Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 22, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:25:25

Need to Know (21 December 2022) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinhart in Fort Myers, Florida.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know, which includes, in this instance, developments in relation to Ukraine.
	The U.S.
	believes Ukraine can retake Crimea, which is actually, frankly, absurd.
	Russia would never allow Crimea to fall back to Ukraine.
	It's incapable of happening.
	While the White House now assesses that Ukraine is incapable of retaking Ukraine, statements to that effect were made to lawmakers during a congressional hearing last month.
	It's just silly.
	Meanwhile, the peninsula was, of course, a region of Ukraine before it was annexed by Russia in 2014.
	Actually, it was a referendum, internationally recognized.
	They believe Putin would respond sharply to an offensive in Crimea, but it ain't gonna happen.
	I guarantee you 100%.
	This is just silly.
	Meanwhile, Russian military says U.S.-made missiles have been shot down over western Russia.
	Four U.S.-made 88-harm anti-radar missiles were intercepted over Belgorod and Oblast in western Russia bordering Ukraine.
	The air-to-surface missiles are designed to home in on electronic signals emitted by radar systems.
	The Pentagon revealed in August it began providing them to Ukraine.
	Last August, in the airspace, four American HARM anti-radar missiles were shot down.
	This week's attack came after The Times reported the Pentagon had given Ukraine a tacit endorsement of strikes on Russian territory.
	The fact that the U.S.
	is approving this is very, very bad, because it makes the U.S., again, in further ways, a co-belligerent.
	Moscow, meanwhile, is declaring U.S.
	policies that put the U.S.
	and Russia on the brink of a direct clash.
	That means a military exchange.
	Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Maria Kharkova made the comments in response to a statement from the spokesman Ned Price of the U.S.
	Department of State, claiming Russia was to blame for the deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations, which again is ridiculous.
	Zakharova said Russia was interested in reducing tensions, called on the Biden admin to avoid escalating.
	For its part, Moscow urges the Joe Biden administration to soberly assess the situation and not to unleash a spiral of dangerous escalation.
	It appears to me they're doing precisely the opposite.
	Throughout the war, Russian officials have made clear they believe they're not just fighting Ukraine, but also the U.S.
	and NATO, about which there can be no doubt.
	The U.S.
	and NATO continue to escalate, with the U.S.
	planning to give Ukraine new weapons, increased training of Ukrainian forces in Germany.
	Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg has acknowledged current policy could lead to a full-blown war with Russia, but said the alliance must continue to support Ukraine despite the risk.
	I fear the war in Ukraine will get out of control and spin into a major war between NATO and Russia if things go wrong.
	Stoltenberg said they can go horribly wrong.
	Nevertheless, NATO and the U.S.
	are promoting it.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, just more hypocrisy from the U.S.
	and the U.K.
	and NATO.
	So Crimea did vote to associate itself with Russia.
	And in 2014, they should have because this was a takeover by NATO in the color revolutions.
	And people should know in our world of the present, Zelensky demonized and then criminalized political opposition.
	You can't criticize the president.
	That's the type of democracy that they have.
	The Donbass did the same thing.
	They voted between 90 to 99 percent To associate itself with Russia and not with the puppet Zelensky.
	So again, this is just anti-democracy Carl B. Herman.
	Blogspot any of these new shows.
	The US has been the lying rogue state empire for Approximately 200 years.
	And for the U.S.
	to be in a proxy war with Russia, of course, that's what they always do.
	If you are an empire and the U.S.
	is the leading empire, one of the things that you always have to do is you have to have live weapons testing, real world weapons development and testing.
	And so, of course, they're doing that.
	That's the U.S.
	is the leading arms dealer and arms user and the world rightly sees.
	the U.S. is the greatest threat to world peace.
	So where this might go is the threat of World War III and a nuclear exchange.
	And I still think we're going to get at least announcements over that, but certainly our opponents want people to be deathly scared so that they can't think straight.
	Chris?
	Yeah, you know, I think that Ukraine, as like I said in many other videos, not only the source of much of the food supply in terms of wheat production and many other essential food commodities in Eastern Europe,
	But it's also a center of bioengineering and biowarfare labs that have been placed there strategically by the Judeo-Masonic orders that have used the fog of war, the Cold War, and many other instances to create color revolutions, in my opinion, just about every decade, it seems like, in Ukraine.
	04, 14 now, you know, going back to the Berlin Wall and since it fell.
	So pretty interesting to see that.
	I also think that it's part of a depopulation strategy, and they're trying to really clear out a lot of real estate in that area, this resource-rich area.
	And it's also a geographic keystone, a stronghold for natural gas and pipelines, like I said, going into Europe.
	So, yeah, you're seeing so many efforts in the United States to provoke Russia and trying to send them into this theater of war, this bullshit economic warfare, in my opinion, based on absurdities, where they pretty much isolate Russia in terms of public opinion and force them into these alternative strategies that where they pretty much isolate Russia in terms of public opinion and force them into these alternative strategies that are not only unstrategic, but complete devastations in terms of what the U.S. seems to be trying
	Forcing them off the swift, taking all their money and defaulting on trade settlements, freezing their accounts, blaming the 2016 Clinton bullshit on Russia, you know, and many other instances that you've seen them try to frame the Soviet Union or Russia, I should say.
	So, yeah, this is interesting to see NATO trying to encircle them in such a manner, going back to the Clinton administration in the 90s and on throughs.
	So yeah, Russia is also waging a war against the fraction reserve banking systems and putting gold-backed and commodity-backed currencies through BRICs and through the Russian rubles.
	So you're really seeing a whole new economic revolution coming about as a result of the Biden administration's ham-handed tactics.
	Even going back to Obama, too.
	It almost seems like this can't be an accident, and it can't be the work of professionals, given how terrible this is.
	It has just been atrocious.
	Very, very nice.
	Meanwhile, the Senate is...
	Advance a $1.66 trillion government-funded bill which apparently has some anti-gun aspects to it that need to be exposed.
	A $1.66 trillion spending bill drew overwhelming bipartisan support in the Senate as lawmakers stirred it toward passing before a weekend deadline to avoid a partial shutdown of federal agencies.
	Democrat and Republican negotiators agreed Tuesday on the sweeping bill.
	Who in the world has actually read it is a good question.
	They voted 70 to 25 to proceed to debate, some Republican senators hoping to offer amendments.
	A handful of conservatives said they objected to the bill but would not try to stop its passage.
	Under no circumstances are we going to go over the shutdown deadline, said Senator Mike Lee.
	Fellow Republican Senator Mike Braun said the group will intensify its budget reform efforts next year after Republicans take control of the House.
	We are not going to win this war with theatrics, he added.
	The bill includes measures agreed on by negotiators from both parties, including ban on the use of TikTok on government-owned devices and clarification of Congress's role in certifying elections to avoid a repeat of the January 6th event, which, however, were all staged by the FBI, the CIA, the House Speaker, and others.
	Senate and State House leaders aim to pass a 4,155-page bill.
	Senate to Biden for signing by the end of the week.
	Tuesday was the first in a series of steps clearing the way.
	Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader, said most of his caucus supports it.
	I think it's a highly productive way from the point of view of the vast majority.
	Failure could bring a partial government shutdown beginning Saturday just before Christmas Sunday, possibly leading to a month's land standoff after Republicans take control on January 3rd.
	Budget experts found fault with the bill's size.
	This budget is too late and too big, said Maya McGuinness, President Committee for Responsible Federal Budget.
	She noted much of the spending increases are to keep pace with inflation, but said a lower number would help bring inflation down.
	Included is $44.9 billion for Ukraine and NATO and $40.6 to assess communities recovering from natural disasters.
	Ukraine funds would be used for military training, equipment, logistics, and intel, and replenishing U.S.
	equipment sent to Kiev.
	It also includes funding for potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine, where Putin has not ruled out the use of nukes.
	Included in the package is $13.4 billion in economic and $2.4 billion to help resettle Ukrainians in the United States.
	That's what we need—more foreign migrants to upset the demographics of the nation.
	The military aid would be on top of the record—$8.58.
	858 billion, spending up from last year's 740 billion, which exceeded Biden's own request.
