All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 30, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
58:22
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (29 January 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Chris Wienert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News, Incorporated.
This is January the 29th, almost the end of the month there.
I'm Donald Griner, host and producer at JD.Consultants.Lab.com.
And first, I have to make a couple of quick announcements.
One, Patricia Johnson, the hostess of Call for Investigation, since 2002, had a stroke this week.
She's in the Lafayette Hospital, and I understand she's sitting up now and doing better.
And so that's good.
Lafayette Hospital in Arkansas.
I'll post it.
And also something new here.
I feel that I should place everyone here.
I noticed that my decision to start a membership group called the Financial Fitness Forum.
And the reason is I'm in affiliation with an astute stock analyst who really has very much good knowledge and will serve to benefit the group.
And so this is the most recent opportunity.
And so he does accurate stock picks and they're very accurate and wonderful over the years.
And I finally believe that membership will give you the opportunity to earn about 20% per month based on his expertise.
And I'm employing him for the benefit of the group.
And it's just totally awesome what he does.
Send me an email.
I'll put it on my email.
But Don, there's a minimum.
You've got to have, what, $25,000?
Yeah, yeah.
We'll do that.
But it's well worth it.
And now, let me introduce my wonderful panel today.
We've got a really special panel.
We've got Jim Fetcher, of course, the lead man who has been wonderfully writing books on things and is quite the authority.
On just about everything that makes him the most dangerous mind in America.
And we have Scott Bennett, who is a military intelligence expert and a communicator extraordinaire who's talking internationally and on TV everywhere.
And now we get to introduce Chris Weiner, who's a military, well, I guess, I guess you'd say you're a rebel.
Is that right, Chris?
Let's just say who may be smarter than the rest of us.
Yeah, and he's graduated from the School of Hard Knocks and he knows an awful lot from his experiences and has lots to share.
So, Jim, I guess let's just start off.
Let's go see what's going on back east in Iran.
Something's going on in Iran?
Well, we got a report and Scott's seeking to verify whether it's legit.
It's a very serious suggestion that Iran is under attack.
More than half a dozen explosions are reported to have rocked down in different cities since Saturday the 28th.
They've all been hitting military industrial facilities.
They appear to be micro aerial vehicles or drones hitting targets throughout the country.
You can see a number of the locations.
Reports are coming in claiming that The Israeli Defense Forces are engaging in attacks inside Syria against Iranian targets.
It's happening now.
7.20 Eastern time, five to six explosions reported in different provinces, industrial plant, weapon depot, airbase, military building, more.
You see some of the locations there.
Bulletin claiming Israel launches a special military operation inside Iran.
The official goal of the Israeli army is the destruction of Iran's military industry, reports the Al Arabian News Network.
7.31—video surfacing of Iranian air force scrambling.
Russian and Iranian state media are claiming the drone attacks are taking place from a NATO or NATO-linked country.
7.35—rumors that the Azerbaijani embassy in the Iranian capital is being evacuated.
Trump's loading documents and equipment Later, the Iranian National Security Council has convened.
Strikes on Iran are extremely distributed.
Less than seven large countries have been struck.
The Iranian Security Council has been convened for an emergency session.
The air defense hit one of the drones they were trying to target, the Isfan military factory.
The other two planes fell into defensive traps and exploded.
More explosions confirmed at various locations here.
Multiple Middle Eastern sources are reporting that Israel has launched this operation against Iran, but nothing's been officially announced by the Israeli government.
The fluid news out of Iran has just stopped.
Nothing coming through.
Complete silence.
Something up.
Here's an analysis.
Most peculiar part is the embassy of Azerbaijan and Tehran being evacuated.
So I ask myself, asking What the F that I realize Azerbaijan is having a tiff with Armenia again, and the Iranian Shia Muslims are backing the Christian Armenia.
So I began wondering if tonight's attack inside Iran might have something to do with Azerbaijan.
Both the Russian and Iranian state media reporting almost from the get-go tonight's attacks are suspected to come from a NATO or NATO-look country.
That would appear to be Azerbaijan.
Just yesterday, the head of security of the Azerbaijan embassy in Tehran was murdered.
It is now being rumored, unconfirmed.
He was part of an operation to smuggle micro drones into the embassy, where the drones might be what's attacking inside Iran tonight.
The rumors, again, unconfirmed.
Want to claim that Iran found out what was coming but could not do anything in time to prevent it, so they simply took out the head of security for Azerbaijan embassy, all very colluded, convoluted, waiting for more information.
It appears that news has been totally cut off.
Here are some of the comments.
They do nothing without the U.S.S.A.
In an earthquake with a bombing, my money is on a tactical nuke.
If it were a tactical nuke, that could take out the communications.
We have a strike on a military plant carried out by Israel with a help of drones, more.
Now Israel wants to go after Iran's drone capabilities, demilitarize them.
Scott, We know this is not all confirmed, but it's pretty damn devastating and significant if it is taking place.
Your thoughts?
Well, it wouldn't be surprising on one level.
The Israelis are desperate to try and trigger a conflict with Iran and escalate this, you know, I think in complete defiance of all common sense, because the United States isn't in any position to launch into an alliance of supportive operation.
I am trying to validate And verify if this is indeed occurring.
I didn't see anything on RT, which I would have presumed would have reported instantly the developments of this, and nor did I see it on Press TV, but I have forwarded it to some of the other media contacts that I've been in communications with.
So it's striking, and I think if the Israelis do follow this sort of a murderous plot, It's designed, you know, an interesting time, and I'm not going to go over what specifically that means.
I'm not going to discuss any trips or anything further.
I'll talk with that in the bonus section, but I think this is being done in reaction to some other events that are coming up over in Iran, and let's never forget the
The BRICS nations, the Russian, Iranian, Chinese, political, social, economic, military agreements that are coagulating together are a disintegrating corrosive force to the U.S.
dominated hegemon.
And Israel, recognizing as the U.S.
disintegrates, even though that's part of their agenda, they're going to be wide open.
So I think you're going to see with Netanyahu in office, I agree with all that, Scott.
I also think that since Iran is providing Russia with these very sophisticated drones, that they're actually in a position to retaliate against Israel if this pans out to be an Israeli-based attack against Iran.
Chris, your thoughts?
Sorry, I'm on mute.
Yeah, it's kind of amazing to see.
Azerbaijan has always been a stronghold of the Rothschild oil interest in Baku.
You know that One Belt, One Road is crucial to get Iran on board with everything they want to do with that.
So maybe this is one of the destabilization efforts that is being put forth in terms of fulfilling that agenda.
And even the drones that are being used in Ukraine by the Russians are, in theory, Right, right, right.
And Scott's doing what he can to verify what exactly is going on.
All to the good.
Meanwhile, Kremlin says that the U.S.
is reporting and certainly until I know more, I really don't have, I can't get too far on a limb commenting on that.
Right, right, right.
Scott's doing what he can to verify what exactly is going on, all to the good.
Meanwhile, Kremlin says that the U.S. Abrams tanks will burn in Ukraine.
Biden pledged to send 31 Abrams tanks to Ukraine, but that's really just a token effort.
Dmitry Peskov says the U.S.-made tanks will burn.
There were battles in World War II that involved 6,000 tanks, so here talking about sending 31 is really just a token.
Here we have a report from TASS.
American Abram tanks are vulnerable, even to Soviet-era weapons.
Now, we're going to send the 31 tanks and they're going to be destroyed!
American M1 Abram tank Washington decided to send to Kyiv have a weakness that allow wiping them out with Soviet weapons, including T-55 tanks, during the conflict in Iraq, said an armor expert, retired Colonel Sergei Servarov, on Thursday.
They can be hardly repaired in field conditions or weakly suited for operation on dusty terrain.
In other words, The dust clogs up their filter systems and the engines will not function properly.
Biden announced on January 25th Washington would hand over just 31 to Kiev.
Germany and Poland made a decision to supply Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine.
Incredibly stupid on their part.
Also that the UK is going to transfer Challenger 2 tanks.
Abrams repeatedly demonstrated their vulnerability in Iraq.
As the Iraq combat experience shows, they went up in flames.
A tank turret was pierced by a 100mm armor-piercing blunt-nose projectile fired by a T-55.
There were instances when Abrams' vehicles were struck by automatic guns of both Bradley and RMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles.
Instances are also known where the Abrams was destroyed by the first Soviet modification of T-72 tanks firing old shells withdrawn from operation even before the Abrams was devised.
He pointed out instances where Abrams were wiped out by RPG-7 and anti-tank grenade launchers.
An extra power plant installed in the rear part of the turret-powered modern electronic system is another weakness.
It was covered with the armor that can withstand assault rifle bullets but is vulnerable to 12.7mm DSHK machine guns.
Hit by a DSH and its motor was smashed, oil and fuel went ablaze, spilled down to the main engine, which went ablaze and the tank went up in flames and burned out.
The American tank has almost no chances engaging in duels with Russian tanks.
If an Abrams emerges at a long distance, a T-72 or T-90 crew will fire an anti-tank missile, and we can say the Abrams will have no chance of even firing as its range won't allow it to do that.
The tank's final efficiency, of course, depends on a commander's skill to operate it and the training of the crew.
Apart from the need to fill Abrams with clean jet fuel, that would be basically kerosene, they have more serious operational flaws that cannot be repaired in field conditions.
If something breakdowns in a power plant, it has to be pulled out of the tank, taken to a special repair workshop with skilled personnel, disconnected from the gearbox, and only then repaired.
What an incredibly stupid design!
The air intake is another vulnerability, an air filter operating similar to the equipment installed in motor vehicles.
If it becomes clogged, it has to be taken out and cleaned.
Meanwhile, all of our tanks are equipped with cyclone dust collectors that are quite smart devices.
Adding an Abrams filter suffices for only 15 minutes of the tank's movement along a dusty terrain during the Iraq campaign.
Pathetic.
This may be a major hurdle in employing them in Ukraine.
It's still possible to operate in winter, but summer is quite dusty.
Abrams rate of fire bore over falls after first three or four shots because of the separate loading system.
Moreover, The American vehicle is inferior to that in other Western tanks, and it will further cut the cruise efficiency.
In a Leopard, for example, a loader stands straight, whereas the Abrams sought to reduce a tank's height, and the loader has to bend over low, which is quite uncomfortable.
The Babylon B has satirized what's going on here.
U.S.
tanks in Ukraine are already destroyed after being easily recognized by their rainbow camouflage.
Ukraine.
Mere hours after deploying 31 brand new U.S.
Emblem and Abrams tanks, sources have now reported all 31 have been destroyed by the Russians.
Experts are attributing this to the fact each of them featured rainbow camouflage that was easily visible to the enemy.
These tanks are state-of-the-art, boasting the latest and greatest in firepower, mobility, and, of course, LGBTQ-affirming camouflage, said Biden's Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.
The fact the Russian would dare fire upon a rainbow-painted tank shows how hateful, bigoted, and on the wrong side of history these Russians truly are.
According to sources, it was a beautiful moment in Ukraine as people cheered the newly deployed Abrams tanks as they made round the streets of Kiev.
Unfortunately, this touching moment was cut short as the tanks rounded the corner and were effortlessly and easily targeted by Russian tanks in seconds.
Lloyd Austin responded in a statement, The American military will learn from these mistakes, and I personally promise to do everything in my power to make our fighting forces even more progressive.
We now know if we're going to stop the Russians, our tanks need to be more diverse, more equitable, and operated by non-binary transpersons of color.
At publishing time, President Biden said he was putting boots on the ground, and that it was okay and not an escalation of war as long as the boots were rainbow-colored.
God, that's pretty close to the mark, I hate to say.
It is a brilliant psyop by its nature, and it's so precise with the truth at the core of the entire woke mentality and agenda.
Hypocrisy and insanity, schizophrenia, mated with delusion and self-destruction.
And that's defined the Ukrainian position from the beginning of this war.
And this tank issue is exactly that.
If I was the Russians, I would plant every tank they destroy with a rainbow flag And mock them.
And that's how you mock and destroy an enemy.
And that's all the United States is becoming, is a mocking, laughing stock.
As well as Germany and Britain and these other fools who have committed their population's taxpayer money and weapons to this meat grinder.
And I can't anticipate any other end other than a complete social political revolution throwing over these political regimes that are Completely lost and devoid of any reality.
Worshipping the climate.
Worshipping wokeism.
You know, the German foreign minister saying, we are in a war with Russia.
We must all stand together.
And everyone's looking at her like, you're an idiot.
Why would we stand together with a moron that launches a moronic war against a titan like Russia, who is Who views every invasion of their country from Napoleon and Hitler as an existential threat.
And this is what this is.
And finally, Russia stepped in to fight back.
The tanks, I've said before on Russian television and other television programs I've done, are just a wonderful opportunity for Russian target practice.
They are going to decimate every single tank that comes into Ukraine before they get 100 yards.
They may play with them a little bit like cat and mouse.
I would.
I would.
I would do all sorts of things to them.
But they're a lost cause.
They're not going to change anything.
Tanks don't defeat aircraft.
Tanks don't defeat hypersonic missiles.
Tanks don't defeat bombs and drones and things like that.
So the other thing is, populating German tanks and American tanks with different language, different systems, different fuels, is like putting a bunch of monkeys into that car in the film Jumanji.
And not that I want to insult monkeys by comparing them to Ukrainians, but they certainly aren't that far off mentally.
The Ukrainians in these tanks are going to be equally pulling levers and pressing buttons and cursing at one another as they go in circles and don't know how to operate.
And no matter how much training they receive at Ramstein or Oklahoma, when they get on the battlefield, they're going to be turned into fertilizer by the Russians, who are now Being more antagonized by the terrorist attacks that they've launched against different parts of Donbass and such.
And I would finally say, you see the true colors coming out when the New York Times writes an article calling Zelensky the great Jew leader.
Really?
He's a Jew leader?
And comparing him better than Netanyahu.
And I don't like either one of them, of course, but it's fascinating to see.
Now we've switched over, and it's suddenly become a Jew versus them, right?
A Jewish issue, a religious issue, or a fake religious issue, suddenly animates the motivation of the Nazis in Ukraine, covered in bandera and swastika tattoos.
So the whole conflict is going to end, I would say, very soon.
It should have ended within a couple months, but of course Russia wasn't looking to launch a war.
It was looking to position itself to demand a political settlement.
And the West has defeated that agenda to their own self-destruction.
So Russia is now going to take up every inch of Ukraine that is worth anything.
And leave the desolate, smoldering ruins of Parkescape to the monkeys that have now left their ruined tanks and are seeking solace in Germany, Poland, and Britain.
Jim?
Scott Ritter says the war is essentially already over, that the major battles being fought are just grinding up the Ukrainian forces and they have nothing left.
I believe they have to take all of Ukraine so they don't have rearguard actions and guerrilla operations.
The U.S.
military cannot make its recruiting quotas.
The army has been decimated because Southern boys Who are very patriotic, don't want to join a woke military, and they are justified in having that aversion.
Chris?
Jim, let me say one thing real quick to that.
When I was in the United States Army, I wrote exactly what you said in my memo to my battalion commander, to the Pentagon, That's why they threw me in jail, part of it, too.
I wrote a memo, and I can put it up, Don can put it up, and it said exactly what you did, what you said.
If we go down this level of wokeism, of homosexuality, of all of this lesbianism and stuff like that, you're going to lose the Americans from the South and the Midwest who have conservative values, and they will not re-up, nor will they join.
And what you said is exactly what I predicted way back in 2011.
Very, very good.
Well, Chris, we have lost momentarily.
He'll no doubt rejoin us.
We'll pick up his thoughts as we proceed.
In the meanwhile, a U.S.
official is hailing the Nord Stream blast.
And of course, that would be none other than Victoria Nuland.
Let me see if we get Chris back here to comment.
Chris, go ahead.
Talk about these recruiting issues and such.
Yeah, well, I think that, you know, the use of tanks, as Scott mentioned, they're kind of using obsolete military hardware.
These ground wars, it reminds me of the pretext of World War I, where they wanted to try out the tanks instead of cavalry in terms of conventional warfare.
This is also very much an economic war and a cyber war, and they are really trying to bring in automation to replace the conventional methods of conventional warfare, to test out new toys under the fog of war.
So, in my opinion, each of these wars has a controlled opposition government, and they're fulfilling a depopulation agenda.
And beneath the fog of war, as Quigley says, you can accomplish more in five years in terms of cultural adjustments than you can in 50 years apiece.
So, I think that really, you know, you're seeing them wheel out some of their higher tech toys beneath the surface and clandestinely, but, you know, like drones and AI and robotic-type weaponries, things like that.
But really, I think it's more like a war for perception management at this point.
A PR tactic, a war to not only distract and misdirect the outrage from fiscal mismanagement, the COVID outrage, the vaccine to follow that, the solution to it.
They're really trying to unite the local civilian populations.
Against the common enemy that is not the 1% that's behind all this stuff.
So in my opinion, it seems like there's also a liquidation of the United States assets, a disruption of property ownership, the complete embezzlement of pensions.
And they're trying to hook everybody on this massive debt.
And I think that really you need these type of wars or the theatrics behind the wars to bring in the new offerings.
Like they'll try to bring in a CBDC or a stimulus program, something to get BlackRock in on the reconstruction in the post-war deals that they've got going on.
So in my opinion, I think that really in terms of fulfilling the resource grab that's going on by these robber variants, you need this type of theatric to not only misdirect the focus from the depopulation agenda of the COVID and the vaccine agenda.
But now you get them to this.
And like I say, it's a perfect misdirection or a perfect distraction away from this.
And they're using civilian populations as proxies in this.
And I really I feel sorry for the Ukrainian people because they're kind of victims of geography and resource ownership.
It's crazy to see what they're doing right now with with the world.
And in my opinion, this it seems to be what they're doing to him as far as I can see.
The reports I have is they're grabbing old men and boys off of the street to put them on the front lines with no training whatsoever.
It's that bad?
The fighting-age male populations, you've got to take them out.
They're the last line of defense against this tyranny, this oligarchy.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, top U.S.
official hails Nord Stream 2 blast.
Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland has expressed joy over the destruction of Nord Stream 2.
She argued that even if the U.S.
had sanctioned the infrastructure weeks before the conflict broke out, this would not have prevented hostilities.
During a Senate hearing Thursday, Nula was asked by Ted Cruz whether his legislation aimed at sanctioning the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, voted down in January 2022, could have stopped the conflict before it began.
Like you, I think the administration is very gratified to know that Nord Stream 2 is now, as you say, a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea, Nuland said.
She noticed that she'd been involved in negotiating with Russia prior to the conflict in a bid to prevent this war.
The Nord Stream 1 and 2 were heavily damaged by underwater explosions, widely thought to be sabotage attacks.
Moscow has consistently denied involvement, denouncing the incident as a terrorist attack.
I mean, it was ludicrous to suggest Russia would destroy its own pipeline.
How dumb are we supposed to be?
Nuland insisted Putin was bound and determined to go into Ukraine, and that cutting Nord Stream 2 off in January would not have been decisive for him.
Nord Stream 2 was to be a route for the delivery of gas from Russia directly to Germany.
Berlin suspended certification following Moscow's recognition of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics.
While a conflict raged in Ukraine last March, Nuland claimed the project was dead and unlikely to be revived.
Many believe, by the way, that provocation with Ukraine and Russia was to sabotage Germany and Russia joining together in such a close commercial relationship that the necessity for NATO would be obvious, that it would be obsolete, and that an era of peace would emerge, which was being opposed by the military-industrial complex.
Russian Security Council Secretary claimed Moscow had obtained certain materials pointing to a Western trace in organizing and executing the blast.
When known as claim responsibility, Secretary of State Blinken described the instance as a tremendous opportunity which would enable EU countries to become less dependent on Russian energy.
Moscow officials have said the U.S.
is a primary beneficiary, with Kremlin press secretary arguing last month by weaning itself off of Russian energy, the EU would conveniently become addicted to American energy instead, except America has no energy supplies to share.
Chris Black writes, the U.S.
is now the lone suspect in the North Stream bombing.
It didn't blow itself up.
It's just nuts to even have the conversation.
Who had the motive?
Who has no interest in investigating?
Who actually said before the bombing that they would take it out?
No one else but the President of the United States.
I promise you, we will be able to do it.
Russia is unlikely to be behind the attack, according to Matthias Warnick, head of Nord Stream 2, two Swiss-based companies operating the undersea Russian pipeline.
Warnick said they have longstanding personal ties with Putin, spoke to the German paper The Zeit.
The Russians?
No.
When asked about Moscow's political complicity, The Sun published a lengthy profile detailing Warren's relation with Putin and his work for companies affiliated with Russia.
Warnick, who has been a managing director of the North Stream AGs since it was founded in 2006, provided no definitive answer to the question of who might be behind.
When asked whether London might have been behind it, he called it speculation, suggesting that journalists think about it.
North Stream 1 and 2 built to deliver increased gas to EU markets, especially Germany, were damaged in a series of underwater explosions on 26 September 2022.
The pipelines, except for one string of North Stream 2, were rendered inoperable and in need of repairs.
Let me say, this appears to be in the US with UK complicity in that I don't think it's a secret as to who was responsible.
Scott, your thoughts?
I think only morons could come to any other conclusion other than the United States was the sole director and master orchestrator.
Yes, it would have been perhaps directly participated on by the British because of the proximity, but I think that no one would do anything without the American guarantee of military protection.
Britain wouldn't have done this unless they endure the wrath of a Russia responding with the annihilation of London, which very much could happen if they press certain issues coming up.
I think the Nord Stream destruction of the pipeline is going to go down in history as the moment when the political A paradigm shift, sea change occurred away from the United States.
The Great Divorce began.
The European leadership and their governments began to disintegrate.
And the people, if they have any moral compunction, if they have any mental acuity that has not been corroded and blunted by the vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccine, they will be rising up and replacing these political leaders.
Uh, you know, and by all means necessary.
And I understand the election fraud that is behind, you know, a lot of the controlling of the political elections.
But at some point, something's got to give, something's got to break.
And the United States has doomed Europe and Germany to high energy prices, which they will not be able to survive and keep their people alive or their businesses alive in the next year.
Their reserves are gone.
Their economies are crashing.
Their people are getting cold and freezing.
Russia has some very poignant advertisements out there showing, you know, Germany, especially having cars that are pulled by horses and, you know, their homes are frigid with frosty air where they're eating their homes are frigid with frosty air where they're eating hamster soup, which was the prior pet of one of the little children in the German household.
These are realities that are inevitable if they do not have sufficient energy.
And if they have energy but without food, you know, how long is this going to last?
So all of these things are emerging and flowering and the pollen of death that's coming from these flowered, ruinous social decisions, political decisions, is going to either annihilate the population.
Or annihilate the governments and the actors behind this.
So, Nord Stream 2 and its destruction and the celebration that was done by the Joe Biden, Victoria Nuland, Anthony Blinken State Department celebration, you know, that's known by Russia and it's known by any other country.
And I think they're going to, this is going to quicken the divorce from the U.S.
more into the BRICS relationships.
And you already see that with other countries making Uh, economic and military packs with Russia.
As I said last year, that was going to happen.
As NATO disintegrates, as the U.S.
and everything starts to implode in Ukraine, so does NATO, and therefore the other nations are going to have to hedge their bets.
They may keep a certain card in the NATO deck, But now they're going to be looking for other places to invest their political capital and Russia is a far safer bet than anything that the United States, NATO, or the EU could provide.
Jim?
Scott, I think you're discerning to point to that act as the turning point for economic and national suicide by the European Union.
I do not believe they will ever be able to recover unless by some weird turn of events they reconcile themselves to Russia.
They had a good thing going, Scott, and it was only going to get better.
And they torpedoed it deliberately, and Victoria Nuland, I guarantee, was a key player.
Chris?
Yeah, Nuland was also behind the 2014 coup where she was basically taking the democratically elected leader of Ukraine and talking about who to replace him with on unencrypted State Department cables.
Talking about Klitschko and putting him in possibly or Porosheko or Janikovic or many of these other things like removing the leader.
So pretty crazy stuff.
And this is somebody who is a CFR member, an NSC member, unelected, operative, an official that's loyal to somebody beyond the United States.
It seems to me the Judeo-Masonic cabal that seems to be running all these governments around the world and the monetary systems.
It's kind of interesting to see how they they're an obvious culprit in terms of destroying the Nord Stream.
It really displays the hypocrisy and irony behind their agendas if you really think about it being these climate change, environmental woke Green Jew deal janissaries you know as far as They're causing a massive environmental disaster to basically undermine or destroy the solvency or the mining privileges or capabilities of the Russian government.
And it's only because retaliation, in my opinion, for them refusing the absolute hegemony of this group.
Amazing to see that the new one's still a thing and that she's doing what she's doing here.
And, you know, I think there's a lot more to this Ukraine thing, not only the pipeline, the natural gas, but the biowarfare labs run by the United States governments, the adrenochrome black markets, a lot of dirty stuff goes on there, in addition to like it being, you know, a major wheat producer and many other things.
So, Ukraine has always been a hotbed for mass genocide, and certainly for these wars, I think they really depopulate a lot of people there.
So you're seeing the liquidation of the United States, in my opinion, and they're certainly playing governments against governments, trying to compete for the business and the favor of this cabal that seems to be putting us all at each other's throats.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, We have the Supreme Court responding negatively to Carrie Lake's second election petition.
Very disappointing.
Reminiscent of the U.S.
Supreme Court declining my petition for a re-hearing.
The Arizona Supreme Court struck down gubernatorial candidate Carrie Lake's second request to take up her election appeal, currently being headed by a state appeals court.
As Lake said Wednesday, she believes her case will eventually be heard by the U.S.
Supreme Court.
In an issue ordered Wednesday, the state's high court wrote, as indicated by the Court of Appeals order, setting an accelerated briefing schedule.
The court has no reason to doubt the Court of Appeals appreciate petitioner's desire for an expedited resolution.
The court then wrote it will again deny the petition for transfer without prejudice to seeking expedited review of an adverse decision after the Court of Appeals has had an adequate opportunity to consider the pleadings, conference the matter, prepare well, consider decision.
In her latest petition, Lake wrote that in vacating the January 24th oral argument date on which this court relied to deny her prior petition a transfer, the Court of Appeals opened the door to months of potential delay.
The court responded by saying the Court of Appeals entered an order on January 9th and set up an expedited briefing schedule starting February 1st.
Earlier reports indicated the appellate court initially wanted to begin in March.
A former broadcasting journalist endorsed by Trump, she filed a lawsuit in December against the Secretary of State and now Governor Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County officials, asking the courts to either redo the election in Maricopa or declare her the winner.
Before sworn in this month, Hobbs was defeated by 17,000 votes, but the evidence of that was simply overwhelming.
During a two-day trial last month, Maricopa Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson dismissed Lake's case, claimed she didn't present enough evidence to make it, which was ludicrous.
He allocated five and a half hours for each side, and the defendants consumed much of Kerry's five and a half hours with frivolous objections to drag it out and deny her the opportunity.
Here we have Bill Gates, chairman of the Maricopa Board of Supervisors, who knows damn well how they stole the election.
Lake's attorneys argued there was widespread issues here, including dozens of tabulators not able to read ballots, confirmed by Bill Gates himself and the recorder, though the county later said no voters were disenfranchised, which is ludicrous.
In an interview with Jovian Pulitzer, Lake said she believed the Supreme Court—she does mean Arizona—arguing there's a precedent to throw out the election results in Racoba or redo the election in the country, which includes—in the county, which includes the city of Phoenix.
Could be a remedy.
Give us a new trial.
I'd be happy with that.
I want people to know what happened.
We're going to move it all the way to the Supreme Court.
It's going there anyway.
We'd love it.
See, go there rather than have it go to the appellate court.
Whatever happens, either side, we'll move it up to the Arizona Supreme Court.
Katie Hobbs, of course, asked that the lawsuit be thrown out, asserting that her opponent had failed to prove voters were disenfranchised.
Despite seven witnesses, hundreds of declarants, and thousands of pages of exhibits, Lake failed to demonstrate any violation of Arizona law, offered no evidence that absent alleged violations of outcome would have been different, Lake's arguments the contrary depend on unsupported and untenable legal standards, which would require election to be thrown out on mere speculation.
Arizona law requires more to disenfranchise millions of Arizonans, but there really can be no serious doubt that it happened.
Days later, Lake's team suggested more evidence is on the way, which could sway the courts in their favor without providing the details.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this is a litmus test for the survivability of the American Republic.
Absence of a court having a, you know, a review of the constitutional processes and systems that are occurring in this country, which is the court's mandate.
That's why it was formed.
It was to ensure balance and referee the political life of the nation.
And if they don't Step in as they, you know, I've been extraordinarily disappointed with what I've witnessed coming from the courts in the denial of the obvious Trump fraud and coup d'etat and the fraud of these various congressmen and senators under Mitch McConnell and then
Of course, now the Speaker of the House, all of them running through the overthrow of Trump, the court did nothing.
There's legitimate grounds for the court to have stepped in, and they haven't.
So they've allowed the American Republic to essentially be destroyed.
And that's why the Constitution says when the government becomes tyrannical, when the Republican form of government, which was created to Exercise the Constitution, and the Constitution was created to preserve the life of the Republic.
When both of those become null and void, the people have no government.
They have no court.
They have no leadership.
They're a bunch of tribal wild Indians looking for, you know, a new leadership structure.
I think we're on that verge.
So how this is handled with Carrie Lake, and ultimately, you know, I think I don't know how Trump is going to endure or materialize out of this.
I see his whole election and that fraud fizzling out.
But Carrie Lake is the president.
She can set in motion an overthrow of this election and a new election to occur.
And they need to, of course, to completely revamp the systems and the voting process to get rid of the electronic voting machines, which are one of the key components of the fraud.
It's very easy to manipulate the machinery.
It's easy to impregnate them with algorithms and et cetera, et cetera.
So I think this is, again, a sign of the death of the republic if it is not resuscitated with The authority and the lawfulness of the court.
And I don't see that happening on the Supreme Court level either.
I think this would go to the Supreme Court and they would affirm the overthrow of Lake because it's now not about law and order.
It's not about the Constitution.
It's about holding on to power and holding on to their lives.
We have a pettiness in American political leadership and judicial leadership and military leadership.
that is losing all of their humanity and devolving into barbarous animals of lasciviousness that, you know, is centered around their own self-preservation.
That's what America has now become, a kleptocracy, a communist state, and run by bureaucrats that are mindless, injected with a mRNA-altering vaccine that is only going to turn us more into...
But can Donald come on this side?
Go ahead.
And, you know, the ironic motto of Dominion Voting Machines is changing the way you vote, as in from Republican to Democrat.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, you know, this kind of seems like something that didn't happen overnight.
This is something that if you go back to the War of 1812, they had the Congress of Vienna that basically Rothschild pooled all his resources and people together and they basically determined that popular sovereignty will no longer be a possibility in terms of deliverance from the government.
And they basically put their people in terms of of undermining this democracy around the world everywhere around the world and did so through banking and of course the Federal Reserve comes exactly a hundred years later and that's a perfect instrument to really put people on the hook through debt and to force their compliance through these measures as well so that's next level stuff going into the world wars and going to where we're at now.
So like I said democracy, freedom, popular sovereignty they have to render this to the to the dustbin of history And replace it with this authoritarianism and this technocratic feudalism that is guised as something completely different, the complete inversion by the PR standards that they put forth.
You know, they try to put some benevolent justification behind these type of agendas that they're putting forward, but they are absolute hypocrisies and they're being proven to be such.
I think they're really trying to make what is understood never be discussed in a serious manner through the U.S.
Supreme Court on this Carrie Lake situation.
It's obvious she was a clear winner and she was completely disenfranchised by the voting machines and by a lot of shenanigans that were going on there.
This is probably a 50 state solution around the country where it's happening as well.
And even around the world in terms of global governments.
So the bar will probably not be the heroes in this.
I think that they will result in some sort of selective admission of evidence where they will ignore the stuff that is relevant and crucial.
And they will be even more selective in their judicial actions.
And none of which will favor the common man.
And certainly most of this and all of this will favor the cabal and the 1%.
And of course, there's no Rico on this.
Nobody's going to investigate.
The deep state is not going to investigate itself and find itself guilty of this.
The military industrial complex is not going to find itself behind this.
The banking, the pharmaceutical, the mainstream media, the election selections, as we're talking about.
These are all essential for putting these corrupt governments in place to embezzle and to extort the people and to put them into debt and to really enslave them by such means.
So, you know, this is a lockstep program that's been going on in the past 20 years.
If you think about what they've done in terms of like 9-11, the NDAA, the Patriot Act, the FEMA, the CDC, the WHO, the censorship, the FAANGs, the social media, they've removed all avenues of recourse and discourse in terms of any discussion of this.
So it's completely absurd to suggest such a possibility or even to suggest that there's a likelihood or not an actuality of this going on right now.
So, yeah, great point, Scott, about Dominion and the voting machines there.
Like Stalin says, you know, whoever counts the votes is really what it's all about.
I'm paraphrasing poorly.
but, uh, Yeah, this is amazing to see this going on, and it's amazing to see so many people are fast asleep in the face of this, and they don't really see it for what it is, and they don't really want to call it out for what it is.
Uh-oh.
As Stalin observed, it doesn't matter who casts the votes, what matters is who counts, and we'll get Chris further thoughts when he's able to reconnect.
Meanwhile, We have Dominion voting contract canceled in Deep Blue State due to concerns about their reliability.
This is a very promising development.
The Shasta County, California, Voter Supervisor voted to terminate its contract with Dominion Voting System, the first county in the state to do so.
Shasta is in a more conservative part of Northern California near the Oregon border, two-hour drive from Sacramento.
Acting County CEO Patrick Minton told the board the cost from the county switching to a new electronic voting system would be at least a million.
Why not get rid of electronic voting altogether, by the way?
I can't see any point in continuing it.
In 2020, the county voted 65.4 for Donald Trump, 32.3 for Biden.
According to San Francisco Gate, the board's makeup is 4-1 conservative.
The vote to stop using Dominion was 3-2.
Supervisor Patrick Jones, Chris Kihlstrom, and Kevin Kreil all voted to end the contract.
Though a conservative, Supervisor Tim Garman wanted more information before he switched systems.
He sided with Mary Rickard in voting against a change.
We have a right to the people to do our due diligence, Garman said, but he cannot have been paying attention or know how obvious it was to get rid of Dominion.
Record pointed out we were all elected by Dominion voting machines.
I'm just really curious.
Are we questioning the outcome of our own elections?
Jones shot back.
Supervisor Record, nobody ran against you.
Jones, Kirsten, and Kai all suggested last year's primary deserved a closer look after four non-establishment candidates lost to incumbents.
Just because we're all sitting here and elected doesn't mean we had a fair and free election every single time.
And for me, watching very closely the 2022 primary here in Chest, I saw lots of concern, said Jones, who led the charge to replace the Dominion machines.
Good, good move.
Two other voting systems from Hart InterCivic and Election Systems Software are certified in California.
Many spoke of eliminating the use of voting machines altogether.
That's the right thing to do.
Those are all issues related to state law.
Neither I nor the board can mandate voter ID, mandatory paper ballots.
That's something that has to come from the legislature.
The county clerk and registrar of voters, Kathy Darlene Allen, told the news outlet.
Joanna Franscutt, Assistant County Clerk and Registrar, wondered what more can be done to gain voters' trust.
We have done a 1% tally audit of every election in Chastis.
In 2018, we found one mistake.
Franscutt is referring to what seems to be a standard practice for checking the accuracy by doing a small hand count of randomly selected precincts.
Handcounts in 2020 and during this past midterm have shown errors in the vote counts tabulated by machines, but they've been attributed to user mistakes.
The most significant recorded discrepancy in the 2020 election occurred in Antrim County, Michigan, which also uses Dominion machines.
Biden initially had a 3,000-vote lead in the county, which Trump had carried by 30 points in 2016 over Hillary.
After a hand count, Trump carried by more than 37,000 votes, a nearly 7,000-vote swing.
A representative of the Michigan estate attributed the discrepancy to counter-user error.
Yeah, right.
A hand count conducted in the entire state of Georgia following the 2020 revealed thousands of ballots had not been tallied.
They were also attributed to human error.
Then President Trump ended up with more than 1,200 votes over Biden, but not enough to change the overall result.
This May, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported, based on the initial results, that Dekalb County Commission candidate Michelle Long Spears, a Democrat, came in third place in her primary and didn't qualify for a runoff.
Spirit and her team, though, noticed the initial results showed her receiving zero election votes in most precincts.
After a hand count, she picked up more than 3,600 votes and went from third to first.
She won the runoff and was elected as a county commissioner.
The Georgia Secretary of State's office admitted making programming mistakes in its Dominion machines in the primary.
The best step that could be taken to reassure voters is to go back to full hand counts using paper ballots that are very difficult to counterfeit.
Yes.
Nations such as France and Germany conduct their elections old school, hand counts, waiver ballots, avoiding all the drama and doubt created by machines.
It seems likely Shasta County would follow suit if it were allowed to do so.
Chris, because you had more comments to make, I want you to go first here.
Go ahead.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, thanks.
Well, I was kind of wrapped up there, but great points about the Diebold machines and the Dominion machines.
I was thinking about Diebold back in 2000 and 2004.
The 2000 was the hanging chads and the Birkenstock revolution.
The 2004 was the Dominion, or the machines that were hacked by an eighth grader, and then ES&S came in after that, then Dominion after that.
Now, I've often wondered why they wouldn't use blockchain for voting, you know, where you could really verify someone's ID.
You can tie it to a social number.
You can have it all public access with oversight.
Instead, they're trying to push forth the the private sector is trying to push forth this for instruments of debt and debt slavery instead of actual voting and democracy.
So I think that's kind of funny.
And I think it ties into like the Fed's next step for the next century.
You know, I think if you give any insider group the ability to commit usury and to control compound interest and to do predatory lending and insider printing and fractional reserve banking all on top of each other over 100 years, any ethnic group, any religious enterprise, I think if you give any insider group the ability to commit usury and to control compound interest and to do predatory lending And I think that's absolutely what these guys are doing.
If that's not evident to people, I don't know what to say.
Spot on, Scott.
Well, the most important thing is for the counties to eject all of these Dominion voting machines and other electronic voting machines, and that's the only way to guarantee with the highest probability that you're going to have honest and accurate and fair elections.
And even if we have to go back to dipping fingers in ink and doing it with our own fingerprints, which I think is the best way, this is This is a sacred right.
This is a sacred, you know, infusion of our own blood and identity into the national state, the polis.
And it is not anything short of that sacred union of people to their political government polis that they live, move, and have their being.
And to see it degenerated and corrupted By obvious criminals who should be executed for treason, by the way, anyone who gets in and starts manipulating these elections should be executed.
I'd say in that's the one case they could pass a constitutional amendment that for unusual punishment that is cruel and particularly painful should be set against anyone who, you know, interferes with the election.
This is something we cannot survive if it's allowed to continue, and this is where every citizen should go to their county and demand, by all means necessary, the complete rejection of that particular county using Dominion voting machines and ESNs or anything else, which I, when I was back again in 2020, November 2020, I was back there as part of Trump's analytical team and we saw
That Union Bank of Switzerland, which had been part of my Shell Game report, had entered into a contract with the Chinese Communist Party to purchase ES&S and Dominion through Staple Street Capital in exchange for Union Bank of Switzerland creating and inheriting 100% of a Chinese-created UBS subsidiary to utilize and capture the domestic Chinese discretionary income market.
That's the real secret.
I saw it when I was back in Hong Kong as well.
We reported it.
It's still coming out, but that's the real world of the election corruption, Jim.
Very good.
Very good.
Go ahead, Don.
Uh, Chris.
Yeah, hey, I just want to point out that, uh, you know, most of the people don't even get on the ballots unless they're blessed by the AIPAC and CFR.
So you really got a group of triple agents that are working outside the interest of the American people and really defying the patriots that fought for democracy and fought for the right to vote.
And it really, it's an abuse to these people that have fought and died for this country.
To see this go down in the way that it's been going down and to have the people that have turned these people out for generations getting away with this type of thing, too.
It's, to me, it needs to be sorted out quick.
And I'm sorry to jump in on you there, Jim.
I just want to add to Scott's point.
No, no, Chris, I'm delighted.
We only have about a half a second, half a minute before we hit the break.
So I'm pleased.
Scott, would you like to add a further comment here on the voting?
Well, you know, again, like all things, it's something we're watching, wondering when are the American people going to violently rise up and overthrow the political violence being done to them, and their children, and all sorts of other ways.
And the absence of this violent rising up and overthrowing is going to lead to nothing but slavery, and loss of humanity, and You know, the whole transgender, transhuman climate change experimentation on human beings is going to accelerate, and perhaps that is part of the end time scenario, but I, for one, am always ready to stand and fight to the death, and I hope there's more Americans that will do the same, and this is one of the battles that need to be fought, Jim.
Excellent, excellent.
Don, take us out.
Yeah, well thank you for happening here on January 29, 2023.
This has been Truth vs. News Incorporated, our first hour.
And there's so much more to share, so come back for the second.
And I think we've got something that nobody else will give you here.
That's just good information.
▲
Export Selection