Need to Know News (28 December 2022) with Joe Olson and Chris Weinert
|
Time
Text
This said, Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, Texas, and Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know, some of which is pretty disturbing stuff.
For example, The CIA, it's reported, is directing sabotage inside Russia.
Investigative journalist Jack Murphy reports the attacks are being carried out by an unnamed European NATO country's spy service.
Very, very troubling.
The report said no U.S.
personnel are on the ground in Russia, but the operations are being directed by the CIA.
The U.S.
is using an ally's intelligence service to add an extra layer of plausible deniability.
And a former special ops officer told Murphy that Layer was a major factor in Biden signing off.
Whoever Biden may be, by the way, we have reports about a mask, a Biden mask being worn by a party, and in some video and photographs you can actually see it at the neckline.
Murphy didn't name the NATO country whose intelligence services were being used because it might endanger the operational security of cells inside of Russia.
It appeared on his website and he added, while working I was asked to do things that were illegal and unethical in one instance and another, where a senior CIA official was editing my article to make an off-the-record statement before he leaked his story to the New York Times, which of course has become nothing but a propaganda wreck.
Two former military officers said the NATO country's spy services had hidden a cache of explosives and equipment in Russia more than a decade ago, some of it having been used recently.
Briefed on the campaign, first-time sleeper cells entered Russia were directed by both the CIA and NATO's ally spy service in 2016.
More have entered since.
They provided the undercover operatives with stories to explain their presence in Russian documents to back them up.
It's not clear how many attacks the sleeper cells have been responsible for, but there has been a series of mysterious explosions at Russian military facilities, power plants, and railways since the invasion.
The saboteurs could have been behind an April fire at the Research Institute for Russia's Aerospace Defense Forces, which killed more than 20.
The CIA is overseeing these sabotage operations, which requires a presidential finding.
Obama had signed one before he left office, allowing covert actions over allegation Moscow interfered in the 2016 election, a claim not only never been proven, but has been exposed as a falsehood, as a hoax.
Obama's finding allowed planting cyber weapons in Russia's infrastructure, the digital equivalent of bombs, that could be detonated if the U.S.
found itself in an escalating exchange with Moscow.
Also, sabotage operations, though the current would have required an amendment or an entirely new finding.
The CIA directing sabotage risks major escalation between NATO and Russia that could lead to a nuclear escalation.
No shit.
Ukraine has indeed stepped up its own attacks inside Russia.
According to the Times, the Pentagon recently endorsed drone attacks that hit airbases deep inside.
At the end of the note, Murphy said he published a story to inform the public.
The Russian government knows perfectly well who is sponsoring these strikes.
The intel community wants them to know.
The only party left in the dark is the public at large, unaware of the shadow war taking place behind the scenes.
The article went through various vigorous fact-checking processes and was deemed as newsworthy as the strategic bombing of Laos and Cambodia or the CIA's secret drone campaign in Pakistan.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh God, the CIA has just been an absolute nightmare since day one.
Even Harry Truman said it was the worst mistake he ever did was to sign that thing into authorization in 1947.
They've been aggravating humanity for the last, what, 70 years now?
And it doesn't appear that they're going to be stopping anytime soon.
We also have reports that there are suitcase nuke bombs that have been placed by One of our friendly little allies in the Middle East, yeah, the one that we just can't seem to give enough money to and can't help but build 30 foot high border walls around and, you know, fight every war they managed to stage set us into.
Yeah, that little ally.
And so supposedly that's blackmail that they're using against the United States to be able to keep this straight up.
Yeah, it's absolutely disgusting.
I had no use for Eisenhower.
He was a rotten P.O.S.
He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations since 1924.
Every one of his military commands was based on being a suck-up.
He was in charge of the Rhine Valley POW death camps, over 2,500 nuclear tests during his period of time as president.
just a savage, worthless, evil human being, just like every other president that's existed in the last century in the United States.
But he did warn us about the military industrial complex, which had successfully rewarded him for his whole entire life.
So he just played Pontius Pilate on his way out the door and said, you know, I have nothing to do with this, but y'all watch out because these people are really bad.
We know that JFK was going to break the thing into a thousand pieces after all of the things that he discovered that they were up to.
And so they were definitely 100% involved in that.
And as much as I love Robert David Steele, I got a chance to meet him when he was doing his Arise tour in a little Mickey Mouse, you can't even call it a town.
There was a feed store on one corner and a grocery store Abandoned filling station on the other corner, a place called Edge, Texas.
It was just a T in the road.
And I got to meet him and shake his hand.
And one of the things that I disagreed with him violently about was that 90% of the people in the CIA are really good.
Yeah, just like 90% the FBI, 90% the CDC, 90% the FDA.
I'm sorry.
If you even associate yourself with these groups without constantly standing out in front of them, picketing them, then you are part of the problem because you're just allowing this kind of criminal behavior by a giant mafia that runs our whole entire world to exist.
And I have no sympathy for you and I have no belief that 90 percent of the people are good.
We're getting evidence every damn day.
Thank you, Mr. Musk.
Chris.
Well, maybe to the defense of some of that 90 percent, I'd have to say a lot of them are blindly following orders 'cause their salary is dependent upon it.
And they are really following orders and not oaths in their duties and their ethical obligations that they should be and swore in their offices to uphold.
So I have to say that, yeah, there is some fault that needs to be administered to both parties here.
They're being given limited information in terms of the mainstream media and internal briefings would be my guess too.
You know, this is how they ran the Cold War, in my opinion, is they got everybody wrapped up in this state of fear, and the Red Scare, and a communist thing, and a socialist thing, and really it turned it into one of these suspicious environments where everybody suspected each other, and spied on each other, and turned each other out, and sold each other out.
Really, it's the atmosphere of fear that they're trying to create, I think, in trying to run these type of things, which are heavily funded, and are really part of what I call the Kabuki theater.
Getting into that a little bit.
The CIA was, before it was even a thing, these organized robber barons, or whatever you want to call them, had used these masonic and mafia forces to, you know, the henchmen, to run these type of gambits against society.
The overworld, the underworld, things like that.
The Pinkertons versus the outlaws, Operation Chaos.
These are against their own citizens.
So you can imagine the amount of subterfuge and sabotage they're going to bring on to Russia, who supposedly their self-elected adversary now.
So Russia is really sticking it in their face in terms of the economic war by really putting these people onto a realistic economic scale in terms of being gold and silver backed is certainly not IOU funded in the fractional reserve interest stuff that the Fed has run and IMF World Bank have put on really colonializing the world.
If you think about after World War Two under these pretenses, you know, putting everybody into terms with these agencies and then, you know, overthrowing democratic governments.
I just have to say the CIA's case to control economically many of these countries to keep them on the petrodollar and whatnot.
So, Interesting to think about how much does that play in terms of organization and planning, in terms of enslaving $7 billion worldwide, and with the full propaganda to do it.
The pageantry is half the trick, in my opinion.
Another thing I've been thinking about lately is this AI stuff that's going on.
I wonder if they got to exchanging blows and thermonuclear exchanges If they could program AI to go down swinging, you know, in other words, if the people ever took back their own government or if we somehow lost an exchange war with Russia or China or whoever we're going to try to fight next because they don't want to pay their bills.
Crazy stuff.
And I'm talking about they meaning the US government, not the Chinese and the Russians, just to be clear, because that's pretty interesting stuff there.
It makes me think of things like maybe the Atlantis situation.
Maybe that's kind of how that happened to be 12,000 years ago in like the long cycle of history.
Maybe Einstein's right with saying World War IV is going to be fought with slingshots.
You know, all these agencies were started under the fog of war or under emergency actions, you know, all these mechanisms of tyranny.
So, you know, they seem to stay around and they keep, you know, spending mad money and overthrowing hundreds of democratic governments, like I mentioned, to impose this economic slavery.
But, you know, it's really a mechanism unto itself.
It is a beast like Eisenhower was talking about.
It's only gotten bigger since his time in office, so I think that really the people are going to have to stand up collectively and really ditch the partisan, the national thing, and realize that it's 1% against this whole 99% and realize what's going on here.
Nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, the former president of Russia observes the world is teetering on the brink of World War III.
A nuclear catastrophe.
Russia's former President, current Deputy Chair of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, wrote a lengthy article for Rossikaya Gazette newspaper summarizing his thoughts on how 2022 has changed the world order forever.
The only thing stopping our enemies today is understanding Russia will be guided by the doctrine of nuclear deterrence.
If there's a real threat, we will act.
He wrote, noting in such a grim scenario, there will be nobody left to argue about whether it was a retaliatory strike or a preventative.
Therefore, the Western world is balancing between a burning desire to maximally humiliate this member to destroy Russia on the one hand, and the desire to avoid a nuclear apocalypse on the other.