	The bill's negotiators on the non-defense side have set funding at 800 billion, a 65% increase over the previous year, including health care for poor kids.
	Among the most significant add-ons is a bipartisan electoral count act overhauling and clarifying Congress' certification for presidential elections.
	Democrats and many Republicans see the measure as crucial to avoid a repeat of the chaos of last year.
	If the Democrats would simply stop trying to steal elections, however, that would be the solution.
	You lawmakers also include a proposal to bar federal employees from using the Chinese TikTok on government-owned devices And back to Proposal Lift, a looming deadline for safety standards for modern cockpit alerts for two new versions of Boeing's 737 MAX.
	Here's McConnell.
	Providing assistance to Ukraine to defeat the Russians is the number one priority for the United States right now, according to most Republicans.
	That's how we see the challenges confronting the country at this moment.
	Grossly distorted and really, simply, frankly absurd in these circumstances with all the other problems we confront.
	Carl.
	Yes, yes, it's Emperor's New Clothes, obvious it's a tragic comic.
	So this 1.666 or whatever it is trillion dollar bill, and I need to remind people that a trillion dollars total was the entire federal budget under President Reagan not that long ago.
	So this is such a joke, you have this 4,000 plus page
	Bill and many of you may have seen the picture of Senator Paul standing beside what the bill looks like and 4,000 pages like I can't even show it I have to like go back probably about here that's about 4,000 pages and just to be have that be dumped on you and then expected to consider it and vote for it I mean this is just looting this is juvenile uh
	And it's associated with what we have and why we have this exponential debt curve and why we're being pushed into herded into the great reset.
	It is just and this is all going to be blamed on not.
	What it is, the mathematical certainty of creating what we use for money as debt.
	Carl B. Herman blogs about any of these shows, the Looting Trillions section.
	As a retired AP Macroeconomics teacher, I'll walk you through that obvious mathematical certainty to create that curve.
	And that article itself, I mean, it just normalizes, it hypnotizes people into thinking that somehow this Idiocy is is normal.
	That was an article from Reuters, which is corporate media propaganda.
	And the line that they had in there that I enjoyed the most was their virtue signaling that prepare that pretending in the bill is language to prevent what happened on January the 6th and when.
	According to the article, a mob of Donald Trump supporters attacked the Capitol to overturn Biden's victory.
	I mean, how many lies can you pack into one sentence?
	Good.
	Chris?
	Well, how much time you got, Carl?
	A lot of these golem enterprises that seem to be coming out of the clear blue imagination of these Robert Barron billionaires that are working towards making us all homeless on our own homeland.
	It seems like they never really run out of Hegelian crisis cycles in terms of disaster capitalism and many things like this.
	And this economic millstone that they're trying to put on $1.66 trillion.
	I guess comparative to the rest of the money they've taken, doesn't seem like much, but everything counts.
	And, you know, think about the $8 trillion plus they put for the COVID lockdowns to run small businesses out of basically being a thing anymore.
	I think there's maybe 5% of the world in the United States is small business now after this.
	So they're forcing everybody into these corporate oligarchies and the Cisco logistics infrastructure, and that's about it.
	And they're also funding lockdowns and quarantines and a healthy vaccine passports, the vaccine itself.
	These are soft kill measures.
	They seem to have all this unlimited amount of money for these things.
	Putting up $30 trillion in our national debt plus, you know, for the war of terror to bail out the insurance companies, the banks, the Wall Street stuff in 08.
	Too big to jail, too big to fail.
	That's the unfortunate thing about all these Ponzi schemes and Gollum enterprises that I mentioned, is that they do need an inflow of money that exceeds the outflow of money in order to keep the charades going.
	So this is, I think, very much part of it.
	If you look at what Wall Street, Congress, and state governments have done with our pensions, either completely blowing it hard or absolutely using them to accessorize these draconian restraints.
	Things like BlackRock and many of these other companies that are You know, putting these, these, investing in these, these offerings that are certainly part of the absurdity, part of the confetti seem to be coordinated at best.
	You know, I think that they always have the money to fund restraints on civil liberties and the Constitution.
	But when it comes to actually looking out for the citizens, you know, you don't really do anything like that.
	How many people are homeless now?
	How many people in small businesses are completely devastated?
	How many people got destroyed by this weather warfare that's going on down south?
	You know, they're lending money out for decades and decades at their own inner circles and negative interest rates, printing it with fractional reserve currency in the way that they have, giving it away to the Fortune 500 companies to run mom and pop shops out of town.
	So, yeah, this $100 billion that they put into Ukraine recently seemed to be just one giant crypto gyro that was being used to hijack the 2022 election.
	And Lord knows what they've done in the last election cycles and what else they're going to do with the next one.
	Yeah, I got to call bullshit on this and I think that they need to stop.
	It's like dealing with addicts.
	You know, if you can let these guys keep going and keep funding and fostering their dependency, they're going to keep abusing that love.
	Yeah.
	And gun owners of America are concerned.
	They've got buried anti-gun stuff in there and you can imagine that's the way to do it.
	Tuck it into a massive bill no one's ever even read.
	So that's very important.
	That should come out.
	Meanwhile, We have the anti-New York Times Mike King addressing the trick of attacking Trump from the far right.
	Until the long-awaited sting operation, commonly referred to as the storm, moves from behind the scene to the open, the public grand finale, and it's coming.
	It is perfectly natural and rational for folks in the conspiracy theory community to maintain a degree of skepticism as to Trump's intention or ability to blow up the plan set for us by Q. Indeed, in spite of our continuing optimism here at Real History Chan, we have never guaranteed that the plan will succeed in the end, only that it does exist and that it has achieved many substantial victories to date.
	That precipitous remnant of used guys who still say Trump is one of them.
	We respectfully pose the following questions.
	Who saved us from Hillary Clinton's planned hell on earth?
	Who arranged from behind the teen to put the mighty Harvey Weinstein in jail?
	Who put Mossad blackmail assets Epstein and Maxwell in jail?
	Who saved Assad regime of Syria?
	Who defended CIA-Mossad ISIS causing the mercenary army to wither away?
	Who got us out of the Middle East entirely?
	Who ended the dangerous Korean Cold War?
	Who defanged and debunked NATO?
	Who cleansed the entire GOP of Jew neocon Israeli persons?
	Who put the Bush dynasty out of business?
	Who put the Cheney dynasty out of business?
	Who put the Cuomo dynasty out of business?
	Who put the McCain mafia out of business?
	Who forced or maneuvered nearly 100 rhino globalist Republicans out of Congress?
	Who made it acceptable to call extreme liberals by the proper label, communists?
	Who fired the untouchable Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright from the Pentagon Board?
	Who won the loyalty of Zion Christians to such an extent that their Mossad-financed pastors cannot possibly undermine Trump?
	Who said, Netanyahu.
	Who split the Israeli lobby in two?
	Who got us out of the Paris climate scam?
	Who got us out of the TPP world government trade deal?
	Who stopped the anti-white replacement of Jackson from the $20 bill with Harriet Tubman?
	Who thwarted the five-year COVID lockdown scheme and the Great Reset, which was to follow?
	Who waged war upon and discredited the fake news like no president before?
	Who is about to blow election fraud wide open?
	Who got rid of Roe v. Wade, a move that has already banned abortion in numerous states?
	Who took away the EPA's power to regulate CO2 emissions?
	Who fired globalist warmest fake scientists from government agencies?
	Who stood before the UN and WEF and boldly denounced globalism right to their faces?
	Who saved us from the pre-planned World War III with Russia and China?
	Who fought the scourge of sex trafficking with children and abuse like no other before?
	Who, through his collaboration with Q, informed millions of folks of these satanic globalists?
	Who has been viciously attacked by Deep State fake news 24-7, 365, ever since 2015?
	Who does Satanists and child rapists fear and hate more than anyone?
	Who put his life at risk and brought so much hatred down upon himself for your sake?
	And who will soon return to the presidency, which he never really abdicated?
	Answer?
	Donald Trump, while acting as a frontman for the worldwide military-patriot alliance.
	That's who.
	And much of this was achieved while playing the strategically necessary game of diversion and optics.
	Not by foolishly screaming, da Jews, da Jews, da Jews, as some of our purest brethren on the far right demand.
