Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 6, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:03:34

Need to Know News (5 December 2022) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with some developments.
	Former Russian president walks the EU over the deleted claim about Ukrainian losses, which are overwhelming.
	The Russians are truly mobbing up.
	She had mentioned in a speech that 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers had already died, as well as 20,000 civilians.
	Then she deleted the tweet.
	It was also removed from the transcript of the meeting.
	The self-censorship was subsequently confirmed, with a spokeswoman saying the number had been an estimation from external forces, but it appears to have been exactly right.
	Meanwhile, the former president of Russia was ridiculing what they were doing here, describing NATO as a criminal entity that should be repented for its crimes against humanity and be dissolved.
	Meanwhile, Russia is giving a free shot to Ukraine, loads 300 cruise missiles on 18 bombers for the largest mass missile attack yet, Western satellites have detected a gathering of 14 Tu-95 and 4 Tu-160 strategic bombers.
	Intensive preparations are made at the base for the attack on Ukraine.
	They also have four Il-78M aerial refueling tankers.
	That adds up to 276 cruise missiles if they all carry a max load.
	That would be three times more than used in a record per day.
	Fuel tankers and support vehicles have been supported.
	It looks very much as though it's going to focus on destroying what's left of Ukraine's electricity and water grids.
	We understand.
	The terrorists, as Zelensky, are planning new attacks.
	Meanwhile, Russia has already destroyed 40% of Ukrainian energy with missile attacks, doesn't have been workered and killed.
	Here you see some of the bombers standing by.
	I'm impressed with what Russia's doing.
	It's in the stages of, I think, about to mop up Ukraine on a massive scale.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	I agree.
	And we need it.
	We need a breakthrough.
	We need it this month.
	Otherwise, patriots are going to have to take matters into an escalated fashion to defend the Constitution, the Republic, the people, ourselves against this rogue state.
	Government now turned its targets onto us for stolen elections forever.
	So I do agree it is in the mop-up stages.
	And there was a report, I haven't looked Enough into it to see if that was the airfield, because Russia did say that they had an airfield hit inside Russia.
	I believe it was like 70 kilometers in.
	It may have been that very airfield.
	I don't know.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I guess no one wins when you're talking about that kind of depopulation, but as far as the ground war, as well as the public relations war, I think it's a known contest.
	Really, it's sad to see the amount of propaganda that's being pumped into this, but the amount of money at the behest of the U.S.
	taxpayers and the debt on our children.
	This is truly deplorable, and it's all for a group of political insiders to make maximum amount of money and to optimize their profit margins at the expense of human life.
	So as far as I'm concerned, it's a no-win situation that we seem to be putting a lot of money into.
	And yeah, I think the product will speak for itself.
	I think you got that.
	Exactly right.
	Meanwhile, the French president declares the U.S.
	climate policy too liberal, even for France.
	That's saying something.
	Wednesday, French President Macron Frank came to America for a state visit with Biden.
	While they agreed on much, he let them know that the U.S.
	had gone too far with its green energy agenda, that the falsely named Inflation Reduction Act is super aggressive for our business people.
	He was referring to government subsidies for American-made products and green technology, which Frank argues will arm not only the French economy but the overall European Macron continued that while we are respected as a good friend, the policy will fix your issues, but it'll increase our problems.
	The move could spark an American-European trade war, given they feel a need to subsidize their own green economic entities in response.
	Biden's Inflation Act, after all, offers huge subsidies for U.S.
	goods and puts non-U.S.
	companies at a disadvantage.
	Inflation Reduction Act, of course, was supposed to bring a huge wave of assistance to Americans, but actually it had to do with Tax, Health Care, and Climate Act.
	It had nothing to do with inflation, but actually exacerbates inflation It resembled a laundry list of Democrats' favorite pet projects.
	The behemoth $739 billion tax increase over 10 years includes $313 billion from a corporate tax increase.
	The bill includes $224 billion for IRS enforcement, $14 for closing carried interest loopholes, last but not least, $369 for energy-focused climate programs.
	While nuclear is something that makes environmentalists cry, France is all into nuclear and drives 70% of its power from that source.
	You don't actually need hundreds of billions in wasteful spending for green schemes when you can just use an affordable, ready, available resource instead, as does France.
	They're building more nuclear plants.
	France, in fact, is the largest Debt exporter of electricity in the world earns around 3 billion euros per year.
	Roughly 17% of their power comes from recycled nuclear fuel.
	Ever notice how often our country is criticized?
	Now thank you, Biden.
	You've made us look ridiculous and stupid to the rest of the world.
	Everyone is laughing.
	Meanwhile, CNN wasted no time gushing over Macron's visit for Biden to host a state dinner.
	They lamented it took so long for such an occasion to happen.
	I mean, look, he's been in the office for over two years, and this is the first state dinner?
	Fellow Democrat Jared Golden called out to Biden amongst hypocrisy for serving mean lobster while imposing harsh new restrictions on mean lobstermen that could put them out of business.
	Unbelievable!
	If the Biden White House can prioritize purchasing 200 mean lobsters for a fancy dinner, Tonis should also take the time to meet with the marine lobstermen in his administration currently regulating out of business.
	While CNS reported how many scoops of ice cream former President Trump would serve compared to his guests, lavish details of the Biden state dinner were likewise dutifully reported, from the table settings to the silverware, the obligatory comparison between Jill Biden's handling and First Lady Melania Trump.
	What might not be good optics for the Biden admin, however, is that while the Bidens and Macrons dine on beef and lobster, many Americans are having to choose between heating their homes and putting food on the table due to inflation.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, funny stories and kind of a context that we see often repeated is that you have a kind of a controlled opposition with that Green Deal with Macron and the actor playing Biden is probably an actor playing Macron too, but it begins with the assumption that the Green Deal is somehow a relevant and useful approach.
	It isn't.
	It's just more scamming.
	As usual.
	So the escalation of the taxes that were mentioned, yeah, this is interesting about how that is going to end.
	The increase, the exponential increase in federal government spending is going to be similar to the exponential increase in the debt curve.
	And that's what the Great Reset is about, so they're just trying to buy out or do the final looting before they attempt to go into the Great Reset.
	That's our opponent's plan.
	I did see that Musk spoke out that FTX may have laundered up to a billion dollars, because remember that money laundering is that the taxes that we the people are paying that we're told is going to Ukraine to fight the war, part of that is being laundered back to the Democratic Party.
	And for CNN to cover the lifestyles of the rich and famous, a state dinner with Macron and Biden.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think that's appropriate because, you know, we can add two and two together.
	And the message to us is, is let us eat cake and then use the warm cake to try to warm our cold hands in the cold winter that's coming.
	Indeed, Chris.
	Yeah, I think it's more like let them eat fake, you know, all this stuff to be a major scumbag alliance that seems to really, I guess, is dwindling down in terms of credibility.
	I've heard that both Biden had an assassination attempt on him and and Macron, Emmanuel Macron virus.
	Somebody actually beat him up in public, from what I heard.
	So it's getting to the point where they can't even walk the streets in the countries that they supposedly preside over.
	And, you know, I think it's about time that these guys have something to fear after all the comfort they've established in their systematic corruption.
	And I really am not encouraging violence or assassination attempts.
	But I would definitely say that people are more than fed up with these assholes running around spending sixty five thousand dollars on quote unquote pizza parties.
	Oh, I I couldn't agree more.
	Very, very good.
	Nice points.
	Meanwhile, The UN and the WEF declare we own the science and admit to censoring information.
	Here are the top 15 contributors to the World Health Organization program budget.
	Number one, the USA, 15.9%.
	Second, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 9.4%.
	UK, 7.7%.
	Gavi Alliance, 6.6%.
	4%, UK 7.7%, Gavi Alliance 6.6%, others lesser.
	The World Economic Forum held a sustainable development impact meeting toward the end of September 2022, convening at the same time as the UN General Assembly, where UN officials declared they own the science.
	They admitted, among other points, partnering with Google to censor search results that don't fit the official narrative and ensure their propaganda is at the top of the list, partnering with big tech social media to boost propaganda messaging on COVID-19 climate change to shape public opinion, giving millions of social media influencers to spout their propaganda to shape public opinion.
	We own the science, and we think the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do.
	If you Google climate change, you will, at the top of your search, get all kinds of UN resources.
	Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, much more trusted than the UN.
	The idea that all speech is equal is not true.
	Welcome to the Great Reset.
	During the WEF Sustainable Development meetings in September of 2022, the unelected globalists held a panel on tackling disinformation, where participants from UN, CNN, and Brown University discussed how to control the narrative.
	Melissa Fleming, an Undersecretary General for Global Communication at the UN, highlighted U.N.
	had partnered with the big tech companies, including Big Tech and Google, TikTok and Google.
	On the climate change narrative, she remarked the U.N.
	had partnered with Google.
	So if you Googled climate change, you'll get U.N.
	resources.
	We're becoming much more productive.
	We own the science.
	We think the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do.
	The unelected globalist efforts on narrative didn't end with partnering with Google.
	Fleming highlighted the UN work with TikTok on a project called Team Halo to boost COVID messaging.
	We had another trusted messenger product called Team Halo, where we trained scientists around the world and doctors on TikTok and had them working with us.
	The U.N.
	claims to own the science, but if we take a closer look at who's directing and coordinating, we got a clear picture of who's really calling the shots.
	Historically, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with the Gates-McGovey Vaccine Alliance have contributed more to the new program budget than all member nations save two, the U.S.
	and the U.K.
	So who owns the science?
	During the WF panel, the UN Global Communication Rep went on to admit people don't trust institutions like the UN, so to counter this, they look to influencers, another key strategy we use.
	The idea of infiltrating and subverting online groups from within by targeting influencers mirrors recommendations coming out of a Google background report back in April of 2021.
	According to their policy recommendations, conspiracists, that means anyone who disagrees with them, have their own experts on whom they lean to support and strengthen their views.
	Their reliance on the experts might limit the impact of formal outreach by public health.
	Our review of the literature shows one alternative approach could be to direct outreach toward moderate members who could influence the broader.
	They went on to say commercial marketing programs use a similar approach, moderating tackling disinformation, ...was managing director Arian Monarch, who in recent months has been name-calling critics of the WEF and of its Great Reset agenda as white supremacists and as anti-Semites engaged in far-right disinformation campaigns.
	When addressing CNN's racial smart, he said CNN was part of a political war strategy to own the narrative.
	CNN is both an organization trying to make sense of the world and trying to establish the facts.
	It's also part of a political war on who owns the narrative and we know on whose side CNN appears.
	They received 3.6 million donations from none other than Bill and Melinda Gates.
	Investigation Reveals Goats has also donated 319 million to many of the biggest and most influential corporate news outlets.
	So who's really engaged in a political war?
	Speaking of owning narratives, last year the W.E.F.
	launched the Great Narrative Initiative as a sequel to the Great Reset, with the goal of reshaping all aspects of society and of the global economy.
	The idea of a great narrative is something a French philosopher, Jean-Francois Lytard, called a grand narrative.
	AKA meta-narrative, which functions to legitimize power, authority, and social customs—everything the Great Reset is trying to achieve.
	Once it establishes its great narrative, those who oppose can be dismissed as disinformation, conspiracists, extremists who must be censored.
	One single panel saw unelected globalists claim they basically had a monopoly on science and that corporate media was embroiled in a battle to own the narrative.
	At the same time, the UN rep claimed people who questioned the narrative are seizing the opportunity of people being afraid to inject disinformation.
	People are very active in the anti-vaccine and others are seizing the opportunity, fueled by some leaders in government.
	However, it was UK's King Charles III who actually had initiated or proposed a great reset of the idea, who said in June of 2020, We have a golden opportunity to see something good with this crisis.
	Its unprecedented shockwave may well make people more receptive to big visions of change.
	Similar, Klaus Schwab said the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity.
	If anyone was seizing the opportunity to exploit people's fears, unelected globalists in the British Crown would certainly top that list.
	Brown University's Claire Wardle, a self-styled leader of experts on misinformation, told the panel she was frustrated people couldn't have a more nuanced conversation about speech, engaging in a nuanced conversation about speech.
	Free speech is free speech, allowing for nuanced or un-nuanced, all varieties of opinion to be permitted.
	That didn't stop her from complaining about free speech, even as she was actively participating in it in real time.
	This idea that all speech is equal is not true.
	I wish we could just have that conversation properly.
	Declaring they own the science, partnering with big tech to manipulate search results, pouring millions into media outlets, the unelected globalists once again are showing their true colors for all to see.
	Owning the science leads to owning the narrative.
	Owning the narrative means controlling thought and speech.
	Controlling thought and speech means the end of a free society.
	Welcome to the Great Reset.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, what we're seeing is an official ministry of truth being pushed out, and of course they're going to claim that we own the science, we own the narrative, and it's coming quickly to the endgame.
	And the endgame In this polarization, where we get a sharper and sharper division between these two endgame options, one is going to be the Great Awakening, which is going to be the truth, the facts.
	And this is objective, independently verifiable, and comprehensive, accurate.
	That is going to lead to the arrests of these leaders for obvious crimes.
	On going in their empire, we get synergy and we get unleashed technology that has been suppressed in order to keep people controlled.
	If we go into the outcome of our opponents of the great reset, then you're going to have this.
	Continuation of factless emotional bullshit to manipulate human beings as children, to try to have them be scared as herd animals.
	We're going to have the police power of the state used for physical force for compliance.
	And we're also going to see this just ongoing pyramid of the rogue state empire.
	And they're going to pay for it all with this monopoly money.
	Until they reset that and then they just tell us, yeah, you're going to own nothing now.
	Yeah, I think that's right, Chris.
	Well, not only do they own the science behind this patented conflict of interest, and they are funding this through massive amounts of debt, which will compound interest as well, to resolve, in my opinion, it's a Ponzi scheme or a Gollum enterprise.
	Google is funding and owning the propaganda behind this to make this possible, including the colossal PR failures in the face of their overwhelming censorship.
	In my opinion, Google is pure evil, certainly not do no evil.
	The World Economic Forum and all the usual suspects have been caught in a massive depopulation event, and they've been trying to really forge the perception management through behavioral insight teams and digital bots.
	And I'm not claiming to be an expert, but I do have a very strong opinion.
	And if they want to call me a far-right anti-Semite and gaslight me through these things, you know, these preemptive Clinton tactics, you know, so be it.
	You got to have thick skin.
	You got to hold your trench and you got to know what the hell is right and what's wrong.
	And I think these people in terms of moral compasses have gone completely askew.
	And as far as philanthropy being a measure of or a shibboleth for this measure of control, I think that really these billionaires that have extorted and embezzled tons and tons of money from the global population have been now using this ill-gotten gain to force this depopulation event, this great reset, which will bring in the CBDC and impose technocratic feudalism upon the entire world.
	And, you know, as far as being afraid to inject anything, I'd be afraid to inject that MRNA recombinant.
	This patented soft kill mechanism that they've oversensationalized and hypersensationalized to combat a weaponized version of influenza which they've also created.
	It's very Hegelian in terms of dialogue and dialect and those of us that know better see better and know exactly what's up and they are really trying to put all political momentum and weaponize the obtuse against the people that are really paying attention and they're trying to do the right thing here.
	So it's a shame and I think the people are seeing through it and it's about time.
	Carl.
	So it really is becoming more Orwellian.
	So Google, if they had to explain it with a straight face, it would be something like this.
	We at Google have removed the word no from do no evil.
	It's now do evil.
	And we need to do that because Twitter has shown us that free speech threatens free speech.
	And we need more war in the Ukraine and Russia to bring peace.
	They say something just like that.
	We need more war to bring peace.
	Absolutely.
	Chris, a further thought?
	Yeah, you're right, Carl.
	Spot on about this Orwellian 1984 verbal inversion.
	And yeah, it's amazing to see the people that don't know about it are falling for this.
	And I'm just glad to see more people are awakening to this and standing up against it, because it's going to take all of us.
	Excellent.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, Twitter released its first transparency report COVID scandal exposed.
	In its first transparency report, Twitter has revealed how it operated before the company was taken over by Elon Musk.
	The social media giant also said it no longer enforced its misleading information policy.
	Must promise to release a report said it's important to regain the public's trust.
	Since January 2020, around 11 million accounts have been challenged for violating the company's COVID information policy.
	The Twitter files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself.
	The public deserves to know what really happened.
	In January 2022, over 2,200 accounts were suspended for violating the policy, no doubt protesting about all the death and damage being done by the VACs.
	In September, the last month of the policy's implementation, only 173 were suspended because they'd already suspended so many.
	As promised, these accounts will be reinstated as long as they don't violate any laws.
	But they weren't violating any laws to begin with.
	Meanwhile, COVID fanatics meltdown over Twitter removing its censorship rules.
	The left-wing Twitter heads have got to be exhausted.
	It's been one mafic meltdown after another, thanks to Elon Musk's push for a transparent and free-speech social media platform.
	Most recently, the hyperbole-laden tweets from the left have focused on a recent change regarding COVID.
	COVID seems like that ex-boyfriend you wish you could erase from your memory, but likes to keep popping up, reminding you of your past poor decisions in life.
	Here, Kyle Becker tweets, Now that Twitter ended COVID misinformation, let's review the experts' misinformation.
	15 days to slow the spread.
	Mass work.
	Lockdowns work.
	Natural immunity is a myth.
	mRNA shots are vaccines.
	COVID shots stop transmission.
	100% safe and effective indeed.
	This was what we were being sold that those who were accused of disinformation were disputing or denying.
	They were right.
	Because there's an excessive number with nothing better to do than comb through social media updates.
	Bluebird was all on Twitter with this update.
	Effective November 23rd, 2022.
	Twitter is no longer enforcing the COVID-19 Misleading Information Policy.
	On the one hand, you had some who celebrated, such as Dr. Simone Gold, who pointed out, Here's her tweet.
	Policy was used to silence people across the world and question the media narrative surrounding the virus and treatment option, a win for free speech and medical freedom.
	Here's her tweet.
	She's, of course, exactly right.
	Others chose an alternative view.
	Twitter has quietly changed their policies to allow COVID-19 misinformation, which will literally kill people, which is about as absurd as it gets.
	Dr. Lucky Tran, what a fraud.
	So there you have it.
	With a single update, Musk has single-handedly signed the death certificate of countless people.
	The power we place in one mere mortal is incredible.
	There is such a thing as overdoing something leading to fan fatigue.
	With me, it's tacos.
	I love them.
	Sometimes I eat too many for too many days in a row and don't want them for some time after.
	I was in the military when COVID burst out on the scene with its moniker coronavirus.
	I was also a senior leader when the first vaccine came out.
	There was an expectation I'd get two taps to the arm.
	To be honest, I didn't want them.
	Not because of any health-related issue, but because I, like many of my fellow service members, was under tight restriction.
	I felt getting the shots didn't give me more freedom was a point.
	Eventually, the decision was made to loosen restrictions for vaccine military, so I got my two shots.
	Two years later, much like many others, I'm over it.
	Last month, data showed only 11% of individuals over the age of 5 had received their updated vaccine, only 30% of those over 65.
	Senior Vice President Kaiser Family Foundation curiously explains, I think it's still a little bit of an uphill battle because so many Americans are weary of COVID and sort of tried to move beyond it, unfortunately.
	Unfortunately?
	What will be allowed to move on to other things than to live our lives?
	Like most abusive relationships, the answer is never.
	This move by Musk shouldn't surprise anyone.
	He's a free speech proponent, creakily government's response from the beginning.
	He said back in 2020, forcibly imprisoning people in their homes against their constitutional right is wrong.
	Leave it to immigrants to understand the Constitution better than Americans.
	Faced with a pandemic, shouldn't we sacrifice our rights for safety?
	No, absolutely not.
	My favorite reaction to Elon's change comes from epidemiologist Eric Fiegelding.
	Bad news.
	Stay, folks.
	Do not cede the town square to them.
	I like to imagine those like Mr. Fiegelding put blue war paint on their face before mounting on their trusty seats or office chairs and fighting the noble fight on the battlefield known as Twitter.
	The whole point of it is that one side doesn't own it.
	It's for all the people.
	Second, don't leave Twitter because people like you provide me with easy article fodder.
	Here's Benny Johnson tweeting, Steven at home should be able to rest easy knowing Twitter is no longer banning COVID misinformation.
	Here's more, Petey Dassey makes KJP do a double take after asking if the White House will delete their Twitter account.
	The COVID pandemic gave bureaucrats and journalists a taste of absolute power, and that flavor was so sweet.
	Unfortunately, we haven't had it, too.
	We capitulated to obnoxious rules that restricted our businesses, schools, and our lives.
	Musk is doing exactly what he said he would do.
	He would bring back free speech to Twitter and give the town square back to the users.
	Thanks to the old Twitter COVID policy, over 11,000 were suspended and over 100,000 content were removed.
	And that's just COVID-related nonsense.
	Don't forget the controversy surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop and the censorship thereof.
	Keep up the good work.
	Continue to poke at the ridiculous, catastrophic rhetoric that the left keeps peddling.
	I'll be over here not wearing a mask and living my best life.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, Twittergate, what a great opening that is.
	So, so far what we know, and there may be much more, is that Agents within the government in the Biden administration, they conducted election interference, which I think is a crime to interfere with the election.
	It's a little bit different from what the FBI notes as election interference, but I think it's going to be a crime.
	It's definitely a destruction of First Amendment rights.
	And this is all by the Ministry of the Truth.
	And if we just take the example of the laptop, Well, let's have public consideration of that laptop, where we have Hunter saying that 10% of the deal goes to the big guy.
	The big guy is what Joe Biden has on, had on the license plate of his own car.
	Let's go ahead and expose that.
	You know, Hunter, in his laptop, in his phone registry, if you look up Pedo Peter, that is the name he uses for his dad.
	On his, uh, on his phone.
	Now, I don't know if you can imagine saying something like that about your dad on your phone, and then there are the photographs where Hunter is engaged in crimes against children with sexual crimes, and I mean elementary school-aged children.
	Photographic evidence of those crimes.
	Now, Kyle Becker had a great tweet.
	He nails the truth right there, and that's a great demonstration of the type of tweets that got people deplatformed from Twitter.
	So, we'll see where this breaks.
	There are so many areas where it looks like, including from that data in that article of people rejecting the shots, well, okay, maybe more people will reject the war on Ukraine.
	Maybe more people will reject the Federal Reserve.
	Maybe more people will reject the election fraud.
	We shall see.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Chris, are you there, my friend?
	Yes, sir, I am.
	Yep, I'm sorry.
	I was just looking at my phone for a minute.
	Yeah, there's something that I didn't understand about the trauma and loss in terms of people.
	No, go ahead.
	that have lost loved ones due to, I don't have a better word for it.
	Can you hear me?
	- Yeah, now we can, now we can, go ahead.
	- Oh, okay, okay, sorry, it looked like you lost you.
	Want me to start again or no?
	- No, go ahead, yeah, start again.
	- Okay, all right, I didn't know if you lost me out there or not.
	Okay, starting back here.
	I'm used to these technical issues, so yeah.
	What I was saying, though, is people that have lost people through this trauma, that they've been forced and created and justified by some sort of distractionary justification, they forge political identities, and it basically creates and fuels these janissaries who follow the echo chambers, who think that repetition equals truth.
	The people that get all their opinions from the mainstream media, the board followers, Who follow along to the butcher's blade, the Judas goats and sheepdogs, who fail to accept it and to acknowledge and to embrace personal responsibility, even in the face of being given fair warning by these people that are depopulating us and providing the symbolism for their own insiders to know this is part of the scam.
	While they target the first and last lines of defense and mobilize those whose salaries are dependent upon their ignorance and compliance.
	I think that it's really, it comes down to what one of the founding forefathers says, and I'm paraphrasing this with my own words, those who would sacrifice their freedoms for these delusions of safety deserve neither.
	And these bureaucrats that are just following orders are like sentinels, and they're waging war upon those with enough common sense and courage to oppose this absolute lunacy.
	And they use these gaslighting tactics to gaslight the victims and to really forge this crazy making through doublespeak by design.
	And I think these weaponized perverts who are trying to make the abort into the new normal are pushing too far as they always do.
	And it's going to fail miserably and blow up in their face.
	Very good.
	Very good, Chris.
	Did it come through?
	Yep.
	Meanwhile, Washington.
	Washington goes to war against Twitter and free speech.
	Here's Jonathan Turley's column this week on the campaign to coerce Elon Musk to restore censorship to Twitter.
	The campaign now involves the full allied forces of the anti-free speech movement, the government corporation, Democrat politicians, the media, and, of course, celebrities.
	It's total war the Beltway.
	But Musk has yet to deploy his greatest weapon, free speech.
	Washington this week is on full wartime footing.
	It's not over the Russian invasion or North Korean missiles or even Chinese expansionism.
	It's about Twitter and the threat of a must to restore free speech to social media.
	Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has emerged as a bellicose general rallying others to the censor or die pressure campaign.
	The problem is citizens are blocking the Twitter, signing up in record numbers.
	They want more, not less, free speech.
	The over 2 million new sign-up per day represented a 66% increase over the same period last year.
	A reporter this week was also alarmed.
	So alarmed, she asked the White House West Secretary about the concern millions are still signing up.
	Demanded to know who's keeping an eye on this for possible federal action.
	Unable to convince users who embrace censorship, Hillary and others are pressuring corporations and foreign governments to deter Musk from restoring free speech.
	Since users are embracing the new Twitter, the campaign is focused on preventing them from signing up by removing the app from the Apple and Google stores.
	In the meantime, Apple is joining the boycott by withholding advertising revenue to coerce Musk to reverse his free speech pledge.
	Musk, however, is sitting on the ultimate weapon to bring the war to an end—free speech itself.
	It will, however, require more than rhetorical recriminations, as Musk asking why Apple execs hate free speech in America.
	The fact that these media and political figures are becoming more and more alarmed as Musk threatens to release files on past censorship stories, like the Hunter Biden lab shop, is revealing.
	Musk has to wonder why Apple CEO Tim Cook would join this anti-free speech.
	But the reason is as obvious as it is craven.
	The boycotts are not about corporations or shareholders.
	They're more likely to diminish profits.
	It's about the executives themselves.
	Many are allies of figures like Hillary.
	Others are yielding to these demands to avoid being attacked or tagged by the left.
	Cook is betting, well, the public wants more free speech, and Apple will also want Apple Watches.
	Apple also has acquired the market power of a true monopoly.
	It does not have a serious competitor, and, shown with such attacks on sites like Parler, it can literally strangle the life out of competing or disfavored products.
	The real question is why the political, business, and media establishment is ramping up this campaign.
	The answer is power.
	With Biden and Democrat senators supporting investigations, the message could not be clearer.
	Proceed at your own peril.
	That message was brought home by Politico's Sam Stein when he warned Musk that it's always risky to attack members of Congress, especially risky with Dems assured of Senate power.
	For years, Democratic politicians and their allies have exercised an enormous degree of control over political discourse through allies in the media and social.
	The problem is, censorship only works if it's complete.
	If there are alternative sources of information, free speech is like water.
	It finds a way out.
	That's why Democrat members pressured cable carriers to drop Fox, the most popular cable news network on television.
	For the record, I appear on Fox as a legal analyst.
	Having an echo chamber on every other channel means little if alternative stories are just a click away.
	The same is true for print media.
	With a Wall Street Journal, New York Post, and a few others, the effort to kill stories like Hunter Biden Laptop could not be a complete success.
	The truth found a way out, now the same outlets that peddled a false Russian disinformation claim are admitting the laptop is authentic.
	The threat is an even greater on social media area of great success for those seeking to control political discourse.
	If Musk carries through on his pledge, the public will have a free speech alternative.
	And they are already speaking loudly by signing up with the company in record numbers.
	Despite a creepy Facebook advertising campaign to embrace censorship, it has not worked.
	The public is not buying.
	They are buying free Twitter.
	The only way to regain control is to prevent people from getting the app or threatening to force Twitter into insolvency.
	The problem is, Musk, an eccentric millionaire, is not easy to intimidate.
	He now stands against a massive alliance of government corporations, celebrities, and politicians.
	He has the only public and free speech on his side.
	He needs to use them both.
	He cannot remain on defense and just take political and economic hits.
	The campaign is growing because the risk is growing for these various interests.
	The way to end it is simple.
	Release everything related to the company's massive censorship operation.
	This is an effort not only to resume censorship and protect the censors, so open the files!
	Allow the public to see not just communications on censorship, but how Twitter may have used verification, throttling algorithms, and other methods to control speech.
	The company doesn't have to release codes or damaging information to reveal the back-channel communication of liberation and targeting choices.
	By embracing total transparency.
	Musk and for example and other companies do face the ugly realities of censorship.
	The Anti-Free Speech Alliance has declared total war on Twitter.
	It's time for Twitter to get into the fight.
	Realize free speech is not just its guiding principle but its greatest weapon.
	When Musk threatened to restore free speech protection, Hillary and others went to cry havoc, let slip the dogs of war.
	So be it.
	The Musk merchants has warned people to pick sides in this fight for free speech.
	Musk can leave the dogs at home, however, and just unleash the truth.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Jonathan Turley, one of my favorite lawyers.
	This is a guy whose law blog has been voted the best in the U.S.
	more than once.
	So he's absolutely right.
	And what we're doing in this polarization is choose a side.
	And it might be that one of the ways that we, the people, can better talk to people is just in this dispassionate passion In this paradox of being a peaceful warrior, it's just encouraged people to choose a side.
	If you want to choose a side for the Great Reset, okay, have censorship, have the Ministry of Truth.
	Have these forever wars of empire like you see in Ukraine with puppets like Zelensky who criminalized all political opposition.
	Have the requirement that if the government says, hey, you're not essential, you got to close your business, you got to get these shots, you got to wear a mask, you got to social distance, you got to not go to church, you got to not sing, So that's what I see is the main principles of the Great Reset or take the Great Awakening.
	The Great Awakening is going to be unleashing truth for freedom of speech.
	It's going to be solutions like, you know, arrest people like Biden and Zelensky and end the wars.
	Just tell the truth.
	These are wars of empire.
	Respect the Nuremberg Code and U.S.
	Title 21 for freedom to decline, any medical experimental products, and unleash solutions.
	If you're concerned about the debt, Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, any of these news shows, monetary reform and public banking, pretty much, they actually do eliminate the whole cause and the effect of the debt, at least the government debts.
	And we would have arrests of these psychopaths.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Carl, good points.
	I remember some of the work that you've done, you know, 15, 20 years ago, trying to forge alternatives to the World Economic Forum, IMF, World Bank, trying to make lending available without going through the Robert Barron's instrument.
	I definitely remember and appreciate your contributions as far as that's concerned.
	But you can also recall that man, that was snuffed out and instantly destroyed as quickly as possible by these very same corrupt instruments of debt slavery.
	So these people in power don't want any competition.
	They certainly don't want anything like that.
	And you can see that's why they fund so much money into this propaganda campaign.
	And truth is the first catchment to war and they have waged war on human species.
	And you know, if you're not part of the club, then you're the target.
	And I'll say that unobjective journalism is nothing more than propaganda.
	And this is a full spectrum of self-help, not only on individual sovereignty, but the Constitution and everything we know in terms of social contracts.
	And they are forcing the reduced population to become wardens of the one world government state.
	They've destroyed small businesses.
	They shut down and destroyed and decimated the mom-and-pop shops.
	And like I said, competition is now a manufactured illusion in their supply-side economic business models.
	The Romnification of America, the Bain-Staples model, whatever you want to call it.
	You know, and they do this so that there's really no other alternatives.
	And they take the human These sentinels that are part of this globalist model.
	And globalism has consumed any and all alternatives to this Judeo-Masonic Leviathan.
	infrastructures, like I'm saying.
	And they've used fractional reserve banking systems after World War II, which are devoid of all true and sound minds to bring this, usher, this technocratic feudalism into reality.
	And I think Elon Musk is probably an occultist that is put into this position, let's just say, in this place to create some degree of street credibility before more radical voices are heard and embraced.
	I think he is a lightning rod that is kind of feeling through analytics the righteous outrage and providing some sort of a watered down resolution to what should really be happening.
	I think the people should be very pissed off about this.
	And, you know, Elon Musk is a guy that can serve as a middleman for those people and make it seem like he's doing them a favor when he's truly, you know, ushering them into the corrals like a Judas.
	So I hope I'm wrong about him, but I doubt it.
	I have my concerns and my fears.
	I don't know.
	What are your thoughts?
	Well, I take it day by day.
	That's all I got.
	Trotsky's doing a great job so far.
	He's put me back on Twitter.
	I'm using it to go full bore forward.
	I put up New Zealand Christchurch shooting critique.
	I put up Pizzagate and all of its sordid mess.
	I'm putting up a lot about Sandy Hook.
	I'm putting up about the Supreme Court Denying my petition, which is outrageous for reasons we're going to discuss today.
	So I say so far so good, but I do not have my eyes closed.
	And if we see evidence to the contrary, then we're well aware, because you and others have sensitized us, that there may be associated risks.
	So I appreciate all the commentary, but for the time being, I regard this guy as a great American hero.
	Yeah, I'm just commenting about his PayPal Mafia associations and all that stuff.
	Google, YouTube, Fangs, all this stuff is very much part of this instrument of censorship and control.
	And I think they do need to have somebody that appears to be a white hat, but they're truly not.
	Well, but Chris, why would they ever allow free speech to come back?
	It would be much better just to maintain the censorship.
	Once people get free speech, they don't want to give it up.
	They know the difference.
	And he's exposing all the chicanery.
	I think he's doing tremendous damage to the bad guys, the Democrats and the censors, for which I'm eternally grateful.
	We shall see.
	But for the time being... Yeah, my theory is if they put these digital devices Then they've lost all control of the public sentiment, and it could be very dangerous for these people that are doing this to us.
	Yes, yes.
	Good comments, Chris.
	I'm sorry to jump in.
	Meanwhile, this is bizarre.
	Ivy League, Princeton University, from which I myself graduated, offers Black, Less Queer, and Leather BDSM courses.
	This is bizarre.
	I find this repulsive.
	Long ago, young people aspired to brassware, may have taken leather-making lessons.
	These days, it's involved in a steamier role.
	Some may recall easy-going elective in your college years.
	Underwater basket weaving still persists, but times have changed.
	Baskets in their construction are Amish.
	Universities now in 2022 are offering more contemporary fare.
	Take, for example, Princeton.
	Embarrassing to me.
	The private Ivy League will host instruction on something fantastically frisky.
	The official website advertises VIS 207, AST 06, GSS 216.
	Black plus queer and leather.
	Black leather.
	BDSM material culture.
	The course will be taught by Teona Nneka McLaughlin, whose homepage shouts her as a Princeton Arts Fellow and award-winning visual artist, filmmaker, and curator.
	College has come a long way, as has curating.
	See, university launches graduate program to fight rampant white supremacy of museums.
	Description of her course!
	Black Queer BDSM Material Culture resists contextualization in relationship with biographical narratives because of the underground elements of the community.
	This course will explore the material culture of this community from three perspectives, architecture plus location, visual arts and exhibitions, and Black Queer BDSM communities with a significant research focus on finding and presenting new material.
	We will consider the fragility of archival engagement with these communities by surveying existing BDSM archives in research libraries, community groups, and individuals and their personal ephemera.
	Schools are hard at work deconstructing that which came before, where Libertine views on sex are concerned at full speed ahead.
	Arizona Department of Education invites 10-year-olds to talk with strangers online about their sexual identities.
	Vermont makes history handing out condoms to 12-year-olds.
	K-2 teachers wear QR codes promoting sex work and sex secrets.
	Dirty work.
	Universities try to sell students on the positives of sex.
	Report!
	Utah College Course invites students to watch pornographic films together.
	University professor says sex work is the best thing for young adults.
	Abolish capitalism and prison.
	More traditional take doesn't always work out.
	Professor claims there are two sexes, but one of her graduate students walks out.
	Princeton's tantalizing training on BDSM boasts a rousing reading list of few samples, sensational flash, race power and masochism, the color of kink, Black women, BDSM and pornography.
	The black body in ecstasy.
	Reading race, reading pornography.
	Fetishism as cultural discourse.
	In the life of black gay anthology.
	A taste for brown sugar.
	Black women in pornography.
	Decades ago, higher education was viewed as superiorly sophisticated, and Ivy League schools avoided unsightly exposure related to salacious subject matter.
	But today, it's beautiful to be bald, and institutions don't mind being caught with their pants down.
	How bad is that?
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, that's funny, isn't it?
	So the idea that I present is that all of our major agencies have been captured by our opponents, and that includes education.
	These professors are hired to push agendas, and the funding for research is contingent upon Playing the game and not getting into trouble with the federal government, not wanting to allow research money to go to your university.
	And if it's hard to believe that a institution or a group like secondary education or post-secondary education could be so captured as a just-retired public school teacher of 38 years, Carl B. Herman Blockspot, I did write a 12-part Series called U.S.
	Public Education Bullshit to Train Stupefied Work Animals, where I just go into the textbooks and point out all the lies of omission and commission to control our children.
	And that information, what gets into, for academic information, into the high school and middle school textbooks is filtered down from the university systems.
	So it would seem that this choice is going to be that the public can choose between this offering of bonded sadism.
	I think that's a good overall capture of our whole choice, or the Great Awakening.
	But to be fair, I may be being a little too critical because I admit I have not sampled any of those readings on the list for that course.
	Chris?
	Yeah, you know, you look at most of the Ivy League schools and they have been a hotbed or at least the tip of the spear in terms of perceived accreditation for the robber barons funding these type of social and moral debaucheries and really providing degrees more like certifications in terms of the Royal Crown's UN systems managers and they're trying to harness the biologically disrupted and socially Yes, yes.
	I think we're well on the way.
	steer them towards certain doom socially, ethically, morally, then it will definitely lead to the downfall and the controlled demolition of the American culture and the Constitution and human sovereignty.
	So yeah, these liberal governments are often instruments used and the use are the deliverance mechanism for mass depopulation, historically speaking.
	And I think that this is part of the formula that they're bringing on too.
	Yes, yes.
	I think we're well on the way.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, Pro or Con, to liveneedtodowatgmail.com.
	Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
	I regret to report that SCOTUS can't figure out it was a scam even when I gave them a Connecticut FEMA map from its offices at San Diego Elementary, plus photos from Connecticut police files showing no bodies, no blood, and no student desks or chairs.
	Petition denied.
	Download to see for yourself.
	State of the Union had even declared this may be the single most important issue brought before the Supreme Court in our lifetime.
	But they did not have time for it.
	Can you believe I provided scholars with proof Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill, presented as mass murder, including the FEMA manual, the Connecticut FEMA schedule, and images from Connecticut State Police showing no bodies and no blood, yet petition denied?
	Here's a report, a sworn affidavit, from Brian Davidson, a certified private investigator in Texas.
	Who went through the files and compared the official report with the photographs in their own files.
	At this point in time, my position is that the evidence appears to be more consistent with the alternative account of a female exorcist presented as mass murderer to promote gun control.
	More!
	Take a look at Appendix E!
	And I sent this to Elon Musk, Jonathan Turley, John B. Wells, and Tom Pitten.
	Take a look at Appendix E, the sworn affidavit of a Texas licensed private investigator.
	He compares the state police report with the photos in its own archive, from which the metadata had been removed.
	Here's down the hallway.
	Caption.
	Looking down the corridor, the shooter walked to enter room 10 after passing room 12, which is immediately to the left.
	Notice the room on the right is room 9, the conference room where the principal, the psychiatrist, and the teacher were killed.
	This is the floor area that is described as having Hawksburg, the principal, and Sherlock, the psychologist, lying in pools of blood.
	While some evidence of a red substance is present, my opinion is not consistent with the statement, pools of blood.
	Here's another to Elon Musk, Jonathan Turley, John B. Wells, Tom Pitten.
	Other photos inside the classroom not only show no bodies or blood, but no student desks or chairs, no teacher's desks, no American flags.
	Not only prove it was not a mass murder, but prove it was not even an operational school.
	Final thoughts.
	Well, first for Jim's case.
	Now, this is very curious because SCOTUS accepted the case for conference.
	That means that this last Friday, they sat in their big conference room at their conference table and they discussed the case and they allowed this evidence to go public.
	And yet, they decided that this was not a worthy enough case to consider for hearing.
	Now, for me, as I see this, this just does open the door for exactly the actions that Jim took.
	This allows for broader discussion and it allows for a greater polarization.
	Because what are the justices going to do if this information goes out to the public and they have to defend?
	Because what SCOTUS is going to say, we carefully select.
	The case is that will have the greatest impact for the future of America.
	I'm right?
	Well, the whole country of America was founded when our own government attempted gun confiscation in 1775 by raiding the gun storage facilities.
	And it was the beginning of the AMREV 1.0 going hot in 1775 in Lexington and Concord when the illegally standing military tried to confiscate those guns.
	So, I hope that it's a trap where these justices are going to have to come down because they can't justify their decision based upon the facts.
	As a just retired school teacher of 38 years, I've seen that photographic evidence.
	I've looked at all of it.
	You can't see it in the pictures, but there's mold on the floors.
	See, as a school teacher, that school, from my view, was being used for storage.
	And the photographic evidence, as Jim showed, that empty classroom, there were supposed to be students in there without chairs, without blood on the floor after a massacre.
	This is prima facie evidence of fraud.
	And the justices, in order to defend their decision, saying this isn't a worthy enough case, they would have had to look at that evidence and then have to come up with some bullshit story of, hey, Look at this classroom picture of classroom number 10 and explain to me how it's rational to conclude that a shooting just took place, killing like 10 people in that room.
	Where's the...?
	They can't do it.
	And finally, I do want to give a demonstration of what Chris talked about earlier, is that no matter How strong our ideas can benefit the public, we're in a controlled system.
	In 2009, I contacted my colleague and friend, Ellen Brown, who is the most known spokesperson and the best in my opinion for public banking.
	And I said, hey, why don't we go talk to both of our our state senators?
	They're both on the banking committee.
	And let's pitch the idea of a public bank for California, since that has been accepted as an idea.
	But man, they just stonewalled the idea.
	Ellen said, OK.
	So we went to my senator's office in Glendale, California.
	I was living in Southern California at the time.
	Senator Carol Liu.
	And we had a big conference room.
	We had like, I don't know, five of us were there and Senator Liu and like five members of the staff.
	And when I lobby, I make sure that I have the principal right next to me.
	There's an energy transfer and I get a better feeling of the honesty of the person.
	So Senator Liu was just to my right and I could tell she had never heard the information of public banking and she was on the banking committee and she was aghast at the benefits.
	So When a government decides to sell debt securities to fund something, that doubles the nominal cost, just as it does getting a mortgage for your home.
	And if you have public banking for in-house at-cost credit, that cuts half the cost.
	All right, so Lou is next to me and she's blown away by this.
	She looks across the table to her chief of staff and says, how come I didn't know this?
	And then another point at the meeting, she says, wow, the Wall Street banks would hate this.
	What happened?
	Well, at the end of the meeting, I closed and said, we've given you breakthrough information here, and you can proceed.
	Either we can brief the banking committee, if you want, for the California Senate.
	You can do it yourself.
	You can have a cost-benefit study of professional economists.
	You can just go ahead and have a pilot study.
	And she's, like, looking at these ideas, nodding her head, imagining the benefits for California.
	And I went to the chief of staff, said, verify the information.
	How about I give you a call in one week from today, and we'll see how you want to move forward?
	And he says, yeah, that'll work.
	They never responded to my phone calls again.
	And finally, after two weeks, the secretary, they wouldn't put me through.
	All I got was answering machines.
	And finally, the secretary said the senator has decided not to move forward with this idea.
	Some of the big banksters had a little chat with Senator Lew.
	Surprise, surprise, Carl.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, you know, I have to say, this type of consistency is not the mark of stupidity, because if it were, they'd occasionally err on the side of humanity from time to time, and I don't think that's happened in a long time.
	So, I don't think they're stupid, I think they're very much corrupt, and they're very much part of this.
	And if they refuse to acknowledge the data and overwhelming evidence in many of these cases, especially yours, Betts, that you're putting forward, Then it becomes very difficult to support any sort of notion of any sort of credibility at all in terms of the rule of law and the righteous justice that needs to occur here.
	So I just have to wonder how many honorable people will it take to expose all of these scandals?
	And really when the rule of law is dedicated to such negligence, should it be followed to the extent to which it has been?
	Ramped up and become authoritarian in terms of its control mechanisms.
	So yeah, this is for all the marble people This is this is a global battle and we've got 1% of the population against the 99 and I'm glad to see people like you yourselves Fighting against this and on another note Fats I'd like to wish you a happy birthday and hope that your case will turn to the better Thank you.
	Thank you, Chris.
	Thank you.
	Carl and Chris continue to do sensational work here, let me just say, on the eve of my 82nd birthday.
	If you want to assist, if you're on Twitter, go to at Jim Fetzer.
	I put out a series of as many as six or eight tweets about this.
	Share them as much as you can.
	We need to get the word out.
	In my opinion, this is a disgrace.
	The State of the Union declared this may be the most important issue before the Supreme Court in our lifetime.
	They got it right.
	The Supreme Court has blown it badly and wrong.
	This cannot be allowed to stand.
	But I need your help to do anything about it.
	Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and family.
	We do not know how much time we have left.

▲