In other words, you cannot destroy Russia without encountering a nuclear apocalypse.
That is the dilemma.
Until Russia receives security guarantees, the world will continue to teeter on the brink of World War III and nuclear catastrophe.
The problem being, of course, that the West's guarantees mean absolutely nothing.
The West guaranteed there would be no encroachment even one inch to the east with the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
The West entered into the Minsk Agreement, but Angela Merkel has explained it was only to buy time in order to arm Ukraine.
They had no intention of adhering to them.
Last December, Russia presented a list of security proposals to the U.S.
and NATO, including imposing a ban on Ukraine becoming a NATO nation and that NATO should retreat to its borders of 1997.
Very appropriate.
The U.S.
and NATO, however, plannedly refused, saying they would only be interested in limited strategic arm controls talk, and that became obvious then, that Moscow has no one to talk to and nothing to negotiate with the West.
He's absolutely right.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian junkies in February announced their desire to revive their nuclear arsenal, leaving Moscow no choice but to act.
Our world has changed forever.
The main question remains, what kind of future begins today?
New disarmament agreements are unrealistic and unnecessary.
The sooner they guarantee a maximum security to Russia, the sooner the situation will normalize.
Earlier this month, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Raghunov said Russia was willing to discuss security guarantees if the West were serious about it.
Until then, Russia will respond appropriately to any further NATO expansion.
The bloc, after all, has moved to welcome Sweden and Finland into its ranks, so it's yet to be finalized.
Colossal stupidity by Sweden and Finland.
I can't believe they did it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, we had DJ T that was president-elect in January of 2017, and one of the first things he did was sign $40 million of arms to Ukraine.
And then in 2019, he got his ass in a sling because he had a private phone call, he thought, with somebody over in Ukraine saying, I think you really ought to investigate what's going on with Hunter Biden.
And if not, I'm going to hold up releasing $400 million of military aid to Ukraine, at which point they decided that was an impeachable offense.
And so they drove us through that whole charade.
So I don't have any faith that there's going to be a political solution.
The guy's still out pandering for votes and still trying to run on the make America great.
Meanwhile, two years later, there's over 800 people that are still in jail awaiting trial on trespass charges.
So I have no faith that there's a political solution.
We had, what, 18 RINO senators vote to send an extra $45 billion to Ukraine this last week.
So, the system is on autopilot to Armageddon, and there's nobody that's got enough brains to be able to turn off the autopilot and take control of the plane before it crashes.
So, yeah, unfortunately, it looks like we're going to have some more suffering to do before this nightmare is over.
I wish I could think of a reason to disagree.
Chris?
Yeah, it seems like we've got a few hundred, maybe at most a thousand or two tyrants that are trying to take over the world and really enslave the human population under these theatrical pretenses.
And it's really justified and more like motivated by resource grabs and control, whether it's controlling energy or the food supply or any of these things.
In terms of Ukraine, even like it being a geopolitical keystone, a border state between East and West, Europe and Russia.
It's also a biowarfare weapons production center, a lot of stuff like that.
Obviously, we talked about the energy and the pipelines through their major.
So yeah, Medvedev is kind of right.
It seems like the Biden administration mostly has just thrown diplomacy completely out the window.
And whenever you see tyrants doing this type of stuff, taking this type of power the way that they have, I have not seen any historic instances where they've chosen to give it back.
It's had to been taken back out of their lifeless hands by the citizens.
So as Jefferson says, when the government's afraid of its people, you have democracy.
And when the people are afraid of their government, then they have tyranny.
And I think that we're kind of more towards the right than the left with that.
So, yeah, amazing stuff that's going on right now.
I can't believe it's happening.
It's like the Chinese curse or Proverbs.
May you live in interesting times.
We are certainly there.
And this Zeilinski guy is calling, you know, same with Congress and AIPAC and many of these other people calling for preemptive strikes against Russia.
because they won't back down on Ukraine on this.
And I think in terms of principle, in terms of media coverage, if this was fairly disclosed and discussed in terms of discourse or diplomacy, you would find that we are probably the transgressors here.
And I don't mean, you know, LGBTQ trans, you know what I'm saying? - Agreed, agreed, agreed.
Meanwhile, Supreme Court rules to keep Title 42 in place indefinitely.
This is welcome news.
The Supreme Court 5-4 ruled Tuesday to keep the pandemic-era limit on immigration referred to as Title 42 in place indefinitely, which allows officials to turn migrants away at the border to prevent the spread of COVID.
Customs and Border Protection warned lawmakers about 50,000 were waiting to cross into the U.S.
once 42 ended.
According to the AP, an order from Chief Justice Roberts stayed a lower court's ruling, which justices extended to give the court time to consider both sides.
Gorsuch, the only dissenting conservative justice to join all the Supreme Court liberal ruling, said the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis.
And court should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address another.
We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort.
The statute which gives the commander-in-chief the power to shut down immigration as an emergency action to keep communicable diseases out of the U.S.
was last used by former President Trump in relation to COVID.
Family Seeking Asylum has filed a lawsuit which led Judge Emmett Sullivan of the U.S.
District Court in D.C.
to order the Biden admin to lift Title 42 by Wednesday.
That has now been nullified.
You'll be speechless when you see what fraud Joe Biden was caught pulling in the last election.
Now that the election is over, the truth can be told.
Americans are furious to find out what really happened.
And you'll be speechless when you see what fraud Biden just got caught pulling in the last.
The economy is always number one issue.
Biden and the Democrats knew that was true heading into the midterms.
In the first two quarters of 2022, the economy contracted.
Two consecutive quarters of negative growth is the technical definition of a recession.
But Biden and the Democrats didn't want a campaign in the midst of a recession.
To get the meeting economists to buy into the admin's lies about the economy not sinking into recession, they issued gangbuster job reports in the first half as evidence the economy was humming along.
But it was all lies.
The administration cooked the books.
Surprise, surprise.
After the election, when it was safe to admit the truth, the Philadelphia Fed published a report showing the admin was lying when it claimed there were 1.1 million jobs created.
Between March and June of 2022, the truth was 10,000.
Paltry.
Biden and the Dems needed a way to defang Republican attacks about inflation and the poor state of the economy, which was clearly in recession.
To that end, they fabricated a narrative about a booming job market to gaslight the public into thinking the economy was running and that his socialist spending policy were delivering benefits.
Republicans underperformed for a number of reasons.
Democrats benefited from ballot harvesting, early voting, and massive fundraising, but actually stealing the election in multiple ways.
Trump endorsed some weak candidates like Oz, but Oz was overwhelmingly stronger than Fetterman.
And besides, most of Trump's candidates did extremely well.
Many who lost were only because of the theft of the election.
Democrats creating a fake narrative about the booming market played a role as well.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, I lied about absolutely everything, but this thing just came across the conservative treehouse.
Watch closely.
Mexico releases agenda for the North American Leadership Summit to be held January 10th in Mexico City.
But their socialist president kind of stuck a thumb in Joe Biden and Trudeau's face by saying, in our country, we shall continue producing oil throughout the energy transition.
With U.S.
investors, we're going to establish gas liquefying plants, fertilizer plants, and we're going to accomplish this with the support of thermal electric plants and also through transmission lines to produce energy for our domestic market, as well as exports to neighboring states in the American Union, for instance, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California.
So, not everybody's on board with the pie fraud And, you know, it looks like there was some encouraging news.
They caught the main guy, Jarrett, that was involved in the election racketeering in Arizona in a massive perjury where, first of all, he said he had no idea how the 19-inch ballots were printed on 20-inch sheets of paper.
And then the next day, under a further cross-examination, he said he only found out about it a couple of days after the election.
So it's like he had no idea how it happened, and then he admitted the next day that a couple of days later.
So this is just one perjury charge to impeach one crooked, broken witness that I guarantee you they can go with enough different counts to a Supreme Court ruling in Arizona They can overturn their little pissant county judge that ruled against Carrie Lake.
So look for that event to continue happening.
This ain't over till it's over, Chris.
Well, yeah, this does seem to be like a massive series of PR campaigns that seem to overlap.
And really, like when they're running for office or running this country, too, they seem to just make up whatever the hell they want.
They torture the truth with their statistics.
And really, if you think about them torturing the truth by their narratives in this regard, these job reports that they're lying about, they're lying about the numbers of jobs that are being created.
They're lying about the nature of these jobs that are being created.
You know, most of these jobs are, you know, in the destruction of the COVID era in the small business.
They are second and third jobs for primary job holders.
There's no benefits.
There's certainly no full-time work.
There's no pensions.
There's no retirements.
It's just people being forced into second and third jobs that are impacting these overall labor numbers in terms of new jobs.
Certainly not jobs that are employable.
Certainly not single income family jobs.
So yeah, they absolutely destroyed the small business.
They pivoted and just sidestepped that narrative completely.
And they're putting this bullshit out there to cover it up and to really serve as, you know, some sort of perception hijacking, I would have to say.
So, and it's also working in tandem with the Title 42, if you really think about it, then bringing in the replacement army, the people that they've groomed and colonialized under the UN economic slavery conditions, the World Health Organization, medical mandates, things like this, the people that are normally subjected to the service industries in their own countries.
You know, by American tourists and whatnot, these rich people that fly around the world and put their fingers in their chest, lecturing them about carbon energy when they fly in on charter jets.
It's amazing stuff when you really think about it.
There's so many dead giveaways, though, in terms of this thing all tying together and leading together, in my opinion, beyond just the Department of Labor lying about the job and the natures of the job.
So there's the yield curve inversion.
There's the interest rates that are going on right now and what you're seeing there.
There's the credit default swaps that are being funded by the Fed.
Completely just bailing out corporations as usual.
The overnight repo rates are just through the roof.
So there's a lot of dead giveaways in terms of economic crisis that seems to be happening then beyond the quote-unquote What do they say the inflation rate was, too, by the way?
It's got to be over 10%.
If you think about it, Feds, the price of goods have tripled since I was in high school to what they are now.
That's 30 years, 300%.
So the interest rates over that amount of time has got to be like 10% a year.
Now, the Spanish Empire went completely bankrupt over being subjected to 2% inflation rates.
And here you see.
The inflation rate going to 10%.
I'm sorry when I said interest rates, I meant inflation rates.
But yeah, that's what we're seeing right now.
And, you know, them telling you something else that's happening when you're looking at this is them just really, you know, trying to hijack your perceptions, in my opinion.
Well, look how outrageous.
They only have 10,000 actual new jobs and they claim they have 1.1 million?
God, these people have no scruples whatsoever.
But then we do.
They're consistent with their bullshit, aren't they?
It's just stunning!
The amount of bullshit coming from this administration just lying to the American people all the time!
I'm unconscionable.
Meanwhile, a very interesting article here.
2022, the year that conspiracy theory became conspiracy fact.
This was the year conspiracy theory became conspiracy fact.
The year it didn't take tinfoil hats to believe powerful elites were pulling up crimes of global proportion.
It was the year theory became documentary.
The documentary had real evidence backing it.
I'm here to help you be comfortable as a conspiracy theorist.
Or make you uncomfortable if you think that's impossible.
Maybe in years past it was hard to pull it off.
Now it's as easy as getting booted from YouTube.
Fact!
Last year, election fraud was for disappointed Trump voters.
This year, Dinesh D'Souza released 2,000 mules, a documentary demonstrating massive ballot box stuffing across the country.
73% of Democrats who saw the film said they would recommend it.
Fact!
Last year, conservatives said the FBI was corrupt.
This year, we have the documents from Twitter and elsewhere.
Fact!
Last year, we knew social media was suppressing free speech.
This year, we not only have the record to prove it, we have the actual messages from Washington, D.C.
liberal leadership pressuring them to do it, and we know they comply.
Elon Musk sums it up.
To be totally frank, almost every conspiracy theory that people had about Twitter turned out to be true.
Stunning.
Fact.
Last year, COVID, Wuhan lab connection made good sense to people who gave it a half a moment's thought.
This year, people who won't bother thinking don't have to.
We have the evidence.
Same with the COVID-19 facts.
Fact.
Last year, the Warren Commission reported JFK assassinations still made good sense.
Only nutcases believe the CIA might have been involved.
Late this year, new facts emerged, and another answer began developing.
It remains to be established as fact, but has lifted the CIA's connection and possibly even Lyndon Baines Johnson involvement well out of the tinfoil hat demand.
I'm delighted, by the way, to read that.
Conspiracy theory doesn't equal crackpot theory.
The problem is, these are still conspiracy theories.
That puts them in horrible company, even if they're true.
Someone, I don't care if it was a conspiracy or not, did a number of us, got us all thinking conspiracy theory equals tinfoil hat nutcase.
We've all been assimilated by aliens' idiocy.
Granted, some conspiracy theories are crazy, but if you believed in 1917 a gang of Bolsheviks was conspiring to take over the world, you would have been right.
If you'd said there was a conspiracy inside the Nixon administration to cover up Roderick, you'd have been right then, too.
The nifty skill of proving they're right without bothering with evidence.
It was actually the Warren Commission responsible for the PR campaign to make conspiracy theory equivalent to crank theory.
Actually, it was the CIA.
Doesn't matter how much proof you had for your theory, your gullible period easily influenced quite possibly strange voices in your head.
If you got evidence, it's fruitcane evidence.
You're a crackpot.
Do a logic test on that, though.
See how it works.
This isn't conspiracy theorizing.
It's just a thought experiment.
Let's imagine some group in the world that's running a conspiracy.
Let's give this group the most neutral label we can think of.
Group A.
Conspiracy, by definition, want to remain unknown and unsuspecting, so Group A will try to hide what it's doing.
Suppose, however, Group B finds evidence, real evidence, of what they're up to.
Group A can call it conspiracy theory.
Group B's evidence goes down the toilet.
Ask yourself how hard it is to imagine that happening in reality.
If you're not sure, you need to get out more.
Ask yourself how much evidence did Group A have to show in order to prove Group B was wrong.
Not one bit.
They've effectively disproven the truth without producing a single shred of evidence.
If you think that's conspiracy theorizing, do me a favor.
Reread the last two paragraphs and ask yourself, how hard is it to imagine that in reality?
If you're still not sure, again, you need to get out more.
How to show you're not so crazy after all?
So what do you do when you try selling someone about his conspiracies?
I say you still bring evidence.
You come in with clear talking points.
You tell them how you know it's true.
That's not easy these days.
2022 was the year one conspiracy theory after another became conspiracy facts.
So many.
It's hard to keep up with them all.
I sympathize.
Someone tells me that COVID vaccine saves lives and anti-vaxxers are walking death machines.
I've read a hundred articles showing that's not true, but can I pull the facts right out there on the spot with documentation?
I guarantee you they've got documentation.
Some paper they'll email you, some study someone has done somewhere.
You've only got one good defense against that, and that's documentation of your own.
Where do you find it?
I've been in that situation so often, I've decided to answer that question for myself and others.
It's coming down the pike.
All of your articles with top talking points on all major conspiracy in 2022 and documentation to support it.
Go on offense, not defense.
In the meantime, it doesn't matter which conspiracy it is or what facts you have, you can always count on them smirking.
That's just a crazy conspiracy theory.
Are you always that gullible?
First, make sure your conspiracy theory isn't crazy.
Some of them still are.
Once you got that straight, ask him straight up.
Seems like you think there's something automatically wrong with anyone who believes conspiracies are possible.
How could he even think something as strange as that?
I add, conspiracy is the most widely prosecuted crime in the United States of America.
Most American conspiracies are economic, but nonetheless conspiracies which only require two or more individuals engaging together to commit an illegal act.
I'm not exactly recommending you go on the defensive here, if you hadn't noticed.
I'm not exactly recommending, if you hadn't noticed, if they retreat to say, okay, but it's just a theory, ask if they know what theory means.
I'll bet they won't.
It does not mean unproved belief.
It means a broad set of principled beliefs or reasons that help to explain some passive reality.
Einstein's relativity theories have been supposed by one scientific finding after another, yet we still rightly call them theories.
This guy may have read my stuff, for God's sake!
Dictionaries tend to define theories strictly in scientific terms.
That's okay.
We're not the ones who borrowed the word from science.
They are.
It's not our fault if they've chosen such a positive word to describe something they consider so negative.
How to be comfortable.
A comfortable conspiracy theorist.
If they say.
Only loonies believe in conspiracies.
Ask them if they think anyone tried to cover up Watergate, or start the Communist Revolution, or that Evangelists is a movement to take over the country from white Christians.
That last one really is loony, but if they believe it, you made your point anyway.
Here's where you're heading.
They just tried using conspiracy theorist rhetoric to rock you back on your heels.
You just returned the favor, but with evidence, not rhetoric.
Be comfortable with it.
Do you see them teetering, feeling uncomfortable?
Good.
You're not guilty of a thing.
They already were on balance.
They just didn't know it.
That's when you tell them it's time to quit the name-calling and look at the real evidence instead.
There's plenty out there.
Pretty nice.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, all of this conspiracy is only available because we have a conspiracy of voting.
It was absolutely 100% proof that JFK won Illinois by the help of the Bailey Crime Syndicate and that he carried Texas with the help of the LBJ.
So we got that going back to the 1960 election.
But then in 2008, Hillary Clinton was on a slam dunk tour to take the White House.
But she had her primary stolen by Barack Obama using caucuses in 12 different states where it doesn't matter what the popular vote was in the primary.
What matters is people that are elected after the primary night election at the precinct headquarters who become delegates to the state convention.
And in Texas and a dozen other states, they were overwhelmed by black activists that wanted nothing but Obama for president.
And that's why we got him.
And then in 2016, Hillary was losing to Bernie Sanders, and she used a similar tactic to steal the primary from Bernie Sanders, and she thought she had enough votes to steal it from DJT, but unfortunately they didn't have the rigging machine set up to do it properly.
So then in 2020, they stole the Democratic primary, from Bernie Sanders again and gave it to FJB, who then had the network in place and the COVID restrictions requiring 25 percent of the nation to vote by mail-in, that they were able to successfully steal it with the help of the U.S. Postal Service. that they were able to successfully steal it with the
So if you think there's not a conspiracy involved in misdirecting all of humanity for the last several centuries, there's no Santa Claus, there's no Easter Bunny, there's no Tooth Fairy, and you've been lied to about your government.
Chris.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Well, if we just wait around long enough, you or Jesus will come and save us all.
Thank God.
Hallelujah.
Anyways, no, I'm going to say that was a good segue, Jim, going into the conspiracies.
You know, these are conspiracies that actually do have conspirators, the benefactors of their said conspiracies.
And if the law enforcement agencies were to actually deploy some standard of criminal investigations upon these people, they would actually find these people to be guilty in many instances.
But, you know, you've got to look at the qui bono.
You've got to look at what they're doing with It's really hard to apply that to the scientific method or to these standards of investigations when you have these type of corruption that is that systemic, I would have to say.
So it's overwrought with insiders that are there to really serve as janitors and certainly not investigators.
Yeah, think about this, you know, with the CIA and the FBI files, how they got to wait 50 years, you know, two to three generations before they'll actually release any and all of their data that they have on this stuff.
And, you know, that's even a partial release.
It's a limited hangout.
It's not a full disclosure.
Man, they've had their mitts in just about every one of these quote unquote conspiracy theories that we talk about.
And it's part of the whole, you know, like I said, war on perception, perception management.
The CIA back in the in the 50s used to actually send out people to steal people's cats and they would call the cops and say hey somebody came in and stole my cat and they would call it you know cat burglars and jest and actually you know look at these people like they're crazy because they would let the cat go when the investigators got there.
Here's your cat right here.
What are you calling us for?
You crazy lady.
Next thing you know, they're using the APA and many other psychiatric institutions to try to lobotomize people because they are crazy, unfit, paranoid, things like this.
Using these full exaggerations and extremist diagnoses to target the people that are suspicious of this behavior and that actually do see this evidence and consider it and stand up and advocate for it.
So it's happened so many times, whether you're talking Ezra Pound or Phil Graham or on and on and on.
Every decade's got dozens of them.
So they do this quite a bit.
And this is the same APA that's, you know, calling people crazy.
They're the ones that are prescribing nanofluorides to people that are really having a hard time with anxiety in the 90s and 2000s.
Convenient there too, you know, dumb them down, you know, the effects of that.
So if you look at the institutions that are put behind these type of things, the CIA's close relationship with the APA, we talked about Jolie West a couple weeks ago, many other ones.
Look at Wall Street and the IPOs they put out for big pharma.
Look at the actual clinicals that they're actually, well, you'll never see this, you know, but if you could look at the actual clinicals for these medications, you'd find that many of these things are far more harmful than beneficial, and they are probably will give you 10 side effects for every supposed one cure.
And of course, Companies like BlackRock and even the World Economic Forum, they have such a tremendous batting average in terms of betting on these things.
What are going to rise and fall?
What are going to be the solutions to the problems they create?
They're always in the right place with their wallets, but certainly their hearts and minds are nowhere to be found.
And when you tie all this stuff into things like Agenda 21 in the 90s or the PACCON conspiracy, the things that the World Health Work Trail Organization leading to 9-11, things like that, even after 9-11 with all the surveillance and the draconian stuff, the trailblazer on through and the NDAAs and everything else, you get Event 201, and then you the trailblazer on through and the NDAAs and everything else, you get Event 201, and then you get You got Bill Gates running Event 202 or whatever the heck this thing's called.
They're talking about the same damn thing, the same damn people, the same money, the same – it's so coincidental.
You know, it's like these false flags that you cover.
Feds, how many times has the FBI been in the same place covering the exact same thing that happens the day of the time that it's happening?
You know, and this goes on for so many things.
So I don't know how people aren't investigating, you know, Bill Gates or Fauci in terms of these investigative authorities.
How they're disregarding whistleblowers at such a tremendous rate, how they're completely ignoring real journalism and rewarding this propaganda that they're putting out, and completely censoring the victims of these crimes completely through social media and everything else.
And the people that maybe are bought into the system and think it's the way of the world, they bear such a cognitive dissonance that it almost like it absolves these onlookers of any sort of guilt or responsibility.
You know, if it's too big to jail, too heavy for Superman, they don't have to touch it, they won't even go near it.
You know, they're in their lanes, they're happy in their world, and they really don't want to face this enemy because they don't want to see this enemy or acknowledge it because they'd have to do something about it.
So, yeah, you know, you could show these guys their documents in their own words, and they'll completely ignore it like it's fiction or a forgery.
You know, you could show them the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and they'll say, oh, it's a forgery.
It's a copy of an original, but whatever.
Getting into what you were saying, too, about the JFK thing, you know, and Momo pulling the strings for him in Chicago.
That's Giancana.
Yeah, he was he was definitely influential in getting him in office.
And he was certainly upset about RFK being put in a position in the spotlight of the media with the Vellacci papers coming out and them going after the mafia and its ties to the deep state.
So, yeah, it's very similar in the before World War Two, when Abe Relish was talking about Murder Incorporated.
Vellacci was saying the same thing about the Genovese family and talking about the infrastructure of not only the commission, but higher ups from there.
So, yeah, they had to do something in terms of going after these these people and lending the optic of diligence.
So JFK ultimately paid the price for that, in my opinion, too.
Yes, yes, yes.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
Welcome to Doug in Exile.
Come in.
Take a seat.
Huge win for Team Carrie Lake.
I posted an earlier video about Katie Hobbs trying to propose a $500,000 fine on Carrie Lake and to sanction her for the lawsuit.
Judge Thompson smacked it down.
This is a huge bonus win for Kerry Lake.
The court finds that plaintiff's claims presented in the litigation were not groundless and brought in bad faith under Arizona statutes.
So the judge agrees that they're not groundless.
They have grounding.
And then he also agrees that they weren't brought in bad faith.
So he's not gonna go and smack her down with a sanction, fine her $500,000.
It is ordered Denying Defendant's Motions for Attorney Fees and Sanctions.
The $500,000 don't have to be paid by Kyrie Lake.
Here's more of the legal mumbo-jumbo.
Defendant, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, has presented her request for $5,900 in expert witness fees to Macius, who was retained as an expert and testified at the hearing.
A separate request for expert witness fees in an amount of $22,000 was submitted.
This is the one that they're going to win is Katie Hobbs as a witness gets $6,000, 5,900 bucks.
The submitted expert witness fees are appropriate under ARS, blah, blah, blah.
The lawyer fees, unreasonable.
The fees of Katie Hobbs as a witness, reasonable.
So it is ordered, awarding defendant, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, $5,900 as taxable costs.
It is further ordered, awarding defendant, Governor-elect Katie Hobbs, $22,000 as taxable costs.
It has also ordered awarded defendant Governor-elect Katie Hobbs $4,600 as a compensation for her appointed representative for inspection of ballots pursuant to ARS.
This will be easily paid for by Carrie Lake's legal fundraising.
So in conclusion, here's the court having entered its finding of fact.
Conclusions of law and orders on December 24th and all matters concerning this litigation before the court having been resolved with nothing else.
Pending.
This is at least good news in that it's no longer going to be giant open season on Kerry Lake from the law's standpoint.
Thanks for watching.
Give us a thumbs up.
This is Doug.
In exile.
Why should you sub?
Because this is the happiest place on earth.
I'm the happiest guy I know.
How about that?
Joe, your thoughts about this Kerry Lake?
Unfortunately, it didn't reach the issues of the corruption of the election.
Your thoughts?
Yes, well, she had a 10-point lawsuit that she submitted, and this kangaroo judge was only able to dismiss eight of those 10, so he allowed her to present two of the different elements of the crime in their case.
But they also, under testimony, admitted that there was over 300,000 votes that had no chain of custody in violation of the Arizona law.
And so they she will be able to bring that back up as an appellate court as a evidence of misjudgment on the part of this, quote, Judge Thompson.
So apparently the guy thinks that he's going to get some great judicial appointment for sucking up and being part of the deep state.
But hopefully that ship is going to sail and that kind of political gamesmanship is not going to be allowed in the court systems going forward.
So hopefully this is the end of that SOB's crooked career.
And best wishes to Carrie Lake and her supporters, because your case is just getting stronger by the day.
There has never been such blatant electoral theft in American history.
And that's saying something.
It's amazing what's going on here.
Yeah, it's amazing to see them using, like I said, perception management the way that they do, claiming this type of majority support for an obvious minority.
And really, if you look at these guys, they don't even campaign.
They don't have any support up until, what, a week or two before the elections.
You start seeing these signs start coming out of everywhere.
You're seeing, like, incentivization of many of their base Through, you know, freebies type stuff.
You're seeing them bringing in immigrants like crazy who are getting more rights to vote than actual US citizens.
You're seeing all kinds of stuff going on in terms of foul deeds.
You're seeing, you know, ballot dumps at the weirdest of hours.
You're seeing all these coincidental mishaps that seem to go on, whether it's issues with ballots, you know, flipping, disappearing, voting machines.
They all seem to favor the same side.
There's no exit polls, and if there are, they seem to be Grossly deviated from from what the actual results are.
So, you know people got to start to think about this because these people in the mainstream media are really at war with you and they are definitely weaponizing your own decencies against you and they're doing these type of operations in a way that they are and I think they're going after Lake in such a punitive manner kind of like in the fashion that they did against Alex Jones and many others that have gone after the false flags and called that called bullshit when it was due to be called.
Uh, you know, the draconian heavy $1 billion fine.
Uh, you know, maybe you got to bow down and kiss the feet of David Hogg or wear a T-shirt and his name, something like that.
But it's, it's, it's punitive.
It is almost like a kangaroo court, almost like a, uh, reminds me of the witch trials, you know, back in, in the early Salem days, uh, and how they would do that, how they would take the victims and place them in, in the position of being attackers and throw the full weight of the law behind these people in many cases, even murder them legally.
So, um, You're going to see that maybe coming next, I guess, in their playbook for all the people that are standing up with the courage and really getting swept under the rug by these operations.
So hopefully the right thing comes to light here and hopefully that people will realize that this is going on right now and that this is a real thing.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, welcome to Ivermectin is safe and effective.
The evidence.
Decades of use with nearly 4 billion doses to human.
Preceded recent use with COVID patients.
Here's from the chapter.
Ivermectin set COVID to lockdown.
Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization list of essential medicines and is approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration.
The well-tolerated but potent anti-parasitic medicine has been prescribed billions of times in its 36-year history against a wide range of parasites.
is a drug in the abramectin family, so named because the compounds are produced by the soil organism Streptomyces abramilitis.
It has also been studied and used against a wide range of viruses, especially over the last decade.
There's evidence of potent antiviral effects against influenza A and over a dozen other viruses tested.
In a meta-analysis of 63 studies of ivermectin versus COVID, 100% showed positive results.
Studies were from all continents except Antarctica.
Considered individually, 29 of the studies were found to be statistically significant regarding the use of ivermectin alone.
Over the 63 studies, pooled effects showed 69% improvement in early treatment, prophylactic use showed 86% improvement, Of those studies that were reviewed, overall improvement was found to be 70%, 64% in randomized, and 86% of those where ivermectin was used prophylactically, showing improvement.
84% in randomized trials.
Mortality from COVID over all the time periods of delay was 76% improved over control, 69% in randomized trials, whereas mortality was improved 84% in early treatment, 82% in randomized control.
40 studies were excluded for complicating factors or insufficient detail, and they also showed 100% positive benefits.
It's estimated the likelihood of an ineffective treatment showing such positive results is exceedingly small—one in a trillion, meaning These are reliable studies.
You can take to the bank that this is a positive and beneficial and safe medication.
The overall results were not only found to be overwhelmingly positive, but very consistent, very insensitive.
Potential selection criteria, effect extraction rules, or bias evaluation.
The first clinical trials was an observational study in four Florida hospitals from March to May of 2020, even in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.
Mortality was 38.8 in the treatment group versus 80.7 in the control.
Wow!
Cutting it in half!
This group showed the strongest mortality difference from controls, which rate the possibility of ivervectin also being available as a salvage or rescue treatment.
In a randomized trial, those given ivervectin were eight times more likely to be medically released than those in the placebo group.
African continent has a remarkably low incidence of COVID.
It may be helpful because ivermectin has been used commonly to deal with malaria and other types of problems in Africa.
The risk of COVID was found to be 88.2% lower, morbidity 85% lower in 31 countries, No known serious drug-related adverse effects.
is endemic, and ivermectin is commonly used, and in 22 countries where neither is the case, though in the latter group, a higher life expectancy of 66 versus 61 years.
Ivermectin for all osparagin viruses is among the safest of medications in long-term and widespread use.
No known serious drug-related adverse effects.
No known serious drug-related adverse effects, I repeat, commonly taken by a population of 31 African countries for effect against endemic parasites, Dosing has been given as a single annual dose of 150 against flurias.
There have been a very few serious adverse effects reported over 30 years of use.
37 of 14,000 patients in Guam, Ghana had symptomatic post hypertension associated with fainting, sweating, or This Lancet study determined that safety in pregnant women risk of fetal damage was not greater than in control.
However, despite the safety data going back three decades, the FDA has alleged the use of ivernectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID should be avoided as its benefits and safety for these purposes have not been established.
The FDA offered no supporting evidence for their claim.
One concerning risk is ivermectin sold over-the-counter for netinary use, and if people feel desperate to use it to ward off, they might break off too large a piece from a large horse hill.
Actually, it comes in a kind of an injectable form, kind of like a jelly.
If people feel desperate, they might break off too large.
For this reason, it's better to consult a health care provider for ivermectin use and dosing to further enhance safety.
Liposom ivermectin carriers have been developed.
Goes on and on.
Despite the spectacular worldwide effect profile of excellent effects against COVID-19, with 0.26 observed minor side effects in use across continents, ivermectin is widely shunned and ignored in Europe and the U.S.
Here's a synopsis of how that happened.
It was invented in Japan in 1975 as an anti-parasite, for which he earned the Nobel Prize in biochemistry.
Turned out to be quite effective against a broad spectrum of parasites.
So effective, and at such low cost, that 3.7 billion doses have been delivered since much of the world's population since its invention.
A cell culture study showed a 5,000-time reduction in SARS-CoV-2 from one dose over 48 hours compared to controls.
In Latin American countries, Egypt, India soon began to use it for COVID, then South Africa, other European.
However, resistance remains strong in the U.S.
and Western Europe.
Following the vocal disapproval of the World Health Organization, the U.S.
National Institute of Health, the FDA, and the European Medical Agency, Disgusting!
All express disapproval of ivermectin for COVID, even after more than 20 randomized controls showed promising effect without adverse reaction.
Western countries have still not adopted its use.
This is just stunning.
Disgusting what's going on here.
How does ivermectin send SARS to lockdown?
There are a number of mechanisms by which components need to stay mobile and active to replicate and to spread throughout the human body.
It turns out ivermectin binds several of those, which inactivates the virus.
Look at exactly what happened with SARS-CoV-2.
RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is one of the main enzymes to achieve RNA replication required for viral genome replication.
Helpful if a nutrient or drug can act on it as an obstacle.
173 drugs were tried for their ability to bind it Including, to examine here, hydroxychloroquine and vitamin C, though C was found to have relatively high binding energy.
Of all the drugs stats, however, ivermectin was found to bind RDRP with higher binding energy than any other drug.
How stunning, how disgusting to deprive Western Europeans and Americans of the most effective treatment joke.
Yes, well the first use of ivermectin in humans was to treat river blindness, which had been an incurable disease in a lot of the tropical parts of the world, and it won the Nobel Prize in 2015 as the most incredible medicine ever produced by nature and in use by man.
So, absolutely wonderful substance, along with quinine, which was stabilized as chloroquine, and then later further stabilized as hydroxychloroquine,
Which has off-label uses including lupus, arthritis, and chronic fatigue syndrome, but it's used as a preventative and a treatment for malaria worldwide, and it was used as quinine for 500 years before freaking Columbus got here, then used universally for 500 years afterwards, over-the-counter in Latin America, all of Indonesia, and all of Africa because of its There's been an enormous number of health benefits.
To put a further finger on the scale, there isn't enough to keep these dirtbags operational.
There was a group called the Together Trial, which rushed together immediate confrontation with the people that were presenting studies showing that ivermectin was effective.
And the FTX, Sam Bagman-Fried, gave them $18 million grant because of their wonderful study.
And then it was found out that every one of the people involved in the study had been previously employed by Pfizer and Moderna.
And that the study was completely fraudulent.
So we have that little deal, the issue to deal with.
And then we have Michael Callahan, a physician with DARPA, who started doing gain-of-function work in Wuhan in 2005, continued until 2014 when Obambe was pressured into signing a gain-of-function continued until 2014 when Obambe was pressured into signing a gain-of-function prohibition by the U.S.
government, and at that point the funding went underground.
Our lovely Fraud Fauci has been continuously funding, and today there's just an article that came out at the Daily Caller, NIH Wuhan bioweapons funding is still being funded by the NIH.
And this is undercover work done by a group called the White Coat Wastes.
And guess who is in charge of bioethics at NIH?
Almost no one seems to realize—this is a tweet that Elon Musk sent out this morning—almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH, the person who is supposed to make sure that fraud chief behaves ethically, is his wife, Christine Grady.
Yes.
Yes.
Chris?
Joe, are you possibly making the suggestion that the people that distributed and the men who invented, patented, controlled, and released COVID would somehow be complicit in covering up the effectiveness of, say, alternative medicines that were completely shot down by the same instruments of propaganda that promoted the vaccine?
Well, if you are... There can be no emergency!
But there could be no emergency use authorization if there is a single treatment and we had two excellent treatments that were both slandered immediately by the Fauci fraud gang.
So yes, yeah, that's that's just an additional layer of fraud to to convict these people and they need to be swinging.
Absolutely, sir.
And, you know, you can even look at UVC lighting and many other alternatives against it, too.
I'm sure the people that, like I said, have invented this and patented this probably understand the weaknesses of their invention and are trying to keep people, like, say, reverse psychology using that tactic.
Oh, that's for, ivermectin's for horses.
HCQ is for malaria.
What are you doing?
You're an idiot.
You know, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame.
Don't try anything that's going to help you.
Take the thing that's going to harm you even further.
You know, that's safe and effective, safe and effective.
They just keep saying safe and effective over and over again like they're catatonic idiots.
But, you know, there's a lot of money that's putting that out there, that's been putting that out there and telling people this is going on.
And, you know, the only safe and effective vaccine is one that's not used according to one of the previous directors of the FDA.
So you look at what's in these vaccines and some of the military capabilities and the biological capabilities of these things.
There's haplotargeting, there's genetic engineering, there's mRNA recombinants, things like this.
And it's all been a justified experimentation under this guise of emergency, which was sensationalized by these very same people.
And they keep saying, trust the science.
But, you know, the people that are trusting the science are the science.
And it's sad to see that the mainstream media, D.C., Wall Street, you know, the Board of Medicines, they're pushing so aggressively this COVID narrative and the vaccine is a solution for it.
And then shooting down ivermectin, you know, HCQ and many other alternative possibilities, chelation therapy.
You don't hear anything about this.
You know, it's completely like there's two tiers of medicine, those for the 99 percent and then a separate one that's secret for the 1 percent.
These guys are living to be 100 years old.
We're dying at 60.
You know, convenient deaths too, because, you know, we can't collect on our overdue social security and many other things like that.
So it's very convenient for their Ponzi scheme as well.
And there's no admission of guilt.
There's no conversation.
There's no even discussions allowed on their mainstream media or their social media outlets.
There's no platforms to be had.
Uh, they're still trying to push it into getting boosters and these damn things.
So, uh, it's pretty crazy.
These are the same guys that took the flu deaths and then called them COVID deaths.
And it was pretty much the same damn numbers.
And they're, they're pushing on, uh, you know, different terminologies for people that have taken the vaccine is whether they're vaxxed or not.
These premature deaths from that are completely ignored, completely, you know, gas lit the other way.
Uh, so yeah, these guys have waged bio warfare on, on the entire first world, as they've done on the third world for the last Medical murder en masse.
Just incredible.
It needs to be called out for what it is, because anybody with a soul has to really see what's going on here and understand in their heart what's being done to them.
And, you know, if you're going to ignore your lying eyes and take their word in its place, then I guess they're going to have a special place for you.
Medical murder en masse.
Just incredible.
The world's never seen anything quite like this before.
Meanwhile.
Can I jump in for a second?
I got one more point to make.
You know, another thing about population control that's going on with this vaccine agenda, Wolfowitz wrote a memo when he was World Bank President in 2005, talking about the behavioral tendencies of the vaccinated and how it does create them into more of a subservient role, less socially amicable.
They're less prone to fight for higher wages.
They'll be more technically proficient, more precise, more punctual, but certainly more enslaved to their single function.
Fascinating.
Good stuff.
obligations than, say, somebody without the vaccine.
So they are really trying to create these spectrum disorders through the vaccines and control the workforce through that as well, in terms of this technical service idea they have for the few survivors that get past their soft kill and hard kill measures.
Fascinating.
Good stuff.
Meanwhile, an election case quietly makes its way forward into the Supreme Court.
Interesting.
As you know, election fraud and integrity have been major topics for some time now.
Most of today's debate from the presidential in 2020, where numerous allegations of fraud and unusual irregularity were brought out, suggesting the outcome might have been affected.
And yet, according to the powers of Democrats who won majorities in the House and the Senate and the White House, fraud did not and does not exist.
They were so adamant about it that real and true investigations into 2020 and possible fraud didn't even see the light of day.
So here we have year three, Biden in the White House.
Most of that talk was swept under the rug.
Thanks to a case docketed by the Supreme Court, however, that could change quickly.
Enter Roland Brunson, a Utah man who filed a suit against Biden, Kamala Harris, Mike Pence, 385 members of Congress who certified the results of the 2020 and paved the way for Biden becoming our president.
He claims those allegations, or at least a larger of election fraud, should have been investigated thoroughly before the election results were certified.
And since they were not, Biden, Harris, Pence, and all of Congress are guilty of treason and violating the Constitution.
Hudson's been joined by his three brothers, says Biden should be removed and Trump installed as the nation's rightful president.
Now, for many, that might sound a bit ridiculous.
Biden's been in the office for three years.
Isn't it too late?
Well, maybe so.
However, this case made it to the Supreme Court, so it must warrant some credibility, right?
I'm not frankly 100% convinced.
I mean, I like the idea and certainly in principle it's correct.
Indeed, according to Supreme Court records, the case was put on docket back in October and will be in conference on January 6th.
Seems fitting, doesn't it?
The second anniversary of the day the Americans came to the Capitol to protest the very same election results being discussed here.
According to the Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, Brownson alleged that, before accepting the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, defendants intentionally refused to investigate evidence that the November 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.
That's pretty much correct, of course.
I mean, the whole idea contriving the Capitol was to interrupt discussion of evidence of fraud.
For Brunson, this was essentially an act of war against the Constitution, violating the oath of office these figures had taken to protect and uphold that very same document.
Now, as Tim Canova, constitutional scholar and professor at Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law in Florida says, SCOTUS is likely taking on the case to get ahead of a bit of damage control that could result should the case gain traction in the media.
Brunson's allegation and recently proven facts that the intel community colluded with social media to suppress anything negative about the Biden family have made Americans rather restless.
The thought is that if SCOTUS doesn't intervene, the U.S.
could find itself in a constitutional crisis.
That does not mean Brunson's allegations aren't worth hearing or false.
As Canova says, the fact it's made its way to the Supreme Court suggests the Court has reason to believe violation of the Constitution may in fact have occurred during the certification of the results, as well as the January 6th Congressional Committee, an intel committee that is supposed to remain impartial to politics.
Of course, it doesn't mean the court would ask Biden.
Some would say too much time has passed, but it would be a royal mess on the foreign policy side of things alone.
It would, of course, be very good for the American people.
But should election integrity and voter fraud be ignored just because it transitioned at this late in the game would be annoying?
That's a question they ask.
I'm not at all sure this is going to make it out of conference.
Joe, your thoughts?
I'd really doubt it would.
Every one of those justices know that they're as vulnerable as somebody in a Zagruder film at this point.
And there's more than enough forces in D.C.
that want to stack the court in a different direction.
And even with a 5-4 split decision on absolutely everything, that means you only need to knock out one or two justices and you can end up having a rubber stamp for whatever transgender ding-dongs you got running wild in the streets of D.C.
So, yeah, I'm not the least bit hopeful that this is going to happen, but it's nice that at least they're considering it.
And Mr. Pence, Pence, you can forget about ever running for elected office again because you had a constitutional and a moral responsibility to hear evidence from the six states that sent two sets of delegates instead of certifying something that you knew to be corrupt.
And there's a channel called High Command on BitChute where the guy has witnesses that has stated they saw Mr. Pence involved in child sacrifice and other things.
doing various things.
So I'm sure that he's a 100% compromised person.
And just another enormously bad HR decision on the part of DJT.
He knew that guy was an untrustworthy total rhino that was going to stab him in the back someday.
It just took four years before he got his brutest moment alone with the president.
And that's exactly what he did.
Chris.
Well, you know, I was thinking about all the official narratives that we've seen in the past 100 years or more.
You know, you can think of the Federal Reserve or World War I or the World War II, the Cold War, the Emergency Powers Acts.
All these things are pretty much even, you know, economic Ponzi schemes and their retirement funds and the commodity manipulations, the elections, COVID, 9-11, War of Terror.
They're all based on fraud.
And you've got to think that anything that is created through fraud needs to be null and void in a court of law.
You know, another thing you've got to think about is how much surveillance is put in after 9-11 and justified.
And you've got to wonder, how do they miss all this stuff with such said surveillance?
And that, to me, proves not only complicity but intent, given the magnitude of which they have the capabilities and given the actual results that they've come up with.
You know, it's amazing to see them doing what they're doing here and feeding this bullshit to us.
And as far as, you know, the court having an anticipation and, you know, anticipating the play on that type of thing, I think it's part of the optic.
It's part of the limited hangouts that they're trying to put on, the scapegoats that they're going to serve up, the low to mid-level guys.
They got to provide the illusion of diligence and the illusions of justice.
Certainly not the actualities of them, but the illusions of them to really suffice the crowd and To really just turn the obtuse back into their paths instead of, you know, gaining any sort of collateral momentum as far as with the outraged and what we keep saying over and over again.
And Fetch, you brought up Joe Biden's foreign policy.
Wow.
I don't even think you can call it that, but whatever you want to call it, it's abhorrent and it's really disgraceful.
And it's certainly not the mark of a democratic leadership.
I'll just say that.
Right, it's Israel using the United States for its own ends.
In fact, Jamie Raskin has said, America must do everything it can to defeat Ukraine for Israel, regardless of the cost to the United States.
How disgusting is that?
There it is, blatant.
Israel wants the U.S.
to fight all the wars for Israel to the last American soldier.
Disgusting.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson dropped a bombshell about a secret this Republican senator is hiding.
Tucker was furious.
He had a score to settle.
He dropped a bombshell about a secret this senator is hiding, namely RINO Senator Lindsey Graham, fully supporting his way to $100 billion to secure Ukraine's borders.
Previously, he'd also aggressively pursued amnesty, which created magnets attracting waves of illegals to America.
What set Tucker off was Graham's recent comment, once again calling for the assassination of Russian President Vladimir Putin as a means to end the war in Ukraine.
How does this war end, Graham told Fox.
When Russia breaks and they take Putin out, anything short of that, the war is going to continue.
To ask the Ukrainians to give Russia part of the country after all this death and destruction is not going to happen.
To signal a ceasefire, Russia will take the opportunity to rearm and come at them again.
So win it to win it, and the only way you're going to win it is to break the Russian military and have somebody in Russia take Putin out.
This is truly disgusting.
Carlson began his commentary by announcing Lindy Graham came out before stopping for a dramatic pause, and then proceeded to slam Graham for backing Biden's insane proxy war in Russia.
So the other day, Lindsey Graham came out—and of course, everyone knows he's gay—the Republican from South Carolina and said he agreed with Biden and Zelensky.
Tucker then said the emptiness in Graham's personal life caused him to abandon all reason, support a blank check for a war in Ukraine even Biden admitted pushed the globe the closest it's ever been to nuclear Armageddon.
So it's really hard to overstate how crazy this is.
And you don't want to play shrink and wonder about, you know, what emptiness at the core of Lindsey Graham's personal life causes him to identify so strongly with a country he's not a citizen of.
Something's going on there.
He explained to viewers how crazy it was to continually ask for Butin's assassination.
Russia owns the world's largest nuclear arsenal, is the largest landmass on the planet.
Killing its leader would plunge a country and the world into chaos.
Biden and the Democrats needed a way to defame Republican attacks about inflation and the poor state of the economy that was clearly in recession.
So they fabricated a narrative about moving jobs and gaslight the public into thinking the economy ran smoothly.
This is back to that 10,000 votes.
So this is a slide out of order, but it's still worth reviewing.
Meanwhile, Joe, Lindsey Graham, Oh, yeah.
Well, we got a whole house full of those kind of people.
We've got Nancy Pelosi, who's a Speaker of the House.
She's been in Congress for 30 years on $174,000 a year salary.
She's managed to net over $9.8 billion per year every year she's been in Congress.
So, yeah, just makes you wonder what's really going on up there.
It has absolutely nothing to do with we, the people.
It has everything to do with them, the Yes, yes.
Chris.
Yeah, they live.
That's damn right.
Something.
You know, the only time I think I've really seen business been booming has been funding for Ukraine or the COVID depopulation events.
All I got to say there.
You mean under Biden?
Yeah, yeah.
Business is good.
Business is good with regard to Ukraine.
Right.
Go woke, go broke.
Disney may be forced to dump cash cow asset.
Things seem to be getting worse and worse for the Disney company as a major report has emerged indicating they may have to ditch one of its most profitable assets in the next year.
Fox News reported Wells Fargo analysts predict Disney is part ways with ESPN and ABC in late 2023 as part of an effort by returning CEO Bob Iger to focus on content and cost rationalization.
Well, ESPN, 80% owned by Disney, has been described as a cash cow for the company.
Fox Business states that linear and sports trends are diverging from the core IP.
Thus, the analysts at Wells Fargo have concluded severing the company is increasingly logical.
The reports note ESVM and ABC are integrally linked, and different ways of monetization between licensed and owned IPs will eventually lead to a spin-off of both from the Disney company.
This is just the latest and perhaps the most dire sign of a serious crisis at Disney emerging over the past year.
2022 was not a good year.
It saw several major blockbusters fall flat at the box office, saw the company engage in a political battle that its image tarnished in the minds of conservative Christians.
In fact, the two problems were linked.
Many of Disney's block office flops were a direct result of the woke stance the company had taken.
It started in the spring when Governor DeSantis passed the Parental Rights and Education Act forbidding education about sexuality to young children at Florida public schools.
It was derided by leftists as the Don't Say Gay Bill.
One of the most vocal of the lessest opponents was Disney.
Seemingly unaware many parents did not want woke sexual politics rammed down their child's throat in school, kicked up a huge stink about the new law.
The ensuing political firestorm resulted in dissenters revoking Disney's self-governing status due to their opposition to the bill.
Then in what Disney thought was a brilliant rejoinder, they released a Toy Story spinoff, Lightyear, featuring a lesbian kiss scene.
After an outcry from parents and woke posturing by the leftist actors involved, the film fell flat at the box office, making only 51 mil in the first week, as opposed to the 70 to 85 it was predicted to make.
But that was not the only woke blunder the company made.
Last month they released Strange World, which featured the company's first openly gay teen star, much like Lightyear it flopped at the box office.
It was not just the woke films that bombed.
Disney released Avatar the Way of Water, a sequel to the highly acclaimed Avatar, but even that failed to bring in the expected revenue.
All these disasters convinced Disney to bring back Michael Beiger as CEO, who promised under his leadership the company would not embroil itself in leftist culture wars.
But it may already be too late, as it appears Disney is crumbling.
Yes, Go Woke, Go Broke may seem to be a cliché, but it's proven time and time again to be true.
People are tired of corporations ramming leftist politics down their throats.
Disney is paying the price for going woke, and having to part ways with cash cows like ESPN indicates it may be on the verge of collapse.
If this can happen to Disney, other companies must take heed to avoid the same fate.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, the House of Mouth stock dropped 43% in 2022.
So that's a one-year drop of, oh, $800 billion.
Let's see if I'm trying to find the exact number.
It keeps clicking off on me.
Yeah, looks like they got him a real problem.
And it couldn't happen to a more deserving group of perverts.
They've been slipping perverted stuff in to children's stories and cartoons for decades.
And it's just gotten progressively worse to the point now where it's like, we can just do open drag shows on all of our TV channels all the time.
And until parents turn it off, it's like, that's what they want.
Well, a lot of parents have decided that's not what they want, and they have decided to turn it off.
And so I think the end is overdue for this particular group of mind bandits as well.
Chris?
Yeah, Disney has often and always been, in my research, has been a Masonic mechanism for indoctrinating the children.
If you look at the symbols, the stories and even the shibboleths, you know, the code words that these guys use and what they really mean to them versus the the average onlooker that maybe is not initiated into their fraternal organizations.
So yeah, this this whole woke thing is part of turning out the kids.
And I think that's really part of their goal.
These creeps really want to turn out our kids.
And they want them to really buy into these very rare human instances that they're trying to sensationalize and really trying to make it look like it's more common than it is, whether it's the homosexual thing or the, you know, the woke stuff or any of this other stuff, too.
Even the COVID thing and the mask thing.
You know, if you go to Disney, there were such Nazis about that, you know, in the midst of a state that was really not the same way.
So I often thought that Disney was bought somehow along the lines by China.
But maybe not.
I don't know.
I could be wrong about that.
And this woke thing is obviously going to backfire in their face, just like Black Santa or Blue Avatar or any of these things they're trying to put on.
It's going to be exposed for what it is.
And I hope that more people seem to catch on and say no to it and stop giving their will, their time, their money to these operations that are trying to do this to your children.
It's just incredible.
Disney was the most family friendly company in America, and it's just descended into the pool of slime.
Joe, yeah.
Yes, well they had a real big scandal in their 1958 Academy Award winning documentary called White Wilderness.
In which they showed streams of lemmings jumping off of a cliff because of overcrowding and the subtext was that we've just finished getting psychological studies where we put rats in a cage and just let them continue to breed until they overpopulated and then certain rats became alpha males and started hunting all the rest of them and the rest of them like
became beta males and hidden and had absolutely no sex drive and so basically colonies are self-regulating through brutal suicides and murder and so they extenuated the same thing by at the same time there was report that human beings had descended not from apes but prior to apes from lemmings
And so here was Disney in 1958 stage setting a bunch of lemmings and they had absolute proof afterwards that the film crews had to herd the lemmings up to the cliff and then they had to chase them off and they had to carefully edit it so nobody saw them whipping and beating these poor lemmings jumping into the ocean supposedly to commit suicide for the benefit of the race.
Yeah, that's exactly where Disney was with their eugenics program in 1958 and they got caught doing it.
Oh, and I and CIA have had ties and roots to CIA and Disney and all that.
So yeah, you can see this throughout history if you really study into it as well.
So great, great points, Joe.
I'm glad you said that.
That's very disturbing.
Wow.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Murderous Vax Bushers must be brought to justice from Beverly.
Check out Behind the Twitter Files podcast below, hosting guests talk about Elon Musk and also Matt Tiabi.
Listen to what they say about Tiabi.
It confirms my opinion he's a total asshole.
Yes, he makes a few good points, But a broken clock is right twice a day.
I never liked the guy.
Before Rolling Stone went woke, I used to read it.
Tiabi couldn't get through an article about the right without snarky comments like Bible-toting rednecks.
If you listen to this podcast, you'll discover he has a similar disdain for conspiracy theorists to anyone who doesn't believe the official narrative.
He's a colossal know-it-all and useful idiot for the powers that be.
That's disturbing.
Last Tuesday, December 20, part of Zelensky's week-long whirlwind public relation tour compliments the Deep State.
He allegedly visited his frontline troops in the war-torn city of Bakhmut, Ukraine's last stand in Donbass, posing for a photo op, awarding soldiers medals, and then after, Bakhmut soldiers signed the Ukrainian flag.
It was off Wednesday to Washington for a one-on-one with Sleepy Joe.
Then came the big event at the Capitol Dome, where he gave his highly-touted speech before Congress.
Just as Zelensky finished to a standing O from his adoring audience, the robotic unit Bob House on cueing presented his signed Ukrainian flag from back to a gushing House Speaker Pelosi and V.B.
Harris.
Down to the awkward Z-Man Pelosi kiss.
The entire stage spectacle was choreographed weeks in advance to bolster Ukraine's waning U.S.
support at all costs.
The thoroughly nauseating scene at the Capitol Building perfectly illustrates just how low the satanic forces in America have sunk as their staged optics show increasing desperation Birthing their unholy Great Reset and one-world government tyranny resulting from every manufactured global weapon of mass destruction catastrophe under the Black Sun to kill us off in genocide.
Remember, those that can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities indeed.
Final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yeah, so I just came across the, uh, back up, wrong thing, I just came across the newspaper article that describes the white wilderness.
I'll send it to you and we can actually discuss the, uh, real topic when we discuss this again on Friday.
So I'm checking search mail, sent, How Disney Tricked the World into Believing Lemmings Commit Mass Suicide.
This is a hyperallergic, uh,
And then yesterday, Jim and I did a takeoff of the World News for 2022, and one of the stories that popped up at the end of October was a pilot for Delta who had 35,000 hours of flight time, had type certification as pilot-in-command for eight different airframes,
Uh, had been flying for 40 years, and author of nine books, and she was writing her PhD thesis at Emory Riddle Flight School, uh, in airline safety, and they had an executive pilots meeting at Delta, and the head of Delta said, the only reason our company is safe is because you pilots report to us anything that's a safety problem.
And she goes, well, hey, guess what?
I've found a whole bunch of safety problems.
They're in my PhD thesis.
I'll send it to you.
He was so horrified that they hired a $74,000 hack psychiatrist from Illinois to analyze her work.
And the guy came out with a report that said the woman is bipolar because no woman can do all the things that she said she did.
And so anyhow, it turned out to be a little bit of a scandal.
And the guy at Delta named Steve Dixon, who was one of the hitmen on this particular hatchet job, was appointed to be head of the FAA in 2017 by DJT, just another one of his rotten was appointed to be head of the FAA in 2017 by HR picks.
The man was absolutely tone-deaf, and everybody surrounding him was horrible.
But the story is absolutely great.
It's written up by Dominic Gates at Seattle Times.
We talked about it yesterday.
I'll put a link in the article yesterday, and I'll put a link in today's program so people can read about it.
Absolutely incredible story of personal achievement and a wonderful story that the judicial system finally worked the right way.
And shame on FAA because they are a captured agency the same way that FDA and CDC are.
Absolutely 100% captured agencies.
Chris, your final thought.
Yeah, to add to Joe's points, it's amazing to see that no matter what kind of popular sovereign government official elected, that they always seem to have their cabinets and their surrounding power structures imposed upon them by, say, a financial group of people that really seem to game every single facet of life and commerce and trade and education and arts and culture and news and everything else.
So, yeah, this is what tyranny does.
And it's happening everywhere.
And I think that really people are going to have to start going with some sort of radical localism to start really combating this.
Start at the community level and work your way up because these people in the top levels of power are using taxation as theft and using inflation as theft and many other methods of economic sorcery to dispossess you from your righteously earned incomes.
And certainly to keep your wages low and to keep your recourse limited at best.
So I want to give a shout out to the guys at Miles Franklin and Dunnigan Kaiser.
You know, they are gold and silver and precious metal dealers.
I think they got the right idea.
They've got some pretty good stuff going on on the Internet.
Liberty and Finance is a channel you can check out of theirs.
And they talk about a lot of the stuff that I'm talking about here in greater length if you're interested in some alternative media ideas.
I think they're doing a great job, and I think they've got it right.
And I think that really the citizens are going to have to start basically abandoning this economic system, this technocratic feudalism, the CBDC that they're trying to put on.
And go with their own alternative, bring back constitutional money, silver, gold, reality-based ledger systems, things like this, no more fractional reserve banking, no more IOUs, no more credits, funding these insane wars and these wars on the people too.
So stock up silver, gold, lead, food, clean water, shelter.
Maybe even it's time for people to start assembling local militias because this is getting pretty severe.
And I think that it's to the point where we have every right as citizens to defend ourselves, our property, the constitution in this country.
Another thing is, you know, people that are censoring the effects of the COVID shot.
I can say my father has had some severe reactions to that.
He's got black clots in his legs.
Maybe I'll put a picture of that on next show so you guys can see what's really, you know, impacting not only me directly, but maybe many others around this country.
And I'm not going to let this go.
I don't think it's fair or right.
And, you know, as a man and a father, it's up to us to defend the children and the elderly.
Excellent, excellent, Chris.
I couldn't agree with you more.
I resonate with the theory about conspiracy theories, the story about conspiracy theories, because 2022 was just an exemplar of how many of them indeed are true, echoing my sentiment, where I've championed collaborative research to take
Conspiracy theories in the weak sense of rumors or conjectures or speculation to conspiracy theories in the strong sense as empirically testable explanatory hypotheses, such as Darwin's theory of evolution, Newton's theory of gravity, Einstein's theory of relativity.
So all of that resonated to create empirically testable so evidence makes a difference.
If we're going to sort our way through any of these things, we have to exercise our intelligence and our rationality and be responsive to evidence.
Otherwise, we are totally lost, no better off than all those lemmings who are being engineered to run off cliffs to their deaths, sad to say.
Thank you for being here.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, your loved one.