	No hard filings here against any abused guys who still deem the plan too good to be true.
	After all, with a notable exception in the 1930s glory days of Germany, we the good, You've been getting your asses kicked up and down the football field for about the past 120 years now.
	And even if the globalist deep staters were to be wiped out in one fell swoop, what to do about the increasingly blending out white masses of Western normiedom, which includes the folks in the lands down under?
	Who have by now been so mentally, morally, and spiritually damaged it would take many years to repair the lost minds and souls.
	Yes, your skepticism and even despondent pessimism is totally understandable.
	Where the proverbial line must be drawn, however, is when silly slanders about Trump being a Red Shield-owned false opposition But Wilbur Ross, but Jared Kushner, but Deathjab, and Q being a Jewish PSYOP start circulating.
	Such absurd assertions are not merely false, but are part of a true clever PSYOP engineered by the usual suspects and executed by their agents within our ranks.
	The objective?
	To undermine and bitterly divide Trump's support base by attacking him from the right.
	Hmm.
	Now where have we seen this tactic before?
	Let's see.
	Here you have the Sunshine Patriots and the Are We There Yet chorus failing to appreciate the magnitude of what Trump has been up against and what the White Hats are attempting to pull off.
	Wilbur Ross, Trump's Secretary of the Interior, worked as a bankruptcy reorganization specialist for Rudfield & Sons in New York and helped Trump before starting his own company.
	Based on that connection, the naysayers and their dupes accuse Trump of being a Red Shield public.
	Spearing Q as a Bolshevik psyop based on the 1920s Operation Trust is another trick of these people.
	Here's Trump.
	I'm just fighting to save our country.
	It's true.
	In 1923, Adolf Hitler won a lawsuit against Vorwärts, a Jewish-owned Marxist newspaper that had falsely accused him of being funded by—get this—American Jews.
	Below is a complete text published by the Jewish Telegraph Agency.
	Merlin Vorwärts paid six million Marx damages for saying Hitler got Jewish and Ford money.
	Adolf Hitler, leader of the Bavarian fascists, was awarded yesterday 6 million marks.
	Editors note, not much due to hyperinflation.
	Damages in his libel suit against the editor of Vorwärts, a socialist daily of Berlin.
	The libel proceedings against a socialist editor were instituted by the reactionary leader of Bavaria following the publication by the Vorwärts A report that the Hitler Organization was receiving financial aid from American Jews and Henry Ford.
	An unlikely combination.
	Weakness in homosexual rivals within Hitler's early NSDAP, such as a treasonous Brother Strasser, would later start whispering campaigns aimed at undermining his support.
	But Hitler had Jewish blood, they said.
	Hitler was a secret Bolshevik, they said.
	To this day, there are certain charlatans and ass clowns, usually pretending to be white nationalists, smearing the Great One as a red shield and an agent of London.
	It's a clever and all-too-often effective boy, and it is today being utilized by these very same pretenders, some with Jewish-sounding surnames or Anglo names, but with a Jewish facial appearance to attack Trump and Putin from the far right and demoralize us in the process.
	Do not listen to them.
	Here are some historical examples.
	Jewish Marxist forward-labeled history is a paid agent of American Jews.
	The Great One sued Rohwertz and won.
	Otto Strasser and his brother Gregor were leaders of the leftist faction within the NSDAP.
	This shady pro-Soviet Union traitor, who was forced to flee Germany in the support of the Allied genocidal war against Germany, spread the lie that Hitler had been a Bavarian communist.
	Here are more.
	Ignoramuses are operatives.
	Adam Green of No More News and one of his frequent guests, Christopher John Perjicknes, often and viciously attack Hitler, Trump, and Putin and Q from the far right.
	But jerkness, ridiculous comic book titles, Adolf Hitler, Bolshevik, and Zionist.
	And Putin's reign of terror featuring a bloody Leon Trotsky on the cover.
	In Trump's case, the nasty smear is proven to be much stickier than it was when applied to the Great One.
	That's because Trump's necessary strategy of keeping your enemies close created, by design, the impression that he really was in love with and beholden to various devious demons such as Sheldon Addison, BB Satan, Yahoo, the IPAC crowd, and more.
	This strategic embrace of the Zio crazies, coupled with equally cosmetic overtures toward the globalist left on various issues, made it easier to attack him from the far right and pick off many sunshine patriots from the pro-Trump ranks in our own donor list in the process.
	In Trump's case, the Nazi smear has woven much stickier than it was.
	The military-supervised Operation Warp Speed, a voluntary vaccine used by Trump to end the dangerous permalockdowns and prevent the deep state from rolling out years from now, an actual mandatory genocidal jab with nanotech tracking chips linked to the cloud, has also been used to brand him as a willful mass murderer in league with the Who, Bill Gates, and Anthony Falsi.
	Trump's position has become apparent to all who've read, with an open nationalist and Greco-thinking mind, that is.
	My compelling piece is defending him from such false charges.
	We can all say with certainty that Donald has outmaneuvered both the Zionist faction and the globalist faction at every turn.
	The unremitting and intense hate articles and TV hit pieces still being machine gun fired at ex-President Trump every single day by the Juden Press are all that one needs to confirm whose side Trump is on—namely, how worse.
	Those bloggers and podcasters many self-describe former Trump supporters who continue to attack Trump from the far right, be it out of sincere emotionalized ignorance or due to fiendish cunning, are actually making hateful common cause with Salzburger's New York Times, Soros's MoveOn, and Red Shield's Economist.
	Think about that for a moment.
	Let it sink in, and be very careful with such right-wing sources.
	Here you have deep state demoralizer to his far right.
	Trump is a globalist psy-op agent.
	He works for the Jews and Big Pharma.
	Epstein had sex apes on him and one billion people would die from his vaccines.
	Or the globalists were going to keep us shut down and starving for up to five years with new variants and a long wait for a mandatory vaccine with microchips in it.
	The vaccines would have come anyway.
	Trump had no way of preventing them.
	Humanity demanded a vaccine to end lockdowns.
	Trump pulled the agenda more than a year forward.
	By doing so, he saved the world from destruction.
	He constantly promoted cures, which eliminated the need for a vaccine.
	He constantly opposed the mandates.
	He said nobody has to be afraid of COVID.
	He supports his allies who warn about the vaccines.
	Trump has outfoxed his highness, understanding the two faces.
	Don Traberoni disposes of yet another Jewish monster, comparing him to Don Corleone.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, I've appreciated Mike King of the Anti-New York Times for probably a decade or more, and as a retired National Board Certified History teacher, I should say something about him calling Hitler the Great One.
	First, U.S., U.K., and NATO, they're not the Great Ones, they're not good, Carl B. Hermann, Blockspot.
	U.S.
	Illegal is the 11-part series to demonstrate that the U.S.
	has been a lying, looting, rogue state empire for 200 years, the U.K.
	longer than that.
	You count up the number of people the U.S.
	military interventions have killed since World War II, and all those are Orwellian illegal.
	The total is more than killed by the German Nazis in World War II, somewhere north of 30 million.
	And then, if you take a look at the narratives, in World War I, both of my grandfathers were lied into that war by the U.S.
	A war to end all wars, a war to make the world safe for democracy, you know, and then what happened is that the winners stole the losers colonies and of course you're going to have and then blame and then build Germany for World War One.
	Of course nationalism is going to rise in Germany after that.
	And they scramble.
	And the Germans enacted a form of monetary reform.
	Karl B. Hermann Blox bought any of these shows looting trillions.
	I'll explain to you that.
	That goes all the way back to Benjamin Franklin saying, hey, if you do this, then as a government, you don't need taxes.
	And Germany became the most powerful economy in the 1930s, prompting Time Magazine to name Hitler Man of the Year, and the enthusiasm of Germans for the German government at that time.
	That's as far as the history is I'm going to take you, but for sure you should withdraw consent of the US, the UK and the NATO's official stories from just that vignette and then follow up with the documentation.
	Don't believe anything that Nice.
	you're being told by these winners.
	As for Q, I'm still at 95% certainty that that is what is happening behind the scenes.
	And the Twitter files, for that to be true, the Twitter files has to be a drip, drip, drip that will lead to the flood of arrests.
	And I mean this month.
	Otherwise, we're going to have to oppose the empire as Gandhi and King did in 2023.
	Nice.
	Chris?
	Well, there's a lot of people that are resorting to this level of Trumpsplaining.
	It's almost like watching The Matrix, you know, where these Q people and the Trust the Plan guys really try to defend accusations like Agenda 21, Event 201, Warp Speed.
	They accumulate the notion of 5D chess being some sort of a thing at play here.
	I can understand to some extent you got to wake the most of the people up.
	You got to give a majority or at least a good amount of people some degree of awakening to what's going on.
	So I understand there's some truth in that, but some of this stuff is hard to overlook, you know, in terms of like the Trump derangement syndrome.
	And it's just as bad on the against as it is on the for.
	And I almost think that it's some sort of dynamic that is instigated amongst fanatics to create this infantilization of the partisan political structure.
	And it certainly has been doing that.
	It reminds me kind of like being in an abusive relationship or being with someone that's a cheater, you know, and you try to justify in so many ways, you know, that what's happening is not happening and things like that.
	I almost think it's more dangerous to give a blind pass in those instances.
	Like I say, the warp speed, the Zionist cabinet, things like that.
	I think Trump is really kind of more of a safety school for the Judeo-Masonic order in terms of credibility.
	And of course, using Cambridge Analytica and Q, you can really tell the people what they want to hear and keep them on their seats rather than out in the streets.
	And I think that was a big part of it, too.
	Trump was given $2-5 billion in mainstream coverage up until he won the election in 2016.
	Then all of a sudden they turn all these these media apparatus against him.
	They start focusing on his molehills and ignoring his mountains.
	You know, the Stormy, the Screepaw, the Steel Memo, the January 6th thing has turned into a complete circus.
	And it almost feels like P.T. Barnum is meeting Vince McMahon here in this WWF infantilization, like I'm saying.
	And it's really to me, I'm having a hard time buying into it.
	I think Trump maybe was brought in to broker the United States bankruptcy behind the scenes and lead into what becomes the CBDC and the economic reset.
	You know, you've got to have 75% truth to usher in the 25% deception, and I think that that could be maybe what's going on here.
	Maybe there's more to this than I can see or that's just my opinion.
	So, whatever.
	Anyways, people can disagree with it or feel whatever they want.
	You know, I think that when you're put in a position of trust versus, you know, the breach of faith that we're seeing here, you know, it's kind of a sticky slope and there's people on each side of this that are going to feel a certain way and people that are onlookers that are going to maybe forge to one of the polarized options.
	You know, I think that Hitler in the case of World War Two was also funded by London.
	And I think if you look at it in terms of a depopulation agenda, you know, an event to drive the European continent and the rest of the world off the gold standard to bring in the World Bank and the IMF to take the central bankers and replace popular sovereign national governments with them and with this UN agenda.
	Look at the structure of the Haverar Agreement in the resettlement of Palestine and the independence models in 1947 as well, where they lend the option and optic of giving these long oppressed countries independence, but they truly put the screws to them even more by economic means and economic sorcery through the banking systems they put in, through controlling education, the medical communities, the arts, the music, the culture, the money, most importantly.
	So I'm having a hard time buying that our Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful man in the world, was somehow silenced by the PayPal Mafia and Peter Thiel and these guys and YouTube and Twitter.
	The guys that put him in there in the first place somehow or another are turning against him.
	This reminds me of, like, the precursor to World War II, the Phony War.
	And, you know, they're setting things up, in my opinion, in terms of public opinion.
	And I just say keep your head up and, you know, trust but verify, I guess.
	Fascinating.
	Absolutely fascinating.
	Meanwhile, Elon Musk, to be replaced by Edward Snowden, is Twitter's CEO with a salary of Bitcoin.
	In a bid to find a capable hand to oversee the operation of Twitter, Elon Musk posted that he's searching for a new CEO.
	A billionaire stressed in his post he's looking for a new CEO who can make Twitter thrive.
	In response, Edward Snowden, the American and naturalized Russian computer scientist, expressed his interest.
	However, Snowden responded by saying he would only take payment in Bitcoin.
	In the meanwhile, Musk has yet to reply.
	Phil Giraldi, Trump is toast.
	Jewish power will trump Trump.
	So the question becomes, are the Jews for Trump or are the Jews against Trump?
	Phil Giraldi is quite a brilliant guy.
	There's considerable irony in the fact that Donald Trump, when president, virtually crawled to do Israel's bidding more than any of his predecessors.
	He moved the U.S.
	embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
	He accepted brutal Israeli settlement and control of the Palestinian West Bank, approved the Israeli annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights, ignored repeated Israeli war crimes using U.S.-provided weapons.
	Yet, for all his gifts to Israel, which did not serve any actual U.S.
	interest, he has currently been crucified by the Jewish-Israeli lobby because of an idiotic dinner with a pair of alleged anti-Semites, one of whom has been labeled a Holocaust denier.
	God forbid.
	And the extreme reaction of Jewish groups to the affront itself possesses a certain irony, and it demonstrates how extraordinarily powerful promoters of Jewish and Israeli interests actually are—something that those selfsame groups take pains to deny at every opportunity, just as they deny having dual loyalty to Israel.
	The fact is that force majeure will prevail, and we will now see the deliberate and methodical destruction of Donald J. Trump's 2024 proposed presidential campaign by American Jewish and Israeli abologists.
	Trump had already been taken out to the back woodshed for a good webbing once after he posted a comment on Truth Social on October 16th, boasting, no president has done more for Israel than have I. Somewhat surprisingly, however, our wonderful evangelicals are far more appreciative of this than the people of the Jewish faith, especially those living in the U.S.
	U.S.
	Jews have to get their act together and appreciate what they have in Israel before it is too late.
	But the rage unleashed by folks like the Anti-Defamation League Jonathan Greenblatt, who labeled the October 16th comment as insulting and disgusting, combined with the attacks on three black celebrities, is already beginning to produce pushback.
	Particularly for many normally apolitical blacks who are upset at the viciousness of the Jewish take-no-prisoners response due to its perceived racial overtones.
	Other observers are also concerned at how the Jewish groups and individuals are overstating the significance of some of the alleged anti-Semitic incidents by their definition.
	In a self-serving effort to validate their view that Jewish suffering is unique, Also, for those who choose to defend the First Amendment right to free speech, it's discouraging to observe how it's possible to say nearly anything as long as it does not offend Jewish sensibilities.
	There have already been moves in Congress to criminalize criticism of Jews or Israel, making such actions the ultimate hate crime.
	Those specifically Jewish sensibilities absurdly include declaring anyone to be an anti-Semite who criticizes the behavior of Israel as it destroys schools and shoots a Palestinian teenager nearly every day.
	Indeed, the U.S.
	media of late has been awash with stories about surging anti-Semitism, which taken altogether celebrate Israeli-Jewish victimhood, while also ignoring Jerusalem's war crimes and focusing instead on alleged conspiracies against Jews.
	Hear from Nick Kohlstrom's brilliant book, Breaking the Spill Illustration 28, a British football team at Auschwitz looking very fit.
	Most despicable in the eyes of those protectors of all things Jewish are the few visible critics who have recognized the standard Holocaust narrative that has been artfully and deliberately shaped since the Second World War is full of inconsistencies and errors and demonstrable fact.
	So-called Holocaust deniers are denigrated beyond all others because they attack the very raison d'etre that constitutes the miraculous Israel creation myth.
	Examining what Kanye West and Donald Trump said and did suggests there's been considerable overreaction from the greenblats of this world and their allies in the media and in government.
	Starting with Kanye West, currently going by the name Ye, one finds that his initial comments were not particularly startling, suggesting that Jews directly own or control and manage the entertainment industry in the United States, which is manifestly true.
	As a criticism of Ye, who believes that blacks are descended from the ancient Hebrews, intensified, he responded with some heat, eventually coming out with an incoherent tweet, too.
	Go DEF CON 3 on Jewish people.
	The comedian Dave Chappelle followed up on the controversy by delivering a stinging monologue on Saturday Night Live on the Jews and their numbers in the entertainment industry, saying that it's not a crazy thing to think that Jews exert outsized influence in Hollywood and the media.
	He also suggested Kanye had violated Hollywood's rules of perception, saying, If they're black, then it's a gang.
	If they're Italian, it's a mob.
	But if they're Jewish, it's a coincidence and you should never speak about it.
	If Greenblatt had ignored Yeats, likely his poorly expressed comments would have been quickly forgotten.
	But that is not how the Greenblatts of this world operate.
	Every offense against a standard narrative of Jewish victimhood requires full-scale war.
	Reports early last week suggest he efforts by ADL and others to convince businesses associated with Yee to cut off all ties from him have been successful, meaning he's no longer a billionaire, likely has a margin reduced to something in the $400 million range.
	There have been similar responses to basketball player Kerry Irving's recent tweet supporting the so-called Black Hebrew Israelite theory that he shares with He, which asserts that Blacks are, in fact, Jews, while Black comedian Dave Chappelle, making fun of the ADL overreaction on Saturday Night Live, is under the gun from that organization, which has accused him of popularizing and normalizing anti-Semitism.
	Kerry Irving, who also believes the earth is flat, was denounced as a person unfit to associate with by his team owner and was suspended for eight games without paying by the Brooklyn Nets, even though he characteristically offered several abject apologies.
	This all led up to the dinner at Mar-a-Lago with he and the so-called white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
	It's not clear what was discussed at dinner, but Yves ate Trump was impressed by Fuentes.
	In the aftermath of the meal, when news of it appeared in the media, a shitstorm erupted.
	Trump claimed both that he did not know Fuentes and that he had been tricked by Yves, that the man who was brought to the meal is Yves' guest.
	Those assertions, most likely lies, have been assailed all over the media by the usual suspects like Greenblatt, who announced that the normalization of anti-Semitism is here.
	On the following day, Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democrat majority leader and himself a Jew, fancies himself as the protector of Israel in the Senate, went to the Senate floor to denounce Trump's actions as disgusting and dangerous before calling them pure evil.
	Prominent Republicans like Kevin McCarthy and Marco Rubio have also piled on, suggesting that Trump will find little support even among those politicians he would normally consider to be favorable to his re-election.
	The Republican-Jewish coalition has joined the attacks, which means that campaign money will not be flowing to Trump from that usually reliable source.
	And even Trump's former lawyer and man he named ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, has condemned his old boss and patron, saying, even a social visit from an anti-Semite like Kanye West and human scum like Nick Fuentes is unacceptable.
	Ironically, Friedman, whose loyalty to the United States might be considered questionable, was a persistent apologist for Israel during his time in that country rather than a promoter of U.S.
	interests.
	I have to confess, I never heard of Nick Fuentes, so I did a little checking at the claim he was a Holocaust denier.
	Fuentes is well documented as making comments reflecting his rather intense dislike for Jews.
	But concerning the Holocaust, I could come up with was a comment allegedly made attacking the claim that six million Jews died in what have been described as death camps, with a suggestion it was more like 200 to 300,000 as a realistic figure, supported by official and other records.
	He described those deaths as cookies, which are baked in the oven, which may have angered critics more than the comment about the numbers.
	Interestingly, the six million number is one of the more ridiculous assertions that are part and parcel of the Holocaust narrative, as it appears to have been arbitrary arrived at as acceptable, and there's been considerable disagreement over its reliability.
	So, Fuentes, it seems, is not a Holocaust denier, but rather appears to be skeptical regarding the standard narrative, as am I and many others who bother to look at the verifiable historical record.
	But that does not mean that anyone in power will be staying in line to excuse his behavior.
	And his dinner partner, Donald Trump, has evidently now outstayed his welcome by the standards of the noble protectors of Jewish and Israeli interests.
	The large dollops of campaign cash will not be coming in, those willing to endorse his candidacy will be far fewer, and the media will turn on him even more than it's done in the past six years.
	Indeed, it is doing so already.
	There are numerous articles in the mainstream every day telling over and over again the fate The tale of the fateful dinner at Mar-a-Lago.
	Trump has clearly crossed the notorious red line on Jewish issues.
	The only remaining question is what it will do to people like Greenblatt.
	If he keeps hammering away, which he will because that is how he is wired, could the worm turn and will Americans be getting to wonder how 2% of the population has obtained so much power?
	That would be a really interesting development.
	Carl.
	Oh, great stories for Twitter for the CEO thing.
	I am still wondering, and I think that this is still going to drop, that Musk has yet to expose how many people on Twitter are fake.
	So he says 120 million accounts.
	OK, how many of those are bots?
	He's never come out with the data.
	That would be interesting to display that data on the poll that he gave that Trump should be reinstated and then again on This last poll of whether Trump should, whether Musk should resign as the CEO.
	Now, regarding the label of people being Jews and Jew, Jew, Jew stuff.
	When I hear that, we need to distinguish that a lot of people within the truth movement are talking about the Kazarian Mafia.
	And really, from my point of view, The people who are committing these crimes, these war crimes, crimes of aggression, for example, the politicians in Israel who have Gaza as the largest concentration camp in the world, that's a horrendous War of aggression is what it is and there are crimes against humanity and war crimes within that war.
	These people are criminal and they just happen to be Jewish.
	They're pretending to uphold Jewish values while they're being empire murderers is what they're doing.
	They're no more Jewish than Bush, Obama, and the Clintons are Christian.
	So it's not anti-Semite at all to point that out.
	Let's see what else.
	For the ADL, I would like to know where they're getting their money from and to see if Twitter has any further information.
	If ADL happened to have a portal.
	And Kyrie Irving, the basketball player.
	So this guy is a world-class performer as an athlete on the basketball court.
	He shared an Alex Jones documentary.
	I did not see that one in question.
	I've probably seen Six or seven of Alex Jones documentaries, they're excellent.
	And for just sharing that, he's smeared as being somehow prejudicial or discriminatory against the Jewish religion.
	Nobody ever explains that.
	They just smear him as being an anti-Semite and then that stuff gets repeated ad nauseam where the New York Knicks front office said that line that he's an unacceptable person to associate with.
	Well, that's really funny.
	What's really going on is that.
	The Jewish ownership of Hollywood and media is really masking a cartel.
	And Carl B. Herman Blogspot, any of these shows, my one published paper, has a part on it documenting that corporate media is these six large companies and they lie aggressively in order to push wars of aggression and bankster looting and all the narratives that support the empire.
	And Dave Chappelle is right.
	You just can't point out, up until now, that it just happens to be that the ownerships of corporate media happen to be these people self-claiming to be Jewish.
	Very good.
	Chris?
	You know, something that Sam Beckman, fraud guy, said that makes a lot of sense to me is that charities are often a shibboleth for this world takeover system that they're trying to fund, and using these financial institutions that they imposed at the end of World War II, as I mentioned in the previous segment.
	Think about this.
	If you give this exclusive control to mint and print and control money on a fractional reserve basis, To any race on earth, the blacks, the Koreans, the Chinese, the whatever, they will accumulate that type of breakaway wealth in that amount of time and then want to resort back to the gold standard after they've taken on the gold from the poor people at bottom dollars.
	So something to think about there.
	These guys play on long time timelines compared to us who live on these mere mortal lives of 50, 60 years as middle class slaves, we'll say.
	So yeah, if you gave the blacks the same powers you gave the Jews, they would be Probably rolling in spree wells pretty tight right now.
	As far as Trump, I forgot to mention the Zionist Cabinet.
	Don't forget that one.
	But also, the term deniers reminds me of the Gollum Enterprises that I mentioned on the other segment of the video today.
	You know, them putting things out of control, like the absurdity of six million cookies and two Easy-Bake Ovens over two and a half years.
	You know, that's not going to happen.
	That kind of production doesn't occur, especially not in that situation.
	So the logistics behind some of these absurdities like the lampshades and the Holocaust museums and all this crap is truly a distractionary tactic.
	It's emotional provocation to draw you away from all the Holodomors that these guys have committed on the rest of the world.
	And if you think about like Carl said, it is probably in the thousands to one in terms of sacrifice and in terms of bloodshed.
	So, interesting to see how they always focus in on that $6 million and ignore the hundreds of millions and billions that they seem to put on their list.
	So, anyways, the ADL, that's another thing that's funded by the Shibboleth.
	It would be known as the Federal Reserve, where they could just take money, print it, and give it away.
	And they will control things like the hate that they then will over-sensationalize.
	I'll say that.
	Control opposition optics, you know, painting backwards swastikas, things like this.
	You know, some of these guys don't really plan out, but then, you know, try to hypersensationalize.
	So that being said, if you look at this in terms of like control, if this Kazarian breach of Judaism wanted a branch of Judaism want to take over everything, They would require a large sacrifice of maybe the Orthodox Jews that Carl mentioned that are probably certainly not as Kabbalistic and Satanistic as this group might be.
	But that being said, you know, it serves as a perfect car fire in World War Two to take them out completely, draw them out and destroy them and dispossess them en masse, and then put in this new banking system with the Kazarians in the way that they have.
	And really, to institute the intelligence services in a way that they have in all 190-some-odd United Nations countries, it's pretty systematic in terms of being control freaks.
	Yeah, I think Kanye violated the rules of Queensbury, the gentleman's agreement being part of the club.
	You don't talk about these type of things in the midst of the public.
	And if you do, the rest of the group will gang up on them.
	And as far as the Jewish black thing, I will say in the 17th dynasty Egypt, it's well known that The temple scribes and priests and moneyers hired the Numidians and Nambians to basically destabilize from the south the Egyptian Empire as well as the Hittites or the Hyksos, whatever you call them from the north, the Shepherd Kings.
	So, you know, they don't really tell you that stuff.
	And mostly UNESCO is around to make sure that that type of information stays within their ranks.
	And if you look at every UNESCO site around the world, you'll find these historic evidences that are being covered up en masse too.
	Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.
	Meanwhile, Trump has a platform for restoring free speech, which appears to be spot on.
	Here's what we'll need to do.
	Can you imagine a presidential candidate 20 years ago needing to have a freedom of speech platform?
	If that had happened, most of us would have thought, wait, don't we already have free speech?
	But as we've learned increasingly, our rights are under an all-out assault from permanent Washington, also known as the swamp.
	Trump, who seems to have always had his finger on the pulse in America, has released his restoring free speech platform.
	Let's take a look.
	Trump announced he'll be issuing executive orders to accomplish most of these objectives.
	Hopefully, they'll be codified into law by Congress, so future Democrats can't immediately overturn them.
	He plans to ban federal agencies from colluding to censor Americans.
	This is a necessary first step.
	Federal agencies were censoring conservatives and Trump supporters from the shadows.
	They didn't do it out in the open because they knew it was illegal—in fact, a blatant violation of the First Amendment.
	We don't even know the extent of the FBI's involvement, because at the time of this writing, Musk hadn't released those files, but now he has done so, and it was massive.
	Agencies would be banned from labeling any information a miss or disinformation.
	Miss and dis are BS terms anyway.
	Something is either true or it is a lie, and the only way free people can determine that sometime is if we have access to all sides of an issue.
	It's fundamentally wrong for federal agencies to be labeling information in regard to political speech or COVID fact speech.
	Here he has it not quite right.
	While every claim is either true or false, lies are falsehoods that are known to be falsehoods but are nevertheless deliberately disseminated to mislead an audience.
	The terms, therefore, are not BS, but they're certainly easy to abuse.
	The president plans to fire every federal bureaucrat involved in censoring American speech in any way, shape, or form.
	I couldn't agree more.
	Fire them?
	Cut off their pensions?
	Using a government paper-pushing office and a six-figure salary to censor truck drivers you disagree with?
	It's probably worth at least a January 6th stint in jail, but firing them is a pretty good punishment.
	Trump wants to have the DOJ investigate and prosecute all parties involved in online censorship, but who would do that?
	The FBI was literally participating in the censorship, having weekly meetings at the tech companies, telling them who to censor about Hunter and Joe Biden.
	He wants to revise Section 230.
	There are pros and cons.
	Seems there should be a more specific and effective way to open the tech companies to liability, but it's better than what we have in place right now.
	However, it will take an act of Congress, which won't happen any time soon.
	He wants to cut off federal funding to nonprofits and colleges with a hand in censoring Americans?
	I think most of us totally agree.
	Most don't think these things, in the elevated terms that founding fathers used, was silencing someone.
	Preventing them from speaking through the power of government is akin to depriving someone of their life.
	That's how important our free speech is.
	So if Harvard or Stanford or some non-profit loses federal funding, that's a fitting and appropriate step.
	He wants to enact criminal penalties for any federal employee who partners with a private entity like Twitter to violate your constitutional rights.
	Yes.
	He's also imposing a seven-year cooling-off period between those who work at an Intel or in national security can take a job at a big tech company.
	Twitter was crawling with fads, as we now know.
	Many state-level secretaries of state simply ran the 2022 midterm elections.
	This is a good proposal, probably doesn't go far enough.
	It's been well over a decade since I, the author, left my position at ABC News.
	I still have friends and contacts in the industry from Fox to the Weather Channel.
	It's the same people working in federal agencies like the CIA and the FBI.
	This should be longer than seven years.
	Finally, Trump is proposing a digital Bill of Rights.
	I like the sound of it, but we don't have the details yet.
	It's a good platform, though it's hard to process the fact that we're talking about free speech as a political issue in America.
	Next, I want to see Trump propose amnesty for every January 6th political prisoner who's been in Biden's gulag for almost two years now.
	Meanwhile, the American left bows out of the free speech fight.
	One of the several unwelcome revelations of the past six years is that liberalism as a political philosophy is dead.
	Oh, there may be some who still identify with it, but for the most part they're old, retired, or counted as silenced by the howling mobs and progressives, the woke, and the identarian left.
	And how do we know?
	By the collapse of colleges and universities as places of open debate and inquiry.
	And we know by the abandonment of any kind of honest and principled journalism, by the vast majority of legacy in social media.
	For decades, these two institutions—the press and the academy—have been the white-hot center of American liberalism, and their metamorphosis into woke and progressive fortresses signals the end of it.
	How else to explain the spectacle of acceptance, if not a promotion of censoring, shadow banning, and canceling?
	The spread of CRT concepts in education from elementary school to college?
	The hostility shored to Elon Musk's stated goal of reinstating free space on Twitter?
	The thuggish and uniform media lies regarding stories like the origin of COVID?
	Inauthenticity of Hunter's laptop?
	You don't have to admire or share the philosophy no liberal is or no was, popularly likened to virtues like tolerance and broad-mindedness, but none of the examples reflected above show those qualities just the opposite.
	In the summer of 2020, Harper's Magazine published an open letter signed by 150 or so, most of whom would then have been regarded as liberals.
	In it, the signers made clear their dismay over the attacks on freedom of speech.
	Here's what they said.
	A free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society, is daily becoming more constricted.
	While we have come to expect this on the radical right, censorousness is also spreading more widely in our culture, and intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.
	More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panic damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms.
	Editors are fired for running controversy of reason.
	Books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity.
	Journalists are barred from writing on certain topics.
	Professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class, and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes.
	As shocking and despicable as the attacks on free speech are, there have been hints the media would not be offended and might even be supportive of them.
	During the many years that I was the head of a Washington think tank, supported financially by media and communication companies, I had many meetings with members of the media, from broadcast and cable to print and digital, and it pains me to say that with few exceptions they evinced a resolute, not to say self-righteous, interest in freedom of the press, but little or no interest in the free speech of people generally.
	When presses do so, they might provide limited support for events like Free Speech Week, but the point survives.
	In overwhelming numbers, media executives, communication lawyers, journalists, and the Media Trade Association appreciate the First Amendment for its protection of freedom of the press, not for its protection of free speech for everyone.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, for free speech, yes, we have to have that, and we We don't have it.
	We don't have anything near it, as the Twitter files are demonstrating the partnership of government to destroy free speech and to push everybody into the one People's Rainbow Uniparty.
	Freedom of speech.
	We don't even have freedom from forced government injections, from forced government lockdowns, from being declared an unessential worker.
	So people need to grasp that we really are in AMREV 2.0, World War III, and we are at the defense of the Constitution against a government who would blatantly take away our rights and to force us to be called work animals.
	So, for that line about J6, these people have been locked up without a trial, some without charges for two years, and they're being locked up just to silence them.
	If they were free, then their stories would go out, and the American people could contrast what they were doing there, their backstory, and who they are.
	The narrative that somehow these people are domestic violent extremists and insurrectionists the government rather just lock them up and it's basically a form of disappearing them and just having them as a number of the number of insurrectionists they had to protect freedom from.
	On January 6th.
	And our opponents, that last article is absolutely correct, our opponents can't survive a debate because they don't have any facts.
	All they have is this bluster and bullying and just incensed emotional rhetoric to herd people, and they have to constrain and keep them at an intellectual level where they will be incompatible.
	Capable of discerning these facts.
	That's one of the reasons why they have so much fear with what they're doing.
	And all they're going to do is they're going to pretend and virtue signal and censor.
	And then they're going to target the people like us exactly as the Twitter files reveal to be able to preemptively remove competition.
	And again, we had 80 plus agents You got it, Carl.
	That's about $10 million worth.
	And from Facebook, that's over 100 agents on Facebook.
	So our taxpayer money has been subsidizing this destruction of debate and this pushing just to have the ministry of truth.
	You got it, Carl.
	Chris.
	Well, man, I got a lot to talk about here.
	I'm kind of all over the place on this, but hopefully you'll stay with me.
	You know, it's kind of funny.
	I feel like, you know, big data and these people are keeping the finger on our pulse while they try to choke us half to death.
	And they just keep us alive so we can stay loyal slaves to this.
	And I think it's really sad, the psychosis that's developed in human nature, complying and going along with this in the way that it has.
	Whatever, that's a different conversation in itself.
	But I do think the big debt on these alphabet agencies have done a lot of things in the last century.
	We talked about World War II, even 9-11 or the Wright-Stagg fires going into World War II, the economic miracle, all that stuff, Pearl Harbor, the phony wars.
	They created this type of situation so that they could bring in a solution.
	It's like I said, a Hegelian problem-reaction-solution type of situation, where they seem to apply that formula to everything they do.
	And beneath the fog of war, They bring in these type of operations, whether it's the banking systems or the political situations, things like that.
	There's a lot of stuff that they're doing in terms of propaganda that seems to be very relevant and control of information, we'll say, in the age of the Internet.
	That seems to be more than deplorable and seems to be more of a war crime than anything I've seen in terms of human conventional warfare, we'll say, in history, I'll say.
	So yeah, these intelligence agencies in the 1930s, they tried to colonialize the world beneath the fog of war going into World War Two.
	And they set up not only these banking systems, but these intelligence agencies, these spy networks under the UK models, And really, they create in propaganda and cultural engineering most of the isms that we adopt as political options.
	And they certainly are offered by the group that are funding these intel agencies like the Boston Brahmin, the Wise Men, the Sanhedrin, whatever you want to call these guys, Charles River Group, go on and on.
	But they really create what I think is this political theater that most of the people sworn to oaths live and die for.
	And usually die from, but the pageantry and all is funded by the same people that put out this propaganda and try to steer us into these voluntary conflicts in which they absolve themselves of any guilt and complicity by doing this.
	Reminds me a lot of the work of Ivy Lee or Edward Bernays or C.D.
	Jackson or even the Harry Dexter White economic stuff with the Morgenthau plan, which I think is still ongoing, but that's another different conversation in itself.
	I mentioned the Smith-Mundt Act, and I think World War II was the reason that they put that in place, to eliminate propaganda from the media.
	And, you know, really, I think what we're seeing, as we saw in World War II, is a bunch of robber barons, secretly in their own betting pool, basically on our death count, our dead pool.
	And World War III is what we're seeing, or what we could call that.
	And I think it's seven billion against this cabal, and certainly not nation-states or political parties, in the way that we conventionally would approach these type of Traditional military conflicts that we would have seen.
	So at the stake is the whole marble.
	We could end up either technocratic feudalistic slaves or we could end up free men, depending on however this turns out.
	But if we go along with 2 plus 2 equals 5, I think we're going to be in big, big trouble.
	You know, just once I would like to see this group come into the light and really, you know, fess up for what they're doing, but they'll never break a Fabian.
	It's up to us to hold them to account for what they're doing.
	Because these are the guys that are behind things like the COVID scam, the war of terror, and it's all cover fire for these resource grabs.
	But you'll never see these looters on national TV like the way they do, you know, with poor people taking necessities.
	Excellent.
	Just wonderful.
	You guys are just coming through like champions.
	I'm just ecstatic.
	Meanwhile, speaking of freedom of speech, a shocking story from Ireland shows normal people must stand up against compelled speech.
	Enoch Burke had been suspended from Wilson's Hospital School in County Westmouth, Ireland, after he refused to address a transitioning student as they, rather than he, on the basis of his devout Christian beliefs.
	Well, since this is only one person, they wouldn't apply anyway, since it's plural.
	So he could object on grammatical grounds alone.
	What an absurdity.
	On Friday's episode of the Ezra LeVant Show, the host, David Menendez, discussed a shocking story out of Ireland regarding a teacher who has been imprisoned for refusing to use gender-neutral pronouns.
	Enoch Burke had been suspended from Wilson's Hospital School in County Westmouth, Ireland, after he refused to address a transitioning student as they, rather than he, on the basis of his devout Christian beliefs.
	Despite being ordered by the school to stay away, Burke continued to attend and was subsequently arrested and jailed.
	Burke argued that he was not a criminal and asked the court to free me for Christmas, signed his religious beliefs as justification for his refusal of the order.
	I'm not sure about you folks, but I do not believe that society must conform to their psychosis so that we don't hurt the feelings of the unhinged.
	I also do not want to live in a society where it's criminal if one disobeys compelled speech.
	Bottom line, when it comes to the lunatic fringe, There are more normal people on the planet than those lunatics who are telling us what to do and what to think.
	We can only take a stand to reverse this odious time.
	As though that were not bad enough, Stanford has declared calling yourself an American is all fancy.
	Academia in the U.S.
	needs to be torn down and built back up from the strapped heap that results.
	Nowhere is this more obvious than the latest incarnation of Stanford University's list of words they'd like to eliminate from the public discourse on campus.
	The document, published by the top university in May but revised Monday and reviewed by the Wall Street Journal, is titled, The Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative.
	The goal of the initiative, according to the memo, is to eliminate many forms of harmful language, including racist, violent, and biased language on the university's website and its internal documents and codes.
	One of the words that stands out to any rational person is America.
	Call yourself an American?
	Please don't, the Wall Street Journal writes.
	Better to say U.S.
	citizen, per the bias hunters, lest you slight the rest of the Americas.
	How absurd.
	The Stanford Guide to Acceptable Words doesn't find the word American offensive, simply based on the fact that there are other Americas, North, South, Central.
	No, It's the fact that people from the United States saying the term suggests they're better than everybody else, which, as this is the greatest country on earth anyway, go figure.
	Stanford adds context to the term American.
	This term often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating that the U.S.
	is the most important country in the Americas.
	Rather than teaching students the word American is offensive, Stanford should consider teaching them why, in fact, the United States of America is the most important country in the world.
	Hey, you guys, here's a list of words Stanford doesn't want us to use anymore.
	Stand-up meeting, for example.
	Say instead, quick meeting.
	This is ableist language that trivializes the experience of people living with disabilities.
	Can you believe it?
	Insane!
	Don't use that.
	Say, surprising or wild.
	Ableist language that trivializes the experience of people living with mental health conditions.
	Brave.
	Capitalized.
	Do not use.
	This term perpetuates a stereotype of the noble, courageous, savage, equating the indigenous male as being less than a man.
	American.
	Say instead, U.S.
	citizen.
	This term often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating the U.S.
	is the most important country in the world, which is actually made up of—in America, which is actually made up of 42 countries.
	User.
	Don't use that word, but rather client.
	I mean, this is just denying the ambiguity of language.
	services, software, systems, services, it can also negatively be associated with those who suffer from substance abuse issues and those who exploit others for their own gain.
	I mean, this is just denying the ambiguity of language.
	This is colossally stupid.
	Beating a dead horse, refusing to let something go.
	This expression normalizes violence against animals.
	Trigger warning.
	Content note.
	The phrase can cause stress as though what's to follow additionally.
	One can never know what may or may not trigger a particular person.
	You guys.
	Use instead.
	Folks, people, everyone.
	Lumps a group of people using masculine language and foreign to gender binary groups, which doesn't include everyone.
	Walk in.
	Instead say drop in, open office.
	Ableist language that trivializes the experiences of people living with disabilities.
	This is unbelievable.
	Talk about insanity.
	This is lunatic.
	As you may imagine, there were rather strong responses to Stanford's guy.
	Dr. J. Plata Cherup, for example, blacklisted from Twitter for views about the pandemic, who happens to be a professor at Stanford, was defiant.
	I remember how proud I was when I became a naturalized American citizen, he tweeted.
	I'm still proud to be an American, and I don't care that Stanford disapproves of my using the term.
	Twitter chief and now Elon Musk also chimed in.
	Stanford disapproves if you're saying you're proud to be an American?
	Every speech advocate responds, whoa!
	Blaze contributor T.J.
	Moe broke it down in basic terms.
	If you are not proud to be an American, then leave.
	This isn't the country for you.
	Those who are running Stanford would do well to find a new home.
	Their spoiled, historically illiterate, evil attitudes are not welcome here.
	I could not agree more.
	Byron York tweets, New Guide says using American can insinuate the U.S.
	is the most important country in the world.
	This is so mental.
	I'm embarrassed for them.
	Pure lunacy.
	The Stanford Guide to Unacceptable Words also frowns on the term immigrant, which is heretofore known as person who has immigrated.
	Master is also unacceptable in its many forms, since, according to Stanford historically, masters enslave people.
	I'm telling you, this is a new form of insanity.
	Carl.
	And the crazier it gets, I think the more rational that we seem on our side.
	So that story that came out of it's either the UK if it's Northern Ireland or from Ireland and.
	Saying that you have to affirm in your language the transgender identity, otherwise go to jail for two years.
	Or I don't know, maybe for two years it's prison.
	Maybe they consider that a felony.
	I don't know.
	And Stanford's list of microaggressions.
	All this is is just virtue signaling and it reminds me of the Harry Potter character Dolores Umbridge, who became the last evil headmaster of the school for the characters in there.
	And her deal was she ran a vicious empire.
	She was a servant of the most evil character, and yet virtue signaling that it was all nice, all good.
	And she covered an entire wall with rules that these children needed to follow.
	And of course, there's no way they could.
	They're always going to be criminal and scared of being criminal with that.
	So it's all virtue signaling, and people need to be brave.
	They need to be American and demand the arrests of these virtue signaling, psychopathic, rogue state imperialists who are war criminals and criminals against humanity.
	Chris?
	Yeah, I tell you, there seem to be a lot of formulas that seem to be constant over time, and these shame-based type of social engineering tactics seem to be very much one of them, Carl.
	So good point there.
	I agree with you 100%.
	Back to your first topic, Jim.
	I'm going to just say they, in quotes, are fucking crazy and that should be the end of the conversation.
	Well, you would hope at least.
	I mean, you know, the biologically confused just cannot and must not be allowed to get away with this type of hyper-passive aggression.
	It's just, I can't take it anymore.
	No, I'm just kidding.
	But what I'm going to say, though, is the U.S.
	is the last bastion of human hope.
	Not only against this social engineering but also this oligarchy that's trying to push it on us and trying to destroy the human freedom and constitutional liberties that should be assured to 7 billion worldwide and certainly not everyone being debt slaves to Rothschild and working to the grave two to three jobs to stay broke.
	Because I don't think that's what life, liberty, pursuit of happiness means at all.
	And if that's what these Robert Barrett's think and have in mind for us, I think they need to get back to the math on that.
	And yeah, you know, another thing that shocked me completely is when you said that victims of medical mutilation and RNA recombinant mutation were somehow or another silenced by their violators.
	That's highly unlikely, you'd have to say, right?
	I got to go get to my second job right now, right?
	No, I mean, this is like the environment that you're seeing when you try to tell people this is going on.
	They literally dismiss it as, you know, completely absurd.
	And I think more people now are starting to understand this is not an absurdity.
	There is a massive amount of people that have been thrown off from Twitter and censored and taken down from their platforms in their last bastion of hope.
	In terms of voicing their what happened to them, you know, and allowing people to bear witness.
	So this is going on in mass.
	And yeah, I think that really we got to look at this type of thing because there's a lot of gaslighting being performed in the shame based social engineering formula that they seem to be playing not only through mainstream media, but through social media as well.
	Oh, I couldn't agree more.
	You got it just right.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
	LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
	Remember, Those that can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
	This is absurd.
	What's going on here in America today, even in institutions prestigious like Stanford and even Princeton, are Beyond belief.
	Absurd.
	This is part of a destruction of American culture, values, intelligence, knowledge, that's ongoing mess, even unprecedented.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts.
	Carl, yours.
	Well, I appreciate our audience for hanging into these conversations and doing good faith work to articulate and to engage with humanity, to wake them up, to prevent this culling.
	So we'll do what we can and I stand where I have stood before in that we have two possible outcomes.
	One is going to be the Great Reset, which is they continue to blame the climate and to enact these wars and to say that we have to be shot.
	For our own health and for the good of the community.
	They'll cull the work animals and that'll be the end of human synergy and creativity will be just a little footnote in creation or the Great Awakening and that is just with the truth and the truth reveals that our oligarchs have lied to us they should be arrested.
	Obvious crimes and they've suppressed a lot of technology.
	Then we have this Star Trek Like future in unimaginable synergy and greatness.
	That would be the one that I would prefer.
	And yet we have this problem of 45 years of civic activism for me.
	My own experience is that maybe 2% of what I say can be heard.
	So we need some sort of assistance.
	If we get it this month, that would be so awesome.
	I would love to have a win.
	If not, then people really do need to give serious thought because I will be engaging in Gandhi and King-like demonstrations.
	I'll be inviting people to join me and that's going to be what we're going to have to do in January if we have no breakthrough.
	Nice.
	Chris, your final thoughts?
	Yeah, Carl, from my experience, I've gotten through more extensive gauntlets in terms of censorship and being thrown out of places in terms of trying to voice free speech in the past five years, and it's been truly a testament of what's going on here, given that, especially that I've been pretty much right about the things I've been saying and being outcast for saying, not an I-told-you-so, but just kind of a there-you-go, I guess.
	Anybody that's been following what I've been saying for a while Understands that I've been calling this stuff out for a long time and seeing it unfold in real time the way that it has it's been absolutely heartbreaking to me to have to watch and I'm just glad where people are finally starting to realize what's going on this is certainly not and I told you so it's a wake up so that people will come together and do the right thing because we are literally facing a social and economic and a cultural dark age if we allow this group to continue doing what they're doing and reside above law justice and human decency
	And more importantly, the social contract that they seem to be violating on every turn.
	Excellent, excellent, excellent, Chris.
	You and Carl are just sensational here today, as you have show after show after show.
	Let me add, all the Jews, all the rhinos, all the woke Democrats, all the progressives, all the libtards, all the New York Times, all the Washington Post, every damn media in the world could condemn Donald Trump, and the American people are still going to believe in this guy.
	He is a phenomenon.
	The Democrats are doing everything they can to smear him, doing their best to make it impossible for him to run again, because they know if he runs again, he will clean their clock, just as he did in 2016 and again in 2020.
	It's going to happen.
	Count on it.
	Their best efforts are going to be unavailing, and I don't care if it's 24-7, 365, attempts to denigrate this guy.
	He has a grip on the American people unlike any I've ever seen in my lifetime, and I suggest in American history, with a possible exception of FDR, who had four terms in office and became someone in whom the American people believed.
	Trump is unique in his kind.
	I continue to believe he's doing great good for the American people.
	I urge you to give this all the thought you can, but I'm really unconcerned about the massive attacks.
	They aren't, in the end, going to make a difference at all.
	Meanwhile, spend all the time you can with your family, your friends, the people you love.
	We do not know.
	A nuclear war could evaporate us all tomorrow, so don't waste a minute of it.
	Back with more of the news you want tomorrow.

▲