Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 28, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

02:45:44

The Raw Deal (27 March 2023)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured.
	Now I find, I've changed my mind, I'll open up the doors.
	Help me if you can, and I'm feeling down.
	And I do appreciate you being around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please, please help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on the Raw Deal.
	I begin with news from Ukraine.
	It turns out the U.S.
	won't even let Ukraine consider peace talks.
	I mean, give us a break.
	Give us a break.
	With the masks off, the collective West is now eagerly showing its bestial grin, Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for the Kremlin, observes.
	Ukraine's Western backers, and the U.S.
	in particular, are doing their best to prevent Kiev from entering into any negotiations with Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.
	The official made the remarks on the sideline of talks between Russian President Putin and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, in Moscow.
	He was asked to comment on recent statements by senior Western officials who said any peace initiative for Ukraine, should it arise from the Russia-China talks, because China was especially eager to promote it, would be unacceptable.
	U.S.
	national security spokesman John Kirby, for example, claimed any ceasefire in the current situation would only ratify Russia's conquests to date rather than contribute to peace.
	And so a peace agreement didn't involve a negotiation and a compromise.
	Russia obviously is not going to surrender the territory it has taken.
	Washington European capital, but first of all, Washington is filled with a desire not to let, under any pretext, Kiev enter into peace negotiations.
	They simply do not let Kiev even think about it, Peskov said.
	Asked whether it were now normal to incite war rather than call for peace, he replied affirmatively.
	Now, when the masks are off, everyone shows off their bestial grin except for Russia and China.
	During the talks, the Russian and Chinese leaders discussing a 12-point roadmap for peace in Ukraine proposed by Beijing, where Putin lauded the initiative, expressing his readiness to discuss and build upon it.
	While also reiterating Moscow's desire to seek a diplomatic solution for the hostilities, which have now dragged on for over a year.
	We believe that many of the provisions of the peace plan put forward by China are consonant with Russian stance and can be taken as a foundation for a peaceful settlement when they are ready for it in the West and in Kiev.
	However, so far, We have not observed such readiness on their Park Butin set after the meeting.
	The Chinese president has insisted Beijing continues to maintain its position on the conflict, has urged both sides to stick to diplomacy and engage in dialogue.
	We're always for peace and dialogue, and we firmly stand on the right side of history, as I stated.
	Meanwhile, China is building up forces near Aria Mosk getting ready for a major battle, according to a former officer.
	Andrei Borchko said the Ukrainian servicemen who have been trained in Western boot camps are now starting to arrive in the combat area.
	By the way, that's just one more reason why if I were Russia, I'd be very pissed off with the West.
	Moscow.
	Ukraine is building up troops and equipment there, a town known in Ukraine as Bakhmut, suggesting Kiev is preparing a large battle in the area.
	But we know, and we've reported on Bakhmut, that Russia has all but completely succeeded in taking there.
	The idea is a buildup of forces in the area where President Zelensky said they would not leave Artyomakovsk, and it backed it up with action.
	Increasing number of fresh forces being deployed there, but they're being wiped out.
	The average lifespan on the front lines for the new troops is four hours.
	Zloynsky has decided to stage a grandiose battle there.
	Perhaps he has in mind a counteroffensive was reported over Pravda.
	He also said Ukrainian servicemen who'd been trained at Western boot camps are beginning to arrive in the combat area.
	According to the Ukrainian sources, they are well-trained.
	He noted that Western-provided armored vehicles are already moving from Western Ukraine to the engagement line.
	No reports yet of tanks reaching the combat area.
	What is known is there are a large number of wheeled armored vehicles on the way, multiple rocket launcher systems.
	We are detecting this.
	Utanian troops do have muscle, thanks to their so-called Western partners.
	Earlier, he reported To TASS that Ukraine had significantly beased up its troops in the major settlements to the west of that area that Collins were passing through the town.
	Meanwhile, Putin says Russia will deploy nuclear weapons to Belarus.
	Russian President Vladimir Putin said Saturday Moscow will deploy tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus at the request of Minsk.
	Announcing the decision, Putin compared the move to NATO's nuclear sharing program, under which U.S.
	weapons are deployed to the territory of five Allied countries—Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Turkey.
	There is nothing unusual here either.
	First, the United States has been doing this for decades.
	They have long deployed their tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of their allied countries, Putin said.
	The Russian leader insisted that deployment would not violate Moscow's non-proliferation commitments.
	Putin also said the decision was related to the UK shipping Ukraine depleted uranium rounds for its British-made Challenger II tanks.
	Depleted uranium ammunition is radioactive, linked to cancer and birth defects, especially in Iraq, where U.S.
	forces use an enormous number of the controversial munitions.
	In response to the announcement, the U.S.
	said it hasn't seen any indication that Russia is planning to use nuclear weapons.
	White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby also said The U.S.
	hasn't seen Russia move any nuclear weapons around yet.
	Putin said the plan is for Russia to build a facility in Belarus to store the nuclear weapons, which will be completed by July 1st.
	Russia has previously provided Belarus with nuclear-capable Isklander missiles and is helping upgrade the country's warplanes so they can carry nuclear warheads.
	We have already helped our Belarusian colleagues to re-equip their planes.
	Ten planes are ready to apply this type of weapon.
	We have headed over to Belarus, our well-known and very effective Isklander system that can carry nuclear weapons, Putin said.
	U.S.
	and NATO officials have remarked they don't see a reason to adjust their own nuclear posture at this point, but one way NATO could respond is by placing nuclear weapons in countries closer to Russia.
	The U.S.
	has not deployed nuclear weapons to countries east of Germany that joined NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, but Some Eastern European countries are willing to host nukes, including Poland.
	Venetian officials have also now ruled out the idea of hosting nuclear weapons, and Finland is posed to join NATO soon.
	Can you imagine how provocative this is from Russia?
	I mean, look, they're saying how they haven't posted Any nuclear weapons, the countries east of Germany joining NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but the number of countries east of Germany following the collapse of the Soviet Union that were supposed to join NATO was zero, zero, zero.
	Just one more indication of the gross way in which the United States and NATO have violated their most solemn agreements with Russia and the Soviet Union.
	Meanwhile, we have a report of Zelensky legalizing cyber hacking against Putin.
	Catch this.
	The Ukrainian government is working on a new law to bring one of its volunteer brigades into an official military role.
	The volunteer group in question is called the IT Army, a group of hackers that works to initiate cyber attacks against and prevent cyber attack from Russia.
	So far, this group has already claimed it was responsible for taking Russian state media websites Well, the country's President Putin was delivering the State of the Union speech recently.
	I think this means hacking, taking down Russian state media website.
	Europe has also drawn a lot of criticism, though, since it attacked some hospitals in Russia, as well as other targets that are civilian in nature.
	Surprise, surprise.
	There are a group of hacktivists ...has also recruited volunteers from other countries.
	All they need to join the cause is a smartphone or a computer with a strong internal signal.
	The new law being proposed in Ukraine would make the IT army an official part of the country's military.
	It wouldn't be the first of its kind, though.
	Countries such as Estonia and Finland each have full-scale cyber forces that augment Their country's regular military divisions.
	In some other countries, reservists who have capabilities in the cyber world are used instead of a dedicated group like Ukraine has.
	Here, there is a group called the National Coordination Center for Cyber Security, working under the National Security Defense Council for President Vladimir Zelensky.
	The secretary of the group, Natalia Chetnik, recently told Newsweek via email, the law on the creation and functioning of cyber forces within the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine should be adopted as soon as possible.
	The law would become the basis for building the state's cyber defense capabilities, engaging cyber volunteers in these activities and creating a cyber reserve.
	This reserve would be a group of cyber experts who are civilians.
	They'd be trained by Ukraine's military and the country would have the ability to mobilize a unit to help defend the country anytime there's a conflict or an increased threat in the cyber world.
	Well, that would provide more details on the law.
	It looks as though the cyber reserve effectively would absorb or replace the IT Army's volunteers entirely.
	It would essentially make the cyber group a more permanent and official branch of the military, rather than just a hodgepodge of volunteers who work on their own accord.
	Apparently, members of the IT Army are all for this new proposed law.
	The email responds to a question Newsweek posed to the group, saying the interest they have would indeed be represented by the new drafting process of the Ministry of Digital Transformation, part of the statement read.
	We fully trust the efforts of the working group to legalize a massive fight in the cyber sector and welcome the moment when it will stop being the gray zone.
	We believe the integration of the IT Army into the Cyber Reserve will help in building a more effective defense against cyber threats.
	Meanwhile, we have a development in the United States that's potentially promising, if it can be passed, how the Holman Rule allows the House to fast-track a proposal to gut government programs without debate or much thought at all.
	The slim Republican majority in the House has just voted to give itself a streamlined way to fire civil servants and shut down federal programs it doesn't like outside the standard process of review and debate.
	This method, known as the Holman Rule, H-O-L-M-A-N, Has been used in the past by both parties to cloak political decisions in the language and process of saving taxpayer money.
	It was included in a package of approvals approved as the House began its business in January.
	As a former acting general counsel of the U.S.
	House of Representatives and author of a treatise on governmental and congressional procedure, I know the author of this article that this method had been used in the past to push extreme political agendas through the political process without due consideration for the public interest, and it's likely to happen again.
	Florida Republican Representative Kat Kamak spoke about the Holman rules adaptation on the House floor in early January 2023.
	Calling federal officials unelected bureaucrats, the true real swamp creatures here in D.C., saying they had run roughshod over the American people without consequence.
	Let me comment.
	Donald Trump has addressed the problem that there's 50 to perhaps 500,000 bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.
	So it may be the smaller number that have permanent jobs or the The executive staff that are civil servants who cannot be fired and who have assumed unto themselves policy-shaping and decision-making roles, even though they're unelected, that do not reflect the will of the American people.
	Trump has talked about what he designed as Schedule F.
	As a way that would enable him to fire these people and get them out of the bureaucracy, which would be a good thing.
	So what is being addressed here by Kat McCormack, the unelected bureaucrats, the true swamp creatures, are precisely those Trump is targeting by Schedule F. This appears to be A partial implementation of what Trump had in mind would be a very good thing.
	Today marks our first move, and certainly not our last, to hold them accountable.
	Jacqueline Simone, public policy director of the American Federation of Government Employees, sees the Holman Rule differently.
	It goes around everything that protects civil service from political corruption, Not just federal employees, but entire agencies.
	It is precisely for theater and to create chaos and disrupt the operation of federal agencies, including law enforcement.
	The rule allows House members to transform the normal process of compiling appropriation bills, normally less of amounts of money to be spent, into vehicles to fire government employees and shut down programs they don't like.
	Anything is ripe for cutting with a whole man rule from environmental protection agencies to government efforts for human rights to existing programs for addressing the sales of semi-automatic weapons.
	Normally, such cuts to staff or programs would have to go through an extensive review process either to restructure or abolish programs.
	That process Includes initial drafting of a full-scale bill, subcommittee and full committee hearings and debate, testimony and evidence presented by the President's administration, press coverage of these steps and adaptation of Congress members' positions in light of that coverage.
	Then votes are held on edits to the bill, known as markups, after which there's a separate committee vote on reporting the bill out to the full House, drafting a committee report section by supporters or opponents, and even more after that.
	But Holman sidesteps that considered process.
	It allows provision for altering or abolishing programs to be offered to and made a part of appropriation bills, as long as the provision putatively saves money.
	Under Holman, individual House members offer amendments during full House consideration of a bill on the floor.
	As long as these amendments cut spending, they are considered proper.
	For example, The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 created a program to improve the technology infrastructure of the IRS and hire more auditors to focus on the wealthy and corporations.
	Estimates are the program will cost $80 billion over a decade.
	Proposed changes to that program and legislation that goes the normal route through many hearings might get bogged down in debate.
	But under Holman, A critic of the program could just drop a change into the must-pass part of the Appropriation Bill that contains spending for Treasury Department operation and kill or alter the program.
	No one could stop that from happening unless they chose to vote against the entire Appropriation Bill, which funds that whole Department of the Government.
	Similarly, The EPA proposes to strengthen regulation limiting the oil and gas industry's methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas.
	A house critic of the methane control program could just pop into the appropriation bill containing spending on the EPA, a whole man rule provision that either cuts the program's head salary to a dollar or terminates that program altogether.
	Historically, The whole man rule, named after Representative William S. Holman of Indiana.
	Historically, the whole man rule, named after Representative William F. Holman of Indiana, wasn't a tool of only the Republican Party.
	It was first developed in 1876 when a Democrat House majority faced a Republican president.
	I wrote about the history of the Holman Rule in my book on Congressional Practice and Procedure.
	At the time, the Democrat Party held what would later be called the Solid South.
	Today, these areas are usually Republican and sought to expel Yankee Reconstruction and repeal the laws behind it.
	Democrats adopted the Hohman Rule to get those repeals of law passed President Grant.
	The Hohman Rule could be and was put to diverse use in its early days.
	The Congressional Research Service says a broad initial construction of the rule by the House resulted in putting a great mass of general legislation upon the appropriation bills.
	The Holman Rule was used from 1876 to 1895 and again from 1911 to 1983, brought back into use by the GOP in 2017.
	and from 1911 to 1983, brought back into use by the GOP in 2017, when Democrats took over the House in 2019, they dropped it.
	In one notable attempt in 2017, House Republicans were angry about evaluation of proposed legislation by staff of the Nonpartisan Budget Analysis Division of the Congressional Budget Office.
	So, they used the Holman Rule to try to abolish that division and move its employees to another part of its parent agency, making the proposal in a wider budget allocation bill.
	Holman allowed disgruntled Republicans to rush their proposal onto the House floor instead of going through slower, more deliberative processes of examining whether the Budget Analysis Division was fulfilling its mission.
	The vote to eliminate the division failed, but significantly.
	The use at that time of the Holman rule was promoted by the same faction of the Republican Party, the Freedom Caucus, that has advocated for using the rule now.
	There are a number of situations that could lead current House Republicans to use the Holman Rule.
	First, they may need to unify their party to pass controversial appropriation bills in the face of anticipated unanimous Democrat resistance.
	Allowing the Holman Amendment to be proposed by members with extreme views may get needed legislative support from the fringe of the caucus.
	House package of provision to cut or wipe out programs and whole agencies has two effects.
	House Republicans can demoralize agency employees who do not know whether to take jobs elsewhere or stay.
	And House passing may precede passing by the whole Congress.
	An attempt by the Senate Democrat majority to kill a House-passed home and rural provision, when it considers legislation sent over from the House, would need 60 votes to move ahead.
	That would require votes from almost a dozen Republican members, which may not be possible to get.
	An appropriation bill that contains Holman provision would then go to conference.
	A temporary committee made up of House and Senate legislators formed to reconcile differences in legislation passed by both chambers.
	Senate Democrats may go along, even with objectionable Holman or other provision, to get buy-in from all the factions of the House Republican Party needed for passage of the appropriation bill in avoidance of a government shutdown.
	That seems to me to be a good move and at least a partial implementation of what Donald Trump has had in mind with regard to Schedule F. I therefore commend it.
	As appropriate, and we'll see exactly what happens here moving forward.
	Very, very significant.
	Very, very significant. very significant.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	Freedom Substance dot com.
	The number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey, everyone.
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada—take guns, impose tyranny, It's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all the marbles.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	Oh, oh, oh, oh. oh.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSix.com, The People Station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, welcome back, everybody. everybody.
	Waiting on a Jim.
	Yeah, there he is.
	Made it.
	Yeah, I know.
	I know we got it.
	We got it.
	I'd invited a guest to call in.
	Is that experience with COVID shots and all that good stuff is a personal report, but we don't have her here at the moment and it may have become impossible for her to join.
	So I'm going to continue with additional responses to what's going on here.
	EU ready to respond to placing nuclear weapons in Belarus with further sanctions.
	Belarus can still stop it.
	It is their choice.
	EU foreign policy chief points out Brussels.
	The European Union is ready to impose further sanctions if Russia deploys its tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, EU Foreign Secretary, Foreign Policy Chief Jairus of Morel said Sunday.
	Belarus hosting Russian nuclear weapons would mean an irresponsible escalation and threat to European security.
	Think about that!
	Belarus hosting Russian nuclear weapons would mean an irresponsible escalation and threat to European security.
	What about Western nations dumping all these tanks and weapons into Ukraine to oppose Russia?
	I mean, the hypocrisy of the West boggles the mind.
	Belarus can still stop it.
	It's their choice.
	The EU stands ready to respond with further sanctions.
	But bear in mind, all the sanctions they've imposed on Russia have backfired.
	They have damaged Europe.
	They have damaged the West.
	They have damaged NATO.
	They have damaged the United States.
	Russia is thriving.
	I mean, BRICS is going to rubles at an all-time high.
	There's a new development, of course, between Russia and China, because while Russia wanted to provide its natural resources to Germany, to Western Europe, to create an era of cordial relations that would have demonstrated that NATO is completely antiquated and useless, that it's no longer necessary to buy vast stocks of weapons from the United States.
	Which of course greatly upset the military-industrial complex right here in the USA, which wants to keep the gravy train rolling.
	Russia has now been forced into a situation where it's turning to China to develop stronger economic and commercial relations, which are going to be hugely beneficial to China, massively detrimental
	To Europe and where, you know, every virtually every decision, it seems to me, every decision that had been made by the West in these matters has been a bad one.
	It's been mistaken.
	It's been stupid.
	And I'm forced to conclude that there is an agenda at work here, which is manifest in the very story that The United States is not allowing Kiev to enter into any discussions or debate with Russia, because it would entail the surrender of the Donbass region and of Crimea at the minute.
	Now, I have the impression that Russia would be okay with that, that Russia would be willing to settle and stop the combat under those conditions.
	But the United States won't let it happen.
	And I'm convinced that has to be because, as Jacob Rothschild observed, Vladimir Putin is an enemy of the New World Order and the New World Order cannot move forward without Ukraine.
	Well, to hell with Ukraine then.
	To hell with Ukraine.
	I mean, everything that's going on here Seems to be the right thing.
	If I haven't shared this now, and I cannot recall that I have, among the many reasons for Russia intruding into Ukraine for the intervention, the special military operation, which Vladimir Putin outlined in a definitive way in a statement which Vladimir Putin outlined in a definitive way in a statement on the 24th of February 2022, when he launched the incursion, not only is it the case that Ukraine wanted to become a member of NATO,
	not only is it the case that Ukraine wanted to become a member of NATO, which was intolerable to Russia, as Russia had long since made clear, but it turns out there was about to be a major assault on the Donbass to wipe out the ethnically Russian-speaking, but it turns out there was about to be a major assault on the Donbass to wipe out the ethnically Russian, Russian-speaking, Russia-friendly population there, and Putin knew of the plan and intervened in a preemptive strike to prevent it from and Putin knew of the plan and intervened in a preemptive strike to prevent it from happening, which
	Millions of lives.
	I mean, it was the right thing to do.
	But in addition, we know there are, what, as many as 40 different biolabs there, including very weird stuff.
	I mean, not only to produce vaccines that were being tailored for genetically Russian population and others are trying to design a bioweapon to kill Russians specifically, But there was a lot of sex trafficking, child sex trafficking and the like.
	Get this.
	Russian soldiers discovered baby factories in Ukraine.
	Kids are grown for child sex brothels and for organ harvesting.
	I mean, this is disgusting.
	Carlo Domenico, Cristofori, Remoritz.
	A video has surfaced of Russian soldiers describing how they found a baby factory in Ukraine where young children are raised for the pedophile child brothels are murdered to harvest their organs and sell on the black market.
	The video is published by the People's Voice and mentions how other sources in Russia have covered the issue, but Western media excuses it as disinformation or propaganda.
	There are good reasons, however, to believe that this footage depicting the horrors discovered by the Moscow army in war zones is reliable.
	Primarily because it was relaunched by Brian Shavely, editor of the Catholic side Health Impact News, who has always proven to be very reliable in choosing his sources on scientific issues related to the pandemic and developed many Journalistic investigations and reports on this terrible topic.
	The nation, led by the pro-Nazi regime in Kiev, which protected the paramilitary Azov battalion with their emblematic tattoos in homage to the SS and to Sainism, with the arrival of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, made itself known
	For the LGBTQ propaganda now forbidden in Russia, in the organization of gay prides in June 2019, where even minors were being welcomed.
	This happened exactly a month after the election of the former comedian of Ashkenazi descent, Volodymyr Zelensky, as president.
	For this reason, it's very close to the Zionist lobbies which defend transgender culture, thanks to their support of the famous Jewish Masonic Lodge benign birth of Washington.
	To understand Israeli LGBTQ propaganda, We have to learn the difference between Masonic Zionism and Judaism, an extensive difficult issue where I want to bring in a speaker on exactly that topic.
	Furthermore, Ukraine is one of the main countries in the world where surrogacy is practiced, also known as womb for rent.
	Because it's easy to reach for all gay male couples in the European Union who want a child.
	You hire a woman to carry a fetus to term.
	This diabolical cultural intrigue between business speculation on children, transgenderism, and Nazism with Satanist drifts represent the ideal breeding ground For the proliferation of very serious phenomena, such as the commodification of children, both for the pedophile's sexual purposes and as resources for organ transplants.
	There's a video here of the Russian soldier reporting.
	Meanwhile, pedophilia could be described as the cultural nightmare of the third millennium.
	Why doesn't everyone agree that pedophilia is a crime against humanity?
	We know there is a cultural lobby that wants to lower the age of consent for minors.
	There are many scholars who argue that pedophilia is by birth and therefore must be respected.
	Pedophile days have been celebrated for years with these words.
	The Sicilian priest, Don Fortunato Di Noto, founder and Presidente of the Italian non-profit society, Meter, on the side of children, commented on the alarming statistics elaborated by his network for monitoring and contrasting child pornography sites.
	Thanks to his investigative activity on the Internet, also conducted in collaboration with the state police in Italy, And other police forces around the world.
	In 2019, he discovered around 7 million images and almost a million videos with acts of pedophilia on minors.
	4,006 of these videos were with infants aged zero to two years.
	I mean, how grotesque and horrific can you get?
	How come last year We denounce the trend of rape newborns, but nobody said a word.
	Why do VIPs take the field for other types of violence while no one raises their voice for the children?
	wondered the Catholic priest, denouncing the horrible cultural trend that makes a video shot in Ukraine quite worthy of belief.
	Because the videos that rape babies are not a function, but a devilish and chilling reality absolutely horrific.
	Let me say, those who know no better, who question, for example, whether child sex trafficking is taking place in the United States, go to my blog, jameshfetzer.org, and check out Jim the Conspiracy Guy, the 65 Shows, and scroll down.
	You don't have to go very far to Pizzagate.
	I mean, it's absolutely staggering what you'll discover there, including, for example, that when WikiLeaks released voluminous documents related there too.
	It included an email about how Barack Obama has spent $65,000 buying pizza and hot dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House.
	And bear in mind, when you talk about Pizza and hot dogs.
	The White House, as a matter of policy, will not accept food at the outside.
	Will not accept food from outside sources.
	So the idea is ridiculous on its face.
	Plus, if this really were pizza or hot dogs, then they'd be soggy and inedible by the time they were flown from Chicago.
	I mean, what a ridiculous idea.
	It's not as though you can't get pizza or hot dogs Elsewhere from other sources, such as right in Washington, D.C., it turns out in the language of pedo-speak, pizza is slang for little girls and hot dogs for little boys.
	So what we're learning here, and you can see it documented in my piece on Pizzagate, Barack Obama flew in little boys and little girls from Chicago for a private party at the White House using $65,000 in taxpayer money.
	Stand by.
	Well, I'm pleased to say that we have been joined by Eric of Six 3131.
	And I believe we have here my guest.
	Noella, are you here?
	No, no, yes, I think so.
	We're going to call back and see if we can get her back.
	I'm telling you, the horrors of Pizzagate are very real.
	Hello?
	Oh, are you there?
	Yes.
	Hey, great, great, great.
	I'm so pleased to have you on.
	Please give us a little sketch and background of how you got involved in all this and why you think it's so important to come forward and explain what happened in your case.
	Okay, does your audience know a little bit, or am I- No, very little, only minimally.
	Go right ahead.
	Okay, well my name is Noelle Florio, and I am a New York educator for over 20 years, with my district for about 15.
	And about June 7th, 2021, I call it the Rubicon, I wrote a letter to my superintendent invoking my constitutional rights.
	And he didn't really take kindly to that.
	And it was with regard to the mask mandate, particularly.
	And basically it was that I was respectfully declining the directive of Andrew Cuomo at the time.
	And that turned into a series of back and forth with other administration.
	In fact, the superintendent never directly responded to me from that date, which I You know, presumptuously think it was because of his oath of office that he sworn in to take.
	Um, and I basically was forced on an unpaid leave.
	There was a lot of, uh, I had tried to get a mask exemption from my physician because I have a, an underlying condition as well.
	And he wrote one for me and later was strong armed by the district to rescind it.
	That was when in August, when the mask mandates were re implemented, because here in New York.
	At the end of June 2021, they lifted them.
	And then when the kids went back to school in September 21, they reinstituted the mandate.
	So that whole story, you know, happened again for me.
	And they said, you know, you're not coming in.
	You're not allowed to come in.
	They forced me to stay at home, unpaid.
	And that's what I've been dealing with for literally the last two years.
	I'm almost, we're approaching the anniversary of it in June.
	And it's just been back and forth.
	And just to add, in order for me to return, if I should so choose, with the mask mandates lifted, they forced me to undergo what's called a 913 exam under New York State law, Section 913, and it's applicable for all educators.
	It is a law, and it's to screen whether they're mentally and or physically fit to teach children.
	And I apparently did not pass the test.
	Does that help?
	Well, well, tell me exactly what was the test testing for?
	I mean, you know, you're obviously rational.
	You're articulate.
	You know what's going on.
	I was offended by the mass mandate.
	I began research way back when.
	I mean, I've been reporting on this since, like, March of 2020.
	I've probably done 500, maybe more, reports about the pandemic, which was fake.
	It didn't cause any change in deaths.
	In any age group, but the Vax, which was real, bringing about lots of deaths.
	I published a dozen or more articles, studies about the mask mandates and how they do no good, actually do harm.
	Indeed, even Tony the Rat was involved in research on the Spanish flu in a group project and discovered that Most of the deaths weren't actually from the flu, but from bronchial pneumonia, which was promoted by wearing face masks.
	They obviously restrict the amount of oxygen you get into your blood that kills brain cells, which unlike skin cells, for example, do not regenerate.
	It puts additional strain on your cardiovascular system.
	I've had at least a dozen studies about this, including from the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, which is the leading scientific medical organization in the United States, where they were talking about six or eight different studies themselves within their article, their very comprehensive overview, explaining how
	Even in the operating room, that masks are only used to keep spittle coming from those who are working on the patient from contaminating the patient.
	And then everything we've been told about the masks is unscientific, unsound.
	I'm a part of a health clinic right here in Wisconsin that really has an excellent reputation.
	Now, I have been protesting that they had a mask requirement
	Just to go over for routine medical calls, even to a very well-known physician who became my personal physician, he's on radio all the time and the like, Zorba Pastor, and I explained to Zorba how this was completely unscientific and inappropriate, but it was a policy of the clinic, and he explained to me that I would not be able to receive medical care there unless I wore the mask.
	I find the mass offensive on all kinds of grounds.
	I mean, if you want a simple reason, you don't have to have a medical condition.
	You like to breathe.
	If you like to breathe, you ought to oppose the mask mandate.
	And you know, it's had all kinds of traumatic side effects, including little kids have been stunted in their speech development because the fact that adults and others with whom they're interacting verbally are wearing masks, they cannot see how their mouths form the words.
	And it's had a deleterious effect.
	I'm worried we may have lost a whole generation of kids to all this happy horse shit related to the mask mandate and everything else related to the fake pandemic, which appears to have a genocidal objective.
	Your thoughts?
	My thoughts are right lockstep with you.
	For me, the vaccine, the jab mandate was not even a question.
	It was completely off my radar because it was simply that I was never engaging in it.
	The masks were so much more Uh, offensive to people that I took a position on it because, you know, let's face it, they were more, they were innocuous.
	They were seemingly harmless because, oh, just, just put it on.
	What's the big deal kind of thing?
	You know, let's, you stick a needle in your arm.
	That's, that's odd.
	That's a glaring invasion, right?
	Of your privacy, of your medical, of your autonomy.
	But the masks were such a pervasive symbol of compliance, suffocation, Don't speak.
	And I struggled with it, particularly because I teach middle school children who are who are on a good day, you know, just so insecure, trying, you're trying to navigate their bodies, their minds, they're going through all of their changes.
	And it's, and it was, it was painful to me.
	I also have a little boy with special needs, who I was, it was just non negotiable.
	He was the only child in the entire school district that wasn't wearing a mask, because I would not allow it.
	To silence these children.
	It's in their developmental and the most fundamental years of their growth, right?
	So this, this, as I said, this has been going on and you know, the district had several opportunities to, to have an amicable conversation.
	I requested on several occasions, please, let's just sit down human being to human being.
	Let's just have a conversation about it.
	But instead they took this authoritarian approach of shut up.
	You fall in line and and you better that's it there's no discussing this follow the orders or get out and that and this is what I've been engaged with uh this whole time and then of course being deemed apparently suffering from psychotic features or uh it's basically Dr. Solomon who is the gentleman who I was referred to and I was forced to go to and by the way the law says you could choose a physician of your choice
	But it seems that this man was the hired hand for not only my school district, but apparently over 60 school districts on Long Island who basically, I would think, gets rid of problem teachers.
	So my thoughts on all of this with the, I did not fit the mold for a compliant, rational, sane teacher.
	I seemingly was psychotic because I disagreed With the same things that you just brought up, Jim, about wanting to breathe, wanting to be seen, wanting to communicate with humans.
	You know, I definitely articulated that you are taking away the fundamental exchange between human beings.
	You're absolutely right.
	What you're describing is a Stalinist theory.
	If you're not politically correct, you're mentally ill.
	So you're either with us or you're a candidate for an insane asylum, for a straitjacket, or for institutionalization.
	I mean, it's outrageous.
	We're about to hit the break, but I'm so glad you are here, and we'll continue our conversation right after this break.
	I appreciate it.
	Wonderful.
	Delighted you are here.
	My pleasure.
	So if I misjudge timing, let's keep going until the break comes.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Oh!
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	And we must fight back!
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio.
	Revolution Radio.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Get this, U.S.
	Department of Defense issued a contract for COVID-19 research in Ukraine three months before COVID was even known to exist.
	Just stunning stuff from the expose.
	The world first started to hear about a novel coronavirus in early January 2020, with reports of an alleged new pneumonia-like illness spreading across Wuhan, China.
	However, the world did not actually know of COVID-19 until February 2020, because it was not until the 11th of that month that the World Health Organization, the WHO, officially named the novel coronavirus COVID-19.
	So this being the official truth, why does the U.S.
	government data show the U.S.
	Department of Defense awarded a contract on the 12th of November 2019?
	To the Labyrinth Global Health Incorporated for COVID-19 research at least a month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus and three months before it was officially dubbed COVID-19.
	The shocking findings do not end there.
	The contract awarded in November 2019 for COVID research was not only instructed to take place in Ukraine, part of a much larger contract for biological threat reduction program in Ukraine, let me say, When they talk about threat reduction, it's like, you know, defensive weapons.
	This is all the opposite.
	It means to proliferate, to develop biological weapons to be used against human beings like you and me.
	Noel, pick up, please, with your story and tell us more about the situation in your state health system.
	Well, I don't think it's any mystery that New York is One of the, I believe New York and California were lockstep in terms of the lockdowns and the incentivizing the vaccines and just shutting people down and their brute force in terms of the compliance issues or lack of.
	But particularly with the educators, let me tell you something.
	I work in a district where there's 9,000 students that attend, that the staffing in terms of teachers are concerned.
	Anywhere I want to say 800 to 1000 educators and then there's also teachers assistants and what have you and I found it very troublesome that I was the only person in the district that had a problem with masking children to the extent that I was vocal enough that they thought I would be a problem to you know I wasn't a problem enough that they would that I would have maybe
	Uh, inspired people to join in, right?
	Because no, even if people even heard about what was happening, nobody seemed to join in.
	And I just found that extremely, extremely upsetting.
	And again, there were so few people, everyone that asked me what, you know, Oh, is this because of the vaccine mandate?
	And I say, no, it was the masks.
	It was any, I just don't understand.
	Why anyone would comply to begin with?
	Why any of this?
	And again, none of it makes sense.
	You start, you start digging down the rabbit hole and you start realizing, or just even if you don't dig down the rabbit hole, it didn't make sense because if it were scientifically based, then why would certain states have mandates and certain states not?
	Right?
	If it worked, if it worked in Long Island, then it should work Then it should work in Florida, it should work in California, it should work in Texas.
	Sure.
	So why did states have mandates and certain states didn't?
	Very nice point, of course.
	And the fact is it was politically driven.
	So you had Democrat-controlled states that were all in on the mandates.
	Just as the Democrats are all in on the Ukraine war.
	It used to be the Democrat Party was skeptical of government.
	It used to be the Democrat Party was strongly anti-war, but now the Democrat Party is all in on war.
	The Democrat Party is all in on stealing elections.
	The Democrat Party is all in on subverting the Constitution.
	And it seems to me, when it comes to constitutional rights, this whole COVID mandate business is a gross violation thereof.
	But the Democrats are all in.
	You know, I wouldn't, I agree with you to some extent, but I also believe that there are the entire, both sides of the bird, right?
	The red, the blue, the left, the right.
	There are players in the entire scheme of it that contributed.
	It was very difficult to discern who was on which side, and it just seemed to have come from a higher source.
	And that, again, actually, that is one of the reasons why I was I was determined, it was determined that I was psychotic because I actually used the word evil.
	The doctor asked, who do you think is behind this?
	And I said, an evil force or an evil presence that is puppeteering, right?
	And that was just my walk to my grave with that statement.
	And because I said the word evil and having a Christian faith, because I thought a lot of Christians believe in good and evil.
	And a lot of people believe that this is a spiritual war.
	And that, the way I have Dr. Bregan actually, who rebutted this entire thing, and he said, you know, think about it.
	There's a lot of people of faith that believe in good and evil.
	And why should I be persecuted?
	Or why should I be deemed psychotic because of my faith?
	And that's really what this physician did.
	Well, it's frankly absurd, unfortunately.
	I mean, there are degrees of bad in the world, and some acts are truly evil.
	It's a colloquial term.
	It has to be interpreted theologically.
	It doesn't mean the existence of a devil or demons.
	It means the existence of horrific forces that are willing, for example, to child traffic, to sexually exploit children, to encourage Pedophilia.
	I mean, those are evil.
	And to have someone in a position of psychiatric or psychological classification to condemn someone for calling out evil as evil is, in my opinion, a monstrous abuse of language and an implementation of a form of thought policing that ought to be 100% objected and rejected in the United States of America.
	I mean, what the hell have we become?
	You know, what's evil, in my opinion, is that myself, my husband, and my four children have been considered agents of disease.
	That we could not go anywhere, that everywhere, anywhere that we went, and what people don't realize, you know, this is not part of my current story, but this started out in August of 2020.
	My son, in his first year of college, got kicked out of his university.
	You know, and they apologized for it afterwards, but for not wearing a mask in his dorm room.
	So that's, you know, these are the things that kind of spiraled out of control.
	And, you know, they were very apologetic.
	And at the time, but it was one thing after another.
	And I had said enough is enough.
	But to vilify, I can take it, but that my children had to endure this branding that was catastrophic, I have to say, to what my family has endured over these last two years.
	It divided us in many ways.
	It brought us together eventually.
	But it really, it was very divisive and painful.
	Even in my own family, my parents, my sisters, you know, let it go, let it go.
	How do I put my head on my pillow at night?
	How do I let this go if I don't fight for my children now?
	How do you, I don't, I don't, I can't process that.
	Maybe some can.
	No, no, you make it such a great point.
	You're saying it brought the family together.
	Yes.
	Eventually.
	But, you know, I mean, we've had divisions in my own family.
	I've been adamantly anti-vax.
	Of course, I've been covering it and reporting on it.
	And the other members of the family tend to take for granted what they're hearing on the major news network.
	My wife is addicted to MSNBC.
	They went ahead and got the facts.
	They went ahead and got the facts without informing me because they knew I'd be adamantly opposed.
	Now, it may be we're lucky because I'm in a small village just south of Madison, Wisconsin, and it looks as though the Midwest may have been spared out of the belief that they're largely Democrat leaning.
	I do believe there's been a political motive behind all of this, in addition to the attempt to wipe out Large numbers of the world's population, but it appears that most of the deadly doses were restricted to certain specific lots that were sent primarily to red states.
	So far as I can put it together, and it may be my family fortuitously got the equivalent of a saline solution or a placebo rather than the active acts.
	People are dropping dead all over the place.
	Stu Peters has done a brilliant job.
	Died suddenly.
	Anyone who hasn't seen that video needs to check it out.
	I'll bet you have seen it before.
	I'm telling you, he's been doing a brilliant job.
	Oh, yes, absolutely.
	And even, you know, listen, I stopped watching mainstream media long ago, but Yeah, you've got to give it to Tucker, who puts a nice spin.
	I mean, listen, I don't know what the reason is that he, he must be protected from some divinity, but at least he gets, he gets the small doses out there.
	I don't know what the angle is behind all of that, but at least, at the very least, the people that are watching, and I mean, even on the other side, they are speaking a little bit about, I mean, from what I understand, I don't know, but people don't, listen, there's that cognitive dissonance where you could have people lining up showing the detriment of masking or getting a vaccine, and people would still watch people drop dead in front of them and still go ahead and line up and say, "Oh, it wouldn't happen to me." You know, that's what we've been programmed, or the majority of, right?
	Or they'll say, "Yeah, but I had a milder case of this, or maybe I lived a little longer because I got the vaccine." I'm understanding it is the instrument of their demise.
	I mean, it's incredible, as you observe the cognitive dissonance phenomenon in this case is staggering.
	Yes, it really, it truly is.
	And not easy.
	You know, listen, it's not easy.
	I've made every attempt to To have to resolve things, as I said, peacefully, to not even gloat and say, see, I told you so, because who, you know, who wants to be wrong?
	Who wants to be wrong on this one?
	Nobody.
	And, and it's, there's supposed to be a coming together.
	I mean, to this day, I said to the attorney that's working with me, if we could just somehow reach a amicable situation, I don't, I will never return to that.
	I mean, I, I had my, my doubts about public education for many years.
	Having been in it for so long and knowing how in the indoctrination that occurs there and these poor kids are doing anything but learning in these public establishments.
	So in a way, this is a huge blessing for me to kind of carve my own road and spend the rest of the time trying to figure out a better way to educate kids.
	You know, what the things that they need to learn that they don't teach in school.
	There's a great book that's out, someone over in the UK that just published it.
	I don't know if you know about John Taylor Gatto, but they took a lot of his philosophies, and that school is no place for kids.
	It really isn't.
	No, tell us about it.
	Tell us about his book.
	So I haven't read this gentleman's book, and forgive me, I listened to him on Mark Atwood.
	Mark Atwood is very vocal about this.
	He's a wonderful gentleman over in the UK.
	I think, I believe he moved to Ireland with his family because he was adamantly opposed to all of this, pulled his kids out of school, I believe.
	And, but he had a gentleman on who was inspired by John Taylor Gatto.
	And this gentleman, he was a New York City educator for, for many years.
	And he was the one that tried to bring to the attention of so many that their indoctrination They're not anywhere where kids should be learning.
	And listen, you could get a great education in New York City just by going and doing things and going on trips, but he fought so hard against the administration, they didn't want to hear it.
	And the irony is that he actually got Teacher of the Year, but I believe he was forced out at the end for being insubordinate, which I have In the charges that I'm facing, I have five counts of insubordination for not listening to directives.
	But he was eventually forced out for insubordination.
	But he supported, I think, what so many of us believe that school is just it's an indoctrination camp.
	And I couldn't handle it anymore.
	And then you add the masks on top of it.
	It was it was so It would add for lack of a better word and an evil environment that I couldn't participate in.
	Unbelievable stuff, just absolutely unbelievable and.
	You're not alone.
	I know a lot of others have been fighting this.
	Monique Lukens out in LA, for example, has been fighting the good fight against the mask mandates and the imposed vaccine requirements and all this other stuff.
	I mean, it's outrageous.
	It's a violation of international law, the Nuremberg Code, which declares, among its other very important points, that no one may be required to take an experimental vaccine without informed consent.
	We're informed consent means being given information, accurate and truthful and complete information about all the risks associated, the adverse effects it may potentially incur, which in this case include death, heart attack, stroke, brain damage, blood clots and a mass of others.
	And there cannot be other less intrusive alternatives that could deal with a problem such as ivermectin and HCQ hydroxychloroquine, both of which I've taken on numerous occasions.
	Which is why they had to demonize.
	And this whole thing, because it was an emergency use application, was approved by the CDC and the FDA without having to enumerate the ingredients.
	In other words, the way in which this was designed was diabolical.
	And if you want to ask, does the term evil apply here?
	Absolutely.
	One hundred percent.
	This was evil.
	And it's still going on.
	It is.
	And they turned many of the schools even worse.
	I mean, there's so many layers to this.
	They were turning the schools into clinics where people were going and lining up by the droves to get the vaccines to children.
	And it was all incentivized.
	You know how much money the districts got, literally billions of dollars in grant money for, I believe it was the CARES Act.
	That it was incentivizing the compliance because, not for anything, if you look at the executive order in New York, it's 202.17, I believe, the executive order for the mask mandate reads that everyone shall wear, is required to wear a mask.
	However, those that are not medically tolerant, anyone under two years old and not medically tolerant, Don't have to wear them, or it has to be in compliance with the ADA Act, the New York Human Rights Law Act, and any other, and the New York State Constitution.
	So right there, they kept saying to me, you're not obeying state law, but that was state law.
	It was just the point that if they allowed me, if they allowed one person the accommodation or the right to breathe, Then they would have to allow everyone and that was the fear.
	So the irony that they said I wasn't obeying the law.
	Well, the law read.
	If you were medically tolerant intolerant.
	Or forget about the law, how about God divine given right that you're allowed to breathe on your own volition that it shouldn't it shouldn't have anything to do with.
	The man, they lost correct.
	I don't know if you're in agreement with that.
	Sure.
	Well, they're pursuing us with a zeal and fanaticism typical of religious fanatics.
	I mean, it's unbelievable what's going on here.
	There's no science to substantiate.
	Tony Fauci is going to go down in history as the greatest mass murder of them all, because he's going to be responsible for more deaths than all of our foreign enemies combined.
	Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot.
	I mean, Fauci is going to be responsible for more deaths and all of them combined.
	It is stunning and outrageous.
	And the president administration is doing nothing about it.
	I grant you that the Warp Speed business took place under Trump, but I'm personally convinced he was played.
	I don't think Trump would have gone along with this for a second, and I'm only hoping he's going to denounce, repudiate the Vax, declare Wall Street was a huge mistake, and concede that he is contrite over having committed a colossal blunder.
	I have my fingers crossed.
	Listen, I don't know how much I take heed in any of political systems anymore.
	And I agree with you that there's a lot of being duped.
	But I also believe that, you know, what is that?
	Keep your friends close.
	Keep your enemies closer.
	And a lot of things needed to be revealed.
	And, you know, I'm sure you're very well aware of a lot of the programs.
	I'm sure we mutually watch is that you can't.
	How many times have we begged our family members?
	Don't get it.
	It has this and this.
	You eat.
	Even when you show the people, they still, again, going back to the cognitive dissonance, it just had to get that bad.
	And it's, again, diabolical that so many people lost their lives if they could have just seen it for what it was, incentivizing.
	And never in your life, right?
	Never in your life did you see Mayor de Blasio eating French fries and saying you can have free beer and French fries If you get this shot.
	I mean, I can't.
	It's absolutely astonishing to me that very well-learned people said, yeah, that's great.
	I'm going to go get a beer and some fries and go get a shot.
	It's stunning to me.
	It really is.
	Yeah.
	I couldn't agree more.
	I mean, it's lunatic.
	And that's the way they were promoting it.
	The mayor of New York coming on with like a whopper and saying get a shot and get a, you know, get a burger at the same time.
	It was absurd!
	Or a free donut or whatnot for giving your life away, for putting your life in jeopardy, for running the risk of brain damage, a stroke, a heart attack, you know, incapacitation permanently, or your total loss of life for a donut?
	And furthermore, there was no, it was evident they put the guidelines for whatever the CDC is worth, which is nothing, of course, we know.
	But they did put, and any loss of life is tragic.
	And I want to make that very clear.
	Any loss of life is tragic.
	However, for what they were promoting, you know, if a survival rate of 99% or 99.9% and practically 100% for all children.
	And in fact, there was a gentleman named Brian Ward, who he has a website, covidpenalty.com, who brings this to light that in New York, I believe specifically, there were no children that suffered fatalities from COVID in terms of there were no children that suffered fatalities from COVID in terms of the way they broke But if you couldn't get people to understand that the survival rate was that high and yet
	There was this incentivizing going on and you're not able to connect the dots and see how pervasive this whole agenda was.
	Again, I don't, I don't know what to do.
	I just know that I can't put my head on my pillow at night, uh, being complicit.
	And I said it in my writing, being complicit in one of the greatest mind control experiments in all of human history.
	And, you know, there's Vera, um, I don't have her last name, but Vera Sharaf.
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured.
	Now I find, I've changed my mind, I'll open up the doors.
	Help me if you can and I'm feeling down.
	And I do appreciate you being around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you please, please help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on the Raw Deal.
	I begin with news from Ukraine.
	It turns out the U.S.
	won't even let Ukraine consider peace talks.
	I mean, give us a break.
	Give us a break.
	With the masks off, the collective West is now eagerly showing its bestial grin, Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for the Kremlin, observes.
	Ukraine's Western backers, and the U.S.
	in particular, are doing their best to prevent Kiev from entering into any negotiations with Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.
	The official made the remarks on the sideline of talks between Russian President Putin and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, in Moscow.
	He was asked to comment on recent statements by senior Western officials who said any peace initiative for Ukraine, should it arise from the Russia-China talks, because China was especially eager to promote it, would be unacceptable.
	U.S.
	national security spokesman John Kirby, for example, claimed any ceasefire in the current situation would only ratify Russia's conquests to date rather than contribute to peace.
	As though a peace agreement didn't involve a negotiation and a compromise.
	Russia obviously is not going to surrender the territory it has taken.
	Washington European capital, but first of all, Washington is filled with a desire not to let, under any pretext, Kiev enter into peace negotiations.
	They simply do not let Kiev even think about it, Peskov said.
	Asked whether it were now normal to incite war rather than call for peace, he replied affirmatively.
	Now, when the masks are off, everyone shows off their bestial grin except for Russia and China.
	During the talks, the Russian and Chinese leaders discussing a 12-point roadmap for peace in Ukraine proposed by Beijing, where Putin lauded the initiative, expressing his readiness to discuss and build upon it.
	While also reiterating Moscow's desire to seek a diplomatic solution for the hostilities, which have now dragged on for over a year.
	We believe that many of the provisions of the peace plan put forward by China are consonant with Russian stance and can be taken as a foundation for a peaceful settlement when they are ready for it in the West and in Kiev.
	However, so far, We have not observed such readiness on their Park Butin set after the meeting.
	The Chinese president has insisted Beijing continues to maintain its position on the conflict, has urged both sides to stick to diplomacy and engage in dialogue.
	We're always for peace and dialogue, and we firmly stand on the right side of history, as I stated.
	Meanwhile, Kiev is building up forces near Erebusk Getting ready for a major battle, according to a former officer.
	Andrei Borchko said the Ukrainian servicemen who have been trained in Western boot camps are now starting to arrive in the combat area.
	By the way, that's just one more reason why, if I were Russia, I'd be very pissed off with the West.
	Moscow.
	Ukraine is building up troops and equipment there, Ariyomovsk, a town known in Ukraine as Bakhmut, suggesting Kiev is preparing a large battle in the area.
	But we know, and we reported on Bakhmut, that Russia has all but completely succeeded in taking there.
	The idea is a buildup of forces in the area where President Zelensky said they would not leave Artyomakovsk, and it backed it up with action.
	Increasing number of fresh forces being deployed there, but they're being wiped out.
	The average lifespan on the front lines for the new troops is four hours.
	Zloynsky has decided to stage a grandiose battle there.
	Perhaps he has in mind a counteroffensive was reported over Pravda.
	He also said Ukrainian servicemen who'd been trained at Western boot camps are beginning to arrive in the combat area.
	According to the Ukrainian sources, they are well trained.
	He noted that Western provided armored vehicles are already moving from Western Ukraine to the engagement line.
	No reports yet of tanks reaching the combat area.
	What is known is there are a large number of wheeled armored vehicles on the way, multiple rocket launcher systems.
	We are detecting this.
	Utanian troops do have muscle, thanks to their so-called Western partners.
	Earlier, he reported To TASS that Ukraine had significantly beased up its troops in the major settlements to the west of that area that Collins were passing through the town.
	Meanwhile, Putin says Russia will deploy nuclear weapons to Belarus.
	Russian President Vladimir Putin said Saturday Moscow will deploy tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus at the request of Minsk.
	Announcing the decision, Putin compared the move to NATO's nuclear sharing program, under which U.S.
	weapons are deployed to the territory of five Allied countries—Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Turkey.
	There is nothing unusual here either.
	First, the United States has been doing this for decades.
	They have long deployed their tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of their allied countries, Putin said.
	The Russian leader insisted that deployment would not violate Moscow's non-proliferation commitments.
	Putin also said the decision was related to the UK shipping Ukraine depleted uranium rounds for its British-made Challenger II tanks.
	Depleted uranium ammunition is radioactive, linked to cancer and birth defects, especially in Iraq, where U.S.
	forces use an enormous number of the controversial munitions.
	In response to the announcement, the U.S.
	said it hasn't seen any indication that Russia is planning to use nuclear weapons.
	White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby also said The U.S.
	hasn't seen Russia move any nuclear weapons around yet.
	Putin said the plan is for Russia to build a facility in Belarus to store the nuclear weapons, which will be completed by July 1st.
	Russia has previously provided Belarus with nuclear-capable Isklander missiles and is helping upgrade the country's warplanes so they can carry nuclear warheads.
	We have already helped our Belarusian colleagues to re-equip their planes.
	Ten planes are ready to apply this type of weapon.
	We have handed over to Belarus our well-known and very effective Isklander system that can carry nuclear weapons, Putin said.
	U.S.
	and NATO officials have remarked they don't see a reason to adjust their own nuclear posture at this point, but one way NATO could respond is by placing nuclear weapons in countries closer to Russia.
	The U.S.
	has not deployed nuclear weapons to countries east of Germany that joined NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact.
	But some Eastern European countries are willing to host nukes, including Poland.
	Finnish officials have also now ruled out the idea of hosting nuclear weapons, and Finland is posed to join NATO soon.
	Can you imagine how provocative this is from Russia?
	I mean, look, they're saying how they haven't posted Any nuclear weapons, the countries east of Germany joining NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but the number of countries east of Germany following the collapse of the Soviet Union that were supposed to join NATO was zero, zero, zero.
	Just one more indication of the gross way in which the United States and NATO have violated their most solemn agreements with Russia and the Soviet Union.
	Meanwhile, we have a report of Zelensky legalizing cyber hacking against Putin.
	Catch this.
	The Ukrainian government is working on a new law to bring one of its volunteer brigades into an official military role.
	The volunteer group in question is called the IT Army, a group of hackers that works to initiate cyber attacks against and prevent cyber attack from Russia.
	So far, this group has already claimed it was responsible for taking Russian state media websites Well, the country's president Putin was delivering the State of the Union speech recently.
	I think this means hacking, taking down Russian state media website.
	Europe has also drawn a lot of criticism, though, since it attacked some hospitals in Russia, as well as other targets that are civilian in nature.
	Surprise, surprise.
	There are a group of hacktivists ...has also recruited volunteers from other countries.
	All they need to join the cause is a smartphone or a computer with a strong internal signal.
	The new law being proposed in Ukraine would make the IT army an official part of the country's military.
	It wouldn't be the first of its kind, though.
	Countries such as Estonia and Finland each have full-scale cyber forces that augment Their country's regular military divisions.
	In some other countries, reservists who have capabilities in the cyber world are used instead of a dedicated group like Ukraine has.
	Here, there is a group called the National Coordination Center for Cyber Security, working under the National Security Defense Council for President Vladimir Zelensky.
	The secretary of the group, Natalia Chetnik, recently told Newsweek via email, the law on the creation and functioning of cyber forces within the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine should be adopted as soon as possible.
	The law would become the basis for building the state's cyber defense capabilities, engaging cyber volunteers in these activities and creating a cyber reserve.
	This reserve would be a group of cyber experts who are civilians.
	They'd be trained by Ukraine's military and the country would have the ability to mobilize a unit to help defend the country anytime there's a conflict or an increased threat in the cyber world.
	Well, that would provide more details on the law.
	It looks as though the cyber reserve effectively would absorb or replace the IT Army's volunteers entirely.
	It would essentially make the cyber group a more permanent and official branch of the military, rather than just a hodgepodge of volunteers who work on their own accord.
	Apparently, members of the IT Army are all for this new proposed law.
	The email response to the question Newsweek posed to the group saying the interest they have would indeed be represented by the new drafting process of the Ministry of Digital Transformation.
	Part of the statement read.
	We fully trust the efforts of the working group to legalize a massive fight in the cyber sector and welcome the moment when it will stop being the gray zone.
	We believe the integration of the IT Army into the Cyber Reserve will help in building a more effective defense against cyber threats.
	Meanwhile, we have a development in the United States that's potentially promising, if it can be passed, how the Holman Rule allows the House to fast-track a proposal to gut government programs without debate or much thought at all.
	The slim Republican majority in the House has just voted to give itself a streamlined way to fire civil servants and shut down federal programs it doesn't like outside the standard process of review and debate.
	This method, known as the Holman Rule, H-O-L-M-A-N, Has been used in the past by both parties to cloak political decisions in the language and process of saving taxpayer money.
	It was included in a package of approvals approved as the House began its business in January.
	As a former acting general counsel of the U.S.
	House of Representatives and author of a treatise on governmental and congressional procedure, I know, the author of this article, that this method had been used in the past to push extreme political agendas through the political process without due consideration for the public interest, and it's likely to happen again.
	Florida Republican Representative Kat Kamak spoke about the Holman Rules adaptation on the House floor in early January 2023.
	Calling federal officials unelected bureaucrats, the true real swamp creatures here in D.C., saying they had run roughshod over the American people without consequence.
	Let me comment.
	Donald Trump has addressed the problem that there's 50 to perhaps 500,000 bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.
	So it may be the smaller number that have permanent jobs or the The executive staff that are civil servants who cannot be fired and who have assumed unto themselves policy-shaping and decision-making roles, even though they're unelected, that do not reflect the will of the American people.
	Trump has talked about what he designed as Schedule F.
	As a way that would enable him to fire these people and get them out of the bureaucracy, which would be a good thing.
	So what is being addressed here by Kat McCormack, the unelected bureaucrats, the true swamp creatures, are precisely those Trump is targeting by Schedule F. This appears to be A partial implementation of what Trump had in mind would be a very good thing.
	Today marks our first move, and certainly not our last, to hold them accountable.
	Jacqueline Simone, public policy director of the American Federation of Government Employees, sees the Holman Rule differently.
	It goes around everything that protects civil service from political corruption, Not just federal employees, but entire agencies.
	It is precisely for theater and to create chaos and disrupt the operation of federal agencies, including law enforcement.
	The rule allows House members to transform the normal process of compiling appropriation bills, normally less of amounts of money to be spent, into vehicles to fire government employees and shut down programs they don't like.
	Anything is ripe for cutting with a whole man rule from environmental protection agencies to government efforts for human rights to existing programs for addressing the sales of semi-automatic weapons.
	Normally, such cuts to staff or programs would have to go through an extensive review process either to restructure or abolish programs.
	That process Includes initial drafting of a full-scale bill, subcommittee and full committee hearings and debate, testimony and evidence presented by the President's administration, press coverage of these steps and adaptation of Congress members' positions in light of that coverage.
	Then votes are held on edits to the bill, known as markups, after which there's a separate committee vote on reporting the bill out to the full House, the drafting a committee report section by supporters or opponents, and even more after that.
	But Holman sidesteps that considered process.
	It allows provision for altering or abolishing programs to be offered to and made a part of appropriation bills, as long as the provision putatively saves money.
	Under Holman, individual House members offer amendments during full House consideration of a bill on the floor.
	As long as these amendments cut spending, they are considered proper.
	For example, The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 created a program to improve the technology infrastructure of the IRS and hire more auditors to focus on the wealthy and corporations.
	Estimates are the program will cost $80 billion over a decade.
	Proposed changes to that program and legislation that goes the normal route through many hearings might get bogged down in debate.
	But under Holman, A critic of the program could just drop a change into the must-pass part of the Appropriation Bill that contains spending for Treasury Department operation and kill or alter the program.
	No one could stop that from happening unless they chose to vote against the entire Appropriation Bill, which funds that whole Department of the Government.
	Similarly, The EPA proposes to strengthen regulation limiting the oil and gas industry's methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas.
	A house critic of the methane control program could just pop into the appropriation bill, contain spending on the EPA, a whole man rule provision that either cuts the program's head salary to a dollar or terminates that program altogether.
	Historically, The whole man rule, named after Representative William S. Holman of Indiana.
	Historically, the whole man rule, named after Representative William F. Holman of Indiana, wasn't a tool of only the Republican Party.
	It was first developed in 1876 when a Democrat House majority faced a Republican president.
	I wrote about the history of the Holman Rule in my book on Congressional Practice and Procedure.
	At the time, the Democrat Party held what would later be called the Solid South.
	Today, these areas are usually Republican and sought to expel Yankee Reconstruction and repeal the laws behind it.
	Democrats adopted the Hohman Rule to get those repeals of law passed President Grant.
	The Hohman Rule could be and was put to diverse use in its early days.
	The Congressional Research Service says a broad initial construction of the rule by the House resulted in putting a great mass of general legislation upon the appropriation bills.
	The Holman Rule was used from 1876 to 1895 and again from 1911 to 1983, brought back into use by the GOP in 2017.
	and from 1911 to 1983, brought back into use by the GOP in 2017, when Democrats took over the House in 2019, they dropped it.
	In one notable attempt in 2017, House Republicans were angry about evaluation of proposed legislation by staff of the Nonpartisan Budget Analysis Division of the Congressional Budget Office.
	So they used the Holman Rule to try to abolish that division and move its employees to another part of its parent agency, making the proposal in a wider budget allocation bill.
	Holman allowed disgruntled Republicans to rush their proposal onto the House floor instead of going through slower, more deliberative processes of examining whether the Budget Analysis Division was fulfilling its mission.
	The vote to eliminate the division failed, but significantly.
	The use at that time of the Holman rule was promoted by the same faction of the Republican Party, the Freedom Caucus, that has advocated for using the rule now.
	There are a number of situations that could lead current House Republicans to use the Holman Rule.
	First, they may need to unify their party to pass controversial appropriation bills in the face of anticipated unanimous Democrat resistance.
	Allowing the Holman Amendment to be proposed by members with extreme views may get needed legislative support from the fringe of the caucus.
	House package of provision to cut or wipe out programs and whole agencies has two effects.
	House Republicans can demoralize agency employees who do not know whether to take jobs elsewhere or stay.
	And House passing may precede passing by the whole Congress.
	An attempt by the Senate Democrat majority to kill a House-passed home and rural provision, when it considers legislation sent over from the House, would need 60 votes to move ahead.
	That would require votes from almost a dozen Republican members, which may not be possible to get.
	An appropriation bill that contains Holman provision would then go to conference.
	A temporary committee made up of House and Senate legislators formed to reconcile differences in legislation passed by both chambers.
	Senate Democrats may go along, even with objectionable Holdman or other provision, to get buy-in from all the factions of the House Republican Party needed for passage of the appropriation bill in avoidance of a government shutdown.
	That seems to me to be a good move and at least a partial implementation of what Donald Trump has had in mind with regard to Schedule F. I therefore commend it.
	As appropriate, and we'll see exactly what happens here moving forward.
	Very, very significant.
	Very, very significant. very significant.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, Freedom Substance dot com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey, everyone.
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada—take guns, impose tyranny, It's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all the marbles.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSix.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Well, welcome back, everybody. everybody.
	Waiting on agenda.
	Yeah, there he is.
	He made it.
	Yeah, I know.
	I know we got it.
	We got it.
	I'd invited a guest to call in is that experience with COVID shots and all that good stuff is a personal report, but we don't have her here at the moment and it may have become impossible for her to join.
	So I'm going to continue with additional responses to what's going on here.
	EU ready to respond to placing nuclear weapons in Belarus with further sanctions.
	Belarus can still stop it.
	It is their choice.
	EU foreign policy chief points out Brussels.
	The European Union is ready to impose further sanctions if Russia deploys its tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, EU Foreign Secretary, Foreign Policy Chief Jairus of Morel said Sunday.
	Belarus hosting Russian nuclear weapons would mean an irresponsible escalation and threat to European security.
	Think about that!
	Belarus hosting Russian nuclear weapons would mean an irresponsible escalation and threat to European security.
	What about Western nations dumping all these tanks and weapons into Ukraine to oppose Russia?
	I mean, the hypocrisy of the West boggles the mind.
	Belarus can still stop it.
	It's their choice.
	The EU stands ready to respond with further sanctions.
	But bear in mind, all the sanctions they've imposed on Russia have backfired.
	They have damaged Europe.
	They have damaged the West.
	They have damaged NATO.
	They have damaged the United States.
	Russia is thriving.
	I mean, BRICS is going to rubles at an all-time high.
	There's a new development, of course, between Russia and China, because while Russia wanted to provide its natural resources to Germany, to Western Europe, to create an era of cordial relations that would have demonstrated that NATO is completely antiquated and useless, that it's no longer necessary to buy vast stocks of weapons from the United States.
	Which of course greatly upset the military-industrial complex right here in the USA, which wants to keep the gravy train rolling.
	Russia has now been forced into a situation where it's turning to China to develop stronger economic and commercial relations, which are going to be hugely beneficial to China, massively detrimental
	To Europe, where, you know, every, virtually every decision, it seems to me, every decision that had been made by the West in these matters has been a bad one.
	It's been mistaken.
	It's been stupid.
	And I'm forced to conclude that there is an agenda at work here, which is manifest in the very story that The United States is not allowing Kiev to enter into any discussions or debate with Russia, because it would entail the surrender of the Donbass region and of Crimea at the minute.
	Now, I have the impression that Russia would be okay with that, that Russia would be willing to settle and stop the combat under those conditions.
	But the United States won't let it happen.
	And I'm convinced that has to be because, as Jacob Rothschild observed, Vladimir Putin is an enemy of the New World Order and the New World Order cannot move forward without Ukraine.
	Well, to hell with Ukraine then.
	To hell with Ukraine.
	I mean, everything that's going on here Seems to be the right thing.
	If I haven't shared this now, and I cannot recall that I have, among the many reasons for Russia intruding into Ukraine for the intervention, the special military operation, which Vladimir Putin outlined in a definitive way in a statement on the 24th of February 2022, when he launched the incursion
	Not only is it the case that Ukraine wanted to become a member of NATO, which was intolerable to Russia, as Russia had long since made clear, but it turns out there was about to be a major assault on the Donbass to wipe out the ethnically Russian, Russian-speaking, Russia-friendly population there, and Putin knew of the plan and intervened in a preemptive strike to prevent it from happening, which no doubt saved
	Millions of lives.
	I mean, it was the right thing to do.
	But in addition, we know there are, what, as many as 40 different biolabs there, including very weird stuff.
	I mean, not only to produce vaccines that were being tailored for genetically Russian population and others are trying to design a bioweapon to kill Russians specifically, But there was a lot of sex trafficking, child sex trafficking and the like.
	Get this.
	Russian soldiers discovered baby factories in Ukraine.
	Kids are grown for child sex brothels and for organ harvesting.
	I mean, this is disgusting.
	Carlo Domenico, Cristofori, Remoritz.
	A video has surfaced of Russian soldiers describing how they found a baby factory in Ukraine where young children are raised for the pedophile child brothels are murdered to harvest their organs and sell on the black market.
	The video is published by the People's Voice and mentions how other sources in Russia have covered the issue, but Western media excuses it as disinformation or propaganda.
	There are good reasons, however, to believe that this footage depicting the horrors discovered by the Moscow army in war zones is reliable.
	Primarily because it was relaunched by Brian Shavely, editor of the Catholic side Health Impact News, who has always proven to be very reliable in choosing his sources on scientific issues related to the pandemic and developed many Journalistic investigations and reports on this terrible topic.
	The nation, led by the pro-Nazi regime in Kiev, which protected the paramilitary Azov battalion with their emblematic tattoos in homage to the SS and to Sainism, with the arrival of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, made itself known
	For the LGBTQ propaganda now forbidden in Russia, in the organization of gay prides in June 2019, where even minors were being welcomed.
	This happened exactly a month after the election of the former comedian of Ashkenazi descent, Volodymyr Zelensky, as president.
	For this reason, it's very close to the Zionist lobbies which defend transgender culture, thanks to their support of the famous Jewish Masonic Lodge benign birth of Washington.
	To understand Israeli LGBTQ propaganda, We have to learn the difference between Masonic Zionism and Judaism, an extensive difficult issue where I want to bring in a speaker on exactly that topic.
	Furthermore, Ukraine is one of the main countries in the world where surrogacy is practiced, also known as womb for rent, because it's easy to reach for all gay male couples in the European Union who want a child.
	Hire a woman to carry a fetus to term.
	This diabolical cultural intrigue between business speculation on children, transgenderism, and Nazism with Satanist drifts represent the ideal breeding ground for the proliferation of very serious phenomena such as the commodification of children.
	Both for the pedophile's sexual purposes and as resources for organ transplants.
	There's a video here of the Russian soldier reporting.
	Meanwhile, pedophilia could be described as the cultural nightmare of the third millennium.
	Why doesn't everyone agree that pedophilia is a crime against humanity?
	We know there is a cultural lobby that wants to lower the age of consent for minors There are many scholars who argue that pedophilia is by birth and therefore must be respected.
	Pedophile days have been celebrated for years.
	With these words, the Sicilian priest Don Fortunato Di Noto, founder and Presidente of the Italian Non-Profit Society, meet her on the side of children.
	Commented on the alarming statistics elaborated by his network for monitoring and contrasting child pornography sites.
	Thanks to his investigative activity on the Internet, also conducted in collaboration with the state police in Italy and other police forces around the world.
	In 2019, he discovered around 7 million images and almost a million videos with acts of pedophilia on minors.
	4,006 of these videos were with infants aged zero to two years.
	I mean, how grotesque and horrific can you get?
	How come last year we denounced the trend of rape newborns, but nobody said a word?
	Why do VIPs take the field for other types of violence while no one raises their voice for the children?
	Wondered the Catholic priest, denouncing the horrible cultural trend that makes a video shot in Ukraine quite worthy of belief.
	Because the videos that rape babies are not a function, but a devilish and chilling reality absolutely horrific.
	Let me say, those who know no better who question, for example, whether Child sex trafficking is taking place in the United States.
	Go to my blog, jameshfetzer.org, and check out Jim the Conspiracy Guy, the 65 Shows, and scroll down.
	You don't have to go very far to Pizzagate.
	I mean, it's absolutely staggering what you'll discover there, including, for example, that when WikiLeaks released voluminous documents Related there too, it included an email about how Barack Obama has spent $65,000 buying pizza and hot dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House.
	And bear in mind, when you talk about pizza and hot dogs, the White House, as a matter of policy, will not accept food at the outside.
	Will not accept food from outside sources, so the idea is ridiculous on its face.
	Plus, if this really were pizza or hot dogs and they'd be soggy and inedible by the time they were flown from Chicago.
	I mean, what a ridiculous idea.
	It's not as though you can't get pizza or hot dogs.
	Elsewhere from other sources, such as right in Washington DC.
	It turns out in the language of pedo speak.
	Pizza is slang for little girls and hot dogs for little boys.
	So what we're learning here, and you can see it documented in my piece on Pizzagate, Barack Obama flew in little boys and little girls from Chicago for a private party at the White House using $65,000 in taxpayer money.
	$20,000 in taxpayer money.
	Stand by.
	Well, I'm pleased to say that we have been joined by area code I'm pleased to say that we have been joined by area And I believe we have here my guest.
	Noella, are you here?
	No, no.
	Yes, I think so.
	We're gonna call back and see if we can get her back.
	I'm telling you, the horrors of Pizzagate are very real.
	The Democratic Party has played.
	Oh, are you there?
	Yes.
	Hey, great, great, great.
	I'm so pleased.
	I'm so pleased to have you on.
	Please give us a little sketch and background of how you got involved in all this and why you think it's so important to come forward and explain what happened in your case.
	Okay, does your audience know a little bit or am I?
	Very little, only minimally.
	Go right ahead.
	Okay.
	Well, my name is Noelle Florio and I am a New York educator for over 20 years with my district for about 15.
	And about June 7th, 2021, I call it the Rubicon, I wrote a letter to my superintendent invoking my constitutional rights.
	And he didn't really take kindly to that.
	And it was with regard to the mask mandate, particularly.
	And basically it was that I was respectfully declining the directive of Andrew Cuomo at the time.
	And that turned into a series of back and forth with other administration.
	In fact, the superintendent never directly responded to me from that date, which I You know, presumptuously think it was because of his oath of office that he's sworn in to take.
	Um, and I basically was forced on an unpaid leave.
	There was a lot of, uh, I had tried to get a mask exemption from my physician because I have a, an underlying condition as well.
	And he wrote one for me and later was strong armed by the district to rescind it.
	That was when in August, when the mask mandates were re implemented, because here in New York.
	At the end of June 2021, they lifted them.
	And then when the kids went back to school in September 21, they reinstituted the mandate.
	So that whole story, you know, happened again for me.
	And they said, you know, you're not coming in.
	You're not allowed to come in.
	They forced me to stay at home, unpaid.
	And that's what I've been dealing with for literally the last two years.
	I'm almost, we're approaching the anniversary of it in June.
	And it's just been back and forth.
	And just to add, in order for me to return, if I should so choose, with the mask mandates lifted, they forced me to undergo what's called a 913 exam under New York State law, Section 913, and it's applicable for all educators.
	It is a law, and it's to screen whether they're mentally and or physically fit to teach children.
	And I apparently did not pass the test.
	Does that help?
	Well, well, tell me exactly what was the test testing for?
	I mean, you know, you're obviously rational.
	You're articulate.
	You know what's going on.
	I was offended by the mass mandate.
	I began research way back when.
	I mean, I've been reporting on this since like March of 2020.
	I've probably done 500, maybe more reports about the pandemic, which was fake.
	It didn't cause any change in deaths.
	In any age group, but the Vax, which was real, bringing about lots of deaths.
	I published a dozen or more articles, studies about the mask mandates and how they do no good, actually do harm.
	Indeed, even Tony the Rat was involved in research on the Spanish flu in a group project and discovered that Most of the deaths weren't actually from the flu, but from bronchial pneumonia, which was promoted by wearing face masks.
	They obviously restrict the amount of oxygen you get into your blood that kills brain cells, which unlike skin cells, for example, do not regenerate.
	What's additional strain on your cardiovascular system?
	I've had, oh, I'd say at least a dozen studies about this, including from the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, which is the leading scientific medical organization in the United States, where they were talking about six or eight different studies themselves within their article, their very comprehensive overview, explaining how
	Even in the operating room, that masks are only used to keep spittle coming from those who are working on the patient from contaminating the patient, and that everything we've been told about the masks is unscientific, unsound.
	I'm a part of a health clinic right here in Wisconsin that really has an excellent reputation, and I have been protesting that they had a mask requirement
	Just to go over for routine medical calls, even to a very well-known physician who became my personal physician, he's on radio all the time and the like, Zorba Pastor, and I explained to Zorba how this was completely unscientific and inappropriate, but it was a policy of the clinic, and he explained to me that I would not be able to receive medical care there unless I wore the mask.
	I find the mass offensive on all kinds of grounds.
	I mean, if you want a simple reason, you don't have to have a medical condition.
	You like to breathe.
	If you like to breathe, you ought to impose a mask mandate.
	And you know, it's had all kinds of traumatic side effects, including little kids have been stunted in their speech development because the fact that adults and others with whom they're interacting verbally are wearing masks, they cannot see how their mouths form the words.
	And it's had a deleterious effect.
	I'm worried we may have lost a whole generation of kids to all this happy horse shit related to the mask mandate and everything else related to the fake pandemic, which appears to have a genocidal objective.
	Your thoughts?
	My thoughts are right lockstep with you.
	For me, the vaccine, the jab mandate was not even a question.
	It was completely off my radar because it was simply that I was never engaging in it.
	The masks were so much more offensive to people that I took a position on it because, you know, let's face it, they were more innocuous.
	They were seemingly harmless because, oh, just put it on.
	What's the big deal kind of thing?
	You know, let's you stick a needle in your arm.
	That's a glaring invasion, right, of your privacy, of your medical, of your autonomy.
	But the masks were such a pervasive symbol of compliance, suffocation, don't speak, etc.
	And I struggled with it, particularly because I teach middle school children who are, who are on a good day, you know, just so insecure, trying, you're trying to navigate their bodies, their minds, they're going through all of their changes.
	And it, and it was, it was painful to me.
	I also have a little boy with special needs who I was, it was just non-negotiable.
	He was the only child in the entire school district that wasn't wearing a mask because I would not allow it to silence these children.
	It's in their developmental, in the most fundamental years of their growth, right?
	So this, as I said, this has been going on.
	And, you know, the district had several opportunities to have an amicable conversation.
	I requested on several occasions, please, let's just sit down.
	Human being to human being.
	Let's just have a conversation about it.
	But instead, they took this authoritarian approach of shut up, fall in line, and you better, that's it.
	There's no discussing this.
	Follow the orders or get out.
	And this is what I've been engaged with this whole time.
	And then, of course, being deemed apparently suffering from psychotic features or basically Dr. Solomon, who is a gentleman, who I was referred to.
	And I was forced to go to.
	And by the way, the law says you could choose a physician of your choice.
	But it seems that this man was the hired hand for not only my school district, but apparently over 60 school districts on Long Island who basically, I would think, gets rid of problem teachers.
	So my thoughts on all of this with the, I did not fit the mold for a compliant, rational, sane teacher.
	I seemingly was psychotic because I disagreed With the same things that you just brought up, Jim, about wanting to breathe, wanting to be seen, wanting to communicate with humans.
	You know, I definitely articulated that you are taking away the fundamental exchange between human beings.
	You're absolutely right.
	What you're describing is a Stalinist theory.
	If you're not politically correct, you're mentally ill.
	So you're either with us or you're a candidate for an insane asylum, for a straitjacket, or for institutionalization.
	I mean, it's outrageous.
	We're about to hit the break, but I'm so glad you are here, and we'll continue our conversation right after this break.
	I appreciate it.
	Wonderful.
	Delighted you are here.
	My pleasure.
	So if I misjudge timing, let's keep going until the break comes.
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Go!
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	and we must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb us Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	City.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio.
	Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. Radio. It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. OTT every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m.
	Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Get this.
	Department of Defense issued a contract for COVID-19 research in Ukraine three months before COVID was even known to exist.
	Just stunning stuff from the expose.
	The world first started to hear about a novel coronavirus in early January 2020, with reports of an alleged new pneumonia-like illness spreading across Wuhan, China.
	However, the world did not actually know of COVID-19 until February 2020, because it was not until the 11th of that month that the World Health Organization, the WHO, officially named the novel coronavirus COVID-19.
	So this being the official truth, why does the U.S.
	government data show the U.S.
	Department of Defense awarded a contract on the 12th of November 2019?
	To the labyrinth Global Health Incorporated, where COVID-19 research at least a month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus and three months before it was officially dubbed COVID-19.
	The shocking findings do not end there.
	The contract awarded in November 2019 for COVID research was not only instructed to take place in Ukraine, part of a much larger contract for biological threat reduction program in Ukraine.
	Let me say, When they talk about threat reduction, it's like, you know, defensive weapons.
	This is all the opposite.
	It means to proliferate, to develop biological weapons to be used against human beings like you and me.
	Noel, pick up, please, with your story and tell us more about the situation in your state health system.
	Well, I don't think it's any mystery that New York is One of the, I believe New York and California were lockstep in terms of the lockdowns and the incentivizing the vaccines and just shutting people down and their brute force in terms of the compliance issues or lack of.
	But particularly with the educators, let me tell you something.
	I work in a district where there's 9,000 students that attend that the staffing in terms of teachers are concerned.
	Anywhere I want to say 800 to 1000 educators and then there's also teachers assistants and what have you and I found it very troublesome that I was the only person in the district that had a problem with masking children to the extent that I was vocal enough that they thought I would be a problem to you know I wasn't a problem enough that they would that I would have maybe
	Uh, inspired people to join in, right?
	Because no, even if people even heard about what was happening, nobody seemed to join in.
	And I just found that extremely, extremely upsetting.
	And again, there were so few people, everyone that asked me what, you know, Oh, is this because of the vaccine mandate?
	And I say, no, it was the masks.
	It was any, I just don't understand.
	Why anyone would comply to begin with?
	Why any of this happened?
	And again, none of it makes sense.
	You start digging down the rabbit hole and you start realizing, or just even if you don't dig down the rabbit hole, it didn't make sense because if it were scientifically based, then why would certain states have mandates and certain states not?
	Right?
	If it worked, if it worked in Long Island, then it should work Then it should work in Florida, it should work in California, it should work in Texas.
	Sure.
	So why did states have mandates and certain states didn't?
	Very nice point, of course.
	And the fact is it was politically driven.
	So you had Democrat-controlled states that were all in on the mandates.
	Just as the Democrats are all in on the Ukraine war.
	It used to be the Democrat Party was skeptical of government.
	It used to be the Democrat Party was strongly anti-war, but now the Democrat Party is all in on war.
	The Democrat Party is all in on stealing elections.
	The Democrat Party is all in on subverting the Constitution.
	And it seems to me, when it comes to constitutional rights, this whole COVID mandate business is a gross violation thereof.
	But the Democrats are all in.
	You know, I wouldn't, I agree with you to some extent, but I also believe that there are the entire, both sides of the bird, right?
	The red, the blue, the left, the right.
	There are players in the entire scheme of it that contributed.
	It was very difficult to discern who was on which side.
	And it just seemed to have come from a higher source.
	And that, again, actually, that is one of the reasons why I was I was determined, it was determined that I was psychotic because I actually used the word evil.
	The doctor asked, who do you think is behind this?
	And I said, an evil force or an evil presence that is puppeteering, right?
	And that was just my walk to my grave with that statement.
	And because I said the word evil and having a Christian faith, because I thought a lot of Christians believe in good and evil.
	And a lot of people believe that this is a spiritual war.
	And that, the way I have Dr. Bregan actually, who rebutted this entire thing, and he said, you know, think about it.
	There's a lot of people of faith that believe in good and evil.
	And why should I be persecuted?
	Or why should I be deemed psychotic because of my faith?
	And that's really what this physician did.
	Well, it's frankly absurd, right?
	I mean, there are degrees of bad in the world, and some acts are truly evil.
	It's a colloquial term.
	It has to be interpreted theologically.
	It doesn't mean the existence of a devil or demons.
	It means the existence of horrific forces that are willing, for example, to child traffic, to sexually exploit children, to encourage Pedophilia.
	I mean, those are evil.
	And to have someone in a position of psychiatric or psychological classification to condemn someone for calling out evil as evil is, in my opinion, a monstrous abuse of language and an implementation of a form of thought policing that ought to be 100% objected and rejected in the United States of America.
	I mean, what the hell have we become?
	You know, what's evil, in my opinion, is that myself, my husband, and my four children have been considered agents of disease.
	That we could not go anywhere, that everywhere, anywhere that we went, and what people don't realize, you know, this is not part of my current story, but this started out in August of 2020.
	My son, in his first year of college, got kicked out of his university.
	You know, and they apologized for it afterwards, but for not wearing a mask in his dorm room.
	So that's, you know, these are the things that kind of spiraled out of control.
	And, you know, they were very apologetic.
	And at the time, but it was one thing after another.
	And I had said enough is enough.
	But to vilify, I can take it, but that my children had to endure this branding that was catastrophic, I have to say, to what my family has endured over these last two years.
	It divided us in many ways.
	It brought us together eventually.
	But it really, it was very divisive and painful.
	Even in my own family, my parents, my sisters, you know, let it go, let it go.
	How do I put my head on my pillow at night?
	How do I let this go if I don't fight for my children now?
	How do you, I don't, I don't, I can't process that.
	Maybe some can.
	No, no, you make it such a great point.
	You're saying it brought the family together.
	Yes.
	Eventually.
	But, you know, I mean, we've had divisions in my own family.
	I've been adamantly anti-vax.
	Of course, I've been covering it and reporting on it.
	And the other members of the family tend to take for granted what they're hearing on the major news network.
	My wife is addicted to MSNBC.
	They went ahead and got the facts.
	They went ahead and got the facts without informing me because they knew I'd be adamantly opposed.
	Now, it may be we're lucky because I'm in a small village just south of Madison, Wisconsin, and it looks as though the Midwest may have been spared out of the belief that they're largely Democrat leaning.
	I do believe there's been a political motive behind all of this, in addition to the attempt to wipe out Large numbers of the world's population, but it appears that most of the deadly doses were restricted to certain specific lots that were sent primarily to red states.
	So far as I can put it together, and it may be my family fortuitously got the equivalent of a saline solution or a placebo rather than the active acts.
	People are dropping dead all over the place.
	Stu Peters has done a brilliant job.
	Suddenly, anyone who hasn't seen that video needs to check it out.
	I'll bet you have seen it before.
	I'm telling you, he's been doing a brilliant job.
	Oh yes, absolutely.
	Listen, I stopped watching mainstream media long ago.
	Yeah.
	You've got to give it to Tucker who puts a nice spin.
	I mean, listen, I don't know what the reason is that he's, he must be protected from some divinity, but at least he gets, he gets the small doses out there.
	I don't know what the angle is behind all of that, but at least, at the very least the people that are watching.
	And I mean, even on the other side, they are speaking a little bit about, I mean, I, from what I understand, I don't know, but people don't listen.
	There's that cognitive dissonance where you could have people lining up.
	showing the detriment of masking or getting a vaccine and people would still watch people drop dead in front of them and still go ahead and line up and say, oh, it wouldn't happen to me.
	That's what we've been programmed or the majority of.
	Right?
	Or they'll say, yeah, but I had a milder case of this or maybe I lived a little longer because I'm understanding it is the instrument of their demise.
	I mean, it's incredible, as you observe the cognitive dissonance phenomenon in this case is staggering.
	Yes, it really, it truly is.
	And not easy.
	Listen, it's not easy.
	I've made every attempt to To have to resolve things, as I said, peacefully, to not even gloat and say, see, I told you so, because who, you know, who wants to be wrong?
	Who wants to be wrong on this one?
	Nobody.
	And, and it's, there's supposed to be a coming together.
	I mean, to this day, I said to the attorney that's working with me, if we could just somehow reach a amicable situation, I don't, I will never return to that.
	I mean, I, I had my, my doubts about public education for many years.
	Having been in it for so long and knowing how in the indoctrination that occurs there and these poor kids are doing anything but learning in these public establishments.
	So in a way, this is a huge blessing for me to kind of carve my own road and spend the rest of the time trying to figure out a better way to educate kids.
	You know, what the things that they need to learn that they don't teach in school.
	There's a great book that's out, someone over in the UK that just published it.
	I don't know if you know about John Taylor Gatto, but they took a lot of his philosophies, and that school is no place for kids.
	It really isn't.
	No, tell us about it.
	Tell us about his book.
	So I haven't read this gentleman's book, and forgive me, I listened to him on Mark Atwood.
	Mark Atwood is very vocal about this.
	He's a wonderful gentleman over in the UK.
	I think, I believe he moved to Ireland with his family because he was adamantly opposed to all of this, pulled his kids out of school, I believe.
	And, but he had a gentleman on who was inspired by John Taylor Gatto.
	And this gentleman, he was a New York City educator for, for many years.
	And he was the one that tried to bring to the attention of so many that their indoctrination They're not anywhere where kids should be learning.
	And listen, you could get a great education in New York City just by going and doing things and going on trips, but he fought so hard against the administration, they didn't want to hear it.
	And the irony is that he actually got Teacher of the Year, but I believe he was forced out at the end for being insubordinate, which I have In the charges that I'm facing, I have five counts of insubordination for not listening to directives.
	But he was eventually forced out for insubordination.
	But he supported, I think, what so many of us believe that school is just it's an indoctrination camp.
	And I couldn't handle it anymore.
	And then you add the masks on top of it.
	It was it was so Yeah, unbelievable stuff.
	Just absolutely unbelievable and.
	You're not alone.
	that I couldn't participate in. - Yeah, unbelievable stuff.
	Just absolutely unbelievable.
	And you're not alone.
	I know a lot of others have been fighting this.
	Monique Lukens out in LA, for example, has been fighting the good fight against the mask mandates and the imposed vaccine requirements and all this other stuff.
	I mean, it's outrageous.
	It's a violation of international law, the Nuremberg Code, which declares, among its other very important points, that no one may be required to take an experimental vaccine without informed consent.
	We're informed consent means being given information, accurate and truthful and complete information about all the risks associated the adverse effects it may potentially incur, which in this case include death, heart attack, stroke, brain damage, blood clots, and a mass of others.
	And there cannot be other less intrusive alternatives that could deal with a problem such as ivermectin and HCQ hydroxychloroquine, both of which I've taken on numerous occasions.
	Which is why they had to demonize.
	And this whole thing, because it was an emergency use application, was approved by the CDC and the FDA without having to enumerate the ingredients.
	In other words, the way in which this was designed was diabolical.
	And if you want to ask, does the term evil apply here?
	Absolutely.
	One hundred percent.
	This was evil.
	And it's still going on.
	It is.
	And they turned many of the schools even worse.
	I mean, there's so many layers to this.
	They were turning the schools into clinics where people were going and lining up by the droves to get the vaccines to children.
	And it was all incentivized.
	You know how much money the districts got, literally billions of dollars in grant money for, I believe it was the CARES Act.
	That it was incentivizing the compliance, because not for anything.
	If you look at the executive order in New York, it's 202.17, I believe.
	The executive order for the mask mandate reads that everyone shall wear, is required to wear a mask.
	However, those that are not medically tolerant, anyone under two years old and not medically tolerant, Don't have to wear them, or it has to be in compliance with the ADA Act, the New York Human Rights Law Act, and any other, and the New York State Constitution.
	So right there, they kept saying to me, you're not obeying state law, but that was state law.
	It was just the point that if they allowed me, if they allowed one person the accommodation or the right to breathe, Then they would have to allow everyone, and that was the fear.
	So the irony that they said, I wasn't obeying the law.
	Well, the law read.
	If you were medically tolerant intolerant.
	Or forget about the law, how about God divine given right that you're allowed to breathe on your own volition that it shouldn't it shouldn't have anything to do with.
	The man, they lost correct I don't know if you're in agreement with that.
	Sure.
	Well, they're pursuing us with a zeal and fanaticism typical of religious fanatics.
	I mean, it's unbelievable what's going on here.
	There's no science to substantiate.
	Tony Fauci is going to go down in history as the greatest mass murder of them all, because he's going to be responsible for more deaths than all of our foreign enemies combined.
	Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot.
	I mean, Fauci is going to be responsible for more deaths than all of them combined.
	It is stunning and outrageous.
	And the president administration is doing nothing about it.
	I grant you that the Warp Speed business took place under Trump, but I'm personally convinced he was played.
	I don't think Trump would have gone along with this for a second, and I'm only hoping he's going to denounce, repudiate the Vax, declare Wall Street was a huge mistake, and concede that he is contrite over having committed a colossal blunder.
	I have my fingers crossed.
	Listen, I don't know how much I take heed in any of political systems anymore.
	And I agree with you that there's a lot of being duped.
	But I also believe that, you know, what is that?
	Keep your friends close.
	Keep your enemies closer.
	And a lot of things needed to be revealed.
	And, you know, I'm sure you're very well aware of a lot of the programs.
	I'm sure we mutually watch is that you can't.
	How many times have we begged our family members?
	Don't get it.
	It has this and this.
	you, it, Even when you show the people, they still, again, going back to the cognitive dissonance, it just had to get that bad.
	And it's, again, diabolical that so many people lost their lives if they could have just seen it for what it was, incentivizing.
	And never in your life, right?
	Never in your life did you see Mayor de Blasio eating French fries and saying you can have free beer and French fries If you get this shot.
	I mean, I can't, it's absolutely astonishing to me that very well-learned people said, yeah, that's great, I'm gonna go get a beer and some fries and go get a shot.
	It's stunning to me, it really is.
	Yeah, I couldn't agree more.
	I mean, it's lunatic!
	And that's the way they were promoting it, you know?
	The mayor of New York coming on with like a whopper and saying get a shot and get a, you know, get a burger at the same time.
	It was absurd!
	Or a free donut or whatnot for giving your life away, for putting your life in jeopardy, for running the risk of brain damage, a stroke, a heart attack, you know, incapacitation permanently, or your total loss of life for a donut?
	And furthermore, there was no, it was evident they put the guidelines for whatever the CDC is worth, which is nothing, of course, we know.
	But they did put, and any loss of life is tragic.
	And I want to make that very clear.
	Any loss of life is tragic.
	However, for what they were promoting, you know, if a survival rate of 99% or 99.9% and practically 100% for all children.
	And in fact, there was a gentleman named Brian Ward, who he has a website, covidpenalty.com, who brings this to light that in New York, I believe specifically, there were no children that suffered fatalities from COVID in terms of there were no children that suffered fatalities from COVID in terms of the way they broke But if you couldn't get people to understand that the survival rate was that high and yet
	There was this incentivizing going on and you're not able to connect the dots and see how pervasive this whole agenda was.
	Again, I don't, I don't know what to do.
	I just know that I can't put my head on my pillow at night being complicit.
	And I said it in my writing, being complicit in one of the greatest mind control experiments in all of human history.

▲