All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 24, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:13
Need to Know (23 November 2022) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin.
Delighted to be joined today by Chris Weiner from Fort Myers, Florida.
Scorpio would normally be joining us.
He's under the weather.
We hope he recovers soon and can rejoin us.
Meanwhile, outrageous brainwashing event.
Sponsored by the Bush Institute and CIA-backed National Endowment for Democracy.
Deliberately falsifies history to inflame American hatred of Russia and China.
There's W who is a dim bulb from the beginning.
The head of the International Republican Institute, Dan Twining, compares Putin and Xi meeting to Ribbentrop-Molotov pact between Hitler and Stalin.
How dumb is that?
While former Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs accuses Russia of igniting protests in Chile.
Russia bashing was in full vogue at a conference at the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.
The first panel entwining the support of right-wing parties worldwide outrageously compared a February 22 summit between Putin and Xi Jinping to the Rubin-Trump-Mulatov pact between the Nazis and the Soviet Union in World War II.
The chair of the panel, Paula Doboransky, Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs from 2001 to 2009, and the daughter of an ally of a Nazi collaborator, blamed Russia for igniting popular protests in Chile through disinformation on social media.
George W. Bush continued Russia bashing in his keynote where he calls Zelensky a tough guy whom history will judge as a remarkable leader.
Fat chance.
He went on to suggest that the United States needs strong leadership where otherwise the world will be made far more dangerous, that the George W. Institute Big believers in Ukrainian freedom, wanting to help the young democracy, when it's the most corrupt and also the poorest nation in Europe.
This is crucial to national security, because what will Europe look like if Putin conquers Ukraine?
Next would be the Baltics.
In other words, a domino theory.
His speech and the larger conference were intended to send a message to the Republicans.
When some of the party have wavered over supporting Ukraine, Bush set the groundwork by supporting a color revolution against Yankevich that brought to bear Yushchenko, who supported Ukraine's ascension into NATO and rehabilitated the Nazi collaborator Stephen Bandura.
President Bush Had done more by pulling the U.S.
out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, explaining NATO to seven countries near Russia, aggressively intervening in Central Asia, supporting the anti-Putin opposition, including Alexei Navalny through the NAD pouring millions to try and unseat the Belarusian President Lukashenko, a Russian ally and socialist, and
Supporting the Rose Revolution in Georgia that brought to power Mikhail Saakhovili and provided military support when he provoked war with Russia in 2008.
These are all bad actors.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, 100%.
The National Endowment of Democracy is an absolute contradiction in terms, or an inversion of terminology, similar to like Health and Human Services, or Military Intelligence, or Jumbo Shrimp, or Democratic Elections now, things like that.
It's one of the many busherisms that you'll hear from George W. And make no mistake, there's a lot of military, and more importantly, organized private money, like through NGOs, that are funding these insurrections, these color revolutions, that has been proven And has been absolutely followed right down to the paper trail to the actual operatives, and most of the time funded by guys like George Soros, in the case of the Golden Dawn operatives, the neo-Nazis in Ukraine.
They all tie back to this Zionist masonic cabal that seems to be behind the funding and the organization of these forces, who are often overlooked by local and federal law enforcement agencies, and almost given a hall pass in terms of these type of operations, while actual citizens are Targeted and pinned down by real grassroots ones.
So, amazing stuff.
Yeah, good, good, good.
Well, the whole Bush family has been a very bad deal for the United States.
Here we have Kerry Lake who's showing real leadership.
We must remedy what happened.
I will become governor.
The pledge came after the Election Integrity Unit of the Arizona Attorney General's Office submitted a letter to Maricopa County officials demanding a full in-depth report.
Regarding all the documented issues that occurred on Election Day, they have received hundreds of complaints pertaining to issues related to the administration of the 2022 general election that go beyond pure speculation, including first-hand witness accounts raising concerns about Maricopa's compliance with Arizona Election law.
Furthermore, statements made by both Chairman Gates and Recorder Richer, along with information Maricopa County released, appear to confirm potential statutory violation of Title 16.
We must make sure all of this was done legally.
They go far beyond hearsay speculation.
Lake and her supporters have been raising concerns about how the election played out, as previously reported.
A stunning number of polling sites experience issues with their tabulation machines reading ballots, forcing voters to wait in line for lengthy periods or return to vote later, or put them in door number three, box number three, which appears to have been a trash bin.
Watch this and tell me what you think.
Oh, stand by, Gary Lake posted.
Since election day, the establishment has been seeking to downplay concerns.
The Daily Mail reported, indeed to hear the press tell it, anyone raising concerns about the tabulation problem is just a conspiracy theorist.
Here we go.
29 out of every 30 ballots did not go through.
Every 30 ballots did not go through.
29 out of every 30 ballots did not go through.
Problems with some Arizona voting machines are stoking right-wing conspiracy theories, said a headline at Time.
Arizona Maricopa County says it's identified a solution, a headline at NBI, likewise read.
Similar headlines all over the internet.
Never mind the problem was so severe, Bill Gates issued a policy the day after he went to vote at the Deer Valley Airport and found none of the machines were reading very well.
A lot of disruption and frustration after tabulation machines rejected people's ballots multiple times.
How many people ran out of time to vote, she asked.
Sam went to vote, found none of the machines were working.
These are first-person accounts.
During the news conference, turned out some 250,000 in-person votes that were guessed on Election Day.
The lion's share have been counted, but 7% About 17,000 were placed in a Dropbox and still have not been counted due to printing errors.
I guarantee you, every one of those was for Kerry Lake.
I apologize yesterday.
We'll do it again.
