% support.
It appears to break along party lines.
88% believe Trump should have been charged, but 63% of Republicans say he should not.
Another 20% unsure.
A plurality say the charges are politically motivated.
Crazy stories.
Even larger majority of Republicans, 79% hold that view.
And a plurality of independents, 48.
64% of Democrats take the opposite.
Carl, your thoughts? - Crazy story.
So first, we have Nancy Pelosi, virtue signaling about upholding the rule of law Wow, what she's really doing is pimping dictatorship.
And dictatorship is whatever is said, when it's said, for as long as it's said.
That's really what they want.
And Pelosi, some of her greatest hits that I can just remember, I remember her saying that the impeachment of Bush and Cheney for that lie started, Orwellian illegal, war of aggression was off the table.
That's what Obama told us, too, after promising universal health care.
He campaigned on that and then he just quickly dismissed it by saying it was off the table.
Pelosi pimps and pushes all of the COVID restrictions against our right, despite the fact that federal title 21, which under the United States Constitution under article 6 is US Supreme Law, federal article title 21 governs the FDA, at least it does on paper, and the CDC, and says new medical experiments With any type of coercive aspect to the choice.
That is, we're totally free to accept or decline.
And that includes the shots, the masks, social distancing, everything that they basically ordered.
So that poll about, you know, should Trump be charged?
Well, the main question is charged with What?
We're going to find out.
And I think that Trump's lawyers are pretty much drooling at the opportunity to take that case apart.
But, you know, all of it is just ridiculous, tragic comic.
It just gets more and more bizarre.
But that's all that all that those of us who are curious about the rule of law is alright.
You think you criminals, you people who are projecting onto others is breaking the law.
Let's see what your argument actually is.
It's a pathetic case.
It was gerrymandered.
Chris, your thoughts?
Oh, yeah, you know, I have a few on this.
I almost think that the whole point of some of these political absurdities are to wear us out fighting to protect things that they're trying to seize, like our every single constitutionally provided amendment rights, and while giving corporations you know, these type of tax breaks, regulatory favors, even the 007 to experiment on U.S. citizens and cause great damage, even giving them wage controls and many other advantages over small businesses and many things like that.
While we basically struggle against this fascist collusion, mind you, a bipartisan one, too, they got us fighting for these rights every day over these distractions.
And certainly while they're looting us blind and entering us into greater political and economic debts, through much of these crazy wars and these corporate welfare plots.
So it's amazing how the DNC has always been so fascinated with these Lady Macbeth type characters, the ruthlessly ambitious, the ones that have the sensibility to serve us with rhetoric to basically muster political support while delivering the exact inverted and polar opposite of what they claim to deliver in rhetoric and actual deliverance for the people.
These, in my opinion, are all bargaining tactics that are used by these people taking things they have no business taking so that you beg to have back the slightest of things and appreciate, you know, not only them, their authority, but, you know, 95 percent of their corruption that goes unaccounted for.
So I think that these whole things that have been put upon us, you know, are violations of due process.
Even the Emergency Powers Act and the National Security Act, the NDAA, the National Security Act, like I mentioned, even the TPP, if that would have passed, would have been the same damn thing.
The COVID-19 Vax mandates, on and on.
I mean, this is the emergency use for these type of things.
This is absolutely abhorrent, what they're doing to the people.
And like I said, every day we're out here fighting to just take back the simplest of things in terms of our dignity and our constitutional rights and our rights to be left alone.
And ultimately, these guys are looting us blind while we're fighting for these things, you know, these distractions.
- Okay.
I like the idea of the right to be left alone.
Man, oh man, oh man, do we miss that.
Here we have Dershowitz explain why a judge may quickly toss a Trump indictment that it was a foolish, foolish decision to bring it.
Legal scholar Alan Dershowitz explained why he believes the indictment against former President Trump will be quickly tossed.
The District Attorney confirmed that a grand jury had indicted him over an alleged hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.
The indictment remains under seal and will not be publicized until he's arraigned, which is expected to take place at 2-15 Tuesday.
Dershowitz added, Frank made a foolish, foolish decision, which would cause a case to be thrown out, I think, on statute of limitation ground.
A scholar of American criminal law, especially constitutional, Dershowitz predicted his attorneys will file an immediate motion to dismiss.
Reacting to the unprecedented news, the Harvard Law School emeritus professor predicted it'll be tossed on statute of limitation grounds.
The most important thing is they indicted him when he was out of New York, and that means they could have indicted him within the statute of limitations when he was out of New York.
The statute of limitations is way expired.
They claimed they couldn't have indicted him because he was outside of New York, but now they've indicted him when he's not in New York.
Here's Newsback tweeting, Alan Dersh on Trump indictment?
They made a foolish, foolish decision which would cause the case to be thrown out, I think, on statute of limitation grounds.
Rang reportedly investigated Trump for falsifying business records over allegations of money he claimed went to Michael Cohen for legal services actually went to Daniels.
As I understand it, by the way, Michael Cohen gave Stormy Daniels the money, and Trump did not reimburse him.
I've seen a statement of Stormy Daniels saying she did not have sex with Trump.
I think it's very unlikely Trump would have had sex with Stormy Daniels, because in a porn actress, she has sex with lots of men.
Trump is germophobic.
I don't think it happened.
And if No one paid the money, and Trump didn't reimburse it.
It's ridiculous.
The crime of falsifying business record is generally a misdemeanor with a two-year statute.
But it could be an E-class felony if it occurred to conceal another crime, in which case the statute is five years.
It's not known what second crime they're going to allege to elevate it to a felony.
Though it's believed that they're going to argue the hush money payment constituted a violation of campaign finance laws.
At the center of the statute is whether they were triggered in 2017 when the payments, he says here, to Cohen, but really it should be by Cohen, were allegedly made or in 2018 on the basis of bookkeeping implications.
As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy observed, Assuming the statute was triggered in 2018, the five-year period would lapse sometime this year.
That, at least in part, explains the frenetic investigative activity that's gone on the last few weeks.
If the state doesn't indict soon, the case would be time-barred, or it could be time-barred already.
The indictment came despite the DOJ having declined to prosecute it in the past, and the Federal Election Commission saying that it had not violated federal campaign finance laws.
So the whole thing is a pile of horseshit as I see it.
Carl, your thoughts?
It is.
So you have a case that was declined to be prosecuted and found to be so lacking in merit that the judge ordered Stormy Daniels to pay $300,000 in legal fees to Trump's team.
And now they're going to cobble those together into something.
They're keeping it secret.
I think it would be in the best interest of the prosecution to get the case tossed out on a statute of limitations because then they can maintain the narrative and that's all our opponents do.
They have a narrative and then they construct events and report on them as if they're true.
That's all that we ever get from those psychopaths and until we have a breakthrough for victory and for truth and where we can have some sort of an independent media to present See, a court case is supposed to be a fair venue where two opposing teams can present their case and their argument about the meaning of the facts to an independent jury to evaluate the factual status.
The Orwellian world that we live in, though, is all just stories and narrative and emotion and then shouting and physical violence through Antifa.
So we need to have this breakthrough or this push and this psychological torture and beratement is all that we're going to get from these people at the top who are trying to control us, hate us, and they're using us.
No doubt.
Chris?
Well, I talk about planks and slivers a lot with the selective persecution and prosecution in terms of Donald Trump versus a lot of the people that are encouraging this, and I guess if only this type of prosecution was available when Hillary Clinton was running for office in 2016, and that Trump would have maybe followed through on locking her up, or at least prosecuting her, that he probably wouldn't have faced many of these problems that he's facing today, and I think that
I guess if the same forces that are covering up a lot of what Hillary Clinton should be investigated for are the ones that are really trying to silence and discredit Donald Trump by going after him for these type of things.
Mountains versus molehills, in my opinion.
And I think that this hyper focus is going to backfire on them significantly as things fall apart under their direction and under their misdirection, I should say.
And certainly, well, I have to say that this only gives a long term advantage to the people that they're attacking in terms of street credibility.
Yes, yes, yes.
But they can't help but realize that it's impossible to defeat Russia on the battlefield.
That's why they carry out more and more aggressive information attacks against us.
The goal is, first of all, young people, young generations.
And here, again, they lie all the time.
They choose young people and young people.
And they constantly lie.
They turn on historical facts and stop the attacks on our culture, on the Jewish Jewish Church, on other traditional religious organizations.
Look at what they are doing with their own peoples.
Destruction of families, perversion, abuse of children, even pedophilia is declared a norm.
스��� Vocês, they believe that theenting shades of children are normal and so on.
Irishmen who's banjo ended expounding all theomic rebellions at one person.
I quite didn't, Mr KallogLuc.
Look at the 23rd, the new books of all the various religions There's all in place, 'The All Simpleтерс interviewed God and His Abße' and training it to keep men with women.
But now these teachings are sort of reviewed, people in the West understand that their vision Elites, I must say, just go crazy.
And it doesn't seem to be cured anymore.
But this is their problem, as I said.
And we must defend ourselves.
And we will do it.
This is their problem, as I already said.
We must protect them.
And we will do this.
We will protect our children from degrading and upbringing.
I mean, my God, there's a guy telling it like it is.
Your thoughts?
I mean, Putin's standing up for a family and a wholesome society and opposing pedophilia and child abuse, and he's absolutely right.
The West has gone stark raving mad.
Carl, your thoughts?
I do like the speech, and in terms of a speech construction, he has the right platitudes, except for in our culture, and I'm no expert with Russian culture, I love Russian culture, no expert in it, but he has that line about believing in the scripture.
I know that that would not play well in the US, I don't know how well it would play In in Russia, but all of the rhetoric and the talking points are nice.
That said, it falls short of that.
We are in this war and in order to fight the war, we need to defeat the enemy.
The enemy are the lawless, the criminal psychopaths, and he needs to bring the evidence.
He needs to articulate what the rest of us all understand of what happened in the Ukraine, that this was an installed puppet that then attacked the Donbass for eight years with artillery killing 14,000 people that prompted the military intervention by the Russians.
He needs to hit hard, maybe with the JFK assassination, with 9-11, or something.
Instead, we're looking at this bizarre playing field where I think that the Democrats' next move is in an economic collapse.
They're going to find some way to blame Trump for the disastrous subversion of trust in government.
I think that's going to be their next step.
Well, I was thinking about that too, Carl.
What if the FSB decided to just drop some of their truth bombs on the world population, a la Julian Assange or something of that nature, where they just go off in rogue in terms of, I guess, unspoken terms of diplomacy and the gentleman's agreement and all that.
and start unwrapping things like the Ukrainian coup, which they have recorded on unencrypted phones.
So it's pretty evident and very amateur in terms of what the U.S. was doing and how they managed to do it.
Very unprofessional, I guess, if it is, in fact, their intention to do this stuff professionally.
And, you know, I think 9-11, he could bring a lot of truth to light with that.
The subsequent war of terror, the Wesley Clark memo, the banking things that are going on in the Middle East, even stuff going back to the Cold War and even getting into aliens and technology and stuff like that.
I mean, he could go next level with this type of stuff.
And it seems like he's making a lot of sense in terms of diplomatic relations and what he's saying, you know, Speaking for sure.
He has a sense of duty, honor, traditional culture, religion.
He's in favor of what seems to be free markets and fair trade, commodity-backed currencies, not debased ones, honest diplomacy, and he's very disciplined financially and fiscally responsible.
So this guy is really stacking a lot of credibility up in his favor, I think, in terms of the last 10 years and how he's handled this overaggression in the United States.
And look at what the U.S. has thrown at him, not only the Ukrainian coup, but like pussy riots, sending him into courts and trying to start this stuff.
You know, the Griner thing, the Browder thing, the Magnitsky.
I mean, they go on and on.
I'm trying to pull these guys into some bullshit.
And they seem to just really take the high road and look good in terms of the global spectrum.
So, yeah, I think it's amazing how these things present themselves and how they're being played out.
And this is certainly a Cold War 2.0, if you ask me.
And I think, you know, it's maybe a controlled one.
But, you know, Russia seems to be the benefactor of a lot of the central bankers' favor with this BRICS and going with pulling 80% of the GDP of the world together under this BRICS initiative seems to be a pretty amazing feat in less than a year.
The whole world is moving in Russia's favor, in Russia's direction.
There's no doubt about it.
The dollar is collapsing.
We're going to suffer the consequence of our incompetence.
Meanwhile, a Trump indictment showed power-crazed Democrats are incompatible with human society, coming from Mike Adams.
I believe Trump's indictment by power-crazed Democrats is another necessary step for the trial by fire that will see America rise up against tyranny, censorship, election rigging, and the demonic infestation of the left that has produced child grooming, transgenderism, trans-terrorism, and widespread psychological trauma.
Quite a statement.
The world needs to see the insanity of the Democrats, as they not only rigged the election against Trump and America, but even now are trying to put him behind bars, just as Democrats themselves are never prosecuted for serious crimes, including bribery, human trafficking, and treason.
You'll hear my broadcast today.
I believe Trump, however, needs to make it through this trial by fire to achieve a personal transformation.
In my opinion, Mike Adams reports, Trump has been too self-centered and tone-deaf to the systematic oppression of his own supporters.
For years into his first administration, Trump seemed to be wholly unaware that his own supporters were being censored, deplatformed, and demonetized across nearly all tech platforms.
Even today, Trump still does not understand his Operation Warp Speed resulted in killing and maiming of millions of innocent Americans.
Some were following Trump's advice to their own demise.
For Trump to be the later Americanese, he must be willing to be nailed to the cross, figuratively speaking, and show that he's willing to put his own neck on the line to take a stand for America.
He must also learn to reject the establishment traitors and deep state goons who characterize his first administration.
Perhaps now, with this indictment, Trump will finally come to experience what the rest of us have been going through for the last 70 years and will suffer enough to realize this is about much more than Trump himself.
It's about whether America can throw off the shackles of authoritarianism and restore its constitutional republic glory.
To restore America, Trump must wholly reject the establishment, must call for the complete dismantling of the deep state and its institutions, including the FBI, DOJ, FDA, CDC, DHS, and more.
They are corrupt beyond repair, weaponized against the American people.
I think Trump's arrest and prosecution may actually be the wake-up call Trump needs to finally get serious about draining the swamp and using executive power to arrest and imprison the traitors, operatives, and prisoners actors who have declared war on this nation.
This may be God's plan, yet only Trump himself can decide if he will undergo the hero's journey transformation necessary to become the revolutionary leader America needs.
In effect, Trump must transcend Trump.
If he is to be a true leader for America's restoration.
George Washington transcended Washington, by the way, and became a servant of God to achieve God's plan for America as a Christian-founded nation.
Personally, I will not vote for Donald Trump the man.
I will vote only for Donald Trump as a servant of God's plan for America.
It's up to Trump himself to decide which Trump he wants to be.
Carl, your thoughts?
I appreciate Mike Adams.
He's hitting hard.
And he's right that the Dem leadership is not fit to lead.
They're criminal.
And the criminals shouldn't be leading.
They shouldn't even be allowed in the society.
But, you know, this is also the Republicans who are associated with Bush, Cheney, Romney.
And there's just a simple test.
And really, everybody in leadership It's not even close.
And you could give a simple test is that they just need to speak up about election fraud.
How about that?
I won't go through the data, but I'll put it in the show notes.
Again, it's definitive.
It's not even close.
You can't argue the facts that is anything other than election fraud.
How about speaking up about the truth of COVID health orders?
Nobody's doing that in Congress that I know of.
How about the lie starter in Illegal Wars of Aggression, the bankster looting?
How about JFK, RFK, and MLK assassinations?
But they don't do anything, Mike!
So, it's not just the Dem leadership.
It's everybody who has been allowed to rise to power along with the criminal corporate media and You know, we need people like Mike and us and our audience members who are willing to state the truth about the most important topics first, and the most important topics is going to be affecting the greatest number of human beings and the most amount of money.
But Mike, great article.
Chris.
Yeah, I agree with what Mike Adams is saying, and I think that's almost the point of this absurdity, is to draw this type of backlash and resentment against this group that has been used as kind of the spit shield and a salad bar in terms of cover fire for this political depopulation agenda that has been thrust upon us.
And I think the The henchmen that have brought this into power and have feigned the optic of a majority are certainly dwindling in terms of number and in terms of
Credibility, I guess in terms of perception, you know, because people are seeing through like you said, Carl, this rigged election and seeing that this has been a psychological operation of a very select minority of people that are putting this on the majority and serving an ulterior agenda that is certainly not the best wishes and the will of the common citizen.
You know, I almost think that, you know, you got to look at how Rothschild puts proxies out there and uses things to extract resources.
In this case, I'm going to talk about the gold and diamonds in South Africa.
They ran a Rothschild house out of England under Rhodes and another one out of France under a different guy.
And basically they were both going to the same primary backing, so to speak, but it was done under the illusion versus French and English.
And the South Africans had recourse or affiliation or alliance or allegiance or distrust with each of the opposite persons that they would do business with or that they'd be wronged by or whatever.
So I almost think this is like the dualism and the binary type of controlled opposition dialogue that's being presented in some way.
And I think that really people have to see through this and maybe start forging a separate alternative outside of the two party political system, because this is bipartisan.
This corruption in this this depopulation plan is part of that.
And it's all bipartisan, in my opinion.
Yes, yes, no doubt.
Meanwhile.
while.
Well...
Thank you.
DeSantis forcefully condemns the un-American Trump indictment, says Florida will refuse to cooperate with extradition.
I think he knew all along Trump couldn't fight it on extradition, that he's got to conform to the law.
Hang on a second, I've got to take this.
This is a medical thing.
Florida Governor DeSantis has luciferously criticized the indictment of former President Trump, calling it un-American, insisting Florida would refuse any extradition insisting Florida would refuse any extradition requests.
But I'm sure he realizes Trump as president cannot fight this with extradition.
It would be unseemly.
As many of our knowledgeable readers are aware, Trump, the current leading Republican candidate, has been indicted for alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels.
But as I understand it, if I have not already made this observation, the payments were made by Michael Cohen to Stormy and not by Trump, where Trump, so far as I know, did not reimburse Cohen, and therefore this whole thing is a charade, as it is on multiple additional grounds.
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg has been pursuing Trump and has reaped the reward with a 34-count indictment.
Bragg has a record of reducing felonious crime to misdemeanors, laying criminals back on the street.
The window of fallen New York Police Detective Jason Rivera, during a heartbreaking eulogy, criticized Bragg for what many believe are his soft-on crime policies.
Yet he found time to aggressively pursue Trump over what amounts to a minor alleged campaign finance violation.
Think about that.
While cop killers were roaming the street, Bragg was focused on Trump for low-level infractions.
Glenn Beck went scorched earth, put on a mega hat during a Tucker Carlson appearance.
There are going to be 100 million people who will walk on broken glass and through fire to vote for someone other than this corrupt Banana Republic administration.
The Santas tweeted, the weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head.
It is un-American.
The sourceback Manhattan D.A.
has consistently bent the law to downgrade felonies and excuse criminal misconduct.
Though they've had their disagreements in the past, dissent has strongly condemned the indictment.
The weaponization of the legal system turns the rule of law on its head.
DeSantis noted Bragg is backed by George Soros and is doing what Democrat DAs are doing, winding up on the side of criminals but willing to go after political opponents with the full force of the law.
And when you realize they're going after the former president, think about what they'd be willing to do to you, a conservative or a Republican voter.
Yep, now he's stretching the law to get a political opponent, DeSantis said a break.
Porter will not assist in an extradition request given the questionable circumstances at issue with his source-backed Manhattan prosecutor and his political agenda.
Jilly Rosas tweets, DeSantis responds to Trump possibly being indicted.
I don't know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair.
It says Alvin Bragg is a Soros-backed DA who is going after Trump for political reasons.
And by the way, I thought that was very cheap for DeSantis to have said it that way.
Trump's going to be arraigned next week.
His team lashed out at DeSantis for comments he made about the case to wit those I've just remarked.
DeSantis teased he doesn't know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star.
The indictment, of course, has glaring problems.
Aside from the fact nobody else on the planet—nobody—would be pursued criminally for a campaign finance violation.
Go ahead and do research on the wrist slaps and downright revulsals that pursue complaints against Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Ilhan Omar for similar violations.
Frank's case has a key piece of evidence that contradicts everything they are alleging.
A letter surfaced last week, specifically claiming Trump never reimbursed his lawyer for the hush money.
The letter, obtained by the Daily Mail, shows Michael Cohen explicitly stating the Republican nominee did not reimburse him for the hush money payments to Daniels.
The outlet calls the letter a potential smoking gun.
There, in black and white, the letter states, Neither the Trump Organization or the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms.
Clifford, and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the payment directly or indirectly.
Here's the letter that he did not reimburse.
The New York State Chief Judge, Saul Wachler, was famously quoted by Tom Wolfe in his book, Bonfire of the Vanities, that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if that's what the DA wanted.
Frank just got through the easy part, but countering the evidence is going to be a different matter.
Fox reported Frank was struggling to move forward due to major dissension in the office over an indictment.
They wrote that dissension was due to the weakness of the case.
If it's too weak to yield results in a criminal case, the gamble would almost assuredly result in the former president being chosen the GOP nominee in 2024, and it just might propel him straight to the White House.
There are already signs that's happening.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, first regarding DeSantis.
Yeah, that was a cheap shot, and he's showing his allegiance to divide and split off people from being encouraged by Trump.
DeSantis is a swamp creature.
Nobody rises to the office of governor without being one.
He hasn't said anything about the lie-starter and illegal wars of aggression that I said have killed 30 million-plus since World War II, said nothing about the banks for looting.
I do appreciate his virtue signaling and at least giving people a chance to stand up against the covid orders to at least demonstrate to the tortured herd of sheeple that they do have other options.
For Glenn Beck to say that 100 million plus Yeah, well, pal, 100 million plus would also be down for Obama – not Obama – for Bush and Cheney's lie-started illegal war of aggression.
We really do need to nail that the empire, the American empire, has had a left arm and a right arm, but it's the same creature.
And again, as a recently retired AP U.S.
government teacher, for me, for regarding the indictment, it really is like, oh, really?
I want to see everything.
I want to know all about your charges.
So they have not yet begun embarrassing themselves.
We just need to hope that the sheep will are paying attention past the CNBC chatter and spin and ugly narratives.
Chris, well, I guess we're seeing the rather incestuous relationship between political officials and corporate interests and the central bankers.
Typically, you would normally see a formalized process of political corruption that runs through a political action committee, a PAC, or an NGO in many cases.
We're seeing maybe a little bit more of an unconventional situation from Trump all along, and I think the normal avenues of power are certainly disrupted by his meteoric rise to success.
And I think, you know, it's kind of interesting to see how another guy like with the name of Cohen ends up in the middle of an entire situation of this nature once again.
And it seems to me like an effort all along or a systematic blanketing of all political candidates of a Mossad blackmail slash blackball operation a la Epstein or something of that nature or, you know, having each candidate have its own departmentalized blackmail dossier having each candidate have its own departmentalized blackmail dossier over them and certainly the dirt, so to speak, on the decision.
DeSantis, I think, I think probably has some dirt on him and he probably has a bit of a sketchy career.
I think he doesn't rise to that position of authority.
We lost him again.
without being blessed by Israel, which he seems to support publicly.
Yeah.
And, you know, I think that really he was the only governor, I give him credit for this, to stand up for the right thing in the right time.
And I think he's doing the same thing here about not prosecuting Trump.
I'll give him that.
But I think really you got to maybe see through some of it.
We lost him again.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
I don't even remember where I was.
Where did it drop off at?
Where did it drop off at?
Do you remember?
Yeah, it was all good though.
Sorry about the mysterious technical difficulties as usual there.
Yeah, I was talking about DeSantis and him standing up for the right thing at the right times, and I think he's doing the right thing by not pushing along the deep state agenda to go after Trump with the switch hunt and using the state of Florida's avenues to help extradite him.
I think that's the right and righteous move.
And yeah, I think really, you know, we're seeing the I guess the long term and the short term of the game that's being played and the people playing the game.
I think you really have to start peeling back this onion and going after AIPAC and Israel and these political action committees that are corrupting our elected officials and buying these people wholesale.
I know it takes a lot of money and a lot of industry and a lot of power to have power and to control people.
But I think at some point in time, the power has to come back to the people.
And if these corporations and these rich entities don't see that and really start to level with people, I think that the more that they try to deceive them, the more it's going to cost them down the line.
Very good.
Trump's all right so far in the lead.
Here we go.
Court, officially confirm details for first hearing in Trump criminal case.
Former Bradentrop first hearing will take place on April 4th.
Just happens to be the anniversary of my first marriage in Las Vegas, we elope.
A court spokesperson confirmed on Friday he's set to appear at 2.15 before New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Marchand.
It'll be open to members of the public and press on a first-come, first-served basis, but not live stream.
The courthouse is in Lower Manhattan.
Not been indicted for reasons that are under seal.
First former president faced criminal charges.
The Democrats, of course, think it's going to help them, but in fact, it's going to have the opposite effect.
A spokesman for the district attorney said his office is coordinating with Trump to surrender the DA's office for arraignment.
Brag, the DA.
Had been probing a payment by former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen to adult performer Stormy Daniels, who alleged Trump had an affair with her.
Trump has denied the claim.
Let me add, I'd seen a statement signed by Stormy Daniels that she and Trump did not have sex.
Merchant on Thursday signed an order authorizing Bragg to disclose the indictment's existence because it would be in the public interest and an appropriate exercise of the court's discretion.
Trump's attorney, Joseph Polkina, previously said the legal team was working out details for his appearance.
He's angry?
Disappointed?
But ready to fight.
He's a pretty tough guy.
His knees don't buckle.
So he'll be ready to go.
Merchant is a judge who oversaw the case of Allen Weisselberg, former chief financial officer for Trump.
Trump said merchant hates me, that the judge railroaded Weisselberg.
He strong-armed Allen, which a judge is not allowed to do, treated my companies, which didn't plead, viciously.
Weisselberg was hit with 15 felony charges, including tax fraud.
He pled guilty and testified against the organization and another Trump company.
He received five months.
A merchant warned him he could face additional time if he did not adhere to the plea agreement.
Merchant also said that he would have sent Weisselberg to a much longer sentence had he not already agreed on the prison term.
Trump's companies were convicted and fined $1.6 million.
Pretty small change, all things considered.
I have 1.1 mil for just publishing three sentences that were supposed to be libelous in a book that proved that Sandy Hook was a hoax.
But it's just more of the manufacturer abuse of the law here to benefit a political agenda.
Disgraceful.
Carl.
Yeah, well, we'll see.
We have our opponents doing what they always do is just spinning a narrative and they're just painting a picture.
They're just going after an emotional response from the sheeple.
So, we really don't know until we can get our hands on facts and then we'll see what adults are in the room and we'll see how the sheeple fall out from the Distance between the narrative and the objective data.
Now, for Trump to make those claims against the judge, I would hope that he has a factual background to provide for that.
But just saying those statements on the surface is just putting more into the divisive type of rhetoric that we don't want.
Remember, part of what our opponents would be happy to have is some sort of a separation and chaos and violence.
And the violence they're likely to attempt to get ongoingly through false flag attacks.
But as long as the people stay peaceful and just insist on the facts, then I think that the facts are going to work out in this case the same way that they have through the factless Russiagate and the crimeless impeachment.
But we still need a breakthrough for the sheeple to recognize the facts.
Chris.
Yeah, I think that part of the systematic frustrations of justice that we keep seeing and the inversions of justice that we keep seeing are very much intended to provoke a reaction, maybe even a violent one, in terms of the court of public opinion.
And I think that really you're going to see some sort of a schism between law and order and, you know, what the people think is the right thing.
And I think it's maybe long overdue in some cases and in this one for sure.
I think that our entire justice system has been infiltrated just like our political and our economic one.
So at some point in time, we're going to have to really get outside that system or destroy it from within and recreate it so that it does serve the people in a magnitude that it was always intended or supposedly intended to do all along.
Yeah, if we just act in accordance with the Constitution, we'd be in great shape.
It's a deviation that would cause us a problem.
Meanwhile, appallingly, Biden says transgender people shape our nation's soul in an official proclamation.
President Biden issued an official proclamation declaring Transgender Americans shape our nation's soul and established a holiday relating to the group this week.
He issued the proclamation Thursday to mark March 31st as a Transgender Day of Visibility, a day some transgenders have renamed a Day of Vengeance.
Transgender Americans shape our nation's soul.
Proudly serving in the military, curing deadly diseases, holding elective office, running thriving businesses, fighting for justice, raising families, and much more, Biden wrote in the proclamation.
Today, too many transgender Americans are still denied rights and freedoms.
A wave of discriminatory state laws is targeting transgender youth, terrifying families and hurting kids who are not hurting anyone.
An epidemic of violence against transgender women and girls in particular, women and girls of color, has taken lives far too soon.
This is all just rhetoric and unbelievable garbage in my opinion.
Meanwhile, we have the Nashville school shooting.
What a coincidence!
Six killed, including three students.
Shooter dead.
Who's supposed to be a transgender, ironically.
Biden's statement went on to tout what he outlined as his administration's effort to support American transgender community, pointed his decision to allow transgender to serve in the military, and to include what he called gender markers on U.S.
passports.
Several states, including West Virginia and now Kentucky, have joined with nine others in banning or restricting transgender surgeries or other care for minors, something Biden and his admin have attacked as being discriminatory and cruel.
Here are some comments.
The last independent Eight-year-olds don't decide if they go to school.
They don't decide what clothes to buy.
They don't decide what's being made for dinner.
They don't decide where the family goes on vacation.
But they're fully qualified to choose their gender, life-altering surgeries, and mental therapy the rest of their lives?
Caesary.
We must figure out how to stop this insanity destroying our country.
To Mandy Holmes.
They have the same rights as everyone in this country.
We just do not want them in the bathrooms, in our bathrooms, until they are fully transitioned.
We do not want our tax dollar paying for it.
We're having biological men competing against our daughters in sports.
Live your life.
No one truly cares.
Just be respectful of others.
Carry.
Today, too many transgender Americans are still denied rights and freedoms, quoting Biden.
What rights and freedoms are they being denied?
Name one.
And don't start talking about minors wanting to change genders.
If that's the case, then we're also restricting their rights by not allowing them to drive cars or buy alcohol.
Why don't we allow them to do those things?
Because they don't make good decisions at that age.
The truth wins.
As of this evening, all people in the U.S.
had exactly the same rights and privileges.
Why the president thinks one group does not shows his dementia is progressing.
Red pill.
Says the man who awarded the Woman of the Year award to a man, with the media here also to pretend that men can be women and vice versa.
Also expecting us to believe this as well.
We're also believing Biden was actually elected and Dr. Fauci competent.
The list goes on.
Bunkai.
Say what?
They shame our nation's soul?
Correction.
They pollute our nation's soul.
Moreover, they're supported and polluted by way of promoting this rather than getting these people the mental health they so obviously need.
Archibald.
Hear me out.
I wonder if the major agenda is to destroy the traditional family, forcing single families of any orientation to have to depend on the government for assistance.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the actor playing Biden is giving a true line in the story is that they do shape our nation's soul, just not in the way that he intended it.
We're shaping our nation's soul is trying to normalize the gender mutilation of our children.
And then we have grooming of this community to increase its numbers by Biden just saying as if he virtue signals as if he cares about so-called transgender women and girls, stating as if being transgender is a fact that you can cut across your genders with hormones and mutilation surgery.
So, uh, Rumors is all I can say.
Now that said, I do have empathy for the population of children who are understandably confused, but I say let's take a different route.
Let's have the truth.
Let's have these people who are the leaders arrested for their obvious and ongoing crimes centered in war and money.
And then let's find out what the kids look like if we remove the poisons from the water, from their Roundup soaked food, get rid of the GMOs, get rid of the injections, get rid of the COVID health orders, And start with the truth by taking a look and seeing really, really, so what does the Pizzagate information have to do with these drag queen pimpers?
I think if we get all the truth to that, then this transgender community, those who have already suffered, will recognize that they have been victims, perhaps the most horrifically mutilated, by these psychopaths.
Yeah, I would think this wouldn't be such an epidemic or such a thing if it wasn't being sensationalized and over-magnified in terms of its occurrence in nature or in reality or in the social engineering that's being put upon the children.
They're targeting these kids at premature ages and really, I guess, capitalizing on their confusion or their biological developments.
Certainly their sexual immaturity is being compromised, to say the least.
And I think that really the people behind all these agendas and these initiatives are the same people that are pushing for most of the liberal agenda and the T-POP and the death in better hands type of thing.
I think they're really trying to dismantle the traditional roles of families, the smallest tribe on earth, and trying to create this generational resentment and this biological resentment amongst people that are maybe subjected to different levels of social engineering.
So yeah, I think it's really an operation.
There's a lot of money behind this that's putting this distraction on us.
And it's turning a simple AB type of biological binary Classification into something more of an essay question and it's amazing to see how people are kind of turning reality to to fit their own proclivities or their imaginations or certainly the agendas of this 1% that's trying to To destroy the population of humanity.
Now think about these kids aren't going to have children.
They're not going to know what life and biology has in store for them under natural courses of action.
They're going to be subjected to this perversion and this lifestyle that is certainly not going to steer them towards these type of avenues, I'll just say the least.
It seems to me this statement and the comments in response reinforce the variety of Vladimir Putin's observation to the Russian people.
I admire the man beyond words.
If only we had a leader of his stature.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
LL Winnie writes, There's a video at banned website called Kate Daly has questioned about missing details of Nashville trans shooter case.
I can only recommend you check it out and see why this is being questioned.
There are false flags and outright hoaxes.
Sandy Hook was an outright hoax.
But I'm open to the possibility the good old government is not above killing children to get our guns.
Or for any other reason, for that matter.
They're not.
But they know grieving families with questions is not a loose end.
They readily should accept.
Remember, the 9-11 Commission would never have happened had the families of those killed not demanded it.
Specifically, it was a Jersey girl, four widows from individuals who died on 9-11 who insisted the formation of a 9-11 Commission after Biden and after Cheney and Bush had evaded it for 441 days.
A hoax means it didn't happen but were led to believe it did.
A false flag means it did happen but was blamed on another party or otherwise orchestrated to further a narrative or agenda.
How many children have to die before Americans give up their guns?
This is not rhetoric in the face of tragedy.
It is a threat.
By the way, I think real or fake, blaming on another party is sufficient to make it a false flag.
Those I call false flags are not therefore legit, though many are.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Democrats want civil war.
They want to push us into reacting so they can use their weaponized government to lock us all up.
They know Trump did not break the law.
They know more than anyone because they've been trying for years to find a way to put him in jail, and they can't.
But now they have a complete fool deranging it up to try, because he's backed by Soros, and Soros wants war to destabilize America and gain full control.
Well said, Marjorie.
Final thoughts, Carl, yours.
Well now we're into April of 2023.
March saw significant movements in the financial markets heading towards what I will claim is an absolute mathematical certainty to collapse this exponential debt system either into a great reset Or a truth where we're going to have superior mechanics and adults in the room.
With the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank and other associated banks to it, the Fed saying that they're going to backstop all deposits, uninsured and insured, the threat of the derivatives market, the movement of the countries to the bricks for a gold-backed ruble, that is significant progress and April is only going to see more.
And remember, We're talking about a breakthrough.
The very first word in that is break.
And so I think the break is going to happen near instantly.
We see the wrap up of the war so close.
It could be pretty much any time that that Ukraine war is going to end in some sort of a conclusion that, again, could be game ending to our opponents.
And we see the ongoing erosion of trust in anything the leaders say or anything that corporate media says.
So hang in there.
MTG with that Civil War.
Yes, it's true.
And I think that the true patriots would be Although I've never seen it, you have to be able to call out the criminals on your own side.
And that's going to be the Bush Cheney.
You have Tulsi Gabbard did a good job of that, of distinguishing the possibility for Democrats, and then Reptillery insulted her and she bailed entirely from them.
So hang in there for the truth.
Again, when a breakthrough happens, all of the lead-up to it will be gone into a new expanse in an instant, and then you have creative processes moving forward.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Well, I think there's a lot of righteous outrage that is being lightning-rodded into a lot of these political distractions and some of these things, I think, in terms of trying to take the tension that would constitute a civil war, the outrage of a public being grossly deceived and underserved by their selected officials and their retirements, their nest eggs, their wages being completely embezzled, extorted, or stolen from them.
In the face of this, in these austerity, liquidity crunch times, people are really tense and outraged righteously as they should be.
They're getting stretched thin and torn to pieces.
So I think that really the whole point is to create these political options and these distractions to serve as, like I say, lightning rods for a lot of this righteous outrage.
I talk about this a little bit.
I have started putting content back on Bitchute under Brutal Honesty.
So if anybody wants to tune in and listen to me ramble out for about a half hour of video, feel free to drop in there and say hi or at least listen to me, I guess, participate in this thing.
It's helpful for me.
It's almost like therapy because I just get in and start talking about stuff that I think that's going on and what's happening in the world.
And maybe it'd be insightful to some.
And if anything, at least it's a good stress release for me.
So I just want to put that out there and plug that a little bit, you know, not to blow my own horn or anything, but if you want to hear more from me, there's where you go.
Give us your URL again, Chris.
I don't know what a URL is, but I think it's BrutalHonesty.org.
No, it's on BitChute.
It's just a BitChute channel right now.
I'm looking for other platforms.
I might get on Rumble.
Yeah, I'm going to get on Rumble and start maybe mirroring the videos on there, too.
It's me just talking for a half hour about shit I think that's going on in the world.
Thanks Carl and Chris for excellent comments once again.
For over a year I've been in contact with a couple of the alleged decedent victims of Sandy Hook.
Emily Parker on the one hand and Vicky Soto on the other.
A darling little girl, first grader, a teacher, was supposed to be a heroine.
They want to regain their lives.
They've come out.
They gave a public broadcast out of a pirate radio station in the Florida Keys of late and spoke their piece.
I know what they thought.
I have two sources verifying hearing the broadcast.
They meant every word.
Among the revelations Vicky apologized for participating in Uvalde, where she was asked to reprise her role as another dead teacher, Eva Morales, for which she was paid $210,000.
They both observed to me that in Nashville, some of the crisis actors were trained in Connecticut, and they bumped the ante.
Now they're getting 310,000 to perform.
It's outrageous.
The Democrats are using American taxpayer dollars to perform propaganda, disinformation, deceitful misleading of the American people.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out my blog, there's a lot about it, jameshfetzer.org, or my witchy channel, Jim Fetzer, or on Twitter, at Jim Fetzer.
This is ridiculous, and it has to be brought to an end.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about, We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection