All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 16, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:00
Need to Know News (15 December 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson.
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with the NATO chief saying a full-blown war with Russia is a real possibility.
I'm afraid that's something most of us don't want to hear.
Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg warned Friday, I fear that the war in Ukraine will get out of control and spread into a major war between NATO and Russia.
If things go wrong, they can go horribly wrong.
Despite the risk, Stoltenberg stressed NATO countries should continue arming Ukraine and that the best way to deter Russia is to strengthen the alliance's position in Eastern Europe.
Meanwhile, Putin makes real nuclear threat.
U.S.
yawns.
Russian President Vladimir Putin stated Friday Russia is considering changing its nuclear doctrine to allow for preventative, not just retaliatory, use of nuclear weapons.
Such a change would align Russia's nuclear posture with Washington's own strategic doctrine, and at one stroke, make the world far more dangerous.
Putin's highly unusual remarks leave no doubt that Russia views the U.S.-NATO proxy war as the kind of existential threat that JFK perceived when Moscow installed nuclear missiles in Cuba.
Those missiles were capable of hitting, within minutes, Washington and the Strategic Air Command in Omaha.
The U.S.
missile capsule is already in place in Romania and Poland.
Ostensibly for anti-ballistic missile purposes, it can accommodate overnight, what Russia calls, offensive strike missiles with even shorter launch-to-target time than those Kennedy's strong-arm cruise job to remove from Cuba.
Another largely unprecedented factoid, when Biden and Putin held a conversation on December 30, 2021, the Kremlin readout stated, Joseph Biden emphasized that Washington had no intention of deploying offensive strike missiles in Ukraine.
At once, the senior Putin advisor pointed out approvingly this had been one of Moscow's chief goals in proposing security guarantees for the U.S.
and NATO to consider.
Six weeks later, he lamented that Biden did not address non-deployment of strike weapon systems on Ukrainian territory.
We received no meaningful response.
Putin's marks also serve to put context around the rash and contrived accusations that he has threatened to use tactical nuclear weapons.
That charge is a red herring, but a highly mischievous one.
The Kremlin's strongest attack is some sort of false-like nuclear explosion, perhaps a dirty bomb.
might be used by the West to justify responding with tactical nukes lying in bunkers in several European NATO member states.
They fear NATO might offer this kind of nuclear solution as the only possible way to stave off definitive defeat of Kiev's remaining forces this winter.
Yes, Russia is fully capable of inflicting such a defeat on Kiev, absent any prospect of serious negotiation.
Putin has not explicitly threatened to use tactical nukes Rather, he has said he is committed to using all the means at his disposal.
In his December 9th remarks, he explained what those mean from Russia's point of view.
He speaks of launch on warning of strategic weapons.
That is the deterrent, which has worked in the past, but only when the U.S.
and Russia had a healthy respect for the balance of power.
Power.
That was what Putin calls a potential detour.
One Russia fears may have lost its edge.
Nor are Putin and his military paranoid to allow for the possibility that the benighted elite around Biden might authorize something more stupid and provocative than blowing up Nord Stream.
Here's a question to Putin.
You said, and I quote, if Russia does not use nuclear weapons first, it won't use them second either.
This caused an uproar.
Please explain.
The U.S.
has this theory of preventative strike.
They're developing a system for a disarming strike.
Regarding a disarming strike, perhaps we should think about using—ensuring their own security.
We need to think about this.
They have a theory and even practice.
They have the concept.
We do not.
Our strategy talks about a retaliatory strike.
That is a response strike.
It is when our early warning system, the missile attack warning system, missiles launch toward the Russian Federation.
First it detects the launches, then response actions begin.
After the early warning system receives a signal indicating missile attack, hundreds of our missiles are launched, and they cannot be stopped.
But it is still a retaliatory strike.
What does that mean?
It means that enemy missile warheads will fall on the territory of the Russian Federation.
This cannot be avoided.
They will fall anyway.
True, Nothing will remain of the enemy, because it's impossible to intercept hundreds of missiles, and this is, without doubt, a potent deterrent.
But if a potential adversary believes it possible to use a preventing strike theory, while we do not, this makes us think about the threat that such ideas in the sphere of other countries' defense pose to us.
And that's all I have to say about this.
Western pundits have been largely silent.
Those who have mentioned it speak of Sater rambling by Butin as though it were bluffing.
I would not be so cavalier.
Ray McGovern, serious guy, talking about this and reporting on it.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first that NATO Chief General, Secretary General Stoltenberg.
So this guy was the PM of Norway for 12 years.
He's been the Secretary General of NATO since 2014, and that communicates to me that this is one of the war criminals who have overseen the expansion of NATO.
One of his political positions is that every child must receive every vaccination.
So this guy is a war criminal and a criminal against humanity.
Whatever it is he's saying, I'm sure that he's threatening, as usual, because that's what our opponents love to do.
But to the extent that we can identify and explain, document, and prove he's just another war criminal, then that'll give leverage for people to demand his arrest rather than to listen to what he has to say.
Based upon what we see, the threat of nuclear war is, of course, real.
Nukes are a weapon and they come in a variety of sizes and probably they have been used dozens of times in history.
We just don't say it because we're not supposed to use them, but probably that they have.
And that article is right.
The U.S.
does have a first strike policy for nukes.
Carl B. Herman Blackspot, my 40-page white paper, With leverage by Congressman Kucinich to impeach Bush and Cheney is documents that that the US policy for first strike is if we perceive a nation as threatening our allies or interests, we can nuke them, which is pretty much anything that we can go ahead and nuke people for.
So generally, this is acts of war, usually a tit-for-tat type of game, but if the missiles are in the air, then the idea of do we launch or do we not launch?
So this is deadly serious, and it is very important that we conclude this show and arrest these clowns before something disastrous like that happens.
Brian?
Well, I'd much rather see Russia just go ahead and go balls to the wall and win this thing.
But the problem with playing poker is you don't always know what your opponent is holding.
And sometimes they get a nice card on the river that's going to help them win that hand.
And we're playing the most dangerous game of poker ever with NATO and the West and Europe playing against Putin.
And I don't think Putin has played a very strong game so far.
He ought to go all in.
He ought to Put an end to this thing, and he ought to do it fast, but the problem is, that's a whole lot of death, and that's a whole lot of bad propaganda that can come out on Russia in the long haul, but he's fighting for his own survival.
When you're playing against a guy who's got nothing to lose and everything to gain, and trust me, we've painted this guy into a corner, we've put him in a bad spot, we've attacked Nord Stream, we've attacked him in other ways.
His back is to the wall, and sooner or later, He's going to be put into a position where he has to go all in.
And all in means a nuclear strike.
What that's going to mean for the West, what that's going to mean for Europe, what that's going to mean for the whole rest of the world, I don't know, but I imagine.