What happened?
We cannot have a repeat at Gates.
So, allowing the voter centers to get bad online.
We're going to do a deep dive on this.
The board will get to the bottom of it.
Never mind.
Election Day problems are serious enough.
Arizona Attorney General Mark Bromovich's office is now investigating them.
Tabulator rejects ballot.
7 a.m.
Tech arrives.
Can't fix.
Tell people to put ballot in box 3 or leave.
She stays.
8.30.
Dominion arrived.
Reset the machine.
No luck.
Look at the ballot.
Ink faded.
Unreadable.
9 a.m.
She misses work.
This is a story of exactly what's been going on there again and again.
Speaking of Brnovich, the letter from his office draws attention to key discrepancies, including printer configuration settings.
According to Miracle County, at least 60 voting locations had issues related to ballot-on-demand printers having printer configuration settings that were non-uniform Which appear to have been resulted in ballots that could not be read, so they'd have to be adjudicated where there's no supervision and every one of them can be counted for the Democrats, based on sworn complaints from election workers.
The printers were tested Monday without any problems.
Many reported successful testing the night before.
They began experiencing problems reading ballots within the first 30 minutes.
That was deliberate.
Meanwhile, following widespread reports, the chairman publicly stated voters who had already checked in but were having difficulties could check out would be able to vote in another place.
Not only have poll workers reported they were not trained or provided with information on how to execute checkout procedures, but many have reported the second voting location Required the voter to cast a provisional ballot, as the e-poll books maintain they'd already cast a ballot in the original voting location.
Technically, the Arizona gubernatorial race has already been called against Lake, but the Republican nominee refuses to concede until all the Election Day shenanigans are thoroughly investigated and adequately explained.
I won't back down.
No, I won't back down.
You can stand me up at the gates of hell, but I won't back down.
Carrie Lake, magnificent.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, wow.
A lot of people that don't know about her would call this Lake News.
But I think she actually did have actual support and actually was a victim of election fraud.
And you can look to Dominion and many other operations in a 50-state solution that have been rolled out across the country.
And it's not like Hillary Clinton, who fails to concede an election.
It's my turn is our only claim to fame there.
This is an actual person that had the votes had the support and has actually been turned away by the person who's in charge of election integrity of the state of Arizona.
So interesting how this all turns out.
You know, no matter how many instances were recorded of fraud or certainly misdeeds at best, I know in Arizona it happened like crazy.
Michigan it happens a lot.
And I know in Michigan, you know, people are threatened or even killed or they incur immense property damage at best with no legal recourse.
This is absolutely what is the par for the course in a 50-state solution around the country.
And I think it's an attempt to condition apathy and disaffect the actual voters away from participating in democracy.
And it conditions a helplessness in the people, you know, when people in positions of authority and duty are the primary sentinels in these cover-ups.
You know, this is and it includes the silencing and censorship of any and all victims.
So the mainstream media is very much a part of this, the socialist media, even law enforcement and election officials, the D.C. apparatus.
These guys have all scripted this narrative of, you know, fake news into the rumor and echo chambers.
And it's repeated until it actually becomes history.
So yeah, the official narrative, to me, is nothing more than a pack of lies agreed upon by this cabal.
And until the people stand behind those that are standing against this, we're really going to be helpless in this.
We need multitudes.
Chris, that was just excellent.
Meanwhile, The Big Lie, revisited by Tom Ermentano.
The mainstream media has repeated almost daily that Trump and other important mega-friendly organizations continue to support the big lie to wit that the 2020 election was stolen.
They also repeat again and again that this claim is totally bogus, since there's no evidence of substantial election fraud ever uncovered in the 65 lawsuits filed after the election.
Trump and his supporters lost them all.
The election was stolen?
What nonsense.
It's all delusional thinking and irrational conspiracy theory.
Case closed.
Well, not quite.
The ABA has published a list of the legal filings challenging the results in a summary court findings.
They make for a very interesting read.
The most important lesson to be drawn is the bulk of them have almost nothing to do with the alleged evidence concerning voter and election fraud.
The reason is reasonably clear.
Fraud itself is extremely difficult to litigate.
Along with any relevant empirical evidence, the legal concept of due diligence and intent have to be fully explored.
Moreover, Any determination of election or voter fraud would have required, at the very minimum, a so-called evidentiary hearing, where the court would take testimony under oath from expert witnesses, accept and evaluate properly supported affidavits, evaluate any relevant election data analysis, and explore the murky issue of intent by elected officials and others at some length.
To my knowledge, none of this process analysis occurred in any of the 65 post-2020 election challenge cases.
So what are they really about?
My reading is they were concerned almost exclusively with procedural issues.
Not with the actual substance of what would constitute election fraud.
For example, the issue of standing is procedural.
Does a plaintiff have the legal right to bring the action?
If the answer is no, the whole case is summarily dismissed, which happened with several of these challenging cases.
This is a perfectly appropriate ruling, but has nothing to do with whether fraud occurred one way or the other.
In another, the 65, the judge actually asked why the plaintiff could not have filed a suit before the election regarding some alleged problem in a way the voting process was likely to be administered.
Too late now, the judge said, case dismissed.
Another actually asserted any complaints about the legitimate certification of the election in Georgia were all now moot, since the election results had already been certified.
But the issue of certification legitimacy was the very concept the plaintiffs were challenging.
Unbelievable.
Several concern the constitutionality of mail-in ballots.
No problem, said the court.
The lateness of counting mail-in.
No problem, said the court.
The absence of observer during voting and tabulating.
No problem, said the court.
The placement and number of draw boxes.
No problem, said the court.
And dozens of other disputed administrative decision and procedures the court get to be.
Guess what?
No problem.
On procedural issues in the law.
The law is simply deferred.
The court simply deferred to the states and their election boards every time.
The courts virtually unanimously held a state election advertisement in the spirit, if not the exact letter of the law, that they, the courts, were not about to set aside the popular vote, simply because, as in Georgia, thousands may have been cast by non-residents.
The real substantive question was, were they?
Too late for that question, the court opined.
The results had already been certified.
Yikes.
So was the election stolen?
Well, I think you'll have a particularly egregious issue debated in several of the cases.
The problem is associated with signature verification of mail-in ballots.
Even assuming there were some legitimate problems here, were they substantial enough either to constitute fraud or to actually swing the election in key battleground states?
Impossible to know from reading the case summaries.
What we do know is the courts took surprisingly little interest in actually exploring any of these substantive issues in any depth, which means, unfortunately, The so-called integrity of most free and fair election in the United States' history is still unresolved.
Chris.
Yeah, you know, it's interesting stuff.
This is a big psychological warfare operation, and it's all about perception and consensus management, in my opinion.
And they're trying to use the concept of people really assimilating to these type of rules of law or democracy.
And I think in doing so, it's going to create a natural atmosphere of tension and severe bipartisan propaganda that's going to really take people down some really dark paths that maybe could be avoided if they really look at the big picture here.
I'm not, I've never really been into the Trump thing, nor GOP, but I'll tell it like I see it.
I think people have the right to vote.
It's part of this great country.
And when I see it being destroyed, I'll stand up and say something, as I think I have.
So, you know, these guys that are doing this, they're the ones that keep, like I say, using rumor and echo in terms of perception management.
And they're the ones saying that elections and vaccines are safe and effective.
So I really got to question the validity of these people and certainly their integrity.
And at some point in time, there's going to be enough people that get out in the streets and talk to each other that realize that this is all perception management operation.
This is a psyop in my opinion.
And, you know, people are falling into compliance with this, paying their taxes and really, you know, not questioning this.
And they're going to be run to silent graves by this whole mechanism.
And unless they really stand up and fight for the truth and fight for what is right.
No, you spot on Chris spot on.
Meanwhile, Stu Peters new film died suddenly rakes in over 2 million years without hours of a swimier on I've watched it.
It is powerful.
It is convincing.
It's penetrating.
I think maybe a whole lot of people may be awakened by this film.
Chris, have you had a chance to catch it out?
No, I've been meaning to, though, man.
I definitely want to check it out.
A couple of my friends saw it, though, and they really spoke highly of it.
So, yeah, I definitely want to check it out.
Very good, very good.
Meanwhile, big tech and corporate media are scrambling to censor the Died Suddenly video exposing the deadliness of the COVID vax.
The film has gone so viral it has so disrupted the big pharma narrative.
Censors and anti-speech algorithms are working overtime to stop users from even posting the film.
Stu Peter's film documentary, Died Suddenly, has been released.
To the other chagrin of the pharmaceutical industry and the Zinus Elite, it has gone viral.
Below is a September 22nd article by Frankie Stocks from National File about the big tech and corporate media scramble to censor it.
Big Tech and its allies are scrambling to censor Stu Peter's earth-shattering new film, Died Suddenly, after amassing millions of views within hours of its release and breaking through the left-wing algorithm to trend on social platforms.
The latest feature-length documentary by Stu Peters and his network, Died Suddenly, blows the lid off the global depopulation scheme at the heart of the death-jab rollout.
Censors on Facebook have already booted Died Suddenly from the platform after millions upon millions of viewers streamed the film within hours of its release.
Apparently, it's gone so viral it has so disrupted the Big Pharma narrative, Facebook's censors and anti-speech algorithm are working overtime to stop users from even posting a film in the first place.
In a screenshot obtained by National File, when a Facebook user tried to post a link to the new Died Suddenly film, they were censored as soon as they hit the post button.
As if they'd swiped a bad credit card.
Facebook said the use of their posts had been declined and wouldn't be allowed on the website.
Declined.
Google, long known for manipulating search results for the political left and corporate government power structure, appears to have delisted the Died Suddenly film, or at least published the actual link to the movie to the very end of their search results.
Currently, the big tech search engine is pushing articles from Forbes and other corporate media to the top of their dying-suddenly results in an attempt to dispel the documentary, which cites hard medical and scientific facts in making its claims.
While Google's Forbes link said, Died Suddenly pushes unfounded claims about the jab, other search results on the very same page prove the entire point of the new film.
Right next to a story from Forbes and The Guardian, our news story profiling people who've died suddenly in the wake of the VAX rollout.
All over the world, the phrase, died suddenly, has become commonplace in the obituary section of newspapers and in web posts made to memorialize jab victims.
Providing the tragic inspiration for the naming of his new film.
Watch it here.
Check it out.
It's on my blog at Bitchute Channel Jim Fetzer.
You don't want to miss.
Chris.
Well, yeah, you got to wonder why they're going through such extensive measures for censorship in terms of not only the election, but the vaccine safety and the died suddenly.
It seems to me that these people with these lockstep formations all have the same cover up agendas and the same things that they're very, very concerned about having open discussions about.
So that's usually not the nature of innocent people.
I'll just say that.
And I think that that's a bold understatement in saying that as well.
So, yeah, I think that also you got to look at life insurance.
Underwriters are factoring into their premiums, the SADs and upping their premium costs and lowering their indemnities as well.
I think that'll come out in the next few months, the next few years.
And that's going to be a hard one to explain, in addition to the massive death counts and the infertility rates and the spectrum disorders that seem to be ascribed by big pharma in the medical industry.
You know, it's funny, these people that have these adverse reactions to whether it's vaccines or trans agenda or AI or any of the crap that they're putting on 5G, all this other offerings, GMOs, they come up with these diagnoses that are heavily departmentalized prognosis of the individual victims so that people fall they come up with these diagnoses that are heavily departmentalized prognosis of the individual victims so that people fall into all these innocuous and different They'll ascribe it to something else, I guess is the way of putting it.
It's hard to really get into and describe what I'm thinking on this, but I think it has a lot to do with what is going on here, as far as being a misdirection ploy and categorizing people into caste systems of the disenfranchised by this big apparatus.
And it's all co-related, in my opinion.
So, yeah, I think you look at the people that are pushing this, that's all the same organized money using Federal Reserve, fractional reserve banking.
I'm very impressed with the documentary and with Stu Peters.
And they're really enslaving us by our own mechanisms, even using our pension funds in many cases to fund these operations and these offerings.
So, yeah, I think this is absolutely there, there.
And I think that Stu Peters has a lot of this right.
And I think that people really need to start coming together and standing up for the right thing, like I said before.
I'm very impressed with the documentary and with Stu Peters.
A terrific guy.
Meanwhile, the Stanford professor who challenged the lockdowns and scientific clerics declares academic freedom to be dead.
I think he's got it right.
A Stanford professor of medicine says academic freedom is dead after his life became a living hell for challenging the coronavirus lockdown and the scientific clarity during the pandemic.
The basic premise is, if you don't have protection and academic freedom in the hard cases, when a faculty member has an idea that's unpopular among some of the other faculty, or even the administration, if they don't protect it in that case, then you don't have academic freedom at all.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya told Fox News.
Matticera is a tenured professor at Stanford, also an economist, who serves as director of Stanford's Center for Demography and Economics for Health and Aging.
He's a very good guy.
Matticera spoke at the Academic Freedom Conference at Stanford Graduate School of Business earlier this month, saying that in the current era, we have a high clarity that glares from on high what is true and what is not true.
He came under fire during the pandemic after co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter signed by thousands of doctors and scientists in 2020, denouncing the lockdowns as horrible.
Buttigieg was joined by Harvard professor of medicine Dr. Martin Kulodov, Oxford professor Dr. Sunyata Gopta in co-authoring.
The declaration was quickly denounced by other health leaders, including NIH Director Anthony Fauci, who slammed the call for herd immunity as nonsense and very dangerous.
When you take a position at odds with the scientific clerics of your life, it becomes a living hell, he said, Bannocera.
You face a deeply hostile work environment.
Soon after the Great Barrington Declaration gained widespread attention, he received death threats, hate mail, questions on where he receives his funding, when most of his money has actually come from NIH.
The purpose of the one-page document was to tell the public there's not a scientific consensus in favor of lockdown that many epidemiologists, many doctors, many others disagree with the consensus.
On campus, a chill-on debate set in.
He was disinvited from delivering a campus talk.
In an effort to organize a debate on COVID policies, he stalled.
The College Fix reported on his remarks.
Here you have how she now retired but being grilled by the Congress.
They systematically try to make it seem everyone agreed with their ideas about COVID, when in fact there was deep disagreement among scientists and epidemiologists about the right strategy.
That's why we wrote the Great Barrington Declaration, to tell the public there was this disagreement.
There were alternative policies available.
He charged that academic freedom is dead and that he was left without support from Stanford leaders.
The policy of the university, when pushed comes to shove, is to permit this kind of hostile work environment.
What if there had been open scientific debate on campus sponsored by the university so people could know there were legitimate alternative views?
He argued if the Stanford President was for debate when the Great Barrington Declaration was written, there would have been a tremendous controversy around it, which would have led to open debate of the issue and resolution, which I suspect would have been against lockdowns and in favor of the Declaration.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, interesting it's come from Stanford, because this feels like one of those Stanford social experiments of the 70s, this whole COVID operation and the Vax follow-up.
It really broke the country down in terms of prisoners and the guards, in terms of vax and anti-vax.
And these lockdowns and selective freedoms that have been justified by means of invasions of medical privacy have actually gone way past the decency of the Constitution, the HIPAA Act, and many other things.
So, interesting to see how mainstream media has gotten over two-thirds of their funding from Big Pharma.
And I remember in the 90s when they were going on the PatCon operation against Patriots, they were running out of Paxil and Prozac into the psychiatric markets just before SSRIs really took hold.
And these were nanofluorides, the first issuance of basic nanofluorides through pharmaceutical dispensation.
So yeah, I think it's kind of interesting, too, how these SSRIs have followed in the footsteps of that.
And even the DARPA gaming that's come along with that, that I think have been behind a lot of these active shooters that have really fallen by the wayside in terms of scope and addressing that.
And of course, the old fall guys like Winchester pay the bill.
And these kids are never even looked at for what really what happened there.
So as far as the medical community goes, I think they are absolutely delivering poison apples and Trojan horses to these children.
And for this doctor to be uninvited by that group of people, I think they should take that as a badge of honor.
It's unfortunate that men like him are surrounded just like Holy Caesar Senate, you know, and people like that are shunned, censored, outcast.
They get in slap fights with their peers.
And really, it's insane that more people aren't there to give them support.
And the reason they're not is because of the censorship that's going on.
So like I say, this is all co-related.
You know, you can say chicken or egg here, but ultimately, it's all coming home to roost.
Wonderful.
Wonderful, Chris.
Absolutely.
I agree with every word.
Meanwhile, Dr. Joseph Mercola manufactured dystopia.
Globalists won't stop hacking humans.
Profoundly disturbing.
He gives a story at a glance.
Digital identity, digital twin, programmable central bank, digital currency, a social credit system, human augmentation, and the Internet of Bodies.
These are all part of the dystopian future being rolled down by the globalist cabal as solutions to the world's problems.
According to transhumanist propaganda, Everyone will benefit from human augmentation in reality.
Transhumanism is a eugenics program differing only in name.
The most human society envisioned by the transhumanists will not have billions of people.
Since a vast number of jobs will be eliminated and replaced by robots and AI, the transhumanist plan requires depopulation.
A global totalitarian regime will not accept responsibility to feed, house, and provide universal basic income or health care to billions who aren't useful.
The logical conclusion is to exterminate the nonproductive and transform the rest into obedient cyborgs imprisoned within the Internet of Bodies 5G ecosystem.
The depopulation requirement of the transhumanist utopia may be why Nations Reviews to address the extraordinary lethality of the COVID jabs.
Digital identity, digital twins, programmable central bank, digital currency called CBDC, a social credit system, human augmentation, and the internet body.
Our bodies are all part of the dystopian future being rolled out by the globalist cabal.
Transhumanism has been sold as a way to make us healthier and eventually even immortal.
It's being promoted under the Great Reset banner of equity.
The propaganda is everyone will benefit from human augmentation from the richest to the poorest.
In fact, transhumanism is eugenics program.
Anyone who thinks the globalist cabal, the wealthiest people on the planet, intend to allow useless eaters who gobble up their resources to live even longer than we do already is sadly mistaken.
They have no such intent.
All that talk of health equity is a smokescreen, a carrot, to lure people into going along with their plan for what will ultimately be the extermination of billions.
Some within this cabal, World Economic Forum advisor Yoad Noah Harari being a notable example, are openly talking about the elite plan for a post-human society, which is precisely what it sounds like.
A world without real humans.
A world where everyone is augmented with, and in most cases controlled by, technology.
A world without belief in a higher power than programmers and inventors.
A world where robots do most of the labor.
AI makes most of the decisions.
And augmented humans run the programming.
A world that has no use for billions of people in one interview.
Harari discusses the fourth industrial revolution, another term for what they have in mind, noting we're now learning to produce bodies and minds, meaning augmented bodies and cloud and artificial intelligence connected minds, and that one of the greatest challenges we face will be what to do with all the people who will become obsolete.
The answer may lie in a combination of drugs and computer games, he suggests.
I don't believe him for a second.
Drugs and computer games have been used as tools to distract and control the younger generation, but the future they are envisioning has no room for non-productive members.
The depopulation requirement and the transhumanist utopia may be why nations refuse to address the extraordinary lethality of the COVID jabs.
I don't see a global totalitarian regime accepting the responsibility to feed, house, and provide basic health care and drugs to billions who aren't useful to them in some way.
No.
The logical solution would be to exterminate the non-productive and transform the rest into obedient cyborgs imprisoned within the Internet of Bodies 5G ecosystem.
I believe the depopulation requirement of the transhumanist utopia is why every nation on the planet refuses to address the extraordinary lethality of the COVID jabs.
Disability and life insurance claims have skyrocketed.
Birth rates have plummeted.
Miscarriages and excess mortality are through the roof.
Yet everyone keeps pussying the jab.
It appears these effects are intentional.
And the only way to make sense of this chilling reality is to understand depopulation is a necessary element of the transhumanist agenda.
There are to be two classes.
The augmented have it all as in the controlled subclass.
Augmentation of the subclass will be for control only, and that will probably include the ability to determine the lives of anyone perceived as having outlived their usefulness.
Those who have looked into transhumanism and the Great Reset see clearly how everything happening is part of a plan to manipulate the masses to accept their envisioned control system.
Those who refuse to look at these issues cannot see it.
They cannot even imagine something so diabolical could be true.
In the movie by Max Egan, The Crow House reviews the history of the Great Deception, the how and why people have been manipulated for decades to believing things that simply were not true.
Beliefs that shape behavior and allow the globalists slowly and quietly move their long-term agenda for global domination along.
And just what is the Internet of Bodies?
Rand defines it as devices with computing capabilities that can communicate with Internet-collected devices or networks that collect person-generated health and biometric data and can alter the function of the human body.
The WEF has described it as an ecosystem of unprecedented number of sensors, including emotional, attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze, and modify their bodies and behavior.
Keywords include modifying human behavior, The WEF doesn't tell us who will be in charge.
We can safely assume it'll be those who have something to gain from calling other people's actions and behavior.
While this sounds like pure sci-fi, the Pentagon and Profuse Incorporated have already developed an implantable biosensor tracking chemical reactions inside your body to detect disease.
As explained by Defense One, it has two parts.
One is a 3mm string of hydrogel inserted under the skin with a syringe, including a specially engineered molecule that sends fluorescent signals outside the body when the body begins to fight an infection.
The other is an electronic component attached to the skin, sending light through the skin, detecting the fluorescent signal.
During another, the wearer can send to a doctor, website, etc.
It's like a blood lab on the skin that can pick up the body's response to illness before the presence of other systems, such as coughing.
The sensor allows a person's biology to be examined at a distance via smart form connectivity.
And Profusa is backed by Google, the largest data mining company in the world.
Knowing that, it's hard to imagine your biological data won't be used to boost Google's profits and further totalitarian control through biosecurity.
Profusa was expecting to receive approval from the FDI in 2021, But it doesn't appear to have been approved yet.
That said, the wheels of approval are in motion, so it's only a matter of time.
In another video, the Wilson Center now interviews Richard Solash, editor of the Wilson Quarterly, and Eleanor Paul Wells, director of the Anticipatory Intelligence Lab, about the Internet of Bodies and the role AI will play in the upcoming algorithmic age.
Howells makes it clear that one of the inescapable facets of the IOB is that we will be under constant assessment, under measure of computation, in every aspect of our lives.
What you eat, who you date, what you buy, how much energy you use, up to and including your vital signs and genetic data.
To explain the idea behind the Internet of Bodies, she suggests you begin by thinking about how the Internet of Things works.
All these smart devices that are connected not only to each other, but to a wider network, where AI can analyze and optimize all the data.
Add to those networks health monitoring devices from wearables to implants, which will share your most private data.
AI will then analyze and optimize those as well.
And while Howells doesn't state such optimization will be carried out automatically without your knowledge, I see no reason to doubt that part of the plan.
Considering all this, the biggest challenge would be to figure out how we can maintain control of our own futures and make sure AI is shaped to our ideals.
While that warning sounds rational, whose ideals are we talking about?
To believe humanity in general will have any say in the matter is naive.
We cannot think about the Internet of Bodies outside of or separate from the eugenicist, transhumanist Great Reset.
The powers pushing the IOB are the same pushing the Great Reset.
The goal to create a one-world government using transhumanism as a platform for control of the human mind and body.
There is no circumstance I can see in which the ideals of AI will be any other than those of the transhumanists, eugenicists, and the great resetters.
AI will make decisions based on its programming, and that programming is shaped and directed by those who aim to rule everyone else.
How can AI be shaped according to human-centric ideals when they're being funded and developed by people looking forward to a post-human society?
The only recourse will be to control the future is reject the I.O.B.
It will not be easy, however.
Few are willing to forgo convenience.
Fewer still really understand where it's all leading.
Perhaps the best we can do is educate ourselves and others about the end goals.
A growing understanding that all this convenience will land us in a digital prison with no possibility of escape may be all that can prevent it.
It's worth remembering, if you give up your freedom, you relinquish your ability to protect those you love.
Your children can be taken from you if you disobey.
Your spouse or parents can be injured or killed, and you will have no say.
Already, Canada offers euthanasia for a variety of conditions and situations, from long COVID and mental illness to hearing loss and poverty, that prevents living with dignity.
As noted by Exposing the Darkness, after two years of genocidal COVID tyranny based on the weaponization of a public health system, deployment of weaponized psychiatry to fight dissent and eliminate mentally ill useless eaters was to be expected.
Considering psychology today has suggested anti-vaxxers may have a mental health problem, it's not out of the realm to imagine a day when refusing a booster puts you on a euthanasia list.
For now, it's supposed to be voluntary, but we all know what a slippery slope that can be, especially when doctors are compensated, paid, for every patient they put six feet under.
In at least one case, family members stated they suspect the patient may have been coerced or tricked into signing the euthanasia form.
In 2018, an Ontario man with an incurable neurological disease released audio recordings of a hospital staff trying to get him to agree to euthanasia, when what he wanted was assisted home care.
For decades we've embraced technology with our mindset on convenience or safety.
That's always how they rope us in.
That's how they'll lure us into embracing the I.O.B.
as well.
Digital Identity and CBDCs.
We have to get smarter about this and start thinking long term.
Because those who want to enslave us surely do.
They're planning decades into the future.
The march toward CBD season in the U.S.
started last week when the Federal Reserve of New York announced it would be launching a 12-week proof-of-concept pilot for central bank digital currency.
It's important to realize we will lose everything worth living for If we continue down this path without privacy safeguards and personal autonomy rights in place, even then it's a risk, as few laws are foolproof.
Just look how the U.S.
Constitution is being trampled today, even though it is supposed to be inviolable.
Chris?
All right, unmute.
Yeah, let me go in the other room here so I can actually not interfere with the house.
Sorry about that.
Yeah, so I agree with you, Fetz.
I think that a lot of this stuff, as far as the trans agenda, the AI, the CBDC, the crypto, the social credit scores, they all tie together.
And it all seems to be conveniently, you know, the next generational offering of what was in the 90s, Agenda 21.
You remember where they talked about citizens will be assessed by their threat levels?
Most UNI would probably end up in the red category there, which means instant death by the government.
So, yeah, I think it's absolutely part of the depopulation agenda.
They talk about useless eaters in the time of resource grabs.
And it's all, I think, being done under this UN colonialization, one world government that will be ruled by 12 individuals who are members of either the Sanhedrin, the Star Chamber or the Privy Council.
And we're just basically here in case these cabal members happen to need a match for an organ transplant or something, you know, and to serve them in terms of menial tasks.
So yeah, this is the new digital plantation, the technocratic feudalism, the system of master and slaves.
And it's been rebranded and ushered in beneath this woke and PC narrative as well.
And I think it's very much part of a global holocaust.
And if you look who's the money and organizing factors behind these efforts, well, it's pretty strange and alarming as well.
And I think that a lot of the stuff they're bringing together, like the neural lace, the quantum financial, the world economic reset, all this stuff, WF stuff, is basically part of this.
You know, they can even use the VACs to incur cytokine storms and turn your immune system into a subscription service.
So, anybody out there who is smart, I think you should get rid of your smart TVs, your smart phones, your smart fridges, and really start to think about what you're giving up in terms of your data.
And think about also how this was all ushered in under the concept of national security after 9-11.
You know, these DARPA Trojan Horse offerings, you know, like I say, these are gifts you give to your children, too.
So, I mean, you trust your doctor, you trust your government, you trust your, you know, politicians, D.C., FBI, Wall Street, yeah, sure.
I even think that, you know, the Bitcoin cryptocurrency thing was an NSA third party proxy offering made up of four Japanese companies.
So I think this is really something, like you say, it's a culmination of decades of planning.
You know, if you read The Economist in 1989, Rothschild was actually talking about Bitcoin with the same exact function, the same exact symbol.
And basically everything is like a blueprint.
And, you know, people, they don't seem to remember this stuff.
Or if they do, they either forget about it or they just That was wonderful.
or consider it the way of the world.
So I think people got to stand up here.
This is the trench to fight and die in here.
That was wonderful.
Just wonderful.
Palti FBI data.
Obscure successful defensive gun uses.
This is a point I've made many times to wit that Americans use guns for defensive purposes millions of times every year, saving an estimated 200,000 lives every single year.
John Arlott may be the world's leading expert.
With crime such an important issue, Americans depend on FBI for accurate data.
The crime data for 2021 is a mess.
Almost 40% of law enforcement agencies not submitting data to the FBI.
In California, 93% did not report crime data.
In New York, 87% did not.
Cities are embarrassing by soaring crime rates.
Even when they've collected the data, they aren't transmitting to the FBI.
But many more data errors are the direct responsibility of the FBI itself.
Up until January last year, I worked in the U.S.
Department of Justice as a senior advisor for research and statistics.
Part of my job was to evaluate the FBI's active shooting reports.
I found there were missing lots of cases and I misidentified others.
Unfortunately, the FBI was unwilling to fix any of these mistakes.
Since leaving the job, I've had many more missed cases.
Updating the list this month.
Nor was it the first time I pointed out such errors to the FBI.
I posted a list of them in a criminology publication in 2015.
These new reports relied on a series of FBI reports on active shooting put together by researchers at Texas State University.
In the FBI report, armed citizens stopped only 11 of the 252 active shooter incidents that occurred between 2014 and 2021.
The FBI identifies active shooter incidents as those in which an individual actively kills or attempts to kill people in a populated public area.
But it does not include shootings that are deemed related to other criminal activities, such as robbery or fighting over drug turf.
Active shooting may involve just one shot being fired at one target, even if it's not hit.
To compile a list, the FBI hired academics at the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center at Texas State.
Police departments don't collect data, so the researchers had to find new stories about the incidents.
My organization, the Crime Prevention Research Center, also undertook a search for those stories.
The CPRC discovered a total of 360 active shooter incidents from 2014 and 2021, found that an armed citizen stopped 124 of these.
I also found the FBI had misidentified five cases, usually because the person who stopped the attack was incorrectly identified as a security guard.
We found these cases on a tiny budget of just a few grand.
We found Armed Citizens had stopped 11 times more cases than the FBI reports.
I make no claim we've identified them all.
It's quite possible the news media itself never covers many such incidents.
But no one needs to take my word for it that the FBI missed many cases.
All the news stories my team collected are listed on the CBERC website.
Well, the FBI claims just 4.4% of active shooting was stopped by law-abiding citizens carrying guns.
The percentage I found was 34.
I am more confident we've identified a higher percentage of recent cases, and percentage in 2021 was even higher, 49%.
The FBI doesn't differentiate between law-abiding citizens stopping attacks where guns are banned and where they're allowed.
But you can't really expect law-abiding citizens to stop attacks where it's illegal to carry guns.
In places where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry, the percentage of active shooting stopped is over 50% for the whole period.
And again, we're more confident we have more of those cases in recent years.
The figure hit 58% in 2021.
In order to follow the FBI's definition, I also had to exclude 24 cases because a law-abiding person with a gun stopped the attacker before he was able to get off a shot.
Well, there's a more basic problem in riots on news coverage to determine whether an active shooting was stopped by an armed civilian.
The news media has a clear bias to cover cases where bad things happen over cases where bad things are prevented.
The old adage, if it bleeds, it leads.
Killings are more newsworthy than woundings.
Woundings are more notable than confrontations if used simply by someone brandishing a gun.
For example, I examined news stories and defensive gun use data from January 1st to August 10th and found 774 defensive gun uses fully, 85% involving people shot, 43% resulting in death, 42% in wounding, 43% resulting in death, 42% in wounding, less than 4% involved no shots fired.
But survey data indicated that in 95% of the cases when people use guns defensively, They merely show the gun to make the criminal back off.
Such defensive gun use rarely makes the news.
The problem is the FBI numbers are used by academics who do research and by the media to see how the FBI reports.
See the January 17th Greenwood Mall shooting near Indianapolis.
Or a young man.
Alicia Haya Dickens used his legally carried gun to stop what clearly would have been a horrible mass public shooting.
The news coverage immediately relied on the FBI in Texas' deep remorse to tell people Dickens' heroism was very unusual.
Making his heroism perhaps even more remarkable is the fact that an armed bystander attacking an armed shooter are rare, CNN noted.
The Greenwood incident is unique because it became one of the rare instances of an armed civilian successfully intervening to end a mass shooting, claimed the Washington Post the day later.
What is really rare is the news coverage of these attacks.
Few know that there were at least six other similar likely public mass shootings that armed civilians stopped in the first nine months of the year.
It's hard to ignore how all this feeds into the gun control debate, nor can one forget about the charges of political bias leveled at whistleblowers and the FBI.
The FBI is systematically missing defensive gun use, and it has failed to fix these errors, even when I pointed them out.
Considering how often the media cites the FBI as an authoritative source, this institution needs to do better.
Clearly, it's all by design.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's amazing how these guys can use statistics and torture them until they become useful.
And I have to say that most statistics are useless at least 76.4% of the time.
So yeah, this is absolutely crazy stuff that they're doing here.
They mess and fudge the numbers to really get it to say exactly what they want.
Whether you're talking about vaccines or crime or active shooters or even hijackings in the 1970s and 80s.
You know, you'll see them really come up with these absurd numbers that have some caveats or that really discount the actual situation from being presented to the public.
And they wouldn't be doing this if they were righteous or actually had the will of the people in mind.
I'll just say that.
Yep, Chris.
Good stuff.
Good stuff.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broadcom, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Family affair, Beverly Brides.
With friends or family like these, who needs enemies?
Mike Rivera reported on his November 21st show that Jerusalem Post reported Jared Kushner and Ivanka were the sources who reported to the feds that Trump had classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
I wonder if this is true.
I am inclined to believe it, given the fact we know Kushner is a Mossad deep-sake lackey.
Has any other politician had this many lives stabbed in his back?
He kowtows to all things Israel, and the Mossad is still out for blood, going so low as to have his son-in-law be a snitch.
Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Conspiracy Virtual Conference for 2021 will be on the 3rd and the 4th of December.
24 speakers, 26 presentations, 2 days.
Learn more.
Go to jameshfetzer.org and check out events.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Wow, I've got a few.
You know, it kind of reminds me of the Israeli spy networks they set up in the communist blocs, where they basically paid half the world to spy on the other half of the world's neighbors in these satellite countries.
Yeah, I want to bring up FTX and some of the things that are brought up about that SPF guy.
You know, Duffy and Summers and Ekon and all these guys are outraged and they're calling him a fraud and a Ponzi schemer, but they are all invested in the same thing, if not much worse.
If you look at Summers and his Yukos and Gazprom things in the 90s with the Harvard Trust, Ekon and his cryptocurrency cities in Africa that he's trying to set up, and Duffy being the The Chicago Mercantile Exchange got it set up, the derivative market.
Yeah, these guys have a lot of room to talk.
And one of the bigger list of creditors, the top 50 that they're talking about exposing was Sullivan and Cromwell, a major white shoe firm that was a counsel for the Edison GE deal, a JP Morgan personal advisor, creating holding companies to basically obfuscate tax liabilities and more importantly, liability for products.
These are the guys that structured the debt programs after World War I.
94 nations in loan agreements in seven years.
They come up with the Securities Act of 1933.
Many of the economic models and stuff that they put forward now, including the economic miracle, they were behind that as well.
So yeah, they defended Kraft, BP in 2010, Dole, AT&T, Kodak for their bankruptcy, Volkswagen for their mission fraud, the Guggenheim takeover, the Dodgers.
They were advisors for Bear Stearns, Lehman, Fannie Mae, AIG, Wachovia, and Barclays in 2008.
And they were also United Fruit Company's advisors in deposing Arbenz in 1954 in Guatemala.
They've been held in court many times for insider trading and many other things.
Their defense for Big Tobacco.
You know, if you get into their alumni, it's even more alarming to see how many people are involved with Bar Association commissionery and things like that.
You know this FTX thing to me seems like a limited hangout.
This guy's kind of a scapegoat and this is a much bigger picture that needs to be tied together.
And these are companies that could very easily do that and do in fact do that and they're not even being any given any kind of scope in terms of mainstream media.
Maybe the alternative media can start looking into these things and really figure out what's going on for themselves more so than the media is laying it out for them.
Yeah, they never let a crisis go to waste.
And when they get one, they have to really sometimes leave out and jackal up on the scapegoat, you know, to really save themselves.
If you get into this FDX crypto thing, it ties into MIT and the NSA and many of the things we talked about.
The Neuralink, the mRNA recombinants, cell programming, AI, crypto and exchanges.
It reminds me of like a digital fairs of Piacenza where this group of cabal members determine the exchange rates of all foreign and domestic currencies and labor rates.
So this is bad.
This is something that's really big and people need to look into this as far as they can.
Because it reminds me a lot of like the affairs of Piacenza or the Augsburg Jews, the guys that bankrupted Spain 12 times in 100 years.
And they basically only had a 2% inflation rate back then.
So bringing goods up sixfold in costs and running the empire into insolvency in a matter of 150 years.
So, you know, this is what they're doing to America.
It's the same model they put in every empire they build and destroy.
So look into this, people, because it's a big effing deal and your lives depend on it.
So that's my final thoughts.
Wonderful stuff, Chris.
It's just a delight doing shows with you, I gotta say.
We look forward to Scorpio being able to rejoin us when his health returns fully restored.
I think John Lott's doing a brilliant job exposing FBI corruption, even in reporting statistical data to bias it in favor of gun control agendas, when Americans are appropriately using guns to defend themselves against criminals every single year, millions of times.
And from law's report, I surmise, they're successful in defeating 50% or more of the cases in which a violent event would take place by virtue of using the guns they're legally entrusted to carry.
The very idea that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens could enhance a public safety is absurd.
Here you have a demonstration once again from John Law, the leading expert in the world in this field, telling us that we're being played.
We're being conned to take away our rights under the Second Amendment.
The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing.
Don't let yourself be played.
Hang on to your guns.
Stock up on ammo.
We may need it for purposes we hadn't really planned.
The time may be near.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, and the people you love.
Know that time is short, and we don't want to waste a word of it.
▲
Export Selection