Need to Know News (24 March 2023) with Brian Davidson and Chris Weinert
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Mass in Wisconsin, joined today by Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas, and Chris Weinhart in Fort Myer, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Ukrainian military getting special targeting from CIA satellites, which was the U.S.
right in the middle of the war.
I do not think this is going to go down well with Vladimir Putin.
Soldiers of Ukraine's 4th Special Op Group were using satellite data provided by CIA to choose targets when conducting road strikes against Russian forces, the unit's commander told the Times.
The 27-man group, formerly a police special op unit, functions independently from the Ukrainian army, works in close collaboration with the country's military intelligence.
The commander, whose name is also Thor, claims he uses a special app on a tablet synced to the CIA satellite to select targets.
We select targets in a program that can be placed on a boat by sea ice satellite in our own, which our volunteers pay for.
Information is collected from all kinds of sources there.
We choose and we arrive and conduct our own reconnaissance.
Another member told The Times SORSA also uses drones to maim rather than kill Russian servicemen.
These ones are to wound the Russians.
Naming a 3D-printed drone with mining explosives.
Take an arm or a leg, he'll be a burden on the state forever.
According to the Times, all members are veterans of Ukraine's 2014 military op against the anti-Kiev rebels in the Donbass Republics, who weren't really anti-Kiev rebels.
They were simply pro-Russian, ethnically Russian, spoke Russian.
Characterizing them as anti-Kiev rebels is pure propaganda.
Moscow has long accused the U.S.
and its allies of being directly involved, essentially waging a proxy war against Russia.
This is not going to reduce the strength of those beliefs.
Meanwhile, NATO is preparing the Ukrainian army for a counter-offensive The situation in the Zaporozhye region has sharply escalated.
A major offensive aimed at smashing the Russian grouping in the Donbass and advancing toward the Sea of Azov is expected in the coming weeks.
Good luck!
On March 19th, Ukrainian forces launched combat reconnaissance.
They attacked Russian positions.
Ukrainian comms was quickly detected by Russian drones, shelled by artillery, and struck with ATGMs.
On the same day, Ukrainian forces struck Russian position near Cherniv, but did not come to a direct clash.
Another attempted offensive took place to the east of Gaia Pole on March 15.
Despite the losses, the Ukrainian military continues combat reconnaissance operation to identify soft spots in the Russian defense.
Good luck with that!
Preparing for a large-scale offensive, A large Ukrainian group is concentrating near the Zaburaya Front.
The main strike force is up to 50,000 servicemen, up to 1,000 military vehicles.
Meanwhile, columns of NATO heavy equipment are approaching the front lines.
Many claim to be earmarked for the offensive in the southern Donbass region.
German Leopard tanks are also expected to be deployed.
The main offensive operation is to begin in the second half of April, when the weather will allow heavy equipment to move easily across the field.
The main strike is likely to hit the bridgehead near the towns of Poligri and Tokmak.
Control of them would pave the way to Berdyumets and Melitopol.
In the case of success, which ain't gonna happen, Ukrainian military would reach the Sea of Azov, cutting the Russians Off from Donbass.
I think all this is highly improbable, but it may require Russia to use some weapons it hasn't used.
I don't mean tactical nukes.
I'm talking about possibly thermobaric or what have you.
Brian, your thoughts?
Oh man, there's so much going on in that region right now, according to all the reports.
I'm beginning to rethink it.
The proxy war is just... it appears to...
Too in your face right now.
I mean, look, you have the Nord Stream Pipeline situation that has blown up on the Americans internationally.
Seymour Hersh just made new claims that now the CIA is ordering foreign publications to run fake stories to try to obfuscate their involvement in the situation.
You have the US drone being hit by, in theory, or at least that's what the story, being hit by the Russian fighter jet.
Although I didn't think the video really added up.
You've got Russia terrorizing all over Ukraine, taking it down.
You've got multiple reports all over the place of fake Putin, and this isn't the real Putin, and this is a doppelganger, and this is that, and that is this.
It is so foggy to try to analyze the entire nature of the situation, but if you were to rely on these reports and put a lot of weight on them, then it looks like the proxy war has become a full-on NATO-involved operation, and it's no longer just a proxy war.
Look, we're talking about cluster munitions going to Ukraine.
You've got Putin retaliating and saying, we're going to absolutely blow the hell out of you if NATO gives them the weapons.
You've got more and more fronts, more and more international incidents, including what's going on in Turkey.
You've got everything developing in France.
There's so much going on.
It feels to me like there's two giants that are in battle, and one being NATO and one being Russia, China, now being joined by Brazil and India and many of the other countries that are in the Brexit movement.
I have a feeling that the New World Order is under pressure of being threatened.
And I hope that's the case, but in a mixed bag like this, what are you going to get at the very end?
I have no idea.
It's foggy to me.
Chris.
Chris.
Chris is frozen up.
He'll figure it out.
He'll get it back to us, and we'll have him pick up from there.
Meanwhile, Mike King reports.
The slow death of NATO continues.
He's responding to articles in the New York Times by means of the anti-New York Times.
Here we have NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg presenting their annual report in Brussels.
New York Times.
NATO members not meeting their military spending targets.
Anti-New York Times.
NATO coming up short on its vending targets in spite of a war going on in eastern Ukraine is just another indication that the New World Order is dying a slow death.
From the article.
Only 7 of the 30 member nations of NATO are meeting the Alliance's target of spending 2% of their GDP on the military, NATO said.
Now would be a good teachable moment to review how NATO was formed and what its true functions were.
Among the religious devotees and dupes of New World Order globalism, NATO ranks right up there with the UN, the WHO, the EU, the World Bank, and the IMF as indispensable institutions of global civility.
The truth is, from its inception in 1949 to now, NATO, a wholly owned subsidiary of the CIA, itself founded just two years prior, has always been a destabilizing, war-making organization in service to the globalists.
The origin of NATO traces back to the Treaty of Brussels in 1948, among Belgium, France, Netherlands, and UK, four European states that had conspired to start World War II in the first place, and in the case of UK, France, Benin, Belgium, World War I as well.
NATO is essentially the greatly expanded 20th century version of the Rothschild-British-French bully alliance, which, in addition to World War I, imposed a Crimean War upon Russia, the Opium Wars upon China, and even plotted to enter the U.S.
Civil War on the side of the Confederacy, until the Russians threatened them not to.
Economically ravaged and militarily weakened by World War II, the four dying colonial powers agreed upon a mutual defense system that would soon include all of Western Europe plus the U.S.
The Alliance's first Secretary General, Lord Ismay, explained that the aims behind the new military bloc were to keep the Russians, Soviets out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.
NATO, having achieved all three of the objectives set forth by ISMAE, and after outliving the Soviet Union and its Eastern European vassal governments, has since expanded eastward into a 30-member force, adapting the keep-the-Russians-out element into one of menace-the-Russians.
In more current times, Admiral Vladimir Koidev, Defense Committee Chairman of the Russian Duma, put it this way.
They would even admit the North Pole to NATO for the purpose of encircling Russia.
Tell it, Admiral.
Tell it like it is.
Meanwhile, NATO would pick up with a war-mongering entente cordial between Britain and France left off.
A 1904 cartoon depicts John Bull, the UK, and his French corps giving Germany a dirty look.
As a German officer keeps a wary eye ten years later, this forerunner to NATO started World War I.
The destruction and unconditional surrender of Germany in 1945 and establishment of the CIA in 1947 enabled the globalists to begin shaping the corrupted and libtard European Union of today.
Note the similarity of NATO and CIA symbols.
The sort of expanding NATO born in 1949 is also a key element of the New World Order.
With this historical context in mind, we can better understand the globalist butthurt of the past few years, the Trump years of NATO decline.
NATO is, and always has been, a violent, dangerous, and cruel war machine.
Indeed, the bloody beast elected to be the very first Supreme Allied Commander of NATO.
was the vile mass murder of 50 million German POWs Dwight D. Eisenhower, a position which he held concurrently with his unmerited resume-enhancing no-show job as president of prestigious Columbia University, from which the globalists were to soon launch his Republican candidacy for president.
The more recent suicidal game of chicken with Russia, which had been deactivated by Trump, was intended to kick off World War III.
To that end, the alliance has stationed many thousands of troops offstaging large-scale war games in Eastern Europe, all part of an effort to bait Putin into drawing first blood.
Exactly as Ordis may have said, Germany and the U.S.—its people, that is—are also adversely impacted by NATO.
For Americans, the expensive NATO quagmire keeps us entangled with and enslaved to globalist schemes.
The game spelled out in debunked protocols of the learned elders of Zion about 120 years ago remained in play until recently.
Protocol 7, Article 3.
We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us.
But if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.
In service to the New World Order, the conspirators at the Council on Foreign Relations in London's Chatham House blew up Germany, Italy, and much of northern France, subjugated the other nations of Europe, assisted the rise of the Soviet Union as a global military power through land lease, Yalta, and more, and then established NATO as a military power to counter the very Soviet threat they had deliberately created in the first place.
Hiroshima Harry Truman signed off on NATO.
Here we have Putin and Trump triumphing over NATO and the globalist bosses.
Trump discusses pulling U.S.
from NATO.
Well, it says Trump might have pulled U.S.
out of NATO, which no doubt would have been a good thing.
NATO is and has always been a great big lie, which is why the conservative anti-communist legend, Senator Robert Taft of Ohio, voted against NATO membership in 1949 in a speech following his no-vote half-sat.
A joint military program has already been made.
It's become an offensive and defensive military alliance against Russia.
I believe our foreign policy should be primarily at security and peace, and I believe such an alliance is more likely to produce war than peace.
A third world war would be the greatest tragedy the world has ever suffered.
Even if we won the war, this time we'd probably suffer tremendous destruction, our economic system would be crippled, and we'd lose our liberty and free system, just as the Second World War destroyed the free systems of Europe.
It might easily destroy civilization on this earth.
Tell it, Senator, tell it.
By the way, Taft was expected to be elected president until 1952, until the instant Republican Eisenhower came along and cheated him out of the party's nomination.
The following year, Taft, an ally of Senator Joseph McCarthy, died of rabid onset cancer.
Nothing has changed since Taft's time.
If anything, the arguments in favor of keeping NATO in existence are now even more absurd.
Not a single one of the NATO member nations and multi-nation face any external threat from Russia, nor do any of the states still being considered for expanded membership, like Ukraine and Georgia.
So let us hope that Trump-Putin understanding that one world is so agitated marks the beginning of the end for this purely offensive military organization.
In 1949, Robert Taft, Mr. Republican, warned that NATO would actually be an offensive organization that could one day drag the U.S.
into World War III.
By that time, Taft was on track to become president in 1952.
The globalists then recruited NATO Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower to literally steal the nomination at the 1952 GOP convention, read, I don't like Ike by M. S. King.
The merciless and murderous bombardment of Yugoslavian Libya dispelled the myth of NATO existing as a defensive organization.
By Bubis Americanus.
I read in the New York Times today NATO is falling short of its military spending targets.
Bubis Americanus second.
NATO seems powerless now in the face of Russian aggression.
St.
Sugar, without the U.S., NATO is nothing, Boobus.
Editor, Putin, Trump, and Xi now protect the world from the Rothschild crime syndicate.
Chris, your thoughts about both?
Okay, great.
Wow, where to begin?
Sorry, I got cut off there in my tablet, mysteriously overheating.
No problem.
Yeah, so I was thinking about going back to the first thing you were talking about, The Ukraine thing and Starlink with Elon Musk.
And I think that that's really showing him to be kind of a deep state DARPA resource in terms of that many of his other offerings.
As far as them using weapons to maim soldiers, it's certainly, it's a short term burden that requires medical logistical support, medical treatment and reduces obvious military forces in pure numbers, in addition to the long term burdens as well.
And, you know, Brian brought up a point about using cluster bombs and even depleted uranium and they're looking into phosphorus weaponry.
bio-warfare weaponry as well.
These type of things, not only do they bear long-term and short-term health issues on the enemy, but also our own soldiers in terms of handling and firing these toxic nukes.
And even the storing and developing of these things are certainly bad news as well.
So you're definitely seeing this proxy warfare and this theater escalate in terms of ushering in this depopulation agenda.
And one thing I'd like to point out is the forging of these two systems that's going to be going on, the BRICS versus IMF World Bank, is something that was, I think, intended and designed intentionally by Goldman Sachs, who was well behind many of the trade deals that have outsourced the United States labor and built the colossus that we're calling our two enemies who was well behind many of the trade deals that have outsourced the United States labor and built the colossus that So,
So Goldman Sachs put out the BRICS initiative in 2001, and it's them using the same model they did in the Cold War, playing the Warsaw versus the NATO forces, you know, the same exact thing.
And in this strategy of tension, they can often get away with a lot of stuff under the fog of this war and in the guise of national security.
So, yeah, that's kind of interesting to see.
And another thing I'd like to point out is I think that you're right about that.
I'm trying to funnel everybody in in the last century to this Keynesian fiat central banking system.
In conjunction with authoritarian governments operating under highly deceptive PR optics.
As you know, Joseph Goebbels was educated in the University of Chicago, one of Rockefeller's institutions, one of the Nazi guys.
And at the highest level, all of these offerings are funded by the same cabal, the same group of, you know, quote unquote, European nobles and bankers.
So, yeah, I think it's them putting on the independence model.
Slaves seem to work better under the guise of freedom and independence than they do under abject poverty and slavery.
Uh, and they know that they have to really try to do people into this, uh, buying into this though.
And I think that's why they're spending so much money to maintain this theater and, and really never, uh, dropping a Fabian in terms of it.
So, uh, they, they understand also that their credibility must have some degree of a basis in reality for it to actually be credible and, and to actually institute credit under its name.
So, uh, I think that that's really a strong push as well.
You know, the back and forth, the controlled demolition of the United States and the rise of the Eastern, uh, empire, so to speak.
It's all part of the CBDC crypto plan, I think.
And I think they're really trying to create these digital IOUs to replace the fiat system where they can issue, control, regulate, switch on, switch off these currencies with the utmost of precision and in real time.
You know, a quantum financial system would take a second to flip someone's money off and really put them on the outside if they say the wrong thing or do the wrong thing.
So, in terms of getting people to force compliance into this cold war or into this type of conflict, I think they need these type of instruments to control not only the human population, but the natural resources.
And as I mentioned, at the highest levels, these are all being implemented by the same monetary cabal.
And it's I think something that has to do with like what Nixon did in 71, taking the gold standard out of the US dollar.
It's to maintain price controls over resources, and more importantly, to keep labor prices down around the world.
Human and natural resources are essential to most military strength and industrial strength of these nations.
And now even you're seeing them going to the next step in terms of replacing the working class with AI.
So you're seeing a depopulation agenda take place on all sides, in my opinion, that is very convenient to the higher classes.
And, you know, one thing I want to bring up about Taft, he was a skull and bones man as well.
Pretty prominent guy.
I don't think they let their insiders go Hang out, let's just say, in such a way.
They only do it selectively.
I don't think that it was too early for Taft to be brought in.
They had Truman and then brought in Eisenhower, and I think that he would be more of a credible person than maybe the skull and bones.
But I don't know, maybe back then they weren't as suspicious of them as we are now.
But it reminds me of the dirty work that happened in 48 with Truman and Dewey in that election.
And Dewey was a guy, just to bring up a side note, he was a prosecutor in New York for the Luciano trial in 1933.
And he actually, in court, labeled Bucky Luciano as an FBI informant and operative.
And at that point in time, they pretty much just took a plea deal and put him upstate for prostitution.
And I forget the other thing that he admitted to, but basically took a deferred prosecution rather than let Dewey grandstand on about him being associated with FBI and being a street operative for these guys.
So you're seeing a very incestuous relationship between the FBI before the CIA even existed and certainly after the National Security Act You're seeing the CIA taking the shadow play roles that the FBI would traditionally have taken on.
It's really like another shell game on the parlor trick.
So yeah, I'm looking at this in terms of history and how they run this proxy war, and I'm kind of trying to see through it and point these things out so other people can start to research this and see through it as well.
Wow.
Brian.
Well, NATO is a component of a generational plan to conquer the world.
I hate to use such big, ridiculous speech, but this has been around for a long, long time.
These guys have been talking New World Order since the formation of the Masonic Lodge back in 1817.
It's a large group of very powerful people that have made this billionaire class around the world that have Generated the banking cartels, the drug cartels, the elite, the protected societies of the world.
And this is, you're talking about France, you're talking about Europe altogether, you're talking about South America.
It's been penetrated many, many times.
Canada, Alaska, lots of people will even say Putin with Russia.
So there is a global elite class that is obviously protected that has a marathon plan.
50 years, 100 years, 150 years, whatever it takes.
And if you can't feel it, they've been penetration testing people, hacking people for a long, long time.
Think about all the different psychological operations we've seen in the last 15 years.
Black Lives Matter, COVID, Black versus white.
Cops versus robbers.
DAs versus criminals.
Children versus their parents.
Gays versus straights.
Boys versus girls.
Name it!
It's all about trying to figure out how to divide and conquer the world.
And all these penetration tests are just giving these people more and more information.
And I imagine that their little AI systems and all their robots and all their Terminator-type Systems are factoring all this in and creating a game plan for how to hack humanity, shut them down, prevent resistance, and decide who to eliminate and who not to eliminate.
So that the ruling class continues to rule the world forever and ever and ever.
And if you think these people aren't that evil, you're wrong.
It's been around for a long, long time.
This stuff goes way back.
I mean, take a look at Asibard's work on the Khazarians and the fall of the Cabal.
Take a look.
I mean, you can go everywhere you want in any library in the world and find a history of this Billionaire philanthropist type of behavior, George Soros type stuff that's been hacking and tearing humanity apart.
I believe our strength is in our masses.
Our strength is in our identity as a culture.
Our strength is in a people group.
And America should have been one of the hardest groups to hack.
But we've become so weak over the last 80 years since World War II, since the greatest generation ever.
We just don't have the strength to go through the adversity, deal with the tough times, and fight back against the system because we're, number one, too far in debt, number two, so poorly educated, number three, so addicted to our televisions, and number four, so addicted to our drugs and pharmaceuticals that we can't even function as an operative society anymore.
Look how divided we are.
Our neighbors don't know our names.
Social media is all that we have to keep us together, which is such a loose connection.
It doesn't go anyplace.
And that now is controlled by Google AI and other types of things that are out there controlling Facebook and deciding what you're going to see and what you're not going to see.
We have to come together.
To fight against these people.
And I think the seeds that you're seeing in France right now, I mean, realize that was just 13 days ago that the largest NATO operation in history took place using over 7,000 NATO forces in France.
And here we are 13 days later and Paris is burning because the people are standing up.
I'm proud of them.
I'm proud of them.
Maybe I'm not going to continue to label them the names that I've been labeling them year in and year out.
Maybe they're showing the world the way it is.
I'm proud of them, too, and I'm proud of you guys.
Those were two of the best commentaries I've ever heard on any story in all these shows I've done.
Meanwhile, the Manhattan D.A., I think trying to get himself off the hook since he found himself in an impossible position, is suggesting Trump Creating a false expectation of an arrest?
I no longer believe it is going to happen.
Manhattan D.A.
Alvin Bragg responded to several House Republican requests for information on the probe into Trump, saying that he had created a false expectation his arrest was imminent.
Bragg's General Counsel sent a five-page letter to the House Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, Brian Stella, Wisconsin, James Comer, Kentucky.
The District Attorney's Office said the investigation was one of thousands conducted by the office, and that Bragg stands by his pledge to release the conclusion of the investigation publicly.
Your letter of March 20th ended an unprecedented inquiry into a pending local prosecution, they wrote in response.
The letter only came after Donald Trump created a false expectation that he would be arrested the next day, and his lawyers reportedly urged you to intervene.
The letter accused.
Neither fact is a legitimate basis for a congressional inquiry.
Greg's office also called the lawmaker request an unlawful incursion into New York sovereignty, argued that federal funding is an insufficient basis to justify these unconstitutional requests.
The letter indicates the request may be related to a review of federal public safety funds, but the letter does not suggest any way in which either the DA testimony about his prosecutorial decisions or the documents and communications of former assistant DAs on a pending criminal investigation would shed light on that review.
Nevertheless, to assist Congress in understanding the way in which the DA's office has used federal funds, We are preparing and will submit a letter describing its use of federal funds.
The letter comes as Jordan sent them to two former Manhattan D.A.
office attorneys seeking information that would support a claim Bragg's prosecution of Trump is politically motivated.
As though there were any room for doubt.
Jordan has contended Bragg's sudden change of heart was tied to the announcement and has criticized what he described as an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority.
This indictment comes after years of the DA's office aggressively pursuing charges, with you and other special prosecutors leading the investigation into every facet of President Trump's finances.
Last year, You resigned from the office over Bragg's initial reluctance to move forward with charges in 2022.
Bragg is now attempting to shoehorn the same case with identical facts into a new prosecution, he wrote, based on your unique role in this matter.
We request your cooperation with our oversight of this politically motivated prosecutorial decision.
Jordan requests all documents and communication between the D.A.' 's office and the D.O.J.
regarding the Trump investigation and such documents and communication between the Manhattan D.A.
and Attorneys Pomerantz and Dunn.
The Manhattan Grand Jury will not hear testimony, deliberate, or vote on Thursday.
Since the Grand Jury does not sit on Friday, a vote is not expected this week.
I do not believe it will come.
I believe it has been abandoned.
A Trump arrest would be the first time a former president has been arrested in American history.
Only one other has been arrested for speeding in a source-drawn carriage, Ulysses Grant, in 1872.
in 1872. Brian, your thoughts? - Well, Alvin Bragg is clearly a political puppet that's been put in place to continue just like on the same track as all the other district attorneys out there that have been soft on crime.
He has reduced 52% of felony arrests down to misdemeanors and plea deals, yet his big deal is to go after Trump on this.
Look, Even if Trump leaked it, it's a brilliant move.
Who cares?
But that's just simply not true.
I'm sure Trump got the intelligence that they were working this Stormy Daniels angle because Bragg had made promises to his contributors that he too, like his predecessors, would go after Trump.
He tried to deliver on the promise.
It backfired.
Trump is getting stronger by the moment.
Let's just hope that they choose this time to cheat in the wrong places With the wrong people watching.
That's all it comes down to.
Can we enforce a proper election?
Because there's no way Joe Biden got 82 million votes.
Maybe 22 million, maybe 32 billion is what I've heard.
So that means that Trump probably got pretty close to 75, 80 million votes.
And if that's the case, it all comes down to one single factor.
Can we, as a people, We gotta get rid of Eric, we gotta get rid of the drop boxes, we gotta get rid of electronic voting machines to make that happen.
This time coming up in 2024.
I don't know that we can or can't.
I don't know.
We got to get rid of Eric.
We got to get rid of the drop boxes.
We got to get rid of electronic voting machines to make that happen.
Chris.
I think we got to get rid of APAC and the CFR while we're at it because you won't see anybody worth a damn even make it to the ballot if they don't kiss the ring of these guys and bow before themselves.
So, yeah, another point I'd like to add to what you're saying.
I think the legal system in my appraisal has very little concern with justice, only maintaining an illusion or an appearance of it, or at least the illusion of diligence.
If they were really concerned about justice, Julian Assange wouldn't be where he is.
All these guys running for office and in office wouldn't be where they are.
And I'll tell you, any journalist that's been worth a damn has been jackled up upon by the rest of the Associated Press and the United Press in such a way that basically they'll never work in this city again if they talk about the wrong things.
And that's got to change.
You know, this is certainly not justice nor anything close to truth.
And I think if this keeps going, it's going to become apparently more obvious to not only us, but even to the people that are trying to put this bullshit on us.
They're going to have a lot tougher time selling it in the face of what keeps going on and what they keep trying to cover up.
Sometimes the cover-up is worse than the crime.
And these ones have been so ham-handed and so obvious that it really doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what's going on here and see what they're doing.
And also I'd like to point out, a lot of these things are tied together with the philanthropy racket, the giving pledge, you know, these depopulation agendas and the complete media obfuscation and ignorance of them.
This is an orchestrated formation.
This is something that is intended, designed.
Like Brian was saying about earlier, Agenda 21 is exactly what he was saying about assessing the threat levels of citizens and either letting them live or exterminating them based on such threats.
This is not a pie in the sky conspiracy theory.
This has been on the forefront of the truth movement for a very long time.
And to add to some of the points that he was saying as well, as far as the intelligence agencies using AI and many other forces like this, before they had these digital devices and this technology and this technocratic feudalism, they had the COINTELP program, which, you know, in hindsight and in full scope was entirely more complicit you know, in hindsight and in full scope was entirely more complicit than most of But it was the basis of what we're being led to now.
And they're still infiltrating, you know, grassroots movements and political movements and causing chaos, violence, disruptions, absurdities, whatever.
So nothing's really changed other than their ability and convenience in doing these type of disruptions.
And until it's really exposed for what it truly is, and certainly not a limited hangout like the House Un-American Activities Committees or any of the bullshit on assassinations in the 70s, the Pike Church Rockefeller Committees.
These things were basically putting out limited hangouts, in my opinion, of the intelligence agencies and distractionary focuses.
For example, like say Cuomo's sex scandal, not killing 50,000 seniors in a nursing home.
They're worried about him playing grab ass with an intern or something.
You know, or like, you know, they focus on the minor crime to distract you from the major ones.
And I think they're kind of doing this with Trump, but I think they're doing this with a lot of things.
It's a formula or a tactic they've used a lot, in addition to the Clinton, you know, accuse your opponents of what you're doing yourself.
I mean, this is so obvious to me, just what they're doing, just seeing it for 40 some odd years and being onto it.
I don't know, it's just, to me, it's painful to watch how obvious it is.
But some people are a little bit slower in coming around to realizing this, and many people are prone to ascribe their own innocence To the complicity of this group doing this to us.
Excellent, Josh.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, we have a concerning update on Mitch McConnell's mental and physical being after he's been hospitalized for weeks.
Frankly, I don't think he will be returning to the Senate.
Never Trump or Reino McConnell, a haughty opponent to the 2024 Republican candidate for president, took what's being described as a severe fall in a fundraiser for his Reino political pact in what was once a very popular Washington, D.C.
meeting spot for mega-supporters of President Trump.
What was once Trump Hotel is now under different leadership.
McConnell and his pals were gathered for a fundraising event.
When he wiped out, fell.
Suffered an injury bad enough to keep him hospitalized for weeks.
McConnell is a frustrated conservative since he first came to office.
Has used his position to thwart any real America First agenda from taking hold.
Now holding up the Senate with his hospitalization, and thus may need to leave his position.
Senate John Doherty reported on more details for Conservative Briefs.
Senate Majority Leader McConnell may be on the verge of early retirement following a fall this month that left him with severe concussion and potential serious brain damage.
The Republican big shot, 81, banged his brain in a terrible March night tumble at the Waldorf Astoria, nearly four years after another serious fall forced him to have shoulder surgery.
After the recent fall, he was admitted to the hospital for six days at Tremont.
Following discharge, transferred to inpatient rehabilitation for care for a brain injury.
One expert told the outlet that can't cause loss of consciousness, convulsion, seizures, loss of coordination, slurred speech, agitation, and confusion.
Sources reportedly told the outlet McConnell has experienced other medical emergencies in the past to go along with a childhood encounter with polio, including a triple bypass in 2003.
In a public appearance three years ago, he displayed bruised and bandaged hands but declined to explain his injuries.
I remember that.
It was very peculiar.
McConnell's fall could be the result of a coordination problem, signifying the presence of more serious progressive cognitive conditions, said one expert.
A D.C.
insider told the outlet, Mitch has been a lion of the Senate so long, it's hard to imagine him not being there.
But he's 81 years old.
This isn't the first time he's fallen.
The talk is he may consider stepping down long before his current six-year term expires in 2027.
And here's Tucker asking, where's Mitch McConnell?
It should be noted, if he has to step down, his replacement will be named by the Kentucky governor, who happens to be a Democrat.
That person would serve until 2006.
Earlier this month, people close to him warned he would not be returning to his legislative duties as soon as some believe.
He's expected to remain for a few days of observation and treatment, grateful to the medical professionals for their care, said his communication director.
A few days later, he added, Leader McConnell's concussion had proceeded well.
The leader was discharged from the hospital at the advice of a physician.
The next step is physical therapy at an inpatient rehabilitation facility.
The leader and Secretary Chao, that's his wife, the Secretary of Transportation, or past, are deeply thankful for the skilled medical care, prayers, and kindness they have received.
Additionally, he reported that McConnell had incurred a minor rib fracture, as well as a concussion.
One aide said he might stay at the medical facility from several days to a few weeks.
That decision will be made by the leader's physicians and therapists.
McConnell is viewed as not being strong on defending the Republicans behind Trump and, in fact, helping to devise a troubled Trump voters' face.
Here's Red Walrus tweeting, This feels appropriate today.
Michigan Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirky caught on camera telling the truth about January 6th.
It was all staged.
Mitch McConnell wanted it to be a mess so he could secure a Trump impeachment conviction for Pelosi and Schumer.
I think that's pretty close to right.
Ryan, your thoughts?
Well, I don't know anything is true with the Mitch McConnell thing.
First of all, I haven't seen anything that is credible in terms of images or anything originating from the scene.
That doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Matter of fact, it probably lends credibility that it did because otherwise they could have just created the deep fake.
I'm glad to see McConnell go.
He's a rhino.
I don't want him around anymore, especially with MAGA around.
He's been nothing but problems for any of us.
You know, let's just remember that these people all serve a master.
They've been put in their position because they have chosen to bow the knee to certain forces and not to other forces.
And just some guys that have been a member of the Black Eye Club, and I'm not sure if McConnell has.
I was just trying to see if I could find any of that.
But there are a number of politicians that have turned up with mysterious black eyes, including John Kerry, George W. Bush, Harry Reid, Prince Philip, John McCain, Richard Branson, Ryan Gosling, Adam Sandler, actors as well.
I mean, there's just, you could go down the list of people that have mysteriously turned up with black eyes.
I haven't had a black eye since I was 17 years old, yet all these big shots are forced to be in this club somehow, have the black eye.
I mean, I'm not really sure what's going on, but at the end of the day, These people are controlled by certain forces, and Mitch McConnell is no different, and he has played the rhino position for far too long, and good riddance.
It's time to go.
I despise a man, Chris.
Yeah, I remember I was talking about even Fetterman.
I wonder where they keep finding these guys, whether it's on the Republican or Democrat side, but these guys are basically braindead.
I'm waiting for them to run Mr. Potato Head for office.
You know, as far as Mitch or Biden, I'd like to call them both maybe the fall guy.
Uh, you know, I mean, it seems to be pretty much all they do as far as contributing to anything positive in public.
Uh, you know, everything else they've done is absolutely harmful and destructive.
Uh, so I guess, uh, you know, we can laugh about these gaffes or whatever they got going on, but you know, ultimately these people should be wearing helmets and staying in tatted rooms for their own safety as well as ours.
And like I mentioned, you know, Mitch, Biden, Fetterman, even you could put AOC in there as a weaponized Karen, Hillary, Rodham, Clinton, you know, the stroke in the 2016 weekend at Bernie's campaign.
Gerald Ford going back in history.
I think he was specifically chosen for being a go along guy and being so damn obtuse.
LBJ once said of him he couldn't fart and chew bubble gum at the same time.
And this explanation is the only sensible one, in my opinion.
You know, this Peter Principle, where these guys seem to fall upwards.
Bill Clinton is another perfect example, if you really think about that.
A disbarred lawyer, scandal-ridden governor, falls into the U.S.
presidency, like Wilson did in 1912.
1912, you know, what, 80 years earlier, basically where the Republican side had two candidates that basically took a majority of each other's votes.
And then the Democrat guy snuck in.
And then, of course, what do they bring in?
In the Clinton administration, they deregulated the communications, the financial regulations, basically created the derivative explosion that's going on right now.
And it's kind of like Wilson brought in the Federal Reserve, World War I, the income tax law, the War Bonds, the Alien Sedition Act, Selective Service Act, League of Nations, You can go on and on, and Clinton doing the same thing with the UN agenda and this bullshit.
A thing to add to maybe to one of Brian's points, and maybe this has evaded his scope probably because he's not one of these perverts, and nor am I.
But I'm just saying from what I hear of these guys, they have the Panda Club is what that is, where they do something with these guys.
And it's involved in a sexual act.
In the old days, they used to rear kings under the same pretenses where they would be sexually controlled in some way, shape or form, where they basically target them as children, abuse them sexually, and make them controllable in terms of public servants or public figures. and make them controllable in terms of public servants or So, yeah, something happens with these guys, you know, in terms of like them reaching a state of ecstasy that causes this type of hemorrhage in their eyes.
So, I don't know.
This is just what I've heard.
I don't know from experience by any means, but it's another one of those sensible explanations that I haven't heard anything else that could serve as in place of it, you know?
So, just back to you on that.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Catch this.
Bernie's tweets.
No government will ask you to vote on digital ID, CBDCs, who control overall things, global health passports, net zero, 15-minute cities, man on fossil fuel, individual carbon credits, Agenda 30, because they know you would vote no.
Be louder before it's too late.
An extraordinary change in labor data reveals a shocking drop in workplace attendance following the Vax campaign from Zero Hedge.
Last we heard from former BlackRock portfolio manager Ed Dowd and his deep dive partners, the rate of serious adverse effects reported during COVID Vax trials closely tracked a spike in disabilities reported following the vaccine's official rollout.
In their analysis, Dowd and Crude used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to show a shocking spike in both employee absence and lost work time rates, which they believe is due to vaccines.
Either primary vaccine injuries or because a weakened immune system due to the jab, and not long COVID caused by the virus itself.
It's not a stretch to conclude from this data that the vaccines are causing death, disability, and injury due to a degradation of individuals' immune system, Doug said.
The rate of change is not explained by the long-cove trope.
Ask yourself, where is funding for such studies?
For the CliffNotes version, he dropped the following Twitter thread summarizing their analysis.
Conclusion!
Taken in conjunction with the increase in disability rates since early 2021, which we've shown previously, we believe the most likely cause for the rise in both was due to the COVID-19 vaccines.
The absence of rate in 2022, the absent rate was 11 sigma above trend, and the work time rate loss in 2022 was 13 sigma from trend.
This is a very strong signal.
Absence rate grew in each consecutive year since 2019.
Lost work time rates have grown substantially since 2019.
In 2022, lost work time rates were 50% higher, an extraordinary change representing a large economic loss in productivity.
For those who don't understand, sigma is standard deviation.
This normal distribution can tell you how rare 11 and 13 sigma events are.
The right and left tails of the distribution are three sigma Jesus, that's a ridiculous signal!
Wow!
So even if people are not disabled, they're just absent more due to being ill, fatigued, wrecked from the jab?
Astounding!
Correct.
As one commentator notes, data from the UK reveals firms are coming under increasing pressure due to rising staff sickness, particularly among those over age 50.
More to come.
Next week we'll reveal our estimates for economic impact to the U.S.
of the vaccine for 2022.
The profits for Pfizer and Moderna are blood money.
The vaccine damage report we're working on will tie together excess death, disabled, work time lost due to chronic sickness.
All start signaling multiple sickness events in 21 concurrent with mandates and vaccines.
We are putting the puzzle pieces together.
More.
Injuries and loss, work time, disability, death, three buckets of cost.
The total cost to the U.S.
economy will be multiples of the U.S.
revenues generated by Pfizer and Moderna.
When the truth comes out, and it will, I predict by 2026, both companies won't be listed on any stock exchange.
That explained how he reacted to the pandemic.
Now, Ric Flaynow, he reacted to the pandemic to Tucker.
Now he and his partner spend their time pouring through data to shed light on harsh realities.
The vigilant Fox Wheat, this has been a war.
The people who have died from COVID vaccine deaths and early treatment denial is greater than all the world wars we've experienced as a nation.
It's much larger than World War II, World War I, Vietnam, or Korea.
This has been a catastrophe.
More.
What has happened to our country is the most awful thing that could ever be imaginable.
Edward Dow was mentally inclined to run around in a loincloth and live in the jungle because he was so disgusted with Vax Mantains.
Parker, why are you not afraid?
Meaning he's speaking out truthfully and causing a lot of commotion, but I have no doubt he's right.
Brian.
Business leaders need to learn to see through the red tape here.
The problem is that they're so overwhelmed with the threats from the legal institutions that they have a hard time making decisions.
Because they're business leaders.
They don't want to make decisions about the health of their population, so they go with the flow.
And of course, half the companies out there are owned by Vanguard or BlackRock, so they're going to put pressure down the line to have these employers force their employees to get the jab, not even paying attention to the economic impact of The output.
I mean, seriously, nobody ever did serious scientific studies on what would happen when all these people got the jab inside of workforces.
The actuaries, there's no way they could have had time to develop the science on it.
And to see that bell curve, that standard bell curve inside there, and see that they were three deviations off what's expected.
Guys, this is the kind of stuff that gets actuaries That right manual's fired to see a deviation that's once in a hundred years when these guys are supposed to be predicting, you know, a deviation of one standard deviation every five years.
These guys are seeing something that the only possible explanation is that the VAX indeed was some sort of operation.
And to me, they're simply humiliating us.
As human beings, as their populations.
They asked us to put on masks and they asked us to put a foreign substance in our bloodstream.
Talk about demeaning, humiliating, ridiculous.
Now they want us to eat bugs and live in our virtual reality with our mask and our headset and our 5x10 cell.
It's demeaning, it's humiliating, and we have to fight back.
And the best way to fight back is from the top down.
You've got employers out there that may be listening to this broadcast, that maybe have anywhere from 50,000 to 5,000 to 10,000 employees.
5,000 to 10,000 employees, I beg you, overrule human resources.
Take the handcuffs off and let your workforce do what they do best, which is be people that work hard.
Go through that handbook, get rid of all of those obligations and all of those requirements, and just let people do their job, and you'll find that your workforces are much more productive than they've ever been.
Spot on.
Chris?
Yeah, I think that if you look at this, Brian, great point about the slave training that they're trying to do.
Back in the Holy Roman and Roman days, they would make free men that were basically taxpaying citizens that were part of a guild wear a pileus.
So if you're truly free, you got to wear this hat to be identified, to walk freely in the streets and to be respected or to not be harassed by, you know, authorities or Inquisition tactics or Lord knows whatever, right?
So this is kind of like the ultimate mindfuck that they do in this independence model that they give you.
It is inversions laced in hypocrisy.
And, you know, as I say, these same central bankers are the ones that are pushing this and have been creating the power systems to put in place to push these things through force.
And I think that any employers that they've used to force the mandate, they should be held accountable legally and punitively for the damages from said mandates.
This is a big reason why they can never admit to this being what it is or doing what it's doing Because not only can you not break a Fabie But if you admit this it obviously opens up a realm of complicity and an accountability and liability that will certainly Destroy the the culprits that were behind trying to destroy us so
Yeah, I think it's one of the many ways that they play these games, you know, create the concept of nation states or these, you know, BRICS versus IMF conflicts, Coke versus Pepsi brought to you by Unilever.
The same central bankers are pushing these type of offerings and all the things on that list that you had there too, Fats, if you really think about it.
And, you know, as I say, I think they're doing this to reduce their obligations and their economic liabilities that come from the social contracts that they've extended to the citizens that have adhered to this and expected this and anticipated this.
And it's one way to get off the hook for the stuff that they can't pay physically anyways.
So, you know, throughout history, they've used this concept of having royals, you know, cousins versus cousins, brothers versus brothers, owning nations, England versus France or France versus Spain or versus Rome or U.S., whatever.
You know, it's a sacrificial kabuki theater, a warfare tactic where they destroy the fighting age male populations and render them incapable for generations to really defend their own homelands in the wake of these type of conflicts.
And better yet, in the wake of such conflicts, it's an order of chaos tactic where they unleash these pandemics or this pandemonium to create such a demand for peace and order that it's really brought by any means necessary and possible in the face of such atrocities.
And in most times, it's ushered in and delivered by the same people that caused the chaos in the first place.
So it's amazing to see how they use these different once removed organizations in such a way to social engineer in this way.
And if you look what they were doing with these VAX mandates, it is absolutely not only unconstitutional, but inhumane.
They're talking about having passports, you know, to go to a concert or go to an airport or to cross a border.
You know, you had to have the VAX or you couldn't do it.
And I think that these type of overreaches, they show you what they've always intended these departmentalized organizations for in the first place.
And I think that really when you get into the concept of wars and you know being the bankers wars and all throughout history it makes a lot more sense to me at least looking at this with the benefit of this in mind.
And I think they're going to keep doing like they did with like say Justin Bieber where they come up with a new disease name a diagnosis that will cover up and cause an ascribed affliction to the victim.
Very nice.
Very nice.
to associate with these type of damages caused by vaccines or externalities or soft kill measures, where they will embrace the accountability for it rather than the institutions that imposed it on them that delivered that to them.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Might get into it later, Fetz.
I got some stuff more on that.
Good, good.
Meanwhile, they're trying to go back to Uvalde and now explain away the incompetence of the police on the scene, although it was a totally staged event.
The report on Uvalde mass shooting exposes why law enforcement sat on their hands for over an hour.
Right.
There's far too long conservatives and Second Amendment fetishes—this is from the Daily Coast, by the way, which is as far left as you can get—have attempted to downplay the mass lethalogy inherent in AR-15s.
It's not difficult to debunk and say the weapon was originally designed for the military as a smaller replacement for four different rifles.
The American assault rifle industry—and by the way, that's an abusive language right there, because an assault rifle has to be fully automatic, and these are not—marketed the AR-15 class of weapons that could be used to do military-style killing, which is just ridiculous.
A lot more killing than simply mowing down a deer, no matter what Republican Senator John Thune says about needing an AR-15 to kill prairie dogs.
The fact AR-15s and similar assault-like consumer rifles have been used in too many mass murders on American soil to keep up with has not dissuaded us Republicans from emblazoning AR-15 lapel pins on their person on Capitol Hill.
They have done all this in the name of not creating any, let alone robust, gun safety legislation.
They've ignored hundreds of dead school children in order to score political points and receive money from the gun lobby.
When 19 very young children and two adults were murdered in a piece of shit wielding an AR-15 at Robb Elementary in Uvalde, In the days and weeks after, it became clear that the law enforcement apparatus failed in myriad ways that day.
A new report with previously unreleased interviews makes it pretty clear the reason nearly 400 law enforcement officers couldn't do jack shit for over an hour was because of the AR-15 the murderer was carrying.
The Texas Tribune reports that very early on, In law enforcement engagement, they were warning one another he was in position of an AR.
In an interview with investigators after the mass murder, Evaldine Police Department Sergeant Donald Page said once they realized he had an AR, We had no choice but to wait and try to get something that had better coverage where we could actually stand up to him.
We weren't equipped to take entry into that room without several casualties, Uvalde Police Department Detective Louis Laundrie said.
Once we found out it was a rifle he was using, it was a different game plan we would have had to come up with.
It wasn't just going in guns blazing, the old West style, and take him out.
It's clear that even if police had been able to quickly stop the shooter, the casualties would have been almost as high as they ended up being.
A large part of the fact that the shooter carried a weapon made them murder things as easily as possible, while also being able to carry it around as easily as possible.
Meanwhile, Gun groups continue working to sanitize online information about mass shootings to try and reframe the AR-15.
Legality is an issue of personal safety, and not a public health crisis it is.
They are not alone.
Many gun fetishes try and take issue with technicalities.
Calling an AR an assault rival would set a gun nut off and a big tirade about knowing the difference between the two classifications, but the fact remains.
Arguing that they're even worse and more powerful guns than the AR-15 is not the argument you think it is.
In February, in a move to try and both own the liberals and make conservative Christians seem to be the most terrible voting bloc in recent memory, Oren Boebert and George Santos co-sponsored a bill to make the AR-15 the national gun of the United States.
Bobert, who came up through the right-wing gun fetishist world, also recently joked that Jesus of Nazareth, the guy all of Christendom is based upon, wouldn't have been crucified if he, or is it he, had owned an AR-15.
After the mass murder in Uvalde, the conservatives across the country have come up with a plan to spend tens of millions on bulletproof shields for police, spend money on trying to fight the release of public school shooting records connected to the failures of Texas law enforcement, place more AR-15s into schools, but in safes, and have vowed to ban kids from attending drag shows to protect kids.
Look at some of the related stories.
Assault rifle manufacturers advertise their guns as weapons for mass murder.
House Republicans spotted wearing AR-15 lapel pins and fight 39 mass shootings in 2023.
Another effing day that we don't get to have our kids.
San Diego families on the 10th anniversary.
A gun group has been editing Wiki's firearm pages to sanitize mass shootings for months.
Senator John Newton says Americans need AR-15 to fend off prairie dogs.
In the wake of the Uvalde mass shooting, Texas Republicans promised to bar kids from drag shows.
Brian, your thoughts?
So, Uvalde.
Does anybody remember Las Vegas, the Las Vegas shooting, this massive disaster that took place at this concert in Las Vegas?
Anybody remember that?
Remember the sheriff that gave us such neat and precise reports?
His name was Joe Lombardo.
Anybody remember him?
It was an absolute fiasco.
Not a single answer that was meaningful was given to anybody, anywhere, anyhow.
It was a joke.
It was an absolute joke.
Who now is Joe Lombardo?
Oh, he's the governor of Nevada.
I predict the next governor of Texas will be Steven McCraw, the head guy at the Texas Department of Public Safety.
Who was involved in making sure that this operation was pulled off.
I drove there.
I saw the scene.
This is a show among shows among shows.
Texas Rangers lined up behind us.
Oh, we're gonna do our press conference.
We're gonna tell everybody how it went down.
We've got our early evidence coming from a person that we can't identify who was on the scene within a few minutes recording for over an hour while no self-respecting police officer entered the quote-unquote room where there was no line of sight and no windows to take out the shooter who had a bunch of baby children inside the room.
And let's just not go in because we're scared of the shooter.
Give me a break.
The entire thing is a fraud.
It's a show.
Now, what evidence will you accept?
Will it be logical deductions from actual researchers who actually do work?
Or will it be propaganda and groupthink?
From the crowd.
Are you going to take the group's answer or are you going to take a look at this for what it actually is?
Now, if you've got the skills and you want to put the skills to work, go out and get a book called Open Source Intelligence Techniques, Resources for Uncovering Online Information.
Go ahead and learn this volume really, really well.
And then once you've practiced it for about two or three years, you'll have a skill set that will allow you to uncover just about anything you want.
I have that skill set.
I've gone through every volume since Volume 5.
I've created a file on Uvaldi and I've spent as much time as I want to spend on it.
I don't need to.
I don't get paid to spend time on it.
I spent as much time as I wanted to.
Enough to satisfy me.
It's just like Orlando.
I went through the whole process to find enough to satisfy me.
And once I was satisfied and I knew exactly what happened, I didn't worry about it anymore.
I have over 150 anomalies about Uvalde documented that don't make any sense.
Now you put it all together, the only structure it fits into is that this is all theater.
Theater, theater, theater.
Just like Las Vegas.
Just like Sandy Hook.
Just like Sutherland Springs.
Just like Santa Fe.
A big show.
And if you want to live your life watching the show, great.
I prefer to know the truth.
The truth will set you free.
I'm a free man.
Everybody else out there?
Slaves.
Great points, Brian.
They're all bullshit, including Parkland.
Every damn one I've investigated has been fraudulent, totally staged.
Nobody died, with the possible exception of Steven Paddock, the one body that was lying in the suite of the Mandalay Bay Hotel, where there were shell casings on top of the blood.
When they had to be underneath, since he stopped firing once he was dead.
Some of which were from CO2 cartridges, others from blanks, because the prop master didn't know the difference.
Chris.
You know, another interesting thing that never gets documented about that Las Vegas thing, it always sat uneasy with me, is I listened to the actual Metro Police dispatch that night, and they were calling for shooters that were all over the city at that point in time, all different places of the city, north, south, east, west, and really not so much to the Luxor where this really happened at.
So one of many incongruencies that seem to pop up when you really research and get into these type of hoaxes, and they always, I guess you can look at the incident, And then look at the reactions, whether they're overreactions or underreactions, and then see the solutions with the benefit of hindsight to understand the Hegelian stagecraft that Brian and you were talking about, and you're absolutely right on.
It also, like you say, gives them an opportunity to introduce or position their pieces into place in the midst of this pandemonium.
So that the culprits look like heroes, you know?
Look at Giuliani in Tower 7 or Couric after 9-11, you know?
Sheriff Israel, another perfect example.
It wouldn't be surprising to see him take DeSantis' place as governor of Florida one day, probably, too, according to Brian's logic.
And he's right there, too.
So, you know, think about all these mass shootings, the COVID, the Vax folks, even the economic stuff that they're completely ignoring, and the poverty narratives they put on.
They're all positioned by the media to create an element of fear and loathing, you know, an emotional and limbic reaction to them, and then to provide some sort of senseless solution that really, you know, if you look through the actual pork of the offerings, it benefits the 1% in such a manner, and it's guised in such inversion that it's there to I could go on and on, I guess, with many of these things that have been put before us in such a manner.
But, you know, they're trying to take our weapons, our AR-15s, while they're arming the SWAT with military surplus weapons and tactical vehicles, basically giving them training to be occupational military forces in our country.
The IDF is training a lot of these people over in Israel, and they're weaponizing the police on one side while trying to defund them through NGOs and political movements on the other.
This reminds me a lot of what they did with the COINTELP thing, going to next level type of stuff.
Not only they're subverting the National Security Act Charters of 47 by allowing military and intelligence agencies to operate domestically through these loopholes, but it's also a way to push these social control agendas that they're trying to push on us.
And as I say, you know, they need something very horrifying and threatening, you know, these false flags and hoaxes.
And it shows really their overreach when they do this.
You know, the cover-ups, I say, is worse than the crime in many times, because that's what they get caught on.
And their social engineering tactics become more and more evident as you see these behavioral insight teams and nudge teams, you know, take to flooding the internet and trying to push people into these certain opinions, these Controlled dialogue narratives or suggestions that really they just they funnel you into these these cul-de-sacs intellectually and certainly don't get anywhere near the truth and they they're absolutely intentional in terms of military warfare and psychological operations.
So yeah, you look at the involvement of like the the Taupea 8200 or the private sector involved with this this stuff in conjunction with this.
Yeah, it's it's it's certainly rotten and it certainly needs to be exposed further than Tayabi and these other guys are exposing as far as censoring citizens.
This goes far beyond just censorship.
This is something entirely new and draconian and next level in terms of authoritarian and despotism.
Like I say, this is a despot's wet dream to be able to get away with what they're doing right now.
And look at how that Daily Kos is right in their plan of change.
We have more here.
After all, Uvalde was a variation on Sandy Hook.
At Sandy Hook, the alleged shooter shot his mother, then went over to the school and shot 20 1st graders and 6 adults.
In Uvalde, he shot his grandmother, and then went to the school and shot 19 2nd, 3rd, and 4th graders and 2 teachers, one of whom had also died already at Sandy Hook.
They made mistakes.
They took a girl they thought was the most photogenic, Amory Garza, and actually had her mourned by two different fathers, both of whom claim to be her actual father.
We're not talking about a stepfather.
Here's a bit of a video clip where you'll see the two.
They have the same last name.
They're both describing her as their daughter.
Sorry for your loss.
You're holding a picture of your daughter.
She had just won an honor roll.
What do you want people to know about her?
That she was just trying to do the right thing.
She was just trying to call the cops.
This is literally like her worst fear.
She talked about something like this?
So I... I'm a med-aid.
So when I arrived on the scene, they still had kids inside.
They started bringing the kids out, and I was... Joe Garza talking about his daughter, who has died here, 10 years old.
10-year-old Amory Joe Garza was another fourth grader at Robb Elementary.
She was a real good student.
She was a very good daughter.
Amory loved to draw, do science experiments, and make people laugh.
She was the perfect daughter, yeah.
She was the perfect daughter.
When he heard about the shooting, Alfred Garza III raced to the school.
While waiting for news about his own daughter, Garza says he tried to comfort the children who did manage to get out.
They were just overwhelmed.
It's hard to even wrap your mind around something like that.
This is the last photo he has of his baby girl, posing proudly with her honor roll certificate just hours before the shooting.
I just want to honor her name.
I just want her to be remembered as the type of person that she was.
These people are paid to do it.
Here's Jim Stone nailing it.
Two different crisis actor dads claim the same daughter with the same name, same honor roll certificate as her daughter.
Both dads with the same last name broadcast on two different networks.
The video shows the same girl.
If it were dad and stepdad, it would have to be daughter and stepdaughter.
The video, thus, is a completely legit bust of the two dads with the same last name both calling her daughter bullshit busted.
They effed up the script, and that's all there is to it.
Not only that, But S.J.
Rollins observed, you mentioned Victoria Soto, that's her on the right, resurrected as Eva Morales in time to be shot at Uvalde Gym.
Did you know our favorite Muslim, Dr. Oz, had a kid on his TV show who supposedly survived Sandy Hook?
A Turkish doctor asked this kid a few leading softball questions, like, are you proud of your teacher?
The kid shrugs his shoulders and says, yes.
After it continues, he gets frustrated and annoys and says, it was a drill.
What?
And, Dr. Oz, there's nothing with this bomb the kid just dropped?
Can't anyone see the ridiculousness?
And, indeed, you have on the right Vicky Soto, supposed to have died at Sandy Hook, and, nonetheless, as Eva Morales, Vicky wants her life back.
She's come out with a woman who was cast as Emily Parker to declare that they were crisis actors at Sandy Hook, and Vicki has gone further to apologize for her participation in Uvalde, for which she was paid $210,000.
She recognizes it was a mistake.
But it wasn't just Vicki who was recast.
Take a look here at this guy in the background.
See if you don't recognize him.
But the healing will take place.
It's just going to take a while.
But the healing will take place.
This is in the tank wall.
And meanwhile, we have a situation where there's supposed to be an issue.
May issue of Majesty Magazine with an article about Emily Parker and Vicki Soto coming out.
Emily's real name is Margaret Cottle.
Vicki's real name is Vicki Aurelio.
She's actually the daughter of the new downtown clerk who's responsible for death certificates and the like.
They want their lives back.
There's supposed to be an article in Majesty Magazine.
But we're having trouble tracking it down.
Does it even exist?
Ryan, take it away, my friend.
Well, I don't believe it exists.
I believe what's going on is that this operation has chosen to take a different tack with our group, and they've chosen to run a deception campaign with us.
The May issue wouldn't even be designed at this point in time.
They would not have decided who's on the cover.
This is not a large magazine.
It's very much funded, or I'm not going to say funded, but it's very much supported by The royal families and supposedly one of the angles that put my understanding is that one of the angles that put them in touch with this magazine journalist was an angle related to a certain Russian president.
Um, I can tell you that the, uh, the managing editor of the magazine is unaware of any article exposing Sandy Hook as of this morning.
So I'm concerned that there is a deceptive artist in play here that's trying to penetrate the group and trying to discover who's willing to talk and or they're simply running an operation on us.
I don't know the answer to that yet.
I don't want to show them all my cards, but I can tell you that I do not believe that that Majesty Magazine article is legit and that It simply hasn't been designed yet, much less approved that there would be some sort of expose article uncovering the truth behind Sandy Hook.
So, I feel like there is a large-scale deception in play here, and it wouldn't surprise me, understanding who Mossad is, and MI6, and the CIA, and the FBI.
I'm speaking more openly about their identity, which I've long known, because they were on the BBC last night on a special report, and I'm seeking to get a copy of the radio broadcast.
But it was heard by a friend of mine in Connecticut, by a friend of his in Russia.
It was blocked from broadcast in America, apparently, but nevertheless broadcast all over Russia.
And Vladimir Putin actually called into the program at a designated time.
Assuming this is on the up and up, and I personally am convinced it is, though Brian has raised very serious questions about the existence of this May issue, which is featuring Prince Harry, which has been described to me in great detail about the content, six or eight columns, six or eight photographs.
I've been described the content of the photographs and so forth.
Nailing this down is a high priority.
And if anyone out there is able to access that radio show, I've asked a dear friend of mine who resides in London to do it, and he sent me the official scheduled programs, and they don't show it.
But it was a special report, supposed to have been broadcast at 9.30 p.m.
U.K.
time last night.
That would have been 5.30 right here in the eastern time zone, 4.30 here in my central.
And I've had a report in detail of its contents that it ran an hour and four minutes.
There were 107 calls from all over the world, though obviously only a fraction of them got onto the air.
But that, actually, it was handled extremely well by Margaret and Vicky.
That's what I can tell you so far.
More to come.
Chris?
Well, I'm going to give you some of my insights based upon a lot of my Research of intelligence operations and history and false flags and things like that.
I've certainly been at it as long as you have fats, but I like to think that I stay after it pretty good in terms of trying to be in front of this and on top of this type of stuff.
It's going to bring me back to something Gary Patrick Hemmings said about Lee Harvey Oswald and any operations that they put on things like Operation Chaos or COINTEL.
Where, you know, in the case of Lee Harvey Oswald, he had credentials and was background with the FBI, the Marines, the CIA, possibly Naval Intelligence, the Soviets and the New Orleans mob.
That's what five, six different background dossiers, five different IDs, five different dossiers, five different scenarios or more for operational cover in terms of using him on the chessboard.
And as I say about positioning their pieces, this is what I'm talking about with the stage actor, crisis actors, B-list guys that are part of these hoaxes and these multiple death victims, you know, that you're talking about.
Because you're absolutely spot on.
You're absolutely right.
I agree with you 100%.
It's kind of maybe a new career for some people in terms of like political theater, liberal arts degree people, even in the terms of like gangs, junkies, pervs, LGBTQ, false flag witnesses, like you say, the These are the people you'll see getting paid in crypto to attend a Biden or a Clinton rally.
You know, the David Hoggs, the Alexa, Maybe not necessarily CIA agents or operatives, but certainly useful idiots and people that are part of some sort of a hush-up or conspiracy or part of the complicity in terms of this thing.
And as we mentioned, the CIA using doubles in many cases, like in Lee Harvey Oswald's case, they had other people impersonating him, setting him up as a patsy, creating different backgrounds and locations for him at different times, alibis, things like this.
So, I'm looking at the multi-level 5D chess that these intelligence agencies have played historically and trying to apply it to current times.
And, you know, what you're saying is absolutely ringing truthful to me and it's going beyond.
I think of, you know, what you're saying in terms of the majesty thing and them having multiple different articles appealing to different people at different times.
Reminds me of the BBC's broadcast on Tower 7, where they tell you, you know, this tower is going down 22 minutes before it goes down, then they say it never happened.
You know it creates a degree of certainty and uncertainty in terms of the people that that saw it or that did not witness it and then hear about it secondhand.
So it does create an inflated degree of tension over certain topics you know whether you're going to go along with looking into this or whether you're going along with the The official narrative, or somewhere in between.
It creates a very large delta between the two types of perceptions, we'll say, the two points of view.
And as far as majesty goes, I think of like the magi, or magic, or what that's based on.
You know, the theatrics of Café Vee that we're seeing in terms of our political theater, it reminds me of the old days.
They call it the Comedia della Artes, where each character had a role or a part to play.
And they were there to, you know, either inform the audience or to deceive them or to steer them into certain types of thought patterns.
You know, it's an instrument that they use in terms of this to admit partial truths and to, you know, obviously fulfill the full agenda, at least in terms of optics or in terms of operations.
So, yeah, I think this this majesty thing is a PR campaign, pure and simple, and it is putting different narratives out there for this group of people to cover their ass and to really, like I said, admit half-truths and steer you towards something else that's maybe off topic or shouldn't be thought about in their mind.
I don't know if that's necessarily what's happening here with this particular instance, but historically speaking, how these guys have worked and how they've distracted historic focus, I think that this could be a possibility.
And yeah, I think it's amazing to see the amount of complexity and complicity involved with arranging all these pieces and this organization and the way that they do this.
This is a full-time job for a lot of people.
Well, Brian has even suggested, and I think it's brilliant, they could have made up a fake issue just to distribute to us.
Just to, yeah, throw you off.
Yeah.
We are definitely digging into it.
And in my opinion, the shit has hit the fan because it's reached a point that it's no longer possible to deny or evade.
It's happening.
Brian, you'd want to add another comment?
So, No, I don't know how much I want to say about what we think we know yet.
This is good.
This is fine.
Here we go.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here we have Dear Jim and Jess.
I need to praise you for your intrepid good work.
This is not to be distracted by the minor points made below.
On to March 21st, you need to know it, Brian Davidson.
There was criticism toward proposed legislation in California regarding banning various ingredients, such as FD&C Red Dye.
Approved by the FDA, as well as other things that are food that are deleterious to human health.
As the story unfolded, I was looking to see if azoic carbonamide ADA was going to be among the items in Brad proposed for being banned.
It was not listed, but it is a very bad ingredient.
After I experienced cancer, I read the book, A Hundred Year Lie, How Food and Medicine Are Destroying Your Health, by Randall Fitzgerald.
FD&C dyes were mentioned there.
Far better for human health if they are, as I had read at the time, at least in Scotland, such unnatural deleterious crap is not in the food, except for making a buck on the cheap.
I remember as a kid eating Twizzlers and enjoying them, but maybe the red dye is there when something not harmful could be in its place.
Not as big a deal as other things, but part of the picture of greed versus health.
I have found Environmental Working Group to be a great source of information on what is good and bad in lives.
Be careful not to paint with a broad brush with respect to legislation that could do some good.
The problem we have, as you know, is that the most dangerous of things are often not only not regulated, but promoted.
Consider the GMO food, the glyphosate from Monsanto, now Bayer, the 5G, chemtrails, COVID and others shot, fluoride and mercury in the water, etc.
I'm right there with you on the CO2 propaganda, the holohoax, false flags, and more.
The other issue I want to note was a letter in the same show where the author, right on most everything, criticized ranked-choice voting.
Unless used in a primary to potentially exclude parties that do not get a candidate in the general, this can happen in California, eliminating all but Democrat Party candidates.
In the general, ranked choice voting is the only way an independent or third party candidate has a shred of a chance.
Of course, given the long-standing corruption in vote counts with the latest Trump election, the first front and center in the public eye, the one of many, it matters not what choices are in place when corruption counts the votes.
All electronic voting machines must be eliminated as but one glaring aspect of the corruption.
Bev Harris and BlackRock Voting, among many others, have been pointing this out for many years.
Thanks for considering my input to keep up the great work, Bernie.
Thank you, Bernie.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Brian, yours.
Well, I appreciate every one of our audience members, and I would encourage you to go ahead and share our channel on social media.
I don't think that there's a lot of guys out there that are as well-tuned as we are in terms of what's really happening under the hood.
There are lots of great commentators on the Internet.
All I know is what I research on my own, and I'm sure some of it's wrong, but we're just people trying to get a show done every week on top of having other jobs and other responsibilities.
So, mistakes get made and things happen, and we talk about things that often we don't understand.
Just remember that we're human.
We're doing the best that we can, given the fact that we don't have any resources to do this.
And we're here to help and we do listen.
We do read the comments.
We do go through and make sure to understand what it is that we think our viewers want to hear.
But we can't guarantee that we're right all the time about everything and we make mistakes.
We don't mind you all pointing it out and look forward to hopefully some better input.
And we need to also harvest some new hosts as well.
So if you're out there and you want to be a part of the program, I'm pretty easy to find.
I don't hide.
Yeah, we're glad to hear from all of our listeners.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Well, I'm going to go off on a little bit of a tangent here, but hopefully it's okay.
I was thinking about the way they sensationalized truth and fiction in terms of social engineering in the media, and I'm thinking if they really gave the true nature of the economic catastrophe that's going on right now, one millionth of the same coverage that they gave to their agendized COVID lockdowns, the mass hysteria, the safe and effective vax hype, or even triggering and polarizing demographics with Trump or anti-Trump kabuki political theater, Then the US corporation would really have a lot of serious issues to face.
And I think there would be what they're trying to do, in my opinion, is to do so and to void all obligations to their social contracts, constitutional rights, their economic contracts.
Think about the insolvency of Social Security, pensions, stocks, bonds.
Think of all this stuff being derivative and interest rate based and how it can These are these are weapons of mass economic destruction and and the same guys that are trying to resolve us getting out of the solution are the you know, Powell and Yellen.
We're very much complicit in creating most of these these very same weapons of economic mass destruction and they have been shocking the so-called free markets for a very long time and accessories and covering up the devastating impacts of such things.
Think about the QE, the repo market, the CDS, collateralized debt obligations or default swaps.
Mortgage-backed securities, derivatives, quantitative tightening, liquidity crunches, rate hikes after zero interest rates, and insider lending allowed hedge funds and private corporations to snatch up most of the real estate in this country and leave an entire generation out of property ownership, not only by wage and price controls, but through doing this as well.
It's amazing to see this predatory and insider lending go on in the same place.
And I wonder if people ever approach their financial institutions with the same levels of scrutiny that they've applied to the individuals seeking to buy their first homes, what they would come up with.
You know, I mean, these are really the true criminals and the masterminds that really pay a fine is deferred prosecution and cost of doing business and still millions and trillions and trillions from people and cause a lot of casualties.
To cover up their misdeeds and to distract us with these unnecessary wars.
And as I mentioned, you know, Powell, he was a Carlisle Group guy, you know, the guys that were kind of involved with a lot of stuff in 9-11 and, you know, part of the war of terror, national security, industrial complex.
And this is all stuff that led to such asymmetrical surveillance of personal and economic data in the first place.
And it's being used to disenfranchise us, the common citizen, for property ownership.
And it's certainly asymmetrical in that we don't have the same sort of research into the books of our lending institutions, which can basically make you a secondary creditor to your own deposits.
I'm sorry, I'm reversed backwards here.
But yeah, they're also the group that has, almost 100 years ago, taken away interloitering property ownership.
It's all about control.
And there's no oversight on these lending institutions other than the regulators that are part of this very same process in the first place.
It's a revolving door.
And these instruments are being used to asset strip us all financially and really to impose us with an insurmountable debt as well.
So, when this all hits the fan, I could see the forced liquidation of military research and development, medical research, life extension technologies, AI technologies, black banks, skunk works operations, going off to the private enterprises at fire sale auction prices, and being used even furthermore against humanity without any sort of governmental oversight or regulation.
And that's not even getting into the financials with OTC derivatives, ETFs, hyper allocated metals, multi-lease physical metals, The COMEX LVMA scams, the LME, the long-term liabilities with various interest rates, variable interest rates, mortgage markets that are going to 8-9% with stringent lending.
And like I say, if only the customer could see his bank's personal financial data in the way that they see ours.
This would be a great way to deter people from investing in such Ponzi schemes and really contributing to their own destruction.
Look at what Brian was saying about using Vanguard, Fidelity, and BlackRock to really accessorize the COVID problem reaction solution and to really buy up 20 to 30% of the single-family homes in this country.
They're rendering entire generations property lists by these these own pensions of the past generations.
So yeah, it's an interesting time and I think it really needs to be called out for what it is because really the onus of accountability falls onto the victims again.
And I was going to go off on that a little bit, but I don't want to take up too much of your show.
I'll do it next show and get into that as well with these medical diagnoses and what they're doing with that as well.
Well, if there's a better pair of commentators on planet Earth, I do not know who they would be over Brian Davidson and Chris Weinhardt.
They are good.
Let me say, the Daily Kos is a propaganda rag.
They are lying to you again and again and again.
If you look at the statistics, there are about 70,000 gun deaths a year, over half of which are suicide, people shooting themselves with guns.
That means there are about 30-35,000 maybe, most of which, 90-95% are done with handguns, very few with rifles.
The AR-50 is a very versatile, all-round, all-purpose handgun, just the kind of weapon the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wanted the Second Amendment to make every citizen a soldier who could come to the defense of the nation in case of a foreign invasion or to overthrow a tyrannical government.
We are confronting a tyrannical government.
Bear in mind.
There's only one reason after nearly 250 years they've now decided they want to take our guns.
That's because they're planning to do something you would shoot them for.
Keep that in mind.
Keep your ammo dry.
Lock and load.
Don't give an inch on the Second Amendment.
Without it, we are lost.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, friend, or people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left, and they want to shorten it if they can.