And just this morning, I was watching a YouTube video on the models associated with Putin striking the United States of America.
It's ugly, man.
It's ugly.
They could take the entire system down faster than all this COVID.
vaccine propaganda ever with with one massive strike and they could use it as a false flag as well and do it to us and blame Russia.
So it's just a very, very dangerous game.
And I really would like to see Putin just play it hard and play it fast rather than this long, drawn out, expensive mess that it's become.
Yeah, I think Putin has relied naively on the rationality and responsibility of the West, which does not exist.
It is all ideological, and Russia has not been given any respect.
That's a fundamental problem.
The Western policies toward Russia are colossally immoral, and they ultimately put the whole world at risk.
Very disturbing.
Meanwhile, shocking discrepancy found in Maricopa boat town that allowed Hobbs to steal the election.
As Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Carrie Leak proceeds with her lawsuit, statements and numbers are being revealed.
They allege 25,000 vote discrepancy in the total number of ballots in Maricopa County initially reported versus a total it reported later that week.
The discrepancy is identified as a ballot chain of custody problem.
Highlighting the chain of custody failures is the fact that two days after Election Day was completed, Maricopa County found more than 25,000 additional ballots.
Whereas properly following a custody procedure would require the election officials to know the exact number of ballots submitted by the day after November 9th.
Specifically, Maricopa County Public Statement concerned remaining ballots to be counted on November 9th and November 10th show an increase of approximately 25,000 votes with no explanation of why the number of remaining ballots should increase.
The brief states that a recorder announced after the county's vote center closed for the day there were 275,000 plus mail-in ballots that had been sorted for scanning and verification.
The next day, however, said it scanned 298,000 ballots.
This unexplained increase was also reflected on Department of State website between the 9th and 10th of November.
On the 9th, they had counted 1,136,849 and had 407,664 left to be counted.
436,849 and had 407,664 left to be counted.
That's a total of 1,544,513.
By November 11, however, they had counted 1,094,000.
2,290,669 and 274,385 left, which is a total of 1,565,554 ballots.
So the difference between the 9th and 11th with 21,041 votes.
Here's a chart showing the total number of ballots cast in the midterm, according to Maricopa County, increased by 21,000 from the day before after the election.
The margin of victory was 17,000.
I have no doubt that 21,000 were all for Katie Hobbs.
The number would be significant because it exceeds her margin of victory.
The shifting number shows a failure to count for EV ballots and to maintain security and chain of custody as required by Arizona law.
A Western Journal reached out to the county and a spokesman replied, the court system is a proper place for campaigns challenging the results to make their case.
Maricopa County respects the election contest process and looks forward to sharing facts, claiming every legal voter had an opportunity to cast their ballot.
His statement is interesting because U.S.
District Judge Don Tucci of the University of the District of Arizona rejected a Lake lawsuit earlier and then moved to find her attorneys and those of Republican Secretary of State candidate Mark Fincham last week.
Imposing sanctions, in this case, is not to ignore the importance of putting in place procedures to ensure our elections are secure and reliable, too, she wrote.
It is to make clear that court will not condone litigants ignoring the steps Arizona has already taken toward this end and furthering false narratives that baselessly undermine public trust at a time of increasing disinformation about and distrust in the democratic process.
It's a sentimental message.
The late campaign identified other issues in Maricopa County, including the widespread ballot printer and tabulator issues affecting 131 polling locations, 59% of the total.
As a reason, the election failed to fulfill Arizona legal requirements.
The county has said 71 sites were impacted, about one-third in all.
Since Republicans vote 3-1 over Democrats on Election Day, what happened was large-scale vote suppression of her supporters.
Here we have more about the 2022 Maricopa voters by party and ballot type, which makes key points in this regard.
Meanwhile, like told Charlie Kirk, 75% of people voting Election Day were voting for me.
And when you shut down or make it impossible to vote or very difficult at roughly 60% of the vocations, you're going to cut into our lead.
This is a disenfranchisement of voters in Arizona.
Wow.
further stated her filing includes affidavits from three whistleblowers who work for Maricopa County, who said 90% of the bows being flagged for signature mismatches did not go through the curing process.
Wow.
Here's a tweet.
The board of the supervisor reported trying to diminish and downplay the level of ineptitude and malfeasance on election day.
We have observers who testified what they saw, witnessed, and did, and it goes against what the Board of Supervisors are saying.
Carl, your thoughts?
Rema Fascia evidence for election fraud and what people really need to do is to demand transparency and accountability for at least the last two elections, 22 and 420.
So my top three reasons why people can just go ahead and demand that these elections be decertified is that you have the machines as a retired AP US government teacher for close to 20 years.
I showed videos to my students from professors at Princeton and Stanford.
Explaining and walking through that these machines are designed to steal elections, not to make it easier.
The numbers with the vote spikes for Biden that we've all heard about in the middle of the night in 2020 is mathematically impossible.
And then those most recent numbers for Maricopa County.
Again, that's ridiculous to think that Hobbs won when she refused to debate and nobody attended her rallies and Lake was on fire to debate and she had bountiful Well, make no mistake about it, right now there is a massive battle brewing in the courts in Maricopa County related to election fraud.
And yet Hobbs won.
Uh-uh.
Yes, yes.
Brian.
Well, make no mistake about it.
Right now, there is a massive battle brewing in the courts in Maricopa County related to election fraud.
In this case, it is just as obvious as it was back in 2020.
It is even uglier, maybe, because Carrie Lake had a team of people out there watching.
And if you read the lawsuits at the Save America Fund, or maybe it's Save Arizona Fund, which is Carrie Lake's legal platform, you see that they did a great job documenting and putting together all the affidavits that they needed on the collusion and the corruption that took place here.
The question is, Will the courts do anything about it?
And this is always the question that we're dealing with.
But this is, this is make it or break it.
Look, I predicted that they would never, ever, ever let Carrie Lake into a position of political power in America.
I'm sticking by that prediction.
I think that they, she's just too scary for them.
She's Donald Trump 2.0 back in 2016.
They're going to do everything they possibly can to fight it.
Hobbes didn't have a chance in hell against Carey Lake in a fair fight, so they cheated.
And they cheated big, and Carey Lake documented it, and now it's up to the courts to determine if they're going to do a new election or how they're going to deal with the problem.
It's not, did it happen?
It's, what are the legal ramifications, assuming that it did?
And I think you're going to want to follow Tom Rents on Twitter and also Carrie Lake and take a real close look at what's happening inside the courtrooms.
I think Black Conservative Patriot did a real good analysis of that yesterday as well.
So, I don't know what to think.
I like to believe that there's a chance for something that will be fair and right, but I just don't have my hopes up.
I think she's just too dangerous and this machine will never let her have power.
The case is so blatant.
The evidence is so clear and powerful.
It's such an egregious act that if the courts do not take appropriate action, we truly are at the end of our rope.
The nation has failed.
We have no law.
And the people, I fear, will have to do something about it, something we may not want.
But I cannot see how many options we have left.
If the judicial system in cases like this fails the American people, We are going to be forced to face up to the choice between continuing to live in tyranny or doing something about it.
Stunning.
Meanwhile, must drops.
Twitter file 2.0 revealing top conservatives who are placed on a blacklist.
Surprise, surprise.
Seems to me he's doing a great job.
A second massive drop.
Of internal Twitter communication reveals further proof under old management the platform was a tool of the far-left authoritarian deep state weaponized against right-thinking conservative points of view.
The Twitter files 2.0 drop was revealed by another investigative journal, Very Wise.
Last week's dump was posted by MacTiabi.
Twitter is working on a software update that will show your true account status, so you know clearly if you've been shadowbanned, the reason why and how to appeal.
He also said Twitter will start freeing the namespace of 1.5 billion accounts in the near future.
These are obvious account deletion with no tweets and no login for years.
Elon Musk.
Twitter once had a mission to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and inform instantly without barriers.
Along the way, barriers nevertheless were erected, Weiss wrote.
She pointed to Stanford Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, longstanding opponent of COVID groupthink, expressing opposition to lockdowns.
Twitter secretly placed him on a trends blacklist with ending his tweets from trending.
Weiss continued reporting that Fox News host Dan Bongino was placed on a search blacklist and that Turning Point USA Charlie Kirk was on a Do Not Amplify.
A new hashtag, Twitter File Investigation, reveals that teams of Twitter employees built blacklists, prevented disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limited the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics, all in secret, without informing users.
Here's another.
Twitter once had the mission To give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly without barriers, but along the way, barriers nevertheless were erected.
Another.
Take, for example, Jay Bhattacharya.
Twitter placed him on the Trends blacklist, reventing his tweets, or consider it popular right-wing talk show host Dan Bongino, slapped with a search blacklist, or setting a counter-Berry activist, conservative activist Charlie Kirk on Do Not Amplify.
Twitter denies that it does such a thing.
In 2018, Twitter's Vijay Agade, then head of legal policy and trust, and Kaypon Bekpor, head of product, said, we do not shadow ban.
And we certainly don't shadow ban based on political viewpoint or ideology.
These were blatant lies.
She went on to note that Blatform's left-wing managers did what the left always does.
They simply changed the language to justify the lie.
What many people call shadowbanning, Twitter execs and employees call visibility filtering, or VP.
Multiple high-level sources confirm its meaning, which is shadowbanning.
If there are any charges former Twitter executives should face for what seem like obvious fraudulent practices, they should face them.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yes, we certainly are facing our Gandhi and Dr. King creative moments going into 2023, and I agree we're going to have to escalate and do something.
And the frame for this AMREF 2.0 was that this is we the people's self-defense against a rogue state government that has attacked us in every way imaginable and many beyond our imaginations.
So the Twitter files has demonstrated election interference, and I think there's more to come, because it was two guys, I think it's the Hodgton twins, I may have their last name wrong, something Hodge something, two black guys, both have blue eyes, they're twins, they're identical twins, they had tweeted to Musk saying,
Let me guess, so you have some juicy emails from government leaders requesting censorship, and Musk responded just with a little trophy emoji.
So I think we're going to have more to come, and I think that we already have prima facie evidence that the Supreme Court, on their January the 6th consideration of the Brunson Brothers case, they're going to have to go forward with that.
We'll see.
A lot happening.
I sure hope you're right about Brunson, Brian.
I spent a lot of time yesterday going through some of these documents related and some of these analysis related to the things that Twitter was censoring.
And we use that word even though once you get into the actual documentation, you'll find it to be a much more sophisticated process than just generally throwing the word censoring at it.
But it's like a checklist of CIA operations worldwide, where they basically set the narrative and told Facebook and Twitter, who were working together at the same time, What operations they didn't want people looking at, what operations they didn't want people looking into, what journalists were becoming a problem for them because they couldn't control the story, and what home journalists and people were out there were saying that needed to be shut up.
So it's very interesting now that the cat's out of the bag in terms of running an analysis of the actual tweets, the actual accounts, the actual all that evidence is out there now.
And it is clear to me why these FBI trolls and these CIA trolls are involved with these massive social media operations now.
It's because they want to make sure that none of this gets exposed on the old interweb and people can find it out.
It's ugly what they've been doing to us psychologically.
And you know, because lately there's been that whole issue of People realizing that 70% of America has a blood clotting vaccine in their blood, and that they're all ticking time bombs, walking around, that there's a lot of remorse.
They're realizing their kids have screwed up, they're realizing that it was all just a big psyop, the whole COVID thing, no worse than the flu, just a massive psychological operation on the American people, and they're regretting it, and they're wanting to go back the other way.
I'll forgive, but I won't forget that these people didn't take the time to educate themselves about what was true and what wasn't.
They didn't take the time to be able to recognize what a psychological operation was, and therefore they got caught up in the mess, and now they've got this ticking time bomb pumping through their bloodstreams.
I'm sorry, but to me, it is a clear calling the herd.
Machine and unfortunately, there's a lot of blood on the hands of the people that went out there and said put on your masks shut down the small businesses close the churches and get your shot because there's real people dropping dead suddenly as a result of this operation and Twitter.
Hey, are they going to be the big hero here?
I'm glad they're exposing it, but do I trust them?
I think Elon Musk's got something up his sleeve long-term, and he's making a trade to get to that deal, but it's too difficult for me to know what that is.
Well, I hail him for the time being, because he's doing great things and exposing a whole lot of happy horseshit that the bad guys don't want the public to know.
So, I say so far, so good.
Meanwhile, Musk fires a woke mind versus the ether defeated or nothing else is either defeated or nothing else matters.
After he was booed when he made a surprise appearance on stage with Dave Chappelle at Chappelle's Show at the Chase Center, Twitter CEO Elon Musk followed by issuing a ringing denunciation of his leftist foes.
It was San Francisco.
When Chappelle introduced Moss, much of the crowd blew, prompting Chappelle to quit.
It sounds like some of the people you fired are in the audience at him.
All of those people who are booing, I'm just pointing out the obvious.
They have terrible seats.
It's all coming from way up there.
Meanwhile, on Monday morning, Moss took on his tweetings directly, tweeting the woke mind virus is either defeated or nothing else matters.
Prior to his appearance on Chappelle's Show, he'd indicated his disdain for the Twitter bots attacking him, tweeting, Blank and blank.
I think those are trolls and chills.
Bots and trolls.
Please attack me, followed by cool.
The bots are so unable to swarm to the top of my replies.
In late November, Buss posted a 12-second video of something he found in a closet at Twitter headquarters that revealed a truly lofty perspective.
He posted a video of the closet that had shelves stacked with T-shirts that part of Twitter's merchandising showed a shelf filled with black T-shirts reading, hashtag, Stay Woke.
Here we are.
At the merch, and there is an entire closet full, mostly explained before someone off-camera added secret closet.
Hashtag woke t-shirts.
There you see one right there.
Found in closet at Twitter headquarters.
Despite criticism from the political left of how he handled the company, he noted at the time, Twitter had added 1.6 million daily active users in the prior week.
Only hours before the tweet showing the woke t-shirts he took aim at his critics.
Wasn't Twitter supposed to die by now or something?
Maybe we've gone to heaven, hell, and don't know it.
A coalition of 60-plus civil rights and civil society groups calling themselves the Stop Toxic Twitter Coalition.
URGE TWITTER STOP ADVERTISING AND BOYCOTT THE COMPANY.
THREATENING.
MUSK MUST NOT ROLL BACK THE BASIC MODERATION PRACTICES TWITTER ALREADY HAS ON THE BOOKS AND MUST INVEST THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO ENFORCE THOSE RULES.
SWEEPING LAYOFFS AT TWITTER MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR TWITTER TO UPHOLD BRAND SAFEGUARDS AND CONTENT MODERATION.
COMPANIES SHOULD IMMEDIATELY STOP ADVERTISING IN RESPONSE.
HOW DISGUSTING IS THAT?
CARL, YOUR THOUGHTS?
Fascinating progress.
So Jim's right in that it's a great, exciting progress of events from Twitter.
And Brian's right that unless we have these arrests, then we don't have anything.
The arrests are going to be required just for us to get back to the position where we can consider ourselves the United States of America, a constitutional republic of limited government.
So, we're far from that.
The name of the game has been and will continue to be to fight the war and to win the war, and we'll know we will have won when the truth is fully unleashed.
Well, Twitter announced that it's going to be moving its headquarters from San Francisco someplace.
My instinct is that it'll be somewhere in Texas, probably Dallas or Houston, hopefully Houston.
Look, their entire workforce was overwhelmed with woke lib ideology.
Everybody knew this.
Everybody that was conservative could feel it, both on Twitter and on Facebook.
It doesn't surprise me that the disease runs that deep on that platform, and unfortunately these people are so butthurt right now that they're having a hard time coping with all the truth that's coming out.
Twitter has become much more fun.
It has It has been interesting watching everything develop on Twitter, and I've seen lots of things that I wouldn't have seen six months ago, eight months ago.
So I'm excited about the platform.
I think there's going to be some outshoots of it.
I think that Musk is going to show that it can turn around with a truly free speech concept.
But the question is, why so many FBI agents?
Why so many CIA agents?
What does our government have to hide that they feel that they have to control the conversation on that level?
Obviously, we all know that they're liars and cheaters and put psychological operations out there day in and day out among our audiences.
We're just hoping to keep informing our audiences about these things, but they were working in absolute overdrive to shut us down.
And why?
Because obviously what we're saying is having an effect on them.
Well, I have a colleague who suggests that all of Silicon Valley is really an extension of the U.S.
Intel apparatus and that you have so many FBI and CIA because they're still doing the work of the FBI and the CIA, Carl.
Yeah, so if, to kind of dot the I here, and what I certainly hope would happen, is you have, I think it was a dozen FBI officials at leadership positions at Twitter.
Okay, so if you really were going to run this censorship operation, then you would need people like that.
And let's say these dozen were the dozen.
They're going to be communicating to DC and to their agencies.
So if we rip that open and see the extent of who was ordering the censorship and take a look at the samples of censorship that is just really for election interference is going to be the crime for it.
I hope that's going to happen, but it has to happen soon.
Yes, yes, yes.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
You do realize that exposing the illegal things your government has been doing is illegal?
A friend sent me this saying it made him think of me.
Meanwhile, watch as Mike Adams and Steve Quayle discuss a globalist plan for mass depopulation.
Apart from a rescue, humanity's extinction is already a done deal.
The globalists have flipped the switch on the kill grid, which in time will end the lives of billions while transforming those who remain into human-machine-transhumanist hybrid cyborgs.
in the following episode mike adam discusses the issue with steve quail who says the world is rapidly approaching the great tribulation those who are not rescued from what is soon to come will be faced with a choice death or transformation into a new breed of artificial humans controlled by the globalists we are experiencing every form of surveillance every form of draconian law every form of medical murder that could have been imagined quail explained to adams
We're really at a point now, an inflection point, a biblical time period, where we're approaching the Great Tibulation.
And I don't think people understand just how dire the plans are for humanity.
Here's where they have the video report of it.
Much of what is already in motion and soon to culminate is contained within the World Health Organization's pandemic treaty, which has been refined this week to implement soon on a global scale.
Adams recently interviewed international bioweapons expert Dr. Francis Boyle about the pandemic treaty.
Boyle told him the language used in the treaty is designed to usurp any constitutional sovereignty, so the powers of nation will be overthrown, and the power of state will be overthrown.
The minute Joe Biden signs this treaty, it will bind the United States government to the conditions of the treaty, even if states attempt to resist it, Adams warned.
Related, check out an earlier interview with Quayle about transhumanist vaccine, domestic warfare, and the global genocide of humanity.
This treaty is, of course, underwritten by the CCP.
It is a communist-globalist takeover of the healthcare infrastructure, and WHO could order you, no matter who you are in the United States or anywhere in the world, order lockdowns, order vaccine mandates, order economic destruction, order quarantines.
The Wuhan coronavirus appears to have been just a test run for the real thing, which Adam said will probably go live the moment the pandemic treaty is enacted.
Once that happens and another pandemic is released, there will be no escaping the lockdowns, jab mandates, and whatever other measures are forced upon the masses.
What you are seeing now in Communist China with its zero-COVID tyranny We'll expand worldwide and become the norm everywhere.
Quayle agrees, having noted during the interview that everything Americans are used to under the Constitution—freedom, due process, protection against government tyranny—will go right out the window once a pandemic treaty is enacted.
The entire technocratic elite went to China to build the ultimate surveillance state, or the ultimate kill grid.
And it was illegal to do what they did in the United States then, but it's perfectly legal now.
What we're talking about is track, whack, and stack.
Another way of saying that everything we do, everything we stand, every place we go, they're going to track everything.
And to whack means to kill, and to stack means a mass grave.
In Quayle's examination, true science is dead.
The only thing that remains is a full implementation of globalist science, which will entail all the things he warned about in the interview.
Be sure to watch above.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, excellent article.
And I think that is the plan of our opponents.
What they wanted to do is to use frequencies of 5G and then have that interact with technology within the shots in order to cull and control the herd.
And I think that they're also correct that they wanted to roll out This so-called treaty with the WEF.
It wouldn't be a treaty.
It destroys the sovereignty of the United States.
But if they did that, then they would have what every totalitarian wants is a more central control and command center.
This would be the one people's party of earth.
And then they could go ahead and order people into being locked down to divide.
People into essential work for the good of the state and the non-essential work and just have a controlled work animals because these people are psychopaths.
They are heartless.
They have no empathy, no love.
They want no synergy and creativity.
They want a hunger game type of a situation where people will just be in districts and they'll do things like do the mining and they'll be out of the capital and they'll just be work animals.
Brian, just, I mean, Carl, just a point of law.
Biden signing a treaty doesn't make it enforceable.
It doesn't mean the United States, it has to be ratified by two thirds of the Senate.
So I don't understand why Mike Adams and Quayle didn't make that point.
It's crucial.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They, they might, uh, who knows what they might do, but that is what they want to do.
I agree with that.
Of course, Brian.
Oh, Mike Adams and Quayle.
Have at least a basic understanding of some of the points, the finer points of biblical theology, and that's important.
What you have to understand about the way, if you look at the way the world is working through the lens of the Bible, then what is really going on?
Since we're talking about End Times prophecy and Steve Quayle and others, what's really going on is not a battle for power.
But it's a battle for the souls of humanity.
And of course, the Bible teaches that we are made in God's image, not only in our body, but in our mind and our soul.
And that soul has an opportunity for redemption.
And Jesus considered the struggle to be the struggle of God Versus the enemy being Satan, so he considered it a spiritual battle.
And I would say that they're going to do everything they can to make sure that as many bodies die as possible before that soul has had a chance to obtain repentance of redemption.
Let's just call it a position with God that's going to be worthy.
In other words, those souls will either end up with God or those souls will end up separate from God, which would be quote-unquote hell.
So, it seems to me that they're using the satanic spiritual energy that they can muster in this world
to usher in a wave of enthusiasm for the incoming antichrist or lucifer that so they're expecting i think they when i say they the globalists the uh zionists the people in charge of controlling this apparatus are expecting that their quote-unquote lord of light will return soon and they see their lord of light and sort of a
Left versus right paradigm instead of a creator versus created paradigm.
So it may sound like I'm rambling a little bit, but if I'm understanding this correctly, humanity will lose.
We will become slaves.
We will fail.
But people will and can still be saved out from the system if I'm understanding how the Bible works correctly.
And again, that's a lifetime of study there, but That's fundamentally what's going on.
It's pretty dire, if you ask me.
Yeah.
I mean, I'd certainly like that not to be the case.
Get this, a Trump ban from Twitter came after pressure from Michelle Obama, of all people.
Radical Marxist Michelle Obama had some powerful ideas about how to treat the civil liberties of American citizens, including squelching speech and building personal power.
Rumors are the other half is thinking of running for POTUS in 2024.
So this reminder of the usurpation of our freedom comes at the perfect time to see how a political junkie like Michelle, or should I call it Mike, Obama, handles the concept of real equal rights.
Remember how Trump was censored and banned from communicating with the American people?
Now we learn how it happened.
A tweet from former First Lady Michelle Obama apparently played a major role in having him removed from Twitter, the latest Twitter files as shown.
Elon Musk and journalist Michael Schellenberger unveiled the fourth set of Twitter files showing communication by the company's executive between January 6 and January 8.
After the events of January 6, The internal and external pressure on Twitter CEO Jack Brose, former first lady, tech journalist Kyra Wisher, ADL, high-tech VC Chris Sacca, and many others publicly call on Twitter to permanently ban Trump.
For years, Twitter had resisted to ban Trump, he tweets.
Blocking a world leader from Twitter, it wrote in 2018, would hide important info and hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.
But after the events of January 6, the internal and external pressure grew.
On January 7, for example, the former First Lady issued a long statement regarding her thoughts on what Silicon Valley should do.
What happened next is essential to understanding how Twitter justified banning Trump.
Sales Exec, we are dropping the public interest policy now.
Raw, six hours later.
In this specific case, we're changing our public interest approach for his account.
Thank you.
We'll come back with comms.
Team Berkshire, one last question.
In the past, we exempted policy violation from a world leader to the public address value.
Are we dropping the public address now?
And any new violation could be a trigger?
For me to understand.
Again, we'll check with comms regarding what we can and cannot share publicly.
Yoel Roth replies, Apologies for the slow.
I've been back to back all day.
In a specific case, we're changing our public interest approach for his account to say any violation would result in suspension.
We aren't completely getting rid of the public interest approach, though we do have work planned on revision in H1 in 2021.
Earlier that day, an employee wrote, my concern is specifically surrounding the unarticulated logic of the decision by Facebook.
That space fills with the idea, conspiracy theory, that all internet moguls sit around like kings casually deciding what people can and cannot see.
Michael Schellenberg posted on Twitter, The evening of January 7th, the same junior employee who expressed an unpopular opinion about ad hoc decisions that didn't appear rooted in policy spoke up one last time.
Earlier that day, exactly as written, my concern is specifically surrounding the unarticulated logic Elon Musk has tweeted himself, Twitter is both a social media company and a crime scene.
Remarkably candid, it seems to me.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so to take a look at the biggest picture here, either what we're experiencing here on Earth is real or it's a simulation.
If it's real, then our job is clear.
We're patriots.
We're heroes.
We're standing up for truth and justice.
If it's a simulation, then either this is training for shit that is real, that we need to be trained for, or it's some sort of a soul development Or this is some sort of a wacky, sadistic type of simulation that I want to refund.
I'm not coming back to the simulation if that is the case.
So the idea of the purpose of life is indeed a big one, and people need to grapple with that.
But at the end of the day, I have seen no other option than to be a patriot And this goes into Matthew 10 39 of, I'll paraphrase it here, but it's, he who shall lose his life for my sake shall find it.
And that might be the ultimate test.
And all of us have come to this existential place where we have to take a stand and know that our life is worth sacrificing for these ideals.
And for me, it's just simple.
I'm not going to live a lie.
Let's see, let's see, let's see.
So Big Mike.
So that was a wonderful little, you know, Big Mike didn't write that.
This was given to the propagandists to write.
And that's a good, a great example of propaganda.
Of course, what is referenced in the propaganda is totally false.
And the top three reasons for it being false is that what happened on January the 6th stopped the presentation of evidence for 2020 election fraud.
And then we have the Brunson case, which was the representatives of Congress who were sworn to uphold the Constitution.
They ignored the evidence of election fraud.
And finally, we have recent emails of more intriguing hints that the Feds had evidence of a whole website of hundreds of people threatening violence on January the 6th.
But really, the slam dunk that I want to see Is the communications from the deep state that's going to be Pence, Pelosi, and those people to the FBI coordinating Antifa, infiltrating Patriots, and then having this be as a false flag.
All that evidence does exist.
It would be great to get it out.
Oh, I think it's going to come out.
I think Musk is really enjoying displaying the corruption and the hypocrisy of the elite.
For me, as an agnostic, it's a bit simpler.
I stand with Patrick Henry.
Give me liberty or give me death.
Brian?
Well, to address the first issue, I believe it's real.
I guess you could go back to freshman Cartesian methodology, but I doubt.
Therefore, I think.
I think, therefore I am.
I think we are physical, we are matter, we are here in this world, and I do think that there is such thing as a creator who created the heavens and the earth, and that there is a way to reconcile ourselves to him, and that there is a reason he has separated himself from this world.
As for Big Mike, Big Mike's part of the PSYOP.
I mean, look, we can all see it, and we can all feel it, this whole dark push to degrade Humanity into some sort of nebulous pink man-woman mix bastard beast.
They don't want man and woman anymore.
They want us to teach our kids.
They want them headed down the wrong path.
They want them in a series of confusion and lostness and regret and shame.
They want them to live with that until it kills them.
Big Mike is just simply a part of that whole trans ideology that has been pushed by this Zionist agenda.
We'll call them Zionists.
I don't know what you want to call them, but this group of globalists that hate God so much and despise the fact That he created man and woman in his image in a particular order of things that they're trying to just degrade the order and destroy the order.
Look, the things that we've seen lately are clearly spiritual.
I saw a video of some fat transvestite woman dancing down the halls of a church yesterday on Twitter, like, so proudly illustrating Total depravity in the context being within a church.
It's sick and disgusting, but it's designed to piss off God.
I hate to say it, not that he's capable of being affected by these things, because he's simultaneously present throughout all time in history.
He is Who he was, who he forever will be, the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, simultaneously present throughout all time, therefore all-knowing, therefore all-powerful, able to create something out of nothing, therefore he knows everything, omniscience.
It's a package that you've got to understand.
And that package says, basically, I've created this, it's good, it's beautiful, and they want to corrupt it.
They want to destroy it, make it ugly, make it disgusting, make this world bad because they've been forever isolated and separated from the Holy God that designed and created all of it.
And they're angry, and they're acting out, and they're trying to bring their Lord of Light into humanity.
And that fundamentally is what the Bible teaches about why things are what they are.
Fascinating, Carl, yes.
So if I understand you correctly, Brian, you're saying that these problems are much bigger than a hug from Big Mike would fix.
Big Mike is just another disgusting example of the whole thing that's been playing out for years and years and years.
And look, this has been playing out for a long, long time.
I remember in the 70s, these Pride people and these Jesus people and this San Francisco thing that was spreading all over the place.
Nothing new under the sun.
This stuff goes way back to the antiquity of history.
Child sacrifice and Baal worship and Molech and symbolism.
This is old stuff.
It's just simply being pushed out with a new sort of bow on it.
It's just old, old stuff.
Old wine in a new bottle.
Yep.
Here we have Kevin McCarthy.
GOP will subpoena 51 Intel officials who claim Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.
His announcement came as a Twitter file dropped by Musk, proving the social media platform deliberately censored the laptop story, as directed by the DNC and Biden's campaign.
With the GOP set to become the majority in the House in January, Kevin McCarthy is promising to hold intel officers who helped cast doubt on the story accountable.
He said those who signed the letter, he'll bring them and subpoena them before the committee.
The 51 agents who said the Biden information was all wrong was Russian collusion.
Many have a security clearance.
Why did they sign it?
Why did they lie to the American people?
A clap or a brannan?
Why do you use the reputation America was able to give you for more information, but use it for political purposes and lie to the American people?
The Twitter files that cast sunlight on the process behind the scene involving Twitter officials went out of their way to censor the story prior to the 2020 presidential election.
In a letter signed by over 50 intel officers, they admitted they do not know if the emails are genuine and they do not have evidence of Russian involvement, but they went on to say, If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election.
We believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.
It has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.
Which was all pure propaganda.
Horseshit.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Directors Mike Hayden, John Bryden, and Leon Panetta all signed the letter.
Well, the media has reluctantly and slowly confirmed the authenticity of the contents of the laptop.
None have ever apologized for misleading voters and tampering with the American election.
He's right.
Many of them hold a security clearance despite having helped spread false propaganda.
One, Jeremy Bash, was even recently named a key member of Biden's Intelligence Advisory Board.
Another, CIA officer David Priest, was given a platform to offer an apology but instead doubled down.
Author of the book, and I kid you not, How to Get Rid of a President, was challenged by Brett Baier in October.
He read back the classic earmarks of the letter and asked, why did you sign on to that?
Rather than admit to disseminating misinformation, he agreed.
He argued that people tend to leave out elsewhere in the letter.
It also says, we don't know if this is.
That has been dramatically changed in the retelling of the story.
If you didn't know, you never should have signed the letter.
What has changed dramatically is that 51 intel officials have proven to be liars.
The media helped amplify the lie, and Twitter shut down opposition to the lie, all in an effort to get Biden elected.
Subpoenas and hearings will be a good start, but it amounts to nothing if somebody isn't held accountable for this insurrection.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so Kevin McCarthy, he started out here in California in the California Assembly, and he's been in politics for 20 years.
Anybody who rises to the top is going to be dirty.
He has been in the House of Representatives since 2006, and if you're a good boy, you get promoted.
And being a good boy is that you have to promote the narrative.
He became the whip And the whip is the person, see it doesn't matter if you have votes against the policy that you want, you just have to have enough to win.
So if you need more votes, then it's the whip that's going to go threaten the members saying that you have to vote for this, otherwise you're going to be in trouble, you're going to get funding.
Yeah, you can get redistricted out of your position.
So whatever it is that that I would love to see the true background on everyone.
But anybody who rises to power is not going to be placed there unless it's a safe bet and by safe controlled by blackmail.
Now this idea of interviewing those 51.
So first of all, this, they lied.
So these 51 people who said that there's, they don't know, they didn't take a look at it and those who took a look at it saw that this laptop was authentic and all evidence was is that this has evidence of Hunter Biden involved in crimes against children.
It has evidence of financial crimes and corruption associated with the president, big guy.
And just to say that he's interviewing these people, then this is going to be a typical CYA move for damage control.
Yes, no doubt.
Brian?
Well, the American people are so stupid.
I mean, Look, the Hunter laptop story is a distraction.
It's one piece of evidence.
We've seen so much evidence over the years.
Go back as far as you want.
The story is not that we found Hunter's laptop and we have the evidence.
The story is, who is the network?
What is the network that protects him?
And why is there no appetite For righteousness or justice or the old American way.
That's the real story.
The Hunter laptop is, oh yeah, Hunter Biden is a nepotistic son of the president who is part of a corrupt apparatus, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Two people, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden.
I'm more concerned with the entire network that protects and holds these people up.
I mean, these guys are just puppets.
They're just part of a machine.
They're just cogs in a very nasty, greasy, dirty, ugly black box that is the American justice system.
And, you know, we haven't seen justice in a long, long time.
Don't expect to see it anytime soon.
Like I said, I'd be real excited the day I see an actual perp walk that's not For personal reasons, like Sam Freed or whatever his name is.
They just wanted to get him shooed off.
That's not a real prosecution.
That's gonna be about as much of a real prosecution as Ghislaine Maxwell.
The whole thing is ridiculous.
Hunter's laptop is a distraction.
The story is, who is the protection apparatus?
Why do they do what they do?
And what do they really have to hide?
Very good.
Meanwhile... CDC has been pressured to delete defensive gun use statistics.
This is rather stunning.
References to a study saying defensive gun use statistics were removed by the Center for Disease Control after gun control advocates complained the information would make passing new restrictions more difficult.
Wow!
Citing email it obtained the reload noted the law being culminated with a private meeting between the gun control of advocates and CDC officials.
It's that introduction from the White House and the office of Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois helped lead the way for advocates to reach the CDC officials to begin with.
Sparking the advocate's complaints with a CDC description of its review of statistics, it estimated defensive gun use occurred between 60,000 and 2.5 million times per year in the U.S.
The higher figure is closer to the truth.
The number of defensive gun use each year is controversial, this from an earlier study.
One ordered by the CDC, conducted by the National Academy's Institute of Medicine and National Research Council reported, defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence.
Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun use by victims are at least as common as offensive use by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from 500,000 to more than 3 million in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms.
This back in 2008, Another study estimates there are 1,029,615 defensive gun uses per year for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere, excluding military service, police work, or work as a security guard, yielding an estimated 162,000 cases per year.
Or someone almost certainly would have been killed if they had not used a gun for protection.
Since this is 2008, my expectation that offensive uses have risen to around 2 million, saving 200,000 per year.
AOC, meanwhile, has stumbled in the past when told more police means less crime.
AOC had a bit of a mental block confronted with facts regarding a push to defund police departments in cities across America.
During an interview with George Stephanopoulos, she was asked flat out, why take money from the police?
Research showed more police on the street means less crime, he added.
You can almost see the hamster fall off the wheel as she tried to wrangle her thoughts.
Well, I think there's one question that's interesting here is that when it comes to funds, it's not always just about the number of officers on the street, she sputtered.
When she finally settled on a thought, it involved a rare police force that has access to tanks.
It's about these police precincts that have tanks, military weaponry, frankly have a degree of material resources in a war-like weaponry.
What nonsense.
Meanwhile, Dr. Elwynn has in the past blogged Gun use for self-defense is offensive gun use.
Guns used not for self-defense but to attack others is offensive gun use.
In 2008, in a landmark, though razor-thin, 5-4 ruling, District of Columbia v. Heller, The Supreme Court stated the Second Amendment protects the individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home.
In its ruling, SCOTUS even leaves open the possibility the individual's right to bear arms may include military-grade weapons.
In Parkland, the school shooting was one in a seemingly endless string of fabricated events that appear to be designed to instill fear into the public to make it more amenable to manipulation and promote a political agenda, which, as Dave Hodges of the Common Sense Show has observed, has three stages.
First, A massive assault on the First Amendment, covered by the use of private companies, namely the social media giants Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, to remove critics of official accounts from publicizing or sharing their research.
Second, A correlated attack on the Second Amendment, where the University of Hawaii's Democide Project has shown there were 19 genocides during the 20th century, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation, leaving the population helpless to resist and, third,
The extraction of dissidents, the critics, those who speak out against fake news propaganda and censorship, who must be removed because they pose a threat to the deep state and can inspire others to stand up for their rights and transfer to American gulags, which we know as FEMA camps.
That the removal of guns from law-abiding citizens is not in the interest of the American people follows from studies that have shown that gun ownership and homicide rates are inversely related, which means that the greater the gun ownership, the lower the homicide rate, as multiple studies have shown.
John Lott, The War on Guns, Makes a very good read about what's really going on.
Consider this map.
Look at regions where you have the highest gun ownership.
Before Canada banned, North America was among the highest in gun ownership, but the lowest in homicide.
Brazil, low in gun ownership, high in homicide.
Russia, low in gun ownership, high in homicide.
Africa, Low in gun ownership, high in homicide.
There is no room for doubt about it.
Meanwhile, I have posted my piece on the Second Amendment and the politics of gun control on my Twitter account, at Jim Fetzer, and on my Facebook account as well.
When they come for our guns, the time has come to use them.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, great articles.
So, the CDC is a captured agency, all of them are, and in the allowed-to-be-captured-by-satanic-forces world that we live in, it's the inversion of what the title of their agency says.
So, the Center for Disease Control is really the Center for Disease Creation, or you could just call it the COD, the Center of Disease.
That'd be a nice handy name for him.
So, and AOC.
So this is just a script reading actress who is out of her depth.
So she's just a pair of tits who is hired to look good, to pretend to be progressive, to rally people around these ideals, but it's just empty rhetoric.
Um, I'm sorry, can you guys?
she has, she's just a script reader.
Yep.
And again, all that we really have is just to stand for the facts and to reject these ridiculous narratives.
I'm sorry, can you guys?
Yeah.
Look, the purpose of the false flags is to get us to give up our guns.
It is, and they see it as a marathon, not a sprint.
So that's why they put so much energy into the kids.
That's why they put so much energy into the school shootings.
They know that older guys like us who have experience with guns and have needed guns and have seen family members and others who have needed guns They know we're not going to give this up.
So this is a psychological operation that's aimed at getting our children to give up their guns so that they can become involuntary.
And I'll use the word slaves.
They'll become in because they'll be entered into involuntary contracts to do things and to not do things.
With the government, for the government, or to be thrown into even concentration camps, or COVID camps, or whatever it happens to be.
You know, look into the one called the Port Arthur Massacre back in 1996, and determine if that massacre in Australia makes any sense.
It was the one that was used to launch the Disarming of Australia.
And look at what happened to them during COVID.
So there's your timeline.
96 to 2021 was really when the people started being put in concentration camps.
And then ask yourself if any of the facts add up on the Port Arthur Massacre or the New Zealand shooting, which was similar to the Buffalo shooting.
Go back and study Sandy Hook.
Go back and study any of them.
You'll find that the government has an agenda, and I think Australia and New Zealand have been great testing grounds for what they can accomplish with their agenda.
And what happened during COVID was a good test to show what's going to happen here in America if we don't stand up for our rights.
Jim, you're muted.
that we did.
Brian, I think you got it exactly right.
Exactly right.
Check it out on Twitter, at Jim Fetzer, and on my Bitchu channel.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Pro or con, liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, eight times our federal government ran a Protect Biden racket.
From one of my best commentators on my blog.
Here's the first.
Censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.
The most recent and well-known example of the feds protecting the Biden family stems from efforts by intel agencies to squelch news coverage of the New York Post reporting And Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company.
The Post discovered that detail and many more implicating Biden in a pay-to-play scandal in a cache of emails and text messages recovered from a laptop Hunter had abandoned at a Delaware computer repair store.
Before the New York Post broke the story on October 14, 2022, about Joe Biden's knowledge of a potential involvement in his son's business dealings, the FBI warned Facebook it should be on high alert.
We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, the FBI said, adding, we have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump similar to that, so just be vigilant.
Based on that warning, Facebook's founder, Mike Zuckerberg, explained.
When the New York Post broke the Hunter Biden laptop story on October 14, 2020, Facebook treated the story as potentially misinformation—important misinformation—for five to seven days while the tech giant's team could determine whether it was false.
Federal Law Enforcement Agency likewise warned Twitter in the lead-up to the 2020 general election that they expect a hack-and-leak operation by state hackers might occur in the period shortly before the 2020 potential election, likely in October.
Twitter's then head of trust and safety, Yoel Roth, further acknowledged in meetings with law enforcement agency learned that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.
According to a letter Twitter's lawyers sent to the Federal Election Commission, the tech giant explained it was the prior warning of a hack-and-leak operation and doubts about the provenance of the materials republished in the New York Post that led its site integrity team to preliminarily determine the materials could have been obtained through hacking.
Just unbelievable.
Final thoughts?
Carl, yours.
Well, we are facing many problems in this nation.
Many more than hugs from former First Lady Michelle Obama could solve.
The FBI, with that last part, the FBI is the inversion of what they say that they're doing.
This is the Federal Bureau of Instigation or the Federal Bureau of Insurrection.
They do, they shield, and all eight of those examples are absolutely accurate.
They are going to act as an enforcement arm against We the People to facilitate the rogue state empire's criminal enterprise businesses.
And for the FBI, for them to make those statements of, gee, we're just concerned about the Russians, that's just virtue signaling and they lie about everything.
They have no interest in fair and free elections.
They have every interest to herd and control and then cull.
They really do want to degrade us to throw a religious and spiritual angle back on it for a creation of the creator, however you want to hold that of life.
Creation, God, whatever.
We are amazing creatures and given freedom, the synergy.
Carl B. Herman Blocks bought any of these new shows.
My mentor Buckminster Fuller, when I was still a teenager, he spent his life Demonstrating that we have all of the resources to have a world that works for everyone.
We could have an unimaginable great place here, a Star Trek-like future, and that's what we need to go for.
We just have this little problem in the meantime that we need some unimaginable breakthrough.
Because so far, everything that we've attempted to do in the field of truth has been thwarted.
And that said, as we've talked about today, there is no other position other than the truth and justice and victory for the light.
Ryan, your final thoughts?
Well, I just want to point out a couple of things about that old Port Arthur massacre from 1996 that you may not be aware of here in America, but basically it was a 66 IQ man who was deemed immensely retarded.
His name was Martin Bryant.
He was able to shoot up a dozen people in a span of 15 seconds with remarkable precision and efficiency, basically akin to a trained special forces operative with, but he had no firearm training.
In total, 35 people were killed and 25 wounded.
Tavistock was accused by a Citizens' Government Coalition in Australia of using Martin Bryant to execute the Port Arthur massacre.
Martin's mother appeared to cast doubt on her son's guilt, saying that there was no evidence he was at Port Arthur and some witnesses Didn't recognize the gunman as being Martin Bryant.
Other accounts of the shooter from witnesses at the scene claim Martin was not there as well.
Martin's mother later retracted her statement at the behest of the Australian government.
Several hospitals had put emergency plans into place days before the massacre.
Helicopter pilots were readily available on the day of the massacre.
A 22-body morgue truck had recently been made available in Port Arthur after being constructed immediately before the shooting.
And subsequently decommissioned, and a number of news reporters were already present for the World Press Convention.
There was never any official coronial inquest, and evidence didn't corroborate the details of the massacre, in essence.
So, does this sound familiar?
Does that sound maybe like our Yuvaldi or Sandy Hook?
Maybe our Buffalo?
Look, That's what they are, and you can see exactly what they are.
The bigger question is, how do we insulate ourselves from the power of these psychological operations?
And how do we work with family members and friends and acquaintances to help insulate them from the power of the PSYOP?
It's very difficult to get people who Are deceived to admit that they've been deceived on such a level and you have to take it one step at a time and what we're doing here and what we do as a team of people is is a very important component in the process of helping people realize that the government has been lying to them and deceiving them and to turn those damn TVs off.
Excellent, excellent comments.
I'm so overjoyed to have Carl Herman and Brian Davidson with the high-quality commentary on our stories.
I think Dave Hodges got it right.
First, they attacked the First Amendment, our freedom of speech, using Twitter, Google, Facebook.
So we can't actually see all sides of issues, so we can't address the evidence against as well as for a proposition.
That's to control our minds.
Then they conduct events, phony stage events, like Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Charlottesville, Parkland, Orlando, Las Vegas, every one of which was fraudulent.
Nobody died in any of those with a possible exception of Paddock, Steven Paddock, who is supposed to be the Las Vegas shooter.
And if you look at his photograph lying on the ground, there are shell casings on top of the blood.
If he actually had died, he couldn't continue to be shooting those shell casings.
It was a prop master who just threw him down, where my dear colleague Scott Bennett, a former Army Psy-Op and Intel officer, identified.
Some of them were gas-propelled.
Cartridges for a pellet gun.
Others were blank cartridges.
In other words, these were just props.
Similarly at Sandy Hook.
Ryan's own work has revealed, by going into the Connecticut police files, the bodies aren't where the bodies are supposed to be.
The blood isn't where the blood is supposed to be.
The furniture is all shoved up against the wall.
There are no student desks.
There are no student chairs.
There's no teacher's desk.
There's no American flag.
These are all propaganda psyops to manipulate us to take away our guns.
Why?
As he also reports, in the 20th century there were 19 demo sites where whole societies were slaughtered by their governments, every one of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
The CDC is trying to suppress the gun grabbers, really.
All the evidence about the defensive use of guns.
About 70,000 die from gun violence, which includes suicides across the United States.
You have, nevertheless, millions of Americans using guns to defend themselves, saving around 200,000 lives every year.
That's three times the number who would die from gun violence, including suicide.
Take away that right to defend ourselves with guns, and the number just rises dramatically, once again.
They're going back to suppress information, freedom of speech, so they can take our guns, so they can subject us to tyranny, and ultimately to genocide.
Don't have any doubt about it.
It's taking place before your very eyes.
Wake up.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, and people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection